PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

200 SOUTH PARKWAY WEST, MEMPHIS, TN 38109 (901) 942-7456
For profit - Limited Liability company 120 Beds WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
0/100
Last Inspection: August 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Parkway Health and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. They rank at the bottom of facilities in Tennessee and Shelby County, meaning there are no better options locally. The facility is showing an improving trend, reducing issues from 10 in 2024 to 4 in 2025, but they still have a concerning $139,562 in fines, which is higher than 92% of facilities in the state. Staffing turnover is a relative strength at 40%, below the state average of 48%, but their RN coverage is just average, which may limit oversight. Notably, there were serious incidents, including a resident suffering a broken arm due to delayed medical attention and another resident who fell and sustained a fractured rib without the staff providing adequate monitoring afterward, leading to actual harm. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing, the facility has critical weaknesses that families should consider carefully.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Tennessee
#112/223
Top 50%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
10 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
40% turnover. Near Tennessee's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$139,562 in fines. Higher than 58% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Tennessee. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Care Quality
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 10 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (40%)

    8 points below Tennessee average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 40%

Near Tennessee avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $139,562

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record

3 actual harm
Feb 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse to the facility Administrator in a timely manner for 1 of 4 (Resident #37) sampled residents for allegations of abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 3/1/2018, revealed .The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse .The abuse coordinator in the facility is the administrator. Reports of allegations or suspected abuse .will be reported immediately to [the] Facility Abuse Coordinator, Director of Nursing, State Agencies, local Ombudsman Office .Abuse means the willful infliction of injury .physical harm, pain, mental anguish .Abuse maybe resident to resident .When abuse .is suspected the Licensed Nurse should .Respond to the needs of the resident, and protect them from further abuse, Notify the Director of Nursing and Administrator, Complete an incident report and initiate an immediate investigation to prevent further potential abuse, notify the attending physician, resident's family/legal representative and Medical Director, Obtain witness statements .Monitor and document the resident's condition .Provide initial and follow-up counseling for the resident(s), Document actions taken .in the medical record .It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for the resident .Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse .are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident to Resident Altercations, dated 9/2022, revealed .All altercations, including those that may represent resident to resident abuse, are investigated and reported to the nursing supervisor, the director of nursing services and to the administrator . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Depression, and Dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Resident was dependent on staff assistance to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). During an interview in the Resident's room on 2/25/2025 at 9:22 AM, the resident stated he was asleep in bed during the night when his roommate (Resident #112) walked over to his bed calling him the N . word and hit him several times on the chest. Resident #37 confirmed that a nurse walked in and instructed his roommate to return to bed. The incident report confirmed this occurred on 2/18/2025. Review of medical record revealed Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14, which indicated Resident #112 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #112's Care Plan revised on 2/20/2025, revealed .Resident has demonstrated physical aggression initiated towards roommate .Resident Will Not Harm Self or Others .behavior monitoring .if Resident poses a potential threat to injure self or others notify provider .If safe, allow Resident personal space .Monitor for cognitive, emotional or environmental factors that may contribute to violent .Monitor for signs / symptoms of agitation .psych consult .Residents separated . Review of the Facility Reported Incident documentation dated 2/20/2025, revealed .[the] Administrator was made aware of a resident-to-resident altercation on 2/20/2025 which occurred on 2/18/2025 AT 11:30 PM . During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 2:37 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the incident occurred on 2/18/2025 and the nurse failed to report the incident to the Director of Nursing or to the Administrator. The Administrator confirmed that allegations of abuse should be reported within 2 hours.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) ass...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided related to showering for 2 of 2 (Resident #82 and #320) sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The findings included: 1. Review of the undated policy titled, .Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) Abilities, revealed It is the policy of the facility to specify the responsibility to create and sustain an environment that humanizes and individualizes each resident's quality of life .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good .grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes, Atrial Fibrillation, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #8 was cognitively intact. Resident #82 required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with showers and bathing. During an interview on 2/24/2025 at 3:37 PM, Resident #82 was asked about his shower/ bathing habits, he stated he should be receiving his showers 3 times a week, on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday and he hasn't received one since January. Review of the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) Shower Sheet revealed Resident #82 did receive a shower as stated on Thursday, 1/2/2025, Tuesday 1/7/2025, Tuesday, 1/14/2025, Thursday 1/16/2025, and Thursday 1/23/2025. Review of the West Wing Shower Schedule form revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #82's room, Resident #82 should have received a shower on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of the .Documentation Survey Report . CNA Bathing Task for January 2025 and February 2025, revealed Resident #82 did not receive a shower on 1/1/2025, 1/3/2025, 1/6/2025, 1/8/2025, 1/10/2025, 1/13/2025, 1/15/2025, 1/17/2025, 1/20/2025, 1/22/2025, 1/24/2025, 1/27/2025, 1/29/2025, 1/31/2025, 2/3/2025, 2/5/2025, 2/7/2025, 2/10/2025, 2/12/2025, 2/14/2025, 2/17/2025, 2/19/2025, 2/21/2025, and 2/24/2025. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #320 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Spinal Stenosis, Morbid Obesity, Neuropathy, Hepatitis B, and Paraplegia. Review of the Baseline Care Plan dated 2/16/2025 revealed Resident #320 is dependent on staff for showers/bath. During an interview on 2/25/2025 at 9:22 AM, Resident #320 was asked about his shower/bathing habits, Resident #320 stated, I have not received a shower since I got here. Review of the facility's West Wing Shower Schedule, form revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #320's room should get a shower on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of the Documentation Survey Report, CNA Bathing Task for February 2025, revealed Resident #320 did not receive a shower on 2/17/2025, 2/19/2025, 2/21/2025, and 2/24/2025. 4. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed she was unable to provide documentation for showers, the DON stated, .Point Click Care (PCC) did not have an area to address showers versus baths .and PCC now has been corrected to address this issue by her Regional Nurse on 2/25/2025.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to administer the prescribed medication for 1 of 5 (Resident #9...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to administer the prescribed medication for 1 of 5 (Resident #90) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Viral Hepatitis, Malnutrition, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, and Schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 9, which indicated Resident #90 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Physician's Order dated 6/6/2023, revealed .Famotidine [used to treat heart burn or acid reflux] Oral Tablet 20 MG [milligram] .Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day .Trazodone [used to treat depression] Oral Tablet 50 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day .Atorvastatin Calcium [used to treat high cholesterol] Oral Tablet 20 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day . Review of Physician's Order dated 8/22/2024, revealed .Baclofen [used to treat muscle spasms] Oral Tablet 5 MG .Give 10 mg by mouth two times a day . Review of Physician Order dated 11/20/2024, revealed ZyPREXA, [used to treat mental disorders] Oral Tablet 5 MG (Olanzapine) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day . Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 1/2025, revealed blanks on 1/4/2025 and 1/5/2025 for the medications of Zyprexa 5mg daily, Baclofen 10mg at bedtime, Famotidine 20mg at bedtime, Trazodone 50mg daily, and Atorvastatin 20 mg daily. During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 8:59 AM, revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked what the blanks on the resident's MAR indicated. The DON confirmed that the blanks meant that the night shift nurse didn't sign the medications off. The DON confirmed that the medications should have been signed out, and she could not confirm that medications were administered.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in the kitchen and failed to clean the East Hall ice machine. The findings include: ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in the kitchen and failed to clean the East Hall ice machine. The findings include: 1. The facility policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, dated 2021, revealed .local, state, and federal standards and regulations will be followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food and nutrition services department . The facility's undated Resident Rights Notice revealed .right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . The facility policy titled Ice Machines and Ice Storage Chests dated 4/2024, revealed .Ice machines and ice storage/distribution containers will be used and maintained to assure a safe and sanitary supply of ice . 2. Observation in the kitchen bathroom on 2/24/25 at 9:50 AM, revealed a large rectangular hole, approximately 3-4 foot high, cut out of the drywall on the inner right wall. A sheet of black plastic covered the opening, and when pulled back revealed the wooden inner framing of the wall. Observation in the Storage Room on 2/25/2025 at 12:10 PM, and on 2/27/2025 at 8:58 AM, revealed what appeared to be mouse excrement (small cylindrical black pellets) on top of one large can of green beans and in an open box containing 7 cans of chicken noodle soup. During an observation and interview in the Nutrition Room on the East Hall on 2/25/2025 at 12:30 PM, a white hard powdery build up was discovered on the plastic casing and coolant tubes inside of the ice machine. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated, .That looks like hard water build-up .I will make sure that gets cleaned . Observation in the Emergency Food Supply closet on 2/25/25 at 3:50 PM, and on 2/27/2025 at 8:58 AM, revealed what appeared to be mouse excrement and small shredded up pieces of paper and cardboard on the floor under the metal rack that held the food. 3. During an interview on 2/25/2025 at 4:41 PM, the Administrator presented an invoice showing Rodent Control with named pest control company had been started as of 2/25/2025 and stated, .I just signed this today During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 9:00 AM, the DM confirmed that mouse excrement should not be found in the Storage Room.
Aug 2024 10 deficiencies 3 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from neg...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from neglect for 1 of 9 (Resident #10) sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired, bedridden and totally dependent on staff for all needs. On 4/5/2024 staff noted Resident #10's left arm swollen with nonpitting edema. On 4/8/2024 the practitioner was notified and orders obtained for x-rays. On 4/9/2024 an x-ray revealed a comminuted (A broken bone that has shattered into 3 or more pieces. This type of fracture is usually caused by a serious trauma) humeral fracture to the left arm of unknown source. The facility's failure to provide timely services to address Resident #10's left arm swelling resulted in Actual Harm. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled ABUSE Prevention Policy, dated 11/2021, revealed .Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .also includes the depravation [deprivation] by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .Neglect means failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm .Injury of Unknown source means source was not observed by another person or injury could not be explained by the resident. Injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, location of injury (e.g. injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma such as facial injuries, bruising of inner thighs, wrap around bruises of arms, legs or torso, skin tears, on sites other than arms/legs) or the number of injuries observed at one point in time or the incidence of injuries over time . Review of the facility's policy titled, INCIDENT REPORT - DOCUMENTATION, INVESTIGATING, AND REPORTING, dated November 2022, revealed .The Charge Nurse at the time of the incident is responsible for documenting the incident in the resident's medical record. The nurses note should contain the following documentation .Clear, objective facts about what occurred .A thorough assessment of the resident's condition at the time of the accident/incident. (This assessment should include a description of the resident, vital signs, and any other physical characteristics apparent as a result of the accident/incident) .Any treatment provided .Any contacts made or attempted with the resident's physician, family .The Administrator/Director of Nursing should obtain signed and dated written statements, from all witnesses with knowledge of the event .Indicate .the follow up interventions put into place to prevent reoccurrences . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (An absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions), Tracheostomy (a surgical opening to help air and oxygen into the trachea to provide an alternate airway), Gastrostomy Status (a surgical procedure to insert a tube through the abdomen and into the stomach to provide nutritional support), Functional Quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty from medical condition without injury to the brain or spinal cord), Dementia, Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), and Contracture Left Hand. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Progress Note dated 4/5/2024 at 2:32 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, revealed .left arm swollen nonpitting edema, placed in MD [medical doctor] book . LPN A noted the left arm swelling in the MD book to notify the MD on the next onsite facility visit and failed to immediately notify the MD or practitioner. Review of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR) note dated 4/8/2024 at 10:10, revealed .Recommendations: resident noted with nonpitting edema to left upper extremity. Extremity repositioned and elevated with pillow. PRN [as needed] Acetaminophen [another name for Tylenol, for pain] administered, New orders obtained for Left Shoulder, Humerus, Elbow and Forearm X-ray and Doppler . The MD/practitioner was not notified of Resident #10's left arm swelling until 3 days after the swelling was initially noted on 4/5/2024. Review of the Incident Report dated 4/9/2124, revealed No Injuries observed at time of incident .No Injuries Observed Post Incident .Notes 4/9/2024, Educate staff on transfers and use of Hoyer lifts . The facility was unable to provide documentation the staff education was provided. The facility X-Rays were obtained on 4/9/2024 and resulted in a comminuted left humerus fracture. Review of the Care Plan dated 4/9/2024, revealed The resident [#10] has left arm Fracture and is at risk for complications .Monitor limb for swelling and skin changes . On 4/10/2024 Resident #10 was sent out to the hospital per family request. Resident #10 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] - 4/15/2024. Review of the [Named Hospital Progress Note] dated 4/15/2024, by Doctor M revealed .Left humeral fracture - occurred at NH [Nursing Home]. Ortho [Orthopedics] consulted and evaluated the patient. Not a surgical candidate with underlying hemiplegia from CVA [Cerebrovascular Accident] Sling, non-weightbearing in LUE [Left Upper Extremity]. Hx [history] of CVA s/p [status post] trach [tracheostomy], PEG [percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube], nonverbal - Pt [patient] is bed bound; will refer to SW [Social Worker] for APS [Adult Protective Services] referral .Social Determinants of Health that impact treatment or disposition: non-verbal patient with unknown POA [Power of Attorney]. Need to discuss with SW about referral to APS to investigate further nature of this patient's injuries (non-verbal, bedridden patient develops left humeral fracture-how?). Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 8/15/2024 at 1:59 PM, LPN A was asked about the injury of unknown origin for Resident #10. LPN A stated, The shower aide [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) N], came and got me, they were in the shower on 4/8/2024, to look at her left arm. The whole left side shoulder to her hand were [was] swollen. I assessed her arm it was swollen I let the [Named Medical Director] know and he came to the facility later that day. He advised me to get an x-ray. Got x-ray the next day on 4/9/2024. I'm not sure if results came back that evening or the next day 4/10/2024. It was on 4/10/2024, a Wednesday, when got results, it [was] fractured. They had gotten an appointment with [named Orthopedic Clinic], but the daughter came in that day and insisted she go to ER [Emergency Room]. She came back a couple days later with a hard brace on the upper left shoulder area. She had the brace until she went to the ortho appointment [and] came back without the brace. LPN A did not report or act on the findings when she noticed the left arm swelling on 4/5/2024, 3 days prior to notifying the facility's Medical Director. During an interview on 8/15/2024 at 2:11 PM, CNA N, confirmed she took Resident #10 to the shower on a shower bed and noticed her left arm was swollen. She said she finished her shower because she could not leave her alone. Then she got the Nurse, LNP A, to come and look at her arm. It was swollen. We used the lift and put her back in the bed. LPN A said she would notify the doctor. During an interview on 8/15/2024 at 4:04 PM, CNA O, working 2nd shift, was asked about the injury of unknown origin for Resident #10. CNA O stated, .She is a heavy wetter, so I do her early. When I pulled the cover back [to do perineal care in Resident #10's room on 4/8/2024] it looked like Popeye's arm, Left [arm] was so swollen and Right [arm] was normal. I went to get the nurse on the 3 to 11 shift. [CNA O didn't remember which nurse] She looked at her arm and said she may need to go out to the ER. She called the doctor. I moved on to another resident. We had to write statements. CNAs do not give report to oncoming shift . During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:28 PM, the DON was asked, should an injury of unknown origin be investigated. The DON stated, Yes. The DON stated, . X ray was ordered 4/9/2024 and received results on 4/9 [2024] but I know we didn't get them on 4/9/24 [2024], it was later. The DON was asked, do you have documentation where you interviewed other staff. The DON stated, No, I don't . The DON was asked, why did it take so long to send her out to the hospital. The DON stated, .out to hospital on 4/10/2024. They didn't have an order to send her out sooner. No one knew anything about her arm being injured .First time noted swelling was in shower on 4/9/24 [4/8/2024]. No reason for the fracture. We did not find the reason or cause of fracture. The DON confirmed there was no monitoring for Resident #10 on 4/16/2024 one day after she was readmitted and there should have been. During a telephone interview on 8/29/2024 at 10:55 AM, after the survey team had exited the facility, Medical Doctor M returned the surveyor's call after several attempts were made to contact the doctor during the survey. Medical Doctor M was asked about Resident #10's humeral fracture. Medical Doctor M was asked, would it take a hard force or hit to cause a comminuted humeral fracture. Medical Doctor M stated, .a fall could do that. Medical Doctor M was asked, could transferring the resident by a lift with a lift pad cause that type fracture. Medical Doctor M stated, I don't think so. In summary, the swelling was first noted in Resident #10's left arm on 4/5/2024 per the note documented by LPN A, the MD/practitioner wasn't notified until 4/8/2024. The x-rays were obtained on 4/9/2024 and the resident was sent to the hospital on 4/10/2024. The hospital admitted Resident #10 from 4/10/2024 - 4/15/2024. The facility's failure to provide timely services to address Resident #10's left arm swelling resulted in Actual Harm.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown source/origin for 1 of 9 (Resident #10) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin when Resident #10, a severely cognitively impaired, bedridden resident sustained a comminuted (A broken bone that has shattered into 3 or more pieces. This type of fracture is usually caused by a serious trauma) humeral fracture. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #10. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, ABUSE PREVENTION POLICY, dated 11/1/2021, revealed .Injury of unknown source means source of injury was not observed by another person or injury could not be explained by the resident. Injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, location of injury .injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma such as facial injuries, bruising of inner thighs, wrap around bruises of arms, legs, or torso, skin tears .When suspicion or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur, as investigation is immediately warranted .Components of the investigation may include .Interview .staff members in the area .Document the entire investigation chronologically .including injuries of unknown source .are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made .The Administrator should follow up with the governmental agencies during business hours to confirm the report was received and to report the results of the investigation when final, as required by state agencies .Administrator will review investigational findings to determine appropriate corrective, remedial, or disciplinary actions to occur with accordance with applicable local, state or federal law . Review of the facility's policy titled, INCIDENT REPORT - DOCUMENTATION, INVESTIGATING, AND REPORTING, dated November 2022, revealed .The Charge Nurse at the time of the incident is responsible for documenting the incident in the resident's medical record. The nurses note should contain the following documentation .Clear, objective facts about what occurred .A thorough assessment of the resident's condition at the time of the accident/incident. (This assessment should include a description of the resident, vital signs, and any other physical characteristics apparent as a result of the accident/incident) .Any treatment provided .Any contacts made or attempted with the resident's physician, family .The Administrator/Director of Nursing should obtain signed and dated written statements, from all witnesses with knowledge of the event .Indicate .the follow up interventions put into place to prevent reoccurrences . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (when the body's tissue don't have enough oxygen), Tracheostomy (a surgically created hole in the windpipe to provide an alternate airway), Gastrostomy Status (a surgical procedure to insert a tube through the abdomen and into the stomach), Functional Quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty from medical condition without injury to the brain or spinal cord), Dementia, Cerebral Infarction (stroke), and Contracture Left Hand. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment. The facility was unable to obtain a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as the resident was unable to participate in the test. Review of the Progress Note dated 4/5/2024 at 2:32 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, documented swelling with nonpitting edema to Resident #10's left arm and placed a note regarding the swelling in the Medical Doctors (MD) book. LPN A failed to notify the practitioner for immediate action and failed to ensure an investigation was immediately started. Review of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR) note dated 4/8/2024 at 10:10, revealed .Recommendations: resident [#10] noted with nonpitting edema to left upper extremity . New orders obtained for Left Shoulder, Humerus, Elbow and Forearm X-ray and Doppler . The facility's investigation consisted of 3 staff interviews with LPN A, certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) N, and CNA O obtained on 4/9/2024, but dated 4/8/2024. The facility's investigation failed to interview staff who cared for Resident #10 back to and before 4/5/2024, when LPN A first documented the swelling in the Resident's left arm. Review of the Care Plan dated 4/9/2024, revealed The resident [#10] has left arm Fracture and is at risk for complications .Monitor limb for swelling and skin changes . The facility X-Rays were obtained on 4/9/2024 and resulted in a comminuted humerus fracture. On 4/10/2024 Resident #10 was sent out to the hospital per family request. Resident #10 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] - 4/15/2024. Review of the [Named Hospital Progress Note] dated 4/15/2024, by Doctor M revealed .Left humeral fracture - occurred at NH [Nursing Home]. Ortho [Orthopedics] consulted and evaluated the patient. Not a surgical candidate with underlying hemiplegia from CVA [Cerebrovascular Accident] Sling, non-weightbearing in LUE [Left Upper Extremity]. Hx [history] of CVA s/p [status post] trach [tracheostomy], PEG [percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube], nonverbal - Pt [patient] is bed bound; will refer to SW [Social Worker] for APS [Adult Protective Services] referral .Social Determinants of Health that impact treatment or disposition: non-verbal patient with unknown POA [Power of Attorney]. Need to discuss with SW about referral to APS to investigate further nature of this patient's injuries (non-verbal, bedridden patient develops left humeral fracture- how?). Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 8/15/2024 at 1:59 PM, LPN A was asked about the injury of unknown origin for Resident #10. LPN A stated, The shower aide [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) N], came and got me, they were in the shower on 4/8/2024, to look at her left arm. The whole left side shoulder to her hand were [was] swollen .I let the [Named Medical Director] know and he came to the facility later that day. He advised me to get an x-ray. Got x-ray the next day on 4/9/2024. I'm not sure if results came back that evening or the next day 4/10/2024. It was on 4/10/2024, a Wednesday when got results, it [was] fractured . During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:28 PM, the DON was asked should an injury of unknown origin be investigated. The DON stated, Yes. The DON was asked what the process was for injuries of unknown origin. The DON stated, . Receive statements from staff, assess the resident and talk with the resident [if able]. After being re-admitted we do initial assessment, and regular body audits. [Named Medical Director] was called by LPN A when swelling was noted. Communicate by report and 24- hour report. Nurses do a huddle with oncoming staff. The DON was asked, do you consider the 3 staff statements were a thorough investigation. The DON stated, All the other staff there had no knowledge of what had happened. X ray was ordered 4/9/2024 and received results on 4/9 [4/9/2024] but I know we didn't get them on 4/9/24 [2024] it was later. The DON was asked, do you have documentation where you interviewed other staff. The DON stated, No, I don't . The DON was asked, why did it take so long to send her out to the hospital. The DON stated, .out to hospital on 4/10/2024. They didn't have an order to send her out sooner. No one knew anything about her arm being injured .First time noted swelling was in shower on 4/9/24. No reason for the fracture. We did not find the reason or cause of fracture. The DON confirmed there was no 72 hour post incident monitoring for Resident #10 on 4/16/2024 one day after she was readmitted and there should have been. During a telephone interview on 8/19/2024 at 1:44 PM, the Medical Director was asked about the humerus fracture of Resident #10. The Medical Director stated, I remember her now, they called me for left arm swelling. She does not move. I ordered a doppler and an x-ray. The x-ray result was a fracture. I got an appointment with Ortho [Orthopedics] but the family was upset and wanted her to go to the hospital. They sent her right back. She is bedridden and it [a comminuted humerus fracture] could happen at any time. Review of the hospital records revealed Resident # 10 was not sent dight back to the nursing home but was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] - 4/15/2024. The facility was unable to provide staff interviews from staff that completed resident care the day prior to finding the swollen arm on 4/5/2024 and 4/8/2024. There was no interview for the staff member who completed the injury of unknown cause report. Resident #10 was an immobile, bedridden resident, who was totally dependent on staff for all her activities of daily living, that sustained a comminuted humerus fracture. Refer to F600.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe envir...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment, adequate supervision/monitoring related to falls, illegal substance use, and elopement for 5 of 9 (Residents #44, #85, #89, #102, and #119) sampled residents reviewed for a safe environment. On 5/27/2024 Resident #44 had a fall, and the facility failed to monitor the resident post fall. On 5/31/2024, 4 days after the fall, Resident #44 complained of rib cage pain and an x-ray revealed a fractured rib, the facility failed to monitor the resident. The Nurse Practitioner was unaware of the resident's fall and fractured rib until 6/3/2024, the resident complained of chest pain on breathing. The facility's failures resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #44. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Risk-Fall Prevention ., dated 11/28/2017, revealed .Fall refers to unintentionally coming to a rest on the ground floor .when resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred .4. After an incident of a fall .complete the Post Fall Risk Assessment .Notify MD [Medical Doctor] and Resident Representative, complete pain assessment after the fall .Fall placed on 24-hour report . Review of the facility's policy titled, Incident Report-Documentation, Investigating, and Reporting . dated 11/2022, revealed .All accidents or incidents involving residents .occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator .the Charge Nurse at the time of the incident is responsible for documenting the incident in the resident's medical record .The nurses note should contain the following documentation .a. Clear, objective facts that occurred .a thorough assessment of the resident's condition at the time of the accident/incident .all quotes by the resident and/or witness involved or present at the time .any contacts made .resident's physician, family .outcome .Nurse's signature, date and time of charting .All incidents .should be reported to the Administrator .The Administrator/Director of Nursing should obtain signed and dated written statements from all witnesses with knowledge of the event . Review of the facility's policy titled, Unsafe Wandering-Elopement Risk Policy, dated 11/30/2021, revealed .Every effort will be made to prevent wandering episodes while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents who are at risk for elopement .If an elopement occurs, a monitoring schedule will be implemented to ensure resident safety . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights Policy, dated 10/20/2022, revealed .The facility strives to protect the rights of residents, including .The resident has the right to reside and receives services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs .The resident has a right to a safe .environment, including .supports for daily living safely . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Orthopedic Aftercare following Surgical Amputation, Fracture of Rib on Right Side, Pressure Ulcer, and Heart Disease. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating he was cognitively intact, had impaired mobility to his lower extremity, received set up help for eating, and partial/moderate assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a Fall Risk Assessment sheet dated 5/27/2024, revealed an effective of date 5/27/2024 and a score of 12, indicating Resident #44 was at high risk for falls. The 5/27/2024 Fall Risk Assessment report was not signed until 8/13/2024. Review of an Incident Report dated 5/27/2024 at 2:20 PM, revealed Resident #44 sustained an unwitnessed fall and was noted to be on the restroom floor beside the toilet, and assisted back onto the toilet. Resident #44 was noted to have no injuries. The Incident Report dated 5/27/2024 was not completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) until 5/31/2024. Record review revealed there were no other progress notes related to Resident #44's fall on 5/27/2024. Review of a Progress Note dated 5/31/2024, revealed, .Resident [#44] c/o [complained of] pain to right rib cage .New order obtained for x-ray . Review of a Radiology Results report dated 5/31/2024, revealed Reviewed by [named person] Nurse Practitioner on 6/3/2024 .CHEST PAIN ON BREATHING .FINDINGS: The bilateral ribs demonstrate an acute right lateral sixth rib fracture . Review of a Physician Progress Note dated 6/3/2024 at 3:08 PM, revealed .He [Resident #44] is being seen for skilled follow up visit. Xray reviewed RIBS Bi-LAT [bilateral sides] .PA [Posteroanterior] CHEST MIN [Minimum] 4V [Views] with acute right lateral sixth, rib fracture. He stated he had a fall last week and he does not have complaints of significant pain . Review of a Progress Note dated 6/3/2024, revealed Resident #44 was transported via stretcher to the emergency room for evaluation due to an abnormal x-ray. Review of the Hospital emergency room Documentation dated 6/3/2024-6/4/2024, revealed .Basic Information .[Resident #44] who presents to the ED [Emergency Department] .for right sixth rib fracture .9 days ago .patient has mild diffuse expiratory wheezing .will order duo-neb given his wheezing .Prescriptions .Azithromycin 5 day Dose Pack .Chest x ray .scattered nodules which may be infectious/inflammatory .will discharge back to rehab center [nursing home] with antibiotic coverage for possible pneumonia and close follow up .Impression and Plan Diagnosis Fall .Pneumonia . Review of the revised Care Plan dated 6/4/2024, revealed .Altercation in musculoskeletal status r/t [related to] fracture of the ribs and gout . Review of a Progress Note dated 6/4/2024, revealed Resident #44 returned to facility with a diagnosis of Pneumonia with antibiotic therapy. Review of a Physician's Order dated 6/4/2024, revealed .Azithromycin Oral Tablet 250 mg [milligrams] .2 tablets by mouth one time a day .and Azithromycin .250 mg 1 tab [tablet] by mouth daily for 4 days .related to MUSCLE WEAKNESS . Review of the revised Care Plan dated 8/13/2024, revealed The resident [#44] has had an actual fall with Poor communication/comprehension. Fall without injury 5/27/2024 .[Revised 8/13/2024] . During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 4:01 PM, the DON confirmed Resident #44 fell on 5/27/2024, however the incident report was not completed until 5/31/2024. The DON stated, .We didn't know he fell till a couple days later .when he complained of pain [on 5/31/2024] . The DON was asked should the nurse have put the incident report in that day (5/27/2024 the day Resident #44 fell). The DON stated, Yes .I can't tell you why she didn't . The DON was asked, when were you made aware he fell in the bathroom. The DON stated, .not until [Resident #44] complained of rib pain to the unit manager, and the Xray was ordered. The DON confirmed she started her investigation on 5/31/2024. The DON was asked do you know the nurse's name that knows about the fall. The DON stated, Yes, [named Registered Nurse (RN) F]. The DON was asked to look in her computer and show the surveyor where the fall was documented on the 24-hour report on 5/27/2024. The DON confirmed Resident #44 was not listed as having a fall on the 24-hour report on 5/27/2024. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 4:57 PM, RN F confirmed she did not know Resident #44, and did not know of any fall concerning him. During a telephone interview on 8/15/2024 at 9:58 AM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) confirmed Resident #44 complained of rib pain on 5/31/2024 and she ordered x-rays. The NP was asked did the facility notify you of the results of the x-ray on 5/31/2024. The NP stated, No. The NP confirmed that the facility did not call her when the facility received the x-ray report of the fractured rib on 5/31/2024. The NP confirmed she was not aware of the fracture until 6/3/2024. The NP confirmed the facility should have called her on 5/31/2024 with results of a fracture. The NP confirmed she assessed Resident #44 on 6/3/2024 and sent him to the emergency room. During an interview on 8/15/2024 at 12:58 PM, the NP was asked if she thought the rib fracture could have contributed to Resident #44's pneumonia. The NP stated.It would take a few days to be acute . The NP was asked if the fall was 7-9 days old could it have contributed to the pneumonia. The NP states, It would be hard to give a definitive answer on that. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 11:26 AM, the DON confirmed the 5/27/2024 Fall Assessment should have been completed and signed the date of fall. The DON was asked when they were notified that Resident #44 fell. The DON stated, .I would say the day the resident got the x-ray. The DON was asked should the Incident Report have been dated 5/27/2024, when she had no information showing the fall occurred on that date. The DON stated, I don't know, I can't remember why I did that, all my information was 5/31/2024. The DON confirmed the physician and family would have been notified on 5/31/2024, not on 5/27/2024 as documented in the incident report. The DON was asked do you have witness statements. The DON stated, No, just summaries of what they said. The DON was asked was there a pain assessment completed. The DON stated, I cannot confirm or deny it wasn't done on that date. The DON confirmed when she realized Resident #44 had fallen on 5/31/2024, he should have been put on the 24-hour report to be monitored. The DON confirmed there was no documentation of injury following a fall on 5/27/2024 or 5/31/2024 after Resident #44 was diagnosed with a rib fracture. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 3:05 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H confirmed she assisted Resident #44 from the floor when he fell in the bathroom. LPN H was unable to confirm the date the fall occurred or the names of the 2 Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) that assisted her. LPN H stated, I told his [Resident #44's] [RN F] about his fall, he was not my Resident . During an interview on 8/21/2024 at 11:26 AM, the Administrator was asked, are you aware of Resident #44's fall. The Administrator stated, Yes. The Administrator confirmed she was not made aware the Resident fell, and staff didn't complete an investigation until 5/31/2024. The Administrator confirmed the Incident report should have been completed the day [5/27/2024] of the fall. The Administrator confirmed that the NP or physician should have been notified of the x-ray results showing the rib fracture on 5/31/2024. The Administrator confirmed witness statements are needed for a complete investigation and should have been completed. The facility failed to monitor Resident #44 for injuries following the fall on 5/27/2024, failed to notify appropriate facility staff, and failed to document timely related to the fall. The facility failed to monitor Resident #44 after the fractured rib was identified on 5/31/2024 and failed to monitor the resident's complaints of pain. The Nurse Practitioner was not aware of the resident's fractured rib identified on 5/31/2024 until the NP saw the resident on 6/3/2024, at which time Resident #44 was sent to the hospital ER. These failures resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #44. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction with Hemiplegia (a condition that causes partial or total paralysis of one side of the body), Sickle-Cell Trait (A genetic blood disorder that occurs when someone inherits one sickle cell gene and one normal gene), Hypertension, History of Falling, and Anxiety. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #85 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact, required moderate/maximum assistance with ADL's and had 2 or more falls. Review of an Incident Report dated 4/20/2024, revealed Resident #85 sustained a fall that was witnessed by another Resident. Review of a Nurse's Note dated 4/20/2024, revealed Resident #85 slid from his chair to the floor, he was placed back in the wheelchair and sat next to the nurse's station. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #85 was not assessed or monitored for injuries for 72 hours following his fall. Review of an Incident Report dated 7/26/2024, revealed Resident #85 was observed half out of the bed with his head on the floor, with no injuries noted. Review of a Nurse's Note dated 7/26/2024, revealed Resident #85 returned from the hospital post fall. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:02 PM, the DON confirmed after a fall a resident should be monitored for 72 hours in his medical record. The DON was asked if Resident #85 was monitored on 4/20/2024 and 7/26/2025 after his falls. The DON stated, No, he was not. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #85 was not assessed or monitored for injuries for 72 hours following his fall, there was no progress note related to his transfer to the hospital, and no assessment or monitoring following the hospital return on 7/26/2024. 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Fracture of Thoracic (T) 11-T12 (compression fracture of the thoracic spine usually at the bottom part of the thoracic spine), Respiratory Failure, Urinary Retention, Diabetes, Atrial Fibrillation, and Dysphagia. Review of the Care Plan dated 7/5/2024, The resident [#119] has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes r/t [related to] impaired decision making/POISONING BY FENTANYL OR FENTANY . Review of the Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #119 scored a 12.0. A score of 10 or higher indicated a high risk for potential falls. Review of the Progress Note dated 7/22/2024 at 8:24 PM, revealed .resident [#119] had an unwitnessed fall outside of her room in the hallway. Resident got up out the bed and walked in the hallway where she fell and hit her head. Resident was assessed, nuerochecks [neuro checks] started and placed back in bed. Resident have [The resident had] no complaints of pain I contacted the NP [Nurse Practitioner] and the DON I attempted to call her RP [Responsible Party] but the phone is disconnected will continue to monitor. Review of the facility's Fall Investigation dated 7/22/2024, revealed Injury Type No injuries observed at time of incident .Injury Report Post Incident No injuries Observed Post Incident .7/23/2024 Assist to nurses station for close supervision .7/24/2024 Resident [#119] remain visible when agitated . Review of the Progress Note dated 7/23/2024 at 5:41 AM, revealed Resident [#119] in bed resting, Resp. [Respirations] even and unlabored, skin w/d [warm/dry] to the touch, no changes in LOC [level of consciousness] noted, neuro checks remain in progress post fall, Resident has swelling noted over right eye, no s/sx [signs/symptoms] of pain or discomfort noted, will continue to monitor . Review of the Progress Note dated 7/23/2024 at 11:15 AM, revealed .Resident [#119] was sent to the hospital due to an unwitnessed fall that occurred last night [7/22/2024]. Resident alert-oriented x [times] 1 . resident has cut on her forehead from the fall. Unable to answer any questions pertaining to the fall . Review of the Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #119 scored a 12.0, which indicated the resident was a high fall risk. Review of the Care Plan dated 7/23/2024, revealed The resident [#119] has had an actual fall with injury Poor Balance Unsteady gait 7/22/24 [2024] actual fall with minor injury .Assist to nurses [nurses'] station for close supervision-7/22/24 . Review of the Physician Order Review Report dated 7/15/2024 - 8/15/2024 revealed no order for x-rays for Resident #119. Review of the Care Plan dated 8/12/2024, revealed The resident has a communication problem r/t Expressive Aphasia . Review of the Care Plan dated 8/13/2024, revealed Alteration in musculoskeletal status r/t [related to] fracture of the T11-T12 vertebra [Resident admitted with the diagnosis of T11- T12 fractures] . The fall investigation for Resident #119's fall on 7/22/2024 fall revealed no injuries. The resident was placed back to bed, but she would not stay, so she was put in a wheelchair and placed at the nurses' station. On 7/23/2024, the Resident was noted to have swelling above her right eye. On 7/23/2024 at 11:15 AM, Resident #119 was sent to hospital for a cut on forehead. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:28 PM, the DON was asked about the injury to the forehead for Resident #119. The DON was asked how many falls Resident #119 had. The DON stated, One .put her back to bed but she would not stay so we put her in a wheelchair at the nurses' station. The DON was asked why she went out 9 hours after the fall. The DON stated, Because of the swelling . The DON was asked did you all put her back to bed after the fall. The DON stated, Yes, she wouldn't stay we put [her] in wheelchair at [the] nurses' station. Policy to get neuro checks. 7/23/24 5:41 AM swelling over right eye. Yeah, same cut from fall on 7/22/24. The cut was from that [7/22/2024] fall. The DON was asked was there a fall investigation for the forehead injury, any other injuries, or staff or resident interviews/statements obtained. The DON stated, Yes she only had one fall .We did not have an order to send her out [but due to the cut and swelling noted on 7/23/2024, the resident was sent out on 7/23/2024] .She didn't need sutures . 5. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including Paraplegia, Neurogenic Bladder (urinary bladder problems due to disease or injury of the central nervous system .involved in the control of urination), Neurogenic Bowel (loss of normal bowel function) Major Depressive Disorder, Constipation, and Chronic Pain. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the Progress Note dated 7/5/2024 at 11:14 AM, revealed Resident [#89] left facility 7/4/24 [7/4/2024] LOA [Leave of Absence] with family. Family transported resident to hospital on 7/5/24 [7/5/2024] and resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] . Review of the undated [Named Hospital] Discharge Summary, revealed .ED [Emergency Department] to Hosp [Hospital] admission .7/5/2024 - 7/11/2024 .Urine drug screen positive for amphetamines and THC [Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive ingredient in the cannabis plant] . During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 10:18 AM, the DON confirmed she was aware of Resident #89 having a positive drug test during the 7/5/2024-7/11/2024 hospitalization. The DON stated, He called me from the hospital [unable to recall the date Resident #89 called] .he told me that he does smoke marijuana when he goes home .he said it must have been laced with something . The DON confirmed Resident #89 denied the use of amphetamines, but admitted he does use marijuana when he goes home. Review of the care plan revised on 8/14/2024, a month after the hospital discharge, revealed .Resident [#89] is at risk for substance abuse disorder r/t [related to] potential THC and opioid use Date Initiated: 8/14/2024 .Monitor for s/sx [signs and symptoms] of possible use .changes in resident behavior, increased unexplained drowsiness, lack of coordination, slurred speech, mood changes, and or loss of consciousness .Report any abnormal s/sx . During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 4:16 PM, the Administrator confirmed she was not aware of Resident #89's positive drug test at the time but he smells of marijuana at times. The Administrator confirmed the facility was initiating monitoring of Resident #89 for illegal drug use beginning 8/14/2024 and the monitoring would be documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). The Administrator confirmed Resident #89 had not been monitored for illegal drug use since his return from the hospital on 7/11/2024. Review of the [Named Facility] Order History Report dated 8/16/2024, revealed there was no order to monitor Resident #89 for substance abuse. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 1:24 PM, the DON confirmed the monitoring for illegal substance use order had not been entered into the system as of that time. During an interview on 8/21/2024 at 10:21 AM, the Administrator confirmed Resident #89 should have been assessed and monitored for illegal drug use and interventions should have been put in place in July 2024, when the facility became aware of the drug use, but nothing was initiated until 8/14/2024. 6. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dementia, Anxiety, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Blindness right eye, and Hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #102 had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated Resident #102 had severely impaired cognition, and had no wandering behaviors. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #102 had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated Resident #102 had severely impaired cognition, required supervision or touching assistance from staff for ambulation, and had no wandering behaviors. Revised of the revised Care Plan dated 5/11/2024, revealed Resident #102 was .an elopement risk/wanderer . with interventions including .Wanderguard bracelet to help prevent elopement . Review of the facility's Incident Investigation Witness Interview Form sheet dated 5/13/2024, revealed Resident #102 exited an East End Hall door alone on 5/11/2024. Review of the facility's Logbook Documentation .Door Security System/Delayed Egress . dated 5/2024, revealed there was no daily interval monitoring of the East End Hall exit door from 5/11/2024 until 5/23/2024. Review of the facility's Securitas Healthcare, invoice dated 5/23/24, revealed .Keypad .Egressable Mag [Magnetic] Lock .Reset Switch .Installation of Locks System . During an interview with the DON on 8/14/2024 at 1:50 PM, the DON was asked about the incident concerning Resident #102 on 5/11/2024. The DON stated, It was a Saturday morning, [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN C)] called me and stated [Resident #102] got out of the building, he had been agitated all night and would not sleep. She had went [gone] in another resident's room to give medication and heard the back door alarm, looked at [the] nurse's station, and the resident was not there. She looked out the back door and he was outside the back door. He was right outside the back door. The DON was asked what was done for the prevention of the resident being able to exit the door again. The DON stated, I cannot remember, will have to look at computer. During an observation and interview on 8/14/2024 at 3:37 PM, LPN C was asked about Resident #102 exiting the door on the East End Hall. LPN C stated, It was the weekend and one of his behaviors was not going to bed. He was walking around. We sat him at the nurse desk to rest him and keep watch on him. The last time I saw him, before he got out, he was sitting in his wheelchair at the nurse station. I went in a resident [resident's] room to pass medication; he was in the wheelchair when I went into that room. I came out [of] the room, because I heard the alarm, it was coming from the back door alarm. I notice [noticed] he was not at the nurse's desk. I ran to the back door. LPN C was asked to confirm which door [Resident #102] exited. LPN C stated, The hall that room [ROOM NUMBER] is on, went to the door and could see [Resident #102] .[Resident #102] was not far from [the] door I could see [Resident #102]. LPN C pointed to area right out the door. Observation at the East End Hall door revealed a metal gate to the left of the door. LPN C confirmed Resident #102 had no injuries. LPN stated, No, he was standing, stated to me he was trying to get home. I walked him back in arm and arm. The staff heard the alarm, went and found Resident #102 just outside near the door. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 5:45 PM, LPN D was asked about Resident #102 exiting the East End Door on 5/11/2024. LPN D stated, It was myself and [LPN C] on the East Hall .The last time I saw [Resident #102] he was at the nurse station sitting in a wheelchair .I went to the cart to get medicine and he was still at the nurse station .I went back in the resident's room to give [female resident] her the med and that is when the door alarm sounded. When I came out [of] the room, I saw [Resident #102] and [LPN C] walking back into the facility . During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 10:06 AM, the Maintenance Director was asked how Resident #102 got out of the facility on 5/11/2024. The Maintenance Director confirmed he did not recall the time of day he was called and thought it was a Saturday. The Maintenance Director confirmed it was the East End Hall door, at the end of the hall that contains room [ROOM NUMBER] and 118. The Maintenance Director stated, .the door had malfunction [malfunctioned] due to a power surge . The Maintenance Director was asked how he determined it was a power surge. The Maintenance Director stated, Because immediately the door opened when pushed in on the door handle. The Maintenance Director was asked when the last time, before the incident, had the East End Hall door been checked to see if properly functioning. The Maintenance Director stated, I did it that Friday [5/10/2024], it is part of daily preventive maintenance, make rounds to check all doors Monday thru Friday. The Maintenance Director confirmed the doors are not checked on the weekends to see if they are working properly. The Maintenance Director was asked how he fixed the East End Hall door. The Maintenance Director confirmed the door is a magnet (mag) lock door; he took the Mag Lock apart then to see if it had problems or damage and found nothing with the Mag Lock, then he reset the Mag Lock and the Mag Lock worked. The Maintenance Director confirmed he checked every door after he came in (on 5/11/2024) and found the East End Hall door was unlocked, and the East End Hall door was the only door he found to have malfunctioned. The Maintenance Director was asked to explain a power surge. The Maintenance Director stated, It is when the power may go out, for example, if someone in those apartments behind us hit a pole and the power goes out, and the generator has to kick in for the electricity to come back on. The Maintenance Director was asked if another power outage happens does the nurses know what to do about the doors, to check the doors for malfunction. The Maintenance Director stated, I told them to check the doors to make sure they are locked. The Maintenance Director was asked did the nurses get an in-service about checking the doors to see if they lock if a power surge occurs, and was it documented. The Maintenance Director stated, No, I told them, it was word of mouth on what to do. The Maintenance Director confirmed after he found out the East End Hall door had malfunctioned; he contacted a vendor to have them to check all doors on the East End Hall and the findings were to replace the Mag Lock. The Maintenance Director stated, .a power surge may have caused the door to malfunction . The Maintenance Director was asked if there was anything in place, so that when it happens to be another power surge, staff will check doors' locks to make sure they are working properly. The Maintenance Director stated, If we have a power outage they will, and I will check the doors. The Maintenance Director confirmed before he left on Saturday, it was word of mouth, no documented in-service that nurses were to check the East End Hall door to make sure it is not immediately opening. The Maintenance Director was asked to explain the East End Hall door's Mag Lock. The Maintenance Director stated, It has a 15 second delay, if you hold handle down for 3 seconds, it will beep and within 15 seconds the magnet will release, and the door will open. The Maintenance Director confirmed after Resident #102 exited the East End Hall Door alone on 5/11/2024, there was no documentation the door was monitored and the intervals that the door was monitored, in order to make sure the Mag Lock was working properly and to prevent another resident from being able to exit alone. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 1:12 PM, the Administrator confirmed it was the East End Hall door that houses rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], that Resident #102 exited alone, and confirmed the Maintenance Director informed her the Mag Lock to that door had malfunctioned and needed to be replaced. The Administrator confirmed the Maintenance Director told her the door needed a new Mag Lock. The Administrator stated, I asked the Maintenance Director do we need someone sitting at the door at all times because of the Mag lock and he reassured me no, to focus on getting the Mag Lock replaced. The Administrator confirmed she was not for sure if there was any documentation of random checks of the East End Hall door for not immediately opening when you push in on the handle. During an interview on 8/19/2024 at 4:28 PM, the DON confirmed the East End Hall exit door is an egress [hold down 15 sec and it will release] door for emergency purposes. The DON confirmed she did not ask the nurses to do anything with the doors. The DON confirmed there are no documented daily checks on the door after the resident got out the East End Hall exit door on 5/11/2024 and until the new Mag Lock was installed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's missing pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's missing property was replaced timely after the Social Worker reported they would replace the missing item for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #38) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse-Investigation Incidents of Theft and/or Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, dated 11/5/2022, revealed .All reports of theft or misappropriation of resident property shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated .Our facility will exercise reasonable care to protect the resident from property loss or theft, including .Promptly responding to and investigating complaints or misappropriation of property . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. During an observation and interview in the resident's room on 8/13/2024 at 11:01 AM, Resident #38 confirmed she told the Social Worker she had an art pad. The Resident #38 made a verbal grievance to the Social Worker that her art pad was missing. The facility did not do an investigation for the missing art pad. The Social Worker told the resident that she would replace the art pad in 7/2024. During the week of 8/12/2024, the art pad had not yet been replaced. During an interview on 8/13/2024 at 2:37 PM, the Social Worker was asked if she was aware Resident #38 had a missing art pad. The Social Worker stated, Yes .during the residents last care plan meeting and during the month of 7/2024. I told her I would buy her another one. I have to put this on the list. I have so many residents asking me to buy them things. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:36 PM, the Social Worker confirmed she was made aware Resident #38 had a missing art pad during the resident's last care plan meeting on 7/17/2024 and she told the resident in 7/2024 that she would replace the art pad. The Social Worker stated, .I will not make this mistake again. I will not be penalized for something I said I would do. I have to buy a lot of stuff for people. She did not receive the art pad because I do not like Walmart . During an interview on 8/20/2024 at 8:21 AM, the Administrator was asked, what is the process when a staff member is made aware a resident is missing an item. The Administrator stated, .It needs to be put on the 24-hour report and grievance log. The social worker will investigate .will look if the resident had been transferred out of the facility or if a room change occurred. If the resident is alert, will let them know that we are looking for the item. If resident is not alert, will let the family know .will ask the family to keep receipt. If no receipt, will replace or give money .to replace the item. The Administrator was asked, what do you expect the staff member to do if a staff is made aware by the resident that the resident has a missing item, and the staff member tells the resident it will be replaced. The Administrator stated, .first tell us about it, say if the resident told us on a Friday, I would try to get the items replaced within 48 to 72 hours .I want the item to be replaced. I want the resident to be happy. We have to put ourselves in their place . The Administrator was asked, when a staff member is made aware of a resident item missing on 7/17/2024 and replacing the item this past week [week of 8/12/24]; is that in a timely matter. the Administrator stated, No, it is not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed to reflect the...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed to reflect the resident's status related to Hospice services for 1 of 1 (Resident #61) residents reviewed or hospice. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Epilepsy, Persistent Vegetative State, Gastrostomy, Hypertension, Dementia, Depression, and Anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 7/3/2020 revealed .The resident has a terminal prognosis r/t [related to] respiratory failure with [Named] Hospice. [Revised 2/27/2024] . Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #61 was not coded for receiving Hospice services. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #61 was not coded for receiving Hospice services. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 8/15/2024, revealed .Admit to [Named] Hospice .diagnosis Respiratory Failure .[Order Date] 2/5/2024 . During an interview on 8/15/2024 at 4:42 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed the MDS assessments dated 4/12/2024 and 7/12/2024, were coded incorrectly and should have been coded to reflect Resident #61 was receiving Hospice services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain weights in accordance with the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain weights in accordance with the facility's policy for 1 of 2 sampled resident (Resident #31) reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention Policy dated 11/2022, revealed .The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents .The nursing staff will measure residents on admission and weekly for (4) weeks thereafter .Weights will be recorded in each unit's Weight Record chart .any weight change of 5 % or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian The Dietitian will review the unit Weight Record by the 15th of the month to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant' weight change has been met .The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria .1 month- 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe . 2. Review of the medical record revealed #31 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including Psychosis, Dementia, and Diabetes. Review of the Physician Orders dated 4/30/2024, revealed orders for; Offer Snack at Hour of Sleep (HS) one time a day, and Regular diet, Mechanical Soft (Chopped) texture, Thin Liquids consistency, double protein portion, every meal. Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary sheet for Resident #31 revealed on 5/2/2024 Resident #31's weight was 215 lbs (pounds). The facility failed to obtain a weekly weigh for Resident #31 the week of 5/5/2024. On 5/15/24 Resident #31's weight was 200.8 lbs, showing a 14.2 lbs weight loss of 6.6 % (percent) in approximately 2 weeks, indicating a significant and severe weight loss. The facility failed to weigh Resident #31 the week of 5/19/2024, and the week of 5/26/2024. Review of the Physician Order dated 5/21/2024 revealed Resident #31 had an order for 120 milliliters (ml) of Medpass (a nutritional supplement) 2.0 two times a day for 4 Weeks Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary sheet revealed on 6/11/2024, Resident #31's weight was recorded as 201 lbs. Review of the facility's E-Interact Form dated 6/14/2024, revealed Resident #31 was transferred to the hospital with Abscess to Lower [NAME] and diagnosed at hospital with Cellulitis of neck. Review of a Progress Note with dated 6/28/2024, revealed Resident #31 was readmitted into the facility. Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary sheet revealed Resident #31's readmission weight was 194.8 lbs on 6/29/2024. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #31 scored a 5 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated severely impaired cognition, and required partial/moderate assistance from staff for eating. Review of the Physician Orders dated 7/2/2024 and 7/3/2024, revealed Resident #31 had an order for 240 ml of MedPass 2.0 one time a day for 2 Weeks. On 7/3/2024, orders revealed a Multivitamin with Minerals tablet to give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day, and Fortified foods with breakfast and lunch two times a day for 4 Weeks. Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary sheet revealed on 7/12/2024, Resident #31's weight was 191 lbs. There were no documented weights between the 6/29/2024 weight and the 7/12/2024 weight. Review of a Physician Order dated 7/15/2024 revealed Resident #31 had an order for 240 ml of MedPass 2.0 two times a day for 2 Weeks. The facility failed to follow the Weight Assessment and Intervention Policy, when Resident #31 was not weighed weekly for 4 weeks after his readmission on [DATE]. Review of a Progress Note and E-Internet Form dated 8/5/2024, revealed was transfer to the hospital with complaint of stomach pain and heart pain. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] - 8/20/2024. Review of a Progress Note dated 8/10/2024, revealed Resident #31 was readmitted into the facility. There was no documentation of a readmission weight for Resident #31. Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary dated 8/14/2024 revealed Resident #31's weight was 184.2 lbs, 4 days after the Resident was readmitted . Review of a Physician Order dated 8/16/2024, revealed Resident #31 had an order for Ice cream with lunch and dinner two times a day for Weight Loss, and 120 ml of Med Pass 2.0 twice a day for 4 weeks two times a day. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 3:34 PM, The DON confirmed the facility failed to weigh Resident #31 weekly for 4 weeks after his admission weights on dates on 4/30/2024 and 6/29/2024. The DON confirmed upon readmission a resident's weight should be obtained within 24 hours. The DON confirmed the facility to weigh Resident #31 within 24 hours of his readmissions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents with enteral feedings when staff failed to check residual as ordered, failed to follow physician orders for water flushes, and failed to administer medications with gravity through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (plastic tube inserted into the stomach to administer medications, supplements and liquid food) syringe for 2 of 2 (Resident #8 and #10) residents reviewed for enteral feedings, and failed to ensure the enteral feedings and the flush solutions were properly labeled for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #90) reviewed PEG tube feedings. The findings include: 1.Review of the Facility's policy titled, Gastrostomy Enteral Feeding and Nutrition Medication Administration Management dated 12/7/2017, revealed .Hang the prescribed feeding .Ensure resident's name, date, rate, and time hung is on the feeding solution . Review of the facility's policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION-ENTERAL TUBES dated 11/2022, revealed, This facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formulas and medications .Crushed medications are not mixed together. The powder from each medication is mixed with water before administration .Each medication is administered separately to avoid interaction and clumping. The enteral tubing is flushed with water between each medication to avoid interaction of the medications .Remove plunger from syringe and insert syringe into tubing .Allow medication to flow down tube via gravity . Review of the facility's policy titled, ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATIONS dated 11/15/2022, revealed, .Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame . 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Aneurysm, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy Status, Dementia, Cerebral Infarction, and Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed there was no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), active diagnosis of Gastrostomy, and the use of a feeding tube. Review of the facility's Order Review History Report dated 7/16/2024 to 8/16/2024, revealed, .Ativan [also known as Lorazepam - a medication used for anxiety] .1 MG [milligram] .via PEG .Baclofen [medication used for muscle spasms] .5 MG .via PEG-Tube .Glycopyrrolate [medication used to dry secretions] .2 MG .via PEG-Tube .Enteral Feed Order .every shift FLUSH TUBE WITH 60CC [cubic centimeters] WATER BEFORE AND AFTER MEDS [medications] . Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 7/21/2024, revealed .at risk for alterations in nutritional status r/t [related to] .NPO [nothing by mouth] with 100% [symbol for percent] nutrition/hydration via [by way of] PEG .The resident is dependent with tube feeding and water flushes administration. See MD [Medical Doctor] orders for current tube flushes and medication administration orders .Enhanced Barrier precautions . Observation during medication administration on the [NAME] Hall at Medication cart #1 on 8/15/2024 at 1:45 PM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, removed 1 Lorazepam 1 mg tablet, 1 Baclofen 5 mg tablet, and 1 Glycopyrrolate 2 mg tablet for Resident #8. LPN B placed all 3 of the medications into a plastic sleeve and crushed all 3 medications together and then placed the mixed medications into a plastic cup. LPN B sanitized her hands, knocked and entered Resident #8's room, donned a clean pair of gloves, checked placement of the PEG. LPN B mixed the medications together with 10 milliliters (ml) of water, flushed the PEG feeding tube with 30 ml of water by pushing the water with a plunger, administered the mixed medications by pushing the medications into the PEG tube with a plunger, flushed the PEG feeding tube with 30 ml of water by pushing the water with a plunger. LPN B placed the enteral feeding syringe into the trash and reconnected the enteral feeding tube and restarted the enteral feeding. LPN B failed to follow the facility's policy and administer the medications separately and failed to allow the medications to flow down the PEG tube via gravity. LPN B failed to flush the PEG feeding tube with 60 cc of water before and after medication administration per physician orders. 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Tracheostomy, Gastrostomy, Quadriplegia, Dysphagia, Dementia, and Aphasia. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed there was no BIMS score, Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired, Range of Motion Limitations to both upper and lower extremities, dependent on staff for all ADLs, incontinent of both bowel and bladder, and had active diagnoses of Aphasia, Cerebrovascular Accident, Non Alzheimer's Disease, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy, and the use of a feeding tube. Review of the Care Plan dated 6/19/2024, revealed .Tracheostomy . ADL Self Care Performance Deficit .impaired cognitive and communication function .at nutritional risk r/t receiving 100% nutrition/hydration via PEG r/t dx [diagnoses] of dysphagia. trach [tracheostomy] .dependent with tube feeding and water flushes. See MD orders for current feeding orders . Review of the facility's Order Review History Report, dated 7/14/2024-8/14/2024, revealed .Glycopyrrolate .1 MG .via PEG-Tube .Enteral Feed Order every shift .to GASTROSTOMY STATUS .flush peg tube with 60cc water before and after meds . Observation on the East Hall at Medication cart #2 on 8/14/24 at 1:35 PM, revealed LPN A, removed 1 Glycopyrrolate 1 mg tablet, crushed the medications and placed it into a plastic cup. LPN A knocked and entered Resident #10's room, exited the room and walked across the hall and returned back to Resident 310's room with an over the bed table from a room across the hall. LPN A washed her hands, donned a clean pair of gloves, mixed the medications with water, removed her gloves, went to the medication cart for plastic cups, returned to the sink, and washed her hands. LPN A checked placement of Resident #10's PEG feeding tube and failed to check the PEG's residual. LPN A flushed the PEG feeding tube with 30 cc of water by pushing the water in with a plunger, administered the medications by pushing the medications in with a plunger, and then flushed the PRG feeding tube with 30 cc of water by pushing water with a plunger. LPN A rinsed the plunger and the syringe and placed both back into the plastic bag and hung on the enteral feeding pole with visible water particles in the plastic bag. LPN A removed her gloves and exited the room. LPN A failed to follow the facility's policy and allow the medication to flow down the PEG tube via gravity. LPN A failed to follow the physician's orders and flush the PEG with 60 cc of water before and after the administration of the medication. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:14 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked, what was the process for administering medications through a PEG tube. The DON stated staff should make sure the resident was comfortable, check placement of the PEG tube, check residual of the PEG, use 5-10 cc of water to mix with the medications, and flush the PEG tube before and after with the physician prescribed amount of water. The DON stated staff should rinse the syringe and the plunger that was used with the medication administration, to air dry the syringe and plunger separately on a clean barrier and ensure the syringe and plunger were completely dry before returning them to the plastic bag for storage. The DON confirmed that is should not be returned to the plastic bag undried and with water particles present. The DON confirmed no medications should be crushed and administered together unless there was a physician order, and medications should be administered by way of gravity unless there was a physician order otherwise. 5. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Aphasia, Dysphasia, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG), and Cerebral Infraction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed there was no BIMS score, and Resident #90 had severely impaired cognitive skills for making decisions and had a PEG feeding. Review of the Physician's Order dated 7/18/2024, revealed .Enteral Feed Order two times a day Jevity [a high calorie nutritional formula] 1.5 at 65 cc/hr [cubic centimeters per hour] x [times] 22h [hour] off 11am on 1p [pm] via peg /pump .Enteral Feed Order every 6 hours h20 [water] flush 250cc q6h [every 6 hours] via peg . Observation in Resident #90's room revealed the following: On 8/12/2024 at 11:53 AM, the Jevity container was not labeled with a rate to be administered or the time. The Jevity had been started. On 8/12/2024 at 4:28 PM, the Jevity container was not labeled with a date the Jevity had been started and the rate it should be administered. On 8/13/2024 at 10:21 AM, the Jevity container was not labeled with a time the Jevity was started or the rate for the Jevity to be administered. There was no date or rate on the water container hanging. On 8/14/2024 at 8:22 AM, the water container hanging with the Jevity was not labeled with a rate to be administered. On 8/14/2024 at 3:53 PM, the water container was not labeled with a rate to be administered. On 8/15/2024 at 8:42 AM, the water container was not labeled with a rate to be administered. During 8/16/24 at 8:48 AM, the DON confirmed the Jevity feeding should be labeled with the resident's name, flow rate to be administered, and the resident's room number. The DON confirmed the water container used for PEG flushes should be labeled with the amount/volume of water and rate of flush.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0778 (Tag F0778)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistance was provided...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistance was provided with grooming and dressing for a Resident with a scheduled physician's appointment in order to ensure the Resident was ready and available when transportation services arrived to take the Resident to the physician's appointment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #67) sampled residents who missed a scheduled physician's appointment. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights Policy dated 10/20/2022, revealed .The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility .The facility strives to protect the rights of residents, including .All activities and interacting with residents by staff .must focus an assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth and incorporating the resident's goals, preferences and choices .The resident has the right to reside and receives services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activity of Daily Living (483.24). dated 11/2022, revealed .Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices this facility will provide the necessary care and services .Each resident shall receive, and this facility will provide necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . 2.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Diabetes, Pain, and Calculus of Kidney. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #67 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition, was dependent upon staff for dressing and bathing, and required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene. Review of the Care Plan dated 5/21/2024, revealed Resident #67 required assist of one for bathing personal hygiene and dressing. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #67 scored a 15 on the BIMS, which indicated intact cognition, required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for dressing and putting on/taking off footwear. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 8:26 AM, Resident #67 was asked to tell the surveyor about the bandage on her right foot. Resident #67 stated, .Infection down to the bone .going to doctor appoint [appointment] today . During an interview in the Resident's room on 8/14/2024 at 11:40 AM, Resident #67 stated, .The driver left me this morning. I needed to be at a doctor's appointment for infection. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 11:48 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if she was aware Resident #67 missed her doctor's appointment due to the bus driver leaving her. The DON stated, Yes she told me she was sore and could not move as fast. During an interview on 8/19/2024 at 11:24 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) L confirmed Resident #67 required assistance from staff for lower and upper body dressing. During an interview on 8/20/2024 at 2:45 PM, Resident #67 confirmed she would not have missed her appointment on 8/14/2024 if a staff member had helped her to get ready and get to the door in enough time to catch the ride on the transportation service. During an interview on 8/21/2024 at 8:29 AM, the DON confirmed Resident #67 does not move fast and staff should have assisted Resident #67 in a timely matter with dressing and grooming in order to ensure the Resident was available for the transportation services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were admini...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a safe and sanitary manner during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) - a plastic tube inserted into the stomach for the administration of medications and feedings) administration for 2 of 2 (Resident #8 and #10) sampled residents observed during medication administration, and the facility failed to ensure hazardous, and infectious waste was properly stored for the prevention of infectious diseases in 2 of 2 soiled linen rooms (West End Hall Soiled Linen Room and East End Hall Soiled Linen Room). The findings include: 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATIONS dated 11/15/2022, revealed .Staff shall follow established facility infection procedures .handwashing .antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions .when these apply to the administration of medications . Review of the Facility's policy titled, Infection Control/Medical Waste Handling dated 11/2022, revealed .Medical waste will be handled and disposed of safely and in accordance with regulatory requirements .For the purpose of this policy, medical waste include human blood and blood soiled articles contaminated items .soiled dressing .disposable sharps .needles .Disposable items contaminated with excretions or secretions from residents believed to be infectious must be placed in plastic bags and sealed, and either decontaminated with .or stored in appropriate container until removal from the premises .Disposable items soiled with blood or other potentially infectious materials must be placed in plastic bags or containers .place in appropriate containers and handled as medical waste . Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control CLEANING AND DISINFECTION OF RESIDENT-CARE ITEMS AND EQUIPMENT dated 11/29/2022, revealed .Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to CDC [Centers for Disease recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] Bloodborne Pathogens Standards .Durable medical equipment [DME] must be cleaned and disinfected before reuse by another resident . Review of the facility's policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION-ENTERAL TUBES dated 11/2022, revealed .Crushed medications are not mixed together. The powder from each medication is mixed with water before administration .Enteral tubes are flushed with at least 15 ml of water before administering any medications and after all medications after all medications have been administered .Each medication is administered separately to avoid interaction and clumping. The enteral tubing is flushed with water between each medication to avoid physical interaction of the medications .Remove plunger from syringe and insert syringe into tubing .Allow medication to flow down tube via gravity . Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 3/30/2024, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities .EBP are used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of PPE [personal protective equipment] to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs [multidrug-resistant organism] to staff hands and clothing .EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following as long as they reside in the facility .Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices .Chronic wounds .pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and venous stasis ulcers .Indwelling medical devices examples include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, and tracheostomies .Resident Status .has a wound or indwelling medical device .Use EBP .Yes .for Residents for whom EBP are indicated, EBP is employed when performing the following high-contact resident care activities .Dressing, Bathing/showering, Transferring, Providing hygiene, Changing linens, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use .central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, Wound care any skin opening requiring a dressing .EBP are intended to be in place for the duration of a resident's stay in the facility or until resolution of the wound or discontinuation of the indwelling medical device . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including of Aneurysm, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy Status, Dementia, Cerebral Infarction, and Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired, and the use of a feeding tube. Review of the facility's Order Review History Report dated 7/16/2024 to 8/16/2024, revealed .Ativan [also known as Lorazepam - medication used for anxiety] .1 MG [milligram] .via PEG .Baclofen [medication used for muscle spasms] .5 MG .via PEG-Tube .Glycopyrrolate [medication used to dry secretions] .2 MG .via PEG-Tube .Enteral Feed Order .every shift FLUSH TUBE WITH 60CC WATER BEFORE AND AFTER MEDS [medications] . Review of the Care Plan dated 7/21/2024, revealed .at risk for alterations in nutritional status r/t [related to] .NPO [nothing by mouth] with 100% [symbol for percent] nutrition/hydration via [by way of] PEG .The resident is dependent with tube feeding and water flushes administration .Enhanced Barrier precautions . Observation during medication administration on the [NAME] Hall at Medication cart #1 on 8/15/2024 at 1:45 PM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, removed 1 Lorazepam 1 mg tablet, 1 Baclofen 5 mg tablet, and 1 Glycopyrrolate 2 mg tablet for Resident #8. LPN B placed all 3 of the medications into a plastic sleeve and crushed all 3 medications together and placed the mixed medications into a plastic cup. LPN B sanitized her hands, knocked and entered Resident #8's room, donned a clean pair of gloves, checked placement with air and residual, mixed the medications with 10 ml (milliliters) of water, flushed the PEG feeding tube with 30 ml of water by pushing the water with the plunger, administered the mixed medications by pushing the medications with the plunger, flushed the PEG feeding tube with 30 ml of water by pushing with the plunger. LPN B placed the enteral feeding syringe into the trash and reconnected the enteral feeding tube and restarted the enteral feeding. LPN B failed to use enhanced barrier precautions when administering Resident #8's medications through the PEG tube. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Cellulitis, Tracheostomy, Gastrostomy, Quadriplegia, Dysphagia, Dementia, and Aphasia. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired, Range of Motion Limitations to both upper and lower extremities, dependent on staff for all ADLs, incontinent of both bowel and bladder, and had active diagnoses of Aphasia, Cerebrovascular Accident, Non Alzheimer's Disease, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy, and the use of a feeding tube. Review of the Care Plan dated 6/19/20 revealed, .at nutritional risk r/t receiving 100% nutrition/hydration via PEG r/t dx [diagnoses] of dysphagia. trach [tracheostomy] .dependent with tube feeding and water flushes .Enhanced Barrier Precautions . Review of the facility's Order Review History Report, dated 7/14/2024-8/14/2024, revealed .Glycopyrrolate .1 MG . via PEG Tube .Enteral Feed Order every shift .to GASTROSTOMY STATUS .flush peg tube with 60cc water before and after meds . Observation on the East Hall at Medication cart #2 on 8/14/2024 at 1:35 PM, revealed LPN A, removed 1 Glycopyrrolate 1 mg tablet, crushed the medication and placed it into a plastic cup. LPN A knocked and entered Resident #10's room, exited the room and walked across the hall and obtained an over the bed table and returned to Resident #10's room. LPN A cleaned the over the bed table with a water moistened paper towel. LPN A washed her hands, donned a clean pair of gloves, mixed the medications with water, removed her gloves, went to the medication cart for plastic cups, returned to the sink, washed and dried her hands, turned off the faucet, and cleaned the vanity top with the same paper towel. LPN A administered the medication. LPN A rinsed the plunger and the syringe and placed both back into the plastic bag and hung on the PEG feeding pole with visible water particles in the plastic bag. LPN A failed to clean the over the bed table with the proper disinfectant wipes, failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions while administering the PEG tube medications, and failed to properly store the PEG tube syringe after cleaning. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 2:25 PM, LPN A confirmed that enhanced barrier precautions are used when a resident has a tracheostomy, PEG feeding tube, and a wound. LPN A confirmed that Resident #10 was on enhanced barrier precautions for her PEG feeding tube and all residents on enhanced barrier precautions has a red dot by their name on the outside of the door. LPN A confirmed that Resident #10 has a red dot by her name on the outside of the room door. LPN A confirmed that she should have used enhanced barrier precautions when administering Resident #10 her medications. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 12:14 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that staff are to use enhanced barrier precautions when they are in close contact with residents, and they should wear a gown and gloves. The DON confirmed staff should use enhanced barrier precautions when administering PEG medications. The DON confirmed when staff are conducting proper hand hygiene, they should use soap and wash their hands for 20-30 seconds, rinse and use a clean paper towel to dry their hands, use a separate paper towel to turn off the faucet. The DON was asked, what should staff use to clean an over the bed table. The DON stated staff should use a bleach micro kill cloth when cleaning any reusable equipment including an over the bed table and should not use a water moistened paper towel. The DON was asked, what was the process for administering medications through a PEG tube. The DON stated staff should make sure the resident was comfortable, check placement of the PEG, check PEG residual, use 5-10 cc of water with the medications, and flush the PEG before and after with the physician prescribed amount of water. The DON stated staff should rinse the syringe and plunger used for the administration of medications via the PEG, and air dry them separately on a clean barrier. The DON stated the syringe and plunger should be completely dry before returning them to the plastic bag for storage. The DON confirmed there should not be observations of water particles present when placing them back in the plastic storage bag. 4. Observation and interview on the [NAME] End Wing Soiled Linen Room on 8/20/2024 at 4:14 PM, revealed 8 filled sharp containers on the counter. The Infection Control Preventionist stated the filled sharp containers should be in a biohazard box lined with a red biohazard bag and not on the counter. Observation and interview in the East End Wing Soiled Room on 8/20/2024 at 4:21 PM, revealed a biohazard box overflowing with red bags filled with biohazard waste. The Infection Control Preventionist verified the biohazard box was overflowing with red bags full of biohazard waste and that the biohazard box should not be stacked and overflowing like that. The Infection Control Preventionist stated a biohazard box full of bags containing biohazard waste should be contained and the biohazard box with the waste should be placed in a plastic biohazard container located in a room that is outside of the facility. The Infection Control Preventionist stated, .The box [biohazard box] should have been removed and a new box should have been put in there .prevents odor .prevents contamination . The Infection Control Preventionist confirmed the red bags full of biohazard waste should not have been stacked above what the biohazard box could contain.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light for 1 of 114 (Resident #108) sampled residents which had the potential to result in unmet ca...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light for 1 of 114 (Resident #108) sampled residents which had the potential to result in unmet care needs. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Call Light Policy, dated October 20, 2022, revealed .The purpose for the call light is to provide a system for the resident to call for assistance .STANDARD OF PRACTICE Equipment: Bedside call light in functioning order .Emergency call light in working order .Report any defective call lights to charge nurse and the maintenance department immediately . 2. Observation of the resident's room on 8/12/2024 at 11:44 AM, revealed Resident #108 had activated his call light, but the hall light above his door was not on to alert staff the call light was on. During an interview in the conference room, on 8/12/2024 at 1:46 PM, the Maintenance Director, was told that Resident #108's call light was not working. The Maintenance Director stated, I will check it out . Observation in the resident's room on 8/13/2024 at 9:48 AM and 4:08 PM, revealed Resident #108 activated his call light, but the hall light over his door was still not working. Resident #108 confirmed maintenance did come in to check the call light, but he had not fixed the call light. Observation in the resident's room on 8/15/2024 at 1:55 PM, revealed Resident #108 activated the call light, but the hall light over the door was not working. Observation in the resident's room on 8/16/2024 at 2:24 PM, revealed Resident #108 pushed the call light and the surveyor went to the hallway to check the light over the door and the light was working. During an interview on 8/16/2024 at 3:20 PM, the Maintenance Director, was asked what was wrong with Resident #108's call light. He stated, I had to replace the board and both cords in the room. During an interview on 8/21/2024 at 7:53 AM, the Administrator was asked whether the East Hall call light system was fixed. The Administrator stated, That is correct. The Administrator was asked, what is an acceptable timeframe for a call light to be fixed when it is not functioning. The Administrator stated, I would say 1-2 hours. I have told them a call light is something important. The Administrator was asked, so would fixing it in 3-4 days be acceptable. The Administrator stated, No Ma'am. The Administrator was asked, so if that section needed to be fixed should they have gotten to it sooner than 3-4 days. The Administrator stated, I would say 1-2 hours.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 40% turnover. Below Tennessee's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Special Focus Facility, 3 harm violation(s), $139,562 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 14 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $139,562 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Tennessee. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility is on CMS's Special Focus list for poor performance. Consider alternatives strongly.

About This Facility

What is Parkway Center's CMS Rating?

PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.

How is Parkway Center Staffed?

Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Parkway Center?

State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2024 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Parkway Center?

PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MEMPHIS, Tennessee.

How Does Parkway Center Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Parkway Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Parkway Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Parkway Center Stick Around?

PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Parkway Center Ever Fined?

PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $139,562 across 2 penalty actions. This is 4.0x the Tennessee average of $34,474. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Parkway Center on Any Federal Watch List?

PARKWAY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is currently on the Special Focus Facility (SFF) watch list. This federal program identifies the roughly 1% of nursing homes nationally with the most serious and persistent quality problems. SFF facilities receive inspections roughly twice as often as typical nursing homes. Factors in this facility's record include $139,562 in federal fines. Facilities that fail to improve face escalating consequences, potentially including termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Families considering this facility should ask for documentation of recent improvements and what specific changes have been made since the designation.