NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE

809 EAST EMERALD AVE, KNOXVILLE, TN 37917 (865) 524-7366
For profit - Limited Liability company 127 Beds NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
35/100
#143 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: March 2023

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

NHC Healthcare in Knoxville has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. They rank #143 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing them in the top half, but their high number of fines at $33,716 raises red flags, as this is more than 83% of other facilities in the state. Although the facility's trend is improving-cutting down issues from 7 in 2023 to 1 in 2024-staff turnover is concerning at 64%, which is above the state average, meaning many staff members leave frequently. While RN coverage is better than 89% of state facilities, recent inspections found serious issues, including incidents of resident abuse where one resident choked another, and failures in kitchen sanitation, which could affect residents' health. Overall, while there are some strengths, such as good RN coverage and an improving trend, the facility has significant weaknesses that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
35/100
In Tennessee
#143/298
Top 47%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$33,716 in fines. Lower than most Tennessee facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 52 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Tennessee. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 7 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Tennessee average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 64%

18pts above Tennessee avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $33,716

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (64%)

16 points above Tennessee average of 48%

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Nov 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of facility investigations, observations and interviews, the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of facility investigations, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (Residents #1, #7, #9, and #3) were free from physical abuse during 4 separate resident versus resident altercations of 23 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the Administrative Procedures Manual, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, dated [DATE], revealed .Abuse: the willful infliction of injury .Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm .Physical Abuse: includes hitting, slapping, pinching and kicking . 1. Review of the medical records and facility investigation documentation revealed a resident-versus-resident altercation occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #2 on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertensive Disease, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, Adult Failure to Thrive, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Anxiety and Delusional Disorders. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 5:05 PM, revealed .Resident [#1] yelling let go of my hair staff [Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA R] witnessed another resident [Resident #2] pulling her [Resident #1's] hair, and immediately separated residents [Resident #1 and Resident #2]. NP [Nurse Practitioner], Psych [psychiatric] provider, Administration [Director of Nursing-DON], SS [Social Services], and family [of Resident #1] made aware. Resident [#1] assessed with no injuries noted. Resident [#1] stated 'my head hurts.' Tylenol offered per order and accepted. Resident [#1] provided a safe calm environment . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 5:49 PM, revealed .Resident [#1] alert and verbal. Denies pain or discomfort at this time, resident [#1] states 'I'm fine, its [it's] not a big deal, she [Resident #2] dont [don't] know what shes [she's] [Resident #2] doing.' Resident [#1] has no changes in range of motion to head neck or upper body at this time. Will continue to observe for changes and provide a safe calm environment . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 1:41 AM, revealed .Resident [#1] resting on bed .No signs of injuries noted from recent incident. No complaints of pain . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 9:30 AM, revealed .moves extremities per usual with minimal discomfort noted to left side of neck. Resident cheerful and pleasant . Review of the Social Services Progress Note for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 10:24 AM, revealed the resident reported she was okay. Resident #1 verbalized she was not afraid of Resident #2. Review of the Physician Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 11:27 AM, revealed .regulatory visit today, and also to follow-up on a patient incident that happened yesterday evening .Yesterday evening another patient [Resident #2] with known Dementia became agitated and pulled her [Resident #1's] hair . A cervical spine x-ray was ordered and revealed .Degenerative changes are identified. Postsurgical .hardware seen .cervical spine. No fracture dislocation or bony destructive lesions [abnormality in bone tissue] are identified . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 3:04 PM, revealed .Resident sitting up in dining room participating in activities. No c/o pain or discomfort .pleasant and interacting with other resident . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 8:15 PM, revealed the resident denied pain and discomfort . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Severe Dementia with Anxiety, Senile Degeneration of Brain and Delusional Disorder. The resident expired on [DATE]. Review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 scored 99 on the BIMS assessment, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident experienced hallucinations and exhibited behaviors not directed toward others (hitting or scratching self or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive) during the assessment period. Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #2 dated [DATE] at 4:57 PM, revealed .Resident [#2] noted to have pulled another resident's [#1] hair as seen by staff [CNA R], and hearing the other resident [Resident #1] say 'let go of my hair.' Residents [Resident #1 and Resident #2] immediately separated. Administration [DON], SS, Psych provider, and NP made aware. [Resident #1's] Family and hospice also made aware. Resident [#1] will be moved to 3rd floor . Review of a comprehensive care plan for Resident #2 dated [DATE], revealed .Behaviors .false beliefs .yelling .worry about babies .pulling other resident's hair .room change to third floor .Provide patient with calm environment and remove from high traffic areas during periods of anxiety and agitation. Provide one on one care as needed .provide 1:1 as needed when resident may have aggressive episodes towards others . Review of the witness statement by CNA R dated [DATE], revealed .[Resident #1] yelling for help [on 200 hall] [Resident #2] had her hands in [Resident #1's] hair. Had to physically open [Resident #2's] hands to remove [Resident #1's] hair. Brought [Resident #2] back to her room. [Resident #2] Been one on one since . Review of the Physician Progress Notes for Resident #2 dated [DATE] at 11:08 AM, revealed .Patient [Resident #2] seen today due to an incident that happened yesterday evening. Evidently, she became agitated while being weighed and then reached out and grabbed another resident's [Resident #1] hair and pulled it .Today I find her [Resident #2] in bed relaxed with her eyes closed . During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 8:55 AM, Resident #1 stated Resident #2 had pulled her hair during activities 7 or 8 months ago. The resident did not voice concerns of pain or discomfort following the incident with Resident #2. Resident #1 stated the facility investigated the incident, she felt safe, and was not afraid of anyone in the facility. 2. Review of a facility investigation dated [DATE], revealed a resident versus resident altercation occurred between Resident #7 and Resident #8. Review of a facility investigation dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 was seated in her wheelchair and was observed patting Resident #7's hand, also seated in a wheelchair. Resident #7 moved Resident #8's hand at which time Resident #8 hit Resident #7 in the face. The residents were immediately separated. The MD/NP (Medical Doctor/Nurse Practitioner), families, Ombudsman, police, and state agency were notified. The residents were assessed for injury with none noted. Residents with a BIMS score greater than 8 were interviewed for abuse, residents with a BIMS score less than 8 received skin assessments. Staff who provided care for the residents were also interviewed to determine if the residents had exhibited behaviors prior to the altercation, no concerns were identified. Resident #7 expired in the facility on [DATE], Resident #8 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease and Dementia with Anxiety. Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #7 scored 1 on the BIMS assessment, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed the facility identified Resident #7 was at risk for behaviors with interventions and monitoring implemented. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Chronic Kidney Disease and Vascular Dementia with Anxiety. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 scored 6 on the BIMS assessment, indicating the resident had significant cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed the resident had delusions (beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality) and verbal behavior symptoms directed toward others. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed the facility had identified Resident #8 was at risk for behaviors .hitting others . During an interview on [DATE] at 12:50 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN C) she confirmed she had assessed Resident #7 and #8 for injuries with none noted, and Resident #8 was immediately relocated to a different room. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 9:00 AM, CNA L confirmed he witnessed the altercation. The CNA stated .it appeared as if [Resident #8] swiped something off of [Resident #7's] face, it was not a smack . 3. Review of a facility investigation dated [DATE], revealed a resident versus resident altercation occurred between Resident #9 and Resident #10. Resident #10 entered Resident #9's room and confronted him about his (Resident #9) behavior of cursing facility employees. A CNA heard Resident #9 and Resident #10 exchange words and alerted the nurse. The residents were immediately separated and assessed for injury, with none noted. Resident #9 reported Resident #10 hit him on the leg. The Administrator, DON, MD/NP, families, state agency, police, and Ombudsman were notified. Residents with a BIMS score 8 or greater were interviewed for abuse. Residents with a BIMS score less than 8 received skin assessments. Staff who provided care for the residents, were also interviewed to determine if the residents had exhibited behaviors prior to the altercation, with no concerns identified. Resident #9 and Resident #10 remained in the facility at the time of the complaint survey conducted on [DATE]-[DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Unspecified Mood Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Disease and Unspecified Hearing Loss. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #9 scored 15 on the BIMS assessment, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #9 had a history of verbal/manipulative behaviors with interventions and monitoring implemented. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below Knee, Acquired Absence of Left Leg Below Knee, Low Vision to Right Eye and Blindness to Left Eye. Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 scored 15 on the BIMs assessment, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed the facility identified Resident #10 was at risk for verbal and physical behaviors with interventions and monitoring implemented. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:50 AM, Resident #9 stated Resident #10 entered his room ([DATE]) and . just started in on me . and hit his leg. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:20 AM, Resident #10 confirmed he had confronted Resident #9 about his recent cursing at the staff. Continued interview revealed Resident #10 reported Resident #9 became angry when confronted. Resident #10 reported Resident #9 then reached for his grabber (a assistive device to extend reach) that was lying on the bed beside his leg. Resident #10 stated he then hit Resident #9 on his leg with an open hand. 4. Review of the medical records and facility investigation documentation dated [DATE], revealed a resident versus-resident altercation occurred between Resident #3 and Resident #4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Anemia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Dementia with Mood Disturbance. Review of an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 scored 6 on the BIMS assessment, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Social Services Progress Notes for Resident #3 dated [DATE] at 3:36 PM, revealed .[Resident #3] understands that the other patient [Resident #4] was confused. She [Resident #3] denies feeling scared and states she's not injured or hurt .Trauma Screen completed and [Resident #3] denies trauma from interaction. [Resident #3] states she is fine . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #3 dated [DATE] and [DATE], revealed no signs of bruising or injury. The resident denied pain or discomfort. Review of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Evaluation Notes for Resident #3 dated [DATE], revealed .[Resident #3] was recently involved in an altercation with another resident [Resident #4]. [Resident #3] says she is doing 'just fine . She denies any pain, distress, or fear. She says understands .'people get confused around here' .Staff reports no specific concerns regarding behaviors or issues .Recommendations: Continue to monitor and offer supportive care. Continue current treatment plan and medications. No adverse effects or distress/fear from recent patient altercation noted or reported . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation, Anxiety, Depression and Severe Dementia with Mood Disturbance. Review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 scored 3 on the BIMS assessment, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had not exhibited behaviors or aggression toward others during the assessment period. Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #4 dated [DATE] at 3:01 PM, revealed .resident [#4] was removed from activities today because she continued to yell. she then removed a wheelchair from behind another resident [#3] when she stood up almost causing her [Resident #3] to fall. then, she begin to hit another resident [#3] .activity staff removed her [Resident #4] from the activity and brought her back to west station where she continues to yell, verbally abuse staff, and ask for us to let her leave this place . Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #4 dated [DATE] at 3:10 PM, revealed the resident was moved to the 3rd floor. Review of the Social Services Progress Notes for Resident #4 dated [DATE] at 3:53 PM, revealed .Social worker spoke with [Resident #4] regarding patient interaction. [Resident #4] stated she would never hit anyone and does not remember doing so . Review of a comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 dated [DATE], revealed .Psychosocial Well-Being .at risk for complication related to psychosocial well being related to patient to patient interaction .Encourage choices and allow control over daily routine .Encourage to express feelings of .anger . Review of the Psychiatric Follow Up Notes for Resident #4 dated [DATE], revealed .[Resident #4] recently had a physical altercation with another resident [Resident #3]. [Resident #4] is very confused and unable to tell me anything about it. She tells me that she needs to go home. She denies any pain or injuries. No distress noted or reported . Review of the facility's investigation dated [DATE], revealed .During a cornhole activity a patient [Resident #4] hit .[Resident #3] when she [Resident #3] sat down in her rolling walker . Resident #3 and Resident #4 were separated and placed on different floors to avoid contact. A skin assessment was performed for Resident #3 with no injuries noted. Resident #4 was interviewed and denied feeling scared and stated she was not injured. Resident #3 was interviewed and stated she would never hurt anyone and did not remember hitting Resident #4. Continued review revealed Resident #4 had been a resident at the facility since [DATE], and had no indication of aggressive behaviors toward other residents. Further review revealed .The incident was verified through interviews and witnesses. No indication of harm to victim [Resident #3] physically or psychologically . Continued review of the facility investigaiton revealed The MD/NP (Medical Doctor/Nurse Practitioner), families, Ombudsman, police, and state agency were notified of the altercation. Review of Resident #3's statement dated [DATE], revealed .Social worker spoke with [Resident #3] regarding her patient-to-patient altercation. [Resident #3] stated she was finishing her turn at cornhole, and the other patient [Resident #4] grabbed her rollator [walker equipped with a seat] from her. [Resident #3] said when she got her rollator back, she sat down, and [Resident #4] softly hit her on her head. [Resident #3] states she tried to remove herself from the situation. [Resident #3] states she knows [Resident #4] gets confused sometimes .[Resident #3] denies injury, states she is not fearful and reports being okay . Review of Resident #4's statement dated [DATE], revealed .Social worker spoke with [Resident #4] regarding patient-to-patient altercation in activities. [Resident #4] denies any altercation. [Resident #4] stated she would never hit anyone. [Resident #4] Denies any distress, and fully denies any event. Reports that she [Resident #4] doesn't even remember going to activities today . During an interview on [DATE] at 2:51 PM, the Activities Director stated Resident #4 was sitting behind Resident #3 during a cornhole activity. The Activities Director stated Resident #4 pulled Resident #3's rollator walker as she (Resident #3) went to sit down on the walker. Resident #4 started striking Resident #3 in the back of her head. Further interview revealed Resident #4 struck Resident #3 with her forearm. The residents were immediately separated. The Activities Director reported she took Resident #4 back to her room and reported the incident to the resident's nurse. The Activities Director stated Resident #3 thought it was minor and continued with activities. The Activities Director stated Resident #4 was relocated to the 3rd floor. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:47 AM, the DON acknowledged when physical contact was made during resident versus resident altercations, the facility was required to report the altercations as allegations of abuse.
Mar 2023 7 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (Resident #30, Resident #75, Resident #31, and Resident #57) were free from abuse of 65 potential residents. Resident #30 grabbed Resident #75 and Resident #57 and pushed and choked Resident #31. Resident #57 struck Resident #30 in response to Resident #30's aggressiveness. Resident #75 and Resident #57 expressed being fearful of Resident #30, resulting in psychosocial harm for Residents #75 and #57. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, dated 2/1/2023, showed .Abuse, neglect .will not be tolerated by anyone, including .patients .The patient has the right to be free from abuse, neglect .The center administrator is responsible for assuring that patient safety, including freedom from risk of abuse or neglect holds the highest priority .Abuse: the willful infliction of injury .pain or mental anguish .Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Physical Abuse: includes hitting, slapping .Mental Abuse: includes, but is not limited to .harassment .PREVENTION POLICY .The center will provide supervision and support services designed to reduce the likelihood of abusive behaviors .All supervisory partners who receive reports of and/or identify inappropriate behaviors will take immediate steps to correct such behaviors .Patients with needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict with partners or other patients will be identified by the Care Planning team, with interventions and follow through designed to minimize the risk of conflict .The Interventions .will include .Identification of patients whose personal histories render them at risk for abusing other patients or partners .Assessment of appropriate interventions strategies to prevent occurrences .Monitoring the patient for any changes that would trigger abusive behavior .Reassessment of the protective strategies on a regular basis .PROTECTION POLICY .Staff will respond immediately to protect the alleged victim .Any individual found to be in danger of injury will be removed from the source of the suspected abusive behavior including, but not limited to room or staffing changes, if necessary, to protect the patient(s) from the alleged perpetrator .Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, including a physical examination or psychosocial assessment if needed .Increased supervision of the alleged victim and patients . Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Blindness Right Eye, Dementia with Anxiety, Insomnia, and Weakness. Review of Resident #30's comprehensive care plan dated 6/27/2022, showed .Diagnosis of dementia with anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation .Combative behavior towards staff with rejection of care. Patient known to inappropriately grasp at objects and wander related to poor eyesight. Anxiety and agitation worse in PM [evening] . with approach dated 1/19/2023, .Redirect patient when he is seen wandering or grasping into or at inappropriate objects . Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #30's vision was highly impaired. Resident #30 had no mood indicators or behavioral symptoms toward others documented and rejection of care occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. Resident #30 used a wheelchair as a mobility device. Further review revealed Resident #30 required extensive assist of one staff member for locomotion on unit, eating, and personal hygiene. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet for December 20, 2022, revealed .grabbing others . Review of Resident #30's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 1/2/2023, showed .Staff state patient has had several episodes of increased anxiety and agitation over the last few days. This is not unusual for patient, but behavior appears to have increased .he has been combative and very agitated with staff during care . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 dated 1/4/2023 at 4:30 PM, showed Resident #30 .was agitated and having behaviors. Pt [patient] was witnessed to have multiple verbal outbursts. Also kicking and swinging arms while in common area, around other residents .was removed from the area and taken to his room .Resident continued with behaviors . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #5 dated 1/4/2023 at 6:06 PM, showed .noted to be agitated this shift arguing with staff and other residents throwing trash in hallway floors . Medical record review revealed two events documented on Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet on 1/4/2023. First entry at 6:56 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 documented cursing at others and the second event documented at 6:57 PM, by CNA #2, Cursing at others. Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #2 dated 1/4/2023 at 7:15 PM, showed Resident #30 .APPEARS AGITATED AND AGRESSIVE [aggressive] DURING TRANSFER BACK TO BED . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by Registered Nurse (RN) #2 dated 1/5/2023 at 9:42 PM, showed Resident #30 .has exhibited increased agitation and behaviors towards staff, and was tested for UTI [urinary tract infection] Patient is currently receiving abt [antibiotic therapy] r/t [related to] uti [urinary tract infection] . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #6 dated 1/7/2023 at 4:22 PM, showed Resident #30 .up in the chair roaming the halls . Medical record review revealed two events documented on Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet on 1/7/2023. First entry at 6:24 PM, CNA #3 documented cursing at others and the second event documented at 6:25 PM, by CNA #3, Disrobing in public. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/15/2023 at 2:04 AM, LPN #2 documented, cursing at others. Review of Resident #30's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 1/17/2023, showed .Patietn [Patient] delusional, exit seeking, and aggressive with redirection at times . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/17/2023 at 7:29 PM, NA #4 documented, grabbing others. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/19/2023 at 12:20 PM, CNA #2 documented, cursing at others for 5 minutes. At 12:21 PM, CNA #2 documented, hitting others. At 8:37 PM, LPN #2 documented, cursing at others for 20 minutes. Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by RN #1 dated 2/13/2023 at 3:22 PM, revealed .is agitated and aggressive .[NAME] [propels] self in chair, needs to be redirected numerous times out of other resident rooms . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 2/13/2023 at 4:49 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #4 documented, grabbing at others for 20 minutes. Redirect, One on one, provide calm environment interventions were documented as not effective. At 4:52 PM, NA #4 documented hitting others for 15 minutes and One on one, provide calm environment interventions were not effective. At 4:54 PM, NA #4 documented, cursing at others and One on one, provide calm environment interventions were not effective. At 4:56 PM, NA #4 documented amended and more data available, however, no further notes noted. Telephone interview on 3/15/2023 at 7:15 PM, when asked to clarify the 2/13/2023 note, NA #4 stated, .This was the night two other CNAs come and got me to help because [RN #1] asked them to come and get me to get him [Resident #30] off a lady [Resident #31] that he had pushed his feet on the back of her wheelchair and grabbed her by the back of her shirt and was choking her . When asked to further clarify the amended note, NA #4 stated, .I was asked to change the note and not put all that in there . When asked who asked him to change the note, NA# 4 replied, .I don't remember . NA #4 further stated, .that was not the first time he [Resident #30] tried to choke somebody . When asked to provide further information and details, NA #4 stated he could not recall, .exactly Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by RN #1 dated 2/14/2023 at 6:26 PM, revealed .Resident [#30] increased agitation and aggressive. Going in others rooms. Difficult to redirect. Cursing staff and other residents . Review of Resident #30's social services progress note by Social Worker (SW) #1 dated 2/24/2023 at 4:30 PM revealed Resident #30 .has restlessness, trouble concentrating on things, and can be easily agitated at times . Review of Resident #30's progress note by the Director of Activities dated 2/27/2023 at 11:12 AM, revealed Resident #30 .propels around in his w/c [wheelchair] as he likes pulling himself along the handrails and door facings (pulling off corner protectors) and at times will pull on other resident chairs and needs redirection several times during the day as he goes in other resident rooms due to his poor eyesight. Pt [patient] can get agitated from time to time during redirection and will reach out to grab clothing or your hands when doing so and can be hard to redirect . Resident #30 can .be disruptive as he propels himself into others, pulls their W/C [wheelchair] or pulls the table clothes [cloths] off the tables with items on them due to his poor eyesight . Review Resident #30's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #30 had a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #30's vision was highly impaired. Resident #30 had mood indicators of feeling tired; having little energy for several days in the last 14 days; trouble concentrating on other things, such as newspaper or watching television nearly every day in the last 14 days; moving or speaking so slowly that other people noticed or being so fidgety or restless that he had been moving around a lot more than usual for half or more of the days; and being short-tempered, easily annoyed for half or more of the days in the past 14 days. Resident #30 had behaviors of hallucinations and delusions. Physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and other behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. Rejection of care occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. Resident #30 used a wheelchair as a mobility device. Further review revealed Resident #30 required extensive assist of two or more staff members for locomotion on unit, eating, and personal hygiene. Observations of Resident #30 on 3/13/2023 during the afternoon hours of 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM and on 3/14/2023 during the morning hours of 8:00 AM - 11:00 AM, revealed the resident sitting in a reclined Broda chair (rolling chair that reclines with a footrest), in the hallway outside his room, reclined at a 30-45-degree angle, with his feet on the floor, quiet and sleeping. During observation on 3/14/2023 at 2:00 PM, the resident had been moved to his room with the door closed. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator stated .There are people that are intimidated . by Resident #30's behaviors.He'll get in a mood, and he'll pull himself .I've heard people complain because he'll go around the whole floor .We've tried to redirect him . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:22 PM, LPN #8 stated Resident #30 .with his vision impairment .likes to try to go in rooms . The staff .must redirect . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:42 PM, the Director of Activities mentioned Resident #30's behavior when he .was pulling on someone's wheelchair . When asked if other residents complained about Resident #30's behavior, the Director of Activities stated .most of them [the residents] don't . complain and she stated that the other residents understood that Resident #30 was blind, and Resident #30 didn't realize what he was doing. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 10:17 AM, Housekeeper #1 stated Resident #30 .be out in the hallways .He don't mean no harm .he might grab .he grab somebody's chair to scoot through the hallway . Housekeeper #1 stated there was an incident involving Resident #30 and an unidentified resident where Resident #30 .grabbed her chair and she hit him .I think she's gone .they sent her to [another nursing home] .She got irritated with him [Resident #30]. Housekeeper #1 stated .he [Resident #30] can't hurt nobody .he's blind .he'll grab and try to feel . During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 10:29 AM, Housekeeper #2 stated .He [Resident #30] can't see but he can still be a little aggressive .He's got that strength .be resistant . Housekeeper #2 denied knowing of any instances of Resident #30 hurting anyone. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident exhibited no behaviors, required extensive assistance of 1 staff for bed mobility, and supervision of 1 staff for ambulation, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #75's Care Plan dated 5/17/2021 showed .receives psychotropic medication for depression, insomnia, and anxiety . Review of Resident #75's Psychotherapy Progress Note dated 2/15/2023, revealed .Patient is seen today for current significant symptoms of depression and anxiety. Patient processed anxious feelings and stressors due to medical issues .Clinician plans to continue psychotherapy and recommends medication evaluation/treatment as needed for significant symptoms of depression and anxiety due to patient is minimally stable/requires ongoing interventions at this time . Review of Resident #75's Psychotherapy Progress Note dated 2/28/2023, reveals .Patient is seen today for current significant symptoms of depression and anxiety. Patient processed anxious feelings and stressors due to medical issues. She reports efforts to cope with getting out of bed/out of room and engaging in walking with walker activities .Clinician plans to continue psychotherapy and recommends medication evaluation/treatment as needed for significant symptoms of depression and anxiety due to patient to minimally stable/requires ongoing interventions at this time . During an interview with Resident #75 on 3/13/2023 at 3:59 PM, Resident #75 stated that Resident #30 comes down the corridor and tries to make it out the door. Resident #75 stated Resident #30 was losing his eyesight and he rolled his chair and pushed on it and jerked the fire alarm and made it sound. Resident #75 stated Resident #30 .He's hurting quite a few people . Resident #75 mentioned an incident she thought occurred three weeks ago. Resident #30 was behind Resident #31 and pushing and got hold of Resident #31's shirt and it took 2 staff members to separate Resident #30 from Resident #31. Resident #75 stated that she heard Resident #31 say Stop .leave me alone . Resident #30 was pushing Resident #31's wheelchair with his feet. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease, Severe Dementia, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #31's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed a BIMS score of 4, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident exhibited no behaviors and required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility and transfer, extensive assistance of 1 staff for dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene, and required limited assistance of 1 staff for locomotion. Review of Resident #31's comprehensive care Plan dated 1/9/2023 showed .Cognitive Deficit .BIMS score indicates severe impairment with difficulty communicating as evidenced by Dementia Dx [diagnoses] and Hard of hearing . The resident was not interviewable. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:03 PM, the Administrator was informed of the allegation of abuse involving Resident #30 against Resident #31 which was witnessed by Resident #75. The Administrator stated .I have not heard about this . and stated .We weren't aware of it . The Administrator stated that there was a previous allegation involving Resident #30 and a person of a name similar to Resident #31's last name. The Administrator stated that .APS [Adult Protective Services] came .State Survey came in . The Administrator was also informed that Resident #75 stated she was fearful of Resident #30 because of his behavior and the Administrator expressed that he was not aware of this. The Administrator stated .He [Resident #30] pulls himself down the hallway .he can't see very well . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:18 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was asked about the allegation of abuse regarding Resident #30 against Resident #31, and she responded .I've never heard that .There was one time he [Resident #30] had a few behaviors and we had a urinalysis drawn . The ADON described the previous behaviors as .He [Resident #30] was yelling .trying to go in and out of the dining room .pushed bedside table .but wasn't anyone around . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:24 PM, the ADON stated that after Resident #30 completed the antibiotics in January 2023, there have been .no more issues . The ADON stated that the behaviors shown prior to the antibiotics were that Resident #30 had .shown anxiety and .pushed a table out of the way . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:29 PM, the Administrator stated that he spoke with Resident #75 regarding Resident #30 moving down the hallway and he stated that Resident #75 identified only one staff member being present and identified the nurse by RN #1's first name. During an interview with RN #1 on 3/14/2023 at 3:36 PM, RN #1 denied seeing an altercation between Resident #30 and Resident #31. The RN stated .I've never seen him [Resident #30] get aggressive .I've not had any trouble .He's not had any behaviors with me . The RN stated that she does not normally work on Resident #30's floor, but that she worked on that floor .a couple of weeks ago . During an interview with Resident #75 on 3/15/2023 at 10:10 AM, Resident #75 confirmed her fear of Resident #30 .I feel he's a threat .violence . Resident #75 stated .He's [Resident #30] grabbed my arms and jerked me .finally I just don't come near his wheelchair . Resident #75 stated that this behavior by Resident #30 has happened .several times .I don't know what the dates were . Resident #75 stated she .did not tell the staff . about the incident where Resident #30 grabbed her arms and jerked her. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 11:39 AM, the Administrator stated .the incident she [Resident #75] described that she was fearful did not occur . The Administrator stated that he interviewed Resident #75 who told him one staff member was involved in the incident and not two staff members. The Administrator stated he spoke with the nurse Resident #75 identified as being present during the incident who was identified as RN #1. The Administrator stated .the nurse [RN #1] said the incident didn't occur . Review of Resident #31's nursing progress note dated 3/15/2023 at 1:05 PM, revealed .This nurse [RN #3] reported, to daughter, allegation of abuse with an undetermined time frame . Interview with 27 residents with BIMS scores of 9 or higher were conducted on 3/15/2023 between 8:35 AM - 1:30 PM, with one additional complaint of abuse reported by Resident #57 against Resident #30. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety with Depressed Mood, Major Depressive Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident Mood Interview showed Resident #57 had feelings of being down, depressed, or hopeless and poor appetite or overeating for 2-6 days over the last 2 weeks. Rejection of care behavior occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. There were no other behaviors noted. Resident #57 used mobility devices of cane/crutch and wheelchair. Review of Patient #57's comprehensive care plan with a start date of 5/1/2020, edited 1/2/2023, showed .Psychotropic medication use r/t [related to] Psychiatric Diagnoses- stress or trauma inducing event that may affect patient's mood/behavior .Goal .Patient will be protected from re-traumatization as much as possible .7/30/2020 .Patient reports h/o [history of] stress or trauma .may affect patient's mood/behavior .Goal .Patient will be protected from re-traumatization as much as possible .Avoid actions that may trigger memories of trauma/stress inducing event . Review of Resident #57's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 2/27/2023, showed .On exam, patient is up in wheelchair. She is attempting to find social services. Appears anxious. She is trying to find out when psychotherapy comes to visit .Denies depression, but states 'I just have some things I want to tell her' .Patient still exhibiting symptoms of anxiety and occasional depression . Review of Resident #57's Psychotherapy Progress Note dated 2/28/2023, showed .Patient is seen today for current significant symptoms of depression and anxiety. Social worker referral due to patient request for psychotherapy .Patient processed anxious feelings and stressors .She also processed difficulty expressing her feelings to others due to trust issues .Clinician plans to continue psychotherapy and recommends medication evaluation/treatment as needed for significant symptoms of depression and anxiety due to patient is minimally stable/requires ongoing interventions at this time . During an interview with Resident #57 on 3/15/2023 at 12:04 PM, the resident stated Resident #30 came into her room multiple times. Resident #57 stated there was an incident where two staff members came into her room to get Resident #30 out of her room. These 2 staff members told Resident #57 to wait in the hallway while the staff members removed Resident #30 from Resident #57's room. The 2 staff members removed Resident #30 from Resident #57's room and returned Resident #30 to his room. The 2 staff members returned to Resident #57's room to clean up the mess Resident #30 made in the room. While Resident #57 waited outside her room, Resident #30 came back out of his room and came toward Resident #57 as she waited in the hallway. Resident #30 attempted to stand up and grabbed the arm of her wheelchair and then touched her right arm and moved his hand up her arm. Resident #57 hit Resident #30 on his hand with her grabber device. The staff intervened and told Resident #57 she could not hit Resident #30 and the staff removed Resident #30. Resident #57 stated she was fearful of Resident #30 because she did not know his capabilities. Resident #57 felt like she was abused by Resident #30 and had the right to defend herself from Resident #30 and did not feel comfortable with Resident #30. Resident #57 was aware if she held her door handle, Resident #30 could not come in her room. Resident #57 stated she did not want to have to think about defending herself from Resident #30 and needed to think of her own well-being. Resident #57 was fearful at night that Resident #30 would come into her room so she would move her bedside table in front of her so Resident #30 could not get to her as quick. Resident #57 stated she told staff members about Resident #30, and they were aware of his behaviors. Resident #57 did not know the date or time of the incident in which she defended herself from Resident #30 and struck him and could not remember the names of the staff members who intervened because they were not wearing name badges. Resident #57 stated she knew of another resident who resided in the room that belonged to Resident #31 and Resident #75 who was also fearful of Resident #30. Resident #57 stated when she was socializing with Resident #75, Resident #75 returned to her room when she saw Resident #30 coming down the hallway. Resident #57 stated Resident #75 stopped their conversation and went into her room to get away from Resident #30. During an interview with the Administrator and the Regional [NAME] President on 3/15/2023 at 3:51 PM, the Administrator stated that the investigation into the abuse allegation involving Resident #30 and Resident #75 was .still ongoing . The Regional [NAME] President stated that 23 other residents had been interviewed by staff and no other abuse complaints had been reported. The Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were asked if they had interviewed Resident #57, and they confirmed that the facility had not interviewed Resident #57. The Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified that Resident #57 reported an altercation with Resident #30 and reported that she was fearful of Resident #30. The Regional [NAME] President and Administrator confirmed that the facility was not aware of an incident between Resident #57 and Resident #30. Review of Resident #57's progress note by RN #3 dated 3/15/2023 at 4:43 PM, showed .Resident reports being fearful of another resident. Resident assessed and is safe and without s/s [signs and symptoms] of increased anxiety at this time. NP made aware. Psych to [be] made aware to assess resident. Will continue to observe for increased anxiety . During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 6:40 PM, the Administrator stated that Resident #30 was moved to another unit and staff has been assigned to monitor him. The Administrator stated that Resident #30 was moved because there was not another private room available for Resident #57 and .because the social worker talked to her [Resident #57] and she did say she was fearful . of Resident #30.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 10 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 10 residents (Resident #80) was treated in a dignified manner during incontinence care. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated 2/2020, showed .We strive to cultivate and sustain an excellent quality of life for each individual with person-centered care and services . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident with Right-sided Hemiplegia, Diabetes and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #80 had no speech, absence of spoken words, was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and required extensive assistance of two persons for toileting (includes change of incontinent pads). Observation while passing by Resident #80's room on 3/14/2023 at 3:46 PM, revealed the door into the room was open, the privacy curtain was not pulled around the resident's bed, and the resident's perineum was exposed, in full view from the hallway. Observation included a Nurse Aide Student (#1) was at Resident #80's bedside providing incontinence care. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:50 PM, the observed Nurse Aide Student #1 stated today was her first day of clinical training. Interview with the RCC (Resident Care Coordinator) on 3/14/2023 at 4:00 PM, revealed the student Nurse Aides are not to do any hands on care alone today. She confirmed the observation of Resident #80's exposure while receiving incontinence care did not maintain her dignity. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 4:30 PM, the acting Director of Nursing stated the mentor for Nurse Aide Student #1 had left the room to obtain more supplies and left the Student Nurse Aide alone. Interview confirmed Resident #80's perineum area should have been covered and the privacy curtain closed, prior to the mentor exiting the room. The interview confirmed Resident #80 was non-verbal and could not object to the exposure and lack of dignity provided while receiving incontinence care.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, and interviews, the facility staff failed to report allegations of ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, and interviews, the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse to the Administrator for 2 residents (Resident #57 and Resident #30) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, dated 2/1/2023, showed .REPORTING POLICY .Any partner having either direct or indirect knowledge of any event that might constitute abuse .must report the event immediately, but not later than 2 hours .All allegations of possible abuse .will be immediately assessed .It is the policy of this facility that 'abuse' allegations .are reported per Federal and State Law . Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Blindness Right Eye, Dementia with Anxiety, Insomnia, and Weakness. Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review Resident #30's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #30 had a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety with Depressed Mood, Major Depressive Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident #57 on 3/15/2023 at 12:04 PM, the resident stated Resident #30 came into her room multiple times. Resident #57 stated there was an incident where two staff members came into her room to get Resident #30 out of her room. These 2 staff members told Resident #57 to wait in the hallway while the staff members removed Resident #30 from Resident #57's room. The 2 staff members returned to Resident #57's room and while Resident #57 waited outside her room, Resident #30 came back out of his room and came toward Resident #57 as she waited in the hallway. Resident #30 attempted to stand up and grabbed the arm of her wheelchair and then touched her right arm and moved his hand up her arm. Resident #57 hit Resident #30 on his hand with her grabber device. The staff intervened and told Resident #57 she could not hit Resident #30. Resident #57 stated she felt like she was abused by Resident #30 and had the right to defend herself from Resident #30 and did not feel comfortable with Resident #30. Resident #57 stated she told staff members about Resident #30, and they were aware of his behaviors. Resident #57 stated she did not know the date or time of the incident and could not remember the names of the staff members who intervened. During an interview with the Administrator and the Regional [NAME] President on 3/15/2023 at 3:51 PM, the Administrator and Regional [NAME] President confirmed they were not aware of the incident between Residents #57 and #30.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to ensure care and interventions for 1 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to ensure care and interventions for 1 resident (Resident #30) with Dementia of 13 residents with Dementia reviewed. Resident #30 exhibited behaviors of grabbing other residents, wandering, and agitation with no effective person-centered interventions in place. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Blindness Right Eye, Dementia with Anxiety, Insomnia, and Weakness. Review of Resident #30's comprehensive care plan showed 06/27/2022 .Diagnosis of dementia with anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation. Patient has difficulty sleeping at night- insomnia. Combative behavior towards staff with rejection of care. Patient known to inappropriately grasp at objects and wander related to poor eyesight. Anxiety and agitation worse in PM [evening] .Goal .Mood/Behaviors will be well managed with current regimen without undue side effects . Review of the care planned interventions revealed, .06/27/2022 Administer medication to aid in sleep as ordered .Administer anti-depressant medication per MD [physician] orders and monitor for side effects .Attempt to discover root cause of behavior/mood disturbance to assist with interventions and anticipate patient's needs .Identify name, roll and function. Visit them to establish trust .Monitor resident for changes in mood and/or behaviors .Notify MD/NP [physician or Nurse Practitioner] if medication not effective .Psych [Psychological/Psychiatric] services as needed .09/21/2022 administer sleep aid as ordered .01/03/2023 Administer anti-anxiety medication per MD orders. Observe the resident closely for significant side effects .01/19/2023 Redirect patient when he is seen wandering or grasping into [onto] or at inappropriate objects . Review of the section Recreation/Wellness with a Start Date of 3/14/2022 and an Edited date of 2/27/2023 showed, .Condition does not allow leisure time to be spent as in past .Goal .I will accept daily visits from staff, peers and visitors and interact during visits as well as redirecting when out in the hallways where I may not know where I am going . The interventions for Recreation/Wellness were all dated 3/14/2022, .Encourage and support activities as preferred with continued COVID precautions .I enjoy church/spiritual services. Offer me room visits as interested .I enjoy seeing pets when feeling well. Animals are fine to visit when in the facility. Invite pet therapy to visit with me when in the facility .I like to be outside when the weather is nice. Invite me to sit in the courtyards and assist as needed .I like to listen to music when feeling well. I like the older types like [NAME] the best. I can listen on my TV in room. I am HOH [Hard of Hearing]. Invite me to join the music groups and assist as needed. Important: TV, visits, Encouragement . There were no new approaches or interventions since 3/14/2022. Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #30's vision was highly impaired. Resident #30 had no mood indicators or behavioral symptoms toward others documented and rejection of care occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. Resident #30 used a wheelchair as a mobility device. Further review revealed Resident #30 required extensive assist of one staff member for locomotion on unit, eating, and personal hygiene. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet for December 20, 2022, revealed .grabbing others . and the intervention of redirection was not effective. Medical record review revealed on 1/2/2023 at 6:56 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #2 documented on Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet, other behavior occurred for 180 minutes with intervention, provide calm environment. Review of Resident #30's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 1/2/2023, showed .Staff state patient has had several episodes of increased anxiety and agitation over the last few days. This is not unusual for patient, but behavior appears to have increased. On 12/30/22, he required two 1x [one time] dose of ativan [a medication used to treat anxiety] .he has been combative and very agitated with staff during care . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 dated 1/4/2023 at 4:30 PM, showed Resident #30 .was agitated and having behaviors. Pt [patient] was witnessed to have multiple verbal outbursts. Also kicking and swinging arms while in common area, around other residents .was removed from the area and taken to his room .Resident continued with behaviors . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #4 dated 1/4/2023 at 4:50 PM, showed Resident #30 was given .Ativan [antianxiety medication] 0.5 mg [milligrams] IM [intramuscularly] given times 1 dose. Multiple staff assisted to give injection . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #5 dated 1/4/2023 at 6:06 PM, showed .noted to be agitated this shift arguing with staff and other residents throwing trash in hallway floors . Medical record review revealed two events documented on Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet on 1/4/2023. First entry at 6:56 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 documented cursing at others and the second event documented at 6:57 PM, by CNA #2, Cursing at others with redirection not effective. Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #2 dated 1/4/2023 at 7:15 PM, showed Resident #30 .APPEARS AGITATED AND AGRESSIVE [aggressive] DURING TRANSFER BACK TO BED . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #4 dated 1/4/2023 at 8:30 PM, showed .Pt [patient - Resident #30] continues to have behaviors. NP [nurse practitioner] notified and orders received . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #4 dated 1/4/2023 at 8:30 PM, showed Resident #30 received .Ativan 0.5 mg IM given per order without incident . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by Registered Nurse (RN) #2 dated 1/5/2023 at 9:42 PM, showed Resident #30 .has exhibited increased agitation and behaviors towards staff, and was tested for UTI [urinary tract infection] Patient is currently receiving abt [antibiotic therapy] r/t [related to] uti [urinary tract infection] . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #6 dated 1/7/2023 at 4:22 PM, showed Resident #30 .up in the chair roaming the halls . Medical record review revealed two events documented on Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet on 1/7/2023. First entry at 6:24 PM, CNA #3 documented cursing at others and the second event documented at 6:25 PM, by CNA #3, Disrobing in public with redirection not effective with the first event. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/15/2023 at 2:04 AM, LPN #2 documented, cursing at others. One on one intervention had to be provided. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/16/2023 at 4:20 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #4 documented exit seeking for 200 minutes. Review of Resident #30's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 1/17/2023, showed .Staff requesting renewal of PRN [as needed] ativan, due to continued agitation and anxiety at times. Worse in PM [evening] and after bed time. Patietn [Patient] delusional, exit seeking, and aggressive with redirection at times . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/17/2023 at 7:29 PM, NA #4 documented, grabbing others. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/19/2023 at 12:20 PM, CNA #2 documented, cursing at others for 5 minutes with redirection not effective. At 12:21 PM, CNA #2 documented, hitting others with redirection not effective. At 8:37 PM, LPN #2 documented, cursing at others for 20 minutes, with redirection not effective. Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #3 dated 1/22/2023 at 6:33 AM, showed Resident #30 .was combative with caregiver, refused to get up this morning . Review of Resident #30's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 1/23/2023, showed .PRN ativan was renewed .He does still have some anxiety and agitation at times. Worse in PM . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 1/25/2023 at 9:15 AM, LPN #3 documented, wandering for 120 minutes with redirection not effective and one on one intervention had to be provided. Review of Resident #30's Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation dated 2/6/2023, showed .PRN ativan was ordered. Recently expired. Appears last dose was used 2/2. Staff state still has some PM agitation and anxiety at times . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 2/8/2023 at 9:32 PM, LPN #3 documented, other behavior for 60 minutes and interventions of Redirection, One on one, offer food/fluids were not effective. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 2/9/2023 at 9:29 PM, LPN #3 documented other behavior for 120 minutes and Redirection, One on one, offer food/fluids interventions were not effective. Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by RN #1 dated 2/13/2023 at 3:22 PM, revealed .is agitated and aggressive, anxiety medication given as a prn [as needed dose of medication]. Unable to voice needs. [NAME] [propels] self in chair, needs to be redirected numerous times out of other resident rooms. Will cot [continue] to monitor behaviors . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 2/13/2023 at 4:49 PM, NA #4 documented, grabbing at others for 20 minutes. Redirect, One on one, provide calm environment interventions were documented as not effective. At 4:52 PM, NA #4 documented hitting others for 15 minutes and One on one, provide calm environment interventions were not effective. At 4:54 PM, NA #4 documented, cursing at others and One on one, provide calm environment interventions were not effective. Telephone interview on 3/15/2023 at 7:15 PM, NA #4 stated, .This was the night [2/13/2023] two other CNAs come and got me to help because [RN #1] asked them to come and get me to get him [Resident #30] off a lady [Resident #31] that he had pushed his feet on the back of her wheelchair and grabbed her by the back of her shirt and was choking her . Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by RN #1 dated 2/14/2023 at 6:26 PM, revealed .Resident [#30] increased agitation and aggressive. Going in others rooms. Difficult to redirect. Cursing staff and other residents. PRN med given. Report to next shift. Will cont [continue] to monitor behaviors . Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 2/16/2023 at 9:25 PM, LPN #3 documented other behavior for 45 minutes with redirection, one on one, offer food/fluids documented as not effective. Review of Resident #30's social services progress note by Social Worker (SW) #1 dated 2/24/2023 at 4:30 PM, revealed Resident #30 .has restlessness, trouble concentrating on things, and can be easily agitated at times . Review of Resident #30's progress note by the Director of Activities dated 2/27/2023 at 11:12 AM, revealed Resident #30 .propels around in his w/c [wheelchair] as he likes pulling himself along the handrails and door facings (pulling off corner protectors) and at times will pull on other resident chairs and needs redirection several times during the day as he goes in other resident rooms due to his poor eyesight. Pt [patient] can get agitated from time to time during redirection and will reach out to grab clothing or your hands when doing so and can be hard to redirect . Resident #30 can .be disruptive as he propels himself into others, pulls their W/C [wheelchair] or pulls the table clothes [cloths] off the tables with items on them due to his poor eyesight . Review Resident #30's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #30 had a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #30's vision was highly impaired. Resident #30 had mood indicators of feeling tired; having little energy for several days in the last 14 days; trouble concentrating on other things, such as newspaper or watching television nearly every day in the last 14 days; moving or speaking so slowly that other people noticed or being so fidgety or restless that he had been moving around a lot more than usual for half or more of the days; and being short-tempered, easily annoyed for half or more of the days in the past 14 days. Resident #30 had behaviors of hallucinations and delusions. Physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and other behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. Rejection of care occurred 1 to 3 days in the past 7 days. Resident #30 used a wheelchair as a mobility device. Further review revealed Resident #30 required extensive assist of two or more staff members for locomotion on unit, eating, and personal hygiene. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 3/9/2023 at 9:29 PM, LPN #3 documented wandering for 90 minutes and redirection, one on one, offer food/fluids was documented as not effective. Observations of Resident #30 on 3/13/2023 during the afternoon hours of 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM and on 3/14/2023 during the morning hours of 8:00 AM - 11:00 AM, revealed the resident sitting in a reclined Broda chair (rolling chair that reclines with a footrest), in the hallway outside his room, reclined at a 30-45-degree angle, with his feet on the floor, quiet and sleeping. During observation on 3/14/2023 at 2:00 PM, the resident had been moved to his room with the door closed. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator stated .There are people that are intimidated . by Resident #30's behaviors.He'll get in a mood, and he'll pull himself .I've heard people complain because he'll go around the whole floor .We've tried to redirect him . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:18 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated .There was one time he [Resident #30] had a few behaviors and we had a urinalysis drawn . The ADON described the previous behaviors as .He [Resident #30] was yelling .trying to go in and out of the dining room . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:22 PM, LPN #8 stated Resident #30 .with his vision impairment .likes to try to go in rooms . The staff .must redirect . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:24 PM, the ADON stated that after Resident #30 completed the antibiotics in January 2023, there have been .no more issues . The ADON stated that the behaviors shown prior to the antibiotics were that Resident #30 had .shown anxiety and .pushed a table out of the way . The ADON stated that resident behaviors were discussed in morning meetings. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:29 PM, the Administrator was asked if he was aware of behaviors by Resident #30 and he stated that .my maintenance guys are familiar . and that Resident #30 had damaged areas moving himself down the hallway. Regarding other behaviors by Resident #30, the Administrator stated .I haven't heard it at morning meeting . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 3:42 PM, the Director of Activities was asked about activities for Resident #30. The Director of Activities stated .I try to give him a pop-it [tactile toy] .stuffed animals .he likes music .take him to church . The Director of Activities mentioned Resident #30's behavior when he .was pulling on someone's wheelchair . When asked if other residents complained about Resident #30's behavior, the Director of Activities stated .most of them [the residents] don't . complain and she stated that the other residents understood that Resident #30 was blind, and Resident #30 didn't realize what he was doing. Medical record review of Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheet revealed on 3/14/2023 at 11:39 PM, LPN #3 documented, other behavior for 45 minutes with redirection, one on one, offer food/fluids documented as not effective. Review of Resident #30's nursing progress note by LPN #3 dated 3/15/2023 at 1:03 AM, revealed .PRN Ativan was given for restlessness with agitation .was somewhat effective . Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident #75 on 3/15/2023 at 10:10 AM, Resident #75 stated .He's [Resident #30] grabbed my arms and jerked me .finally I just don't come near his wheelchair . Resident #75 stated that this behavior by Resident #30 has happened .several times .I don't know what the dates were . During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 10:17 AM, Housekeeper #1 stated Resident #30 .be out in the hallways .He don't mean no harm .he might grab .he grab somebody's chair to scoot through the hallway . Housekeeper #1 stated there was an incident involving Resident #30 and an unidentified resident where Resident #30 .grabbed her chair and she hit him .I think she's gone .they sent her to [another nursing home] .She got irritated with him [Resident #30]. Housekeeper #1 stated .he [Resident #30] can't hurt nobody .he's blind .he'll grab and try to feel . Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety with Depressed Mood, Major Depressive Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident #57 on 3/15/2023 at 12:04 PM, the resident stated Resident #30 came into her room multiple times. On one occasion, Resident #30 came into her room, pilfered through her things, and attempted to touch the wall air unit. Resident #57 stated there was an incident where two staff members came into her room to get Resident #30 out of her room. These 2 staff members told Resident #57 to wait in the hallway while the staff members removed Resident #30 from Resident #57's room. The 2 staff members removed Resident #30 from Resident #57's room and returned Resident #30 to his room. The 2 staff members returned to Resident #57's room to clean up the mess Resident #30 made in the room. While Resident #57 waited outside her room, Resident #30 came back out of his room and came toward Resident #57 as she waited in the hallway. Resident #30 attempted to stand up and grabbed the arm of her wheelchair and then touched her right arm and moved his hand up her arm. Resident #57 stated she hit Resident #30 on his hand with her grabber device. During an interview and medical record review with the facility MDS Coordinator on 3/15/2023 at 4:40 PM, the MDS Coordinator showed the Surveyor Resident #30's Behavior Monitoring sheets and compared them with the Progress Notes. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #30, .has Behavior Monitoring Sheets, for December 2022; January 2023; February 2023 and current to date for month of March 2023 . Interview with the MDS Coordinator revealed staff had not always made progress notes with details of Resident #30's behaviors when they documented on the Behavior Monitoring records that behaviors had occurred. During an interview with the ADON on 3/15/2023 at 5:16 PM, the ADON stated Resident #30, .doesn't have behavior monitoring sheets [MDS Coordinator had presented the behavior monitoring sheets at 4:40 PM]. There has to be a doctor's order for it to flow onto the behavior sheet and he does not have an order . The ADON showed the computer listing of documents for Resident #30 and stated, .see here, he doesn't have a Behavior Monitoring Sheet . When asked if she was certain, the ADON stated, .yes . During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 6:40 PM, the Administrator stated that Resident #30 was moved to another unit and staff has been assigned to monitor him.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, facility staff failed to follow handwashing procedures for 1 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, facility staff failed to follow handwashing procedures for 1 resident (#299) of 1 resident in contact isolation precautions. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control Clinical Supplement dated 12/2019, showed .This is intended as a supplement to help provide more detailed disease specific direction for initiation and duration of precautions .Contact Precautions .For patients with known or suspected .infections or colonization with resistant organisms transmitted by direct or indirect contact with residents or the environment .Hand hygiene is the single most important practice to reduce the transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings .When dealing with C. difficile infection, hand washing with either plain or antiseptic-containing soap and water is recommended over alcohol based products because spores are not killed by alcohol products; the mechanical action of washing with soap and water washed off the spores [C. difficile spores] . Resident #299 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left non-dominant side and Enterocolitis due to Clostridium Difficile. Medical record review of Resident #299's 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required assistance of 1 staff member for bed mobility, transfer, ADL's, dressing, toileting, and bathing. Medical record review of Resident #299's physician order dated 3/9/2023, showed .Contact Isolation-C.Diff [Clostridium Difficile] . During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 9:46 AM, the following signs were posted outside of Resident #299's room: 1. Please Speak With Nurse Before Entering Room Thank You. 2. Contact Isolation (Mandatory PPE [Personal Protective Equipment] in addition to mask and eye protection) GOWN GLOVES. 3. A picture collage used to depict the handwashing procedure using soap and water. During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 1:03 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and Nursing Assistant (NA) #2 donned PPE (gown and gloves) prior to entering the room of Resident #299 to deliver a meal tray. The nursing assistant delivered the tray, exited the room after doffing PPE, then sanitized their hands with alcohol based hand sanitizer from the dispenser located in the hallway. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 1:05 PM, CNA #1 and NA #2 could not explain why Resident #299 was placed on contact isolation. They were unaware the resident had Clostridium-Difficile (C-Diff-an organism that causes diarrhea) and why it was important to wash hands with soap and water. Both CNA #1 and NA #2 confirmed they did not follow the facility policy for infection prevention. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 3:20 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed Resident #299 was placed on isolation precautions and the expectation prior to exiting the resident's room, was staff were to wash the hands with soap and water. The ADON confirmed both CNA #1 and NA #2 did not follow the facility's policy for proper infection control practice.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for 13 of 38 resident rooms. The facility failed to repair wallpaper in 8 of 38 resident rooms and in 5 out of 5 hallways. The facility failed to clean air vents on 5 of 5 hallways. The facility failed to replace ceiling tiles in 5 of 38 resident rooms. The facility failed to repair window seals which resulted in uncomfortable temperature levels in 5 of 38 resident rooms. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, NHC Knoxville Housekeeping Policy, dated 3/15/2023, showed .NHC expects to maintain our building in a manor [manner] that is clean, presentable for our patients and staff. Routine cleaning of patient rooms Daily. High-Touch surfaces, floors and sinks are cleaned daily. Low touch surfaces are scheduled weekly or when visibly soiled. Weekly High surfaces .such as tops of cupboards, vents, walls, baseboards and corners. Monthly window blinds, bed curtains and any AC [Air conditioning] units/vents in room . Review of the facility policy titled, NHC Knoxville Maintenance Policy, dated 3/15/2023 showed .NHC expects to maintain our building in a manor [manner] that is clean and operational. Should items need to be updated, repaired, cleaned, or replaced, we will do so . During an observation on 3/14/2023 at 10:10 AM, in the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], the flooring tile was heavily stained with dirt. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 10:15 AM, a housekeeper assigned to the second floor was aware of the dirt-stained floor and she stated, We need something stronger .bleach cleanser or something to get the stains up . During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 10:30 AM, the Housekeeping Supervisor revealed she had a staff member responsible for the floors. The Housekeeping Supervisor stated there was a scrubber small enough to get into the bathrooms for cleaning. Continued interview revealed she did not have a process in place to keep a list of bathroom floors needing to be deep cleaned. During a follow up interview on 3/14/2023 at 10:45 AM, the Housekeeping Supervisor returned with a list of bathrooms she identified on the second floor needing to be deep cleaned which included rooms 212, 215, 218, and 265. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, rooms 200, 201, 203, 205, 209, 211, 213, 214, 217, 221, 223 were observed with thick, gray-black dirt substance on the air vents. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, rooms 200, 201, 208, 214, 220, 221, 223 were observed with dead bugs and brown-gray dust with debris on the window seals. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, rooms 203, 211, 212, 213, 214, 217, 219, 224 were observed with the wallpaper needing repair with holes and tears ranging from 1 inch to 12 inches long and wallpaper coming apart from wall. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, 5 of 5 hallways needed wallpaper repairs with holes and tears ranging from 1 inch to 12 inches long. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, the ceiling air vents had thick, black dust substance present. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, rooms 203, 209, 221, 223, 227 needed ceiling tile repairs with holes ranging from dime size to golf ball size. During multiple observations on 3/15/2023 from 8:31 AM to 1:38 PM, rooms 200, 203, 220, 223, 224 had a cool air draft around the window area. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 10:42 AM, the Maintenance Director confirmed the window seal in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had temperature changes around the window area with a thermometer reading ranging from 63 degrees Fahrenheit to 68 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 10:43 AM, the Maintenance Director confirmed 5 of 5 hallways and all the resident rooms on the second floor had wallpaper torn, several ceiling tiles in 5 of 5 hallways and several resident rooms were damaged and needed to be replaced, the window seals in 200, 203, 220, 223 and 224 had a cool draft, several rooms had dead bugs and brown-gray dust with debris on the window seals, and the air vents in 13 of 38 rooms on the second floor had brownish-gray dusty debris. During an interview in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/15/2023 at 10:56 AM, the Maintenance Director confirmed the brownish-black dirt substance behind the torn wallpaper next to the bathroom door was brown rust from the metal underlay . During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Maintenance Director confirmed 2 holes in the ceiling in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 1:36 PM, the Maintenance Assistant stated the facility had 3 full rolls of wallpaper and a partial roll of wallpaper to be used for repairs. He stated the plan was to replace the wallpaper in the halls first . The Maintenance Assistant confirmed that the resident rooms on the second floor were not planned for repair at this time.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on facility policy review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff wore protective beard coverings while preparing food observed for 2 of 2 staff members. The fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff wore protective beard coverings while preparing food observed for 2 of 2 staff members. The facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment as evidenced by undated food and food open to air observed in 1 of 1 dry storage rooms and failed to maintain sanitary kitchen equipment which had the potential to affect 100 of 102 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Hygiene & Safety Practices, revised 11/2017, revealed .partners shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings, or nets, beard restraints .that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles . Review of the facility policy titled, Safety & Sanitization Best Practice Guidelines, dated 11/2017, showed .packages should be closed securely . Review of the facility policy titled, Safety & Sanitization Best Practice Guidelines, dated 11/2017, showed .Equipment must be cleaned and/or sanitized after every use according to the manufacturer's directions .Non-food contact surfaces of foodservice equipment should be free of unnecessary ledges, projections, and crevices, and designed and constructed to allow easy cleaning and to facilitate maintenance .Department inspection should be conducted to review sanitation and immediate action should be taken to correct any problems that interfere with meeting sanitary standards . Review of kitchen cleaning policy could not be completed. The kitchen cleaning policy was requested twice and was not provided. During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 10:28 AM, 2 of 2 dietary staff members in the kitchen were not wearing face coverings to ensure all facial hair was covered. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 10:28 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed beards were not fully covered in the kitchen area. The CDM stated he thought the mask would be sufficient to cover their beards . During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 10:30 AM, in the kitchen dry storage room was a loaf of bread with a hole in the package and was undated after use. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 10:30 AM, the CDM stated all dry foods should be dated and sealed . The CDM confirmed the loaf of bread had a hole in the package and was undated after use. During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 10:37 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). During the tour, the following items were observed: - The steamer had spatter of dried food debris on window of unit. - The equipment cleaning schedule had not been completed for 14 of 14 days. - The can opener had solid food debris and a metal shard protrusion. - The cooler had food debris located in the bottom. - Four dessert cups had solid food debris present with dried food observed on the tray underneath. - Coffee dispenser on beverage cart had dried food substance present. - Dish room temperature form had not been completed 13 of 13 morning shifts, 12 of 12 afternoon shifts, and 4 of 12 evening shifts. - Kitchen air unit and ceiling tiles were soiled with a thick, black dirt substance. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 10:42 AM, the CDM stated he was responsible to oversee the cleanliness and sanitary operation of the kitchen in the facility. The CDM confirmed the equipment in the facility's kitchen had not been maintained in a sanitary condition, the equipment cleaning schedule had not been completed in 14 of 14 days, and the Dishroom Temperature monitoring form had not been completed as scheduled. During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 11:54 AM, the second-floor dining area showed solid, dried food debris on the coffee dispenser on the beverage cart. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 11:55 AM, Nurse Aide #1 confirmed the presence of solid debris on the coffee dispenser on the beverage cart located on the second floor. During an observation on 3/13/2023 at 12:12 PM, the second-floor dining area showed food debris on three serving spoons. During an interview on 3/13/2023 at 12:12 PM, Dietary Aide #1 confirmed the presence of food debris on three serving spoons. During an observation on 3/14/2023 at 10:08 AM, the second-floor dining area showed food debris inside a food pan that stored packaged jelly. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 10:08 AM, Dietary Aide #2 confirmed the presence of food debris inside the food pan that stored packaged jelly and stated this needs to be cleaned .
Dec 2019 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the care plan for falls for 1 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the care plan for falls for 1 resident (#86) of 23 sampled residents. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including History of Falling, Fracture of Left Femur, Osteoarthritis, Lack of Coordination, and Hypertension. Medical record review of the Baseline Care Plan, dated 11/19/19, revealed .fall risk .bed in lowest position . Medical record review of Resident #86's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed the resident required extensive assistance of 2 persons for transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. Medical record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/3/19 revealed .Keep bed in lowest position . Medical record review of the Certified Nursing Assistant Care Plan, dated 12/3/19, revealed to keep Resident #86's bed in lowest position. Review of an Event Report dated 12/12/19 revealed Resident #86 had an unwitnessed fall from bed, without injury, on 12/12/19 at 6:20 PM. Continued review revealed .PT [patient] BACK UP AGAINST THE BED WITH BRIEF OBSERVED DOWN TO ANKLES BED IN HIGH POSITION . Observation on 12/17/19 at 3:57 PM, in the resident's room, revealed Resident #86 lying in a low positioned bed. Interview and review of the facility fall investigations with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 12/18/19 at 9:12 AM, in the conference room, confirmed the resident was not in the low position bed on 12/12/19. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/18/19 at 9:54 AM, in the conference room, confirmed the care planned low bed intervention was not in place at the time of the fall.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Medical record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including History of Falling, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Medical record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including History of Falling, Fracture of Left Femur, Osteoarthritis, Lack of Coordination, and Hypertension. Medical record review of the Baseline Care Plan, dated 11/19/19, revealed .fall risk .bed in lowest position . Medical record review of Resident #86's admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed the resident required extensive assistance of 2 persons for transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. Medical record review of Resident #86's Fall Risk Assessment Tool dated 11/26/19 revealed the resident was a high fall risk. Medical record review of the Certified Nursing Assistant Care Plan dated 12/3/19, revealed .Keep bed in lowest position . Medical record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan dated 12/3/19 revealed Resident #86 had a history of falls and interventions included to keep the resident's bed in low position. Review of an Event Report dated 12/12/19 revealed Resident #86 had an unwitnessed fall from bed without injury on 12/12/19 at 6:20 PM. Further review revealed .PT [patient] BACK UP AGAINST THE BED WITH BRIEF OBSERVED DOWN TO ANKLES BED IN HIGH POSITION .Patient fell to floor from bed trying to roll herself off a bedpan . Observation on 12/17/19 at 3:57 PM, in the resident's room, revealed Resident #86 lying in a low positioned bed. Interview and review of the facility fall investigations with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 12/18/19 at 9:12 AM , in the conference room, confirmed the resident's bed .was not in the low position as I would have expected for a resident here for falls and hip fracture . Interview with the DON on 12/18/19 at 9:54 AM, in the conference room, confirmed the low bed intervention was not in place. In summary, the facility failed to ensure the low bed intervention was in place to prevent a fall for Resident #86 on 12/12/19. Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, observation and interview the facility failed to add a new intervention after a fall for 1 resident (#69) and failed to implement a care plan intervention to prevent accidents for 1 resident (#86) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Falls Policy, revised 7/14/17 revealed .Based on the preceding assessment, the staff and/or physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and to address risks of serious consequences of falls .If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various relevant interventions, based on assessment of the nature or category of falls, until falling reduces or stops or until a reason is identified for its continuation . Medical record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia with Behavior Disturbance, Diabetes, and Hypertension. Medical record review of Resident #69's care plan revised 3/5/19 revealed .Bed Alarm, ensure functioning and placement qshift [every shift] . Continued review revealed no new interventions had been implemented after the 9/20/19 fall. Medical record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of 1 for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. Medical record review of a Falls Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 scored a 19. Continued review revealed a resident score greater that 13 indicated a high risk for falls. Review of an Event Report facility dated 9/20/19 revealed Resident #69 had an unwitnessed fall in the resident's room on 9/20/19 without injury. Continued review revealed the immediate measures implemented was a bed alarm (implemented on 3/5/19). Observation on 12/18/19 at 8:30 AM, in the resident's room, revealed Resident #69 sleep in bed with a bed alarm in place, a fall mat to the left side of the bed, and the call light within reach. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/18/19 at 2:00 PM, in the DON's office, confirmed the facility failed to implement a new falls intervention after the fall on 9/20/19 and failed to follow the facility policy for falls.
Dec 2018 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurate for 1 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurate for 1 resident (#9) of 36 sampled residents. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Hypertension, Adult Failure to Thrive, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Cardiac Murmur, and Leukocytosis. Medical record review of Medication Order dated 12/20/17 revealed a physician's order for a wanderguard (an alam bracelet to monitor wandering behavior). Medical record review of the Nurse's Notes dated 9/1/18 documented, .placed wanderguard to (R) [right] ankle . Medical record review of the Quarterly (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed Resident #9 required limited assist of one staff member for locomotion on the unit and was not assessed as having as wandering behavior. Medical record review of the Recreation Quarterly Progress Note dated 9/4/18 revealed, .[Resident #9] continues his same daily routine .with much confusion and ambulates around his rooma nd [and] the facility as he likes through the day Pt [patient] .walks around the facility and has to be redirected many times as he will wonder [wander] in and out of other rooms in the facility . Medical record review of Resident #9's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 4/4/18 and updated 9/12/18 revealed .Resident has wandering tendencies . Observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant #1 on 12/03/18 at 12:29 PM, in the 2nd floor dining room, revealed Resident #9 confused and wandering. Interview confirmed .He does this all day, he wanders talking . Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 on 12/04/18 at 3:51 PM, on the east hall, revealed Resident #9 wanders daily about the facility. Further interview revealed .He has wandered since admission; it's something he's always done . Interview with MDS Coordinator #1 on 12/05/18 at 10:28 AM, in the MDS office, revealed Resident #9 wanders and was not coded on the MDS as wandering. Further interview confirmed the MDS was not accurate to reflect the resident's wandering behavior.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to include ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to include care of a concussion after a fall for 1 resident (#100) of 2 residents reviewed for falls of 36 residents reviewed. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum, Stage 1, Chronic Pain, Anxiety, Localized Edema, Obesity, Depression, and Opioid Dependence. Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurse's Note revealed Resident #100, on 11/23/18 at 10:45 PM, was found on her bedroom floor with a laceration to her head. Further review revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) at 11:40 PM, and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 7:26 AM. Continued review revealed Resident #100 returned to the ER on [DATE] at 12:10 PM, after complaints of increased drowsiness s/p [status post] fall and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 5:15 PM, with a diagnosis of a concussion. Medical record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan revealed no care plan on the care and management of concussions for Resident #100. Interview with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator #2 on 12/5/18 at 2:20 PM, in the MDS office confirmed she failed to develop a care plan for the care of Resident #100's concussion. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/4/18 at 4:15 PM, in the Conference Room, confirmed the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for the care of a concussion following a fall for Resident #100.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to revise a care plan for fall risk and skin integrity followin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to revise a care plan for fall risk and skin integrity following a fall with a laceration for 1 resident (#100) of 36 residents reviewed. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum, Stage 1, Chronic Pain, Anxiety, Localized Edema, Obesity, Depression, and Opioid Dependence. Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurse's Note revealed Resident #100 on 11/23/18 at 10:45 PM, was found on her bedroom floor with a laceration to her head. Further review revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) at 11:40 PM, and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 7:26 AM. Review of the hospital's Discharge Instructions dated 11/24/18 at 6:44 AM, revealed Laceration Care, Adult .if sutures or staples were used: Keep the wound clean and dry .keep the wound completely dry for the first 24 hours or as told by your health care provider, after that time, you may shower or bathe. However, make sure that the wound is not soaked in water until after the sutures or staples have been removed. Clean the wound one time each day .wash the wound with soap and water. Rinse the wound with water to remove all soap. Pat the wound dry with a clean towel. Do not rub the wound . Medical record review of the Baseline Care Plan, undated, for Resident #100 revealed care areas for Fall Risk and Skin/Wound. Further review revealed the Fall Risk Care Plan was updated on 11/24/18 with CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] instructed to stay with pt [patient] while toileting. Continued review revealed no revision to the Skin/Wound Care Plan and no documentation of the scalp laceration. Medical record review of the Complete Patient Care Plan, dated 11/28/18 revealed care plans for Falls and At Risk for Alteration in Skin Integrity with no revision or documentation of care or treatment of the scalp laceration. Interview with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator #2 on 12/5/18 at 2:20 PM, in the MDS office confirmed it was her responsibility to develop, revise, and review the care plans and the facility failed to revise the care plans for Resident #100 falls and skin integrity to include the scalp laceration. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/4/18 at 4:15 PM, in the Conference Room, confirmed the facility failed to update and revise the care plans on Falls and Skin Integrity for Resident #100 for the care and treatment of the scalp laceration.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, review of medical records, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow hospita...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, review of medical records, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow hospital discharge instructions following a fall for 1 (#100) resident of 2 residents reviewed for falls of 36 residents sampled. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Transfer Documentation, revised 1/2017, revealed .Responsibilities upon patient's return to the center .physician's orders should accompany the patient from the hospital. admission orders should be processed the same way as for a new admission .Begin a new Medication Record using the new physician orders received upon return . Review of the facility policy Return From Transfer/Medical Appointment with Specialist, undated, revealed .Any patient that is transferred to the ER [emergency room] .the facility will resume previous in-house orders and include any changes from the ER evaluation . Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum, Chronic Pain, Anxiety, Localized Edema, Depression, and Opioid Dependence. Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurse's Notes revealed Resident #100, on 11/23/18 at 10:45 PM, was found on her bedroom floor with a laceration to her head. Further review revealed the resident was sent to the ER at 11:40 PM, and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 7:26 AM. Review of the hospital's Discharge Instructions dated 11/24/18 at 6:44 AM, revealed Laceration Care, Adult .if sutures or staples were used: Keep the wound clean and dry .keep the wound completely dry for the first 24 hours or as told by your health care provider, after that time, you may shower or bathe. However, make sure that the wound is not soaked in water until after the sutures or staples have been removed. Clean the wound one time each day .wash the wound with soap and water. Rinse the wound with water to remove all soap. Pat the wound dry with a clean towel. Do not rub the wound . Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurse's Note for Resident #100, dated 11/24/18 at 7:26 AM, revealed .returned from hospital .Laceration c [with] 2 sutures to (r) [right] posterior scalp intact .only orders is to remove sutures in 10 days . Medical record review of the 11/2018 and 12/2018 Medication, Treatment and Task Administration Record Report (MAR/TAR) revealed no documentation or observations had been added for the treatment and care of the laceration and sutures to Resident #100's head. Observation of Resident #100 on 12/4/18 at 8:30 AM, in the resident's room, revealed 2 sutures intact to the right posterior side of the head. Interview with the Registered Nurse/Resident Care Coordinator (RN/RCC) #1 and RN #1 on 12/4/18 at 2:25 PM, in the Conference Room, confirmed RN #1 failed to add the laceration/suture care to the MAR/TAR for Resident #100. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) #2 and #3 on 12/4/18 at 2:45 PM, in the third floor lounge, confirmed they were assigned to care for Resident #100 and were not aware Resident #100 had sutures in her scalp. Interview with the Medical Director on 12/4/18 at 3:00 PM, in the 3rd floor chart room, confirmed the facility failed to follow the ER discharge orders for Resident #100. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/4/18 at 4:15 PM, in the Conference Room, confirmed the facility failed to place the discharge instructions for the care and treatment of the sutures for Resident #100 on the MAR/TAR. Further interview confirmed the facility failed to follow the ER discharge instructions for Resident #100 following a fall with laceration/sutures.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of nursing standards of care, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of nursing standards of care, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care to address 1 resident's (#105) decline in respiratory status of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care of 36 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Twelfth Edition, [NAME] publisher 2010 revealed, Assessing for Heart Failure - Be alert for the following signs and symptoms: GENERAL - Fatigue .Dependent Edema, Weight Gain .Respiratory - Dyspnea on exertion . Medical record review revealed Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Status Post Open Heart for Mitral Valve Replacement, Pneumonia Post-Op (after surgery), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Medical record review of the admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed, A&O x3 [alert and orient to person, place and time] .Respirations even/unlabored with diminished bases [less lungs sounds heard in lower lungs] .Expressed need for therapy before returning home. Medical record review of a Nurse Practitioner's progress note dated 11/26/18 revealed, Pt [patient] seen today following admission .pt reports doing okay, just with little energy .called back to her room later this afternoon because her O2 [oxygen] saturation dropped to 86% on room air [normal O2 saturation value 94-99%] 1) CHF [Congestive Heart Failure] with exertional dyspnea [shortness of breath] will give additional 40 mg [milligrams] Lasix [diuretic] .now .3) COPD with exacerbation .Schedule duoneb QID [respiratory nebulizer treatments 4 times a day] .Aggressive pulmonary toilet [medical and nursing measures to address lung function]. Encourage pt to splint and cough. Check CXR [chest X-ray] 2 views now . Medical record review of the Nurse Practitioner's progress noted dated 11/27/18 revealed, .9) Volume overload [too much retained fluid] - SP [status post] Lasix diuresis for dyspnea-watch weight . Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurses Notes revealed from 11/28/18-12/1/18 the resident's oxygen saturation averaged 94% with no record of the amount of liters oxygen being delivered per minute when the oxygen level was measured. Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurses Note on 12/3/18 at 12:00 PM, revealed no recorded vital signs. Continued review of the one entry for 12/3/18 revealed, Resting in bed at this time. NC [nasal cannula] in place delivering O2. Pt had SOB [shortness of breath] this am [morning] and didn't have NC in. NC placed and O2 sat 91% shortly thereafter. Call light in reach. Will monitor . Medical record review of the Nurse Practitioner's progress noted dated 12/4/18 revealed, Pt seen today for reports of SOB. Pt treated for CHF exacerbation upon admission. Despite diuretics, her SOB has not improved. O2 demand has increased [need for increased liters of supplemental oxygen] and pt feels as if she cannot get enough air in. Pt does report unilateral LLE [lower leg edema in both legs] since admission O2 sat [saturation] 90% on 5 Lpm [5 liters per minute of oxygen by nasal cannula] .1) SOB - obtain .CXR. Give Lasix 40 mg IM [intramuscular] 1 dose now .2) Acute hypoxemic [low oxygen level] resp [respiratory] failure - now on 5 Lpm [5 liters per minute]. Pt's O2 sat during exam was 89-91%. Pt did not require O2 prior to hospitalization. With COPD will attempt to keep sat >90%. Avoid high O2 flow [amount of oxygen administered per minute] d/t [due to] unknown hypercapnia [excessive carbon dioxide in the bloodstream] hx [history] . Medical record review of the Daily Skilled Nurses Notes from 11/26/18-12/4/18 revealed no record of the resident being assisted to splint and cough. Medical record review of the Baseline Care Plan, undated and unsigned, revealed Care Area .Respiratory .Oxygen 1.5 L [liters per minute] keep sats [oxygen saturation] 90%-92%. Continued review revealed no intervention listed related to the aggressive pulmonary toilet prescribed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) to assist the resident to splint and cough. Observation and interview with the resident on 12/3/18 at 9:00 AM, in her room, revealed she was seated on her bed, appeared short of breath and this increased when she attempted to answer more than a few questions. Observation and interview with the resident on 12/5/18 at 2:00 PM, in her room, revealed she was seated on her bed with unlabored respirations. Interview continued and the resident stated she was .better .up all night off and on going to the bathroom [the same night after receiving the 40 mg of Lasix IM]. Interview with the resident's Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on 12/3/18, at 3:00 PM, in the conference room, revealed the LPN restated the information provided on his nursing entry for 12/03/18. In addition, he added the resident had been in the low 80's [referring to oxygen saturation] when she returned from the bathroom without her oxygen]. Continued interview confirmed he had not notified the Nurse Practitioner who was onsite of the low oxygen saturation and had not assessed the resident's lung sounds. Interview with the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) #1 on 12/4/18 at 9:05 AM, at the third floor nursing station, revealed the resident was not weighed on Monday 12/3/18 and stated LPN #2 told the RCC, .She should have been. Interview continued and revealed the NP had not seen the resident on Monday 12/3/18. Further interview confirmed a NP had not seen the resident for the previous 6 days and the resident had not been weighed since 11/30/18. Interview with the NP on 12/4/18 at 8:45 AM, in the third floor nursing station, revealed I have never seen the resident (#105) .plan to assess her this morning . Interview with RCC #2 on 12/4/18 at 1:15 PM, in the conference room, revealed the resident's weight this day was 153 pounds and confirmed this was an increase of 5 pounds from the last weight of 148 pounds, 4 days earlier. Further interview confirmed the weight was to be done every Monday and had not been done as ordered. Continued interview revealed the chest x-ray had been reported and included in the findings The lungs again demonstrate patchy infiltrate in the right base, probably with effusion [fluid]). There is an active process in the left base . Interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 12/4/18 at 1:45 PM, in the conference room, revealed the nurses were to take SaO2 [oxygen saturation level in the bloodstream] on all residents as part of the routine vital signs. Continued interview revealed the DON could not provide a formal respiratory care policy. A document titled O2 Saturation Guidelines, undated, was provided for the interview. Further interview confirmed the 3 guidelines provided did not require the information of the amount of oxygen being delivered when oxygen saturation was obtained. Continued interview revealed .a lot of problems with residents' oxygen levels are found by the rehab staff . Further interview revealed Resident #105 had not been fully assessed daily by the nursing staff for her respiratory status and had not been care planned to receive the Aggressive pulmonary toilet prescribed by the NP on 11/26/18.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to resubmit a PASARR Level 1 (Pre admission Screening and Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to resubmit a PASARR Level 1 (Pre admission Screening and Resident Review that determines whether or not an individual who has an active diagnosis of mental illness or Intellectual/Development Disability meet the criteria for admission to a nursing facility and may require specialized services) after new psychiatric diagnoses for 2 residents (#56 and #59) of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR level 2 (The results of this evaluation result in a determination of need, determination of appropriate setting and a set of recommendations for service to inform the individual's plan of care) of 36 residents reviewed. The finding include: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, and Intracranial Injury. Medical record review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 6/11/14 revealed Resident #56 did not have a diagnosis of a major mental illness and did not have a history of mental illness in the last 2 years. Medical record review of a Psychiatric Progress Note dated 10/19/18 revealed .Pt [patient] seen for the management of dementia, anxiety, and depression . Medical record review of Resident #56's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had current diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder and Depression. Medical record review of Resident #56's Comprehensive Care Plan updated 11/6/18 revealed, .Side effects, potential for: Paxil [an antidepressant medication], Depakote [a mood stabilization medication] .Dx [diagnosis] depression, anxiety, behaviors .becomes agitated .Mental Health Consult & Tx [treatment] . Medical record review of the current Physician's Orders dated 12/1/18 revealed, .Paroxetine HCL [a medication for depression] 30 mg [milligrams] . with order dated 1/19/18 and .Valproic Acid [a medication for mood stabilization] 250 mg/5ml [milliliters] . with order dated 3/8/18. Further review revealed, .Psychiatric services to evaluate and treat as needed . with order dated 5/18/17. Medical record review of the Diagnostic Problem List dated 12/4/18 revealed, .Anxiety Disorder .Start date 6/12/14 .End date 9/22/17 .Psychosis .Start date 12/22/14 .End date 2/20/18 .Generalized Anxiety Disorder .Start date 9/22/17 .Major Depressive Disorder .Start Date .9/22/17 .End date .5/14/18 .Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood .Start dated .5/14/18 . Interview with MDS Coordinator #2 on 12/04/18 at 2:20 PM, in the MDS office, confirmed the facility failed to submit a PASARR change of status when the resident was diagnosed with a newly evident or possible mental disorder. Medical record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and Mood Disorder. Medical record review of Resident #59's PASARR Level 1 dated 11/5/16 revealed a PASARR Level 1 was submitted on Resident #59 prior to admission to the facility. Continued review revealed the Primary 1 Axis Diagnosis was Bipolar Disorder. Further review revealed the resident was not approved for PASARR Level 2 services. Medical record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had a BIMS of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review revealed no documentation of a Psychiatric/Mood Disorder of Anxiety. Medical record review of the Psychiatric Consult dated 8/17/18 revealed, .Pt seen for management of mood and anxiety . Continued review revealed .Based on diagnosis or prescribed treatment, patient is at risk for worsening mood or anxiety, leading to potential for decreased participation in care, worsening of associated comorbidities and/or psychiatric hospitalization . Medical record review of Resident #59's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had documentation of a new Psychiatric/Mood Disorder of Anxiety. Medical record review of Resident #59's Comprehesive Care plan dated 11/7/18 revealed the resident was care planned for mood as evidence by diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, and Mood Disorder. Medical record review of the Psychiatric Consult dated 11/7/18 revealed, .Symptom(s) .Challenge(s) Addressed in Today's Session .Anxiety .New/Ongoing Target Sx [symptoms] .Anxiety .DIAGNOSIS ASSESSMENT AND PLAN .Anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition . Medical record review of the Psychiatric Consult dated 11/14/18 revealed .Summary of Session: SW [Social Worker] referred patient d/t [due to] anxiety/depression d/t difficulty adjusting to LTC [long term care] . Interview with MDS Coordinator #2 on 12/5/18 at 10:40 AM, in conference room, confirmed Resident #59 received a new diagnosis of Anxiety in 8/2018. Continued interview confirmed the facility failed to resubmit a PASARR Level 1 to determine if Resident #59 would be approved for PASARR Level 2 services. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/5/18 at 11:36 AM, in the conference room, confirmed the facility failed to resubmit a PASARR Level 1 for Resident #59 after the resident received a new diagnoses of Anxiety.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s), $33,716 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $33,716 in fines. Higher than 94% of Tennessee facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (35/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville Staffed?

CMS rates NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 64%, which is 18 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE during 2018 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 15 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville?

NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 127 certified beds and approximately 96 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in KNOXVILLE, Tennessee.

How Does Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (64%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville Stick Around?

Staff turnover at NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE is high. At 64%, the facility is 18 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville Ever Fined?

NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE has been fined $33,716 across 1 penalty action. The Tennessee average is $33,416. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Nhc Healthcare, Knoxville on Any Federal Watch List?

NHC HEALTHCARE, KNOXVILLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.