WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Waters of Memphis Rehabilitation & Nursing Center has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and in the middle of the pack for nursing homes. It ranks #221 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the bottom half, and #16 out of 24 in Shelby County, indicating that there are better local options available. The facility is showing improvement, with issues dropping from 8 in 2023 to just 1 in 2025. However, staffing is a concern, as it received a poor 1-star rating and has a high staff turnover rate of 69%, much higher than the state average of 48%. There have been incidents regarding meal service, including significant delays in meal delivery to residents, and issues with food safety, such as improper food storage and unsanitary kitchen practices. While the facility has a strong quality rating of 5 stars, these weaknesses highlight areas that families should consider when evaluating care options.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Tennessee
- #221/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 69% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $5,293 in fines. Higher than 93% of Tennessee facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Tennessee average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
22pts above Tennessee avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
21 points above Tennessee average of 48%
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of an ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping to maintain a sanitary...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to provide d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection were used when 2 of 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain and enhance resident's dignity and respect when 7 of 24 (Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions when 5 of 24 staff members Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA#1, #2, #3, #4, #6)...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to deliver meal trays to residents in a timely manner resulting in late meals. This had the potential to affect the 73 of the 78...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by undated food items, a dirty deep fryer...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions when dietary staff did not properly restrain hair and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade C (53/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 69% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 69%, which is 22 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 80%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR during 2019 to 2025. These included: 12 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr?
WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 90 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MEMPHIS, Tennessee.
How Does Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (69%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr Stick Around?
Staff turnover at WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR is high. At 69%, the facility is 22 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 80%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr Ever Fined?
WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR has been fined $5,293 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Tennessee average of $33,132. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
WATERS OF MEMPHIS A REHABILITATION & NURSING CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.