APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE

1536 APPLING CARE LANE, CORDOVA, TN 38018 (901) 385-1803
For profit - Limited Liability company 78 Beds LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
48/100
#170 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: August 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Families considering Applingwood Post Acute in Cordova, Tennessee should be aware that it has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below average performance and some concerns about care quality. The facility ranks #170 out of 298 in Tennessee, placing it in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, and #9 out of 24 in Shelby County, meaning only eight local options are better. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2018 to 9 in 2025, signaling growing concerns. On a positive note, staffing has a decent turnover rate of 43%, which is better than the state average, and the facility has no fines on record, suggesting compliance with regulations. However, specific incidents of concern include failing to provide necessary wound care for residents, resulting in deterioration of injuries, and not assisting residents with personal hygiene, which could impact their overall well-being.

Trust Score
D
48/100
In Tennessee
#170/298
Bottom 43%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 9 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
43% turnover. Near Tennessee's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Tennessee. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2018: 1 issues
2025: 9 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (43%)

    5 points below Tennessee average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Tennessee average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 43%

Near Tennessee avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Aug 2025 9 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, failed to initiate wound treatments when a wound was identified on admission, failed to complete skin assessments on residents, and failed to administer wound treatments for residents determined to be at risk of skin breakdown for 3 of 4 (Resident #8, #70 and #80) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer wounds. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a Pressure Ulcer/Injury to the sacrum. No treatments were ordered at that time. Treatments were administered 8 days after admission. The Pressure Ulcer/Injury deteriorated to a Stage 3 and on 2/22/2025, Resident #80 was transferred to the hospital for an infected wound. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 7/14/2025 and hospital records documented his skin was intact. Nine (9) days after admission to the facility, a skin sweep identified a Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer/Injury on Resident #70's Right Buttock. The facility's failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for Resident #80 and #70. The facility failed to ensure wound treatments were provided daily as ordered for Resident #8. Immediate Jeopardy is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death of a resident. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-686 on 8/7/2025 at 5:27 PM, in the Sunroom. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-686. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy F-686 at a scope and severity of J which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 2/6/2025 through 8/11/2025, the IJ was removed on 8/12/2025. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the Jeopardy, was received on 8/11/2025 at 11:25 AM, and the Removal Plan was validated onsite by the surveyors on 8/11/2025 and 8/12/2025 through policy review, medical record review, review of education records, and staff interviews. The facility's non-compliance at F-686 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated July 2017, revealed .The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record .Medications administered .Treatments or services performed .the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided . Review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries, dated April 2020, revealed .Risk Assessment.Assess the resident on admission for existing pressure injury risk factors. Repeat the risk assessment weekly and upon any changes in condition.Conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon (or soon after) admission with each risk assessment.Inspect the skin on a daily basis. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Pneumonia, Malnutrition, Depression, Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease and Pressure Ulcer Stage 3. Review of the admission care plan for Resident #80 dated 2/6/2025, revealed .SKIN INTEGRITY .PROBLEM Wound care (see tx [treatment] orders) . Review of the INITIAL SKIN INJURY DOCUMENTATION for Resident #80 dated 2/6/2025, revealed .on admission.Sacrum.Length 10 CM [centimeter] Width.9 CM.Depth 0.1 CM. Review of the Wound Assessment for Resident #80 revealed, .Date of Assessment 02/8/2025.Present on admission.Sacrum .Pressure .Stage 2 .Odor.No.Length.10.50 [cm].Width.9.00 [cm].Depth.0.1 [cm]. Review of the Inpatient Physicians [Named Group Practice] form dated 2/8/2025, revealed .sacral P.U. [pressure ulcer also known as pressure wound] stage 3 / 4. Review of the 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Bried Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated Resident #80 was cognitively intact. Resident #80 was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had a stage 2 pressure ulcer on admission. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #80 dated 2/12/2025, revealed .Begin Date 02/12/2025 .hydrocolloid [dressing to promote healing of wounds] 3 Times Weekly .SACRUM .Clean area with Normal Saline. Apply Hydrocolloid for autolytic debridement . Review of the February Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #80 revealed wound care to the sacrum was not ordered until 2/12/2025.hydrocolloid.Three Times weekly Starting 02/12/2025 . Review of the February TAR revealed no documentation wound care treatments were performed on the Resident's sacrum would until 2/14/2025, when the sacrum wound had declined to a Stage 3. Review of the Wound Assessment for Resident #80 dated 2/17/2025, revealed .Odor.No.Length.11.50 [cm].Width.10.00 [cm].Depth.< [less than] 0.2 [cm].Wound was previous [previously] classified on [as] stage 2 on admission has now declined and is now classified as a stage III [3]. Resident place on alternating pressure mattress. Review of the care plan dated 2/18/2025, revealed, .Problem.has stage 2 pressure injury, POA [present on admission] . now stage 3 . Review of the progress notes dated 2/22/2025, revealed .2/22/2025 Resident's daughter in building requesting that resident be transferred to [Named Hospital] ER [emergency room].possible infected wound that is worsening with foul odor. Order carried out at this time. Spoke with weekend on call NP [Nurse Practitioner]. Review of Hospital #1's emergency room records for Resident #80 dated 2/22/2025, revealed .Chief Complaint .Wound Check .with c/o [complaint] unstageable sacral wound. Pt [patient] states the wound started .2 weeks ago Aox4 [alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation] .cannot ambulate .Visit Diagnoses .Infected decubitus ulcer .Wound of sacral region .[elderly patient] .presenting to the emergency room from the nursing home with worsening sacral wound with drainage .over the last couple of weeks she has developed ulceration .the drainage and symptoms got worse so they sent her to the ER today .IMPRESSION .Sacral decubitus ulcer with foci of gas extending from the ulcer to the bone [The presence of gas extending from the pressure ulcer to the bone is a serious finding in which can indicate a severe infection] though the ulcer itself does not extend quite as deep .Medical Decision Making .in the emergency room, she had a white count [white blood cell count (WBC) which indicates infection] that was elevated 19,000 [normal WBC range is 4,000-11,000] .she [Resident #80] was started on .antibiotics .we will go ahead and admit, I also consulted general surgery for possible wound debridement . Review of the facility Clinical Notes Report for Resident #80 dated 2/23/2025, the day after the Resident had been discharged from the facility to the hospital, revealed .Wound to sacrum has worsen [worsened], wound bed is dark in color with slough present, surrounding skin tissue has erythema present no odor noted. Wound present now as a stage III. Rp [responsible party] Daughter was present at this time and made aware of mother [mother's] condition and acknowledge understanding of wound care treatment going forward. N.O [New Order] Cleanse with [brand name of wound cleaning solution] .apply [prescription brand name of ointment used to remove dead tissue from wounds to help them heal] followed by Calcium alginate [used for wounds] and cover with Superabsorbent [dressing] daily. MD [Medical Doctor] aware. On 2/25/2025, Resident #80 was transferred from Hospital #1 to Hospital #2 and admitted to inpatient care for worsening/infected sacral wound and for surgical interventions. Review of Hospital #2's Clinical Records for Resident #80 dated 2/26/2025, revealed .REASON FOR VISIT: Infected sacral wound.admitted to [Hospital #1] .2/22 [2025] of worsening sacral wound with foul-smelling drainage.transfer to [Named hospital #2] .2/25 [2025].IMPRESSION.infected sacral decubitus ulcer. Colonized [presence of bacteria] with Pseudomonas aeruginosa[a bacteria that often contributes to delayed healing and increased tissue damage] Needs aggressive wound care and surgical evaluation for possible debridement [a procedure to remove dead, or infected tissue from a wound] of sacral wound (planned for 2/28 [2025] .). Antibiotics will not cure this wound.WOUNDCX [wound culture] 3 + [plus] Pseudomonas aeruginosa 02/24/2025.WBC 20.86 02/23/2025. Review of Hospital #2's discharge document revealed, .Taken to OR [operating room].for infected sacral wound debridement on 2/28 [2025]. Wound growing Pseudomonas. Resident #80 was discharged to another long-term care facility on 3/7/2025. During a telephone interview on 8/6/2025 at 8:53 AM, Wound Nurse J confirmed that Resident #80 was admitted with a stage 2 sacral pressure wound that deteriorated to a stage 3 pressure wound. Wound Nurse J was asked when should wound care be ordered. Wound Nurse J stated, Immediately.I call it [pressure wound] what it is and document and discuss with the doctor or NP . Wound Nurse J was informed that Resident #80's wound care was not ordered until 2/12/2025 and not performed until 2/14/2025. Wound Nurse J stated, .the nurses at that time should have initiated wound care . During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 11:49 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed wound treatments should have been ordered immediately and that Resident #80 should have received wound care to the sacrum on 2/6/2025. The DON confirmed the sacral wound went from a stage 2 to a stage 3 pressure ulcer. The DON was asked what should have been done for Resident #80. The DON stated, .should have done a lot of things.if they [referring to the nurses] identify something .should have notified the doctor.it's the protocol.that's what should have happened.if you don't catch it, it's on us.don't know what happened . During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 12:17 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C confirmed she had done Resident #80's initial sacral wound assessment on admission on [DATE]. LPN C stated, .once we identified the wounds.we turn it over to the wound care nurse and they come behind us and identify the treatment plan.we have been told to go ahead and open up skin assessment.identify area.measurement.good description of the wound.if drainage.or odor.do not sign or lock the assessment. LPN C could not recall if she had notified the provider on 2/6/2025 and did not see any documentation that she had notified the provider or provided treatment to the sacral wound. LPN C stated, .we should have had a treatment in place. LPN C reviewed Resident #80's TAR and identified the first treatment was ordered on 2/12/2025 but was not administered until 2/14/2025. LPN C was asked what do you think happened. LPN C stated, It's got to be poor communication, why it took so long. During a telephone interview on 8/6/2025 at 1:15 PM, the Medical Director confirmed he saw Resident #80's sacral pressure wound on 2/8/2025 and stated, .documented as stage 3 or stage 4.large and deep.no draining.or infection.real sick lady.discussed with the wound care when I finished to make sure standard treatment.not for sure what they did.to make sure she received treatment. The Medical Director was asked should Resident #80 have received wound care treatment when the wound was identified. The Medical Director stated, .absolutely.she should have received regular wound care.I'm surprised she didn't. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 1:45 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was asked when a wound is identified when should a treatment be started. The ADON stated, .on that day.our policy is the admission nurse.should put something in place. The ADON confirmed wound care for Resident #80 was ordered on 2/12/2025 and wasn't provided until 2/14/2025. The ADON denied that she saw Resident #80's wound. The ADON stated,.I think it was a DTI [deep tissue injury] and it broke down like it should have.I think some incorrect documentation as far as describing the wound.I think the failure was it was a very hard weekend. He [referring to Wound Nurse J] came in and assessed the wound on Saturday.and no charting was done.there was so much going on.I think he just didn't have time to put the order in.he worked the med [medication] cart on Friday.Saturday and Sunday.that weekend we had 2 nurses in the hospital. The ADON confirmed that the wound care nurse, the risk manager, and herself had worked that weekend on the floor. During a telephone interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:38 PM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was informed Resident #80 was admitted with a pressure wound on 2/6/2025, and there was no order for wound treatment until 2/12/2025. The NP stated, .we should always have an order, should be standard to have a treatment to start .I'm surprised it wasn't . During an interview on 8/8/2025 at 11:30 AM, the Administrator was asked about the system failure for pressure ulcer identification, initiating treatments, and assessments. The Administrator stated, I think we were focused on the data and not looking deeper on the documentation side of it and really just started focusing on the documentation side of it in July.we are needing to do education.we lost one treatment nurse.and started working with the new one.with her coming on board in June.really July, we could really [have] started working on the process.documentation.complete assessment. 3. Review of the [Named Hospital] Hospital Medicine Progress Note, for Resident #70 dated 7/13/2025, revealed .Skin: No rash or ulcerations . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Congestive Heart Failure and Hypokalemia. Review of the admission NURSING ASSESSMENT . for Resident #70 dated 7/14/2025 and signed as completed on 8/13/2025, revealed .Skin breakdown/issues noted, Please Refer to Skin Assessment .He is incontinent of B/BL [bowel and bladder]. open area noted to rt [right] buttock . Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #70 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #70 was dependent on staff for bathing, required maximum assistance of staff for mobility, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. No skin issues were indicated, but Resident #70 was at risk for pressure ulcers. Review of the care plan for Resident #70 revealed .developed stage 3 pressure injury to right buttock.Date Initiated: 07/23/2025.Administer treatment as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 07/23/2025.Assess for any skin breakdown during ADL's Date Initiated: 07/24/2025.Assess/record/monitor wound healing. Measure length, width and depth when possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD [medical doctor]. Date Initiated: 07/23/2025.Monitor/document/report to MD PRN [as needed] changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx [signs and symptoms] of infection, wound size, stage. Date Initiated: 07/24/2025.Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 07/24/2025.Resident is at risk for skin breakdown/further skin breakdown due to: Decreased mobility/immobility Date Initiated: 07/24/2025.Skin check during ADL care and report significant findings Date Initiated: 07/24/2025.Treatment/med as ordered Date Initiated: 07/24/2025. Review of the SKIN ASSESSMENT (PRESSURE INJURY) . for Resident #70 dated 7/23/2025, revealed Acquired during stay .date of onset 7/23/2025 .Pressure Ulcer Stage .III [3] .Right buttock .Pressure .1.5 [cm-length] .1.2 [cm-width] .0.1 [cm-Depth] .RIGHT BUTTOCK STAGE 3: WOUND BED 100% [percent] GRANULATION [new tissue that forms during the healing process] TISSUE. WOUND EDGES ARE FLAT AND INTACT. PERIWOUND OF NORMAL COLOR. NO ODOR, EDEMA NOR REDNESS NOTED. SMALL AMOUNT OF DRAINAGE NOTED. WOUND BED IS MOIST. NEW ORDER: CLEANSE WITH NS [normal saline], PAT DRY, APPLY XEROFORM [wound dressing that promotes a moist healing] TO WOUND BED AND COVER SILICONE BORDERED FOAM [dressing to promote healing] EVERY MON [Monday], WED [Wednesday], FRI [Friday] AND PRN [as needed]. TOLERATED TREATMENT WELL. NO S/SX INFECTION NOTED . Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #70 dated 7/25/2025, revealed .RIGHT BUTTOCK STAGE 3: CLEANSE WITH NS, PAT DRY, APPLY XEROFORM TO WOUND BED, COVER WITH BORDERED GAUZE DAILY every day shift for STAGE 3 AND as needed . Review of the TAR for Resident #70 dated July 2025, revealed .RIGHT BUTTOCK STAGE 3: CLEANSE WITH NS, PAT DRY, APPLY XEROFORM TO WOUND BED, COVER WITH BORDERED GAUZE DAILY. every day shift for STAGE 3 -Start Date 07/26/2025 0600 . Resident #70 developed a facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcer/injury on 7/23/2025. Treatments were not ordered until 7/25/2025 and were not started until 7/26/2025, 3 days after the wound was identified. 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer Right Hip, Chronic Pain Syndrome and Anxiety. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated Resident #8 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #8 was admitted with an unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #8 dated 7/2/2025, revealed, .has pressure injuries.Interventions. Administer treatment as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Review of the admission NURSING ASSESSMENT. for Resident #8 dated 7/2/2025, revealed . SKIN CONDTION.Skin breakdown/issues noted, Please refer to Skin Assessment. Review of the SKIN ASSESSMENT (PRESSURE INJURY). dated 7/2/2025, revealed .RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK Pressure.Length 2.1 [cm] Width 2.5 [cm].Depth UTD [unable to determine].Stage Unstageable. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #8 dated 7/4/2025 revealed, .Santyl [an ointment that removes dead tissue from the wound so they can start to heal] External Ointment 250 UNIT/GM [gram] Apply to RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK .everyday shift for UNSTAGEABLE PRESSURE ULCER APPLY NICKEL THICK TOPICALLY TO WOUND BED . Review of the SKIN ASSESSMENT (PRESSURE INJURY). for Resident #8 dated 7/8/2025, revealed, .RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK Pressure.Length 2.1 [cm] Width 2.4 [cm].Depth UTD.Stage Unstageable.RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK UNSTAGEABLE PRESSURE ULCER . Review of the SKIN ASSESSMENT (PRESSURE INJURY), dated 7/15/2025, revealed .RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK Pressure.Length 2.2 Width 2.0.Depth UTD.Stage Unstageable.RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK UNSTAGEABLE PRESSURE ULCER . Review of the SKIN ASSESSMENT (PRESSURE INJURY), dated 7/22/2025, revealed .RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK Pressure.Length 3.4 [cm] Width 2.2 [cm].Depth UTM [UTD].Stage Unstageable.RIGHT UPPER BUTTOCK UNSTAGEABLE PRESSURE ULCER . Review of the TAR dated July 2025, for Resident #8 revealed missed wound care to the right upper buttock on 7/7/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, and 7/17/2025. During an interview on 8/7/2025 at 9:24 AM, the Administrator stated, .The skin sweep identified an area on [named Resident #8] .The initial admitting [Registered Nurse (RN) E] nurse on 7/14/2025, did not put in the admission assessment in a timely manner and upon review and speaking to her .She [RN E] came in on 8/3/2025 and completed the admission assessment . During an interview on 8/07/2025 at 10:46 AM, RN E stated .I started on the admission .I was going to finish the admission, but I was too tired and went home .I misplaced my cheat sheet, I knew the only thing was his knee abrasions, but when I looked at the chart I saw the wound nurse had charted a pressure ulcer and I doubted myself and thought I missed something .I was late on getting back to complete the admission . During an interview on 8/12/2025 at 12:25 PM, the Administrator was asked should wound care be provided as ordered by the physician. The Administrator stated, Yes ma'am. The Administrator was shown Resident #8's July's TAR and was asked should there be blanks on the TAR. The Administrator stated, Should not be. Review of the facility's removal plan received on 8/11/2025, and verified through record review, observation, and interviews with staff and administration on 8/11/2025-8/12/2025, revealed the following: The facility will ensure vulnerable residents who are at risk for skin breakdown, will receive the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. 1) What corrective actions will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice. Resident #70: On 7/30/2025 the Treatment Nurse resolved the facility acquired stage 3 pressure injury and this was documented on the skin assessment. On 8/7/2025 the ADON and Charge Nurse completed a full head to toe assessment and no new areas were identified. Resident #80: On 8/8/25 the Administrator verified that the resident was discharged from the facility on 2/22/25. On 8/7/25 the Quality Service Team reviewed the Prevention of Pressure Injuries Policy and the Pressure Injuries Overview Policy and no changes were made. The Administrator and Nurse Managers to include the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, the MDS Coordinators, Risk Manager, and Treatment Nurse were educated on 8/7/25 by the Quality Service Team with post test to ensure competency on the Prevention of Pressure Injuries Policy and the Pressure Injuries Overview Policy. Point Click Care (PCC) process to include identifying and assessing skin injuries/issues through head to toe body audits upon admission using the admission assessment, weekly using the weekly summary assessment, and/or skilled residents using the Alert charting . If skin injuries/issues are identified, same day documentation and communication will occur for the following: skin assessment, initiation of treatments, notification to the providers verbally via phone or in person or through email, entering orders and documenting in the electronic health record post treatment. Certified nursing assistants observing for skin changes and communication with nursing of skin changes the same day using the point of care documentation: new alert>eInteract Alerts (Stop and Watch)>change in skin color or condition>Save. Nursing staff will review the alert bell in Point Click Care (PCC) for any new alerts related to new skin issues during their scheduled shift. They will complete a head to toe assessment and address new skin injuries/issues as mentioned above per the PCC process. The Treatment Nurse, Charge Nurse or Nurse Manager will carry out the ongoing weekly skin assessments for skin injuries/issues until resolved and may make adjustments to classifications, staging, and treatments as necessary. 8/11/2025-8/12/2025 Surveyors verified through record review, observation, and interviews with staff and administration. 2) How the facility will identify other residents having the potential to be affected by the same deficient practice. On 8/7/25 the Nursing Staff and Nursing Managers initiated a skin sweep to identify any new skin injuries/issues through head-to-toe body audits and documented on the skin monitoring sheets. There were 8 residents with new skin injuries/issues identified. 2/8 residents had pressure injuries, all other identified areas were non pressure. The charge nurses or nurse managers will complete documentation of the areas identified in the EHR, notify the providers, initiate treatments and sign out the treatments in the EHR. Upon completion of the skin sweep the residents with new skin injuries/issues identified, the nurses or nurse managers will document the skin injury/issues in the electronic health record. The resident provider will be notified of the newly identified skin injuries/issues and treatments will be initiated following the provider orders for the skin injuries/issues and documented on the Medication/Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) after completion. On 8/8/25 an audit was initiated to compare the skin assessments post skin sweep to the current census to ensure all residents received a skin assessment. If skin injuries/issues were identified, the PCC process was initiated to include initiation of skin assessments, provider notification, new treatment orders initiated and signed out on the EMAR/ETAR. On 8/8/25 a Quality Service Consultant initiated updating the care plans for any new skin injuries/issues identified from the skin sweep. All residents with skin injuries/issues have the potential to be affected. On 8/7/25 a Quality Service Nurse initiated an audit on current residents with wounds for complete assessments and documentation in the electronic health record, current physician order implementation, and treatments initiated the same day post identification and documented on the EMAR/ETAR. Wound Healing Care Specialist (WHCS) was consulted and initiated their first visits on 4/4/25 and will continue to be consulted weekly for wound assessments and recommendations as needed. If circumstances prevent on site rounds, WHCS will be contacted by phone. The WHCS NP assessed newly identified skin injuries/issues on 8/8/25 with the Facility Treatment Nurse as a follow-up review and will provide any recommendations as needed. On 8/8/25 the IDT to include the Medical Director and Quality Service team updated and reviewed the Treat in Place protocols for Wound Management and the Medical Director approved. Updated Treat in Place protocols initiated and posted at the Nurses Stations for quick reference. On 8/8/25 the Quality Service Consultant initiated an audit for the week of 8/3/25-8/9/25 current residents per the census to determine if a weekly summary assessment which includes a skin assessment was completed and if any skin injuries/issues were noted on the assessment. Any resident identified without a weekly summary assessment documented will have a weekly summary assessment completed and documented by the Nursing Staff. 8/11/2025-8/12/2025 Surveyors verified through record review, observation and interviews with staff and administration. 3) What measures will be put into place or what systemic changes you will make to ensure that the deficient practice does not recur. Wound Healing Care Specialist (WHCS) Nurse Practitioner will round weekly with the Treatment Nurse or designee on residents with identified skin injuries/issues, assess the skin injuries/issues, provide recommendations as needed, and provide the facility with a copy of any WHCS skin assessment. The Treatment Nurse, Charge Nurse or Nurse Manager will complete dressing changes per orders and document on the EMAR/ETAR and complete a weekly skin assessment weekly until skin injuries/issues are resolved. The Treatment Nurse is notified of new skin injuries/issues through a variety of resources such as: through communication with the charge nurses and CNA's, reviewing admission assessments, weekly summary assessments, alert charting, skin assessments, and/or through bell alerts in the EHR. Nurse Managers initiated education to Nurses on 8/7/25 with a post test to ensure competency on the Prevention of Pressure Injuries Policy and the Pressure Injuries Overview Policy. Point Click Care (PCC) process to include identifying and assessing skin injuries/issues through head to toe body audits upon admission using the admission assessment, weekly using the weekly summary assessment and/or skilled residents using the Alert charting. If skin injuries/issues are identified, same day documentation and communication will occur for the following: skin assessment, initiation of treatments, notification to the providers verbally via phone or in person or through email, entering orders and documenting in the electronic health record post treatment. Certified nursing assistants observing for skin changes and communication with nursing of skin changes the same day using the point of care documentation: new alert>eInteract Alerts (Stop and Watch)>change in skin color or condition>Save. Nursing staff will review the alert bell in Point Click Care (PCC) for any new alerts related to new skin issues during their scheduled shift. They will complete a head to toe assessment and address new skin injuries/issues as mentioned above per the PCC process. The Treatment Nurse or designee will carry out the ongoing weekly skin assessments for skin injuries/issues until resolved and may make adjustments to classifications, staging, and treatments as necessary. Nurse Managers initiated education to on duty certified nursing assistants on 8/7/25 on observing for skin changes and communication with nursing of skin changes the same day using the point of care documentation: new alert>eInteract Alerts (Stop and Watch)>change in skin color or condition>Save. Off duty licensed nurses or Agency Nurse upon returning to work are to be educated by the Nurse Managers with post tests to ensure competency on the Prevention of Pressure Injuries Policy and the Pressure Injuries Overview Policy. Point Click Care (PCC) process to include identifying and assessing skin injuries/issues through head to toe body audits upon admission using the admission assessment, weekly using the weekly summary assessment, and/or skilled residents using the Alert charting. If skin injuries/issues are identified, same day documentation and communication will occur for the following: skin assessment, initiation of treatments, notification to the providers verbally via phone or in person or through email, entering orders and documenting in the electronic health record post treatment. Certified nursing assistants observing for skin changes and communication with nursing of skin changes the same day using the point of care documentation: new alert>eInteract Alerts (Stop and Watch)>change in skin color or condition>Save. Nursing staff will review the alert bell in Point Click Care (PCC) for any new alerts related to new skin issues during their scheduled shift. They will complete a head to toe assessment and address new skin injuries/issues as mentioned above per the PCC process. The Treatment Nurse or designee will carry out the ongoing weekly skin assessments for skin injuries/issues until resolved and may make adjustments to classifications, staging, and treatments as necessary. Off duty and Agency certified nursing assistants upon returning to work are to be educated by the Nurse Managers on observing for skin changes the same day and communicating this to the nurses using the point of care documentation: new alert>eInteract Alerts (Stop and Watch)>change in skin color or condition>Save. Newly hired licensed nurses will be educated during orientation with a post test to ensure competency on the Prevention of Pressure Injuries Policy and the Pressure Injuries Overview Policy. Point Click Care (PCC) process to include identifying and assessing skin injuries/issues through head to toe body audits upo
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Liv...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided related to showering and personal hygiene care for 2 of 2 (Resident #10 and #60) sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) ., revealed .Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Bipolar Disorder, Renal Dialysis, and Acute Kidney Failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated Resident #10 was cognitively intact, and required maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene. Review of the Care Plan dated 6/3/2025, revealed Resident #10 had impaired visual function r/t [related to] blindness. Observations in Resident #10's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:40 AM and 3:37 PM, revealed Resident #10 had excessive facial hair growth to her chin, upper lip, and face. Resident #10's fingers had dark discolored areas with the appearance of dirt, underneath the nails. During an interview on 8/5/2025 at 3:28 PM, Resident #10 stated, They gave me a shower last night and cut my fingernails. During an interview on 8/5/2025 at 3:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked should a female resident have a large growth of facial hair to her face. The DON stated, No, Ma'am, faces should be shaved and clean. The DON was asked should residents have dirty fingernails. The DON stated, No, they should be clipped and clean. 3. Review of medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinsons and Hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #60 was cognitively intact. Resident #60 required partial assistance from staff to complete all activities of daily living. Review of the Care Plan dated 7/22/2025, revealed .has an ADL self-care performance deficit and is at risk for ADL decline r/t limited mobility . Review of the undated Shower List Day Shift, revealed Resident #60 should be getting showers on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of the Documentation Survey Report, dated July 2025, revealed Resident #60 did not get a shower on the following scheduled shower days: 7/24/2025, 7/29/2025, 7/31/2025, and 8/2/2025. Review of the Documentation Survey Report, dated July 2025, revealed Resident #60 received a bed bath on 7/25/2025, 7/29/2025, 7/30/2025, and 7/31/2025. Review of the Documentation Survey Report, dated August 2025, revealed Resident #60 received a bed bath on 8/2/2025, 8/3/2025, and received a shower on 8/4/2025. During a telephone interview on 8/5/2025 at 3:12 PM, Resident #60's wife stated that he received a shower on 7/26/2025 and 8/4/2025 and those are the only showers the Resident has had since admission to the facility. Resident #60's wife stated that the Resident's teeth have not been brushed since 7/26/2025. During an interview on 8/5/2025 at 3:29 PM, Resident #60 stated that his teeth hadn't been brushed, and he had only had a shower on 7/26/2025 and 8/4/2025. Resident stated that he would like a shower on his scheduled days, and he would like for his teeth to be brushed every day. Observation in Resident #60's bathroom on 8/5/2025 at 3:30 PM, revealed there was not a toothbrush or toothpaste in the bathroom. During an interview on 8/5/2025 at 3:40 PM, the DON was asked if the shower schedule should be followed. The DON stated, Yes. The DON was asked if a Resident's teeth should be brushed daily. DON stated, Yes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders and fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders and failed to ensure that residents received treatments and medications in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 of 36 (Resident #5, #8, #15, and #18) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, dated July 2016, revealed .Medications shall be administered upon the written order . Review of the facility policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated July 2017, revealed .The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: Medications administered .Treatments or services performed .the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Fracture of Upper End of Left Tibia, Fracture of Shaft of Left Fibula, Lupus, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/23/3025, revealed Carvedilol [used to treat high blood pressure] Oral Tablet 6.25 MG [milligram].two times a day. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Carvedilol at 9:00 PM on 6/24/2025 and 6/27/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Carvedilol at 9:00 AM on 7/16/2025 and at 9:00 PM on 7/2/2025, 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/23/2024, revealed .Furosemide [used to treat conditions involving excessive fluid retention] Oral Tablet 40 MG.one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Furosemide on 7/16/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/23/2025, revealed .levETIRAcetam [used to help control seizures] Oral Tablet 750 MG.one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Levetiracetam on 7/16/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/23/2025, revealed .Losartan Potassium [used to treat high blood pressure] Oral Tablet 25 MG.one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Losartan on 7/16/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/23/2025, revealed .Rosuvastatin Calcium [used to manage cholesterol] Oral Tablet 20 MG.at bedtime. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Rosuvastatin Calcium on 7/2/2025, 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/23/2025, revealed .Senna [used to treat constipation] Oral Tablet 8.6 MG.at bedtime. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Senna on 7/2/2025 and 7/3/2025. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed .Docusate Sodium [stool softener] Oral Capsule 100 MG.two times a day. Review of the MAR dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Docusate Sodium at 9:00 PM on 6/28/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed no documentation of the administration of Docusate Sodium at 9:00 AM on 7/16/2025 and at 9:00 PM on 7/2/2025, 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed .SWALLOWING/NUTRITIONAL .DATA COLLECTION.every shift. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation for monitoring Swallowing/nutritional collection for 6:00 PM shift on 6/24/2025 and 6/27/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed .Record Intake & Output.every shift. Review of the TAR dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation for recording Resident #5's intake and output for the 6:00 PM shift on 6/24/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed .Assess pain level Q [every] shift. Review of the MAR and TAR dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation that Resident #5's pain level was assessed for the 6:00 PM shift on 6/24/2025, 6/27/2025, and 6/28/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation that Resident #5's pain level was assessed for the 6:00 AM shift on 7/3/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, and 7/31/2025; and on the 6:00 PM shift on 7/2/2025, 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed . Notify MD [Medical Doctor] if the patient has ANY of the following symptoms: 1. Temperature < [less than] 96.8 or > [greater than] 99F [Fahrenheit] 2. Heart Rate > 90 BPM [Beats Per Minute] 3. Respiratory Rate > 20 4. Acute Change in Mental Status 5. 02 [Oxygen] Sat [Saturation] of < 90% [percent] 6. Systolic [the force of blood flow when blood is pumped out of the heart] BP [Blood Pressure] < 100.every shift. Review of the TAR dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation Resident #5's vital signs were monitored for the 6:00 PM shift on 6/24/2025, 6/27/2025, and 6/28/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation Resident #5's vital signs were monitored for the 6 AM shift for 7/3/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, and 7/31/2025; and on 6 PM shift for 7/2/2025, 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed .Incentive Spirometer [a handheld device used to help improve lung function].four times a day. Review of the TAR dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation for the Incentive spirometer for 6:00 PM shift on 6/24/2025, 6/27/2025, and 6/28/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/24/2025, revealed .prednisoLONE [used to reduce inflammation] Oral Tablet 5 MG.one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Prednisolone on 7/16/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/26/2025, revealed .Pregabalin [used to treat pain caused by damage to the nerves] Oral Capsule 300 MG.two times a day. Review of the MAR dated 6/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Pregabalin at 9:00 PM on 6/26/2025 and 6/28/2025 for Resident #5. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Pregabalin at 9:00 AM on 7/16/2025, and at 9:00 PM on 7/2/2025, 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #5. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that physician's orders should be followed and there should be no blanks on the resident's MARs or TARS. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Spondylosis (wear and tear of spinal disks), Radiculopathy (disease of the root of a nerve, such as from a pinched nerve or tumor), Hypertension, Arthritis, and Pressure Ulcer Right Hip. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated Resident #8 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the Physician Orders dated 7/2/2025, revealed .Famotidine [medication used for the stomach] 20 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily . Review of the July 2025 MAR revealed there was no documentation of the administration of Famotidine 20mg tablet on 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025, 7/26/2025, and 7/30/2025 at 9:00 PM for Resident #8. Review of the Physician Orders dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Active Liquid Protein [medication used for healing pressure wounds] 30ml [milliliters] twice daily for wounds . Review of July 2025 MAR revealed no documentation of the administration of Active Liquid Protein 30 ml on 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025, 7/26/2025 and 7/30/2025 at 9:00 PM for Resident #8. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/8/2025, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high contact time secondary to: OPEN WOUNDS two times a day . Review of July 2025 MAR revealed no documentation the facility used Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for Resident #8 on 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025, 7/26/2025, and 7/30/2025 at 9:00 PM for Resident #8. Review of the Physicians Order dated 7/11/2025, revealed . Monitor BBW [Black Box Warning-warning to alert healthcare providers of the possibility of major adverse reactions and safety concerns] LOOP DIURETICS [medications used for retaining water] QS [Every Shift] .FUROSEMIDE [medication used for retaining water] for water and electrolyte depletion. Watch for: weakness, arrhythmia [irregular heartbeat], confusion .every shift . Review of July 2025 MAR revealed the facility failed to document the monitoring of the use of the Loop Diuretics as ordered by the physician on 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025, 7/26/2025, and 7/30/2025 at 9:00 PM for Resident #8 for Resident #8. 4. Review of medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dysphagia and Hemiparesis. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 was rarely/never understood and was unable to complete a BIMS assessment. Review of the Physician's orders dated 2/15/2025, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high contact time secondary to: PEG [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy-a tube inserted into the abdomen to receive nutritional supplements] every shift related to HEMIPLEGIA AND HEMIPARESIS FOLLOWING CEREBRAL INFARCTION AFFECTING RIGHT DOMINANT SIDE. Review of Physician's Orders dated 2/20/2025, revealed .Enteral Feed Order every shift related to HEMIPLEGIA AND HEMIPARESIS FOLLOWING CEREBRAL INFARCTION AFFECTING RIGHT DOMINANT SIDE.ENTERAL: Flush.feeding tube with 30ml [milliliter] of water BEFORE administration of FIRST medication, then flush with 5ml of water IN BETWEEN medications. Flush feeding tube with 30ml of water AFTER the LAST medication administration. Observation in Resident #15's room on 8/5/2025 at 5:01 PM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) A flushed the Resident's PEG tube with 15 ml of water, administered the first medication, flushed the PEG tube with 15 ml of water, administered the second medication, and flushed the PEG tube with 15 ml of water after the last medication. RN A failed to follow the Physician's Orders for PEG tube flushes during medication administration for Resident #15. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Physician's Orders should be followed. 5. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Encephalopathy (a medical condition that affects brain function), Diabetes, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease, Dementia, and Paranoid Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 00, which indicated that Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired, and schizophrenia was not marked as an active diagnosis in the last 7 days. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .risperiDONE [used to treat Schizophrenia] Oral Tablet 1 MG .at bedtime. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of risperidone 1 MG on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .ANTIPSYCHOTIC: Monitor S/E [side effects] .RISPERIDONE QS. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation for monitoring risperidone S/E on the 6 AM shift for 7/12/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/31/2025; and on 6 PM shift for 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Assess pain level Q [every] shift. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation for assessing the pain level on the 6 AM shift for 7/12/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/31/2025; and on 6 PM shift for 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Monitor BBW .QS - Risperidone . Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation for monitoring BBW for risperidone on the 6 AM shift for 7/12/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/31/2025; and on 6 PM shift for 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Eliquis [blood thinner] Oral Tablet 5 MG .two times a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Eliquis at 9 AM for 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025; and at 9 PM for 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .amLODIPine Besylate [used to treat high blood pressure] Oral Tablet 10 MG .one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Amlodipine Besylate on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Nystatin [used to treat a fungal infection] Mouth/Throat Suspension.for times a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Nystatin at 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 5:00 PM on 7/16/2025; and at 9:00 PM on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Behavior Monitoring for use of RISPERIDONE.every shift. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation for behavior monitoring for use of Risperidone on the 6 AM shift for 7/12/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/31/2025; and on 6 PM shift for 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Notify MD [medical doctor] if the patient has ANY of the following symptoms: 1. Temperature < 96.8 or > 99F 2. Heart Rate > 90 BPM 3. Respiratory Rate > 20 4. Acute Change in Mental Status 5. 02 Sat of < 90% 6. Systolic BP < 100.every shift. Review of the MAR and TAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation for monitoring of vital signs on the 6 AM shift for 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/31/2025; and on the 6 PM shift for 7/3/2025, 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Fluticasone Proplonate Nasal Suspension [used to treat nasal symptoms associated with allergies].one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Fluticasone Proplonate Nasal Suspension on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Omeprazole [used to treat heartburn] Oral Tablet.one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Omeprazole on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Pravastatin Sodium [used to treat high cholesterol] Oral Tablet.at bedtime. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Pravastatin Sodium on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .risperiDONE [antipsychotic medication] Oral Tablet 0.5 MG.one time a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Risperidone 0.5 MG on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Senna Oral Tablet 8.6 MG.at bedtime. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation of administration of Senna on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/3/2025, revealed .Polyethylene Glycol [used to treat constipation] 3350 Powder.two times a day. Review of the MAR dated 7/2025, revealed no documentation of administration of Polyethylene Glycol Powder for the 6 AM shift on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025; and for the 6 PM shift on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/8/2025, revealed .ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET [blood thinner] MEDICATION - ASSESS FOR S/SX [signs/symptoms] OF BLEEDING, DISCOLORED URINE, BLACK TARRY STOOLS, SUDDEN SEVERE HEADACHE, N&V [nausea and vomiting], DIARRHEA, MUSCLE JOINT PAIN, LETHARGY, BRUISING, SUDDEN CHANGES IN MENTAL STATUS AND/ OR V/S [vital signs], SOB [shortness of breath], NOSE BLEEDS QS. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed no documentation for monitoring of anticoagulant s/sx for the 6 AM shift on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025; and for the 6 PM shift on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/8/2025, revealed .Incentive Spirometer.four times a day. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed no documentation for the incentive spirometer at 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM, and 5:00 PM on 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025, and 7/31/2025; and at 9:00 PM on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/22/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/9/2025, .Monitor BBW S/E QS of Eliqus [Eliquis-medication used to prevent blood clots]. Review of the TAR dated 7/2025, revealed no documentation for monitoring of Eliquis side effects for the 6 AM shift on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025; and for the 6 PM shift on 7/11/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025 and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/14/2025, revealed .FINGERSTICK [blood glucose check]: AC [before meals]/HS [at bedtime].four times a day. Review of the MAR and TAR dated 7/2025, revealed no documentation of the fingerstick results for 4:30 AM on 7/15/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/23/2025, and 7/27/2025; for 11:00 AM on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025; for 4:00 PM on 7/16/2025 and 7/31/2025; for 9:00 PM on 7/14/2025, 7/22/2025, and 7/26/2025 for Resident #18. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Physician's Orders should be followed and there should be no blanks on the resident's MARs or TARS.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the Resident [NAME] of Rights, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an env...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the Resident [NAME] of Rights, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards when chemical aerosol room freshener and sharps were observed in 2 of 39 (Resident #56 and #57) resident rooms. There were 18 residents with wandering behaviors in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the .RESIDENT BILL OF RIGHTS, revealed This document lists your rights as a resident of the Facility .The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health of safety of the resident or other residents .Safe environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable .environment . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Fracture of Lower End of Right Humerus, Diabetes, Acute Kidney Failure, and Adult Failure to Thrive. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired. Observations in Resident #56's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:21 AM and 1:10 PM, revealed (Brand Name) can of aerosol air freshener sitting in a plastic caddy on top of Resident #56's bedside table. During an interview on 8/4/2025 at 1:12 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed the can of aerosol air freshener should not be in the building. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes, Hypertension, Depression, and Anxiety. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Observations in Resident #57's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:51 AM and 12:05 PM revealed a pair of scissors on Resident #57's bedside table. During an observation and interview in Resident #57's room on 8/4/2025 at 1:05 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D confirmed the Resident had scissors at the bedside, and they should not be there.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter when nursing staff failed to obtain a physician's order and provide care and services for an indwelling urinary catheter for 2 of 2 (Resident #1 and #5) sampled residents for indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, dated 7/2016, revealed .Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing.Medications shall be administered upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary dated 8/2022, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections.Nursing and the interdisciplinary team should assess and document the ongoing need for a catheter that is in place. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmit of 6/20/2025, with diagnoses including Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Obstructive Reflux Uropathy, and Cauda Equina Syndrome. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 2/15/2025, revealed .Cleanse catheter site with water and soap, rinse then pat dry QS [every shift]. Review of the Physician Orders dated 4/15/2025, revealed, Change 16FR [French] Indwelling Foley catheter once every month. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for May 2025, revealed there was no documentation that indwelling catheter site care had been performed on 5/3/2025, 5/4/2025, 5/8/2025, 5/17/2025, 5/18/2025, 5/21/2025, 5/222025, and 5/31/2025 for Resident #1. The facility failed to provide documentation that the indwelling urinary catheter was changed during the month of May 2025. Review of the TAR for June 2025, revealed there was no documentation that indwelling catheter site care had been performed on 6/1/2025, 6/5/2025, 6/9/2025, 6/13/2025, 6/14/2025, 6/15/2025, 6/16/2025, 6/17/2025, 6/18/2025, 6/19/2025, 6/20/2025, 6/23/2025, 6/24/2025, and 6/27/2025 for Resident #1. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 cognitively intact, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the TAR for July 2025, revealed there was no documentation that indwelling catheter site care had been performed on 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025, 7/16/2025, 7/17/2025, 7/26/2025, 7/27/2025, 7/30/2025, and 7/31/2025 for Resident #1. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 8:54 AM, the Lead of Quality Services confirmed that the facility was unable to provide clinical documentation for the May 2025 indwelling foley catheter change. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Physician's Orders should be followed and there should be no blanks on the Resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) or TARS. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Fracture of Upper End of Left Tibia, Fracture of Shaft of Left Fibula, Lupus, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia. Review of the care plan dated 6/23/2025, revealed .[Resident #5] has a [an] Indwelling Catheter. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated that Resident #5 was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 6/2025 and 7/2025, revealed there were no orders for an indwelling catheter, catheter monitoring, or catheter care. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and TAR dated 6/2025 and 7/2025, revealed there was no documentation for indwelling catheter monitoring or catheter care. Observation in Resident #5's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:52 AM, revealed Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 8/4/2025, revealed .Monitor Catheter urinary drainage bag and document the following every shift: Color, consistency, odor, hematuria, bladder distention, burning, sensation.Observe for s/s [signs and symptoms] of infxn. [infection] & complic. [complications] r/t [related to] use of FC [foley catheter].every shift FOR EARLY DETECTION OF POSSIBLE INFECTION FOR USE OF INDWELLING CATHETER.Secure indwelling catheter tubing using anchoring device/leg strap to prevent movement and urethral traction. Check placement Q [every] shift.Indwelling urinary (Named) catheter is in privacy bag, check for placement Q shift.Record Intake & Output .every shift for cath [catheter] care for 30 Days.Irrigate Indwelling catheter with 60 ml [milliliters] of Normal Saline PRN [as needed].Cleanse Indwelling catheter site with water and soap, rinse then pat dry .every shift.Change catheter drainage bag PRN.Change Indwelling Catheter Fr.(16) [catheter size] PRN. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 8/5/2025, revealed, .Indwelling Foley Catheter Fr 16/10cc [cubic centimeter].Check placement and patency Q daily. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 10:33 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C confirmed that Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter since admission date of 6/23/2025. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:58 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #5 should have had a Physician's Order for an indwelling catheter.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on education record review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 7 (Licensed Prac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on education record review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 7 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, LPN F, LPN G, and LPN H) licensed nurses had the competencies and skill sets necessary to care for 1 of 1 sampled Residents (Resident #76) with a Laryngeal ([NAME])Tube. Based on education record review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 7 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, LPN F, LPN G, and LPN H) licensed nurses had the competencies and skill sets necessary to care for 1 of 1 sampled Residents (Resident #76) with a Laryngeal ([NAME])Tube. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated [NAME] Tube Education Record, revealed By signing this record of education, you acknowledge receiving educational training and a copy of the new process . Review of the education record revealed LPN B, LPN F, LPN G and LPN H did not receive the education and new process for the [NAME] tube. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Respiratory System, Malignant Neoplasm [cancer] of the Supraglottis [upper part of the larynx above the vocal cords], Malignant Neoplasm of the Lymph Nodes of the Head, Neck and Face, Diabetes, Dementia, and Anxiety. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not able to be assessed and Resident #76 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Medication Record Administration (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 7/31/2025 and 8/2025 revealed LPN B, LPN F, LPN G, and LPN H provided care to Resident #76. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 8/1/2025, revealed .[NAME] [Laryngeal] TUBE- Change the HME [Heat Moisture exchangers] in daytime using the daytime HME and change to nighttime HME at bedtime. every morning and at bedtime for breathing through stoma [surgically created opening]. [NAME] TUBE- Change the HME daily at bedtime .[NAME] TUBE- Clean and disinfect [NAME] tube as needed if dirty and/or when mucus collects in [NAME] Tube . Review of the Nurses Notes dated 8/3/2025, revealed .trach [tracheostomy] cap popped out several times - changed this am and repositioned - stoma area tender with redness- remains weak and lethargic but responsive .requires total care . Review of the Physician's Orders dated 8/3/2025, revealed .[NAME] TUBE- Monitor the stoma site for signs of infection, lesions/ulcers, and drainage daily at bedtime, [NAME] TUBE- Clean and disinfect the [NAME] Tube daily at bedtime . Review of the progress notes dated 8/4/2025, revealed .[NAME] tube was cleaned .He [Resident #76] has frequently coughed up greenish- yellow phlegm causing the cap to come off. Frequent monitoring is required, and care is provided as needed . Review of the care plan dated 8/4/2025, revealed .Resident has laryngeal tube and is at risk for alteration in respiratory function related to diagnosis of laryngectomy .[NAME] ostomy care daily/PRN .Observe for signs and symptoms of obstructed airway or need for suctioning such as audible crackles, dyspnea [shortness of breath] .intervene promptly .Suction as needed/ Q2H [every 2 hours] . During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:27 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was asked how she knows that staff are competent in caring for Resident #76 if they have not had education about the Laryngeal tube prior to their shift. The ADON stated, I don't.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were proper...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when medications were found unsecured and unattended in 2 of 39 (Residents #41 and #56) occupied resident rooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 2/2023, revealed .The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dementia, Glaucoma, Memory Deficit, and Diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated Resident #41 was severely cognitively impaired. Observations in Resident #41's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:18 AM, 10:53 AM, and 1:02 PM, revealed (Brand Name) moisture barrier cream on Resident #41's bedside table. During an observation and interview in Resident #41's room on 8/4/2025 at 2:57 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was shown the (Brand Name) moisture barrier cream on Resident #41's bedside table and confirmed that medication should not be left at bedside unsecured and unattended. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Fracture Right Humerus, Diabetes, and Adult Failure to Thrive. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired. Observations in Resident #56's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:21 AM and 1:10 PM, revealed a (Brand Name) Antifungal Medication and (Brand Name) Antibiotic Ointment at bedside. During an observation and interview in Resident #56's room on 8/4/2025 at 1:12 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed medications should not be left in residents' rooms unattended and should be stored on the locked medication cart. During an interview on 8/5/2025 at 2:57 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed medications should not be left unsecured and unattended at the resident's bedside and should be stored in a locked medication cart.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not followed for 2 of 2 (Resident #15 and #76) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Isolation-Categories of Transmission -Based Precautions, dated September 2022, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. EBP are indicated for residents with.Chronic wounds and/or indwelling medical devices. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dysphagia and Hemiparesis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 was cognitively impaired. Review of the Physician's Order dated 2/15/2025, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high contact time secondary to: PEG [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy-tube in the stomach used for nutrition and medication] every shift related to HEMIPLEGIA AND HEMIPARESIS FOLLOWING CEREBRAL INFARCTION. Observation in Resident #15's room on 8/5/2025 at 5:01 PM, revealed Registered Nuse (RN) A administered medications through the PEG tube while wearing gloves but did not wear a gown which resulted in RN A not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) according to the facility policy. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that PPE should be worn when administering meds through a PEG tube. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Respiratory System, Malignant Neoplasm [cancer] of the Supraglottis [upper part of the larynx above the vocal cords], and Malignant Neoplasm of the Lymph Nodes of the Head, Neck and Face. Review of the discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score was not able to be assessed and Resident #76 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Physician's Order dated 8/4/2025, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high contact time secondary to: (indwelling device), LARYOSTOMY suctioning for airway clearance as needed . Observation in Resident #76's room on 8/6/2025 at 8:17 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I went in the room and did not don PPE. Resident #76's Laryngeal tube was out of his stoma, and the Resident was coughing yellow thick sputum through the Laryngeal stoma. LPN I went to the hall and called for help, went back in the room and did not don PPE. The Infection Preventionist came in the room and did not don PPE and assisted in placing the tube back in the stoma. Neither LPN I nor the Infection Preventionist performed hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and neither nurse wore proper PPE on for EBP during this invasive procedure.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for 1 of 39 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for 1 of 39 (Resident #71) occupied resident rooms when walls were observed with brown dried dripping stains, a brown dried substance was observed on the head board of the bed, the floor, the wall behind the bed, the corner, on the wall near the window, and on the base of the enteral feeding pole. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Housekeeping - Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, dated 1/10/2025, revealed .Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soils from objects and surfaces.consistent surface cleaning will be conducted with a detailed focus on.Enteral pump poles.surfaces with infrequent hand contact.walls.should be cleaned on a regular basis. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Diabetes. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, which indicated Resident #71 was severely cognitively impaired, and used a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Observation in Resident #71's room on 8/4/2025 at 10:15 AM and 11:30 AM, revealed a dried dark and light beige colored dripping substance on the wall underneath the television, the wall near the heating and air conditioner unit, the wall behind the bed, in the corner of the room on the long wall behind the bed, on the headboard of the bed, and on the base and the wheels of the enteral feeding pole. During an observation and interview in Resident #71's room on 8/5/2025 at 11:42 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was shown the dried dark brown and beige substance on the walls, in the corner of the room behind the bed, on the headboard, and on the base and wheels of the enteral feeding pole and asked if those areas should have dried dark brown and beige substances on them. The DON confirmed the areas should be clean and not have dried substances on them. The DON was asked what the dried brown and beige substance on the walls, in the corner, on the headboard and on the enteral feeding pump were. The DON confirmed she was not sure, but it should not be there.
Oct 2018 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 (Licensed Practi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1) nurses followed physician orders for respiratory medications. The findings include: 1. The facility's Physician Orders policy, revised: 11/27/17 documented, .The physician shall authenticate orders for the care and treatment of assigned residents. The community will follow physician orders as written . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Encephalopathy, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Shortness of Breath. 3. A physician's order dated 8/22/18 documented, .Ipratropium-Albuterol 0.5 mg [milligram] [respiratory medications] - 3 mg (2.5 mg base)/3 ml [milliliter] nebulization soln [solution] .every 8 hours .inhalation . Observations in Resident #47's room on 10/22/18 at 2:24 PM, revealed LPN #1 administered Ipratropium without Albuterol via nebulizer mask. Interview with LPN #1 on 10/22/18 at 2:36 PM, at the 100 hall medication cart, LPN #1 confirmed that she had failed to administer the Albuterol per physician orders.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
  • • 43% turnover. Below Tennessee's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 48/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Applingwood Post Acute's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Applingwood Post Acute Staffed?

CMS rates APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Applingwood Post Acute?

State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE during 2018 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 9 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Applingwood Post Acute?

APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 78 certified beds and approximately 67 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CORDOVA, Tennessee.

How Does Applingwood Post Acute Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Applingwood Post Acute?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Applingwood Post Acute Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Applingwood Post Acute Stick Around?

APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Applingwood Post Acute Ever Fined?

APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Applingwood Post Acute on Any Federal Watch List?

APPLINGWOOD POST ACUTE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.