Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating a poor rating with significant concerns regarding resident care. Ranking #56 out of 72 facilities in Rhode Island places it in the bottom half, and it is the lowest-rated facility in Bristol County. Although the facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 10 in 2023 to 7 in 2024, it still reports a concerning number of incidents, including critical failures to protect residents from abuse and a choking incident that resulted in a resident's death. Staffing turnover is impressively low at 0%, but the facility has accumulated $216,258 in fines, which is higher than 90% of similar facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. While RN coverage is average, families should weigh these significant weaknesses against the facility’s good quality measures rating.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Rhode Island
- #56/72
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $216,258 in fines. Lower than most Rhode Island facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Rhode Island. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Rhode Island average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0691
(Tag F0691)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide care consistent with prof...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmiss...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 2 and 3.
Findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that an alleged violation of abuse was investigated, relative to an allegation of residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4.
Findings are as fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to e...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that services provided by the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality relative to physician's orders for 1 of 4 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide nec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observations, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan, relative to the presence of an infection for 1 of 2 residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principle...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care consistent with professional standards of pra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its' residents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to care for each resident in an environment that promotes maintenance of his/her qual...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for fluid restriction, Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary psychotropic medication relative to receiving a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with p...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), 4 harm violation(s), $216,258 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 24 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $216,258 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Rhode Island. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Rhode Island, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center Staffed?
CMS rates Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center?
State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center during 2022 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 4 that caused actual resident harm, and 17 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center?
Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GREEN TREE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 128 certified beds and approximately 109 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Bristol, Rhode Island.
How Does Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center Compare to Other Rhode Island Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island, Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center Stick Around?
Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center Ever Fined?
Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center has been fined $216,258 across 5 penalty actions. This is 6.1x the Rhode Island average of $35,241. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Silver Creek Rehab And Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.