Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC

5721 Springfield HWY, Williston, SC 29853 (803) 266-3229
For profit - Limited Liability company 44 Beds CARLYLE SENIOR CARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
51/100
#71 of 186 in SC
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average, sitting in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #71 out of 186 facilities in South Carolina, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 3 in Barnwell County, indicating that only one local option is better. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 5 in 2023 to just 2 in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 56%, which is on par with the state average. However, the facility has received concerning fines amounting to $12,649, which is higher than 79% of other South Carolina facilities, suggesting potential compliance problems. While Carlyle Senior Care has good RN coverage, it has faced significant issues, including a critical incident where a resident was slapped by a nursing aide, resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation. Additionally, the facility failed to keep residents' health information confidential, posting sensitive login information publicly. Another concern was the lack of written notification to families when residents were transferred to the hospital, which could leave families in the dark about their loved ones' health. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and RN coverage, these serious incidents and compliance issues are significant weaknesses to consider.

Trust Score
C
51/100
In South Carolina
#71/186
Top 38%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
5 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$12,649 in fines. Higher than 60% of South Carolina facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for South Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 5 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near South Carolina average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 56%

10pts above South Carolina avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $12,649

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: CARLYLE SENIOR CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above South Carolina average of 48%

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify in writing the resident's responsible party (RP) of three of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify in writing the resident's responsible party (RP) of three of three Residents (R4, R23, and R33) transfer to the hospital out of a sample of 17 residents. This had the potential for the resident's RP not to be informed of the resident's transfer to the hospital and the reasons why. Findings include: 1.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab revealed R4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R4's EMR under the Notes tab revealed R4 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to hyperkalemia. There was no documentation, located in the EMR, of written notification regarding R4's transfer to R4's RP. 2.Review of the EMR under the Face Sheet tab revealed R23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R23's EMR under the Notes tab revealed R23 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to sepsis. There was no documentation located in the EMR, of written notification regarding R23's transfer to R23's RP. 3.Review of the EMR under the Face Sheet tab revealed R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R33's EMR under the Notes tab revealed R33 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to the diagnosis of sepsis. There was no documentation, located in the EMR, of written notification regarding R33's transfer to R33's RP. During an interview on 03/06/25 at 1:30 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) explained that upon transfer of a resident to the hospital the nurse involved in the transfer made verbal contact with the RP to notify them of the change in the resident's condition and need to go to the hospital for evaluation. The DON stated this communication was documented in the resident's medical record. The DON was not aware written notification of the transfer needed to be sent to the RP.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written information regarding the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy to the resident's responsible party (RP) at the time of transfer or within 24 hours of the transfer for three residents (Resident (R) 4, R23 and R33) of three reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 17 residents. This failure has the potential to negatively impact any resident transferred to the hospital due to the RP not being aware of the bed hold options. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer dated 02/01/23 indicated, Policy: At the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide the resident and/or the resident's representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and addresses the information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed .Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer 1. Before a resident is transferred to the hospital .the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written information that specifies, a. The duration of the state bed-hold policy .during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility; b. The reserve bed payment in the state plan policy, if any. c. The facility policies regarding bed-hold periods to include allowing residents to return to the next available bed. d. Conditions upon which the resident would return to the facility: The resident requires the services which the facility provides .2. In the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide within 24 hours written notice of the facility's bed hold policies . Review of the facility's admission packet under the section titled, Bed Holds and Discharges undated indicated, 1. Bed Hold Procedure The Resident may need to be absent from the Facility temporarily for hospitalization. The Resident may request that the Facility hold open the Resident's bed during this time. This is known as a bed hold. The Resident shall be given notice the bed hold option at the time of the hospitalization. If the Resident's care is paid under the Medicaid program .Medicaid allows for 10 bed hold days. If the Resident's care is not paid under the Medicaid program the Resident requesting a bed hold must pay the Facility's private daily rate for the bed being held during the bed hold period . 1.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab revealed R4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R4's EMR under the Notes tab revealed R4 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to hyperkalemia. There was no documentation, located in the EMR, confirming that written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy was provided to R4's RP at the time of the transfer. 2.Review of the EMR under the Face Sheet tab revealed R23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R23's EMR under the Notes tab revealed R23 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to sepsis. There was no documentation, located in the EMR, confirming that written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy was provided to R23's RP at the time of the transfer. 3.Review of the EMR under the Face Sheet tab revealed R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R33's EMR under the Notes tab revealed R33 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to the diagnosis of sepsis. There was no documentation, located in the EMR, confirming that written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy was provided to R23's RP at the time of the transfer. During an interview on 03/06/25 at 1:30 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) explained that upon transfer of a resident nursing places a copy of the facility's bed hold policy with the information that was sent with a resident to the hospital. The DON said that all residents and RPs are provided a copy of the facility's bed hold policy upon admission. The DON was not aware that written information needed to also be provided to the resident's RP.
Jun 2023 5 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 3 residents from physical abuse. On 04/0...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 3 residents from physical abuse. On 04/02/23 at approximately lunchtime, Resident (R)24 was slapped by Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)2 after a combative incident. This was witnessed by CNA3 and the Activities Director. Because a wheelchair-bound resident was struck by a nursing aide, the resident was placed at increased risk for severe harm and mental anguish. On 06/13/23 at approximately 3 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 06/13/23 at 5:30 PM the Administrator was notified that the physical abuse of R24 by CNA2 constituted immediate jeopardy at F600. The facility presented an acceptable plan of removal of the immediate jeopardy on 06/14/23 at 10 AM. The survey team validated that the immediate jeopardy was removed on 06/14/23 at 12 PM following the facility's implementation of the plan of removal of the immediate jeopardy. The facility's presented plan revealed the facility had identified its own deficiencies and corrected prior to the start date, warranting F600 at past noncompliance. The IJ began on 04/02/23 and was removed on 04/09/23. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Abuse and Neglect and revised on 09/27/22 revealed that It is the policy of [NAME] Healthcare and Rehab to ensure that residents are free from any form of abuse or neglect. The policy defined physical abuse as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and includes controlling resident behavior through corporal punishment. R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral brain infarction affecting left nondominant side, frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction. She scored 04/15 on her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) during her admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 03/03/23 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of CNA3's statement written to the facility on [DATE] revealed R24 knocked a phone out of the possession of CNA2. After the incident, CNA2 slapped the resident and continued to pick up her phone. CNA2 also said that the resident knocked her new phone from her and that's the reason she slapped the resident. Interview with CNA3 on 06/13/23 at approximately 2:42 PM revealed that she and three other CNAs were standing by the nurse's station. R24 tried to stand from her chair. CNA2 went to the resident to seat her down when R24 pushed the phone from CNA2's hand. CNA2 picked it up and slapped the resident. This happened after lunch. Review of Activities Director statement to the facility written on 04/02/23 revealed that she witnessed CNA2 slap R24. The Activities Director was trying to help the resident in the wheelchair, but the resident was resistant. She called CNA2 to assist. During the struggle, the resident knocked CNA2's phone from her possession. The CNA gave the resident a slap across the face and stated, she slapped my new phone out of my hand. Afterward the resident was quiet. Activities reported the incident to Licensed Practicing Nurse (LPN)3. Multiple unsuccessful attempts were made to contact the Activities Director for interview during the course of the survey. Review of LPN3's statement to the facility, written on 04/02/23, revealed she was informed of the abuse incident by the Activities Director. She notified LPN2, who was the nurse for R24. Multiple unsuccessful attempts were made to contact LPN3 for interview during the course of the survey. Review of LPN2's statement to the facility, written on 04/02/23, revealed she was in her car during her lunch break when LPN3 informed her of the abuse incident. She performed a body audit for R24 and found no abnormal findings or apparent injury. She notified the abuse coordinator. Multiple unsuccessful attempts were made to contact LPN2 for interview during the course of the survey. Review of CNA2's undated statement to the facility, and her follow-up statement conducted by phone by Registered Nurse (RN)1 on 04/04/23 revealed she denied slapping R24. Interview with CNA2 on 06/13/23 at approximately 11:27 AM revealed she denied the abuse allegation. Interview with daughter of R24 on 06/13/23 at approximately 4:30 PM revealed, when asked regarding changes in the resident after the abuse incident, that R24 gets scared. The facility followed up on the resident for psychosocial harm. Review of R24 progress notes revealed a 04/03/23 social services note indicating that the resident was calm with no signs or symptoms of distress. Review of R24's Care Plan revealed that the facility care planned for Alleged incident occurring 04/02/23, and that interventions included 14-day monitoring for victim for mental and physical signs of distress or anger as well as psychosocial support. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/13/23 at 4:40 PM revealed that she had repeatedly instructed CNA2 to not have their phones out in resident care areas. The DON had educated staff on this over and over. Interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 06/13/23 at approximately 5:30 PM revealed she monitored R24 in the days after the incident as well as updating the care plan for the resident. There were no psychosocial or behavioral changes or concerns in the days following the incident or the months since the investigation. Multiple observations of R24 during the course of the survey revealed no concerns, physical or psychosocial, regarding the abuse incident that occurred on 04/02/23. The facility's removal plan included: R24 was assessed by the charge nurse and found to be without injury. The resident has continued to receive body audits for a total of 2 more days to monitor for any signs of injury. These were completed on 04/03/23 and 04/04/23 with no injuries noted. Social Services began following R24 for any negative psychosocial outcomes related to the incident and none had been observed. Nurses monitored R24 for 14 days for any negative effects regarding the incident and none have been noted. R24 was assessed by the facility Nurse Practitioner on 04/03/23 with no negative outcomes noted. R24's medical doctor was notified of the incident on 04/02/23. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of the incident on 04/02/23. The alleged perpetrator was suspended pending outcome of investigation on 04/02/23 and was terminated on 04/05/23. All interviewable residents in the facility were interviewed / assessed to identify if they felt safe and if they had ever experienced abuse while living at the facility. There were no further allegations or issues noted. Abuse policies were reviewed, and no revisions were made. All staff received education on facility abuse policies by the administrator starting on 04/03/23. All staff will receive abuse training, reporting and protecting residents, including agency staff prior to their assigned duties. All newly hired staff will receive proper abuse training, reporting, and protecting residents during orientation. New agency staff will be in-serviced by the DON or charge nurse prior to working regarding resident abuse, reporting, protecting the residents, and abuse policy. All staff received training regarding how to deal with residents who are resistive or combative during care provided by the Administrator starting 04/06/23. All newly hired staff will receive this training during orientation. All new agency staff will be in-serviced by the DON or charge nurse prior to starting work regarding dealing with resistant or combative residents. Abuse investigation procedures and documentation process were reviewed and revised. The Administrator implemented a new reportable incident procedure to ensure investigations were initiated and completed thoroughly on 04/06/23. The IDT staff were educated on changes starting on 04/06/23. The Administrator, DON, and Social Services Director will conduct random interviews and observations of residents and staff regarding any signs, complaints of abuse, timely reporting, and timely protection of resident and following policy and providing proper care of residents who are aggressive and resistive to care. This will be done weekly x 4, then monthly x 3, then quarterly. Root cause analysis was conducted and presented to IDT on 04/06/23 by the nurse consultant.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide services to a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (AD...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide services to a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident (R)24) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for assistance ADL care. Specifically, R24 had toenails that were long, thick, and jagged. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nail Care, dated 11/27/2017, revealed, the purpose of this procedure guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health. 1. Assessments of resident nails will be conducted on admission and readmission to determine the resident nail condition, needs, and preferences for nail care. 6. Principles of nail care: a. Nails should be kept smooth to avoid skin injury. c. If a resident had a toe infection, diabetes mellitus, neurologic disorders, renal failure, or peripheral vascular disease (PVD), toenail trimming should be performed by a physician or practitioner. Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 11/27/2017, revealed, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of admission Records indicated the facility admitted R24 on 09/26/2019 with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Data (ARD) of 06/03/2023, revealed R24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required limited assistance with bed mobility, and transfers, extensive assistance with personal hygiene and total dependence on staff for bathing. Review of R24's Care Plan, initiated on 03/10/2023, and revised on 03/28/2023, revealed R24 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, grooming, toileting and bathing due to Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), hemiparesis, hemiplegia, and weakness. Interventions included to provide total assistance with bathing and showering. R24 required staff to provide extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Interventions included to keep feet dry and clean between toes and refer to podiatrist as needed. R24 had diabetes mellitus with interventions to refer to podiatrist/foot care. Review of R24's Physician Orders for the month of 06/2023, revealed an order, dated 02/24/2023, for podiatry care as needed. Also, revealed an order dated 06/08/2023, for 500 milligrams (mg) metformin hydrochloride (HCI) (a diabetic medicine)- give one tablet by mouth one time a day for elevated blood sugars. Review of nursing Progress Note, dated 02/24/2023 at 11:57 AM, revealed R24 arrived at the facility with a head-to-toe assessment performed. R24 had toenails that were very long and thick. Review of the Podiatry Vendor Appointment Add-on List, dated 03/20/2023, revealed R24 was added to podiatry services for the next visit. Review of the Podiatry Vendor Appointment List, dated 03/22/2023, revealed a list of residents to receive foot care by podiatrist on 03/22/2023. R24 was not included on the list to be seen by the podiatrist. On 06/12/2023 at 2:39 PM, R24 was observed laying in bed with toenails, on both feet, which extended over the tip of the toe about ½ inches in length to ¾ inches in length. The toenails were thick, uneven, twisted, and jagged. The toenail of the small toe of the right foot was bending towards the underside of toe with skin intact. During an interview on 06/12/2023 at 2:39 PM, Family Member (FM)1 was at the bedside of R24. FM1 stated they asked staff about taking R24 to see a podiatrist to get R24's toenails cut and were told they had an in-house podiatrist that would see R24. On 06/14/2023 at 11:32 AM, the Admissions/Social Worker (Adm/SW) stated that she was aware of the nurse's note on 02/24/2023 that stated R24 toenails were long and thick. She stated she was responsible for maintaining the list of residents who needed to see the podiatrist and any residents that needed added on before the next scheduled podiatry visit. She stated she received a list of residents the podiatrist would see about a month in advance of residents but could add residents onto the list if needed. She stated the day before the podiatrist was scheduled to visit, she posted the list of residents to be seen at the nurse's station. She stated for residents not on the list, and need podiatry care, staff could add the residents to the posted list. She stated when the podiatrist visits, the beauty shop was used for their visits. She stated R24 should have been on the list to be seen by the podiatrist when they visited on 03/22/2023. She stated she did not know why R24 was not on the list and did not see the podiatrist. She stated she expected a resident's toenails to be trimmed and maintained. On 06/14/2023 at 11:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)4 stated that she went to R24's room and filed some of their toenails down. LPN4 stated the toenails were ¼ inches in length to ½ inches in length, and thick, and the right big toe was thick, curled and backwards. She stated the nurses inspected all residents' feet a week or two prior to the scheduled podiatry visit, and when a resident needed to be seen by podiatry, she told the ADM/SW so they could be added to the next podiatry visit. She stated the list of residents to be seen by the podiatrist were posted at the nurse's station one day prior to the podiatrist visit. She stated she was aware that R24 was added to the list in March 2023 but did not see the podiatrist when they visited on 03/22/2023. LPN4 stated she expected residents to be seen by the podiatrist as needed and for a resident's toenails to be trimmed and maintained. On 06/14/2023 at 1:03 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated FM1 indicated R24's toenails needed to be cut a few months ago and FM1 would take them to the podiatrist. The DON stated she told FM1 they had a podiatrist come to the facility to cut residents toenails and she would be put on the list to be seen by the podiatrist. She stated she told ADM/SW that R24's toenails needed cut and to add them to the next scheduled visit. She stated the list of residents to be seen by the podiatrist was posted at the nurse's station a day before they visited the facility. She indicated residents could also be written in on the list to be seen, if staff noticed their nails needed cut. She stated R24 should have been seen when podiatry visited on 03/22/2023. She stated the ADM/SW was responsible for scheduling appointments and maintaining the list of residents to be seen by dental, vision, and podiatry. She stated that she expected R24 toenails to be trimmed and clean and for appointments to be followed. On 06/14/2023 at 2:32 PM, the Administrator stated the ADM/SW was responsible for the list of residents that need podiatry appointments and any residents added on to the list as needed. She stated that R24 was added to the list dated 03/20/2023 and should have been seen by the podiatrist on 03/22/2023. She stated she expected residents to receive care in a timely manner and for resident's toenails to be trimmed and maintained.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent/mitigate a fall with injury for Resident (R)24. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program last revised 10/24/22 revealed Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. The facility utilizes a standard risk assessment for determining a resident ' s fall risk. For program identification purposes, the facility utilizes high risk and low/moderate risk, using the coring method designated on the risk assessment. High Risk Protocols include: the resident will be placed on the facilities Fall Prevention program; indicate fall risk on care plan; provide interventions that address unique risk factors measured by the risk assessment tool: medications, psychological, cognitive status, or recent changes in functional status; additional interventions as directed by the resident ' s assessment, including but not limited to: assistive devices, increased frequency of rounds, sitter if indicated, medication regime review, low bed, alternate call system access, scheduled ambulation or toileting assistance, family/caregiver or resident education, or therapy services referral. Each resident ' s risk factors, and environmental hazards will be evaluated when developing the resident's comprehensive plan of care. R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to type 2 diabetes without complications, fracture of part of neck of left femur, encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, aphasia, muscle weakness, repeated falls, dysphagia, mild cognitive impairment, and hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/1/23 revealed R24 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 out of 15 which indicates she is not cognitively intact. Further review of R24's Quarterly MDS revealed she needs limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and walking. An observation and interview on 6/12/23 at 3:47 PM with R24 and her Resident Representatives revealed R24 lying in a high bed with no observation of a side-rail or fall mats near the bedside. Interview with R24 Resident Representatives revealed R24 had a fall last week (6/4/23) trying to get out the bed to use the restroom but tripped over the trash can near her bed and broke her hip. She has had several falls over the last few months, but this is the first time she has had an injury from a fall. Since her fall on last week, I staff have not put any anything into place to prevent her from falling and hurting herself again. Before she moved into this room she had side-rails so she could pull herself up in bed. An observation on 6/13/23 at 9:24 AM of R24 and her room revealed a fall mat added on the right side of the bed, no observation for the side rail during observation. Review of R24's Physician Orders revealed an order for ½ side rails to promote bed mobility with an order date of 2/24/23 and an order for a fall mat for safety on the right side of the bed with an order date of 6/13/23. Record review of R24's Side Rail assessment dated [DATE] reviewed on 6/14/23 at 9:31 AM revealed bed and side rail equipment are appropriate for this resident. Record review of R24's Fall assessment dated [DATE] reviewed on 6/14/23 at 9:32 AM revealed R24 was a High-Risk for falling. Review of R24's Care Plan last revised on 6/13/23 reviewed on 6/14/23 at 9:33 AM revealed Resident is at risk for falls related to weakness, unsteadiness, related to history of stroke. On 5/13/23 resident had a fall, on 6/4/23 R24 tripped over a trashcan resulting in a fracture. Fall on 5/12/23 R24 was attempting to ambulate from bed, no injuries noted from this fall. Inventions include: ½ side rails up on both sides of the bed to aid resident in bed mobility to encourage independence in bed mobility for safety; anticipate the needs of the residents; be sure call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use for assistance as needed; bed mat on right side of bed (initiated on 6/13/23); follow facility fall protocol; keep bed in the low position when care not being provided; review information on falls and attempt to determine cause of falls. Record possible root causes and alter/move any potential causes if possible. Review of R24's Nurses Note dated 6/5/23 revealed Resident had an apparent fall on yesterday 6/4/23 around 10 AM. Resident has left leg and arm pain and now unable to move limbs or walk. Made a call to the Director of Nursing (DON) to report incident. Call made to Nurse Practitioner (NP), Resident Representative, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for transportation. Review of R24's Nurses Note dated 6/8/23 revealed Resident returned from hospital with a left hip fracture. Review of R24's Nurses Note dated 6/12/23 revealed Resident had an unwitnessed fall around 8pm. Resident stated she got up out of bed and slid on the floor trying to go to the bathroom. Resident was laying on the left side when found by the CNA. I assessed resident for injury and pain and there is no apparent injury or pain. Resident stated she is not having any pain. Resident was lifted off floor and placed back into the bed. The bed is in the lowest position with the call light within reach. Sent a text message to the DON to notify her of the incident. Bed rails will be placed onto resident's bed in the morning. Made call to NP and Resident Representative to notify them of the fall. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 on 6/13/23 at 10:59 AM revealed I was not working on the days when the resident had her most recent falls (6/4/23 and 6/12/23) but is familiar with this resident. Interventions that the facility has put into place to help prevent the resident from having falls include more frequent checks on the resident and a fall mat on the side of her bed. Nursing staff and the Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Team (IDT) team are currently reviewing if the resident is appropriate for a side rail. The resident has a hip fracture and was ordered at the hospital to be on bed rest for a few days but now the facility is looking into beginning physical therapy for this resident. Further stated that the resident is very active and will often attempt to walk or stand without assistance, and previously attempted to exit seek from the facility. When I spoke with the resident's daughter she told me the resident likes to do things with her hands such as crocheting and gardening but think the resident gets bored and that causes her to have behaviors. Finally stated that the facility currently does not have an Activity Director at this time. An interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 on 6/13/23 at 2:21 PM revealed On the morning on 6/4/23, R24 fell at 10:00 AM while leaning over the trash can. Her CNA asked if I could help the nurse get her up, I assisted the nurse and helped R24 on her bed, the resident had no complaints of pain. An interview with the DON on 6/13/23 at 2:53 PM revealed that the facility has a falling program for residents that are at a high risk of falls. R24 had had repeated falls; one last week on 6/4/23 and another on 6/12/23, but they were not in the building during the times the resident had fallen. Interventions that are now in place for R24 include a fall protection mat on the side of her bed and the maintenance director will a side rail to the resident's bed. R24 previously had a side rail in her old room, but staff must have not transferred it over into her new room.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of the facility policy, observation and interviews, the facility failed to complete ensure appropriate infection control and hand hygiene protocols were followed during an observation ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of the facility policy, observation and interviews, the facility failed to complete ensure appropriate infection control and hand hygiene protocols were followed during an observation of the laundry for 1 of 1 laundry facility reviewed. Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Linen and Personal Laundry revealed All contaminated linen and personal laundry will be handled appropriately to prevent cross-contamination. Laundry will be hygienically cleaned and handled to prevent recontamination from dust and dirt during loading and transport. When moving from the soiled area to the clean area (drying, folding, and storage), staff will remove the gown and gloves, and wash their hands with antibacterial soap. An observation and interview on 6/14/23 at 8:54 AM revealed Housekeeping Staff (HK)1 with appropriate PPE and handling linen to be put in the washing machine. After putting the linen in the machine, HK1 was observed walking into the dirty linen room and doffing PPE appropriately. Observation revealed HK1 exiting the dirty linen area without sanitizing the washing machine and no hand sanitization prior to exiting the dirty linen area. Interview with HK1 revealed that they last sanitized the washing machine on Monday, two days prior, and does not sanitize the machine after each use. An interview with the Maintenance Director on 6/14/23 at 9:05 AM revealed that the dirty linen area has a hand sanitizer machine located on the wall outside of the the dirty linen storage room, that housekeeping staff could use prior to exiting the dirty linen room to wash their hands in the sink in the nearby area. An interview on 6/14/23 at 1:50 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that they expect staff to complete hand hygiene prior to exiting the soiled linen area and that the machines should be sanitized after each use.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to protect the confidential health informati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to protect the confidential health information of residents on 2 of 2 halls. Specifically, the facility posted the username and password to the electronic health record (EHR) on the wall. This had the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Confidentiality of Personal and Medical Records, dated 10/24/2022, revealed, this facility honors the resident's right to secure, and confidentiality of all information contained in a resident's records, regardless of the form of storage or location of the record. 1. Personal and medical records include all types of records the facility might keep on a resident, whether they are medical, social, fund accounts, automated, or other. On 06/12/2023 at 12:17 PM, an activities of daily living (ADL) coding poster was observed hanging on the wall, located on A-hall, next to an electronic touch screen kiosk, next to resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a yellow piece of paper taped to the poster that had a handwritten username and password for agency certified nursing assistants to login into the resident's EHR. On 06/13/2023 at 9:01 AM, an ADL coding poster was observed hanging on the wall located on A-hall, next to an electronic touch screen kiosk, next to resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a yellow piece of paper taped to the poster that had a handwritten username and password for agency certified nursing assistants to login the residents EHR. On 06/13/2023 at 9:02 AM, an ADL coding poster was observed hanging on the wall located on A-hall, next to an electronic touch screen kiosk, next to resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a yellow piece of paper taped to the poster that had a handwritten username and password for agency certified nursing assistants to login the residents EHR. On 06/13/2023 at 9:04 AM, an ADL coding poster was observed hanging on the wall located next to the nurse's station between A-hall and B-hall, next to an electronic touch screen kiosk, with a yellow piece of paper taped to the electronic kiosk that had a handwritten username and password for agency certified nursing assistants to login the residents EHR. On 06/14/2023 at 9:27 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5-stated that she had been employed by the facility for a few months. She stated that CNAs and nurses had access to resident medical records by using the electronic touch screen kiosk that was located on the halls and by the nurses' station with the posted username and password. She stated that CNAs charted ADLs, and care provided to the residents on the kiosk. She stated that anyone could access the resident's charts with the username and password that was posted on the wall by the kiosk. She stated the privacy and confidentiality of all residents should be maintained. She stated by posting the username and password to the EHR on the hall, the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of their medical records could be breached. On 06/14/2023 at 10:13 AM, CNA #6 demonstrated how to login to the kiosk, and access resident medical records with the posted username and password. She stated she had access to all the residents, ADLs, and skin care observations. She stated the username and passwords were located at all kiosks in the facility. She stated that anyone could access the residents record by using the kiosk with the username and password posted next to the kiosk. She stated she expected resident's rights to privacy and confidentiality to always be maintained. On 06/14/2023 at 10:23 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the kiosks are used by the CNAs to document the care and assistance provided to the residents. She stated a former human resource posted the username and password on the posters. She stated it was possible for anyone to access the kiosk with the username and password posted next to kiosk. She stated she expected a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality to be always maintained. On 06/14/2023 at 10:39 AM, Human Resource Director (HRD) stated both facility and agency CNA's access the kiosk located in the facility. She stated that she was aware the username and password were posted next to kiosk. She stated the username and password posted are used for agency employees only. She stated she expected the privacy and confidentiality of resident's medical records always be maintained. She stated that by having the username and password posted to the resident EHR, it could be accessed by hackers and other people who visited the facility. On 06/14/2023 at 10:51 AM, the Administrator stated the kiosk were used by CNAs to document resident's daily ADL status. She stated she was aware that a previous human resource director posted the username and passwords next to kiosk. She stated she did not think that visitors would know how to navigate the EHR but could login with the username and password posted. She stated she expected a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of their medical records to be protected.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $12,649 in fines. Above average for South Carolina. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade C (51/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 51/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc Staffed?

CMS rates Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 6 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc?

Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CARLYLE SENIOR CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 44 certified beds and approximately 45 residents (about 102% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Williston, South Carolina.

How Does Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (56%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc Ever Fined?

Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC has been fined $12,649 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the South Carolina average of $33,205. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Carlyle Senior Care Of Williston Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

Carlyle Senior Care of Williston LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.