CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of the residents to be free from abus...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of the residents to be free from abuse for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #'s 29, 39, and 41) reviewed for abuse.
The facility failed to keep Residents #41 and Resident # 39 free from abuse and neglect.
The facility failed to implement interventions after each incident between Resident #29 and Resident #41 to prevent further incidents of abuse.
The facility failed to protect the resident by allowing CNA B to work after an abuse allegation was made by Resident #39.
The facility failed to ensure residents were not fearful of retaliation.
The facility failed to protect resident from abuse by staff.
This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) identified on 08/23/23. While the IJ was removed on 08/25/23, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective system
This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
1. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #41 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses which include gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (acid reflux), weakness, moderate intellectual disabilities (difficulty in social situations and problems with social cues and judgment), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (is the state of inadequate intake of food) pain unspecified, iron deficiency anemia unspecified (occurs when your body doesn't have enough iron to produce hemoglobin), cocaine abuse, uncomplicated.
Record review of Resident # 41's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #41 was understood and was able to understand others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no delusions or hallucinations. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed toward others.
Record review of Resident #41's comprehensive care plan dated 08/09/2023, indicated Resident #41 exhibits socially inappropriate disruptive behavioral symptom, guarded behavior, attention seeking, and embellishes the truth.
Record review of Resident #41's progress notes from 05/09/23 through 08/23/23 revealed no documented incidents regarding Resident #41 having coffee thrown at her or an attempted stabbing with a fork.
During Resident council meeting on 08/22/23 at 3:00 PM, revealed Resident #41 stated that she was afraid of Resident #29 because he had poured coffee on her and attempted to stab her in the eye with a fork. Resident #41 stated staff witnessed the incidents, and she called the Administrator to report what had happened. Resident #41 stated that CNA A had witnessed the incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:03 PM, Resident # 41 stated she didn't know the exact date the incident occurred. Resident # 41 stated Resident # 29 tried to pour coffee on her after supper. Resident # 41 stated she jumped back quickly but the coffee got on her feet. Resident # 41 stated she told CNA A and CNA A told him to quit. Resident # 41 stated Resident #29 had a fork and tried to hit her in the eye with the fork. Resident # 41 stated she jumped down and Resident #29 missed her. Resident # 41 stated both incidents occurred on the same day in June. Resident #41 stated she told CNA A. Resident # 41 stated CNA A told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that; he would be in jail. Resident #41 stated CNA A witnessed both incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:42 PM, CNA A stated she witnessed both incidents. CNA A stated the incident were Resident # 29 poured coffee on Resident #41 happened in the hallway, she intervened and reported it to the charge nurse because ADM was not in the building. CNA A stated she could not remember who the charge nurse was. CNA A stated the incident with the fork happened at the nurse's station with multiple staff members around that witnessed the incident. CNA A stated she intervened and notified the charge nurse due to the Administrator not being in the building. CNA A stated the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. CNA A stated she could not remember the exact date of the incidents, but it was the end May or the first of June. CNA A stated she could not remember the charge nurse she reported the incident to. CNA A stated she could not remember the other staff members that were present. and she could not remember who the charge nurse was.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 8:42 AM, the Administrator stated she investigated the incidents and Resident #41 said it did not happen. The Administrator stated she talked to the staff and the staff said they did not witness the either incident. The Administrator stated she can't remember when the incidents happened, it was back in April. The Administrator stated it had been a long ago, it was not a new allegation, it is an old allegation. The Administrator stated still to this day Resident # 41 says it did not happen.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 9:20 AM, Resident #41 stated the Administrator asked her if she was ok after both incidents, each time and she asked if she wanted to go to the hospital. Resident #41 stated the nurses did assessments on her and she did not have any injuries. Resident #41 stated after the incidents she had to move out of the way to avoid injuries when both incidents occurred.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 11:45 AM, CNA A stated she was not for sure when the incidents happened. CNA A stated staff were picking up trays during dinner that was when Resident #29 threw the coffee on Resident # 41 in the hallway. CNA A stated Resident # 29 got a fork from somewhere and tried to stab Resident #41 at the nurse's station. He did not go to her room. CNA A stated she told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that, and he listened. CNA A stated she took the fork and got rid of it. CNA A stated she wasn't aware of any further incidents.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:12 PM, RN D stated the incidents wasn't reported to her. RN D stated Resident# 41 is on the other side of facility.
2. Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old-male who originally admitted on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (injury to the brain resulting from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), Bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes extreme mood swings from high to low), and other schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder that affects how people perceive and interact with reality, often causing hallucinations, delusions, and social withdrawal).
Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 was understood by other and understood others. The MDS indicated in the Temporal Orientation section of the MDS indicated Resident #39 answered the month accurate within 5 days. The MDS indicated Resident #39 had no behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS in Section I indicated Resident #39's active diagnosis included traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS indicated in Section N Resident #39 received antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. The MDS in Section O indicated Resident #39 did not receive any psychological therapy.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:04 p.m., the person said the incident between Resident #41 and Resident #29 occurred in July. The person indicated Resident #29 threw coffee on Resident #41's face and hit her on her arm. The person also indicated Resident #29 had attempted to stab Resident #41 with a fork. The person said it was hard to intervene with Resident #29 due to his aggressiveness. The person indicated the Administrator was not present when the incident occurred, but she was notified by phone. The person also said Resident #'s 41, 11, and 21 had voiced fearing retaliation with the Administrator. The person said numerous staff feared voicing any concerns or report abuse to the Administrator for fear of the loss of their jobs. The person said she had witnessed the Administrator yell at Resident #'s 12, 11, 21, and 10 when asking for their resident funds. The person indicated the Administer yelled for them to get out of her office. The person indicated on around July 23, 2023, or July 24, 2023, CNA B refused to change Resident #39 and began cursing him. The person indicated Resident #39 informed the Administrator of the allegation. The person indicated CNA B was allowed to continue to work with the residents and was never sent home for suspension. The person said CNA B boasted the Administrator had sent her a text indicating you are suspended, but I need you so If state comes hide then leave and do not let Resident #39 see you.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:30 p.m., the person indicated she was aware of the Administrator and other employees being allowed to verbally abuse the residents. The person indicated she had heard CNA s B and F tell residents to, sit your mother fucking ass down. The person said the Administrator would yell and curse at the residents to get out of her office. The person said the maintenance supervisor has told a resident to keep your fucking ass in this room. The person said employees have voiced concerns that the corporate regional director covers for the Administrator, so the employees feel as though there was no one to reach out to tell their concerns. The person said CNA B as allowed to work during her suspension period. The person said lastly the verbal abuse, and retaliation was so horrible at the facility.
During a confidential group meeting on 8/22/2023 at 3:00 p.m., residents voiced concern of retaliation when reporting allegations.
Record review of CNA A's Employee Timecard report dated 7/01/2023- 7/31/2023 time reporting period was created on 8/23/2023 by the BOM. The report indicated CNA A worked:
7/23/2023 from 6:34 a.m. to 2:02 p.m., there were no other punch times for this day.
7/24/2023 from 2:02 a.m. to 9:44 a.m. with a lunch of 9:44 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. then 10:30 a. m. - 2:17 p.m.
7/25/2023 from 7:34 a.m. to 2:05 p.m. there were no other punch times for this day.
7/26/2023 from 7:36 a.m. to 9:50 a.m. with a lunch 9:50 a.m. to 10:48 a.m. then 10:48 a.m. to 2:07 p.m.
7/27/2023 from 1:01 a.m. to 2:54 a.m. with a lunch 2:54 a.m. to 3:55 a.m. then from 3:55 a.m. to 7:39 a.m. then 2:59 p.m. to 8:11 p.m.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 4:05 p.m., the DON said the Administrator was the abuse coordinator and she handled the abuse allegations.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
The Administrator was notified on 08/23/2023 at 1:05 PM, that an immediate jeopardy situation was identified due to the above failures. The Regional Director of Operations and Administrator was provided the immediate jeopardy template on 08/23/23 at 9:47 AM. The templete was amended on 08/23/23 at 5:33 and returned to the he Regional Director of Operations and Administrator.
The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 8/24/2023 at 3:04 p.m. and included:
Action: Resident #29 was discharged from the facility on 8/22/2023 to a safe alternative location and will not return to the facility
Date: 8/22/2023
Action: Administrator, Maintenance Director, and 2 CNAs have been suspended pending investigation to include verbal abuse towards resident (s).
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Resident safe surveys completed on all residents that can answer the questions, remainder of the resident (who cannot answer) received head-to-toe assessments. Resident safe survey interviews to include fear of retaliation/comfortable reporting issues related.
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Progress notes and event reports reviewed to ensure no other additional resident to resident altercations have occurred without appropriate interventions being place in the care plan, notifications made to psychiatric services and the MD. Date: 8/23/2023 by 3:00 p.m.
Action: Employee (all) interviews conducted to include:
Have you ever witnessed an employee physically, sexually, or verbally abuse a resident? (If yes proceed to further questions)
If yes, who was the employee, who was the resident, and when about did this occur?
Were there other witnesses to this event?
Did you report this information to anyone and if so, to who?
Date: 8/23/2023
Action: Residents involved in resident-to-resident altercations, identified in the previous 30-days, had their care plans reviewed to ensure proper interventions are in place. Any identified lacking proper interventions have been reviewed with the IDT and added.
Date: 8/23/2023 at 3:00 p.m.
Action:
Education provided:
All staff-abuse/neglect (key takeaway: thorough investigations and fully completing event reports, person centered care plan interventions, who the abuse coordinator is and when to report-Administrator and immediately, documentation/assessment/follow up.)
All staff have been educated on the corporate compliance line. If the Administrator is unavailable, they can call the compliance line and/or notify the Director of Nursing.
Nurses-Education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medial record and documented follow up regarding the events.
All staff to be in-serviced prior to working their next/first shift.
Date 8/23/2023 by 4:00 p.m.
All staff-Resident to resident altercation policy (key takeaway: how to respond and what order to respond-ensure resident safety by separating the residents, staying with the aggressor, and notify charge nurse and abuse coordinator).
All Staff-Corporate Compliance Line education provided to all staff to understand if they report something and they feel as if appropriate action has not taken place, to reach out to the compliance line. Any issues with the abuse coordinator/administrator to reach out to the compliance line.
Action: All resident has been given the corporate compliance line and informed they should call that number if they are fearful of retaliation within the facility and need t report abuse/neglect.
Date: 8/24/2023
Action: 1:1 education provided to Administrator and Director of Nursing over the PL17-19 regarding abuse/neglect/reporting.
Education regarding investigating allegations and implementing interventions.
Date:8/23/2003 by 2:00 p.m.
Action Item: Ad hoc QAPI meeting with Medical Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing completed regarding IJ templates and Plan of Removal
Date: 8/23/2023 by 2:00 p.m.
Corporate compliance line is monitored by the corporate compliance office. This officer is not affiliated with the center. Once the facility is made aware of an allegation of abuse/neglect by an outside entity (such as our partners at HHSC and The Ombudsman) the facility will initiate an investigation and follow the abuse and neglect policy/protocol.
On 8/25/2023 the surveyors confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) by:
Record review of Resident #29's medical record indicated he discharged on 8/22/2023 to a sister facility.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Administrator was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Maintenance supervisor was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA B was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA F was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of the safe survey results for the residents.
Record review of the employee Abuse Questionnaires.
Record review of the education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medical record and documented follow up regarding the events.
Record review of the Abuse prevention program resident-to-resident altercations with retaliation towards residents was a form of abuse and could lead to termination.
Record review of the 1:1 education provided to Administrator and Director of Nursing over the PL17-19 regarding abuse/neglect/reporting.
Record review of the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting completed with the Medical Director was completed on 8/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m. with the physician, the Administrator, Regional Director of Operations, and the Survey Resource staff.
Interview of Licensed Nurses (LVN C, LVN E, LVN H, LVN S, LVN AA, LVN DD, RN D, Infection Preventionist, ADON, DON) were performed. During the interviews all licensed nurses were able to correctly identity abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation. Licensed Nurses were able to provide education regarding documentation of event or incident and follow up in the medical records. Licensed Nurses were able to identify whom to contact when they feel appropriate action has not taken place on issues that have been reported.
Interview of all staff (DA W, [NAME] P, Housekeeper X, Housekeeper Y, Housekeeper Z, NA BB, NA CC, CNA A, CNA B, CNA F, CNA T, CNA U, CNA V, MA L, AD, DM, DOR, BOM, and Housekeeping Supervisor) were performed. During the interviews all staff were able to correctly identify abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation. All employees were interviewed to inquire about incidents of abuse. All staff members were able to identify whom to contact when they feel appropriate action has not taken place on issues that have been reported.
Interview with the residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #18, #20, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #247) were completed. All residents were able to identify the number they should call if they were fearful of retaliation within the facility and needed to report abuse or neglect.
Interview with the DON was completed. The DON was able to correctly identify when and how to report abuse or neglect and how to investigate allegation and implement interventions.
Interview with RDO said the employees on the inservice sheets had been educated on abuse/neglect If they signed the sheet for inservice they were educated on abuse and neglect and ways to report and to inform any residents to report to the corporate compliance line and where the number could be found in the building. The RDO showed me the number hanging on hall wall at this time. The Corporate Survey Resource said she would immediately start contacting those employees to go back over the inservice information especially since the Administrator was out of the office for now and the corporate compliance line was always available.
Record review of the facility's policy, titled, Abuse Prevention Program, last revised on 06/2021, indicated, . The Administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of our center's abuse prevention program policies and procedures. Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Our center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aide in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/ neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. Our center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discrimination, or coercion during investigation of abuse allegation. Our center will provide protections for the health, warfare and rights of each resident residing in the center to ensure the reporting of crimes. Develop and implement policies and procedures to aid to our center in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents.
Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse: investigate and report any allegations of abuse within timeframe as required by federal requirements; protect resident during abuse investigation; the Administrator will suspend immediately any employees who has been accused of resident abuse, pending the outcome of the investigation; all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the center's Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following person or agencies as required:
On 8/25/2023 at 3:53 p.m., the Regional Director of Operations was notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed; however, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immeidate jeopardy at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents and establish policies and procedures to report and investigate such allegations, for 2 of 16 residents (Resident's #29 and Resident #41) reviewed for abuse.
The facility failed to thoroughly report to the State when the administrator received a report that Resident #29 attempted to stab Resident #41 in the eye with a fork and threw coffee on her.
The facility did not implement policy on reporting abuse when Resident #29's family member visited the facility on 08/13/23 and was yelling at resident and threw his personal belongings outside of his room.
The facility did not implement their abuse policy and allowed CNA B to work during her suspension period after an allegation of abuse was made by Resident #39.
The facility failed to report the allegations of staff to resident abuse.
The facility failed to report the Resident #41's allegations of abuse to HHSC.
This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) identified on 08/23/23. While the IJ was removed on 08/25/23, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate joepardy at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective system
This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
1. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #41 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses which include gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (acid reflux), weakness, moderate intellectual disabilities (difficulty in social situations and problems with social cues and judgment), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (is the state of inadequate intake of food) pain unspecified, iron deficiency anemia unspecified (occurs when your body doesn't have enough iron to produce hemoglobin), cocaine abuse, uncomplicated.
Record review of Resident # 41's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #41 was understood and was able to understand others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no delusions or hallucinations. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed toward others.
Record review of Resident #41's a care plan with dated 08/09/2023, indicated Resident #41 exhibits socially inappropriate disruptive behavioral symptom, guarded behavior, attention seeking, and embellishes the truth.
Record review of Resident #41's progress notes from 05/09/23 through 08/23/23 revealed no documented incidents regarding Resident #41 having coffee threw at her or attempted stabbing with a fork.
During Resident council meeting on 08/22/23 at 3:00 PM, revealed Resident #41 stated that she was afraid of Resident #29 because he had poured coffee on her and attempted to stab her in the eye with a fork. Resident #41 stated staff witnessed the incidents, and she called the Administrator to report what had happened. Resident #41 stated that CNA A had witnessed the incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:03 PM, Resident # 41 stated she didn't know the exact date the incident occurred. Resident # 41 stated Resident # 29 tried to pour coffee on her after supper. Resident # 41 stated she jumped back quickly but the coffee got on her feet. Resident # 41 stated she told CNA A and CNA A told him to quit. Resident # 41 stated Resident #29 had a fork and tried to hit her in the eye with the fork. Resident # 41 stated she jumped down and Resident #29 missed her. Resident # 41 stated both incidents occurred on the same day in June. Resident #41 stated she told CNA A. Resident # 41 stated CNA A told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that; he would be in jail. Resident #41 stated CNA A witnessed both incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:42 PM, CNA A stated she witnessed both incidents. CNA A stated the incident were Resident # 29 poured coffee on Resident #41 happened in the hallway, she intervened and reported it to the charge nurse because ADM was not in the building. CNA A stated she could not remember who the charge nurse was. CNA A stated the incident with the fork happened at the nurse's station with multiple staff members around that witnessed the incident. CNA A stated she intervened and notified the charge nurse due to the Administrator not being in the building. CNA A stated the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. CNA A stated she could not remember the exact date of the incidents, but it was the end May or the first of June. CNA A stated she could not remember the charge nurse she reported the incident to. CNA A stated she could not remember the other staff members that were present. and she could not remember who the charge nurse was.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 8:42 AM, the Administrator stated she investigated the incidents and Resident #41 said it did not happen. The Administrator stated she talked to the staff and the staff said they did not witness the either incident. The Administrator stated she can't remember when the incidents happened, it was back in April. The Administrator stated it had been a long ago, it was not a new allegation, it is an old allegation. The Administrator stated still to this day Resident # 41 says it did not happen.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 9:20 AM, Resident #41 stated the Administrator asked her if she was ok after both incidents, each time and she asked if she wanted to go to the hospital. Resident #41 stated the nurses did assessments on her and she did not have any injuries. Resident #41 stated after the incidents she had to move out of the way to avoid injuries when both incidents occurred.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 11:45 AM, CNA A stated she was not for sure when the incidents happened. CNA A stated staff were picking up trays during dinner that was when Resident #29 threw the coffee on Resident # 41 in the hallway. CNA A stated Resident # 29 got a fork from somewhere and tried to stab Resident #41 at the nurse's station. He did not go to her room. CNA A stated she told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that, and he listened. CNA A stated she took the fork and got rid of it. CNA A stated she wasn't aware of any further incidents.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:12 PM, RN D stated the incidents wasn't reported to her. RN D stated Resident# 41 is on the other side of facility.
Record review of the policy on, Abuse Prevention Program, revised June 2021, indicated, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by Center management .The Administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation of the Center's abuse prevention program .The alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment will be reported immediately and reported no later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involves abuse.
2. Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), dementia (impaired memory) and Parkinson's disease (disorder that impacts the nervous system and movement).
Record review of Resident #29's physician orders indicated lorazepam 1mg three times a day.
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed Resident #29 was usually understood and usually understood others. Resident #29 had a BIMS score of 4 indicating severely impaired.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited 08/09/23, revealed Resident #29 had behavioral symptoms combative and elopement. The approach indicated Resident #29 became upset due to his sister came to the facility and was yelling at him and the resident's behaviors stem from his sister visits.
Record review of LVN E's progress note dated 08/13/23 indicated Resident #29's family member was in his room throwing Resident #29's clothing outside of the room and yelling at Resident #29. LVN E indicated he notified the nurse supervisor.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 1:42 PM, LVN E stated he was completing his medication pass on 08/13/23 when Resident #29's family member came to the facility. LVN E stated he heard a loud voice and yelling coming from Resident #29's room. LVN E stated when he got closer to the room he observed clothing being thrown out of the room and Resident #29's family member was, Getting loud towards resident and he was upset. LVN E stated he told Resident #29's family member that he would handle the situation if she would tell him what the problem was and then he redirected Resident #29 towards the dresser. LVN E stated he then assisted Resident #29 with picking out what clothing he wanted to wear and stayed with Resident #29 until he calmed down. LVN E stated Resident #29's family member left the building quickly and he notified the DON and Administrator.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON reported she was not at the facility during the incident so she could not say what happen. The DON reported the Administrator was notified and she was responsible for determining if abuse needed to be reported.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated, I would not say the family member was yelling, but if she was yelling at him then it should have been reported. The Administrator stated she should have done an investigation and it should have been reported if it was indicated in the progress note that the family member was yelling at Resident #29. The Administrator stated the importance of reporting abuse was to keep the resident safe and the resident could have been harmed if the incident was not investigated.
3. Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old-male who originally admitted on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (injury to the brain resulting from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), Bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes extreme mood swings from high to low), and other schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder that affects how people perceive and interact with reality, often causing hallucinations, delusions, and social withdrawal).
Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 was understood by other and understood others. The MDS indicated in the Temporal Orientation section of the MDS indicated Resident #39 answered the month accurate within 5 days. The MDS indicated Resident #39 had no behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS in Section I indicated Resident #39's active diagnosis included traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS indicated in Section N Resident #39 received antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. The MDS in Section O indicated Resident #39 did not receive any psychological therapy.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:04 p.m., the person said the incident between Resident #41 and Resident #29 occurred in July. The person indicated Resident #29 threw coffee on Resident #41's face and hit her on her arm. The person also indicated Resident #29 had attempted to stab Resident #41 with a fork. The person said it was hard to intervene with Resident #29 due to his aggressiveness. The person indicated the Administrator was not present when the incident occurred, but she was notified by phone. The person also said Resident #'s 41, 11, and 21 had voiced fearing retaliation with the Administrator. The person said numerous staff feared voicing any concerns or report abuse to the Administrator for fear of the loss of their jobs. The person said she had witnessed the Administrator yell at Resident #'s 12, 11, 21, and 10 when asking for their resident funds. The person indicated the Administer yelled for them to get out of her office. The person indicated on around July 23, 2023, or July 24, 2023, CNA B refused to change Resident #39 and began cursing him. The person indicated Resident #39 informed the Administrator of the allegation. The person indicated CNA B was allowed to continue to work with the residents and was never sent home for suspension. The person said CNA B boasted the Administrator had sent her a text indicating you are suspended, but I need you so If state comes hide then leave and do not let Resident #39 see you.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:30 p.m., the person indicated she was aware of the Administrator and other employees being allowed to verbally abuse the residents. The person indicated she had heard CNA s B and F tell residents to, sit your mother fucking ass down. The person said the Administrator would yell and curse at the residents to get out of her office. The person said the maintenance supervisor has told a resident to keep your fucking ass in this room. The person said employees have voiced concerns that the corporate regional director covers for the Administrator, so the employees feel as though there was no one to reach out to tell their concerns. The person said CNA B was allowed to work during her suspension period. The person said lastly the verbal abuse, and retaliation was so horrible at the facility.
During a confidential group meeting on 8/22/2023 at 3:00 p.m., residents voiced concern of retaliation when reporting allegations.
Record review of CNA A's Employee Timecard report dated 7/01/2023- 7/31/2023 time reporting period was created on 8/23/2023 by the BOM. The report indicated CNA A worked:
7/23/2023 from 6:34 a.m. to 2:02 p.m., there were no other punch times for this day.
7/24/2023 from 2:02 a.m. to 9:44 a.m. with a lunch of 9:44 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. then 10:30 a. m. - 2:17 p.m.
7/25/2023 from 7:34 a.m. to 2:05 p.m. there were no other punch times for this day.
7/26/2023 from 7:36 a.m. to 9:50 a.m. with a lunch 9:50 a.m. to 10:48 a.m. then 10:48 a.m. to 2:07 p.m.
7/27/2023 from 1:01 a.m. to 2:54 a.m. with a lunch 2:54 a.m. to 3:55 a.m. then from 3:55 a.m. to 7:39 a.m. then 2:59 p.m. to 8:11 p.m.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 4:05 p.m., the DON said the Administrator was the abuse coordinator and she handled the abuse allegations.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
The Administrator was notified on 08/23/2023 at 1:05 PM, that an immediate jeopardy situation was identified due to the above failures. The Regional Director of Operations and Administrator was provided the immediate jeopardy template on 08/23/23 at 9:47 AM. The [NAME] was amended on 08/23/23 at 5:33 and returned to the he Regional Director of Operations and Administrator.
The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 8/24/2023 at 3:04 p.m. and included:
Action: Resident #29 was discharged from the facility on 8/22/2023 to a safe alternative location and will not return to the facility
Date: 8/22/2023
Action: Administrator, Maintenance Director, and 2 CNAs have been suspended pending investigation to include verbal abuse towards resident (s).
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Resident safe surveys completed on all residents that can answer the questions, remainder of the resident (who cannot answer) received head-to-toe assessments. Resident safe survey interviews to include fear of retaliation/comfortable reporting issues related.
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Progress notes and event reports reviewed to ensure no other additional resident to resident altercations have occurred without appropriate interventions being place in the care plan, notifications made to psychiatric services and the MD. Date: 8/23/2023 by 3:00 p.m.
Action: Employee (all) interviews conducted to include:
Have you ever witnessed an employee physically, sexually, or verbally abuse a resident? (If yes proceed to further questions)
If yes, who was the employee, who was the resident, and when about did this occur?
Were there other witnesses to this event?
Did you report this information to anyone and if so, to who?
Date: 8/23/2023
Action: Residents involved in resident-to-resident altercations, identified in the previous 30-days, had their care plans reviewed to ensure proper interventions are in place. Any identified lacking proper interventions have been reviewed with the IDT and added.
Date: 8/23/2023 at 3:00 p.m.
Action:
Education provided:
All staff-abuse/neglect (key takeaway: thorough investigations and fully completing event reports, person centered care plan interventions, who the abuse coordinator is and when to report-Administrator and immediately, documentation/assessment/follow up.)
All staff have been educated on the corporate compliance line. If the Administrator is unavailable, they can call the compliance line and/or notify the Director of Nursing.
Nurses-Education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medial record and documented follow up regarding the events.
All staff to be in-serviced prior to working their next/first shift.
Date 8/23/2023 by 4:00 p.m.
All staff-Resident to resident altercation policy (key takeaway: how to respond and what order to respond-ensure resident safety by separating the residents, staying with the aggressor, and notify charge nurse and abuse coordinator).
All Staff-Corporate Compliance Line education provided to all staff to understand if they report something and they feel as if appropriate action has not taken place, to reach out to the compliance line. Any issues with the abuse coordinator/administrator to reach out to the compliance line.
Action: All resident has been given the corporate compliance line and informed they should call that number if they are fearful of retaliation within the facility and need t report abuse/neglect.
Date: 8/24/2023
Action: 1:1 education provided to Administrator and Director of Nursing over the PL17-19 regarding abuse/neglect/reporting.
Education regarding investigating allegations and implementing interventions.
Date:8/23/2003 by 2:00 p.m.
Action Item: Ad hoc QAPI meeting with Medical Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing completed regarding IJ templates and Plan of Removal
Date: 8/23/2023 by 2:00 p.m.
Corporate compliance line is monitored by the corporate compliance office. This officer is not affiliated with the center. Once the facility is made aware of an allegation of abuse/neglect by an outside entity (such as our partners at HHSC and The Ombudsman) the facility will initiate an investigation and follow the abuse and neglect policy/protocol.
On 8/25/2023 the surveyors confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) by:
Record review of Resident #29's medical record indicated he discharged on 8/22/2023 to a sister facility.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Administrator was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Maintenance supervisor was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA B was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA F was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of the safe survey results for the residents.
Record review of the employee Abuse Questionnaires.
Record review of the education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medical record and documented follow up regarding the events.
Record review of the Abuse prevention program resident-to-resident altercations with retaliation towards residents was a form of abuse and could lead to termination.
Record review of the 1:1 education provided to Administrator and Director of Nursing over the PL17-19 regarding abuse/neglect/reporting.
Record review of the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting completed with the Medical Director was completed on 8/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m. with the physician, the Administrator, Regional Director of Operations, and the Survey Resource staff.
Interview of Licensed Nurses (LVN C, LVN E, LVN H, LVN S, LVN AA, LVN DD, RN D, Infection Preventionist, ADON, DON) were performed. During the interviews all licensed nurses were able to correctly identity abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation. Licensed Nurses were able to provide education regarding documentation of event or incident and follow up in the medical records.
Interview of all staff (DA W, [NAME] P, Housekeeper X, Housekeeper Y, Housekeeper Z, NA BB, NA CC, CNA A, CNA B, CNA F, CNA T, CNA U, CNA V, MA L, AD, DM, DOR, BOM, and Housekeeping Supervisor) were performed. During the interviews all staff were able to correctly identify abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation.
Interview with the residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #18, #20, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #247) were completed. All residents were able to identify the number they should call if they were fearful of retaliation within the facility and needed to report abuse or neglect.
Interview with the DON was completed. The DON was able to correctly identify when and how to report abuse or neglect and how to investigate allegation and implement interventions.
Record review of the facility's policy, titled, Abuse Prevention Program, last revised on 06/2021, indicated, . The Administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of our center's abuse prevention program policies and procedures. Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Our center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aide in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/ neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. Our center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discrimination, or coercion during investigation of abuse allegation. Our center will provide protections for the health, warfare and rights of each resident residing in the center to ensure the reporting of crimes. Develop and implement polices and procedures to aid to our center in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents.
Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse: investigate and report any allegations of abuse within timeframe as required by federal requirements; protect resident during abuse investigation; the Administrator will suspend immediately any employees who has been accused of resident abuse, pending the outcome of the investigation; all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the center's Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following person or agencies as required:
On 8/25/2023 at 3:53 p.m., the Regional Director of Operations was notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed; however, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy at a scope of a pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of suspected abuse was thoroughly investigated...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of suspected abuse was thoroughly investigated for 2 of 12 (Resident #'s 39 and 41) residents reviewed for abuse.
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate when the administrator received a report that Resident #29 attempted to stab Resident #41 in the eye with a fork and threw coffee on her.
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate when Resident #39 reported an allegation of abuse regarding CNA B.
The facility failed to report the Resident #'s 39 and 41's allegations of abuse to HHSC.
This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) identified on 08/23/23. While the IJ was removed on 08/25/23, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy at a scope of a pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective system
This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
1.Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #41 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses which include gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (acid reflux), weakness, moderate intellectual disabilities (difficulty in social situations and problems with social cues and judgment), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (is the state of inadequate intake of food) pain unspecified, iron deficiency anemia unspecified (occurs when your body doesn't have enough iron to produce hemoglobin), cocaine abuse, uncomplicated.
Record review of Resident # 41's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #41 was understood and was able to understand others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no delusions or hallucinations. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed toward others.
Record review of Resident #41's a care plan with dated 08/09/2023, indicated Resident #41 exhibits socially inappropriate disruptive behavioral symptom, guarded behavior, attention seeking, and embellishes the truth.
Record review of Resident #41's progress notes from 05/09/23 through 08/23/23 revealed no documented incidents regarding Resident #41 having coffee threw at her or attempted stabbing with a fork.
During Resident council meeting on 08/22/23 at 3:00 PM, revealed Resident #41 stated that she was afraid of Resident #29 because he had poured coffee on her and attempted to stab her in the eye with a fork. Resident #41 stated staff witnessed the incidents, and she called the Administrator to report what had happened. Resident #41 stated that CNA A had witnessed the incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:03 PM, Resident # 41 stated she didn't know the exact date the incident occurred. Resident # 41 stated Resident # 29 tried to pour coffee on her after supper. Resident # 41 stated she jumped back quickly but the coffee got on her feet. Resident # 41 stated she told CNA A and CNA A told him to quit. Resident # 41 stated Resident #29 had a fork and tried to hit her in the eye with the fork. Resident # 41 stated she jumped down and Resident #29 missed her. Resident # 41 stated both incidents occurred on the same day in June. Resident #41 stated she told CNA A. Resident # 41 stated CNA A told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that; he would be in jail. Resident #41 stated CNA A witnessed both incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:42 PM, CNA A stated she witnessed both incidents. CNA A stated the incident were Resident # 29 poured coffee on Resident #41 happened in the hallway, she intervened and reported it to the charge nurse because ADM was not in the building. CNA A stated she could not remember who the charge nurse was. CNA A stated the incident with the fork happened at the nurse's station with multiple staff members around that witnessed the incident. CNA A stated she intervened and notified the charge nurse due to the Administrator not being in the building. CNA A stated the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. CNA A stated she could not remember the exact date of the incidents, but it was the end May or the first of June. CNA A stated she could not remember the charge nurse she reported the incident to. CNA A stated she could not remember the other staff members that were present. and she could not remember who the charge nurse was.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 8:42 AM, the Administrator stated she investigated the incidents and Resident #41 said it did not happen. The Administrator stated she talked to the staff and the staff said they did not witness the either incident. The Administrator stated she can't remember when the incidents happened, it was back in April. The Administrator stated it had been a long ago, it was not a new allegation, it is an old allegation. The Administrator stated still to this day Resident # 41 says it did not happen.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 9:20 AM, Resident #41 stated the Administrator asked her if she was ok after both incidents, each time and she asked if she wanted to go to the hospital. Resident #41 stated the nurses did assessments on her and she did not have any injuries. Resident #41 stated after the incidents she had to move out of the way to avoid injuries when both incidents occurred.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 11:45 AM, CNA A stated she was not for sure when the incidents happened. CNA A stated staff were picking up trays during dinner that was when Resident #29 threw the coffee on Resident # 41 in the hallway. CNA A stated Resident # 29 got a fork from somewhere and tried to stab Resident #41 at the nurse's station. He did not go to her room. CNA A stated she told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that, and he listened. CNA A stated she took the fork and got rid of it. CNA A stated she wasn't aware of any further incidents.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:12 PM RN D stated the incidents wasn't reported to her. RN D stated Resident# 41 is on the other side of facility.
2)Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old-male who originally admitted on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (injury to the brain resulting from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), Bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes extreme mood swings from high to low), and other schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder that affects how people perceive and interact with reality, often causing hallucinations, delusions, and social withdrawal).
Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 was understood by other and understood others. The MDS indicated in the Temporal Orientation section of the MDS indicated Resident #39 answered the month accurate within 5 days. The MDS indicated Resident #39 had no behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS in Section I indicated Resident #39's active diagnosis included traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS indicated in Section N Resident #39 received antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. The MDS in Section O indicated Resident #39 did not receive any psychological therapy.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:04 p.m., the person said the incident between Resident #41 and Resident #29 occurred in July. The person indicated Resident #29 threw coffee on Resident #41's face and hit her on her arm. The person also indicated Resident #29 had attempted to stab Resident #41 with a fork. The person said it was hard to intervene with Resident #29 due to his aggressiveness. The person indicated the Administrator was not present when the incident occurred, but she was notified by phone. The person also said Resident #'s 41, 11, and 21 had voiced fearing retaliation with the Administrator. The person said numerous staff feared voicing any concerns or report abuse to the Administrator for fear of the loss of their jobs. The person said she had witnessed the Administrator yell at Resident #'s 12, 11, 21, and 10 when asking for their resident funds. The person indicated the Administer yelled for them to get out of her office. The person indicated on around July 23, 2023, or July 24, 2023, CNA B refused to change Resident #39 and began cursing him. The person indicated Resident #39 informed the Administrator of the allegation. The person indicated CNA B was allowed to continue to work with the residents and was never sent home for suspension. The person said CNA B boasted the Administrator had sent her a text indicating you are suspended, but I need you so If state comes hide then leave and do not let Resident #39 see you.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:30 p.m., the person indicated she was aware of the Administrator and other employees being allowed to verbally abuse the residents. The person indicated she had heard CNA s B and F tell residents to, sit your mother fucking ass down. The person said the Administrator would yell and curse at the residents to get out of her office. The person said the maintenance supervisor has told a resident to keep your fucking ass in this room. The person said employees have voiced concerns that the corporate regional director covers for the Administrator, so the employees feel as though there was no one to reach out to tell their concerns. The person said CNA B was allowed to work during her suspension period. The person said lastly the verbal abuse, and retaliation was so horrible at the facility.
During a confidential group meeting on 8/22/2023 at 3:00 p.m., residents voiced concern of retaliation when reporting allegations.
Record review of CNA A's Employee Timecard report dated 7/01/2023- 7/31/2023 time reporting period was created on 8/23/2023 by the BOM. The report indicated CNA A worked:
7/23/2023 from 6:34 a.m. to 2:02 p.m., there were no other punch times for this day.
7/24/2023 from 2:02 a.m. to 9:44 a.m. with a lunch of 9:44 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. then 10:30 a. m. - 2:17 p.m.
7/25/2023 from 7:34 a.m. to 2:05 p.m. there were no other punch times for this day.
7/26/2023 from 7:36 a.m. to 9:50 a.m. with a lunch 9:50 a.m. to 10:48 a.m. then 10:48 a.m. to 2:07 p.m.
7/27/2023 from 1:01 a.m. to 2:54 a.m. with a lunch 2:54 a.m. to 3:55 a.m. then from 3:55 a.m. to 7:39 a.m. then 2:59 p.m. to 8:11 p.m.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 4:05 p.m., the DON said the Administrator was the abuse coordinator and she handled the abuse allegations.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy, titled, Abuse Prevention Program, last revised on 06/2021, indicated, . The Administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of our center's abuse prevention program policies and procedures. Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Our center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aide in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/ neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. Our center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discrimination, or coercion during investigation of abuse allegation. Our center will provide protections for the health, warfare and rights of each resident residing in the center to ensure the reporting of crimes. Develop and implement polices and procedures to aid to our center in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents.
Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse: investigate and report any allegations of abuse within timeframe as required by federal requirements; protect resident during abuse investigation; the Administrator will suspend immediately any employees who has been accused of resident abuse, pending the outcome of the investigation; all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the center's Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following person or agencies as required:
The Administrator was notified on 08/23/2023 at 1:05 PM, that an immediate jeopardy situation was identified due to the above failures. The Regional Director of Operations and Administrator was provided the immediate jeopardy template on 08/23/23 at 9:47 AM. The template was amended on 08/23/23 at 5:33 and returned to the he Regional Director of Operations and Administrator.
The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 8/24/2023 at 3:04 p.m. and included:
Action: Resident #29 was discharged from the facility on 8/22/2023 to a safe alternative location and will not return to the facility
Date: 8/22/2023
Action: Administrator, Maintenance Director, and 2 CNAs have been suspended pending investigation to include verbal abuse towards resident (s).
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Resident safe surveys completed on all residents that can answer the questions, remainder of the resident (who cannot answer) received head-to-toe assessments. Resident safe survey interviews to include fear of retaliation/comfortable reporting issues related.
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Progress notes and event reports reviewed to ensure no other additional resident to resident altercations have occurred without appropriate interventions being place in the care plan, notifications made to psychiatric services and the MD. Date: 8/23/2023 by 3:00 p.m.
Action: Employee (all) interviews conducted to include:
Have you ever witnessed an employee physically, sexually, or verbally abuse a resident? (If yes proceed to further questions)
If yes, who was the employee, who was the resident, and when about did this occur?
Were there other witnesses to this event?
Did you report this information to anyone and if so, to who?
Date: 8/23/2023
Action: Residents involved in resident-to-resident altercations, identified in the previous 30-days, had their care plans reviewed to ensure proper interventions are in place. Any identified lacking proper interventions have been reviewed with the IDT and added.
Date: 8/23/2023 at 3:00 p.m.
Action:
Education provided:
All staff-abuse/neglect (key takeaway: thorough investigations and fully completing event reports, person centered care plan interventions, who the abuse coordinator is and when to report-Administrator and immediately, documentation/assessment/follow up.)
All staff have been educated on the corporate compliance line. If the Administrator is unavailable, they can call the compliance line and/or notify the Director of Nursing.
Nurses-Education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medial record and documented follow up regarding the events.
All staff to be in-serviced prior to working their next/first shift.
Date 8/23/2023 by 4:00 p.m.
All staff-Resident to resident altercation policy (key takeaway: how to respond and what order to respond-ensure resident safety by separating the residents, staying with the aggressor, and notify charge nurse and abuse coordinator).
All Staff-Corporate Compliance Line education provided to all staff to understand if they report something and they feel as if appropriate action has not taken place, to reach out to the compliance line. Any issues with the abuse coordinator/administrator to reach out to the compliance line.
Action: All resident has been given the corporate compliance line and informed they should call that number if they are fearful of retaliation within the facility and need t report abuse/neglect.
Date: 8/24/2023
Action: 1:1 education provided to Administrator and Director of Nursing over the PL17-19 regarding abuse/neglect/reporting.
Education regarding investigating allegations and implementing interventions.
Date:8/23/2003 by 2:00 p.m.
Action Item: Ad hoc QAPI meeting with Medical Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing completed regarding IJ templates and Plan of Removal
Date: 8/23/2023 by 2:00 p.m.
Corporate compliance line is monitored by the corporate compliance office. This officer is not affiliated with the center. Once the facility is made aware of an allegation of abuse/neglect by an outside entity (such as our partners at HHSC and The Ombudsman) the facility will initiate an investigation and follow the abuse and neglect policy/protocol.
On 8/25/2023 the surveyors confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) by:
Record review of Resident #29's medical record indicated he discharged on 8/22/2023 to a sister facility.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Administrator was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Maintenance supervisor was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA B was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA F was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of the safe survey results for the residents.
Record review of the employee Abuse Questionnaires.
Record review of the education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medical record and documented follow up regarding the events.
Record review of the Abuse prevention program resident-to-resident altercations with retaliation towards residents was a form of abuse and could lead to termination.
Record review of the 1:1 education provided to Administrator and Director of Nursing over the PL17-19 regarding abuse/neglect/reporting.
Record review of the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting completed with the Medical Director was completed on 8/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m. with the physician, the Administrator, Regional Director of Operations, and the Survey Resource staff.
Interview of Licensed Nurses (LVN C, LVN E, LVN H, LVN S, LVN AA, LVN DD, RN D, Infection Preventionist, ADON, DON) were performed. During the interviews all licensed nurses were able to correctly identity abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation. Licensed Nurses were able to provide education regarding documentation of event or incident and follow up in the medical records.
Interview of all staff (DA W, [NAME] P, Housekeeper X, Housekeeper Y, Housekeeper Z, NA BB, NA CC, CNA A, CNA B, CNA F, CNA T, CNA U, CNA V, MA L, AD, DM, DOR, BOM, and Housekeeping Supervisor) were performed. During the interviews all staff were able to correctly identify abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation.
Interview with the residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #18, #20, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #247) were completed. All residents were able to identify the number they should call if they were fearful of retaliation within the facility and needed to report abuse or neglect.
Interview with the DON was completed. The DON was able to correctly identify when and how to report abuse or neglect and how to investigate allegation and implement interventions.
On 8/25/2023 at 3:53 p.m., the Regional Director of Operations was notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed; however, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy at a scope of a pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources e...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident for 44 of 44 residents who resided in the facility.
The Administrator failed to follow abuse policies and report incidents of abuse.
The Administrator failed to follow abuse policies and protect Resident #39 from further abuse by allowing CNA B to work when she was supposed to be suspended for an allegation of abuse.
The Administrator failed to ensure residents were not fearful of retaliation.
The Administrator allowed CNA B to work during suspension from an alleged abuse allegation.
The Administrator was aware of multiple staff verbally abusing residents and did not place any protective measures in place.
An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 8/23/2023 at 5:15 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 8/23/2023 at 5:56 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 8/25/2023 at 3:53 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and at a scope of widespread due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
These failures could residents at an increased risk for abuse, further abuse, increased anxiety, emotional distress, depression, neglect, and retaliation.
Findings included:
1)Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #41 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses which include gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (acid reflux), weakness, moderate intellectual disabilities (difficulty in social situations and problems with social cues and judgment), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (is the state of inadequate intake of food) pain unspecified, iron deficiency anemia unspecified (occurs when your body doesn't have enough iron to produce hemoglobin), cocaine abuse, uncomplicated.
Record review of Resident # 41's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #41 was understood and was able to understand others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no delusions or hallucinations. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #41 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed toward others.
Record review of Resident #41's a care plan with dated 08/09/2023, indicated Resident #41 exhibits socially inappropriate disruptive behavioral symptom, guarded behavior, attention seeking, and embellishes the truth.
Record review of Resident #41's progress notes from 05/09/23 through 08/23/23 revealed no documented incidents regarding Resident #41 having had coffee thrown at her or an attempted stabbing with a fork.
During Resident council meeting on 08/22/23 at 3:00 PM, revealed Resident #41 stated that she was afraid of Resident #29 because he had poured coffee on her and attempted to stab her in the eye with a fork. Resident #41 stated staff witnessed the incidents, and she called the Administrator to report what had happened. Resident #41 stated that CNA A had witnessed the incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:03 PM, Resident # 41 stated she didn't know the exact date the incident occurred. Resident # 41 stated Resident # 29 tried to pour coffee on her after supper. Resident # 41 stated she jumped back quickly but the coffee got on her feet. Resident # 41 stated she told CNA A and CNA A told him to quit. Resident # 41 stated Resident #29 had a fork and tried to hit her in the eye with the fork. Resident # 41 stated she jumped down and Resident #29 missed her. Resident # 41 stated both incidents occurred on the same day in June. Resident #41 stated she told CNA A. Resident # 41 stated CNA A told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that; he would be in jail. Resident #41 stated CNA A witnessed both incidents.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 4:42 PM, CNA A stated she witnessed both incidents. CNA A stated the incident were Resident # 29 poured coffee on Resident #41 happened in the hallway, she intervened and reported it to the charge nurse because ADM was not in the building. CNA A stated she could not remember who the charge nurse was. CNA A stated the incident with the fork happened at the nurse's station with multiple staff members around that witnessed the incident. CNA A stated she intervened and notified the charge nurse due to the Administrator not being in the building. CNA A stated the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. CNA A stated she could not remember the exact date of the incidents, but it was the end May or the first of June. CNA A stated she could not remember the charge nurse she reported the incident to. CNA A stated she could not remember the other staff members that were present. and she could not remember who the charge nurse was.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 8:42 AM, the Administrator stated she investigated the incidents and Resident #41 said it did not happen. The Administrator stated she talked to the staff and the staff said they did not witness the either incident. The Administrator stated she can't remember when the incidents happened, it was back in April. The Administrator stated it had been a long ago, it was not a new allegation, it is an old allegation. The Administrator stated still to this day Resident # 41 says it did not happen.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 9:20 AM, Resident #41 stated the Administrator asked her if she was ok after both incidents, each time and she asked if she wanted to go to the hospital. Resident #41 stated the nurses did assessments on her and she did not have any injuries. Resident #41 stated she had to move out of the way to avoid injuries when both incidents occurred.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 11:45 AM, CNA A stated she was unsure the date the incidents happened but indicated was a couple of months ago. CNA A stated Resident #29 threw coffee on Resident #41 in the hallway as staff was picking up the dinner trays in the dining room. CNA A stated Resident # 29 used a fork and attempted to stab Resident #41 at the nurse's station. CNA A said Resident #41 was able to jump back to miss getting hurt. CNA A stated she told Resident # 29 he couldn't do that, and he listened. CNA A stated she took the fork from Resident #29.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:12 PM, RN D stated the incidents wasn't reported to her. RN D stated Resident# 41 is on the other side of facility.
2) Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old-male who originally admitted on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (injury to the brain resulting from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), Bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes extreme mood swings from high to low), and other schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder that affects how people perceive and interact with reality, often causing hallucinations, delusions, and social withdrawal).
Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 was understood by other and understood others. The MDS indicated in the Temporal Orientation section of the MDS indicated Resident #39 answered the month accurate within 5 days. The MDS indicated Resident #39 had no behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS in Section I indicated Resident #39's active diagnosis included traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS indicated in Section N Resident #39 received antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. The MDS in Section O indicated Resident #39 did not receive any psychological therapy.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:04 p.m., the person said the incident between Resident #41 and Resident #29 occurred in July. The person indicated Resident #29 threw coffee on Resident #41's face and hit her on her arm. The person also indicated Resident #29 had attempted to stab Resident #41 with a fork. The person said it was hard to intervene with Resident #29 due to his aggressiveness. The person indicated the Administrator was not present when the incident occurred, but she was notified by phone. The person also said Resident #'s 41, 11, and 21 had voiced fearing retaliation with the Administrator. The person said numerous staff feared voicing any concerns or report abuse to the Administrator for fear of the loss of their jobs. The person said she had witnessed the Administrator yell at Resident #'s 12, 11, 21, and 10 when asking for their resident funds. The person indicated the Administer yelled for them to get out of her office. The person indicated on around July 23, 2023, or July 24, 2023, CNA B refused to change Resident #39 and began cursing him. The person indicated Resident #39 informed the Administrator of the allegation. The person indicated CNA B was allowed to continue to work with the residents and was never sent home for suspension. The person said CNA B boasted the Administrator had sent her a text indicating you are suspended, but I need you so If state comes hide then leave and do not let Resident #39 see you.
During an anonymous telephone interview on 8/23/2023 at 3:30 p.m., the person indicated she was aware of the Administrator and other employees being allowed to verbally abuse the residents. The person indicated she had heard CNA s B and F tell residents to, sit your mother fucking ass down. The person said the Administrator would yell and curse at the residents to get out of her office. The person said the maintenance supervisor has told a resident to keep your fucking ass in this room. The person said employees have voiced concerns that the corporate regional director covers for the Administrator, so the employees feel as though there was no one to reach out to tell their concerns. The person said CNA A was allowed to work during her suspension period. The person said lastly the verbal abuse, and retaliation was so horrible at the facility.
During a confidential group meeting on 8/22/2023 at 3:00 p.m., residents voiced concern of retaliation when reporting allegations.
Record review of CNA A's Employee Timecard report dated 7/01/2023- 7/31/2023 time reporting period was created on 8/23/2023 by the BOM. The report indicated CNA A worked:
7/23/2023 from 6:34 a.m. to 2:02 p.m., there were no other punch times for this day.
7/24/2023 from 2:02 a.m. to 9:44 a.m. with a lunch of 9:44 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. then 10:30 a. m. - 2:17 p.m.
7/25/2023 from 7:34 a.m. to 2:05 p.m. there were no other punch times for this day.
7/26/2023 from 7:36 a.m. to 9:50 a.m. with a lunch 9:50 a.m. to 10:48 a.m. then 10:48 a.m. to 2:07 p.m.
7/27/2023 from 1:01 a.m. to 2:54 a.m. with a lunch 2:54 a.m. to 3:55 a.m. then from 3:55 a.m. to 7:39 a.m. then 2:59 p.m. to 8:11 p.m.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 4:05 p.m., the DON said the Administrator was the abuse coordinator and she handled the abuse allegations.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the Abuse Prevention Program policy and procedure dated June 2021 indicated 1. The Administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of our Center's abuse prevention program policies and procedures. 2. Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. 5. Our center will condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. 6. Our center will protect resident from harm, reprisal, discrimination, or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations. 7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by Center management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Investigation .6. The Administrator will suspend immediately any employee who has been accused of resident abuse, pending the outcome of the investigation.
The Administrator/Corporate Regional Director was notified on 8/2323 at 5:45 p.m., that an Immediate Jeopardy situation was identified due to the above failure. The Administrator/Corporate Regional Director was provided the Immediate Jeopardy template on 8/23/2023 at 5:56 p.m.
The facility's Plan of Removal was accepted on 8/24/2023 at 3:46 p.m. and included:
Action: Regional Director of Operations reviewed intake #438802. Employee identified as allegedly abusing the resident has suspension paperwork in place, resident was assessed and interviewed and states the following:
Do you feel safe here: yes
Do you feel kike staff is treating you with respect: yes
Do you feel comfortable reporting to staff any problems or concerns: yes
Any questions for me: no
Date: 7/26/2023
Person responsible: Regional Director of Operations
Action: Administrator received 1:1 education with the Regional Director of Operations regarding Abuse/Neglect Reporting.
Administrator and Director of Nursing received 1:1 education regarding suspending of alleged perpetrators until the investigation is completed. Alleged perpetrators can then return to work if the allegation is confirmed, inconclusive, or unfounded.
Date: 8/24/2023 at 4:40 p.m.
Action: Administrator has been suspended pending an investigation by the Regional Director of Operations. Parties assisting with the investigation include Regional Director of Operations and the Chief Nursing Officer.
Date 8/23/2023 at 4:40 p.m.
Action: Maintenance Director, and 2 CNAs have been suspended pending investigation to include: verbal abuse towards resident (s).
Date: 8/23/2023 by 4:40 p.m.
Action: Resident safe surveys completed on all residents that can answer the questions, remainder of the resident (who cannot answer) received head-to-toe assessments. Resident safe survey interviews to include fear of retaliation/comfortable reporting issues related.
Date 8/23/2023
Action: Employee (all) interviews conducted to include:
Have you ever witnessed an employee physically, sexually, or verbally abuse a resident? (If yes proceed to further questions)
If yes, who was the employee, who was the resident, and when about did this occur?
Were there other witnesses to this event?
Did you report this information to anyone and if so, to who?
Date: 8/23/2023
Action:
Education provided:
All staff-abuse/neglect (key takeaway: thorough investigations and fully completing event reports, person centered care plan interventions, who the abuse coordinator is and when to report-Administrator and immediately, documentation/assessment/follow up.)
All staff have been educated on the corporate compliance line. If the Administrator is unavailable, they can call the compliance line and/or notify the Director of Nursing.
All staff-Resident to resident altercation policy (key takeaway: how to respond and what order to respond-ensure resident safety by separating the residents, staying with the aggressor, and notify charge nurse and abuse coordinator).
All Staff-Corporate Compliance Line education provided to all staff to understand if they report something and they feel as if appropriate action has not taken place, to reach out to the compliance line. Any issues with the abuse coordinator/administrator to reach out to the compliance line.
Nurses-Education provided regarding documentation of events/incidents in the medial record and documented follow up regarding the events.
All staff to be in-serviced prior to working their next/first shift.
Date 8/23/2023 by 4:00 p.m.
Action: All resident has been given the corporate compliance line and informed they should call that number if they are fearful of retaliation within the facility and need t report abuse/neglect.
Date: 8/24/2023
Action Item: Ad hoc QAPI meeting with Medical Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing completed regarding IJ templates and Plan of Removal
Date: 8/23/2023 by 2:00 p.m.
Corporate compliance line is monitored by the corporate compliance office. This officer is not affiliated with the center. Once the facility is made aware of an allegation of abuse/neglect by an outside entity (such as our partners at HHSC and The Ombudsman) the facility will initiate an investigation and follow the abuse and neglect policy/protocol.
On 8/25/2023 the surveyors confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) by:
Record of the Employee memorandum indicated CNA A was provided a suspension dated 7/23/2023.
Record review of a safe survey with Resident #39 dated 7/26/2023.
Record review of the safe survey results for the residents.
Record review of the attestation from the MDS nurse ensured all care plans were reviewed for the last 30 days for resident-to-resident altercations.
Record review of the attestation from the ADON nurse ensured all progress notes and/or event reports for the previous 30 days.
Record review of the attestation from the Corporate RN indicated she ensured the progress notes and/or event reports.
Record review of the signed In-service sign in sheet indicated the Regional Director of Operations in-serviced the Administrator and the DON was provided material related to reporting allegations of abuse to HHSC, completing through investigations, follow the abuse policy, implementation of interventions, suspending alleged perpetrators dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Administrator was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the Maintenance supervisor was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA B was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of an employee memorandum indicated the CNA F was provided a Suspension form related to an allegation of abuse dated 8/23/2023.
Record review of the employee Abuse Questionnaires.
Record review of the Abuse and Neglect In-service dated 8/23/2023 indicated to report abuse from vendors, family, or staff toward our residents.
Record review of the Abuse prevention program resident-to-resident altercations with retaliation towards residents was a form of abuse and could lead to termination.
Record review of the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting completed with the Medical Director was completed on 8/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m. with the physician, the Administrator, Regional Director of Operations, and the Survey Resource staff.
Interview of Licensed Nurses (LVN C, LVN E, LVN H, LVN S, LVN AA, LVN DD, RN D, Infection Preventionist, ADON, DON) were performed. During the interviews all licensed nurses were able to correctly identity abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation. Licensed Nurses were able to provide education regarding documentation of event or incident and follow up in the medical records. Licensed Nurses were able to identify whom to contact when they feel appropriate action has not taken place on issues that have been reported.
Interview of all staff (DA W, [NAME] P, Housekeeper X, Housekeeper Y, Housekeeper Z, NA BB, NA CC, CNA A, CNA B, CNA F, CNA T, CNA U, CNA V, MA L, AD, DM, DOR, BOM, and Housekeeping Supervisor) were performed. During the interviews all staff were able to correctly identify abuse, when to respond, when to report, who to report to, retaliation, protection, and documentation. All employees were interviewed to inquire about incidents of abuse. All staff members were able to identify whom to contact when they feel appropriate action has not taken place on issues that have been reported.
Interview with the residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #18, #20, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #247) were completed. All residents were able to identify the number they should call if they were fearful of retaliation within the facility and needed to report abuse or neglect.
Interview with the DON was completed. The DON was able to correctly identify when and how to report abuse or neglect and how to investigate allegation and implement interventions.
On 8/25/2023 at 3:53 p.m., the Regional Director of Operations was notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed; however, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not iImmediate jeopardy and at a scope of widespread due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors rece...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 2 residents' (Resident #6) reviewed for trauma-informed care.
1. The facility did not ensure Resident #30 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #30 had a history of trauma.
2. The facility did not ensure Resident #30 was protected from triggers of previous emotional trauma. Resident #297 yelled at Resident #30 in the dining room. Resident #297 was aggressive and had the same name as a man from Resident #30's past that triggered her previous emotional trauma.
3. The facility did not ensure trauma screenings were completed upon admission to the facility.
These failures could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization.
The findings included:
Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/21/23, revealed Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles that can cause fatigue and shortness of breath).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 06/14/23, revealed Resident #30 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #30 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #30 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed no behaviors or refusal of care.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited on 08/10/23, revealed Resident #30 was allegedly hit on the face by another resident. The interventions included: Avoid over-stimulation (e.g., noise, crowding, other physically aggressive residents). The care plan did not address history of trauma.
Record review of the event report, dated 07/09/23, revealed Resident #30 was hit on the left side of her face by another resident, which was unwitnessed. The event report revealed a head-to-toe assessment was completed.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 11:39 AM, Resident #30 was walking down the hallway using a rolling walker. Resident #30 walked to the dining room entrance and turned around and backed out. Resident #30 stated she normally sat at the dining room table closest to the entrance, but she was not going to sit there because the black man [Resident #297], sitting at the end of the table, had hit her previously. Resident #30 stated he was not supposed to sit at the table with her, but he does sit there frequently. Resident #297 wheeled himself away from the dining table and Resident #30 stated she was going to sit down. Resident #30 sat at the dining room and was talking pleasantly with several other residents at the table.
During an observation on 08/21/23 at 11:42 AM, Resident #297 wheeled himself back to the dining table sitting near Resident #30. Resident #30 appeared scared with her back turned toward Resident #297 and her eyes opened wide. Resident #297 was attempting to yell and accuse Resident #30 of getting her moved out of his room. Resident #30 continued to ignore Resident #297 and he attempted to reach out to touch Resident #30, unsuccessfully. Several staff members were observed at the dining table during the exchange with no interventions put into place. Resident #30 placed her head down on her hands and started audibly crying with tears rolling down her cheeks. CNA K stopped at the dining table and assisted Resident #30 back to her room.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 11:49 AM, CNA K stated Resident #30 was upset and wanted to go back to her room. CNA K stated she walked with Resident #30 back to her room to make sure she was okay. CNA K stated Resident #30 and several other ladies at the dining room table were afraid of Resident #297 because he talked loudly at them and had a history of hitting other residents. CNA K stated Resident #30 had her support dog in her room and she wanted to be near the dog because it made her feel safe.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 11:57 AM, Resident #30 was sitting up on her bed with a support dog lying beside her. Resident #30 was smiling and visited pleasantly during the interview. Resident #30 stated she had a good relationship with Resident #297 when she first admitted to the facility. Resident #30 stated Resident #297 would come up to her in the dining room and ask her questions because no one could understand him. Resident #30 stated Resident #297 would become angry and started verbally abusing the staff. Resident #30 stated he then started becoming angry and saying mean things to her until one day he hit her. Resident #30 stated staff immediately kept them separated and a few days later Resident #297 was sent to the behavior hospital to have his medications adjusted. Resident #30 stated he was in the hospital for approximately half of July and August 2023. Resident #30 stated he just returned to the facility during the last week, and he was moved to another hallway. Resident #30 also stated signage was placed on the hall that stated do not enter to try and keep Resident #297 off the hallway. Resident #30 stated she did not want to be around Resident #297. Resident #30 stated Resident #297 came straight to the dining table she had been sitting at since returning to the facility. Resident #30 stated she had reported to staff that she felt uncomfortable sitting at the dining room table with Resident #297, but the staff told her Resident #297 had a right to sit at the table. Resident #30 stated she wanted to eat lunch with her friends but was unable to because he was sitting there, and she did not feel safe. Resident #30 stated she reported the situation to RN D, LVN H, ADON, DON, and some CNAs, whose name she was unable to recall.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 2:52 PM, Resident #11 stated she sat the dining room table with Resident #30 and Resident #297. Resident #11 stated Resident #297 had run off 3 of her friends at the dining room table. Resident #11 stated the staff told her You can't claim the table, anyone that wants to sit there can. Resident #11 stated she did not feel safe at the dining room table. Resident #11 stated Resident #297 could have gone off at any second and tried to hit them. Resident #11 stated Resident #297 had tried to hit her several times. Resident #11 stated the facility staff were aware of the situation and have not done anything.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 3:29 PM, LVN H stated no residents have reported feeling unsafe or uncomfortable sitting at the dining room table. LVN H stated Resident #30 became anxious a lot and stayed in her room most of the time. LVN H stated Resident #30 recently obtained her dog and that helped with her anxiety. LVN H stated Resident #30 went to the dining room for lunch and dinner and had not reported feeling unsafe or uncomfortable. LVN H stated she was unsure if Resident #30 and Resident #297 had been eating at the same dining table. LVN H stated Resident #297 had swung at Resident #30 a couple of months ago, but he left the facility for treatment. LVN H stated Resident #297 had his medications adjusted and his demeanor had improved after returning to the facility.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 3:50 PM, Resident #10 stated she was not afraid of Resident #297, but he was always causing trouble at the dining room table. Resident #10 stated Resident #297 talked loudly and got on her nerves. Resident #10 stated Resident #297 had just returned to the facility after being sent out for hitting another resident.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 4:18 PM, the ADON stated Resident #30 admitted from the hospital was pretty much independent with ADLs. The ADON stated Resident #30 was very sweet. The ADON stated Resident #30 had not had many anxiety issues since she obtained her dog. The ADON stated Resident #30 did have some confusion and was occasionally forgetful. The ADON stated Resident #30 had not told her that she felt uncomfortable or unsafe sitting at the dining table with Resident #297. The ADON stated Resident #30 and Resident #297 had an altercation a few months previously but had not had any issues since. The ADON stated no facility staff had reported that Resident #30 did not feel safe or comfortable. The ADON stated Resident #30 normally sat in the dining room for meals with no issues reported. The ADON stated it was reported today that Resident #30 had become upset in the dining room, but she was already out of the dining room and the CNA had comforted Resident #30. The ADON stated she was unaware if any other residents had concerns. The ADON stated the only concerns that had been reported on Resident #297 was he was too loud.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 4:27 PM, the DON stated Resident #30 made up stories every now and then. The DON stated not too long ago one of the residents allegedly hit Resident #30 and it was not observed. The DON stated the incident was not witnessed and it was not proven that it happened. The DON stated she was just made aware, within the last hour, that Resident #30 felt uncomfortable and unsafe in the dining room. The DON stated she was unsure what staff member reported it. The DON stated she was fixing to go talk to Resident #30 because that was what she would normally do.
During an interview on 08/21/23 at 5:00 PM, the DON stated a safe survey was completed on Resident #30. The DON stated Resident #30 told her Resident #297 had not been aggressive or spoken rudely to her. The DON stated Resident #30 said the name Paul was a trigger for her and she did not deal well with strong, loud personalities because of past traumas. The DON stated she asked Resident #30 if a referral could have been made for psychological services and Resident #30 agreed.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 8:23 AM, Resident #30 stated the DON talked to her yesterday. Resident #30 stated she believed her past trauma was making her feel uncomfortable around Resident #297. Resident #30 stated she had a cousin who threatened to kill the whole family at a wedding, and he had the same name as Resident #297. Resident #30 stated she also remembered getting spanked by her grandfather at young age and the incident had made her fearful of men with strong personalities. Resident #30 stated the relationship with Resident #297 was okay until he hit her. Resident #30 stated she still did not want to sit at the dining room table with Resident #297 because she felt uncomfortable. Resident #30 stated she had never been asked by the facility if she had a history of trauma.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 9:48 PM, the DON stated trauma informed care observations were supposed to have been completed on admission to the facility. The DON stated the electronic charting system was not alerting anyone the observation needed to be completed. The DON stated none of the residents at the facility had a trauma screening completed.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 10:13 AM, the DON stated the Social Worker was responsible for completing the trauma screening on every resident upon admission to the facility. The DON stated the facility had not had a Social Worker since 10/20/22. The DON stated the electronic charting system had a feature that sent an alert to the dashboard that an observation was needed. The DON stated the electronic system was not sending an alert for the trauma screening assessment, so it was not being completed. The DON stated there was no process in place for monitoring to ensure the trauma screen observations were being completed.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:15 PM, RN D stated she normally cared for Resident #30. RN D stated Resident #30 had not been eating in the dining room as frequently. RN D stated Resident #297 did not typically sit at the same dining table as Resident #30. RN D stated Resident #30 was social and talkative. RN D stated Resident #30 was pleasant and cooperative and was cognitively intact. RN D stated Resident #30 or other staff member had not reported to her that she felt unsafe or uncomfortable eating lunch at the dining table. RN D stated Resident #30 could have reported that she felt unsafe with Resident #297 prior to being sent to the behavior hospital. RN D stated facility staff did move Resident #297's room away from Resident #30 as an intervention. RN D stated she was unaware of Resident #30's previous history of trauma.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 12:12 PM, the DON stated the system for completing and monitoring trauma screens was broken. The DON stated it was important to ensure trauma screens were completed so staff would know what triggers the residents with a history of trauma and to avoid those triggers to prevent re-traumatization and provide more individualized care.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 3:25 PM, the Director of Social Services stated she oversaw the facility's social services program. The Director of Social Services stated the process for trauma screens was that were to be completed upon admission to the facility. The Director of Social Services stated the facility was responsible for monitoring to ensure trauma screens were completed upon admission. The Director of Social Services stated she did complete random audits and assisted the facility in education training. The Director of Social Services stated none had been completed on trauma informed care since she had been with the company, approximately 2 months. The Director of Social Services stated it was important to ensure trauma screening was completed to identify past trauma and avoid resident triggers to prevent re-traumatization.
During an attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 PM to gather more information, the Administrator did not answer. No phone call was returned upon exit of the facility.
Record review of the Trauma Informed Care policy, revised December 2019, revealed 3. Include trauma-informed care as part of the QAPI plan, so that needs, and problem areas are identified and addressed. The policy further revealed 6. Implement universal screening of residents for trauma. The policy revealed 1. As part of the comprehensive assessment, identify history of trauma or interpersonal violence when possible. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences may involve record review or the use of screening tools.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #1) and 1 of 1 staff (MA L) reviewed for resident rights.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with dignity by sitting him at the front by the nurses' station with dirty, soiled shirts.
The facility failed to ensure MA L knocked prior to entering Resident #4's room.
These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and loss of self-worth.
Findings included:
1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that appear in infancy or early childhood and permanently affect body movement and muscle coordination), unspecified, severe intellectual disabilities (limitations in your mental abilities affect intelligence, learning and everyday life skills), and supraventricular tachycardia (irregularly fast or erratic heartbeat).
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #1 was sometimes understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #1's BIMS score was 3, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was totally dependent for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
Record review of the care plan last edited on 08/11/2023 indicated, Resident #1 required total assistance for dressing and grooming needs.
During an observation and attempted interview on 08/21/2023 at 11:19 AM, Resident #1 was non-interviewable, and was sitting in his wheelchair at the front by the nurses' station with a navy-blue shirt that had white stains and white flakes on it.
During an observation on 08/21/2023 at 2:47 PM, Resident #1 was sitting in his wheelchair at the front by the nurses' station with a navy-blue shirt that had white stains and white flakes on it.
During an observation on 08/23/2023 at 12:47 PM, Resident #1 was sitting in his wheelchair at the front by the nurses' station with a blue shirt that had a dark blue circle on the chest area.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 1:59 PM, CNA K said she was not aware Resident #1's shirt had white stains and flakes on it when he was sitting at the front by the nurses' station on Monday, 08/21/2023 because when she put it on him in the morning it was clean. CNA K said it was important for the residents to be clean and look good so they would not feel bad or sad. CNA K said on 08/23/2023 the MDS Coordinator and CNA B had gotten Resident #1 up in his wheelchair and put him at the front by the nurses' station.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 2:10 PM, the MDS Coordinator said she did not notice Resident #1 had a dark blue circle on his chest area. The MDS Coordinator said Resident #1 drooled so his shirt was probably wet. The MDS Coordinator said Resident #1 not having a clean shirt was a dignity issue. The MDS Coordinator said Resident #1's shirt needed to be dry so he would not have skin issues.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 12:36 PM, the DON said the CNAs should have changed Resident #1. The DON said she usually rounded daily and made observations of the residents' appearance to ensure their appearance was good and clean. The DON said she had not noticed Resident #1 had stains on his shirt on either day. The DON said she had not noticed because she was tied up with state in the building. The DON said she expected the nursing staff to take care of the residents. The DON said it was important for Resident #1 to have clean clothes and a clean appearance for his dignity.
2. During an observation on 08/22/2023 at 9:25 a.m., MA L entered Resident #4's room without knocking.
During an attempted interview on 08/22/2023 at 9:42 a.m. with Resident #4, indicated she was non-interview able as evidence by confused conversation.
During an interview on 08/22/2023 at 9:46 a.m., MA L stated she should have knocked prior to entering Resident #4 room. MA L stated she got sidetracked and forgot to knock since the door was already open. MA L stated this failure was a lack of dignity and privacy.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:15 p.m., the DON stated she expected staff to knock prior to entering residents' room. The DON stated she typically sees staff knocking prior to entering residents' room and was unsure why it was not completed for Resident #4. The DON stated she monitored by performing random observations. The DON stated it was important for resident rights and privacy.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, last revised February 2021, indicated, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem . Staff are expected to knock and request permission before entering residents' rooms .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and rece...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for reasonable accommodations.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 had a grab bar to assist with transferring to the toilet.
This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity.
Findings included:
Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), bipolar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one of the body) affecting left nondominant side.
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/28/23, revealed Resident #13 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #13 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #13 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderately impaired. The MDS revealed Resident #13 required extensive assistance with transferring and two-person assist. The MDS revealed Resident #13 required staff assistance with moving on and off the toilet and impairment on both upper and lower extremities.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited 08/10/23, revealed Resident #13 exhibited ADLs functional Status/Rehabilitation potential and Resident #13 would achieve maximum functional mobility with toileting amount of assist.
During an interview and observation on 08/21/23 beginning at 10:02 AM, Resident #13 stated he was paralyzed on his left side. Resident #13 was sitting in his wheelchair and had an arm rest on the left side of his wheelchair. Resident #13 stated he had requested to move into a different room after he was admitted to the facility to assist with transferring to the toilet. Observation made of Resident #13's bathroom and there was a grab bar on the left side of the toilet and no grab bar on the right side. Resident #13 stated he was told there was no way of installing a grab bar on the right side of the toilet due there was no wall on that side. Resident #13 was told by the Administrator he would have to be moved to a different room with a grab bar already installed on the right side of the wall once a room become available. Resident #13 stated he was told to use his pull up for bowel incontinence due to there was no grab bar available to assist him with transferring to the toilet. Resident #13 stated not being able to transfer to the toilet made him feel terrible because he had to have accidents in his pullups and he felt like it impacted his health negatively.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:05 PM, CNA K stated Resident #13 had never informed her that he needed a grab bar to assist with transferring to the toilet. CNA K stated Resident #13 was total care with toileting and a grab bar would not work because Resident #13's stroke side was not steady, and he was always leaning over to one side. CNA K stated Resident #13 wore briefs and staff changed him in the bed due to incontinence.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:24 PM, CNA B stated she was not aware that Resident #13 needed a grab bar. CNA B stated Resident #13 could have transferred from the toilet if he had a grab bar available.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:36 PM, Maintenance stated he was aware that Resident #13 needed a grab bar to assist with transferring but there was no rooms available at this time with grab bars on the right side of the bathroom wall. Maintenance stated the facility did not have any grab bars available to install in Resident #13's bathroom since there was not a wall on the right side of the toilet.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 5:00 PM, LVN C stated she did not know Resident #13 was needing a grab bar to transfer to the toilet. LVN C stated Resident #13 could transfer with assist it if he had a grab bar available. LVN C stated the importance of having assistive devices available was to promote independence and prevent skin breakdown. LVN C stated not having a grab bar could impair Resident #13's independence.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated she was not aware that Resident #13 needed a grab bar. The DON stated the importance of having a grab bar was to promote independence, dignity, and respect. The DON stated not having a grab bar available could result in Resident #13 falling.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated she was aware that Resident #13 needed a grab bar and she had already moved him to a room that accommodated his needs. The Administrator stated she was not aware of Resident #13 not having a grab bar on the right side of the toilet and she expected him to have one.
Record review of the Accommodation of Needs policy, revised March 2021, indicated, The residents individual needs and preferences are accommodated to the extent possible adaptions may be made to the physical environment, including the bathroom .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, ne...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect (Resident #29).
The facility did not report abuse when Resident #29's family member visited the facility on 08/13/23 and was yelling at resident and threw his personal belongings outside of his room within the 2-hour time frame.
This failure could place the residents at risk for unreported allegations of abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin.
Findings included:
Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), dementia (impaired memory) and Parkinson's disease (disorder that impacts the nervous system and movement).
Record review of Resident #29's physician orders indicated lorazepam 1mg three times a day.
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed Resident #29 was usually understood and usually understood others. Resident #29 had a BIMS score of 4 indicating severely impaired.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited 08/09/23, revealed Resident #29 had behavioral symptoms combative and elopement. The approach indicated Resident #29 became upset due to his sister came to the facility and was yelling at him and the resident's behaviors stem from his sister visits.
Record review of LVN E's progress note dated 08/13/23 indicated Resident #29's family member was in his room throwing Resident #29's clothing outside of the room and yelling at Resident #29. LVN E indicated he notified the nurse supervisor.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 1:42 PM, LVN E stated he was completing his medication pass on 08/13/23 when Resident #29's family member came to the facility. LVN E stated he heard a loud voice and yelling coming from Resident #29's room. LVN E stated when he got closer to the room, he observed clothing being thrown out of Resident #29's room and Resident #29's family member was, Getting loud towards resident and he was upset. LVN E stated he told Resident #29's family member that he would handle the situation if she would tell him what the problem was and then he redirected Resident #29 towards the dresser. LVN E stated he then assisted Resident #29 with picking out what clothing he wanted to wear for the day and stayed with Resident #29 until he calmed down. LVN E stated Resident #29's family member left the building quickly and he notified the DON and Administrator.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON reported she was not at the facility during the incident so she could not say what happen. The DON reported the Administrator was notified and she was responsible for determining if abuse needed to be reported.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated, I would not say the family member was yelling, but if she was yelling at him then it should have been reported. The Administrator stated she should have done an investigation and it should have been reported if it was indicated in the progress note that the family member was yelling at Resident #29. The Administrator stated the importance of reporting abuse was to keep the resident safe and the resident could have been harmed if the incident was not investigated.
Record review of the policy on, Abuse Prevention Program, revised June 2021, indicated, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by Center management .The Administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation of the Center's abuse prevention program . The alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment will be reported immediately and reported no later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involves abuse.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive resident-centered assessment of each resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive resident-centered assessment of each resident's cognitive, medical, and functional capacity in a timely manner for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #247) reviewed for accuracy of assessments.
The facility failed to complete Resident #247's admission MDS assessment within 14 days of admission.
This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met.
Findings included:
Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 indicated Resident #247 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (problems with your metabolism cause brain dysfunction), malignant neoplasm of skin (skin cancer), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (moderate damage to the kidneys and loss of kidney function).
Record review of Resident #247's comprehensive MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/08/2023 indicated in Section A0310 it was an admission assessment (required by day 14). The MDS assessment for Resident #247 indicated in Section A1600 an entry date of 08/01/2023. The MDS assessment in Section Z0500B was signed completed on 08/18/2023, which indicated the MDS assessment for Resident #247 was completed 4 days late.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 11:21 AM, the Regional Reimbursement Manager said Resident #247's admission MDS assessment was completed late. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said she did not pay close enough attention because usually the MDS Coordinator completed the MDS assessments timely. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said she performed audits randomly on the MDS assessments to check them for timeliness. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said it was important to complete the MDS assessments timely because it was the regulation, and the admission assessment triggered the care area assessment. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said the care area assessment was needed to develop the residents plans of care.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 11:37 AM, the MDS Coordinator said the admission MDS assessment should be completed within 14 days of admission. The MDS Coordinator said Resident #247's admission assessment was completed late. The MDS Coordinator said she was not able to complete Resident #247's MDS assessment on time because she was working the floor. The MDS Coordinator said it was important for the MDS assessments to be completed timely for the facility to have an accurate assessment and for them to be able to initiate the plan of care in a timely manner.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 12:41 PM, the DON said she signed the MDS assessments completed, but she was not aware of the required timeframes. The DON said the MDS Coordinator just told her when she was supposed to sign them, and she signed them. The DON said it was important for the MDS assessments to be completed timely because the MDS assessments told a story and helped develop the residents plan of care.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, last revised July 2017, indicated, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes . Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual .
Record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 updated October 2023 indicated, For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600).
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care, for 2 of 7 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care, for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #42) reviewed for professional standards with medication administration.
The facility did not ensure Resident #4 was given Calcium with Vitamin D3 600mg-12.5 mcg.
The facility did not ensure Resident #42 was given Gentamicin into one eye instead of both eyes.
These failures could place residents at an increased risk for inaccurate drug administration and not receiving the care and services to meet their individual needs.
Findings included:
1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis included bilateral (both sides) primary osteoarthritis (joint pain) of knee.
Record review of Resident #4's physician order report, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #4 was prescribed (2) calcium capsule with vitamin D3, 600mg-12.5 mcg by mouth one time a day with a start date 06/02/2023.
Record review of the medication administration history dated 08/01/2023-08/24/2023, revealed Resident #4 received (2) calcium capsule with vitamin D3, 600mg-12.5 mcg by mouth one time a day.
During an observation on 08/22/2023 at 9:25 a.m., MA L was preparing Resident #4's medication for administration. MA L obtained a bottle of calcium with vitamin D 600 mg-10 mcg and placed 2 oval white tablets in the cup. MA L finished preparing the remainder of Resident #4's morning medications. MA L obtained a plastic glass of water and went into Resident #4's room. MA L gave Resident #4 her medication cup, which included the calcium with vitamin D, and Resident #4 swallowed the medication.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 11:12 a.m., MA L stated the medication should be verified with the MAR prior to administering medication. MA L stated if the medication label did not match the physicians order she should have notified the nurse for clarification. MA L stated she was unaware the dosage was different for Resident #4's calcium with vitamin D. MA L stated it was important to clarify discrepancies in the medication orders prior to medication administration so medication errors or adverse reactions did not occur.
2. Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis included abscess (confined pocket of pus) of eyelid to right eye.
Record review of Resident #42's physician order report, dated 08/223/2023 did not address the gentamicin drops.
Record review of the medication administration history dated 08/01/2023-08/24/2023, revealed Resident #42 received 2 gtt of gentamicin (antibiotic) to right eye four times a day times 5 days with a start date 08/18/2023.
During an observation and interview on 08/22/23 at 12:32 p.m., MA L was standing at the medication cart, preparing to administer gentamicin 0.3% eye drops, to Resident #42. The medication label on the eye drops box read as follows: gentamicin 0.3% - 2 drops to both eyes twice daily. MA L obtained the eye drops, gloves, and tissues and went into Resident #42's room. MA L administered the gentamicin 0.3% eye drops to Resident #42's right eye. MA L stated the eye drops were started yesterday and she only administered them to Resident #42's right eye. MA L then read the label on the gentamicin 0.3% eye drop box and stated Oh, I didn't realize it was both eyes. MA L then prepared the gentamicin eye drops, went into Resident #42's room, and administered the eye drops to the left eye.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:54 p.m., MA L stated the medication label on a medication from the pharmacy should have matched the physicians order in the computer. MA L stated if the medication label did not match the physicians order she should have notified the nurse for clarification. MA L stated when the surveyor intervened, she reported the discrepancy to the nurse and DON. MA L stated she should have notified the nurse for clarification prior to administering the eye medication. MA L stated it was important to clarify discrepancies in the medication orders prior to medication administration so medication errors or adverse reactions did not occur.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:26 p.m., the DON stated she expected medications to be given per MD orders. The DON stated staff who pass medications should follow the rights medication administration, including correct dose. The DON stated staff had been in serviced on that. The DON stated it was important to compare the MAR to the medication label and the staff should have completed this during medication administration. The DON stated the staff should have held the medication and notified the physician if medication dosage did not match. The DON stated it was important to verify and administer the correct dose to prevent adverse reaction to resident.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications last revised on 04/2019, indicated, medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label Three (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in ac...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 16 (Resident #35) residents reviewed for quality of care.
The facility failed to provide wound care for Resident #35 per the physician's orders.
This failure could place residents of risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment.
Findings included:
Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #35 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels which results in reduce blood flow to the limbs), and acquired absence of left leg above knee.
Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #35 was able to make self-understood and was understood by others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #35 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #35 did not exhibit rejection of care. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #35 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #35 had 7 venous and arterial ulcers present. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #35 had open lesions on the foot.
Record review of the care plan last reviewed 08/21/2023, indicated Resident #35 had a right lateral knee arterial ulcer (wounds on your skin that develop because of problems with blood circulation), right 2nd toe arterial ulcer, right 3rd toe arterial ulcer, right 5th toe arterial ulcer, right calf venous ulcer, right lateral leg venous ulcer, right distal lateral leg arterial ulcer and right medial foot arterial ulcer. The approaches included dressing change per physician's order to right proximal leg, apply calcium alginate silver and wrap with unna boot (special gauze bandage used for the treatment of ulcers of the legs), dressing change per physician's order apply calcium alginate and silver to right calf and wrap with unna boot, dressing change per physician's order apply calcium alginate silver and wrap with unna boot, dressing change per physician's order apply calcium alginate silver to 5th toe and wrap with unna boot, dressing change per physician's order apply calcium alginate and silver to right medial foot and wrap with unna boot.
Record review of Resident #35's Physician Order Report dated 07/22/2023-08/22/2023 indicated an order with a start date of 07/21/2023 to cleanse wounds to left lower extremity with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate silver to open areas, wrap with unna boots and rolled gauze as needed, and an order with a start date of 08/04/2023 to cleanse wounds to left lower extremity with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate silver to open areas, wrap with unna boots, then rolled gauze, and compression bandage wrap once a day on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday on the 6:00 PM-6:00 AM shift.
Record review of the Medication Administration Record dated 08/01/2023-08/21/2023 indicated Resident #35's wound care was completed on 08/19/2023 as ordered by RN G.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/2023 at 10:07 AM, Resident #35 said his dressing to his right leg was not changed on Saturday (08/19/2023). Resident #35 said the last time his dressing was changed was Thursday (08/17/2023). Resident #35 said sometimes the wound care on his right leg was not done as scheduled. Resident #35's right lower leg and foot had gauze and a wrapped bandage that was falling off of his leg and the wound to his calf was exposed.
During an interview on 08/21/2023 at 5:21 PM, LVN H said she had not noticed Resident #35's dressing was coming off when she checked on him earlier. LVN H said the night nurse on Saturday should have done his wound care, but she would change it. LVN H said it was important to perform wound care as ordered to prevent the wound from worsening or getting an infection.
During an interview on 08/21/2023 at 5:43 PM, RN G said she probably had signed off on the Medication Administration Record that she completed the wound care for Resident #35. RN G said she had not performed the wound care on Resident #35's right lower leg on Saturday (08/19/2023). RN G said she was unable to respond to why she had not done the wound care. RN G said she had not realized Resident #35's order for wound care was incorrect. RN G said Resident #35's ulcers were on his right lower leg. RN G said it was important to provide wound care as ordered by the physician to prevent infections to the wound.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 12:50 PM, the DON said the nurses were responsible for performing wound care. The DON said she was not aware Resident #35's wound care was not done on Saturday. The DON said the ADON was responsible for putting in the wound care orders. The DON said she was not aware Resident #35's wound care order indicated to provide wound care to his left lower extremity. The DON said Resident #35's wounds were on his right lower extremity. The DON said she could not answer what the process for reviewing the residents' orders was. The DON said the ADON monitored wound care. The DON said it was important for the wound care orders to be entered correctly because it could cause medication errors, and the wound care could be performed on the wrong leg. The DON said if wound care was not provided as ordered by the physician the wound could worsen and the resident could get an infection and become septic (infection of the blood stream resulting in a cluster of symptoms such as drop in a blood pressure, increase in heart rate and fever).
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:48 PM, the ADON said she was responsible for wound care. The ADON said she expected the nurses to provide wound care as ordered. The ADON said Resident #35's ulcers were on his right lower extremity. The ADON said she had not noticed Resident #35's orders indicated to perform wound care on his left lower extremity. The ADON said she did not know why the order was incorrect. The ADON said it was important for the nurses to perform wound care and for the orders to be correct for the wounds to heal.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, last revised June 2022, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided with profession...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided with professional standards of practice for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #34) reviewed for respiratory care and services.
The facility failed to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician for Resident #34.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's non-invasive ventilator (bi-pap) mask was properly covered.
This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications.
The findings included:
1. Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and obstructive sleep apnea (characterized by episodes of a complete (apnea) or partial collapse (hypopnea) of the upper airway with an associated decrease in oxygen saturation or arousal from sleep. This disturbance results in fragmented, nonrestorative sleep.)
The most recent Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating his cognition was intact. The MDS indicated Resident #9 had shortness of breath with exertion, when sitting at rest and when lying flat. The MDS indicated Resident #39 received oxygen therapy while a resident and a non-invasive ventilator while a resident.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 4/08/2023 indicated Resident #9 was at risk for shortness of breath, respiratory distress. The goal of the care plan was Resident #9 would have decreased episodes of shortness of breath. The interventions of the care plan indicated Resident #9 would apply oxygen as ordered, and provide respiratory treatments as ordered.
Record review of the consolidated physician orders dated 7/25/2023 - 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #9 had received oxygen therapy via a nasal canula at 2 liters per nasal canula continuously. The physician orders indicated Resident #9 would have a non-invasive ventilator (bi-pap) with the setting of 8.0 at night with a full face mask.
During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 11:04 a.m., Resident #9's bi-pap mask was lying in the top drawer of his bedside table without being covered.
During an interview on 8/25/2023 at 9:32 a.m., LVN C said the oxygen masks should be bagged. LVN C said the nurse was responsible for ensuring masks were bagged for infection control purposes.
During an interview on 8/25/2023 at 1:00 p.m., the DON said masks should be cleansed dried and put in bag. The DON said nursing was responsible for ensuring the masks were bagged properly to prevent infections.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
2. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #34 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with unspecified severity (long-time open sore on the skin), and asthma (chronic disease that affects millions of people worldwide, making it hard to breathe and causing coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness).
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #34 was understood and understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed toward others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 did not exhibit rejection of care in the 7-day lookback period. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, supervision for eating, and total dependence for bathing. The MDS assessment did not indicate the use of oxygen in the last 14 days for Resident #34.
Record review of the care plan last edited 08/10/2023 indicated Resident #34 had a diagnosis of asthma and was at risk for shortness of breath and respiratory failure. Resident #34's care plan included to administer oxygen for unrelieved shortness of breath and to administer oxygen and oxygen saturations as ordered.
Record review of the Physician Order Report dated 07/22/2023-08/22/2023 indicated Resident #34 had an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously every shift with a start date of 12/19/2022.
Record review of the Medication Administration Record dated 08/01/2023-08/22/2023, indicated Resident #34 received oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute as ordered for Shift 1 on 08/21/2023 and 08/22/2023 signed by LVN H. The Medication Administration Record indicated Resident #34's oxygen tubing was to be changed once a week on Sundays. The Medication Administration Record indicated the oxygen tubing was changed on 08/20/2023 by RN G.
During an observation on 08/21/2023 at 10:52 AM, Resident #34 was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 liters per minute. Resident #34's oxygen tubing was undated.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/2023 at 4:50 PM, Resident #34's oxygen via nasal cannula was set at 5 liters per minute. Resident #34 said he believed his oxygen should be set at 2 liters per minute, but he was not sure because the nurses were the ones who set it. Resident #34 said he was unable to reach the oxygen concentrator. Resident #34's oxygen tubing was undated. Resident #34 said the tubing had not been changed on Sunday night (08/20/2023).
During an observation and interview on 08/22/2023 at 3:47 PM with LVN H, Resident #34's oxygen was set at 5 liters per minute via nasal cannula and the tubing was undated. LVN H said she was supposed to be making sure Resident #34's oxygen via nasal cannula was set at 2 liters per minute. LVN H said she could not remember if she had checked what it was set at yesterday. LVN H said she had signed off yesterday and today for the Shift 1 that Resident #34's oxygen was set at 2 liters per minute. LVN H said she had not checked to make sure Resident #34's oxygen was set correctly prior to signing it off on the Medication Administration Record. LVN H said she had not checked it because she did not think to check the setting of the oxygen since Resident #34 was unable to change the settings. LVN H said she was supposed to verify the orders for oxygen and check the residents prior to signing off on the Medication Administration Record. LVN H said it was important to ensure residents received oxygen per the physician's order to ensure they were not getting too little or too much oxygen. LVN H said she could not think of how receiving too much oxygen could harm a resident. LVN H said the oxygen tubing should be changed weekly on Sundays on the night shift. LVN H said the oxygen tubing should be dated to make sure it was getting changed. LVN H said it was important for the oxygen tubing to be dated and changed for cleanliness and to prevent kinks in the tubing.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 1:00 PM, the DON said the oxygen tubing should be dated. The DON said the night shift nurses should change the tubing and date it every 7 days. The DON said the department heads on angel rounds were supposed to be making sure the oxygen tubing was dated. The DON said it was important for the oxygen tubing to be changed every 7 days and dated for infection control because they did not want for the residents to get an infection. The DON said the nurses were supposed to be checking Resident #34's oxygen to ensure it was set per the physician's order. The DON said it was important to make sure the residents' oxygen was set correctly because if it was set too high it could make the go into respiratory failure.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)- Prevention of Infection, revised November 2011, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff . change the oxygen cannulae and tubing every (7) days or as needed . Infection Control Considerations Related to Medication Nebulizers/Continuous Aerosol . Store the circuit in plastic bag, marked with date and residents name, between uses .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.9 %, b...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.9 %, based on 2 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Resident #4 and #42) reviewed for medication administration.
1. The facility did not ensure Resident #4 was given calcium with vitamin D3 600mg-12.5 mcg.
2. The facility failed to administer Resident #42's gentamicin eye drops (antibiotic eye drops) as ordered by the physician.
These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders.
Findings included:
1. During an observation on 08/22/2023 at 9:25 a.m., MA L was preparing Resident #4's medication for administration. MA L obtained a bottle of calcium with vitamin D 600 mg-10 mcg and placed 2 oval white tablets in the cup. MA L finished preparing the remainder of Resident #4's morning medications. MA L obtained a plastic glass of water and went into Resident #4's room. MA L gave Resident #4 her medication cup, which included the calcium with vitamin D, and Resident #4 swallowed the medication.
Record review of Resident #4's physician order report, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #4 was prescribed (2) calcium capsule with vitamin D3, 600mg-12.5 mcg by mouth one time a day with a start date 06/02/2023.
Record review of the medication administration history dated 08/01/2023-08/24/2023, revealed Resident #4 received (2) calcium capsule with vitamin D3, 600mg-12.5 mcg by mouth one time a day.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 11:12 a.m., MA L stated the medication should be verified with the MAR prior to administering medication. MA L stated if the medication label did not match the physicians order she should have notified the nurse for clarification. MA L stated she was unaware the dosage was different for Resident #4's calcium with vitamin D. MA L stated it was important to clarify discrepancies in the medication orders prior to medication administration so medication errors or adverse reactions did not occur.
2. During an observation and interview on 08/22/23 at 12:32 p.m., MA L was standing at the medication cart, preparing to administer gentamicin 0.3% eye drops, to Resident #42. The medication label on the eye drops box read as follows: gentamicin 0.3% - 2 drops to both eyes twice daily. MA L obtained the eye drops, gloves, and tissues and went into Resident #42's room. MA L administered the gentamicin 0.3% eye drops to Resident #42's right eye. MA L stated the eye drops were started yesterday and she only administered them to Resident #42's right eye. MA L then read the label on the gentamicin 0.3% eye drop box and stated Oh, I didn't realize it was both eyes. MA L then prepared the gentamicin eye drops, went into Resident #42's room, and administered the eye drops to the left eye.
Record review of Resident #42's physician order report, dated 07/25/2023-08/25/2023, indicated an order for gentamicin drops 0.3 %; 2 drops in the right eye four times a day; 08:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 04:00 PM, 08:00 PM with a start date of 08/18/2023 and end date 08/23/2023.
Record review of the medication administration history dated 08/01/2023-08/24/2023, revealed Resident #42 received 2 drops of gentamicin (antibiotic) to right eye four times a day times 5 days with a start date 08/18/2023.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 4:54 p.m., MA L stated the medication label on a medication from the pharmacy should have matched the physicians order in the computer. MA L stated if the medication label did not match the physicians order she should have notified the nurse for clarification. MA L stated when the surveyor intervened, she reported the discrepancy to the nurse and DON. MA L stated she should have notified the nurse for clarification prior to administering the eye medication. MA L stated it was important to clarify discrepancies in the medication orders prior to medication administration so medication errors or adverse reactions did not occur.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:26 p.m., the DON stated she expected medications to be given per MD orders. The DON stated staff who pass medications should follow the rights medication administration, including correct dose. The DON stated staff had been in serviced on that. The DON stated it was important to compare the MAR to the medication label and the staff should have completed this during medication administration. The DON stated the staff should have held the medication and notified the physician if medication dosage did not match. The DON stated it was important to verify and administer the correct dose to prevent adverse reaction to resident.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications last revised on 04/2019, indicated, medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label Three (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 4 medication carts (medication and nurse carts) reviewed for storage of medications.
The facility failed to ensure [NAME] Hall nurse's cart and Southeast medication cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel.
This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion.
Findings included:
1. During an observation on 08/22/2023 at 11:51 a.m., LVN C was preparing to give Resident #9 insulin (a product used to lower blood sugar). LVN C drew the insulin in the syringe, gathered an alcohol pad and closed the cart. LVN C then entered the room of Resident #9 and left [NAME] Hall nurse's cart unlocked, and out of sight, while administering Resident #9's insulin into his right arm.
During an interview on 08/22/2023 at 12:22 p.m., LVN C stated the medication cart should be locked anytime she walked away from it, or out of her sight. LVN C stated she forgot to lock the cart because the surveyor was present. LVN C stated it was important to keep the medication locked at all times for safety.
2. During an observation on 08/22/2023 at 12:32 p.m., MA L was preparing to administer Resident #42 eye drops. MA L gathered Resident #42's eye drops and left the Southwest medication cart unlocked, and out of sight, while administering Resident #42's eye drops.
During an interview on 08/23/2023 at 4:54 p.m., MA L stated she had been working the medication cart all morning and she had not left her cart unlocked until it was observed by the surveyor. MA L stated she should have verified her cart was locked prior to entering Resident #42's room. MA L stated it was left unlocked because she was nervous. MA L stated it was important to ensure the medication cart was locked to prevent residents from taking medication and harming themselves.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:15 p.m., the DON stated she expected staff to ensure medication carts were locked. The DON stated it was monitored by random daily observations and education. The DON stated it was important because a residents could get in it, and it was dangerous. The DON stated it was dangerous because of overdose or adverse reaction.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications last revised on 11/2020, indicated, the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 6. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended
Record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications last revised on 04/2019, indicated, During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for hospice services.
The facility did not ensure Resident #7's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility.
This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs.
The findings included:
Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/25/23, revealed Resident #7 was an [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, without behaviors (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 08/11/23, revealed Resident #7 had no speech and was rarely or never understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #7 was rarely or never able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #7 was unable to complete the BIMS assessment. The MDS revealed Resident #7 had a life expectancy of less than 6 months and received hospice services.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited on 08/17/23, revealed Resident #7 required hospice as evidenced by a terminal illness of dementia. The goal was dignity will be maintained, and the resident will be kept comfortable and pain free with in one hour of interventions over next 90 days. The interventions included repot decline in condition to hospice agency.
Record review of the physician order report dated 07/25/23 - 08/25/23, revealed Resident #7 had an order, which started on 02/10/22, to admit to hospice.
Record review of Resident #7's hospice binder, accessed on 08/23/23 at 4:56 PM, revealed no updated hospice documentation since March of 2023.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 9:16 AM, the Assistant Clinical Director for the hospice company stated the last nurse visit for Resident #7 was on 08/22/23. The Assistant Clinical Director stated the nurses were required to see Resident #7 two times per week. The Assistant Clinical Director stated typically the nurses would have seen the resident, then would have printed the notes, and brought them during the next scheduled visit. The Assistant Clinical Director stated that each facility was different, but she believed the facility kept a hospice binder and either the hospice updated it, or the nurses gave it to the medical records. The Assistant Clinical Director stated the plan of care and hospice certification should have been updated when the IDT meetings were conducted, every 2 weeks. The Assistant Clinical Director stated the process for collaborating with the facility was completed verbally with the nurses, ADON, and DON.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 9:28 AM, the DON stated the hospice nurse did not normally bring the visit notes to leave with the facility. The DON stated the hospice nurse met with the DON and Administrator prior to leaving the facility but did not leave any notes that she was aware. The DON stated she was going to call the hospice nurse to verify.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 9:37 AM, the DON stated there were no notes in the facility after March 2023 from the hospice company.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 10:05 AM, LVN C stated the hospice nurse did not leave visit notes. LVN C stated the hospice nurse communicated verbally. LVN C stated the hospice binder at the nurses' station had information to use as a resource for Resident #7. LVN C stated it was important to ensure the hospice binder had updated information to ensure the hospice and facility were on the same page. LVN C stated it was important for the care of the residents that the hospice was not left out.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 12:29 PM, the DON stated the hospice company brought Resident #7's updated paperwork. The DON stated there was no process in place for monitoring the hospice binders and documentation to ensure the most up to date information was in the facility. The DON stated the hospice nurse had been communicating with the facility staff verbally. The DON stated it was important to ensure recent hospice documentation was in the facility for continuity of care.
During an attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 PM to gather more information, the Administrator did not answer. No phone call was returned upon exit of the facility.
Record review of the Nursing Facility Services Agreement, dated 10/28/21, revealed e) provision of information . At a minimum, Hospice shall provide the following information to Facility for each Hospice Patient residing at the Facility: i) plan of care, medication, and orders. The most recent plan of care, medication information and physician orders specific to each hospice patient residing at the facility, iii) certifications. Physician certifications and recertification of terminal illness.
Record review of the Hospice Program policy, revised July 2017, revealed d. Obtaining the following information from the hospice: 1. The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each resident .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in adv...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for right to be informed. (Resident #12, #13, and #39)
1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had a signed psychotropic consent form for ziprasidone (an antipsychotic medication).
2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 had signed a psychotropic consent form for Seroquel 100mg (antipsychotic).
3. The facility failed to obtain Resident #39's written consent prior to administration of an anti-psychotic medication.
These failures could place residents at risk for treatment or services provided without informed consent.
The findings included:
1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/25/23, revealed Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behaviors (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), bipolar disorder (serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 06/23/23, revealed Resident #12 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #12 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #12 had a BIMS of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #12 had trouble concentration on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching television 12 - 14 days during the 14-day look-back period. The MDS revealed Resident #12 had no behaviors or refusal of care. The MDS revealed Resident #12 received an antipsychotic medication 6 out of 7 days during the look-back period.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited on 08/18/23, revealed Resident #12 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and took medications.
Record review of the physician order report dated 07/25/23 - 08/25/23, revealed Resident #12 had an order, which started on 05/12/23, for ziprasidone 80 mg (antipsychotic) for bipolar disorder.
Record review of the Consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic Medication Treatment form, signed by the physician on 04/28/23, revealed no resident or resident representative signature.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 10:28 AM, Resident #12 was sitting up on the side of her bed with clean clothing and her hair combed neatly. Resident #12 stated she was aware she was taking an antipsychotic medication but was unable to remember if she signed a consent form. Resident #12 stated she had no adverse effects from her medication.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 10:07 AM, LVN C stated she was unsure who was responsible for completing the psychotropic medication consents. LVN C stated if a new order was received for a psychotropic medication, she relied on upper management to obtain the consent. LVN C stated it was important to obtain consent prior to administering a psychotropic medication so the residents were aware of the risks and what they were taking. LVN C also stated it was important so the residents could decide to take the medication if they wanted to.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 12:21 PM, the DON stated she was responsible for filling out the psychotropic consent forms and getting them signed by the physician and the resident or responsible party. The DON stated the staff would have made her aware of the new orders, she would have filled out the consent form and sent it to the physician for a signature, then had the resident or responsible party sign. The DON stated the medications were being administered without the consent form being signed per the facilities current process. The DON stated she was thankful it was brought to her attention, and she was now reviewing the current process for obtaining consents. The DON stated it was important to obtain psychotropic consents prior to medication administration so the residents were not given a medication they did not consent to.
2. Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and bipolar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/28/23, revealed Resident #13 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #13 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #23 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderately impaired. The MDS revealed Resident #13 had delusions and received antipsychotic medication for the last 7 days and on a routine basis.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, dated 09/20/22, revealed Resident #13 exhibited mood state and to take meds as ordered.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, dated 09/20/22, revealed Resident #13 exhibited behavioral symptoms and to always ask for help if resident becomes abusive or resistive.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, dated 09/20/22, revealed Resident #13 exhibited psychotropic drug use and to do gradual dose reduction and monitor for side effects.
Record review of the order summary report, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #13 had an order, which started on 09/08/22, for Seroquel 100mg twice a day (antipsychotic).
Record review of the uploaded consent files, dated 06/18/23, revealed Resident #13 had no psychotropic consent form for the antipsychotic medication Seroquel.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 10:01 AM, Resident #13 was sitting in his wheelchair watching television, no behavior issues observed. Resident #13 stated he did not know if he signed a consent form to take the medication.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated she was responsible for making sure the psychotropic consent forms were signed prior to taking the medication. The process was to have the order first, then get the form signed and to begin giving the medication. The importance was to make sure the medication was reviewed for gradual dose reduction and the consent was a requirement. The DON stated if there was no consent, then Resident #13 could have received a medication that he had not agreed to.
3. Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old-male who originally admitted on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (injury to the brain resulting from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), Bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes extreme mood swings from high to low), and other schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder that affects how people perceive and interact with reality, often causing hallucinations, delusions, and social withdrawal).
Record review of the consolidated physician's orders dated 7/25/2023 - 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #39 had an order for quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) 200 mg at bedtime. The physician's order indicated Resident #39's physician prescribed this medication on 2/15/2023.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 2/15/2023 and edited on 8/18/2023 indicated Resident #39 used psychotropic drugs and would benefit from the use without side effects. The care plan failed to address Resident #39 consented to the use of Seroquel.
Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 was understood by other and understood others. The MDS indicated in the Temporal Orientation section of the MDS indicated Resident #39 answered the month accurate within 5 days. The MDS indicated Resident #39 had no behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS in Section I indicated Resident #39's active diagnosis included traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS indicated in Section N Resident #39 received antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. The MDS in Section O indicated Resident #39 did not receive any psychological therapy.
Record review of Resident #39's electronic medical record on 8/24/2023 indicated there was not a consent for the use of quetiapine (antipsychotic medication).
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 4:05 p.m., the DON said there was not a consent for the use of Resident #39's quetiapine (antipsychotic medication). When the DON was asked had the nursing staff administered the quetiapine without the consent of Resident #39, she replied looks like we have.
During an interview on 825/2023 at 10:07 a.m., LVN C said she was unaware of who was responsible for getting the consents for psychotropic drug use. LVN C said she relied on the nurse management team to obtain the consent. LVN C said it was important for residents to know what medications they are receiving, and the risks of the medication.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of a Medication Monitoring policy dated 1/2022 indicated .Procedures 10. A resident and/or representative has the right to be informed about the resident's condition; treatment options, relative risks, and benefits of treatment, required monitoring, expected outcomes of the treatment; and has the right to refuse care and treatment.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0576
(Tag F0576)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility for...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility for the resident through the means other than a postal service for 8 of 9 confidential residents reviewed for weekend mail delivery.
The facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on the weekend.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving mail in a timely manner that could result in a decline in resident's psychosocial well-being and quality of life.
Findings included:
During a confidential group interview 8 of the 9 residents stated mail was not being distributed on Saturdays. They stated mail did not get delivered until Monday morning by the BOM.
During a telephone interview on 8/24/2023 at 8:25 a.m., the Postmaster stated mail was delivered on Saturdays.
During an interview on 08/244/2023 at 8:55 a.m., the BOM stated the residential locked mailbox was located outside the facility. The BOM stated to her knowledge she was the only one that had a key to the mailbox. The BOM stated the mail was not available to the residents on Saturdays. The BOM stated on Monday she would obtain the mail from the mailbox and distributed to the residents. The BOM stated she was unaware of the requirements for the residents to have access to their mail on Saturdays. The BOM stated residents had a right to receive their mail in a timely manner. The BOM said this failure could affect their rights.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights last revised on 02/2021, indicated, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: cc. access to a telephone, mail, and email
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike envir...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 3 of 16 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]A) reviewed for physical environment.
The facility did not ensure the bathroom light worked in room [ROOM NUMBER].
The facility did not ensure the bathroom light worked in room [ROOM NUMBER].
The facility failed to ensure scratches on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]A were repaired.
The facility failed to ensure the light cover in room [ROOM NUMBER]A was not broken.
The facility failed to ensure the 4 chairs in the sitting area were in good repair.
The facility failed to ensure the florescent dining room lights were free from dead insects.
The facility failed to ensure the patio was clean and free from a weather boxed gazebo.
The facility failed to ensure the linen storage room was free from garbage on the floor.
The facility failed to ensure resident wheelchairs were clean and free of debris.
The facility failed to ensure large furniture was discarded properly.
The facility failed to ensure the sidewalk was free from an air conditioning unit.
These failures could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and infection due to unsanitary conditions.
Findings included:
1. During an observation on 08/21/23 at10:01 AM, the bathroom light would not turn on in room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an observation on 08/23/23 at 3:09 PM, the bathroom light would not turn on in room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an observation on 08/21/23 at10:29 AM, the bathroom light would not come on in room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:24 PM, CNA B stated she was aware that the bathroom light did not work in room [ROOM NUMBER], and she had reported it to the Maintenance Supervisor on 08/18/23. CNA B stated she was not aware of the light not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:05 PM, CNA K stated she was aware of the light not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom and had reported it to the Maintenance Supervisor verbally. CNA K was not able to recall the date she reported the light to the Maintenance Supervisor. CNA K stated she was not aware of the light not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 3:12 PM, RN D stated she was not aware of the bathroom light not working in room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN D stated the process was to log the issue in the maintenance book and to verbally notify the Maintenance Supervisor as well. RN D stated the importance of having adequate lighting was for safety and could result in a fall hazard.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 5:00 PM, LVN C stated she did not know about the bathroom lights not working in room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. LVN C stated, Adequate light could help with seeing things like water in the floor and it was a safety issue. LVN C stated if the bathroom light was not working it could result in residents getting hurt.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:36 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated he was not aware of the bathroom lights not working. The Maintenance Supervisor stated you could no longer get light bulbs for the residents' bathrooms, and he would have to rewire the fixtures.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated she was not aware of the bathroom lights not working and she expected them to work properly. The DON stated the importance of proper lighting was to make sure residents could see in the bathroom and not fall or get hurt. The DON stated the process was to notify the Maintenance Supervisor immediately and it should have been fixed immediately due to safety.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated she did not know the bathroom lights were not working in room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] and the importance was for the residents to be independent.
2. During an observation on 08/21/2023 at 11:28 AM, the light cover above the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]A had a hole in it exposing the bulb where the hole was, and there were multiple downward scrapes across the wall next to the bed.
During an observation on 08/22/2023 at 10:00 AM, the light cover above the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]A had a hole in it exposing the bulb where the hole was, and there were multiple downward scrapes across the wall next to the bed.
During an observation on 08/23/2023 at 12:07 PM, the light cover above the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]A had a hole in it exposing the bulb where the hole was, and there were multiple downward scrapes across the wall next to the bed.
During an observation on 08/24/2023 at 10:33 AM, the light cover above the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]A had a hole in it exposing the bulb where the hole was, and there were multiple downward scrapes across the wall next to the bed.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 3:50 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor said he was aware of the broken light cover and scratches on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]A. The Maintenance Supervisor said the staff had notified him verbally a couple weeks ago that the light cover and the scratches on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]A needed to be repaired. The Maintenance Supervisor said he had not gotten around to fixing the light cover and the scratches on the wall. The Maintenance Supervisor said he was responsible for repairing the residents' rooms. The Maintenance Supervisor said if a room needed repairs the staff could log it in the maintenance book or tell him verbally. The Maintenance Supervisor said it was important to repair damages to the rooms so the residents would not be harmed.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 1:22 PM, the DON said she was not aware the light cover was broken and there were scratches on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]A. The DON said the Maintenance Supervisor was responsible for repairing the residents' rooms. The DON said it was important for damages to residents' rooms to be fixed so the residents were safe, and they could feel good about themselves and their home.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's Maintenance log dated between 5/2/23-8/03/23, did not reveal a maintenance request form for room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], or room [ROOM NUMBER]A.
3. During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 9:55 a.m., there were 4 chairs with orange colored vinyl material to the cushions. The vinyl covering was worn and peeling away leaving a black material exposed. The surface of these chairs would not allow for thorough cleaning.
During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 1:00 p.m., the dining room florescent light covers had numerous dead white colored insects inside of them. The florescent lights were over the resident dining tables.
During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 1:05 p.m., the resident courtyard/patio had a very large cardboard box. The cardboard box appeared discolored and weathered.
During an observation on 8/24/2023 at 8:42 a.m., the linen storage room had 2 crumbled Kleenex tissues lying on the floor, 1 plastic bag, and 2 pairs of used gloves (wadded together inside out) lying on the floor.
During an observation and interview on 8/24/2023 at 8:45 a.m., the ADON visualized Resident #9's wheelchair. The ADON said the undercarriage was dirty with a white buildup underneath. The ADON said wheelchairs were supposed to be washed on the night shift. The ADON said she had not seen the wheelchair washing schedule and was unsure if the schedule was completed by rooms or by halls. The ADON said the managers monitor for dirty resident equipment during morning rounds.
During an observation on 8/24/2023 at 10:40 a.m., there was a window air conditioner sitting half on the sidewalk and half on the ground going to the laundry.
During an observation on 8/24/2023 at 10:41 a.m., a couch was sitting on its side on the grass next to the garbage dumpsters.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 3:35 p.m., the maintenance supervisor said he pulled the air conditioner out of room [ROOM NUMBER] on last Friday and replaced it. The maintenance supervisor said he needed to wash the air conditioner out to ensure it worked well. The maintenance supervisor said he was responsible for cleaning the lights in the dining room. He said he had just not checked them. The maintenance supervisor said insects could fall in the resident's food. The maintenance supervisor said the large box on the patio was a gazebo. The maintenance supervisor said the company was supposed to send help to put the gazebo together, but no one has come to complete the project. The maintenance supervisor said the sofa was thrown in the dumpster. The maintenance supervisor said he was unsure why the sofa was lying on the ground and not in the dumpster.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the Homelike Environment policy, last revised in February 2021, indicated, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible .The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment; b. comfortable (minimum glare) yet adequate (suitable to the task) lighting c. clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 3 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 3 of 16 residents (Resident #12, Resident #34, and Resident #247) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy.
The facility did not ensure Resident #12's MDS assessment was accurately coded to reflect her level II PASRR status for mental illness.
The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #34's use of oxygen.
The facility failed to accurately document Resident #247's tobacco use.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.
Findings included:
1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/25/23, revealed Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder (serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 12/23/22, indicated Resident #12 was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited on 08/11/23, revealed Resident #12 was identified as having mental illness PASRR positive status related to bipolar disorder and was receiving services.
Record review of level II PASSR evaluation, dated 02/18/22, revealed Resident #12 met the PASRR definition of mental illness.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 11:03 AM, the Regional Reimbursement Manager stated the MDS should have accurately reflected the level II PASRR status. The Regional Reimbursement Manager stated she performed random audits to ensure MDS assessments were completed accurately. The Regional Reimbursement Manager stated she was unsure why Resident #12's comprehensive MDS assessment was not accurately coded to reflect the level II PASRR status. The Regional Reimbursement Manager stated it was important to ensure the MDS was accurately coded to paint of a clear picture of the resident's status and help develop the plan of care.
Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, last revised October 2019, revealed Code 1, yes: if PASRR Level II screening determined that the resident has a serious mental illness .
2. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #34 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with unspecified severity (long-time open sore on the skin), and asthma (chronic disease that affects millions of people worldwide, making it hard to breathe and causing coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness).
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #34 was understood and understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment did not indicate the use of oxygen therapy in the last 14 days for Resident #34.
Record review of the care plan last edited 08/10/2023 indicated Resident #34 had a diagnosis of asthma and was at risk for shortness of breath and respiratory failure. Resident #34 had approaches that indicated to administer oxygen for unrelieved shortness of breath.
Record review of the Physician Order Report dated 07/22/2023-08/22/2023 indicated Resident #34 had an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously every shift with a start date of 12/19/2022.
Record review of the Medication Administration Record dated 06/01/2023-06/30/2023, indicated Resident #34 received oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute as ordered for the entire month of June.
During an observation on 08/21/2023 at 10:52 AM, Resident #34 was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 liters per minute. Resident #34 said he wore it all the time because it helped him breathe better.
3. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 indicated Resident #247 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (problems with your metabolism cause brain dysfunction), malignant neoplasm of skin (skin cancer), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (moderate damage to the kidneys and loss of kidney function).
Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #247 was able to make himself understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #247 had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment did not indicate Resident #247 used tobacco.
Record review of the care plan last reviewed on 08/08/2023 did not indicate Resident #247 used tobacco or smoked cigarettes.
Record review of the Smoking Risk (Acuity) completed on 08/01/2023 indicated Resident #247 used cigarettes and was a safe smoker. The Smoking Risk (Acuity) indicated to initiate the plan of care.
During an interview on 08/21/2023 at 11:41 AM, Resident #247 said he smoked.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 10:55 AM, the Regional Reimbursement Manager said Resident #34's use of oxygen should have been coded on his MDS assessment. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said Resident #247's tobacco use should have been on the MDS assessment because he smoked. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said she performed random audits of the MDS assessments, and she tried to hit the high points like the ADLs, medications, therapy, physician's orders, and behaviors when she reviewed the MDS assessments. The Regional Reimbursement Manager said it was important for the MDS to be coded correctly to pain a clear picture of the resident and what was going on with the resident to care plan appropriately.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 11:24 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was aware Resident #247 smoked, and Resident #34 used oxygen. The MDS Coordinator said she guess she missed it. The MDS Coordinator said it was important to accurately code on the MDS assessment because it directed the plan of care and payment for the facility.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 12:31 PM, the DON said she tried to review the MDS assessments for accuracy when she signed them, but the MDS Coordinator was responsible for completing the MDS assessments and she signed them. The DON said Resident #247's use of tobacco should have been on his MDS assessment, and Resident #34's use of oxygen should have been on the MDS assessment. The DON said it was important for the MDS to be completed accurately because it assisted with developing the plan of care.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised November 2019, indicated, Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan tha...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's needs for 3 of 16 residents (Resident #'s 29, 44, and 247) reviewed for care plans.
1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #247 care plan indicated he smoked.
2. The facility failed to refer Resident #247 to the ENT.
3. The facility did not ensure Resident #44's weight bearing status was care planned.
4.The facility did not ensure Resident #44's desired weight loss was care planned.
5.The facility did not implement a comprehensive care plan to address Resident #29's combative and aggressive behavior.
These failures could place residents at risk for unmet care needs and decreased quality of care.
Findings included:
1). Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 indicated Resident #247 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (problems with your metabolism cause brain dysfunction), malignant neoplasm of skin (skin cancer), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (moderate damage to the kidneys and loss of kidney function).
Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #247 was able to make himself understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #247 had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment did not indicate Resident #247 used tobacco.
Record review of the care plan last reviewed on 08/08/2023 did not indicate Resident #247 used tobacco or smoked cigarettes.
Record review of the Smoking Risk (Acuity) completed on 08/01/2023 indicated Resident #247 used cigarettes and was a safe smoker. The Smoking Risk (Acuity) indicated to initiate the plan of care.
Record review of Resident #247's discharge summary indicated, he was being discharged to the nursing home and he was to keep an appointment with the ENT in 5 days.
During an interview on 08/21/2023 at 11:41 AM, Resident #247 said he was waiting to be taken to the doctor to be evaluated for the cancer to his ear and his nose. Resident #247 said he smoked.
During an interview on 08/22/2023 at 11:41 AM, the DON said she was not aware Resident #247's hospital discharge summary indicated he needed an appointment with the ENT in 5 days. The DON said the Medical Director did all the referrals. The DON said it was important for the residents to be referred as necessary for them to get appropriate treatment.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 11:19 AM, the Medical Director said he decided to postpone the referral to ENT N because he had to gather all of Resident #247's clinical record to send to ENT N. The Medical Director said his office had sent ENT N Resident #247's records and a referral for an appointment. The Medical Director said Resident #247 did not have an appointment with ENT N.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 11:45 AM, ENT N's front desk receptionist said Resident #247 did not have an appointment. The front desk receptionist said she was able to see the ENT N saw Resident #247 while he was hospitalized , but there was no referral from the Medical Director. The Front Desk Receptionist said they had received an oncology report from the Medical Director on 08/04/2023, but not a referral for an appointment with ENT N.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 11:20 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she had not yet completed the care plans, but she was not allowed to implement the care plan because she was an LVN. The MDS Coordinator said Resident #247's care plan should have included that he smoked. The MDS Coordinator said it was important for his care plan to include that he smoked to make sure he was safe to smoke, and everyone knew that he smoked.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 12:45 PM, the DON said she completed a lot of the care plans. The DON said the MDS coordinator started the care plan, and she developed it. The DON said Resident #247's care plan should have included that he smoked. The DON said she did not know why it was not in his care plan. The DON said it was important to include in the care plan that Resident #247 so that staff knew if he was eligible to smoke or if he failed the smoking assessment or if he needed a smoking apron.
2) Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), dementia (impaired memory) and Parkinson's disease (disorder that impacts the nervous system and movement).
Record review of Resident #29's physician orders indicated lorazepam 1mg three times a day.
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed Resident #29 was usually understood and usually understood others. Resident #29 had a BIMS score of 4 indicating severely impaired.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited 08/09/23, revealed Resident #29 had behavioral symptoms combative and elopement. The approach indicated to always ask for help if resident becomes abusive or resistive. Resident #29 was care planned for behavioral symptoms and the approach was to use diverse activities for calming and soothing resident with simple conversation. Resident #29 was care planned for dementia with agitation. The approach included medication as ordered.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 04/16/23 indicated Resident #29 was caught by another staff member allegedly hitting another resident.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 8/10/23 indicated Resident #29 hit another resident in the chin trying to take his cigarettes from him.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 8/14/23 indicated Resident #29 went into another resident's room without permission and attempted to take his cell phone, stole a Pepsi. and Smacked the glasses off of a residents face.
During an observation and interview on 08/22/23 at 11:08 AM, Resident #29 was in bed watching TV. Resident #29's room window faced the patio area that was closed in with fencing. Resident was not interviewable.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 10:52 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated she had entered the room on 8/14/23 after Resident #29 had smacked the glasses off a resident's face and stole a Pepsi. The MDS Coordinator stated there was ice scattered all over the floor and a pair of glasses on the floor. The MDS Coordinator stated staff tried to supervise Resident #29 when they could, but no other interventions were put in place.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 4:45 PM, the Corporate MDS Coordinator stated any resident-to-resident altercations should have been added to the current care plan and the DON was responsible for making sure the care plans were correct.
The Corporate MDS Coordinator stated Resident #29's care plan was revised on 08/9/23 but it was not person centered to add resident-to-resident altercations. The Corporate MDS Coordinator stated the importance of updating care plans was to help staff understand the interventions that needed to be put in place.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated she was not aware of Resident #29's combative or aggressive behavior towards other residents. The DON stated the combative behavior should have been care planned and she was responsible. The DON stated the importance of updating care plans was to give direction to the nurses and CNA's because they follow care plans to provide resident care. The DON stated, If care plans were not updated, it could have led to more resident incidents.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated she expected care plans to have been updated after incidents. The Administrator stated the importance of updating care plans was so staff had interventions in place for resident care and to prevent other incidents from happening.
3). Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of fractured (broken) left ankle and left fibula (outer and usually smaller of the two bones between the knee and the ankle), lymphedema (a build-up of fluid in soft body tissues when the lymph system is damaged or blocked), and protein calorie malnutrition (the state of inadequate intake of food as a source of protein, calories, and other essential nutrients).
Record review of the consolidated physician's orders dated 7/25/2023 - 8/25/2023 for Resident #44 did not reveal her non-weight bearing status to the left leg/ankle.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 8/08/2023 indicated Resident #44 had a pathological bone fracture to the fibula. The goal of the care plan was Resident #44 would achieve her highest level of mobility. The interventions of activity level per MD order, avoid direct and indirect pressure to area, keep call light within reach, physical therapy referral, remind resident not to ambulate without any assistance, and teach Resident #44 safety measures to prevent falls and injury.
During an observation and interview on 8/21/2023 at 10:12 a.m., Resident #44 was lying in bed with a boot to her left leg/foot. Resident #44 said she had a broken ankle and was non-weight bearing until her next appointment with the surgeon.
During a telephone interview on 8/24/2023 at 11:24 a.m., the orthopedic clinic nurse indicated Resident #44 was on a non-weight bearing status until her next appointment in September 2024.
Record review of Resident #44's weights provided by the DON on 8/24/2023 at 10:45 a.m., indicated Resident #44's weight on admission was 435 pounds, on 8/08/2023 her weight was 407.5, and on 8/22/2023 her weight was 405.5. The DON said she was unaware if the dietician was aware of Resident #44's weight loss. The DON said she had not care planned the desired weight loss.
Record review of Resident #44's comprehensive care plan dated 8/24/2023 at 11:25 a.m., the corporate nurse wrote Resident #44 had experienced an expected weight loss related to lymphedema being treated with diuretic therapy (after surveyor intervention). The goal of the care plan was Resident #44 would maintain stable weight without significant adverse effects. Resident #44's care planned interventions included give Lasix (diuretic medication) as ordered, monitor meal intake, and notify the MD if decline in intake occurs, and monitor weights weekly for 4 weeks.
During a telephone interview on 8/24/2023 at 2:23 p.m., the dietician said she was unaware Resident #44 had a weight loss. The dietician said she had only the admission weight to review when she was in the facility this week.
During an interview on 8/25/2023 at 10:55 a.m., the MDS staff member indicated the acute care plans were completed by the nursing IDT (intradisciplinary team). The MDS staff member said Resident #44's weight loss was identified yesterday. The MDS staff member indicated she believed the care plan of pathological bone fracture with avoid direct and indirect pressure to area was the care plan for no weight bearing status.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the policy and procedure Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans dated December 2020 indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet he resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, are provided by qualified persons, are culturally competent and trauma informed. 1. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. 2. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. 8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: g. Incorporate identified problem areas, h. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems.
Record review of a Weighing and Measuring the Resident policy and procedure dated March 2011 indicated the purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition to the resident, and to provide a baseline height and in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident Documentation . The following information should be recorded in the residents medical record: 1. The date and time the procedure was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual (s) who performed the procedure. #. The height and weight of the resident Reporting 1. Report significant weight loss/weight gain to the nurse supervisor.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carryout activiti...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carryout activities of daily living received services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #'s 9, 23, and 38) reviewed for ADLs.
The facility did not ensure Resident #9 and #38 was routinely showered.
The facility did not ensure Resident #23 was shaved.
The facility did not ensure Resident #38 had routine nail care.
These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving services/care and a decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
1)Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of need of assistance with personal care, morbid obesity, and lack of coordination.
Record review of the consolidated physician orders dated 7/25/2023 - 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #9 was to have nail care on shower days of Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday on the 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. shift.
The most recent Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating his cognition was intact. The MDS indicated Resident #9 did not reject care. The interview for daily preferences on the MDS indicated Resident #9 said choosing a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath was very important to him. The MDS indicated Resident #9 required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, and extensive assistance of one staff with bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #9 was frequently incontinent of urine, and frequently incontinent of bowel.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 8/09/2023 indicated a general care plan indicated the following care task will be documented in the computerized program. The goal of the care plan was the resident would perform the follow tasks at their highest practicable level. The approach/intervention included Resident #9 prefers to take his bath/shower on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday on the 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. shift.
Record review of the shower sheets provided for Resident #9 indicated he was provided a shower on 6/22/2023, 6/24/2023, and 8/24/2023.
Record review of Resident #9's point of care history for bathing indicated:
8/22/2023: unanswered
8/19/2023: not done
8/17/2023: not done
8/15/2023: unanswered
8/12/2023: not done
8/10/2023: not done
8/08/2023: not done
8/05/2023: not done
8/03/2023: unanswered
8/01/2023: not done
During an observation on 8/22/2023 at 11:51 a.m., Resident #9's sheets were brown in color and the area smelled of a strong urine odor.
During an observation on 8/22/2023 at 3:35 p.m., Resident #9's sheets continued to appear brownish in color and smelled of a strong urine odor.
During an observation and interview on 8/23/2023 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #9 said he had not been bathed yet this week. Resident #9 said he could not even remember the last time he had been bathed. Resident #9 smelled of urine and his bed sheets were stained brown in color and smelled of a strong urine odor.
During an observation and interview on 8/23/2023 at 12:22 p.m., Resident #9's sheets were stained brown in color. The stain was from the middle of the bed to 12 inches from the end of the mattress. Resident #9's incontinent pads smelled of urine and had black flying insects crawling on the bad. The Administrator was in the room and was asked to view the bed condition. The Administrator shined her phone light on the bed, refused to answer questions, and left the room.
During an observation and interview on 8/24/2023 at 8:30 a.m., Resident #9 was sitting in the common area of the nursing home. Resident #9 said he has not yet been bathed this week. Resident #9 continues to smell of urine. Resident #9 said he had asked the Administrator about moving his room to room [ROOM NUMBER]. When asked why do you want to move rooms? Resident #9 responded I would be on B side of the room, maybe I would get bathed on the B side.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 8:34 a.m., the corporate nurse Resident #9 would be showered today, and she would see if he could move to room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an interview on 8/25/2023 LVN C said nurses were responsible for ensuring bathing was completed. LVN C said the CNAs completed the bathing tasks. LVN C said the process was if the resident refused a bath, then they should tell the nurse. LVN C said then the nurse would follow up. LVN C said she would try and monitor by looking at the residents. LVN C said she could tell by their appearance if they had been bathed. LVN C said Resident #9 preferred his bath on the 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. shift but she was not allowed to change the shower sheets. LVN C said she made the DON aware of Resident #9's preferences. LVN C said when a resident had not received their showers, they could feel bad and mess with their mental health.
2) Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #38 was [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain caused by a rupture of an intracranial aneurysm), dementia (memory loss disease), and convulsions (sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body, caused by involuntary contraction of muscles and associated especially with brain disorders).
Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #38 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #38's BIMS score was 3 indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #38 had no behaviors nor had he rejected any care. The MDS indicated Resident #38 required extensive assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene, and he required total assistance of two staff with bathing.
Record review of the consolidated physician orders dated 7/25/2023 - 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #38 had a physician's order dated 7/13/2023 indicating nail care on shower days of Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday on 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 1/06/2023 indicated Resident #38 had an ADL function care plan with the goal of Resident #38 would achieve maximum functional mobility. The care plan approaches included dressing and grooming with a to be determined amount of assistance and bathing/hygiene amount of assistance was to be determined as well. The care plan, the following task will be documented in the computerized site with a goal of Resident #38 would perform the following tasks at their highest practicable level. The care plan approaches were Resident #38 preferred to be bathed/showered on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday on the 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. shift. The care plan did not address nail care.
Record review of requested bath sheets provided by the DON indicated Resident #38 had a bed bath on 6/22/2023 and 6/24/2023. The DON did not provide shower sheets for July.
During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 10:03 a.m., Resident #38 was lying in bed. Resident #38 was not interviewable but he was able to show me both of his hands. Resident #38's fingernails were trimmed but had brown colored material underneath them. Resident #38's hair appears greasy looking with white flaky material resembling dandruff.
During an observation on 8/23/2023 at 9:22 a.m., Resident #38's hair remains greasy appearing with white flakey material resembling dandruff. Resident #38's pillowcase seems dingy, discolored, and had loose hairs all over the pillowcase. Resident #38 continues to have brown material underneath his fingernails.
During an observation on 8/24/2023 at 8:39 a.m., Resident #38 continues to have brown material underneath his fingernails. Resident #38's hair appeared greasy looking with white flakey material resembling dandruff throughout.
During an interview with the ADON on 8/24/2023 at 12:05 p.m., the ADON provided one bath sheet for Resident # 38. The ADON said she had not had time to look for more bath sheets.
During an interview on 8/25/2023 at 1:30 p.m., the DON said the nurses know about the shower book with shower sheets the CNAs sign when providing showers. The DON said she was unsure why Resident #'s 9 and 38 had not been bathed. The DON said not bathing could cause skin issues and she wanted their skin clean.
3)Record review of consolidated physician orders dated 08/22/23 indicated Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old male, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including unspecified dementia (progressive memory impairment), hypertension (force of blood against the artery walls is too high) and chronic systolic congestive heart failure (the left heart ventricle is weak).
Record review of the most recent comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #23 made himself understood and was understood by others. The MDS indicated Resident #23 had a BIMS score of 99 indicating he was unable to complete the interview. The MDS did not indicate Resident #23 rejected care. The MDS indicated Resident #23 required extensive one person assist with personal hygiene.
Record review of the most recent comprehensive care plan edited 8/10/23 indicated Resident #23 refused to shower more than once weekly. The approach indicated to encourage resident to shower according to the shower schedule.
Record review of Resident #23's shower records for July 03, 2023, to August 21, 2023, were not filled out.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/23 at 10:29 AM, Resident #23 had long facial hair and stated he had been asking staff to shave his face for a week.
During an observation and interview on 08/22/23 at 11:20 AM, Resident #23 had long facial hair and stated he was scheduled for a bath and shave today. Resident #23 stated it made him feel better if he got shaved because he liked to look half decent, and it made him feel better to just be shaved.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:05 PM, CNA K stated she had offered Resident #23 a bath and he refused. CNA K does not remember asking Resident #23 about shaving, but stated he normally told her if he wanted his face shaved. CNA K stated she had not noticed Resident #23's long facial hair yesterday when she offered him a shower. CNA K stated the process in place for showering and grooming was to update the shower sheet daily with the resident refusal or if they received. CNA K stated the shower sheets were kept at the nurse's station, CNA K stated if a resident refused a bath, then CNAs were responsible for notifying the charge nurse.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:24 PM, CNA B stated Resident #23 often refused his bath. CNA B stated if a resident refused a bath, she would notify the charge nurse and DON. CNA B stated the DON would later talk to the resident to see if they would allow staff to bathe them.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 3:12 PM, RN D stated she was notified verbally every time a resident refused a bath, and she would talk to them. RN D stated Resident #23 refused baths all the time and would notify CNA's when he needed to be shaved. RN D stated CNAs offered to shave Resident #23 on his scheduled bath days.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated if residents refused to take a shower or shave, then she would talk to the resident and try to get them to change their mind.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated the process for showers and shaving would need to be discussed with the ADON and DON. The Administrator stated she expected showers and grooming to be done.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of an Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) supporting dated March 2018 indicated residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care).
Record review of a Bath, Shower/Tub policy and procedure dated February 2018 indicated the purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin.
Record review of a Fingernails/Toenails, care of policy dated February 2018 indicated the purpose of this procedure was to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections General Guidelines 1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. 2. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as fre...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 16 (Resident #27, Resident #29, Resident #9 and Resident #38) residents reviewed for monitoring and supervision.
The facility failed to properly store wound cleanser leaving it on Resident #'s 9 and 38's bedside tables.
The facility failed to properly store wound cleanser leaving it on Resident #'27's bathroom floor.
The facility failed to provide supervision and interventions as evidenced by Resident #29's wandering.
This failure could place residents at an increased risk for injury and for future resident-resident altercation.
The findings included:
1). Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 revealed, Resident #27 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (mood disorder characterized by abnormal thought processes and unstable mood), major depression (loss of interest in activities) and pain, unspecified.
Record review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was able to make herself understood and had the ability to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident #27 had a BIMS score of 15 for intact cognition.
During an observation on 08/21/23 at 10:49 AM, Resident #27 had a bottle of wound care spray located in her bathroom floor next to the toilet. Observation made of Resident #27's bilateral feet amputated and a bandage on her right ankle.
During an observation and interview on 08/22/23 at11:09 AM, Resident #27 had a bottle of wound care spray on the bathroom floor. Resident #27 stated the bottle of wound cleaner had been sitting in the floor since she was admitted to the facility and belong to the last resident that resided in that room. Resident #27 stated that staff had never told her that wound cleaner needed to be in a locked area. Resident #27 stated residents had wandered in her bathroom in the past but never touched the wound care spray that she knew of.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:05 PM, CNA K stated she had never gone in Resident #27's bathroom before to notice the wound care spray because resident was independent.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:24 PM, CNA B stated she never went in Resident #27's bathroom because resident was independent of care. CNA B stated she had never noticed the wound care spray.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 3:12 PM, RN D stated she was not aware of the wound care spray in Resident #27's bathroom floor and it should not had been in there. RN D stated she made rounds every two hours into each resident room and did not look in the bathroom floor. RN D stated the importance of keeping the wound care spray locked up was to prevent other residents from accidentally drinking it. RN D stated other residents could have gotten hurt if they drunk the wound care spray and she was responsible for checking the rooms to make sure it was picked up.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated, Whomever did the admission for Resident #27 was responsible for making sure the wound care spray was not in the floor. The DON stated she was not aware of the wound care spray being in the bathroom until yesterday and it should not have happened. The DON stated the importance of picking up wound care spray was to prevent other residents from drinking it or spraying it in their eyes. The DON stated it could have resulted in a resident being hospitalized due to drinking the wound care spray.
During an interview on 08/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated she expected the wound care spray to be picked up and not in Resident #27's bathroom floor. The Administrator stated other residents could have gotten a hold of the wound care spray and hurt themselves.
2). Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), dementia (impaired memory) and Parkinson's disease (disorder that impacts the nervous system and movement).
Record review of Resident #29's physician orders indicated lorazepam 1mg three times a day.
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed Resident #29 was usually understood and usually understood others. Resident #29 had a BIMS score of 4 indicating severely impaired.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited 08/09/23, revealed Resident #29 had behavioral symptoms combative and elopement. The approach indicated to always ask for help if resident becomes abusive or resistive. Resident #29 was care planned for behavioral symptoms and the approach was to move resident to a room that had a window on the secure side of the facility opening to the patio area and 1:1 monitoring during times of attempts of leaving. The care plan indicated another approach was to always ask for help if resident became abusive/resistive. Resident #29 was care planned for dementia with agitation. The approach included medication as ordered.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 04/16/23 indicated Resident #29 was caught by another staff member allegedly hitting another resident.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 05/11/23 indicated Resident #29 was extremely combative and aggressive with staff. Resident #29 was in an empty room attempting to open the window to get out and did not respond well to redirection. The Medical Director was notified, and Resident #29 was given Ativan 0.5mg twice daily routinely.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 7/27/23 indicated Resident #29 was next to the open window in his room and redirected to the lobby.
Record review of Resident #29's progress note dated 7/28/23 indicated Resident #29 had aggressive behavior manifested from the earlier shift without increased lethargy or somnolence. Resident #29 continued to have exit seeking behaviors.
Record review of Resident #29's provider investigation dated 8/10/23 indicated Resident #29 hit another resident in the chin while trying to take his cigarettes from him.
Record review of Resident #29's provider investigation dated 8/14/23 indicated Resident #29 went into another resident's room without permission and attempted to take his cell phone, stole a Pepsi. and Smacked the glasses off of a residents face. Resident #29 was taken to the lobby to keep the residents separated. New order received to increase Ativan and pending psych referral. Record review of the 15min supervision checks dated 8-14-23 in the provider investigation report.
During an observation and interview on 08/22/23 at 11:08 AM, Resident #29 was in bed watching TV. Resident #29's room window faced the patio area that was closed in with fencing. Resident was not interviewable.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:05, CNA K stated Resident #29 wandered into all of the resident's rooms and staff had to redirect resident. CNA K stated if Resident #29 got agitated, staff wound take turns watching him. CNA K stated 2 CNAs worked during the day shift and staffing was never increased for 1:1 supervision.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:24 PM, CNA B stated, Staff had to keep an eye on Resident #29 since he got into stuff. CNA B stated staff had to redirect Resident #29 daily and they were often busy on the halls having 2 CNAs on day shift and needed extra help for supervising Resident #29.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 10:52 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated staff tried to monitor/supervise Resident #29, but no other interventions were put in place. The MDS Coordinator stated she would often approach Resident #29 in the hall and ask him what he was looking for and she would get him something to drink to help with redirection. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #29 was easily redirected out of other residents' rooms and was pending approval for transfer to another facility.
During an interview on 8/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated Resident #29's behaviors had been discussed in the IDT meetings and he was placed on supervision and pending transfer.
An interview was attempted on 08/25/23 at 4:33 PM and 4:36 PM with the Administrator and was not successful.
3). Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of need of assistance with personal care, morbid obesity, and lack of coordination.
The most recent Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating his cognition was intact.
During an observation on 8/22/2023 at 11:04 a.m., there was a bottle of wound cleanser sitting on Resident #9's bedside table.
During an observation on 9/22/2023 at 3:35 p.m., the bottle of wound cleanser remained sitting on Resident #9's bedside table.
4). Record review of a face sheet dated 8/25/2023 indicated Resident #38 was [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain caused by a rupture of an intracranial aneurysm), dementia (memory loss disease), and convulsions (sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body, caused by involuntary contraction of muscles and associated especially with brain disorders).
Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #38 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #38's BIMS score was 3 indicating he had severe cognitive impairment.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 1/06/2023 indicated Resident #38 had an ADL function care plan with the goal of Resident #38 would achieve maximum functional mobility.
During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 11:04 a.m., a bottle of wound cleanser was sitting on the bedside table of Resident #38.
During an observation and interview on 8/22/2023 at 4:05 p.m., LVN C was shown the bottles of wound cleanser sitting on the bedside tables of Resident #38 and Resident #9. LVN C said the wound cleansers should be stored securely to prevent harm if swallowed, and/or sprayed in the eyes of a resident. LVN C removed the bottles of wound cleanser from the rooms. LVN C said all staff were responsible for proper storing of medications.
Attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of a Safety and Supervision of Residents policy and procedure dated July 2017 indicated the facility strived to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Facility-Oriented Approach to Safety 1. The facility-oriented approach to safety addresses risks for groups of residents .4. Employees shall be trained on potential accident hazards and demonstrate competency on how to identify and report accident hazards and try to prevent avoidable accidents. Resident Risks and Environmental Hazards 1. Due to their complexity and scope certain resident risk factors and environmental hazards are addressed in dedicated policies and procedures. These risk factors and environmental hazards include: .F. Poison Control.
During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:50 PM, Survey Resource revealed the facility did not have a policy on accidents and hazards policy.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 medication carts (Southeast nurse's cart and [NAME] Hall medication cart) and 1 of 25 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for pharmacy services.
1. The facility did not ensure LVN's M, N and RN G counted controlled drugs every shift change.
2. The facility failed to obtain and administer Resident #42's gentamicin eye drops (antibiotic eye drops) as ordered by the physician.
These failures could result in an inaccurate controlled medication count, drug diversion, and decreased therapeutic effects from medications.
Findings included:
1. During a record review and random count observation of [NAME] Hall medication cart with MA L on 08/24/2023 at 11:43 a.m. revealed missing signatures for Off duty for 08/10/2023 and 08/18/2023 of the narcotic count sheet.
During a record review and random count observation of Southeast nurse's cart with RN D on 08/24/2023 at 11:46 a.m. revealed missing signatures for Off duty and On duty for 08/04/2023, 08/05/2023, 08/06/2023, 08/07/2023, 08/18/2023, 08/19/2023, 08/20/2023, and 08/21/2023 of the narcotic count sheet.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 2:38 p.m., LVN M stated she should have signed the narcotic sheet before and after counting the narcotics on 08/10/2023, 08/18/2023, 08/22/2023 and 08/23/2023. LVN M stated, I counted the narcotics but forgot to sign. LVN M stated this failure could potentially cause a drug diversion.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 3:03 p.m., RN G stated she should have signed the narcotic count sheet after counting the controlled drugs with the nurse before and after shift on 08/18/23, 08/19/23, 08/20/23, and 08/21/23.RN G stated she counted the narcotics but forgot to sign. RN G stated this failure could potentially cause a drug diversion.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/24/2023 at 3:22 p.m. with LVN O, was unsuccessful.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:32 p.m., the DON stated she expected nurses to signed at the beginning and at the end of their shift after they completed count with the incoming and off-going nurse. The DON stated this was monitored monthly by the pharmacy consultant. The DON stated she had never really had a problem so monitoring more often was not required. The DON stated if the staff was not signing the narcotic count sheets, she is unable to prove they are counting. The DON stated it was important to ensure a drug diversion did not occur.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
2. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/25/2023, indicated Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer), malignant neoplasm of breast (breast cancer), and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar).
Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #42 was understood and understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #42 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated her cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #42 required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #42's care plan last reviewed on 08/10/2023, did not address the use of gentamicin eye drops (eye drops used for an eye infection).
Record review of Resident #42's Physician Order Report dated 07/25/2023-08/25/2023, indicated an order for gentamicin drops 0.3 %; 2 drops in the right eye four times a day; 08:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 04:00 PM, 08:00 PM with a start date of 08/18/2023 and end date 08/23/2023.
Record review of the Medication Administration Record dated 08/01/2023-08/23/2023, indicated gentamicin drops 0.3 % amount to administer 2 drops four times a day in the right eye for 5 days with a start date of 08/18/2023 and end date of 08/23/2023. The medication was documented as not administered and drug unavailable by RN D on 08/18/2023, 08/19/2023, and 08/20/2023.
During an observation and interview on 08/21/2023 at 10:39 a.m., Resident #42 said she had gone 3 days without the antibiotic eye drops for her eye, but she was doing better now because she was getting the eye drops. Resident #42's right eye was red and had some dried discharge to it.
During an interview on 08/23/2023 at 4:09 PM, RN D said she received the new order for Resident #42's eye drops from the Medical Director on Friday, 08/18/2023. RN D said she put the order in the same day so the pharmacy would deliver them to the facility. RN said she did not know why the pharmacy had not delivered the gentamicin eye drops that night. RN D said the gentamicin eye drops were not delivered by the pharmacy Saturday. RN D said since the pharmacy was not delivering the medications, she called Resident #42's hospice, and they delivered them late Sunday evening. RN D said she administered the gentamicin eye drops late Sunday; therefore, she was not able to document them as administered on the medication administration record. Rn D said she should have notified the Medical Director that the gentamicin eye drops were not delivered and administered as ordered, but she did not. RN D said she should have notified the ADON or DON that Resident #42's gentamicin eye drops were not delivered so she was unable to start them, but she did not. RN D said it was important for Resident #42 to start the gentamicin eye drops in a timely manner because the infection could worsen and spread.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 1:26 PM, the DON said if an order for antibiotic eye drops was received during the day it should have been delivered that evening by the pharmacy. The DON said if they were not delivered the nurses should notify her so she can obtain the medication from a different pharmacy. The DON said if the medication was not able to start that day the physician should be notified the medication was not received and it was not started. The DON said she was not aware the nurses had not started Resident #42's gentamicin eye drops in a timely manner. The DON said it was her responsibility to make sure if a medication is ordered it is in the building to be administered to the residents. The DON said it was important for new medications to be ordered and obtained in a timely manner to prevent delayed treatment for the residents. The DON said for Resident #42 not starting the medication days later could cause her infection to worsen.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substances last revised on 04/2019, indicated, the facility complies with all laws, regulations and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications 8. Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift. 12 a. Controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determine the count together
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Orders Non-Controlled Medication Orders, dated 12/12, indicated, . the prescriber shall be contacted by nursing for direction when delivery of a medication will be delayed, or the medication is not available .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only k...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.
The facility did not ensure:
1. The deep fryer was clean and had clear grease.
2. The can opener was cleaned.
3. 2 muffin pans were free from encrusted black colored grease buildup coating the entire outside and most of the inside surface.
4. The juice machine spigot was free from a red gooey substance where the juice was dispersed.
5. The microwave was clean and free of food debris.
6. The dish room was free from missing tiles.
These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Findings included:
During the initial tour observation with the Dietary Manager on 08/21/2023 between 9:30 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., the following was revealed:
1. 2 muffin pans stacked on top of each other on the dish rack had an encrusted black colored grease buildup on the entire outside surface and most of the inside surface.
2. Missing floor tiles noted in the dishwashing area.
3. The juice machine spigot with a gooey red substance.
4. The can opener had a thick black/brown grimy layer on the blade.
5. Inside the microwave had a black/yellow buildup.
6. The deep fryer had oil spots on the outside. The grease observed in the deep fryer was a solid dark brown and had numerous golden or black food crumbs of various sizes observed on the inside surfaces.
7. A brown gooey substance was observed on the outside and inside of the refrigerator.
Record review of the kitchen/food service observation completed by the Dietician dated 03/3/2023, 04/25/2023, 05/29/2023, 06/27/2023, 07/31/2023, and 08/23/2023 indicated missing floor tiles was noted in the dishwashing area.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 3:35 p.m., the Maintenance Supervisor stated he has contacted corporate about getting the floor tiles redone. The Maintenance Supervisor stated he was told by corporate they would try and send a contractor out to fix them. The Maintenance Supervisor stated he did not have any documentation showing where he reached out to corporate about the missing tiles. The Maintenance Supervisor stated it was important for the tiles to be in good condition, so the staff or residents did not fall.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 10:31 a.m., [NAME] P stated everybody that used the pots, pans, and dishes were responsible for ensuring they were in good repair. [NAME] P stated she should have told the Dietary Manager the muffin pans needed to be replaced. [NAME] P stated she did not think it would affect the residents. [NAME] P stated the juice dispenser should be cleaned every day by taking the nozzle off and washing it. [NAME] P stated the juice dispenser should not had the reddish residue. [NAME] P stated the can opener blade should be ran through the dishwasher every day. [NAME] P stated she did not know why the can opener blade was dirty. [NAME] P stated the grease should be changed once a week on Monday. [NAME] P stated the grease was probably dirty because they had fried chicken Sunday night. [NAME] P stated the microwave and refrigerator should have been cleaned. [NAME] P stated the fryer, microwave and refrigerator should be cleaned daily and as needed. [NAME] P stated the missing tiles have been missing for a while, approximately over six months. [NAME] P stated the Maintenance Supervisor knew about the missing tile and had done nothing about it. [NAME] P stated it was important for the tiles to be in good condition, so the staff or residents did not fall. [NAME] P stated these failures could potentially put residents at risk for food borne illness and cross contamination.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 10:44 a.m., the Dietary Manager stated she was responsible for making sure the pots and pans were clean. The Dietary Manager stated it was monitor by inspecting them weekly. The Dietary Manager stated she expected staff to inform her if they noticed the muffin pans needed to be replaced. The Dietary Manager stated the grease from the deep fryer should be clear and yellow. The Dietary Manager stated usually she cleaned the fryer herself. The Dietary Manager stated she cleaned the fryer on 08/14/2023. The Dietary Manager stated it was important to ensure the grease was changed and the deep fryer was cleaned because she would not have wanted anything to taste like the last thing that was fried and safety of the residents. The Dietary Manager stated the juice dispenser should not have been dirty, the can opener should not have been dirty. The Dietary Manager stated the refrigerator should be wiped down daily or as needed when visually soiled. The Dietary Manager stated she monitored the staff by performing random checks daily. The Dietary Manager stated it was important to ensure those things were completed to prevent foodborne illness. The Dietary Manager stated the missing tiles on the floor had been that way before she started 2 years ago. The Dietary Manager stated the Maintenance Supervisor looked at it a couple months ago and nothing was done after that. The Dietary Manager stated it was important for the tiles to be in good condition, so the staff did not fall.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled General Kitchen Sanitation last revised in 12018, indicated, the facility recognizes that food-borne illness has the potential to harm elderly and frail residents. All nutrition and food service employees will maintain clean, sanitary kitchen facilities in accordance with the state ad US Food Codes in order to minimize the risk of infection and food borne illness 2. Clean food-contact surfaces of grills, griddles and similar cooking devices and the cavities and door seals of microwave ovens at least once a day 3. Keep food-contact surfaces of all cooking equipment free of encrusted grease deposits and other accumulated soil .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated as necessar...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated as necessary, and at least annually for 1 of 1 facility.
The facility did not update their facility assessment when they admitted Resident #35 and #43 who required hemodialysis (a treatment to filter wastes and water from your blood, as your kidneys did when they were healthy) treatment.
The facility did not update their facility assessment when they admitted Resident #39 with a wound vac (a type of therapy to help heal wounds).
These deficient practices could affect the resident by not having the necessary resources to ensure appropriate care is provided.
Findings included:
Record review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed it did not address residents who used a wound vac or received dialysis.
1. Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #35 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included dependence on renal dialysis, hypertension (high blood pressure), and COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs).
Record review of the physician order report, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #35 to attend hemodialysis Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays with chair time at 12:10 p.m. with a start date 05/23/2023.
2. Record review of Resident #43's face sheet, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included dependence on renal dialysis, hypertension (high blood pressure), and COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs).
Record review of the physician order report, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #43 to attend hemodialysis Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays with a start date 06/28/2023.
3. Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, and acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis (kidney disorder involving damage to the tubule cells of the kidneys).
Record review of the physician order report, dated 08/24/2023, indicated Resident #43 had a wound vac to his right lateral leg with a start date 07/06/2023.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 1:40 p.m., the Survey Resource stated the Administrator was responsible for completing and updating the facility assessment.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:15 p.m., the DON stated the Administrator was responsible for completing and updating the facility assessment. The DON stated the facility assessment should have been reviewed and updated to reflect Resident #35 and #43 who required hemodialysis and Resident #39 who had a wound vac to his right lateral leg. The DON stated it was important to update the facility assessment to reflect changes in the care and services the facility provides.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Center Assessment last revised on 10/2021, indicated, a center assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our residents during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for our residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. 9. The center assessment is reviewed and updated annually, and as needed. Center or resident changes or modifications that may prompt a reassessment sooner included: a. A decision to provide specialized care or services that had not been previously available to residents; c. A significant change in the resident census and/or overall acuity of our residents 10. The QAPI Committee is responsible for reviewing center and resident information quarterly to determine if a reassessment is warranted
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #34) reviewed for resident records.
The facility failed to ensure RN G documented the administration of medications to Resident #1 on 08/04/2023, 08/05/2023, 08/06/2023, and 08/20/2023.
The facility failed to ensure RN G documented the administration of medications to Resident #34 on 08/04/2023, 08/06/2023, and 08/20/2023.
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician and medication errors.
Findings included:
1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that appear in infancy or early childhood and permanently affect body movement and muscle coordination), unspecified, severe intellectual disabilities (limitations in your mental abilities affect intelligence, learning and everyday life skills), and supraventricular tachycardia (irregularly fast or erratic heartbeat).
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #1 was sometimes understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #1's BIMS score was 3, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was totally dependent for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #1's care plan last reviewed 08/11/2023 indicated to administer medications as ordered.
Record review of Resident #1's Physician Order Report dated 07/22/2023-08/22/2023 indicated the following orders:
Enteral Feeding Bolus Administration (feeding via tube in stomach): (Jevity 1.5) with fiber, Bolus (237) ML 5 times per day; 12:00 AM, 05:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 03:00 PM, 08:00 PM with a start date of 11/22/2022
Risperdal (risperidone) (medication used to treat irritability and anxiey) 2 mg via gastric (stomach) tube twice a day; 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 04/26/2021
Buspirone 5 mg (medication used for anxiety) twice a day; 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 06/06/2021
Keppra (levetiracetam) (medication used for seizures) 750 mg three times a day; 09:00 AM, 02:00 PM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 02/01/2023
metoprolol tartrate (medication used to treat hypertension and heart rate) 12.5mg twice a day; 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 03/04/2023
Lamictal (lamotrigine) (medication for seizures) 200 mg twice a day; 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 04/04/2023.
Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record dated 08/01/2023-08/24/2023 indicated:
On 08/04/2023 buspirone 5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 enteral feeding bolus administration of Jevity 1.5 with fiber bolus 237 ml 5 times a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 keppra (levetiracetam) 750 mg three times a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 lamictal (lamotrigine) 200 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 risperdal (risperidone) 2 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/05/2023 buspirone 5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/05/2023 enteral feeding bolus administration of Jevity 1.5 with fiber bolus 237 ml 5 times a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM.
On 08/05/2023 keppra (levetiracetam) 750 mg three times a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM
On 08/05/2023 lamictal (lamotrigine) 200 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/05/2023 metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/05/2023 risperdal (risperidone) 2 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 buspirone 5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 enteral feeding bolus administration of Jevity 1.5 with fiber bolus 237 ml 5 times a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 keppra (levetiracetam) 750 mg three times a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM
On 08/06/2023 lamictal (lamotrigine) 200 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 risperdal (risperidone) 2 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 buspirone 5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 enteral feeding bolus administration of Jevity 1.5 with fiber bolus 237 ml 5 times a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 keppra (levetiracetam) 750 mg three times a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM
On 08/20/2023 lamictal (lamotrigine) 200 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 risperdal (risperidone) 2 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
During an attempted interview on 08/21/2023 at 11:19 AM, Resident #1 was non-interviewable.
2. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023, indicated Resident #34 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with unspecified severity (long-time open sore on the skin), and asthma (chronic disease that affects millions of people worldwide, making it hard to breathe and causing coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness).
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #34 was understood and understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed toward others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 did not exhibit rejection of care in the 7-day lookback period. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #34 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, supervision for eating, and total dependence for bathing. The MDS assessment did not indicate the use of oxygen in the last 14 days for Resident #34.
Record review of Resident #34's care plan last reviewed 08/11/2023 indicated to administer medications as ordered.
Record review of Resident #34's Physician Order Report dated 07/22/2023-08/22/2023 indicated the following orders:
Metformin (medication used to treat high blood sugars) 1,000 mg twice a day 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 12/19/2022
Sertraline (medication used for depression) 100 mg at bedtime 9:00 PM with a start date of 12/19/2022
Prazosin (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 2 mg at bedtime 9:00 PM with a start date of 01/15/2023
Novolin R Flexpen (used for high blood sugars) 100 unit/ml per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime 06:30 AM, 11:30 AM, 04:30 PM, 08:00 PM with a start date of 01/19/2023
Arginine (L-arginine) (protein aids in wound healing) 1 packet twice a day 9:00 AM, 9:00 PM with a start date of 01/20/2023
ascorbate calcium (vitamin C) (used to promote wound healing) 500 mg twice a day; 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 01/20/2023
Zyrtec (cetirizine) (used to relieve allergy symptoms) 10 mg at bedtime 09:00 PM with a start date of 03/02/2023
Furosemide (medication used to eliminate extra fluid from the body) 20 mg twice a day 09:00 AM, 09:00 PM with a start date of 03/16/2023.
Clonazepam 0.5 mg (medication for anxiety) twice a day; 08:00 AM, 08:00 PM with a start date of 06/09/2023.
Lantus U-100 Insulin subcutaneous injection (medication for high blood sugars given as injection beneath the skin) 35 Units twice a day; 08:00 AM, 08:00 PM with a start date of 07/06/2023.
Record review of the Medication Administration Record dated 08/01/2023-08/22/2023 indicated:
On 08/04/2023 Lantus U-100 Insulin subcutaneous injection 35 Units; subcutaneous twice a day was not documented as administered for 8:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 Novolin R Flexpen 100 unit/ml per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime was not documented as administered for 8:00 PM.
On 08/04/2023 clonazepam 0.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM
On 08/06/2023 arginine (L-arginine) powder 1 packet twice a day was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 ascorbate calcium (vitamin C) 500 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 clonazepam 0.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM
On 08/06/2023 furosemide 20 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM
On 08/06/2023 Lantus U-100 Insulin subcutaneous injection 35 Units; subcutaneous twice a day was not documented as administered for 8:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 metformin 1000 mg twice a day was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 Novolin R Flexpen 100 unit/ml per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime was not documented as administered for 8:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 prazosin 2 mg at bedtime was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 sertraline 100 mg at bedtime was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/06/2023 Zyrtec 10 mg at bedtime was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 arginine (L-arginine) powder 1 packet twice a day was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 ascorbate calcium (vitamin C) 500 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 clonazepam 0.5 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM
On 08/20/2023 furosemide 20 mg twice a day was not documented as administered at 8:00 PM
On 08/20/2023 Lantus U-100 Insulin subcutaneous injection 35 Units; subcutaneous twice a day was not documented as administered for 8:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 metformin 1000 mg twice a day was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 Novolin R Flexpen 100 unit/ml per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime was not documented as administered for 8:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 prazosin 2 mg at bedtime was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 sertraline 100 mg at bedtime was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
On 08/20/2023 Zyrtec 10 mg at bedtime was not documented as administered for 9:00 PM.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 9:06 AM, Resident #34 said he was receiving his insulin and medications every day, and he had not missed any medications.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 3:12 PM, RN G said she worked the nights of 08/04/2023, 08/05/2023, 08/06/2023, and 08/20/2023, and administered all the medications as order to Resident #1 and Resident #34. RN G said she always administered all the medications to the residents. RN G said she documented the administration of medications on the Medication Administration Record. RN G said she was surprised the medications for Resident #1 and Resident #34 were not documented as administered. RN G said sometimes she had trouble documenting medications as administered because she was not familiar with the computer system used at the facility. RN G said she needed to pay more attention. RN G said it was important to document medications that were administered to keep things accurate and to prevent confusion and medication errors.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 1:17 PM, the DON said she expected the nurses to document medications as administered when they administered medications. The DON said she randomly looked over the medication administration records to ensure all medications were being signed off. The DON said she was not aware Resident #1 and Resident #247's medication administration records were missing administered medications documentation. The DON said it was important for medications that were administered be documented appropriately to let the nurses know a medication was administered. The DON said the medication administration record was a part of the resident's record, and it was part of the resident's care.
During an attempted phone interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:36 PM, the Administrator did not answer the phone.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2009, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .The individual administering the medication document in the resident's electronic record after administering each medication .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the required committee members for 5 of 5 meetings (March 202...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the required committee members for 5 of 5 meetings (March 2023, April 2023, May 2023, June 2023, and July 2023) reviewed for QAPI.
The facility did not ensure the ADON attended QAPI meetings in March 2023, April 2023, and May 2023.
The facility did not ensure the DON attended QAPI meeting in June 2023.
The facility did not ensure one additional staff member attended QAPI meetings in April 2023, May 2023, June 2023, and July 2023.
This failure could place residents at risk for quality deficiencies being unidentified, no appropriate plans of action developed and implemented, and no appropriate guidance developed.
Findings included:
Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign-in-sheets for March 2023, April 2023, and May 2023 indicated the ADON did not sign in for their meetings.
Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign-in-sheets for June 2023 indicated the DON did not sign in for their meetings.
Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign-in-sheets for April 2023, May 2023, June 2023, and July 2023 indicated one additional staff member did not sign in for the meetings.
Record review of an undated form titled QAA/QAPI Committee indicated the committee members were the Administrator, DON, ADON, Maintenance, Director of Rehab, Housekeeping Supervisor, Director of Dining Services, and the MDS Coordinator.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 2:38 p.m., the ADON stated her role as a ADON was not until 03/27/2023. The ADON stated, honestly I couldn't tell you why I didn't attend the meetings in April and May. The ADON stated it was important to attend the meetings so the facility can identify any trends that needed intervention.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:15 p.m., the DON stated she normally attended QAPI once a month. The DON stated she believed she attended in June 2023 and was unsure why she did not sign the minutes. The DON stated she was unsure why one additional staff member did not attend the meetings in April 2023, May 2023, June 2023, and July 2023. The DON stated if other staff members attended the meetings or reviewed the minutes after the meetings, they should have signed the sign in sheet. The DON stated it was important to make sure QAPI minutes were signed to prove she was there and so she could monitor the resident's care and communicate with the nursing staff.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program last revised on 02/08/2023, indicated, this center shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, center-wide, data-driven QAPI Program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents Authority 3. The Administrator is responsible for assuring that this center's QAPI program complies with federal, state, and local regulatory agency requirements. Implementation 1. The QAPI Committee oversees implementation of our QAPI Plan, which is the written component describing the specifics of the QAPI program, how the center will conduct its QAPI functions, and the activities of the QAPI Committee. 3. The committee meets monthly to review reports, evaluate data, and monitor QAPI-related activities and make adjustments to the plan
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program des...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #19, Resident #247) reviewed for infection control practices related to wounds, 3 of 6 facility staff members (CNA F, LVN H, MA L) reviewed for infection control practices related to incontinent care and medication pass, and 1 of 1 biohazard storage area. The facility further failed to ensure facility personnel handled, stored, processed, and transported linens so as to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 3 clean linen carts.
1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was on transmission-based precautions following a positive culture for multi-drug resistant organisms.
2. The facility failed to follow the infection control practices for Resident #247's bloody ear drainage.
3. The facility failed to ensure CNA F changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #1 and Resident #38.
4. The facility failed to properly store biohazard waste.
5. The facility did not ensure LVN H performed hand hygiene prior to preparing Resident #1's medications via G-tube (surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration, or medication).
6. The facility did not ensure MA L disinfected the wrist blood pressure monitor between Resident #4, #10 and #18.
7. The facility failed to make sure the linen cart cover was clean and securely closed.
These failures could place residents at increased risk for infection or cross-contamination that could diminish the resident's quality of life.
The findings included:
1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/23/23, revealed Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cellulitis, unspecified (serious bacterial infection of the skin), subcutaneous pheomycotic abscess and cyst (infection of the deep subcutaneous tissue of the skin caused by brown fungi), mild protein-calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high blood sugar in the blood), and atherosclerotic heart disease without chest pain (condition where the arteries become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque (fats) in the artery wall).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 06/09/23, revealed Resident #19 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #19 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #19 had a BIMS of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #19 had no behaviors or refusal of care. The MDS revealed Resident #19 received antibiotic 1 out of 7 days during the look-back period.
Record review of the comprehensive care plan, edited 08/18/23, revealed Resident #19 had a pressure ulcer to right heel. The interventions included wound culture obtained. The care plan did not address the current antibiotic treatment or wound infection.
Record review of the physician order report dated 07/01/23 - 08/23/23, revealed Resident #19 had an order, which started on 08/17/23, for a wound culture to right heel. The order report further revealed Resident #19 was started on Bactrim DS (antibiotic) on 08/17/23 and was discontinued on 08/19/23. The order report revealed Resident #19 was started on levofloxacin (antibiotic) on 08/19/23. The order report also revealed a daily wound treatment to right heel and wound care to eval and treat as indicated. The order report revealed no order for isolation precautions.
Record review of the wound management detail report, dated 08/17/23, revealed an unstageable pressure ulcer to Resident #19's right heel. The wound reported revealed heavy, serous (clear, amber, thin, and watery) drainage.
Record review of the wound culture results, dated 08/19/23, revealed gram positive and gram-negative bacteria with resistant markers for ESBL (enzymes that confer resistance to most beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillin and cephalosporins), macrolide (resistance to macrolide antibiotics), sulfonamide (resistance to sulfonamide antibiotics), and tetracycline (resistance to tetracycline antibiotics).
Record review of Resident #19's progress notes, dated 08/19/23, revealed received results of c and s [culture and sensitivity] of wound noted Bactrim ineffective contacted Physician Q with results new order to dc [discontinue] Bactrim at this time and to add levofloxacin 500 mg po daily for 10 days mars [medication administration records] updated at this time family notified of change in medication DON, ADON aware of new orders.
Record review of Resident #19's progress notes, dated 08/23/23, revealed isolation precautions were clarified with the Physician Q after surveyor intervention.
During an observation and attempted interview on 08/21/23 at 9:22 AM, Resident #19 was dragging his feet on the ground while wheeling himself down the hallway in his wheelchair. Resident #19 had a white dressing to right lower leg and a yellow sock on the left foot. Resident #19 was non-interviewable as evidenced by confused conversation. Resident #19 had no isolation signage on the door to his room.
During an observation on 08/22/23 at 9:55 AM, Resident #19 was dragging his feet on the ground while wheeling himself down the hallway in his wheelchair. Resident #19 had a white dressing to his right lower leg that had blackish-brown stains and a yellow, non-skid sock to left sock. Resident #19 had no isolation signage on the door to his room.
During an observation on 08/22/23 at 1:13 PM, Resident #19 was dragging his feet on the ground while wheeling himself down the hallway in his wheelchair. Resident #19 had a white dressing to his right lower leg that was unwrapped, approximately 2 wraps around his leg. Resident #19 had no isolation signage on the door to his room.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 12:06 PM, LVN C stated she normally performed wound care on Resident #19. LVN C stated she already performed wound care during the morning because it was reported that his dressing had come off. LVN C stated she normally wears gloves and a gown to perform wound care. LVN C stated when she completed wound care, she placed everything in a red biohazard bag and immediately disposed of it in the biohazard box. LVN C stated Resident #19 was on contact isolation during wound treatment because of his culture results. LVN C stated Resident #19 was not on isolation precautions outside of wound treatment because he wounds stayed covered up and always wrapped. LVN C stated signage should have been posted but other staff were notified of the contact isolation status verbally via education provided by the nurses. LVN C stated there was no isolation precautions signage posted to Resident #19's room at this time. LVN C stated it was important to ensure signage was posted and isolation precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infection.
During an interview on 08/23/23 at 3:03 PM, LVN C stated Resident #19 was not on contact isolation. LVN C stated the staff was supposed to use standard, universal precautions. LVN C stated she believed Resident #19 was on contact isolation because his medication had been changed because of the ESBL in his wound. LVN C stated Physician Q was notified after we had talked and stated he did not require contact isolation unless the wound care was being provided, then he required contact precautions. LVN C stated residents who had multi-drug resistance organisms in their culture results should have been placed on contact isolation and signage should have been posted on his door. LVN C stated placed residents who had MDROs on contact isolation was important to prevent the spread of infection. LVN C stated the clarification should have been obtained sooner.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 12:27 PM, the DON stated the Infection Preventionist was responsible for handling the infection control procedures for residents with ESBL in their wounds. The DON stated if isolation precautions were required, then it should have been included in the orders and signage should have been posted. The DON stated it was important to alert staff to prevent the spread of infection.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 3:32 PM, the Infection Preventionist stated she spoke with Physician Q regarding Resident #19's wound for clarification. The Infection Preventionist stated according to Physician Q the wound did not require isolation because it was well covered, and Resident #19 ran no risk of contamination because he believed it was colonized. The Infection Preventionist stated wound cultures were unreliable anyways because of contamination and there was no way to be sure he actually had a MDRO infection. The Infection Preventionist stated according to Physician Q, universal precautions were adequate.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 3:49 PM, Physician Q stated it was not responsible for the wound management at the facility. Physician Q stated he did order the antibiotics for Resident #19 but he did not handle the wound management and was unable to say if isolation precautions were required for Resident #19.
During an interview on 08/25/23 at 3:54 PM, NP R stated she was responsible for management of wounds at the facility. NP R stated she was aware Resident #19's wound to his right heel was infected. NP R stated Resident #19 was receiving antibiotics for treatment. NP R stated staff should ensure the wound was kept wrapped, secured, and covered. NP R stated contact isolation precautions should be used when provided wound care treatment because of his MDROs, which included gown and gloves. NP R stated signage should have been posted to alert others to prevent the spread of infection.
Record review of the competency assessment for pressure injuries and dressings, dated 07/21/23, revealed LVN C demonstrated competencies for all areas.
Review of https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/mdro-guidelines.pdf, accessed on 08/25/23, revealed for long-term care facilities 3. * For ill residents (e.g., those totally dependent upon healthcare personnel for healthcare and activities of daily living .) and for those residents whose infected secretions or drainage cannot be contained, use Contact Precautions in addition to Standard Precautions.
Record review of the Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions policy, revised January 2012, revealed Transmission-Based precautions shall be used when caring for residents who are documented or suspected to have communicable disease or infections that can transmitted to others. The policy further revealed 2. Examples of infections requiring contact precautions include, but are not limited to: a. infections with multi-drug resistant organisms (determined on a case by case basis) . The policy also revealed 7. Signs - the facility will implement a system to alert staff and visitors to the type of precaution the resident requires.
Record review of Surveillance for Infections policy, revised March 2022, revealed 1. The purpose of the surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and Healthcare-Associated Infections, to guide appropriate interventions, and to prevent future infections. A. Multidrug-resistant reports: 1. All multidrug-resistant reports require immediate attention. 2. Ensure that appropriate precautions, if needed, are in place.
Record review of the Employee Training on Infection Control policy, revised January 2022, revealed 3. Infection control training topics will include at least: a. standard precautions, including hand hygiene; b. transmission-based precautions (airborne, droplet, contact) .
2. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/22/2023 indicated Resident #247 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (problems with your metabolism cause brain dysfunction), malignant neoplasm of skin (skin cancer), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (moderate damage to the kidneys and loss of kidney function).
Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #247 was able to make himself understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #247 had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired.
Record review of Resident #247's care plan last reviewed on 08/09/2023 indicated, he had cancer lesions and refused for the right ear and nose to be dressed or would remove the dressing immediately after it was applied. Resident #247 had approaches that included to monitor area to nose, treat the lesion per the doctor's order and encourage the resident to leave the dressings in place and to document his refusal.
During an observation on 08/21/2023 at 11:41 AM, Resident #247 was sitting in the dining room. He had dried blood down his face and neck, and his shirt and shorts had dried blood on it. Resident #247 said he changed his own clothes when he was ready to change them.
During an observation on 08/24/2023 at 2:04 PM, Resident #247 was walking around the nurses' station. Resident #247 had blood running down his neck and would scratch his neck and face and then put his hands down on desk at the nurses' station.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 2:17 PM, the DON said they had tried to wrap the areas on Resident #247's ear and cover the area on his nose but Resident #247 would take off the dressings. The DON said Resident #247 stayed in his room majority of the day. The DON said if Resident #247 was in the dining room he sat alone at the back of the dining room. The DON said Resident #247 would sit in a chair by the nurses' station. The DON said the staff wiped the areas where he went and touched. The DON said her, and the nurses encouraged Resident #247 to allow them to cover his ear and nose. The DON said Resident #247 touching surfaces after scratching his bleeding ear/face could cause him to get an infection or spread an infection to others.
During an observation on 08/25/2023 at 10:23 AM, Resident #247 had bloody drainage rolling down his face from his ear. Resident #247 had bloody drainage that had leaked from his face covering the front of his shirt. Resident #247 had reached up and touched his face while he was walking over to the community coffee urn. Resident #247 grabbed a coffee cup and filled it up using the community coffee urn.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 3:38 PM, the Infection Control Preventionist said Resident #247 had a right to refuse wound care and dressings to his ear/nose. The Infection Control Preventionist said he had no infections in the areas to his ear/nose. The Infection Control Preventionist said the facility was cleaning all high-risk contact areas per facility protocol, and they monitored Resident #247 the best they could. The Infection Control Preventionist said there was no risk to the other residents.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
3. During an observation on 08/21/23 between 9:55 AM - 10:08 AM, CNA F provided incontinent care to Resident #38. CNA F put on her gloves, and unfastened Resident #38's dirty brief. CNA F wiped Resident #38's buttocks and applied the clean brief. CNA F used the same gloves to place the clean incontinent pad under Resident #38. CNA F did not change her gloves or perform hand hygiene prior to applying clean brief or clean linen. CNA F then pulled the covers up, raised the head of the bed, placed the call light in reach, and moved the bedside table over the bed using the dirty gloves.
During an observation on 08/22/23 at 10:04 AM, CNA F provided incontinent care to Resident #1. CNA F put on gloves, and unfastened Resident #1's dirty brief. CNA F wiped Resident #1's buttocks. CNA F's gloves became soiled, and she changed the gloves and performed hand hygiene. CNA F applied new gloves and continued to wipe Resident #1's buttocks. CNA F finished wiping Resident #1's buttocks and applied the clean brief. CNA F did not change her gloves or perform hand hygiene prior to applying the clean brief. CNA F got Resident #1's clean clothes and put them on him. CNA F was still wearing the dirty gloves. CNA F transferred Resident #1 from his bed to the wheelchair with assistance of another CNA. After transferring Resident #1 CNA F removed her dirty gloves and performed hand hygiene.
During an interview on 08/22/2023 at 11:54 AM, CNA F said she should change her gloves when they were soiled or if they ripped. CNA F said she should perform hand hygiene before and after providing care and when changing gloves. CNA F said she should have changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after cleaning Resident #1's and Resident #38's buttocks and prior to applying Resident #1's clean brief. CNA F said she should have changed gloves prior to changing Resident #1's clothes. CNA F stated she should have performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves prior to touching Resident #38's clean linen, pulling up covers, raising the head of the bed, touching the call light, and bedside table. CNA F said she did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene while providing incontinent care because it slipped my mind. CNA F said she received training on incontinent care about every month. CNA F said it was important to change her gloves and perform hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to prevent cross contamination. CNA F said not changing gloves and performing hand hygiene adequately could cause the residents to have a urinary tract infection.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 1:11 PM, the DON said she randomly went in with the CNAs to observe them do incontinent care. The DON said the biggest problem she had seen was the CNAs not changing gloves and performing hand hygiene at the appropriate times. The DON said the CNAs should change gloves at the start and anytime when going from dirty to clean. The DON said she had observed CNA F provide incontinent care, and she had not changed her gloves at the appropriate times. The DON said she told her she needed to change them. The DON said it was important to change gloves and perform hand hygiene while providing incontinent care so the residents would not get a urinary tract infection.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the perineal care return demonstration, dated 06/20/23 and 06/23/23, revealed CNA F correctly demonstrated proper procedure while performing perineal care.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care, last revised 01/20/2023, indicated, Perineal Care is providing cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infection, skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin . perform hand hygiene and don gloves . clean the rectal area thoroughly, including the area under the scrotum, the anus, and the buttocks, change the cleansing wipe, as needed. Use a clean section of the cleansing wipe for each stroke by folding each used section inward . remove gloves and discard into designated container. 13. Perform Hand Hygiene. 14. Reposition the bed covers. Make the resident comfortable .
4. During an observation on 8/24/2023 at 10:42 a.m., the biohazard portable storage building was open. Inside the storage building were 6 closed biohazard boxes sitting up right in the building, and there was one box opened and turned over. The storage building had biohazard boxes and bags strewn about and there was a kitchen commercial fryer machine in this building as well. The door is propped up inside the storage building against the boxes of biohazard.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 3:35 p.m., the maintenance supervisor said the wind blew the door off, but he said he could not remember the day it blew off. The maintenance supervisor said repairing the door to close was his responsibility. The maintenance supervisor said he could fix the door to close. The maintenance supervisor said it would not be a good thing if someone or an animal got into the biohazard material. The maintenance supervisor said the biohazard material had body fluids on it.
During an interview on 8/25/2023 at 1:11 p.m., the DON said biohazard should be stored securely and properly. The DON said someone could get inside the biohazard storage building and could get hurt and spread infections.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
5. During an observation and interview on 08/22/2023 at 8:02 a.m., LVN H did not perform hand hygiene after entering Resident #1's room prior to initiating medication administration. LVN H stated she should have performed hand hygiene after entering Resident #1's room and prior to preparing his medications. LVN H stated she was nervous because the surveyor was present. LVN H stated it was important to perform hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination and spread of germs.
During an observation and interview on 08/22/2023 at 9:25 a.m. MA L used the wrist blood pressure monitor to check Resident #4's blood pressure. After using the wrist blood pressure monitor, MA L placed the blood pressure monitor back on top of the medication cart without disinfecting it. MA L administered Resident #4's medications. MA L took the wrist blood pressure monitor, without disinfecting it, and checked Resident #10's blood pressure. After using the wrist blood pressure monitor, MA L placed the blood pressure monitor back on top of the medication cart without disinfecting it. MA L administered Resident #10's medications. MA L then took the wrist blood pressure monitor, without disinfecting it, and checked Resident #18's blood pressure. After using the wrist blood pressure monitor, MA L placed the blood pressure monitor back on top of the medication cart without disinfecting it. MA L administered Resident #18's medications. MA L placed the blood pressure monitor back on top of the medication cart. MA L stated she should have sanitized the blood pressure monitor between residents. MA L stated, I forgot. MA L stated it was important to sanitize between uses to prevent the spread of infections.
During an interview on 08/25/2023 at 4:15 p.m., the DON stated she expected staff to ensure the blood pressure cuff was sanitized between uses and hand hygiene was performed during medication pass. The DON stated it was monitored by random observations and education. The DON stated it was important for infection control and to prevent cross contamination.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene last revised on 01/20/23, indicated, this facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections . 1. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors
Record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube last revised on 03/2015, indicated, the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube Steps in the Procedure 1. Wash your hands
Record review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment last revised on 10/2018, indicated, resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard 3. Durable medical equipment (DME) must be cleaned and disinfected before reuse by another resident
6. During an observation on 08/21/23 at 10:48 AM, the south hall linen cart cover was not closed, and multiple brown discolorations were on the linen cart cover.
During an observation on 08/22/23 at 11:24 AM, multiple brown discolorations were on the linen cart cover.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 12:05 PM, CNA K stated the linen cart cover should have been closed. CNA K stated residents often open the linen cart cover and get things from the cart. CNA K stated all staff was responsible for making sure the linen cart cover was closed at all times.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 12:24 PM, CNA B stated the brown discoloration had been on the south hall linen cart for the past 1.5 years since she had been working at the facility. CNA B stated the linen cart cover should be closed and it was everyone's responsibility to check the linen cart.
During an interview on 8/23/23 at 3:12 PM, RN D stated the linen cart cover should have been closed and he cart cover should not have brown discolorations on it. RN D stated it was everyone's responsibility to make sure the linen cart cover was closed and clean. The importance of having the linen cart cover closed was to make sure residents do no contaminate or spread germs. RN D stated if the linen cart cover was left open, it could be an infection control problem.
During an interview on 8/25/23 at 10:00 AM, the House Keeping Supervisor stated housekeeping was not responsible for washing the linen cart covers and she did not know who was responsible.
During an interview on 8/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated the linen cart cover should be closed and the cover should be clean. The DON stated she did not know housekeeping's schedule for cleaning the cart covers. The DON stated the linen cart cover should be closed to prevent germs and residents from getting into the linen carts. The DON stated the CNAs were responsible for making sure the linen carts were closed.
During an interview on 8/24/23 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated the linen cart covers should have been closed and all staff was responsible. The Administrators stated there was no schedule for housekeeping to wash the linen cart covers. The Administrator stated the importance of making sure the linen carts were clean and closed was so linens did not get dirty.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0924
(Tag F0924)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility corridors were equipped with firmly secured handr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side of the corridor for 2 of 3 corridors reviewed for secured handrails. (South and [NAME] Halls)
The facility failed to ensure the [NAME] hall's handrails were affixed to the walls securely.
The facility failed to ensure the handrail were properly secured between room [ROOM NUMBER] and #18, room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER] and #25 on South Hall.
This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for injury, and falls.
Findings included:
During an observation on 08/21/23 between 10:18 AM and 10:59 AM, The handrails between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] were visibly loose, hanging from the wall, with the screws exposed.
During an observation on 8/21/2023 at 11:08 a.m., the handrails were loosened from the wall when touched.
During an observation on 8/23/2023 at 9:14 a.m., the handrails remained loosened from the wall.
During an observation on 8/23/2023 at 12:00 p.m., the handrails remained loosened from the wall when touched.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 3:35 p.m., the maintenance supervisor said the walls on the west hall were made of concrete blocks. The maintenance supervisor said the handrails were hung with a toggle bolt. The maintenance supervisor said the toggle bolt was not the correct bolt to use in concrete. The maintenance supervisor said his regional supervisor was supposed to ensure the company who hung the handrails returned to ensure the handrails were hung properly. The maintenance supervisor said the handrails had been loosened from the walls for 2-3 months.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of an Accommodation of Needs policy and procedure dated March 2021 indicated our facility's environment and staff behaviors were directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity, and well-being .2. The resident's individual needs and preferences, including the need for adaptive devices and modifications to the physical environment, including the resident's bedroom and bathroom, as well as the common areas in the facility. Examples of such adaptations may include:
A.
Providing access to assistive devices, such as grab bars
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Smoking Policies
(Tag F0926)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 12 residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for smoking.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 followed the facility's policy on smoking.
The facility failed to follow their safety and supervision policy and allowed cigarette smoking outside of the only smoking area.
The facility failed to ensure smoked cigarettes were extinguished in a fire-retardant receptacle.
This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment and injury.
This deficient practice could place residents at risk for injury and burns due to the presence of discarded and used cigarette butts.
Findings included:
Record review of the face sheet, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and bipolar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings).
Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 07/28/23, revealed Resident #13 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #13 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #23 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderately impaired.
Record review of Resident #13's care plan, edited 08/10/23, indicated he was a smoker and was explained/shown where designated smoking areas were and smoking times. The care plan indicated Resident #13 was monitored when smoking to assure residents safety.
Record review of Resident #13's smoking assessment, dated 09/08/22 indicated he was not careless with smoking materials and was able to understand the facilities safe smoking policy. The smoking assessment did not indicate any behavior issues.
Record review of the facility's smoke break times: 6:30 a.m., 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 3:30 p.m., 7:00 p.m., and 9:00 p.m.
Record review of the facility's smoker list indicated the facility had 12 residents who smoke.
During observations on 8/21/2023 at 9:30 a.m. - 8/24/2023 at 4:00 p.m., the following was observed:
*A plastic flowerpot next to the front door had numerous cigarette butts on top of the potting soil. These cigarette butts remained in the plastic flower pot the entire observation period.
*Numerous cigarette butts were lying on the ground next to a chair sitting outside of the laundry room. These cigarette butts remained lying on the ground around the chair outside of the laundry room the entire observation period.
During an observation and interview made on 08/24/23 at 2:01 PM, Resident #13 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room with 2 cigarette butts on the armrest of his wheelchair. Resident #13 stated he brought his butts inside every time he smoked and threw them in the trash can either in his room or in the kitchen trash can. Resident #13 stated the cigarette butts could not start a fire because the cigarettes were not lit.
During an interview on 8/22/23 at 12:05 PM, CNA K stated she was responsible for taking Resident #13 out to smoke during the last smoke break. CNA K stated she was responsible for making sure residents did not bring any cigarette butts back inside of the facility and she did not notice Resident #13 had 2 cigarette butts on his arm rest or she would have thrown them away. CNA K stated Resident #13 had a history of bringing cigarette butts back inside the building and she had thrown them away previously. CNA K stated the cigarette butts in the front of the building in the flowerpots were from her taking the residents out to smoke a while back. CNA K stated it was raining outside and the residents did not want to go to the designated smoking area to smoke and she let them go in the front of the building. CNA K stated she did not know residents had to smoke in designated areas, and she was instructed by management not to do anymore. CNA K stated the importance of making sure Resident #13 did not bring cigarette butts back into the building was make sure he could not give them to another resident or cause a fire in the facility.
During an interview on 8/24/2023 at 3:35 p.m., the maintenance supervisor said the facility had only one smoking area. The maintenance supervisor said the only smoking area was in the courtyard underneath the pavilion. The maintenance supervisor said everyone was responsible for ensuring the cigarette butts were discarded properly. The maintenance supervisor said he makes rounds and picks up the cigarette butts every two weeks. The maintenance supervisor said the discard cigarette butts could initiate a fire due to the current weather conditions.
During an interview on 8/24/23 at 10:23 AM, the DON stated staff was responsible for observing the residents during smoking times and responsible for collecting all of the cigarettes butts when the resident returned to the building. The DON stated she expected staff to have thrown away the cigarette butts outside in the designed trash can. The DON stated she was not aware of Resident #13 bringing cigarette butts into his room or throwing them away in the kitchen trash can. The DON stated the importance of making sure cigarette butts were disposed of in the designated area was to make sure other residents did not try to eat the cigarette butts or start a fire in the facility.
An interview was attempted on 08/25/23 at 4:33 PM and 4:36 PM with the Administrator and was not successful.
Record review of the facility's policy on, Smoking, (no date) indicated Residents and visitors shall not be permitted to smoke in any area that is not designed as a smoking area.
Record review of a Safety and Supervision of Residents policy and procedure dated July 2017 indicated the facility strived to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Facility-Oriented Approach to Safety 1. The facility-oriented approach to safety addresses risks for groups of residents .4. Employees shall be trained on potential accident hazards and demonstrate competency on how to identify and report accident hazards and try to prevent avoidable accidents. Resident Risks and Environmental Hazards 1. Due to their complexity and scope certain resident risk factors and environmental hazards are addressed in dedicated policies and procedures. These risk factors and environmental hazards include: .d. Smoking.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, b...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS fiscal year 2023 for the second quarter (January 1, 2023, to March 31, 2023) reviewed for administration.
The facility failed to submit accurate RN hours for: 1/3 (TU); 1/6 (FR); 1/16 (MO); 1/17 (TU); 1/20 (FR); 1/25 (WE); 1/31 (TU); 2/8 (WE); 2/15 (WE)
These failures could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met.
Findings included:
Record review of the CMS PBJ report for the second quarter of 2023 (January 1, 2023, through March 31, 2023) indicated there was no RN hours for the following dates: 1/3 (TU); 1/6 (FR); 1/16 (MO); 1/17 (TU); 1/20 (FR); 1/25 (WE); 1/31 (TU); 2/8 (WE); 2/15 (WE)
Record review of a RN punch detail report for January and February 2023 indicated RN hours on 1/3/2023, 1/6/2023, 1/16/2023, 1/17/2023, 1/20/2023, 1/25/2023, 1/31/2023, 2/8/2023 and 2/15/2023.
During an interview on 08/24/2023 at 1:58 p.m., the Compliance Officer stated he was responsible for ensuring the PBJ data was submitted. The Compliance Officer stated due to organizational changes in the PBJ reporting it was possible there may be direct care hours that were worked but not reporting in the PBJ submission. The Compliance Officer stated the source he used during January 1st, 2023-March 31st, 2023, to pull the hours were not picking up the RN hours accurately. The Compliance Officer stated he has now figured out a more accurate way of submitting RN hours. The Compliance Officer stated it was important to submit the PBJ data to have a more accurate reflection of the exact care the facility was given.
An attempted telephone interview on 08/25/23 at 4:33 p.m. with the Administrator, was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Staffing last revised on 07/2021, indicated, 4. Direct care staffing information per day (including agency and contract staff) is submitted to the CMS payroll-based journal system on the schedule specified by CMS, but no less than once a quarter