NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI

993 E COLLEGE ST, PULASKI, TN 38478 (931) 363-3572
For profit - Corporation 102 Beds NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
60/100
#144 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: October 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

NHC Healthcare in Pulaski has a Trust Grade of C+, which indicates it is slightly above average but not outstanding. It ranks #144 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, but is last in its county at #3 of 3. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2019 to 6 in 2022, which raises concerns about care quality. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 47%, slightly below the state average, and there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign. However, there were serious incidents where the facility failed to follow care plans for three residents, resulting in injuries, and issues with cleanliness in the ice machine were noted, highlighting some areas needing improvement despite having excellent quality measures.

Trust Score
C+
60/100
In Tennessee
#144/298
Top 48%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Tennessee. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 1 issues
2022: 6 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Tennessee average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 47%

Near Tennessee avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Chain: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Oct 2022 6 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, hospital record review, and interviews, t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, hospital record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #30, Resident #50, and Resident #75) reviewed for falls with injury which resulted in actual harm. Resident #30 had a laceration, bruising and bump to the head that required one staple. Resident #50 had a contusion to right hip and shoulder. Resident #75 had a left forehead laceration, approximately 5 mm [millimeter] requiring steri-strips with an acute traumatic subdural hematoma). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Services revised 2/2022 revealed, .The care plan serves as a guide for care decisions and is made available for use by all patient care personnel . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program revealed, .Purpose: To reduce patient's risk of falling .Apply fall risk interventions as appropriate for the patient . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Senile Degeneration of Brain, Unspecified Fracture of Right Pubis, and History of falling. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #30 revealed a problem/assessment for falls. Interventions included, .Approach start date: 05/03/2021 Bolsters to both sides of bed to form perimeter .04/02/2021 Apply fall mats to left and right sides of bed .04/02/2021 Bed in safest, lowest position . Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #30 dated 8/5/2022 revealed, .04:30 AM Pt [patient] was found on floor at 0315 by tech .Fall interventions were not in place at time of fall. She had rolled out of bed and hit her head .sent to [Named Hospital] .received one staple at the ER [emergency room] .08/25/2022 05:19 PM Post fall investigation summary: Patient was FOF [found on floor] on 8/5/22 at 3:45 AM after rolling out of bed. Careplanned bolsters and fall mats not in place at time of fall .Pt sustained laceration, bump, and bruising to top of head, was sent to ER, and returned with staple to laceration .Physical Therapy . Review of the hospital records for Resident #30 dated 8/5/2022, revealed she was admitted to the emergency department with a laceration to her scalp. Continued review revealed the laceration was closed with 1 staple. Radiological exam revealed soft tissue swelling of the frontal scalp. Review of the facility document titled, FSI-Fall Scene Investigation Report, dated 8/5/2022 revealed, .Fell out of bed. Bolsters/fall mats not in place .Root Cause of this Fall .Assistive/Protective device .Pt did not have bed bolsters in place . Review of the East Hall CNA shift report form revealed Resident #30 was not listed as a fall risk and not indicated as on the Fall Focus Program. During a telephone interview on 10/18/2022 at 5:04 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)#1 confirmed Resident #30 had a fall and sustained a laceration to her head which required a staple closure. She stated the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was not aware of Resident #30's required interventions. She stated the bed bolsters and the fall mats were not in place at the time of the fall. She confirmed Resident #30's care plan included bed bolsters and fall mat interventions related to her high fall risk evaluation. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 12:35 PM, Physical Therapy Assistant #1 stated he had completed the investigation for Resident #30's fall with injury. He confirmed the fall interventions were not in place at the time of the fall on 8/5/2022. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 5:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #30's fall with injury resulted when care planned interventions were not implemented. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included History of Falling, Cerebral Infarction, and Dementia. Review of the Significant Change in status assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognitive abilities. Continued review revealed he required extensive assistance of 2 or more caregivers for bed mobility, total dependence on transfers of 2 or more caregivers, extensive assistance for dressing of 1 caregiver, and extensive assistance for toileting of 2 or more caregivers. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #50 revealed, .Fall risk for injury related to physical limitations in functional mobility .history of falls . Approach for fall prevention included, . 4/11/2022 bed in lowest, safest position .9/10/2022 Bumpers in place while pt [patient] is in bed. Educate staff to keep bed in low position while pt is in bed . Review of Resident #50's Safety Events - Fall dated 9/10/2022, revealed, .05:23 AM pt was found on the floor .pt stated that he was asleep in bed and next thing he knew he was in the floor .pt was assisted back to bed lifted manually by 4 people .once back in bed pt c/o [complained of] severe right hip pain .upon examination pt hip found to be internally rotated with resistance to ROM [range of motion} and was shorter than left leg .pain med admin [administered] with little help. MD notified, order given to transport pt to hospital for further evaluation . Continued review of the Safety Events - Fall revealed, .9/10/2022 at 10:18 AM pt returned from ER [Emergency Room] with diagnosis of contusion to hip and shoulder . Further review of the Safety Events - Fall revealed, .10/6/2022 05:16 PM post fall investigation summary: Pt was FOF [Found on floor] beside bed on 9/10/22 at 3:48 AM after rolling out of bed while sleeping. Pt was sleeping on winged mattress and fall mats were in place, but bed was not in lowest position . Review of Resident #50's Fall Investigation Report dated 9/10/2022, revealed, .Factors observed at time of fall .Bed height not appropriate .Describe initial interventions to prevent future falls .educate staff to have bed in low position . Review of Resident #50's ER visit dated 9/10/2022, revealed Diagnosis of Pelvic and Right shoulder Contusion. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 1:55 PM, the Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) confirmed Resident #50's bed was not at the appropriate height which contributed to his injury on 9/10/2022. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 4:20 PM, the DON confirmed she would expect Certified Nursing Staff to lower a resident's bed to the lowest position prior to leaving the resident's room after providing care. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included [NAME]-[NAME] Syndrome [autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle weakness], Myasthenia Neoplasm, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 had a BIMS score of 99 indicating the resident could not complete the assessment. Continued review revealed Resident #75 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers with two staff. Resident #75 had bilateral impairment of the upper extremities. Review of Resident #75's Care Plan interventions dated 1/6/2021 revealed .keep bed in low position. Ensure safe environment, free from clutter and obstacles . Review of the facility's documentation dated 8/2/2022 revealed .Summoned to Pt [patient] room at 11 pm per CNA [Certified Nurse Aide]. Pt laying on floor on left side on top of fall mat. Pt nursing alert. Baseline orientation Normal. Noted bleeding on floor. Pt assessed for injury 1/2 inch. Laceration to left side of forehead. First aid initiated. MD notified. with orders received for transfer to ER [emergency room]/ via ambulance for further eval [evaluation]. Pt wife notified .this nurse took call from ER at this time stating they were admitting patient for observation noted Subdural Hematoma [blood between brain and its outermost covering], nonsurgical .On 8/2/2022 at 11:00 PM, Patient was FOF [found on floor] beside bed on fall mat. CNA reports that patient had been changed within an hour of incident, but bed was apparently not in lowest position . Review of the History and Physical dated 8/3/2022 revealed .admission Diagnosis 1. Status post bed height fall with blunt head trauma and 5 mm [millimeter] left forehead laceration, reapproximated with Steri-strip with secondary 2.5 cm [centimeter] acute traumatic Subdural Hematoma .This is a [AGE] year old nursing home resident with [NAME]-[NAME] Syndrome and Dementia, who is non ambulatory and nonverbal who last evening fell from bed height. He did sustain blunt head trauma with 5 mm laceration to left forehead and was found to have 2.5 mm acute Subdural Hematoma . During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 2:15 PM, the PTA stated he had interviewed another agency CNA who assisted Resident #75 from the floor and she revealed the bed was not in the lowest position and the bedside table was close to the side of the bed. During a telephone interview on 10/19/2022 at 4:57 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #3 stated she was at the nurses' station and a LPN had approached her and told her Resident #75 had fallen out of bed. Resident #75 was found on the floor facing the door. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 3:14 PM, the DON stated she had not reviewed the post fall investigation for Resident #75. The DON expected staff to ensure a resident's bed was in a low position and the floor was clutter free before exiting the room.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect 3 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #30, Resident #50, and Resident #75) reviewed related to falls with injury which resulted in actual harm (Resident #30 had a laceration, bruising and bump to the head that required one staple. Resident #50 had a contusion to right hip and shoulder. Resident #75 had a left forehead laceration, approximately 5 mm [millimeter] requiring steri-strips with an acute traumatic subdural hematoma). The Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Incident and Accident Process revised 8/13/2013 revealed, .examples of incidents/accidents are: Falls, Found on floor . Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Services revised 2/2022 revealed, .The care plan serves as a guide for care decisions and is made available for use by all patient care personnel . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program revealed, .Purpose: To reduce patient's risk of falling .Apply fall risk interventions as appropriate for the patient . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Senile Degeneration of Brain, Unspecified Fracture of Right Pubis, and History of falling. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #30 revealed a problem/assessment for falls. Interventions included, .Approach start date: 05/03/2021 Bolsters to both sides of bed to form perimeter .04/02/2021 Apply fall mats to left and right sides of bed .04/02/2021 Bed in safest, lowest position . Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #30 dated 8/5/2022 revealed, .04:30 AM Pt [patient] was found on floor at 0315 by tech .Fall interventions were not in place at time of fall. She had rolled out of bed and hit her head .sent to [Named Hospital] .received one staple at the ER [emergency room] .08/25/2022 05:19 PM Post fall investigation summary: Patient was FOF [found on floor] on 8/5/22 at 3:45 AM after rolling out of bed. Careplanned bolsters and fall mats not in place at time of fall .Pt sustained laceration, bump, and bruising to top of head, was sent to ER, and returned with staple to laceration .Physical Therapy . Review of the hospital records for Resident #30 dated 8/5/2022, revealed she was admitted to the emergency department with a laceration to her scalp. Continued review revealed the laceration was closed with 1 staple. Radiological exam revealed soft tissue swelling of the frontal scalp. Review of the facility document titled, FSI-Fall Scene Investigation Report, dated 8/5/2022 revealed, .Fell out of bed. Bolsters/fall mats not in place .Root Cause of this Fall .Assistive/Protective device .Pt did not have bed bolsters in place . Review of the East Hall CNA shift report form revealed Resident #30 was not listed as a fall risk and not indicated as on the Fall Focus Program. During a telephone interview on 10/18/2022 at 5:04 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)#1 confirmed Resident #30 had a fall and sustained a laceration to her head which required a staple closure. She stated the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was not aware of Resident #30's required interventions. She stated the bed bolsters and the fall mats were not in place at the time of the fall. She confirmed Resident #30's care plan included bed bolsters and fall mat interventions related to her high fall risk evaluation. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 12:35 PM, Physical Therapy Assistant #1 stated he had completed the investigation for Resident #30's fall with injury. He confirmed the fall interventions were not in place at the time of the fall on 8/5/2022. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 5:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #30's fall with injury resulted when care planned interventions were not implemented. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included History of Falling, Cerebral Infarction, and Dementia. Review of the Significant Change in status assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognitive abilities. Continued review revealed he required extensive assistance of 2 or more caregivers for bed mobility, total dependence on transfers of 2 or more caregivers, extensive assistance for dressing of 1 caregiver, and extensive assistance for toileting of 2 or more caregivers. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #50 revealed, .Fall risk for injury related to physical limitations in functional mobility .history of falls . Approach for fall prevention included, . 4/11/2022 bed in lowest, safest position .9/10/2022 Bumpers in place while pt [patient] is in bed. Educate staff to keep bed in low position while pt is in bed . Review of Resident #50's Safety Events - Fall dated 9/10/2022, revealed, .05:23 AM pt was found on the floor .pt stated that he was asleep in bed and next thing he knew he was in the floor .pt was assisted back to bed lifted manually by 4 people .once back in bed pt c/o [complained of] severe right hip pain .upon examination pt hip found to be internally rotated with resistance to ROM [range of motion} and was shorter than left leg .pain med admin [administered] with little help. MD notified, order given to transport pt to hospital for further evaluation . Continued review of the Safety Events - Fall revealed, .9/10/2022 at 10:18 AM pt returned from ER [Emergency Room] with diagnosis of contusion to hip and shoulder . Further review of the Safety Events - Fall revealed, .10/6/2022 05:16 PM post fall investigation summary: Pt was FOF [Found on floor] beside bed on 9/10/22 at 3:48 AM after rolling out of bed while sleeping. Pt was sleeping on winged mattress and fall mats were in place, but bed was not in lowest position . Review of Resident #50's Fall Investigation Report dated 9/10/2022, revealed, .Factors observed at time of fall .Bed height not appropriate .Describe initial interventions to prevent future falls .educate staff to have bed in low position . Review of Resident #50's ER visit dated 9/10/2022, revealed Diagnosis of Pelvic and Right shoulder Contusion. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 1:55 PM, the Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) confirmed Resident #50's bed was not at the appropriate height which contributed to his injury on 9/10/2022. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 4:20 PM, the DON confirmed she would expect Certified Nursing Staff to lower a resident's bed to the lowest position prior to leaving the resident's room after providing care. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included [NAME]-[NAME] Syndrome [autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle weakness], Myasthenia Neoplasm, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 had a BIMS score of 99 indicating the resident could not complete the assessment. Continued review revealed Resident #75 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers with two staff. Resident #75 had bilateral impairment of the upper extremities. Review of Resident #75's Care Plan interventions dated 1/6/2021 revealed .keep bed in low position. Ensure safe environment, free from clutter and obstacles . Review of the facility's documentation dated 8/2/2022 revealed .Summoned to Pt [patient] room at 11 pm per CNA [Certified Nurse Aide]. Pt laying on floor on left side on top of fall mat. Pt nursing alert. Baseline orientation Normal. Noted bleeding on floor. Pt assessed for injury 1/2 inch. Laceration to left side of forehead. First aid initiated. MD notified. with orders received for transfer to ER [emergency room]/ via ambulance for further eval [evaluation]. Pt wife notified .this nurse took call from ER at this time stating they were admitting patient for observation noted Subdural Hematoma [blood between brain and its outermost covering], nonsurgical .On 8/2/2022 at 11:00 PM, Patient was FOF [found on floor] beside bed on fall mat. CNA reports that patient had been changed within an hour of incident, but bed was apparently not in lowest position . Review of the History and Physical dated 8/3/2022 revealed .admission Diagnosis 1. Status post bed height fall with blunt head trauma and 5 mm [millimeter] left forehead laceration, reapproximated with Steri-strip with secondary 2.5 cm [centimeter] acute traumatic Subdural Hematoma .This is a [AGE] year old nursing home resident with [NAME]-[NAME] Syndrome and Dementia, who is non ambulatory and nonverbal who last evening fell from bed height. He did sustain blunt head trauma with 5 mm laceration to left forehead and was found to have 2.5 mm acute Subdural Hematoma . During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 2:15 PM, the PTA stated he had interviewed another agency CNA who assisted Resident #75 from the floor and she revealed the bed was not in the lowest position and the bedside table was close to the side of the bed. During a telephone interview on 10/19/2022 at 4:57 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #3 stated she was at the nurses' station and a LPN had approached her and told her Resident #75 had fallen out of bed. Resident #75 was found on the floor facing the door. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 3:14 PM, the DON stated she had not reviewed the post fall investigation for Resident #75. The DON expected staff to ensure a resident's bed was in a low position and the floor was clutter free before exiting the room.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 of 37 sam...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident #7) reviewed for weight loss. The Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Nursing Services, revealed, .The patient care plan is developed to address the immediate need of the patient .the center will include the attending physician in the development of the patient's plan of care by incorporating the physician's plan of care [orders] into the care plan .planning is based on identified needs/problems .and is made available for use by all patient care personnel . Review of medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Dementia, Pneumonia, and Essential Hypertension (HTN). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated severely impaired cognitive abilities. Continued review of the MDS revealed Resident #7 required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #7 required set up help with eating. Review of Resident #7's Vitals Report revealed her weight on 4/28/2019 was 147 lbs (pounds), 4/6/2020 139.7 lbs., 2/7/2022 Resident #7's weight dropped to 128 lbs., and one month later her weight dropped 19.5 lbs to 108.5 lbs on 3/21/2022. Further review of the Vitals Report revealed on 7/4/2022 Resident #7's weight was 123.5 lbs then on 8/11/2022 Resident #7's weight was down 9.1 lbs to 114.4 lbs which indicated significant weight loss in one month. Resident #7's current weight continues to be down at 115.1 lbs. Review of the FNS (Food Nutritional Services) Progress Notes dated 3/22/2022 revealed .[Named Resident] showing 15% weight loss x [times] one month. WT [weight] : 108.5 [3/21], 109 [3/17], 128 [2/7]. She has had increased confusion with increased drowsiness. Appetite has decreased .still able to feed herself after set-up but needs total set-up and encouragement to eat .added Med Pass [Fortified Nutritional Shake] 3 oz [ounce] tid [three times day] to increase calorie/protein intake. Will add Ensure plus at lunch daily .Nursing reported she has been eating < [less than] 50 percent at all meals. Will start weekly weight to monitor. MD [Medical Director] informed of weight loss .3/31/2022 .was started on Megace [medication to treat loss of appetite] on 3/23 .accepting Ensure at lunch some days .7/20/2022 .[Named Resident] is at risk for malnutrition and will proceed with PCP r/t [related to] decreased appetite with increased confusion r/t dementia, and need for set-up at meals with poor vision .09/09/2022 .now at 3.4 % weight loss x one month .weekly weight until 9/20 or until stable . Review of the Care Plan dated 4/29/2019, revealed Resident #7 was assessed for Nutritional Status, stable weight, and long-term goal will continue to feed herself with no significant weight loss. Continued review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #7's approach to assist with meals as needed. Further review of the Care Plan revealed no updated approaches since 6/1/2022 to reflect the resident's weight loss. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 2:45 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #7's Care Plan did not reflect her weight loss since 3/2022 nor were additional approaches added to prevent weight loss.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, procedure manual review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, procedure manual review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to label and date enteral feeding for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #231) requiring enteral feedings. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 1/1/2019, revealed, .Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier . Review of the facility's undated procedure manual titled, Changing the tubing, bottle or bag, revealed, .Pour bags: Pour only enough feeding for 8 hours at a time, rinse bag before adding next 8 hour feeding .Bottle/bag will be labeled with time of hang date, rate of flow and nurses initials . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #231 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #231's Physician Orders dated October 2022, revealed, .Jevity 1.5 at 65 cc [cubic centimeters] hr [hour] flush with 45 cc of water every hour . Observations in Resident #231's room on 10/17/2022 at 11:14 AM, 12:30 PM, and 2:14 PM revealed an unlabeled and undated bag of tan liquid hung on a pole being administered to the resident at 65 milliliters/hour (ml/hr) per pump. Observation and interview in Resident #231's room on 10/17/2022 at 2:15 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1/Unit Manager confirmed the bag of tan liquid was unlabeled and undated.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to prevent the spread of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to prevent the spread of infection for 3 of 21 residents (Resident #27, Resident #53, and Resident #58) related to proper storage/sanitation of nebulizer equipment and failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner for 1 of 3 observations in the dietary department related to pink debris in the ice machine where ice was kept. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, ORAL INHALATION ADMINISTRATION, dated 1/1/2019 revealed, .When equipment is completely dry, store in a plastic bag with the resident's name and the date on it . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the Physician Orders for Resident #27 dated 6/8/2022, revealed, .Ipratropium-albuterol solution for nebulization . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Review of the Physician Orders for Resident #53 dated 9/23/2022, revealed, .Ipratropium-albuterol solution for nebulization . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Review of the Physician Orders for Resident #58 dated 7/13/2022, revealed, .Albuterol sulfate solution for nebulization . Observation in Resident #27 and Resident #58's room on 10/19/2022 at 10:45 AM revealed nebulizer equipment uncovered on each of the bedside tables. Observations in Resident #53's room on 10/17/2022 at 12:40 PM, 10/18/2022 at 8:30 AM, and 10/19/2022 at 10:55 AM, revealed her nebulizer equipment uncovered and laying on her bedside table. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 10:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 stated after giving a nebulizer treatment the equipment should be cleaned and stored in a bag to prevent contamination between uses. She confirmed Resident #27 and Resident #58's nebulizer equipment was uncovered and left in a basket on their bedside tables. Observation and interview on 10/19/2022 at 10:58 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 confirmed Resident #53's nebulizer equipment was uncovered on the bedside table. She stated the nebulizer equipment should be cleaned and stored in a bag to prevent contamination. During an interview on 10/19/2022 at 11:44 AM, Respiratory Therapist #1 stated she had in-serviced the nursing staff to store nebulizer equipment in a bag with the resident's name and date on it. She confirmed that Professional Standards of Practice for storing nebulizer equipment required storage in a closed container or bag. Observation and interview in the dietary department on 10/17/2022 at 10:25 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), revealed 2 areas of pink debris on the right and left edge of the vertical plastic covering in the ice machine. Further observation revealed ice was touching the vertical plastic covering. The CDM confirmed the 2 areas of pink debris on the vertical plastic covering in the ice machine.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner for 1 of 3 observations in the dietary department. The findings include: Observation and inter...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner for 1 of 3 observations in the dietary department. The findings include: Observation and interview in the dietary department on 10/17/2022 at 10:25 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), revealed 2 areas of pink debris on the right and left edge of the vertical plastic covering in the ice machine. Further observation revealed ice was touching the vertical plastic covering. The CDM confirmed the 2 areas of pink debris on the vertical plastic covering in the ice machine.
Oct 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and safely when 2 of 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and #2) nurses left medicat...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and safely when 2 of 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and #2) nurses left medications out of site and unattended. The findings include: 1. The facility's MEDICATION STORAGE IN THE FACILITY policy dated 6/2016, documented, .Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly .The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel .B .medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access . 2. Observations during medication administration in Resident #35's room on 10/8/19 at 3:10 PM, revealed LPN #1 entered Resident #35's room to administer a medication and a bolus enteral feeding. LPN #1 placed a crushed medication on the overbed table, and entered the bathroom, leaving the medication out of site and unattended. LPN #1 returned to administer the enteral bolus feeding, but then entered the bathroom to obtain water for the enteral water flush, leaving the medication on the overbed table out of site and unattended. LPN #1 returned to administer the enteral bolus feeding, after LPN #1 administered the feeding, LPN #1 entered the bathroom to rinse out the enteral syringe, leaving the medication out of site and unattended. 3. Observations during medication administration in Resident's #20's room on 10/9/19 at 9:44 AM, revealed LPN #2 entered Resident #20's room to administer oral medications and insulin. LPN #2 placed the medication and the insulin syringe on the overbed table, and entered the bathroom, leaving the oral medications and insulin syringe out of site and unattended. LPN #2 returned to administer the insulin, gave Resident #20 a glass of water, and then returned to the bathroom, leaving the oral medications out of site and unattended. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 10/9/19 at 2:05 PM, in the ADON Office, the ADON was asked if medications should have been left at the bedside out of site and unattended. The ADON stated, No.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Concerns
  • • 7 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 60/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski Staffed?

CMS rates NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI during 2019 to 2022. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 5 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski?

NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 102 certified beds and approximately 92 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in PULASKI, Tennessee.

How Does Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski Stick Around?

NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski Ever Fined?

NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Nhc Healthcare, Pulaski on Any Federal Watch List?

NHC HEALTHCARE, PULASKI is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.