SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

220 S. FOURTH AVENUE, WEST READING, PA 19611 (610) 374-5175
For profit - Corporation 184 Beds SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#125 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has an impressive Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with top-tier quality. It ranks #125 out of 653 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half statewide, and #5 out of 15 facilities in Berks County, meaning there are only a few local options that rank higher. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 2 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. While staffing is rated 3 out of 5, with a low turnover rate of 22% compared to the state average, it is concerning that the RN coverage is less than 96% of state facilities, which may impact care quality. Recent inspections revealed some weaknesses, including a failure to create comprehensive care plans for residents with complex needs and not adequately addressing continence management for a resident experiencing incontinence, which could affect their comfort and dignity.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Pennsylvania
#125/653
Top 19%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
22% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 26 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Pennsylvania. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 2 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (22%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (22%)

    26 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record

Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 36 and 82) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 36 had diagnoses that included depression, dementia, anxiety, and hallucinations. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary dated August 2, 2024, noted that the resident's psychotropic medication was to be addressed in the care plan. An MDS summary dated January 20, 2025, noted that the resident's psychiatric disorders continued. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident's 36's psychotropic medication were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 82 had dementia, depression, and partial blindness. The MDS CAA summary dated December 4, 2024, noted that the resident's psychotropic medication and vision were to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 82's psychotropic medications and vision were included in the current care plan. In an interview on March 21, 2024, at 1:35 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no documented evidence that the care areas were addressed in the care plans or implemented in accordance with the care plans. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services to restore bladder continence to the extent possible for one of two sampled residents who had urine incontinence. (Resident 92) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Policy Continence Management Program, last reviewed February 16, 2024, revealed that upon admission the nurse was to interview the resident and review any underlying conditions that may affect the resident's ability to participate in a continence management program. Staff was to identify candidates for a bladder incontinence program who required limited to extensive assistance in toilet use and could benefit from a prompted or scheduled toileting plan. A continence evaluation was to be conducted to determine if a 72 hour bowel and bladder tracking was indicated for the resident. If the tracking was indicated, the licensed nurse was to instruct the nursing assistants to fill out the 72 hour bowel and bladder tracking form. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included anxiety, a history of sepsis, osteoarthritis, and urinary incontinence. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented, was frequently incontinent of bladder, and required substantial assistance with toileting. The assessment indicated a discharge goal of partial to moderate assistance with toileting and the assessment also indicated that the resident was not on a toileting program. A review of the care plan initiated February 5, 2024, revealed that the resident was incontinent of bladder. At the time of admission, there was no documented evidence that the facility reviewed underlying conditions that may have affected the ability for the resident to participate in a continence management program. In addition, there was no documented evidence that a continence evaluation was completed for 72 hours to track bowel and bladder continence for the resident as per the facility policy until February 19, 2024, 17 days after the resident had been admitted to the facility. On February 21, 2024, a nurse documented that Resident 92 was incontinent of bladder, required assist of one person for transfers and for assistance with toileting. The note further indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known. A nurse noted on March 4 and 7, 2024, that the resident was incontinent of bladder. Review of bladder documentation from March 10, 2024, through April 9, 2024, revealed that she had been incontinent of urine at least 50 times. In an interview on April 12, 2024, at 11:08 a.m., the Director of Nursing stated that the facility failed to initiate the continence evaluation and 72 hour bowel and bladder tracking form upon admission as per the facility policy. In addition, the Director of Nursing confirmed that once the tracking form was initiated, there was incomplete documentation during the 72 hours of whether the resident had been continent or incontinent of bladder on certain shifts. 28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder for one of 33 sampled residents. (Resident 8) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 had diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of a psychiatric consultation dated January 29, 2024, revealed that Resident 8 stated there was a history of trauma related to emotional abuse. There was no assessment or care plan in Resident 8's clinical record that identified the PTSD diagnosis, symptoms or triggers related to this diagnosis, or resident-specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. In an interview on April 12, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no assessment completed or care plan developed to address Resident 8's PTSD diagnosis, symptoms, or triggers. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing Services.
May 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with shaving for one of 33 sampled residents. (Resident 109) Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with shaving for one of 33 sampled residents. (Resident 109) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 109 had diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disease of the brain). According to the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated April 9, 2023, the resident could make his needs known and needed assistance from staff for hygiene, including shaving. On May 2, 2023, at 12:33 p.m., the resident was observed in bed with a heavy beard. In an interview at that time, the resident stated that he preferred to be clean shaven and had not been assisted with shaving. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurate for one of 33 sampled residents. (Resident 149) Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurate for one of 33 sampled residents. (Resident 149) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 149 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypotension. On January 13, 2023, the physician ordered for staff to administer Midodrine (a drug used to treat low blood pressure) three times daily and to hold the medication if Resident 149's systolic blood pressure was greater than 130 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Review of the Medication Administration Record for March through May 4, 2023, revealed that on 12 occasions Resident 149's Midodrine was documented as administered when his systolic blood pressure was greater than 130 mmHg. In an interview on May 5, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., the Director of of Nursing confirmed that staff incorrectly documented that Resident 149's medication had been administered when it was actually held. 28 PA. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Staffed?

CMS rates SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 22%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 5 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 184 certified beds and approximately 169 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WEST READING, Pennsylvania.

How Does Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (22%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?

Staff at SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 22%, the facility is 24 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 15%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?

SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?

SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.