White Oak Manor - Columbia
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
White Oak Manor in Columbia, South Carolina, has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and situated in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #140 out of 186 facilities in the state, placing it in the bottom half, and #9 out of 14 in Richland County, indicating that only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from four in 2024 to one in 2025, though it still had 11 total issues identified in recent inspections, including a serious incident where a resident with a history of falls sustained an injury due to inadequate supervision. Staffing is a moderate strength, with a 3-star rating and a turnover rate of 39%, which is lower than the state average, but the RN coverage is concerning, being less than that of 86% of facilities in South Carolina. On a positive note, the facility has not incurred any fines, suggesting compliance with regulations, but there are notable weaknesses in areas like food safety and cleanliness, including failures to label and date food items and maintain kitchen sanitation.
- Trust Score
- C
- In South Carolina
- #140/186
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near South Carolina's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most South Carolina facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for South Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below South Carolina average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below South Carolina average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near South Carolina avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls, failed to consider all causal factors rel...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)79 was screened time...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy at the physician's prescribed setting for 1 of 3 residents (Resident (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to: 1) remove/dispose of expired medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to label and date open food items. The facility furthe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor medication refrigerator temperatures in 2 of 2 medication refrigerators. These failures had the pot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, review of facility policies, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) C...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2021
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment to residents for one of four halls toured during the initial observation of the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, records review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 received respiratory care consistent with the physician's order for one of one sampled resident review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interview and review of the facility Infection Control Prevention the facility failed to make sure the kitchen staff wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) appropr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen adequately cleaned and sanitized, including ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most South Carolina facilities.
- • 39% turnover. Below South Carolina's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade C (55/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is White Oak Manor - Columbia's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns White Oak Manor - Columbia an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is White Oak Manor - Columbia Staffed?
CMS rates White Oak Manor - Columbia's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the South Carolina average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at White Oak Manor - Columbia?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at White Oak Manor - Columbia during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 10 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates White Oak Manor - Columbia?
White Oak Manor - Columbia is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WHITE OAK MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 108 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Columbia, South Carolina.
How Does White Oak Manor - Columbia Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, White Oak Manor - Columbia's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting White Oak Manor - Columbia?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is White Oak Manor - Columbia Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, White Oak Manor - Columbia has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at White Oak Manor - Columbia Stick Around?
White Oak Manor - Columbia has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for South Carolina nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was White Oak Manor - Columbia Ever Fined?
White Oak Manor - Columbia has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is White Oak Manor - Columbia on Any Federal Watch List?
White Oak Manor - Columbia is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.