ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Asbury Place Kingsport has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is decent and slightly above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #113 out of 298 in Tennessee, placing it in the top half of the state, and #3 out of 7 in Sullivan County, meaning there are only two local options that are better. The facility is showing improvement, with issues decreasing from four in 2023 to just one in 2024. Staffing is rated as average with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 50%, which is close to the state average of 48%. However, the facility has concerning fines of $23,604, which are higher than 84% of other Tennessee facilities, suggesting potential compliance issues. On the positive side, Asbury Place boasts good RN coverage, exceeding that of 92% of state facilities, which is crucial for catching potential problems. However, there have been issues such as failing to properly discard expired food items and not ensuring dishes were cleaned in a sanitary manner, which could affect resident safety. Additionally, there was a failure to submit required follow-up reports to the state after an investigation, indicating some lapses in protocol. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and RN coverage, families should be aware of the facility's past compliance issues.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Tennessee
- #113/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $23,604 in fines. Higher than 82% of Tennessee facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 51 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Tennessee. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Tennessee average (2.8)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Tennessee avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview the facility failed to subm...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly contained in 1 of 4 dumpsters.
The findings include:
Review of facility polic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene practices were followed during meal service on 1 of 3 hallways observed during meal ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in good repair in 1 of 2 kitchens.
The findings include:
Review of the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were discarded and failed to ensure food was properly stored in a walk-in freezer in 1 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2020
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (#1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2018
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess 1 resident (#3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure POLST (physician orders life...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure proper administ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on the manufacturer's instruction review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dishes were cleaned in a sanitary manner for 34 of 52 residents on census.
The findings inclu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $23,604 in fines. Higher than 94% of Tennessee facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Asbury Place Kingsport's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Asbury Place Kingsport Staffed?
CMS rates ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Asbury Place Kingsport?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT during 2018 to 2024. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Asbury Place Kingsport?
ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ASBURY COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 67 certified beds and approximately 33 residents (about 49% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in KINGSPORT, Tennessee.
How Does Asbury Place Kingsport Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Asbury Place Kingsport?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Asbury Place Kingsport Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Asbury Place Kingsport Stick Around?
ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Asbury Place Kingsport Ever Fined?
ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT has been fined $23,604 across 5 penalty actions. This is below the Tennessee average of $33,315. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Asbury Place Kingsport on Any Federal Watch List?
ASBURY PLACE KINGSPORT is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.