SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Signature Healthcare of Ridgely Rehab & Wellness Center has received a Trust Grade of C, indicating an average performance that places it in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. In Tennessee, it ranks #210 out of 298 facilities, putting it in the bottom half, but it is the best option in Lake County. The facility is experiencing a troubling trend, as the number of reported issues has increased from 4 in 2019 to 9 in 2023. Staffing is rated at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average, with a turnover rate of 58%, slightly above the state average. While the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign, there are significant concerns regarding specific incidents, such as medications being left unattended at residents' bedsides, improper handling of food and dishes that could lead to contamination, and failure to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Overall, while there are some strengths, such as the absence of fines, the weaknesses in care practices and increasing issues are concerning for families considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Tennessee
- #210/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Tennessee average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
12pts above Tennessee avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
10 points above Tennessee average of 48%
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Aug 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess residents fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a PASRR after the resident had...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct Care Plan meetings for 1 of 8 (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0790
(Tag F0790)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when 1 of 4 staff members Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3) left medicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and sanitized their hands while going back and forth from dirty to clean dishes, when 2 of 3 (Die...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection when 4 of 4 nurses (LPN #1, LPN #3, LPN #4, and LPN #6) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2019
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was fre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NAUAP) Pressure Ulcer Prevention quick reference guide, medical r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2018
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, manufacturer's recommendations, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by dust above the stove and on the oven fan, carbo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- • 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade C (50/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR during 2018 to 2023. These included: 15 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 100 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in RIDGELY, Tennessee.
How Does Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr Stick Around?
Staff turnover at SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr Ever Fined?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Signature Healthcare Of Ridgely Rehab&Wellness Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF RIDGELY REHAB&WELLNESS CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.