COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC

5501 PERKIOMEN AVENUE, READING, PA 19606 (610) 779-0600
For profit - Corporation 130 Beds COMPLETE CARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#20 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Complete Care at Berkshire LLC has received an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating excellent care and high recommendations from residents and families. Ranked #20 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, this puts them in the top half of nursing homes statewide, and they are #2 of 15 in Berks County, suggesting they are one of the best options locally. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from seven in 2023 to just one in 2024, and they have no fines on record, which is a positive sign. However, staffing is average with a turnover rate of 44%, slightly better than the state average, and while RN coverage is also average, they have received positive marks for quality measures. On the downside, recent inspections revealed concerns such as dirty environments and inadequate grooming for residents, highlighting areas that need attention.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Pennsylvania
#20/653
Top 3%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
44% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Pennsylvania. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
○ Average
8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 7 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (44%)

    4 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 44%

Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: COMPLETE CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record

Nov 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for one of 26 sampled residents. (Resident 25) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Resident Showers/Bathing, last reviewed November 19, 2024, revealed that staff were to assist residents with hygiene needs following bathing. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 25 had diagnoses that included anxiety and osteoporosis. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and had fragile skin. Staff were to check fingernail length and trim and clean on bath days as needed, and her fingernails were to be kept short. On November 19, 2024, at 12:56 p.m., the resident was observed out of bed in her wheelchair. Her fingernails were long and dirty; there was a dark colored substance underneath the nails. The resident stated that her fingernails needed to be cut. On November 20, 2024, at 10:24 a.m., the resident was observed in bed, her finger nails remained long and dirty. In an interview on November 21, 2024, at 9:21 a.m., Nurse Educator 1 confirmed that the resident's fingernails should have been trimmed and cleaned with bathing and as needed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Dec 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to enhanc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to two of 24 sampled residents. (Residents 7, 107) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was oriented and needed substantial/maximal assistance from staff for bathing. The resident was to receive a shower twice per week on Mondays and Thursdays. During an interview on December 12, 2023, at 12:05 p.m., the resident reported that she preferred to take a shower twice a week and was not offered the opportunity to do so. Review of documentation in the clinical record revealed that the resident was not offered a shower seven of nine scheduled times from November 13, 2023, through December 11, 2023. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 107 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident needed substantial/maximal assistance from staff for bathing. The resident was to receive a shower twice per week on Mondays and Thursdays. During an interview on December 12, 2023, at 12:25 p.m., Resident 107 stated that she preferred to take a shower twice a week and was not offered the opportunity to do so. Review of documentation in the clinical record revealed that the resident was not offered a shower seven of eight scheduled times from November 16, 2023, through December 11, 2023. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was complete to accurately reflect the resident's status for one of 24 sampled residents. (Resident 32) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Sections C (Cognitive Patterns) and D (Mood) of Resident 32's MDS assessment dated [DATE], was incomplete. In an interview on December 15, 2023, 12:57 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the identified MDS sections were not completed during the assessment period to reflect the resident's current status.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, observation, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary serv...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, observation, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for three of 24 sampled residents. (Residents 44, 91, 116) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 44 had diagnoses that included tremor, osteoarthritis left hand, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had no memory impairment and required assistance from staff with daily hygiene and grooming. Review of the current care plan revealed that staff was to provide the resident assistance with hygiene. Observations on December 12, 2023, at 2:16 p.m. and December 14, 2023, at 1:09 p.m., revealed that the resident had long and jagged fingernails with a dark brown substance under the nails. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 91 had diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness and mild cognitive impairment and end stage renal disease. The care plan dated December 1, 2023, indicated that Resident 91 had difficulty caring for himself due to his physical and cognitive limitations and interventions included for staff to provide assistance with daily hygiene and grooming. Observations on December 13, 2023 at 12:14 p.m., and December 14, 2023 at 3:00 p.m., 2023, revealed that Resident 91's mustache had grown over his mouth, interfering with eating. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 116 had diagnoses that included fracture of right lower leg, tremor, and diabetes. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had no memory impairment and required assistance from staff with daily hygiene and grooming. Review of the current care plan revealed that staff was to provide the resident assistance with hygiene. Observations on December 12, 2023, at 1:47 p.m., December 13, 2023, at 9:57 a.m., and December 14, 2023, at 1:14 p.m., revealed that the resident had thick facial hair growth. The resident stated that he needed assistance from staff to shave and had asked staff to shave his facial hair on December 11, 2023, but that staff did not provide the assistance. In an interview on December 15, 2023, at 1:57 p.m., the Administrator stated that nail care and men's facial hair shaves and trims were to be completed with shower and bathing activities and as requested. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two of two nursing units. (First Floor, Second Floor) Findings include: During the environmental tour of the First Floor nursing unit on December 12, 2023, at various times, the following was observed: The linoleum floor was cracked, broken, and/or taped in resident rooms 125, 126, 127, 128, 132, and 133. The floor was sticky in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a urine odor in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Toilets were soiled with a brown substance in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. There was a rusty toilet seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The first floor resident lounge refrigerator was soiled with a brown substance inside. During an environmental tour of the Second Floor nursing unit on December 14, 2023, at various times, the following was observed: The linoleum floor was taped in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Light bulbs were not working in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. Toilets were soiled with a brown substance in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. There was peeling wallpaper in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The lavatory faucet leaked in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. In the multipurpose room, there were brown-stained ceiling tiles, taped cracks in the window, and the telephone was hanging loosely on the wall. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2.1) Management.
Jan 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide service...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services and treatment to prevent further limitations in range of motion for one of 24 sampled residents. (Resident 79) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 79 had diagnoses that included dementia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had memory impairment, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living including dressing, and had impaired range of motion in the left upper extremity. Review of an occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], recommended that the resident wear a palm protector splint on the left hand at all times, and to only remove it for care. On November 28, 2022, the physician ordered for staff to apply a palm protector hand splint to the resident's left hand and the splint was to be in place at all times, except when receiving care. Observations on January 11, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., and January 12, 2023, at 9:50 a.m., 10:30 a.m., and 11:18 a.m., revealed that the resident was in bed without the palm protect splint to her left hand. In an interview on January 13, 2023, at 9:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the left hand palm protector splint was to be in place as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation during a tour of the kitchen on January 10, 2023, at 10:...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation during a tour of the kitchen on January 10, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., revealed that the wall near the floor, underneath the three compartment sink was missing with exposed insulation. In the dry storage room there was a brown stain on a ceiling tile near the doorway and on the wall underneath. There was an opened, undated bag of noodles. There were two sanitizing buckets stored on top of an unsealed bag of cake mix and the milk refrigerator contained a tube draining water into a bucket of standing water.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster area on January 10, 2023, at 10:55 a.m. revealed trash and debris on t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster area on January 10, 2023, at 10:55 a.m. revealed trash and debris on the ground on the side of the dumpster and between the dumpster and loading dock that included trash in bags, used gloves, and the top of a bedside table.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • 44% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Complete Care At Berkshire Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Complete Care At Berkshire Llc Staffed?

CMS rates COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Complete Care At Berkshire Llc?

State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC during 2023 to 2024. These included: 7 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Complete Care At Berkshire Llc?

COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by COMPLETE CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 130 certified beds and approximately 121 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in READING, Pennsylvania.

How Does Complete Care At Berkshire Llc Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Complete Care At Berkshire Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Complete Care At Berkshire Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Complete Care At Berkshire Llc Stick Around?

COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Complete Care At Berkshire Llc Ever Fined?

COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Complete Care At Berkshire Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

COMPLETE CARE AT BERKSHIRE LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.