GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #23 out of 95 facilities in South Dakota, placing it in the top half of the state, and #2 out of 9 in Minnehaha County, meaning only one local option is rated higher. The facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a concern, with a 64% turnover rate, higher than the state average, although the facility still maintains average RN coverage. Some specific incidents raised during inspections included a failure to consistently reposition a resident who was completely dependent on staff for care, leading to a serious risk of skin breakdown. Additionally, there were issues with food safety practices, where food items were improperly labeled and staff did not follow hand hygiene protocols during meal service. While the nursing home has strengths, such as a good overall rating, these incidents highlight areas that require attention.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In South Dakota
- #23/95
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $11,261 in fines. Lower than most South Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 48 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for South Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
17pts above South Dakota avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
16 points above South Dakota average of 48%
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint review, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect and abuse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI) review, record review, and interview, the p...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure seven bottles of one bulk medication that was expired were appropriately discarded. Findings include.
1. Observation ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the provider failed to have available, prepare, and serve, resident preferred and selected menu items requested by four of four sampled residents (33, 46, 71, and 3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure infection control practices had been followed for:
*One of two observed administrations of nutritional ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure:
*Food items were appropriately labeled and st...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint intake information, record review, interview, and policy revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $11,261 in fines. Above average for South Dakota. Some compliance problems on record.
- • 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within South Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center Staffed?
CMS rates GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 64%, which is 17 percentage points above the South Dakota average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 6 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center?
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 98 certified beds and approximately 80 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SIOUX FALLS, South Dakota.
How Does Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center Compare to Other South Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Dakota, GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (64%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in South Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER is high. At 64%, the facility is 17 percentage points above the South Dakota average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center Ever Fined?
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER has been fined $11,261 across 1 penalty action. This is below the South Dakota average of $33,191. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center on Any Federal Watch List?
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY SIOUX FALLS CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.