PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING

401 PRINCETON ROAD, JOHNSON CITY, TN 37601 (423) 975-1800
For profit - Corporation 47 Beds SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#35 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating that it is highly recommended and performing well compared to other facilities. It ranks #35 out of 298 nursing homes in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 8 in Washington County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility's trend is stable, with only one issue reported in both 2019 and 2025, showing consistency in quality. Staffing is fairly average with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars, but a 0% turnover rate is impressive, indicating that staff members are likely to stay long-term and are familiar with the residents. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, and the facility boasts more RN coverage than 98% of Tennessee facilities, ensuring better oversight of resident care. However, there are some concerns to consider. An inspector found that staff did not wear appropriate beard coverings or follow hand hygiene practices during food preparation in 2019, which could risk the health of residents. In 2025, expired blood collection tubes were discovered in a medication room, indicating potential lapses in medication management. These incidents highlight areas where improvements are needed, but overall, the facility has strong ratings and a good reputation.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Tennessee
#35/298
Top 11%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 95 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Tennessee nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to dispose of expired blood collection tubes i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to dispose of expired blood collection tubes in one medication room (400-500 hall medication room) of one medication room observed for medication storage. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage dated 1/2025, revealed .biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturers or provider .recommendation .storage conditions .monitored on a regular basis as a random quality assurance .check .problems are identified, recommendations are made for corrective action to be taken . During an observation of the 400-500 hall medication room on [DATE] at 1:04 PM, revealed 9- 3 milliliter (ml) blue top blood collection tubes with an expiration date of [DATE] and 28- 4 mL green top blood collection tubes with an expiration date of [DATE] were stored in medication room and was available for resident use. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 1:09 PM, the Corporate Care Consultant Nurse observed the 9- 3 mL blue top blood collection tubes, confirmed the expiration date was [DATE]. Continued observation and interview with the Corporate Care Consultant Nurse stated the expiration date on the 28- 4 mL green top blood collection tubes was [DATE]. The Corporate Care Consultant Nurse further stated he would reach out to a representative with their contracted laboratory to discuss the date on the blood collection tubes. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:20 PM, the Corporate Care Consultant Nurse confirmed the 9- 3 mL blue top blood collection tubes and the 28- 4 mL green top blood collection tubes were expired and were available for resident use.
Jul 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate beard coverings during food preparation and failed to ensure staff followed appropriat...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate beard coverings during food preparation and failed to ensure staff followed appropriate hand hygiene practices during meal preparation in 1 of 1 kitchen observed; potentially affecting 42 of 43 residents. The findings include: Review of facility policy HANDWASHING AND GLOVE USE, last revised 2/1/14, revealed .Hands must be washed .when working with different food substances .and following contact with unsanitary surface .opening doors .Gloves must be changed as often as hands need to be washed .Gloves may be used for one task only .It is important to remember that gloves can often give a false sense of security and can carry germs the same as our hands . Review of facility policy Personal Hygiene, last revised 7/5/18 revealed .Beards or any body hair that may be exposed .must be covered . Observation of the kitchen during meal preparation on 7/29/19 from 11:55-12:25 PM, revealed the Chef and Kitchen Staff #1 with beards. Further observation revealed the Chef and Kitchen Staff #1 did not wear a beard covering during food preparation. Continued observation revealed a cooking utensil fell into a bin containing pork chops with liquid. Further observation revealed the Chef removed the wet utensil from the pork chop bin with a gloved hand, then proceeded to retrieve a piece of bread from a plastic bag, placed the bread on a plate, opened the door to the hot box, retrieved broccoli from the hot box, and placed it in the steamer wearing the same glove. Interview with the Certified Dietary Manager on 7/31/19 at 1:30 PM, in the conference room, confirmed the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene practice during food service and failed to ensure facial hair was covered during meal preparation. Further interview confirmed the facility failed to follow facility policy.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Tennessee.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living Staffed?

CMS rates PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING during 2019 to 2025. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living?

PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 47 certified beds and approximately 42 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in JOHNSON CITY, Tennessee.

How Does Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living Stick Around?

PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living Ever Fined?

PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living on Any Federal Watch List?

PRINCETON TRANSITIONAL CARE & ASSISTED LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.