VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION

460 HANNINGS LANE, MARTIN, TN 38237 (731) 587-3193
For profit - Corporation 91 Beds THE ENSIGN GROUP Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
63/100
#157 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: July 2021

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Vanayer Senior Living and Rehabilitation in Martin, Tennessee has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #157 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the bottom half, and #3 out of 4 in Weakley County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility's trend is stable, with two issues reported in both 2021 and 2025. Staffing is a moderate strength, with a turnover rate of 45%, which is lower than the state average of 48%, though it received an average rating of 3 out of 5 stars overall. However, there have been concerning incidents, including a resident suffering multiple fractures from a fall due to inadequate supervision and issues with food sanitation and medication storage that could pose risks to residents. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing stability, the facility has critical areas that need improvement to ensure resident safety and care quality.

Trust Score
C+
63/100
In Tennessee
#157/298
Bottom 48%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
2 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
45% turnover. Near Tennessee's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$8,278 in fines. Higher than 65% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Tennessee. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2021: 2 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (45%)

    3 points below Tennessee average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Tennessee average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 45%

Near Tennessee avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $8,278

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Feb 2025 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (Q...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee documentation review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance and supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 12 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. Resident #1, who was dependent on staff for bed mobility, fell from her bed on 1/14/2025 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A rolled the resident on her side then CNA A turned her back on the resident during incontinence care. Resident #1 sustained a right distal femoral shaft fracture (break in the lower part of the thighbone, just above the knee joint), left distal femoral shaft fracture, and left proximal tibia fracture (break in the upper part of the shinbone near the knee joint) from the fall, which resulted in actual HARM to the resident. The facility was cited past noncompliance for F689, and is not required to submit a plan of correction. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Management System, with a revision/review date of 12/2023, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to provide an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as possible .to provide each resident with appropriate assessment and interventions to prevent falls and to minimize complications if a fall occurs .Fall refers to unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level, but not as a result of overwhelming external force .Review of the fall incident will include investigation to determine probable causal factors . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Fracture of Left Proximal Tibia, Fracture of Left Distal Femoral Shaft, Fracture of Right Distal Femoral Shaft, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the Left Non-Dominant Side, Leukemia, Contracture of the Right and Left Hand (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and nearby tissues that causes the joint to shorten and become very stiff), Parkinson's Disease, Vascular Dementia, and Osteoporosis. Review of the Fall Risk Evaluation dated 11/9/2024, revealed Resident #1 scored an 11 which indicated she was at high risk for falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 scored an 8 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #8 experienced limited range of motion in bilateral upper and lower extremities and was totally dependent on staff for mobility. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 11/20/2024 with a revision date of 12/14/2024, revealed .ADL [activities of daily living] self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] .ambulation, bathing, bed mobility, dressing, eating, hygiene, locomotion, transfers .BED MOBILITY: Assist with bed mobility as needed .pressure reducing mattress, position for comfort .Turn/reposition every 2 hours/prn [as needed] .TRANSFERS .[Named brand] lift x [times] 2 staff for transfer bed to chair .The resident is at risk for falls r/t Unaware of safety needs, functional/cognitive deficits .The resident will be free of falls .Anticipate and meet the resident's needs . Review of the Nursing Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 1/8/2025 at 1:14 PM, revealed Temp [temperature] 99.3 observed with cough and runny nose. Received new order .for CXR [Chest xray], COVID test and Flu [influenza] test. Review of the Nursing Progress note for Resident #1 dated 1/9/2025 at 9:52 AM, revealed .flu test came back with positive results for flu A. MD [Medical Doctor/Director] made aware with new order . Review of the [Named Hospital] Laboratory Report for Resident #1 dated 1/9/2025, revealed Resident #1 tested positive for Influenza A and a new order for Tamiflu (medication to treat influenza) 75 milligrams (mg) twice daily for 5 days was received from the physician. Review of the [Named Company] Radiology Report for Resident #1 dated 1/9/2025, revealed a chest xray was obtained and no active cardiopulmonary disease was seen. Review of the Physician's Order for Resident #1 dated 1/9/2025, revealed .cefTRIAXone Sodium Injection [an antibiotic given for bacterial infections] .1 GM [gram] Inject 1 gram intramuscularly one time a day for congestion for 3 days. Review of the Nursing Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 1/13/2025 at 3:59 AM, revealed .Resident continues to receive Tamiflu .d/t [due to] positive for flu .Occasional cough still noted and generalized malaise [feeling of weakness, overall discomfort, illness, or simply not feeling well]. Review of the Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #1 revealed no documentation of the fall Resident #1 sustained on 1/14/2025 at approximately 9:15 to 9:30 AM. Review of the Nursing Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 1/14/2025 at 1:27 PM, revealed O2 [oxygen] applied to resident due to decreased SpO2 [oxygen saturation-measurement of how much oxygen the blood is carrying] .MD made aware of current condition and Xray results with new orders for bilateral knee immobilizers and Albuterol [medication to treat wheezing, difficulty breathing, and chest tightness] 2 puffs per inhaler [small handheld device that delivers medication in a spray or powder form directly to the lungs through inhalation] QID [four times a day] . Review of the Nursing Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 1/15/2025 at 4:09 PM, revealed Called and updated daughter .on patient's condition. Respiratory status is declining . Review of the Nursing Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 1/18/2025 at 11:54 AM, revealed .Resident with no B/P [blood pressure], heart tones or spontaneous respirations. Time of death 11:50a.m. [11:50 AM] . 3. Review of the facility investigation Incident Report dated 1/14/2025, revealed Resident [#1] .Incident Location: Resident's Room .Nursing Description: While receiving incontinent care CNA [A] rolled resident on her side and turned to grab a pad and resident slid off the bed .MD in facility and examined resident with new orders received. 2 person assist with turning and repositioning [new intervention implemented after Resident #1's fall] .Predisposing Physiological Factors .Recent illness . The report was completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B. Review of the facility investigation FALL QUESTIONNAIRE dated 1/14/2024, revealed .[Named Resident #1] .calm, let me [CNA A] get her cleaned up .Incontinent .As I [CNA A] was changing [Resident #1] I turned to grab a pad to put under her and she slid off of the side of the bed . The document was documented by LPN B and signed by CNA A. Review of the radiology report for Resident #1 dated 1/14/2025 at 11:44 AM, and reported at 12:09 PM, revealed .KNEE .LEFT .Fracture of the distal femoral shaft with malalignment .Proximal tibia fracture with mild displacement . KNEE .RIGHT .Fracture of the distal femoral shaft with malalignment . Review of the typed investigation signed by the Administrator and dated 1/15/2025, revealed On Tuesday, January 14 [2025], at approximately 9:30 am, it was reported to this staff member that [Named Resident #1] .was being changed by [Named CNA A]. [Named CNA A] had turned [Named Resident #1] towards the window, away from her [CNA A], in order to tuck a clean pad underneath [Named Resident #1]. [Named Resident #1] has transfer rails [grab bars] on her bed and usually holds to the bar when she is turned. Prior to this time, [Named Resident #1] had been sick and was weaker than baseline. According to [Named CNA A], she turned to grab a pad to put under [Named Resident #1] and [Named Resident #1] started to slide off the side of the bed. [Named CNA A] stated she tried to get to [Named Resident #1] in time to stop the fall but was not quick enough. [Named Resident #1] fell on her bottom, hitting her knee on the floor .An Xray of both knees was obtained on 1/14/2025 at 12:08 [PM] .left leg: Acute appearing femoral and tibial fracture. Right leg: Acute appearing femoral fracture . Review of the handwritten statement for Resident #1 documented by CNA A on 1/17/2025 for the incident that happened on 1/14/2025, revealed I [CNA A] went into the room [Resident #1's room] around 9am [9:00 AM]. I gathered all of my things to assist [Named Resident #1]. As I finished cleaning her [Resident #1] up in the front I rolled her away from me, towards the window. I turned to grab a pad and sheet to put under her. As I was turned I heard her start to slide off of the side [of the bed]. I tried to get to her in time to keep her on the bed but I wasn't quick enough. She fell on her bottom hitting her knee on the ground. I ran out the door to grab a nurse to assist me. We were able to get her on her back with the help of two others and [Named Brand lift] her back into the bed, where I finished up with help. 4. During a telephone interview on 2/4/2025 at 10:36 AM, Family Member (FM) C denied Resident #1 received hospice services. FM C stated, .I had signed for her a DNR .no she was not in hospice because as I understood if she were in hospice care she would not be able to be taken to the hospital .[Resident #1] was a fighter and had made it to 94 [years old] .apparently the CNA was trying to change her and she [CNA] dropped her out of the bed and it fractured both of her femurs . FM C was asked was there only one CNA in the room. FM C stated, Yes .quite often there was two because she was immobile from the waist down and had lost a lot of her upper arm strength. FM C stated, .somewhere in there I made the decision for them not to move her to the hospital because [Named Medical Director] had said he didn't believe she would make it through surgery .the only objection, with a patient who is 94, immobile from the waist down, [had] just gone through the flu, [was given] antibiotics for chest congestion, that instead of two CNAs to change her they had one and that's how the accident happened .I'm just so unhappy about the accident because it was avoidable .her hands had contractures . During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 9:27 AM, CNA A read and verified her handwritten statement dated 1/17/2025. CNA A was asked if she was familiar with [Resident #1's] care. CNA A stated, A little bit .I hadn't been working with her for maybe a month or so prior to that because my hours went down because I had gone back to school .I usually work when someone calls off or they're short staffed . CNA A confirmed she worked in the facility as the shower aide, also. CNA A was asked was she scheduled as the shower aide that day [1/14/2025]. CNA A stated, I think in the schedule I was, but someone had called off, so they put me on the floor. CNA A was asked did she look at Resident #1's [NAME] (system that summarizes care a resident requires for the CNA staff) or Care Plan before she went in Resident #1's room. CNA A stated, No, I didn't get a chance to. CNA confirmed she did not receive a shift report from the off-going CNA prior to beginning her shift. CNA A stated, I was [here] as a shower aide and they didn't know someone had called out, so I didn't get report before starting. CNA A acknowledged that she was not aware Resident #1 had been sick with the flu and chest congestion over the past few days prior to the fall and that information would have been important for her to know. CNA A was asked what interventions to prevent falls were in place before the accident occurred. CNA A stated, I do not know, it was never brought up to me. CNA A was asked if Resident #1 was one or two-person assist for ADLs. CNA stated, A lot of times people did her one person but I think she should have been two person [that day] .I had her before and she used to be able to hold herself up, but I didn't know she was sick and wasn't as strong as she usually was. CNA A stated, I went in there roughly 9 or 9:15ish, I had grabbed my pad, brief, rags, and gloves as I went in there, cleaned up the front side [while she was lying on her back] .rolled her toward [the] window .[CNA A confirmed she was behind Resident #1 when she rolled her over] .With her right hand [Resident #1 grabbed the grab bar on the bed] .I proceeded to clean up her back side, took the old brief out, tucked the old pad under her. I turned around to grab the new pad and the new brief and as I was turned, I heard her sliding but wasn't sure what I was hearing, so I turned around and by the time I turned she was already on the floor. CNA A stated she turned around to the overbed table to grab the brief and pad. CNA A was asked if her hands were on the resident or was she completely turned around. CNA A stated, I was completely turned around .I yelled for help and went to open the door. My nurse [named LPN B] was there in the hall . CNA A was asked did Resident #1 complain of pain. CNA A stated, She was saying Ow, Ow . CNA A stated Resident #1 was sitting on her bottom with her legs in front of her and was leaning against the wall the window was on. CNA A confirmed LPN B obtained Resident #1's vital signs while she got two other CNAs to help them get the resident up with the mechanical lift. CNA A stated, After the fall she was kind of out of it .she couldn't keep her eyes open .now that I know she was sick, she didn't look too good .looked like she was in a lot of pain and didn't feel too good. I did let the nurse know [that it] looked like she was going in and out of consciousness and didn't feel too good. CNA A stated Resident #1 was on an air mattress (alternating pressure mattress). CNA A was asked did she believe the air mattress contributed to the fall. CNA A stated, A little bit. It wasn't as firm [as the regular mattresses], it was soft, you would put your hand on it, and it would go down. CNA A stated this incident taught her to get the help she needed and trust her instincts. CNA A was asked to explain what she meant by trust her instincts. CNA A stated, When I went in there, she wasn't looking too good because she was sick, so I definitely should've gotten help. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 10:39 AM, LPN B acknowledged she was familiar with Resident #1. LPN B stated, .She was total assist .she could feed herself, but you would have to watch her plate and turn it and sometimes assist [with eating] .Yes [contractures] of her hands .one hand she kept closed but the other you could have her open up and she could drink her coffee and used her spoon . LPN B was asked how the flu [positive for flu A on 1/9/2025] affected her. LPN B stated, .You could just tell she didn't feel good. LPN B was asked what were [Resident #1's] risk factors for falling. LPN B stated, She didn't get out of bed, no falls .I was kind of shocked when [Named CNA A] came and got me [after Resident #1 fell out of bed on 1/14/2025] .never dreamed [Named Resident #1] would fall. LPN B stated, She was on an air mattress and they [facility Administration] think that contributed to the fall .[Resident #1 had] No falls in the time I've been here [2 years in June or July 2025] . LPN B was asked what caused the accident. LPN B stated, .what [Named CNA A] said is all I know. She said she turned her [Resident #1] away from her [CNA A] towards the window and reached to grab the pad .and she [Resident #1] just tumbles over .She had a hematoma on her right knee. [Named Medical Director] was in the facility, and I wanted him to see it. I had put ice on it [right knee] and he said we needed to xray [her] bilateral lower extremities .he said he thought she had a fracture, so we got xrays and she had 2 fractures [Resident #1 had 3 fractures per xrays]. LPN B stated, She was sitting in the floor with her back against the window [wall the window was on] and her legs were kind of to the side [LPN B sat in the floor and demonstrated how she found Resident #1, sitting on her bottom with her legs bent at the knees, out to the right of the resident, and angled towards her bottom]. LPN B was asked was it safe for CNA A to turn Resident #1 on her side then turn her back and leave the resident on her side. LPN B stated, .I wouldn't have done that myself. During a telephone interview on 2/6/2025 at 3:32 PM, the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) stated Resident #1 was on her caseload and she saw her once a month and as needed. The FNP was asked was she aware of the resident's fall from bed on 1/14/2025. The FNP stated, Yes, I was aware of the fall, [I was] actually rounding in the facility. Actually [Named Medical Director] and I went in there together. He looked her [Resident #1] over .She was laying in bed, did not appear to be in any pain, [we] asked her several times if she was hurting, and she said no .could tell by looking at her legs she probably had fractures. The FNP stated she was not aware how the fall happened, but she thought it was during patient care. The FNP was asked in her professional opinion did she believe it was safe for a staff member to turn her (Resident #1) on her side and turn their back to retrieve items from the over bed table. The FNP stated, You and I both know the answer to that. It could have been a safety concern, obviously . The FNP was asked in her professional opinion did she believe the fall where Resident #1 sustained a left femur fracture, left tibia fracture, and a right femur fracture on 1/14/2025 may have contributed to her death 4 days later (1/18/2025). The FNP stated, That's too hard to say, she already had flu and had respiratory illness .with fracture of long bones there's always a risk of death. She was in very poor health and very fragile . During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 10:40 AM, the Staffing Coordinator was asked how she taught CNA students to recognize when two staff members were needed for resident care. The Staffing Coordinator stated, [I] teach them if the patient cannot physically hold on to the side rail, to make sure they have two people .prior to this incident when you rolled her [Resident #1] she would hold on .with her wrist and hand .around the grab bar kind of like hugging it. The Staffing Coordinator was asked if Resident #1 was in a weakened state physically from the flu. The Staffing Coordinator stated, Yes, I think she was. During an interview on 2/10/2025 at 3:44 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, On some days she [Resident #1] could feed herself, some days she couldn't, [staff] would always pop in to make sure she didn't need extra help. She was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The DON stated she was made aware of Resident #1's fall on 1/15/2025, because she was not working on 1/14/2025 when the fall occurred. The DON was asked was it safe for CNA A to leave Resident #1 on her side and turn her back to retrieve a clean brief and pad. The DON stated, It's hard for me to say because I wasn't in there to see if she [CNA A] made sure she [Resident #1] was safe. The DON was asked did she believe it was safe for CNA A to completely turn her back on the resident. The DON stated, No, I do not. During an interview on 2/11/2025 at 11:08 AM, the Administrator stated she went to Resident #1's room immediately after her fall, .[I] observed her on the bed .looked at her mattress .She has a transfer rail .she would typically hold to it but she had been weak and sick, she had the flu and she didn't do that this time evidently [hold to the transfer rail/grab bar]. The Administrator was asked with Resident #1 being weak and sick, should two people have been used to provide care for the resident. The Administrator stated, It depends, this girl [CNA A] had done her before [provided care alone] like I said, she wasn't labeled as two-person . The Administrator was asked was Resident #1 harmed when CNA A left her on her side, turned her back to retrieve supplies, and she fell out of bed. The Administrator stated, Yeah, she fell out of bed and was harmed for sure. The Administrator was asked what the QAPI Committee identified as the root cause of the fall. The Administrator stated, I named 4 factors that contributed .determined because of these 4 things the safest practice would be to have a 2nd staff member on the other side of the alternating mattress [5 Whys but they only identified 4 Whys] . 5. Review of the QAPI Committee documentation revealed the following: A typed summary of the incident and corrective action steps taken dated 1/15/2025, revealed the following: a. Resident #1's alternating pressure mattress was examined and determined to be in the proper working order with normal pressure indicated. Of significance the pressure mattress was noted to give downward when the edge of the mattress was weighted which could allow a weak resident to slide downward when weight was applied to the edge of the mattress. CNA instructor/Staffing Coordinator was consulted regarding instructions for CNA students when turning a resident for occupied bed care, such as changing linens. b. Resident #1's transfer rails were properly installed and sturdy. c. All alternating pressure mattresses in the facility were assessed on the afternoon of 1/14/2025 and it was determined that bedbound residents on alternating pressure mattresses who lacked core body control were also at risk. d. The 5 Whys were used to determine the root cause of the fall. e. An in-service was initiated on 1/15/2025 for all nursing staff. f. An Ad Hoc QAPI Clinical meeting was conducted on 1/15/2025. Review of the undated Root Cause Analysis document revealed, Problem Identified: Fall with Major Injury .During the committee's investigation, the 'Five Whys' method was utilized to identify the root cause of the problem so that appropriate approaches can be planned. Slid out of bed . a. Why did this occur? Turned on left side for the CNA to change pad, slid out of bed. b. Why did this occur? Alternating Pressure Mattress gives downward on edges when direct weight is applied. c. Why did this occur? Alternating air mattress edge is not as firm as regular mattresses. d. Why did this occur? Resident's legs were believed to have slid off the edge of the bed pulling her torso with her. The QAPI Committed concluded the root cause of the problem was the design of the alternating pressure mattress, and the resident was weak from illness and was unable to stabilize her torso when turned on her side. Review of the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) began on 1/14/2025 and completed on 1/31/2025, revealed the following Action Plan for Improvement: a. Investigation and Root Cause Analysis completed. b. All facility residents on air mattresses requiring assistance with turning and repositioning have been identified as having the potential to be affected. c. 100 percent (%) audit of air mattresses to ensure proper working order was completed by the Administrator (who is a Registered Nurse). No concerns were identified. d. Education was initiated on 1/15/2025 to CNAs and licensed nurses by the Administrator regarding residents on air mattresses requiring assistance with turning and repositioning shall have 2 staff members present to assist. e. 100% audit of residents' care plans and [NAME] reviewed and revised between 1/15/2025 and 1/31/2025 to include revised intervention of two person assistance with bed mobility for all residents with alternating pressure mattresses. f. Knowledge checks to demonstrate nurses and CNAs competency of education received were initiated by the Staffing Coordinator on 1/29/2025 and completed on 1/31/2025. g. Competency return demonstrations regarding making an occupied bed and positioning a resident on side their was initiated for CNAs by the Staffing Coordinator on 1/30/2025 and will be ongoing with random checks. h. An Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held on 1/31/2025 to review current corrective actions plans. Further review of the PIP dated 1/31/2025, revealed the subsequent follow up to monitor the corrective action plan: a. Nurse Administration and charge nurses will perform knowledge checks and random observations, each rotation (shift) weekly for 4 weeks and then bi-monthly for 2 months. b. Nurse Managers and Administrator will perform air mattress audits to ensure proper functioning, weekly for 4 weeks, and then bi-monthly for 2 months. c. Findings will be reported to the QAPI committee for the 1st QAPI quarter, 2025. d. If substantial compliance is not met, staff will be re-educated and facility audits will continue, until substantial compliance is met. Review of the facility's investigation and corrective action plan revealed the facility returned to substantial compliance on 1/31/2025.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately when an unsecured medication was observed in 1 of 38 resident rooms (Resident #4's room) which could have potentially affected the 4 identified wandering residents (Resident #11, #12, #13, and #14) in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 1/2025, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure the proper and safe storage of drugs and biologicals .Drugs and/or biologicals should not be left unsecured/unattended . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease, Anemia, Cardiomegaly, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Allergic Rhinitis, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Polyosteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicating Resident #4 was cognitively intact. No behaviors were documented during the 7-day lookback period. Review of the Care Plan dated 10/9/2024 with a revision date of 12/28/2024, revealed Resident #4 was not care planned to self-administer medications. Review of the Physician's Order for Resident #1 dated 1/10/2025, revealed .Breo Ellipta 100-25 MCG [microgram]/ACT [Actuation-a mouthpiece to allow the patient/resident to operate the inhaler and directs the medicine into the lungs] Aerosol Powder .INHALE ONE PUFF INTO THE LUNGS EVERY DAY. RINSE MOUTH AFTER USE AND SPIT OUT . Observation and interview in Resident #1's room on 2/7/2025 9:02 AM, revealed a Breo Ellipta 100 mcg/25 mcg inhaler (a small handheld device that delivers medication in a spray or powder form directly to the lungs through inhalation) on the foot of Resident #4's bed. When asked if she kept the inhaler in her room, Resident #4 stated, No, the nurse left it for me to use .She gave it to me and will come to get it on her way back. If not, I'll take it to her. During an interview on 2/10/2025 at 11:42 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked should medications be left unattended in the residents' rooms. The DON stated, No, ma'am. The DON confirmed Resident #4 had not been assessed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to self-administer the Breo-Ellipta inhaler. The DON was asked if self-administration of medications was on the resident's care plan. The DON stated, I'm pretty sure it's not . During an interview on 2/10/2025 at 3:44 PM, the DON confirmed Resident #4's care plan did not include self-administration of medications.
Jul 2021 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment and failed to follow physician's orders for changing oxygen tubing and humidifie...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment and failed to follow physician's orders for changing oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #25, #35, and #163) reviewed for Respiratory Care. The findings include: Review of medical record, revealed Resident #25 had diagnoses of Aphasia, Epilepsy, Diabetes, Hypertension, Acute Respiratory Failure, Obesity, and Dysphagia. Review of Physician's Orders dated 7/25/2021, revealed .albuterol sulfate 2.5 mg [milligram]/3 ml [milliliter] solution for nebulization .Nebulization Every 6 Hours . Observation in the resident's room on 7/26/2021 at 9:56 AM, 11:29 AM and 3:15 PM, and on 7/27/2021 at 8:05 AM, revealed the Resident #25's nebulizer mask and nebulizer were sitting on the back of the oxygen concentrator with the mask lying against the wall uncovered. Review of medical record, revealed Resident #163 had diagnoses of Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Cardiomegaly, Obesity, and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Review of Physician's Orders dated 7/22/2021, revealed .Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 2 Times Daily .at HS [hour of sleep] .Remove in AM . Observation in in the resident's room on 7/26/2021 at 9:19 AM, and 11:58 AM, and on 7/27/2021 at 9:37 AM, revealed Resident #163's CPAP mask was lying on top of the night stand uncovered. During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 5:39 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that CPAP and nebulizer masks should not be stored uncovered, and the nebulizer mask should not be lying on the oxygen concentrator with the mask touching the wall. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #35 had diagnoses of Right Hip Fracture, Repeated Falls, Atrial Fibrillation, and Hypertension. Review of the July 2021 Physician Orders Sheet, revealed orders for Oxygen at 2-3 liters/minute via binasal cannula, to change Oxygen tubing every week, and to change the humidifier bottle every week. Review of Resident #35's July 2021 Treatment Administration Record (TAR), revealed the Oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were signed off as having been changed on 7/23/2021. Observation in the resident's room on 7/26/2021 at 9:20 AM, and 3:14 PM, 7/27/2021 at 5:30 PM, and on 7/28/2021 at 7:48 AM, and 8:09 AM, revealed Resident #35 was in the room receiving Oxygen through a binasal cannula dated 7/18/2021 and a humidifier bottle was dated 7/18/2021. During an interview on 7/28/2021 at 8:09 AM, the DON confirmed the oxygen tubing was dated 7/18/2021, and these should have been changed. The DON confirmed nurses should not sign out tubing and humidifier changes on the TAR unless they have actually been changed.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions as e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions as evidenced by carbon build-up on pots and pans, expired food items in the Kitchen, open and undated food items in the Kitchen, dirty equipment in the Kitchen, staff failed to clean the thermometer during tray line temperature checks, and 5 of 10 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) placed contaminated cups back onto a clean dining cart, entered a droplet isolation room without the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and failed to perform hand hygiene during dining observations. The facility had a census of 59 with 59 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Food Service, revised 7/12/2021, revealed .Leftover foods are stored in appropriate containers .Leftovers should be used within three (3) days .All stored items should have an expiration date or a purchase/delivery date . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Cleaning, dated 7/13/2021, revealed .Adequate Cleaning and sanitizing will minimize the risk of food born illness .Kitchen Supervisor will post a weekly cleaning schedule that identifies .The equipment .to be cleaned .The frequency of cleaning . Review of the CLEANING SCHEDULE, revealed, .Refrigerator/Reach in Cooler .check Dates .Daily . Review of the facility policy's titled, Hand Hygiene, revised 3/15/2021, revealed .Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated .Between resident contacts . Review of the facility's policy titled, Transmission-Based Precautions revised 2/2020, revealed .Donning personal protective equipment (PPE) upon entry . Observation in the Kitchen on 7/26/2021 at 8:48 AM, 8:57 AM, and 9:04 AM, revealed the following: a. 1 medium and large skillet with a large amount of carbon buildup b. 1 open and undated carton of a thickened liquid lemon flavored water c. 1 open and undated carton of a thickened dairy drink in the refrigerator d. 2 cartons of buttermilk with an expiration date of 7/25/2021 in the refrigerator e. 1 open and undated carton of buttermilk in the refrigerator f. 4 cartons of 4-ounce orange juice with an expiration date of 7/25/2021 in the refrigerator g. 10 sheet pans with carbon build up on the bottom and the inside corners h. An air fryer sitting on the preparation table with large amount of greasy buildup i. 1 container of American sliced cheese with an open date of 7/8/2021 in the refrigerator j. 1 open and undated container of sliced Swiss cheese in the refrigerator k. 1 container of chicken salad with an open date of 6/18/2021 in the refrigerator l. 1 container of tuna salad with an open date of 7/12/2021 in the refrigerator m. 1 open and undated container of pimento cheese in the refrigerator n. 1 open and undated bag of French fries in the freezer Observation outside of Resident #164's room on 7/26/2021 at 11:40 AM, revealed a SPECIAL DROPLET/CONTACT PRECAUTIONS, sign posted on the door, with the following instructions .Clean hands when entering and leaving room .wear face mask .wear eye protection (face shield or goggles) .Gown and glove at door . Observation in the resident's room on 7/26/2021 at 11:40 AM, revealed CNA #1 entered the isolation room without donning proper PPE and picked up two cups from Resident #164's bedside, entered the bathroom and emptied the cups, exited the resident's room and placed the cups on the bottom of the dining cart with meal trays waiting to be served. Observation in the resident's room on 7/26/2021 at 11:56 AM, revealed CNA #2 entered Resident 3's room in droplet precautions without donning the proper PPE to assist the resident with her meal. Observation in the resident's room on 7/26/2021 at 12:02 PM, revealed CNA #3 delivered a lunch tray to Resident #7's room, set the tray down on the overbed table, touched the resident's bedding and repositioned the resident, then left Resident #7's room without performing hand hygiene, returned to Resident #7's room, uncovered the tray, walked back out of Resident #7's room while touching her own hair, returned to the room with a folding chair, touched her hair again, touched the bed controls, failed to perform hand hygiene, then proceed to open Resident #7's straw with her bare hands and placed it in her drink cup. Observation in the Kitchen on 7/27/2021 at 7:06 AM, revealed during the tray line temperatures, the Dietary manager failed to clean the thermometer between each food item. Dining observation in the resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]/27/2021 at 7:37 AM, CNA #1 entered Resident #164's room without donning the proper PPE in a droplet isolation room. Dining observation in the resident's room on 7/27/2021 at 7:40 AM, revealed CNA #1 entered Resident #3's room without donning proper PPE in a droplet isolation room. Dining observation in the residents' shared room on 7/27/2021 at 7:48 AM, revealed CNA #4 touched Resident #26's bed controls and bedding, failed to perform hand hygiene, then helped reposition Resident #4 up in the bed. CNA #4 exited the room and failed to perform hand hygiene. Observation in the 200 Hall on 7/27/2021 at 7:50 AM, revealed CNA #4 touched her goggles, removed a meal tray from the meal cart and delivered the tray to Resident #24, and placed the tray on the over bed table, then CNA #4 moved Resident #24's bedside table and exited the room, and failed to perform hand hygiene. CNA #4 removed the tray from the meal cart and delivered it to Resident #17. CNA #4 placed a towel over the Resident #17's chest, removed the lid from the plate, and started assisting Resident #17 with her meal and failed to perform hand hygiene. Observation in the resident's room on 7/27/2021 at 8:08 AM, revealed CNA #5 delivered a breakfast tray to Resident #35, touched personal items on the bedside table, bed controls and blankets, uncovered Resident #35's plate, and then exited Resident #35's room without performing hand hygiene. CNA #5 then went to the medication cart, returned back to Resident #35's room, touched the light switch, failed to perform hand hygiene, opened the butter and stirred it into the oatmeal with a spoon, and opened and placed a straw in the juice. Observation in the Kitchen on 7/27/2021 at 9:52 AM, revealed black discolored substance on the sides and the top lid of the ice machine. Observation in the Kitchen on 7/28/2021 at 8:43 AM, revealed the following: a. 8 sheet pans with carbon build-up on the bottom and and inside corners b. 1 large cake pan with carbon build-up on the outside c. 1 large steam table pan with carbon build-up outer rim d. 1 large skillet with carbon build-up on the outside and outer rim During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 7:10 AM, the Dietary Manager confirmed that she should have cleaned the thermometer between tray line temperature checks. During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 7:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed staff should don gown, gloves, goggles, and mask before entering a droplet isolation room. During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 7:46 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the staff members should don gloves, gown, mask, and goggles before entering a droplet isolation room. The DON confirmed that staff members should sanitize their hands before each tray. During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 8:19 AM, CNA #1 confirmed that she should not remove dirty cups from a droplet isolation room and place them on a dining cart of meal trays. During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 9:53 AM, the Registered Dietitian confirmed that the black substance inside the ice machine was mildew. During an interview on 7/28/2021 at 9:12 AM, the Dietary Manager confirmed that the equipment should not have carbon build-up. The Dietary Manager confirmed that there should not be any black discoloration inside the ice machine. The Dietary Manager confirmed there should not be items in the coolers or refrigerator beyond its expiration date. The Dietary manager confirmed that items should be dated when opened. The Dietary manager confirmed that there should not be dirty equipment on the preparation table.
Dec 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 1 (Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 1 (Resident #17) sampled residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fracture of Right Radius, Osteoarthritis, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Other Disorders of Bone Density, and Cerebrovascular Disease. The Interdisciplinary Team Occurrence Investigation Worksheet form documented, .Putting Pants on without Assistanc [Assistance] .Intervention .put in place .Cue Cards in Room to alert staff before Transferring .Date of Incident 10-4-19 .Fall to floor . Observations on 12/9/19 at 9:32 AM and 12/10/19 at 1:22 PM revealed no cue cards in Resident #17's room. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/10/19 at 2:10 PM in the DON Office, the DON was asked what intervention had been put in place after the fall. The DON stated, .cue cards . Interview with the DON on 12/10/19 at 2:19 PM in Resident #17's room, the DON confirmed there were no cue cards present in the room.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 45% turnover. Below Tennessee's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 5 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 63/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 4 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation?

VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE ENSIGN GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 91 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MARTIN, Tennessee.

How Does Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation Stick Around?

VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION has been fined $8,278 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Tennessee average of $33,162. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Vanayer Senior Living And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

VANAYER SENIOR LIVING AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.