COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD

901 COUNTY FARM RD, MURFREESBORO, TN 37127 (615) 893-2624
Non profit - Corporation 131 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#238 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: May 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Community Care of Rutherford has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance and significant concerns about the quality of care. It ranks #238 out of 298 nursing homes in Tennessee, placing it in the bottom half of facilities in the state and #5 out of 8 in Rutherford County, meaning only three local options are worse. While the facility is on an improving trend, reducing issues from 14 in 2022 to just 1 in 2024, it has a concerning history with critical incidents. Staffing is below average with a rating of 2/5 stars, but a 0% turnover rate is a positive sign, showing staff stability. Specific incidents include the failure to implement a care plan for a resident at risk of wandering, which resulted in the resident eloping from the facility, placing them in immediate jeopardy. Overall, while there are some improvements and strengths, the facility has significant weaknesses that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Tennessee
#238/298
Bottom 21%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
14 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Tennessee. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
23 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 14 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Tennessee average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

The Ugly 23 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of sign...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #3) of 7 sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the policy titled [Named Facility's] Incidents and Accidents Policy dated 1/17/24 (1/17/2024) revealed .It is the policy of this facility to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident .The following incidents/accidents require an incident/accident report but are not limited to .Medication or treatment errors .The nurse will contact the resident's practitioner to inform them of the incident/accident, report any injuries or other findings, and obtain orders .The resident's family or representative will be notified .documentation should include the date, time, nature of the incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications and orders obtained . Review of the policy titled Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders dated February 2023, revealed .The attending physician shall authenticate orders for the care and treatment of assigned residents. For consulting physician/practitioner orders received in writing or via fax, the nurse in a timely manner will: a. Call the attending physician to verify the order. b. Document the verification order by entering the order and the time, date, and signature on the physician order sheet .c. Follow facility procedures for verbal or telephone orders including: noting the order, submitting to pharmacy, and transcribing to medication or treatment administration record . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, Major Depressive disorder, Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation (Afib). Review of Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #3 with goals and interventions that included .12/01/2021 risk for alteration in neurological status r/t [related to] dementia .have A Fib .Give atrial fibrillation medication as ordered . Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 revealed, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of Order Recap Report dated 6/1/2023-3/31/2024 revealed a physician's order dated 5/17/2021 for Donepezil Tab 10mg (milligram) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime. The Donepezil order was discontinued on 2/22/2024. Review of the Order Recap Report dated 6/1/2023-3/31/2024 revealed a physician's order dated 5/17/2021 for Eliquis Tab 5mg give one tablet by mouth two times a day. The Eliquis 5mg order was discontinued on 10/30/2023. Review of the hospital Final Report dated 10/30/2023, revealed Resident #3 was directly admitted from the office of PCP (Primary Care Physician).Discharge Medications .apixaban (Eliquis 5mg oral tablet) 5 Milligram 1[one] tab(s) By mouth Twice daily for 30 Days .donepezil (donepezil 10mg oral tablet) 10 Milligram 1 tab (s) By mouth once daily, at bedtime . Review of the October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed physician orders for .11/22/2021 ELIQUIS TAB 5MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to .ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (D/C 10/30/2023) .10/31/2023 ELIQUIS TAB 5MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to UNSPECIFIED ATRIAL FIBRILLATION .for 30 Days . Review of the October 2023 MAR revealed a physician order for .11/22/2021 Donepezil Tab 10mg (milligram), Give 1[one] tablet orally at bedtime related to .DEMENTIA . Review of the November 2023 MAR revealed a physician's order for .10/31/2023 ELIQUIS TAB 5MG, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to UNSPECIFIED ATRIAL FIBRILLATION for 30 days . The physician's order was automatically discontinued on 11/29/2023. Review of the PCP notes dated 12/22/2023, revealed resident was seen as a follow up. It had been confirmed that the resident does have a diagnosis of dementia and restarted donepezil. The resident had a history of A-fib and was on Eliquis 5mg tab as directed. Review of the January 2024 MAR revealed physician's orders for Donepezil Tab 10mg give 1 tablet orally at bedtime and Donepezil HCL Oral Tablet 5mg give 5mg by mouth one time a day for memory and cognition. There had been 31 days that both dosages were administered. Review of the January 2024 MAR revealed Eliquis 5mg was not restarted as ordered by the provider after hospital discharge. Review of the February 2024 MAR revealed a physician's order dated 11/22/2021 Donepezil Tab 10mg give 1 tablet orally at bedtime. The physician's order for Donepezil was discontinued on 2/22/2023. There was a physician's order for 2/20/2023 Donepezil HCL Oral Tablet give 5mg by mouth one time a day for memory and cognition. There had been 17 doses of Donepezil 10mg administered. Review of the February 2024 MAR revealed a physician's order dated 2/22/2024 to resume Eliquis Tab 5 give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to Atrial Fibrillation. There had been 43 doses of blood thinner missed during the month of February. Monitoring for blood thinner side effects had been discontinued on 2/17/2024 and 25 shifts of monitoring had not been documented on the MAR. Review of the March 2024 MAR revealed there had been no order for monitoring of blood thinner side effects. (There had been 36 shifts without monitoring order as of March 19 at 3:18 PM. During an interview on 3/18/2024 at 1:30 AM, Family Member (FM) #1 stated Resident #3 had been hospitalized and upon discharge, she had been given a prescription for blood thinner for Afib (Arterial Fibrillation) and the prescription was for 30 days therefore, it fell off the Medication Administration Record (MAR) at the end of November 2023. Since they were unable to contact the NP (Nurse Practitioner/MD (Medical Director), they decided to get an outside provider Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP). Resident #3 needed to be assessed for Dementia following COVID. FM #1 stated that the FNP wanted Resident #3 off Donepezil for dementia for 9 weeks prior to neurology appointment and this did not happen. FM #1 stated it had also been discovered that Resident #3, allegedly had been taking, 3 times the amount of medication prescribed for dementia. During an interview on 3/19/2024 at 1:10 PM, the Unit Manager (UM)/ RN #1 stated when it had been discovered that Resident #3's blood thinner had been discontinued, a request was sent to the NP for an order to resume the blood thinner. During an interview on 3/21/2024 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the order written by the Neurologist. When asked what she would do with the order that was written for Donepezil 5 MG knowing the resident was already on this medication at a different strength, the DON stated she would contact the outside provider to clarify whether the medication was meant to replace the order currently in place or whether the new dosage should be added to the dosage presently in place. During an interview on 3/21/2024 at 3:00 PM, the NP stated Resident #3's daughter chose to transfer physician services to an outside physician. When the NP was asked what the risks for a resident with Afib not being on an anticoagulant, the NP stated they have an increased risk for developing a blood clot and having a stroke. When residents under the care of the facility's physician services return from hospitalization, the resident has been seen by the NP or MD for stabilization visit/evaluation and medication review. At that visit, they monitor the length of medication care, and they may need prescriptions for them to be extended. During an additional interview on 3/21/2024 at 5:45 PM, the DON stated when a resident goes to an outside provider, they are sent with a copy of their current medication list. If they have new medications, then a prescription should be sent to the facility. The facility will then enter the order into the Electronic Medical Record and the MD will sign off on the medication. There was a prescription sent to the facility from the Neurologist dated 12/19/2023. This prescription was for Resident #3 and was for Donepezil 5MG daily. When the DON was asked how she would process this prescription, she stated she would clarify with the provider that wrote the prescription to see whether this medication should be added to her current dose or whether this prescription was meant to replace the current dosage. The DON agreed that the 5 MG dose was added to the 10mg dose already in place and should not have been. When the DON was asked if this was written up as a medication error, she stated No. She stated, when the resident returned from the provider there was no communication/visit summary sent to the facility from the physician.
Nov 2022 3 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility document review, observation, and interview, the facility faile...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility document review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan for risk of elopement for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for risk of wandering and/or elopement with a diagnosis of Dementia. The facility's failure to implement the care plan and interventions for Resident #2 placed the resident in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The facility failed to implement an elopement care plan with interventions for Resident #2 which resulted in an elopement from the facility on 8/2/2022. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/15/2022 at 3:04 PM in the Administrator's Office. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-656. The facility was cited at F-656 at a scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed onsite and was effective from 8/2/2022 to 11/15/2022. An acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 11/15/2022 at 7:18 PM. The corrective actions were validated onsite by the surveyors on 11/15/2022 at 7:30 PM. The facility's noncompliance at F-656 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring of the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement and Wandering Residents, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk .6. Monitoring and Managing Residents at Risk for Elopement or Unsafe Wandering a. Residents will be assessed for risk of elopement and unsafe wandering upon admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary care plan team. b. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate the unique factors contributing to risk in order to develop a person-centered care plan. c. Interventions to increase staff awareness of the resident's risk, modify the resident's behavior, or to minimize risks associated with hazards will be added to the resident's care plan and communicated appropriate staff. d. Adequate supervision will be provided to help prevent accidents or elopements. e. Charge nurses and unit managers will monitor the implementation of interventions, response to interventions, and document accordingly. f. The effectiveness of interventions will be evaluated, and changes will be made as needed. Any changes or new interventions will be communicated to relevant staff .TIPS FOR PREVENTION OF ELOPEMENTS .React to statements such as I want to go home. Observe for aimless wandering .Consider use of a personal alarm for the resident . Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The facility's rationale for deciding whether to proceed with care planning will be evidenced in the clinical record . Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising for those residents experiencing a status change .The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change .Upon identification of a change in status the nurse will notify the MDS [Minimum Data Set] Coordinator, the physician .MDS Coordinator and the Interdisciplinary Team will discuss the resident condition and collaborate on intervention options .The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions .Care plans will be modified as needed .The Unit Manager or other designated staff member will conduct an audit on all residents experiencing a change in status, at the time the change in status is identified, to ensure care plans have been updated to reflect current resident needs . Review of medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 scored 13 on the BIMS Assessment (indicating cognitively intact), limited assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, supervision with walking and locomotion on unit, mobility devices of walker and wheelchair, and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #2 initiated 7/12/2022, revealed, a care plan with goals and interventions for .At risk for Cardiac Complications .I have an ADL self-care performance deficit .I am at risk for falls .I have potential for pain .The resident has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes . and a care plan created on 8/3/2022 .I am at risk for elopement positive Wandering/Elopement assessment . There was no documentation provided by the facility of a Care Plan for wandering or elopement prior to Resident #2's elopement on 8/2/2022. Review of Resident #2's Social Services Notes revealed, .7/13/2022 .Resident is pleasantly confused .7/20/2022 .Resident came out of her room with all her belongings on rollator [wheeled walker]. SW [social worker] asked Resident where she was going. Resident stated that she would like to go to front office to sign out and go home .7/21/2022 .Resident came out of her room with all of her belongings and with her purse on her shoulder ready to go home .She is pleasantly confused . The SW notes from 7/13/2022 - 7/21/2022 confirmed Resident #2 was at risk for elopement. Review of a Behavior Note dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, Patient is currently becoming increasingly anxious and confused .Patient believes she is supposed to go work at [named hospital] as a nurse and she says she is running late for work. Patient has purse, jacket, and car keys in hand currently. I reoriented patient, but this has been an ongoing pattern throughout the day . Review of a Nurses Note dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .AT BEDTIME RESIDENT REDIRECTED MULTIPLE TIMES FOR WANDERING, EXIT SEEKING, RESIDENT STATED THAT SHE WANTS TO GET HOME TO HER HUSBAND WHO IS HOME ALONE . Review of a Wandering Elopement assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 revealed .Wandering pattern .Objects to living away from own home .Wandering during disoriented period is common .At risk to wander or elope the facility .RESIDENT WANDERING ON UNIT, PURSE AND CAR KEYS WITH HER ON ROLLATOR, RESIDENT STATES NEED TO GET HOME TO HUSBAND WHO SHE SAYS IS HOME ALONE .Proceed to Care Plan as needed . Review of Facility's Reported Incident (FRI) #202282213039 dated 8/2/2022 confirmed Resident #2 eloped from the facility to an unsafe environment. During an interview in the conference room on 11/15/2022 at 11:00 AM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed Resident #2's documented wandering/exiting behaviors exhibited should have been brought to the interdisciplinary teams attention to review plan of care and initiate increased monitoring interventions as appropriate. During an interview in the conference room on 11/15/2022 at 3:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the expectation was when a resident has a history of/or identified as a wander/elopement risk, nursing should contact the physician to obtain an order for a WanderGuard and initiate a care plan for wandering/elopement for the resident. The surveyors verified the acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan on 11/15/2022 at by: 1. On 11/15/2022 surveyors revealed that Resident #2 who eloped from the facilty on 8/2/2022 did not have a care plan to reflect the risk for elopement. The nurse notes, social notes, and elopement risk assessment revealed prior to the elopement she was at high risk. 2. The surveyors verified that after the elopement on 8/2/2022 Resident #2 received a wanderguard and Elopement Plan of Care was put in place on 8/3/2022. 3. The facility will review nursing's notes and elopement risk assessments daily in morning meeting. Discuss the findings at daily Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings to ensure that measures are put in place to ensure safety and the care plans are updated accordingly to reflect any changes in care. 4. The surveyors verified the facility educated all staff on care planning and crafting of care plans on 11/15/2022 and 11/16/2022. 5. The surveyor verified IDT Note on 8/3/2022 reviewed Resident #2's plan of care and interventions. 6. The surveyor verified Facility Elopement Books located at nurse's stations on each hall of facility were up to date with current of Walk and Talk Residents including pictures and WanderGuard battery expiration dates. 7. The surveyors verified the facility held an Elopement Assessment Changes Inservice on 8/3/2022. The facility implemented elopement assessments to be done on admission and again in 48 hours. The nurse would obtain an order for a WanderGuard for residents determined at risk for exiting the facility. Every ambulatory resident admitted will have WanderGuard placed X 7 days then re-evaluated. 8. The facility will report to the weekly at-risk meeting regarding nursing notes and elopement risk assessment to ensure that all in need of a care plan was completed. Weekly reporting to at-risk IDT meeting will continued for 3 months and then monthly for 3 months. Report findings and progress to quarterly Quality Assurance (QA). The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-(Tag).
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility's policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, observation, and interview, the facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility's policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for risk of wandering and/or elopement with a diagnosis of Dementia. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and implement interventions to prevent elopement for Resident #2 who eloped from the facility on 8/2/2022 on a hot summer day. This placed the resident in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/15/2022 at 1:39 PM in the Administrator's Office. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-689. The facility was cited at F-689 at a scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed onsite and was effective from 8/2/2022 to 11/15/2022. An acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 11/15/2022 at 7:18 PM. The corrective actions were validated onsite by the surveyors on 11/15/2022 at 7:30 PM. The facility's noncompliance at F-689 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring of the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction. Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, revised 3/7/2022, revealed, .All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc. (similar items included), occurring on our premises must be investigated and reported to the Administrator .All incidents are to be reported timely and appropriate interventions implemented .The Nurse Supervisor and/or Charge Nurse shall: a. Examine all accident/incident victims .b. Notify the Medical Director or the victim's personal or Attending Physician, and inform the physician of the accident or incident .c. If necessary, transfer the injured person to the emergency room, medical treatment center, hospital . Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement and Wandering Residents, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk .6. Monitoring and Managing Residents at Risk for Elopement or Unsafe Wandering a. Residents will be assessed for risk of elopement and unsafe wandering upon admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary care plan team. b. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate the unique factors contributing to risk in order to develop a person-centered care plan. c. Interventions to increase staff awareness of the resident's risk, modify the resident's behavior, or to minimize risks associated with hazards will be added to the resident's care plan and communicated appropriate staff. d. Adequate supervision will be provided to help prevent accidents or elopements. e. Charge nurses and unit managers will monitor the implementation of interventions, response to interventions, and document accordingly. f. The effectiveness of interventions will be evaluated, and changes will be made as needed. Any changes or new interventions will be communicated to relevant staff .TIPS FOR PREVENTION OF ELOPEMENTS .React to statements such as I want to go home. Observe for aimless wandering .Consider use of a personal alarm for the resident . Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The facility's rationale for deciding whether to proceed with care planning will be evidenced in the clinical record . Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising for those residents experiencing a status change .The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change .Upon identification of a change in status the nurse will notify the MDS [Minimum Data Set] Coordinator, the physician .MDS Coordinator and the Interdisciplinary Team will discuss the resident condition and collaborate on intervention options .The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions .Care plans will be modified as needed .The Unit Manager or other designated staff member will conduct an audit on all residents experiencing a change in status, at the time the change in status is identified, to ensure care plans have been updated to reflect current resident needs . Review of medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Polyarthritis, Unspecified, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, and Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. Resident #2 was discharged on 08/20/2022. Review of Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed, a score of 7 for Resident #2 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #2 initiated 7/12/2022, revealed, a care plan with goals and interventions for .At risk for Cardiac Complications .I have an ADL self-care performance deficit .I am at risk for falls .I have potential for pain .The resident has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes . and a care plan created on 8/3/2022 .I am at risk for elopement positive Wandering/Elopement assessment . There was no documentation provided by the facility of a Care Plan for wandering or elopement prior to Resident #2's elopement on 8/2/2022. Review of a Social Services Progress Note dated, 7/13/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Resident is pleasantly confused . Review of History and Physical dated 7/15/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Past Medical History .Delirium, Dementia .Psychiatric: Forgetful Oriented to self, confused . Review of a Skilled Nursing Note dated, 7/16/2022 for Resident #2, revealed, .Patient is very confused. She doesn't know where she is .She thinks she is on vacation . Review of admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 scored 13 on the BIMS Assessment indicating cognitively intact, limited assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, supervision with walking and locomotion on unit, mobility devices of walker and wheelchair, and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The previous BIMS score for 7/12/2022 which was 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment and 7/17/2022 BIMS score of 13 (intact cognition) confirmed Resident #2's cognitive abilities varied at different times during her stay at the facility. Review of a Physical Therapy (PT) Progress Report dated 7/18/20/22, for Resident #2 revealed a functional skill assessment of .transfers .independent .Ambulation Walk 10 feet independent, Walk 50 feet with Two Turns .Reason for Skilled Services: Continued PT services are necessary in order to promote safety awareness, increase LE [lower extremity] ROM [range of motion] and strength, minimize falls, improve dynamic balance, facilitate independence with all functional mobility Review of a Social Services Note dated 7/19/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .She is alert with some confusion noted . Review of a Social Services Noted dated 7/20/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Resident came out of her room with all her belongings on rollator [wheeled walker]. Social Worker [SW] asked Resident where she was going. Resident stated that she would like to go to front office to sign out and go home . Review of a Social Services Note dated 7/21/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Resident came out of her room with all of her belongings and with her purse on her shoulder ready to go home .She is pleasantly confused . Review of a Social Services Noted dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .SW called [Family Member #1] about Resident d/c [discharge] plans. She is alert with confusion and requires redirection by Staff. She is able to use rollator. She is a fall risk . The Social Service notes from 7/13/2022 - 7/27/2022, confirmed Resident #2 was an elopement risk prior to 8/2/2022. Review of a Physical Therapy (PT) Treatment Encounter note dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Pt [patient] ambulated throughout F hall today for 3 laps, completing directional changes at supervision. Gait training completed for ~500 ' [500 feet] with pt presenting with no fatigue . Review of Medical Administration Record (MAR) note dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Patient exhibited confusion while lying in bed this afternoon .Patient stated she was here to play with friends and to make friends. Patient continued on to ask about when she could go home . Review of a Behavior Note dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, Patient is currently becoming increasingly anxious and confused .Patient believes she is supposed to go work at [named hospital] as a nurse and she says she is running late for work. Patient has purse, jacket, and car keys in hand currently. I reoriented patient, but this has been an ongoing pattern throughout the day . Review of a Nurses Note dated 7/27/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, AT BEDTIME RESIDENT REDIRECTED MULTIPLE TIMES FOR WANDERING, EXIT SEEKING, RESIDENT STATED THAT SHE WANTS TO GET HOME TO HER HUSBAND WHO IS HOME ALONE . Review of the MAR note dated 7/28/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Behavior Monitoring .resident wandering throughout unit, exit seeking . Review of Wandering Elopement Assessment dated 07/28/2022 for Resident #2 revealed .Wandering pattern .Purposeless wandering .Objects to living away from own home .Sensory dependent; searches for things/persons .At risk to wander or elope the facility .RESIDENT WANDERING ON UNIT, PURSE AND CAR KEYS WITH HER ON ROLLATOR, RESIDENT STATES NEED TO GET HOME TO HUSBAND WHO SHE SAYS IS HOME ALONE .Physical changes in the brain .Diagnosis of Dementia .Searching for home or people from past .Disorientation to time .Proceed to Care Plan as needed . Review of a PT Therapy Progress Report dated 7/29/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Functional Skill Assessment Bed Mobility .Independent .Transfers .Independent .Ambulation Walk 10 feet = Independent Walk 50 feet with Two Turns = Independent Walk 150 feet = Setup or clean-up assistance .Mobility Function Score (ranges from 0-12; 12 being the highest function) = 12 . Review of a PT Treatment Encounter note dated 7/29/2022 for Resident #2 revealed .Conversation with patient who stated she is ambulating ad lib [at pleasure] in the facility with the use of rollator. Patient amb [ambulate] 300ft [feet] in 6 min [minute] with rollator Review of a Skilled Nursing Note dated 8/1/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .walks with walker. Wanders occasionally, dementia noted . Review of a Social Services Noted dated 8/2/2022 for Resident #2 revealed, .Resident is alert with confusion, requires curing and redirection daily by Staff . Review of a Nurses Note dated 8/2/2022 for Resident #2, revealed, .Notified at 6:28 PM that resident was found in front reception hallway/front lobby, turned around asking for help to the front door. Employee explained to her that she must have just come inside the front door and employee had previously seen resident about 6:20 PM outside walking .toward facility with walker clothes .employee assisted resident to hallway, to CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] on the hallway and CNA assisted resident to her room .Prior to this incident .at approximately 6-6:10 pm Resident come out of her room with walker, purse, keys, and some clothing. Resident walking in the F hallway .Resident didn't have wanderguard [electronic bracelet used to protect residents from elopement] in place. Placed new Wanderguard transmitter on left ankle. Walk and Talk [a facility systemic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement or unsafe wandering] performed by staff and all residents accounted for. Increased visual checks, monitoring resident every 30 minutes. Notified daughter, Notified [Medical Director], Notified facility Director of Nursing [DON]. No injuries noted . Review of facility document Falls Committee Meeting Agenda dated 7/29/2022 revealed, an Interdisciplinary Meeting was held at 9:00 AM Resident #2 was reviewed with the following note .sundowns [the appearance of confusion, agitation, and other severely disruptive behavior markedly worsening at night in older patients with Dementia]: packs clothes enters other residents room @ [at] night - But stays on unit .Home/ALF [Assisted Living Facility] soon . Review of the facility's investigation of elopement dated 8/3/2022, which occurred on 8/2/2022 revealed, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) Assessment score of 7 for Resident #2. Review of measurements requested from Community Care of [NAME] County Maintenance Director on 11/16/2022, revealed 0.5 miles or 2,640 feet distance from facility front door to creek using paved surfaces, 0.3 miles or 1,584 feet distance from far end of service drive area using paved surfaces to the creek, and 0.6 miles or 3,168 feet from facility back door to the creek using paved surfaces. Review of Time and Date website on 11/15/2022 revealed, weather in Murfreesboro, Tennessee for 8/2/2022 at 6:15 PM was a Temperature of 88 degrees Fahrenheit per website: https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/usa/murfreesboro/historic?month=8&year=2022. Observation of the train traveling on tracks across from facility entrance on 11/15/2022 at 9:30 AM, 11:10 AM, 11:50 AM, 4:30 PM, 5:15 PM, and on 11/16/2022 at 8:40 AM. During a phone interview on 11/15/2022 at 8:22 AM, Family Member #1 stated Resident #2 was admitted to the facility following a hospitalization for rehabilitation, and PT. Family Member #1 stated .the facility called me immediately after she tried to leave on 8/2/2022. I believe she became confused and followed someone out the door trying to go home During an interview at the entrance to F Hallway on 11/15/2022 at 10:00 AM, Medical Records Personnel #1 stated I was coming in late on 8/2/2022, walking toward F Hall and I looked out the window around 6:20 PM and saw a lady pushing a rollator walker down the driveway towards the front entrance with a purse and pile of clothing in a dry cleaner bag. I assumed she was a visitor bringing a resident some clothing, so I continued walking to the F Hall nurses desk. I finished my business there and walked around toward the front entrance reception area around 6:25 PM, and the same lady was now in the front reception hall. I asked her for her name and realized at that point it was [Resident #2]. [Resident #2] was confused and tired, so I got a wheelchair and assisted her back to F Hall and asked for help from the CNT [Certified Nursing Technician] on duty. During a phone interview on 11/15/2022 at 10:45 AM, LPN #1 stated that on 8/2/2022, Resident #2 had her clothes, purse, and keys walking with rollator up and down F Hall and was easily re-directed to return to her room. Around 6:00 PM to 6:10 PM Resident #2 was seen with rollator walker, purse, keys, and some clothing walking in F Hall toward the nurse's station. During an interview in the conference room on 11/15/2022 at 11:00 AM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that documented wandering/exiting behaviors exhibited by a resident should have been brought to the interdisciplinary team attention to review plan of care and initiate increased monitoring interventions as appropriate. During a phone interview on 11/15/2022 at 11:07 AM, CNT #1 confirmed her written statement that on 8/2/2022 Resident #2 was last seen on F Hall at 6:00 PM, was returned to F Hall at 6:25 PM, has a history of packing up all her belongings every night saying she wants to go home, and is easily redirected to go back to her room. During an interview on 11/15/2022 at 11:30 AM Maintenance Director and Assistant maintenance Director confirmed written statement dated 8/2/2022 that they were working in front of the facility completed their work at 6:00 PM, left the facility at 6:05 AM (confirmed by Time Clock Plus Records) and no residents were seen outside the facility. During an interview in the conference room on 11/15/2022 at 3:30 PM DON confirmed the expectation is when a resident has a history of/or identified as a wander/elopement risk, nursing should contact the physician to obtain an order for a WanderGuard which will initiate a care plan for wandering/elopement for the resident. During a phone interview on 11/15/2022 at 5:17 PM with RN #1 she confirmed she completed a Wandering/Elopement Assessment on Resident #2 on 7/28/2022 due to the resident was wondering the hall with her belongings on her rollator walking toward the doors asking if it was raining. RN #1 stated she did not remember any specific training on how to complete the Wandering/Elopement Assessment, the determination of At risk to wander or elope the facility but is not physically or mentally able was based on her nursing judgement that Resident #2 was easily re-directed to return to her room and Resident #2 was not cognitively able to follow commands needed to exit the facility. RN #1 further confirmed that she worked the 7 PM to 7 AM shift on 8/2/2022, received report of Resident #2's elopement, and a WanderGuard was placed on the resident. The surveyors verified the acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan on 11/15/2022 at by: 1. The surveyors verified that Resident #2 received a WanderGuard and placed on Walk and Talk Residents list on 8/3/2022. Surveyors verified with medical record review frequent checks started every thirty minutes for the next 24 hours on Resident #2 on 8/2/2022. 2. The surveyors verified the facility educated staff on elopement risk management. 3. Surveyors verified with medical record review frequent checks started every thirty minutes for the next 24 hours on Resident #2 on 8/2/2022. 4. The surveyors verified the facility held an Elopement Assessment Changes Inservice on 8/3/2022. The facility implemented elopement assessments to be done on admission and again in 48 hours. The nurse would obtain an order for a WanderGuard for residents determined at risk for exiting the facility. Every ambulatory resident admitted will have WanderGuard placed X 7 days then re-evaluated. 5. If a resident is found to be an elopement risk, interventions will be addressed and communicated to all staff. If any resident has behaviors that are exit seek, behavior monitoring will be initiated and the behaviors documented. 6. All residents, new admissions, readmissions, and those residents who experience significant change will be assessed and considered for the least restrictive measures to ensure their safety and well-being and promote resident independence. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-(Tag).
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on job description review, facility policy review, and interview, Administration failed to administer the facility in a ma...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on job description review, facility policy review, and interview, Administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain the highest practicable wellbeing of the residents. The failure of Administration to ensure adequate supervision was provided and to ensure the care plan was updated, which placed 1 of 13 sampled Residents (Resident #2) reviewed for risk of wandering and/or elopement with a diagnosis of Dementia in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/15/2022 at 3:04 PM in the Administrator's Office. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-835. The facility was cited at F-835 at a scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed onsite and was effective from 8/2/2022 to 11/15/2022. An acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 11/15/2022 at 7:18 PM. The corrective actions were validated onsite by the surveyors on 11/15/2022 at 7:30 PM. The facility's noncompliance at F-689 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring of the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction. The findings include: Review of Community Care of [NAME] County Nursing Home Administrator job description updated 2020, revealed, .This position has direct twenty-four (24) hour, seven (7) days a week, operational authority .Provides the leadership framework for planning, directing, coordinating and improving Services at Community Care of [NAME] County that are responsive to the needs of the patients .The administrator will ensure the development and implementation of policies and procedures for program operations .and will also assume direct responsibility for the planning and coordination of the Dietary, Housekeeping, Laundry, Maintenance, Business Office, Security, Nursing, and all other departments of Community Care of [NAME] County .Ensures development and implementation of organization-wide and unit specific age specific, safety, security . Review of [contracted agency] Administrator job description undated revealed, .Positions Supervised: Business Office Manager .Director of Maintenance & Housekeeping .Director of Nursing .Social Worker .The Administrator is responsible for administering, directing, facilitating, supporting and coordinating all activities of the community ensuring that quality care, financial and people objectives are in compliance with all local, state and federal laws and in accordance with United Church Homes, Inc. policy .Identifies and maintains accountability for security within assigned areas of responsibility .Ensures all care, treatment and services are provided with appropriate dementia care protocols . (Administrator is employed by contracted agency and contracted to serve as Administrator of Community Care of [NAME] County). Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement and Wandering Residents, revised 5/1/2020, revealed, .This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk .Adequate supervision will be provided to help prevent accidents or elopements . The Administration failed to ensure care plans were developed for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for risk of wandering and/or elopement with a diagnosis of Dementia. Refer to F-656. The Administration failed to ensure adequate supervision for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for risk of wandering and/or elopement with a diagnosis of Dementia, which resulted in an elopement. Refer to F-689. During an interview on 11/15/2022 at 1:10 PM the Administrator stated he had been expecting the State Surveyors and was not surprised at receiving an IJ for the elopement incident of Resident #2. The surveyors verified the acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan on 11/15/2022 at by: 1. The surveyors verified that after the elopement on 8/2/2022 Resident #2 received a WanderGuard and Elopement Plan of Care was put in place on 8/3/2022. 2. The surveyors verified a Wandering Elopement Assessment dated 08/03/2022 for Resident #2 was completed to show at risk to wander from or elope facility. 3. The surveyors verified the facility held an Elopement Assessment Changes Inservice on 8/3/2022. The facility implemented elopement assessments to be done on admission and again in 48 hours. The nurse would obtain an order for a WanderGuard for residents determined at risk for exiting the facility. Every ambulatory resident admitted will have WanderGuard placed X 7 days then re-evaluated. 4. The surveyors verified a facility elopement drill was performed on 8/12/2022. 5. On 11/15/2022 surveyors verified the facility educated staff on care planning and crafting of care plans. 6. Designee to report in facility weekly at-risk meeting regarding nursing notes and elopement risk assessments to ensure that all in need of a care update was completed. Weekly reporting to at-risk Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting for 3 months and then monthly following for 3 months. The findings and progress will be reported in the quarterly Quality Assurance meeting. 7. On 11/15/2022, Executive Director of Managed Communities educated the Administrator on F835, and how it related to updating care plans in the community. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-(Tag).
May 2022 11 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for a fall for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #44), which resulted in actual harm (blunt trauma to head with 3 staples needed for closure of a laceration). The facility also failed to implement a care plan for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #76) reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 9/20/2016, revealed, .Plans of Care are developed by the interdisciplinary team, to coordinate and communicate care approaches and goals for the resident related to clinical diagnosis or identified concerns .The facility develops a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental/psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment .[named facility] staff will refer to the goals and interventions when evaluating the residents progress .the plan of care will be reviewed .as needed to enhance the resident's ability to meet his/her objectives . Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, Spinal Stenosis, Muscle Weakness, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #44 required extensive assistance 1 person physical assistance for transfer, locomotion on unit and off unit. Further review of the MDS revealed 2 falls with no injury and 2 falls with injury during the assessment reference dates. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #44 revealed an intervention created on 3/4/2022 for Anti-rollbacks (prevents wheelchair from rolling when resident stands) to wheelchair. Continued review revealed no additional interventions were placed on the care for 3/4/2022. Review of The Equipment Lifecycle System (TELS) for Resident #44 (apartment - G4) revealed a work order created on 3/4/2022 with updated status on 4/1/2022 by Maintenance Director commented .this resident is in a high back reclinable wheelchair which prohibits me from installing anti rollback devices on it because the device is not designed to fit this type of chair . Further review of the TELS for Resident #44 revealed an additional work order (for the Anti-Roll back devices) was submitted on 4/8/2022 with updated status on 4/11/2022 by Maintenance Director commented .completed 4/11/2022 .[referring to the placement of the Anti-rollback devices on another wheelchair]. Continued review of the TELS work order system confirmed an email dated 4/1/2022 was sent to the Administrator which confirmed comments .this resident is in a high back reclinable wheelchair which prohibits me from installing anti-rollback devices on it because the device is not designed to fit this type of chair . During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 3:43 PM, Maintenance Director confirmed he was unable to apply Anti-rollback to chair on 4/1/2022 and informed the Administrator by email. Continued interview with the Maintenance Director confirmed Maintenance had numerous work orders to complete in TELS during that time frame. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 4:20 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Anti-rollbacks for wheelchair was on Care Plan on 3/4/2022 and also confirmed the intervention was not implemented until 4/7/2022 after the fall on 4/6/2022. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 3:46 PM, Administrator confirmed he did not inform the DON that Maintenance could not apply Anti-rollbacks to Resident #44's wheelchair. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #76 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Hemiplegia, Unspecified Affecting Right Dominate Side, Vascular Dementia, and Cerebrovascular Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #76 had poor short term and long term memory. Continued review of the MDS revealed Resident #76 required extensive assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the active Order Summary Report for Resident #76 revealed 5/27/2021 .Clopidogrel [antiplatelet] tab 75 milligram [mg] give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Cerebrovascular Disease .2/6/2022 .Levetiraceta Sol [Anticonvulsant] 100 mg/milliliters [ml] give 5 ml by mouth two times a day related to Unspecified Convulsions . Review of the current Care Plan revealed no care plan to address the use of Clopidogrel which puts Resident #76 at risk for bleeding or bruising and the use of an Anticonvulsant. During an interview on 5/10/2022 at 3:30 PM, MDS Coordinator confirmed the Care Plan did not address the use of an Antiplatelet and an Anticonvulsant medication.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident which resulted...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident which resulted in actual harm (blunt trauma to head with 3 staples needed for closure of a laceration) for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #44). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigation and Reporting, revised 4/2006 revealed .All accidents or incidents involving residents .occurring on our premises must be investigated .the Nurse Supervisor .Charge Nurse shall .if necessary, transfer the injured person to the emergency room [ER] .hospital . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Accident/Incident Reporting, revised 3/7/2022, revealed .Purpose .All incidents are to be reported timely and appropriate interventions implemented .Resident incident reports are to be implemented at the time of the incident .investigation form to be completed immediately .incident reports will be reviewed by Interdisciplinary Team [IDT] within 24-72 hours .for additional interventions .or follow up needed . Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Falls Management Policy, revealed .It is a standard of practice to identify those residents that are at risk for falling and provide prompt intervention to decrease the number of occurrences .The facility understands that poor health and limited function makes the resident highly susceptible to falling .ensure interventions are on each report, and ensure that interventions are placed on the Care Plan . Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Risk Assessment, dated 9/10/2022, revealed .it is the policy of this facility to provide an environment that is free from accidents .and provides .assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents .An [At Risk for Falls] care plan will include interventions .consistent with a resident's needs, goals .in order to reduce the risk of an accident .Monitor the effectiveness of the care plan interventions, and modify the interventions as necessary . Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, Spinal Stenosis, Muscle Weakness, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #44 required extensive assistance 1 person physical assistance for transfer, locomotion on unit, off unit and walking did not occur in the last 7 day period. Further review of the MDS revealed 2 falls with no injury and 2 falls with injury during the assessment reference dates. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #44 revealed a problem/assessment, .I am at risk falls related to impaired mobility .Anti-rollbacks to wheelchair . created on 3/4/2022. Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #44 revealed .3/4/2022 15:09 .Interdisciplinary Team [IDT] .Resident fall from chair on 3/3/2022, new skin tear .discussed in IDT meeting this AM .Anti-rollbacks to be applied to wheelchair . Continued review of the Progress Notes revealed .4/7/2022 13:50 IDT .fall from chair on 4/6/2022 discussed in IDT meeting this AM .Resident received head laceration to back of head, was sent to emergency room [ER] for eval/treatment [tx], returned with staples in place .therapy to evaluate seating .as resident often attempts to pull up on various objects . Review of the Disposition from the Emergency Department (ED) for Resident #44 revealed 4/6/2022 .The patient presents following fall .she has history of multiple falls .she complains of right shoulder pain .that worsened after the fall .head .2 centimeter [cm] scalp laceration .blunt trauma .due to fall .Procedure Laceration repair .4/6/2022 .Anesthesia .lidocaine .skin closure: #3 staples . Review of the Physical Therapy Treatment Encounter Note for Resident #44 dated 4/7/2022 revealed .Patient [Pt] had fall day prior .Pt was provided with dumped [slanted seat] manual wheelchair this date with nursing being made aware and with maintenance order being placed for anit-rollbacks to be installed .[manual] wheelchair was placed in room, with her to continue to use current chair until rollbacks can be added .Electronically signed .4/7/2022 02:48:33 PM . Review of The Equipment Lifecycle System (TELS) for Resident #44 (apartment-G4) revealed a work order created on 3/4/2022 with updated status on 4/1/2022 by Maintenance Director comment .this resident is in a high back reclinable wheelchair which prohibits me from installing anti rollback devices on it because the device is not designed to fit this type of chair . Further review of the TELS for Resident #44 revealed a work order created again on 4/8/2022 for Anti-rollbacks to wheelchair with updated status on 4/11/2022 by Maintenance Director comment .completed 4/11/2022 . Continued review of the TELS work order system confirmed an email dated 4/1/2022 was sent to the Administrator which confirmed comment .this resident is in a high back reclinable wheelchair which prohibits me from installing anti-rollback devices on it because the device is not designed to fit this type of chair . During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 3:43 PM, Maintenance Director confirmed he received a work order on 3/4/2022 to apply Anti-rollbacks to Resident #44's wheelchair and was unable to apply Anti-rollback to chair on 4/1/2022 and informed Administrator by email. Continued interview with the Maintenance Director confirmed Maintenance had numerous work orders to complete in TELS during that time frame. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 3:39 PM, Rehab Director confirmed dump seat and anti-rollback to wheelchair were not completed until 4/11/2022. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 3:46 PM, Administrator confirmed he did not inform the DON that Maintenance could not apply Anti-rollbacks to Resident #44's wheelchair. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 4:20 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Anti-rollbacks for wheelchair was on Care Plan on 3/4/2022 and also confirmed the intervention was not implemented until 4/7/2022 after the fall with injury on 4/6/2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 95 of 98 (3 of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 95 of 98 (3 of the 98 residents required enteral feedings) residents were treated in a dignified manner during the lunch meal on 5/9/2022. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 2016, revealed, .The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbances, Blindness, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed she had severely impaired vision and required extensive assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and total dependence for eating. Observation in Resident #15's room on 5/9/2022 at 11:35 AM, revealed she was sitting in a reclining chair beside her roommate's bed without a lunch tray. Her roommate was laying in bed eating her lunch. The privacy curtain was not pulled between the residents. Resident #15 stated, I'm hungry. When asked if she could smell the food she stated, Yes, and I am hungry. Observation and interview in Resident #15's room on 5/9/2022 at 12:08 PM, revealed the MDS coordinator delivered Resident #15's lunch tray, 30 minutes after her roommate's tray was delivered. Her roommate had finished her lunch tray. The MDS coordinator confirmed Resident #15 was an assisted diner and she delivered her tray at this time. She confirmed Resident #15's roommate had already received her tray and had already eaten. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease and Dysphagia. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had short and long term memory problems. Continued review revealed Resident #37 required extensive assistance with one staff member during meals. Review of the undated paid feeding assistant list of residents revealed Resident #37 was assigned to the service to receive assistance. Observation in the J and K dayroom on 5/09/2022 at 11:45 AM and 11:46 AM revealed Certified Nurse Technician (CNT) #6 was standing and feeding Resident #37 her lunch meal. During an interview on 5/9/2022 at 11:48 AM, CNT #6 confirmed she was standing while feeding Resident #37's lunch. When surveyor asked how should you feed the resident, She stated, sit in front for her and correctly administer the food to her mouth. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 11:31 AM, the Director Of Nursing (DON) stated, she expected staff to be seated while feeding residents their meals. Observation and interview in the kitchen on 5/9/2022 at 11:00 AM, revealed food was being served on foam dishware. During an interview, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated the food was being served on foam dishware because they were short staffed. She stated it should get better in 2 weeks. Observation in the J and K dayroom on 5/9/2022 during the lunch meal at 11:31 AM to 11:59 AM, revealed 4 residents were seated at a table. Continued observation revealed 3 of the 4 residents were served their meal at 11:31 AM. The fourth resident was served her meal at 11:59 AM, 28 minutes after the other residents were served. Further observation revealed the lunch meal was served to all residents in the dayroom on foam dishware. During an interview on 5/9/2022 at 11:49 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 confirmed there were 4 residents seated at the same table in the dayroom, and 3 residents were served their meal, and eating before the 4th resident was served. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated the dining process was for the staff to pass out meal trays in the dining room to all the residents sitting at the same table at the same time and deliver the meal trays to the residents in the same room at the same time. Continued interview she stated she expected the staff to serve meals to the residents at the same time whether in the dayroom or in their rooms.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident ide...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident identifiable information was kept confidential for 2 of 32 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #34) reviewed. The facility also failed to maintain patient confidentiality related to 1 of 5 computer screens open with resident health information visualized with no staff attendance. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, HIPAA (Health Information Portability and Accountability Act), dated 7/15/2020, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to apply sanctions against employees who fail to comply with all policies and procedures regarding the protection of personal identifiable health information of our residents .This information from any source and in any form, including, but not limited to paper records, oral communications, audio/digital recordings, and electric display of information is strictly confidential . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Anoxic Brain Damage and Persistent Vegetative State. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance and Bipolar Disorder. Observation in Resident #3's room on 5/9/2022 at 10:25 AM and 2:32 PM, revealed the Nurse Aide Information Sheet containing Resident #3's identifiable patient information was on top of the bedside table at the foot of his bed in view of anyone who came in the room. Observation in Resident #34's room on 5/9/2022 at 10:25 AM, 11:20 AM, and 2:29 PM, revealed the Nurse Aide Information Sheet containing Resident #34's identifiable patient information was posted on the wall under the clock at the foot of her bed in view of anyone who came into the resident's room. Interview at the K Hall Nurses' station on 5/9/2022 at 2:42 PM, Certified Nurse Technician (CNT) #1 and Registered Nurse (RN) #1 both stated, Resident care plans are kept on the computer and a copy should be on the door inside the resident's closet. Observation and interview in Resident #3's room on 5/9/2022 at 2:44 PM, RN #1 confirmed the Nurse Aide Information Sheet for Resident #3 was laying on the bedside table at the foot of the resident's bed in view of anyone who entered his room. RN #1 stated, It [Nurse Aide Information Sheet] should not be out in the room, it should be in the closet out of sight due to HIPAA. During an interview in Resident #34's room on 5/9/2022 at 2:46 PM, RN #1 confirmed the resident's Nurse Aide Information Sheet was posted on the wall under the clock at the foot of the resident's bed. RN #1 stated, It should not be on the wall, it should be in the closet. During an interview on 5/9/2022 at 3:04 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Nurse Aide Information Sheets should be in the computer or posted inside the closet door in the patient rooms. Observation of the I Hall medication cart on 5/10/2022 at 4:20 PM, revealed a computer screen open and unattended containing resident identifiable information in view of visitors. During an interview on 5/10/2022 at 4:22 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed she had left the computer screen open with resident identifiable information in view while she wasn't at the medication cart. During an interview on 5/10/2022 at 4:30 PM, RN #2 (also known as the Unit Manager for I Hall) confirmed the computer screen was to be placed on the privacy screen when unattended.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation, and interview, the facilty failed to update/revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation, and interview, the facilty failed to update/revise the care plan for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #63) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Revision Upon Status Change revised 5/11/2022 revealed .The care plan will be updated with the new and modified interventions . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #63 had a fall prior to the assessment. Review of the fall investigations revealed Resident #63 had falls on 4/3/2021, 9/5/2021, and 2/14/2022. Review of the current care plan revealed no revised fall interventions for 4/3/2021, 9/5/2021, and 2/14/2022. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 4:19 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed falls on 4/13/2021, 9/5/2021, and 2/14/2022 did not have revised fall interventions on the current care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide ADL (activitie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #24). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revised 5/1/2020 revealed .A resident who is unable to to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease and Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #24 required extensive assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene. Review of the current Care Plan dated 12/8/2021, revealed, .I have an ADL self care performance deficit .Nutritional risk R/T (related to): Parkinson's Disease .Interventions: Staff to provide set up and assist with daily oral care as needed . Observation in Resident #24's room on 5/9/2022 at 10:51 AM, revealed Resident #24 was seated in his wheelchair with the television on. A bedside table was in front of Resident #24 and he had 5 cups of various thickened liquids. Resident #24 had dried white debris on his mouth and face. Continued observation revealed Resident #24 was wearing a shirt and plaid pajama pants which had dried white debris stains. Observation in the J and K dayroom on 5/9/2022 at 2:58 PM, revealed Resident #24 seated in his wheelchair. Resident #24 had dried green debris covered on his mouth. Continued observation revealed Resident #24 was wearing both tennis shoes with one non-skid sock. The tennis shoes were dirty. During an interview on 5/9/2022 at 3:30 PM, Certified Nurse Technician (CNT) #1, stated when asked if Resident #24's mouth was clean, she confirmed, no it is not clean at the moment. CNT #1 confirmed Resident #24's shoes were dirty, and he was wearing only one non-skid sock. During an interview on 5/9/2022 at 3:38 PM Registered Nurse (RN) #1 confirmed Resident #24's mouth and shoes were dirty. RN #1 expected the residents to wear clean clothes, have clean teeth, brushed hair, and not to be in a gown. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 11:31 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) expected the staff to perform mouth care on the residents after a meal especially if their mouth is covered with food. The DON stated she expected staff to have residents wearing clean clothes and shoes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to keep water in reach for 1 of 35 sampled reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to keep water in reach for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #11) observed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia, Parkinson's, and Dysphagia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the current care plan dated 1/5/2022 revealed .Nutritional risk r/t [related to]: dx [diagnosis] dementia, history of GERD [Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease], COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease], Parkinson's, hx [history] breast CA [cancer], DM [diabetes mellitus], Constipation, dysphagia .Interventions: Offer fluids throughout the day . Observation in Resident #11's room on 5/9/2022 at 11:07 AM, revealed Resident #11 was in bed and her water pitcher and covered glass of water were on the bedside table out of reach of the resident. Observation and interview in Resident #11's room on 5/9/2022 at 11:12 AM, Resident #11 stated she felt she had something in her throat and reached for the water pitcher or glass of water and could not reach it. Observation in Resident #11's on 5/9/2022 at 11:19 AM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 moved the bedside table close to resident as she laid the lunch tray down. During an interview on 5/9/2022 at 11:22 AM, RN #1 confirmed Resident #11's water pitcher and glass of water were out of reach.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #44) was monitored for the side effect of Tardive Dyskinesia (a condition affecting the nervous system, often caused by long-term use of some psychiatric drugs. Symptoms include repetitive muscle movements in the face, neck, arms and legs) related to the use of antipsychotic medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy dated 5/1/2020, with an addendum added on 5/11/2020, titled, Use of Antipsychotic Drugs, revealed, .It is the facility's policy that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs, including unnecessary antipsychotic drugs .AIMS [Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale] Assessment done every 6 months to monitor for abnormal involuntary movements for residents taking Antipsychotic medications .AIMS are completed by Psyche or MDS [Minimum Data Set] Coordinator . Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, and Unspecified Psychosis Not Due to a Substance or Known Physiological Condition. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed a diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Psychotic Disorder. Continued review revealed she received an antipsychotic 7 days out the the 7-day look back period. Review of the active Physician's Orders as of 5/1/2022 for Resident #44, revealed an order for, .ARIPiprazole [an antipsychotic medication] Tablet Give 15 mg [milligrams] by mouth in the morning related to UNSPECIFIED PSYCHOSIS NOT DUE TO A SUBSTANCE OR KNOWN PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION . Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) for Resident #44 dated 4/1/2022 and 5/1/2022, revealed she was administered Aripiprazole 15 mg each morning. Review of the medical record for Residnt #44 revealed there was no AIMS assessment completed and the resident continued to receive antipyschotic medications. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #44 revealed an assessment/problem, .The resident uses psychotropic medications .Observe/document/report PRN [as needed] any adverse reactions of PSYCHOTROPIC medications: unsteady gait, tardive dyskinesia, EPS [extrapyramidal symptoms] [shuffling gait, rigid muscles, shaking], frequent falls . During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 11:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #44 was scheduled to have an AIMS assessment completed in February 2022, and it was not done. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 4:20 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #44 should have had an AIMS assessment completed in February, and it was not done.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 2 of 57 residents (Resident #10 and #51). The facility also failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and discarded properly in 2 of 5 medication carts. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated [DATE], revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observations of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart . Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration, dated [DATE], revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to assure proper and safe storage of medications requiring refrigeration and to prevent the potential alteration of medication by exposure to improper temperature controls. Date label of any multi-use vial when the vial is first accessed (needle punctured). the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial . Review of the undated facility's documentation titled, Extended Care Pharmacy Medication Expiration Dates, revealed, .Medication type: Insulin, Expiration Date: Must be dated when removed from refrigeration, Expectations: Novolog-28 days, Lantus-28 days. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Long Term Use of Insulin. Review of Resident #10's Physician Order Summary Report revealed, XXX[DATE] .Insulin Glargine Solution 100 Unit/Ml [milliliter] Inject 10 unit subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime for diabetes . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, and Long Term Use of Insulin. Review of Resident #51's Order Summary Report revealed, XXX[DATE] .Insulin Detemir Solution 100 Unit/Ml Inject 16 unit subcutaneously in the morning for diabetes . Observation and interview in Resident #28's room on [DATE] at 10:46 AM, revealed a cup with 8 unidentified pills and a bottle of prescription eye drops sitting on the over bed table, unattended. During interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and Unit Manager/Registered Nurse (RN) #2 confirmed the medications were unattended in the room on the table. Observation and interview in Resident #87's room on [DATE] at 2:54 PM, revealed two medicine cups containing cream and ointment were sitting on the dresser. During interview LPN #1 confirmed the medications were topical skin treatments and should not be sitting in the room unattended by the nurse. Observation and interview of the F & G Hall medication carts on [DATE] at 4:45 PM, in the presence of LPN #2 revealed one Lantus Solostar pen opened on [DATE] and two insulin Aspart flex pens unopened and undated. During interview LPN #2 confirmed the Lantus Solostar pen on the cart was opened and expired and there were two insulin Aspart flex pens unopened and undated on the medication cart. During continued interview she confirmed the unopened insulin was to be stored in the refrigerator until opened. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:45 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 confirmed when insulin was brought in from the pharmacy, it was to be kept in the refrigerator until opened, then placed on the medication cart and discarded after 28 days.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for residents being assisted with the lunch meal on 6/27/2022. The findings include:...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for residents being assisted with the lunch meal on 6/27/2022. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 4/12/2020, revealed, .Staff shall not touch food with bare hands . Observation in the H/I Dining room on 6/27/2022 at 12:03 PM, revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #6 placed her bare left hand on the resident's sandwich and cut the sandwich with a knife with her right hand and then picked up a resident's sandwich from his meal tray with her bare right hand and began to hand the sandwich to the resident. During an interview on 6/27/2022 at 12:04 PM, CNA #6 confirmed she was holding the resident's sandwich in her right bare hand. During an interview on 6/27/2022 at 12:05 PM Registered Nurse #1 (who was sitting at the table with the resident and CNA #6), confirmed CNA #6 touched the resident's sandwich with her bare hands. She stated, We are not to touch residents' food with our bare hands.
Dec 2019 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment timely...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment timely for 1 (#20) of 30 residents reviewed for MDS timeliness. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Peripheral Vascular Disease and Anxiety Disorder. Medical record review of Resident #20's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed the electronic signature was dated 9/13/19. Interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 12/4/19 at 5:20 PM in the MDS office confirmed the annual MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #20 was not completed until 9/13/19, she stated past 14 days. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/4/19 at 6:02 PM in the conference room revealed her expectations of the MDS staff were to follow their calendars and reports to accurately code and submit the MDS assessments timely.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (#1) of 30...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (#1) of 30 residents reviewed for completion of Quarterly MDS Assessments. The findings include: Medical record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the MDS Assessment was incomplete. Interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 12/4/19 at 5:20 PM in the MDS office when asked to look at Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] she stated, Oh boy, it's not complete, it should have been completed on 10/17/19. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/4/19 at 6:02 PM in the conference room revealed her expectations of the MDS staff were to follow their calendars and reports to complete and submit the MDS assessments when they are due.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to accurately assess a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessm...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to accurately assess a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 1 (#19) and failed to accurately assess a Discharge MDS assessments for 2 (#95 and #97) of 30 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimers Disease, Dementia and Diabetes Mellitus. Medical record review of Resident #19's Physician Orders dated 8/6/19 revealed .Hospice to eval [evaluate] and treat . Medical record review of Resident #19's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed hospice was not coded. Medical record review revealed Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Age Related Osteoporosis w/o [without] current pathology, Wedge Compresrsn (Compression) fx (Fracture) First [NAME] (Lumbar) [NAME] (Vertebrae), Muscle Weakness, Vascular Dementia Without Behavior Disturbances. Medical record review of Resident #95's Physician Orders dated 10/1/19 revealed .DISCHARGE home on [DATE] . Medical record review of Resident #95's progress notes dated 10/5/19 revealed she discharged back to her apartment on 10/2/19. Medical record review of Resident #95's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident discharged to another nursing home or swing bed. Medical record review revealed Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes with Foot Ulcer, Arthritis of Right Knee, Gout, Chondracalcinosis of Right Knee. Medical record review of Resident #97's nursing notes dated 9/21/19 at 4:41 PM revealed resident discharged home. Medical record review of Resident #97's Discharge Summary revealed Resident #97 discharged to home. Medical record review of Resident #97's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident discharged to an Acute Hospital. Interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 12/4/19 at 5:20 PM in the MDS office confirmed the Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #19 dated 11/19/19 was not coded for hospice, she stated Got missed putting on there. Further interview confirmed the Discharge MDS assessment for Resident #95 and Resident #97 was not coded accurately, she stated they should have been coded discharged to community. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/4/19 at 6:02 PM in the conference room revealed her expectations of the MDS staff were to accurately code the MDS assessments.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, interview and test tray, the facility failed to provide foo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, interview and test tray, the facility failed to provide food at palatable and appetizing temperatures for 1 (#93) of 10 residents observed at the noon meal on 12/2/19. The findings include: Facility policy review, Maintaining a Sanitary Tray Line, dated April 2008 revealed .Periodically monitor food temperatures throughout the meal service to ensure proper hot food (at or above 135 degrees) . Facility policy review, Food Preparation and Service, dated April 2008 revealed .The danger zone for food temperature is between 41 F [degrees Fahrenheit] and 135 F. This temperature range promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness . Medical record review revealed Resident #93 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hypertension, Malnutrition and Arthritis. Medical record review of Resident #93's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #93 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Observation of the tray line on 12/2/19 at 11:41 AM in the kitchen in the presence of the Dietary Manager revealed the following food temperatures: Peas - 192 F Chicken & Dumplings 199 F Alternate Carrots 180 F Alternate Tater Tot Casserole 186 F Alternate Turkey 176 F Pureed Bread 177 F Pureed Chicken & Dumplings 181 F Mechanical Chicken & Dumplings 179 F Pureed Peas 188 F Mashed Potatoes 176 F Milk 34.3 F Observation on 12/2/19 at 12:00 PM in the kitchen revealed the H hall dining cart left the kitchen at 12:00 PM. Observation of the H hall dining cart on 12/2/19 at 12:04 PM revealed the first tray was delivered to the resident at 12:04 PM and the last tray was delivered at 12:12 PM, with a total delivery time of 8 minutes. Observation on 12/2/19 at 12:13 PM in the presence of the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on the H Hall of the H hall dining cart revealed the following test tray temperatures: Mechanical Soft Chicken and Dumplings 137 F, a temperature decrease of 42 degrees Pureed Chicken and Dumplings 127.2 F, a temperature decrease of 54 degrees Pureed Peas 133.5 F, a temperature decrease of 55 degrees Chicken and Dumplings 152.4 F, a temperature decrease of 47 degrees Peas 109 F, a temperature decrease of 81 degrees Interview with Resident #93 on 12/2/19 at 10:55 AM in her room revealed her food is always cold. Interview with Resident #93 on 12/2/19 at 12:21 PM in her room during the noon meal she stated my food is just warm. Interview with the CDM on 12/4/19 at 3:47 PM in the hallway outside of the kitchen confirmed the tray line food temperatures did not hold through delivery during the noon meal on 12/2/19.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner as evidenced by expired foods in the kitchen dry storage room. The Findings ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner as evidenced by expired foods in the kitchen dry storage room. The Findings include: Facility policy review, Food Receiving and Storage, dated April 2018, revealed .Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .foods will be rotated using a first in-first out method . Observation and interview with the Licensed Dietary Manager on 12/4/19 at 12:00 PM in the kitchen dry storage room confirmed Sprinkles, 3 five pound containers expired on 1/31/19, Dessert toppings two 19.5 ounce containers expired on 7/26/19 and Lemon juice 1 Quart container expired on 11/2019. Interview with the Licensed Dietary Manager in the presence of the Dietary Manager on 12/4/19 at 3:47 PM in the hallway outside of the dietary department confirmed sprinkles, dessert topping and lemon juice were expired.
Aug 2018 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen at ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the physician's prescribed rate for 2 (#4 and #45) of 16 residents reviewed receiving respiratory treatments. The findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration dated May 1, 2008 and revised April 2018, revealed .Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders . Medical record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Suspected Pneumonia, Heart Failure and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Medical record review of Physician Orders dated 8/22/18 revealed .Oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute to keep sats [saturation] above 90% (percent) . Medical record review of Treatment Administration Record dated 8/2018 revealed Resident #4's oxygen saturation on 8/23/18 at 6:00 PM 97%, 8/24/18 at 12:00 PM 97%, 6:00 PM 96%, 8/25/18 at 6:00 AM 96%, 12:00 PM 96%, 6:00 PM 95%, 8/26/18 at 12:00 PM 96%, 6:00PM 97%, 8/27/18 6:00 AM 95%, 12:00 PM 95%, 6:00 PM 95%, 8/28/18 6:00 AM 95%, 6:00 PM 97%, 8/29/18 6:00 AM 99%. Observation on 8/27/18 at 11:31 AM, 8/28/18 at 8:32 AM, 12:21 PM, 4:07 PM and 8/29/18 at 7:50 AM in Resident #4's room revealed the resident was receiving oxygen at 4 liters per minute (lpm) by nasal cannula. Observation on 8/29/18 at 9:20 AM in Resident #4's room revealed the resident was receiving oxygen at 3 lpm by nasal cannula. Observation of Resident #4 on 8/29/18 at 9:22 AM in the resident's room with LPN #1 present confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen at 3 lpm by nasal cannula. Interview with LPN #1 on 8/29/18 at 9:25 AM at the HI hall nurse station confirmed Resident #4's oxygen was to be administered at 2 lpm. Medical record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Iron Deficiency Anemia, Anxiety and Dyspnea. Medical record review of Resident #45's physician orders for August 2018 revealed .02 (oxygen) at 3 liters/minute (lpm) via nasal cannula continuous . Medical record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #45 dated 7/2/18 revealed the resident was receiving oxygen therapy. Observation of Resident #45 on 8/27/18 at 11:31 AM and 3:32 PM and on 8/28/18 at 7:36 AM and 9:22 AM in the resident's room revealed the resident was receiving oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute (lpm) by nasal cannula. Observation of Resident #45 on 8/28/18 at 11:43 AM in the resident's room with the Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 present confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen at 2.5 lpm by nasal cannula. Interview with the Unit Manager/LPN #4 on 8/28/18 at 11:45 AM at the JK hall nurse station confirmed Resident #45's oxygen was to be administered at 3 lpm.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve attractive pureed texture food for 1 of 5 meal observations. The findings include: Observation on 8/27/18 at 11:15 AM at the dietary de...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve attractive pureed texture food for 1 of 5 meal observations. The findings include: Observation on 8/27/18 at 11:15 AM at the dietary department trayline, with the Dietary Manager present, revealed the puree Beef Casserole, pureed Beans, and pureed Corn Relish were runny in texture. Further observation revealed the pureed food ran together and commingled on the plate. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 8/27/18 at 11:15 AM at the dietary department trayline confirmed the pureed food texture was to thin and should not run together on the plate.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to label and date oxygen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to label and date oxygen tubing and humidified canisters for 3 (#19,#45,and #47) of 16 residents reviewed receiving respiratory treatments. The findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Policy not dated, revealed .Cannulas and masks should be changed weekly . Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Anemia, Heart Failure, and Obesity. Medical record review of the 8/2018 recapitulation Physician Orders revealed oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula initiated on 8/16/18. Observation of Resident #19 on 8/27/18 at 12:18 PM and on 8/28/18 at 8:54 AM revealed an oxygen concentrator with the humidifier canister and tubing dated 8/20/18. Interview with Respiratory Therapist (RT) #1 on 8/28/18 at 8:54 AM in Resident #19's room revealed the RT Department was responsible to change this resident's oxygen and breathing equipment tubing and masks. Further observation revealed the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were to be changed weekly. Further interview confirmed the oxygen tubing and humidifier canister were dated 8/20/18 and should have changed it yesterday. Interview with LPN #1 on 8/28/18 at 11:55 AM by the JK hall nurse station revealed the oxygen tubing and humidifier canisters were to be changed weekly when the skin assessment was scheduled to be completed. Further interview, after reviewing the 8/2018 Medication Administration Record, revealed LPN #5 had done the skin assessment on Sunday 8/26/18. Interview with LPN #5 on 8/29/18 at 3:55 PM in Resident #19's room confirmed the oxygen tubing and the humidifier canister were to changed when the skin assessment was completed weekly. Further interview confirmed the tubing had not been changed as scheduled on 8/26/18 when she did the skin assessment. Medical record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Iron Deficiency Anemia, Anxiety and Dyspnea. Medical record review of Resident #45's physician orders for August 2018 revealed .02 (oxygen) at 3 liters/minute (lm) via nasal cannula continuous . Observation of Resident #45 on 8/27/18 at 11:31 AM and 3:32 PM and on 8/28/18 at 7:36 AM and 9:22 AM in the resident's room revealed the resident's oxygen tubing and humidified canister was dated 8/20/18. Observation of Resident #45 on 8/28/18 at 11:43 AM in the resident's room with the Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 present revealed the resident's oxygen tubing and humidified canister was dated 8/20/18. The Unit Manager/LPN #4 looked at the oxygen tubing and humidified canister and said it's wrong; it has 8/20/18 on it. Further interview with the Unit Manager/LPN #4 confirmed the oxygen tubing and humidified canisters are to be changed weekly with the resident's skin assessment and Resident #45's oxygen tubing and humidified canister had not been changed as scheduled on 8/27/18 with the resident's skin assessment. Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Hypoxemia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Medical record review of the 8/2018 Physician Orders revealed oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula initiated on 8/16/18. Observation on 8/27/18 at 12:00 PM and 3:06 PM, and on 8/28/18 at 8:18 AM revealed the humidifier canister was dated 8/20/18 and the oxygen tubing was not dated. Observation on 8/28/18 at 11:46 AM revealed the Staff Coordinator/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) came into Resident #47's room with oxygen tubing. Interview with the Staff Coordinator/LPN on 8/28/18 at 11:46 AM in Resident #47's room confirmed the oxygen tubing on the concentrator was not dated and the humidifier canister was dated 8/20/18. Further interview revealed the oxygen tubing and humidifier were to be replaced every 7 days. Interview with LPN #1 on 8/28/18 at 11:55 AM by the JK hall nurse station revealed the oxygen tubing and humidifier canister were to be changed weekly when the skin assessment was scheduled to be completed. The last skin assessment for Resident #47 was completed on Sunday 8/26/18.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 23 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Community Care Of Rutherford's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Community Care Of Rutherford Staffed?

CMS rates COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Community Care Of Rutherford?

State health inspectors documented 23 deficiencies at COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD during 2018 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 18 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Community Care Of Rutherford?

COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 131 certified beds and approximately 89 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MURFREESBORO, Tennessee.

How Does Community Care Of Rutherford Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Community Care Of Rutherford?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Community Care Of Rutherford Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Community Care Of Rutherford Stick Around?

COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Community Care Of Rutherford Ever Fined?

COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Community Care Of Rutherford on Any Federal Watch List?

COMMUNITY CARE OF RUTHERFORD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.