CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 32 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for abuse, in that:
1. The facility did not take measures to prevent verbal abuse of Resident #87 by LVN C.
2. The facility failed to implement measures, like identifying verbal abuse and handling residents with behaviors r/t PTSD, to protect residents from further abuse.
3. The facility failed to protect Resident #87 from having his mustache shaved against his will.
4. The facility failed to prevent LVN C from instructing staff to not give Resident #87 a blanket when Resident #87 complained of being cold.
5. The faciity failed to follow Resident #87's care plan in giving him fluids to prevent dehydration.
6. The facility failed to allow Resident #87 to have his meal tray in front of him for the entirety of his meal because he was eating quickly, instead of assisting Resident #87 per his care plan.
7. The facility failed to ensure that LVN C's abusive behavior was reported and corrected.
An IJ was identified on 12/20/2023. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions.
This failure could affect the residents at the facility and place residents at risk for physical, verbal, and/or psychosocial harm.
The findings were:
Record review of Resident #87's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), anxiety disorder (reaction to stress an intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body), schizophrenia (A mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech and behavior), major depressive disorder, and need for assistance with personal care.
Record review of Resident #87's most recent MDS assessment, dated 11/29/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 9/15, signifying moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment further revealed that it was known that Resident #87 had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, such as threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others. It was revealed that Ressident #87 needed supervision while eating. No pertinent information was revealed in Section K-Swalloing/Nutritional Status of the MDS assessment.
Record review of Resident #87's comprehensive care plan revealed:
Resident #87 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs r/t cognitive deficits, physical limitations, revised on 12/7/2023, with an intervention of all staff to converse with [Resident #87] while providing care.
Resident #87 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis d/t CVA, revised 12/7/2023, with an intervention of EATING: The resident requires assistance b (1) staff to eat.
Resident #87 is verbally aggressive with staff r/t poor impulse control and schizophrenia, revised 12/7/2023, with interventions of analyze of key times, places, circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. And Provide positive feedback for good behavior. Emphasize positive aspects of compliance. And Psychiatric/Psychogeriatric consult as indicated.
Resident #87 has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes r/t dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, revised 12/7/2023, with an intervention of COMMUNICATION: Use the resident preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact.
Resident #87 has a communication problem r/t impaired ability to understand and make self understood, revised 12/11/2023, with an intervention of Speak on an adult level, speaking clearly and slower than normal.
Resident #87 needs assistance from staff for dehydration, at risk for dehydration, revised 12/7/2023, with an intervention of Encourage the resident to drink fluids of choice.
Record Review on 12/19/23 of Resident #87's comprehensive care plan revealed that the facility revised Resident #87's care plan on 12/18/23. The updated comprehensive care plan revealed:
Resident #87 has hx of torture, PTSD and active dx of paranoid schizophrenia., revised 12/19/2023, with interventions of Provide explanation when resident is denied an item he cannot have i.e. food not according to order., when redirecting resident maintain calm voice tone, look directly at resident, do not touch resident unless there is imminent danger to resident or others, maintain relaxed body posture.
Resident #87 has Schizophrenia and Bipolar at risk for behavioral problems with an intervention of resident to see [counseling] per resident needs/prn
Record Review of a nurse's progress note on 12/18/23 at 2:09 PM, author unknown, [Resident #87] was in dining room during lunch, claims charge nurse yelled at him. Feels that its abuse. Charge nurse was removed from schedule. Resident assessed for any signs of emotional distress. None noted at this time. Resident up to wheelchair at nurse's station. [NP] made aware. [Resident #87's RP] called but no response.
During an observation on 12/18/2023 at 12:35 PM in the 600-hall dining room for lunch service, Resident #87 was coughing while eating his lunch meal. There were no drinks present on his lunch meal tray. Resident #87 was sitting by himself while LVN C was sitting at another table about 8 feet away, helping other residents eat. LVN C addressed Resident #87 in an elevated, derogatory voice, telling the resident to slow down while eating, multiple times. LVN C appeared to have her brow furrowed and with an upset expression on her face. After Resident #87 kept coughing while eating, LVN C told CNA E to take food away from the resident. CNA E took Resident #87's lunch meal tray away from him as he continued to cough, without telling the resident what she was going to do.
Observation and interview 12/18/2023 at 12:40 PM, Resident #87 stated that LVN C was mean.
During an observation and interview on 12/18/2023 at 12:41 PM, the RD had a surprised expression on her face and confirmed that LVN C was yelling at Resident #87 across the dining room. The RD was present during 12/18/23 lunch service and confirmed that there was no beverage present on Resident #87's lunch meal tray. The RD revealed that there should be a beverage on Resident #87's meal trays, and Resident #87 drank, ate quickly, and required cueing.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 12:45 PM, the RD stated it was inappropriate for LVN C to be yelling across the room to Resident #87. The RD further stated that if LVN C was speaking to her like LVN C was speaking to Resident #87 she would not like it. The RD further stated LVN C should have spoken to Resident #87 in a more passive tone. During the interview with the RD, Resident #87 stated he did not get respect and wanted another staff member instead of LVN C to provide care for him. Resident #87 further stated LVN C was mean to him in the mornings as well.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 1:12 PM, Resident #87 stated he had not reported that LVN C was mean to him to anyone else. Resident #87 was unable to quantify how long this was going on but that LVN C was always mean to him.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 1:38 PM, the RD stated she was going to report to the DON what happened to Resident #87 during lunch.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 1:53 PM, CNA E revealed that she worked in the 600 hall for 3 months. CNA E was present during 12/18/2023 600-hall lunch service. CNA E stated that yelling at Resident #87 was the way LVN C talked to Resident #87 when he coughed at mealtimes. Resident #87 got his tray removed from him so he could calm down and stop coughing. CNA E stated they removed drinks from Resident #87's meals because he rushed to eat and drink. CNA E further stated she knew to care for Resident #87 from LVN C and not from a care plan. CNA E further stated when Resident #87 got cold LVN C would tell CNA E to not cover the resident because he would get a rash. CNA E further stated LVN C was rude and raised her voice at times but, that was the way she spoke. CNA E stated LVN C only treated Resident #87 like that. CNA E stated she would feel bad if she was treated how LVN C treated Resident #87. CNA E stated she did not recognize LVN C's behaviors as abuse.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 2:11 PM, CNA CC stated LVN C would talk to Resident #87 with authority. CNA CC stated LVN C told nursing staff to give Resident #87 liquids after he ate so that he did not choke, even though Resident #87 would ask for his drinks during his meal. CNA CC was present during 12/18/2023 600-hall lunch service. CNA CC stated LVN C spoke loudly and raised her voice at Resident #87, however CNA CC would not say that LVN C yelled at Resident #87 during 12/18/2023 lunch service. CNA CC stated she would not feel welcome if LVN C spoke to her how LVN C spoke to Resident #87.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 2:30 PM, Restorative Aide DD stated LVN C was strict, but it was best for the residents. Restorative Aide DD stated LVN C provided more focus on Resident #87, and further stated LVN C would speak in a loud tone but, can't tell if it's a yell or not. Restorative Aide DD stated no staff should be speaking loudly to residents and staff should be speaking calmly to residents. Restorative Aide DD stated he did not recognize LVN C's behaviors as abuse.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 5:33 PM, The PT/Rehab Director revealed that the last time Speech Therapy assessed Resident #87, they determined that Resident #87 was to eat 2-3 bites of food then drink some fluids throughout his meal. It was also revealed that Resident #87 should be fed by staff, however, staff reported that he did not want to be fed.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 11:49 AM, Resident #87's RP stated Resident #87 had complained about a nurse being in a bad mood when the resident would ask for something. Resident #87's RP stated they were concerned because the staff was paid for taking care of the residents at the facility. Resident #87's RP stated he had not reported it because he did not want to have problems with the facility because Resident #87 was by himself in the facility. Resident #87's RP stated he felt sad and hurt about Resident #87's experience.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 12:18 PM, the DON stated there were no concerns with LVN C, and further stated LVN C was previously educated on customer service because LVN C's tone had come off as aggressive versus stern in the past. The DON confirmed there were no other complaints about LVN C.
During an interview and record review on 12/19/2023 at 12:26 PM, the DON revealed Resident #87 had a history of aggressive behavior towards staff, so that was expected from Resident #87. The DON further stated the facility was Resident #87's home and staff should treat the resident with dignity. The DON stated LVN C tried to make Resident #87 slow down while eating. The DON stated there was a way to redirect Resident #87 and to speak to Resident #87 in a calm tone. The DON stated LVN C had been educated on not having an aggressive tone of voice in the past. The DON further statedthat because Resident #87 had PTSD then LVN C's voice should not have been elevated. The DON read through various nurse's notes for Resident #87. Record review of a nursing note, authored by LVN C, on 9/19/2023 at 1:00PM revealed, [Resident #87] became combative when [CNA D] shaving mustache, punched him in the stomach, when nurse approached and explained keeping mustache not good hygiene due getting food stuck on it and stained with juice given to him, called nurse [expletive], reminded not to disrespect staff and [CNA D] only attempting to render care, reminders futile, will continue to monitor. The DON stated Resident #87 had the right to keep his mustache, if he wanted, because it was his right. The DON further stated Resident #87 should not be told what to do and the nursing staff should have adjusted the resident's care to his behaviors.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 1:16 PM, CNA F stated they had not worked at the facility since November 2023. CNA F worked since June 2023 with LVN C. CNA F stated most staff were kind of scared or concerned about working with LVN C because she could be very stern. CNA F stated Resident #87 would argue with LVN C. CNA F further stated LVN C would, not necessarily yell at him, but would speak in a, loud assertive voice,,then Resident #87 would yell back. CNA F stated that if Resident #87 was cold, he would not be given a blanket because LVN C stated it was a safety issue. CNA F stated at mealtimes they would let Resident #87 eat his food first and then let him drink fluids because he would rush to eat and choked. CNA F staed LVN C told staff to not give liquids to Resident #87 while he was eating, and further stated that was odd and would understand why Resident #87 would feel frustrated. CNA F did not think any of that behavior should be reported as abuse and that emotional abuse should be reported to the Administrator.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 1:51 PM, CNA D stated the plan of care for Resident #87 would be based off what LVN C told the other nursing staff to do. CNA D stated if Resident #87 asked for another drink when he already had one in front of him, they would not give him another one because he needed to drink one drink at a time. CNA D spoke about a time that Resident #87 refused to get his mustache shaved but LVN C told Resident #87 that he would have to have his mustache shaved because he got food in his mustache. CNA D stated it was easier to wash Resident #87's mustache than to shave his mustache. CNA D explained that abuse could be if Resident #87 was not able to do what he wanted to do. CNA stated that if he was treated like that, it, wouldn't go well if it happened to him, but did not identify that behavior as abuse.
During an interview on 12/19/2023 at 5:00 PM, Resident #87 stated LVN C yelled at him all of the time and, you can see it in her eyes that she is angry with me. Resident #87 stated, she is bad, and there was, anger in face and eyes. Resident #87 stated one-time LVN C ordered for his mustache to be shave, and repeated that, she's [LVN C] mean. Resident #87 stated he had a mustache when he got to the facility and they wanted to shave it because food would get stuck in his mustache, but he did not want to have his mustache shaved. Resident #87 stated, I don't want them to do it, about not wanting his mustache shaved. Resident #87 stated CNA D was the CNA who had shaved his mustache and further stated, I got mad. Resident #87 stated the nursing staff would not give him beverages when he asked for them during mealtime. Resident #87 stated he did not want go into more detail about not having his beverages given to him. Resident #87 was unable to quantify how long this had been going on.
During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 1:20 PM, LVN C stated Resident #87 was always choking while he had meals and LVN C was the one who had to redirect the resident because none of the other staff redirected him. LVN C stated she had asked CNA E to move Resident #87's tray during 12/18/2023 lunch because the resident was coughing. LVN C stated speech therapy had not advised nursing staff to move the tray from Resident #87 if he was coughing while he was eating, but that this was how they cared for Resident #87 during mealtimes. LVN C stated Resident #87 could have food then was given liquids after he was done with the food portion of his meal. LVN C stated she did not tell speech therapy about the interventions the nursing staff was doing for the resident. LVN C stated these interventions were not documented anywhere, and LVN C stated she did not read the resident's care plans. LVN C stated Resident #87 got mad at her because LVN C was the only one telling Resident #87 to slow down. LVN C further stated Resident #87 thought she was picking on him because she told him to slow down while eating, and further stated Resident #87 did not like to be told to slow down. LVN C stated when Resident #87 did not seem to want his mustache shaved but was okay after LVN C explained he needed to have his mustache shaved because a lot of food would remain in his hair. About the incident that occurred on 12/18/2023, LVN C stated she did not feel like she was yelling at Resident #87 because that was how she talked. LVN C revealed that she had been working with Resident #87 for several years, but the exact timeframe was unknown.
During an interview on 12/22/23 at 5:48 PM. PT/Rehab Director revealed that Resident #87 could sip fluids fine throughout meals, but someone needed to sit with him and cue him while he ate. He revealed that you cannot cue a resident from across the room. Resident #87 was educated on how he had to eat to prevent coughing/choking and Resident #87 was able to learn quickly. The PT/Rehab Director further revealed that Resident #87 struggled with feeding himself at mealtime because he had a stroke. The PT/Rehab Director further revealed that mealtime should be enjoyable, and Resident #87 responded well to positive reinforcement. The PT/Rehab Director stated Resident #87 would have ongoing speech therapy and ensure that Resident #87's care plans would be updated so that other staff was aware of how to care for Residnet #87.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 6:10 PM, the DON stated she had trained the facility staff to think about how they would treat their family members at the facility. The DON stated she wanted to make sure residents were safe. The DON stated Resident #87's care plan was updated to indicate his diagnosis of PTSD due to torture. The DON stated it was inappropriate to speak in a, raised, voice when speaking to a resident with PTSD.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes, implemented 1/13/23, revealed, It is the practice of this facility to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and protecting the rights of each resident.
Record review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, implemented 8/15/2022, revealed:
III. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation that achieves:
B. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or misappropriation of resident property is more likely to occur with the deployment of trained and qualified, register, licensed, and certified staff on each shift in sufficient numbers to meet the needs of the residents, and assure that the staff assigned have knowledge of the individual residents' care needs and behavioral symptoms;
D. The identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect;
H. Assigning responsibility for the supervision of staff on all shifts for identifying inappropriate staff behaviors.
IV. Identification of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation
A. The facility will have written procedures to assist staff in identifying different types of abuse .
B. Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to:
1. Resident, staff or family report of abuse
5. Verbal abuse of a resident overheard
7. Psychological abuse of a resident observed
8. Failure to provide care needs such as comfort safety, feeding, bathing, dressing, turning & positioning
10. Sudden or unexplained changes in behaviors and/or activities such as fear of a person or place, or feelings of guilt or shame.
This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/20/2023 at 10:30 AM. The Administrator was notified and provided with the IJ template on 12/20/2023. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on 12/21/2023 at 7:01 PM.
Immediate Jeopardy
PLAN OF REMOVAL
LETTER OF CREDIBLE ALLEGATION
FOR REMOVAL OF IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY
Issue: F-Tag 600: Abuse The facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect.
Done for those affected:
- Resident #87 was assessed by facility social worker for psychosocial wellbeing on 12/20/23.
- Resident #87 was assessed on 12/20/23 by ADON and there were no signs and symptoms of dehydration. On 12/18/23, the dietician evaluated for hydration needs and no additional recommendations were provided.
- There was not a note from the RD, just the interview
- Resident #87 Plan of Care was reviewed and updated on 12/20/23 to ensure appropriate interventions to assist the resident in attaining and maintaining the highest level of function are in place.
- The alleged staff member was suspended on 12/18/23 and terminated on 12/20/23.
Identify residents who could be affected:
- On 12/20/23, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of residents to assess for potential abuse. No additional concerns were identified.
- On 12/20/23, DON reviewed grievances in the last 30 days to ensure that concerns were addressed, and abuse allegations were reported per HHSC requirement.
Systemic Process:
- Effective immediately on 12/20/2023, the Administrator/ DON and/ or designee began reeducation to 100% of facility staff on the following:
- Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
- Assistance of Residents Activities of Daily Living
Staff will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. Any facility staff on FMLA, Leave of Absence, non-scheduled workday or PTO will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift.
- The facility will utilize the following processes if the resident or family is unable to or fearful of voicing concerns:
- The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will review the Grievance Reporting process during the quarterly and annual IDT care plan meeting and will provide the resident and resident's representative with the Compliance Hotline number and the Ombudsman Information.
- The Compliance Hotline and Ombudsman information will be provided to the resident's representative in the IDT mailed care plan meeting invitation.
- On 12/21/23 the facility sent a Media Alert to facility staff and resident's representative with the Compliance Reporting Hotline:
- If you have concerns about the care we provide or any compliance or legal concerns, please contact us at any time without fear of retaliation by calling our 3rd Party Compliance Hotline at [PHONE NUMBER].
- [Facility] is committed to honest and ethical behavior and conducting our business with integrity.
- If you witness questionable activity or areas where we can improve our commitment to patient care, please tell us.
- On 12/21/23 the facility sent a Media Alert to facility staff and resident's representatives with the Ombudsman Information:
- If you have a concern or question, the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program can help, confidentially and free of charge. Our local Ombudsman is [name redacted] and can be reached at: (956)682-3481 ext. 117 or [PHONE NUMBER] ext 117.
- An Ombudsman helps, residents, family members, friends or facility staff members on behalf of a resident.
- An Ombudsman will:
- listen
- protect your rights
- offer ideas and options
- help resolve concerns
- support resident and family counsels
- respect your choices
- The facility maintains an onsite Weekend Manger and Nursing Supervisor that conduct rounds and may initiate and address resident grievances and may escalate to the appropriate administrative staff when required. The Administrator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation.
- To monitor, the Director of Nursing/ designee will review Grievances and resident incidents in facility Stand-up Morning Meeting, attended Monday - Friday. Grievances and resident incidents will be reviewed for potential abuse situations and need for reporting as per HHSC guidelines.
- The Compliance Hotline and Ombudsman information will be reviewed at the Resident Council Meeting
- The Administrator/designee will review new grievances and resident incidents daily Monday-Friday to insure concerns are addressed timely and if necessary reported per HHSC guidelines.
- Administrator/designee will conduct quarterly and as needed on Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation education to ensure facility staff remains knowledgeable on the identification and reporting of abuse/neglect/exploitation.
- The facility has the Essential Rounds Program in place where administrative staff is assigned to residents. Staff will round and visit to ensure resident wellness and safety. Findings will be reported during Morning Stand-up meetings to address and follow up on concerns/grievances.
- The facility will place written information in each resident's room informing them how to file grievance and/or an allegation of abuse and neglect. The poster will contain the following:
- Ombudsman name and contact information
- Compliance Hotline number
- Abuse Coordinator name and contact information
Monitoring:
- DON/designee will audit Grievances and residents' incidents for possible abuse/neglect/exploitation issues 3 times per week for 3 months.
- Administrator/designee will present findings to the QAPI committee monthly for 3 months. The QAPI Committee will make recommendations accordingly.
- An AdHoc QAPI was conducted on 12/20/23 attended by the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Regional Clinical Specialist to discuss the Immediate Jeopardy concerning F tag 600 - Free from Abuse and Neglect and develop the above Action Plan
Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for the determination of Immediate Jeopardy issued on 12/20/2023.
POR Verification
During an interview with SW AA, SW RR, and the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 a.m., SW AA, SW RR, and the DON confirmed that Resident #87 was assessed for psychosocial wellbeing.
Record Review of Resident #87's clinical record as of 12/22/2023, revealed a progress note: New psychosocial intervention added - consult with psychologist for talk therapy in addition to services already in place from psychiatric NP.
During an interview with ADON H on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 a.m., ADON H confirmed she assessed Resident #87 on 12/20/2023 and there were no signs of dehydration.
During interview with the Consultant RD on 12/22/2023 at 10:15 a.m., the Consultant RD confirmed she evaluated Resident #87 for hydration needs and no additional recommendations were provided.
Record Review of Resident #87's clinical record as of 12/22/2023 revealed a progress notes written by ADON H and dated 12/20/2023 which stated an assessment for dehydration had been completed.
During an interview with the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 a.m., the DON confirmed Resident #87 Plan of Care was reviewed and updated on 12/20/23 to ensure appropriate interventions to assist the resident in attaining and maintaining the highest level of function are in place.
Record review of Resident #87's plan of care as of 12/22/2023 revealed it was updated on 12/20/2023.
During an interview with the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 a.m., the DON confirmed the alleged staff member was suspended on 12/18/23 and terminated on 12/20/23.
Record review the alleged staff member's personnel file revealed Personnel Action Form dated 12/20/2023 which stated the staff member was terminated.
During an interview with SW AA, SW RR, and the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 a.m., SW AA, SW RR, and the DON confirmed that SW AA and SW RR interviewed 148 facility residents to assess for potential abuse with no additional concerns identified.
During an interview with the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 a.m., the DON confirmed she reviewed grievances in the last 30 days to ensure that concerns were addressed, and abuse allegations were reported per HHSC requirement.
Record review of the grievance log book as of 12/22/2023 revealed no unresolved grievances.
Record review of the HHSC intake system as of 12/22/2023 revealed no new incidents or complaints regarding abuse had been filed.
A record review of the facility's nursing roster revealed a nursing staff of 100, to include RN's, LVN's, and CNA's. 26 staff were interviewed and a sample of the 26 from all 3 shifts were documented as follows:
08:00 AM to 05:00 PM shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 9:57 AM, Van Driver YY stated she had received recent training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation. She was able to give examples of abuse and the abuse coordinator was the Administrator.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:01 AM, Central Supply stated he had received recent training to include abuse, neglect, and exploitation. He was able to identify multiple examples.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:02 AM, SW AA stated she received training to include abuse, neglect, exploitation. She was able to present several examples.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:05 AM, the Maintenance Director and Maintenance assistant ZZ received recent training to include abuse, neglect, and exploitation and reported that the Administrator is the abuse coordinator.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:07 AM, the DM and the food service department were interviewed, including dietary aides BBB/FFF/V and Cooks CCC/DDD/EEE/AAA/W. They received recent training that included abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:13 AM, the therapy department, including Speech Therapist GGG, Occupational Therapist HHH, PTA III, PTA JJJ, OT/Assistant Rehab Director, PT/Rehab Director. They received recent training that included abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
06:00 AM to 02:00 PM shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 4:09 PM CNA TTT stated she had received recent training to include abuse, neglect, and exploitation. She was able to identify some examples and who to report to.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 4:16 PM CNA UUU stated she had received recent training to include abuse, neglect, and exploitation. She was able to identify some examples and who to report to.
02:00 PM to 10:00 PM nursing shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 2:28 PM, RN PPP, RN QQQ, CNA LLL, LVN RRR, and LVN SSS stated that they had received recent training to include abuse, neglect, and exploitation. They were able to give examples of these and knew who to report to.
10:00 PM to 06:00 AM nursing shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 3:45 PM, CNA MMM stated that she had received recent training to include abuse, neglect, and exploitation. She was able to give examples of these and knew who to report to.[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for treatment and care for diabetic assessments and supports, in that:
The facility failed to identify care or support for Resident #61 needs for an insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of glucose (a type of sugar) in the blood] delivery pump, blood glucose [sugar] monitor, remote controller and lab assessments for HbA1C [ an average blood glucose (sugar) levels for the last two to three months]. Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] with an insulin pump. The pump was designed only to be used with 100-units per milliliter insulin and was used with 200-units per milliliter insulin. The manufacturer of the pump warned not to use any other strength of insulin and warned the practice could include adverse reactions including death. The practice if using 200-units per milliliter continued from 05/01/2023 to 12/23/2023. The facility was unaware of the practice, was untrained on supporting Resident #61 with the insulin pump, and did not monitor Resident #61 blood sugar levels.
An IJ was identified on 12/20/2023. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions.
This failure placed Residents at risk for harm to include death by a failure to assess, train, and support residents needs for insulin delivery adaptive equipment.
The findings included:
A record review of Resident #61's Face Sheet, dated 12/18/2023, revealed an admission date of 05/01/2023 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes [the most common type of diabetes, is a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high].
A record review of Resident #61's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/31/2023, revealed Resident #61 was a [AGE] year-old male, diagnosed with diabetes, admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated no mental cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #61's care plan, dated 12/18/2023, revealed, Resident #61 has Diabetes Mellitus and has an insulin pump, at risk for hyperglycemia and other complications. Further review of Resident #61's care plan did not reveal interventions for care and or support of the insulin pump.
A record review of Resident #61's physicians orders, dated 12/18/2023, revealed DR. T prescribed Resident #61 insulin lispro [a fast-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults and children with diabetes] to be injected subcutaneously [the injection is given in the fatty tissue, just under the skin] with an injection pen, [insulin lispro] Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 200 units [u] per milliliter [ml]; Inject 40 unit subcutaneously before meals related to type 2 diabetes mellitus, unsupervised self-administration use with [brand name] insulin pump. May obtained B/S results from B/S; call MD if less than 70 milligrams [mg] / deciliter [dl] or greater than 250 mg/dl, Start Date-11/17/2023 1100.
A record review of the insulin pumps' manufacturer's website, https://www.omnipod.com/sites/default/files/Omnipod-5_User-guide.pdf , User Guide, accessed 12/20/2023, revealed, 1.4. Compatible Insulins The [brand name insulin pump] Pump (Pod) is compatible with the following U-100 insulins: [brand names of insulin lispro 100-units per milliliter] . 1.5. General Warnings . Warning: ONLY use rapid-acting U-100 [brand name insulin lispro] insulin in the [brand name insulin pump] System as they have been tested and found to be safe for use with this system . Warning: ALWAYS be prepared to inject insulin with an alternative method if insulin delivery from the Pod is interrupted. You are at increased risk for developing hyperglycemia if insulin delivery is interrupted because the Pod only uses rapid-acting U-100 insulin .
A record review of the insulin lispro 200u/ml injection pen manufactures' website;
https://medical.lilly.com/us/products/answers/can-humalog-insulin-lispro-200-units-ml-be-administered-using-an-insulin-pump-36312?redirect-referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F#reference-2918962f-8b1a-45c0-9054-805e5c1e3af0-3
accessed 12/18/2023 revealed, Can [brand Name] (insulin lispro) 200 units/mL be administered using an insulin pump?
Do not administer Humalog (insulin lispro) 200 units/mL by continuous subcutaneous infusion using an insulin pump.
Administration Using an Insulin Pump
Do NOT administer [brand Name] (insulin lispro injection) 200 units/mL by continuous subcutaneous infusion using an insulin pump.
[Brand Name insulin lispro] 200 units/mL is only available in a [pen injector brand name] presentation.
Do not transfer Humalog 200 units/mL from Humalog 200 units/mL[pen injector brand name] to syringe. The markings on the insulin syringe will not measure the dose correctly. An overdose may occur, causing severe hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), putting the patient's life in danger .Date of Last Review: May 10, 2022.
During an observation and interview on 12/17/2023 at 10:33 AM Resident #61 presented in his room in bed. Resident #61 was awake active with arts and crafts activity. Resident #61 stated he was frustrated by the staff and or pharmacy. Resident #61 explained he had a need for insulin injection pens to refill his insulin pump and was frustrated he would run out and the injection pens would not be available. Further interview revealed Resident #61 had a battery powered insulin pump adhered to his abdomen adjacent to a battery powered wireless blood glucose monitor also adhered to his abdomen. Resident #61 lifted his shirt to demonstrate the equipment. Resident #61 stated his endocrinologist T and NP U had supported him to use the pump by refilling the pump with insulin lispro 200u/ml via an injection pen. Resident #61 stated the nursing staff would give him an injection pen and syringes and he would draw the insulin out of the injector pen with a syringe and inject the medication into his pump every 3-4 days. resident #61 stated the equipment was controlled by a wireless application downloaded to his cell phone and communicated with Dr. T and NP U. Resident #61 stated the facility did not have information regarding the insulin pump and only provided the insulin injection pens from the pharmacy. Resident #61 stated the facility did not monitor his blood sugar levels. Resident #61 stated the facility had not given him any training for the insulin pump. Resident #61 stated he did not have lab blood work done at the facility. Resident stated he attended quarterly appointments with Dr. T and NP U at their clinic.
During an observation and interview on 12/17/2023 at 2:00 PM, Resident #61 stated he had a need for 200 unit/mL Humalog insulin injection pens supplied by the facility supplied because he removed the insulin from the pens and injected it into his insulin pump. Resident #61 showed the surveyor his blood sugar monitor and insulin pump and said that they wirelessly communicated with an application on his cell phone.
During an interview on 12/17/2023 at 6:21 PM, RN A stated she was Resident #61's evening charge nurse and she had supplied Resident #61 with the 200 unit/mL Humalog insulin pen and assisted Resident #61 refill the insulin pump. RN A stated she was not trained on how to refill the insulin pump and had no detailed knowledge about the insulin pump stating, he was admitted with the pump and he knows how to do it. RN A stated the physicians order for the insulin pen was for nursing to administer 40 units of the 200 unit/mL insulin three times a day prior to meals and to monitor blood glucose levels and to report to the physician any measurements outside of the physicians' parameters. RN A stated nobody, including herself, had documented the administrations or glucose readings on Resident #61's MARs. RN A stated, he was admitted with the pump and he takes care of it himself .at times he asks us to manually check his blood glucose levels so he can calibrate his wireless glucometer monitor .but he has refused to allow us [nursing staff] to check his sugars [blood glucose levels] and has refused to show his glucose levels on his phone.
During interview on 12/17/2023 at 6:28 PM, ADON B stated she was RN A's supervisor and stated Resident #61 had a need for 200 unit/mL Humalog insulin pens which he self-administered. ADON B stated the facility's pharmacy would supply the resident with 200 unit/mL Humalog insulin pens and, he refills his pump .he has no need for self-administration training .he was admitted with the pump and knows how to use it, .he will not allow anyone to touch it.
During an interview on 12/19/2023 at 9:28 AM Nurse Practitioner Q stated she was the NP for Resident #61, and she was responsible for Resident #61 since November 1, 2023. NP Q stated she was not aware Resident #61 was not being monitored for blood sugar levels, HbA1C laboratory results, and supervision for the insulin pump. NP Q stated at a minimum the expectations would be for Resident #61 to be monitored once a shift for blood sugar levels, once every 3 months for HbA1C blood sugar levels, and for daily supervision for care and support of the insulin pump. NP Q stated nursing staff needed to be trained to care and support Resident #61 with the insulin pump per the manufacture's recommendations. NP Q stated the risk for Resident #61 was fluctuations in blood sugar levels to include low blood sugar levels and high blood sugar levels.
During an interview on 12/19/2023 at 4:19 PM Pharmacy Doctor R stated the practice of removing insulin from an insulin injection pen could not be supported by the pharmacy and were contrary to the insulin pen manufactures recommendations.
A record review of the facility's Insulin Administration policy dated September 2014, revealed, the nursing staff will have access to specific instructions [from the manufacturer if appropriate] on all forms of insulin delivery system[s] prior to their use. residents who are capable of managing their glucose monitoring and or insulin administration must be assessed periodically for their ongoing willingness and ability to do so safely and effectively. any resident who is actively involved in glucose monitoring and insulin administration will be provided with diabetes self-care education [as appropriate], and supported by the staff person designated for diabetes teaching and management.
This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/20/2023 at 10:30 AM. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 12/20/2023. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on 12/21/2023 at 7:01 PM.
LETTER OF CREDIBLE ALLEGATION
FOR REMOVAL OF IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY
Issue: F-Tag 684: Quality of Care. The facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice.
Done for those affected:
- Resident #61 was assessed by the ADON for signs and symptoms of hypo/hyper glycemia on 12/20/23 and found to be in stable condition. On 12/20/23, Resident #61 was asked by ADON if experiencing any signs of hypo/hyperglycemia and verbalized no concerns. A physicians order was obtained on 12/20/23 for assessing resident for signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia to ask resident for personal reading of blood glucose; ask resident if experiencing signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia as listed below:
- Signs and Symptoms of Hypoglycemia: Shakiness, Excess sweating, Dizziness, headache, irritability, anxiety and/or fatigue
- Signs and Symptoms of Hyperglycemia: increased thirst and appetite, frequent urination, weight loss, fatigue, dry skin, poor wound healing, muscle cramps, and pain, Kussmaul breathing, acetone breath (smells fruity), stupor, coma
- Resident #61 completed endocrinologist tele-medicine appointment on 12/20/23. No change in orders given by the endocrinologist. The current order and plan of care include:
- [Brand Name] Sensor to be changed out every 10 days to start on 12-21-23; Licensed Nurse will check for placement every shift. Resident will change the [Brand Name] Sensor. The licensed nurse will supervise resident to ensure the [Brand Name] sensor is applied correctly.
- Tegaderm applied to abdomen site prior to new [Insulin pump] change every 2-3 days to prevent irritation by the resident and supervised by the licensed nurse. Nurse to assess every shift.
- [Insulin pump] to be changed and refilled every 2-3 days by resident, supervised by staff.
- [Insulin pump] Packaging provided Needle for Pod refill, resident will extract 200 units of [Insulin Lispro] from [Insulin pen] insulin and refill [Insulin pump] as instructed by [Insulin pump] Monitor follow the [Insulin pump] prompts (2 beeps) Discard Needle in sharps container. Await refill prompt from [Insulin pump] Monitor once prompted then proceed to apply as directed, Resident will then proceed to apply refilled [Insulin pump] to Tegaderm prepped area with abdomen area of choice. Wait for insertion of needle, resident will sense it and we hear a clicking noise then [Insulin pump] will turn pink to ensure proper placement of needle as per [Insulin pump] Monitor.
- [Insulin Lispro injection pen] Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 200 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) **DAW** Inject 40 unit subcutaneously before meals related to TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH MILD NONPROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY WITHOUT MACULAR EDEMA, BILATERAL (E11.3293) (Insulin to be administered as per [Insulin pump] Insulin Management Device) request blood sugar read from resident to be obtained from [Insulin pump] Management Device to be released as per Settings of [Insulin pump]set by [Manufacturing company])
- Self-Administration of Medication Assessment was completed on 12/19/23 by DON and resident was completely capable of self-administration as evidenced by return demonstration by resident. The Self Administration of Medication Assessment will be completed quarterly and with changes in condition.
- On 12/19/23, an order was issued by the Facility Family Nurse Practitioner for blood sugar monitoring as needed if noted with signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia.
- Resident #61 Plan of Care was reviewed and updated on 12/19/23 to reflect the resident's use of the [Insulin pump] insulin administration device and nursing interventions to include but not limited to monitoring of glucose readings from the device or resident before meals as ordered and as needed for any signs of hypo/hyperglycemia, notify MD notifications for any concerns and/or blood glucose outside of the physician's parameters, monitoring for signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia, Completing self -administration assessment/re-assessment to ensure resident's abilities with utilization of the [Insulin pump]; assisting resident with the [Insulin pump] insulin administration unit as needed.
Identify residents who could be affected:
- On 12/20/23, the ADON, audited all residents receiving automated insulin and BS management system device and no other residents were identified.
- The Care Management Nurses completed a 100% review on 12/20/23 of residents with Insulin administration orders to ensure ongoing blood glucose monitoring as ordered to include documentation and notification to providers when resident glucose levels exceed parameters.
Systematic Process:
- Endocrinologist instructed DON on [Insulin pump] management on 12/20/23.
- On 12/20/23 licensed staff who provides direct care for Resident #61 were instructed on management of the [Insulin pump] insulin management system using the manufacturer's Quick Guide and the manufacturer's online training video.
- Effective immediately on 12/20/2023, DON/designee began reeducation to 100% of licensed nursing staff on the following:
- Use of the [Insulin pump] Insulin Management System utilizing the [Insulin pump] Quick Guide
- Assessment, documentation and monitoring of signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia Signs and Symptoms of Hypoglycemia: Shakiness, Excess sweating, Dizziness, headache, irritability, anxiety and/or fatigue
- Signs and Symptoms of Hyperglycemia: increased thirst and appetite, frequent urination, weight loss, fatigue, dry skin, poor wound healing, muscle cramps, and pain, Kussmaul breathing, acetone breath (smells fruity), stupor, coma
- Staff will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. Any facility staff on FMLA, Leave of Absence or PTO will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift.
The Director of Nursing/ Designee will review new orders received for insulin administration to ensure that orders are complete to include monitoring and plan of care completed during the Morning Clinical Meeting attended Monday-Friday. Additional resident and staff training will be conducted as indicated with regards to plan of care.
Monitoring:
- DON/designee will audit residents with automatic insulin delivery devices 2 times/week to assess for ongoing assessment of blood sugars, signs of symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia and notification of providers when deviation from as per ordered parameters, completion of Self Administration of Medications quarterly and with change in condition and proper functioning of automatic insulin delivery device.
- The results of the reviews will be presented by the Administrator/designee to the QAPI committee monthly for 3 months. The QAPI committee will make recommendations as needed.
- DON/designee will visually assess the [Insulin pump] insulin administration system weekly for:
- [Insulin pump] controller is charged and operational.
- [Insulin pump] for proper placement
- [Brand Name] sensor of the [Insulin pump] for proper placement
- [Brand Name] transmitter of the [Insulin pump] for proper placement
The DON/designee will monitor compliance with the process weekly. Results of the findings will be discussed in the QAPI meeting monthly for 3 months. The plan will be continued as needed.
- An AdHoc QAPI was conducted on 12/20/23 attended by the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Regional Clinical Specialist to discuss the Immediate Jeopardy concerning F tag 684 - Treatment and Care in Accordance with Professional Standards of Care and development of the above Action Plan.
Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for the determination of Immediate Jeopardy issued on 12/20/2023.
POR Verification
During an interview with ADON H on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., ADON H confirmed she has assessed Resident #61 and found him to be in stable condition.
Record review of Resident #61's clinical record revealed a progress note, dated 12/20/2023 which stated ADON had assessed Resident #61 and found him to be in stable condition.
During an interview with the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the DON confirmed she completed a Self-Administration of Medication Assessment with Resident on 12/20/2023. The DON stated Resident #61 was completely capable of self-administration as evidenced by return demonstration by the resident, and stated the Self Administration of Medication Assessment will be completed quarterly and with changes in condition.
Record review of Resident #61's clinical record revealed a progress note, dated 12/20/2023 which stated the DON had completed a Self-Administration of Medication Assessment with Resident #61.
Record review of Resident #61's clinical record revealed an order, dated 12/19/2023 for Resident #61's blood sugar to be monitored as needed if noted with signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia
Record review of Resident #61's clinical record revealed his care plan was updated on 12/19/2023 to reflect the resident's use of the [insulin pump] insulin administration device and nursing interventions to include but not limited to monitoring of glucose readings from the device or resident before meals as ordered and as needed for any signs of hypo/hyperglycemia, notify MD notifications for any concerns and/or blood glucose outside of the physician's parameters, monitoring for signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia, Completing self -administration assessment/re-assessment to ensure resident's abilities with utilization of the [insulin pump]; assisting resident with the [insulin pump] insulin administration unit as needed.
Record review of the clinical records as of 12/22/2023 of all residents who received insulin revealed only Resident #61 received insulin via BS management system.
During an interview with the DON, ADON B, ADON H, ADON I, and Regional RN Y on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the DON, ADON B, ADON H, ADON I, and Regional RN Y confirmed that the ADONs completed a 100% review on 12/20/23 of residents with Insulin administration orders to ensure ongoing blood glucose monitoring as ordered to include documentation and notification to providers when resident glucose levels exceed parameters.
Record review of all facility residents' clinical records as of 12/22/2023, revealed 32 residents received insulin. Record review of the clinical records as of 12/22/2023 of 10 residents who received insulin, revealed all 10 records were accurate.
During an interview with the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the DON confirmed she had received instruction regarding insulin pump management from Endocrinologist [Dr. T].
During an interview with the DON, ADON B, ADON H, ADON I, and Regional RN Y on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the DON, ADON B, ADON H, ADON I, and Regional RN Y confirmed that all licensed staff who provide direct care for Resident #61 were instructed on management of the [insulin pump] insulin management system using the manufacturer's Quick Guide and the manufacturer's online training video.
During an interview with the DON, ADON B, ADON H, ADON I, and Regional RN Y on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the DON, ADON B, ADON H, ADON I, and Regional RN Y confirmed that all licensed staff who provide direct care for Resident #61 were educated as described above.
A record review of the facility's nursing roster revealed a nursing staff of 100, to include RN's, LVN's, and CNA's. 53 staff were interviewed and a sample of the 53 from all 3 shifts were documented as follows:
06:00 AM to 02:00 PM nursing shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:18 AM CNA FF stated she had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too much blood sugar [being thirsty and hungry, frequent urination, muscle cramps, fruity breath].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:19 AM CNA GG stated she had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too little blood sugar [having shakiness, sweating, dizziness, headaches, irritability, anxiety and/or fatigue].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:20 AM CNA HH stated he received training for residents who used an insulin pump. CNA HH stated he would report to the nurse any signs of the pump making warning sounds, becoming displaced, or redness, swelling, and or discomfort to the pump site.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:17 AM CNA II stated she had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too much blood sugar [being thirsty and hungry, frequent urination, muscle cramps, fruity breath].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:21 AM CNA JJ stated he had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too little blood sugar [having shakiness, sweating, dizziness, headaches, irritability, anxiety and/or fatigue].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:19 AM LVN KK stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN KK stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:38 AM LVN MM stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN KK stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
02:00 PM to 10:00 PM nursing shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:18 AM CNA NN stated he had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too much blood sugar [being thirsty and hungry, frequent urination, muscle cramps, fruity breath].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 2:04 PM CNA D stated he had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too little blood sugar [having shakiness, sweating, dizziness, headaches, irritability, anxiety and/or fatigue].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 2:05 PM CNA OO stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump. CNA OO stated she would report to the nurse any signs of the pump making warning sounds, becoming displaced, or redness, swelling, and or discomfort to the pump site.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 10:18 AM CNA PP stated she had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too much blood sugar [being thirsty and hungry, frequent urination, muscle cramps, fruity breath].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 2:28 PM CNA QQ stated he had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too little blood sugar [having shakiness, sweating, dizziness, headaches, irritability, anxiety and/or fatigue].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 2:03 PM LVN RR stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN RR stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 2:04 PM LVN SS stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN SS stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
10:00 PM to 06:00 AM nursing shift:
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 3:47 PM CNA TT stated she had received recent training to include residents' signs and symptoms of too much blood sugar [being thirsty and hungry, frequent urination, muscle cramps, fruity breath].
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 3:54 PM LVN UU stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN UU stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 3:50 PM LVN VV stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN VV stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 3:42 PM LVN XX stated she received training for residents who used an insulin pump from the DON. LVN XX stated she had reviewed the manufactures instructions for care and maintenance of the pump as well as the physicians' orders for the use of the insulin pump.
During an interview with the Administrator, DON, and Regional RN Y on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the Administrator, DON, and Regional RN Y confirmed the DON/designee will audit residents with automatic insulin delivery devices 2 times/week to assess for ongoing assessment of blood sugars, signs of symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia and notification of providers when deviation from as per ordered parameters, completion of Self Administration of Medications quarterly and with change in condition and proper functioning of automatic insulin delivery device
Record Review of the DON's initial audit was completed, Interview was completed to ensure that she plans to continue to do so 2 times per week as per POR.
During an interview with the Administrator, DON, and Regional RN Y on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the Administrator, DON, and Regional RN Y confirmed that results of the reviews will be presented by the Administrator/designee to the QAPI committee monthly for 3 months. The QAPI committee will make recommendations as needed.
During an interview with the DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the DON confirmed she or designee will visually assess the [Insulin pump] insulin administration system weekly for:
Record Review of the DON's initial assessment was completed, Interview was completed to ensure that she plans to continue to do so 1 time per week as per POR.
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 12/22/2023 at 10:36 a.m., the Administrator and DON confirmed the DON/designee will monitor compliance with the process weekly. Results of the findings will be discussed in the QAPI meeting monthly for 3 months. The plan will be continued as needed.
Record review of AdHoc QAPI meeting attendance sheet, dated 12/20/2023 revealed the committe met.
The Administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy was lifted on 12/22/2023 at 6:08 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to support resident rights to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances for 1 of 29 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to support resident rights to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #80) and the months reviewed (October, November, and December 2023) reviewed for grievances, in that;
LVN P did not initiate a grievance report on behalf of Resident #80 when Resident #80 reported mistreatment by CNA D.
This failure placed residents at risk by denying their right to make and have grievances heard and contributed to feelings of not being heard and unresolved issues.
The findings included:
A record review of Resident #80's admission record dated 12/21/2023 revealed an admission date of 03/24/2023 with diagnoses which included congested heart failure [AKA Heart Failure - a long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs.] and acute pain due to trauma.
A record review of Resident #80's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/13/2023, revealed Resident #80 was assessed with a BIMS score of 9 out of a possible 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
During an observation and interview on 12/17/2023 at 10:07 AM revealed Resident #80 was seated in his wheelchair at the threshold of his door at the hallway. Resident #80 was upset and loudly complaining he had a complaint of mistreatment. Further interview revealed Resident #80 stated CNA D had come in his room to provide incontinent care for his roommate and had thrown a dirty soiled adult brief and wipes on the floor adjacent to where he was seated, and stated, it was nasty .dirty!. During the interview CNA D and LVN P approached and interacted with Resident #80. Resident #80 stated CNA D had thrown the soiled dirty adult brief on the floor next to where he was seated. CNA D denied the accusation and Resident #80 replied Don't lie!. LVN P stated she was aware of the complaint and asked CNA D to attend other residents. Resident #80 reported to LVN P his senses were insulted by CNA D's throwing the brief on the floor.
During an interview on 12/17/2023 at 10:12 AM LVN P stated she was aware Resident #80 was upset and she had asked CNA D to attend to other residents and she would report the incident to the SW Z. LVN P was asked if there was anything else she might do for Resident #80's complaint and LVN P stated No.
A record review of the facility's grievance records dated 12/01/2023 through 12/20/2023 revealed no grievance report for Resident #80.
During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 8:50 AM Resident #80 stated no one had given him a report about his complaint about CNA D. Resident #80 stated They don't care.
During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 11:05 AM LVN P stated she had received a complaint from CNA D and Resident #80 about CNA D throwing a dirty soiled adult brief on the floor next to Resident #80 on 12/17/2023. LVN P stated she reported Resident #80's complaint to SW Z on 12/17/2023 and SW Z spoke with Resident #80 on 12/17/2023. LVN P stated she had not generated a grievance form for Resident #80 because she reported the complaint to SW Z.
During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 1:05 PM SW Z stated she had received a report from LVN P referring to an incident on 12/17/2023 and she had visited with Resident #80. SW Z stated Resident #80 reported he was offended by CNA D when CNA D threw a dirty adult brief on the floor while he provided incontinent care for Resident #80's roommate. SW Z stated she had not generated a grievance report because LVN P was the person who originally received the complaint, and stated, I only followed-up with the resident.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 5:00 PM the Administrator stated she had learned Resident #80 had made a grievance to LVN P on 12/17/2023 and LVN P and SW Z had interviewed Resident #80 without either of them generating a grievance report. The Administrator stated at a minimum she should have received 2 grievance reports from the same incident. The Administrator stated the potential harm would be residents' grievances would go unresolved.
A record review of the facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy dated 08/15/2022, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident and family members right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Definition: prompt efforts to resolve. include facility acknowledgement of a complaint and or grievance and actively working towards resolution of that complaint and or grievance . grievances may be voiced in the following forms: verbal complaint to a staff member or grievance official . the staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form . forward the grievance form to the grievance official as soon as practicable. the grievance official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and those actions, on the grievance form . all staff involved in the grievance investigation or resolution should make prompt efforts to resolve the grievance and return the grievance form to the grievance official. prompt efforts include acknowledgement of complaint and or grievances and actively working towards a resolution of that compliance and or grievance . the grievance official or designee will keep the resident appropriately apprised of progress towards the resolution of the grievances.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-center...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' mental, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for care plans in that:
The facility failed to implement Resident #87's comprehensive person-centered care plan to address dehydration and ADL self-care performance deficit related to eating.
This failure could affect residents who have care areas not addressed by the care plan by not having their needs met and putting them at risk of not receiving appropriate care.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #87's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), anxiety disorder (reaction to stress an intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body), and need for assistance with personal care.
Record review of Resident #87's most recent MDS assessment, dated 11/29/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 9/15, signifying moderate cognitive impairment. Record Review of Section K Swallowing/Nuritional Status did not reveal any pertinent information.
Record review of Resident #87's comprehensive care plan revealed:
Resident #87 needs assistance from staff for dehydration, at risk for dehydration, revised 12/7/2023, with an intervention of Encourage the resident to drink fluids of choice.
Resident #87 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis d/t CVA, revised 12/7/2023, with an intervention of EATING: The resident requires assistance by (1) staff to eat.
Resident #87 potential nutritional problem r/t Diet restrictions, dysphagia [A condition with difficulty in swallowing food or liquid], revised 12/7/2023, with an intervention of Provide and serve diet as ordered. Resident gets anxious staff to monitor fluid intake and encourage resident to slow down when consuming fluids d/t high risk for aspiration.
During an observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 12:35 PM in the 600-hall dining room for lunch service, Resident #87 was coughing while eating his lunch meal. There were no drinks present on his lunch meal tray. Resident #87 was sitting by himself and LVN C was the only staff that was cueing him from another table. The RD confirmed there was no beverage present on Resident #87's lunch meal tray and there should have been because Resident #87 had no fluid restrictions. The RD confirmed Resident #87 did not have any nursing staff sitting next to him to assist resident with eating.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 1:53 PM, CNA E stated she worked in the 600 hall for 3 months. Resident #87 got his meal tray removed from him until he stopped coughing while eating. CNA E stated they removed drinks from Resident #87's meals because he rushed to eat and drink and they would give him his drinks after he finished eating.
During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 2:11 PM, CNA CC stated LVN C told nursing staff to give Resident #87 liquids after he ate so he did not choke, even though Resident #87 would ask for his drinks during his meal.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 1:51 PM, CNA D stated if Resident #87 asked for another drink when he already had one in front of him, they would not give him another one because he needed to drink one drink at a time.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 5:00 PM, Resident #87 stated the nursing staff would not give him beverages when he asked for them during mealtime. Resident #87 stated he did not want to go into more detail about not having his beverages given to him.
During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 1:20 PM, LVN C stated Resident #87 was always choking while he had meals and had to be redirecting him because none of the other staff redirected him. LVN C stated she had asked CNA E to move Resident #87's tray during 12/18/2023 lunch. LVN C stated speech therapy had not advised nursing staff to move tray from Resident #87 while he was eating to help with the resident's coughing. LVN C stated Resident #87 could have foods then gave liquids after. LVN C stated she did not tell speech therapy about these interventions. LVN C stated Resident #87 had to be told to slow down when eating and drinking due to his potential for choking. LVN C stated these interventions were not documented anywhere and LVN C did not read the resident's care plans.
During an interview on 12/22/23 at 2:57 PM, Case Management Specialist EE stated all the residents were at risk for dehydration and should be offered fluids, unless they have a fluid restriction. Case Management Specialist EE stated the focus of residents being at risk for dehydration was reflected in their care plans. The Case Management Specialist EE stated if a resident requested a drink, it should have been given to the resident as it would be an intervention in a resident's care plan.
During an interview on 12/22/23 at 5:48 PM, the PT/Rehab Director stated Resident #87 could sip fluids fine throughout the meal and needed someone to sit with him to provide cueing. The PT/Rehab Director stated Resident #87 learned quickly and responded well to positive reinforcement while he was eating. The PT/Rehab Director stated Resident #87 would have ongoing speech therapy and ensure that Resident #87's care plans will be updated accordingly.
During an interview on 12/22/23 at 6:10 PM, the DON stated Resident #87 should have been offered fluids during various times, such as during meals and med pass. The DON further stated if a resident was denied foods or beverages, it was a dignity issue. The DON stated Resident #87's plan of care should be reflected in his care plan. The DON stated the nursing staff should stay updated with any care plan updates.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, implemented 10/24/22, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. And 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and 6. The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the resident's progress.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies a...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, and described in the plan of care for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for nursing competencies, in that:
LVN K failed to administer Resident #35's blood pressure medication within the acceptable parameters for safe medication administration and did not obtain/document Resident #20's oxygen saturation readings prior to administering oxygen per the physician's orders.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and could contribute to possible adverse reactions.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes (a chronic, long-lasting health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy), chronic kidney disease stage 3 (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should), and pure hypercholesterolemia (a genetic anomaly that causes high cholesterol levels).
Record review of Resident #35's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/11/23 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making skills.
Record review of Resident #35's comprehensive care plan, revision date 8/9/23 revealed the resident had hypertension and was at risk for cardiovascular complications with interventions that included to give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered.
Record review of Resident #35's order summary report, dated 12/18/23 revealed the following:
- Amlodipine Besylate tablet 5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension, hold and call MD if blood pressure less than 110/60 or pulse less than 60
-Carvedilol 6.25 mg tablet, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension, hold and all MD if blood pressure less than 110/60 or pulse less than 60
Record review of the nursing competency dated 5/16/23 revealed LVN K had satisfied the requirements for medication administration.
Observation on 12/18/23 at 7:40 a.m. during the medication pass revealed, LVN K obtained Resident #35's blood pressure prior to medication administration. Resident #35's blood pressure reading was 121/58 and pulse reading was 58. LVN K then administered the following medications to Resient #35:
- Amlodipine 5 mg tablets, by mouth daily for hypertension
- Carvedilol 6.25 mg by mouth twice daily, hold for parameters
-Atorvastatin 20 mg by mouth daily
-Florastor probiotic, 1 capsule twice daily
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 8:26 a.m., LVN K stated the reason she administered the blood pressure medications outside of the ordered parameters was because, since I know Resident #35 and have worked with the resident for over a year, I know her blood pressure will go up later on. LVN K revealed she was not certain why the physician would place blood pressure and pulse parameters on the orders. LVN K stated she was trying to manage Resident #35's blood pressure as best she could.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 2:51 p.m., ADON H revealed LVN K was using her nursing judgement when she administered the blood pressure medication outside the parameters to Resident #35 as LVN K knows the patient. ADON H revealed LVN K could have re-checked Resident #35's blood pressure and pulse and re-assessed.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 5:25 p.m., the DON revealed blood pressure medications should be followed based on the physician's orders and as indicated on the comprehensive care plan. The DON revealed, the physician's orders outranked nursing judgement.
Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration, dated 10/24/22 revealed in part, .Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection .Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in locked compartme...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 7 Medication Carts (600 Hall Medication Cart) reviewed for storage of drugs, in that:
The 600 Hall Medication Cart was left unlocked and unattended with the cart keys attached to the lock.
This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion.
The findings included:
Observation on 12/18/23 at 4:08 p.m., revealed LVN M opened the 600 Hall Medication Cart to obtain the glucometer with glucometer strip and a lancet, entered a resident's room, closed the door behind her and left the keys on the lock of the 600 Hall Medication Cart with the drawer pulled slightly open. The 600 Hall Medication Cart was facing into the hallway next to a resident's room in the memory unit.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 4:14 p.m., LVN M revealed she became distracted when asked by a resident where the bathroom was. LVN M revealed the 600 Hall Medication Cart must be closed and always locked because a resident could get into it. LVN M revealed the 600 Hall Medication Cart had wound supplies including insulin needles, syringes and chemicals. LVN M revealed if a resident were to get into the 600 Hall Medication Cart they could get hurt or use the items in the cart to hurt someone else of the staff.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 5:25 p.m., the DON revealed staff must lock the medication carts and keep the keys in their pocket to ensure resident safety.
Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Medication Carts and Supplies for Administering Meds, revision date 10/1/19 revealed in part, .The facility maintains equipment and supplies necessary for the preparation and administrations of medications to residents .The purpose of the mobile medication system is to insure appropriate control and surveillance of resident assigned medications .Only a Licensed Nurse or Certified Medical Aide may carry keys to the medication cart .The Medication Cart is locked at all times when not in use .Do not leave the medication cart unlocked or unattended in the resident care areas .The cart must remain in your line of sight when it is not locked .
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 4 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 4 of 32 residents (Residents #5, #15, #67, and #144) reviewed for advanced directives, in that:
1. Resident #5's OOH-DNR was missing the physician's license number.
2. Resident #15's OOH-DNR was missing the witness signatures.
3. Resident #67's OOH-DNR was missing the executor's signature.
4. Resident #144's OOH-DNR was witnessed two department heads, one of whom provided direct care.
These failures could place residents at-risk for residents' rights not being honored and having CPR performed against the residents' will.
The findings included:
1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement, chiefly affecting middle-aged and elderly people), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), vascular dementia (a common form of dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain, stroke), need for assistance with personal care and adult failure to thrive.
Record review of Resident #5's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making skills.
Record review of Resident #5's comprehensive care plan, revision date [DATE] revealed the resident was a DNR status with the goal to comply with resident/family wishes and interventions that included to ensure the signed DNR document was in the medical record.
Record review of Resident #5's order summary report, dated [DATE] revealed the following:
- DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), with order date [DATE] and no end date.
Record review of Resident #5's OOH-DNR, dated [DATE] was incomplete and was missing the physician's license number.
During an interview on [DATE] at 12:47 p.m., Social Worker AA revealed she was responsible for the residents who resided on the 400, 500, and 600 unit, which included Resident #5. Social Worker AA revealed, Resident #5's OOH-DNR document was missing the physician's license number therefore making the document invalid. Social Worker AA revealed she helped execute the OOH-DNR document but believed the Medical Records Staff checked behind her to ensure the form was complete. Social Worker AA revealed Resident #5's incomplete OOH-DNR would make the resident a full code and would be going against the family's wishes.
During an interview on [DATE] at 1:59 p.m., the LVN Medical Records staff revealed she often audited the OOH-DNR documents before uploading into the electronic record. The LVN Medical Records staff revealed the Social Services staff were responsible for executing the OOH-DNR, but the LVN Medical Records staffs' focus was to obtain the physician's signature before uploading into the electronic record. The LVN Medical Records staff revealed Resident #5's OOH-DNR was invalid because it was missing the physician's license number therefore making the resident a full code. The LVN Medical Records staff revealed it affected the way Resident #5 was cared for and it would go against the family's wishes.
2. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a common form of dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain, stroke), delusional disorders and cognitive communication deficit.
Record review of Resident #15's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making skills.
Record review of Resident #15's comprehensive care plan, revision date [DATE] revealed the resident was a DNR status with the goal to comply with resident/family wishes and interventions that included to ensure the signed DNR document was in the medical record.
Record review of Resident #15's order summary report, dated [DATE] revealed the following:
- DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), with order date [DATE] and no end date.
Record review of Resident #15's OOH-DNR, dated [DATE] revealed two witness signatures were missing.
During an interview on [DATE] at 12:33 p.m., Social Worker Z revealed she was responsible for the residents who resided on the 100, 200, and 300 unit, which included Resident #15. Social Worker Z revealed Resident #15's OOH-DNR document was missing the two witness signatures that were supposed to be on the bottom of the document therefore making the document invalid. Social Worker Z revealed, she and the Medical Records Staff audit the OOH-DNR documents to ensure they were completed. Social Worker Z revealed, Resident #15's OOH-DNR was invalid with the missing witness signatures and if something should happen to the resident the staff would have to initiate CPR which was against the family's wishes.
3. Record review of Resident #67's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's Disease, Legal Blindness, and Cognitive Communication Deficit.
Record review of Resident #67's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
Record review of Resident #67's care plan, revised [DATE], [incorrectly] revealed, [Resident #67] is a full code.
Record review of Resident #67's Order Summary Report as of [DATE] revealed an order dated [DATE], DNR (Do Not Resuscitate).
Record review of Resident #67's OOH-DNR, dated [DATE], revealed the executor's second signature was missing from lower portion of the form.
During an interview with Social Worker Z on [DATE] at 10:42 a.m., Social Worker Z confirmed that the executor's second signature was missing from lower portion of Resident #67's OOH-DNR form, therefore invalidating the form, potentially causing confusion among facility staff or emergency services staff regarding the validity of the resident's OOH-DNR form, and potentially resulting in the resident and her representatives' wishes being dishonored.
4. Record review of Resident #144's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Aftercare Following Joint Replacement Surgery, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Unspecified Complications, and Chronic Pain Due to Trauma.
Record review of Resident #144's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition.
Record review of Resident #144's care plan, dated [DATE], revealed, Resident is a DNR.
Record review of Resident #144's Order Summary Report as of [DATE] revealed an order dated [DATE], DNR (Do Not Resuscitate).
Record review of Resident #144's OOH-DNR, dated [DATE], revealed the form had been witnessed by two department heads, one of whom provided direct care to residents.
During an interview with Resident #144 on [DATE] at 10:18 a.m., Resident #144 confirmed that she had executed an OOH-DNR form.
During an interview with Social Worker Z on [DATE] at 10:42 a.m., Social Worker Z confirmed that Resident #144's form had been witnessed by two department heads, one of whom provided direct care to residents, therefore invalidating the form, potentially causing confusion among facility staff or emergency services staff regarding the validity of the resident's OOH-DNR form, and potentially resulting in the resident's wishes being dishonored.
Record review of the Texas Health and Safety Code Title 2 Health, Subtitle H Public Health Provisions, Chapter 166 Advance Directives, Sec. 166.003. WITNESSES. In any circumstance in which this chapter requires the execution of an advance directive or the issuance of a nonwritten advance directive to be witnessed: (1) each witness must be a competent adult; and (2) at least one of the witnesses must be a person who is not: . (F) an employee of a health care facility in which the declarant is a patient if the employee is providing direct patient care to the declarant or is an officer, director, partner, or business office employee of the health care facility or of any parent organization of the health care facility .
Record review of the Texas Health and Human Services webpage titled, Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Program, updated [DATE], accessed [DATE], revealed, Frequently Asked Questions for DNR: What happens if the form is not filled out correctly or EMS has doubts about any of the information? Health professionals can refuse to honor a DNR if they think: The form is not signed twice by all who need to sign it or is filled out incorrectly.
Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Communication of Code Status, dated [DATE] revealed in part, .It is the policy of this facility to adhere to resident's rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information .The facility will follow facility policy regarding a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an Advance Directive .
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for respiratory care in that:
The facility failed to monitor Resident #20's oxygen therapy by failing to monitor oxygen saturation levels to monitor the resident's respiratory condition and response to therapy provided.
This failure could affect residents who were dependent on respiratory care and could contribute to upper respiratory infections and worsening of their physical condition.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 12/17/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should leading to symptoms of shortness of breath), hypertension (high blood pressure), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that occurs when a rapid, erratic heart rate begins suddenly and then stops on its own within 7 days), and need for assistance with personal care.
Record review of Resident #20's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/9/23 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making skills.
Record review of Resident #20's comprehensive care plan, revision date 12/8/23 revealed the resident had shortness of breath related to hypoxia (deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching the tissues of the body), congestive heart failure and respiratory failure with interventions that included to maintain a clear airway by encouraging the resident to clear own secretions with effective coughing and to monitor and document breathing patterns.
Record review of Resident #20's order summary report, dated 12/19/23 revealed the following:
- May have oxygen at 2 liters via nasal canula prn as needed for shortness of breath or oxygen saturation less than 92%. May titrate to keep oxygen saturation above 92%, with order date 9/7/23 and no end date.
Record review of Resident #20's Oxygen Saturation Summary revealed the resident's oxygen saturation was obtained as follows:
- 10/20/23 at 12:47 p.m., oxygen saturation registered at 95%, oxygen via nasal canula
- 10/21/23 at 7:27 a.m., oxygen saturation registered at 97%, room air
- 11/2/23 at 5:08 p.m., oxygen saturation registered at 92%, oxygen via nasal canula
- 11/8/23 at 9:15 a.m., oxygen saturation registered at 95%, oxygen via nasal canula
- 12/2/23 at 3:37 p.m., oxygen saturation registered at 96%, oxygen via nasal canula
Record review of Resident #20's hospice binder, under the Patient Care Flow Sheet revealed the resident's oxygen saturation was last documented on 12/18/23 by hospice staff and registered at 95% with oxygen at 2 liters per minute.
Observation and interview on 12/17/23 at 11:31 a.m. revealed Resident #20 in bed and the oxygen concentrator operating at 2 liters via nasal canula. Further observation revealed the oxygen concentrator's filter on the back was covered in a light gray substance. Resident #20's family member was at the bedside and revealed she visited the resident daily and the resident always used the oxygen concentrator.
Observation on 12/17/23 at 2:42 p.m. revealed Resident #20 in bed and the oxygen concentrator operating at 2 liters via nasal canula. Further observation revealed the oxygen concentrator's filter on the back was covered in a light gray substance.
Observation on 12/19/23 at 9:25 a.m. revealed Resident #20 in bed and the oxygen concentrator operating at 2 liters via nasal canula. Further observation revealed the oxygen concentrator's filter on the back was covered in a light gray substance.
Observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 9:41 a.m. with LVN K stated Resident #20 was receiving hospice services and was being provided comfort measures. LVN K stated the Sunday overnight staff set up the oxygen concentrators, but LVN K monitored the oxygen throughout the day for the unit, which included Resident #20. LVN K stated Resident #20 had been receiving oxygen via nasal canula from the oxygen concentrator daily for approximately 3 months. LVN K removed the filter from behind Resident #20's oxygen concentrator and stated the filter had dust. LVN K stated the oxygen concentrator filter with dust on it could hinder the concentrator from filtering correctly which meant Resident #20 was not getting clean oxygen and could die. LVN K further revealed she obtained Resident #20's oxygen saturation earlier in the morning and had registered at 99%. LVN K stated she wrote the oxygen saturation results on a piece of paper but was unable to provide the piece of paper and added, I told the hospice nurse Resident #20's oxygen saturation was 99%, I hope he wrote it down. LVN K then revealed, she would obtain Resident #20's oxygen saturation often because the resident was declining but was not documenting it. LVN K could not explain why she was not documenting the oxygen saturations for Resident #20.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 10:45 a.m., the DON stated the oxygen concentrators were set up by the Sunday overnight shift, but the oxygen concentrator filters were checked by the Maintenance Director. The DON stated, nursing is not in charge of that. The DON further stated the Maintenance Director oversaw changing the filters and ensured they were not dusty. The DON revealed it was important to keep the oxygen concentrator filters clean because it would decrease the chance of the residents becoming infected with a bacterium. The DON revealed Resident #20's most recent oxygen saturation was recorded on 12/2/23. The DON further revealed there should have been documentation of oxygen saturation and signs or symptoms of shortness of breath recorded on Resident #20's record because it would justify the reason for using the oxygen and verified the nursing assessment on the resident.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 10:56 a.m., the Maintenance Director stated he was not responsible for checking the oxygen concentrator filters but believed the Central Supply Staff may have been responsible. The Maintenance Director stated he was responsible for ensuring oxygen tanks were kept in supply and was in charge of the air conditioning filters.
During an interview on 12/19/23 at 11:02 a.m., the Central Supply Staff stated he only serviced an oxygen concentrator when staff reported it was malfunctioning. The Central Supply Staff revealed it was not part of his daily duties to check the oxygen concentrators.
The facility did not provide a policy and procedure for the maintenance of oxygen concentrators, requested on 12/19/23 at 10:45 a.m.
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Residents are free of any significant medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Residents are free of any significant medication errors, for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #87) reviewed for significant medication errors, in that:
1.Resident #87 was administered clonazepam 1mg without a physician's order by LVN G 77 times from 07/25/2023 to 12/19/2023.
These failures placed residents at risk for receiving medications not prescribed by a physician.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #87's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), anxiety disorder (reaction to stress an intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body), and need for assistance with personal care.
Record review of Resident #87's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/29/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 09/15, signifying moderate cognitive impairment.
Record review of Resident #87's comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #87 shizophrenia and Bipolar at risk for behavioral problems, revised 12/18/2023, with an intervention of Administer medications as ordered.
A record review of Resident #87's May, June, July, August, September, October, November, and December 2023 physicians' orders revealed:
1.Resident #87 had an order to receive clonazepam 1mg daily which was discontinued on 05/31/2023.
2.Resident #87 received a new order for clonazepam 1mg to be given as needed for paranoia from 05/31/2023 to 06/13/2023.
3.Resident #87 received a new order for clonazepam 1mg to be given as needed for paranoia from 07/10/2023 to 07/24/2023.
4.Resident #87 received a new order for clonazepam 1mg to be given as needed for paranoia from 08/10/2023 to 08/24/2023.
Further review revealed no other orders for clonazepam.
Record reviews of Resident #87's clonazepam 1mg pharmacy count sheets revealed:
1.A clonazepam 1mg count sheet for Resident #87 dated 04/18/2023 with documentation for clonazepam dispensation to match physicians' orders until 07/24/2023 and again from 08/10/2023 to 08/24/2023. Further review of the document revealed on 07/25/2023 LVN G documented she administered 1 pill to Resident #87 at 02:00 PM without a physician's order. Further review revealed LVN G continued to document dispensation of clonazepam 1mg to Resident #87 without a physician's order until the exhaustion of the clonazepam supply on 09/20/2023 for a total of 28 dispensations from 07/25/2023 to 09/20/2023.
2.A clonazepam 1mg count sheet for Resident #87 dated 05/11/2023 with documentation by LVN G for clonazepam dispensation without a physician's order starting on 09/22/2023 thorough 12/19/2023 for a total of 49 dispensations from 09/22/2023 to 12/19/2023. Further review revealed the count sheet had 9 more pills available.
During an observation and interview on 12/20/2023 at 04:35 PM revealed LVN G at the 600-hll medication cart. LVN G stated she was the charge nurse for Resident #87 and Resident #87's medications were stored in the cart. LVN G demonstrated Resident #87's clonazepam 1mg drug card with 9 pills, out of a beginning inventory of 60, remaining. LVN G was asked if Resident #87 had an order for the clonazepam 1mg to which LVN G did not verbally reply and gestured with her arms and hands outstretched and shoulders raised.
During an interview on 12/21/2023 10:42 AM ADON H stated PharmD R alerted the facility on 12/12/2023 there was clonazepam 1mg in the medication cart for 600-hall, for Resident #87 which had no physicians' order for administration and the count sheet appeared as if was being administered. ADON H stated an investigation revealed LVN G had admitted she had been administering the medication without an order. ADON H stated LVN G had been suspended pending an investigation.
During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 04:10 PM the DON stated LVN G had admitted to administering clonazepam to Resident #87 without a physician's order and LVN G had been suspended pending an investigation. The DON stated residents would only receive medications per a physician's order and LVN G should not have administered any medication without a physician's order. The DON stated the risk for harm was residents may receive medications with effects not intended for them.
During an interview on 12/22/2023 at 05:10 PM the Administrator stated the expectation was for residents to receive medications per physician's orders.
A record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated 10/24/2022, revealed, medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff were legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, any manner to prevent contamination or infection. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: . review medication administration record to identify medication to be administered . Administer medication as ordered . sign medication administration record after administered .
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 ki...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that:
1. In the reach-in refrigerator, there was/were:
a. A head of lettuce in a plastic bag, undated.
b. A container wrapped in foil with P labeled on top instead of fortified pudding with no use-by date.
c. Overcrowding of boxes on the top rack. These boxes were less than 6 inches away from the ceiling.
d. Sandwiches wrapped in plastic that did not have a use-by date.
e. A container of pickles with circles of black substances on top of the container
f. A container that was labeled FP and not fortified pudding with no use-by date.
These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.
The findings included:
1. During an observation and interview on 12/17/23 starting at 10:14 AM,
a. In the walk-in refrigerator, there was a head of lettuce in a plastic bag, undated. The DM took the head of lettuce out of the refrigerator and instructed the Dietary Aide V to use the lettuce for lunch and then package it, label, and date the plastic bag before putting it back into the refrigerator. The DM revealed that the kitchen staff are trained to date, label and put food products in sealed containers.
b. There was a container wrapped in foil with P labeled on top. The DM revealed that P meant fortified pudding and that the kitchen staff is aware that P meant fortified pudding.
c. There were boxes on the top rack that did not have 6 inches of space from the top of the box to the ceiling. The DM confirmed that there was not enough space from the top of the box on the top row and the ceiling. The DM revealed that [NAME] W put the boxes from the last delivery away in the fridge. The DM further revealed that the kitchen staff are aware not to overstock the top row. The DM told [NAME] W to make sure that there was enough space in between the top of the boxes on the top rack, in the fridge, and the ceiling.
d. There were sandwiches that were made as snacks for the residents. These only had one date written on the plastic wrap of the sandwich. The DM revealed that this was the date that the sandwich was made. The DM revealed that sandwiches are thrown out the same day that they are made, if not used, so the sandwiches remained of high quality. The DM further revealed that prepared foods only had one date (the date that the food was prepared), and the kitchen staff knew to throw out prepared foods 3 days after the date that is written on the food package. The DM confirmed that there was no use-by dates on their prepared foods.
e. There was a container of pickles with circles of black substance on top of the container. The DM revealed that it was mold because it was exposed to moisture. The DM revealed that the man who stocks the milk probably did not notice that milk was leaking and probably spilled on top of the lid of the container of pickles. The DM further stated that the kitchen staff may have not noticed the mold on top of the container and did not throw it out. This container was dated 10/6/2023. The DM proceeded to throw this container out at the time of this finding.
f. During an observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 11:16 AM, there was a container that was labeled FP with only one date: 12/17/23. The DM revealed that the kitchen staff understood that this was Fortified Pudding and they knew to throw it out on 12/20/23, 3 days after it was prepared.
The DM revealed that if foods are not packaged appropriately that this could cause contamination or foodborne illnesses.
Record review of facility policy 03.003 Food Storage, revised June 1 2019, revealed, 2. Refrigerators c. Do not line shelves with foil or paper. Do not over stock the refrigerator and leave space between items to further improve circulation, d. Date, label, and tightly seal all refrigerated foods using clean, nonabsorbent, covered containers that are approved for food storage.
Record review of the Food Code, U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. FDA, 2022 U.S. Department of H&HS, revealed 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat/Time Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except as specified in (E) -(G) of this section, refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1.
Record review of the Food Code, U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. FDA, 2022, U.S. Department of H&HS, revealed 3-305.1, Food Storage, (A) Food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food: (1) in a clean, dry location; (2) Where it is not exposited to splash, dust, or other contamination.
Record review of the Food Code, U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. FDA, 2022 U.S. Department of H&HS, revealed, 3-602.11 Food Labels. (B) Label information shall include: (1) The common name of the FOOD, or absent a common name, an adequately descriptive identity statement;
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0813
(Tag F0813)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 1 Bistro refrigerators reviewed for food safe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 1 Bistro refrigerators reviewed for food safety, in that:
The facility failed to ensure that the Bistro refrigerator had a temperature log attached to the refrigerator and the contents of refrigerator were labeled with date and name of the food product.
This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses and at risk for choking.
Findings included:
During an observation on 12/17/23 at 11:20 AM, the Bistro room, there was where families brought outside foods and ate with residents, a refrigerator that contained food in several Styrofoam to-go containers. There were no names and no dates written on these containers to identify the food products. There was not a temperature log for this refrigerator. This refrigerator had no locks on the refrigerator doors making it easily accessible to anyone in the facility.
During an observation and interview on 12/17/23 at 11:25 AM, RN X confirmed that there was food in the Bistro refrigerator that was not labeled, no names and no dates. There was a digital number on the outside of the refrigerator and RN X revealed that it says 43 and it could be the temperature of the refrigerator. RN X revealed that the Bistro was used for families to eat with resident. RN X further revealed that not labeling the food products could be detrimental to residents that had dysphagia.
During an interview on 12/17/23 at 11:28 AM, the DON revealed that the refrigerator in the Bistro was used by family while they were dining in the Bistro. The DON revealed that there should not be any food left in the refrigerator. The DON revealed that mostly housekeeping staff used this refrigerator for their leftovers. The DON further revealed that their last in-service on not using the Bistro refrigerator was in October 2023, after using this refrigerator was noted as a past issue for the facility.
During an interview on 12/17/23 at 11:32 AM, RN Y revealed that leaving foods that were for a regular diet in the Bistro refrigerator could put residents at risk for choking if they had access to these foods, unsupervised. Later in the day and throughout the rest of the survey, it was observed that the Bistro refrigerator was turned off and had a sign put up to deter anyone from using it. No specific date or specific time noted.
During an interview on 12/21/23 at 3:35 PM, the RD reported that having food available in a communal fridge could pose food safety concerns, if residents were not aware of food safety practices. The RD further revealed that foods could be choking hazards if it was not appropriate for a resident's diet.
Record review of the facility policy Potluck Meals and Food from Home, approved October 1 2018, revealed The facility will provide the resident and family education on the basics of food safety and the use and storage of food to ensure safe consumption. And 1. When outside foods are brought in to the facility by resident family or friends, it must be labeled to clearly distinguish it from the food purchased or prepared by the facility and stored separately from the facility's food by placing on a distinguished shelf, labeled bag, or in a bin labeled resident food with the resident name on the items. Foods must be dated with food safety guidelines followed. And 5. Residents must be assisted on accessing and consuming outside foods and beverages in the safest manner possible.
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program d...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #35, #42, #97 and #82) observed for infection control in that:
1. During the medication pass, LVN K did not sanitize the wrist blood pressure cuff used between Resident #35 and Resident #42.
2. During the medication pass, CMA L did not sanitize the wrist blood pressure cuff used between Resident #97 and Resident #82.
These deficient practices could place residents at risk of infection.
The findings included:
1. a. Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes (a chronic, long-lasting health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy), chronic kidney disease stage 3 (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should), and pure hypercholesterolemia (a genetic anomaly that causes high cholesterol levels).
b. Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture), acute respiratory distress syndrome (life-threatening condition of the lungs resulting in severe impaired oxygenation of the blood), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol).
Observation on 12/18/23 at 7:40 a.m. revealed LVN K obtained Resident #35's blood pressure with the wrist blood pressure cuff, and then placed the wrist blood pressure cuff on top of the medication cart without sanitizing it. LVN K then took the same wrist blood pressure cuff from the medication cart counter and obtained Resident #42's blood pressure without sanitizing it.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 8:26 a.m., LVN K revealed the wrist blood pressure cuff was her own personal wrist blood pressure cuff and used it throughout the day. LVN K revealed she should have sanitized the wrist blood pressure cuff between resident use but got nervous and forgot. LVN K revealed it was important to sanitize the wrist blood pressure cuff between resident use to prevent cross contamination and to prevent infection.
2. a. Record review of Resident #97's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), history of falling, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), kidney failure, heart failure and need for assistance with personal care.
b. Record review of Resident #82's face sheet, dated 12/18/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (a chronic, long-lasting health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy), hypertension (high blood pressure), cardiomegaly (abnormal enlargement of the heart), repeated falls and need for assistance with personal care.
Observation on 12/18/23 at 8:43 a.m. revealed CMA L obtained Resident #97's blood pressure with the wrist blood pressure cuff, and then placed the wrist blood pressure cuff on top of the medication cart without sanitizing it. CMA L then took the same wrist blood pressure cuff from the medication cart counter and obtained Resident #82's blood pressure without sanitizing it.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 9:19 a.m., CMA L revealed the wrist blood pressure cuff was her own personal wrist blood pressure cuff and used it throughout the day. CMA L revealed she did not sanitize the wrist blood pressure cuff between resident use because she forgot. CMA L revealed the wrist blood pressure cuff needed to be sanitized between resident use because one person may have something and could pass to another patient and was cross contamination.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 2:51 p.m., ADON H revealed since the residents were not on transmission-based precaution and the blood pressure cuff made indirect contact with the resident's skin then the blood pressure cuff did not need to be disinfected.
During an interview on 12/18/23 at 5:25 p.m., the DON revealed it was her expectation the blood pressure cuffs were to be disinfected between patient use to ensure the resident's general health and to prevent cross contamination. The DON further revealed if cross contamination were to occur, the residents could pass an illness to one another.
Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident - Care Items and Equipment, revision date 1/2018 revealed in part, .Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard .Noncritical items are those that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes .Examples of noncritical patient-care items are .blood pressure cuffs .several low-level disinfectants that may be used for noncritical items .
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 4 shower rooms (Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]), in that:
Observation on 12/17/2023 at 10:42 a.m. in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER], next to resident room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed approximately six razors were found on top of a storage bin and within reach of residents. Additionally, the toilet located inside the shower room was loosely affixed to the wall and the toilet room had a foul odor resembling sewer gas.
During an interview with Social Worker AA on 12/17/2023 at 10:45 a.m., Social Worker AA confirmed approximately six razors were found on top of a storage bin and within reach of residents, the toilet located inside the shower room was loosely affixed to the wall, and the toilet room had a foul odor resembling sewer gas. Social Worker AA stated she would inform the Maintenance Director of the needed repair [electronic notification system].
During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 12/22/2023 at 11:48 a.m., the Maintenance Director confirmed he had been informed that the toilet located inside the shower room was loosely affixed to the wall and the toilet room had a foul odor resembling sewer gas via [electronic notification system]. The Maintenance Director also confirmed the odor had been in place for a while.
During an interview with the Administrator on 12/21/2023 at 12:45 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility had no policy regarding Physical Environment.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep information that is resident-identifiable from the public for all of the residents of the facility, in accordance wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep information that is resident-identifiable from the public for all of the residents of the facility, in accordance with professional standards and practices, in that:
The facility failed to prevent having identifiable resident information on top of a counter in the dining room, unattended.
These deficient practices could affect all residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for violation of privacy.
The findings included:
During an observation and interview on 12/17/23 at 10:25 AM, there was a binder laying out on the countertop inside of the dining room. This binder was accessible to anyone who would want to open the binder. The binder labeled Diet Listing, on the front, included 11 pages of the Order Listing Report printed 12/15/2023 for all of the residents at the facility. The DM revealed that LVN N updated the binder daily so that the nursing staff is aware of what diets that the residents had.
During an observation and interview on 12/17/23 at 12:51 PM, LVN N revealed that the binder titled Diet Listing was on the countertop and was accessible to anyone in the dining room. LVN N revealed that this binder should only be accessible during meal services, when the nursing staff checked to make sure that the meal trays matched the residents' diet orders. LVN N further revealed that since this binder was present on the countertop in the dining room and accessible to anyone, this was a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violation because the residents' personal health information was accessible. LVN N further revealed that this binder should be locked when not in use.
During an interview on 12/17/23 at 12:54 PM, the Regional RN Y revealed that this Diet Listing binder should have been locked up when not in use and told LVN N to put the binder in a secure place.
Record review of facility policy Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes, implemented 1/13/23, revealed, It is the practice of this facility to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and protecting the rights of each resident.
Policy for HIPAA was not requested. HIPAA is the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act that is a federal law that required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient's consent or knowledge.