CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician of a significant...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status due to medication error for one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for resident rights.
The facility failed to notify Resident #7's physician in a timely manner when Resident #7 was administered 1 ml of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML (Morphine Sulfate) instead physician's order of 0.1ml morphine sulfate on 01/10/2023.
An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/11/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the facility Administrator on 08/11/2023 at 7:23 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/13/2023 at 6:54 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of actual harm because of the facility's need to complete in-servicing and monitoring interventions.
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and interventions and/or death.
The finding included:
Record review of Resident #7's admission Record dated 12/12/2022 indicated Resident #7
was an [AGE] year-old female and was admitted to facility on 09/28/2022 with the following diagnosis: of encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), COVID-19, lobar pneumonia (acute exudative inflammation of the entire lobe), generalized anxiety disorder (severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities), gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (a type of Gerd that does not involve inflammation of the esophagus), spinal stenosis, cervical region (narrowing of the spinal canal), dependence on supplemental oxygen, depression, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of lipids like cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood), chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, chronic ischemic heart disease ( heart problems caused by narrowed heart arteries), peripheral vascular disease, constipation, secondary kyphosis (fracture in one or more vertebral bodies) spondylosis (age related wear and tear of the spinal disks), adult failure to thrive, and history of falls.
Record review of Resident #7's MDS assessment, dated 12/15/2022 indicated:
-BIMS score was 15 (cognitively status independent, decisions consistent/reasonable)
-Coded as being under hospice care
-required limited assistance with one person assist with bed mobility, transfer, walk-in corridor, walk-in-room,
and toilet use
-required supervised with one person assist for locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, dressing and personal
hygiene
-was independent with setup help only for feeding
-history of falls prior to admission/entry or re-entry
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan dated 09/29/2022 revealed:
Resident #7 was under hospice
Focus: Resident #7 has a terminal illness and is receiving hospice or palliative care. During the end-of-life process weight loss, skin breakdown, dehydration, fecal impaction, and the gradual o or rapid loss of the ability to move may be unavoidable. Date initiated: 01/08/2023
Goal: Dignity will be maintained, and the resident will be kept comfortable and pain free within one hour of interventions through the next review. Date initiated: 01/08/2023
Interventions:
Coordinate with hospice to ensure the resident's spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs are met. Date initiated 01/08/2023; Assist with ADL's and provide comfort measures as needed. Date initiated 01/08/2023; Monitor for abnormal weight loss, poor appetite, and skin breakdown. Report abnormals to the physician as noted. Date initiated 01/08/2023; Monitor for signs and symptoms of increased pain, discomfort-give medications and treatments as ordered and monitor for relief. Date initiated 01/08/2023.
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan dated 09/29/2022 revealed Morphine Sulphate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 mg/5 ml (morphine sulfate) was not care planned.
Record review of Resident #7's eMAR for January 2023 revealed:
Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 mg/5ML (morphine Sulphate) Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for severe pain 7-10. Start date-01/09/2023 16:01 and discontinue date-01/11/2023 08:22. Further review of eMAR indicated Resident #7 did not receive Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 mg/5ML (morphine sulfate) from January 09, 2023, through January 11, 2023. Physician order viewed under orders.
Record review of Resident #7's progress note dated 01/09/2023 at 16:04 (04:04 p.m.) revealed Note: This order is outside of the recommended dose or frequency.
Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for Severe Pain 7-10 Pain.
Record review of Resident #7's progress note dated 01/10/2023 at 14:00 (04:00 p.m.) revealed eMAR Medication Administration Note: Duplicate Order -
Note Text: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML
Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for Severe Pain 7-10 Pain
Record review of Resident #7's progress note date 01/10/2023 at 18:47 revealed eMAR Medication Administration Note: Duplicate Order -
Note Text: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML
Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for Severe Pain 7-10 Pain
Both progress notes dated 01/10/2023 at 14:00 and 18:47 had been struck off.
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan and progress notes indicated no notes from facility why Resident #7 was sent to the hospital.
Record review of the hospital records for Resident #7, dated 01/10/2023 at 18:23 (06:23 p.m.) revealed the following:
Patient is an 87 y/o (year old) F (female) with PMH (past medical history) of DM (diabetes mellitus), CVD (cardiovascular disease) with no residual effect per son who presents as trauma admission s/p (status post) unwitnessed GLF (ground level fall) at 17:00 on 01/10/2023. Per family member patient lives in a nursing facility and had a fall from her wheelchair as she was trying to get up. No LOC (loss of consciousness). Patient at baseline is non ambulatory; uses a wheelchair. On presentation, patient difficult to awaken, sternal rub elicits limited response. History limited due to patient's status; patient family member present at bedside is also unclear of history.
Physical Examination:
General: minimally responsive; open eyes minimally after sternal rub.
Eye: unable to examine
HENT: V shaped laceration on the left side of forehead
Respiratory: Lungs are clear to auscultation, respirations are non-labored
Cardiovascular: Normal rate, regular rhythm, good pulse equal in all extremities
Gastrointestinal: soft, non-tender, non-distended
Musculoskeletal: unable to examine
Integumentary: decubitus ulcer in sacral area and heal, present on admission
Neurologic: minimally responsive to sternal rub
Cognition and Speech: unable to examine
Psychiatric: unable to examine.
Impression and Plan
Patient non arousable initially on exam. Head CT on arrival shows 0.4 subdural hematoma, repeat CT head recommended in the AM.
Hospital [NAME]:
Heat CT (cat scan) on arrival shows 0.4 mm subdural hematoma. Dr. consulted recommended repeat CT (cat scan) head the following morning which was stable with 4 mm subdural hematoma. No intervention per neurosurgery. Patient is complaining of neck pain with history of cervical stenosis, previous workup negative for acute cardiac pathology. Patient's family requested application to new SNF (skilled nursing facility), during her stay patient had no acute events. Patient is ready for discharge.
Operative Report:
Consent: signed by patient
Location: forehead
Preparation and technique: 3 sutures placed
Interview on 08/10/2023 at 5:55 p.m. via telephone with LVN A, revealed on 01/10/2023 at about 4:00 p.m. Staff F came to the nurse's station where she was and advised her Resident #7 was requesting pain medication due to having neck pain. Staff E said she told Staff F Resident #7 had recently been prescribed Morphine for pain. LVN A said she and RN A walked over to Resident #7's room because she wanted to make sure Resident #7 was alert and I just wanted to observe her to make sure she was in pain. LVN A said she had been in Resident #7's room a short time before and she did not complain of any pain. Upon entering Resident #7's room, Resident #7 was observed sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed. LVN A said Resident #7 did complain of neck pain and requested pain medication. At that time LVN A said she and RN A went outside to the hall and unlocked the med cart and pulled the Morphine box out and compared the label on the box with the order which indicated to give 0.1 ml as needed for pain every 1 hour. LVN A said after she and RN A verified the name, dosage, and route she went back to Resident #7's room to transfer her to bed while RN A stayed in the hall preparing the medication. LVN A said she transferred Resident #7 back to bed and advised her not to get up and if she needed anything to make sure to press the call light. Soon after that RN A came into Resident #7's room and administered Morphine. LVN A said RN A held up the syringe, showed it to her, and asked if it was ok to administer the Morphine, LVN A said, I didn't physically look at the syringe, but I said yes, and RN A administered the Morphine orally. LVN A said we both left back to the nurse's station and immediately RN A said she thought she had given Resident #7 the wrong dose of Morphine. At that point, LVN A replied, what do you mean RN A repeated I gave Resident #7 the wrong dose. LVN A said she immediately walked over to the med cart unlocked it and pulled the Morphine box out of the narc box to check the syringe. LVN A said after Morphine was given to a resident #7, the syringe was placed in a red plastic bag and placed back in the manufacture's box along with the Morphine. LVN A said when she checked the manufacture's box the syringe was not there. LVN A asked RN A where she had left the syringe and her response was I think I left it in Resident #7's room. LVN A said she went to Resident #7's room and found the syringe in a plastic bag on top of the dresser. At that point, RN A picked up the syringe and pointed to the 1.0 ml and told LVN A that's how much I gave her. LVN A said the facility has no protocol on how to manage medication errors, she said what she did after learning of the medication error was what she learned in nursing school. LVN A said she had been working at this facility for about 5 years and was trained on medication pass when hired. LVN A said she immediately went to check on Resident #7 and found her to be alert, not in respiratory distress and still lying-in bed. LVN A said, I don't remember if RN F or I notified hospice nurse, DON, and family member but they were notified immediately of the medication error. LVN A said I went to check on Resident #7 couple more times, I checked her breathing and was not in distress and was alert. LVN A said she does not remember the exact times she checked on Resident #7's saying, it's been a while. LVN A said between 5:30 p.m. and 5:45 p.m., a CNA was walking by Resident #7's room and noticed her laying on her left side on the floor. CNA called for help and LVN A ran to assist her. LVN A said Resident #7 was right by the door laying on her left side, bleeding from her forehead and had a bump on top of her scalp. LVN A said Resident #7 told her she managed to get out of bed, sit herself on her wheelchair when she tried reaching for something and fell. LVN A said she asked Resident #7 why she had gotten out of bed, and she replied, you know I'm stubborn. LVN A said she called Resident #7's doctor to inform of fall and was given instruction to send Resident #7 to the hospital to be evaluated. LVN A was asked if she notified Resident #7's doctor of the morphine dose error and she said yes adding I also notified the hospital when I called to let them know we were sending Resident #7 to the ER due to the fall. LVN A said Resident #7 was sent to the hospital due to the fall and not to the Morphine medication error. LVN A said Resident #7 had a history of falling and had received stiches on her head before due to the falls she had sustained since being admitted . LVN A said she made an incident report related to the medication error and the fall Resident #7 sustained on 01/10/2023. Surveyor asked LVN A how a medication error of Morphine negatively affect Resident #7 she replied to the most serious side effect could be respiratory distress. LVN A said the next day (01/11/2023) the DON and Administrator provided both she and RN A an in-service training on medication errors, were counseled individually and suspended for 3 days pending an investigation. Surveyor asked LVN A if RN A had given an explanation as to why she gave the wrong dose and she said RN A told her that in her previous job it was customary to give 1.0 of morphine so she figured it was the same at this facility.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 9:40 a.m., Primary Care physician (PCP) said he was not informed of Resident #7's morphine medication error. He said he wanted to make sure we understood this was the first time he was informed. The PCP said if he had been informed of the morphine medication error that would have unleashed a whole new protocol. Surveyor asked what he would have instructed the nurse to do, he replied, there would have been two possible responses. If resident was not experiencing respiratory distress, pulse was within range, she was cognitively aware, and heart rate was not abnormal, I would have instructed the nurse to observe the resident continuously (he did not say how long because everyone is different), resident did not need to be sent to the hospital because at that point because resident was stable. If the resident were experiencing respiratory distress, pulse was not within range, was not cognitively aware, and heart rate was abnormal, he would have instructed the nurse to administer Narcan and sent to hospital immediately. The PCP said Resident #7 received 10 times her prescribed order of morphine. PCP said 1.0 is the max dose of morphine and not deadly for a hospice resident because eventually they will require a higher dose. The PCP said Resident #7 still needed to be monitored for any adverse effect.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 10:30 a.m., The Hospice DON said Resident #7 was placed on hospice due to respiratory failure. The Hospice DON said facility called hospice at 09:32 p.m. on 01/10/2023. to inform them Resident#7 suffered a fall and sent to the hospital due to sustaining a hematoma to her forehead. The Hospice DON said on 01/11/2023 at 11:15 a.m. Facility's DON called them and advised of the morphine medication error. The Hospice DON said facility's DON said the syringes that came in the manufacture's box of the morphine medication did not have numbers only lines and that could have caused RN A to administer the wrong dosage of morphine to Resident #7. The Hospice DON said the medication/syringe was delivered by the pharmacy and it was considered a multi-use syringe. The Hospice DON said as a correction plan the hospice company delivered 10 to 15 syringes with numbers to avoid another medication error. The Hospice DON said if the facility had called immediately after the morphine medication error, she would have sent the hospice RN to the facility to assess Resident #7. The Hospice DON said she would have also instructed hospice RN to check her level of consciousness more frequent, her vitals for hypertension and fall precautions for at least 2 hours after medication error. The Hospice DON said Narcan would have been ordered depending how Resident #7 looked.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 11:00 a.m. The Hospice DON called back to say she had spoken to the previous acting hospice DON (at time of incident) who had clarified the first-time facility's DON had reported morphine medication error was on 01/11/2023. The Hospice DON also verified they had notified Resident #7's primary physician of her fall on 01/10/2023 at 9:30 p.m.
Interview on 08/11/2023 at 11:15 a.m., LVN A said she had struck out Morphine entry on progress notes at 18:47 on PCC because she was not the one who had administered the morphine to Resident #7.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 12:50 p.m., RN A said on January 10, 2023, at approximately 4:00 p.m. while working under the supervision of Staff E (as it was her first day on the floor since being hired) she walked into Resident #7's room to check on her. RN A said Resident #7 complained of neck pain and requested pain medication. She immediately went looking for LVN A and found her in the nurse's station. She informed LVN A Resident #7 was requesting pain medication due to neck pain. RN A said she was told by LVN A Resident #7 was under hospice care and had a PRN (as needed) order of Morphine. RN A said she proceeded to the medication cart to prepare the syringe with the morphine solution. RN A said after she prepared the syringe with the morphine solution, she went looking for LVN A. RN A said she found LVN A in the medication storage room and appeared to be talking to someone on the phone because she had an ear pod in one ear. RN A said she signaled LVN A though the glass window to come out. RN A said LVN A opened the door without coming out and at that time they both checked the Morphine order with the label, name, dose, route, and I showed her the syringe with the morphine solution, and she nodded yes, she gave me a thumbs up. RN A said she then proceeded to Resident #7's room to administer the morphine. RN A said she first educated Resident #7 on the medication she was going to receive and transferred her back to her bed and administered the Morphine oral solution. RN A said she went to check on Resident #7 after 30 minutes or 1 hour (was not sure on the time) and Resident #7 was good, being her normal self. RN A said, we did our thing throughout our shift and around 5 or 6 p.m. LVN A calls out for help because Resident #7 had fallen and had a wound on her forehead. RN A said she stayed with Resident #7 while LVN A went to call 911. RN A said Resident was found between her bed and bathroom. RN A said she discovered the morphine medication error at about 6:30 p.m. when she was looking back at the eMAR and discovered I have given more than I should. RN A said she immediately informed LVN A but does not remember what her response was. RN A said, I texted DON at 6:31 p.m. telling her LVN A and I wanted to meet with her tomorrow to review possible med error. RN A said she texted DON because it was after working hours and DON was no longer at facility. As per RN A, DON responded back via text at 7:00 p.m. telling her Yes, please do so. RN A said Resident #7 had already been discharged to the hospital by the time she discovered the morphine medication error. RN A said sometime before the end of her shift LVN A told her We could have fixed it RN A reply to LVN A was there's no fixing, I gave what I gave. Surveyor asked RN A if she knew what LVN A meant by that and she said, to put 0.1 ml in the narc sheet even though I had given 1.0 ml of morphine. RN A said the next morning, DON met with both and them together and individually. She said they also had a general training with all nurses to make sure all nurses were doing their job. RN A said she received training on how to read eMAR and was not sure on the topics of other trainings received after med error incident. She said she and LVN A were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Surveyor asked RN A how Resident #7 could have been negatively impacted by receiving 1.0 ml of morphine sulfate instead of the ordered 0.1 ml, she said her breathing distress and high blood pressure. Staff F said 1.0 ml of morphine sulfate was appropriate for hospice patients but there must have been a reason Resident # 7's doctor had prescribed 0.1 ml of morphine sulfate. RN A said she decided to voluntarily quit her job as a registered nurse at the facility because she was told by someone LVN A had written a statement saying she had never shown her the syringe. RN A said she believed they would take LVN's statement over her since she had just been hired. RN A also said it was not a healthy environment and did not feel comfortable working at the facility. LVN A said she took a picture of the syringe used to administer the morphine sulphate to Resident #7
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 11:20 a.m. The Medical Director said he was informed of Resident #7's medication error by the facility's nurse on duty (did not have nurse's name) on 01/11/2023 and was not sure of the time either. The Medical Director said he and the rest of the QAPI team discussed medication error on 02/23/2023. The Medical Director said during the meeting they checked narcotic orders for all residents. The Medical Director was asked how Morphine medication error could negatively impacted Resident #7 and his response was she could have suffered neurological sedation, respiratory depression or excessive sedation but added Resident #7 did not have any negative effects. The Medical Director said if Resident #7 had suffered any side effects he would have ordered Narcan and sent to the hospital immediately. The Medical Director emphasized he was available to the facility 24/7 and facility did not notify him immediately.
Interview on 08/11/2023 at 3:00 p.m., The DON said she expects all her nurses to inform her immediately in case of a medication error. She said if she was not at facility (after working hours) she expects a call from them immediately. The DON said she will ask the nurse what medication was given, the dosage and the correct dosage and depending on what they tell her, she would instruct them to either monitor or send to hospital. The DON said she immediately notifies resident's primary physician, family representative, medical director, and administrator of the medication error. The DON said after resident was cared for, she would complete the medication error report, start an investigation, re-educate staff and report to HHSC. The DON said the medication error was discovered after Resident #7 was discharged to the hospital due to sustaining an unwitnessed fall. The DON said Resident #7 had a history of falls and was non-compliant. The DON said she notified Resident # 7's primary doctor and hospice immediately of the fall but was not sure if she informed them of the medication error on the same day. The DON said the fall or medication error was not care planned because Resident #7 did not go back to facility after being discharged from hospital.
Interview on 08/11/2023 at 3:30 p.m., The Administrator said facility's policy regarding medication error was for the nurses to let the DON know immediately after discovering a medication error was occurred. The Administrator said depending on how the resident was feeling, DON will instruct of appropriate action. The Administrator said it was the DON's responsibility to inform her of any medication errors immediately after being notified of one. The Administrator was asked how a morphine medication error could negatively affect Resident #7; her response was I don't know how to answer that question.
Observation on 08/11/2023 at 1:41 p.m. RN A texted picture to surveyor and it showed a thin syringe with 4 lines (0.25 ml, 0.50 ml, 0.75 ml, and 1 ml).
Record review of print out facility provided revealed five residents who were currently receiving Morphine.
Record review sample audit conducted by DON showed five resident who were currently receiving Morphine.
Record review of facility's policy Notification of Changes dated 01/10/2020 revealed:
policy
To provide guidance on when to communicate acute changes in status to MD, NP, and/responsible party. The facility will immediately inform the resident: consult with the resident's physician; and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or appropriate family member(s) of the following:
An accident resulting in injury to the resident that potentially requires physician intervention
a significant change in the physical, mental or psychosocial status of the resident
The need to significantly alter the resident's treatment
The facility documents resident assessment(s), interventions, physician and family notification(s) on SBAR, Nurses Progress Notes, or Telephone Order Form (physician/family notice) as appropriate
INTERACT IV may be used as a resource for evaluating resident change of condition for physician notification
a.
Immediate Physician Notification-the physician is notified immediately and should respond timely (within minutes), the Medical Director will be contacted before the resident will be sent for emergency room evaluation.
b.
Non-Immediate Physician Notification-the physician is notified and there should be a return call within the same day (worsening of symptoms use Immediate Physician Notification steps)
The Administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/13/2023 at 6:54 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of 4 and a scope of J due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
1. Immediate Action Taken
On 1/10/2023 resident # 7 was sent to the hospital and never returned to the facility.
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee completed an audit of all residents receiving Morphine in the center to verify that correct dose of Morphine was entered into the computer. This will be completed at 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023.
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee completed rounds on all residents to verify that a physician's notification was completed if a resident was identified with a change of condition. No residents were identified
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee started education with all licensed nurses on:
o
Policy on Medication Administration Guidelines that provide directions on the process of verifying labels for accuracy, verifying administration accuracy, verifying a focused assessment, administering the medication according to the physician's orders. This will be completed by 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
o
Policy on Preventing/Detecting adverse consequences and Medications errors that provides directions to license nurses on immediate actions to take for a signification medication related error or adverse consequence:
License nurse will notify the attending physician promptly of any significant error or adverse consequence
License Nurse will Immplement (that is how it was written on POR) orders as directed by physician, and the resident is monitored closely for 24 to 72 hours or as directed.
License Nurse will Communicate with other across shifts as indicated to alert staff of the need to monitor resident
License Nurse will Complete an Incident report or Medication error form
License Nurse to Report significant error to the DON
DON will report significant error to Consultant Pharmacist
This will be completed by 3:00 pm on 8/12/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
The DON/Designee will be responsible for ensuring all license nurses understand and follow the guidelines for a significant error or adverse consequence.
o
Policy on Notification Change of Condition that provides directions on notifying family and physician when a change in a resident's conditions occurs. This will be completed by 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
o
A skills competency on Medication Administration will be completed for all license nurses, validating proficiency in Medication Administration to validate medication administration competency and action to take if a significant error occurs. The DON/Designee will be responsible to ensure all license nurses are proficient in Medication Administration. This will be completed by 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
2. Identification of Residents Affected or Likely to be Affected:
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee started an audit review of all residents with new orders for the past 7 days to verify that correct dose of medications was entered into the computer correctly and no significant error occurred. This will be completed by 10:00 am on 8/12/203.
3. Actions to Prevent Occurrence/Recurrence:
The DON/Designee daily will review all new medication orders during the morning meeting to verify all orders were entered correctly x 30 days.
The DON/Designee daily will review the 24-hour report daily x 30 days to verify that any resident with a change of condition has physician and family notification.
The DON/Designee will do random skills validation reviews with licensed nurses to verify medication administration competency and knowledge on what steps to take if a significant error occurs. The DON/Designee will be responsible to ensure all licenses nurses are proficient in Medication administration.
On 8/11/2023 at 8:15pm the facility's Administrator notified the Medical Director regarding the Immediate Jeopardy's the facility received related to residents free from significant medication error and Notification in change of condition and reviewed plan to sustain compliance.
Verification: Started on 08/14/2023 at 8:30 a.m. and included:
The following observations, record reviews and interviews were conducted by the survey team to ensure licensed staff's understanding of in-service trainings received between 08/11/2023 and 08/13/2023:
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN C was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN D was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN D was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, RN B was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Medication Administration Guidelines conducted by DON. 23 LVN's and 7 RN's were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/14/2023.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 resident (R#4) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents, in that:
Registered Nurse (RN E) and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA D) failed to use a mechanical lift to transfer R#4 resulting in R#4 sustaining a left femoral fracture.
The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 03/03/2023 and ended on 03/09/2023. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began.
Past Non-Compliance form sent to Administrator on 8/11/2023 at 7:23 PM.
This failure could lead to the injury of residents that are transferred with a mechanical lift.
The findings included:
Record review of R #4's file reflected an [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of 02/09/2022. Diagnoses included: Osteoporosis (bones become weak and brittle), fracture of lower end of left femur (upper leg), Myalgia (muscle pain), fracture of left tibia (one of the two bones that connects the knee with the ankle bones), fracture of upper end of left humerus (upper arm), history of falling, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy (disturbed nerve cell activity in the brain), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), muscle wasting and atrophy, and muscle weakness.
Record review of R #4's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected R#4 had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact), required extensive assistance (resident involved in activity, staff provide weight-bearing support) with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS also reflected R #4 required total dependence (full staff performance every time during entire 7-day period) with transfers (how resident moves between surfaces including to or from: bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position). R #4 required a two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene.
Record review of R #4's Care Plan dated 06/26/2023 reflected R #4 sustained alteration in musculoskeletal status related to left hand contracture-hemiplegia, left humerus fracture, left tibia fracture, and left femur fracture. R #4's care plan also reflected R #4 required total assistance x 2 with mechanical lift for transfers.
Record Review reflected a progress note documented by RN E indicated on 03/03/2023 RN E and CNA D transferred R #4 from her wheelchair to the bed at approximately 5:54 PM. RN E and CNA D transferred R #4 without a mechanical lift. At the time of the transfer R #4 complained of pain to her left leg. An order for an x-ray was obtained.
Further review of R #4 nurse's notes documented by RN F on 03/03/2023 at 8:30 PM reflected R #4 complained of pain and was sent out to the hospital for an x-ray approximately 2 hours later. The hospital x-ray revealed a distal fracture (break in the bone just above the knee) of the left femur.
Record review of a progress note documented by RN F dated 03/04/2023 at 3:44 AM indicated R #4 stated she did not fall at any time. She stated that during the day shift, when she was being transferred from the bed, the mechanical lift was not working and that an attempt was made to transfer her. That was when she felt pain to her left lower extremity and immediately the attempt to transfer her was stopped. Nurse Practitioner was informed.
Record review of the facility investigation dated 03/11/2023 revealed CNA D and RN E conducted a manual transfer due to the mechanical lift not operating. CNA D informed RN E of the mechanical lift not working, and RN E decided to do a manual transfer with CNA D. R #4 complained of pain to her left lag. RN F notified the doctor. X-ray results showed no fracture. R #4 continued to complain of pain. RN F notified the doctor. New order to send R #4 to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. R #4 returned to the facility with no fracture and no hospital paperwork. RN F contacted the hospital and RN F was told R #4 had a left femoral fracture. New orders for pain medication. The Administrator interviewed R #4. R #4 stated she did not fall. R #4 stated she did not feel the incident was intentional and she gets good care at the facility. Investigation findings: Unfounded. Provider action taken post-investigation: RN E and CNA D were terminated. In-serviced all staff on abuse, neglect, fall management, Hoyer transfer, and plan of care. Transfer skill review.
Interview with R #4 on 08/08/2023 at 11:45 AM revealed RN E and CNA D transferred her without using the mechanical lift, resulting in pain to her left leg when her left leg got stuck under her right leg during the transfer. She was checked by the nurse, sent to the hospital, and was diagnosed with a fracture.
Interview with RN F (incoming shift nurse on 03/03/2023) on 08/10/2023 at 10:30 AM revealed R #4 was transferred by RN E and CNA D without a mechanical lift. RN F said he was not working when the transfer was done as he came into his shift after. RN F said he was working when R #4 was complaining of pain and R #4 was sent out the hospital due to pain to her left leg. It was determined R #4 obtained a fracture to her left leg. RN F said he recalled RN E being in a hurry to leave the facility during their shift change. RN F said the facility did trainings after this incident on how to properly use the mechanical lift. RN F said whenever there is an incident, the facility also does trainings on abuse/neglect, resident rights, and fall prevention, which the facility also did in this case.
Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 08/10/2023 at 1:15 PM revealed the facility had a total of four mechanical lifts used for transfers. He added that the lifts were serviced every 3 months by the medical equipment provider. Maintenance Supervisor said there had not been any inoperable lifts or issues reported during the month of March 2023.
Interview with the DON on 08/10/2023 at 3:40 PM revealed RN E and CNA D transferred R #4 without a mechanical lift, resulting in a femoral fracture to her left leg. The DON indicated that both staff were feeling pressured because at the time of transfer, R #4 was crying and wanting to get into bed, although the sling for the lift was not positioned well. The DON said CNA D and RN E did not use the lift because of the sling, not because the lift was not working, or the battery was not charged. The DON added that if there was any issue with the mechanical lift, whether it was the battery, lift, or sling, staff should get another mechanical lift, and not transfer the resident manually. The DON said staff should have followed R #4's care plan which indicated that she required a two-person transfer with the mechanical lift. The DON said R #4 had Osteopenia and brittle bones. The DON said failing to use the mechanical lift, placed R #4 at risk of obtaining injuries such as fractures, which was what ended up happening. The DON said all staff had been re-educated on the proper usage of mechanical lifts and transfers, on abuse/neglect, fall management, and resident rights.
Interview with the Administrator on 08/11/2023 at 11:45 AM revealed RN E and CNA D transferred R #4 without a mechanical lift, resulting in a left femoral fracture. The Administrator said staff were trained on how to properly transfer residents. The Administrator said staff are trained when they are hired, annually, quarterly, and as needed. The Administrator said all staff were trained again after this incident with R #4. The Administrator added that there were several mechanical lifts, batteries, and extra slings that can be used at any time throughout the facility. The Administrator said the staff should have taken steps to follow R #4's care plan. The Administrator said RN E and CNA D were both terminated due to poor performance during the incident. The Administrator said to prevent an incident like that from reoccurring, they re-trained and re-educated all staff. The Administrator said staff have been in-serviced on mechanical lifts, transfers, resident rights, abuse/neglect, and fall management. The Administrator said they completed the in-services with all staff to ensure they knew where the batteries were located, how to properly use the sling, and the lift. The Administrator said the skills review for all staff were completed where staff demonstrated how to complete the skills. The Administrator said there have not been any similar situations or issues happen since then.
Record Review of the Transfer of Residents Policy dated, 05/2012 revealed:
-Transfers are defined as the act of moving a resident from one surface to another. The goal is to ensure the safety of the resident when moving from one place to another, to prevent injuries to the resident.
Record Review of the Mechanical Lift Policy dated, 04/24/2014 revealed:
-To move immobile residents from whom manual transfer poses potential for a resident injury.
The following observations, interviews and record reviews were conducted by the survey team to ensure the Past Non-Compliance was corrected by 03/09/2023:
-The following interviews were conducted by the Survey Team on 08/09/2023 and 08/10/2023: 2 CNA's, 2 LVN's, and 1 RN.
-Staff acknowledged understanding of the topics they were in-serviced regarding the mechanical lift.
-In-services reflect 57 staff were trained on the mechanical lift from 03/04/2023-03/09/2023.
-Interviews with the DON, Administrator, and record review of the employee files reflected that CNA D and RN E were terminated due to poor performance during the incident with R #4.
-On 08/17/2023, CNA N and CNA O were observed during a transfer with a mechanical lift. No discrepancies were noted.
Interview with R #5 on 08/08/23 at 2:00 PM revealed she was doing fine. When asked if she had any issues with her care, R #5 shook her head no. When asked if she had any complaints or concerns, R #5 shook her head no. Other baseline questions were asked. However, R #5 would mumble or was clearly not understood.
Interview with CNA A on 08/09/2023 at 1:55 PM revealed CNA A worked and transferred R #4 on the morning of 03/03/2023. CNA A said the mechanical lift was working on the morning of 03/03/2023 without issue. CNA A said if the mechanical lift was not working properly due to the battery or other reason, the staff should not do the transfer without the lift. CNA A said they should look for another battery or another lift. CNA A said R #4 required a two-person transfer with the mechanical lift. CNA A said the facility did trainings on how to use the lift properly, abuse/neglect, fall management, and rights. CNA A said the trainings are completed constantly, but the trainings were also completed after R #4 was injured.
Interview with LVN C on 08/09/2023 at 3:00 PM revealed LVN C worked on 03/04/2023 when R #4 was requesting a police report be made for her injury. LVN C said she had informed the nurse and the nurse indicated to go ahead and call the police. LVN C said an officer came out to the facility and spoke to R #4 regarding her fracture. LVN C said she was not working on 03/03/2023 when R #4 got injured. LVN C said R #4 has always been a two person transfer with the mechanical lift. LVN C said the battery for the lift is charged in the supply room. LVN C said it is up to everyone to ensure the battery is charged. LVN C said there are extra lifts in the facility. LVN C said the facility did do trainings for abuse/neglect, rights, fall management, and how to use the lift properly. LVN C said the DON also did a skills review. LVN C said the trainings are done constantly but they were also done after R #4 was injured.
Interview with LVN G on 08/10/2023 at 2:05 PM revealed LVN G said the extra battery for the lift is charging in the supply room next to the nurse's station. LVN G said when staff are hired, they are shown where the battery is kept. LVN G said if the lift is not working or if the battery is not charged, then the staff should tell the resident to wait a moment. LVN G said the staff can either look for another lift, change the battery, or charge the current battery a bit to use the lift. LVN G said the staff should not do the transfer without the lift if the resident requires it as they need to follow the care plan. LVN G said the facility constantly do trainings, but they were also done after R #4 was injured on 03/03/2023. LVN G said the trainings were on abuse/neglect, rights, fall management, and how to use the lift properly. LVN G said they were told about the extra batteries, extra slings, and how to ensure the lift is working before trying to use it.
Interview with CNA H on 08/10/2023 at 2:35 PM revealed CNA H said R #4 requires the two-person transfer with the mechanical lift. CNA H said whenever she is going to use the mechanical lift, she ensures is has battery and that it is in good condition to use. CNA H said there is an extra battery in the supply room by the nurse's station. CNA H said if the mechanical lift is not working, the staff should look for another one. CNA H said the facility constantly does trainings with them to ensure they know how to do transfers or about abuse/neglect. CNA H said the DON did a training to review their skills after R #4 got hurt on 03/03/2023. CNA H said the DON also did trainings on abuse/neglect, rights, fall management, and how to use the lift properly.
In an observation with R #17 on 08/10/23 at 5:35 PM. CNA N and CNA O knocked on the door, closed the door and washed their hands. CNA N closed the blinds. The CNAs explained to R #17 what they were going to do. CNA O turned him to place sling under his right side. CNA N turned him to place the sling under his left side. The CNAs kept asking R #17 if he is okay throughout process. CNA N moved the Hoyer lift into position and put on the brakes. CNA N lowered the mechanical lift. The CNAs connected the clips into place. CNA N lifted the mechanical lift using the remote. The CNAs comforted R #17 throughout, ensuring him he was okay. The CNAs moved the mechanical lift over with R #17 in the sling. The CNAs positioned the lift in front of the wheelchair and put the brakes on the lift. CNA N lowered the sling. The CNAs ensured R #17's feet, body, and wheelchair were in good position as the sling was lowered to the wheelchair. The CNAs unhooked the sling. CNA N moved the lift away. CNA O moved R #17 in the wheelchair and positioned him in front of the television. CNA O informed R #17 that it would be time for dinner soon.
In an interview with R #17 on 08/10/23 at 5:46 PM, R #17 was asked what his name was and how was he doing. R #17 did not respond. R #17 was asked other baseline questions, but he did not respond.
Record review reflected that from 03/04/2023-03/09/2023 all staff were in-serviced and re-educated on the proper usage of the mechanical lift, mechanical transfers-staff to use 2-person assist for mechanical transfers, staff to audit the mechanical lift prior to moving the machine, assure battery was charged, slings were matching, intact, and not torn. If the battery was not charged, staff were to find a new charged battery promptly. Plan of care-staff to follow the resident's plan of care at all times. The facility also in-serviced and re-educated all staff on resident rights, abuse/neglect, and fall management. A skills review was also completed for transfers including performance criteria of: properly cleaned hands prior to procedure, explained procedure to resident and encouraged resident to participate, provided for privacy as appropriate, used transfer device specified by care plan (Hoyer, slid board, etc.), used gait belt and obtained assistance as indicated by care plan, locked brakes or stabilized chair if not equipped with brakes, safely transferred resident using proper body mechanics, and type of transfer observed (chair to bed, bed to chair, chair to commode).
Record review on 08/11/23 reflected there were 34 residents in the facility that use a mechanical lift, including R#4, R #5, and R #17.
Record Review of Employee files reflected:
RN E - Acknowledgement of abuse neglect and exploitation on 05/21/2021
Date of hire for RN E - 05/27/2021
CNA D - Acknowledgement of abuse neglect and exploitation 01/11/2023
Facility trainings done on 01/11/2023 for CNA D included: Reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of belongings, and Residents rights and responsibilities.
Date of hire for CNA D - 01/13/2023
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drug records are in order and that an account of all controll...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident # 10) being reviewed for pharmacy services.
Facility did not ensure that narcotics were reconciled as being given from the resident's eMAR to the resident's narcotic reconciliation form on medication cart.
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their narcotic medications and drug diversion.
An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/13/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:54 p.m. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/17/2023 at 2:30 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm but potential for more than minimal harm due to no evidence of actual harm to any resident, because of the facility's need to complete in-servicing and auditing interventions.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #8's admission Record indicated Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Dementia with no behavioral disturbance, sequelae of cerebral infarction (residual effects or conditions produced after acute phase of an illness or injury has ended), other instability left wrist, chronic venous insufficiency (improper functioning of the vein valves in the leg, causing swelling and skin changes), presence of aortocoronary bypass graft (a surgical procedure used to treat coronary heart disease), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), oropharyngeal phase (malignant cells form in the tissues of the oropharynx) nondisplaced fracture of the lateral epicondyle of left humerus, contracture left hand, vascular dementia (brain damaged caused by multiple strokes), psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, dysphasia following cerebral infarction, presence of automatic cardiac defibrillator, Unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles), bipolar disorder, presence of cardiac pacemaker, epilepsy, and epileptic syndrome.
Record review of Resident #8's MDS assessment, dated May 09, 2023, revealed:
BIMS-left blank (severe impairment)
requires extensive assistance with a two person assist with bed mobility
requires limited assistance with a two person assist with transfer, dressing, eating and personal hygiene
Record review of Resident #8's comprehensive care plan dated 03/08/2023 revealed:
Focus: Resident #8 has a terminal illness and is receiving hospice or palliative care.
Goal: Dignity will be maintained, and the resident will be kept comfortable and pain free within one hour of interventions through next review. Date initiated: 03/08/2023/Target date: 05/21/2023.
Interventions: Monitor signs and symptoms of increased pain, discomfort-give medications and treat as ordered and monitor for relief.
Record review of Resident #9's admission Record indicated Resident #9 is a [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, osteoarthritis, scoliosis in thoracic region, acute kidney failure, history of falls, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, diverticulosis of large intestine, age-related physical debility, need for assistance with personal care, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, personal history of covid-19, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), alternating exotropia (outward turning eyes), edema, constipation, seasonal allergic rhinitis, major depressive disorder, hypertension, hypokalemia (low potassium), hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of lipids), anemia, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, presence of intraocular lens, vitreous membranes and strands, right eye.
Record review of Resident #9's MDS record dated 07/18/2023 revealed:
BIMS: 12 (cognitively intact)
Requires extensive assistance with a two person assist for bed mobility
Requires extensive assistance with a one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene
Record review of Resident #8's eMAR schedule for February 2023 revealed:
Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 20 MG/5ML (Morphine Sulfate), give 0.25 ml via G-tube every hour of sob (shortness of breath) and or severe pain. Start date: 02/03/2023 at 0945 D/C 08/12/2023
Record review of Resident #8's eMAR schedule for March-August 2023 revealed:
Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) give 0.25 ml sublingually every 1 hours as needed for SOB (shortness of breath)/Severe Pain 7-10.
Record review of Resident #8's orders for Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML, give 2 MG/ML every 4 hours as needed for anxiety (sublingual).
Record review of Resident #8's eMAR schedule for March 24,2023-June 12, 2023, revealed:
Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML. Give 1m by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety, give sublingual.
Record review of Resident #8's Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC sheet) and eMAR (electronic medication administration record) revealed:
Record review of Resident #8's eMAR schedule for March 24,2023-June 12, 2023, revealed:
Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML. Give 1m by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety, give sublingual.
Record review of Resident #8's Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC sheet) and EMAR revealed:
April 2023, 8 doses of Lorazepam 2 mg/ml were signed off on the Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC Sheet) and 15 were signed off on eMAR.
May 2023, 4 doses of Lorazepam 2 mg/ml were signed off on the Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC Sheet) and 4 were signed off on eMAR.
June 2023, 6 doses of Lorazepam 2 mg/ml were signed off on the Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC Sheet) and 3 were signed off on eMAR.
From February 3, 2023, to August 12, 2023, 38 doses Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) were signed off on the Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC sheet) while only 16 doses of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) were signed off on the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR).
From June 2023 to July 12, 2023, 8 doses of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) were signed off on Resident #9's Controlled Substance Record of Administration (NARC Sheet) while only 2 doses were signed off her Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR).
Interview on 08/12/2023 at 10:30 p.m., DON and ADON were asked to reconcile Resident #8's order of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) with his Controlled Substance Record of Administration with his record of Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) in front of surveyor. Both DON and ADON confirmed 38 doses of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) were signed off on his Controlled Substance Record of Administration and only 16 doses were signed off on his Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR). Surveyor asked why the discrepancies and DON replied, I need to check with my nurses.
Record review of Resident #9's eMAR schedule for June-July 2023 revealed:
Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML-give 0.25 ml sublingually every 4 hours as needed for Pain/SOB (shortness of breath). Start date-04/12/2023-Discontinue date-07/21/2023.
Interview on 08/12/2023 at 10:40 p.m., DON and ADON were asked to reconcile Resident #9's order of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) with her Controlled Substance Record of Administration with her record of Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) in front of surveyor. Both DON and ADON confirmed 8 doses of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (morphine sulfate) while only 2 doses were signed off her Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR). Surveyor asked why the discrepancies and DON replied, I need to check with my nurses.
Record review of Resident #10's admission Record dated 8/13/23 reflected [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 7/7/23 and with diagnoses of Malignant Neoplasm of Vertebral Column (cancerous tumor of Spinal column), Malignant Neoplasm of Liver (cancerous tumor of liver) Not specified as Primary or Secondary, Malignant Neoplasm (cancerous tumor) Unspecified Part of Unspecified Bronchus or Lung, Malignant Neoplasm(cancerous tumor) of Pelvic Bones, Sacrum (triangular bone between hipbones of the pelvis in lower back) & Coccyx (small triangular bone at bottom of spinal column), Malignant Neoplasm(cancerous tumor) of Bone & Articular Cartilage (living tissue that lines the bony surface of joints) Unspecified, and Unspecified Cirrhosis (damage where healthy cells are replaced by scar tissue) of Liver.
Record review of Resident #10's Clinical Physician Orders dated 8/11/23 reflected he had orders for -Oxycodone HCI Oral Tablet 10 MG 0.5 by mouth every 1 hour as needed start date: 7/7/23, d/c (discontinue) date: 7/12/23
-Oxycodone HCI Oral Tablet 10 MG 0.5 by mouth every 1 hour as needed start date: 7/15/23, d/c (discontinue) date: 7/21/23
-Oxycodone HCI Oral Tablet 10 MG .05 by mouth every 1 hour as needed start date: 7/10/23, d/c (discontinue) date: 7/14/23
-Oxycodone HCI Oral Tablet 10 MG give 10 MG by mouth every 1 hour as needed start date: 7/22/23, d/c (discontinue) date: 7/24/23
-Oxycodone HCI Oral Tablet 10 MG give 10 MG by mouth every 1 hour as needed start date: 7/21/23, d/c (discontinue) date: 7/21/23
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/10/23 at 0529 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/10/23 at 0530 and again at 2315 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/11/23 at 2342 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/11/23 at 0530 and again at 2342 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/12/23 at 2359 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/12/23 at 0109, 0402, and 2359 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/15/23 no dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/15/23 at 2320 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/17/23 10:31, 12:09 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/17/23 at 11:00, 12:00, 1400 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/19/23 1149 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/19/23 at 1149, 1430 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
-Record review of Resident #10's EMAR reflected on 7/22/23 0845 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
Record review of Resident #10's Controlled Substance Record of Administration reflected on 7/22/23 at 8:45 and 9:45 dose of oxycodone HCI oral concentrate 10 MG/0.5 ML .25 ml given by mouth.
In an interview on 8/14/23 at 11:43 a.m. LVN M stated she does not recall it was human error and she did not have an excuse for not documenting on the EMAR of Resident #10's narcotic dosage. She said she knew she is supposed to document on both the EMAR and the narcotic sheet.
In an interview on 8/14/23 at 1:21 p.m. LVN W stated she corrected her error and let the hospice nurse know. She said she filled out medication error paperwork when she failed to document on EMAR the dosage of narcotic given to Resident #10. She said she knew the procedure but was maybe in a rush that day. She could not remember.
Record review of facility's policy on Drug Diversion Guideline dated 02/23/2017 revealed:
The following recommendations are designed to reduce and limit drug diversions:
Signing the narcotic shift count sheet means you are accepting responsibility for the controlled substances. Therefore, do not sign unless you are certain that all the controlled substances are present and have not been alternated/tempered with or altered in any way.
Document usage both on MAR and narcotic count sheet as soon as possible after administration of medication
Document administration of PRN's controlled substances on the MAR's including dose, date, time, route and effectiveness of medication
Notify the DON and/or pharmacy consultant immediately in the event of suspected drug tampering or diversion
Reporting
Drug diversions or potential drug diversions are reported immediately to Administrator, DON, Pharmacy, State Agency, and Police for investigation.
Record review of facility's policy on Clinical Document Guidelines dated 03/25/2014 revealed:
Policy
The patients clinical record provides a record of the health status, including observations, measurements, history and prognosis and serves as a primary document describing health care services provided to the patient
Fundamental Information
The clinical record is used by healthcare team to record, preserve and communicate the patient's progress and current treatment
Procedure
Clinical document entries should be objective, factual information and communication that pertain to the care of the patient for i.e., patient centered
Clinical document entry should contain the month, day, year and the time the narrative is written
Entries are signed by the person writing the narrative and include the first initial, last name and the title or credentials of the author
Each healthcare team member must document his or her own clinical record entries
An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/13/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:54 p.m.
A plan of removal was accepted on 08/13/2023 at 6:54 p.m. and indicated the following:
1. Immediate Action Taken
A. DON/Designee completed a resident Pain assessment on resident #8, and #9, verified that these 2 residents did not have a negative outcome due to license nurse failure to either initial the
E-MAR after the medication administration, or failure to sign out for the medication on the
Narcotic controlled count sheet. Resident # 10 was discharged from the facility on 7/22/2023. This was completed on 8/13/2023 at 7:45 pm.
B. On 8/13/2023 DON/Designee began education with all licensed nurses On Clinical Practice Guidelines Medication and Documentation with emphasis on:
Administer the medication according to the physician order.
Document initials and/or signature for medications and treatments administered on the E- MAR immediately following administration.
When a controlled medication is administered the licensed nurse obtains the medication from the locked area. The licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters the following information on the accountability record when removing the dose from controlled storage; date and time of administration, amount administered, signature of the nurse administering the dose. (Also document controlled medication dose administrated on the E-MAR)
Strike out initials for those medication or treatment that were not administered and document reason for the non -administration in the clinical record.
When a dose of a controlled medication is removed from the container for administration but refused or not given, the medication must be destroyed with two nurse witness. Both nurses sign the accountability record on the line representing the dose.
Document PRN medication and treatment administration on the E-MAR along with the reason immediately following administration. Document effectiveness of the intervention on the E-MAR as indicated
Review each E-MAR after each medication administration is completed and prior to the end of the shift to validate documentation is completed and supports services provided according to physician orders.
Document omission or held medication on the 24- Hour Report
Complete a Medication Error Report for medication administration discrepancies
Provide a summary of medication administration issues to on-coming charge nurse during shift-to-shift report
This education will be completed on 8/14/2023 by 10:00am and no licensed nurse will be able to work until this education has been completed.
The DON/Designee will be responsible to ensure this education is completed and all licensed nurses understands bullet points above related to providing accurate administration and documentation of medication.
2. Identification of Residents Affected or Likely to be Affected:
A. On 8/13/2023 DON/Designee identified all resident who receive a controlled medication and completed an audit to ensure that if a resident received a controlled medication, it was signed out on the Narcotic controlled count sheet, and that it was initialed on the E-MAR as given and that both the match.
B. For discrepancies identified from the audit; the DON/Designee will complete a Medication Error Report for each identified issue, with immediate notification to Physician and Hospice provider if applicable. This will be completed on 8/14/2023 by 10:00 am.
3.Actions to Prevent Occurrence/Recurrence:
A. DON/Designee will use The QAPI Narcotic Monitoring form daily x 30 day to ensure that all
Controlled substances are reconciled with the E-MAR:
It is signed out for on the Controlled Narcotic Count sheet, that it is initialed on the E-MAR at the time of administration
There is documenting for omission or held medication on the 24- Hour Report
There is a completed Medication Error Report for medication administration discrepancies
If a dose of a controlled medication is removed from the container for administration but refused or not given, the medication was destroyed with two nurse witness. Both nurses sign the accountability record on the line representing the dose.
On 8/13/2023 the facility's Administrator notified the Medical Director regarding the Immediate Jeopardy the facility received related to Pharmacy Services and reviewed plan to sustain compliance.
Verification: Started on 08/15/2023 at 2:35 and included:
The following observations, record reviews and interviews were conducted by the survey team to ensure licensed staff's understanding of in-service trainings received between 08/11/2023 and 08/13/2023:
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN C was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN D was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN D was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, RN B was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Medication Administration Guidelines conducted by DON. 23 LVN's and 7 RN's were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/14/2023.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors conducted by DON. 23 LVN's and 7 RNs were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/13/2023.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Notification Change of Condition conducted by DON 23 LVN's and 7 RN's were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/14/2023.
Interviews on 08/15/2023 between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, the survey team interviewed 28 licensed staff (23 LVN's and 5 RN's), all 28 licensed staff verbalized understanding of what they learned during in-services they received between 08/11/2023 and 08/13/2023.
Interview on 08/15/2023 at 9:30 a.m., LVN D was able to verbalize understanding of the following in-services received: Medication Administration Guidelines, Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors, and Notification Change of Condition.
Interview on 08/15/2023 at 9:45 a.m., RN B was able to verbalize understanding of the following in-services received: Medication Administration Guidelines, Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors, and Notification Change of Condition.
Interview on 08/15/2023 at 10:00 a.m., RN F was able to verbalize understanding of the following in-services received: Medication Administration Guidelines, Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors, and Notification Change of Condition.
Interview via telephone on 08/15/2023 at 11:55 a.m., LVN M was able to verbalize understanding of the following in-services received: Medication Administration Guidelines, Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors, and Notification Change of Condition.
Interview on 08/15/2023 at 3:15 p.m., LVN C was able to verbalize understanding of the following in-services received: Medication Administration Guidelines, Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors, and Notification Change of Condition.
Record review of facility audits of eMAR's and Narcotic sheets of all residents receiving controlled substance medications were provided to Survey Team. Discrepancies discovered during the audit were reported to resident, resident's PCP, HHSC, police and noted on their progress notes.
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 5:28 for Resident #8 revealed:
Nurse informed primary care physician regarding Morphine eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 2/4/23, 4/15/23, 4/24/23, 4/30/23, 5/16/23, 6/7/23, 6/11/23, 6/12/23, 6/24/23, 7/29/23, 8/5/23, 8/6/23, 8/7/23, 8/8/23, 8/9/23, 8/10/23, 8/12/23, 8/13/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse also informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach. Created by ADON 1
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 5:41 p.m. for Resident #8 revealed:
Nurse informed primary care physician regarding Lorazepam eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 4/27/23, 5/2/23, 05/03/23, 6/11/23, 6/12/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/I reach. Created by ADON 1
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 5:14 for Resident #9 revealed:
Nurse informed primary care physician regarding Morphine eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 6/10/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse also informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach. Created by ADON 1
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 5:46 for Resident #2 revealed:
Nurse informed doctor regarding Ativan eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 10/27/2022, 01/17/2023, 06/06/2023. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/I reach. Created by DON.
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 05:46 for Resident #3 revealed:
Nurse informed doctor regarding Tramadol eMAR documentation error which occurred on 05/18/23, 05/19/2023, 05/20/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach. Created by DON.
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 05:22 for Resident #5 revealed:
Nurse informed doctor regarding Tylenol # 3 eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 04/19/23, 04/15/23, 04/16/23, 04/17/23, 05/2/23, 05/2/23, 05/4/23,06/05/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new orders r/t medication error. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach.
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 05:20 for Resident #6 revealed:
Nurse informed doctor regarding Lyrica eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 08/13/23 which time on narcotic sheet and eMAR did not completely match. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse informed resident of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach. Created by DON
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/23 at 5:24 for Resident #11 revealed:
Nurse informed doctor regarding Tramadol medication error, RX ordered was completed but Resident continues to receive Tramadol without MD ordered on the following dates: 12/24/22, 12/25/22, 12/26/22, 12/27/22, 12/28/22, 12/29/22, 12/30/22, 12/31/22, 01/01/23, 01/02/23, 01/03/23, 01/04/23, 01/05/23, 01/06/23, 01/07/23, 01/08/23, 01/09/23, 01/10/23, 01/11/23, 01/12/23, 01/13/,23, 01/14/23, 01/15/23, 01/16/23, 01/17/23, 01/21/23, 01/23/23, 01/25/23, 01/26/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach. Created by DON.
Record review of progress notes dated 08/15/2023 at 5:35 for Resident # 13 revealed:
Nurse informed doctor regarding Tramadol eMAR missed documentation error which occurred on 07/17/23, 07/23/23, 08/07/23. Resident sustained no negative outcome related to error. MD gave no new order r/t medication error. Nurse informed RP of same. All due care rendered. No distress noted. Call light w/in reach. Created by DON
Interview on 08/17/2023 at 10:56 a.m., DON said facility does have a policy in place regarding medication administration. DON was asked how often she would conduct audits to make sure the Controlled Substance Record of Administration and eMAR coincided with each other, her response was daily. She said she would conduct random daily audits whenever she passed by a medication cart, whenever she would see a nurse administering medication or during care plan meetings. She said she would go over the eMAR and the Controlled Substance Record of Administration to make sure all doses were documented. DON said eMAR system was implemented one year ago and all staff were trained on how to use it. Surveyor asked DON if she conducted daily random audits of the eMAR and the Controlled Substance Record of Administration how could she have missed so many entries for Resident #8 and Resident #9, her response was she would have to check with the nurses to see what happened. Administrator was also present during the interview but did not participate in the interview. DON said she would have to get with her Regional Nurse to see if a new policy needed to be drafted related to documentation of medication.
Interview on 08/17/2023 at 11:45 a.m., DON said regarding drug diversion/missed documentation, I cannot personally answer but make sure we are complying. She said she does random (daily) audits on eMAR and Narc sheets to make sure they coincide. If there is an issue with the nurses not documenting on eMAR then that is on them because they have been trained 100 % by the facility and are board certified by the state of Texas. She said she cannot answer for those nurses that are not following policy. DON said her safety net is she conducts daily random audits and before 08/17/2023 she had not found any discrepancies during those daily random audits. DON said it was not until the Immediate Jeopardy was identified when she and ADON conducted 100% audits on all resident's eMAR, and Controlled Substance Record of Administration and discrepancies were identified. DON said facility has nurses that are not complying with their policy of documenting on eMAR, and it has been reported to the state as non-compliance. DON said police has also been notified. Administrator was present but did not participate in the interview. The DON said she had trained all licensed staff in the above trainings. She said she will be conducting daily reviews of all new medication orders during the morning meetings to verify all orders were entered correctly for 30 days. She/designee will review the 24-hour report daily for 30 days to verify that any resident with a change of condition has physician and family notification. The DON/designee will do random skill validation review with licensed nurses to verify medication administration competency and knowledge on what steps to take if a significant error occurs. The DON said she or designee will be responsible to ensure all licensed nurses were proficient in Medication Administration.
Interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:40 p.m., Administrator said she has reported all discrepancies found in the above audits to the state and police. She said she will make sure DON/designee follow up on the conditions listed above for the next 30 days. Administrator said DON/designee will use the QAPI Narcotic form for 30 days to ensure all controlled substance are reconciled with the eMAR.
The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/17/2023 at 2:30 p.m.
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for medication errors in that:
The facility did not follow physician's orders for Resident #7 when Resident #7 was administered 1 ml of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML (Morphine Sulfate) instead physician's order of 0.1ml morphine sulfate.
An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/11/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:23 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/13/2023 at 6:54 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of actual harm because all staff had not been trained on residents free of significant medication error.
The failure could place residents at risk for complications and possible death from receiving the wrong or excessive dosage of medication.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #7's admission Record dated 12/12/2022 indicated Resident #7 was an [AGE] year-old female and was admitted to facility on 09/28/2022 with the following diagnoses: of encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), COVID-19, lobar pneumonia (acute exudative inflammation of the entire lobe), generalized anxiety disorder (severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities), gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (a type of Gerd that does not involve inflammation of the esophagus), spinal stenosis, cervical region (narrowing of the spinal canal), dependence on supplemental oxygen, depression, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of lipids like cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood), chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, chronic ischemic heart disease ( heart problems caused by narrowed heart arteries), peripheral vascular disease, constipation, secondary kyphosis (fracture in one or more vertebral bodies) spondylosis (age related wear and tear of the spinal disks), adult failure to thrive, and history of falls.
Record review of Resident #7's MDS assessment, dated 12/15/2022 indicated:
-BIMS score was 15 (cognitively status independent, decisions consistent/reasonable)
-coded as being under hospice
-required limited assistance with one person assist with bed mobility, transfer, walk-in corridor, walk-in-room,
and toilet use
-required supervised with one person assist for locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, dressing and personal
hygiene
-was independent with setup help only for feeding
-history of falls prior to admission/entry or re-entry
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan dated 09/29/2022 revealed:
Resident #7 was under hospice
Focus: Resident #7 has a terminal illness and is receiving hospice or palliative care. During the end-of-life process weight loss, skin breakdown, dehydration, fecal impaction, and the gradual o or rapid loss of the ability to move may be unavoidable. Date initiated: 01/08/2023
Goal: Dignity will be maintained, and the resident will be kept comfortable and pain free within one hour of interventions through the next review. Date initiated: 01/08/2023
Interventions:
Coordinate with hospice to ensure the resident's spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs are met. Date initiated 01/08/2023; Assist with ADL's and provide comfort measures as needed. Date initiated 01/08/2023; Monitor for abnormal weight loss, poor appetite, and skin breakdown. Report abnormals to the physician as noted. Date initiated 01/08/2023; Monitor for signs and symptoms of increased pain, discomfort-give medications and treatments as ordered and monitor for relief. Date initiated 01/08/2023.
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive plan dated 09/29/2022 revealed Morphine Sulphate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 mg/5 ml (morphine sulfate) was not care planned.
Record review of Resident #7's eMAR for January 2023 revealed:
Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 mg/5ML (morphine Sulphate) Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for severe pain 7-10. Start date-01/09/2023 16:01 (04:01 p.m.) and discontinue date-01/11/2023 08:22. Further review of eMAR indicated Resident #7 did not receive Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 100 mg/5ML (morphine sulfate) from January 09, 2023, through January 11, 2023. Physician's order was under orders on PCC.
Record review of Resident #7's progress note dated 01/09/2023 at 16:04 (04:04 p.m.) revealed Note This order is outside of the recommended dose or frequency.
Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for Severe Pain 7-10 Pain.
Record review of Resident #7's progress note dated 01/10/2023 at 14:00 (04:00 p.m.) revealed eMAR Medication Administration Note: Duplicate Order -
Note Text: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML
Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for Severe Pain 7-10 Pain
Record review of Resident #7's progress note date 01/10/2023 at 18:47 (06:47 p.m.) revealed eMAR Medication Administration Note: Duplicate Order -
Note Text: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 100 MG/5ML
Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 1 hours as needed for Severe Pain 7-10 Pain
Both progress notes dated 01/10/2023 at 14:00 (02:00 p.m.) and 18:47 (06:47 p.m.) had been stuck off.
Record review of the hospital records dated 01/10/2023 at 18:23 (06:47 p.m.) revealed the following:
Patient is an 87 y/o (year old) F (female) with PMH (past medical history) of DM (diabetes mellitus), CVD (cardiovascular disease) with no residual effect per son who presents as trauma admission s/p (status post) unwitnessed GLF (ground level fall) at 17:00 on 01/10/2023. Per family member, patient lives in a nursing facility and had a fall from her wheelchair as she was trying to get up. No LOC (loss of consciousness). Patient at baseline is non ambulatory; uses a wheelchair. On presentation, patient difficult to awaken, sternal rub elicits limited response. History limited due to patient's status; patient's family member present at bedside is also unclear of history.
Physical Examination:
General: minimally responsive; open eyes minimally after sternal rub.
Eye: unable to examine
HENT: V shaped laceration on the left side of forehead
Respiratory: Lungs are clear to auscultation, respirations are non-labored
Cardiovascular: Normal rate, regular rhythm, good pulse equal in all extremities
Gastrointestinal: soft, non-tender, non-distended
Musculoskeletal: unable to examine
Integumentary: decubitus ulcer in sacral area and heal, present on admission
Neurologic: minimally responsive to sternal rub
Cognition and Speech: unable to examine
Psychiatric: unable to examine.
Impression and Plan
Patient non arousable initially on exam. Head CT on arrival shows 0.4 subdural hematoma, repeat CT head recommended in the AM.
Hospital Cause:
Heat CT (cat scan) on arrival shows 0.4 mm subdural hematoma. Dr. consulted recommended repeat CT (cat scan) head the following morning which was stable with 4 mm subdural hematoma. No intervention per neurosurgery. Patient is complaining of neck pain with history of cervical stenosis, previous workup negative for acute cardiac pathology. Patient's family requested application to new SNF (skilled nursing facility), during her stay patient had no acute events. Patient is ready for discharge.
Operative Report:
Consent: signed by patient
Location: forehead
Preparation and technique: 3 sutures placed
Interview on 08/10/2023 at 5:55 p.m. via telephone with LVN A revealed on 01/10/2023 at about 4:00 p.m. RN A came to the nurse's station where she was and advised her Resident #7 was requesting pain medication due to having neck pain. LVN A said she told RN A Resident #7 had recently been prescribed Morphine for pain. LVN A said she and RN A walked over to Resident #7's room because she wanted to make sure Resident #7 was alert and I just wanted to observe her to make sure she was in pain. LVN A said she had been in Resident #7's room a short time before and she did not complain of any pain. Upon entering Resident #7's room, Resident #7 was observed sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed. LVN A said Resident #7 did complain of neck pain and requested pain medication. At that time LVN A said she and RN A went outside to the hall and unlocked the med cart and pulled the Morphine box out and compared the label on the box with the order which indicated to give 0.1 ml as needed for pain every 1 hour. LVN A said after she and RN A verified the name, dosage, and route she went back to Resident #7's room to transfer her to bed while RN A stayed in the hall preparing the medication. LVN A said she transferred Resident #7 back to bed and advised her not to get up and if she needed anything to make sure to press the call light. Soon after that RN A came into Resident #7's room and administered Morphine. LVN A said RN A held up the syringe, showed it to her, and asked if it was ok to administer the Morphine, LVN A said, I didn't physically look at the syringe, but I said yes, and RN A administered the Morphine orally. LVN A said we both left back to the nurse's station and immediately RN A said she thought she had given Resident #7 the wrong dose of Morphine. At that point, LVN A replied, what do you mean RN A repeated I gave Resident #7 the wrong dose. LVN A said she immediately walked over to the med cart unlocked it and pulled the Morphine box out of the narc box to check the syringe. LVN A said after Morphine was given to a resident, the syringe was placed in a red plastic bag and placed back in the manufacture's box along with the Morphine. LVN A said when she checked the manufacture's box the syringe was not there. LVN A asked RN A where she had left the syringe and her response was I think I left it in Resident #7's room. LVN A said she went to Resident #7's room and found the syringe in a plastic bag on top of the dresser. At that point, RN A picked up the syringe and pointed to the 1.0 ml and told LVN A that's how much I gave her. LNV A said the facility has no protocol on how to manage medication errors, she said what she did after learning of the medication error what she learned in nursing school. LVN A said she immediately went to check on Resident #7 and found her to be alert, not in respiratory distress and still lying-in bed. LVN A said, I don't remember if RN A or I notified hospice nurse, DON, and family member but they were notified immediately of the medication error. LVN A said I went to check on Resident #7 a couple more times, she checked her breathing and was not in distress and was alert. LVN A said she does not remember the exact times she checked on Resident #7's saying, it's been a while. LVN A said between 5:30 p.m. and 5:45 p.m., a CNA was walking by Resident #7's room and noticed her laying on her left side on the floor. CNA called for help and LVN A ran to assist her. LVN A said Resident #7 was right by the door laying on her left side, bleeding from her forehead and had a bump on top of her scalp. LVN A said Resident #7 told her she managed to get out of bed, sit herself on her wheelchair when she tried reaching for something and fell. LVN A said she asked Resident #7 why she had gotten out of bed, and she replied, you know I'm stubborn. LVN A said she called Resident #7's doctor to inform of fall and was given instruction to send Resident #7 to the hospital to be evaluated. LVN A was asked if she notified Resident #7's doctor of the morphine dose error and she said yes adding I also notified the hospital when I called to let them know we were sending Resident #7 to the ER due to the fall. LVN A said Resident #7 was sent to the hospital due to the fall and not to the Morphine medication error. LVN A said Resident #7 had a history of falling and had received stiches on her head before due to the falls she had sustained since being admitted . LVN A said she made an incident report related to the medication error and the fall Resident #7 sustained on 01/10/2023. Surveyor asked LVN A how a medication error of Morphine negatively affect Resident #7 she replied to the most serious side effect could be respiratory distress. LVN A said the next day (01/11/2023) the DON and Administrator provided both she and RN A an in-service training on medication errors, were counseled individually and suspended for 3 days pending an investigation. Surveyor asked LVN A if RN A had given an explanation as to why she gave the wrong dose and she said RN A told her that in her previous job it was customary to give 1.0 of morphine so she figured it was the same at this facility.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 9:40 a.m., the PCP said he was not informed of Resident #7's morphine medication error. He said he wanted to make sure we understood this was the first time he was informed. The PCP said if he had been informed of the morphine medication error that would have unleashed a whole new protocol. Surveyor asked what he would have instructed the nurse to do, he replied, there would have been two possible responses. If resident was not experiencing respiratory distress, pulse was within range, she was cognitively aware, and heart rate was not abnormal, I would have instructed the nurse to observe the resident continuously (he did not say how long because everyone is different), resident did not need to be sent to the hospital because at that point because resident was stable. If the resident were experiencing respiratory distress, pulse was not within range, was not cognitively aware, and heart rate was abnormal, he would have instructed the nurse to administer Narcan and sent to hospital immediately. The PCP said Resident #7 received 10 times her prescribed order of morphine. The PCP said 1.0 is the max dose of morphine and not deadly for a hospice resident because eventually they will require a higher dose. The PCP said Resident #7 still needed to be monitored for any adverse effect.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 10:30 a.m., The Hospice DON said Resident #7 was placed on hospice due to respiratory failure. The Hospice DON said facility called hospice at 09:32 p.m. on 01/10/2023 to inform them Resident#7 suffered a fall and sent to the hospital due to sustaining a hematoma to her forehead. The Hospice DON said on 01/11/2023 at 11:15 a.m. Facility's DON called them and advised of the morphine medication error. The Hospice DON said facility's DON said the syringes that came in the manufacture's box of the morphine medication did not have numbers only lines and that could have caused the RN A to administer the wrong dosage of morphine to Resident #7. The Hospice DON said the medication/syringe was delivered by the pharmacy and it was considered a multi-use syringe. The Hospice DON said as a correction plan the hospice company delivered 10 to 15 syringes with numbers to avoid another medication error. The Hospice DON was asked if facility had called immediately, she would have sent their hospice RN to go to facility and assess Resident #7 at facility. The Hospice DON if the facility had notified them as soon as the medication error said she would have also instructed hospice RN to check her level of consciousness more frequent, her vitals for hypertension and fall precautions for at least 2 hours after medication error. The Hospice DON said Narcan would have been ordered depending how Resident #7 looked.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 11:00 a.m. The Hospice DON called back to say she had spoken to previous acting hospice DON (at time of incident) who had clarified the first-time facility's DON had reported morphine medication error was on 01/11/2023. The Hospice DON also verified they had notified Resident #7's primary physician of her fall on 01/10/2023 at 9:30 p.m.
Interview on 08/11/2023 at 11:15 a.m., LVN A said she had struck out Morphine entry on progress notes at 18:47 on PCC because she was not the one who had administered the morphine to Resident #7.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 12:50 p.m., RN A said on January 10, 2023, at approximately 4:00 p.m. while working under the supervision of LVN A (as it was her first day on the floor since being hired) She walked into Resident #7's room to check on her. RN A said Resident #7 complained of neck pain and requested pain medication. She immediately went looking for LVN A and found her in the nurse's station. She informed LVN A Resident #7 was requesting pain medication due to neck pain. Staff F said she was told by LVNA Resident #7 was under hospice care and had a PRN (as needed) order of Morphine. RN A said she proceeded to the medication cart to prepare the syringe with the morphine solution. RN A said after she prepared the syringe with the morphine solution, she went looking for LVN A. RN A said she found LVN A in the medication storage room and appeared to be talking to someone on the phone because she had an ear pod in one ear. RN A said she signaled LVN A though the glass window to come out. RN A said LVN A opened the door without coming out and at that time they both checked the Morphine order with the label, name, dose, route, and I showed her the syringe with the morphine solution, and she nodded yes, she gave me a thumbs up. RN A said she then proceeded to Resident #7's room to administer the morphine. RN A said she first educated Resident #7 on the medication she was going to receive and transferred her back to her bed and administered the Morphine oral solution. RN A said she went to check on Resident #7 after 30 minutes or 1 hour (was not sure on the time) and Resident #7 was good being her normal self. RN A said, we did our thing throughout our shift and around 5 or 6 p.m. LVN A calls out for help because Resident #7 had fallen and had a wound on her forehead. RN A said she stayed with Resident #7 while LVN A went to call 911. LVN A said Resident was found between her bed and bathroom. RN A said she discovered the morphine medication error at about 6:30 p.m. when she was looking back at the eMAR and discovered I had given more than I should RN A said she immediately informed LVN A but does not remember what her response was. RN A said, I texted DON at 6:31 p.m. telling her LVN A and I wanted to meet with her tomorrow to review possible med error. RN A said she texted DON because it was after working hours for DON. As per RN A, DON responded back via text at 7:00 p.m. telling her Yes, please do so. RN A said Resident #7 had already been discharged to the hospital by the time she discovered the morphine medication error. RN A said sometime before the end of her shift LVN A told her We could have fixed it RN A reply to LVN A was there's no fixing, I gave what I gave. Surveyor asked RN A if she knew what RN A meant by that and she said, to put 0.1 ml in the narc sheet even though I had given 1.0 ml of morphine. RN A said the next morning, DON met with both and them together and individually. She said they also had a general training with all nurses to make sure all nurses were doing their job. RN A said she received training on how to read eMAR and was not sure on the topics of other trainings received after med error incident. She said she and LVN A were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Surveyor asked RN A how Resident #7 could have been negatively impacted by receiving 1.0 ml of morphine sulfate instead of the ordered 0.1 ml, she said her breathing distress and high blood pressure. Staff F said 1.0 ml of morphine sulfate is appropriate for hospice patients but there must have been a reason Resident # 7's doctor had prescribed 0.1 ml of morphine sulfate. RN A said she decided to voluntarily quit her job as a registered nurse at the facility because she was told by someone RN A had written a statement saying she had never shown her the syringe. RN A said she believed they would take LVN's statement over her since she had just been hired. RN A also said it was not a healthy environment and did not feel comfortable working at the facility. RN A said she took a picture of the syringe used to administer the morphine sulphate to Resident #7.
Interview via telephone on 08/11/2023 at 11:20 a.m. The Medical Director said he was informed of Resident #7's medication error by the facility's nurse on duty (did not have nurse's name) on 01/11/2023 and was not sure of the time either. The Medical Director said he and the rest of the QAPI team discussed medication error on 02/23/2023. The Medical Director said during the meeting they checked narcotic orders for all residents. The Medical Director was asked how Morphine medication error could negatively impacted Resident #7 and his response was she could have suffered neurological sedation, respiratory depression or excessive sedation but added Resident #7 did not have any negative effects. The Medical Director said if Resident #7 had suffered any side effects he would have ordered Narcan and sent to the hospital immediately. The Medical Director emphasized he was available to the facility 24/7 and facility did not notify him immediately.
Interview on 08/11/2023 at 3:00 p.m., The DON said she expects all her nurses to inform her immediately in case of a medication error. She said if she is not at facility (after working hours) she expects a call from them immediately. The DON said she would ask the nurse what medication was given, the dosage and the correct dosage and depending on what they would tell her, she would instruct them to either monitor or send to hospital. The DON said she immediately notifies resident's primary physician, family representative, medical director, and administrator of the medication error. The DON said after resident is cared for, she will complete the medication error report, start an investigation, re-educate staff and report to HHSC. The DON said the medication error was discovered after Resident #7 was discharged to the hospital due to sustaining an unwitnessed fall. The DON said Resident #7 had a history of falls and was non-compliant. The DON said she notified Resident # 7's primary doctor and hospice immediately of the fall but was not sure if she informed them of the medication error on the same day. The DON said the fall or medication error was not care planned because Resident #7 did not go back to facility after being discharged from hospital.
Interview on 08/11/2023 at 3:30 p.m., The Administrator said facility's policy regarding medication error was for the nurses to let the DON know immediately after discovering a medication error was occurred. The Administrator said depending on how the resident was feeling, DON will instruct of appropriate action. The Administrator said it was the DON's responsibility to inform her of any medication errors immediately after being notified of one. The Administrator was asked how a morphine medication error could negatively affect Resident #7; her response was I don't know how to answer that question.
Observation on 08/11/2023 at 1:41 p.m., RN A texted picture to surveyor and it showed a thin syringe with 4 lines (0.25 ml, 0.50 ml, 0.75 ml, and 1 ml).
Record review of the facility policy titled Prevention of Medication Errors dated 05/30/2018 indicated:
Anticipated Outcome
Residents will be free of incidents related to medication
Fundamental Information
Medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order, manufacturer's specification or accepted professional standard and principals.
Significant medication error: means one which caused the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his or her health and safety.
Review MAR to identify medication to be administered
Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time.
Administer medication as ordered with the appropriate amount of fluid or food.
Sign MAR after administered. For those medications requiring vital signs, record the vital signs onto the MAR at the time of medication administration.
If medication is a controlled substance, sign narcotic book and complete other standard of practice documentation
Nurse /Medication Aide will be able to identify or have quick reference of action and common side effects of medication.
Correct any medication discrepancies and report to director of nursing
Staff education regarding risk of medication errors
The Administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/13/2023 at 6:54 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of 4 and a scope of J due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
1. Immediate Action Taken
On 1/10/2023 resident # 7 was sent to the hospital and never returned to the facility.
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee completed an audit of all residents receiving Morphine in the center to verify that correct dose of Morphine was entered into the computer. This will be completed at 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023.
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee completed rounds on all residents to verify that a physician's notification was completed if a resident was identified with a change of condition. No residents were identified
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee started education with all licensed nurses on:
o
Policy on Medication Administration Guidelines that provide directions on the process of verifying labels for accuracy, verifying administration accuracy, verifying a focused assessment, administering the medication according to the physician's orders. This will be completed by 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
o
Policy on Preventing/Detecting adverse consequences and Medications errors that provides directions to license nurses on immediate actions to take for a signification medication related error or adverse consequence:
License nurse will notify the attending physician promptly of any significant error or adverse consequence
License Nurse will Immplement (that is how it was written on POR) orders as directed by physician, and the resident is monitored closely for 24 to 72 hours or as directed.
License Nurse will Communicate with other across shifts as indicated to alert staff of the need to monitor resident
License Nurse will Complete an Incident report or Medication error form
License Nurse to Report significant error to the DON
DON will report significant error to Consultant Pharmacist
This will be completed by 3:00 pm on 8/12/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
The DON/Designee will be responsible for ensuring all license nurses understand and follow the guidelines for a significant error or adverse consequence.
o
Policy on Notification Change of Condition that provides directions on notifying family and physician when a change in a resident's conditions occurs. This will be completed by 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
o
A skills competency on Medication Administration will be completed for all license nurses, validating proficiency in Medication Administration to validate medication administration competency and action to take if a significant error occurs. The DON/Designee will be responsible to ensure all license nurses are proficient in Medication Administration. This will be completed by 10:00 pm on 8/11/2023, and no licensed nurse will be allowed to work until they have received this education.
2. Identification of Residents Affected or Likely to be Affected:
On 8/11/2023 DON/Designee started an audit review of all residents with new orders for the past 7 days to verify that correct dose of medications was entered into the computer correctly and no significant error occurred. This will be completed by 10:00 am on 8/12/203.
3. Actions to Prevent Occurrence/Recurrence:
The DON/Designee daily will review all new medication orders during the morning meeting to verify all orders were entered correctly x 30 days.
The DON/Designee daily will review the 24-hour report daily x 30 days to verify that any resident with a change of condition has physician and family notification.
The DON/Designee will do random skills validation reviews with licensed nurses to verify medication administration competency and knowledge on what steps to take if a significant error occurs. The DON/Designee will be responsible to ensure all licenses nurses are proficient in Medication administration.
On 8/11/2023 at 8:15pm the facility's Administrator notified the Medical Director regarding the Immediate Jeopardy's the facility received related to residents free from significant medication error and Notification in change of condition and reviewed plan to sustain compliance.
Verification: Started on 08/15/2023 at 2:35 and included:
The following observations, record reviews and interviews were conducted by the survey team to ensure licensed staff's understanding of in-service trainings received between 08/11/2023 and 08/13/2023:
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN C was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN D was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, LVN D was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Observation on 08/16/2023, RN B was observed during med pass by survey team, no discrepancies were observed.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Medication Administration Guidelines conducted by DON. 23 LVN's and 7 RN's were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/14/2023.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Preventing and detecting adverse consequences and medication errors conducted by DON. 23 LVN's and 7 RNs were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/13/2023.
Record review of the licensed nurses In-Service Program Attendance Record for the following topic Notification Change of Condition conducted by DON 23 LVN's and 7 RN's were in-serviced between 08/11/2023 and 08/14/2023.
Interviews on 08/15/2023 between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, the survey team interviewed 28 licensed staff (23 LVN's and 5 RN's), all 28 licensed staff
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignit...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for one Resident (Resident #12) of eight residents reviewed for dignity issues.
The facility failed to provide Resident #12's request with personal grooming for removal of facial hair.
This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, disrespected and could decrease residents' self-esteem and/or quality of life.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #12's admission record dated 08/09/23 reflected Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12's diagnosis included dementia (loss of thinking ability), syncope and collapse (loss of consciousness), need for assistance for personal care, parkinson's (disorder of central nervous system),
delusional disorder (mental illness), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function) and dizziness and giddiness.
Record review of Resident #12's significant change MDS, dated [DATE] reflected,
-resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired.
-was independent for transfers, bed mobility.
-required limited assistance by one person for dressing.
-required supervision for dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #12's care plans, initiated on 08/02/23 reflected Resident #12 had a
Focused area for ADL Self Care Performance Deficit and is at risk for not having their needs met in a timely manner. Performance deficit is related to: Cognitive impairment, Activity intolerance, Impaired balance/impaired coordination, muscle weakness. Requires encouraging for bathing, dislikes showering and gets aggressive with staff when attempting to provide care, resident has hx of syncope (fainting) in shower, Date Initiated: 09/18/2019, Revision on: 3/27/2023.
Interventions included Provide shower, oral care, hair care, and nail care per schedule and when needed.
Date Initiated: 09/18/2019, Revision on: 01/03/2023.
Record review of the ADL task for personal grooming for Resident #12 dated from 07/28/23 to 08/09/23 reflected Resident #12 had not refused personal grooming during those dates.
Observation on 08/09/23 at 10:47 am revealed Resident #12 standing by her bed in her room, eating a snack. Observation revealed Resident #12 had approximately 30 hairs on her chin that were approximately one-eighth inch long. Resident #12 said she had just taken a shower. Resident #12 touched her chin hairs and said she always liked to have her chin hairs removed when she had been at home. Resident # 12 said she had asked staff to do this for her and no one had helped her remove her chin hairs.
Interview on 08/09/23 at 10:50 am with CNA XX and CNA XZ revealed Resident #12 did not like staff to touch her face when they provided her with a shower. CNA XX and CNA XZ they had asked Resident #12 if they could remove her chin hairs and she would refuse to let them remove her facial hairs. CNA XX and CNA XZ said they were responsible to provide the resident with assistance with personal grooming that included face hair removal.
Observation and interview on 08/09/23 at 10:55 am revealed CNA XX and CNA XZ ask Resident #12 if she would let them remove the hairs on her face and chin. Resident #12 replied she would like very much to have her chin hairs removed. Resident #12 said she had always been able to remove her facial hair when she was living at home. Resident #12 was observed sitting down while CNA XX and CNA XZ prepared to shave her facial hair using shaving cream and a razor from her upper lip and her chin. Resident #12 appeared very calm and quiet while staff shaved Resident #12's facial hairs.
Interview on 8/09/23 at 11:00 am with LVN ZZ revealed that if any resident refuses any type of ADL care the CNAs must report the information to the charge nurse. LVN ZZ said none of the staff including CNA XX and CNA XZ had reported to her that Resident #12 refused to have staff provide her with personal grooming that included removal of her facial hair. LVN ZZ said had been Resident #12's charge nurse and she had not noticed Resident #12's excessive facial hair growth and did not know whether Resident #12 had refused that type of personal grooming. LVN ZZ said she would bring up the personal care issue to the CNAs.
Observation and interview on 08/09/23 at 11:05 am revealed Resident #12 in her hallway appearing very happy she had facial hairs removed. Resident #12 said she didn't have a razor to do it herself. Resident #12 said she used to cover her chin with her hands when she was out of her room because she was uncomfortable with her chin hair.
Interview on 08/09/23 at 2:20 pm with the DON revealed she knew Resident #12 refused to have staff assist Resident #12 with hair and showers. The DON said she did not know if Resident #12 refused to have her facial hairs removed.
Interview on 08/15/23 at 3:17 pm with the Administrator revealed the DON, ADONs and the charge nurse were responsible to ensure the ADLs tasks were carried out.
Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living Care Guidelines revised on 02/10/20 reflected, Residents will receive essential services for activities of daily living to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights revised on 02/20/21 reflected,
Respect and dignity: The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to prohibit abuse and neglect for...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to prohibit abuse and neglect for 1 of 1 resident (R #4) reviewed for incident reporting.
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for R #4 within the required time frame of the incident.
This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, and not having incidents reported appropriately.
The findings included:
Record review of the Policy and Procedures: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy date implemented, 10/24/2022 reflects:
-Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:
2. The facility's Abuse Prevention Coordinator is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with the law.
VII: Reporting/Response
A.
2. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes.
a.
Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or
b.
Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury
Record review of R#4's file reflected an [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of 02/09/2022. Her diagnoses included: Osteoporosis (bones become weak and brittle), history of fractures, history of falling, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy (disturbed nerve cell activity in the brain), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), muscle weakness, Mood Disorder, and Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulties with thinking and how someone uses language).
Record review of R #4's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected R#4 had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) and required a two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene.
Record review of R #4's Care Plan dated 06/26/2023 reflected R #4 sustained alteration in musculoskeletal status related to left hand contracture-hemiplegia, left humerus fracture, left tibia fracture, and left femur fracture. R #4's care plan also reflected R #4 required total assistance x 2 with mechanical lift for transfers. R #4 will maintain current level of cognitive function without a decline.
Record Review of R #4's order entry dated 08/07/2023 reflected an arm x-ray ordered for one time only for 1 day at 11:42 AM. Ordered by NP.
Further review of R #4's medical record noted x-ray results from 08/07/2023 (uploaded on 08/09/2023) reflected R #4's patient report. Two views of the left shoulder. History: Pain in left shoulder. Someone pulled on patient's arm. Findings: no acute fracture or discoloration. Electronically signed on 08/07/2023 at 5:27 PM. Handwritten note: relayed to NP. Gave no new orders.
In an interview with R #4 on 08/10/2023 at 10:00 AM, R #4 said there was an x-ray done on her left arm because a few days ago, CNA L pulled on her arm during a brief change. It was CNA L and CNA M assisting her. R#4 said she does not need anyone pulling on her arm. R#4 said she told CNA L that he pulled her arm, but CNA L told R #4 that he did not. R #4 said she told CNA L to not pull her arm. R #4 said CNA L did stop and continued to assist CNA M. R #4 said she did not think CNA L pulled her arm trying to abuse R #4. R #4 said she currently does not have pain to her arm or shoulder. R #4 said she let the staff know about CNA L pulling her arm but does not remember who she told.
In an interview with the DON on 08/10/2023 at 3:40 PM the DON was asked about the x-ray R #4 had on 08/07/2023. The DON said she was not working on that day and would need to ask the Administrator about that.
In an interview with CNA L on 08/10/2023 at 5:50 PM, CNA L said he assisted CNA M to change R #4. CNA L said he did not pull R #4's arm, use force, grab R #4, or abuse R #4 in any way.
In an interview with the Administrator on 08/11/2023 at 11:45 AM, the Administrator said that on 08/07/2023 the Administrator went to conduct rounds with R #4 and that was when R #4 informed the Administrator that R #4 did not like how CNA L moved her arm without letting her know first. The Administrator said a grievance was filed and CNA L was in-serviced on customer service, specifically how to inform the residents of the care that would be rendered beforehand. The Administrator said R #4 never stated that CNA L had pulled her arm. The Administrator said she was not aware of the x-ray results noting a statement that someone had pulled on R #4's arm until it was brought up to the DON. The Administrator indicated there was a miscommunication between the nurse and the x-ray technician and that must have been why that statement was on the x-ray results. The Administrator said she spoke to R #4 again on 08/10/2023 and R #4 repeated the same concern about CNA L not informing R #4 that CNA L would be moving her, not that R #4's arm was pulled. The Administrator indicated the incident was called in to HHSC yesterday, 08/10/2023.
In an interview with CNA M on 08/15/2023 at 1:05 PM CNA M said that she asked CNA L to assist her in changing R #4. CNA M said she did not witness CNA L pull R #4's arm, grab R #4's arm, or touch any part of R #4's body. CNA M indicated they only moved R #4 using the bed sheet. CNA M said R #4 did not complain of pain that she recalls. CNA M said R #4 did want to speak to the nurse, so CNA M informed the nurse that was in charge at that time.
In an interview with R #4 on 08/15/2023 at 1:35 PM R #4 said that the CNA L did not pull her arm with force. It was more that CNA L moved it suddenly. CNA L could have told R #4 that CNA L was going to move R #4's arm before simply moving it. CNA L had assisted the other CNA M to change R #4's brief and to reposition R #4's with the bed sheet. R #4's only complaint was that CNA L did not tell R #4 that CNA L would be moving R #4 arm, but R #4 did not feel CNA L was abusive towards R #4.
In an interview with the Administrator on 08/15/2023 at 3:35 PM the Administrator said the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. The Administrator said when there is an allegation of abuse, the staff should notify the charge nurse, but they are also instructed to notify the Administrator and the DON. The Administrator said the facility has 2 hours to report it. The Administrator said as soon as the Administrator is aware, the Administrator calls it in to the state. The Administrator said the facility completes in-services on abuse/neglect and investigates the alleged incident. The Administrator said she did not become aware that there was an allegation that CNA L or someone had pulled R #4's arm until the x-ray results were brought to the Administrator's attention. The Administrator said the x-ray results are usually reviewed by the charge nurse who receives the x-ray results. The Administrator said the nurse informs the doctor and the doctor reviews the x-ray results. The Administrator said the nurse and the doctor talk about it to see if there needs to be new orders. The Administrator said the administration also talks about x-ray results during their morning meetings, but they would usually only review what the doctor ordered or what the doctor said. The Administrator said now, the administration will be reviewing the entirety of the x-ray results to prevent other issues like this where something was missed. The Administrator said the nurse that was working when the x-rays were taken was LVN I and LVN I told the Administrator that LVN I did not recall telling the x-ray technician that someone had pulled on R #4's arm. The Administrator said if an allegation of abuse like this is not reported, it can lead to the potential of the facility not investigating or finding out what happened. The Administrator said failing to report can also place the residents at risk of whatever the allegation was, for instance, in this case, place R #4 of getting her arm pulled again. The Administrator said every time the Administrator spoke to R #4, R #4 did not tell the Administrator that anyone had pulled R #4's arm or voiced an abuse allegation.
In an interview with RN F on 08/15/2023 at 4:00 PM, RN F said he spoke to R #4 on 08/07/2023 after CNA L and CNA M had changed her brief. R #4 was angry that CNA L did not tell R #4 to get ready or that CNA L was going to move R #4's arm. RN F assessed R #4's arm. RN F said that R #4 said that CNA L had pulled R #4's arm. RN F said that R #4 said that CNA L then grabbed the draw sheet to assist CNA M to move her. RN F said he asked R #4 if she was in pain, and R #4 said no. R #4 was just visibly upset. RN F said he asked R #4 if she needed medical attention, and R #4 declined it. RN F said he asked R #4 twice if R #4 wanted to go to the hospital, but R #4 refused. RN F said R #4 was alert and R #4 told him R #4 just did not want CNA L to assist R #4 anymore. RN F spoke to CNA M who informed him that CNA L had not pulled R #4's arm and never touched R #4's body. RN F said CNA M told him CNA L only helped CNA M by moving R #4 with the draw sheet. RN F said he texted the Administrator and the DON to let them know. RN F said he texted them what R #4 had told him, that CNA L had pulled R #4's arm. RN F said he wanted to see what they wanted him to do. The Administrator and the DON did not respond to RN F right away. RN F said that it was shift change, and RN F told LVN I what happened just in case. R #4 was not complaining of pain at that time. RN F had texted the DON at 6:36 AM and the DON replied until an hour later. RN F verified he texted the DON exactly what R #4 had told RN F, that CNA L pulled her arm. RN F had also sent the Administrator the same text. The DON replied and asked RN F what he had done, but by that time RN F had already left the facility. RN F had told LVN I to keep an eye on it in case R #4 complained of pain. R #4 was her own responsible party, and R #4 was coherent, so it was R #4's decision not to get medical attention and that was R #4's right. R #4 had denied being in pain. RN F said the Administrator did not text RN F back or respond to RN F about this. RN F said the Administrator texted RN F days later about something else.
In an interview with LVN I on 08/15/2023 at 4:15 PM, LVN I said she was the incoming day shift nurse on 08/07/2023. LVN I was informed by RN F that R #4 might require x-rays. LVN I does not recall obtaining orders for the x-ray from the doctor, but LVN I was there when the x-rays were done by the mobile x-ray company. R #4 was having some pain. LVN I indicated R #4 told her that when they were moving R #4 up in bed to position her better, CNA L was on the left side, which was R #4's weaker side. CNA L was on that side and touched R #4's arm. LVN I assumed during the reposition, CNA L touched R #4's arm. R #4 did verbalize to LVN I that the CNA L had pulled her arm. LVN I said when the x-ray technician went in, the technician did ask the reason for the x-rays. LVN I told the x-ray technician that it was for pain to R #4's left arm. LVN I did not say that someone pulled R #4's arm. LVN I said RN F would have been the one to order the x-rays. LVN I verified she was not working when the CNAs assisted R #4, during the incident in question. LVN I said she did not get the x-ray results. LVN I said the x-ray results come up in their electronic medical record system. LVN I said they can review the results once they have been uploaded. LVN I said the x-ray results are first faxed in. LVN I said they do not receive an imagine but a fax with the results. LVN I said the nurse goes over it with the doctor. LVN I said the doctor decides if any orders are needed. LVN I does not recall reviewing the x-ray results for R #4's arm with the doctor. LVN I did not inform the Administrator or the DON about R #4 saying that R #4's arm was pulled because RN F already knew about it. R #4 told LVN I that R #4's arm was pulled like CNA L moved R #4's arm too hard.
In an interview with the DON on 08/17/2023 at 10:00 AM, the DON said the DON was notified on the morning of 08/07/2023 by RN F that R #4 was complaining of pain to R #4's left shoulder. The DON said RN F had sent her a text. The DON said RN F indicated that R #4 did not like the way that CNA L had repositioned R #4 and that R #4 did not feel comfortable with CNA L. The DON said she followed up with RN F and asked if RN F let the doctor know or what was done. The DON said the doctor ended up ordering an x-ray of R #4's shoulder since R #4 does have Osteoporosis and a history of fractures. The DON was not working when the x-ray was ordered. The DON said the Administrator spoke to R #4 on 08/07/2023. The DON said R #4 informed the Administrator that CNA L did not hurt R #4 or abuse her. The DON said R #4 wanted CNA L to let R #4 know that CNA L would be moving R #4, so that R #4 was not startled. The DON said RN F did not text or inform the DON that R #4 said R #4's arm was pulled by anyone. The DON said RN F indicated R #4's arm was hurting after CNA L had finished taking care of her. The DON said CNA M was also in the room with CNA L assisting R #4. The DON said the Administrator did speak to both CNAs and they stated CNA L did not pull R #4's arm. The DON said the Administrator did do an in-service with CNA L and re-educated him on how to work with R #4 and other residents in the manner of informing them when CNA L is going to move them or what CNA L is going to do while assisting the residents. The DON said RN F had relayed the information to LVN I. The DON said LVN I told the x-ray technician that R #4 said CNA L hurt R #4's arm. The DON said it was a miscommunication between LVN I and the x-ray worker. The DON said that is why it said on the x-ray results that someone had pulled R #4's arm. The DON verified the DON did not know about the allegation that someone had pulled R #4's arm until this investigator asked her about it on 08/10/2023. The DON said nobody, including the DON, had seen that the x-ray results indicated someone pulled R #4's arm. The DON said the charge nurse reviewed the x-rays along with the doctor. The DON said there was no fracture or injury found and there were no new orders. The DON said the mobile x-ray staff must have overheard the nurses or there was miscommunication. The DON said they have since then instructed the nurses to only speak of the facts. The DON said the nurse did not see the statement on the x-ray results where it said that someone had pulled R #4's arm. The DON said that was an outside vendor's (mobile x-ray staff) opinion, not one of the facility's staff members. The DON said the facility's policy for reporting abuse and neglect is to report it to the state within 2 hours, whether there is an injury or not, and for all allegations. The DON said if the policy is not followed, the perpetrator would still have access to the resident. The DON said the resident would be at risk for further allegation or for the allegation (arm being pulled or abuse) to continue to happen. The DON said they must follow the policy to ensure the facility removes the alleged person and investigates promptly.
Record review of the facility investigation reflected date and time reported to HHSC was on 08/10/2023 at 7:14 PM. Further review revealed date and time of incident was on 08/07/2023 at 6:36 AM. Head to toe assessment and pain assessment completed on 08/07/2023 at 5:00 AM. No injury noted.
Record review of R #4's progress notes reflected no nursing/progress notes for the alleged incident.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mis...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 1 resident (R #4) reviewed for abuse/neglect.
The facility did not report an allegation of resident abuse to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame. R #4 alleged CNA L pulled on R #4's arm during care.
This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect.
The findings included:
Record review of R#4's file reflected an [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of 02/09/2022. Her diagnoses included: Osteoporosis (bones become weak and brittle), history of fractures, history of falling, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy (disturbed nerve cell activity in the brain), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), muscle weakness, Mood Disorder, and Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulties with thinking and how someone uses language).
Record review of R #4's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected R#4 had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) and required a two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene.
Record review of R #4's Care Plan dated 06/26/2023 reflected R #4 sustained alteration in musculoskeletal status related to left hand contracture-hemiplegia, left humerus fracture, left tibia fracture, and left femur fracture. R #4's care plan also reflected R #4 required total assistance x 2 with mechanical lift for transfers. R #4 will maintain current level of cognitive function without a decline.
Record Review of R #4's order entry dated 08/07/2023 reflected an arm x-ray ordered for one time only for 1 day at 11:42 AM. Ordered by NP.
Further review of R #4's medical record noted x-ray results from 08/07/2023 (uploaded on 08/09/2023) reflected R #4's patient report. Two views of the left shoulder. History: Pain in left shoulder. Someone pulled on patient's arm. Findings: no acute fracture or discoloration. Electronically signed on 08/07/2023 at 5:27 PM. Handwritten note: relayed to NP. Gave no new orders.
In an interview with R #4 on 08/10/2023 at 10:00 AM, R #4 said there was an x-ray done on her left arm because a few days ago, CNA L pulled on her arm during a brief change. It was CNA L and CNA M assisting her. R#4 said she does not need anyone pulling on her arm. R#4 said she told CNA L that he pulled her arm, but CNA L told R #4 that he did not. R #4 said she told CNA L to not pull her arm. R #4 said CNA L did stop and continued to assist CNA M. R #4 said she did not think CNA L pulled her arm trying to abuse R #4. R #4 said she currently does not have pain to her arm or shoulder. R #4 said she let the staff know about CNA L pulling her arm but does not remember who she told.
In an interview with the DON on 08/10/2023 at 3:40 PM the DON was asked about the x-ray R #4 had on 08/07/2023. The DON said she was not working on that day and would need to ask the Administrator about that.
In an interview with CNA L on 08/10/2023 at 5:50 PM, CNA L said he assisted CNA M to change R #4. CNA L said he did not pull R #4's arm, use force, grab R #4, or abuse R #4 in any way.
In an interview with the Administrator on 08/11/2023 at 11:45 AM, the Administrator said that on 08/07/2023 the Administrator went to conduct rounds with R #4 and that was when R #4 informed the Administrator that R #4 did not like how CNA L moved her arm without letting her know first. The Administrator said a grievance was filed and CNA L was in-serviced on customer service, specifically how to inform the residents of the care that would be rendered beforehand. The Administrator said R #4 never stated that CNA L had pulled her arm. The Administrator said she was not aware of the x-ray results noting a statement that someone had pulled on R #4's arm until it was brought up to the DON. The Administrator indicated there was a miscommunication between the nurse and the x-ray technician and that must have been why that statement was on the x-ray results. The Administrator said she spoke to R #4 again on 08/10/2023 and R #4 repeated the same concern about CNA L not informing R #4 that CNA L would be moving her, not that R #4's arm was pulled. The Administrator indicated the incident was called in to HHSC yesterday, 08/10/2023.
In an interview with CNA M on 08/15/2023 at 1:05 PM CNA M said that she asked CNA L to assist her in changing R #4. CNA M said she did not witness CNA L pull R #4's arm, grab R #4's arm, or touch any part of R #4's body. CNA M indicated they only moved R #4 using the bed sheet. CNA M said R #4 did not complain of pain that she recalls. CNA M said R #4 did want to speak to the nurse, so CNA M informed the nurse that was in charge at that time.
In an interview with R #4 on 08/15/2023 at 1:35 PM R #4 said that the CNA L did not pull her arm with force. It was more that CNA L moved it suddenly. CNA L could have told R #4 that CNA L was going to move R #4's arm before simply moving it. CNA L had assisted the other CNA M to change R #4's brief and to reposition R #4's with the bed sheet. R #4's only complaint was that CNA L did not tell R #4 that CNA L would be moving R #4 arm, but R #4 did not feel CNA L was abusive towards R #4.
In an interview with the Administrator on 08/15/2023 at 3:35 PM the Administrator said the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. The Administrator said when there is an allegation of abuse, the staff should notify the charge nurse, but they are also instructed to notify the Administrator and the DON. The Administrator said the facility has 2 hours to report it. The Administrator said as soon as the Administrator is aware, the Administrator calls it in to the state. The Administrator said the facility completes in-services on abuse/neglect and investigates the alleged incident. The Administrator said she did not become aware that there was an allegation that CNA L or someone had pulled R #4's arm until the x-ray results were brought to the Administrator's attention. The Administrator said the x-ray results are usually reviewed by the charge nurse who receives the x-ray results. The Administrator said the nurse informs the doctor and the doctor reviews the x-ray results. The Administrator said the nurse and the doctor talk about it to see if there needs to be new orders. The Administrator said the administration also talks about x-ray results during their morning meetings, but they would usually only review what the doctor ordered or what the doctor said. The Administrator said now, the administration will be reviewing the entirety of the x-ray results to prevent other issues like this where something was missed. The Administrator said the nurse that was working when the x-rays were taken was LVN I and LVN I told the Administrator that LVN I did not recall telling the x-ray technician that someone had pulled on R #4's arm. The Administrator said if an allegation of abuse like this is not reported, it can lead to the potential of the facility not investigating or finding out what happened. The Administrator said failing to report can also place the residents at risk of whatever the allegation was, for instance, in this case, place R #4 of getting her arm pulled again. The Administrator said every time the Administrator spoke to R #4, R #4 did not tell the Administrator that anyone had pulled R #4's arm or voiced an abuse allegation.
In an interview with RN F on 08/15/2023 at 4:00 PM, RN F said he spoke to R #4 on 08/07/2023 after CNA L and CNA M had changed her brief. R #4 was angry that CNA L did not tell R #4 to get ready or that CNA L was going to move R #4's arm. RN F assessed R #4's arm. RN F said that R #4 said that CNA L had pulled R #4's arm. RN F said that R #4 said that CNA L then grabbed the draw sheet to assist CNA M to move her. RN F said he asked R #4 if she was in pain, and R #4 said no. R #4 was just visibly upset. RN F said he asked R #4 if she needed medical attention, and R #4 declined it. RN F said he asked R #4 twice if R #4 wanted to go to the hospital, but R #4 refused. RN F said R #4 was alert and R #4 told him R #4 just did not want CNA L to assist R #4 anymore. RN F spoke to CNA M who informed him that CNA L had not pulled R #4's arm and never touched R #4's body. RN F said CNA M told him CNA L only helped CNA M by moving R #4 with the draw sheet. RN F said he texted the Administrator and the DON to let them know. RN F said he texted them what R #4 had told him, that CNA L had pulled R #4's arm. RN F said he wanted to see what they wanted him to do. The Administrator and the DON did not respond to RN F right away. RN F said that it was shift change, and RN F told LVN I what happened just in case. R #4 was not complaining of pain at that time. RN F had texted the DON at 6:36 AM and the DON replied until an hour later. RN F verified he texted the DON exactly what R #4 had told RN F, that CNA L pulled her arm. RN F had also sent the Administrator the same text. The DON replied and asked RN F what he had done, but by that time RN F had already left the facility. RN F had told LVN I to keep an eye on it in case R #4 complained of pain. R #4 was her own responsible party, and R #4 was coherent, so it was R #4's decision not to get medical attention and that was R #4's right. R #4 had denied being in pain. RN F said the Administrator did not text RN F back or respond to RN F about this. RN F said the Administrator texted RN F days later about something else.
In an interview with LVN I on 08/15/2023 at 4:15 PM, LVN I said she was the incoming day shift nurse on 08/07/2023. LVN I was informed by RN F that R #4 might require x-rays. LVN I does not recall obtaining orders for the x-ray from the doctor, but LVN I was there when the x-rays were done by the mobile x-ray company. R #4 was having some pain. LVN I indicated R #4 told her that when they were moving R #4 up in bed to position her better, CNA L was on the left side, which was R #4's weaker side. CNA L was on that side and touched R #4's arm. LVN I assumed during the reposition, CNA L touched R #4's arm. R #4 did verbalize to LVN I that the CNA L had pulled her arm. LVN I said when the x-ray technician went in, the technician did ask the reason for the x-rays. LVN I told the x-ray technician that it was for pain to R #4's left arm. LVN I did not say that someone pulled R #4's arm. LVN I said RN F would have been the one to order the x-rays. LVN I verified she was not working when the CNAs assisted R #4, during the incident in question. LVN I said she did not get the x-ray results. LVN I said the x-ray results come up in their electronic medical record system. LVN I said they can review the results once they have been uploaded. LVN I said the x-ray results are first faxed in. LVN I said they do not receive an imagine but a fax with the results. LVN I said the nurse goes over it with the doctor. LVN I said the doctor decides if any orders are needed. LVN I does not recall reviewing the x-ray results for R #4's arm with the doctor. LVN I did not inform the Administrator or the DON about R #4 saying that R #4's arm was pulled because RN F already knew about it. R #4 told LVN I that R #4's arm was pulled like CNA L moved R #4's arm too hard.
In an interview with the DON on 08/17/2023 at 10:00 AM, the DON said the DON was notified on the morning of 08/07/2023 by RN F that R #4 was complaining of pain to R #4's left shoulder. The DON said RN F had sent her a text. The DON said RN F indicated that R #4 did not like the way that CNA L had repositioned R #4 and that R #4 did not feel comfortable with CNA L. The DON said she followed up with RN F and asked if RN F let the doctor know or what was done. The DON said the doctor ended up ordering an x-ray of R #4's shoulder since R #4 does have Osteoporosis and a history of fractures. The DON was not working when the x-ray was ordered. The DON said the Administrator spoke to R #4 on 08/07/2023. The DON said R #4 informed the Administrator that CNA L did not hurt R #4 or abuse her. The DON said R #4 wanted CNA L to let R #4 know that CNA L would be moving R #4, so that R #4 was not startled. The DON said RN F did not text or inform the DON that R #4 said R #4's arm was pulled by anyone. The DON said RN F indicated R #4's arm was hurting after CNA L had finished taking care of her. The DON said CNA M was also in the room with CNA L assisting R #4. The DON said the Administrator did speak to both CNAs and they stated CNA L did not pull R #4's arm. The DON said the Administrator did do an in-service with CNA L and re-educated him on how to work with R #4 and other residents in the manner of informing them when CNA L is going to move them or what CNA L is going to do while assisting the residents. The DON said RN F had relayed the information to LVN I. The DON said LVN I told the x-ray technician that R #4 said CNA L hurt R #4's arm. The DON said it was a miscommunication between LVN I and the x-ray worker. The DON said that is why it said on the x-ray results that someone had pulled R #4's arm. The DON verified the DON did not know about the allegation that someone had pulled R #4's arm until this investigator asked her about it on 08/10/2023. The DON said nobody, including the DON, had seen that the x-ray results indicated someone pulled R #4's arm. The DON said the charge nurse reviewed the x-rays along with the doctor. The DON said there was no fracture or injury found and there were no new orders. The DON said the mobile x-ray staff must have overheard the nurses or there was miscommunication. The DON said they have since then instructed the nurses to only speak of the facts. The DON said the nurse did not see the statement on the x-ray results where it said that someone had pulled R #4's arm. The DON said that was an outside vendor's (mobile x-ray staff) opinion, not one of the facility's staff members. The DON said the facility's policy for reporting abuse and neglect is to report it to the state within 2 hours, whether there is an injury or not, and for all allegations. The DON said if the policy is not followed, the perpetrator would still have access to the resident. The DON said the resident would be at risk for further allegation or for the allegation (arm being pulled or abuse) to continue to happen. The DON said they must follow the policy to ensure the facility removes the alleged person and investigates promptly.
Record review of the facility investigation reflected date and time reported to HHSC was on 08/10/2023 at 7:14 PM. Further review revealed date and time of incident was on 08/07/2023 at 6:36 AM. Head to toe assessment and pain assessment completed on 08/07/2023 at 5:00 AM. No injury noted.
Record review of R #4's progress notes reflected no nursing/progress notes for the alleged incident.
Policy and Procedures: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy date implemented, 10/24/2022 reflects
-Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:
2. The facility's Abuse Prevention Coordinator is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with the law.
VII: Reporting/Response
B.
2. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes.
c.
Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or
d.
Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for 1 (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for 1 (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions.
The facility failed to review and revise Resident #1's comprehensive person-centered care plan for falls and transmission-based precautions.
This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
The findings were:
Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/09/2023, revealed she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, dementia, history of falling, fracture of right femur (leg bone), fracture of base of neck of right femur (hip), and hypertension (high blood pressure).
Review of Resident #1's Significant Change in Status MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 00 which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #1 had adequate hearing, unclear speech, and staff could usually understand her and she usually was able to understand others. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with two-person assist for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting, extensive assistance with one-person physical assist for personal hygiene, transfers had not occurred. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowels. Resident #1 had a history of falls.
Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 05/18/23, revealed:
-Resident #1's care plan did not have falls documented for 01/25/23, 02/19/23, 03/21/23, 04/13/23, or 04/28/23.
-Resident #1's care plan was not updated to include transmission-based precautions/isolation for an infection of the urine on 08/04/23.
Record review of facility's incident/accident reports revealed; falls on 01/25/23 and 04/28/23 were on the incident/accident reports for those dates.
Record review of Resident #'1's progress notes revealed; Falls on 02/19/23, 03/21/23, and 04/13/23 were documented on Progress Notes.
Review of Resident #1's physician's orders dated 08/04/23, revealed Resident #1 was placed on Contact Isolation R/T (related to) Escherichia Coli/ ESBL (the most common bacteria found to cause UTIs/an enzyme that makes the germ that causes UTIs, harder to treat with antibiotics) to urine for 7 days.
In an interview on 08/08/23 at 04:00 p.m., LVN ZZ stated signage on room [ROOM NUMBER] door (See nurse before entering room) was for ESBL to urine for the resident in A Bed (Resident #1).
In an observation and interview on 08/12/23 at 04:14 p.m., Resident #1 lying in bed with two fall mats at bedside. Resident #1 stated she fell awhile back and was better now. Resident #1 stated she no longer hurts from the fall.
In an interview on 08/12/23 at 08:12 p.m., the ADON stated when a CNA tells her a resident has fallen or if she witnesses a resident fall, she goes to assess the resident. The ADON stated if the patient was in pain, she does not move the resident. The ADON stated she would take vital signs and if there was no pain with ROM, they (staff) can transfer the resident to bed, chair, etc. The ADON stated if the resident was in pain, she would leave the resident where they were, notify the MD and transfer to ER for evaluation. The ADON stated if the resident was put back in bed, she would notify MD, RP and start 72-hour neuro checks, complete an incident report which goes under Risk Management. The ADON stated ADON, nurses and MDS were the ones who update Care Plans when there was a change in the resident's status, but falls were not listed on any resident's Care Plan (including Resident #1's Care Plan). The ADON stated residents' falls were under Risk Management. ADON stated surveyor did not have access to the Risk Management tab on PCC. The ADON did not know what or who was the CMM.
In an interview on 08/14/23 at 04:20 p.m., the DON stated they did not need to put falls in the care plan because they changed the revision date and that was all that was needed.
Record review of facility's Care Plan and CAAs (Care Area Assessments), revised 05/06/16, revealed:
Purpose:
The purpose of this guide is to ensure that an interdisciplinary (IDT) approach is utilized in addressing the Care Area Triggers (CATs) that were generated by the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) in order to effectively address the Care Area Assessments (CAAs) and ultimately achieve the completion of an effective comprehensive plan of care for each resident.
Procedure:
-All admission and Significant Change care plans that are generated by the MDS-CAAs will be initiated by a Registered Nurse (RN)
-All comprehensive care plans will be completed utilizing the Point Click Care electronic system.
-All care plans will be kept in an area that is accessible by all staff.
-The facility IDT members are responsible for addressing their assigned CAT/CAA triggered by the MDS at the time of MDS assessment.
Case Mix Manager (CMM) or designee will be responsible for:
2. ADL Function
4. Falls
11. Pain
Acute Care Plans
As acute problems or changes to intervention or goals are identified, an appropriate care plan will be developed or modified by a Nursing staff member.
Record review of facility's Fall Management Policy revised on 01/03/2017 revealed the following:
Policy
It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be assessed to determine his/her risk for falls, and a plan of care implemented based on the resident's assessed needs.
Procedure
D. Documentation requirements for residents sustaining a fall
1.A licensed nurse will complete an Incident/Accident Report after each fall. The Incident/Accident report is not part of the medical record and documentation is not to reflect that an incident report was completed.
2.The licensed nurse will document the fall on the nurses notes of the medical record. The documentation will reflect notifications to legal representatives and attending physician or their agent of the fall.
3.The licensed nurse will assess and document the condition of the resident at least once per shift for at least 72 hours post fall.
4.Documentation in the nurse's notes and/or care plan will reflect interventions attempted.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for one Resident (Resident #12) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living.
The facility failed to provide Resident #12 with personal grooming for removal of facial hair.
These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues and decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #12's admission record dated 08/09/23 reflected Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12's diagnosis included dementia (loss of thinking ability), syncope and collapse (loss of consciousness), need for assistance for personal care, parkinson's (disorder of central nervous system),
delusional disorder (mental illness), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function) and dizziness and giddiness.
Record review of Resident #12's significant change MDS, dated [DATE] reflected,
-resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired.
-was independent for transfers, bed mobility.
-required limited assistance by one person for dressing.
-required supervision for dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #12's care plans, initiated on 08/02/23 reflected Resident #12 had a
Focused area for ADL Self Care Performance Deficit and is at risk for not having their needs met in a timely manner. Performance deficit is related to: Cognitive impairment, Activity intolerance, Impaired balance/impaired coordination, muscle weakness. Requires encouraging for bathing, dislikes showering and gets aggressive with staff when attempting to provide care, resident has hx of syncope (fainting) in shower, Date Initiated: 09/18/2019, Revision on: 3/27/2023.
Interventions included Provide shower, oral care, hair care, and nail care per schedule and when needed.
Date Initiated: 09/18/2019, Revision on: 01/03/2023.
Record review of the ADL task for personal grooming for Resident #12 dated from 07/28/23 to 08/09/23 reflected Resident #12 had not refused personal grooming during those dates.
Observation on 08/09/23 at 10:47 am revealed Resident #12 standing by her bed in her room, eating a snack. Observation revealed Resident #12 had approximately 30 hairs on her chin that were approximately one-eighth inch long. Resident #12 said she had just taken a shower. Resident #12 touched her chin hairs and said she always liked to have her chin hairs removed when she had been at home. Resident # 12 said she had asked staff to do this for her and no one had helped her remove her chin hairs.
Interview on 08/09/23 at 10:50 am with CNA XX and CNA XZ revealed Resident #12 did not like staff to touch her face when they provided her with a shower. CNA XX and CNA XZ they had asked Resident #12 if they could remove her chin hairs and she would refuse to let them remove her facial hairs. CNA XX and CNA XZ said they were responsible to provide the resident with assistance with personal grooming that included face hair removal.
Observation and interview on 08/09/23 at 10:55 am revealed CNA XX and CNA XZ ask Resident #12 if she would let them remove the hairs on her face and chin. Resident #12 replied she would like very much to have her chin hairs removed. Resident #12 said she had always been able to remove her facial hair when she was living at home. Resident #12 was observed sitting down while CNA XX and CNA XZ prepared to shave her facial hair using shaving cream and a razor from her upper lip and her chin. Resident #12 appeared very calm and quiet while staff shaved Resident #12's facial hairs.
Interview on 8/09/23 at 11:00 am with LVN ZZ revealed that if any resident refuses any type of ADL care the CNAs must report the information to the charge nurse. LVN ZZ said none of the staff including CNA XX and CNA XZ had reported to her that Resident #12 refused to have staff provide her with personal grooming that included removal of her facial hair. LVN ZZ said had been Resident #12's charge nurse and she had not noticed Resident #12's excessive facial hair growth and did not know whether Resident #12 had refused that type of personal grooming. LVN ZZ said she would bring up the personal care issue to the CNAs.
Observation and interview on 11:05 am revealed Resident #12 in her hallway appearing very happy she had facial hairs removed. Resident #12 said she didn't have a razor to do it herself. Resident #12 said she used to cover her chin with her hands when she was out of her room because she was uncomfortable with her chin hair.
Interview on 08/09/23 at 2:20 pm with the DON revealed she knew Resident #12 refused to have staff assist Resident #12 with hair and showers. The DON said she did not know if Resident #12 refused to have her facial hairs removed.
Interview on 08/15/23 at 3:17 pm with the Administrator revealed the DON, ADONs and the charge nurse were responsible to ensure the ADLs tasks were carried out.
Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living Care Guidelines revised on 02/10/20 reflected, Residents will receive essential services for activities of daily living to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights revised on 02/20/21 reflected,
Respect and dignity: The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during bot...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies for one of one facilities.
The facility did not have a designated seven-day food supply for emergencies for their census of 118 residents who were served from the facility kitchen and 104 staff.
The facility's failure could place the resident population at risk for not having resources identified and available to provide the necessary care and services the residents required.
The findings included:
Interview and observation in the facility kitchen on 08/14/23 at 9:30 with the Dietary Manager revealed she did not have a designated 7-day food supply for emergencies for residents and staff. The Dietary Manager said she had several large cans of tomatoes, chili con carne, and beans that were designated for emergency food supply that were inventoried with the daily general food supply. The Dietary Manager said she had not made any calculations to determine how much was needed for a 7-day food supply for emergencies for the current census of residents and the total number of staff.
Record review of the facility policy titled Disaster Plan Food Services dated 12/17/21 reflected the facility will keep adequate supply of emergency food, paper supplies, and water on hand to be able to provide food to all residents in the event of an emergency natural or manmade disaster. Inventory current emergency food supply to ensure adequate product is on hand.
- Rotate and replenish stock levels to meet needs. Needs = census + staff + potential received residents and staff.
-Must have 7 days supply of non-perishable foods on hand at all times, (or per state regulation, Texas requires 7 days).
-order the foods 7 days ahead and keep rotated per menu.
-Non-perishable foods are canned or dry foods.
Interview on 08/15/23 at 4:30 pm with the Administrator revealed the Food Dietary Manager did not have an emergency 7-day food supply calculated and kept in inventory for emergencies. the Administrator revealed she was responsible to ensure the emergency 7-day food supply was calculated and stored for emergencies.
Record review of the Facility Assessment, dated 2023 reflected Hazards/Risks identified were,
-tornado, medium priority
-hurricane, high priority
-winter storms, medium priority
-bomb threat, medium priority
-active shooter, high priority
-loss of power, high priority
-SARS COVID-19 outbreak-high priority
-fire-high priority
-flooding, medium priority.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented, for one Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented, for one Resident (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records.
The facility failed to document Resident #1's falls in the Progress Notes.
This failure could place all residents with falls at risk of not receiving adequate care and services.
The findings were:
Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/09/2023, revealed she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, dementia , history of falling, fracture of right femur (leg bone), fracture of base of neck of right femur (hip), and hypertension (high blood pressure).
Review of Resident #1's Significant Change in Status MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 00 which indicated cognition was severely impaired. Resident #1 had adequate hearing, unclear speech, and staff could usually understand her and she usually was able to understand others. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with two-person assist for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting, extensive assistance with on- person physical assist for personal hygiene, transfers had not occurred. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowels.
Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 05/18/23, revealed Resident #1 did not have falls reflected in the care plan.
Review of facility's incident/accident reports dated January 2023 revealed Resident #1's fall on 01/25/23.
Review of facility's incident/accident report dated April 2023 revealed Resident #1's fall on 04/28/23.
In an interview on 08/12/23 at 08:12 p.m., the ADON stated they do not document falls under Progress Notes. The ADON stated when a fall occurred, the incident report went under Risk Management and the follow-ups go in the Progress Notes. Surveyor did not have access to Risk Management.
In an interview on 08/14/23 at 04:20 p.m., the DON stated she would have to check with her nurses to see if they documented in Progress Notes when a resident fell. The DON stated the nurses would do an incident report for falls.
Record review of facility's Clinical Documentation Guideline revised 03/25/14, revealed:
Policy:
The patient's clinical record provides a record of the health status, including observations, measurements, history, and prognosis and serves as the primary document describing healthcare services provided to the patient.
Fundamental Information
The clinical record is used by healthcare team to record, preserve and communicate the patient's progress and current treatment.
Documentation
Clinical record progress notes, physician orders, flow records.
Record review of facility's Fall Management Policy revised on 01/03/2017 revealed the following:
Policy
It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be assessed to determine his/her risk for falls, and a plan of care implemented based on the resident's assessed needs.
Procedure
D. Documentation requirements for residents sustaining a fall
1.A licensed nurse will complete an Incident/Accident Report after each fall. The Incident/Accident report is not part of the medical record and documentation is not to reflect that an incident report was completed.
2.The licensed nurse will document the fall on the nurses notes of the medical record. The documentation will reflect notifications to legal representatives and attending physician or their agent of the fall.
3.The licensed nurse will assess and document the condition of the resident at least once per shift for at least 72 hours post fall.
4.Documentation in the nurse's notes and/or care plan will reflect interventions attempted.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one resident (Resident #1) of eight residents observed for infection control issues, in that:
The facility did not have a Contact Isolation sign or PPE outside of Resident #1's door to prevent anyone from entering Resident #1's isolation room without donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
This failure could place residents and visitors in hall 300 at risk for infections.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/09/2023, revealed she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, dementia , history of falling, fracture of right femur (leg bone), fracture of base of neck of right femur (hip), and hypertension (high blood pressure).
Review of Resident #1's Significant Change in Status MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 00 which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #1 had adequate hearing, unclear speech, and staff could usually understand her and she usually was able to understand others. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with two-person assist for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting, extensive assistance with one-person physical assist for personal hygiene, transfers had not occurred. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowels.
Review of Resident #1's physician's orders dated 08/04/23, revealed Resident #1 was placed on Contact Isolation R/T Escherichia Coli/ ESBL (the most common bacteria found to cause UTIs/an enzyme that makes the germ that causes UTIs, (harder to treat with antibiotics) to urine for 7 days.
Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 05/18/23, revealed the care plan did not address isolation precautions.
Observation on 08/08/23 at 03:55 p.m., revealed there was no sign on or beside Resident #1's door that indicated Resident #1 was on isolation precautions. There was no PPE outside of Resident #1's room.
In an interview on 08/08/23 at 04:00 p.m., standing outside Resident #1's door, LVN ZZ stated signage on room [ROOM NUMBER] door (See nurse before entering room) was for ESBL to urine for the resident in A Bed (Resident #1).
In an interview, standing by the door of room [ROOM NUMBER], on 08/08/23 at 04:00 p.m., LVN ZZ stated signage (see nurse before entering room) on room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door was for ESBL to urine for the resident in A Bed (Resident #1). LVN ZZ stated there was PPE hanging on the wall halfway down the hall of Resident #1's room.
In an interview on 08/12/23 at 08:12 p.m., the ADON stated there now was a precaution sign on room [ROOM NUMBER]. The ADON stated when residents were on isolation precautions, there was always supposed to be a sign on their door and PPE outside their door.
08/14/23 04:20 PM the DON stated she would have to check Resident #1's orders and check with nurses to see what Resident #1 needed. The DON then walked away.
On 08/09/23 04:05 PM the Surveyor requested policy on TBP from the DON. A policy on COVID-19 was received, not giving the information on TBP, signage or PPE.