SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan to reflec...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan to reflect the residents' current status for 3 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #11, #20, and #56). The facility's failure to revise the Care Plan with appropriate interventions resulted in actual harm when Resident #56 sustained a fall which resulted in a fracture (broken bone) to the left femur (large upper bone in the leg).
Findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls Management Program Guidelines, dated 12/1/2018, revealed .Should the Resident experience a fall the attending nurse shall complete a post fall assessment. This includes .interventions to reduce the risk of repeat episodes and a review by the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] to evaluate thoroughness of the investigation and appropriateness of the interventions .The care plan should be updated to reflect, any new or change in interventions .
Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, revealed .Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Hypertension, Depression, and Anxiety Disorder.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficits, required supervision with his activities of daily living, and had no functional limitations in range of motion.
Review of the Care Plan dated 7/27/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at risk for falls related to impulsiveness, poor safety awareness, and history of falling. The following interventions were identified: follow facility fall protocol, anticipate and meet the resident's needs, be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it, the resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance, Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered, educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders, and the resident needs a safe environment with even floors free from spills and clutter, adequate glare free light, a working reachable call light, the bed in low position at night, siderails as ordered, handrails on walls, and personal items in reach.
Review of the Nursing Progress Notes dated 10/3/2021, revealed .The nurse was called to resident room at 11:00 AM due to resident having a fall in his room. Resident was noted to be sitting in the floor between the air conditioner and the bed .Denies any pain. Neuro checks were started and acceptable .
There was no Post Fall Review with interventions for this fall and the Care Plan was not revised to reflect Resident #56's fall on 10/3/2021.
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/9/2021, revealed .I walked in and observed the patient on his back and on the floor .He also stated that he bumped his head .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/9/2021, revealed the footwear, assistive devices, and safety interventions used at the time of the fall were shoes and slippers. The recommendation on this form was for the resident to wear shoes but according to the documentation on the form this intervention had previously been implemented.
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect the fall on 10/9/2021.
Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 had a BIMS score of 7, required supervision with his activities of daily living, had no functional limitations in range of motion, and had 1 fall without injury and 1 fall with minor injury since admission.
Review of the Nursing Progress Notes dated 10/22/2021, revealed .Resident noted sitting on floor. Resident examined .Denies pain. Neuro intact .
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect the fall on 10/22/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if the interventions of wearing shoes/slippers prevented Resident #56 from falling. The DON stated, No .care plan was not updated . The DON was shown the Post Fall Review dated 10/22/2021 and the interventions documented for the resident to wear shoes or slippers and the new intervention was also shoes/slippers. The DON stated, .there are no new interventions that will prevent resident from falling . The DON was asked if the Care Plan was updated. The DON stated, No. The DON was asked if the staff should be updating the Care Plan. The DON stated, Sure.
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/23/2021, revealed .I walked in the room and observed [Resident #56] sitting down on the floor beside his bed .
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect the fall on 10/23/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked if a new intervention was put into place to prevent the resident from falling after the resident had the fall on 10/23/2021. The DON stated, No .I don't see she [staff] updated the Care Plan.
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/25/2021, revealed .Resident slipped while walking from bed to chair without shoes or non slip socks .List the immediate fall prevention interventions .Non slip socks, call light in reach and instructed on use . Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment.
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect the fall on 10/25/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked if there had been any new interventions implemented after Resident #56 fell on [DATE] to prevent the resident from falling. The DON stated, No .no new interventions .
Review of the Care Plan dated 10/27/2021, revealed Resident #56 had a fall on 10/27/2021. The interventions documented were .Keep phone and personal items on [in] reach Date Initiated: 10/27/2021 . This new intervention was not implemented and placed on the Care Plan until 12/8/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON confirmed there had been no new interventions implemented after the fall on 10/27/2021.
Review of the Incident Report dated 11/8/2021, revealed .This nurse was called to the dining room on rehab [rehabilitation therapy] unit .observed resident sitting on buttocks on the floor with a dining room chair behind him .When asked resident if he was hurting anywhere, resident stated, 'My left hip hurts, I cannot move.' .
Review of the Radiology Report dated 11/8/2021, revealed .Acute intertrochanteric fracture [broken hip] of the proximal left femur is noted with minimal displacement .Limited range of motion in the left hip joint .
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/8/2021, revealed Resident #56 had another fall on 11/8/2021 with the intervention for staff to assist with transfers as allowed and tolerated. This Care Plan intervention was not documented until 12/8/2021 (1 month after Resident #56 fell). The resident was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. This intervention was documented on the Care Plan on 12/2/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked what interventions were put in place to prevent the resident from falling. The Regional Director of Clinical Services stated, .I don't think any intervention would have kept him from missing the chair. It was an isolated incident . The DON was asked if the resident was safe to ambulate unassisted. The DON stated, .He is care planned for aggressive behaviors .he'll swing at you if he feels like it and difficult to re-direct . The DON was asked if he was agitated during the incident. The DON stated, I don't know.
Review of the discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 was assessed to have a BIMS of 7, required supervision with his activities of daily living, had no functional limitations, had 2 or more falls without injury, 2 or more falls with minor injury, and 1 fall with major injury since the prior assessment.
Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 now had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance with most of his activities of daily living, and had no falls since admission or prior assessment.
Review of the Nursing Progress Note dated 11/23/2021, revealed .During rounds CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] noted resident on floor. Resident immediately notified nurse of the incident .
Review of the Referral to Rehabilitation Services dated 11/23/2021, revealed .Resident stated he slipped while attempting to go to the restroom .Pt [Patient] currently on PT [Physical Therapy] /OT [Occupational Therapy]/ST [Speech Therapy] caseload for therapy. Pt's balance and safety awareness are being addressed .
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/23/2021, revealed Resident #56 had a fall that day. On 12/8/2021 this fall was documented on the Care Plan with interventions to educate the resident regarding the call light (Resident #56 had severe cognitive deficits).
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked if educating the resident about using the call light would be effective if the resident had a low BIMS score. The DON stated, .Some days he was really with it . The DON was asked if the Care Plan had been updated to reflect the interventions to prevent the resident from falling. The DON stated, .He was referred to therapy . The DON was informed Resident #56 was already in the therapy case load at the time of the fall. The DON stated, Oh.
Review of the Incident Report dated 11/30/2021, revealed .I walked in room and observed patient on the floor .
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/30/2021, revealed Resident #56 had a fall on 11/30/2021. Interventions to .Keep in sight as allowed and tolerated . were not documented on the Care Plan until 12/08/2021.
During a telephone interview on 12/9/2021 at 8:13 AM, the physician of Resident #56 was asked about Resident #56's falls. The Physician stated, .I know he has fallen .they [facility] probably notified the Nurse Practitioner, I assumed they informed her .I saw him on 10/20/2021 for his low vitamin D labs .a vitamin D deficiency can potentially predispose the resident to fractures . The Physician was asked if Resident #56 could be educated regarding safety measures. The Physician stated, .initially it appeared that he could be educated but if you talked to him long enough, well he doesn't make much sense . The Physician was asked if the facility should have put interventions in place to prevent the falls. The Physician stated, .should have put something in place .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 8:45 AM, the DON was asked if Resident #56's Care Plan should have been updated with new interventions. The DON stated, Yes. The DON was asked if the resident was wearing shoes, as written in the Post Fall Reviews and if shoes were an appropriate intervention. The DON stated, No.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 10:45 AM, the Adult Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner (AGACNP) was asked if Resident #56 could be educated. The AGACNP stated, .I think there is a memory loss, but the staff should re-teach to call for assistance, but I don't think he'll remember . The AGACNP was asked if the facility should be implementing interventions. The AGACNP stated, .Yes, new interventions every time .
The facility's failure to update the Care Plan with appropriate interventions resulted in actual harm when Resident #56 sustained a fall which resulted in a fractured left femur.
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Osteoporosis, Parkinson's Disease, Falls, Dysphagia, Tremor, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia and Adult Failure to Thrive.
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 9/17/2021, revealed Resident #11 had a fall and documented, .List the immediate fall prevention intervention(s) put in place .place in bed after being up all night. Call light in reach .
The Care Plan was not revised for Resident #11's fall on 9/17/2021.
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 11/1/2021, revealed Resident #11 had a fall and documented, .List the immediate fall prevention intervention (s) put in place .instructed resident to use call light to call for assistance .
Review of the Physician's Orders dated 11/5/2021, revealed .Place Left foot in immobilization foot brace for 2 weeks .
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect the fall on 11/1/2021 or the Physician's Orders for the immobilizer ordered on 11/5/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 4:46 PM, the DON confirmed the Care Plan was not revised timely to reflect Resident #11's falls on 9/17/2021 and 11/1/2021.
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Polyosteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Vitamin D Deficiency, Malignant of Colon, Adult Failure to Thrive, and Repeated Falls.
Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #20 had a BIMS of 8, which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired.
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 9/30/2021, revealed Resident #20 had a fall and it was documented, .Bed replaced with scoop mattress and matts [mats] put on floor beside bed .
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect Resident #20 was to have a scoop mattress or fall mats at the bedside.
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/17/2021, revealed Resident #20 had a fall and documented, .List the immediate fall prevention intervention(s) put in place .Redirected resident and encouraged use of call light .Redirect with education the use of the call light and waiting for staff to come assist before attempting transfers .
Review of the Care Plan dated 10/17/2021, revealed interventions to keep personal items within reach as allowed and tolerated, redirect resident and encourage to use call light were documented on the Care Plan on 12/9/2021.
Review of the Post fall Review dated 10/18/2021, revealed Resident #20 had a fall and documented, .Non-kid socks .Fall Mat at bedside .
Review of the Care Plan dated 10/18/2021 and revised on 12/9/2021 documented staff were to monitor for placement of shoes, keep them at the bedside as allowed and tolerated, and encourage to use call light for assistance with all needs.
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect that Resident #20 was to have a scoop mattress or fall mats at the bedside.
Review of a Fall Incident Report dated 11/7/2021, revealed .Resident was found sitting on the floor beside her bed .
There was no Post Fall Review completed on 11/7/2021 and the Care Plan was not revised to reflect Resident #20's fall on 11/7/2021.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/9/2021 at 12:23 PM and at 6:31 PM, revealed Resident #20 was seated in a wheelchair in the door of her room. There were no fall mats at the bedside.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 6:56 PM, Unit Manager #2 and the DON both confirmed the Care Plan was not revised timely to reflect the resident's falls on 9/30/2021, 10/17/2021, 10/18/2021, and 11/7/2021. The DON confirmed that the intervention to educate Resident #20 was not an appropriate intervention.
During an interview in the resident's room on 12/9/2021 at 7:07 PM, the DON confirmed there were no fall mats at Resident #20's bedside and stated, .she [Resident #20] was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER] B on 10/27/2021 .they [staff] should have moved her mats with her . The DON confirmed Resident #20 should have fall mats in place at her bedside.
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement appropriate interven...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to prevent falls and injury for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #56) reviewed for accidents. The facility's failure to provide appropriate interventions resulted in actual harm when Resident #56 sustained a fall which resulted in a fracture (broken bone) of the left femur (large upper bone of the leg).
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls Management Program Guidelines, dated 12/1/2018, revealed .strives to maintain a hazard free environment, mitigate fall risk factors and implement preventative measure .recognizes even the most vigilant efforts may not prevent all falls and injuries. In those cases, intensive efforts will be directed toward minimizing or preventing injury .DEFINITION: A fall is considered to be .an unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force .An episode where a resident lost his/her balance .would have fallen, if not for staff intervention, is considered a fall .Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred .Should the Resident experience a fall the attending nurse shall complete a post fall assessment. This includes .interventions to reduce the risk of a repeat episode and a review by the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] to evaluate thoroughness of the investigation and appropriateness of the interventions .The care plan should be updated to reflect, any new or change in interventions .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Hypertension, Depression, and Anxiety Disorder.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 7/6/2021, revealed Resident #56 was not at risk for falling.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficits, required supervision with his activities of daily living, and had no functional limitations in range of motion.
Review of the Care Plan dated 7/27/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at risk for falls related to impulsiveness, poor safety awareness, and history of falling. The following interventions were identified: follow facility fall protocol, anticipate and meet the resident's needs, be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it, the resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance, Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered, educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders, and the resident needs a safe environment with even floors free from spills and clutter, adequate glare free light, a working reachable call light, the bed in low position at night, siderails as ordered, handrails on walls, and personal items in reach.
Review of the Nursing Progress Notes dated 10/3/2021, revealed .The nurse was called to resident room at 11:00 AM due to resident having a fall in his room. Resident was noted to be sitting in the floor between the air conditioner and the bed .Denies any pain. Neuro checks were started and acceptable .
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/3/2021, revealed .This nurse was called to resident room by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] who was alerted by a housekeeper that resident was sitting in the floor between the air conditioner and the bed .
There was no Post Fall Review with interventions for this fall and the Care Plan was not revised to reflect this fall.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 10/8/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at low risk for falling.
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/9/2021, revealed .I walked in and observed the patient on his back and on the floor .He also stated that he bumped his head .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/9/2021, revealed the footwear, assistive devices, and safety interventions used at the time of the fall were shoes and slippers. The recommendation on this form was for the resident to wear shoes but according to the documentation on the form this intervention had previously been implemented.
The Post Fall Review is the facility's investigation and the resident's caregivers do not refer to this form for interventions.
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect this fall.
Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 still had a BIMs of 7, required supervision with his activities of daily living, had no functional limitations in range of motion, and had 1 fall without injury and 1 fall with minor injury since admission.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 10/22/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at high risk for falling.
Review of the Nursing Progress Note dated 10/22/2021, revealed .Resident noted sitting on floor. Resident examined .Denies pain. Neuro [neurological status] intact .
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/22/2021, revealed .Resident noted sitting on floor .Floor cleared of liquids .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/22/2021, revealed the footwear, assistive devices, and safety interventions used at the time of the fall were shoes. The intervention/recommendation was shoes which had been in place prior to this fall.
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect this fall.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if the intervention of wearing shoes/slippers prevented Resident #56 from falling. The DON stated, No .care plan was not updated . The DON was asked if the Care Plan was updated. The DON stated, No. The DON was asked if the staff should update the Care Plan with new interventions after a fall. The DON stated, Sure.
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/23/2021, revealed .I walked in the room and observed [Resident #56] sitting down on the floor beside his bed .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/23/2021, revealed the resident was wearing shoes and the intervention for this fall was for the resident to have footwear. This intervention was already in place.
The Care Plan was not revised to reflect new interventions after this fall.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 10/23/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at high risk for falling.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked if a new Care Plan intervention was implemented on 10/22/2021 to prevent any further falls. No .I don't see she [staff] updated the Care Plan.
Review of the Incident Report dated 10/25/2021, revealed .Resident was noted to be sitting in the floor at the foot of the bed by the chair. Legs curled to the side. Bare feet no shoes or non skid socks .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 10/25/2021, revealed .Resident slipped while walking from bed to chair without shoes or non slip socks .List the immediate fall prevention interventions .Non slip socks, call light in reach and instructed on use [Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairments] .
Review of Resident #56's Care Plan dated 10/25/2021, revealed .10/25/2021 Fall noted. Apply non-skid socks Date Initiated: 10/25/2021 . but the intervention was not placed on the Care Plan until 12/8/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked if there had been any new interventions implemented on the Care Plan to prevent the resident from falling after the fall on 10/25/2021. The DON stated, No .no new interventions .
Review of the Care Plan dated 10/27/2021, revealed Resident #56 had another fall on 10/27/2021. The interventions documented were .Keep phone and personal items on [in] reach Date Initiated: 10/27/2021 . This new intervention was not implemented and placed on the Care Plan until 12/8/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON confirmed there had been no new interventions implemented after the fall on 10/27/2021.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 10/27/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at high risk for falling.
Review of the Incident Report dated 11/8/2021, revealed .This nurse was called to the dining room on rehab [rehabilitation therapy] unit .observed resident sitting on buttocks on the floor with a dining room chair behind him .When asked resident if he was hurting anywhere, resident stated, 'My left hip hurts, I cannot move.' .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 11/8/2021, revealed the resident was wearing shoes at the time of the fall and the intervention was Physical Therapy and Restorative Nursing.
Review of the Radiology Report dated 11/8/2021, revealed .Acute intertrochanteric fracture [broken hip] of the proximal left femur is noted with minimal displacement .Limited range of motion in the left hip joint .
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 11/8/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at high risk for falling.
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/8/2021, revealed Resident #56 had another fall on 11/8/2021 with the intervention for staff to assist with transfers as allowed and tolerated. This Care Plan intervention was not documented until 12/8/2021 (1 month after Resident #56 fell). The resident was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. This intervention was documented on the Care Plan on 12/2/2021.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked why Resident #56 had been in the Rehabilitation Dining Room by himself. The DON stated, .it wasn't dinner time .he walked down the hall from his room unassisted. There is a big television in there . The DON was asked what interventions were implemented to prevent the resident from falling. The Regional Director of Clinical Services stated, .I don't think any intervention would have kept him from missing the chair. It was an isolated incident . The DON was asked if the resident was safe to ambulate unassisted. The DON stated, .He is care planned for aggressive behaviors .he'll swing at you if he feels like it and difficult to re-direct . The DON was asked if he was agitated during the incident. The DON stated, I don't know.
Review of the discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 still had a BIMS score of 7, required supervision with his activities of daily living, had no functional limitations, had 2 or more falls without injury, 2 or more falls with minor injury, and 1 fall with major injury since the prior assessment.
Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance with most of his activities of daily living, and had no falls since admission or prior assessment.
Review of the Nursing Progress Note dated 11/23/2021, revealed .During rounds CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] noted resident on floor. Resident immediately notified nurse of the incident .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 11/23/2021, revealed the resident was wearing socks at the time of the fall and the fall prevention intervention for this fall was to educate the resident to use the call light when attempting to transfer even though the resident had severe cognitive deficits.
Review of the Referral to Rehabilitation Services dated 11/23/2021, revealed .Resident stated he slipped while attempting to go to the restroom .Pt [Patient] currently on PT [Physical Therapy] /OT [Occupational Therapy]/ST [Speech Therapy] caseload for therapy. Pt's balance and safety awareness are being addressed .
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/23/2021, revealed Resident #56 had an actual fall on 11/23/2021 and the staff were to increase room rounds to assist with toileting. This intervention was not placed on the Care Plan until 12/8/2021.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 11/23/2021, revealed Resident #56 was a high risk for falling.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, the DON was asked if educating the resident about using the call light could be effective if the resident had a BIMS score of 3. The DON stated, .Some days he was really with it . The DON was asked if the Care Plan had been updated to reflect interventions to prevent the resident from falling. The DON stated, .He was referred to therapy . The DON was informed Resident #56 was in the therapy case load at this time. The DON stated, Oh.
Review of the Nursing Progress Notes dated 11/28/2021, revealed .12:10 PM this nurse was called to resident room to evaluate resident and assist to bed per request of his brother .had attempted to assist resident to the rollator seat beside his bed but was unable to do this .both advised he did not fall he sat him down .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 11/28/2021, revealed .Resident was sitting upright on his buttocks in the floor beside his bed with knees flexed and was laughing when I walked in the room. He said I'm in trouble .Resident was attempting to get to his rollator walker with the assistance of his brother . wearing non skid socks. The resident and his brother were .cautioned against transfer without staff assistance .
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/28/2021, revealed the resident had another fall on 11/28/2021 with interventions to .Encourage Family to ask for assistance when assisting Resident with transfers-Mats to bedside . This intervention was not placed on the Care Plan until 12/8/2021.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 11/28/2021, revealed Resident #56 was high risk for falling.
Review of the Referral to Rehab Services dated 11/29/2021, revealed .Brother tried to assist with walker and sat resident on floor .Pt is currently receiving skilled OT/PT/ST services at this time to address strength, balance, & safety. Resident is not safe to use walker/rollator at this time. Recommend removal [of walker/rollator] .
Review of the Incident Report dated 11/30/2021, revealed .I walked in room and observed patient on the floor .
Review of the Post Fall Review dated 11/30/2021, revealed the resident was wearing shoes and slippers. The immediate fall prevention interventions implemented were a .fall mat and call assessment .
Review of the Care Plan dated 11/30/2021, revealed Resident #56 had another fall on 11/30/2021 with interventions to .Keep in sight of staff as allowed and tolerated . The interventions were placed on the Care Plan on 12/8/2021.
Review of the Fall Risk Scale dated 11/30/2021, revealed Resident #56 was at high risk for falling.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/6/2021 at 2:45 PM, revealed Resident #56 lying in the B bed (by the window) with a sheet covering his bottom area. A rollator walker was at the foot of his bed next to the wall. Resident #56 was confused and alert to his name only.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/7/2021 at 8:55 AM and 3:30 PM, revealed Resident #56 lying in the B bed sleeping with the head of his bed raised. His roommate had his television on, and fall mats were on each side of the roommate's bed.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/8/2021 at 10:45 AM, revealed Resident #56 seated on the side of the B bed. His wheelchair was at the bedside.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 6:52 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 was asked which bed was Resident #56's bed. LPN #12 stated, B bed.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/9/2021 at 8:08 AM, revealed Resident #56 was seated in his wheelchair with a blanket wrapped around him. The rollator remained at the foot of his bed against the wall. The rollator had been recommended to be removed on 11/29/2021 by therapy.
During a telephone interview on 12/9/2021 at 8:13 AM, Resident #56's Physician was asked about Resident #56's fall record. The Physician stated, .I know he has fallen .they [facility] probably notified the Nurse Practitioner, I assumed they informed her .I saw him on 10/20/2021 for his low vitamin D labs .a vitamin D deficiency can potentially predispose the resident to fractures . The Physician was asked if Resident #56 had the cognitive ability to be educated. The Physician stated, .initially it appeared that he could be educated but if you talked to him long enough, well he doesn't make much sense . The Physician was asked if the facility should have put interventions in place to prevent the falls. The Physician stated, .should have put something in place .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 8:45 AM, the DON was asked if Resident #56's Care Plan should have been updated with new interventions. The DON stated, Yes. The DON was asked if the resident was wearing shoes, as documented in the Post Fall Reviews and if shoes were an appropriate intervention. The DON stated, No.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 beginning at 8:50 AM, in Resident #56's room, the DON was asked to identify Resident #56. The DON was informed Resident #56 had been observed on 12/6/2021, 12/7/2021, and 12/8/2021 in the bed by the window. The DON stated, .The resident was moved to the A bed [bed by the door] on Saturday. I guess they [staff] are not communicating because it hasn't been changed in the computer either. The DON was asked if the rollator walker should be in the resident's room if the therapist had recommended it to be removed. The DON stated, It should be removed. The DON was asked if the fall mats would be effective if they were on each side of the A bed when Resident #56 was in the B bed. The DON stated, No. The DON was asked if staff should be with Resident #56 when he was ambulating down the hall. The DON stated, .we can't stop him from ambulating .if staff try to assist him, he will go irate, swing at you, and curse you .staff may not see him . The DON was asked if she felt the interventions were implemented after each fall. The DON stated, No.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 10:45 AM, the Adult Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner (AGACNP) was asked if Resident #56 could be educated. The AGACNP stated, .I think there is a memory loss, but the staff should re-teach to call for assistance, but I don't think he'll remember . The AGACNP was asked if the facility should be implementing interventions. The AGACNP stated, .Yes, new interventions every time .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 9:15 AM, CNA #18 was asked which bed was Resident #56's bed. CNA #18 stated, .he was changed to the A bed .we are moving him today .
Observation in the resident's room on 12/9/2021 at 11:44 AM, revealed Resident #56 lying in the A bed wearing nonskid socks. There were floor mats noted on each side of his bed.
The facility's failure to provide appropriate interventions resulted in actual harm when Resident #56 sustained a fall which resulted in a fractured left femur.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care for residents in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care for residents in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #41 and #251) observed with an indwelling urinary catheter.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, revised 8/2009, revealed .Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality .Helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bag covered .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Urinary Tract Infection, Hypertension, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (blockage of the urinary tract), Neuropathic Bladder, and Heart Failure.
Review of the Physician's Orders dated 11/1/2021, revealed .Foley Catheter 18 Fr [French] with 10 cc [centimeters] bulb d/t [due to] Neurogenic bladder .
Review of the Physician's Orders dated 11/30/2021, revealed .Privacy bag to foley drainage bag every shift .
Observation in the resident's room on 12/6/2021 at 9:23 AM, 3:04 PM, and on 12/7/2021 at 8:08 AM and 2:25 PM, revealed Resident #41 had an indwelling urinary catheter with an uncovered catheter bag that contained amber urine hanging on the left side of the bed. The catheter bag was visible from the door into the hallway.
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Wedge Compression Fracture, Diabetes, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Malignant Neoplasm (tumor) of Prostate, Major Depressive Disorder, and Hypertension.
Review of the Physician's Orders dated 11/17/2021, revealed .Foley [catheter] OR Suprapubic catheter 16 FR with 10 cc balloon to bedside straight drainage .diagnosis/Hx [history] .malignant neoplasm of prostate .
Observation in the Rehabilitation Hallway on 12/6/2021 at 11:50 AM, revealed Resident #251 was being assisted by a staff member down the hall in his wheelchair. Resident #251 was holding his uncovered indwelling catheter bag that contained amber urine that was visible to anyone in the hallway.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/6/2021 at 3:32 PM, revealed an uncovered indwelling catheter bag hanging on the right side of the bed that contained amber urine.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/7/21 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #251 was receiving therapy in his wheelchair. His indwelling catheter bag was uncovered on the right side of the wheelchair and contained cloudy amber urine.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 2:24 PM, Unit Manager #1 confirmed that residents' urinary catheter bags should be covered.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 2:58 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the indwelling catheter bags should be covered.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide interventions to prote...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide interventions to protect other vulnerable residents from further abuse during an investigation of an altercation for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #10) reviewed for abuse.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 9/3/2020, revealed .Protection of Resident .facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Unsteadiness on Feet, and Parkinson's Disease.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment.
Review of the Care Plan dated 12/8/2021 revealed .12/08/2021 Aggressor: Resident to resident altercation. The resident [Resident #10] grabbed the first female resident and shook her multiple times. This resident caused the first female resident to lose her balance. The resident also grabbed a second female resident who responded by telling him to quit and striking him with an open palm .Interventions .12/8/21 Resident placed on 1:1 [1 on 1] supervision with a nurse. Awaiting psych [psychiatric] referral for transfer to a mental health facility for treatment and evaluation .
Review of the Incident Report dated 12/8/2021 at 12:45 PM, revealed .nurse walked into the hallway and observed this resident [Resident #10] hastily pushing another resident in her wheelchair .Resident continued to hold onto wheelchair .nurse asked resident to help with something, resident then let go of this residents [resident's] wheelchair. This resident then grabbed the arm of another resident, squeezed, and would not let go. While attempting to break free of hold, the other resident lost balance and fell .resident was again redirected, but grabbed another resident .and pushed her into the double door .Immediate Action Taken .1:1 monitoring began with this resident .
Observation on 12/8/2021 at 6:04 PM, revealed Resident #10 was ambulating down the hall in the Memory Care Unit without any staff present. Resident #64 was also walking down the hall and Resident #10 turned around, walked toward Resident #64 and stopped in front of Resident #10. Resident #64 yelled at Resident #10. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9 came out of a resident room, intervened, and assisted Resident #10 down the hall.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 3:46 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 stated, .I walked through the door [Named Activity Director] said he [Resident #10] was holding on a resident wheelchair .going back and forth in the Dining Room .said to let her go, he pushed her back and forth .I redirected him to help me with yard work and he let go of her and grabbed another wheelchair .and rolled her back and forth trying to take her out of the dining room .told him to let go .I was pushing her back in the dining room .he grabbed [Named Resident #64's] arm and her shirt and wouldn't let her go and had a tight grip .he let go and she fell in the process .she started wiggling and lost her balance .we initiated one on one .
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 3:47 PM, LPN #14 confirmed Resident #10 was on 1:1 and should not have been walking down the hall unattended by staff.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 9:06 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9 confirmed Resident #10 was in the hall by himself yesterday when she intervened between him and Resident #64. CNA #9 stated, .he was supposed to be on 1:1 .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 7:54 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked what staff were expected to do if a resident is 1:1 care. The DON stated, Should stay with them at all times .and close enough if they did something the staff member could intervene. The DON was asked if a resident that is 1:1 care should be left unattended, ambulating down the hall without staff. The DON stated, No.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an immobilizer as ordered for 1 of 7 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an immobilizer as ordered for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #11) reviewed for falls.
The finding included:
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Osteoporosis, Parkinson's Disease, Falls, Dysphagia, Tremor, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, and Adult Failure to Thrive.
Review of the Radiology Report dated 11/2/2021, revealed .CONCLUSION: Transverse lucency proximal metaphysics fourth metatarsal [possible broken bone in the foot] likely artifact [likely a defect in the image] .if there is clinical concern here immobilization [elimination of motion] and repeat x-ray in 10-14 days recommended .
Review of the Physician's Orders dated 11/5/2021, revealed .Place Left foot in immobilization foot brace for 2 weeks .
Review of the Radiology Report dated 11/17/2021, revealed .acute nondisplaced fracture distal diaphysis [main or midsection of the bone] 3rd, 4th, and fifth metatarsal bone .severe degree of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 1:58 PM, the Physical Therapy Assistant stated .she was supposed to have an immobilizer .never got one .
During a telephone interview on 12/9/2021 at 2:03 PM, the Rehabilitation Director stated, .I have called the [Named Company] .had a man come to take measurements . The Rehabilitation Director confirmed she could not provide any documentation that she had ordered the immobilizer.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 2:54 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the nurses are responsible for entering the orders in the computer system. The DON stated, .when the FNP [Family Nurse Practitioner] makes a recommendation for an immobilizer .they would give the referral to therapy .therapy would order it [the immobilizer] .she would order it [the immobilizer] through the Administrator for all DME [Durable Medical Equipment] . The DON confirmed that she is responsible for making sure the resident receives the care and equipment needed. The DON confirmed the facility should follow the Physician and Nurse Practitioner's recommendations and orders.
During a telephone interview on 12/9/2021 at 4:02 PM, the Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner stated, .I went back to see the resident .she did not have it [the immobilizer] on .I did not see it in the resident's room .I talked to the nurse .she did not know that she was to have an immobilizer .I went to the nurse and told her we need to figure out why she is not in the immobilizer .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care acco...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care according to the facility's policy 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #18) reviewed for tracheostomies.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Tracheostomy Care and Cleaning, revealed .Perform hand hygiene and provide privacy .Open trach [tracheostomy] tray and set on bedside table, position closest to resident. Maintain sterility .Open sterile saline container and pour into trach tray basin .Apply sterile gloves and face shield .Remove gloves, perform hand hygiene, and apply new pair of sterile gloves .Secure the outer cannula neck plate with index finger and thumb of non-dominant hand .replace the inner cannula .with dominant (clean) hand while stabilizing the outer flange of the cannula with non-dominant (dirty) hand .Cleanse around the tracheostomy site with applicator soaked in normal saline .change tracheal ties if needed .Discard soiled equipment, including gloves .perform hand hygiene .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure, Morbid Obesity, Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Failure, Heart Failure, Depression, and Anxiety.
Review of the Physician's Orders dated 8/4/2019, revealed .Trach [tracheostomy] care with sterile water and hydrogen peroxide every shift related to CHRONIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE .
Observation in the resident's room on 12/7/2021 at 1:59 PM, revealed Unit Manager #1 performed Resident #18's trach care. He washed his hands, gathered his supplies, placed a barrier on the over bed table, and placed the supplies of an inner cannula, mask, and sterile water on the overbed table. Unit Manager #1 donned his gloves, adjusted the head of the bed and the overbed table, removed his gloves, used hand sanitizer, and taped a red biohazard bag on the end of the bed. Unit Manager #1 removed his gloves, washed his hands and donned a new pair of gloves. He removed the tracheostomy ties and applied new ones while holding the neck plate in place. Unit Manager #1 then had the resident hold the neck plate in place with his bare hands. Unit Manager #1 removed the gloves, used hand sanitizer, donned a new pair of gloves, applied new tracheostomy ties, removed his gloves, and washed his hands. Unit Manager #1 then donned a new pair of gloves, removed the disposable inner cannula, removed his gloves, washed his hands, and donned a new pair of gloves. Unit Manager #1 inserted a new inner cannula, removed his gloves, used hand sanitizer, donned a new pair of gloves, and changed out the trach collar. The trach collar was heavily soiled, Unit Manager #1 removed his gloves, washed his hands, and changed and dated the mask.
Unit Manager #1 did not use a sterile trach tray and did not don sterile gloves and a face shield according to the facility's tracheostomy care and cleaning policy. Unit Manager #1 allowed Resident #18 to hold the neck plate in place with his bare hands. Unit Manager #1 did not clean around the tracheostomy site.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 2:46 PM, Unit Manager #1 confirmed he should have opened a sterile tray and donned sterile gloves during tracheostomy care.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 5:59 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the staff should use a sterile trach tray with sterile gloves and follow the facility's policy and procedure during tracheostomy care.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 staff nurses (Lic...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 staff nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 and #8) administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%) for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #67) observed during medication pass. A total of 4 medication errors were made out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 14.29 %.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated [DATE], revealed .Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection .If other than PO [by mouth] route, administer in accordance with facility policy for the relevant route of administration .identify expiration date and ensure medication is not expired .Observe resident consumption of medication .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure, Dysphagia, Seizures, Alzheimer's Disease, and Parkinson's Disease.
Review of the Physician's Order dated [DATE]-[DATE] revealed the following orders for medications:
a. Valproate Sodium 250mg (milligram) ml (milliliter) Give 2.5ml via (by way of) PEG (percutaneous endoscopic-gastrostomy) - Tube two times a day
b. Furosemide Tablet 40 MG 1 tablet via PEG-Tube one time a day
c. Haloperidol Tablet 2 MG 1 tablet via PEG-Tube two times a day
d. Aspirin EC (enteric coated) one time a day
e. Polyethylene Glycol 17 grams via PEG-Tube one time a day
f. Donepezil 5 MG 2 tablets via PEG-Tube one time a day
g. Docusate Sodium 100 MG 1 tablet via PEG-Tube two times a day
h. Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 MG 1 tablet via PEG-Tube one time a day
i. Guaifenesin Tablet 400 MG 1 tablet via PEG-Tube four times a day
k. Nasacort Aerosol 1 unit in both nostrils one time a day
l. Minocin Capsule 100 MG 1 capsule two times a day
Observation in the resident's room on [DATE] at 7:10 AM, revealed LPN #4 performed medication administration through a peg tube to Resident #67. LPN #4 left a small fragment of the undissolved iron tablet in one medication cup, pink liquid was left in one medication cup, and a white liquid substance was left in one medication cup. The medication residue left in the medication cups resulted in medication error #1, #2, and #3.
Observation in the resident's room on [DATE] at 5:43 PM, revealed LPN #8 performed medication administration through a peg tube to Resident #67. LPN #8 left a moderate amount of white residue in one of the medication cups. The medication residue left in the medication cup resulted in medication error #4.
During an interview on [DATE] at 7:10 AM, LPN #4 was shown the medication cups and was asked if there should be medications left in the cups. LPN #4 stated, .I should have added water till all the meds [medications] were gone .
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:43 PM, LPN #8 confirmed that she should not have left any residual in the bottom of the medication cup and that she did not give the entire dose of medication.
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:53 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the nursing staff should give the entire dose of medication during medication administration.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide and maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment as evidenced by overbed tables in disrepair in 1 of 3 Dining Room...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide and maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment as evidenced by overbed tables in disrepair in 1 of 3 Dining Rooms (Memory Care Unit).
The findings included:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance Service, revised 12/2009, revealed .Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment .Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards .
Observation in the Dining Room on the Memory Care Unit on 12/6/2021 at 11:12 AM, revealed 2 overbed tables with the vinyl peeled off the top of the table, the wood exposed, and one overbed table with vinyl completely missing and the top of the table revealed pressed wood.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 4:00 PM, the Maintenance Director was shown the three overbed tables that were in disrepair in the Dining Room and was asked if the overbed tables should be in this condition. The Maintenance Director stated, .no ma'am .I should pay more attention .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0924
(Tag F0924)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment when the handrails in the hallway were lo...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment when the handrails in the hallway were loose and not secured to the wall for 1 of 5 hallways (Rehabilitation Hallway).
The findings include:
Observation on the Rehabilitation Hallway on 12/6/2021 at 10:37 AM and on 12/7/2021 at 10:23 AM and 2:31 PM, revealed the handrail between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 15 had plastic pieces protruding from the wall with sharp edges and the handrail between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 12 was hanging off the wall with the screws and sheet rock visible.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the handrails should not be hanging loose from the wall and should not have sharp plastic pieces coming from the wall.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 3:09 PM, the Maintenance Director confirmed he could not provide a work order to have the damaged handrails on the Rehabilitation Hallway repaired. The Maintenance Director confirmed the handrail should not be hanging loose from the wall and should not have sharp plastic pieces coming from the wall.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 3:14 PM, the Maintenance Director confirmed there were no work orders in the Maintenance Tracking System (TELS) and there were no handwritten work orders to repair the damaged handrails on the Rehabilitation Hallway at this time.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0569
(Tag F0569)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident personal funds accounts review, policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to no...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident personal funds accounts review, policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the family and/or resident when the amount in the resident's account exceeded the eligibility limit for 7 of 64 residents (Resident #6, #12, #34, #38, #48, #53, and #75) personal fund account statements reviewed.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Personal Funds,dated 3/21/2021, revealed .The facility must notify each resident that receives Medicaid benefits: a. When the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the SSI [Social Security Income] resource limit for one person b. If the amount in the account, in addition to the value of the resident's other nonexempt resources, reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Mild Intellectual Disabilities, Peripheral Disease, and Hypertension.
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape (resident personal fund account) revealed Resident #6 had the following balances in the personal funds account:
a. On 7/2/2021 Resident #6 had a closing balance of $6,851.14.
b. On 8/4/2021 Resident #6 had a closing balance of $6,742.42.
c. On 9/9/2021 Resident #6 had a closing balance of $6,792.72.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 5:45 PM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated, .we are in the process of getting him new stuff .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Schizoaffective Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension.
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape revealed the following:
a. On 7/30/2021 Resident #12 had a closing balance of $3,479.25.
b. On 8/17/2021 Resident #12 had a closing balance of $3,460.98.
c. On 9/24/2021 Resident #12 had a closing balance of $3,430.15.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 5:45 PM, the BOM stated, .the Social Worker is supposed to be getting him a burial policy .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia Following a Cerebral Infarction, Hypertension, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape revealed the following:
a. On 7/20/2021 Resident #34 had a closing balance of $3,355.61.
b. On 8/30/2021 Resident #34 had a closing balance of $3,656.08.
c. On 9/3/2021 Resident #34 had a closing balance of $3,992.23.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 5:45 PM, the BOM stated, .we [facility] are trying to get conservatorship over him so we can get a burial set up .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's Disease, and Diabetes Mellitus,
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape revealed the following:
a. On 7/30/2021 Resident #38 had a closing balance of $3,444.23.
b. On 8/31/2021 Resident #38 had a closing balance of $3,289.38.
c. On 9/28/2021 Resident #38 had a closing balance of $3,100.96.
During an interview conducted on 12/9/2021 at 5:45 PM, the BOM stated, .the family knows what the balance is and doesn't want to spend down .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Vascular Dementia, Hypertension, and Diabetes Mellitus.
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape revealed the following:
a. On 7/2/2021 Resident #48 had a closing balance of $5,951.36.
b. On 8/13/2021 Resident #48 had a closing balance of $5,976.59.
c. On 9/10/2021 Resident #48 had a closing balance of $6,015.56.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 5:45 PM, the BOM stated, .On April 21, 2021 we spoke with the daughter about putting money towards a burial policy .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia Following a Cerebral Infarction, Vascular Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension.
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape revealed the following:
a. On 7/2/2021 Resident #53 had a closing balance of $5,156.39.
b. On 8/3/2021 Resident #53 had a closing balance of $5,206.61.
c. On 9/3/2021 Resident #53 had a closing balance of $5,256.83.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 5:45 PM, the BOM stated, .the family is supposed to be getting her a burial policy .
Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Schizophrenia.
Review of the Resident Statement Landscape revealed the following:
a. On 7/30/2021 Resident #75 had a closing balance of $2,869.49.
b. On 8/9/2021 Resident #75 had a closing balance of $2,749.47.
c. On 9/3/2021 Resident #75 had a closing balance of $2,622.40.
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 6:35 PM, the BOM was asked if she was aware and educated the residents' families on the outcome if the resident's funds exceed the resource limit. The BOM stated, .they could lose their Medicaid benefits .I spoke with the Social Worker and she doesn't have any notes either that documented the conversations she had with the family members encouraging them to spend down the resident accounts .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 7:54 PM, the Administrator was asked what monetary limit of funds the residents can have in their accounts without risking losing their Medicaid. The Administrator stated, Anything close to 1800 hundred that is our bench mark .have to call family members to make authorization to spend it .
The facility failed to provide documentation that the residents and/or families were notified when the resident personal funds accounts reached $200.00 less than the SSI resource limit.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was clean, comfortable, and sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was clean, comfortable, and sanitary when overbed tables were in disrepair in 8 of 80 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #18, #204, #208, #209, #211, #212, and #213) observed.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance Service, revised 12/2009, revealed .Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards .
Observation during initial tour on 12/6/2021 beginning at 9:05 AM, revealed the following:
a. room [ROOM NUMBER] A-an overbed table with peeling vinyl and the wood was visible.
b. room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B-the overbed tables had peeling vinyl.
c. room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B-the overbed tables had peeling vinyl and the wood was visible.
d. room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B-the overbed tables were missing part of the vinyl and the wood was visible.
e. room [ROOM NUMBER] B-overbed table with peeling vinyl and the wood was visible.
f. room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B-the overbed tables had portions of the vinyl missing and the wood was visible.
Observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] A on 12/6/2021 at 10:19 AM, revealed the vinyl around the edges of the table were missing.
Observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] A on 12/7/2021 at 2:25 PM, revealed an overbed table in disrepair and the brown plastic top coating of polyethylene (vinyl) was peeled off on three fourths of the sides of the overbed table.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 1:30 PM, Resident #89 (in room [ROOM NUMBER] B) confirmed she had put orange tape on her overbed table due to it .scratches my fingers and hands .
During interview on 12/7/2021 at 4:00 PM, the Maintenance Director was shown the overbed tables in the residents' rooms, and he stated, They do look bad .I will try to do better .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the Medications with Shortened Expiration Dates, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the Medications with Shortened Expiration Dates, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly in 5 of 11 medication carts (Rehab (Rehabilitation) Unit Medication Cart #5, Rehab Unit Medication Cart #6, Heritage Way Medication Cart #2, Heritage Way Medication Cart #1, and Memory Care Unit Medication Cart #3) and 1 of 6 nurses (Unit Manager #2) failed to ensure medications were not left unattended and out of sight during medication pass observations.
The findings include:
Review of the MEDICATIONS WITH SHORTENED EXPIRATION DATES provided by MED PASS, revealed Fluticasone/salmeterol (Advair) expires 30 days after removing from the protective wrap, Combivent expires 3 months after the first actuation, Incruse expires 6 weeks after opening the foil tray, Serevent expires 6 weeks after removal from the moisture protective overwrap, Pulmicort expires 6 weeks after removal from the aluminum pouch, Spiriva expires 3 months after the first use, Humalog and Lantus expires 28 days after the first use or removal from the refrigerator, whichever comes first.
Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated [DATE], revealed .During a medication pass, medication must be under the direct observation or locked in the medication storage area/cart .The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defected, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible or missing labels. These medications are destroyed .
Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated [DATE], revealed .Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection .identify expiration date and ensure medication is not expired .
Observation of the Rehab Unit Medication Cart #5 on [DATE] at 9:52 AM, revealed the following:
a. One open and undated Admelog Lispro insulin pen
b. One open and undated Advair Diskus
Observation of the Rehab Unit Medication Cart #6 on [DATE] at 10:05 AM, revealed the following:
a. One open and undated Semglee insulin Glargine pen
b. One open and undated Semglee insulin Glargine pen
c. One open and undated Lispro insulin pen
d. One open and undated Fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler
Observation of the Heritage Way Medication Cart #2 on [DATE] at 10:47 AM, revealed the following:
a. One open and undated Lispro insulin pen
b. One Semglee insulin Glargine pen with an open date of [DATE]
c. One Lispro insulin pen with an open date of [DATE]
Observation of the Heritage Way Medication Cart #1 on [DATE] at 11:04 AM, revealed the following:
a. Two Novolog insulin pens with an open date of [DATE]
b. Three open and undated Lispro Insulin pens
c. Two open and undated Humalog pens
d. Two open and undated Humulin 70/30 pens
e. One open and undated Glargine insulin pens
f. One open and undated vial of Lantus
g. One open and undated Basaglar KwikPen
h. One Semglee insulin Glargine with an open date of [DATE]
i. One open and undated Incruse Ellipta inhaler
j. One open and undated Fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler
k. One open and undated Serevent inhaler
Observation of the Memory Unit Medication Cart #3 on [DATE] 05:49 PM, revealed the following:
a. One Amelog insulin pen with and open date of [DATE]
b. One open and undated Pulmicort inhaler
c. One open and undated Spiriva inhaler
Observation in the resident's room on [DATE] at 8:13 AM, revealed Unit Manager #2 entered Resident #252's room and placed a bag of intravenous antibiotic and the supplies on the resident's over bed table. Unit Manager #2 went into the resident's bathroom, washed her hands, and left the medication out sight and unattended.
During an interview on [DATE] at 11:04 AM, LPN #9 confirmed that the insulin and inhalers should have an open date when opened.
During an interview on [DATE] at 6:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the Pharmacist comes to check the medication cart monthly. The DON confirmed that insulin without an open date or medications that have expired past their open date should not be in the medication carts. The DON confirmed that inhalers should be dated when opened.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:17 AM, Unit Manager #2 confirmed that she should not have left the resident's medication on the overbed table out of sight when she went into the bathroom and washed her hands.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide hand hygiene for residents before dining for 5 of 98 residents (Resident #16, #52, #200, #201, and #202) reviewed during dining obser...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide hand hygiene for residents before dining for 5 of 98 residents (Resident #16, #52, #200, #201, and #202) reviewed during dining observations.
The findings include:
Observation in the resident's room on 12/6/2021 at 11:45 AM, revealed Resident #16 was served his lunch tray and was observed eating his lunch with his fingers. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN) did not encourage the resident to perform hand hygiene and did not offer to perform hand hygiene for Resident #52 prior to eating his meal.
Observation in the resident's room on the Isolation Unit on 12/6/2021 at 6:05 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #4 placed a Styrofoam dinner tray on Resident #200's overbed table. The RN did not encourage the resident to perform hand hygiene and did not offer to perform hand hygiene for Resident #200 prior to eating the meal.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/6/2021 at 6:40 PM, revealed Resident #52 was served his meal tray and was observed eating lunch with his fingers. The CNAs did not encourage the resident to perform hand hygiene prior to eating the meal and did not offer to perform hand hygiene for the resident prior to eating the meal.
Observation in the resident's room on the Isolation Unit on 12/6/2021 at 6:05 PM, RN #4 placed a Styrofoam dinner tray with on Resident #201's overbed table. The RN did not encourage the resident to perform hand hygiene and did not offer to perform hand hygiene for the resident before the resident's meal.
Observation in the resident's room on the Isolation Unit on 12/6/2021 at 6:05 PM, RN #4 placed a Styrofoam dinner tray on Resident #202's overbed table. The RN did not encourage the resident to perform hand hygiene and did not offer to perform hand hygiene for the resident before the meal.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/8/2021 at 11:31 AM, revealed Resident #52 seated in his wheelchair in preparation for the meal tray. Resident #52's fingernails had an unknown black substance under the nails. The CNA placed the meal tray in front of the resident and failed to wash Resident #52's hands. Resident #52 was observed eating his meal with his fingers.
During an interview on 12/6/2021 at 6:40 PM, Resident #52 confirmed the staff does not wash his hands before and after each meal. The resident stated, .I eat with fingers all the time .I can find it [food] better .but if I have cereal, I eat it with a spoon .
During an interview on 12/6/2021 at 6:42 PM, CNA #16 confirmed she did not cleanse Resident #52's hands before serving his meal tray.
During an interview on 12/6/2021 at 6:49 PM, CNA #14 stated, .he [Resident #52] is blind .we should use the clock method to explain his meal plate .we should always wash, rinse, and dry the resident's hands before and after their meal .
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, .tell them [residents] wash their hands before and after each meal .
During an interview with the DON on 12/9/2021 at 9:25 AM, the DON was asked if the residents' hands should be cleaned prior to serving a meal. The DON stated, Yes.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to deliver meal trays to residents in a timely manner which resulted in delayed mealtimes on 5 of 5 halls (100 Hall, 200 Hall, 3...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to deliver meal trays to residents in a timely manner which resulted in delayed mealtimes on 5 of 5 halls (100 Hall, 200 Hall, 300 Hall, 400 Hall, and the Rehabilitation Hall). This failure had the potential to affect 98 of the 100 residents who received a meal tray.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Frequency of Meals, dated 7/2017, revealed .Meals will be served .to help assure that residents receive nutritional requirements. The following meal times have been established by our facility for residents: Breakfast 7 AM [7:00 AM] Start .Lunch 11 AM [11:00 AM] Start .Dinner 5 PM [5:00 PM] Start .
Observation of the Rehabilitation Hall meal cart revealed the cart was delivered to the unit on 12/6/2021 at 6:19 PM (1 hour and 19 minutes late).
Observation of the 300 Hall meal cart revealed the cart was delivered to the 300 Hall on 12/6/2021 at 6:30 PM (1 hour and 30 minutes late).
Observation of the 100/400 Hall meal cart revealed the cart was delivered to the 100/400 Hall on 12/6/2021 at 6:40 PM (1 hour and 40 minutes late).
Observation of the 200 Hall meal cart revealed the cart was delivered to the 200 Hall on 12/6/2021 at 6:45 PM (1 hour and 45 minutes late).
During an interview on 12/6/2021 at 6:50 PM, the Dietary Manager confirmed the dinner trays on 12/6/2021 were scheduled to be served at 5:00 PM. The Dietary Manager stated, .time got away from me .we started supper over an hour late .the dinner trays should have been served at 5 [5:00] PM, with the last cart served at 5:30 PM .the dinner trays were over an hour late .
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, policy review, Staff Screening Tool review, Daily Schedule Report review, and Timecard Detail review, observation, and interview, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, policy review, Staff Screening Tool review, Daily Schedule Report review, and Timecard Detail review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the spread of infection were maintained when 3 of 7 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 and #8, and Unit Manger #2) failed to perform proper hand hygiene during medication administration and discarded a needle into the trash for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #2, #67, and #252) reviewed for medication pass observations and failed to follow Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Infection Control guidelines to ensure all staff who enter the facility completed the screening process for the prevention and potential spread of COVID 19 when 28 of 108 staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) #1 and #2, LPN #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15, Housekeeper #1 and #2, and Laundry Technician #2) failed to complete the screening log prior to working on 7 of 14 days (11/21/2021, 11/22/2021, 11/23/2021, 11/24/2021, 11/25/2021, 11/26/2021, and 12/4/2021) reviewed. This had the potential to affect the 100 residents residing in the facility.
The findings include:
Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines titled, Recommended routine infection prevention and control (IPC) practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, updated 9/10/2021, revealed .Establish a process to identify anyone entering the facility, regardless of their vaccination status, who has any of the following so that they can be properly managed .1) a positive viral test for SARS-CoV-2, 2) symptoms of COVID-19, or 3) who meets criteria for quarantine or exclusion from work .Options could include (but are not limited to): individual screening on arrival at the facility; or implementing an electronic monitoring system in which individuals can self-report any of the above before entering the facility .
Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised 8/2015, revealed .Vigorously lather hands with soap and rub them together .for a minimum of 20 seconds .Rinse hands thoroughly under running water .Dry hands thoroughly under running water .Dry hands thoroughly with paper towels and then turn off faucets with a clean, dry paper towel .
Review of the facility's policy titled, COVID-19 Standard of Practice (SOP), revised 8/16/2021, revealed, .Complete infection control education and screening questionnaires for all employees, visitors, outpatients, contractors who attempt to enter facility. The screening will include temperature and other possible symptoms of COVID19 .Have designated facility employee at main entrance providing screening and offering education handouts, if possible .
Observation in the resident's room on 12/8/2021 at 7:10 AM, revealed LPN #4 performed medication administration on Resident #67 through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg tube) tube. LPN #4 placed medications on the overbed table, washed her hands and turned the faucet off using the same paper towel. LPN #4 donned new gloves, poured water into each medication cup, then went to the medication cart, obtained her stethoscope, and cleaned it with a bleach wipe. LPN #4 washed her hands, turned the faucet off using the same paper towel and donned new gloves. LPN #4 administered medications, removed her gloves, washed her hands, and turned off the faucet using the same paper towel.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/8/2021 at 8:13 AM, revealed Unit Manger #2 gathered Intravenous (IV) line supplies and placed them on Resident #252's overbed table which appeared dirty. The Unit Manger went into the bathroom, washed her hands, and turned off the faucet with the same paper towel. Unit Manger #1 placed the medication on the IV pole, donned gloves, wiped the overbed table with a disinfectant wipe, removed her gloves, washed her hands, and turned off the faucet with the same paper towel.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 10:17 AM, Unit Manager #2 was asked if the resident's medications should have been placed on the resident's dirty over bed table. Unit Manager #2 stated, No, should have wiped the table off . Unit Manager #2 was asked if she should use the same paper towel, she had dried her hands with to turn off the faucet. Unit Manager #2 stated, No.
Observation in the resident's room on 12/8/2021 at 8:50 AM, revealed LPN #8 washed her hands prior to medication administration and turned the faucet off using the same paper towel she had used to dry her hands. After injecting Resident #2 with her prescribed insulin, LPN #8 placed the needle from the insulin pen into the resident's trash.
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 8:55 AM, LPN #8 was asked if the syringe should have been discarded in the resident's trash. LPN #8 stated, .no, I should not have .
During an interview on 12/9/2021 at 9:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked how staff should wash their hands. The DON stated, They should turn on faucet and let the water run, scrub hand 20-30 seconds .dry hands with paper towel and use a dry towel to turn off the faucet. The DON confirmed staff should not use the same paper towel to dry their hands.
Review of the facility's Staff Screening Tool, Daily Schedule Report, and Timecard Detail Report from 11/21/2021-12/4/2021, revealed the following employees worked on the following days and failed to screen for signs and symptoms of COVID-19.
a. 11/21/2021 - LPN #1 and LPN #2; CNA #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5.
b. 11/22/2021 - LPN #3 and #4; CNA #13 and #14.
c. 11/23/2021 - LPN #5 and CNA #15.
d. 11/24/2021 - LPN #1, #6, and #8; CNA #2, #6, #8, and #9; Housekeeper #1; and Laundry Technician #2.
e. 11/25/2021 - RN #2; CNA #2, #3, #10, and #11
f. 11/26/2021 - LPN #2; CNA #12 and #13; and Housekeeper #2
g. 12/4/2021 - RN #1; LPN #1, #6 and #7; CNA #2, #3, and #7.
During an interview on 12/7/2021 at 3:50 PM, Unit Manager #2 and the Infection Preventionist were asked who audited the screening logs to make sure all staff were screening for COVID-19 prior to entering the building. Unit Manager #2 stated, .I audit the screening logs every 3 weeks or so .
During an interview on 12/8/2021 at 8:25 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) was asked whose responsibility it was to make sure staff screens for COVID-19 prior to entering the facility. The BOM stated, .it's my responsibility to make sure everyone screens. I have 2 receptionist that know they are to make sure everyone that enters the building screens .