Silver Spring

1690 N. Treadway Blvd., Abilene, TX 79601 (325) 701-9975
For profit - Corporation 120 Beds HMG HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 7 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#1110 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Silver Spring nursing home in Abilene, Texas, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. They rank #1110 out of 1168 facilities in Texas, placing them in the bottom half, and #11 out of 12 in Taylor County, suggesting limited local options for better quality care. The facility is showing some improvement, with issues decreasing from 8 in 2024 to just 2 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, which is well below the Texas average, and they have more RN coverage than 89% of Texas facilities, ensuring better oversight of resident care. However, there are serious issues: residents have gone days without necessary treatments, and there have been critical failures to notify physicians about significant changes in residents' conditions, raising concerns about neglect and the overall safety of care.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#1110/1168
Bottom 5%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
8 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$25,974 in fines. Higher than 89% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
35 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 8 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Federal Fines: $25,974

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: HMG HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 35 deficiencies on record

7 life-threatening
Jun 2025 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for pain. Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's pain was recognized, properly assessed and received pain management in accordance with professional standards of practice. Facility nurse aides and occupational therapy assistant moved Resident #1 from the floor to the wheelchair to the bed, after a fall without a nurse assessing the resident for any pain or injuries on 4/8/25 at approximately 6PM. Facility nurse aides failed to relay Resident #1's pain to nurse immediately after a fall on 4/8/25 at approximately 6PM. Facility nurse failed to complete a proper pain assessment on Resident #1 when later notified of a resident leg pain on 04/08/25 at approximately 7:00PM. Resident #1 was transported to the local community hospital and was diagnosed with a femoral fracture. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 6.23.25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 6.23.25 at 4:20 pm. While the IJ was lowered on 6.25.25 at 4:27 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm, with a scope of isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could put residents at pain not being managed by the facility. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6.5.25 revealed Resident #1 was admitted on 4.8.25 and was [AGE] years old. Resident #1 had diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where a systemic health issue or imbalance impairs brain function, causing a range of symptoms from confusion and memory loss to coma), type 2 diabetes, cirrhosis of liver (a condition where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue, preventing the liver from functioning properly), and sepsis due to Escherichia coli (occurs when an E. coli infection spreads to the bloodstream and triggers a dangerous overreaction of the body's immune system, potentially leading to organ damage and even death). Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan reflected: No Care plan available. Resident #1 was only in building for 6 hours total. Record review of Resident #1's medical record dated 4.9.25 indicated: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Exam: {lain films of the left knee (xray). Findings: On the AP view there is a cortical irregularity in the lateral distal femoral metaphysis consistent with fracture. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes written by LVN W dated 4.8.25 indicated: Late Entry: Note Text: Pt. family member approached this nurse and reported that Pt. is c/o pain to the leg, according to family member the pain was R/T fall. This nurse explained to the family member that no fall, was reported during shift change. This nurse f/u to find out from Pt. when the fall occurred. It was reported that prior to shift change the resident was lowered to floor during toileting due to her legs getting too weak to stand. Pt. stated, I was being cleaned up in the restroom while standing and my legs gave up on me and sat in the floor. Head to toe assessment was completed, Pt. was A&O x2. Pt. was able to move the upper limb but refuse to move the lower limb and complained pain of 12 to the whole of left. Comparing L-leg to right leg, no shortness was noted however, Slight swelling was noted to left knee, but this nurse couldn't confirm if that was R/T fall because it was the 1st time seeing this Pt. Family explained that was not normal for Pt. Acetaminophen 325 mg po x 2 tabs was administered per order. Vital signs: T-97.3, BP-141/94. Day nurse, LVN A was contacted due to Pt. complain of fall, and LVN A said CNA B reported that Pt. had assisted fall. This explained to family that X-ray will be done to find out what was causing the pain but for stat X-ray pt. might has to transfer to the ER for and family said yes. EMT was contacted and at 9:03 pm Pt. together with family members left the facility to the ER. DON notified. During an interview on 6.3.25 at 12:05 pm LVN A stated he does remember Resident #1. He stated that he did do her initial documentation when Resident #1 admitted to the facility. He stated that the hospital never mentioned that Resident #1 needed lift assistance or anything like that. He stated that the resident was seen to transfer with no assistance, but he would say he would recommend Resident #1 at least had two persons to assist her. He stated he must have missed filling out the mobility/safety section in Resident #1 initial assessment. He stated that he should have filled this part of the document out because it indicates to other staff the type of assistance Resident #1 needed. He stated this information could help Resident #1 not sustain any falls. Record review of CNA B witness statement dated 4.8.25 indicated: CNA C then carefully raised Resident #1's leg so CNA D could put a pillow under Resident #1 knee and then CNA C carefully and slowly laid Resident #1 leg down on the pillow. The lady (Resident #1) didn't complain that it hurt until after CNA C had laid Resident #1 knee back down on the pillow. I gave Resident #1 the bed control as CNA D gave her the call light, I walked out of the room. Record review of CNA C witness statement dated 4.8.25 indicated: Me and CNA B held her up as PT E and CNA D tried to put the wheelchair underneath her. When she finally had the bottom in the wheelchair enough to pull her out of the bathroom, PT E told the lady to bend her knees so she can scoot back in the chair. At that time of bending the knee is when she yelled that it hurt. Record review of PT E witness statement dated 4.8.25 indicated: Transitioned resident from EOB to supine with 4 people. Resident complained of pain upon being positioned in supine and notified night shift nurse as day shift nurse was on the phone receiving report for new admission. During interview on 6.22.25 at 10:20 am PT E stated that when she went to report to LVN W that Resident #1 had a fall, she stated that all she told LVN W was that Resident #1 complained of left knee pain. She stated she did not tell the nurse that Resident #1 had a fall because she assumed LVN W already knew because CNA C let LVN A know about the fall. During an interview on 6.20.25 at 6:45 pm LVN W stated that a fall is any change in position from one height to another. She stated this was a fall and the resident should have been assessed. She stated during shift change LVN A was usually good about letting her know about every situation, but he forgot to on the day of the incident. She stated she could not remember at what time, but PT E came to her and said Resident #1 was complaining of left leg pain. She stated she should have asked more questions but did not. She stated she was in the middle of giving out medications, so she took 2 Tylenol to Resident #1. She stated she did not do an assessment of Resident #1 at this time, only that she gave Resident #1 pain medication. She stated later when she was working at the nurse's station and the daughter of Resident #1 came to her and stated that Resident #1 had a fall. She stated to the daughter, when, thinking it just happened. She stated the daughter said no earlier. She stated she went to assess the resident. She stated on doing an assessment you must do a head-to-toe assessment of the resident looking for any abnormalities. She stated, that can include, bruising, swelling, redness, etc. She stated that Resident #1's left knee/leg was a little bit swollen, and the resident did state it was painful. She stated this was the first time she had ever seen the resident since she was a new admit today, so she was not sure if this was the resident's baseline. She stated she went and called LVN A to ask if he knew anything and found out about the incident over the phone. She stated at that point she let the daughter know that there was no portable stat xray available at this time, so the only other option was to send the resident out to the hospital via EMS to go get the residents xray complete. She stated that was what the family wanted and that was why the resident was sent out. She stated she has no idea why anyone would have moved the resident from the floor to the wheelchair without letting a nurse assess the resident first and she has no idea why all this information was not provided to her during shift change. She stated when it comes to a fall and the resident was on the ground they are to stay there until the resident was assessed by a nurse. She stated in this case, if a fall occurs and the resident was assessed and noted to have pain to hip or knee area, she would make the resident comfortable on the floor and call ems because she would not want to move the resident if there was a break to the knee or hip. She stated but this did not happen. During an interview on 6.20.25 at 7:15 pm CNA D he stated that this was literally his first or second day on the job. He stated that when he came into work, he noticed that the residents call light was on so he was going to answer it. He stated that CNA B joined him because she had assisted the resident to the restroom and the resident had already started to pee and got some on herself. He stated so CNA B wanted to come and help him, so he was not cleaning and doing everything by himself. He stated they went into the resident room they assisted the resident to stand from toilet using gait belt. He stated they were both cleaning the resident up when the resident stated she couldn't do it and began to go down. He stated CNA B was behind the resident at this time in which the resident was lowered down onto CNA B. He stated it was very slow. He stated around the same time CNA C had entered the room. He stated he was not sure but believe CNA C went to let the nurse know about the assessment. He stated CNA C came back to the room and he was not sure how long but maybe 10 mins and PT E came by and asked if they needed assistance. He stated he can't remember if CNA B said anything about no assessment had been done by a nurse or not, but they all assisted the resident back into the wheelchair. He stated the only thing he could remember was that the resident was stating that her knee hurt while they were waiting on the nurse to assess the resident. He stated he was not sure why they didn't wait on the assessment to be completed but they should have waited. He stated this was all new to him. During an interview on 6.5.25 at 11:15 am admin stated that before a resident was accepted into the building the assessment of the resident should be complete. He stated the administration side he may not know everything, but he knows that the information that was needed before accepting the resident was if the resident needs any devices, (walker, wheelchair, etc.), if the resident was ambulatory, needs assistance, what kind of assistance, if the resident needs oxygen or any extra equipment. He stated this should all be known before the resident was accepted into the building. He stated this information is necessary to know that the facility can provide the proper care for the resident and that the resident will have all their needs met. He stated if any of this information was not acquired then it could result in an injury to the resident. During an interview on 6.5.25 at 1:25 pm the DON she stated that the readmit screener documentation should have been filled out completely which was not done. She stated LVN A should have completed that documentation so the staff/facility would have known the assistance required by the resident. She stated overall there were a few misses here in this situation, but she started in-services on the situation to cover documentation. She stated the pain assessment and head-to-toe should have been done while Resident #1 was still on the floor. She stated this did not occur. She stated there were a lot of misses that occurred during this incident. Record review of facility policy dated December 2016 titled: Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process indicated: Assessment and information collection includes (WHAT, WHERE and WHEN). The objective of the information collection (assessment) phase is to obtain, organize, and subsequently analyze information about a patient. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6.23.25 at 4:20 PM. The Administration was informed of the IJ. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 6.23.25 at 4:20 pm. Record review of Plan of Removal accepted on 6.24.25 at 12:10 PM reflected the following: Impact Statement: On 6/23/2025 an abbreviated survey was initiated on 6/23/25 the facility was provided with notification that the Survey Agency has determined that the conditions at the center constitute Immediate Jeopardy to resident health due to failure for 1 of 87 residents pain being recognized, properly assessed, and receiving pain management. What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? a. The resident involved in the incident on 4/8/25 received immediate pain management and evaluation once identified. The resident was sent to the emergency room on 4/8/25 and diagnosed with a femoral fracture. Resident's pain was managed per physician orders and follow-up care was provided. b. Ambassador rounds were completed by the interdisciplinary team on 4/8/25 and incident reports of falls that occurred in the last 24 hours were reviewed to ensure any resident pain was properly assessed, reported, and addressed by direct care staff and no other discrepancies were identified. What does the facility need to change immediately to keep residents safe and ensure it does not happen again? a. On 6/23/25 the Director of Nursing and/or nurse managers in-serviced direct care staff on recognizing, properly assessing, and receiving pain management. Staff educated on reporting recognized resident pain to the charge nurse, the charge nurse is to immediately assess the resident's pain, and administer pain medication in accordance to the results of the pain assessment completed. All Direct care staff employees will be in-serviced by the Director of Nursing and/or nurse managers on recognizing, properly assessing, and receiving pain management prior to their next scheduled shift. Staff members will recite understanding of the education to the educator and 5 staff interviews will be completed daily for seven days. b. The facility DON or nurse manager will in-service new hires during orientation, on recognizing, properly assessing, and receiving pain management prior to their next scheduled shift. Staff educated on reporting recognized resident pain to the charge nurse, the charge nurse is to immediately assess the resident's pain, and administer pain medication in accordance to the results of the pain assessment completed. Effectiveness of staff educated on recognizing, properly assessing, and receiving pain management will be evaluated with staff reciting information and 5 staff interviews per day for seven days to ensure information is retained. How will the system be monitored to ensure compliance? a. Starting 6/23/25 the DON or nurse manager will complete resident interviews and/or assessments daily for seven days to ensure are pain was recognized, properly assessed and received pain medication in a timely manner. Post the daily monitoring on 6/30/25 the DON/nurse manager will round on residents to ensure pain was recognized, properly assessed and received pain medication in a timely manner effectively 2x week X 6 weeks or until it is determined the metric is met. Any discrepancies identified will be addressed immediately by the nurse manager and further education provided by the DON or designee when necessary. b. Starting 6/23/25 the DON and/or nurse manager will review the 24 hour report in electronic medical record that identifies all nurse documentation, PRN pain administration, resident assessments completed, and progress note documentation daily for 7 days and then 5x week for 3 weeks to ensure any documented pain was recognized, properly assessed and received pain medication in a timely manner. c. Administrator and/or designee will review the 24 hour report and round on residents daily for seven days and then on a weekly basis for six weeks to ensure nurse managers are following the plan of removal or until it is determined the metric is met starting 6/23/25. Quality Assurance An impromptu Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement review of the plan of removal was completed on 6/23/25 with the Medical Director. The Medical Director has reviewed and agrees with this plan. Monitoring of facilities Plan of Removal through observations, interviews, and record reviews from 06/24/2025 to 06/25/2025: During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:10 pm CNA F stated she got in-serviced yesterday 6.23.25 at roughly late afternoon. She stated that there were so many that they molded together, but she knows she did at least 3. She stated one in-service covered falls. She stated that it covered what constitutes as a fall, what to do in case of a fall and who to call. She stated if a fall occurred assisted or not she was not allowed to touch the resident. She stated if there was another CNA with you that CNA can go and let the nurse know but if you were by yourself you need to call out for help because you do not leave the resident. She stated that nothing was to be done to the resident until the nursing assessment had been completed by the nurse. She stated the nursing assessment was to be completed by the nurse, and there was no reason for the resident to ever be moved until it was completed. She stated but if a resident did complain of pain, no associated to a fall or anything witnessed, then the CNA would ask the resident basic questions such as, how bad is the pain, how did you hurt yourself etc. She stated once that information was received she would go directly to the charge nurse to let them know the resident had pain. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:25 pm CNA G stated she has been doing this for many years and this was all a refresher for her. She stated that the topics discussed in the in-services were falls, nursing assessments and pain. She stated a fall is any time a resident ends up on the ground without intending to. She stated it did not matter if it was assisted or witnessed, with injury or no injury, a fall was to be reported to the charge nurse immediately. She stated she should not move the resident, sit the resident up, assist the resident in anyway. She stated the focus at that time was to make sure the resident did not move and stayed on the floor and then go and inform the charge nurse. She stated nothing at all was to be done even while waiting on the nurse to come and do the assessment. She stated ever fall in the building must have a nursing assessment completed. She stated lastly pain was discussed. She stated anytime a resident has any sort of pain, major or minor, she would repot to the charge nurse and let them know the resident was complaining of pain. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:35 pm CNA H stated she was in-serviced 3 different times over the past day or so. She stated pain was a big one she can remember. She stated she is not a nuse so assessing the resident for pain was not something required. She stated but inquiring about pain level and maybe how the resident hurt themselves was okay. She stated right when the resident let her know of any pain she would report it to the charge nurse. She stated the next two topics kind of went hand in hand. She stated that if a resident has a fall, assisted or not, it must be reported to the nurse and nothing should be done to the resident until the nuse has completed her assessment of the resident. She stated, essentially, if a resident falls, let charge nurse know, don't move the resident and wait for the nurse to do their assessment of the resident before any moving of the resident was allowed. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:45 pm CNA I stated any fall any was any change in residents plane. She stated even if it's a 3 inch movement, different plane means a fall. She stated it also doesn't matter if it was assisted, witnessed or unwitnessed it was still a fall and had to be reported to the nurse. She stated even while waiting on the nurse to get to the residents room, the resident was not to be moved or assisted in any way. She stated once the nurses assessment was complete she would be allowed to, with the help of the nurse, get the resident up. She stated the other in-service covered pain. She stated this could be any pain, in general or associated to a fall. She stated all pain should be immediately reported to the nurse and the nurse would come and do the assessment of the resident. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:00 pm RN J stated she has been nurse since 23. She stated she was in-serviced this morning before she was allowed to work. She stated that she went through a few in-services. She stated the first one covered falls. She stated, it covered what constitutes as a fall, with injury or no injury. She stated that the in-service covered what a CNA must do related to a fall and what a nurse must do related to a fall. She stated that a CNA was not to assist or move the resident, but only too report the fall to the nurse and wait for the nurse to come do the nursing assessment. She stated second the nursing assessment covered a head to toe assessment that checked for swelling, bruising, bleeding, how the resident was acting, etc. she stated if there were concerns the resident hit their head the resident would not be moved at all and EMS would be called to come and get the resident. She stated after assessment was completed on resident then the resident could be moved and then monitored. She stated lastly, if any resident complains of any sort of pain, to CNA, the CNA should come report to the nurse immediately, but if the pain was notated directly from resident to nurse, the nurse must do a head to toe assessment and pull meds pending level of pain or reach out to physician if pain was high. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:15 pm LVN K stated that this was a refresher, but it was everything that she did consistently. She stated the main topic was about falls and pain associated to falls. She stated the CNA's got a little bit different of an in-service then the nurses did. She stated for the nurses, the requirement was no matter how big of a fall, a nurse must go and assess the resident before they were allowed to be moved by anyone. She stated pain was covered and the overview was that any resident who complains of any sort of pain, associated to a fall or not should be assessed from head to toe and meds could be given associated to the level of pain and what medications were available to the resident. She stated primary focus, no moving of any resident associated to any fall could be done until the nursing assessment was completed. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:25 pm RN L stated that she was in-serviced and it covered 3 parts. She stated two parts went together, any fall occurs in the building a nurse must respond to the resident and do a full body head to toe assessment of the resident before the resident was allowed to be moved by anyone. She stated that CNA's were to either call for help while still being able to see the resident or have another CNA who was with them to go and let the nurse know that they had a fall and a nursing assessment must be done. She stated that all pain in the same process should be notated to the nurse at this time as well. She stated beyond a fall, any pain a resident notates to any CNA, the CNA must immediately come to the nurse and let the nurse know of the pain and the nurse must go and perform a pain assessment on the resident and provide the resident with any medication the resident may have for pain or reach out to the physician. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:45 pm ADON stated that he was aware of the situation going on. He stated that he has been helping/part of every in-service provided by the DON to all nursing staff. He stated that the main topic was falls and pain, which went for both CNA's and nurses. He stated that any fall in the facility must be responded to and a nurse must do a nursing assessment before the resident was allowed to be moved at all. He stated that it was imperative that any CNA does not move the resident at all until the resident was assessed by the nurse. He stated it was also imperative that a nurse do a head to toe nursing assessment on all residents who had a fall, checking for swelling, bruising, blood, etc. he stated second topic for both CNA and nurse was to communicate fully to each other when any resident complains of pain anywhere on their body. He stated the CNA just needs to inform the nurse that resident complained of pain and where on the body. He stated it was then the nurses responsibility to go and assess the resident for any pain. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 3:00 pm CNA M stated she was in serviced last night before she came on shift. Phone interview. She stated that she got in-serviced the night before. She stated it was roughly around 5:30pm. She stated there were 3 topics covered, falls, pain, and nursing assessments. She stated the main thing for the CNA's that was covered was falls. She stated the definition of a call, which was anytime a residents body went to the floor. She stated it does not matter if it was assisted or not, it was still considered a fall. She stated second the topic that was associated to the fall was that a CNA's was not to move or get the resident up after the fall unless a nurse had completed the nursing assessment of the resident. She stated lastly was pain, she stated pain does not have to be only associated to a fall but anytime a resident complains of any pain on their body they are to report it to the nurse so the nurse could come and do a pain assessment of the resident. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:10 pm CNA N stated that there were 3 topics covered. She stated pain, falls, and nursing assessment. She stated that pain can be any complaint made by the resident no matter how big or small of a complaint, the complaint should be reported to the nurse immediately. She stated she was not a nurse so she would not assess the resident for pain but may ask how it happened or level of pain. She stated the other topic that was covered, was falls and reporting falls to the nurse. She stated not only do you have to report the fall to the nurse but stay with the resident, do not move them until the nurse has physically come and done a nursing assessment. She stated that it was drilled into the CNA's that they are not to move the resident for no reason until that nursing assessment was completed. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:15 pm CNA O stated she works nights and can work both sides. she stated she got in-serviced yesterday 6.23.25 at roughly late afternoon. She stated that there were so many that they molded together, but she knows she did at least 3. She stated one in-service covered falls. She stated that it covered what constitutes as a fall, what to do in case of a fall and who to call. She stated if a fall occurred assisted or not she was not allowed to touch the resident. She stated if there was another CNA with you that CNA can go and let the nurse know but if you were by yourself you need to call out for help because you do not leave the resident. She stated that nothing was to be done to the resident until the nursing assessment had been completed by the nurse. She stated the nursing assessment was to be completed by the nurse, and there was no reason for the resident to ever be moved until it was completed. She stated but if a resident did complain of pain, no associated to a fall or anything witnessed, then the CNA would ask the resident basic questions such as, how bad is the pain, how did you hurt yourself etc. She stated once that information was received she would go directly to the charge nurse to let them know the resident had pain. Record Review of in-service presented by DON titled communication of complaints of pain-CNA's from residents, dated 6.23.25, signature page provided. Inservice covered CAN/CMA's: When a resident reports having pain, specifically after a fall, ask the resident where the pain is coming from on their body. Then tell the resident's charge nurse immediately. DO NOT MOVE RESIDENT AFTER A FALL WITHOUT A NURSE COMPLETING AN ASSESSMENT OF PAIN AND/OR INJURY. All employees interviewed were verified with signatures. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:20 pm LVN P stated she worked the north side. She stated that she got in-serviced last night. She stated that the main topic covered for the nurses was that an assessment had to be done from head to toe for each resident now matter how minor of a fall occurred. She stated there was no excuse that a resident after a fall was not assessed before the resident was moved off of the ground. She stated the second topic covered was pain in general. She stated pain associated to a fall or not, must be brought to the attention of the nurse even if it was minor. She stated once being reported that a resident complained of pain, the nurse must go to the resident and assess the resident for pain level, location, injury, etc. she stated once the pain was identified, medications could be administered if resident has prn meds or pain meds in general. Record review of in-service presented by DON titled Resident Assessment of Pain-Nurses. Do not move resident after a fall without completing an assessment of pain and/or injury. Assess: onset- Mechanism of injury or etiology of pain, if identifiable. Location/distribution. Duration. Course or temporal pattern. Character and quality of the pain. Aggravating/provoking factors. Alleviating factors. And Associated symptoms. Administer pain medication as ordered by physician. If no pain medication is previously ordered by physician, notify physician immediately of residents pain/pain assessment. Acquire orders as given by physician for pain control and/or additional orders as received. All employees interviewed were verified with signatures. Record Review of Qapi Signature Page. Quapi meeting covering PoR and topic of IJ. Attendees included administrator, Dr A, DON, ADON, RUP, and DRO. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:40 pm RN Q stated that she got in-serviced last night. She stated that the main topic covered for the nurses was that an assessment had to be done from head to toe for each resident now matter how minor of a fall occurred. She stated there was no excuse that a resident after a fall was not assessed before the resident was moved off of the ground. She stated the second topic covered was pain in general. She stated pain associated to a fall or not, must be brought to the attention of the nurse even if it was minor. She stated once being reported that a resident complained of pain, the nurse must go to the resident and assess the resident for pain level, location, injury, etc. she stated once the pain was identified, medications could be administered if resident has prn meds or pain meds in general. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:50 pm CNA R stated topics covered pain, then falls, wait for assessment before anyone is moved. She stated there were a few in-services. She stated that the topics discussed in the in-services were falls, nursing assessments and pain. She stated a fall is any time a resident ends up on the ground without intending to. She stated it did not matter if it was assisted or witnessed, with injury or no injury, a fall was to be reported to the charge nurse immediately. She stated she should not move the resident, sit the resident up, assist the resident in anyway. She stated the focus at that time was to make sure the resident did not move and stayed on the floor [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate com...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety anfor 1 of 8 (Resident #1) resident reviewed for staffing, in that: Facility failed to ensure licensed nurses and nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents need. Facility nurse aides failed to relay resident complaint of pain to appropriate nurse after a fall so that resident could be promptly assessed. Facility nurse failed to provide the on-coming nurse with information about the residents assisted fall from earlier in the day in order for resident to be monitored. Facility nurse aides and staff (PT) moved a resident after a fall without a nurse completing an assessment of resident for pain or injury. Facility nurses did not fully assess resident pain before administering pain medication. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 6.23.25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 6.23.25 at 4:20 pm. While the IJ was removed on 6.25.25 at 4:27 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm, with a scope of isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could put residents at risk of not being provided care by nursing staff with sufficient skills/training. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6.5.25 revealed Resident #1 was admitted on 4.8.25 and was [AGE] years old. Resident #1 had diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where a systemic health issue or imbalance impairs brain function, causing a range of symptoms from confusion and memory loss to coma), type 2 diabetes, cirrhosis of liver (a condition where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue, preventing the liver from functioning properly), and sepsis due to Escherichia coli (occurs when an E. coli infection spreads to the bloodstream and triggers a dangerous overreaction of the body's immune system, potentially leading to organ damage and even death). Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan reflected: No Care plan available. Resident #1 was only in building for 6 hours total. Record review of Resident #1's medical record dated 4.9.25 indicated: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Exam: {lain films of the left knee (xray). Findings: On the AP view there is a cortical irregularity in the lateral distal femoral metaphysis consistent with fracture (fracture of femur). Record review of Resident #1's admit/readmit form indicated all sections to be completed by LVN A except for section mobility/safety. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 4.8.25 indicated: Late Entry: Note Text: Pt. family member approached this nurse and reported that Pt. is c/o pain to the leg, according to family member the pain was R/T fall. This nurse explained to the family member that no fall, was reported during shift change. This nurse f/u to find out from Pt. when the fall occurred. It was reported that prior to shift change the resident was lowered to floor during toileting due to her legs getting too weak to stand. Pt. stated, I was being cleaned up in the restroom while standing and my legs gave up on me and sat in the floor. Head to toe assessment was completed, Pt. was A&O x2. Pt. was able to move the upper limb but refuse to move the lower limb and complained pain of 12 to the whole of left. Comparing L-leg to right leg, no shortness was noted however, Slight swelling was noted to left knee, but this nurse couldn't confirm if that was R/T fall because it was the 1st time seeing this Pt. Family explained that was not normal for Pt. Acetaminophen 325 mg po x 2 tabs was administered per order. Vital signs: T-97.3, BP-141/94. Day nurse, LVN A was contacted due to Pt. complain of fall, and LVN A said CNA B reported that Pt. had assisted fall. This explained to family that X-ray will be done to find out what was causing the pain but for stat X-ray pt. might has to transfer to the ER for and family said yes. EMT was contacted and at 9:03 pm Pt. together with family members left the facility to the ER. DON notified. During an interview on 6.3.25 at 11:45 am CNA B stated the resident was brand new that day. She stated that when she went to answer the call light the resident was already in her wheelchair. She stated before she went to the restroom, she asked the resident how stable she was and if she needed much help because she was not sure how much assistance the resident needed. She stated that the resident told her that at the hospital she really didn't even need much assistance to transfer from wheelchair to toilet. She stated that she took the resident to the restroom and told the resident to use her call light after she was done, and she would come help her. She stated the resident used to the call light indicating resident was complete. She stated that CNA D and herself went to the resident's room and went to assist the resident off the toilet. She stated the resident stood up and she was standing behind the resident while CNA D was on the front/side of the resident. She stated the resident stood fully up, then stated I can't do this, and went to sit back down. She stated the resident started to sit down and slowly slid down to the ground, basically using her legs as a slide down to the floor landing on her foot. She stated that CNA C let LVN A know of the assisted fall and then was called into Resident #1's room, the entire time the resident was on her foot, the resident was assisted back to the wheelchair and then put back into bed. She stated that roughly 15min later the resident complained of her left knee hurting. She stated this all happened around shift change, the resident was sent out and she is not sure what has happened since then. During an interview on 6.3.25 at 1:55 pm LVN A stated he did not go in and do an assessment of the resident because the way he was told it was like the resident just was assisted and sat on the floor. He stated he should have went and assessed Resident #1 before she was moved from the floor. He stated any resident that sustained a fall, must be assessed by a nurse before the resident was allowed to be moved. During an interview on 6.5.25 at 11:55 am CNA C stated that the nurse should have come and assessed the resident, but it did not happen. She stated she let him know and he said OK but never came down to assess the resident. She stated the protocol for any fall, assisted or not needs to be assessed by a nurse before moved. She stated blood pressure and vitals everything before the resident was moved, but this did not happen. During interview on 6.22.25 at 10:20 am PT E stated that when she went to report to LVN W that Resident #1 had a fall, she stated that all she told LVN W was that Resident #1 complained of left knee pain. She stated she did not tell the nurse that Resident #1 had a fall because she assumed LVN W already knew because CNA C let LVN A know about the fall. Record review of CNA B witness statement dated 4.8.25 indicated: CNA C then carefully raised Resident #1's leg so CNA D could put a pillow under Resident #1 knee and then CNA C carefully and slowly laid Resident #1 leg down on the pillow. The lady (Resident #1) didn't complain that it hurt until after CNA C had laid Resident #1 knee back down on the pillow. I gave Resident #1 the bed control as CNA D gave her the call light, I walked out of the room. Record review of CNA C witness statement dated 4.8.25 indicated: Me and CNA B held her up as PT E and CNA D tried to put the wheelchair underneath her. When she finally had the bottom in the wheelchair enough to pull her out of the bathroom, PT E told the lady to bend her knees so she can scoot back in the chair. At that time of bending the knee is when she yelled that it hurt. Record review of PT E witness statement dated 4.8.25 indicated: Transitioned resident from EOB to supine with 4 people. Resident complained of pain upon being positioned in supine and notified night shift nurse as day shift nurse was on the phone receiving report for new admission. During an interview on 6.20.25 at 6:45 pm LVN W stated that a fall is any change in position from one height to another. She stated this was a fall and the resident should have been assessed. She stated that PT E did let her know about Resident #1's knee pain so she went and gave Resident #1 two Tylenol. She stated she did not assess Resident #1 at this time, but only gave her Tylenol. She stated during shift change LVN A was usually good about letting her know about every situation, but he forgot to on the day of the incident. She stated that she was working at the nurse's station and the of the resident came to her and stated that the resident had a fall. She stated to the, when, thinking it just happened. She stated the said no earlier. She stated she went to assess the resident. She stated on doing an assessment you must do a head-to-toe assessment of the resident looking for any abnormalities. She stated, that can include, bruising, swelling, redness, etc. She stated that the resident's left leg/knee was a little bit swollen, and the resident did state it was painful. She stated this was the first time she had ever seen the resident since she was a new admit today, so she was not sure if this was the resident's baseline. She stated she went and called [NAME] to ask if he knew anything and found out about the incident over the phone. She stated at that point she let the daughter know that there was no portable stat xray available at this time, so the only other option was to send the resident out to the hospital via EMS to go get the residents xray complete. She stated that was what the family wanted and that was why the resident was sent out. She stated she has no idea why anyone would have moved the resident from the floor to the wheelchair without letting a nurse assess the resident first and she has no idea why all this information was not provided to her during shift change. She stated when it comes to a fall and the resident was on the ground they are to stay there until the resident was assessed by a nurse. She stated in this case, if a fall occurs and the resident was assessed and noted to have pain to hip or knee area, she would make the resident comfortable on the floor and call EMS because she would not want to move the resident if there was a break to the knee or hip. She stated but this did not happen. During an interview on 6.5.25 at 11:15 am Admin stated that from what he knows, any fall that occurs in the building a nurse must go and assess the resident before the resident is allowed to be moved from the ground. He stated this was protocol and from what he found out; this did not occur. During an interview on 6.5.25 at 1:25 pm DON stated this was absolutely a fall. She stated the first time she heard of the incident was when the night nurse LVN E reached out to her asking her if she was aware of any fall by that resident. She stated she didn't know, she stated she started to reach out to her aids via text and realized this was a fall. She stated that LVN A the nurse on shift during the incident should have gone and assessed the resident. She stated that the way it was described to LVN A it was not a fall, so he didn't assess. She stated it should have been treated as a fall. She stated overall there were a few misses here in this situation, but she started in-services on the situation to cover documentation and what was considered a fall. She stated a change in plane was considered a fall. Record review of facility policy dated September 2012 titled: Falls-Clinical Protocol indicated: 2. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following: a. vital signs, b. recent injury, especially fracture or head injury, c. musculoskeletal function, observing for changing in normal range of motion, weight bearing etc., d. change in cognition or level of consciousness, e. neurological status, f. pain, g. frequency and number of falls since last physician visit. H. precipitating factors, details on how fall occurred, i. all current medications, especially those associated with dizziness or lethargy, and j. all active diagnosis. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6.23.25 at 4:20 PM. The Administration was informed of the IJ. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 6.23.25 at 4:20 pm. And a Pla of Removal was requested. The facility Plan of Removal was accepted on 6.24.25 at 12:10 PM and reflected the following: Impact Statement: On 6/23/2025 an abbreviated survey was initiated on 6/23/25 the facility was provided notification that the Survey Agency has determined that the conditions at the center constitute Immediate Jeopardy to resident health due to failure to protect 1 of 87 residents in ensuring licensed nurses and nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident's needs. What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? a. The resident involved in the incident on 4/8/25 received immediate pain management and evaluation once identified. The resident was sent to the emergency room on 4/8/25 and diagnosed with a femoral fracture. Resident's pain was managed per physician orders and follow-up care was provided. Resident was closely monitored for any complications related to the injury or delayed treatment on 4/8/25. b. On 6/23/25 all current residents who have had an incident in the last two weeks were reviewed to ensure the resident was not moved prior to a nurse assessing the patient and pain was assessed by licensed nurse prior to administering medication. No other discrepancies identified with licensed nurses and nurse aides being able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for the residents needs. What does the facility need to change immediately to keep residents safe and ensure it does not happen again? a. On 6/23/25 the Director of Nursing and/or nurse managers initiated an in-service direct care staff reporting recognized resident pain to the charge nurse, the charge nurse is to immediately assess the resident's pain, and administer pain medication in accordance to the results of the pain assessment completed. The in-service will be completed by 6/24/25. All Direct care staff employees will be in-serviced by the Director of Nursing and/or nurse managers on recognizing, properly assessing, and receiving pain management and any PRN or weekend staff will be in-serviced by 6/24/2025. If PRN or weekend staff are unable to be reached, they will be removed from the schedule until in-service is completed. Effectiveness of staff educated on reporting recognized resident pain to the charge nurse, the charge nurse is to immediately assess the resident's pain, and administer pain medication in accordance to the results of the pain assessment completed will be evaluated with staff reciting information and 5 staff interviews per day for seven days to ensure information is retained. b. On 6/23/25 an in-service was initiated by the Director of Nursing and nurse managers with nurse aides on relaying resident's complaint of pain to charge nurse when a resident expresses signs of pain and not moving a resident after a fall without a nurse completing an assessment of resident for pain or injury. All nursing assistants will be in-serviced by 6/24/2025 by the Director of Nursing and/or nurse managers on relaying resident's complaint of pain to charge nurse when a resident expresses signs of pain and not moving a resident after a fall without a nurse completing an assessment of resident for pain or injury including PRN and Weekend staff. If staff are unable to be reached to provide in-service by 6/24/25 they will removed from the schedule until in-service is completed. Effectiveness of staff educated on relaying resident's complaint of pain to charge nurse when a resident expresses signs of pain and not moving a resident after a fall without a nurse completing an assessment of resident for pain or injury will be evaluated with staff reciting information and 5 staff interviews per day for seven days to ensure information is retained. c. On 6/23/25 the Director of Nursing and nurse managers initiated an in-service with licensed nurses on completing a full assessment of a residents pain prior to administering pain medication. The in-service will be completed 6/24/25. All licensed nurses will be in-serviced by the Director of Nursing and/or nurse managers initiated an in-service with licensed nurses on completing a full assessment of a residents pain prior to administering pain medication including PRN and weekend staff by 6/24/25 or they will be removed from the schedule until in-service is completed. Effectiveness of staff educated on completing a full assessment of a residents pain prior to administering pain medication will be evaluated with staff reciting information and 5 staff interviews per day for seven days to ensure information is retained. d. The facility DON or nurse manager will in-service new hire nursing assistants and licensed nurses during orientation, relaying resident's complaint of pain to nurse so the resident can be properly assessed, not to move a resident post resident fall without a nurse completing an assessment of resident for pain or injury, and the need to fully assess a resident's pain before administering pain medication. Staff members will recite understanding of the education to the educator. How will the system be monitored to ensure compliance? a. Starting 6/23/25 the DON or nurse manager will complete interviews and/or assessments with residents daily for seven days to ensure pain was recognized, properly assessed and received pain medication in a timely manner. Post the daily monitoring on 6/30/25 the DON/nurse manager will round on residents to ensure pain was recognized, properly assessed and received pain medication in a timely manner effectively 2x week X 6 weeks or until it is determined the metric is met. Any discrepancies identified will be addressed immediately by the nurse manager and further education provided by the DON or designee when necessary. b. Starting 6/23/25 the DON and/or nurse manager will review the 24 hour report in electronic medical record that identifies all nurse documentation, PRN pain administration, resident assessments completed, and progress note documentation daily for 7 days and then 5x week for 3 weeks to ensure any documented pain was recognized, properly assessed, the resident was fully assessed prior to pain medication administration, and received pain medication in a timely manner c. Starting on 6/23/25 the DON and/or nurse manager will review fall incident reports daily in the electronic medical record for seven days and then 3x week for six weeks to ensure resident was assessed for pain and/or injury by a licensed nurse prior to moving the resident post fall and that the resident was fully assessed for pain prior to providing pain medication by the licensed nurse. If it is identified that a resident was not assessed prior to being moved, the resident will immediately be assessed and the employee will receive further education. d. Administrator and/or designee will review the 24 hour report in the electronic medical record and round on residents daily for seven days and then on a weekly for six weeks basis to ensure nurse managers are following the plan of removal of ensuring staff are competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident needs or until it is determined the metric is met starting 6/23/25. Quality Assurance An impromptu Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement review of the plan of removal was completed on 6/23/25 with the Medical Director. The Medical Director has reviewed and agrees with this plan. Monitoring of facilities Plan of Removal through observations, interviews, and record reviews from 06/24/2025 to 06/25/2025 revealed: During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:10 pm CNA F stated she got in-serviced yesterday 6.23.25 at roughly late afternoon. She stated that there were so many that they molded together, but she knows she did at least 3. She stated one in-service covered falls. She stated that it covered what constitutes as a fall, what to do in case of a fall and who to call. She stated if a fall occurred assisted or not she was not allowed to touch the resident. She stated if there was another CNA with you that CNA can go and let the nurse know but if you were by yourself you need to call out for help because you do not leave the resident. She stated that nothing was to be done to the resident until the nursing assessment had been completed by the nurse. She stated the nursing assessment was to be completed by the nurse, and there was no reason for the resident to ever be moved until it was completed. She stated but if a resident did complain of pain, no associated to a fall or anything witnessed, then the CNA would ask the resident basic questions such as, how bad is the pain, how did you hurt yourself etc. She stated once that information was received she would go directly to the charge nurse to let them know the resident had pain. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:25 pm CNA G stated she has been doing this for many years and this was all a refresher for her. She stated that the topics discussed in the in-services were falls, nursing assessments and pain. She stated a fall is any time a resident ends up on the ground without intending to. She stated it did not matter if it was assisted or witnessed, with injury or no injury, a fall was to be reported to the charge nurse immediately. She stated she should not move the resident, sit the resident up, assist the resident in anyway. She stated the focus at that time was to make sure the resident did not move and stayed on the floor and then go and inform the charge nurse. She stated nothing at all was to be done even while waiting on the nurse to come and do the assessment. She stated ever fall in the building must have a nursing assessment completed. She stated lastly pain was discussed. She stated anytime a resident has any sort of pain, major or minor, she would repot to the charge nurse and let them know the resident was complaining of pain. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:35 pm CNA H stated she was in-serviced 3 different times over the past day or so. She stated pain was a big one she can remember. She stated she is not a nuse so assessing the resident for pain was not something required. She stated but inquiring about pain level and maybe how the resident hurt themselves was okay. She stated right when the resident let her know of any pain she would report it to the charge nurse. She stated the next two topics kind of went hand in hand. She stated that if a resident has a fall, assisted or not, it must be reported to the nurse and nothing should be done to the resident until the nuse has completed her assessment of the resident. She stated, essentially, if a resident falls, let charge nurse know, don't move the resident and wait for the nurse to do their assessment of the resident before any moving of the resident was allowed. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 1:45 pm CNA I stated any fall any was any change in residents plane. She stated even if it's a 3 inch movement, different plane means a fall. She stated it also doesn't matter if it was assisted, witnessed or unwitnessed it was still a fall and had to be reported to the nurse. She stated even while waiting on the nurse to get to the residents room, the resident was not to be moved or assisted in any way. She stated once the nurses assessment was complete she would be allowed to, with the help of the nurse, get the resident up. She stated the other in-service covered pain. She stated this could be any pain, in general or associated to a fall. She stated all pain should be immediately reported to the nurse and the nurse would come and do the assessment of the resident. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:00 pm RN J stated she has been nurse since 2023. She stated she was in-serviced this morning before she was allowed to work. She stated that she went through a few in-services. She stated the first one covered falls. She stated, it covered what constitutes as a fall, with injury or no injury. She stated that the in-service covered what a CNA must do related to a fall and what a nurse must do related to a fall. She stated that a CNA was not to assist or move the resident, but only too report the fall to the nurse and wait for the nurse to come do the nursing assessment. She stated second the nursing assessment covered a head to toe assessment that checked for swelling, bruising, bleeding, how the resident was acting, etc. she stated if there were concerns the resident hit their head the resident would not be moved at all and EMS would be called to come and get the resident. She stated after assessment was completed on resident then the resident could be moved and then monitored. She stated lastly, if any resident complains of any sort of pain, to CNA, the CNA should come report to the nurse immediately, but if the pain was notated directly from resident to nurse, the nurse must do a head to toe assessment and pull meds pending level of pain or reach out to physician if pain was high. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:15 pm LVN K stated that this was a refresher, but it was everything that she did consistently. She stated the main topic was about falls and pain associated to falls. She stated the CNA's got a little bit different of an in-service then the nurses did. She stated for the nurses, the requirement was no matter how big of a fall, a nurse must go and assess the resident before they were allowed to be moved by anyone. She stated pain was covered and the overview was that any resident who complains of any sort of pain, associated to a fall or not should be assessed from head to toe and meds could be given associated to the level of pain and what medications were available to the resident. She stated primary focus, no moving of any resident associated to any fall could be done until the nursing assessment was completed. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:25 pm RN L stated that she was in-serviced and it covered 3 parts. She stated two parts went together, any fall occurs in the building a nurse must respond to the resident and do a full body head to toe assessment of the resident before the resident was allowed to be moved by anyone. She stated that CNA's were to either call for help while still being able to see the resident or have another CNA who was with them to go and let the nurse know that they had a fall and a nursing assessment must be done. She stated that all pain in the same process should be notated to the nurse at this time as well. She stated beyond a fall, any pain a resident notates to any CNA, the CNA must immediately come to the nurse and let the nurse know of the pain and the nurse must go and perform a pain assessment on the resident and provide the resident with any medication the resident may have for pain or reach out to the physician. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 2:45 pm ADON stated that he was aware of the situation going on. He stated that he has been helping/part of every in-service provided by the DON to all nursing staff. He stated that the main topic was falls and pain, which went for both CNA's and nurses. He stated that any fall in the facility must be responded to and a nurse must do a nursing assessment before the resident was allowed to be moved at all. He stated that it was imperative that any CNA does not move the resident at all until the resident was assessed by the nurse. He stated it was also imperative that a nurse do a head to toe nursing assessment on all residents who had a fall, checking for swelling, bruising, blood, etc. he stated second topic for both CNA and nurse was to communicate fully to each other when any resident complains of pain anywhere on their body. He stated the CNA just needs to inform the nurse that resident complained of pain and where on the body. He stated it was then the nurses responsibility to go and assess the resident for any pain. During an interview on 6.24.25 at 3:00 pm CNA M stated she was in serviced last night before she came on shift. Phone interview. She stated that she got in-serviced the night before. She stated it was roughly around 5:30pm. She stated there were 3 topics covered, falls, pain, and nursing assessments. She stated the main thing for the CNA's that was covered was falls. She stated the definition of a call, which was anytime a residents body went to the floor. She stated it does not matter if it was assisted or not, it was still considered a fall. She stated second the topic that was associated to the fall was that a CNA's was not to move or get the resident up after the fall unless a nurse had completed the nursing assessment of the resident. She stated lastly was pain, she stated pain does not have to be only associated to a fall but anytime a resident complains of any pain on their body they are to report it to the nurse so the nurse could come and do a pain assessment of the resident. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:10 pm CNA N stated that there were 3 topics covered. She stated pain, falls, and nursing assessment. She stated that pain can be any complaint made by the resident no matter how big or small of a complaint, the complaint should be reported to the nurse immediately. She stated she was not a nurse so she would not assess the resident for pain but may ask how it happened or level of pain. She stated the other topic that was covered, was falls and reporting falls to the nurse. She stated not only do you have to report the fall to the nurse but stay with the resident, do not move them until the nurse has physically come and done a nursing assessment. She stated that it was drilled into the CNA's that they are not to move the resident for no reason until that nursing assessment was completed. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:15 pm CNA O stated she works nights and can work both sides. she stated she got in-serviced yesterday 6.23.25 at roughly late afternoon. She stated that there were so many that they molded together, but she knows she did at least 3. She stated one in-service covered falls. She stated that it covered what constitutes as a fall, what to do in case of a fall and who to call. She stated if a fall occurred assisted or not, she was not allowed to touch the resident. She stated if there was another CNA with you that CNA can go and let the nurse know but if you were by yourself you need to call out for help because you do not leave the resident. She stated that nothing was to be done to the resident until the nursing assessment had been completed by the nurse. She stated the nursing assessment was to be completed by the nurse, and there was no reason for the resident to ever be moved until it was completed. She stated but if a resident did complain of pain, no associated to a fall or anything witnessed, then the CNA would ask the resident basic questions such as, how bad is the pain, how did you hurt yourself etc. She stated once that information was received she would go directly to the charge nurse to let them know the resident had pain. Record Review of in-service presented by DON titled communication of complaints of pain-CNA's from residents, dated 6.23.25, signature page provided. Inservice covered CAN/CMA's: When a resident reports having pain, specifically after a fall, ask the resident where the pain is coming from on their body. Then tell the resident's charge nurse immediately. DO NOT MOVE RESIDENT AFTER A FALL WITHOUT A NURSE COMPLETING AN ASSESSMENT OF PAIN AND/OR INJURY. All employees interviewed were verified with signatures. During a phone interview on 6.24.25 at 3:20 pm LVN P stated she worked the north side. She stated that she got in-serviced last nig[TRUNCATED]
Nov 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 4 (Resident #13) Resident's rooms observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure that Resident # 13's blinds were free from dust. The facility's failure placed the residents at risk for diminished quality of life and discomfort. The findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 11/07/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with most recent admission on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Encephalopathy (central nervous system diseases located in brain), Hypothyroidism, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, Heart failure and anxiety. Record review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: Section C- Cognitive Patterns Resident #13 had a BIMS of 13, meaning she was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #13's care plan dated revealed Resident #13 had oxygen therapy prn related to her Congestive Heart Failure. During an observation and interview on 11/06/24 at 2:51 PM Resident #13 stated she wished that her blinds were cleaned and did not have dust on them. Resident #13 stated the dust on the blinds irritated her allergies. The blinds were observed to have a layer of dust on them. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 1:44 PM the HK DM stated her expectation was resident's rooms were to have been dusted at least every other day; she stated there should not have been dust on the blinds. The HK DM stated the housekeepers were responsible to ensure that blinds were cleaned daily and ultimately it was the HK manager 's responsibility. The HK DM stated the effect on residents could have been Resident's allergies being agitated by breathing in the dust. The HK DM stated what led to the failure was staff getting in a hurry and skipping steps. During an interview on 11/07/2024 at 1:55 PM the ADMN stated his expectation was that housekeeping clean residents' room daily. The ADMN stated there should not have been dust on the blinds. The ADMN stated it was the responsibility of the housekeeper and housekeeper manager to ensure that blinds were being cleaned. The ADMN stated dust on blinds could have caused residents' allergies to be agitated by dust in the room. The ADMN sated lack of supervision of the housekeeping staff, by the housekeeping supervisor, led to the failure. Record review of facility form tilted 5- step Daily Room Cleaning revealed: Horizontal surfaces- disinfected Using a solution of properly diluted germicide, sanitize all horizontal surfaces. As you enter the room, work clockwise around the room hitting all surfaces. Use your high duster to dust hard to reach areas, such as the tops of closets, high lights, and ceilings areas as needed. Tabletops, headboards, windowsills.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in locked compartments and only authorized personnel were permitted to have access to the keys...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in locked compartments and only authorized personnel were permitted to have access to the keys for 1 cart (medication cart Hall 500) of 3 medication carts reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure medication cart Hall 500 was locked and secured when unattended. These failures could place all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of , medications/biologicals or misappropriation of medications, or drug diversions. Findings included: During an observation on 11/05/2024 at 11:24 AM the medication cart was unlocked and not secured and left in the middle of the 500 hallway. RN A was in a resident's room with resident's door closed. The medication cart was not within eyesight of the nurse and narcotics were under one lock, instead of two. The unlocked medication cart contained prescription and OTC medications that included eye medications, stool softeners, antipsychotics, Insulins, Blood Pressure Medications, Narcotics, antibiotics, diuretics, lidocaine cream, and nasal sprays. One resident and one visitor were observed to have walked past the unlocked medication cart while it was unattended. During an interview on 11/05/2024 at 11:24 AM RN A stated she was responsible for this medication cart and there were 8 residents' medications on the cart. RN A stated that she knew better and did not know why she left the medication cart unlocked. RN A stated someone could access the cart and take medications that were not prescribed for them. RN A stated this could have caused harmful side effects such as allergic reaction for the residents. RN A stated she had been trained on locking the medication cart when not in use. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 02:05 PM the DON stated medications carts should be locked when not in use, unattended and not in line of sight. The DON stated she believed the nurse being distracted led to this failure. The DON stated nurses are trained upon hire and with routine education on security of medication carts. The DON stated possible harm to residents would be if a resident accessed the medication cart and took a medication that was not prescribed for them. The DON stated if a resident took a medication not prescribed for them there could have been adverse side effects. The DON stated locked medication carts were monitored by the two ADON's, herself and the ADMN. Review of facility's policy titled Security of Medication Cart dated Revised April 2007: Policy statement The medication cart shall be secured during medication passes. 1. The nurse must secure the medication cart during the medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry. 2. The medication cart should be parked in the doorway of the resident's room during the medication pass. The cart doors and drawers should be facing the resident's room. 3. When it is not possible to park the medication cart in the doorway, the cart should be parking in the hallway against the wall with doors and drawers facing the wall. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. 4. When the medication cart is not being used, it must be locked and parked at the nurses' station or inside the medication room.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control progra...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 (CNA-E and LVN-F) staff observed during incontinent care and wound care. The facility failed to ensure that staff (CNA-E) performed proper peri-care (incontinent care) using improper hand hygiene for Resident #33. The facility failed to ensure that staff (LVN-F) performed proper wound care for Resident #33. These failures placed residents of the facility at risk of infections from incontinent care and wound care. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #33's Face Sheet dated 11/06/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and his original admission on [DATE]. Review of Resident #33's diagnoses revealed: Type 2 Diabetes, multiple Pressure Ulcer of unspecified stages, and Muscle Weakness. Record review of Resident # 33's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior a BIMS score of 08 (moderately impaired cognition). Section H-Bladder and Bowel, Indwelling catheter, and always incontinent. During observation and interview on 11/06/2024 at 10:04 AM, CNA-E had not changed her gloves or perform hand hygiene from dirty to clean during the peri care of Resident #33. CNA E was observed to touch the clean linens and to reposition the resident while wearing her soiled gloves. CNA E stated she was supposed to have done hand hygiene between dirty and clean gloves as well as not touching clean linens or the resident before taking her dirty gloves off. CNA-E stated there could have possibly been cross contamination between residents with the possibility of infections. Record Review of CNA-E's Perineal Care training dated 09/11/2024 revealed: CNA-E's performance Criteria was completed and met. During observation on 11/06/2024 at 10:41 AM, while having clean gloves on, LVN-F removed her unclean pen and unclean scissors from her scrub pant pockets and proceeded with performing wound care with dirty gloves for Resident #33. During an interview on 11/07/2024 at 2:17 PM, LVN-F stated she should have washed her hands and put on new gloves after she touched the pen and scissors from her pant pockets. She stated it could have caused crossed contamination between residents. LVN-F stated she should have had those items cleaned with other supplies needed for her wound care. Record Review of LVN-F's Wound Care Competency dated 09/09/2024 revealed: LVN-F's performance Criteria was completed and met. During an interview on 11/07/2024 at 2:20 PM the DON stated the wound care staff should not have retrieved her pen and scissors out of her pocket. The DON stated in doing so, her clean gloves became contaminated prior to dressing the wound which could have been caused the wound to have been infected. The DON also stated, she monitored the staff and observed during rounds. She stated the negative impact for residents could have possibly led to infection or bacteria with distraction and nervousness being what led to the failure. The DON stated her expectations were for staff to have washed their hands between treatments when changing their contaminated gloves between procedures. She stated staff should not touch clean linen or touch resident with contaminated gloves . Record review of the policy titled Perineal Care dated 12/2011 revealed: Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident skin condition. Precedure : .12. Remove gloves and discard into designated container. Wah and dry your hands thoroughly. 13. Put on clean gloves and place new brief and secure in place 18. Remove gloves, and 19. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly. Record review of the policy titled Wound Care dated with 12/2011 revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing .6. Put on gloves. 7. Use no-touch technique 14. Be certain all clean items are on clean field
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for 3 of 18 Residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident #6) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for Resident #1, #3, and #6 every 3 months. This failure could place residents at risk for not getting an accurate assessment and could result in lack of care. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Urinary Tract Infection, Bladder dysfunction, and Depression. Review of Resident #1's last completed MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #1's MDS tracking record revealed the last completed MDS was completed on 07-11-2024. The next MDS listed was a quarterly dated 10-31-2024 that was in progress as of 11/07/2024. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, and Dementia. Review of Resident #3's last completed MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #3's MDS tracking record revealed the last completed MDS was completed 06-22-2024. The next MDS listed was a quarterly dated 9-22-2024 that was in progress as of 11/07/2024. Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Dementia, Depression, and heart failure. Review of Resident #6's last completed MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed with a BIMS score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #6's MDS tracking record revealed the last completed MDS was an annual completed 07-05-2024. The next MDS listed was a quarterly dated 10-05-2024 that was in progress as of 11/07/24. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 10:54 AM, the ADMN stated MDS assessments were to be completed annually and quarterly. He stated he was unsure as to the timeframe requirement for submission. He stated his expectation was for MDS assessments to be completed and submitted within the required time frame. He stated he was unaware that the facility was behind on MDS assessment completions and submissions, and he was not sure as to what caused the failure. He stated this failure did not directly affect the residents but did affect the facility with reimbursement. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 11:03 AM, the DON stated she was not aware that MDS assessments were not being completed and submitted within a timely manner. She stated that it was the MDS Coordinator's responsibility to monitor MDS completions and submissions. The DON stated it was not her responsibility to ensure the completion of MDS assessments in a timely manner. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 02:09 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated that MDS assessments should have been completed and submitted within 14 days of their due date. She stated they should have been done annually and quarterly. She stated she was responsible for ensuring they are completed in a timely manner. She stated the facility had a flood at the beginning of the year and that was her reasoning for being behind. MDS nurse stated this failure did not directly impact the residents. Review of facility policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, revised September 2010, revealed in part: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Assessment Team conduct a timely resident assessments and reviews according to the following schedule: a. Within fourteen days of resident's admission to the facility; b. Where there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; c. At least quarterly; and d. Once every twelve months .
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that spoiled food items were disposed of properly. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included: During observation on 11/05/2024 at 10:00 AM in the kitchen: Refrigerator 1) 2 cucumbers with a white substance on them 2) An unopened clear bag of broccoli that contained broccoli that had turned brown. 3) An unopened clear bag of lettuce that had turned brown. 4) A box that contained red bell peppers, 3 of the red bell peppers had black spots and soft spots on them. 5) A box that contained yellow bell peppers, 2 of the yellow bell peppers had black spots and soft spots on them. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 11:06 AM the DM stated her expectation was when food appeared to have spoiled it needed to be thrown out. The DM stated all kitchen staff were responsible to throw out food that was spoiled or expired, but she was ultimately responsible to ensure food had been discarded when it had spoiled. The DM stated that if residents were to receive spoiled food it could have caused them to become sick. The DM stated what led to failure was there had been some staff turnover and staff calling in and she had been working extra hours to cover shifts. During an interview on 11/07/2024 at 1:13 PM the ADMN stated his expectation was that food that was spoiled or expired should be discarded. The ADMN stated the DM was responsible to ensure that spoiled food was discarded. The ADMN stated if residents received food that was spoiled it could cause food borne illness. The ADMN stated lack of oversight by the DM led to the failure of spoiled items not being discarded. Record review of facility policy titled, Receiving dated 2/2023 revealed: Safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be in the transportation, delivery, and subsequent storage of all food items.
Aug 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy for 1 (Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's BIMS score and medical diagnosis was not given to non-family or non-medical persons in the building. These failures could allow residents' protected HIPAA information to be shared with individuals who do not have a need or right to know which could place residents at a risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 7/30/24, with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a neurological disorder that occurs when a chemical imbalance in the blood affects the brain), arthritis, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 8/21/24 reflected a BIMS score of 10 (moderate impairment). During a phone interview on 8/19/24 at 2:35 p.m., the ombudsman stated that she had a call from Resident #1's Family Member A who stated that someone at the building on 8/5/24 gave out Resident #1's BIMS and diagnosis to someone they should not have. She stated that there is an ongoing court case involving Resident #1 and Family Member B. She stated that a notary came to the facility and attempted to get Resident #1 to sign documentation to not evict Family Member B off the property back home. She stated that there was an argument, and some medical information was given out to the notary. She stated she followed up on the incident on 8/7/24 and went to the facility and asked who in the building gave away this information. She stated that the administrator stated, she was the one who gave out this information to the notary. She stated the administrator stated, she gave out the information to calm everyone down. During a phone interview on 8/19/24 at 2:55 p.m., Family Member A stated that on august 5th 2024 around 5:30 p.m., a notary came to the facility. She stated that the notary was trying to get Resident #1 to sign documentation which she should not sign. She stated that the next day august 6th 2024 there was a court case in which the notary at the facility shared Resident #1's diagnosis and BIMS score. She stated she has no idea who gave this information to the notary, and this should never have happened. She stated that was when she decided to reach out to the ombudsman to figure out who gave this information away. During an interview on 8/19/24 at 3:15 p.m., the Administrator stated that there was an incident on August 5th, 2024, in which a notary from the court was at the facility. She stated that Resident #1's Family Member A came and banged on her door and stated that the notary in the building should not be there and is not sure why he was there. She stated that there had been an ongoing court case, and this was roughly the 4th time the case was trying to be determined. She stated that in open conversation she stated to both the notary and Family Member A that they needed to know the residents BIMS score to determine if she had the ability to make the decision on her own. She stated that once she found out Resident #1's BIMS score she stated out loud to a group of employees and the notary. She stated she was trying to help the situation. Record review of Facility Policy dated December 2006; titled Confidentiality of Information indicated: Policy statement-our facility shall treat all resident information confidentially. Policy interpretation and implementation: 1. The facility will safeguard all resident records, weather medical, financial, or social in nature, to protect the confidentiality of the information.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 2 newly admitted residents (Residents #2) reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #2. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for decreased quality of life, improper care, and injury. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 8/20/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Record review of Resident #2's baseline care plan reviewed 8/20/24 revealed no data available. During an interview on 8/19/24 at 4:45 p.m., MDS C stated that Resident #2 came in on a Friday 6/28/24 and left AMA early Monday 7/1/24 morning. She stated that the nurses interim plan of care was completed upon admission for Resident #2. She stated but no baseline care plan was completed for the resident. She stated that the resident was not here long enough to get the care plan completed because it was through a weekend, and she left before they started on 7/1/24. She stated a baseline care plan should be completed on every resident within 48 hours. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 11:45 a.m., the administrator stated a baseline care plan should be completed within 48 hours of being admitted into the facility. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 12:25 p.m., the DON stated that a baseline care plan should be done within 48 hours of the resident being admitted . She stated that sometimes they use the interim plan of care to get an initial care plan done for a resident. She stated however, the interim plan of care documentation is incomplete and there is no baseline care plan completed Resident #2. She stated this was a miss by the staff, even if it was a weekend, it should have been completed and it was not. Record review of Facility Policy dated December 2016; titled Care Plans-Baseline indicated: Policy statement-A baseline pan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission.
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional p...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 2 of 6 (Hall 600 & Hall 700) Medication Carts. 1.) The facility failed to ensure medication cart #1 was locked when unattended by nurse. 2.) The facility failed to ensure that all medications stored in Hall 600 & 700 medication carts were properly stored/labeled. These failures placed all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of potency of medications/biologicals or misappropriation of medications. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 01/26/2024 at 11:27 a.m., of 700 hall medication cart, revealed RN A stored 10 loose pills in the top drawer under one lock in a clear medication cup with no label. RN A stated she had attempted to administer the medications earlier and the resident would not take them so she stored it in the top of medication cart to attempt to give again. She stated she knew what the resident's medications were for due to it was the only medication cup with medications in the top of her cart. She stated medications were for Resident #2 which included 5 supplements, 1 thyroid medication, 1 blood thinner, 1 proton pump inhibitor, 1 constipation medication, 1 diuretic, and 1 blood pressure medication. RN 1 did not state any negative outcome when asked if there could be a negative outcome from storing medication outside of their original medication packages. During an observation and interview on 01/26/2024 at 12:04 p.m. of the 600 hall medication cart, revealed RN B stored loose medications in 3 medication cups in the top drawer under one lock 1 medication cup had Resident #3's last name written on it and one capsule in a medication cup. 2 medication cups had Resident #4's last name written on them with 7 pills in them. RN B stated the medications were for Resident #3 and Resident #4 which included: 1 antibiotic, 1 heart arrythmia medication, 4 supplements, 1 steroid, and 1 blood thinner. RN B stated she attempted to give medications earlier and both residents would not take. She stated she had stored them in the top drawer to attempt to administer the medications later and then would dispose of them if residents continued to refuse. RN B stated she did not know if the facility had a policy on medication storage regarding loose medication in cups. During an interview on 01/26/2024 at 12:08 p.m., the DON stated she was not aware if the facility had policy on medication storage. She stated she felt it was better to store medications loose in medication cups than to dispose of the medications right away when resident refused to take and not attempt to give the medications again. During an observation on 01/27/2024 at 8:12 p.m., revealed the medication cart #1 was unlocked and unsupervised on the 700 hall. Residents were observed near the medication cart and no staff were visible. On top of the medication cart there were 7 medication cups labeled with resident last name on some and room number on others for Residents #2, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10 stacked on top of each other with medications pre-popped inside of the cups. There were 2 additional medication cups that had a crushed medication inside of them. 1 medication cup has 4 pills, 2 medication cups had 5 pills, 1 medication cup had 6 pills, and 1 medication cup had 11 pills. The loose medications included: Crestor a cholesterol lowering medication; Melatonin a supplement to help induce sleep; Mirtazapine an anti-depressant; Eliquis a blood thinner (medication that interferes with blood clotting); Metoclopramide a medication that increases the speed the stomach empties into the intestines. Lyrica a medication used to treat nerve pain; Calcium / Magnesium / Zinc supplement; Atorvastatin a cholesterol lowering medication; Trazodone an antidepressant that can help with sleeplessness; Baclofen a medication that helps reduce muscle spasms; Carvedilol a medication that is used to help heart and circulation of blood; Famotidine a medication that decreases the amount of acid in the stomach; Keflex an antibiotic for infection; Seroquel an anti-psychotic medication used to treat psychosis; Senna-S a medication used to treat constipation; Buspirone an anti-anxiety medication; Sertraline an anti-depressant; Metoprolol a medication used to treat high blood pressure or elevated heart rate; Potassium chloride a supplement; Ticagrelor a medication that lowers risk for heart attack and helps lower risk of blood clots; Carisoprodol a medication to help relax muscles and reduce nerve pain; Amitriptyline a medication that helps lower depression; Metformin a medication used to help lower blood sugars in Type 2 diabetics; Gabapentin a medication used to help reduce nerve pain; Omeprazole a medication used to lower stomach acid; Donepezil a medication used to treat dementia. The medication names were gathered from the MARs of each of these residents. During an interview on 01/27/2024 at 8:17 p.m., RN C stated the medication cart was her cart and that she had not left the cart unattended for very long. RN C stated that she had pre-popped medications for resident #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10 that were to be administered at nighttime. RN C stated the medication cart should have been locked and that medications should not have been on top of the cart. RN C stated it was not appropriate to pre-pop the medications, but she lived in the real world and that was the only way she would have time to administer all her medications to residents. During an interview on 01/27/2024 at 8:35 p.m., the DON stated she and the ADONs were responsible for monitoring medication storage and administration by performing rounds. She stated an in-service was performed with staff that handle medications earlier today. The DON stated pre-popping medications increases the chance of medication errors. The DON was unsure of why medications were pre-popped but felt the nurse pre-popped to make her medication pass faster. During an interview on 01/27/2024 at 8:45 PM RN C stated she had signed an in-service when she started her shift informing her about not pre-popping medications. Review of an in-Service document provided by the facility to CMAs and nurses on 01/27/2024 titled Medication Administration revealed RN C had signed the in-service document prior to observation. The in-service document revealed: It is not best practice to leave medications in the cart for any reason. If the resident won't take their medications, and you have already popped them out of the card, then you will need to waste the pills that were popped with another nurse. Record review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised date of April 2007 revealed: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner .Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers .The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner .Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others.
Oct 2023 11 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to preserve the resident right to make choices about aspects of his ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to preserve the resident right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 of 6 (Resident #31) reviewed for Resident Rights. The facility failed to respect the rights of Resident #31 regarding smokeless chewing tobacco. These failures placed residents at risk of their rights to make choices about their life being disregarded. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's Facesheet dated 10/05/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a diagnosis list that included Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen saturation), (Primary), Cognitive communication deficit, Morbid obesity due to excess calories, Type II diabetes with foot ulcer, Hypertension. Record review of Resident #31's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 meaning he had no cognitive deficits. Record review of Resident #31's Careplan last revised 09/25/23 did not address that resident utilized chewing tobacco or snuff. Record review of Resident #31's admission Consent labeled A Comprehensive Form of Authorizations, Consents, Releases, and Acknowledgements signed 04/01/22 revealed: I hereby acknowledge that the facility is a non-smoking facility. Residents may not use or keep cigarettes, cigars, matches, or any smoking paraphernalia in their room or on their person at any time during their stay at the facility. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in immediate discharge. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 10:53 AM with Resident #31, he said he would like to be able to have dip in and out of the building. Resident #31 said he had snuff, and the facility kept taking it from him. He said he did not mind that he might have to go outside to dip but said there was staff that smoked out back of the facility and there was staff that dipped, and they did it in the building. Resident #31 said it was not fair that the staff was able to smoke or dip and he was not. He said he would like the facility to let him come and go outside to dip and keep his tobacco himself. During an interview on 10/04/23 at 10:56 AM with MR-R, she said the facility had an admissions coordinator that ensured residents completed the entire admission packet and she uploaded it to the electronic health record. She said she thought a smoking policy might be in the packet but didn't know. She reviewed resident uploaded documents and did not see the file; she was going to speak to the admissions coordinator. During an interview on 10/04/23 at 11:23 AM with ADM-C, she said she considered snuff to be a smoking paraphernalia, per say, but that she would find their smoking policy to see what it had to say. CNS-S said that it would probably be just the same as E cigarettes, and they would look at their policy, it might just need some updating. During an interview on 10/04/23 at 02:29 PM with Resident #31, he was again adamant that he wanted his tobacco/snuff back. He said his snuff was not smoking paraphernalia. Resident #31 said he was fine if they could not do it but felt the staff should not be able to do it either. Record review of ADM-C email sent on 10/04/23 at 11:53 AM that stated: has smoking policy, but we are non-smoking, so admission packet is what we follow for smoking-free facility. Paraphernalia includes tobacco, but mgmt. office has agreed to expand on the paraphernalia working on admission packet. Record review of facility policy labeled Resident Rights revised 10/2009 revealed: Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 15 employees (CNA-P) reviewed for criminal history checks and EMR/NAR's. The facility failed to perform an initial criminal and EMR/NAR checks for CNA-P. These failures placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program last revised 08/2006 revealed: Our facility conducts employee background checks and will not knowingly employ any individual who has been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals. Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents. Our abuse prevention program provides policies and procedures that govern, as a minimum: a. Protocols for conducting employment background checks. Record review of facility policy titled Personnel Records last revised 04/2008 revealed: a. Criminal History Check (completed prior to hire) . d. Misconduct Registry Check (completed prior to hire and annually) Record review of Personnel Files revealed: CNA-P had a hire date of 1/23/23 with an initial criminal history ran on 1/25/23 and an initial EMR/NAR ran on 1/30/23. During an interview on 10/04/23 at 02:48 PM with ADM- C, she said the facility had a computer virus that took away their access to get the EMR/NAR and criminal histories during the months of August and September of 2023 so new employees or employees that needed annual history checks in the months of August and September 2023 did not get them done timely. She said if the employee was hired or their annual was in the months prior to August and September or after September then they should have been completed timely. During an interview on 10/05/23 at 04:17 PM with HR-T and HRA-V, HR-T said she had been working as HR for about a month. HRA-V said he had been working about 8 months. HR-T said she did a criminal history and EMR/NAR check before the employee was hired, but only did a criminal hx annually after that. HR-T said she could just do them all in January each year, not on their anniversary date. She said she was unaware that the criminal history and the EMR/NAR was to be ran annually on the employee's anniversary date. They both said they got a few days training by former HR personnel. HR-T said the criminal history and EMR/NAR check was to ensure that the facility did not hire someone that had committed certain crimes like abuse, assault, felony theft. HR-T said she understood that some things might not come through when someone was first hired or that they may have had a conviction after they are working. HRA-V said the criminal history and the EMR/NAR should have been ran before an employee was hired, not days after they were hired .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assure that each resident received an accurate assessment, refle...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assure that each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, for 1 of 1 (Resident #71), resident reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to include accurate discharge for Resident #71 on MDS. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status. Findings included: Review of resident #71's face sheet revealed resident was admitted to facility 05/17/2023 and discharged on 07/13/2023. Review of r esident #71's MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident #71 was discharged to a local community hospital. Review of resident #71's progress notes on 07/13/2023 at 12:23 PM by SW A revealed that resident #71 was transferred to a skilled nursing facility. During an Interview on 10/05/2023 at 3:45 pm the MDS coordinator stated that it was her responsibility to ensure that the MDS was accurate. She stated that she received the information on the resident by reading the resident's chart in the electronic health record. She stated that she reviewed the resident's progress notes, assessments, discharge summary as well as interviewed staff regarding the resident. The MDS coordinator demonstrated in the electronic health record that Resident #71 had no discharge summary. The MDS coordinator then showed in the resident's progress notes of the electronic health record a note reflected Resident #71 was discharged on 07/13/2023 from the facility to another skilled nursing facility with medications. She then showed in the MDS section of the electronic health record where Resident #71 entered to be discharged to an acute hospital. The MDS coordinator stated that it was her error. She stated that she entered the incorrect code and information on Resident #71's discharge status in the Minimum Data Set. She stated that it should have been entered as 02 another nursing home and instead she entered 03 acute hospital. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, DON D stated that she was the person responsible to sign off on MDS assessments . Record review of policy for Resident Assessment Instrument dated revised September 2010, reflected All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS Resident Assessment Form MUST sign such document attesting to the accuracy of such information.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to Incorporate Level II Recommendations from the PASRR level II determ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to Incorporate Level II Recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR (Pre-admission screening and resident review) evaluation for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for PASRR in that: The facility failed to follow up with the LA for PASRR Level II determination when Resident #13's PASRR Level 1 Screening reflected she was positive for mental illness. This failure could place the residents with a documented mental illness, intellectual and/or developmental disability at risk for not receiving needed services. The findings are: Record review of Resident #13's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features; and post-traumatic stress disorder. Record review of Resident #13's PASRR Level 1 Screening dated 08/16/2023 revealed the resident was positive for mental illness. Record review of Resident #13's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Record review of Care Plan dated 08/16/2023 revealed Resident #13 had focus that included taking antidepressant, mood problem, and psychosocial wellbeing problem. Record review of Behavioral Health progress note by the behavioral therapist dated 09/15/2023 revealed that patient would be receiving therapy for major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic, and Insomnia due to other mental disorder. Current Psychotropic Medications included: Clonazepam 0.5mg quantity 1 twice a day, Cymbalta 90mg quantity 1 at bedtime, Gabapentin 100mg quantity 1 at bedtime, and Gabapentin 800mg quantity 1 three times a day. During an interview on 10/04/2023 at 3:12 p.m., SW A stated that the MDS coordinator was responsible for completing the MDS PASRR section . During an interview on 10/04/2023 at 3:13 p.m., MDS coordinator B stated that the PASRR 1 form was submitted to the local authority on 08/23/2023. She provided that PASRR 1 submitted on 08/23/2023 at 9:39a.m. On 08/23/2023 at 9:39 AM the resident was placed in nursing facility Exempted Hospital Discharge. On 08/23/2023 at 9:39 a.m., the resident had been admitted to the nursing facility and required less than 30 days of nursing facility services. On 09/15/2023 at 9:19 a.m. status was awaiting PE. MDS coordinator B stated that Resident #13 planned to reside in facility longer than 30 days and information was inputted wrong. MDS coordinator B could not provide information on when the PE (was to be performed. After surveyor requested information, she voiced that she would follow up with local authority today on the status of the PE. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 10:50 a.m., the ADMN stated the facility was in the process of having a PE scheduled for Resident #13. She stated that she had spoken to MDS coordinator B, and that the local authority voiced they would perform the PE but was unsure of the time. She stated she would provide the policy and procedure. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 11:06 a.m., MDS coordinator B stated that she spoke to local authority on the telephone, and the facility had Resident #13's PE scheduled. She could not state the effect on the resident for failing to have completed PASRR II assessment. Review of the PASRR clinical policy on 10/05/23 01:55 p.m. revealed If documentation entered on the PL1 Indicates MI/ID/DD, a PE must be completed. The PL1 must be completed and submitted via the LTC Online Portal for every individual seeking admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility prior to admission, regardless of funding source. The Referring Entity (RE) will perform the PL1 Screening Form for individuals admitted to the HMG Facility under the Preadmission process. Only a Local Authority (LA) or HMG Facility can submit a PL1 on the LTC online portal .The PL1 submission procedure: 1. Enter the data from the had written PL1 Screening paper form into the online version of the PL1. 2. Retain a copy of the handwritten PL1 Screening paper form, with the appropriate original signatures, in the resident's record in the Business Office. The handwritten PL1 Screening paper form with the appropriate original signatures will be kept as a part of the resident's record for 5 years after resident's discharge or death. 3. The PL1 Screening must include the address of the individual, or LAR or the address where the individual or LAE can be contacted. 4. The PL1 Screening must include at least 1 nursing facility choice entered in Section D regardless of PASRR eligibility .Section C; PASRR Screen (Screener) INTENT: This section to be completed for resident's suspected of having Mental Illness .A mental disorder is defined as the following: a schizophrenic, mood, paranoid, panic or other severe anxiety disorder, somatoform disorder; personality disorder; other psychotic disorder; or another mental disorder that may lead to a chronic disability Nursing Responsibilities 5. The MDS/DON and/or designee will monitor the LTC Online Portal daily for submitted PE's.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0661 (Tag F0661)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a discharge summary for 1 (Resident #71) of 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a discharge summary for 1 (Resident #71) of 1 resident reviewed for discharge summaries. The facility failed to ensure a dDischarge sSummary for Resident # 71 was completed which included a complete recapitulation of the resident's stay for a resident discharged to another facility. This failure could place residents discharged from the facility at risk for incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information recorded regarding discharged residents, and failure in the continuity of care for residents. The findings included: Record review of Resident #71's electronic face sheet dated 10/05/2023 indicated a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Shortness of Breath, Depression, Anxiety Disorder, and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia Review of Resident #71's discharge MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact . Review of Resident #71's comprehensive care plan dated 06/20/2023 revealed the resident was independent in ADLs. Review of Resident #71's progress notes by SW A dated 07/12/2023 revealed r esident #71 was accepted to another facility. Review of Resident #71's progress notes by nursing dated 07/13/2023 revealed Resident #71 was discharged to another facility. Review of Resident #71's record revealed no evidence of a physician's discharge summary. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 1:50 pm, the Adm C stated that discharge summaries had been stopped by the nurses at some point but stated that she did not know when. Adm C looked in Resident #71's electronic medical record and stated that there was not a discharge summary. Adm C stated it was the responsibility of the nurses to ensure it was done. She stated the facility had a new form for the discharge summary they will begin now. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 2:30 pm RN L stated that she had been employed by the facility less than two weeks. She stated the discharge summary was to be done on each resident. RN L stated that the facility must first have an order to do discharge summaries. She then stated that discharge summaries were completed in the resident's electronic medical record. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 2:40 pm LVN K stated that all residents' discharge planning began when the resident was admitted . LVN K stated that the discharge summary was under the section assessments in the resident's electronic medical record. She stated that the social worker opened the discharge document in resident's electronic medical record. She stated that it was the nurse's responsibility to make sure that all areas of care were done. She stated that the facility printed the discharge summary. She said the nurse would go over the discharge summary with the resident and or the facility if the resident was being transferred. She stated that the resident would sign the printed discharge summary. She stated that the resident and or facility receiving the resident would receive a copy. She then stated that the original signed discharge summary would be put in the social worker's box. LVN K stated that there was not a discharge summary when asked if she could locate the discharge summary on Resident # 71 in the electronic medical record. Record review of policy for Discharge Summary and Plan dated revised December 2016, reflected when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment. A copy of the following will be provided to the resident and receiving facility and a copy will be filed in the resident medical records: a. An evaluation of the resident's discharge needs; b. The post-discharge plan; and c. The discharge summary.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant mediatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant mediation errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN F administered the medication Admelog SoloStar 100 unit/ML Solution to Resident #31 as ordered by the physician. The facility administered the wrong medication insulin glargine to Resident #31 instead. This failure could place resident at risk of his medication not being administered in accordance with physician's orders, which could place resident at an increased risk of experiencing adverse effects such as low blood sugar that could lead to seizures and may be life threatening. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer (an open sore or wound on the foot of a person with diabetes), and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that is caused by diabetes). Review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #31's Physician's Orders dated 10/03/2023 revealed an order with start date of 08/01/2023 for Insulin Glargine Solution 100units/ML with directions to give 35 units subcutaneous at bedtime. Review of Resident #31's Physician's Orders dated 10/03/2023 revealed an order with start date of 08/09/2023 for Admelog SoloStar also known as insulin lispro 100unit/ML Solution with directions to give per sliding scale (if FSBS 201-250 give 6 units). Review of drugs.com accessed on 10/09/2023 at https://www.drugs.com/mtm/insulin-glargine.html revealed that Glargine is long-acting insulin that starts to work several hours after injection to improve blood sugar control in people. Review of drugs.com accessed on 10/09/2023 at https://www.drugs.com/admelog.html revealed that Admelog is a fast-acting insulin that starts to work in about 15 minutes to improve blood sugar control in adults. During an observation on 10/03/2023 at 11:30 a.m., revealed LVN F checked Resident #31's finger stick blood sugar using the glucometer with a reading of 235 and then administered 6 units of insulin glargine 100units/ML into subcutaneous tissue. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 3:28 p.m., LVN F stated she had verified that she had given insulin glargine thinking that it was the correct insulin as it was the only insulin in the medication cart. LVN F stated if she was not familiar with a medication, she would have to look it up on her phone. She stated she was not aware of any medication books for reference provided by the facility. She stated she did not know what the adverse effect the medication error could had been on the resident but did voice that his FSBS had been good. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 4:16 p.m., the DON said that it was the ADONs' and pharmacy representatives' responsibility to monitor if medications were administered correctly. The DON said the pharmacy representatives would follow nurses and watch medication administration when they were in the facility. She stated the lack of education was what led to the medication error failure. She stated that RN E and LVN F had notified her of the medication errors observed by the surveyor and that the medication error process had been done including notifying the ordering physician. She stated that insulin was a high-risk medication. She stated that she did provide LVN F medication interchange guide that the pharmacy had given the facility. She stated that the effect of insulin not being administered correctly (correct dose or correct medication) would have caused the resident to have low/high blood sugars or worse. Her expectation was that medications were given correctly using the 8 rights of medication administration (right Resident, right medication, right dose, right route, right time, right documentation, right reason, and right response). She stated that correct insulin was found in medication room fridge and education given to LVN F. Review of Pharmacy name Therapeutic Interchange Form on 10/03/2023 provided by DON revealed Pharmacy name is offering the following therapeutic interchange protocols. Original Medication Prescribed Novolog vials, pens .Therapeutic Interchange Admelog pen, vial or generic lispro pen, vial. Review of facility's policy for Administering Medications on 10/03/2023 at 4:32 p.m. revealed 7. The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 2 resident rooms. The facility failed to ensure call lights were connected to the light in the hallways for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving staff assistance for quality of care issues. Findings included: During observations on 10/02/2023 between 11:08 AM and 2:53 PM revealed the call lights did not connect to the light in the hallway when pressed for room [ROOM NUMBER]A/B and room [ROOM NUMBER]A/B During an observation and interview on 10/02/2023 at 02:53 PM, revealed the call light did not light in the hallway when resident pushed her call light button. LVN G stated sometimes she had to jiggle and reset the restroom lights in order for the light in the hallway to work. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 10:42 AM, LVN H, stated there should have been maintenance in the facility. She stated once they changed the overhead light chords out, they worked fine. She stated when the residents broke them, the staff would have placed the work order in the facility computer program for maintenance to review and repair. LVN H stated she had not ever followed up on how long it took for maintenance to repair the orders she had previously placed; she would resubmit the order if she saw that it had not been corrected. She stated, the staff, including herself had to troubleshoot the call light systems in a few rooms. She stated the scuffs and holes in the residents' walls were related to the beds rubbing on them and had been there at least a couple of months. An interview on 10/05/2023 at 11:08 AM, the ADM stated the staff had discussed why the call system was not fully engaging with the lights in the hallway outside the residents' rooms. She stated, when the residents told the staff their lights outside of their rooms had not worked, the staff would know to go troubleshoot and jiggle the wires where it was connected into the wall. The ADM stated that it was a random occurrence but was always fixable. She stated, when the facility had maintenance, the staff notified them. The ADM stated if it happened at night, their upper management was notified in a group message. She stated it was the CNAs and nurses that worked those hallways during the times the call light would not function correctly. She stated staff used a program on the computer to report issues that needed to be maintained, but the facility had been without maintenance for almost a month. The ADM stated once the incidents were reported and logged into their maintenance repair program, it should have been maintenance to follow up with those, with her as the ADM to monitor maintenance. She stated the facility protocols were for staff to have reported the repairs needed with maintenance prioritizing the needed repairs. The ADM stated she would not have liked living in those situations as it was not homelike. The ADM stated the negative impact to the residents was that the environment was not conducive and not beneficial to them. She stated if the call lights were not working, they could then have a possible behavior issue. She stated the failure for not having maintenance led to the failure, which delayed the process of not getting the repairs done. She stated she was not sure if the call lights could be repaired, as she believed it to be a wiring issue between the bathroom call light when used and the room call light. The ADM stated her expectations were for the facility to look nice for the residents with them feeling like it was their home and being felt taken care of. Record review of the facility's Open & In Progress work orders dated 10/04/2023 revealed: #1566 Pull string for light in room is missing-Medium priority-Room/Area 808A-Not Assigned #1509 Overhead bed light needs string-Low priority-Room/Area 803A-Not Assigned #1521 wall damage-Low priority-Room/Area 706A-Not Assigned #1496 Large hole in wall where recliner use to be-Low priority-Room/Area 501B-Not Assigned #1564 Family states light over the bed is not managed by the cord but by switch-Medium priority-Room/Area 508B-not assigned Record review of the facility policy statement and procedures for Maintenance Service revised December 2009 revealed: Policy Statement: Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. 2. Functions of maintenance personnel include, but are not limited to: a. maintaining the building and compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines. b. Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazard . d. plumbing fixtures, . In good working order. e. Maintaining lighting levels that are comfortable, and assuring that exit lots are in good working order. f. Establishing priorities in providing repair service i. Providing routinely scheduled maintenance service to all areas. j. Others that may be become necessary or appropriate. 3. The maintenance director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service to assure that the building, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner. 4. A copy of the maintenance schedule shall be provided to each department director so that appropriate scheduling can be made without interruption of services to residents. 5. Maintenance personnel shall follow the manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule. 6. Changes in maintenance schedules must be approved by the maintenance director 8. The maintenance director is responsible for maintaining the following record/reports. a. Inspection of building; b. Work order request; c. Maintenance schedule; d. Authorized vendor listing; and e. Warranties and guarantees 9. Records shall be maintained in the maintenance directors office. 10. Maintenance personnel shall follow established safety regulations to ensure the safety and well-being of all concerned. Record review of facility policy Answering the Call Light dated with the revised date of March 2012 revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs . .7. Report all defective call lights to the Nurse Supervisor promptly.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The medication error rate was 7.41% with 2 errors in 27 opportunities involving 2 staff; RN E and LVN F and 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 125 and Resident # 31) reviewed for medication errors. 1.) The facility failed to ensure RN E administered the medication Aspirin 325mg to Resident #125 as ordered by the physician. The facility administered the wrong dose 81mg to Resident #125 instead. 2.) The facility failed to ensure LVN F administered the medication Admelog SoloStar 100 unit/ML Solution to Resident #31 as ordered by the physician. The facility administered the wrong medication insulin glargine to Resident #31 instead. The facility's failure could place residents at risk of uncontrolled pain, decreased circulation, low blood sugar readings or seizures. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #125's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, low back pain, high blood pressure, and fibromyalgia (disorder that affects muscle and soft tissue characterized by chronic muscle pain, tenderness, fatigue, and sleep disturbances). Review of Resident #125's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #125 had a BIMS of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #125's Physician's Orders dated 10/03/2023 revealed an order with start date of 09/28/2023 for Aspirin Oral Tablet 325MG with directions to be give one tablet by mouth twice a day. Review of drugs.com accessed on 10/09/2023 at https://www.drugs.com/aspirin.html revealed that Aspirin is used to treat pain, reduce inflammation, and to treat and prevent heart attacks, strokes, and chest pain. During an observation on 10/02/2023 at 10:12 a.m., RN E administered Aspirin 81 MG one tablet by mouth to Resident #125 from OTC bottle in the top of medication cart. During an observation and interview on 10/03/2023 at 3:36 p.m., RN E said that he was just used to giving 81MG and did not realize that the resident was ordered a different dosage. He looked in the resident's records and verified that the order reflected to give 325MG Aspirin twice a day. He stated the effect on the resident getting the wrong dose could affect the resident's circulation or pain. 2. Review of Resident #31's Face Sheet dated 10/03/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer (an open sore or wound on the foot of a person with diabetes), and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that is caused by diabetes). Review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #31's Physician's Orders dated 10/03/2023 revealed an order with start date of 08/01/2023 for Insulin Glargine Solution 100units/ML with directions to give 35 units subcutaneous at bedtime. Review of Resident #31's Physician's Orders dated 10/03/2023 revealed an order with start date of 08/09/2023 for Admelog SoloStar also known as insulin lispro 100unit/ML Solution with directions to give per sliding scale (if FSBS 201-250 give 6 units). Review of drugs.com accessed on 10/09/2023 at https://www.drugs.com/mtm/insulin-glargine.html revealed that Glargine is long-acting insulin that starts to work several hours after injection to improve blood sugar control in people. Review of drugs.com accessed on 10/09/2023 at https://www.drugs.com/admelog.html revealed that Admelog is a fast-acting insulin that starts to work in about 15 minutes to improve blood sugar control in adults. During an observation on 10/03/2023 at 11:30 a.m., revealed LVN F checked Resident #31's finger stick blood sugar using the glucometer with a reading of 235 and then administered 6 units of insulin glargine 100units/ML into subcutaneous tissue. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 3:28 p.m., LVN F stated she had verified that she had given insulin glargine thinking that it was the correct insulin as it was the only insulin in the medication cart. LVN F stated if she was not familiar with a medication, she would have to look it up on her phone. She stated she was not aware of any medication books for reference provided by the facility. She stated she did not know what the adverse effect the medication error could had been on the resident but did voice that his FSBS had been good. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 4:16 p.m., the DON said that it was the ADONs' and pharmacy representatives' responsibility to monitor if medications were administered correctly. The DON said the pharmacy representatives would follow nurses and watch medication administration when they were in the facility. She stated the lack of education was what led to the medication error failure. She stated that RN E and LVN F had notified her of the medication errors observed by the surveyor and that the medication error process had been done including notifying the ordering physician. She stated that insulin was a high-risk medication. She stated that she did provide LVN F medication interchange guide that the pharmacy had given the facility. She stated that the effect of insulin not being administered correctly (correct dose or correct medication) would have caused the resident to have low/high blood sugars or worse. Her expectation was that medications were given correctly using the 8 rights of medication administration (right Resident, right medication, right dose, right route, right time, right documentation, right reason, and right response). She stated that correct insulin was found in medication room fridge and education given to LVN F. Review of the facility's policy for Administering Medications on 10/03/2023 at 4:32 p.m. revealed 7. The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of [Pharmacy name] Therapeutic Interchange Form on 10/03/2023 revealed [Pharmacy name] is offering the following therapeutic interchange protocols. Original Medication Prescribed Novolog vials, pen and Therapeutic Interchange Admelog pen, vial or generic lispro pen, vial.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe and app...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability and appetizing temperature. The facility failed to serve meals that were palatable and at an appetizing temperature. These failures could affect the residents who ate food from the facility kitchen by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction of the meals served. Findings included: During an observation on 10/03/2023 at 1:06 PM the facility tray was provided and consisted of a beef hamburger with cheese, tater tots, [NAME] slaw, fruit cocktail and peaches. The hamburger's internal temperature at the time of service was 106 degrees Fahrenheit. It was not palatable. During an interview on 10/04/2023 at 3:00 PM Resident #39 stated that food is cold . During an Interview on 10/05/2023 at 9:20 AM, the Dietary M anager stated that everyone in the kitchen from the cooks, the aides, whatever personnel that was in the kitchen was responsible to ensure that food was served at the proper temperatures of 165 degree Fahrenheit. The Dietary manager stated that the negative effects of foods not being served at the proper temperatures could make a resident sick, cause them to get salmonella, E.coli and it could cause them to have a decreased palatability. She stated that her expectations of staff are that temperatures are to be done on all food items to be served to the residents. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 9:40 AM, the [NAME] stated the staff responsible for serving were responsible to ensure meals were served at the correct temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit. She stated that the negative effects of food not at correct temperatures could cause residents that consume the meals to get bacteria, food poisoning and sicknesses. She also stated residents would not want to eat their meals and they could lose weight. Record review of the policy for Food Quality and Palatability HCSG Policy 006 dated 05/2014, revised 09/2017, reflected Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Record review of the facility policy for Food Preparation HCSG 016 dated 05/2014, revised 09/2017, reflected All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 for hot holding.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public reviewed for a safe and homelike environment for 3 (halls 500, 600, and 700) of 4 hallways. The facility failed to have residents' rooms, without damage: 1. hole in the drywall, 2. call lights did not connect to the light in the hallway, 3. scuffed paint with exposed sheetrock, 4. broken blind, 5. light string broken, 6. no toilet cover, and 7. toilet without a flushing handle. These failures could place residents and staff at risk of unsafe and unsanitary environment. Findings included: During observations on 10/02/2023 between 11:08 AM and 2:53 PM revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER]B-There was a hole in the drywall. room [ROOM NUMBER]A/B and room [ROOM NUMBER]A/B-The call lights did not connect to the light in the hallway when pressed. room [ROOM NUMBER]A-There was scuffed paint with exposed sheetrock. room [ROOM NUMBER]A/B- The window blind was broken and with resident unable to easily open, and the resident light string was broken and out of reach. room [ROOM NUMBER]A/B-There was a hole in the drywall at the resident's head of bed; in the bathroom there was no toilet cover, and no handle for easy access to flush the toilet. During an observation and interview on 10/02/2023 at 02:53 PM, revealed the call light did not light in the hallway when resident pushed her call light button. LVN G stated sometimes she had to jiggle and reset the restroom lights in order for the light in the hallway to work. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 10:42 AM, LVN H, stated there should have been maintenance in the facility. She stated once they changed the overhead light chords out, they worked fine. She stated when the residents broke them, the staff would have placed the work order in the facility computer program for maintenance to review and repair. LVN H stated she had not ever followed up on how long it took for maintenance to repair the orders she had previously placed; she would resubmit the order if she saw that it had not been corrected. She stated, the staff, including herself had to troubleshoot the call light systems in a few rooms. She stated the scuffs and holes in the residents' walls were related to the beds rubbing on them and had been there at least a couple of months. An interview on 10/05/2023 at 11:08 AM, the ADM stated the staff had discussed why the call system was not fully engaging with the lights in the hallway outside the residents' rooms. She stated, when the residents told the staff their lights outside of their rooms had not worked, the staff would know to go troubleshoot and jiggle the wires where it was connected into the wall. The ADM stated that it was a random occurrence but was always fixable. She stated, when the facility had maintenance, the staff notified them. The ADM stated if it happened at night, their upper management was notified in a group message. She stated it was the CNAs and nurses that worked those hallways during the times the call light would not function correctly. She stated staff used a program on the computer to report issues that needed to be maintained, but the facility had been without maintenance for almost a month. The ADM stated once the incidents were reported and logged into their maintenance repair program, it should have been maintenance to follow up with those, with her as the ADM to monitor maintenance. She stated the facility protocols were for staff to have reported the repairs needed with maintenance prioritizing the needed repairs. The ADM stated she would not have liked living in those situations as it was not homelike. The ADM stated the negative impact to the residents was that the environment was not conducive and not beneficial to them. She stated if the call lights were not working, they could then have a possible behavior issue. She stated the failure for not having maintenance led to the failure, which delayed the process of not getting the repairs done. She stated she was not sure if the call lights could be repaired, as she believed it to be a wiring issue between the bathroom call light when used and the room call light. The ADM stated her expectations were for the facility to look nice for the residents with them feeling like it was their home and being felt taken care of. Record review of the facility's Open & In Progress work orders dated 10/04/2023 revealed: #1566 Pull string for light in room is missing-Medium priority-Room/Area 808A-Not Assigned #1509 Overhead bed light needs string-Low priority-Room/Area 803A-Not Assigned #1521 wall damage-Low priority-Room/Area 706A-Not Assigned #1496 Large hole in wall where recliner use to be-Low priority-Room/Area 501B-Not Assigned #1564 Family states light over the bed is not managed by the cord but by switch-Medium priority-Room/Area 508B-not assigned Record review of the facility policy statement and procedures for Maintenance Service revised December 2009 revealed: Policy Statement: Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. 2. Functions of maintenance personnel include, but are not limited to: a. maintaining the building and compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines. b. Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazard . d. plumbing fixtures, . In good working order. e. Maintaining lighting levels that are comfortable, and assuring that exit lots are in good working order. f. Establishing priorities in providing repair service i. Providing routinely scheduled maintenance service to all areas. j. Others that may be become necessary or appropriate. 3. The maintenance director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service to assure that the building, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner. 4. A copy of the maintenance schedule shall be provided to each department director so that appropriate scheduling can be made without interruption of services to residents. 5. Maintenance personnel shall follow the manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule. 6. Changes in maintenance schedules must be approved by the maintenance director 8. The maintenance director is responsible for maintaining the following record/reports. a. Inspection of building; b. Work order request; c. Maintenance schedule; d. Authorized vendor listing; and e. Warranties and guarantees 9. Records shall be maintained in the maintenance directors office. 10. Maintenance personnel shall follow established safety regulations to ensure the safety and well-being of all concerned. Record review of facility policy Answering the Call Light dated with the revised date of March 2012 revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs . .7. Report all defective call lights to the Nurse Supervisor promptly.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to: A. dispose of food items after the use by or expiration date . B. store, seal and date food items. These failures could place residents receiving oral nutritional intake at risk for foodborne illness and a decline in health status. The findings included : During observations on 10/02/2023 from 10:01am to 11:30am of the kitchen revealed: Dry Storage: One unsealed opened bag containing fish fry seafood breading mix in an unlabeled 25-pound box One can of cream of mushroom soup with a dent on the side of the can Refrigerator One box of individual one pound margarine sticks in a 30pound box with no arrive or open date One 32 once container labeled vanilla yogurt with no arrive or open date Freezer One fourth full unsealed opened bag containing frozen sliced carrots in an unlabeled 30-pound box One plastic bag labeled ham with ice around the ham with a date of 01/01/2023 One half full unsealed opened bag of sweet green peas in an unlabeled 30-pound box One, one fourth full unsealed opened bag of lima beans in a 30-pound box with an open date of 09/21/2023 One three fourths full unsealed opened bag containing crinkled cut potato fries in an unlabeled 30-pound box One unopened 32-ounce bag of sugar snap peas with no arrive date During an interview 10/05/2023 at 09:20 AM Dietary Manager stated that her expectation of her staff was to correctly store, seal and label all foods. The Dietary Manger stated that if foods were not stored, labeled and dated properly that it could cause residents to get food borne illnesses. She stated that everyone in the kitchen is responsible to ensure foods are stored properly. She stated that as the dietary manger she is responsible to ensure that staff are properly trained on sealing, labeling and storing of foods. The dietary manger stated that all residents eat from the kitchen. During an interview on 10/05/2023 at 9:40 AM the [NAME] stated that she was trained by the dietary manager on how to properly store foods. She stated that she was trained by in-services and physically shown how to properly store foods. The c ook stated that if food was not stored properly that it could make residents sick. Review of facility policy HCSG 017, 019 titled Food Storage and Receiving of Food, revised 2022, revealed: All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of the FDA Food Code 2022 revealed: 3-602.11 Food Labels. (A) FOOD PACKAGED in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, shall be labeled as specified in LAW, including 21 CFR 101 - Food labeling, and 9 CFR 317 Labeling, marking devices, and containers. (B) Label information shall include: (1) The common name of the FOOD, or absent a common name, an adequately descriptive identity statement; (2) If made from two or more ingredients, a list of ingredients and sub-ingredients in descending order of predominance by weight, including a declaration of artificial colors, artificial flavors and chemical preservatives, if contained in the FOOD; (3) An accurate declaration of the net quantity of contents; (4) The name and place of business of the manufacturer, [NAME], or distributor; and (5) The name of the FOOD source for each MAJOR FOOD ALLERGEN contained in the FOOD unless the FOOD source is already part of the common or usual name of the respective ingredient. Pf (6) Except as exempted in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act § 403(q)(3) - (5), nutrition labeling as specified in 21 CFR 101 - Food Labeling and 9 CFR 317 Subpart B Nutrition Labeling. (7) For any salmonid FISH containing canthaxanthin or astaxanthin as a COLOR ADDITIVE, the labeling of the bulk FISH container, including a list of ingredients, displayed on the retail container or by other written means, such as a counter card, that discloses the use of canthaxanthin or astaxanthin. Time/temperature control for safety refrigerated foods must be consumed, sold or discarded by the expiration date.
Aug 2023 7 deficiencies 5 IJ (4 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment in accorda...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was making appointments with the Podiatrist/Orthopedic Surgeon (OS) post amputation of 5th digit of left foot. 2. The facility failed to obtain orders from Resident #1's Podiatrist/Orthopedic Surgeon (OS) Podiatrist when appointments were missed status post amputation of 5th digit of left foot. 3. The facility failed to follow Podiatrist/Orthopedic Surgeon (OS)'s orders for daily dressing changes. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. While the IJ was lowered on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could place residents at risk of infections, worsening of wounds, injuries, emotional distress, and even death due to missed appointments, lack of follow-up, dressing changes, and lack of monitoring of amputations Findings include: Resident # 1 Review of Resident # 1's closed record face sheet dated [DATE] revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of [DATE] and discharge date of [DATE] with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease Review of Resident #1's hospital records dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was admitted to local hospital on [DATE] with stroke like symptoms, diabetes, and end stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Further review of hospital records revealed metatarsal resection (amputation of toe) on [DATE]. Further review of hospital record revealed resident Resident #1 was discharged from local hospital on [DATE] at 4:30pm with diagnosis of ulcer of left foot due to necrosis (death of tissues) of bone because of chronic osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone due to infection) of left foot with orders to follow up with Podiatrist/Orthopedic Surgeon in two weeks ([DATE]). Review of Resident # 1's closed record admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #1's closed record care plan dated on [DATE] revised on [DATE] revealed: Focus The resident has infection of the left foot r/t candidiasis. Date Initiated: [DATE] Revision on: [DATE]. Interventions: Administer medication as ordered. Date Initiated [DATE]. Follow facility policy and procedures for line listing, summarizing infections. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Maintain universal precautions when providing resident care. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Perform and document weekly assessment of skin for changes or observations. Record review of Resident #1's closed record progress note on [DATE] written by NP revealed Patient was admitted for sepsis of multi sourced infection sites. Patient was started on empiric antibiotics and blood cultures were negative. Patient underwent a left fifth metatarsal head resection on [DATE]. Patient was medically stabilized and subsequently discharged to facility on [DATE] . Patient to have follow-up with OS on [DATE] at10:30 a.m. Dressing is to remain on the left foot until he is seen by the orthopedic surgeon. Further review of Resident #1's closed record revealed no evidence of documentation of missing Resident #1's appointment with OS on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated [DATE] revealed Resident return from OS per physician progress notes: 1) Please do NOT change the patients dressing 2)RTC on [DATE] @ 1130AM. Transportation notified of f/u appt. and Info updated on 24 hour report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated [DATE] revealed Resident return from OS office per physician progress notes Please change Resident #1's foot wound dressing daily. No further need for ACE wrap. Please see that patient gets his augmentin as ordered. Call placed to OS office for clarification on orders what does provider want for dressing orders and orders for augmentin. Per nurse at OS office to cleanse wound then swab with betadine cover with 4x4 and secure. Augmentin 875mg q12 hours x10days. Orders updated in chart and placed on24 hr{hour} report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated [DATE] revealed Resident return from OS appointment per physician's progress notes: Continue daily dressing changes with betadine to wound base . Return in 1 week appt of [DATE] @ 1045am Transportation notified. Record review of Resident # 1 physician orders revealed start date [DATE] Location of wound: left foot with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS or Wound Cleanser and pat dry. Swab with betadine swab. Cover with 4x4 and secure with tape. and no end date. Record Review of Resident #1's TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE], revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's hospital records dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was re-admitted to local community hospital on [DATE] due to complications related to End Stage Renal Disease requiring dialysis. Further review of Resident #1's hospital records revealed resident was discharged [DATE] to in house hospital hospice. During an interview on [DATE] at 12: 59 PM, Resident # 1's family member stated he/she had concerns about Resident 1's care while at the facility. Resident #1's family member stated he/she felt Resident #1 was neglected by the facility which led to his death. Resident #1's dressing on his wounds were never changed timely. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:35 PM, the DON stated documentation for wound care should have been on the TAR. The DON stated if there were no initials of nursing staff then it meant that the wound treatment was not provided. The DON stated her expectation was that wound care orders be followed and need to be completed, and if resident refused the refusal should have been documented that resident refused wound care. The DON stated she was not aware of missed treatments, she stated she thought treatments were done because she saw TX G's pushing treatment cart up and down the hall. The DON stated that was why she went in and initiated some of the treatment dates. The DON stated that missed treatments could have caused resident decline in wounds. The DON stated if nurse did not document there was no way to prove treatments were done. The DON stated the negative affect on residents, if wound care treatments were not completed, could have caused skin breakdown, and could have caused the wounds to worsen in various ways. The DON stated that RNWS J and LVN F should have provided wound care on the blank entry dates for missed wound care for Resident #1. During an interview on [DATE] at 6:13 PM, RNSW J stated he had never heard of Resident #1. RNWS J stated if wound care was not done it could have caused infection, or resident to become septic. RNWS J stated he had never not documented work, if you do not document it did not happen. During an interview on [DATE] at 6:32 PM, LVN F stated she had never done wound care on Resident #1. LVN F state skin assessments were completed by treatment nurse, and for new admissions the nurse on unit would complete skin assessments. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:05 CSD stated thru her audits she discovered issues with TX G documentation and reeducated TX G. CSD stated she continued to see missed documentation and TX G was removed from treatment nurse about the [DATE]th. TX G stated if someone were to document late then there should be a progress note that explained the late documentation. CSD stated NA was not appropriate entry into TAR, that documentation needed to reflect what was assessed and observed during treatment. CSD stated skin assessments needed to be completed weekly. CSD stated she could run a report that would identify who documented and the date and time they completed the documentation. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:00 PM CSD stated she had ran a report, Medication Admin Audit Report. CSD stated the report showed that DON and ADON E had completed documentation after surveyors had entered the building. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:30 PM, RN OS stated OS had concerns with facility not showing up for appointments or calling to reschedule. RN OS stated Resident #1 was scheduled for one week follow up o [DATE] after surgery and missed appointment. RN OS stated the facility never called to clarify treatment orders, or to called to reschedule appointment. RN OS stated when she called to reschedule, facility stated visits were missed because another resident had an appointment. RN OS stated Resident #1 did not make it to the office for 3 weeks. The bandage had not been changed in 3 weeks and had to be soaked to remove dressing and Resident #1 received bandage burns to his skin. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:50 AM, the OS stated he had concerns Resident #1 was a no call/no show for his first scheduled post-operation visit on [DATE]. The OS stated the facility never called to reschedule visit or to clarify orders. The OS stated Resident #1 went over 3 weeks without bandage being changed, which led to the bandage had to be soaked to be removed and Resident #1 had bandage burns. The OS stated he was never notified of missed wound treatments. The OS stated Resident #1 missing wound care treatments postponed his foot healing. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:46 PM, MR stated she is responsible for making transportation arrangements. She stated she doesn't make the doctor's appointments and when residents are discharged from hospital with a card, the nurse is responsible to make the appointments. MR stated she did not have documentation to why Resident #1 missed appointment on [DATE]. MR stated there were days when the transportation van was not working in order to take residents to appointments; however, it was functioning and working properly on [DATE]. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 5:15pm. The Administration was informed of the IJ. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE] at 5:15pm. Record review of Plan of Removal accepted on [DATE] at 2:35 PM reflected the following: What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? A. Resident # 1 was unable to be assessed (expired 7/23). B. Transportation Log, Hospital Discharge Paperwork and Nurses notes will be reviewed during clinical morning meeting - appointments will be placed in log for Medical Records and Appointments will be reviewed with Administrator/Designee to ensure transportation for residents is provided. C. Transportation barriers will be communicated to Administrator/Designee to ensure appointments are followed. In event of transportation barrier facility will utilize outside resources (ie local transportation company, rental companies) to provide transportation for residents. D. Clinical Staff will notify Medical Records (via appointment sheets) of resident's MD appointments of cancelations or requests for rescheduling of appointment by family members. Medical Records will coordinate with MD office for appointment changes, cancelations or rescheduling of appointments. Clinical Staff will confirm with MD if current orders will remain in place or change any orders until next appointment. Clinical Staff will document changes in appointments in EHR. E. Medical Records / Designee with call family members and resident MD office to verify appointments, place on transportation log, upon return from MD appointment new appointment sheet will be made to reflect next appointment if necessary. How were other residents at risk to be affected by this deficient practice identified? All residents residing in the facility have the potential to be affected by this proposed deficient practice. What does the facility need to change immediately to keep residents safe and ensure it does not happen again? A. On [DATE] Administrator in-serviced the DON, Medical Records and ADONs on reviewing hospital discharge records and nursing documentation in clinical records for any MD appointments, place appointments on appointment sheet for medical records to coordinate transportation. DON and ADONs verbalized teach back of education provided to them. B. An in-service was initiated on [DATE] by Medical Records with clinical staff on appointment sheets for hospital discharge appointments, and MD appointment follow ups. Licensed staff verbalized teach back of education provided to them. C. Newly hired nurses and contract staff will be in-serviced by the Director of Nursing or ADON on appointment sheets for hospital discharge appointments, and MD appointment follow ups. Licensed staff will verbalized teach back of education provided to them. How will the system be monitored to ensure compliance? A. Medical Records / Designee will review during morning clinical meeting any clinical notes, hospital discharge records for MD appointments, will place on Transportation log, verify appointments. B. Medical Records / Designee will communicate with family prior to appointments, if family is unable to attend Medical Records will communicate with MD office on reschedule, will notify Charge Nurse and document in nurses note reason for change of MD appointment. C. Medical Records and Administrator will communicate regarding any appointment conflicts or families who are unable to attend appointments to ensure staff able to attend if needed. Quality Assurance Administrator / Designee will conduct 3 random transportation calendar audits a week for 2 months. Findings of audits and system management will be reported to the QAPI committee during the monthly meetings for the next 2 months, identifying system compliance or need for further education and clinical oversight. Administrator / Medical Records / IDT will conduct on [DATE] Ad Hoc QAPI meeting to review issue and response plan as indicated. An impromptu Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement review of the plan of removal will be completed on [DATE] with the Medical Director. The Medical Director has reviewed and agrees with this plan. Surveyors monitored the facility's Plan of Removal and confirmed it was sufficient to remove the IJ through observations, interviews, and record reviews from [DATE] at 8:00 am to [DATE] at 2:35pm as follows: During an interview on [DATE] at 11:08AM with TX D, she said neglect was not performing a doctor order, not documenting a doctor order, and not changing a resident's wound care dressings. She said the nurse aides were to notify the nurse about any new skin issue and at that time the nurse was supposed to go and do a skin assessment on the resident and notify the resident's physician and family. TX D said that would be the time to get an order from the physician and document the work in the resident's record. She said orders needed to be instant and should never take longer than an hour much less days from the physician and they needed to be implemented immediately as well. She said the treatment nurse was responsible for completed weekly skin assessments and they should reflect the actual picture of resident and their skin. TX D said progress notes and the TAR were supposed to be completed daily with an assessment of the wounds on the TAR and that NA was not an appropriate answer for the assessment of the wound, as it was not an accurate finding. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:25AM with CNA N, she said neglect from an aide would be to not report a skin issue to a nurse and not turning or repositioning a resident so not to put pressure on their wounds or causing pressure sores. CNA N said that the aides did not have an area to document issues, only that they were supposed to report abnormal things to their nurses. is report Nurse first, Skin issue get nurse to look at the skin issue, does not have a place to document. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:33AM with CNA P, she said that neglect from the aides would be not turning and repositioning a resident at least every 2 hours or not telling the nurse about a new skin problem when it was first seen. She said that the residents ran the risk of developing sores or their sores getting worse if the aides didn't frequently reposition the residents. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:30PM with CNA R and Resident #8. Residnet #8 had a pillow behind her right shoulder, and she was inclined approx 45 degrees in the bed wearing oxygen. Resident #8 said the pillow was uncomfortable. While talking with Resident #8, CNA R came into her room, and told her that she wanted to be repositioned. CNA R said she would get help. While waiting for help to arrive, CNA R said the nurse aides were supposed to notify the charge nurses for any change in residents. For residents that had incontinence, the facility had barrier cream they could use for each change, but if they noticed reddened or open sores they were to call the charge nurse immediately. The residents were supposed to be repositioned at least every 2 hours. Resident #8 had an additional mattress overlay on her bed. CNA R said Resident #8 was on hospice, and they must have brought that overlay that morning. Resident #8 said the overlay was fine and she liked it, just didn't like the pillow at her shoulder. CNA R reminded Resident #8 that she had a sore on her lower back and bottom that they needed to try and take some pressure off to help it heal. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:06PM with ADON M, she said she had not been the RN that has been monitoring the skin of the residents of the facility. She said she became the ADON as of [DATE] and started at facility at the very end of May as an RN. she said CSD went over information regarding treatments, skin assessments, documenting in a timely manner, notifying the Dr of changes or if a resident had a refusal of treatment, and scheduling appointments. She said, if you did treatment and didn't sign the MAR, make a late entry to show that it was completed and forgot the documentation but do not go back and fill in the hole after the shift. She said the nurses were supposed to place any and all information on the 24-hour report sheets to help with continuity of care. ADON M said the treatment nurse was supposed to do the treatments and skin assessments, but if not, then the nurse for each resident should do them. She said at least 1 nurse key set has the treatment cart key to access supplies. ADON M said when she did treatments she would date and initial the bandage on the resident so anyone else could see when it was done last. She said, Personally, as a nurse if I see that it wasn't done, or the dates are old I would do a treatment myself. She said with the EHR you can go and change the date in the computer and lookback at the MAR and TAR to see the holes and back date for an assessment. She said, she would not see that as a competent nurse that it would be as a standard of nurse practice to, sign for another person or write something that you had not done yourself. She said she wouldn't want someone to fill in her own work. ADON M said she didn't think that could be a 28-day gap of knowing what I had done at work. I work 2 jobs, so it would definitely be hard to think back more than a couple of days what I had done. She said she would talk to the person that worked previously and ask them then to make a late entry if she seen that documentation had been missed. ADON M said she felt like the window of time that the information was not in the resident's records did not make them an accurate record for the resident. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:49PM with ADON E, he said he had been an LVN for 20 years and he had been working at the facility since May of 2023. ADON E said he started training as a floor nurse first with the expectation as he was going to be the ADON. He said as he was an LVN, he was not managing or monitoring wounds in the facility. He said TX G was managing wounds then TX D was and starting [DATE] it would be ADON C, all of those which were LVN's, so there were no RNs overall who were managing the wounds. ADON E said it had been himself and ADON C that had performed the skin sweep on [DATE] using a resident roster and the full body sheets to mark any skin issue a resident had. He said they did not do an assessment on the residents named in the allegations, as that was the responsibility of DON. He said after they completed the skin sweep, they took their paperwork to DON, but did not do new individual skin assessments in any of the resident's EHR's. ADON E said, So, I learned my lesson, will leave it red and put in a progress note, regarding filling in holes in the MAR and TAR. He said he would do treatment, or an assessment and just didn't get the documentation done, stating, days have just run together. He said, No it is not a standard of practice to go back in and back date or fill in holes in the MAR, TAR or assessments. It's the wrong thing to do. He said you do not chart the next date or later that something was done in a timely manner and never chart for someone else's work or lack of work. I wouldn't know how to defend that in court. He said he would not feel comfortable if someone else did his charting because you never know if you have an enemy. ADON E said he did inservice staff on wounds, charting, just make a note if it was wrong or late, aide to notify the nurse and the nurse needed to notify the doctor that there was a new skin issue. He said they had the 24-hour clip board for the writing of issues. ADON E said Have your shift to document your work. He said the nurses should make a note that the something was not done. He said for any changes, or refusals, the nurses should notify the dr sometime in the shift. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:28PM with MR, she said now they had 2 binders for appointments so each nurses station had 1. She said she was to look at the binders each day and transfer them to the appointment logs. MR said she was in-serviced on the doctor's notes to follow up about an appointment. She said ADM was her manager and if an appointment needed to be rescheduled, then she was to tell ADM and give an explanation. MR said she would be part of the clinical meetings each morning so she could also find out about resident issues and possible appointments, then further check on the binders. She said the facility had their own van and could use local van services or a taxi if needed to get residents to the doctor. MR said, if a family wanted to be with the resident, they did their best to accommodate. She said she a new change would be that they had to follow-up within the day with the family and the doctor's office to confirm appointments and rescheduling of appointments. She said the nurse looked through the admission paperwork for needed appts, and she would as well. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:45PM with ADON C she said, she had been an LVN for 16 yrs and had been working at the facility for 2 yrs. and 2 months. She said yesterday ([DATE]) she became the treatment nurse and before that she was an ADON. The weekend supervisor was the treatment nurse for the weekends. She said new admissions had to have a skin assessment and if they had any types of wounds they needed to have something as far as treatment orders in place within 24 hrs even on weekends. ADON C said every resident had a weekly skin assessment and they were able to run a report for the list of residents with skin assessments to see if they were done. She said, If you didn't document, it wasn't done. Regarding skin assessments and holes in MAR and TAR. She said she wouldn't feel comfortable to have another nurse document for her or doing so for another nurse. She said, That would be false documentation. ADON C said, There is no way I can even remember what I ate for supper last night. There is no way I would remember what I did last week or even further than that, regarding documentation that was days and weeks later. She said CSD was monitoring and managing the skin assessment reports and TAR's to make sure the nurses were getting their work done. She said herself and ADON E did the skin sweep on [DATE] and took skin sweep sheets to DON that had her notes on them. She said they used a skin sheet with the body, if there was nothing on the residents skin, they just put an x or line over body, if there was an area then they circled it with quick description, like redness or sore. ADON C said they didn't do any measurements, just noted any issue. She said CSD in-serviced them to document as you go and at latest the end of the shift, if its after the shift then have to write a progress note indicating it's a late entry and the reason documentation might have been missed or if it wasn't completed. Do not back date or fill in holes. Do not strike out an inaccurate assessment, just do a progress not to indicate the inaccuracy. ADON C said not doing a treatment or a skin assessment was a neglectful action. She said that was how skin issues were identified past a redness or stage 1 and why some wounds got worse. The intact then open sore or intact then DTI within days proved to be inaccurate representation of the resident's skin. She said the admission nurse had to look at new resident's paperwork to see if a resident either had an appointment or needed a follow up appointment and it was the admission nurse's responsibility to call and make the appointment and to put the information in the appointment book at the nurses station. ADON C said she worked with other orthopedic doctors in the past that at times would have orders not to touch the surgical dressing until follow-up appointments and it would sometimes be 2 weeks before a resident could be seen. She said that after the incident with Resident #1, they would now have to make follow-up calls for clarification of the treatment orders with those situations as well as follow up calls to the dr if the dressings were becoming dirty or heavy drainage through the dressing. ADON C said the biggest fix that she could do herself was to step down as an ADON and go back to being the treatment nurse herself. It had been several months since it was her responsibility so she would have to take some time to familiarize herself with wounds again. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:00PM with LVN B, she said she had been an LVN since 2005 and had been working at the facility since December of 2022. She said she had been in serviced regarding wound care in that the nurses needed to complete documentation on wounds either through the skin assessment sheets or the TAR when they were due and to make sure to notify doctor if something was new or a treatment was not completed due to a refusal. She said the nurse that admitted the resident had a skin assessment as a part of the admission paperwork. LVN B said the assessment would include what the skin looked like and if there were any wounds then should describe what the wound looked like, the approximate the size and the location of the wound. She said if there were wounds already present on the resident, they were to review the resident's paperwork for treatment orders and if there were not any orders then the nurses were supposed to notify the doctor to get treatment orders. In the case of resident doctors appointments, most especially if a resident had wounds, LVN B said the nurses reviewed the resident's paperwork for an already scheduled follow-up appointment or if an appointment needed to be scheduled for a resident. She said the nurses were responsible for calling the doctors office to confirm or set up an appointment and to clarify if a treatment was supposed to stay in place, or due to the extended period that it would be before the resident would be seen by the doctor, if the doctor would like to make an order for wound care treatments until the resident could be seen by the doctor. LVN B said each nurses station had an appointment book that the nurses were supposed to either place the appointment card in or write down the resident's name, date of appointment, which doctor and their address in the book. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:20PM with DON, she said she had been a nurse since 2008. She said she had been the DON since [DATE]th of 23. DON said there had been a big learning curve on the change of EHR system from what she had been used to in other facilities in the past. She said she is just very overwhelmed. DON said her orientation was really just a welcoming to the company not a EHR orientation. She said she did not really know how to pull reports to see what the nurses were completing or not. The CSD had been at the facility 3 times since DON came to facility. DON said the CSD has been available by phone has only recently showed her how to run reports. She said the CSD brought it to her attention that skin assessments had not been completed several times for several residents. DON said nursing management started with audits and was having daily all-day meetings checking on the nurses work, and TX G (former tx nurse) didn't want to participate, was not doing her work, would not communicate with DON that she could not get her work done. DON said the CSD said that there was a lot of issues with no documentation regarding treatments and said there was an issue back in March and April of 23 with TX G not getting her work done or her documentation done. She did not know the full description of which nurses did skin assessments for which residents but thought that the floor nurses split odd rooms day shift and even rooms night shift maybe. She said the treatment nurse should be the person that did residents skin assessments that had wounds. DON said she just got hyper focused on catching up the skin assessments and was just so overwhelmed that I was on auto pilot trying to get the documentation caught up. DON said, knows that you should not fill in holes in the MAR and TAR. Said she had never just maliciously done something like that before. She said, I know I have made mistakes, if someone will just tell me it is a mistake, I can fix it, but if you don't tell me whats wrong, I can't fix it. She said the last few days CSD had been going through the system showing her how to run different reports. She said she did a skin sweep when she first came to the facility with the other ADON's s and TX, and over the last week the ADON's s and TX had been doing them almost daily. She said Thursday ([DATE]) she went to the residents that had wounds and had the wound care doctor's notes from that morning and just made sure that there were no [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when there was a significant cha...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when there was a significant change of condition for 4 (Resident #4, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #6) of 8 residents reviewed for notification of changes. 1. The facility failed to notify physician of Resident #4's missed treatments to wounds. 2. The facility failed to notify physician of Resident #1's missed treatments to wounds. 3. The facility failed to notify physician of Resident #2's newly acquired pressure ulcer. Resident #2 went 12 days without treatment to wound. 4. The facility failed to notify physician of Resident #6's left heel Deep Tissue Injury. Resident #6 went 5 days without treatment to wound. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. While the IJ was lowered on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: 1.Resident #4 Review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of [DATE], with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #4's care plan dated [DATE] revealed: Focus: The resident has the potential for pressure ulcer development r/t impaired mobility, incontinence, obesity. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Revision on: [DATE]. Interventions: Notify nurse immediately of any signs of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises and discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Provide assist with turning and repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: [DATE]; Focus: The resident has (DTI) pressure injury to Rt medial heel r/t Reduced Mobility. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Revision on: [DATE]. Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Assess/record/and monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Revision on: [DATE]. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulation/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following orders start date [DATE] Location of wound: Plantar right heel with order to be performed topically one time a day for Apply betadine to plantar right heel unstageable ulcer daily apply betadine until healed. Offloading @ all times. F/U with wound care and end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment being completed on: [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date [DATE] Location of wound: Right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Leptospermum honey in to wound bed cover with border dressing. and end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4 physician order revealed the following order start date [DATE] Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Collagen powder and Calcium alginate with silver cover with border dressing. and end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date [DATE] Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Collagen powder and Calcium alginate with silver cover with border dressing. and end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date [DATE] Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen powder and sodium hypochlorite get (anapest) cover with border dressing. And end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4 physician order revealed the following order start date on [DATE] Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift every Tue, Thu, Sat Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4 physician order revealed the following order start date on [DATE] Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on [DATE] - [DATE] revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: [DATE], and [DATE]. During interview on [DATE] at 10: 50 AM, the WCS stated he was not made aware of missed treatments or treatment refusals. WCS stated missing treatments and/or delay in treatment would have interfered with improvement of wound. 2. Resident # 1 Review of Resident # 1's closed record face sheet dated [DATE] revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent hospital readmission date of [DATE], with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident # 1's closed record admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #1's closed record care plan dated [DATE] (revised on [DATE]) revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure injury r/t History of Pressure Injuries, Poor nutrition, Reduced Mobility, Sheering/friction problems. Date Initiated: [DATE] Revision on: [DATE]; Perform and document weekly assessment form of skin for changes or observations. Date Initiated: [DATE] Protect elbows and heels from friction. Date Initiated: [DATE] Protect heels-offload when in bed. Administer medication as ordered. Date Initiated [DATE]. Follow facility policy and procedures for line listing, summarizing infections. Focus The resident has a stage 1 pressure injury to his R buttocks r/t Reduced Mobility, Incontinence, Sheering/Friction. Date Initiated: [DATE] Revision on: [DATE]. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated [DATE] Assess/record/monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Revision on: [DATE]. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated [DATE]. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Provide pressure relieving cushion to wheelchair. Monitor for placement and condition. Notify supervisor if cushion needs to be replaced. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed start date [DATE] stating Location of wound: left foot with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS or Wound Cleanser and pat dry. Swab with betadine swab. Cover with 4x4 and secure with tape. and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE], revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed start date [DATE] Location of wound: Unstageable Rt Ischium (hip) with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE], revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed start date [DATE] stating Location of wound: right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry Apply Triad cream and cover with silicone dressing with end date [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #1's TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE], revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed order with start date [DATE] stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Anasept and TAO to wound bed cover bordered gauze dressing with end date [DATE] written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE], revealed no evidence of treatment for completed on: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated [DATE] revealed start date [DATE] stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated [DATE] - [DATE], revealed no evidence of being completed on: [DATE] and [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:30 PM, RN OS stated OS had concerns with facility not showing up for appointments or calling to reschedule. RN OS stated Resident #1 was scheduled for one week follow up on [DATE] after surgery and missed appointment. RN OS stated the facility never called to clarify treatment orders, or to called to reschedule appointment. RN OS stated when she called to reschedule, facility stated visits were missed because another resident had an appointment. RN OS stated Resident #1 did not make it to the office for 3 weeks. The bandage had not been changed in 3 weeks and had to be soaked to remove dressing and Resident #1 received bandage burns to his skin. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:50 AM, the OS stated he had concerns Resident #1 was a no call/no show for his first scheduled post-operation visit on [DATE]. The OS stated the facility never called to reschedule visit or to clarify orders. The OS stated Resident #1 went over 3 weeks without bandage being changed, which led to the bandage had to be soaked to be removed and Resident #1 had bandage burns. The OS stated he was never notified of missed wound treatments. The OS stated Resident #1 missing wound care treatments postponed his foot healing. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:46 PM, MR stated she is responsible for making transportation arrangements. She stated she doesn't make the doctor's appointments and when residents are discharged from hospital with a card, the nurse is responsible to make the appointments. MR stated she did not have documentation to why Resident #1 missed appointment on [DATE]. MR stated there were days when the transportation van was not working in order to take residents to appointments; however, it was functioning and working properly on [DATE]. 3. Resident #2 Review of Resident # 2's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of [DATE], with the following diagnosis unspecified dementia (primary), need for assistance with personal care, flaccid hemiplegia (inability to move without assistance) affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident # 2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 8 (moderate); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #2 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent for bowel; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #2's care plan dated [DATE] revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure ulcer development r/t disease process and immobility. Date Initiated: [DATE] Revision on: [DATE]; Interventions: administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date initiated [DATE]. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date initiated [DATE]. Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. Initiate initiated: [DATE]. Inform the resident/family/caregivers of any new area of skin breakdown. Date initiated: [DATE]. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, S/SX of infection, wound size (length X width X depth), stage. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated. Weekly skin assessments. Date initiated: [DATE]. Revision on: [DATE]; Focus: patient has a stage 4 pressure injury to right posterior calf with potential for further skin breakdown R/T: disease process, immobility, impaired mobility, lack of sensation, non-compliance with therapeutic regimen. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Review of Resident # 2's nurses notes dated [DATE] at 11:00 PM written by LVN T revealed: Aide has brought to my attention that [Resident #2] has open area on back of right ankle area. When this nurse assessed, I found wound that is denuded, partial thickness and has black eschar in wound bed. I cleansed wound with wound cleanser, applied hydrophilic ointment and covered with bordered gauze. Entire leg and foot have severe outward rotation. It is stroke effected side. Heel is elevated off bed and wound area is hanging free with no pressure. Review of Resident # 2's nurses note dated [DATE] at 1:37 PM written by LVN A revealed: Resident noted to have a DTI per night nurse to his right lower calf area cleaned Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed no evidence of pressure ulcer treatment between [DATE] and [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed: Order date [DATE] at 2:15 PM Cleanse right lower posterior calf with dermal wound cleaner apply Triad Debriding Cream to wound bed and cover with boarder dressing. Every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for promote Wound healing and every 1 hour as needed for skin irritation. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:35 PM, the DON stated she had completed skin assessment on [DATE] for Resident #2. The DON stated the system was new to her, and she must have gotten confused between patients. The DON stated she had not completed a thorough assessment and that her assessment did not give an accurate assessment of Resident # 2. The DON stated the negative affect on residents, if wound care treatments were not completed, could have caused skin breakdown, and could have caused the wounds to worsen in various ways. During interview on [DATE] at 10: 50 AM, the WCS stated he was not made aware of missed treatments or treatment refusals. WCS stated missing treatments and/or delay in treatment would have interfered with improvement of wound. 4. Resident # 6 Review of Resident # 6's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of [DATE], with the following diagnosis Type 2 diabetes (primary), age-related physical debility, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident # 6's significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 99 (Unable to complete interview); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had extensive dependence with most activities (1 physical assist); Section F- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent to bowel and bladder. Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #6 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #6's care plan dated [DATE] revealed no intervention related to Deep Tissue Injury prevention or care. Review of Resident #6's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated [DATE] completed TX D revealed; Suspected Deep Tissue Injury to left heel measuring 4cm in length by 3cm in width. Review of Resident #6's physician orders revealed no evidence of wound treatment order for Deep Tissue Injury between [DATE] and [DATE]. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated [DATE] revealed Skin prep to left heel every day and prn every day shift for wound care related to weakness. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:35 PM, the DON stated orders for new skin issues should be obtained within the shift but not later than 24 hours after identified. During interview on [DATE] at 10: 50 AM, the WCS stated he was not made aware of missed treatments or treatment refusals. WCS stated missing treatments and/or delay in treatment would have interfered with improvement of wound. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:19 AM TX G stated she had been the treatment nurse until mid-July. TX G stated she documented when she performed wound care. TX G stated if there were blanks in the TAR treatments were not done. TX G stated she had to work the floor on day or night shifts on several occasions and was not able to complete her duties as treatment nurse. TX G stated when she worked the floor, if she was am not the treatment nurse that day or not working, the charge nurses were responsible for wound care of their patients. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:38 AM, the ADM stated her expectation was that treatments were followed per physician's order. The ADM stated if treatment orders were missed it should have been documented why the treatment was missed and notify the physician that treatments were missed. The ADM stated missed treatments could have caused wounds to worsen. The DON was to monitor that treatments were completed. The ADM stated missing treatment could have put the residents at risk of neglect. The ADMN stated what led to the failure of physician not being contacted for orders and/or updating the physician was that staff got busy with other tasks or assumed that another shift had contacted physician. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:08 AM TX D stated neglect was not contacting a doctor when new issues were identified, not following doctor and/or performing a doctor's order. TX D stated the doctor should be contacted immediately when resident had a change of condition. TX D stated there was not any reason that a resident should have to wait for over 24 hours for orders. TX D stated missed wound treatments could have resulted in poor wound healing or worsening of wound. Record Review of Facility policy titled, Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment dated [DATE] revealed: If the resident refuses the treatment, the reason for refusal and the resident's response to the explanation of the risks of refusing the procedure, the benefits of accepting and available alternatives. Document family and physician notification. Notify attending MD {Medical Director} if new skin alteration noted. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 5:15pm. The Administration was informed of the IJ. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE] at 5:15pm. Record review of the Plan of Removal accepted on [DATE] at 2:35 PM reflected the following: What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? A. Resident # 1 was unable to be assessed (expired 7/23). B. Resident # 2 was assessed by Director of Nursing on [DATE] at the time the concern was identified. No new concerns were identified. Wound Care physician also assessed patient on 8/3. No new concerns were identified C. Resident # 4 was assessed by Director of Nursing on [DATE] at the time the concern was identified. No new concerns were identified. Wound Care physician also assess patient on 8/3. No new concerns were identified. D. Resident # 6 was assessed by Director of Nursing on [DATE] at the time the concern was identified. No new concerns were identified. E. Facility nurse management (Assistant Directors of Nursing) completed a skin audit on residents residing in the facility on [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Skins audits were reviewed by DON and Nurse management team. Two residents were identified that had open areas. Physician was notified and orders received by facility for treatment. F. Residents physician will be notified upon the identification of a new wound, any wounds that have progressively worsened and any missed treatment or treatments that were refused by the resident. This notification will be documented in the resident's chart. G.DON and/or designee will review and ensure that orders, treatments and notification to the physician are completed through the facilities daily clinical meeting. Any concerns identified will be addressed immediately. How were other residents at risk to be affected by this deficient practice identified? A. All residents residing in the facility have the potential to be affected by this proposed deficient practice. B. Facility nurse management (Assistant Directors of Nursing) completed a skin audit on residents residing in the facility on [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Skins audits were reviewed by DON and Nurse management team. Two residents were identified that had open areas. Physician was notified and orders received by facility for treatment. The facility has 15 total residents with skin issues. The physician has been notified of all issues. The two additional residents were identified on the 8/2 skin round. Resident A had two areas (irritant dermatitis from body fluid) on this scrotum/anterior thigh. Resident B had one area on each buttock. Hospice and physician were notified on both patients. What does the facility need to change immediately to keep residents safe and ensure it does not happen again? A. During the facilities morning clinical meeting the DON and/or designee will review any new wounds, any new treatments, wounds that have progressively worsened and any treatments that were missed or refused and ensure physician notification was completed and documented appropriately in the residents chart. B. On [DATE] Corporate Clinical Services Director in-serviced the DON and nurse managers on properly and accurately assessing resident's skin, monitoring for change of condition, wound care documentation, clinical records documentations, and any omissions of treatments in the treatment record. This in-service included MD notification. DON, ADONs and Treatment Nurse will verbalize teach back of education provided to them. Any staff not available will be required to receive in-service prior to their next schedule shift. C. Facility direct care staff was in-serviced by the Clinical Management team on [DATE] regarding pressure ulcer prevention. This in-service included MD notification. Any staff not available will be required to receive in-service prior to their next schedule shift. D. An in-service was initiated on [DATE] by Director of Nursing and ADONs with the licensed nursing staff on properly assessing resident's skin, monitoring for change of condition, wound care documentation, clinical records documentation, and omissions of treatments in the treatment record. Licensed staff will verbalize teach back of education provided to them. This in-service included MD notification. Any staff not available will be required to receive in-service prior to their next schedule shift. E. Newly hired nurses and contract staff will be in-serviced by the Director of Nursing or ADON on properly assessing resident's skin, monitoring for change of condition, wound care documentation, clinical records documentation, and omissions of treatments in the treatment record. This in-service included MD notification. Licensed staff will verbalize teach back of education provided to them. F. Facility has implemented/re-implemented the following procedure to ensure How will the system be monitored to ensure compliance? Facility Director of Nursing and/or designee will review skin assessments, treatment administration records, documentation and physician notification through facilities clinical morning meeting. Any identified concerns will be address immediately. Facility Administrator and/or designee will attend the clinical morning meeting and ensure system is being followed. Any concerns identified will be addressed immediately. This process began immediately on [DATE] and will continue weekly DON will Monitor and the Administrator will oversee Clinical documentation review upon admission/readmission noting pressure injury/skin and that physician was notified, orders were received, and area treated. Any identified concerns will be addressed immediately with staff and physician. Monitoring will continue 5x weekly for the next 8 weeks. DON will monitor and the Administrator will oversee that upon admission/readmission that the charge nurse on duty has completed the full body skin assessment - intentionally assessing the resident head to toe for evidence of any pressure injury or skin concerns. DON and facility treatment nurse will review to ensure accuracy and to ensure the physician was notified of any identified concerns. Monitoring will continue 5x weekly for the next 8 weeks. DON will monitor and Administrator will oversee conducting weekly skin assessments shall be completed upon admission/readmit at least every 7 days thereafter. This will be monitored through the facility's clinical morning meeting. Monitoring will continue 5x weekly for the next 8 weeks. DON will monitor and Administrator will oversee the signing out for weekly skin assessments on the MAR and signing out the treatments as ordered and administered by licensed nurse a minimum of 5x weekly for three months during the morning clinical meeting. If there is an omission in the TAR or an assessment showing not completed the assigned nurse will be called immediately to verify if there was a reason for the omission. If truly missed the resident will be assessed immediately and the physician notified of the missed treatment/assessment. DON will monitor and Administrator will oversee that the Charge Nurse / Wound Care Nurse conducts a head - to - toe skin assessment upon admission / readmission and that physician is notified and orders received and that this is documented in the resident chart. Charge nurses will perform a complete skin assessment for each admission/re-admission including notifying the physician, receiving orders and documenting such. DON, ADONs or Treatment Nurse will conduct post admission skin assessments within 24 -72 hours after the initial admission/readmission skin assessment to validate accuracy of documentation of skin condition. Any remedial education or reprimand will occur at this time. DON will monitor and the Administrator will oversee weekly for the next 8 weeks that the IDT will review the plan of care to ensure appropriate interventions are in place to address the prevention of or minimizing the risks associated with skin injury in relation to the identified residen[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 6 of 8 residents (Resident #4, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) reviewed for neglect. 1. The facility failed to follow physician's orders to prevent Resident #4's Deep Tissue Injury to right medial heel to deteriorate to a stage 4 pressure ulcer. 2. The facility failed to follow physician's orders to prevent Resident #1's Right Ischium(hip) pressure ulcer to deteriorate from a stage 2 to a stage 3. 3. The facility failed to obtain orders from Resident #1's Podiatrist when appointments were missed status post amputation of 5th digit of left foot. 4. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #2's pressure ulcer on right posterior calf. Resident #2 went 12 days without treatment to wound. Resident #2 was assessed on 08/03/2023 with Stage IV. 5. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #6's left heel Deep Tissue Injury. Resident #6 went 5 days without treatment to wound. 6. The facility failed to complete skin assessments of Resident #7 which led to the development of a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right upper buttocks and stage 2 to the right lower buttocks. 7. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments which led to Resident #8 developing stage 2 pressure ulcer to left buttock and stage 2 pressure ulcer to right buttock. 8. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 2 and Resident #4 ' s skin assessments were completed, assessed accurately and accurately documented by the DON. 9. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #4 and Resident #5 ' s wound treatments were completed and accurately documented by DON and ADON E. 10. The facility failed to maintain accurate list of residents with pressure ulcers. The facility did a skin sweep and found Resident #7's and Resident #8's wounds after surveyor intervention requesting accurate lists of residents with pressure ulcers. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/03/23. While the IJ was lowered on 08/07/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could place residents at risk of infections, worsening of wounds, injuries, emotional distress, and even death. Findings included: 1.Resident #4 Record review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 05/15/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has the potential for pressure ulcer development r/t impaired mobility, incontinence, obesity. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Interventions: Notify nurse immediately of any signs of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises and discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022. Provide assist with turning and repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022; Focus: The resident has (DTI) pressure injury to Rt medial heel r/t Reduced Mobility. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 03/29/2023. Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Assess/record/and monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 06/05/2023. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulation/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed start date 03/14/2023 Location of wound: Plantar right heel with order to be performed topically one time a day for Apply betadine to plantar right heel unstageable ulcer daily apply betadine until healed. Offloading @ all times. F/U with wound care and end date 04/13/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment being completed on: 04/08/2023 and 04/09/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the order start date 04/13/2023 Location of wound: Right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Leptospermum honey in to wound bed cover with border dressing. and end date 05/04/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 04/14/2023, 04/15/2023 and 04/23/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date 05/04/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Collagen powder and Calcium alginate with silver cover with border dressing. and end date 06/27/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 05/01/2023 - 05/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 05/08/2023, 05/15/2023, 05/16/2023, 05/22/2023, 05/29/2023, 05/30/2023 and 05/31/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 06/02/2023, 06/03/2023, 06/04/2023, 06/12/2023, 06/19/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/21/2023 and 06/24/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date 06/27/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen powder and sodium hypochlorite get (anapest) cover with border dressing. And end date 06/29/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 06/28/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date on 06/29/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift every Tue, Thu, Sat Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date 07/10/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 07/01/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order dated 07/29/2023 revealed the following order start date on 07/10/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date 07/20/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 07/14/2023, 07/15/2023, and 07/23/2023. Record review of Resident #4's Medication Administration Audit Report generated by CSD revealed: -Scheduled for 07/14/2023 at 06:00AM and charted as completed on 07/29/2023 8:58PM by DON. -Scheduled for 07/15/2023 at 06:00AM was charted as completed on 07/29/2023 9:06PM by DON. -Scheduled for 07/23/23 at 6:00AM was charted as completed on 7/29/23 at 9:53PM by DON. Record review of Resident #4's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed DTI (deep tissue injury) to right medial heel. Record review of Resident #4's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by DON revealed Skin Intact. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note dated 05/18/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.8cm in length by 2.4cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note dated 05/25/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.8cm in length by 2.4cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Treatment options - risks - benefits and the possible need for subsequent additional procedures on this wound were explained on 04/13/2023 to the patient. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note titled dated 07/27/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.4cm in length by 2.2cm in width by 0.2cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. During an observation and interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:30PM Resident #4 was sitting up in wheelchair with offloading boot to right foot and elevated with extended wheelchair footrest. Resident #4 stated she gave permission to observe foot and take a photograph of wound. Resident #4's right foot pressure ulcer had thick green tinged skin surrounding a circular wound with beefy red granulation tissue observed to wound bed. Observation of small amount of drainage observed to bandage and no odor. Resident #4 stated she had no concerns with her wound. 2. Resident # 1 Record review of Resident # 1's closed record face sheet dated 07/29/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent hospital readmission date of 06/03/2023, with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Record review of Resident # 1's closed record admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Record review of Resident #1's closed record care plan dated 05/15/2022 (revised on 06/04/2023) revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure injury r/t History of Pressure Injuries, Poor nutrition, Reduced Mobility, Sheering/friction problems. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 02/21/2022; Perform and document weekly assessment form of skin for changes or observations. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect elbows and heels from friction. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect heels-offload when in bed. Administer medication as ordered. Date Initiated 11/29/2022. Follow facility policy and procedures for line listing, summarizing infections. Focus The resident has a stage 1 pressure injury to his R buttocks r/t Reduced Mobility, Incontinence, Sheering/Friction. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 10/24/2022. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated 08/18/2022 Assess/record/monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated 08/18/2022. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide pressure relieving cushion to wheelchair. Monitor for placement and condition. Notify supervisor if cushion needs to be replaced. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed no new areas, continue tx{treatment} to diabetic ulcer to lt{left} foot. Record review of Resident #1's closed record admission Summary Progress Note dated 06/03/2023 revealed stage 2 pressure wound on coccyx. Record review of Resident #1's closed record progress note titled Skin/Wound Note dated 06/15/2023 revealed WCS here this am to see resident. Stage 3 on rt ischium measures3x4.5x0.3. Light serous drainage with45% slough 5% granulation, 50% skin. Deterioration noted. [NAME] tinge to drainage concerning for Pseudomonas. No signs of infection. WCS preformed surgical excisional debridement to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 06/21/2023 revealed Resident return from OS per physician progress notes: 1) Please do NOT change the patients dressing 2)RTC on June 25 @ 1130AM. Transportation notified of f/u appt. and Info updated on 24 hour report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 06/30/2023 revealed Resident return from OS office per physician progress notes Please change Resident #1's foot wound dressing daily. No further need for ACE wrap. Please see that patient gets his augmentin as ordered. Call placed to OS office for clarification on orders what does provider want for dressing orders and orders for augmentin. Per [NAME] nurse at OS office to cleanse wound then swab with betadine cover with 4x4 and secure. Augmentin 875mg q12 hours x10days. Orders updated in chart and placed on24 hr{hour} report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 07/07/2023 revealed Resident return from OS appointment per physician's progress notes: Continue daily dressing changes with betadine to wound base . Return in 1 week appt of 7/14/23 @ 1045am Transportation notified. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 4 pressure ulcer to R Ischium with wound care and left leg dressing intact. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 3 pressure ulcer to R Ischium measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth and left leg dressing intact. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 3 pressure ulcer to R Ischium measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 05/18/2023 revealed diabetic wound of the left, distal, plantar, lateral foot full thickness. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated for removal of necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. No mention of R Ischium wound. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/08/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 2.3cm in length by 4.5cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/15/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 3.0cm in length by 4.5cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/22/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/29/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 3.5cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 07/06/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 4.0cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record hospital records dated 05/16/2023 revealed Stage 2 coccygeal & gluteal PI-POA. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed start date 06/27/2023 Location of wound: Unstageable Rt Ischium with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 07/01/202, 07/03/2023, 07/05/2023, 07/07/2023 and 07/12/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed start date 06/05/2023 stating Location of wound: right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry Apply Triad cream and cover with silicone dressing with end date 06/09/2023. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 06/07/2023, 06/08/2023, 06/09/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed order with start date 06/09/2023 stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Anasept and TAO to wound bed cover bordered gauze dressing with end date 06/27/2023 written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for completed on: 06/09/2023, 06/14/2023, 06/19/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/21/2023, 06/24/2023, 06/25/2023 and 06/26/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed start date 06/27/2023 stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of being completed on: 06/27/2023 and 06/30/2023. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed no evidence of treatment orders for Resident #1 left foot from 06/01/2023 to 06/30/2023. Record review of Resident # 1 physician orders revealed start date 06/30/2023 Location of wound: left foot with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS or Wound Cleanser and pat dry. Swab with betadine swab. Cover with 4x4 and secure with tape. and no end date. Record Review of Resident #1's TAR dated July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 07/01/2023, 07/03/2023, 07/05/2023, 07/07/2023, 07/09/2023 and 07/12/2023. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note dated 08/03/23 revealed: DON performed skin assessment of this resident who has stage 4 pressure wound to right posterior, lower extremity, measures 3.2 x 1.8 x 1.0cm with minimal serous drainage noted, peri wound of normal skin color for resident. 70% granulation tissue noted, no slough, and tendon and bone noted. Suprapubic cath site to mid-lower abdomen area, no drainage or leakage to area noted. No sis of infection or further abnormalities noted. Signed DON 8/3/23 at 7:40PM Record review of Resident #2's Wound Care Physician Assessment Note dated 08/03/23 revealed: Focused Wound Exam (Site 1) STAGE 4 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE RIGHT, LATERAL CALF FULL THICKNESS. Etiology (quality), Pressure. Stage. 4. Duration > 1 days During an interview on 07/29/2023 at 12: 59 PM Resident # 1's family member stated he/she had concerns about Resident 1's care while at the facility. Resident #1's family member stated he/she felt Resident #1 was neglected by the facility which led to his death. Resident #1's family member stated his room always smelled like urine and that Resident #1's dressing on his wounds were never changed timely. During an interview on 08/03/2023 at 11:50 AM the OS stated he had concerns Resident #1 was a no call/no show for his first scheduled post-operation visit. The OS stated the facility never called to reschedule visit or to clarify orders. The OS stated Resident #1 went over 3 weeks without bandage being changed, which led to the bandage had to be soaked to be removed and Resident #1 had bandage burns. The OS stated he was never notified of missed treatments. The OS stated Resident #1 missing wound care treatments postponed his foot healing. 3. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08/03/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 10/05/2022, with the following diagnosis unspecified dementia (primary), need for assistance with personal care, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident #2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 8 (moderate); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #2 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent for bowel; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #2's care plan dated 07/04/2022 revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure ulcer development r/t disease process and immobility. Date Initiated: 06/26/2018 Revision on: 04/15/2021; Interventions: administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date initiated 06/26/2018. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date initiated 06/26/2018. Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. Initiate initiated: 06/26/2018. Inform the resident/family/caregivers of any new area of skin breakdown. Date initiated: 06/26/2018. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, S/SX of infection, wound size (length X width X depth), stage. Date Initiated: 06/26/2018. Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated. Weekly skin assessments. Date initiated: 06/26/2018. Revision on: 03/03/2023; Focus: patient has a stage 4 pressure injury to right posterior calf with potential for further skin breakdown R/T: disease process, immobility, impaired mobility, lack of sensation, non-compliance with therapeutic regimen. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 07/29/1013. Review of Resident #2's nurses notes dated 07/15/2023 at 11:00 PM written by LVN T revealed: Aide has brought to my attention that [Resident #2] has open area on back of right ankle area. When this nurse assessed, I found wound that is denuded, partial thickness and has black eschar in wound bed. I cleansed wound with wound cleanser, applied hydrophilic ointment and covered with bordered gauze. Entire leg and foot have severe outward rotation. It is stroke effected side. Heel is elevated off bed and wound area is hanging free with no pressure. Review of Resident #2's nurses note dated 07/17/2023 at 1:37 PM written by LVN A revealed: Resident noted to have a DTI per night nurse to his right lower calf area cleaned Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed no evidence of pressure ulcer treatment between 07/15/2023 and 07/27/2023. Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed: Order date 07/27/2023 at 2:15 PM Cleanse right lower posterior calf with dermal wound cleaner apply Triad Debriding Cream to wound bed and cover with boarder dressing. Every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for promote Wound healing and every 1 hour as needed for skin irritation. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by DON revealed Skin Intact. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by TX D revealed Right lower leg stage 3 pressure ulcer measuring 2.5cm in length by 2.7cm in width by 0.5cm in depth. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by TX D revealed right lower leg unstageable pressure ulcer measuring 2.5cm in length by 2.0cm in width by 0.5cm in depth. During an observation on 07/29/2023 at 4:10PM of Resident #2 revealed Resident #2 lying in bed with right leg on pillow. Resident #2's right lower leg was covered by gauze and secured with tape. The dressing did not have a date on the outside. During an observation on 7/30/2023 at 3:30 PM of Resident #2 revealed Resident #2's lower right leg had a wound that had red tissue present, surrounding skin within normal limits for race, no tendon or bone observed, no necrosis observed, measurements were not taken appeared to be a Stage 3. During an interview on 07/30/2023 at 5:35 PM, the DON stated she had completed skin assessment on 7/20/2023 for Resident #2. The DON stated that she should have looked at the nurses notes to verify that Resident #2 did have a pressure ulcer. The DON stated the system was new to her, and she must have gotten confused between patients. The DON stated she had not completed a thorough assessment and that her assessment did not give an accurate assessment of Resident # 2, because if nurses note on 07/13 and 7/15 stated he had a pressure ulcer then her assessment on 7/20 should have reflected that. The DON stated the negative affect on residents, if wound care treatments were not completed, could have caused skin breakdown, and could have caused the wounds to worsen in various ways. 4. Resident # 6 Review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 08/31/2018, with the following diagnosis Type 2 diabetes (primary), age-related physical debility, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #6's significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 99 (Unable to complete interview); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had extensive dependence with most activities (1 physical assist); Section F- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent to bowel and bladder. Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #6 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #6's care plan dated 5/15/2023 revealed no intervention related to Deep Tissue Injury prevention or care. Review of Resident #6's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 07/25/2023 completed TX D revealed; Suspected Deep Tissue Injury to left heel measuring 4cm in length by 3cm in width. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 07/29/2023 revealed no evidence of wound treatment order for Deep Tissue Injury between 07/25/2023 and 07/29/2023. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 07/30/2023 revealed Skin prep to left heel every day and prn everyday shift for wound care related to weakness. During an observation and interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:25 PM revealed Resident #6 laying on her back not wearing her offloading boot, the boot was to the left side of her foot. Resident #6's wound was located on left heel, the wound was circular and purple in color, there was no drainage and skin appeared. During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:25 PM ADON C stated Resident #6 should have been wearing the offloading boot while in laying bed. ADON C stated that Resident #6's wound was not healed and needed further treatment. 5. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 07/27/2023, with the following diagnosis cerebral infarction (primary), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and Type 2 diabetes. Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed limited to extensive assist needing 1 - 2+ persons for assistance; Section- H Bowel and Bladder revealed occasionally incontinent to bladder and frequently incontinent to bowel. Section M- Skin Conditions revealed resident is at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 05/31/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has pressure injury to Rt buttock stage 3 with potential for further skin breakdown r/t: chronic progressive disease, impaired mobility, obesity. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Document wound appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx of infection, wound size (length X width X depth) and stage, and report to MD PRN any changes in skin status. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Notify Nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Provide pressure relieving device in bed. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Refer to dietician and follow recommendation. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Review of Resident #7's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 07/28/2023 completed by TX D revealed redness to right buttock. Review of Resident #7's Skin Note dated 07/31/2023 completed by TX D revealed Wounds to bilateral gluteal ischium tuberosities are healed, discontinue wound care to these areas, will continue to monitor. Review of [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohib...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse and neglect for 6 of 8 residents (Resident #4, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) reviewed for neglect. 1. The facility failed to follow physician's orders to prevent Resident #4's Deep Tissue Injury to right medial heel to deteriorate to a stage 4 pressure ulcer. 2. The facility failed to follow physician's orders to prevent Resident #1's Right Ischium(hip) pressure ulcer to deteriorate from a stage 2 to a stage 3. 3. The facility failed to obtain orders from Resident #1's Podiatrist when appointments were missed status post amputation of 5th digit of left foot. 4. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #2's pressure ulcer on right posterior calf. Resident #2 went 12 days without treatment to wound. Resident #2 was assessed on 08/03/2023 with Stage IV. 5. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #6's left heel Deep Tissue Injury. Resident #6 went 5 days without treatment to wound. 6. The facility failed to complete skin assessments of Resident #7 which led to the development of a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right upper buttocks and stage 2 to the right lower buttocks. 7. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments which led to Resident #8 developing stage 2 pressure ulcer to left buttock and stage 2 pressure ulcer to right buttock. 8. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 2 and Resident #4 ' s skin assessments were completed, assessed accurately and accurately documented by the DON. 9. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #4 and Resident #5 ' s wound treatments were completed and accurately documented by DON and ADON E. 10. The facility failed to maintain accurate list of residents with pressure ulcers. The facility did a skin sweep and found Resident #7's and Resident #8's wounds after surveyor intervention requesting accurate lists of residents with pressure ulcers. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/03/23. While the IJ was lowered on 08/07/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could place residents at risk of infections, worsening of wounds, injuries, emotional distress, and even death. Findings included: 1.Resident #4 Record review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 05/15/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has the potential for pressure ulcer development r/t impaired mobility, incontinence, obesity. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Interventions: Notify nurse immediately of any signs of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises and discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022. Provide assist with turning and repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022; Focus: The resident has (DTI) pressure injury to Rt medial heel r/t Reduced Mobility. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 03/29/2023. Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Assess/record/and monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 06/05/2023. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulation/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed start date 03/14/2023 Location of wound: Plantar right heel with order to be performed topically one time a day for Apply betadine to plantar right heel unstageable ulcer daily apply betadine until healed. Offloading @ all times. F/U with wound care and end date 04/13/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment being completed on: 04/08/2023 and 04/09/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the order start date 04/13/2023 Location of wound: Right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Leptospermum honey in to wound bed cover with border dressing. and end date 05/04/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 04/14/2023, 04/15/2023 and 04/23/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date 05/04/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Collagen powder and Calcium alginate with silver cover with border dressing. and end date 06/27/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 05/01/2023 - 05/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 05/08/2023, 05/15/2023, 05/16/2023, 05/22/2023, 05/29/2023, 05/30/2023 and 05/31/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 06/02/2023, 06/03/2023, 06/04/2023, 06/12/2023, 06/19/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/21/2023 and 06/24/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date 06/27/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen powder and sodium hypochlorite get (anapest) cover with border dressing. And end date 06/29/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 06/28/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date on 06/29/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift every Tue, Thu, Sat Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date 07/10/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 07/01/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order dated 07/29/2023 revealed the following order start date on 07/10/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date 07/20/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 07/14/2023, 07/15/2023, and 07/23/2023. Record review of Resident #4's Medication Administration Audit Report generated by CSD revealed: -Scheduled for 07/14/2023 at 06:00AM and charted as completed on 07/29/2023 8:58PM by DON. -Scheduled for 07/15/2023 at 06:00AM was charted as completed on 07/29/2023 9:06PM by DON. -Scheduled for 07/23/23 at 6:00AM was charted as completed on 7/29/23 at 9:53PM by DON. Record review of Resident #4's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed DTI (deep tissue injury) to right medial heel. Record review of Resident #4's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by DON revealed Skin Intact. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note dated 05/18/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.8cm in length by 2.4cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note dated 05/25/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.8cm in length by 2.4cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Treatment options - risks - benefits and the possible need for subsequent additional procedures on this wound were explained on 04/13/2023 to the patient. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note titled dated 07/27/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.4cm in length by 2.2cm in width by 0.2cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. During an observation and interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:30PM Resident #4 was sitting up in wheelchair with offloading boot to right foot and elevated with extended wheelchair footrest. Resident #4 stated she gave permission to observe foot and take a photograph of wound. Resident #4's right foot pressure ulcer had thick green tinged skin surrounding a circular wound with beefy red granulation tissue observed to wound bed. Observation of small amount of drainage observed to bandage and no odor. Resident #4 stated she had no concerns with her wound. 2. Resident # 1 Record review of Resident # 1's closed record face sheet dated 07/29/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent hospital readmission date of 06/03/2023, with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Record review of Resident # 1's closed record admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Record review of Resident #1's closed record care plan dated 05/15/2022 (revised on 06/04/2023) revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure injury r/t History of Pressure Injuries, Poor nutrition, Reduced Mobility, Sheering/friction problems. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 02/21/2022; Perform and document weekly assessment form of skin for changes or observations. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect elbows and heels from friction. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect heels-offload when in bed. Administer medication as ordered. Date Initiated 11/29/2022. Follow facility policy and procedures for line listing, summarizing infections. Focus The resident has a stage 1 pressure injury to his R buttocks r/t Reduced Mobility, Incontinence, Sheering/Friction. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 10/24/2022. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated 08/18/2022 Assess/record/monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated 08/18/2022. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide pressure relieving cushion to wheelchair. Monitor for placement and condition. Notify supervisor if cushion needs to be replaced. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed no new areas, continue tx{treatment} to diabetic ulcer to lt{left} foot. Record review of Resident #1's closed record admission Summary Progress Note dated 06/03/2023 revealed stage 2 pressure wound on coccyx. Record review of Resident #1's closed record progress note titled Skin/Wound Note dated 06/15/2023 revealed WCS here this am to see resident. Stage 3 on rt ischium measures3x4.5x0.3. Light serous drainage with45% slough 5% granulation, 50% skin. Deterioration noted. [NAME] tinge to drainage concerning for Pseudomonas. No signs of infection. WCS preformed surgical excisional debridement to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 06/21/2023 revealed Resident return from OS per physician progress notes: 1) Please do NOT change the patients dressing 2)RTC on June 25 @ 1130AM. Transportation notified of f/u appt. and Info updated on 24 hour report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 06/30/2023 revealed Resident return from OS office per physician progress notes Please change Resident #1's foot wound dressing daily. No further need for ACE wrap. Please see that patient gets his augmentin as ordered. Call placed to OS office for clarification on orders what does provider want for dressing orders and orders for augmentin. Per [NAME] nurse at OS office to cleanse wound then swab with betadine cover with 4x4 and secure. Augmentin 875mg q12 hours x10days. Orders updated in chart and placed on24 hr{hour} report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 07/07/2023 revealed Resident return from OS appointment per physician's progress notes: Continue daily dressing changes with betadine to wound base . Return in 1 week appt of 7/14/23 @ 1045am Transportation notified. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 4 pressure ulcer to R Ischium with wound care and left leg dressing intact. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 3 pressure ulcer to R Ischium measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth and left leg dressing intact. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 3 pressure ulcer to R Ischium measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 05/18/2023 revealed diabetic wound of the left, distal, plantar, lateral foot full thickness. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated for removal of necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. No mention of R Ischium wound. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/08/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 2.3cm in length by 4.5cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/15/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 3.0cm in length by 4.5cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/22/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/29/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 3.5cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 07/06/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 4.0cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record hospital records dated 05/16/2023 revealed Stage 2 coccygeal & gluteal PI-POA. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed start date 06/27/2023 Location of wound: Unstageable Rt Ischium with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 07/01/202, 07/03/2023, 07/05/2023, 07/07/2023 and 07/12/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed start date 06/05/2023 stating Location of wound: right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry Apply Triad cream and cover with silicone dressing with end date 06/09/2023. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 06/07/2023, 06/08/2023, 06/09/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed order with start date 06/09/2023 stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Anasept and TAO to wound bed cover bordered gauze dressing with end date 06/27/2023 written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for completed on: 06/09/2023, 06/14/2023, 06/19/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/21/2023, 06/24/2023, 06/25/2023 and 06/26/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed start date 06/27/2023 stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of being completed on: 06/27/2023 and 06/30/2023. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders dated 7/29/23 revealed no evidence of treatment orders for Resident #1 left foot from 06/01/2023 to 06/30/2023. Record review of Resident # 1 physician orders revealed start date 06/30/2023 Location of wound: left foot with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS or Wound Cleanser and pat dry. Swab with betadine swab. Cover with 4x4 and secure with tape. and no end date. Record Review of Resident #1's TAR dated July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 07/01/2023, 07/03/2023, 07/05/2023, 07/07/2023, 07/09/2023 and 07/12/2023. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note dated 08/03/23 revealed: DON performed skin assessment of this resident who has stage 4 pressure wound to right posterior, lower extremity, measures 3.2 x 1.8 x 1.0cm with minimal serous drainage noted, peri wound of normal skin color for resident. 70% granulation tissue noted, no slough, and tendon and bone noted. Suprapubic cath site to mid-lower abdomen area, no drainage or leakage to area noted. No sis of infection or further abnormalities noted. Signed DON 8/3/23 at 7:40PM Record review of Resident #2's Wound Care Physician Assessment Note dated 08/03/23 revealed: Focused Wound Exam (Site 1) STAGE 4 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE RIGHT, LATERAL CALF FULL THICKNESS. Etiology (quality), Pressure. Stage. 4. Duration > 1 days During an interview on 07/29/2023 at 12: 59 PM Resident # 1's family member stated he/she had concerns about Resident 1's care while at the facility. Resident #1's family member stated he/she felt Resident #1 was neglected by the facility which led to his death. Resident #1's family member stated his room always smelled like urine and that Resident #1's dressing on his wounds were never changed timely. During an interview on 08/03/2023 at 11:50 AM the OS stated he had concerns Resident #1 was a no call/no show for his first scheduled post-operation visit. The OS stated the facility never called to reschedule visit or to clarify orders. The OS stated Resident #1 went over 3 weeks without bandage being changed, which led to the bandage had to be soaked to be removed and Resident #1 had bandage burns. The OS stated he was never notified of missed treatments. The OS stated Resident #1 missing wound care treatments postponed his foot healing. 3. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08/03/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 10/05/2022, with the following diagnosis unspecified dementia (primary), need for assistance with personal care, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident #2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 8 (moderate); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #2 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent for bowel; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #2's care plan dated 07/04/2022 revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure ulcer development r/t disease process and immobility. Date Initiated: 06/26/2018 Revision on: 04/15/2021; Interventions: administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date initiated 06/26/2018. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date initiated 06/26/2018. Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. Initiate initiated: 06/26/2018. Inform the resident/family/caregivers of any new area of skin breakdown. Date initiated: 06/26/2018. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, S/SX of infection, wound size (length X width X depth), stage. Date Initiated: 06/26/2018. Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated. Weekly skin assessments. Date initiated: 06/26/2018. Revision on: 03/03/2023; Focus: patient has a stage 4 pressure injury to right posterior calf with potential for further skin breakdown R/T: disease process, immobility, impaired mobility, lack of sensation, non-compliance with therapeutic regimen. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 07/29/1013. Review of Resident #2's nurses notes dated 07/15/2023 at 11:00 PM written by LVN T revealed: Aide has brought to my attention that [Resident #2] has open area on back of right ankle area. When this nurse assessed, I found wound that is denuded, partial thickness and has black eschar in wound bed. I cleansed wound with wound cleanser, applied hydrophilic ointment and covered with bordered gauze. Entire leg and foot have severe outward rotation. It is stroke effected side. Heel is elevated off bed and wound area is hanging free with no pressure. Review of Resident #2's nurses note dated 07/17/2023 at 1:37 PM written by LVN A revealed: Resident noted to have a DTI per night nurse to his right lower calf area cleaned Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed no evidence of pressure ulcer treatment between 07/15/2023 and 07/27/2023. Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed: Order date 07/27/2023 at 2:15 PM Cleanse right lower posterior calf with dermal wound cleaner apply Triad Debriding Cream to wound bed and cover with boarder dressing. Every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for promote Wound healing and every 1 hour as needed for skin irritation. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by DON revealed Skin Intact. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by TX D revealed Right lower leg stage 3 pressure ulcer measuring 2.5cm in length by 2.7cm in width by 0.5cm in depth. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by TX D revealed right lower leg unstageable pressure ulcer measuring 2.5cm in length by 2.0cm in width by 0.5cm in depth. During an observation on 07/29/2023 at 4:10PM of Resident #2 revealed Resident #2 lying in bed with right leg on pillow. Resident #2's right lower leg was covered by gauze and secured with tape. The dressing did not have a date on the outside. During an observation on 7/30/2023 at 3:30 PM of Resident #2 revealed Resident #2's lower right leg had a wound that had red tissue present, surrounding skin within normal limits for race, no tendon or bone observed, no necrosis observed, measurements were not taken appeared to be a Stage 3. During an interview on 07/30/2023 at 5:35 PM, the DON stated she had completed skin assessment on 7/20/2023 for Resident #2. The DON stated that she should have looked at the nurses notes to verify that Resident #2 did have a pressure ulcer. The DON stated the system was new to her, and she must have gotten confused between patients. The DON stated she had not completed a thorough assessment and that her assessment did not give an accurate assessment of Resident # 2, because if nurses note on 07/13 and 7/15 stated he had a pressure ulcer then her assessment on 7/20 should have reflected that. The DON stated the negative affect on residents, if wound care treatments were not completed, could have caused skin breakdown, and could have caused the wounds to worsen in various ways. 4. Resident # 6 Review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 08/31/2018, with the following diagnosis Type 2 diabetes (primary), age-related physical debility, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #6's significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 99 (Unable to complete interview); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had extensive dependence with most activities (1 physical assist); Section F- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent to bowel and bladder. Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #6 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #6's care plan dated 5/15/2023 revealed no intervention related to Deep Tissue Injury prevention or care. Review of Resident #6's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 07/25/2023 completed TX D revealed; Suspected Deep Tissue Injury to left heel measuring 4cm in length by 3cm in width. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 07/29/2023 revealed no evidence of wound treatment order for Deep Tissue Injury between 07/25/2023 and 07/29/2023. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 07/30/2023 revealed Skin prep to left heel every day and prn everyday shift for wound care related to weakness. During an observation and interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:25 PM revealed Resident #6 laying on her back not wearing her offloading boot, the boot was to the left side of her foot. Resident #6's wound was located on left heel, the wound was circular and purple in color, there was no drainage and skin appeared. During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:25 PM ADON C stated Resident #6 should have been wearing the offloading boot while in laying bed. ADON C stated that Resident #6's wound was not healed and needed further treatment. 5. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 07/27/2023, with the following diagnosis cerebral infarction (primary), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and Type 2 diabetes. Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed limited to extensive assist needing 1 - 2+ persons for assistance; Section- H Bowel and Bladder revealed occasionally incontinent to bladder and frequently incontinent to bowel. Section M- Skin Conditions revealed resident is at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 05/31/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has pressure injury to Rt buttock stage 3 with potential for further skin breakdown r/t: chronic progressive disease, impaired mobility, obesity. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Document wound appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx of infection, wound size (length X width X depth) and stage, and report to MD PRN any changes in skin status. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Notify Nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Provide pressure relieving device in bed. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Refer to dietician and follow recommendation. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Review of Resident #7's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 07/28/2023 completed by TX D revealed redness to right buttock. Review of Resident #7's Skin Note dated 07/31/2023 completed by TX D revealed Wounds to bilateral gluteal ischium tuberosities are healed, discontinue wound care to these areas, will continue[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers that were avoidable and failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 6 of 8 residents (Resident #4, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) reviewed for skin integrity. 1. The facility failed to follow physician's orders to prevent Resident #4's Deep Tissue Injury to right medial heel to deteriorate to a stage 4 pressure ulcer. 2. The facility failed to follow physician's orders to prevent Resident #1's Right Ischium(hip) pressure ulcer to deteriorate from a stage 2 to a stage 3. 3. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #2's stage 4 pressure ulcer on right posterior calf. Resident #2 went 12 days without treatment to wound. 4. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #6's left heel Deep Tissue Injury. Resident #6 went 5 days without treatment to wound. 5. The facility failed to complete skin assessments of Resident #7 which led to the development of a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right upper buttocks and stage 2 to the right lower buttocks. 6. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments which led to Resident #8 developing stage 2 pressure ulcer to left buttock and stage 2 pressure ulcer to right buttock. 7. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #4's skin assessments were completed, assessed accurately and accurately documented by the DON. 8. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #4 and Resident #5's wound treatments were completed and accurately documented by DON and ADON E. 9. The facility failed to maintain accurate list of residents with pressure ulcers. The facility did a skin sweep and found Resident #7's and Resident #8's wounds after surveyor intervention requesting accurate lists of residents with pressure ulcers. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/03/23. While the IJ was lowered on 08/07/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures could place residents at risk of wound deterioration, wound development, and infection. Findings include: 1.Resident #4 Record review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 05/15/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has the potential for pressure ulcer development r/t impaired mobility, incontinence, obesity. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Interventions: Notify nurse immediately of any signs of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, and discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022. Provide assist with turning and repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 08/23/2022; Focus: The resident has (DTI) pressure injury to Rt medial heel r/t Reduced Mobility. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 03/29/2023. Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Assess/record/and monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 06/05/2023. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulation/mobility, good nutrition, and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed start date 03/14/2023 Location of wound: Plantar right heel with order to be performed topically one time a day for Apply betadine to plantar right heel unstageable ulcer daily apply betadine until healed. Offloading @ all times. F/U with wound care and end date 04/13/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment being completed on: 04/08/2023 and 04/09/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the order start date 04/13/2023 Location of wound: Right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Leptospermum honey in to wound bed cover with border dressing. and end date 05/04/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 04/14/2023, 04/15/2023 and 04/23/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date 05/04/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound area. Apply Collagen powder and Calcium alginate with silver cover with border dressing. and end date 06/27/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 05/01/2023 - 05/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 05/08/2023, 05/15/2023, 05/16/2023, 05/22/2023, 05/29/2023, 05/30/2023 and 05/31/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 06/02/2023, 06/03/2023, 06/04/2023, 06/12/2023, 06/19/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/21/2023 and 06/24/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date 06/27/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen powder and sodium hypochlorite get (anapest) cover with border dressing. And end date 06/29/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 06/28/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order revealed the following order start date on 06/29/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift every Tue, Thu, Sat Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date 07/10/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 07/01/2023. Record review of Resident #4's physician order dated 07/29/2023 revealed the following order start date on 07/10/2023 Location of wound: Stage 4 right posterior medial heel to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around peri wound. Apply Collagen power cover with border dressing. and end date 07/20/2023. Record Review of Resident #4's TAR dated on 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 revealed no evidence of treatment for order with being completed on: 07/14/2023, 07/15/2023, and 07/23/2023. Record review of Resident #4's Medication Administration Audit Report generated by CSD revealed: -Scheduled for 07/14/2023 at 06:00AM and charted as completed on 07/29/2023 8:58PM by DON. -Scheduled for 07/15/2023 at 06:00AM was charted as completed on 07/29/2023 9:06PM by DON. -Scheduled for 07/23/23 at 6:00AM was charted as completed on 7/29/23 at 9:53PM by DON. Record review of Resident #4's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed DTI (deep tissue injury) to right medial heel. Record review of Resident #4's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by DON revealed Skin Intact. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note dated 05/18/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.8cm in length by 2.4cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note dated 05/25/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.8cm in length by 2.4cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Treatment options - risks - benefits and the possible need for subsequent additional procedures on this wound were explained on 04/13/2023 to the patient. Record review of Resident #4's WCS physician note titled dated 07/27/2023 revealed stage 4 pressure wound of the right, posterior, medial heel full thickness measuring 1.4cm in length by 2.2cm in width by 0.2cm in depth. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. During an observation and interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:30PM Resident #4 was sitting up in wheelchair with offloading boot to right foot and elevated with extended wheelchair footrest. Resident #4 stated she gave permission to observe foot and take a photograph of wound. Resident #4's right foot pressure ulcer had thick green tinged skin surrounding a circular wound with beefy red granulation tissue observed to wound bed. Observation of small amount of drainage observed to bandage and no odor. Resident #4 stated she had no concerns with her wound. 2. Resident # 1 Record review of Resident # 1's closed record face sheet dated 07/29/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent hospital readmission date of 06/03/2023, with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Record review of Resident # 1's closed record admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Record review of Resident #1's closed record care plan dated 05/15/2022 (revised on 06/04/2023) revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure injury r/t History of Pressure Injuries, Poor nutrition, Reduced Mobility, Sheering/friction problems. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 02/21/2022; Perform and document weekly assessment form of skin for changes or observations. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect elbows and heels from friction. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect heels-offload when in bed. Administer medication as ordered. Date Initiated 11/29/2022. Follow facility policy and procedures for line listing, summarizing infections. Focus The resident has a stage 1 pressure injury to his R buttocks r/t Reduced Mobility, Incontinence, Sheering/Friction. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 10/24/2022. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated 08/18/2022 Assess/record/monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed, and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition, and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated 08/18/2022. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide pressure relieving cushion to wheelchair. Monitor for placement and condition. Notify supervisor if cushion needs to be replaced. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Record review of Resident #1's closed record admission Summary Progress Note dated 06/03/2023 revealed stage 2 pressure wound on coccyx. Record review of Resident #1's closed record progress note titled Skin/Wound Note dated 06/15/2023 revealed WCS here this am to see resident. Stage 3 on rt ischium measures3x4.5x0.3. Light serous drainage with45% slough 5% granulation, 50% skin. Deterioration noted. [NAME] tinge to drainage concerning for Pseudomonas. No signs of infection. WCS preformed surgical excisional debridement to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 06/21/2023 revealed Resident return from OS per physician progress notes: 1) Please do NOT change the patients dressing 2) RTC on June 25 @ 1130AM. Transportation notified of f/u appt. and Info updated on 24 hour report. Record review of Resident #1's nurses progress note dated 06/30/2023 revealed Resident return from OS office per physician progress notes Please change Resident #1's foot wound dressing daily. No further need for ACE wrap. Please see that patient gets his augmentin as ordered. Call placed to OS office for clarification on orders what does provider want for dressing orders and orders for augmentin. Per [NAME] nurse at OS office to cleanse wound then swab with betadine cover with 4x4 and secure. Augmentin 875mg q12 hours x10days. Orders updated in chart and placed on24 hr{hour} report. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurses progress note dated 07/07/2023 revealed Resident return from OS appointment per physician's progress notes: Continue daily dressing changes with betadine to wound base . Return in 1 week appt of 7/14/23 @ 1045am Transportation notified. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 4 pressure ulcer to R Ischium with wound care and left leg dressing intact. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 3 pressure ulcer to R Ischium measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth and left leg dressing intact. Record review of Resident #1's closed record nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed stage 3 pressure ulcer to R Ischium measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 05/18/2023 revealed diabetic wound of the left, distal, plantar, lateral foot full thickness. Surgical excisional debridement procedure indicated for removal of necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. No mention of R Ischium wound. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/08/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 2.3cm in length by 4.5cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/15/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 3.0cm in length by 4.5cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/22/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 2.2cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 06/29/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 3.5cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record WCS physician notes dated 07/06/2023 revealed R Ischium wound measuring 4.0cm in length by 5.0cm in width by 0.3cm in depth. Record review of Resident #1's closed record hospital records dated 05/16/2023 revealed Stage 2 coccygeal & gluteal PI-POA. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed start date 06/05/2023 stating Location of wound: right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry Apply Triad cream and cover with silicone dressing with end date 06/09/2023. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 06/07/2023, 06/08/2023, 06/09/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed start date 06/09/2023 stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Anasept and TAO to wound bed cover bordered gauze dressing with end date 06/27/2023 written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of treatment for completed on: 06/09/2023, 06/14/2023, 06/19/2023, 06/20/2023, 06/21/2023, 06/24/2023, 06/25/2023 and 06/26/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed record physician orders revealed start date 06/27/2023 stating Location of wound: Unstageable right Ischium with order to be performed every day shift: Treatment order: Cleanse with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to peri wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing and no end date written. Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023, revealed no evidence of being completed on: Record Review of Resident #1's closed record TAR dated June 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023, reviewed on 07/29/2023 at 1:17 pm, revealed no evidence of treatment for order being completed on: 06/27/2023, 06/30/2023, 07/01/2023, 07/03/2023, 07/05/2023, 07/07/2023 and 07/12/2023. Record review of Resident #1's closed Medication Administration Audit Report for July 2023 revealed Instructions were: Location of wound: Unstageable Rt Ischium every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to pen wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing. Record review of Resident #1's closed Medication Administration Audit Report generated by CSD revealed: -Scheduled date of 7/1/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:11PM by ADON E. -Scheduled date of 7/3/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:09PM by ADON E. -Scheduled date of 7/12/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:27PM by ADON E. During an interview on 07/29/2023 at 12: 59 PM Resident # 1's family member stated he/she had concerns about Resident 1's care while at the facility. Resident #1's family member stated he/she felt Resident #1 was neglected by the facility which led to his death. Resident #1's family member stated his room always smelled like urine and that Resident #1's dressing on his wounds were never changed timely. 3. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08/03/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 10/05/2022, with the following diagnosis unspecified dementia (primary), need for assistance with personal care, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident #2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 8 (moderate); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #2 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent for bowel; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #2's care plan dated 07/04/2022 revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure ulcer development r/t disease process and immobility. Date Initiated: 06/26/2018 Revision on: 04/15/2021; Interventions: administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date initiated 06/26/2018. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date initiated 06/26/2018. Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. Initiate initiated: 06/26/2018. Inform the resident/family/caregivers of any new area of skin breakdown. Date initiated: 06/26/2018. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, S/SX of infection, wound size (length X width X depth), stage. Date Initiated: 06/26/2018. Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated. Weekly skin assessments. Date initiated: 06/26/2018. Revision on: 03/03/2023; Focus: patient has a stage 4 pressure injury to right posterior calf with potential for further skin breakdown R/T: disease process, immobility, impaired mobility, lack of sensation, non-compliance with therapeutic regimen. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 07/29/1013. Review of Resident #2's nurses notes dated 07/15/2023 at 11:00 PM written by LVN T revealed: Aide has brought to my attention that [Resident #2] has open area on back of right ankle area. When this nurse assessed, I found wound that is denuded, partial thickness and has black eschar in wound bed. I cleansed wound with wound cleanser, applied hydrophilic ointment and covered with bordered gauze. Entire leg and foot have severe outward rotation. It is stroke effected side. Heel is elevated off bed and wound area is hanging free with no pressure. Review of Resident #2's nurses note dated 07/17/2023 at 1:37 PM written by LVN A revealed: Resident noted to have a DTI per night nurse to his right lower calf area cleaned Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed no evidence of pressure ulcer treatment between 07/15/2023 and 07/27/2023. Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed: Order date 07/27/2023 at 2:15 PM Cleanse right lower posterior calf with dermal wound cleaner apply Triad Debriding Cream to wound bed and cover with boarder dressing. Every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for promote Wound healing and every 1 hour as needed for skin irritation. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by DON revealed Skin Intact. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by TX D revealed Right lower leg stage 3 pressure ulcer measuring 2.5cm in length by 2.7cm in width by 0.5cm in depth. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's skin assessment dated [DATE] completed by TX D revealed right lower leg unstageable pressure ulcer measuring 2.5cm in length by 2.0cm in width by 0.5cm in depth. During an observation on 07/29/2023 at 4:10PM of Resident #2 revealed Resident #2 lying in bed with right leg on pillow. Resident #2's right lower leg was covered by gauze and secured with tape. The dressing did not have a date on the outside. During an observation on 7/30/2023 at 3:30 PM of Resident #2 revealed Resident #2's lower right leg had a wound that had red tissue present, surrounding skin within normal limits for race, no tendon or bone observed, no necrosis observed, measurements were not taken appeared to be a Stage 3. During an interview on 07/30/2023 at 5:35 PM, the DON stated she had completed skin assessment on 7/20/2023 for Resident #2. The DON stated that she should have looked at the nurses notes to verify that Resident #2 did have a pressure ulcer. The DON stated the system was new to her, and she must have gotten confused between patients. The DON stated she had not completed a thorough assessment and that her assessment did not give an accurate assessment of Resident # 2, because if nurses note on 07/13 and 7/15 stated he had a pressure ulcer then her assessment on 7/20 should have reflected that. The DON stated the negative affect on residents, if wound care treatments were not completed, could have caused skin breakdown, and could have caused the wounds to worsen in various ways. 4. Resident # 6 Review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 08/31/2018, with the following diagnosis Type 2 diabetes (primary), age-related physical debility, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #6's significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 99 (Unable to complete interview); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had extensive dependence with most activities (1 physical assist); Section F- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent to bowel and bladder. Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #6 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #6's care plan dated 5/15/2023 revealed no intervention related to Deep Tissue Injury prevention or care. Review of Resident #6's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 07/25/2023 completed TX D revealed; Suspected Deep Tissue Injury to left heel measuring 4cm in length by 3cm in width. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 07/29/2023 revealed no evidence of wound treatment order for Deep Tissue Injury between 07/25/2023 and 07/29/2023. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 07/30/2023 revealed Skin prep to left heel every day and prn every day shift for wound care related to weakness. During an observation and interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:25 PM revealed Resident #6 laying on her back not wearing her offloading boot, the boot was to the left side of her foot. Resident #6's wound was located on left heel, the wound was circular and purple in color, there was no drainage and skin appeared firm. ADON C voiced that facility treatment nurse applying skin prep daily. ADON C placed offloading boot to left foot that was lying to the left of her left leg when surveyor entered room. During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 4:25 PM ADON C stated Resident #6 should have been wearing the offloading boot while in laying bed. ADON C stated that Resident #6's wound was not healed and needed further treatment. 5. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 07/27/2023, with the following diagnosis cerebral infarction (primary), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and Type 2 diabetes. Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed limited to extensive assist needing 1 - 2+ persons for assistance; Section- H Bowel and Bladder revealed occasionally incontinent to bladder and frequently incontinent to bowel. Section M- Skin Conditions revealed resident is at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 05/31/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has pressure injury to Rt buttock stage 3 with potential for further skin breakdown r/t: chronic progressive disease, impaired mobility, obesity. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Document wound appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx of infection, wound size (length X width X depth) and stage, and report to MD PRN any changes in skin status. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Notify Nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Provide pressure relieving device in bed. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Refer to dietician and follow recommendation. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 03/02/2023. Review of Resident #7's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 07/28/2023 completed by TX D revealed redness to right buttock. Review of Resident #7's Skin Note dated 07/31/2023 completed by TX D revealed Wounds to bilateral gluteal ischium tuberosities are healed, discontinue wound care to these areas, will continue to monitor. Review of Resident #7's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 08/02/2023 completed by TX D revealed new stage 2 right upper gluteal fold pressure ulcer measured 2cm in length by 2cm in width and 0.1cm in depth and stage 2 right lower gluteal fold pressure ulcer measured 1cm in length by 0.3cm in width and 0.1cm in depth. During an interview on 08/02/2023 at 9:40 AM, Resident #7 stated he wished the facility was more proactive and would have prescribed antibiotics for his possible wound infection. 6. Resident #8 Review of Resident # 8's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 07/15/2021, with the following diagnosis Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (primary), type 2 diabetes mellitus, mild cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident # 8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 11 (moderately impaired); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had extensive dependence with most activities (1-to-2-person assistance with physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed Resident #8 Frequently incontinent to bowel and bladder M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #8 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident #8's care plan on 08/02/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has the potential for pressure ulcer development r/t disease process, [TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific comp...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 1 of 1 DONs for 5 of 8, (Resident #1, #2, #4, #5, #7) residents reviewed for competent nursing. DON failed to complete accurate skin assessments on Resident #1,2,4,5. DON failed to complete accurate documentation in Resident #1,4,5 TAR. DON failed to complete documentation that included information that she gathered from another source for Resident #2, 4, 5, 7. These failures placed residents at risk of meeting their health care needs appropriately. Findings included: During an interview with Resident #1 Review of Resident # 1's face sheet dated 07/29/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent hospital readmission date of 06/03/2023, with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident # 1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive decline); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Resident #1 had a DTI and 1 surgical wound. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 05/15/2022 revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure injury r/t History of Pressure Injuries, Poor nutrition, Reduced Mobility, Sheering/friction problems. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 02/21/2022; Goal: The resident will have intact skin, free of pressure injury through review date. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 08/23/2022 Target Date: 05/20/2023; Interventions: Alert dietitian of pressure injury risk to ensure any nutritional deficits are alleviated. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Apply lotion after each shower. DO NOT massage over reddened bony prominences. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Assess for restorative program to ensure maximal remobilization Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Offer fluids in conjunction with turning and positioning Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Perform and document weekly assessment for of skin for changes or observations. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect elbows and heels from friction. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect heels-offload when in bed. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020. Turn and reposition frequently. Keep body in good alignment with pillows for positioning and pressure relief. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020. Use briefs to wick and hold moisture away from resident's skin. Date Initiated. Use lift sheet to move/position resident in bed. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020. Use moisture barrier with incontinent care episodes. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020., Focus The resident has a stage 1 pressure injury to his R buttocks r/t Reduced Mobility, Incontinence, Sheering/Friction. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 10/24/2022. Goal: The resident's will wound will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 08/23/2022 Target Date: 05/20/2023. Interventions: The resident requires the bed as flat as possible to reduce shear. Date Initiated 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022 Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated 08/18/2022 Assess/record/monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide pressure relieving cushion to wheelchair. Monitor for placement and condition. Notify supervisor if cushion needs to be replaced. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Record review of Resident #1's Skin Assessments revealed: 6/11/23 at 23:12 (11:12PM) revealed Continue treatment to stg 4 on dressing in place to lt leg No measurements, and no reference to pressure injuries to buttock. 6/18/23 locked as completed 06/27/23 at 13:29 (1:29PM) revealed dressing to lt foot remains intact .Site: Other Rt ischium (buttock). Type of skin issue: Pressure, 2.2x5x0.3cm Stage III (3). 6/25/23 locked as completed 0627/23 at 13:30 (1:30PM) revealed: Site: Other Rt ischium (buttock). Type of skin issue: Pressure, 2.2x5x0.3cm Stage III (3). No reference to left foot surgical wound. Record review of Resident #1's Admit/Readmit Screener dated 06/03/23 revealed resident had a surgical wound and a pressure injury. It stated that Resident #1 had a stg II (2) pressure injury to his right gluteal fold (buttocks). The screener did not indicate where the surgical wound was located on the resident, nor did it include any measurements, appearances, or treatments for either wound. Record review of Resident #1's admission summary dated [DATE] revealed that resident had L foot 5th toe partial resection d/t gangrene was performed. From hospitalization. No mention of other skin issues. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Audit Report dated 08/01/23 revealed : Location of wound: Unstageable Rt Ischium PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0= no intervention I =reposition resident 2= PRN medication 3= scheduled pain medication 4= gentle range of Motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y=Yellow B=Black G=Green W=White T=Tan PU=Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to pen wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing Scheduled date of 7/1/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:11PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 7/3/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:09PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 7/12/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:27PM by ADON E. Location of wound: Left foot PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0= no Intervention I = reposition resident 2= PRN medication 3 = scheduled pain medication 4= gentle range of motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y YeIIow B=Black G=Green W=White T=Tan PU=Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS or Wound Cleanser and pat dry. Swab with betadine swab. Cover with 4x4and secure with tape. Scheduled date of 07/01/2023 at 6:00 charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 07/29/2023 9:11PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 07/03/2023 at 6:00 charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 07/29/2023 9:09PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 07/12/2023 at 6:00 charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 07/29/2023 9:27PM by ADON E. Resident #2 Review of Resident # 2's face sheet dated 08/03/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 10/05/2022, with the following diagnosis unspecified dementia (primary), need for assistance with personal care, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident # 2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #2 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent for bowel; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident # 2's Care plan dated 07/04/23 revealed, Focus: patient has an stage 4 pressure injury to right posterior calf with potential for further skin breakdown R/T: disease process, immobility, impaired mobility, lack of sensation, non-compliance with therapeutic regimen. Date Initiated: 07/27/2023. Revision on: 08/02/2023. Goal: Pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Target Date: 09/18/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 07/29/1013. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/02/2023 Revision on: 08/02/2023. Refer to dietitian and follow recommendation. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Supplements per orders. Date Initiated: 08/02/2023. Revision on: 08/02/2023. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note dated 08/03/23 revealed: DON performed skin assessment of this resident who has stage 4 pressure wound to right posterior, lower extremity, measures 3.2 x 1.8 x 1.0cm with minimal serous drainage noted, peri wound of normal skin color for resident. 70% granulation tissue noted, no slough, and tendon and bone noted. Suprapubic cath site to mid-lower abdomen area, no drainage or leakage to area noted. No sis of infection or further abnormalities noted. Signed DON 8/3/23 at 7:40PM Record review of Resident #2's Wound Care Physician Assessment Note dated 08/03/23 revealed: Focused Wound Exam (Site 1) STAGE 4 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE RIGHT, LATERAL CALF FULL THICKNESS. Etiology (quality), Pressure. Stage. 4. Duration > 1 days Resident #4 Review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer Resident #4 Review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident # 4's annual MDS assessment that has not been submitted dated 07/30/2023 revealed, M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 had a stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #4's care plan revised 07/29/23 revealed: Focus: The resident has (DTI) pressure injury to Rt medial heel r/t Reduced Mobility. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 07/29/2023. Goal: the resident's will wound will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by through review date. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 07/31/2023. Target Date: 08/15/2023. Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Assess/record/and monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 06/05/2023. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including: transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulation/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated: 07/20/2023. Review of Resident #4' Medication Administration Audit Report dated 08/01/23 revealed: Location of wound: Stage 4 it posterior medial heel. PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0= no Intervention I =reposition resident 2= PRN Medication 3 = scheduled medication 4= gentle range of motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y=Yellow B= Black G=Green W=White T=Tan PU=Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around pen wound. Apply Collagen powder cover with border dressing Scheduled for 07/14/2023 at 06:00AM and charted as completed on 07/29/2023 8:58PM by DON. Scheduled for 07/15/2023 at 06:00AM stated administered on 07/15/2023at 9:04PM charted as documented on 07/29/2023 9:06PM by DON. Scheduled for 07/23/23 at 6:00AM stated administered on 7/23/23 at 9:52PM, charted as documented on 7/29/23 at 9:53PM Review of Resident #4's Progress Note dated 08/03/23 by DON revealed: DON performed skin assessment of this resident who has a stage 4 pressure wound on her right heel with measurements of 1.4 x 2.2 x 0.2 cm. The periwound is reddened, there is moderate drainage noted that is yellow-green in color. There is 70% granulation tissue and 30% slough. WCS, wound physician has seen this resident's wound today also. Wound culture was ordered and specimen was collected and is waiting for lab pick up. Review of Resident #4's Wound Care Specialist assessment dated [DATE] revealed: STAGE 4 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE RIGHT, POSTERIOR, MEDIAL HEEL FULL THICKNESS. Etiology (quality) Pressure. MDS 3.0 Stage 4. Duration >107 days. Wound Size (L x W x D):1.4 x 2.2 x 0.2 cm. Surface Area: 3.08 cm. Exudate: Moderate Serous. Slough: 30 %. Granulation tissue: 70 %. ADDITIONAL WOUND DETAIL [NAME] drainage concerning for Pseudomonas. Resident #5 Review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 03/06/2023, with the following diagnosis Unspecified dementia (primary) and muscle weakness. Review of Resident # 5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 99 (Unable to complete interview); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had total dependence with most activities (1 to 2 persons physical assist); Section H Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent to bowel and bladder. M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #5 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and 1 stage 3 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #5's care plan dated 07/11/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t decreased mobility. Date Initiated: 07/12/2023. Revision on: 07/12/2023. Goal: Will maintain current level of function in (Bed Mobility, Transfers, Eating, Dressing, Toilet Use and Personal Hygiene; . SKIN INSPECTION: Observe for redness, open areas, scratches, cuts, bruises and report changes to the Nurse. Date Initiated: 07/12/2023 . Focus: The resident has pressure injury to (on rt mid back stage 3)with potential for further skin breakdown r/t: cognitive impairment, disease process, hx of pressure injuries, immobility, incontinence, lack of sensation, nutritional deficit. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Revision on: 06/29/2023. Goal: Pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Target Date: 07/11/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Document wound appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx of infection, wound size (length X width X depth) and stage, and report to MD PRN any changes in skin status. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Notify family of any new area of skin breakdown. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Notify nure immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Provide pressure relieving device in bed. Date Initiated: 06/29 2023. Provide wound healing supplements as ordered; (MVT, Vit C, Liquid Protein, Zinc, Shakes, Juven, Supplement with medications). Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Revision on: 07/12/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Use 2 person transfer and use draw sheet to avoid friction/shearing of resident skin. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Use draw sheet to reduce friction. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Record review of Resident #5's Weekly Skin Integrity Reviews for July of 2023 revealed: 7/7/23-Skin intact 7/18/23- Old open area, Stage 3 pressure injury upper back. 7/25/23-Old open area, Stage 3 pressure injury on sacrum (buttocks), no identification of the pressure injury on upper back. 7/31/23-Old open area, Stage 3 pressure injury on upper mid vertebrae. Record review of Resident #5's Medication Administration Audit Report dated 08/01/23 revealed: Location &wound: Stage 3 right upper back PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0 = no Intervention 1=reposition resident 2 = PRN medication 3 = scheduled pain medication 4 = gentle range of motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y=Yellow B=Black G [NAME] W=White T=Tan PU Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply collagen powder to wound bed. skin prep to pen wound cover with island dressing. Scheduled on 07/01/2023 at 06:00am administered on 07/29/2023 at 8:53PM documented on 07/29/2023 at 8:54PM by DON. Scheduled on 07/03/2023 at 6:00AM, administered on 07/29/2023 8:55PM documented on 07/29/2023 8:55PM by DON. Scheduled on 07/14)2023 at 06:00AM administered on 07/29/2023 8:57PM documented on 07/29/2023 8:57PM by DON. Scheduled on07/15/2023 at 06:00AM, administered on 07/29/2023 at 9:12PM, documented on 07/29/2023 at 9:12PM by DON. Review of Resident #5's Progress Note dated 08/03/23 by DON revealed: DON performed skin assessment on this resident. Mid back in thoracic region has a 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.1 cm wound. The periwound is pink, there is minimal serous drainage. There is 70% granulation tissue and 30% slough. Skin tear to right lateral calf has minimal serous drainage noted, wound tissue is red and periwound is of normal skin color of resident. There are no s/s of infection, or any further abnormalities noted to either wound. Review of Wound Care Specialist assessment dated [DATE] revealed: STAGE 4 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE RIGHT UPPER BACK FULL THICKNESS. Etiology Pressure. MDS 3.0 Stage 4. Duration >55 days. Wound Size {L x W x D): 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.1 cm. Surface Area: 0.16 cm. Exudate: Light Serous. Slough: 30%. Granulation tissue 70%. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 12:06PM with ADON M, she said she had not been the RN that has been monitoring the skin of the residents of the facility. She said she became the ADON as of 6/12/23 and started at facility at the very end of May as an RN. She said, if you did treatment and didn't sign the MAR, make a late entry to show that it was completed and forgot the documentation but do not go back and fill in the hole after the shift. She said the nurses were supposed to place any and all information on the 24-hour report sheets to help with continuity of care. ADON M said the treatment nurse was supposed to do the treatments and skin assessments, but if not, then the nurse for each resident should do them. She said at least 1 nurse key set has the treatment cart key to access supplies. ADON M said when she did treatments she would date and initial the bandage on the resident so anyone else could see when it was done last. She said, Personally, as a nurse if I see that it wasn't done, or the dates are old I would do a treatment myself. She said with the EHR you can go and change the date in the computer and lookback at the MAR and TAR to see the holes and back date for an assessment. She said, she would not see that as a competent nurse that it would be as a standard of nurse practice to, sign for another person or write something that you had not done yourself. She said she wouldn't want someone to fill in her own work. ADON M said she didn't think that could be a 28-day gap of knowing what I had done at work. I work 2 jobs, so it would definitely be hard to think back more than a couple of days what I had done. She said she would talk to the person that worked previously and ask them then to make a late entry if she seen that documentation had been missed. ADON M said she felt like the window of time that the information was not in the resident's records did not make them an accurate record for the resident. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 12:49PM with ADON E, he said he had been an LVN for 20 years and he had been working at the facility since May of 2023ADON E said, So, I learned my lesson, will leave it red and put in a progress note, regarding filling in holes in the MAR and TAR. He said he would do treatment, or an assessment and just didn't get the documentation done, stating, days have just run together. He said, No it is not a standard of practice to go back in and back date or fill in holes in the MAR, TAR or assessments. It's the wrong thing to do. He said you do not chart the next date or later that something was done in a timely manner and never chart for someone else's work or lack of work. I wouldn't know how to defend that in court. He said he would not feel comfortable if someone else did his charting because you never know if you have an enemy. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 1:45PM with ADON C she said, she had been an LVN for 16 yrs and had been working at the facility for 2 yrs. and 2 months. She said yesterday (8/4/23) she became the treatment nurse and before that she was an ADON. The weekend supervisor was the treatment nurse for the weekends. She said new admissions had to have a skin assessment and if they had any types of wounds they needed to have something as far as treatment orders in place within 24 hrs even on weekends. ADON C said every resident had a weekly skin assessment and they were able to run a report for the list of residents with skin assessments to see if they were done. She said, If you didn't document, it wasn't done. Regarding skin assessments and holes in MAR and TAR. She said she wouldn't feel comfortable to have another nurse document for her or doing so for another nurse. She said, That would be false documentation. ADON C said, There is no way I can even remember what I ate for supper last night. There is no way I would remember what I did last week or even further than that, regarding documentation that was days and weeks later. She said CSD was monitoring and managing the skin assessment reports and TAR's to make sure the nurses were getting their work done. She said herself and ADON E did the skin sweep on 8/3/23 and took skin sweep sheets to DON that had her notes on them. She said they used a skin sheet with the body, if there was nothing on the residents skin, they just put an x or line over body, if there was an area then they circled it with quick description, like redness or sore. ADON C said they didn't do any measurements, just noted any issue. She said CSD in-serviced them to document as you go and at latest the end of the shift, if its after the shift then have to write a progress note indicating it's a late entry and the reason documentation might have been missed or if it wasn't completed. Do not back date or fill in holes. Do not strike out an inaccurate assessment, just do a progress not to indicate the inaccuracy. ADON C said not doing a treatment or a skin assessment was a neglectful action. She said that was how skin issues were identified past a redness or stage 1 and why some wounds got worse. The intact then open sore or intact then DTI within days proved to be inaccurate representation of the resident's skin. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 3:20PM with DON, she said she had been a nurse since 2008. She said she had been the DON since May 15th of 23. DON said there had been a big learning curve on the change of EHR system from what she had been used to in other facilities in the past. She said she is just very overwhelmed. DON said her orientation was really just a welcoming to the company not a EHR orientation. She said she did not really know how to pull reports to see what the nurses were completing or not. The CSD had been at the facility 3 times since DON came to facility. DON said the CSD has been available by phone has only recently showed her how to run reports. She said the CSD brought it to her attention that skin assessments had not been completed several times for several residents. DON said nursing management started with audits and was having daily all-day meetings checking on the nurses work, and TX G (former tx nurse) didn't want to participate, was not doing her work, would not communicate with DON that she could not get her work done. DON said the CSD said that there was a lot of issues with no documentation regarding treatments and said there was an issue back in March and April of 23 with TX G not getting her work done or her documentation done. She did not know the full description of which nurses did skin assessments for which residents but thought that the floor nurses split odd rooms day shift and even rooms night shift maybe. She said the treatment nurse should be the person that did residents skin assessments that had wounds. DON said she just got hyper focused on catching up the skin assessments and was just so overwhelmed that I was on auto pilot trying to get the documentation caught up. DON said, knows that you should not fill in holes in the MAR and TAR. Said she had never just maliciously done something like that before. She said, I know I have made mistakes, if someone will just tell me it is a mistake, I can fix it, but if you don't tell me whats wrong, I can't fix it. She said the last few days CSD had been going through the system showing her how to run different reports. She said she did a skin sweep when she first came to the facility with the other ADON's s and TX, and over the last week the ADON's s and TX had been doing them almost daily. She said Thursday (8/3/23) she went to the residents that had wounds and had the wound care doctor's notes from that morning and just made sure that there were no new areas. She said she used his measurements from that morning because they had just been done and there was no reason to believe that measurements would have changed that much. She said, I don't feel that my documentation was false just that I made a mistake and was just overwhelmed with the need to catch everything up in the residents' records. During an interview on 8/6/23 at 12:50PM with RNWS J, He said he had been an RN for 27 years and had begun working at the facility on the 24th of June 2023 as a weekend RN and basically the weekend rn nursing supervisor. He said it was his responsibility to do the skin assessments for the new admissions and make sure the nurses were doing their charting. RNWS J said the weekend supervisor was supposed to do the wound care. He said he would go through the TAR to see who had treatments and go from there. He said it was also his responsibility to make sure the weekend was staffed and if he could not, then he would cover himself as a nurse or aide, in which case all the nurses were responsible for doing their own wound care and skin assessments. RNWS J said he had only been able to be the supervisor 4 days since he started in June of 2023. He said that a nurse not doing weekly skin assessments or doing daily wound care treatments was neglect and when he had come to work that morning he had been inserviced on completing the wound care and skin assessments in a timely manner daily. RNWS J said he had also been inserviced that all charting was to e completed by the end of each shift. He said if documentation had been forgotten or was not accurate then the nurses were supposed to leave the MAR's and TAR's blank from the previous time and make a progress note to identify that it was a late entry and the work was completed or missed and the reason for the lateness. He said to go into the MAR or TAR and fill in holes that were not your own work just for the sake of filling in the holes in the MAR or TAR were not standards of nursing practice. He said he would not be comfortable to do it for another nurse, nor have another nurse do it for him. RNWS J said he would not be able to chart anything from even the previous weekend of work, much less any further than that and a typical standard of nursing practice that has been taught was that if it were not documented, then it was not done In a time when a skin assessment had not been completed in a timely manner, then he would go and assess a resident and do the skin assessment himself and never back date the assessment stating, As ethics go should not fix others charting, and shouldn't back date charting. He said that the identification of residents' pressure sores as stage 2, 3, or 4 and the sores not decreasing in size and severity were pretty obvious that they were not having their skin assessed accurately and they were not receiving their treatments. RNWS J said they were insereviced on setting up appointments for the residents as well. He said the nurse that admitted a resident was supposed to go through the admitting orders and paperwork to see if the resident either already had a follow up appointment or had the need for 1 to be scheduled. He said on the weekends, they could not schedule an appointment, however they would put a note on the 24-hour report for the nurse at the start of the week to call the Dr's offic[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 7 (Resident #1,2,4,5,6,7,8) of 8 residents reviewed for medical records. Resident #1 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. Resident #2 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. Resident #4 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. Resident #5 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. Resident #6 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. Resident #7 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. Resident #8 did not have an accurate skin assessment, accurate documentation on TAR, and/or accurate progress notes. These failures place residents at risk of health and safety due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident # 1's face sheet dated 07/29/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent hospital readmission date of 06/03/2023, with the following diagnosis metabolic encephalopathy (primary), encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, need assistance with personal care, dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident # 1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderate cognitive decline); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #1 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident # 1 always incontinent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Resident #1 had a DTI and 1 surgical wound. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 05/15/2022 revealed: Focus: The resident is at risk for pressure injury r/t History of Pressure Injuries, Poor nutrition, Reduced Mobility, Sheering/friction problems. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 02/21/2022; Goal: The resident will have intact skin, free of pressure injury through review date. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Revision on: 08/23/2022 Target Date: 05/20/2023; Interventions: Alert dietitian of pressure injury risk to ensure any nutritional deficits are alleviated. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Apply lotion after each shower. DO NOT massage over reddened bony prominences. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Assess for restorative program to ensure maximal remobilization Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Offer fluids in conjunction with turning and positioning Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Perform and document weekly assessment for of skin for changes or observations. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect elbows and heels from friction. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020 Protect heels-offload when in bed. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020. Turn and reposition frequently. Keep body in good alignment with pillows for positioning and pressure relief. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020. Use briefs to wick and hold moisture away from resident's skin. Date Initiated. Use lift sheet to move/position resident in bed. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020. Use moisture barrier with incontinent care episodes. Date Initiated: 08/20/2020., Focus The resident has a stage 1 pressure injury to his R buttocks r/t Reduced Mobility, Incontinence, Sheering/Friction. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 10/24/2022. Goal: The resident's will wound will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022 Revision on: 08/23/2022 Target Date: 05/20/2023. Interventions: The resident requires the bed as flat as possible to reduce shear. Date Initiated 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022 Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated 08/18/2022 Assess/record/monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Revision on: 08/23/2022. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Provide pressure relieving cushion to wheelchair. Monitor for placement and condition. Notify supervisor if cushion needs to be replaced. Date Initiated: 08/18/2022. Record review of Resident #1's Skin Assessments revealed: 6/11/23 at 23:12 (11:12PM) revealed Continue treatment to stg 4 on dressing in place to lt leg No measurements, and no reference to pressure injuries to buttock. 6/18/23 locked as completed 06/27/23 at 13:29 (1:29PM) revealed dressing to lt foot remains intact .Site: Other Rt ischium (buttock). Type of skin issue: Pressure, 2.2x5x0.3cm Stage III (3). 6/25/23 locked as completed 0627/23 at 13:30 (1:30PM) revealed: Site: Other Rt ischium (buttock). Type of skin issue: Pressure, 2.2x5x0.3cm Stage III (3). No reference to left foot surgical wound. Record review of Resident #1's Admit/Readmit Screener dated 06/03/23 revealed resident had a surgical wound and a pressure injury. It stated that Resident #1 had a stg II (2) pressure injury to his right gluteal fold (buttocks). The screener did not indicate where the surgical wound was located on the resident, nor did it include any measurements, appearances, or treatments for either wound. Record review of Resident #1's admission summary dated [DATE] revealed that resident had L foot 5th toe partial resection d/t gangrene was performed. From hospitalization. No mention of other skin issues. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Audit Report revealed Location of wound: Unstageable Rt Ischium PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0= no intervention I =reposition resident 2= PRN medication 3= scheduled pain medication 4= gentle range of Motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y=Yellow B=Black G=Green W=White T=Tan PU=Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep to pen wound. Apply Leptospermum honey to wound bed cover border gauze dressing Scheduled date of 7/1/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:11PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 7/3/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:09PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 7/12/23 at 6:00AM charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 7/29/23 at 9:27PM by ADON E. Location of wound: Left foot PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0= no Intervention I = reposition resident 2= PRN medication 3 = scheduled pain medication 4= gentle range of motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y YeIIow B=Black G=Green W=White T=Tan PU=Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse with NS or Wound Cleanser and pat dry. Swab with betadine swab. Cover with 4x4and secure with tape. Scheduled date of 07/01/2023 at 6:00 charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 07/29/2023 9:11PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 07/03/2023 at 6:00 charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 07/29/2023 9:09PM by ADON E. Scheduled date of 07/12/2023 at 6:00 charted as N/A for assessment of wound bed and completed on 07/29/2023 9:27PM by ADON E. Resident #2 Review of Resident # 2's face sheet dated 08/03/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 10/05/2022, with the following diagnosis unspecified dementia (primary), need for assistance with personal care, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Review of Resident # 2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #2 had mostly total dependence (needed one to two + persons physical assist with most ADLs); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent for bowel; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of Resident # 2's Care plan dated 07/04/23 revealed, Focus: patient has an stage 4 pressure injury to right posterior calf with potential for further skin breakdown R/T: disease process, immobility, impaired mobility, lack of sensation, non-compliance with therapeutic regimen. Date Initiated: 07/27/2023. Revision on: 08/02/2023. Goal: Pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Target Date: 09/18/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 07/29/1013. Provide low air loss mattress to bed. Date Initiated: 08/02/2023 Revision on: 08/02/2023. Refer to dietitian and follow recommendation. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 07/29/2023. Supplements per orders. Date Initiated: 08/02/2023. Revision on: 08/02/2023. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note dated 08/03/23 revealed: DON performed skin assessment of this resident who has stage 4 pressure wound to right posterior, lower extremity, measures 3.2 x 1.8 x 1.0cm with minimal serous drainage noted, peri wound of normal skin color for resident. 70% granulation tissue noted, no slough, and tendon and bone noted. Suprapubic cath site to mid-lower abdomen area, no drainage or leakage to area noted. No sis of infection or further abnormalities noted. Signed DON 8/3/23 at 7:40PM Record review of Resident #2's Wound Care Physician Assessment Note dated 08/03/23 revealed: Focused Wound Exam (Site 1) STAGE 4 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE RIGHT, LATERAL CALF FULL THICKNESS. Etiology (quality), Pressure. Stage. 4. Duration > 1 days Resident #4 Review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer Resident #4 Review of Resident # 4's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 01/11/2023, with the following diagnosis Sepsis (primary) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident # 4's annual MDS assessment that has not been submitted dated 07/30/2023 revealed, M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #2 had a stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact); Section G- Functional Status revealed Resident #4 had physical help limited to transfer only (mostly setup help or one person physical assist); Section H- Bowel and Bladder revealed always continent for bowel and bladder; Section M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and that Resident #4 had stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #4's care plan revised 07/29/23 revealed: Focus: The resident has (DTI) pressure injury to Rt medial heel r/t Reduced Mobility. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 07/29/2023. Goal: the resident's will wound will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by through review date. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 07/31/2023. Target Date: 08/15/2023. Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Assess/record/and monitor wound healing weekly. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Revision on: 06/05/2023. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including: transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulation/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: 03/29/2023. Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated: 07/20/2023. Review of Resident #4' Medication Administration Audit Report dated 08/01/23 revealed: Location of wound: Stage 4 it posterior medial heel. PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0= no Intervention I =reposition resident 2= PRN Medication 3 = scheduled medication 4= gentle range of motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y=Yellow B= Black G=Green W=White T=Tan PU=Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply skin prep around pen wound. Apply Collagen powder cover with border dressing Scheduled for 07/14/2023 at 06:00AM and charted as completed on 07/29/2023 8:58PM by DON. Scheduled for 07/15/2023 at 06:00AM stated administered on 07/15/2023at 9:04PM charted as documented on 07/29/2023 9:06PM by DON. Scheduled for 07/23/23 at 6:00AM stated administered on 7/23/23 at 9:52PM, charted as documented on 7/29/23 at 9:53PM Resident #5 Review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 08/02/2023 revealed, [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission date of 03/06/2023, with the following diagnosis Unspecified dementia (primary) and muscle weakness. Review of Resident # 5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C-Cognitive Behavior revealed a BIMS score of 99 (Unable to complete interview); Section G- Functional Status revealed patient had total dependence with most activities (1 to 2 persons physical assist); Section H Bowel and Bladder revealed always incontinent to bowel and bladder. M-Skin Conditions revealed Resident #5 had a risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and 1 stage 3 pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #5's care plan dated 07/11/2023 revealed: Focus: The resident has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t decreased mobility. Date Initiated: 07/12/2023. Revision on: 07/12/2023. Goal: Will maintain current level of function in (Bed Mobility, Transfers, Eating, Dressing, Toilet Use and Personal Hygiene; . SKIN INSPECTION: Observe for redness, open areas, scratches, cuts, bruises and report changes to the Nurse. Date Initiated: 07/12/2023 . Focus: The resident has pressure injury to (on rt mid back stage 3)with potential for further skin breakdown r/t: cognitive impairment, disease process, hx of pressure injuries, immobility, incontinence, lack of sensation, nutritional deficit. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Revision on: 06/29/2023. Goal: Pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Target Date: 07/11/2023. Interventions: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Assist resident with turning/repositioning during rounds. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Check for incontinence during rounds and provide care as needed. Keep resident clean and dry. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Document wound appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx of infection, wound size (length X width X depth) and stage, and report to MD PRN any changes in skin status. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Notify family of any new area of skin breakdown. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Notify nure immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown: redness, blisters, bruises, discoloration noted during bath or daily care. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Provide pressure relieving device in bed. Date Initiated: 06/29 2023. Provide wound healing supplements as ordered; (MVT, Vit C, Liquid Protein, Zinc, Shakes, Juven, Supplement with medications). Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Revision on: 07/12/2023. Serve diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Use 2 person transfer and use draw sheet to avoid friction/shearing of resident skin. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Use draw sheet to reduce friction. Date Initiated: 06/29/2023. Record review of Resident #5's Weekly Skin Integrity Reviews for July of 2023 revealed: 7/7/23-Skin intact 7/18/23- Old open area, Stage 3 pressure injury upper back. 7/25/23-Old open area, Stage 3 pressure injury on sacrum (buttocks), no identification of the pressure injury on upper back. 7/31/23-Old open area, Stage 3 pressure injury on upper mid vertebrae. Record review of Resident #5's Medication Administration Audit Report dated 08/01/23 revealed: Location &wound: Stage 3 right upper back PAIN CODE INTERVENTION: 0 = no Intervention 1=reposition resident 2 = PRN medication 3 = scheduled pain medication 4 = gentle range of motion 5 = back rub DRAINAGE: S=Saturated M=Moist D=Dry GENERALAPPEARANCE: R=Red Y=Yellow B=Black G [NAME] W=White T=Tan PU Purple BR=Brown GR=Gray P=Pink SURROUNDING SKIN: M=Macerated R=Reddened F=Firm N=Normal every day shift Treatment order: Cleanse area with NS/wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply collagen powder to wound bed. skin prep to pen wound cover with island dressing. Scheduled on 07/01/2023 at 06:00am administered on 07/29/2023 at 8:53PM documented on 07/29/2023 at 8:54PM by DON. Scheduled on 07/03/2023 at 6:00AM, administered on 07/29/2023 8:55PM documented on 07/29/2023 8:55PM by DON. Scheduled on 07/14)2023 at 06:00AM administered on 07/29/2023 8:57PM documented on 07/29/2023 8:57PM by DON. Scheduled on07/15/2023 at 06:00AM, administered on 07/29/2023 at 9:12PM, documented on 07/29/2023 at 9:12PM by DON. During an interview on 08/04/23 at 11:08AM with TX D, she said the treatment nurse was responsible for completed weekly skin assessments and they should reflect the actual picture of resident and their skin. TX D said progress notes and the TAR were supposed to be completed daily with an assessment of the wounds on the TAR and that NA was not an appropriate answer for the assessment of the wound, as it was not an accurate finding. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 12:06PM with ADON M, she said she had not been the RN that has been monitoring the skin of the residents of the facility. She said she became the ADON as of 6/12/23 and started at facility at the very end of May as an RN. She said, if you did treatment and didn't sign the MAR, make a late entry to show that it was completed and forgot the documentation but do not go back and fill in the hole after the shift. She said the nurses were supposed to place any and all information on the 24-hour report sheets to help with continuity of care. ADON M said the treatment nurse was supposed to do the treatments and skin assessments, but if not, then the nurse for each resident should do them. She said at least 1 nurse key set has the treatment cart key to access supplies. ADON M said when she did treatments she would date and initial the bandage on the resident so anyone else could see when it was done last. She said, Personally, as a nurse if I see that it wasn't done, or the dates are old I would do a treatment myself. She said with the EHR you can go and change the date in the computer and lookback at the MAR and TAR to see the holes and back date for an assessment. She said, she would not see that as a competent nurse that it would be as a standard of nurse practice to, sign for another person or write something that you had not done yourself. She said she wouldn't want someone to fill in her own work. ADON M said she didn't think that could be a 28-day gap of knowing what I had done at work. I work 2 jobs, so it would definitely be hard to think back more than a couple of days what I had done. She said she would talk to the person that worked previously and ask them then to make a late entry if she seen that documentation had been missed. ADON M said she felt like the window of time that the information was not in the resident's records did not make them an accurate record for the resident. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 12:49PM with ADON E, he said he had been an LVN for 20 years and he had been working at the facility since May of 2023. ADON E said, So, I learned my lesson, will leave it red and put in a progress note, regarding filling in holes in the MAR and TAR. He said he would do treatment, or an assessment and just didn't get the documentation done, stating, days have just run together. He said, No it is not a standard of practice to go back in and back date or fill in holes in the MAR, TAR or assessments. It's the wrong thing to do. He said you do not chart the next date or later that something was done in a timely manner and never chart for someone else's work or lack of work. I wouldn't know how to defend that in court. He said he would not feel comfortable if someone else did his charting because you never know if you have an enemy. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 1:45PM with ADON C she said, she had been an LVN for 16 yrs and had been working at the facility for 2 yrs. and 2 months. She said yesterday (8/4/23) she became the treatment nurse and before that she was an ADON. The weekend supervisor was the treatment nurse for the weekends. She said new admissions had to have a skin assessment and if they had any types of wounds they needed to have something as far as treatment orders in place within 24 hrs even on weekends. ADON C said every resident had a weekly skin assessment and they were able to run a report for the list of residents with skin assessments to see if they were done. She said, If you didn't document, it wasn't done. Regarding skin assessments and holes in MAR and TAR. She said she wouldn't feel comfortable to have another nurse document for her or doing so for another nurse. She said, That would be false documentation. ADON C said, There is no way I can even remember what I ate for supper last night. There is no way I would remember what I did last week or even further than that, regarding documentation that was days and weeks later. She said CSD was monitoring and managing the skin assessment reports and TAR's to make sure the nurses were getting their work done. She said herself and ADON E did the skin sweep on 8/3/23 and took skin sweep sheets to DON that had her notes on them. She said they used a skin sheet with the body, if there was nothing on the residents skin, they just put an x or line over body, if there was an area then they circled it with quick description, like redness or sore. ADON C said they didn't do any measurements, just noted any issue. She said CSD in-serviced them to document as you go and at latest the end of the shift, if its after the shift then have to write a progress note indicating it's a late entry and the reason documentation might have been missed or if it wasn't completed. Do not back date or fill in holes. Do not strike out an inaccurate assessment, just do a progress not to indicate the inaccuracy. ADON C said not doing a treatment or a skin assessment was a neglectful action. She said that was how skin issues were identified past a redness or stage 1 and why some wounds got worse. The intact then open sore or intact then DTI within days proved to be inaccurate representation of the resident's skin. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 2:26PM with MDS H, she said she had been an LVN since 2005 and had been working at the facility for 3 years. She said she typically just did the MDS's but would help as an aide and had to work as the floor nurse before as well but didn't even do it very often. She said she would not be able to remember what happened a month ago to be able to chart on something. Said she was using the skin assessments that were in resident EHR that were already completed to complete MDS's. MDS H said she didn't go do her own skin assessments. She said, had she known the skin assessments were wrong, then she would have done her own. And that because the skin assessments were wrong, that also made the MDS's wrong as well. During an interview on 08/05/23 at 3:20PM with DON, she said she had been a nurse since 2008. She said she had been the DON since May 15th of 23. DON said there had been a big learning curve on the change of EHR system from what she had been used to in other facilities in the past. She said she is just very overwhelmed. DON said her orientation was really just a welcoming to the company not a EHR orientation. She said she did not really know how to pull reports to see what the nurses were completing or not. The CSD had been at the facility 3 times since DON came to facility. DON said the CSD has been available by phone has only recently showed her how to run reports. She said the CSD brought it to her attention that skin assessments had not been completed several times for several residents. DON said nursing management started with audits and was having daily all-day meetings checking on the nurses work, and TX G (former tx nurse) didn't want to participate, was not doing her work, would not communicate with DON that she could not get her work done. DON said the CSD said that there was a lot of issues with no documentation regarding treatments and said there was an issue back in March and April of 23 with TX G not getting her work done or her documentation done. She did not know the full description of which nurses did skin assessments for which residents but thought that the floor nurses split odd rooms day shift and even rooms night shift maybe. She said the treatment nurse should be the person that did residents skin assessments that had wounds. DON said she just got hyper focused on catching up the skin assessments and was just so overwhelmed that I was on auto pilot trying to get the documentation caught up. DON said, knows that you should not fill in holes in the MAR and TAR. Said she had never just maliciously done something like that before. She said, I know I have made mistakes, if someone will just tell me it is a mistake, I can fix it, but if you don't tell me whats wrong, I can't fix it. She said the last few days CSD had been going through the system showing her how to run different reports. She said she did a skin sweep when she first came to the facility with the other ADON's s and TX, and over the last week the ADON's s and TX had been doing them almost daily. She said Thursday (8/3/23) she went to the residents that had wounds and had the wound care doctor's notes from that morning and just made sure that there were no new areas. She said she used his measurements from that morning because they had just been done and there was no reason to believe that measurements would have changed that much. She said, I don't feel that my documentation was false just that I made a mistake and was just overwhelmed with the need to catch everything up in the residents' records. During an interview on 8/6/23 at 12:50PM with RNWS J, He said he had been an RN for 27 years and had begun working at the facility on the 24th of June 2023 as a weekend RN and basically the weekend rn nursing supervisor. He said it was his responsibility to do the skin assessments for the new admissions and make sure the nurses were doing their charting. RNWS J said the weekend supervisor was supposed to do the wound care. He said he would go through the TAR to see who had treatments and go from there. He said it was also his responsibility to make sure the weekend was staffed and if he could not, then he would cover himself as a nurse or aide, in which case all the nurses were responsible for doing their own wound care and skin assessments. RNWS J said he had only been able to be the supervisor 4 days since he started in June of 2023. He said that a nurse not doing weekly skin assessments or doing daily wound care treatments was neglect and when he had come to work that morning he had been inserviced on completing the wound care and skin assessments in a timely manner daily. RNWS J said he had also been inserviced that all charting was to e completed by the end of each shift. He said if documentation had been forgotten or was not accurate then the nurses were supposed to leave the MAR's and TAR's blank from the previous time and make a progress note to identify that it was a late entry and the work was completed or missed and the reason for the lateness. He said to go into the MAR or TAR and fill in holes that were not your own work just for the sake of filling in the holes in the MAR or TAR were not standards of nursing practice. He said he would not be comfortable to do it for another nurse, nor have another nurse do it for him. RNWS J said he would not be able to chart anything from even the previous weekend of work, much less any further than that and a typical standard of nursing practice that has been taught was that if it were not documented, then it was not done In a time when a skin assessment had not been completed in a timely manner, then he would go and assess a resident and do the skin assessment himself and never back date the assessment stating, As ethics go should not fix others charting, and shouldn't back date charting. He said that the identification of residents' pressure sores as stage 2, 3, or 4 and the sores not decreasing in size and severity were pretty obvious that they were not having their skin assessed accurately and they were not receiving their treatments. RNWS J said they were insereviced on setting up appointments for the residents as well. He said the nurse that admitted a resident was supposed to go through the admitting orders and paperwork to see if the resident either already had a follow up appointment or had the need for 1 to be scheduled. He s[TRUNCATED]
Jun 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan that included...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 2 (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed Resident #1's dialysis needs. The facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed Resident #1's frequent refusal to attend dialysis sessions. These failures place residents at risk of meeting and addressing their medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Findings included: Record review of resident #1 face sheet updated 05/25/2023 revealed: a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a diagnosis list that included dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Record review of resident #1 MDS that was a 5-day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed: resident utilized dialysis both while he was not a resident and while he was a resident of the facility within the last 14 days. Record review of resident ##1's physician orders dated 06/01/2023 revealed: HD: Obtain and Document Vital Signs prior to resident leaving for Dialysis in the morning every Tue, Thu, Sat -Start Date 04/29/2023 . HD: Obtain and Document Vital Signs upon resident return to facility from Dialysis in the afternoon every Tue, Thu, Sat -Start Date-04/29/2023 .HD: Dialysis access location: Right arm No Needle stick or BP taken in affected extremity. every shift -Start Date- 04/29/2023 . HD: Monitor dialysis catheter and dressing for signs/symptoms of infection Q shift every shift -Start Date- 04/28/2023 . HD: May change dressing to dialysis access site only if soiled with excessive drainage and notify MD. as needed -Start Date- 04/28/2023 Record review of Resident #1's Progress Notes from 04/25/2023 through 05/25/2023 revealed: 4/28/2023 dialysis T, TH, Sat @ 6am, fistula to R upper arm . 5/1/2023 [NAME] Medical Center emergency room on [DATE] with complaints of shortness of breath and weakness . He had reported a missed dialysis session . Patient was admitted for ESRD and pulmonary edema. Nephrology was consulted and the patient was dialyzed .05/02/2023 Note Text: Aide and this nurse attempted to get resident up and ready for dialysis. He stated several times that he is not going. I asked him why and he stated that his leg hurt. I offered him Tylenol and he declined stating that he just wanted to rest. Unable to notify dialysis at this time as they don't open till 6am.Will attempt again . 05/09/2023 Note Text: Notified by night nurse that resident refused to go to dialysis stating that he is just to tired and in pain. Called dialysis and notified that as of now resident is agreeing to go tomorrow for a make up appt. She states that they have a chair open for 7am.Scheduling notified. Resident has an app on 5/12/23 to get his pain meds. Notified Dr. to see if we could get something before then. Awaiting a response . 05/09/2023 ESRD: Patient with dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday. Patient was educated today on the importance of his compliance with dialysis sessions. Patient verbalized understanding.05/04/2023: I spoke with the patient extensively today on the importance of compliance with his dialysis sessions and the consequences of not attending his dialysis to include but are not limited to hyperkalemia, arrhythmia, heart attack, death. Patient verbalized understanding. Approximate time spent20 minutes. 05/09/2023: I spent 20minutes speaking to this patient on the importance of his compliance with his dialysis sessions as well as the consequences of not going to his dialysis sessions. Patient verbalized understanding and endorses pain as well keeping him from going to his sessions . 05/12/2023 Refused dialysis, resident stating he's trough with life and wants to go home on hospice . 05/17/2023 Resident refused dialysis because he doesn't have his dialysis bag, blanket, wheelchair or shoes. All left in the room contaminated with bed bugs. C/O of being uncomfortable and restless. 05/18/2023 This nurse spoke with CN at Center who reports Resident #1 refusing several sessions of HD is baseline for him. CN reports patient misses several sessions and then ends up in the hospital due to the missed HD sessions . 05/18/2023 Note Text: SW followed up with Res regarding what he wanted to do as he refused dialysis session today. Restated he was still thinking about everything and went back to sleep. SW will continue to follow up . 05/18/2023: I discussed with the patient at length today the consequences of refusals of dialysis. From my understanding, patient has not been to dialysis and has missed x3sessions now. I discussed with him the implications of missing his dialysis ultimately leading to demise and patient verbalized understanding . 05/20/2023 Note Text: Resident sent to ER this morning due to multiple miss dialysis treatment. Follow up this evening and found out that resident will be admitted to the hospital. Family is aware. DON was notified for the update of the president. Record review of Resident #1's Careplan initiated 05/05/2023 revealed: No dialysis care area initiated with a Focus, Goal, or Approach. No reference to resident refusing dialysis treatments. Record review of Resident #1's census information was that he discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and as of 06/01/2023, he had not returned to the facility. During an interview on 05/25/2023 at 5:10PM with Medical Records staff, she said Resident #1 only had 3 dialysis communication forms completed during his stay, because he frequently refused to go to dialysis. During an interview on 05/25/2023 at 5:45PM with the ADM, she said they did not have a policy for residents that utilized dialysis. She said they only had the dialysis contracts for the dialysis centers. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 11:30AM with ADM, she said that the SW did most of the behavioral care plan areas, the treatment nurse did the careplan area for skin, but she was not sure who did the other health part of care plans. She said they did discuss changes during the morning meetings. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 11:45PM with the transport driver, he said Resident #1 had a very early morning appointment time of 6AM for T, TH, S. Transport driver said in the short time Resident #1 was in the building, he had frequently refused to go to dialysis. He said Resident #1 went maybe 1 time a week to dialysis. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 1:50PM with LVN A, she said all staff had access to resident care plans. She said the admission nurse would begin the resident care plan as they were completing the admission packet. She said that although any of the nurses could add items to the resident care plan, the issues were discussed during a morning meeting each day and it was the responsibility of the Nurse Managers to make and update resident care plans. LVN A said that a resident that needed dialysis should have had it addressed on their care plan, it would have included any of the orders for dialysis to include where the resident went to dialysis, what days they went to dialysis, as well as any monitoring of the dialysis port and the completing of the dialysis communication forms with the dialysis center. LVN A said that if a resident was frequently refusing to go to dialysis that it would also have been addressed in the resident's care plan. LVN A said she did not have Resident #1 as her resident during his short time in the facility, but that she had been aware that he did have dialysis and that he frequently refused to go to dialysis. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 3:35PM with the DON, she said that a resident care plan should address their dialysis care needs. She said the care plan would address that the resident did have dialysis and any monitoring of the dialysis port. DON said if a resident would refuse to go to dialysis, then that should have also been part of the care plan. She said she was new to the facility so she was not sure of the corporation's expectation of how specific the dialysis area should have been on the care plan; however, dialysis should definitely have been addressed on the resident's comprehensive care plan. DON said the admission nurse was responsible for a resident's interim plan of care that was to be followed up by the MDS nurse with the comprehensive care plan. Any further revisions to care plans would fall to the nurse managers to complete. Record review of Facility Policy labeled Care Plans Comprehensive Person Center revised December 2016 revealed: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develops and implements A comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Each residence comprehensive person-centered care plan will be consistent with the residents right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her care plan, including the right to participate in the planning process; request revisions to the plan of care; participate in establishing the expected goals and outcomes of the care; . The care planning process will: facilitate resident and or representative involvement; include an assessment of the resident strengths and needs; and incorporate the residence personal and cultural preferences and developing the goals of care. the comprehensive person centered care plan will: include measurable objectives and timeframes; describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residence highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; describe services that would otherwise be provided for the above, that are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her right, including the right to refuse treatment; describe any specialized services to be provided as a result of past our recommendations; include the resident stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; include the residents stated preference and potential for future discharge, including his or her desire to return to the community and any referrals made to local agencies or other entities and support such a desire; incorporate identified problem areas; incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; built on the resident strengths; reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives and measurable outcomes identify the professional services that are responsible for each element of care; aid in preventing or reducing decline in the residence functional status and or functional levels; enhance the optimal functioning of the resident thing on a rehabilitative program; and reflect currently recognized
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to revise resident care plans based on changing goals...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to revise resident care plans based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions for 3 of 5 (Resident # 2,3,4) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The facility failed to update Resident #2's care plan for an actual fall on 04/27/2023. The facility failed to update Resident #3's care plan for an actual fall on 05/17/2023 and 05/22/2023. The facility failed to update Resident #4's care plan for an actual fall on 05/17/2023. These failures place residents at risk of meeting and addressing their changing medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Findings included: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's Facesheet dated 06/01/2023 revealed: an [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had a diagnosis list that included: Repeated falls, Need for assistance with personal care, Unspecified lack of coordination, Abnormal posture, Muscle weakness, Other difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, unsteadiness on feet other lack of coordination, Fracture of superior rim of left pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Other specified fracture of left pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: A BIMS of 2 meaning severe cognitive impairment. Her balance during transitions was not steady but able to stabilize without staff assistance, and walking was an activity that had not occurred. She only needed limited 1-person physical assistance for transfers. Resident #2 did not have any impairments in her range of motion for upper or lower extremities and she utilized a wheelchair. Resident#2 had not had any falls documented since the previous MDS assessment (3 months prior). Record review of Incident/Accident Log dated 03/25/23 -05/25/23 revealed Resident #2 had an actual fall on 04/27/2023. Record review of Resident #2's Care plan Area for Actual Falls last revised 09/28/2021 revealed: No revision to include the addition of the most recent fall on 04/27/2023. During an observation of Resident #2 on 06/01/2023 at 3:30PM, she was resting in bed with her eyes closed. Her bed was in a comfortable height position meaning it was not in the lowest position available. Resident did not arouse to sound of person talking. Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's Facesheet dated 06/01/2023 revealed: An [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had a diagnosis list that included: Muscle weakness, Primary osteoarthritis, unspecified site, Primary generalized (osteo)arthritis, Age-related physical debility, Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, Repeated falls, Other lack of coordination, Weakness. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: A BIMS of 6 meaning severe cognitive impairment. Resident #3 needed extensive 2-person physical assistance with transfers, she was not steady and was unable to stabilize herself without staff assistance for transfers and she did not walk. She utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #3 did not have any documented falls since the last MDS (3 months prior). Record review of Resident #3's Careplan Area for Risk of Falls last revised 03/28/2020 revealed: The resident is at risk for falls r/t Confusion, Deconditioning, Gait/balance problems. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020 Revision on: 03/28/2020. Goals: The resident will be free of minor injury through the review date. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020 Revision on: 03/05/2023. Target Date: 05/30/2023. Interventions. Anticipate and meet the resident's needs. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020. Encourage resident to use call light and/or ask for assistance with ADL and mobility tasks if feeling weak or dizzy. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020. Encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020. Ensure that the resident is wearing appropriate footwear when ambulating or mobilizing in w/c. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020. PT evaluate and treat as ordered. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020. Revision on: 02/14/2020. The resident needs a safe environment with: even floors free from spills and/or clutter; adequate, glare-free light; a working and reachable call light, the bed in low position at night; handrails on walls, personal items within reach. Date Initiated: 02/14/2020 Revision on: 02/14/2020 Resident care plan did not address actual falls on 05/17/2023 and 05/22/2023 of which she sustained a fracture. Resident was utilizing a stabilizing metal brace to heal on her right leg, she had her bed in the lowest position, mobility bars on the bed and had 1 fall mat on each side of her bed for a total of 2 fall mats. Record review of Incident/Accident Log dated 03/25/23 -05/25/23 revealed Resident #3 had an actual fall on 05/17/2023 and 05/22/2023. During an observation and interview on 06/01/2023 at 2:10PM with Resident #3. She was laying in bed near the window of the room. Her bed was in the lowest position near the floor, a mobility ½ rail on both sides of the bed, with a fall mat on both sides of her bed. Resident was unable to recall both of her falls from 05/17/2023 and 05/22/2023. Resident did say that she had a little pain and that she had a brace on. Resident #3 did have an open, metal brace with a dial at the knee on her right leg that extended from her thigh to near ankle. Resident #3 was resting on her back with a slight elevation to her right side and her head was elevated to approximately 45 degrees. Her right leg was resting on a pillow. Resident began speaking in a word salad. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 2:20PM with CNA B, she said she had been working at the facility for less than a month at that time. She said Resident #3 and Resident #4 were residents that she always worked with. CNA B said that during the time she had been working both Resident #3 and Resident #4 were to be in a low positioned bed if the staff was not performing care. She said that Resident #3 had the brace on her right leg and had the 2 fall mats at her bedside, with 1 on either side of the bed since she started. CNA B said Resident #3 frequently tried to remove her brace and it had prompted that the staff was supposed to monitor her more frequently. She said she did not know how to access residents care plans at that time, but she would reach out to another CNA or a nurse to find out. Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's Facesheet dated 06/01/2023 revealed: An [AGE] year-old female that was admitted on [DATE]. She had a diagnosis list that included: Unspecified fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Displaced fracture of medial malleolus of left tibia, subsequent encounter for open fracture type i or ii with routine healing, Displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right fibula, subsequent encounter for open fracture type i or ii with routine healing, Displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of left fibula, subsequent encounter for open fracture type i or ii with routine healing, Encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, Nondisplaced fracture of medial malleolus of right tibia, subsequent encounter for open fracture type i or ii with routine healing, Other lack of coordination, Need for assistance with personal care, Muscle weakness (generalized), Unspecified lack of coordination, Muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, Age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, vertebra(e), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Contracture, right knee, Contracture, left knee, Unsteadiness on feet, History of falling. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: A BIMS of 99 meaning she was unable to complete the assessment. She had a short- and long-term memory problem. Resident #4 needed extensive 1-person physical assistance for transfers, she was not steady needing staff to stabilize her, and she did not walk. Resident #4 utilized a wheelchair. She had not had any documented falls since the last MDS (3 months prior). Record review of Resident #4's Careplan for Actual Falls last revised on 01/25/2023 revealed: Falling star program and fall mat at bedside to reduce the risk of injury as interventions. Resident did not have a revision of the care area to address that she had a fall with a fracture on 05/17/2023. Record review of Incident/Accident Log dated 03/25/23 -05/25/23 revealed Resident #4 had an actual fall on 05/17/2023. During an observation on 06/01/202023 at 2:15PM of Resident #4, she was in a low position bed near the floor, laying on her back resting her eyes. She had a fall mat in her floor beside her bed. Resident #4 did not respond to sound of person voice. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 11:30AM with ADM, she said that the SW did most of the behavioral care plan areas, the treatment nurse did the careplan area for skin, but she was not sure who did the other health part of care plans. She said they did discuss changes during the morning meetings. During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 3:35PM with the DON, she said that a resident care plan should address their actual falls. She said the care plan would address that the resident did have a fall and any injuries that might have occurred. She said it would have addressed any interventions such as fall mats, low beds, injury treatments, etc. She said she was new to the facility so she was not sure of the corporation's expectation of how specific the actual fall care area should have been on the care plan; however, the actual fall should definitely have been addressed on the resident's care plan. DON said the admission nurse was responsible for a resident's interim plan of care that was to be followed up by the MDS nurse with the comprehensive care plan. Any further revisions to care plans would fall to the nurse managers to complete. Record review of Facility Policy labeled Care Plans Comprehensive Person Center revised December 2016 revealed: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develops and implements A comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Each residence comprehensive person-centered care plan will be consistent with the residents right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her care plan, including the right to participate in the planning process; request revisions to the plan of care; participate in establishing the expected goals and outcomes of the care; . The care planning process will: facilitate resident and or representative involvement; include an assessment of the resident strengths and needs; and incorporate the residence personal and cultural preferences and developing the goals of care. the comprehensive person centered care plan will: include measurable objectives and timeframes; describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residence highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; describe services that would otherwise be provided for the above, that are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her right, including the right to refuse treatment; describe any specialized services to be provided as a result of past our recommendations; include the resident stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; include the residents stated preference and potential for future discharge, including his or her desire to return to the community and any referrals made to local agencies or other entities and support such a desire; incorporate identified problem areas; incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; built on the resident strengths; reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives and measurable outcomes identify the professional services that are responsible for each element of care; aid in preventing or reducing decline in the residence functional status and or functional levels; enhance the optimal functioning of the resident thing on a rehabilitative program; and reflect currently recognized
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line maintenance. The facility failed to acknowledge Resident #1 had a PICC line until 11/07/2022 which was 9 days after admission and failed to provide adequate maintenance of the PICC by not performing any dressing changes. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving needed care to maintain optimum health and placing them at risk for infection and/or deterioration in their condition. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet accessed on 11/23/2022 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include a surgical wound, low blood level, depression, and arthritis. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Section C: BIMS score of 13 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan initiated 11/03/2022 revealed no evidence regarding Resident #1 having a PICC line. Review of discharge and admission paperwork from the hospital sent to the facility upon admission revealed no evidence of Resident #1 having a PICC line or needing a PICC line. Review of Resident #1's Admit/Readmit Screener dated 10/29/2022 and signed by LVN C revealed no evidence regarding Resident #1 having a PICC line. Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/29/2022 and signed by LVN C revealed no evidence regarding Resident #1 having a PICC line. Review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 10/29/2022 and signed by the Wound Care Nurse revealed single lumen PICC line in place. Review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 11/13/2022 and signed by the Wound Care Nurse revealed no evidence regarding Resident #1 having a PICC line. Review of Resident #1's electronic physicians orders accessed 11/23/2022 revealed: PICC IV: change IV dressing every seven days and as needed With an order date of 11/7/2022 and entered by LVN B. Review of Resident #1's MAR revealed the PICC line dressing change to be completed on 11/08/2022 blank with no signature. Further review of the MAR revealed the PICC line dressing change to be completed on 11/15/2022 was completed and signed by LVN A. Review of Resident #1's hospital clinical record dated 11/18/2022 and signed by RN A revealed: ED Reassessment: General Comments: Patient has a mid-line (PICC line) that has not been changed since 10/28 according to the tag on the dressing. Further review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of Sepsis. During an interview on 11/23/2022 at 1:40 PM, Resident #1's family member stated she felt the facility had not properly cared for Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with sepsis. She stated Resident #1 is now on hospice services and will not be returning to the facility. She stated when Resident #1 arrived at the hospital, the emergency room physician told her the PICC line dressing was still dated 10/28/2022 and the dressing should have been changed weekly. She stated she felt Resident #1 had become septic due to improper nursing care. During an interview on 11/23/2022 at 2:30 PM, the DON stated the nurse on duty who received the admitted resident was responsible for entering the resident's physicians' orders into the computer. She stated the nurse on duty was also responsible for the initial head-to-toe assessment of the new resident. She stated the nurse managers including her were responsible to follow up and ensure that all orders were correct. She stated she was unsure how and why the failure occurred and why Resident #1's PICC line was not documented on the assessment. She stated PICC line dressing changes should be performed weekly and the PICC line should be flushed every shift. The DON stated not appropriately maintaining the PICC line could cause a resident to become septic. During an interview on 11/23/2022 at 2:35 PM, LVN A stated she was aware Resident #1 had a PICC line. She stated she had flushed the PICC line several times, but she was unsure as to the dates. LVH A stated she could not remember if she had changed the PICC line dressing for Resident #1. She stated if she documented changing the PICC line dressing then she did change it. During an interview on 11/23/2022 at 2:40 PM, LVN B stated the nurse on duty was responsible for the admitted resident's physician's orders entry and assessment. She stated all nursing management staff including her were to verify for correct order entry. She stated she did not work the week after Resident #1 was admitted to verify the orders. She stated she entered the physician's order for the PICC line dressing changes weekly on Resident #1 on 11/07/2022. She stated she was unaware Resident #1 had a PICC line until that date when the Wound Care Nurse notified her. During an interview on 11/23/2022, LVN C stated she was the nurse on duty when Resident #1 was admitted to the facility. She stated Resident #1 had arrived at the end LVN C's shift. She stated she did not perform a complete head-to-toe assessment. LVN C stated she completed an assessment of Resident #1's wound but did not know that Resident #1 had a PICC line. She stated she was unaware Resident #1 had a PICC line until this interview. She stated it was her responsibility to perform a complete head-to-toe assessment for admitted residents. She stated she did not because she was focused on Resident #1's wound and it was the end of her shift. LVN C stated she should have completed a thorough assessment and she should have known that Resident #1 had a PICC line. She stated the paperwork from the hospital and the phone report she received from the hospital nurse did not have any information that indicated Resident #1 had a PICC line. Review of facility policy titled, Central Venous Catheter Dressing Changes revised April 2016, revealed: Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings. General Guidelines: .4. After original insertion of CVAD, the dressing will consist of gauze. This must be changed within 24 hours. 5. Change transparent semi permeable membrane dressings at least every five to seven days and as needed when wet soil or not intact.
Aug 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives based on assessed needs with the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #9) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan that was resident centered with measurable, realistic objectives based on assessed needs for Resident #7 and Resident #9. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's electronic face sheet accessed on 08/24/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, problems communicating, weakness and breathing problems. Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's Comprehensive Care Plan with a review date of 08/18/2022 revealed a problem focus of [Resident #7] like company and she like to be read too. The goal for the problem focus was go read to [Resident #7]; a staff, not resident, centered goal without a means to measure if the goal was achieved and an intervention of to read book to her three times a week. Review of Resident #7's nursing, activity, and social worker documentation from date initiated on 5/25/2022 through target date of 8/17/2022 did not reveal implementation of the intervention. Review of Resident #9's electronic face sheet accessed 08/24/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included pain in fingers, knee, shoulder, and abdomen. Review of Resident #9's comprehensive/quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score 13 indicating mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #9's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 08/23/22 revealed problem focus {Resident #9} has the potential for discomfort, complications or s/sx related to dx of GERD secondary to:. Review of Resident #9's medical diagnoses list did not reveal a diagnosis of GERD. Further review revealed no evidence of problem focus, objectives, or interventions related to diagnosis of pain. During an interview on 08/10/2022 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator stated the IDT was responsible for developing the comprehensive care plans. According to the Administrator, the IDT consisted of the MDS coordinator, Social Worker, Activity Director, Dietary manager, and Therapy Director. Training members of the IDT on care planning occurred during orientation and on the job. The Administrator stated the failure to develop a care plan that was resident centered with measurable, realistic objectives based on assessed needs occurred because more training for staff involved in creating the care plans was needed. She stated the negative impact to residents would be that their needs would not be met. During an interview on 08/25/22 at 02:26 PM, the DON explained all direct care staff were responsible for developing care plans. She stated the expectation was that all residents had an individualized/personalized plan of care. The DON stated residents would be at risk for their needs not being met if an individualized care plan is not in place. During an interview on 08/25/22 at 02:33 PM, the Activity Director stated she was a member of the IDT and was responsible for care planning activity problems identified. The activity director was not able to provide an explanation for the goal on Resident #7's care plan go read to [Resident #7]. She stated vague goals and interventions on a care plan leave room for errors to occur. The Activity Director stated training on care planning was on the job. She stated the effect of inadequate care plans on the residents was the residents not getting needs met. Review of the facility's policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, Policy Statement revealed A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation Item #1: revealed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. Item #3 revealed The IDT includes: a. The Attending Physician; b. A registered nurse who has responsibility for the resident; c. A nurse aide who has responsibility for the resident; d. A member of the food and nutrition services staff; e. The resident and the resident's legal representative (to the extent practicable); and f. Other appropriate staff or professionals as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments in medication carts for 1 of 4 (500 Hall medication Cart ) medicati...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments in medication carts for 1 of 4 (500 Hall medication Cart ) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure medication Cart 1 was not left unlocked and unsecured while unattended. These failures could place residents at risk of accessing and ingesting medications not intended for the resident and could result in significant adverse consequences necessitating hospitalization to stabilize resident. The findings included: During an observation on 08/25/2022 between 3:07PM and 3:15PM at northside nurses' station, Hall 500 Medication Cart to be unlocked and unattended. One resident was observed passing the medication cart. Hall 500 Med Cart was parked against the resident side of the nurse's station., LVN A was sitting on the opposite side of the nurses' station working at computer. Hall 500 Med Cart contained the following: artificial tears, Insulin, glucometers, synergies, finger sticks, scissors, Lidocaine patch, Metoprolol, Antibiotics, Losartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, Lasix, Plavix, Lisinopril, Promethazine, Namenda, Zetia, Amiodarone, Tramadol, Aricept, Buspirone, Lexapro, Depakote, Celexa, Cymbalta, Midodrine. The following controlled substances were not under double lock: Tylenol w/ Codeine, Norco, Lorazepam, Morphine, Diazepam, Fentanyl patch, Lyrica, and Clonazepam. During an interview on 08/25/2022 at 3:15 PM with LVN A, she stated Hall 500 Med Cart was her cart. LVN A stated that she did not know why her cart was unlocked, she thought she had locked it. LVN A stated an unlocked medication cart posed minimal to severe harm to residents if they were to get medications out of the cart. LVN A was not sure what led to failure of her medication cart being unlocked, she always locks the medication cart. LVN A stated she must have gotten in a hurry when resident fell and forgot to lock medication cart back. During an interview on 08/25/2022 at 03:30 PM with DON, she stated medication carts should be kept locked when not in use. She stated there was a potential for a resident to get in the medication cart and take medications. She stated she does not know how this happened She stated she did not know where the cart was located at the time it was found unlocked. She stated there was not any formal training, as a nurse or CMA were taught safety of medications. The nurses or CMA that was assigned the medication cart would be responsible for monitoring the medication cart was locked when not in use. Review of facility policy titled: Security of Medication Cart dated (Revised April 2007) The medication cart shall be secured during medication passes. Policy and Interpretation and Implementation 1. The nurse must secure the medication cart during the medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry. 2. The medication cart should be parked in the doorway of the resident's room during the medication pass. The cart doors and drawers should be facing the resident's room. 4. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. 5. When the medication cart is not being used, it must be locked and parked at the nurses' station or inside the medication room. Review of facility policy titled: Storage of Medications (Revised April 2007) Policy Statement The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. Review of facility policy titled: Controlled Substances (Revised December 2012) Policy Statement The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Only authorized licensed nursing and/or pharmacy personnel shall have access to Scheduled II controlled drugs maintained on premises. 5. Controlled substances must be stored in medication room in a locked container, separate from containers for any non-controlled medications. The container must remain locked at all times, except when it is accessed to obtain medications for residents. ?
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 rooms occupied by...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 rooms occupied by (Resident #14, Resident #36 and Resident #44, Resident #33) of 70 rooms. 1. Resident #44 and Resident #33's room had a hole in the dry wall on near the headboard. 2. Resident #14 and #36's room had scrapped paint down to the drywall. These failures placed residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is uncomfortable, unsafe, and unsanitary. Findings include: During Observation on 8/23/22 at 11:28 am the room occupied by residents #44 and #33, had a wall behind the bed that had one 3 inches long and 1-inch-wide hole completely through the wall and 3 large tears in the drywall deep enough to expose the brown paper of the drywall behind resident's #44's headboard. Resident #33's bed had multiple quarter size paint chips exposing the bare drywall under the paint on the wall behind and above the resident's headboard. During observation on 8/24/22 at 2:03 PM of the room occupied by Resident #36 and Resident #14 the walls had scraped paint approximately 12 inches long and 1 inch wide swirls down to bare drywall on the right side of room and exposed drywall behind headboard behind the bed, 4 side by side locations with scraped paint 2 inches wide and 5 inches long down to white primer above Headboard on bed. Interview with Maintenance Director on 08/25/22 at 3:38 PM, said that he was aware of the damage to rooms occupied by residents #44, #33 and Residents #14, #36 but was behind on repairing the damage in resident rooms. He said he has not been employed with the facility long. He said normally issues are reported either by staff or he writes something down or tries to make a work order. He said the staff don't make work orders and usually they verbalized issues, but they could make work orders through Point Click Care (PCC) the computer system which is used in the facility. When asked, Maintenance Director could not say how long the damage had been there or if there was a facility policy on how to process work orders or how to monitor environmental inspections. He said he did not have a work order for repairs on Resident's #44, #33 #14, and #36 rooms. Interview on 08/25/22 at 3:55 PM, the Administrator said that maintenance issues are generally reported during morning meeting by nurses and Department Heads. She said that the Maintenance Director should be notified of maintenance issues by staff with the Point Click Care (PCC) system. During interview on 08/25/22 at 2:30 PM, Resident #44 stated that no one has ever talked to him about the damaged walls or any possible repairs the facility would make. He stated that the damage to the rooms didn't bother him. Resident #44 said the holes were always there. Two attempts to interview Resident #33 was made but unsuccessful because Resident #33 was sleeping. Residents #14 and resident #36 said they had no concerns with the damage to their rooms. Environmental Policy was request from the Administrator on 8/25/22 at 3:55 PM regarding room repairs, facility. She said the facility did not have policy.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of a resident's admiss...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 3 (Resident #23, #119, #169) of 3 residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to complete Resident #23, Resident #119, and Resident #169's Baseline Care Plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified. Findings included: Review of Resident #23's electronic face sheet, revealed an 86 -year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Congestive heart failure, Anemia, Chronic Kidney disease, liver failure, history of falling, need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident # 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed: Section C: Cognitive Patterns revealed resident had a BIMS of a 13(Cognitively intact). Section G: Functional Status revealed resident required limited to extensive assistance for bed mobility, Transfer between chair/bed/standing position/wheelchair and total dependence for bathing. Section N: Medication revealed that in the last 7 days of review period resident required Insulin injections 6 of those 7 days; Hypnotics 6 of those 7 days; Antibiotic 6 of the 7 days; Diuretics 6 of those 7 days; Opioids 3 of those 7 days. Record review on 08/25/2022 of Resident #23's electronic care plan revealed no evidence of baseline care plan completed. Review of Resident #119's electronic face sheet, revealed an 89 -year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: high blood pressure, Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease, Insomnia and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident # 119's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C: Cognitive Patterns, revealed a BIMS of a 13 (moderate impairment). Section G: Functional Status revealed that resident required at least one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfer, toileting and personal hygiene. Section H: Bladder and Bowel revealed resident had an indwelling catheter. Section O: Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs revealed resident received 85 minutes of speech therapy for 7 days out of the last 7 days of the review period. Record review 08/25/2022 of Resident # 119's electronic care plan revealed no evidence of baseline care plan completed. Review of Resident #169's electronic face sheet, revealed a 55 -year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: stroke, anxiety, high blood pressure, lack of coordination, and aphasia. Record review of Resident # 169's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C: Cognitive Patterns, revealed a BIMS of an 8 (moderate impairment). Section G: Functional Status revealed that resident required at least one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Section N: Medication revealed that resident received antianxiety medications 7 days of the last 7 days of the review period. Record review 08/25/2022 of Resident # 169's electronic care plan revealed no evidence of baseline care plan completed. During an interview on 08/25/22 at 12:43 pm with the DON, she stated the Interim Plan of Care, located in the resident's electronic chart, was the facility's Baseline Care Plan. The DON stated the Interim Plan of Care was an assessment that was completed by the Interdisciplinary Team by answering a list of generated questions. After the DON reviewed the Interim Plan of Care she stated, the plan did not address diagnosis, medications, psychosocial needs, or the type of assistance a resident required. The DON stated the Interdisciplinary Team was responsible for completing the Interim Plan of Care the morning after resident was admitted . The DON stated not having a Baseline Care Plan could have affected residents care, because services could have not been addressed which could have led to residents needs not being met. After the DON reviewed the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, she stated she did not have a reason to the failure of the facility not following the Baseline Care Plan policy. During interview on 08/25/22 at 1:29 PM with the Social Worker, she stated her responsibility for the Baseline Care Plan was to ask residents about their discharge goals. The Social Worker stated there was not a form completed during the Baseline Care meeting to provide residents or their representee. The Social Worker stated there was not a copy of a Baseline Care Plan given to residents. Record review of facility's policy titled Care Plans- Baseline, without a date, revealed: To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including but not limited to: initial goals based on admission orders; Physician orders; Dietary orders; Therapy services; social services; and PASRR recommendation, if applicable. The baseline care plan will be use until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary person-centered care plan. The resident and the representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but is not limited to: The initial goals of the resident; A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 7 life-threatening violation(s), $25,974 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 35 deficiencies on record, including 7 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $25,974 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 7 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Silver Spring's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Silver Spring an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Silver Spring Staffed?

CMS rates Silver Spring's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Silver Spring?

State health inspectors documented 35 deficiencies at Silver Spring during 2022 to 2025. These included: 7 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 28 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Silver Spring?

Silver Spring is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by HMG HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 84 residents (about 70% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Abilene, Texas.

How Does Silver Spring Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, Silver Spring's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Silver Spring?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Silver Spring Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Silver Spring has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 7 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Silver Spring Stick Around?

Silver Spring has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Silver Spring Ever Fined?

Silver Spring has been fined $25,974 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Texas average of $33,339. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Silver Spring on Any Federal Watch List?

Silver Spring is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.