MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION

904 HIDDEN ACRES DR, MOUNT PLEASANT, TN 38474 (931) 379-5502
For profit - Limited Liability company 72 Beds SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
63/100
#139 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Mount Pleasant Healthcare and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of C+, which indicates that it is slightly above average among nursing homes. It ranks #139 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, but only #5 out of 6 in Maury County, meaning there is one local option that is better. The facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 2 in 2023 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is rated average, with a turnover rate of 47%, which is slightly below the state average, suggesting some stability among staff. However, the home has received $7,443 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 76% of facilities in Tennessee. Additionally, the nursing home has average RN coverage, which is important for monitoring residents' health. Specific incidents from inspections revealed that a resident experienced falls due to inadequate hazard identification, and there were failures to report allegations of sexual abuse, as well as inadequate personal hygiene care for several residents. While there are some strengths, such as decent staffing levels, the facility also faces serious concerns that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
C+
63/100
In Tennessee
#139/298
Top 46%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
2 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$7,443 in fines. Higher than 55% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
○ Average
10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Tennessee average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 47%

Near Tennessee avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $7,443

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Mar 2025 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse for 1 of 4 (Resident 165) residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect Exploitation dated 2/19/2025, revealed It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse .are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations .Sexual Abuse is the non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident .the facility will report all alleged violations and all substantiated incidents to the state agency .Abuse: The willful infliction of injury .intimidation .It includes .sexual abuse .is the non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident .Alleged violation: A situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment .Investigation: The facility will investigate all allegations and types of incidents .Reporting .The facility will report all alleged violations and all substantiated incidents to the state agency and to all other agencies required .The licensed/Registered Nurse will: Respond to the needs of the resident and protect him/her from further incident .Remove the accused employee from resident care areas .Notify the attending physician, resident's family/legal representative and Medical Director . Review of the Policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2/19/2025 revealed .It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse .'Sexual Abuse' is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident .Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation .Resident, staff or family report of abuse .The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychological harm . 2. Review of medical records revealed Resident #165 was admitted to this facility on 10/6/2022, with diagnoses which include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #165 was cognitively intact. Review of the Care Plan revealed 3/25/2024 Resident #165 had .Behavioral Symptom r/t [related to] emotional outbursts .noted to place herself on the floor .history if telling stories that are not exactly accurate .history if making sexual inappropriate statements and making sexual advances towards staff . Review of Resident Progress Notes dated 4/10/2024 at 12:30 PM, revealed Social Service Director (SSD) documented Resident making false accusations about staff/care received. Review of Resident Progress Notes dated 4/12/2024 at 7:11 AM, SSD documented Resident #165 .Recently exhibited increase in socially inappropriate behaviors related to male staff members and making false allegations . Review of Progress Notes dated 4/14/2024, revealed Resident #165 was seen by the Medical Director. Review of TIBRS (Tennessee Incident Based Reporting System) Narrative dated 4/12/2024 at 10:28 AM, revealed The Director of Nursing (DON ) .stated the staff was made aware of the allegations by a resident of the facility [Named Resident #165] on Wednesday April 10, 2024, and began looking into the allegations .there was an allegation that [Named LPN H] had inappropriate sexual contact with [Named Resident #165] on Tuesday 4/9/2024 during an examination of her pelvic and buttocks region due to complaints of hurting in the area. The DON stated [Named Resident #165] had a growth on her pelvic region that requires them to have 2 staff with peri care. Law enforcement reported Resident #165 was confused and was on the phone when she was interviewed. [Named Resident #165] reported to law enforcement she had been raped by [Named LPN H]. [Named Resident #165] allegedly reported she was asleep and knew he had sex with her.After getting information for a report I left the facility. I was contacted a short time later by [Named DON] and advised that after I left Named Resident [Resident #165] requested to speak with her. [Named Resident #165] informed the [named DON] that what she told did not happen. She stated she lied about it because she was mad. Named DON stated [Named Resident #165] had called her friend [Named FM I] and told her it was all a lie. [Named FM I] also stated she was on the phone with [Named Resident #165] when I [law enforcement] was speaking with her and she told me something totally different than she told her. Due to [Named Resident #165] stating she lied about the allegations this report is closed as unfounded . The Administrator was asked on 3/19/2025 to supply a copy of the URIS report mentioning Resident #165 and was unable to provide. An email was sent to the Ombudsman on 3/19/2025 at 8:59 AM, asking whether she had been notified of the allegation of sexual abuse by Named Resident #165 and the Ombudsman stated, she had not been notified. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 4:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked whether education was done after the allegation of abuse by Resident #165, and she responded No. The DON was asked when this incident was reported to the state agency and she stated, it was not reported to the state agency. During an interview in the Conference Room on 3/20/2025 at 5:15 PM, the Administrator was asked if she was the Abuse Coordinator, and she responded that she was, and the DON would fill in when she was absent. The Administrator was asked when should abuse be reported and the Administrator responded, immediately. The Administrator was asked whether she reported the incident between Resident #165 and LPN H to the State Agency and she responded, I did not because the investigation was completed with the 2-hour window. A follow up question was asked . The Administrator stated, [Named LPN H] was suspended pending investigation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide adequate pers...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide adequate personal hygiene and bathing to 4 of 8 (Resident #8, #13, #19, and #32) sampled residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), revised 1/2025, revealed .Care and services will be provided for the following .Bathing, dressing, grooming .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good .grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, dated 1/23/2025 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff .to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Type 2 Diabetes, and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated Resident #8 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing. Review of the care plan revised 2/10/2025, revealed .Problem .has an ADL [Activities of Daily Living] self-care performance deficit r/t [regarding to] CVA [cerebrovascular accident] w/ [with] residual deficits, functional impairments .The resident will improve current level of function in ADL's through the review date .Approach .The resident requires substantial/maximal assistance by x1 [times 1] staff with bathing/showering . Review of Point of Care History dated 1/29/2025 - 3/18/2025, revealed .how did the resident bathe .activity did not occur . for dates 1/30/2025, 2/1/2025, 2/3/2025, 2/4/2025, 2/5/2025, 2/6/2025, 2/7/2025, 2/10/2025, 2/11/2025, 2/12/2025, 2/13/2025, 2/15/2025, 2/16/2025, 2/19/2025, 2/20/2025, 2/21/2025, 2/26/2025, 2/27/2025, 3/1/2025, 3/2/2025, 3/4/2025, 3/5/2025, 3/9/2025, 3/10/2025, 3/11/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/14/2025, 3/15/2025, 3/16/2025, 3/17/2025, and 3/18/2025. Resident #8 is documented to have received a shower on 2/18/2025 only. Review of Progress notes dated 1/30/2025-3/18/2025 does not reveal documentation of Resident refusing showers. During observation and interview in the resident's room on 3/17/2025 at 9:55 AM, revealed the resident sitting in her wheelchair at the sink brushing her hair and wearing a red and black plaid pajama top and bottom. Resident stated that it had been two weeks since she had a shower and asked to speak later. During an interview on 3/17/2025 at 11:14 AM, Resident #8 confirmed that the last time she had shower was on last Wednesday (3/12/2025) with therapy and that she was supposed to get a shower every Tuesday and Thursday. During observation and interview in the resident's room on 3/18/2025 at 8:11 AM, revealed the resident in lying in bed wearing a red and black plaid pajama shirt. Resident #8 confirmed she has not changed clothes and that she has been wearing the same socks for several days. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 9:51 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) NN confirmed there is a shower list that lists which rooms get showers on which days and they are to fill out a shower sheet and document the shower in the computer. CNA NN was asked where the shower sheets are kept. CNA NN stated, I believe we do have a book. CNA NN was asked to provide the book. CNA N stated, Give me just a second. Observation in the hallway on 3/18/2025 at 10:25 AM revealed Resident #8 was up in wheelchair wearing red and black plaid pajama top and bottoms. The resident confirmed she was going to ask staff if she could have a shower. 3/18/2025 11:00 AM facility unable to provide any shower sheets on Resident #8. Observation in the resident's room on 3/18/2025 at 3:33 PM, revealed the resident wearing red and black plaid pajama top and bottoms. Resident #8 confirmed she asked CNA EE if she could have a shower and was told staff would try to. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:36 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was asked who is responsible for showers on the hall, she stated, .the tech on this hall that is responsible for that room . During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 9:35 AM, CNA PP was asked if she knew when the residents she took care of received showers. CNA PP stated, I look in our book. Where do you chart that, CNA PP stated, .Matrix .I can put what kind of bath in here . CNA PP was asked if Resident #8 ever refuse. CNA PP responded, No. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 10:53 AM, the ADON acknowledged the staff is expected to document showers in the computer and on the shower sheet. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 4:44 PM, the DON was asked how often residents should get bathed, the DON stated, Depending on their preference but usually 2 to 3 times per week . 3. Review of medical records revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include Secondary Malignant Neoplasm, Essential Hypertension and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a score of 13, which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Observation on 3/18/2025 at 8:48 AM, revealed Resident #13, a female resident, had facial hair on top lip and chin. Observation on 3/18/2025 at 3:20 PM, revealed Resident #13 remained in bed with bed clothes on and facial hair continued to be present on top lip and chin. Observation and interview in Resident #13's room on 3/19/2025 at 9:42 AM, revealed Resident #13 continued to have facial hair on top lip and chin. Resident #19 was asked whether she liked the facial hair removed and she stated, I get it shaved when somebody does it for me and I need this hair done to. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 11:06 AM, CNA E was asked how often the female residents have their facial hair trimmed. CNA E stated, I usually shave their face on shower day. 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 13, which indicated Resident #19 was cognitively intact, uses wheelchair for mobility and required substantial to maximal assist for shower/bath and supervision or touching assist needed for personal hygiene. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 12, which indicated Resident #19 was moderately cognitively impaired, required substantial to maximal assist needed for shower/bath and transfers, and supervision or touching assist needed for personal hygiene.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical records review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to follow physician or...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical records review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to follow physician orders and failed to obtain timely skin treatment orders for 2 of 20 (Resident #7 and #8) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Orders, revised 2/2025, revealed .Medications should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe .The charge nurse on duty at the time the order is received should note the order and enter it on the physician order sheet or electronic format . Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised 1/23/2025, revealed .Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice . Review of the facility policy titled, Wound Treatment Management, revised 3/2024, revealed .Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders .Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure, Depression, Anxiety, and Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated she had no cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for all care, always incontinent. Resident received Antianxiety, Antidepressants, Anticoagulants, and Anticonvulsants, and received Oxygen. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 12, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident was dependent on staff for all care and was always incontinent. Resident received Antianxiety, Antidepressants, and Anticonvulsants, and received Oxygen and Hospice care. Review of the care plan dated 10/9/2024, revealed .has altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to chronic respiratory failure .elevate head of bed .O2 per MD orders . Physician's Orders dated 10/22/2024 revealed .O2 [Oxygen] at 4 LPM [liters per minute] BNC [binasal cannula-a medical device to deliver supplemental oxygen through the nostrils] PRN [as needed] SOB [shortness of breath . Observation in the resident's room on 3/17/2024 at 9:56 AM and at 03/18/25 09:14 AM, revealed the resident's oxygen set to 2 liters. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 9:22 AM, LPN F Confirmed that Resident #7's oxygen order was for 4 liters, and stated, .I will change that right now . During an interview on 3/20/25 at 4:44 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed that physician's orders be followed regarding oxygen settings. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Diabetes, and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated Resident #8 had moderate cognitive impairment and is at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of the care plan revised 2/10/2025, revealed .Resident will not exhibit skin breakdown .Apply moisture barrier to skin .Report any signs of skin breakdown . Review of the facility's form titled, Skin Integrity Events, dated 3/14/2025, revealed .MASD [Moisture-Associated Skin Damage] to right and left buttock .zinc cream [used to protect skin from being irritated and wet] twice a day . Review of the Physicians Orders dated 3/14/2025- 3/18/2025, revealed no order for zinc cream. Review of the Progress Notes dated 3/14/2025 - 3/18/2025, revealed no documentation regarding the resident's skin condition. Review of the Physicians Orders dated 3/19/2025, revealed .Zinc to bil. bouttucks [bilateral buttocks] BID [twice a day] . Review of the progress note dated 3/19/2025 at 1:49 PM, the Advanced Practice registered Nurse Practitioner (APRN NP) documented, .Seen today for evaluation of MASD. The resident has skin irritation, redness to b/l [bilateral] buttocks .consult wound care. cleanse area with wound cleanser, apply zinc oxide to affected area BID until healed . During an interview in the resident's room on 3/17/2025 at 11:47 AM, the resident confirmed she has an open spot on her bottom and the staff is aware. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 10:53 AM, the ADON was asked what the process is when a resident has a new skin condition, she stated, .document in progress note .who we contacted .implement those verbal orders .enter the order in the computer . The ADON acknowledged there was not a physician's order from 3/14/2025 - 3/19/2025 for treatment of the MASD. The ADON was asked if any treatments were provided from 3/14/2025-3/19/2025, she stated, .I do know she was getting the zinc applied . Observation in the resident's room on 3/19/2025 at 3:09 PM with the ADON revealed MASD to buttocks as described in event note. During an interview on 3/20/2025, at 4:44 PM, the DON was asked what should be done when a skin issue is identified, she stated, .notify the md [Medical Doctor] .look at it .do an event .notify family .get an order for treatment . The DON acknowledged that an identified skin issue should be documented in the medical record, should receive an order on the day a skin issue is identified, and that nursing staff cannot treat a skin issue without an order.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility assessment review, medical record review, facility ADL (Activities of Daily Living) documentation review, faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility assessment review, medical record review, facility ADL (Activities of Daily Living) documentation review, facility staffing time punch review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels to meet the ADL needs (bathing/showers, grooming, and skin care) for 5 residents (Residents #7, #8, #13, #19, and #32) of 20 residents reviewed for ADL care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE], revealed . Average Daily Census (ADC) .50 .Registered Nurse Hours per Resident Day . 18.76 .Licensed Nurse Hours per Resident Day .55.20 .Nurse Aide Hours per Resident Day .55.01 .Total Nursing Hours per Resident Day .128.97 . 2. Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, dated 1/23/2025, revealed .The facility will supply services by sufficient numbers of each of the following personnel types on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents .nurse aides . Review of the facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, last revised on 1/25/2025, revealed .The facility conducts and documents a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents . The facility assessment will, at a minimum, address or include .the facility's resident population .The care required by the resident population .The facility will use the facility assessment to . Inform staffing decisions to ensure there are a sufficient number of staff .Consider specific staffing needs for each resident unit .each shift .and adjust as necessary based on any changes to its resident population .The facility assessment will be reviewed and updated as necessary and at least annually .based on changes to resident population . 3. Review of Licensure Staffing Requirements for 2/15/2025- 3/14/2025, revealed the facility census average for that period was 65. Review of Licensure Staffing Requirements for 2/15/2025- 3/14/2025, revealed on 2/15/2025, 2/22/2025, and 2/23/2025 the Aide hours were below the facility's assessment of 1.1 nurse aide hours per resident. Continued review revealed on 2/15/2025 nurse aide hours per resident were 0.73. Review revealed on 2/22/2025 nurse aide hours per resident were 1.08. Review revealed on 2/23/2025 nurse aide hours per resident were 1.04. Review of the Federal requirement for 483.35(b) Registered nurse, 483.35(b)(1), and 483.35(b)(3) for F727 revealed, . Except when waived under paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week .483.35(b)(3) The director of nursing may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents . 4. Review of the clock in and clock outs for 2/15/2025 from 7:32 AM until 6:51 PM (11 hours 19 minutes) [named Certified Nursing Assistant CNA #E] was the only CNA in the facility. Review of the clock in and clock outs for 3/15/2025 from 10:30 PM until 3/16/2025 at 7:06 AM (8 hours 36 minutes) revealed CNA #Q was the only CNA in the facility. 5. The facility failed to provide adequate personal hygiene and bathing Activities of Daily Living for Resident #8, #13, #19, and #32. 6. The facility failed to obtain timely skin treatment orders for Resident #8. 7. The facility failed to maintain Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week. 8. During an interview on 3/19/25 at 11:11 AM, CNA A stated, .I am taking care of 20 residents today .the hospitality aides answer call lights, help with activities, pass ice, they cannot give any direct care because they are uncertified . During a telephone interview on 3/19/2025 at 6:03 PM, CNA B was asked about staffing for the facility. CNA B stated, .it is bad .I work night shift 7 PM to 7 AM, there have been numerous nights I have come in and meals are still not passed out and I have to feed residents on the hall .I know it's going to be a bad night if the trays are still on the hall .the nurses are having to work the floor as CNAs at times because we don't have enough help .baths are not getting done . CNA B was asked if she was able to complete incontinence care, turning and repositioning every 2 hours. CNA B stated, .when we come in and trays are still out it maybe 8:30 [8:30 PM] or 9:00 [9:00 PM] before we can ever start our turns by that time the residents are soaked .residents are left up in their chairs all day and when I go to get them out of the chair with the lift, the urine will get on me .I know of several days that only 1 CNA in the whole building .there are times I don't get to sit down to do any charting until 12:00 [12:00 AM] .I have expressed my concerns to nursing and they tell me just take a break for a little while .If you raise any concerns about the resident care the management staff will say your being aggressive .they want that point of care charting to be 100% .resident with skin issues, rashes, UTI's [Urinary Tract Infections] and it is because they are sitting in s . for hours .residents that really need 2 person assist you have to find help because they are so fragile I am afraid I might hurt them and that is hard when you are on the hall by yourself .there are 3 areas where you can chart showers either on paper or when you go in the computer you click on a link for ADLs and you either chart shower or bath . During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 9:08 AM, CNA N was asked why most CNA's have 20 residents a piece to care for CNA N stated, We have been short staffed this week. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 8:20 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L confirmed she tries to assist staff with rounds when she can but her duties as a nurse often consume all her time. LPN L stated that there were 2 CNAs on her hall but now it is 1 and it is a lot for them to do. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 8:27 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) J was asked how many CNAs usually work during the day. RN J stated, .We like to run 5-6, but we've had a lot of sickness over the last month. Most days we have had 4 people, this week has been harder, mostly 3 this week . During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 4:46 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if a CNA could give adequate care to 20 residents. The DON stated that they could if they have support from the nurses, and that the nurses could assist with giving showers and doing ADLs between med passes. The DON confirmed the morning medication pass takes 2 to 3 hours and nurses give medications throughout the day, assist with meals, provide wound care, communicate with family and physicians, deal with events such as falls, and occasionally do lab draws. Refer to F677, F684, F727
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy, Facility Assessment review, Chapter 1000-02 Rules and Regulation of the Licensed Practical Nurses ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy, Facility Assessment review, Chapter 1000-02 Rules and Regulation of the Licensed Practical Nurses Rules and Regulations review, employee file review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all nursing staff possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely for 2 of 2 (Resident #50 and Resident #63) sampled residents with PICC lines (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter inserted into the arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, dated 1/23/2025 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident .The facility must ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care . 2. Review of the facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, revised 1/25/2025 revealed, .The facility assessment will, at a minimum, address or include .care required by the resident population, using evidence-based, data-driven methods .staff competencies and skill sets that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed . 3. Review of CHAPTER 1000-02 RULES AND REGULATIONS OF LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES dated 10/2024, revealed 1000-02-.02 (3), .Licensed Practical Nurses shall not administer the following fluids/medication/agents or drug classifications in the context of intravenous therapy .Titrated medication and dosages calculated and adjusted by the nurse based on patient assessment and/or interpretation of lab values . and 1000-02-.02 (4) (a) 1.The Licensed Practical Nurse administers IV [Intravenous] push medications in peripheral lines [flexible tube inserted into a vein in the arm, hand, leg, or foot] only . 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Osteomyelitis of Vertebra (bone infection of the spinal column), lumbar region. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #50 was receiving IV medications over the last 7 days. Review of the Physician Order Report dated 2/20/2025-3/20/2025 revealed an order for PICC line for Antibiotic (ATB) infusion with start date 3/12/2025. Continued review revealed an order for Vancomycin (Antibiotic given that may require blood levels to monitor dosage) 1,250 mg (milligram) intravenous with start date of 1/28/2025 and Ceftriaxone (antibiotic) 2 gm (gram) intravenous with start date of 2/27/2025. Review Hospital #1's Discharge Instructions dated 2/27/2025 for Resident #50 revealed, .You [Resident #50] are going home with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) . Review of the Medication Administration History dated 3/1/2025-3/20/2025 revealed Daptomycin (Vancomycin) and Ceftriaxone (Rocephin) 2 gm was administered intravenously via PICC line by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LPN L on 3/7/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/15/2025 and LPN M administered Daptomycin and Ceftriaxone intravenously via the PICC line on 3/15/2025 and 3/19/2025. 5. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Osteomyelitis, unspecified and Charcot's (a progressive condition causing the bones and joints in the foot to degenerate) joint, right ankle and foot. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 had an IV access over the last 7 days. Review of the Physician Order Report dated 2/20/2025 - 3/20/2025 revealed an order for PICC line dressing change per RN (Registered Nurse) every 3 days. Continued review revealed and order for Vancomycin 750 mg intravenous per venous catheter every 12 hours with start date of 3/15/2025. Review of the Medication Administration History dated 3/1/2025-3/20/2025 revealed Vancomycin 750 mg was administered intravenously through PICC line by LPN L on 3/17/2025 and 3/18/2025 and LPN M administered Vancomycin via the PICC line on 3/19/2025 and 3/20/2025. During an observation and interview on 3/19/2025 at 8:45 AM LPN M stated, .[Named Resident #50] has a PICC line and receiving Rocephin 2 gm, she has been here for 3 weeks, she is receiving the medication for Osteomyelitis of her Spine post her surgery . During the interview a lab tech informed LPN M she was unable to obtain the Vancomycin trough (lowest level of the drug in the resident's body to monitor the antibiotic) on Resident #65, the nurse informed the lab tech to let the Director of Nursing (DON) know on her way out so the DON could try and draw the lab from her PICC line. The LPN stated, .the lab comes every Wednesday to draw troughs . The LPN was asked if she could access a PICC line and she stated, .Yes I can hang the IV, but I can't draw blood from the port . The nurse put on her protective gown prior to going into the room to hang the Rocephin, she prepared the IV medication to hang on IV pole, flushes the tubing line and uses a dial a flow to set the rate, the nurse flushed the PICC line port with 10 ml [milliliters] of normal saline flush per a 10 ml syringe, hung the Rocephin, verified the IV antibiotic was dripping and the resident was ok. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 8:52 AM, LPN L was asked if she had administered Vancomycin through [Named Resident #50 and Resident #65]'s PICC line. LPN L confirmed she had accessed the PICC line and ?performed the Vancomycin ?for [Named Resident #50 and Resident #65]. LPN L was asked if she had been through an IV certification course. LPN L stated, .I haven't gone anywhere for that. I don't remember any extra training I received here at the facility? .? During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 5:00 PM, the DON was asked if LPNs could access PICC lines and hang IV antibiotics. The DON stated, .LPNs can do anything but hang blood products or push medications. They can and have been trained. I have skill check offs; we provide training and skill check offs . 6. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M's employee file revealed training for Peripheral IV Insertion dated 7/19/2024 with the observer's signature of Registered Nurse (RN) C. No specialized IV (intravenous) training for PICC lines [thin tube inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded to a large vein near the heart] was found in the employee file. Review of LPN L's employee file revealed training for Peripheral IV Insertion dated 8/8/2024, with the observer's signature as LPN O. LPN L's employee file revealed no specialized IV training. 7. The Regional Nurse came to the conference room on 3/20/2025 at 6:07 PM and presented a copy of Chapter 1000-02 Rules and Regulation of Licensed Practical Nurses and stated, .Nothing says they cannot . referring to accessing a PICC line.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week. The findings included: 1. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, dated 1/23/2025 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment .The facility must ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care .Except when waived, the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week .The Director of Nursing [DON] may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents . 2. Review of the facility's licensure information revealed the facility has 4 RNs. Review of the staffing clock in and out punches for 2/15/2025, and 2/22/2025 revealed no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours. Review of the staffing clock in and out punches for 3/6/2025, revealed no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours. Director of Nursing (DON) worked 8.5 hours; facility census was 64. Review of the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Form dated 3/6/2025, revealed there were no RNs scheduled that date. 3. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 4:46 PM, the DON confirmed there must be RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours every day and that the DON cannot serve as a charge nurse if the facility's average daily occupancy is greater than 60.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy, observation and interview the facility failed to store all drugs in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 4 medication storage areas. The findi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy, observation and interview the facility failed to store all drugs in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 4 medication storage areas. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, with revision date 9/2024 revealed, .It is the policy to this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in accordance to .External Products .drugs for external use are stored separately from internal .medications .Internal Products: Medications to be administered by mouth are stored separately from other formulations ( .eye drops .). 2. During an observation and interview on 3/19/2025 at 10:56 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) L was working on the White medication cart. RN L was asked to open the medication cart so surveyor could review the storage of medications. Continued observation revealed a bottle of antacid chewable tablets stored with eye drops and an ear wax removal bottle stored with the topical Lidocaine (topical pain medication) and Nicotine (transdermal patch used to quit smoking) patches. RN L was asked if these medications should be stored together and she stated, No. During an interview on 3/20/2025 at 4:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if oral medications should be stored with the eye drops; she stated, No. The DON was asked should an ear wax removal kit be stored with topical patches and she stated, No.
Sept 2023 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) sampl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. This failure contributed to resident falls with injury. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility policy titled Accidents and Supervision, revised 03/23/2022, indicated, The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). Evaluating and analyzing hazards(s) and risk(s). Implementing interventions to reduce hazards(s) and risk(s). Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. Additionally, the policy specified, The facility should make a reasonable effort to identify the hazards and risk factors for each resident. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/05/2022 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, age-related Osteoporosis, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the Event Report dated 03/01/2023 at 5:00 PM, revealed Resident #2 reported they fell reaching for something that had had fallen off their bedside table on to the floor. The immediate intervention was to declutter the resident's bedside table. The Event Report revealed the resident sustained redness to their left elbow. The facility updated the resident's care plan to include, bedside table decluttered, with a start date of 03/01/2023. However, the resident's care plan at the time of the fall already had an intervention directing staff to provide an environment free of clutter. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/15/2023, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required supervision with most activities of daily living, except the resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing, required extensive assistance with dressing, and limited assistance with toilet use. The MDS revealed Resident #2 was frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. A review of the Event Report dated 04/09/2023, revealed Resident #2 was found on the floor on their left side. The Event Report revealed Resident #2 complained of left hip pain with movement and had a red knot noted on the resident's left hip. The Event Report revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) after a mobile x-ray confirmed the resident had sustained a left hip fracture. Per the Event Report, the root cause of the fall was that the resident had on fuzzy socks and the immediate intervention put in place was to remove the fuzzy socks from the resident's room. However, the resident's Care Plan in place at the time of the fall directed staff to provide proper, well-maintained footwear. Review of Resident #2's Resident Progress Notes, dated 04/10/2023 at 4:23 AM, revealed the resident's x-ray results were received and revealed, Osteoporosis. High suspicion of an impacted left-sided subcapital fracture. A review of the ED [Emergency Department] Note Physician, dated 04/10/2023, revealed Resident #2 presented to the ED post fall, mobile x-ray results showed a possible left hip fracture. The ED Physician's Note revealed a computed tomography (CT)) scan of the pelvis and hip was performed and revealed a fracture of the greater trochanter. Review of Resident #2's Resident Progress Notes, dated 04/19/2023 at 8:15 PM, revealed Resident #2 was found on the floor in the hallway beside their bedroom door. The Resident Progress Notes revealed the handrail on the wall was noted to be on the floor and Resident #2 was unable to explain what happened. Further review revealed the resident sustained two skin abrasions to the right arm and complained of bilateral hip pain due to their recent hip fracture. The intervention implemented as the result of this fall was for a medication review due to a recent change in the resident's medication regimen. A review of an Event Report dated 04/23/2023, revealed an unknown person placed a riser seat on Resident #2's toilet and when the certified nursing assistant (CNA) left the resident alone in the bathroom, the resident fell off the toilet onto their left side. Further review revealed Resident #2 complained of left knee pain and was not able to bear weight on their left leg. The Event Report revealed the probable root cause of the resident's fall was the riser on toilet and the resident being left alone in the bathroom. The immediate intervention was to remove the riser per the Event Report. Review of the Event Report dated 07/24/2023, revealed Resident #2 was found on the floor on their left side in the doorway to the bathroom. The Event Report revealed an applicable care plan intervention was not in place at the time of the resident's fall. Per the Event Report, Resident #2 attempted to go to the bathroom and their wheelchair and rollator were not present in the resident's room. The Event Report revealed the staff were educated to ensure the resident's wheelchair was in their room when the resident was in their bed. Review of the Event Report dated 07/28/2023, revealed Resident #2 was found on the floor beside their bed. The Event Report revealed there was no care plan interventions in place for a fall at bedside. Further review of the Event Report revealed the intervention for this fall was to place mats to the resident's bedside. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan, initiated on 09/06/2022, indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, Parkinson's disease, dementia, poor safety awareness and memory recall, and the inability to be educated. Interventions directed the staff to encourage the use of environmental devices such as handrails, keep personal items and frequently used items within reach, provide an environment free of clutter, and provide proper, well-maintained footwear. During an interview on 09/20/2023 at 12:42 PM, the Maintenance Director reported the handrail had been ripped out of the wall when the resident pulled on it on the way down to the floor. According to the Maintenance Director, he determined the screws that had been used to initially install the handrails were too short. During an interview on 09/20/2023 at 3:25 PM, LPN #9 stated there was a toilet riser in Resident #2's bathroom that was not a facility toilet riser. LPN #9 stated she did not know how the riser got into the facility because it was not the type of riser they used in the facility. LPN #9 stated the facility toilet risers had clamps that affixed to the toilet seat, whereas the rise that on Resident #2's toilet at the time of the fall was not affixed. LPN #9 stated she believed Resident #2 may have moved while sitting on the riser and then fell along with the riser. During an interview on 09/20/2023 at 3:35 PM, LPN #10 (who was called to Resident #2's room when Resident #2 was found on the floor beside the bed on 07/28/2023), stated there was only one mat in the room when she arrived in Resident #2's room to respond to the fall. LPN #10 stated the one mat that was at the resident's bedside was on the opposite side of the bed, and Resident #2 was found on the side of the bed without a fall mat in place.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, document review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an incident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, document review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an incident of alleged abuse to administrative staff and to the state survey agency for 1 of 3 (Resident #7) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with a revision date of 08/30/2022, revealed It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Further review revealed, VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. 2. Review of Resident Progress Notes, dated 01/27/2023, revealed Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility. Review of the Resident Progress Notes, dated 01/29/2023 at 5:12 PM, revealed Resident #7 was sent to the hospital emergency room (ER) for evaluation. Review of Resident #7's Resident Face Sheet revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Urinary Tract Infection and Unspecified Dementia. Further review of the Resident Face Sheet indicated the facility discharged the resident on 02/12/2023 and the resident did not return to the facility. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/10/2023, revealed Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS indicated Resident #7 exhibited other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others four to six days during the seven-day review period. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance from staff for toilet use and personal hygiene and was always incontinent of urine and bowel. A review of Resident #7's Care Plan History, dated 02/06/2023 that indicated the resident had cognitive loss/dementia. Another problem statement, with a start date of 02/06/2023, indicated the resident used psychotropic medication. Approaches directed staff to assess if the resident's behavioral symptoms presented a danger to the resident and/or others. A third problem statement, dated 02/06/2023, indicated the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers related to incontinence. Approaches directed staff to provide incontinence care after each episode of incontinence. Review of a nursing Progress Note, dated 01/29/2023 at 5:12 PM, indicated that while incontinence care was being provided Resident #7 hit one certified nursing assistant (CNA) across the face and struck another CNA in the chest. After care was provided, Resident #7 got out of bed and struck their roommate in the shoulder with their fist. The Progress Note indicated the resident was placed in a wheelchair in the line of sight of staff and was later sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation. Review of a nursing Progress Note, dated 02/02/2023 and written by the DON, indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and pneumonia. The Progress Note indicated, that during an interview with staff members working at the time of the incident on 01/29/2023, Resident #7 thought a staff member was a man that rubbed their [genitalia] too hard during care. Review of a nursing Progress Note, dated 02/03/2023 at 6:20 PM, indicated the resident was transferred back to the facility from the hospital. The Progress Note indicated Resident #7 had redness and irritation in the genital area and was scratching the area and causing it to worsen. Review of a file provided by the Administrator on 09/20/2023, revealed that an investigation was conducted following the incidents that occurred on 01/29/2023 (the allegation by Resident #7 that a male staff member touched them roughly during care and the resident-to resident altercation between Resident #7 and their roommate). The file included statements dated 01/30/2023 from CNA #7 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9, resident interviews, and a Care Management Progress Note from the hospital for Resident #7 (dated 01/29/2023 with a print date of 01/31/2023). Further review of documentation in the file indicated that staff in-servicing was provided on 01/30/2023 that included Abuse Investigating and Reporting, Signs of Abuse, Behavior Monitoring and the facility's policy related to behavior management plans and the Behavior Management Program Flowchart. Review of the phone interview statement made by CNA #7 and dated 01/30/2023 at 12:15 PM, indicated Resident #7 was assisted to use the toilet by two female CNAs (CNA #7 and CNA #8) on 01/29/2023. When CNA #8 wiped the resident's perineal area the resident hit CNA #8; CNA #7 said to the resident, Please don't hit us, and then Resident #7 struck CNA #7. According to the phone interview statement, Resident #7 later pointed at CNA #7 and stated, She's a part of the issue and that man that rubbed my [genital area] too hard, and pointed at CNA #8. The statement indicated that the CNAs noted Resident #7's perineal area was red, and that the area hurt when they touched the resident during perineal care. The statement also indicated that CNA #7 stated the CNAs did not report the incident to the nurse before Resident #7 hit their roommate but would be sure to report any similar incident next time. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 12:24 PM, CNA #7 stated Resident #7 thought a man was rough with them during perineal care. CNA #7 stated there were no male staff working the night of 01/29/2023 and only she and CNA #8 were providing care for Resident #7. CNA #7 recalled that the Administrator and DON interviewed other residents on the hall where Resident #7 resided the next day to ask them about abuse and care. CNA #7 said she did not report Resident #7 stating that a man rubbed them too hard, to the DON until the next day. She stated she did not consider it abuse because they were trying to clean Resident #7 and change their brief when the resident made the comment. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 1:30 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not report the allegation made by Resident #7 to the state survey agency. He stated they did not report the allegation as abuse because it was determined to be a care issue since the resident was referring to the female CNA and stating she was a man, and staff had been conducting an adult brief change at the time. The Administrator stated there were no male staff members working during that shift. The Administrator stated the staff were in-serviced on abuse reporting in response to the allegation because the staff involved did not inform anyone about the allegation until the DON collected witness statements related to the resident becoming combative. The Administrator stated the facility had not reported the resident-to-resident altercation to the state survey agency either because when there was a resident-to-resident altercation, the facility reviewed whether the altercation was willfully intended toward the resident. He said in this case, Resident #7 was unaware of what they were doing, was sent to the hospital, and was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection that was likely associated with the combativeness. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 12:00 PM, the Administrator reiterated that the allegation had not been reported because he knew from family conversations that Resident #7 had a history of making similar false allegations and the CNA that Resident #7 was referring to as a man was a female CNA who was trying to provide perineal care at the time the allegation was made. The Administrator stated he also took into account the fact that Resident #7 likely had pain in the perineal area due to being excoriated and had a chronic urinary tract infection.
Dec 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, grievance log, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their grievance polic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, grievance log, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy for 3 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #17, #41, and #258) interviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Filing Grievances/Complaints updated 1-16-19, showed, .Our facility will help residents, their representatives (sponsor), other interested family members, or resident advocates file grievances or complaints when such requests are made .The facility will maintain evidence demonstrating the result of all grievances for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision . 2. Review of the March, May, and July 2019 Grievance/Complaint Log showed there were no grievances documented for Resident #17, #41, and #258. The facility was unable to provide a Grievance/Complaint Log for August, September, October, November, and December 2019. 3. Medical record review showed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Schizoaffective Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia, and Depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for decision making. During an interview on 12/16/19 at 3:24 PM, Resident #17 stated, .had a christmas ball [ornament] stolen out of my room that my sister brought me .I told [Named Administrator] and they looked through my drawers .it had my name on it . During an interview on 12/17/19 at 4:50 PM, the Administrator stated, .she just told me this afternoon, today .someone brought her to my office and she told me .she has two sons but no sisters or daughters .usually I talk with the resident to see if the item is misplaced .Grievance/complaint form is filled out when I determine whether something has actually been stolen . The Administrator was asked how long it takes for a complaint to be resolved. The Administrator stated, .5 business days .I haven't started my typical stuff for [named Resident #17] yet .I haven't filled out a grievance form yet . 3. Medical record review showed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] showed a BIMs of 15. During an interview on 12/17/19 at 8:22 AM, Resident #41 confirmed that she had 2 crosses broken by a member of housekeeping staff while cleaning her room. The resident confirmed she had notified the Administrator 6-7 months ago. The resident stated, .He [Administrator] glued them together but they won't stay .just in pieces .I just wrapped it in a napkin and put it in my drawer. During an interview on 12/17/19 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed that Resident #41's broken items were not placed on the Grievance Log. 4. Medical record review revealed Resident #258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure, and Anxiety Disorder. Th admission MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #258 had a BIMs score of 14. The undated INVENTORY OF PERSONAL EFFECTS form labeled with Resident #258's name showed the resident had a .Cell phone . on admission. During an interview on 12/16/19 at 3:47 PM, in Resident #258's room, the resident was asked if he ever had any missing personal property. The resident stated, My telephone charging cord is missing. I have told everyone . During an interview on 12/17/19 at 5:23 PM, the Administrator confirmed no grievances had been placed on the log since July. The Administrator stated, .Sometimes I think it's the severity of what's missing .if it's money that's different .I hate to say that . The Administrator was asked when he should be notified of grievances. The Administrator stated, .Policy is they notify me immediately .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 63/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 9 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation?

MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 72 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MOUNT PLEASANT, Tennessee.

How Does Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Stick Around?

MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has been fined $7,443 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Tennessee average of $33,153. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.