HARDIN HOME
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Hardin Home in Savannah, Tennessee has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #191 out of 298 nursing homes in Tennessee, placing it in the bottom half, and #4 out of 5 in Hardin County, meaning only one local facility is rated higher. The facility's situation is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, earning a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars, although the turnover rate is 46%, which is slightly better than the state average of 48%. There have been no fines recorded, which is a positive sign, but the facility has less registered nurse (RN) coverage than 98% of facilities in the state, raising concerns about resident care. Specific incidents noted by inspectors include the employment of a nurse who is a registered sex offender, which poses a serious risk to residents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that an RN was on duty for at least 8 consecutive hours each day for a significant number of days, potentially compromising care quality. While the lack of fines is a strength, the overall staffing and management issues highlight significant weaknesses that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Tennessee
- #191/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Tennessee average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Tennessee avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Employment Screening
(Tag F0606)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on the TN Department of Health Guidelines for Sex Offenders, Registered Sex Offender Registry review, policy review, personnel file review, and interview, the facility failed to protect 24 of 24...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, TN Department of Health Guideline for sex offender review, personnel file review, Registered Sex offender review, and interview, the facility failed to administer in a manner t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from si...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy and interview, the facility failed to follow its policy and provide education and vaccination for COVID-19 to 3 of 5 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, Laundry Supervisor, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of the facility ' s Licensure Staffing Requirements, daily staffing schedules, staff time punches, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty at l...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual, and interview the facility failed to provide a qualified Infection C...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report an injury...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess residents for activities of daily living ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately when undated, opened, unlabeled, and unsecured medications were obse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 7 staff (Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 and #2, and Registered Nurse (RN) #1) served food under sanitary cond...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Hardin Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HARDIN HOME an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Hardin Home Staffed?
CMS rates HARDIN HOME's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Hardin Home?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at HARDIN HOME during 2021 to 2025. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Hardin Home?
HARDIN HOME is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 39 certified beds and approximately 25 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SAVANNAH, Tennessee.
How Does Hardin Home Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, HARDIN HOME's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hardin Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Hardin Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HARDIN HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Hardin Home Stick Around?
HARDIN HOME has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Hardin Home Ever Fined?
HARDIN HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Hardin Home on Any Federal Watch List?
HARDIN HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.