MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Mount Pleasant Healthcare and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of C+, which indicates that it is slightly above average among nursing homes. It ranks #139 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, but only #5 out of 6 in Maury County, meaning there is one local option that is better. The facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 2 in 2023 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is rated average, with a turnover rate of 47%, which is slightly below the state average, suggesting some stability among staff. However, the home has received $7,443 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 76% of facilities in Tennessee. Additionally, the nursing home has average RN coverage, which is important for monitoring residents' health. Specific incidents from inspections revealed that a resident experienced falls due to inadequate hazard identification, and there were failures to report allegations of sexual abuse, as well as inadequate personal hygiene care for several residents. While there are some strengths, such as decent staffing levels, the facility also faces serious concerns that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Tennessee
- #139/298
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $7,443 in fines. Higher than 55% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Tennessee average (2.8)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Tennessee avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide adequate pers...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical records review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to follow physician or...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility assessment review, medical record review, facility ADL (Activities of Daily Living) documentation review, faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy, Facility Assessment review, Chapter 1000-02 Rules and Regulation of the Licensed Practical Nurses ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week.
The findings included:
1. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy, observation and interview the facility failed to store all drugs in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 4 medication storage areas.
The findi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, document review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an incident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, grievance log, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their grievance polic...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 9 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation?
MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 72 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MOUNT PLEASANT, Tennessee.
How Does Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Stick Around?
MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has been fined $7,443 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Tennessee average of $33,153. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Mt Pleasant Healthcare And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
MT PLEASANT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.