CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #109) of 4 residents reviewed for elopement on 10/27/24.
The facility failed to put interventions in place to prevent Resident #109 from eloping from the facility when she walked out of the memory care unit and exited the fire alarm gate on 10/27/24. Resident #109 was found by an exit door again on 12/01/24 . Resident has history of opening the doors after pushing on them for 15 seconds allowing the door to open.
An IJ was identified on 12/12/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:30 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/13/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
This deficient practice could place residents at risk for unsafe elopements, injuries, and hospitalization.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #109's admission record, dated 12/12/24, reflected she was an [AGE] year old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes a gradual decline in memory, thinking, and reasoning skills), Hypokalemia (a condition where the potassium levels in the blood are lower than normal), Hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormones to meet your body's needs), Hyperlipidemia (a condition where there are abnormally high levels of lipids (fats) in the blood), Essential primary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure that develops gradually over time and has no clear cause), Chronic atrial Fibrillation (a type of heart arrhythmia that causes the upper chambers of the heart to beat irregularly and quickly), unspecified atrial fibrillation (a heart condition where the upper chambers of the heart beat irregularly and out of sync with the lower chambers), seasonal allergic rhinitis (an inflammatory condition of the upper airways that occurs when the immune system overreacts to airborne allergens), constipation (a bowel dysfunction that makes it difficult or infrequent to have a bowel movement), primary osteoarthritis (is a type of arthritis that develops in joints over time and has no known cause), abnormalities of gait and mobility (any deviation from a normal walking pattern, which can manifest as difficulties with balance, coordination, or the rhythm of walking, often caused by underlying neurological, musculoskeletal, or sensory issues, leading to symptoms like limping, shuffling, dragging feet, or an unsteady gait), Altered mental status (a general term that describes a change in how well the brain is working) and cognitive communication deficit (a communication difficulty caused by a cognitive impairment).
Review of Resident #109's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 10/16/24, reflected a BIMS of 2 indicated severe cognitive impairment. MDS review reflected wandering - Presence and Frequency: Resident score 1 indicating behavior of this type occurred 1 to 3 days.
Review of Resident #109's care plan, dated 10/11/24, reflected Resident #109 has impaired cognitive function with potential for worsening cognition related to progression of disease along with adjusting to new environment. Staff were instructed to keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible to decrease confusion. Resident #109 is an elopement risk/wanderer related to disoriented to place, Impaired safety awareness. Staff were to maintain resident's safety will be maintained through the review date .
Review of Resident #109's progress notes, from 10/10/24 through 12/1/24 , reflected,
-A note by RN A on 10/10/24 at 5:09 AM, Late entry, which stated, behaviors: Wandering, Chronic. There have not been any recent medication reductions.
-A note by LVN I on 10/10/24 at 1:54 PM, stated admission details: Mental Status: Resident is confused. Resident is inattentive. Resident is experiencing signs of short-term memory loss. Resident is disorganized in thinking. Oriented to person. Confused: Chronic. Short term memory loss: Chronic. Safety: Utilizing wander elopement alarm.
-A note by LVN T, on 10/11/2024 at 10:54 AM, stated elopement evaluation: history of elopement while at home. Yes. Wandering behavior, a pattern or goal directed. Yes. Wanders aimlessly or non-goal-oriented: No. Wandering behavior likely to affect the safety or well-being of self/others: No. Wandering behavior likely to affect the privacy of others. No. Recently admitted or re-admitted (within past 30 days) and has not accepted the situation: No. Elopement Score: 5.0 Score of 5.0 means: High risk of elopement.
-A note by LVN E, on 10/13/2024 at 11:10 AM stated, note text: Resident exit seeking currently. Resident pushed on doors until they came open. Resident walked through doors down hall. RN charge and I were able to redirect resident back onto secure unit, with no resistance. Directed resident to her room.
- A note by LVN E, on 10/13/2024 at 2:57 PM stated, note text: Resident in exit seeking, in search of her car to go home. Redirected resident to different activities with other residents. Redirection effective currently. Will continue with current plan of care.
- A note by LVN E, on 10/13/2024 at 3:52 PM stated, Mood and behavior: Resident is currently experiencing unwanted behaviors. Wandering: Chronic. Mood and behavior note exit seeking.
-A note by LVN U, on 10/13/2024 at 8:00 PM stated, note text: Noted with restlessness. Continuously pacing up and down hallway attempting to exit out of locked doors. Has held door long enough to release lock multiple times with staff able to redirect. Continues to state, I need to get to the parking lot and get my grey [NAME]. I am sorry but I am not staying here, especially when I do not belong here. Staff attempt to re-orient resident with no success. Staff continues to redirect currently. Plan of care to continue.
- A note by LVN I, on 10/15/2024 at 6:19 PM stated, Behavior notes: Noted with increased restlessness/agitation/exit-seeking - repeatedly ambulating to double doors while stating, I need to go home, I have work to do at home. Initially easily redirected though required x2 staff to redirect from exiting and to dining area for supper. Noted confusion increasing when interacting with peers- staff able to direct to dining area for supper. RP made aware of behaviors.
- A note by LVN V, on 10/27/2024 at 1:29 PM stated, note text: Resident was found around back of building approximately at 11:48 am. Resident was redirected back into the building by staff in which she was easily redirected without incidence. Resident assessed and noted no visible injuries, vitals taken 142/76/77, temperature 97.2, respiration rate 18. Skin warm, dry and intact. Resident states she had not been outside today. When question was asked resident stated she followed someone out of the gate and around the building, she also stated she goes out there numerous times. All parties are made aware including, MD, Representative, DON and administration. Resident eats her lunch and remains at table until family arrives.
-A note by DON, on 10/27/2024 at 2:55 PM , indicates note strike out reason from resident chart: Incorrect documentation. Note text: After review of camera footage; resident noted to be outside for approximately one hour. Weather noted to be 94 degrees. Notified Medical Director Received new orders for labs to be drawn when resident arrives back at facility for CBC, CMP. Diagnosis: Fatigue. Representative made aware of new orders.
-A note by DON on 10/27/2024 at 3:00 PM, stated Note text: after review of the camera footage and time stamp; resident noted to be out of sight for 14 minutes . Medical Director updated.
-A note by LVN E on 12/01/2024 at 03:46 PM, stated nurse note: Resident was observed at exit doors. Resident pushed on doors until they came open. Resident came through doors to other side. Nurse intervened and assisted in getting resident back on the other side.
Review of Resident #109's admission wandering evaluation, dated 10/11/24, reflected she had a history of wandering/elopement. There were no goals or interventions notated on the evaluation for Resident #109.
Review of Resident #1's plan of care, from 10/11/24 through 11/03/24, reflected Resident #109 exhibited Problem: The resident is an elopement risk/wanderer related to disoriented to place, impaired safety awareness. 10/27/2024: Resident found outside back of building with no injuries (resident states she followed someone out of gate). Interventions/Tasks: Resident to reside on secured unit. Staff education regarding elopement/wandering with new policy regarding elopement. Date initiated: 10/27/2024. Wander alert: resident may have wander guard applied to alert staff of attempts to exit to facility; check placement and functioning every shift. Problem: The resident has impaired cognitive function with potential for worsening cognition related to progression of disease along with adjusting to new environment. Interventions/tasks: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/Document for side effects and effectiveness (Namenda and Aricept). Keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible to decrease confusion.
Review of the facility's investigation file for Resident #109's incident on 10/27/24 reflected on 10/27/24, ADM investigation summary indicated review of camera footage. Resident observed exiting back door at 11:33 am. Resident noted exiting gate at 11:33 LVN V, observed walking out to the porch and to gate that is sounding at 11:35 am. Resident was escorted back to memory care wing at 11:49 am. Head to toe assessment performed, no injuries noted. Medical Director notified. Resident family member notified. Received new lab orders from doctor. Residents assessed and note no visible injuries, vitals taken 142/76/77, temperature 97.2, respirations 18. Skin was dry and intact. Resident states she had not been outside today. Resident eats her lunch and remains at table until family arrives as resident was scheduled to go out on pass this day to watch family member's theater performance. Action taken 10/27/24: Dementia training with appropriate interventions. Abuse and Neglect. Elopements. State reportable. 300 hall education: No propping open door, roller shades to be open. 10/28/24 Wander guard system placed for additional monitor placement on exit gate. Created new policy and procedure to follow for when exit alarms sound that include nursing staff conducting a roll call for all residents.
During an interview on 12/11/24 at 9:50 AM, LVN H stated Resident #109 was outside in the smoking area. LVN H noticed her outside and realized that she was a little confused and then realized she was a resident from the facility. She was standing outside the gate; the gate was propped open in the smoking rest area for residents. LVN H redirected the resident back inside. LVN H verbalized, I'm not sure how long she was outside, I didn't see her when I passed by the window but when I went outside to take a break, I noticed her outside, it could not have been that long voiced LVN H.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:36 AM, LVN V stated she was the charge nurse for the memory unit on 10/27/24. She verbalized that staff were not very familiar with Resident #109 and the resident's family member had called that morning and asked that the staff get the resident ready for an outing. Staff got the resident ready and that morning staff had residents out in the outside area enjoying the weather. LVN V verbalized she is not sure if the resident was with the group but when the staff brought the residents back in shortly after the gate alarm went off outside. LVN V voiced she went out to check the gate and it was closed. She said she did not see anyone outside, so she closed the door that was left propped open during the process of bringing the residents back in that morning. LVN V verbalized she just thought someone pushed up on the gate and that is why the alarm went off. So, she turned the alarm off. LVN V, voiced another nurse came up to her at one point and told her he found one of her residents near the smoking area. LVN V provided a skin assessment on the resident and notified the doctor and family. LVN V, voiced she thinks the resident was gone for about 10 to 15 minutes. LVN V, verbalized that administration came in and re-checked everything to make sure staff complied and provided an in-service on elopements, abuse, and neglect. LVN V was sent home and informed that this was just part of the investigation process.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 10:16 AM, LVN E verbalized Resident #109 can read so she knows that the instructions on the door say to hold for 15 seconds, and it will open. LVN E, verbalized after the 10/27/24 elopement staff have been instructed to see who is at the door if the alarm goes off and do a head count of all the residents.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 10:28 AM, the DON verbalized she was not here the day Resident #109 eloped, but staff informed her of the elopement. DON voiced she is not sure if the resident walked through the grass around the back to reach the other end, or if she walked through the street that is located directly behind the building. DON acknowledged there was a potential for the resident to get hurt when she walked out of the memory care unit gate. DON verbalized that there were no other elopements since 10/27/24.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 11:12 AM the ADM verbalized that the videos show the resident leaving the facility at 10:33 AM but that the video was behind the regular time by one hour. ADM verbalized that the back cameras behind the building were not working.
During an observation of the facility video footage on 12/12/2024, it reflected on 10/27/2024 resident exiting the alarm door outside the memory unit.
During a telephone interview with Resident #109's family member on 12/12/24 at 1:24pm, she stated they called her about the elopement that she was in their outdoor patio and waited long enough that she stated that they did not tell her about the incident. Resident daughter verbalized she does not have any concerns about her being able to get out she is very normal, and a lot of people do not realize that she belongs there. Daughter verbalized if the resident does get out, she is not going to get hurt and not going to get far and stated with the nature of her disease it will happen from time to time.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 2:11 PM, maintenance employee W, stated that the alarms on the doors are checked monthly and records were provided and reviewed by survey team.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 2:15 PM, ADM verbalized that the back door was propped open for about 15 minutes on 10/27/24 after the residents were brought back into the building that morning. ADM verbalized she is trying to provide video footage, but it keeps freezing on her end.
During an interview with DON on 12/12/24 at 3:02 PM, DON stated the nurse that was working on the 300-memory unit hall is was PRN nurse and 2 CNAs, along with an LVN and med aide. DON verbalized, I was not here that day, but I was told she walked outside the side door in front of the day room. The resident walked out the gate to the right, went out that door the blinds were closed in day room. Nurse went outside and she looked but the resident had closed the gate, so she just assumed that one of the residents pushed up on it. She was not gone that long at all. I will be honest less than 30 minutes. I will be honest the time stamp on the video footage is off. I believe when I calculated the time it was less than 30 minutes. Since then, we have done an in-service that includes staff need to make sure they are doing a roll count. Anytime alarms sound if it is not a planned exit, they need to make sure the residents are safe and all in the building. Make sure no doors are propped open. DON verbalized that all staff have been in-serviced and they were informed not to prop doors open, keep blinds open.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 3:15 PM, ADM voiced new policies and procedures to do roll call will, new wander guard ordered to be installed by 12/16/24 . They have increased staffing levels. Staff have dementia training that they must update monthly.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 3:48 PM with Alarm Representative X, the delayed egress should not be used for resident protection.
An observation of the outside of the back gate on 12/12/2024 at 11:00 AM where Resident #109 exited to the smoking gate where she was found by LVN H on 10/27/24 reflected approximately 200 - 225 feet of distance that the resident walked. There was a residential road directly behind the facility and a parking lot for employees to park.
This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/12/24, The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 12/12/24 at 3:30 PM.
The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 12/13/24 at 11:08 AM
Plan of Removal
Immediate Threat
On 12/12/2024 an abbreviated survey was initiated at facility. On 12/12/2024 the surveyor provided an Immediate Jeopardy that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety.
The notification of Immediate Jeopardy states as follows: state the issue you will find the info on the template you were provided.
Action: 1:1 Monitoring; assess staff is required to be always within arm's reach of resident.
Start Date: 12/12/2024 at 1:35 PM
Completion Date: In progress, will not complete until additional hardware (wander guard is installed on 12/16/2024)
Responsible: Facility's staffing nurse, the QM nurse, & Director of Nursing is responsible for ensuring the adequate 1:1 Monitoring of resident.
12-12-24 (Thursday): Staff #1 from 4 till left on bus.
Staff #2- while on the bus
12-12-24 (Thursday): staff # 3 from 8P-6A
12-13-24 (Friday): staff #4 from 6A-6P
12-13-24 (Friday): staff #3 from 6P-6A
12-14-24 (Saturday): staff #5 from 6A-6P
12-14-24 (Saturday): staff #6 from 6P-6A
12-15-24 (Sunday): staff #4 from 6A-6P
12-15-24 (Sunday): staff # 7 from 6P-6A
12-16-24 (Monday): staff # 4 from 6A-6P
12-16-24 (Monday): staff # 8 from 6P-6A
Action: Door Monitoring
Start Date: 12/12/2024 6:00 PM.
Completion Date: In progress until new locking mechanisms is installed, date pending.
Responsible: Facility's staffing nurse, the QM nurse, & Director of Nursing is responsible for ensuring the adequate 1:1 Monitoring of resident.
12/12/24 7P- 6A Staff member #9
12/13/23 6A-6P Staff member #10
12/13/24 6P- 6A Staff member #10
12./14/24 6A-6P Staff member #9
12/14/24 6P- 6A Staff member #11
12/15/24 6A-6P staff member #9
12/15/24 6P- 6A staff member # 11
12/16/24 6A-6P Staff member #12
12/16/24 6P- 6A Staff member # 13
Action: Training regarding: Abuse/Neglect, 1:1 Monitoring / Guarding of exit Doors, Elopement. A new policy and procedure , initiated on October 28, 2024, this procedure implements a roll call for all residents within the building. Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and Administrator created the policy and procedure 10/28/24. The CNAs receive training from charge nurses or administrative nurse, charge nurses are trained by the administrative nurses, who receive training from the DON, the DON receives training from Administrator; the Administrator receives training from Facility Consultant.
Start Date: 12/12/2024.
Completion Date: 12/13/2024
Responsible: In-service was conducted by previous ADON on roll call 10/28/2024 & again 12/12/2024 by IP and QM . Agency staff will receive in-services prior to their shift begins by the charge nurse on shift. Staff members who are off shift or PRN will receive in-service training via portal.
Action: Door Signage posted as a reminder to staff not to prop the door open. In-service training provided by QM to re-iterate that doors are not to be propped open at any time. The CNAs receive training from charge nurses or administrative nurse, charge nurses are trained by the administrative nurses, who receive training from the DON, the DON receives training from Administrator; the Administrator receives training from Facility Consultant .
Start Date: 12/12/2024.
Completion Date: 12/12/2024 6:30 PM
Responsible: QM Admin Nurse
Action: Elopement Assessments Completed monthly and Care plans Updated as needed. Findings will be reported monthly to QA committee for review, with changes made to the plan as required.
Start Date: 12/12/2024 5:30 PM
Completion Date: 12/12/2024 09:30
Responsible: Assessments Charge Nurse #1, Care plans updated by designated MDS administrative nurse
Action: The facility will conduct monthly audits to ensure that all assess
Start Date: 12/12/2024 5:30 PM
Completion Date: 12/12/2024 09:30
Responsible: Assessments Charge Nurse #1, Care plans updated by designated MDS administrative nurse. QAPI attendees include Facility Consultant, Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and all administrative nursing personnel. The Administrator receives training from facility consultant.
The Survey Team monitored the Plan of Removal on 12/13/24:
Observation on 12/13/2024 at 8:30 and 11:15am staff member sitting by the door .
Observation on 12/13/2024 at 11:15am revealed a staff member was in arm reach of Resident #1 . Further observation revealed that door signage was posted on both doors .
Observation on 12/13/2024 at 1:27pm revealed a staff member was sitting by the door .
Observation on 12/13/2024 at 1:28pm revealed a staff member was in arm reach of Resident #1 .
During an Interview on 12/13/2024 at 2:27 pm, LVN I stated and confirmed she took the training this month. LVN A stated that she was trained on one-on-one monitoring, Resident #109 is within arm's length and to always know the resident's location, and to keep the resident distracted. LVN, I stated she has been trained on monitoring the exit doors and she took all the training today. LVN, I stated when the alarm sounds, we must do a head count on all residents, monitor the doors, and keep them closed, do not leave them open. LVN, I stated she took the elopement training today, and to keep the door closed, perform head counts if the alarm goes off, and to always know the locations of all residents. LVN, I stated if a resident elopes, I must notify the ADM and DON, call 9-1-1, and to notify staff and attempt to locate the resident. LVN, I stated if the alarm goes off, I go to the location of the alarm, investigate what is going on, if I see a resident by the door I redirect the resident, I conduct a head count on the residents, and notify the ADM and DON. LVN I stated when completed the Charge nurse will ensure each resident is accounted for and after roll call, I keep a mental note of the findings and I then review our wander guard list and ADL list.
During an interview on 12/13/2024 at 2:37 pm, CNA M stated she took the in-service yesterday (12/12/2024), she has been educated on resident rights, she has been in-serviced on one-on-one monitoring. CNA M stated the training covered on how not to leave the resident's (Resident #109) side, and that a staff must be always at their side. CNA M stated he has been trained on monitoring exit doors, and that if the alarm goes off, we look at the surrounding area and ensure no resident got out, we do a head count and we can reset the alarm. CNA M stated that she has been trained on elopement procedures and that if a resident elopes or even steps on the other side of the door we must intervene and report to the charge nurse on duty, the charge nurse then reports the elopement up the chain of command, the goal is ensure no residents eloped. CNA M stated if a resident attempts to elope we must act, we redirect the resident and have them come back inside, we make sure there are no other residents out, we immediately notify the charge nurse on duty and we do a head count. CNA M added that we (staff) are all responsible that each resident is accounted for, one of us goes down the hall, another staff goes to the day area, and a third staff check the other doors, and that after the roll call we notify the nurses where all the residents were located, and we make a mental note on the residents and we communicate with all staff to assure all residents are accounted for.
During an interview on 12/13/2024 at 2:52 pm, CNA L stated she has been in-serviced on one-on-one monitoring on residents, and that we must keep residents safe, keep them from falling, assure residents are taken care of, and assure residents are within arm's reach. CNA L stated that she was trained on monitoring the exit doors and that she took the training today. CNA L stated the training covered the importance of watching and monitoring the doors, calling the ADM for all elopements, and the importance on all staff locating the residents. CNA L stated we immediately notify the charge nurse if a resident elopes, and if I hear an alarm I get up and check what set the alarm off; I see who went in our out, who is close to the door, I check outside to assure no residents are outside. CNA L stated that all staff are responsible for assuring each resident is accounted for, and that after roll call I confirm findings with nurse. CNA L stated that after our roll call we are checking all residents are accounted for, we are checking the number of residents locations and his or her ADL sheets.
During an interview on 12/13/2024 at 2:58 pm, CNA K stated she has taken the training, she has been trained on one-on-one monitoring. CNA K stated that she was in-serviced on having the resident stay within arm's reach, and if the resident (Resident #109) attempts to leave outside we must redirect the resident and have them come back inside, we were educated on redirecting the resident, keeping the resident busy by communicating with the resident. CNA K stated she was in-serviced on monitoring the exit doors, and we cannot leave doors cracked or propped open, we cannot let residents leave unsupervised. CNA K stated she was trained on elopement procedures, CNA K added if I see a resident g out , I intervene, I notify the nurse on duty, I tell the charge nurse, I start looking for the residents, and we notify the ADM and DON. CNA K stated if an alarm goes off, I will run and investigate who is going out of the door, I investigate if it was a resident or if a resident is outside the door. CNA K stated all staff, the charge nurse, everyone is responsible on assuring all residents are accounted for, and that after we complete our roll call for residents we communicated with the nurse on findings. CNA K stated that during the roll call, we confirm all residents, we count and make sure all residents are here and we review the ADL sheet for the residents.
During an interview on 12/13/2024 at 3:20 pm, LVN J she took trainings today, she has been trained on one-on-one monitoring and that we always have eyes on resident, within arm's reach, and if a staff member needs to go on break, we notify another staff to assure we are always doing these things. LVN J stated if an alarm goes off, we act, we do a head count, then a roll call to account all residents are here. LVN J confirmed she has taken the elopement trainings today, and added that if an alarm goes off, we act, the system will inform us what number band (wander guard) set off the alarm, and we follow the location of residents and roll call procedures. LVN J stated we must report all elopements to the DON, and if an alarm goes off, we find out if a resident went out of the building, we check outside the surrounding areas for any residents, and that we are all responsible that each and all residents are accounted for. After the roll call, I would take a mental note and recall each resident, if a resident is missing or not accounted for, I check our computer (records) and review who has been checked out (signed out on pass, appointment, et all) of the facility and reference that for all residents that should be present in the facility.
During an interview on 12/13/2024 at 3:22 pm, DON stated training was completed today, on the importance of one-on-one monitoring, how residents must be within arms always reach and for staff to communicate if they need a break, staff must assure another staff takes over the important duties until they return. DON stated we had education on guarding or monitoring the doors today and that staff should be at the door 24/7 and that the elopement training was done this morning. DON stated the training covered what to do if there is an elopement; there needs to be a roll call and if it is in the secured unit, we need to do an elopement assessment to determine who is at risk of an elopement, we always respond to alarms or if a resident elopes. DON also stated if nursing staff will assure the roll calls are completed for the whole facility, I (DON) will notify ADM and do a self-reported incident to HHSC . DON stated staff are to respond immediately, to get our residents to safety, staff need to communicate and get in touch with the charge nurses to do a roll call of the entire facility, charge nurses will use a printed midnight census to assure all residents are in the building and after the roll call staff are to huddle, assure all is clear on resident head counts and locations and to report all findings to myself and ADM.
During an interview on 12/13/2024 at 3:29 pm, ADM stated we must report all findings of abuse, we have trained staff on one-on-one monitoring, we educated staff that one-on-one is defined as you (staff) stay within arm's reach of the resident that needs the monitoring and to communicate and call if they (staff) need a break so one-on-one can continue. ADM stated I have been trained on monitoring exit doors, and that guarding or monitoring the exit doors mean to redirect or ask for additional staff to assist with residents who are trying to enter or exit. ADM confirmed the elopement training education conducted today, this morning, that in the elopement training we check for resident's safety, staff must notify us, administration, the residents RPs and Doctors. ADM added that we placed interventions to keep our residents safe and from further elopement. ADM added we have been trained in an elopement situation staff are to perform if an alarm goes off, even if it is just a fire alarm, all residents must be accounted for, we look around the premises, we locate the residents, we call local law enforcement advise of a silver alert, we notify doctors or nurse practitioners, we were trained on the importance of a roll call being completed and that we can just clear or turn off the alarm, all residents must be accounted for prior to resetting any alarm. ADM stated that the charge nurses for each hallway are responsible for assuring the residents are accounted for by matching face to name on the midnight census, after the roll call this will be submitted to the nursing office.
Record Review of In-Services for 1:1, door monitoring, door propping, elopement, abuse, and neglect, exit alarm sounding and Dementia revealed that 110 out of 129 staff have been in serviced. Staff [TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents rights to request, refuse, and/or discontinue...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents rights to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for advanced directives.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's out of hospital do-not-resuscitate (OOH-DNR) order form was signed by a physician.
These failures could place residents at-risk of having their wishes dishonored or delay necessary medical treatment or intervention due to confusion.
Finding included:
Review of Resident #26 face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure.
Review of Resident #26 physician orders dated [DATE] reflected an order for do not resuscitate.
Review of Resident #26 care plan dated [DATE] revealed resident or family requested to be DNR. Interventions included chart to have proper documentation of DNR status and goals included resident decision to be honored through review date.
Review of Resident#26's out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate (ooh-dnr) order form revealed no physician signature in the physician statement section. Further review revealed there was no physician signature in the section all persons who have signed above must sign below, acknowledging that this document has been properly completed.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:17 PM, LVN C stated that she knew what a resident's code status was by a list provided by the ADON/DON. She stated that the list is updated often and that it was also in their chart. She stated that she verified an OOH-DNR was complete and valid because it was in the resident's chart and uploaded into the document section. LVN C stated that you had to make sure there were signatures on the OOH-DNR. LVN C stated an OOH-DNR is not considered valid if it did not have physician signature. LVN C reviewed Resident #26's OOH-DNR and stated that it did not have any physician signature. LVN C stated that because the OOH-DNR did not have a physician signature the resident would have to be a full code and it was not valid. She stated that unfortunately the resident's wishes may not be met if they had an OOH-DNR and are put as a full code.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:22 PM, LVN D stated that she knew a resident's code status because it was in their chart on their face sheet and as an order. She stated she verified that an OOH-DNR is complete and valid by the physician signature. LVN D stated that if an OOH-DNR did not have a physician signature it was not considered valid. LVN D viewed Resident #26's DNR and stated that it did not have physician signatures and it should have them.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:56 PM, SW stated that she knew a resident's code status was because she participated in getting signatures for OOH-DNRs. SW stated their code status is also in the system on their face sheet and there were copies of the OOH-DNRs. She stated that she verified that an OOH-DNR is valid by when she witnessed the resident or representative sign it and then it was sent to the doctor. SW stated it was incomplete until doctor signed it. SW stated she is unsure if there was an audit to see if OOH-DNRs were completed. She stated nurse handles scanning the OOH-DNR into the resident's chart. SW viewed Resident #26's OOH-DNR and stated it was not valid because it did not have physician signature. She stated that if a resident did not have a valid OOH-DNR a medical professional may assume it was valid and the resident may pass and later realize the resident was a full code. She stated that it was not valid, and staff performed CPR it would have also been a major concern.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:54 PM, DON stated that staff knew a resident's code status because it was in PCC and binders were also available with the document. She stated that code status was also posted at the nurses stations. She stated that the SW was supposed to verify if an OOH-DNR was complete or valid. She stated that the SW should audit the document when they initially get the OOH-DNR. DON stated she expected that OOH-DNRs are audited quarterly. DON stated an OOH-DNR was not valid without a physician signature. She stated that the potential harm of an incomplete OOH-DNR was not following the wishes of the family or resident. DON stated that if an OOH-DNR was not valid the facility could potentially perform CPR, and if a resident did not want CPR it may lead to trauma.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:04 PM, ADM stated that audits are completed monthly for advanced directives. She stated during the audit it was reviewed the accuracy of the OOH-DNR and match it to the order in the resident's chart. She stated the SW was responsible for completing OOH-DNR audits, but it has been a collaboration with nursing recently. She stated that an OOH-DNR should include physician signatures. ADM stated that the potential harm was that they may not resuscitate someone if an OOH-DNR was not valid.
Review of facility policy Advanced Directives dated [DATE] revealed the resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy.
Review of health and safety code 166.083(b)(4)(6) revealed an OOH-DNR order at minimum must contain statement that the physician signing the document is the attending physician of the person and that the physician is directing health care professionals acting in out-of-hospital settings, including a hospital emergency department, not to initiate or continue certain life-sustaining treatment on behalf of the person and places for the printed names and signatures of the witnesses or the notary public's acknowledgment and for the printed name and signature of the attending physician of the person and the medical license number of the attending physician
Further review of health and safety code 166.089(3) revealed an OOH-DNR order form appears valid when it includes the signature or digital or electronic signature of the declarant or persons executing or issuing the order and the attending physician in the appropriate places designated on the form for indicating that the order form has been properly completed.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from resident neglect...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from resident neglect for one
(Resident #12) out of three residents reviewed for neglect.
The facility failed to ensure FTA from ensuring the facility lift was located at the back facility door to transfer Resident #12 off the van onto the lift . Resident #12 fell from the van onto the lift located on the ground on 11/15/2024.
This noncompliance was identified as PNC. The deficient practice occurred on 11/15/2024 and in-service was completed on 11/15/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.
This failure could place residents at risk of neglect, injury, and psychosocial harm.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident # 12's face sheet, dated, 12/11/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia ( a condition that affects the brain's ability to think, remember, caused by lack of blood flow to the brain), type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical condition where the body's ability to take in oxygen is suddenly impaired, leading to a dangerously low level of oxygen in the blood. Hypoxia can be life-threatening), muscle weakness ( a lack of muscle strength that makes it difficult to move your body),glaucoma ( buildup fluid in the front of the eye, which increases pressure inside the eye. If left untreated can lead to vision loss and eventually blindness), and type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy ( when nerve damage develops due to long-term high blood sugar levels).
Record review of Resident #12's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 10/07/2024, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 4, which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #12 required assistance with transfers, dressing, hygiene, and showers.
Record review of Resident #12's Comprehensive Care Plan, completed on, 11/18/2024, reflected Resident #12 had Impaired physical mobility. Intervention: Assist resident in performing movements and tasks. Educate Resident and Representative on safety precautions. Educate resident and representative on safe transfer techniques. Resident #12 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to some cognitive deficits (related to mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things) and safety concerns. Resident #12 required assistance with most aspects of ADL s. Intervention: Transfers: Resident #12 required one person assist with difficult transfers related to weakness. Resident #12 was at risk for falls. Resident #12 had a fall incident with transportation van on 11/15/2024 and was evaluated at emergency room with laceration and hematoma to back of head. Interventions: anti-roll back to wheelchair. Staff education on safe operation of van with loading and unloading residents. Van maintenance for proper function of the transportation van.
Record review of Resident #12's nurses note dated 11/15/2024 at 3:30 PM reflected called by transportation driver to the front awning. Seen resident laying on her left side. Resident was assisted into a sitting position. Resident stated she hit her head and it was hurting her. Small laceration and formation of hematoma was noted to the back of her head. Resident complained of pain to her bottom but denied pain anywhere else. Upon further assessment, no other injuries noted. Focused neuro assessment was completed, resident was alert and oriented , Vitals BP- 140/90, P-92, Respiration- 24, Temperature- 98.6, O2- 100 % RA. Assessed residents ROM, WNL of resident's baseline. EMS was called, R/P, MD, DON , and Administrator notified. Resident consented to transport. Signed by RN A.
Record review of the facility investigation report, dated 11/18/2024, reflected Transportation Aide T failed to raise the lift prior to rolling Resident #12 out of the van resulting in resident falling out of the rear exit of the van. The investigation was confirmed, and Transportation Aide T was terminated.
Record review of Resident #12's incident report, dated 11/15/2024, reflected called by transportation driver to the front awning. Seen resident laying on her left side. Resident stated she hit her head and it was hurting. Small laceration and formation of hematoma to the back of her head. Resident complained of pain to her bottom but denied pain elsewhere. No other injuries noted. Resident stated I fell out the back of the van. Resident noted to be anxious. Resident knew where she was and able to inform the nursing staff her name and date of birth . The following was documented on the incident report:
1. Immediate action taken: Resident sent to local hospital by EMS.
2. Injuries observed at the time of incident: laceration to the back of head.
3. Level of Pain: Resident #12's pain level was a 10 (on scale of 1 to 10 and 10 being the maximal level of pain). Resident #12 was alert.
4. Mental Status: Resident #12 was oriented to the following: person, situation, place and, time.
5. Injuries report post incident: Resident #12 did not have any observed post incident.
6. Witnessed fall: Resident #12 fell outside.
7. Predisposing situation and physiological factors: none.
8. Other information: Lift was not in raised position. Lift was lowered to the ground from previous resident that was unloaded from the van.
9. Statements: TA T statement was not printed in its entirety. ( The sentences were not complete due to printing error on the incident report) Requested on 12/10/2024 at 2:30 PM from the DON for a new incident report. It was not provided prior to exit. Resident #12 incident report was provided in the facility investigation, however, it did not have the statement by transportation aide T. Agencies/People notified: Physician, DON, and Family member.
Record review of Resident #12's first hospital visit on 11/15/2024 reflected findings of a fracture of the surgical neck of the right humerus, mild angulation, and impaction. Suspect second part fracture extending into the greater tubercle. No other evidence of injury. First hospital recommended Resident #12 sent to another hospital for further testing and assessment.
Record review of Resident #12's second hospital visit on,11/15/2024, reflected history of present illness. Resident #12 was presented to the ED as a transfer status post fall from wheelchair. Outside hospital imaging was concerning for subdural and right humerus fracture. However repeat trauma imaging did not show any signs of subdural hematoma or new humerus fracture aside from an old fracture. Trauma CT scan revealed an incidental finding of right lower lobe segmental Pulmonary Embolism ( a blood clot that blocks an artery in the lungs, preventing blood flow to part of the lung). Resident #12 had new O2 requirement and required 2 L on nasal cannula. Resident #12 at baseline and did not require any oxygen at facility. The hospital completed CT scans and x-rays of all areas of Resident #12. Resident #12 had an old fracture and did not have any new injuries.
Record review of Transportation Aide T personnel record reflected Transportation Aide T was hired on 04/15/2024 as a transportation aide. She received training by the former Transportation Coordinator U on 04/15/2024. Transportation Aide T and Transportation Coordinator U signed the facility form Steps for Operating the lift in the van. The facility followed protocol for any incident occurring in the facility van. Transportation Aide T results of the drug test was in the personnel file, and it was negative. Transportation Aide T was terminated on 11/15/2024.
Record review of Transportation Aide R's personnel record reflected her training and orientation to be a transportation aide was completed on 11/18/2024 and 11/21/2024.
Record review of Transportation Aides S personnel record reflected her training and orientation to be a transportation aide was begun on 12/2/2024 and was continued for 2 weeks.
Record review of demonstration in-services completed by Transportation Coordinator on 11/18/2024 after the incident on 11/15/2024 with Resident #1 in the white ford van reflected all staff on the facility van insurance was required to demonstrate how to load residents on the van and how to unload the residents off the van. The following was demonstrated :
Steps for operating the Lift in the [NAME] Ford Van
1. Ensure the van's engine is running.
2. Engage the emergency brake.
3. When a resident is positioned on the lift, lock the brakes on their chair.
4. Secure the strap behind the chair.
5. Gradually lower the resident and the ramp to the ground.
If there is a second resident awaiting unloading inside the van, ensure their chair remains secure with a harness until the staff is ready to assist.
1. Secure the yellow strap belt.
2. Return the lift to its raised position.
Please note: If the lift is left in the lowered position, an alarm will activate when the weight contacts the yellow-marked barrier on the lift mechanism.
Steps for Operating a [NAME] Dodge Caravan or the Green/ Gray [NAME]:
1. The ramp is operated manually
2. Ensure the vehicle is parked at least four feet from the curb and facing away from the traffic to prioritize safety.
3. Lower the ramp while employing proper body mechanics.
4. Secure all residents using a four-point harness system.
5. Fasten each resident with a seatbelt for additional safety.
6. When loading a resident , they should face inward towards the van.
7. During unloading, ensure the resident descends the ramp while facing the interior of the van.
Record review of Abuse and Neglect in-service dated 11/15/2024 reflected abuse and neglect was discussed during the in-service. Neglect- is the failure to care for properly. Cases of suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation shall be reported immediately to the abuse coordinator, The Administrator or to The Director of Nurses.
Record review on 12/11/2024 of the signs steps for operating a white dodge caravan or the green/gray [NAME] placed in the facility vans after the incident on 11/15/2024. The signs reflected the following:
1. The ramp is operated manually.
2. Ensure the vehicle is parked at least four feet from the curb and facing away from traffic to prioritize safety.
3. Lower the ramp while employing proper body mechanics.
4. Secure all residents using a four-point harness system.
5. Fasten each resident with a seatbelt for additional safety.
6. When loading a resident, they should face inward towards the van.
7. During unloading, ensure the resident descends the ramp while facing the interior of the van.
Record review of QAPI for the upcoming meeting in January 2025 reflected the incident with the facility van would be addressed during the QAPI meeting and review the steps taken to prevent another incident on the van.
Record review, on 12/10/2024 of additional steps to be taken to ensure the staff was operating the van per protocol the Transportation Coordinator will complete monthly random checks with the transportation aides and the other staff on the insurance card to ensure they are operating the van per protocol. These random checks will be unannounced.
Record review, on 12/10/2024, of additional protocol was to perform drug testing on any new hires to drive the van and will do drug testing if suspect anyone is using illicit drugs.
Record review on 12/10/2024, of a statement from Transportation Aide T given to Transportation Coordinator, dated 11/15/2024, reflected, Transportation Aide T had both Resident #12 and Resident #48 in the transit van out from of the facility. Transportation Aide T Unstrapped Resident #48, pushed her on the ramp, lowered the ramp, and proceeded to wheel Resident #48 into the nursing home. Transportation Aide T then went through the right side of the transit van to unstrap Resident #12. Transportation Aide T stated they were talking and making jokes while Transportation Aide.
Unable to conduct observation of the facility van used to unload Resident #12 when she fell from the van onto the ground as it was not at the facility. The white dodge caravan was in the shop.
Record review of the invoice faxed from the mechanic shop where the facility white caravan was being repaired reflected the mechanics were working on the transmission torque converter and not the wheelchair lift.
In an interview on 12/10/2024 at 9:05 AM the Director of Nurses stated Resident #12 was returning from a doctor's appointment in the facility van. She stated Transportation Aide T had assisted Resident #48 off the facility van and into the facility. She stated when Transportation Aide T returned to the van she did not step onto the lift and maneuver the lift to the door instead she entered the van from the side door. She stated Transportation Aide T unhooked the belts and all the safety gear from Resident #12's wheelchair and began to assist her to the back of the van. The Director of Nurses stated Resident #12's back was toward the open door and Transportation Aide T was face to face to Resident #12. She stated Transportation Aide T pushed her off the van without the lift being at the door of the van. Resident #12 fell from the van onto the lift located on the ground. The Director of Nurses stated Resident #12 did not sustain any injuries. She was immediately transported to the emergency room by EMS and later transferred to another emergency room for further x-rays and CT scans. She stated the hospital report indicated no injury from the fall. The Director of Nurses stated Transportation Aide T was given a drug test per protocol of the facility's insurance and she was negative for any illicit drugs. She stated Transportation Aide T was terminated immediately for not following proper policies and procedures when transferring Resident #12 off the van. The DON stated during the investigation it was confirmed neglect. She stated the facility immediately began abuse and neglect in-services. The Transportation Coordinator on 11/18/2024 in-service everyone on the insurance card to demonstrate how to operate the vans. She stated this incident was on the next QAPI agenda. The Director of Nurses stated the facility will be doing random observation of staff operating the van and this would be unannounced. She also stated the facility has put in place to do drug screens on any staff will be operating the facility van and will do random drug screens if any suspicion of drug use when on duty.
In an interview on 12/10/2024 at 9:45 AM Transportation Coordinator stated Transportation Aide T came into the facility and asked for a nurse immediately. Transportation Coordinator stated few nurses went outside and she heard people talking and she immediately went outside. She stated when she arrived outside under the awning near the front door was the Van ( white dodge van). Transportation Coordinator stated she saw Resident #12 on the ground and there were two or three nurses assessing Resident #12. She stated she spoke with Transportation Aide T, and she was very upset. She stated Transportation Aide T explained what happened with Resident #12. Transportation Coordinator stated she wrote a statement of what Transportation Aide T stated what occurred and she did not think to get Transportation Aide T to sign the statement. ( The statement is listed above this interview). Transportation Coordinator stated she could understand how the statement could be confusing. She stated Transportation Aide T left the lift ( ramp) on the ground after unloading Resident #48. She stated after Transportation Aide T Escorted Resident #48 into the facility she returned to the van and entered from the side door. Transportation Coordinator stated Transportation Aide T unhooked all the belts and safety devices from Resident #12 wheelchair. She stated Transportation Aide T was facing Resident #12 and was pushing her backwards to the open door in the back of the van. Transportation Coordinator stated Transportation Aide T did not have the lift to the van door. She stated Resident #12 back was facing the open door and Transportation Aide To push resident off the van and Resident #12 fell from the van onto the lift located on the ground. She stated she was informed by the Administrator to escort Transportation Aide T to get a drug test. Transportation Coordinator stated after the drug test she escorted her into the Administrator's office and Transportation Aide T was terminated immediately. Transportation Coordinator stated she had been in this position after Transportation Aide T was hired. She stated the former Transportation Coordinator U Trained Transportation Aide T. She stated all staff hired as transportation aides are trained 2 weeks or more before they can drive the vans. She stated there were two facility vans one is a [NAME] Dodge Caravan and this was the one Resident #12 was in when she fell. She stated there was another van a Green/Gray [NAME]. Transportation Coordinator stated all staff on the insurance card had been re-trained on how to operate the vans uploading and unloading on 11/18/2024. She stated there was a new hire on 12/02/2024 as a full-time van driver. Transportation Coordinator stated the new van driver received training on how to operate the van on 12/02/2024 and for 2 weeks prior to Transportation Aide S drove the van. She stated Transportation Aide S and any new hires received training and would observe the current Transportation Aide R before she drove the van. Transportation Coordinator showed her list of staff on the insurance card, and it matched the administrations list. Transportation Coordinator stated everyone on that list had been in serviced verbally and given form of steps for operating the lift on the vans and the staff had to demonstrate how to operate the van on an individual basis. She stated this was the first time Transportation Aide T had an accident/ incident with unloading a resident off the van. Transportation Coordinator stated she was not aware of any transportation aides or anyone driving the vans having an incident.
Interview on 12/10/2024 at 1:00 PM Transportation Aide S stated she was hired on 12/02/2024 as a full-time transportation aide. She stated she did not work at this facility prior to being hired on 12/02/2024. Transportation Aide S stated she was given in-service and training over a week before she began driving the van. She stated she observed Transportation Aide R drive the van and observed residents being unloaded and uploaded on to the vans. She repeated how to upload a resident onto the van and unload a resident off the van. She stated she was in-serviced on resident neglect.
In an attempt to interview via phone Transportation Aide T on 12/10/2024 at 2:23 PM, 12/11/2024 at 10:20 AM and 12/12/2024 at 12:22 PM unable to leave voice message and sent 3 texts on the same dates and time to return phone call. Transportation Aide T did not return phone call or respond to three text messages.
Interview on 12/11/2024 at 10:30 AM RN A stated she heard staff calling for a nurse to go to the parking lot. She stated she was sitting in her office and immediately exit office and went to the parking lot. She stated she was first nurse to observe Resident #12. She stated Resident #12 was at an odd position on the lift and part of her side was on the ground. RN A stated Resident #12 was lying on the lift where a staff would push a resident onto the lift. RN A stated Resident #12 was lying on the arm of the wheelchair and Resident #12 was lying on the left side of wheelchair. RN A stated it was an unusual position and was difficult to describe. She stated Resident #12 buttocks was partially in the wheelchair. She stated Resident #12 was complaining of pain back of her head. RN A stated it appeared a small hematoma was forming, and she had a small laceration to back of the head. RN A stated there were two other nurses assisting with Resident #12. RN A stated the physician, EMR, Family, DON and the Administrator was contacted. She stated she wrote a nurses note, and another nurse completed incident report. RN A stated she did not speak with Transportation Aide A and was focusing on assessing Resident #12. She stated she knew Resident #12 fell from the bus on to the lift and ground and the lift was not at the door when she fell. She stated she knew this due to needing to know how she fell onto the ground. RN A stated there was a lot going on and she did not recall who gave this information. She stated she had been in serviced on Abuse and neglect. RN A stated she did not drive the vans.
In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 8:15 AM former Transportation Aide/ Receptionist stated she did work with Transportation Aide T when she was full time transportation aide. She stated she had ridden with Transportation Aide T when she drove the van and observed her unloading and loading residents. Former Transportation Aide/ Receptionist stated she never saw Transportation Aide To do anything wrong with the operation of any part of both vans. She stated training on how to operate every part of the van including the lifts was very important to the facility and the staff received hands on training. She stated she had was in-service on abuse and neglect. She stated she is currently receptionist and does not drive the van any longer, however she did go through the training on 12/18/2024 as a precaution if there was an emergency, she would be willing to drive the van. She stated she was in-service on abuse and neglect.
In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 10:55 AM Transportation Aide R stated she had been working at this facility as a MA and CNA since 11/7/2023. She stated she did drive the van as needed when Transportation Coordinator U was working at the facility, and he trained me how to use the vans. She stated Transportation Coordinator U would have me to demonstrate using a fake person in a wheelchair and observed me unloading, uploading , placing the straps secure and things like that in the van. She stated she was retrained on 11/18/2024 by the present Transportation Coordinator. She stated she is a full time Transportation Aide as of 12/02/2024 and was part time transportation aide prior to 12/02/2024. Transportation Aide R stated she did go through re orientation and in-service on abuse and neglect.
In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 1:35 PM the Administrator stated Transportation Aide T, had returned to the facility in the facility white van with 2 residents from doctor appointments. Transportation Aide T Unloaded Resident # 48 off the facility van with the lift. She stated when Transportation Aide T returned to the facility van, she did not enter the van per facility protocol. The Administrator stated Transportation Aide T did not stand on the lift and move the lift from the ground to the back open door. She stated Transportation Aide T was required per policy to stand on the lift and maneuver the lift from the ground to the back door to use to transfer Resident #12 from the facility van onto the ground. Transportation Aide T entered the facility van from the side door and proceeded to unhook the straps and belts from Resident #12's wheelchair. Transportation Aide T pushed Resident #12 wheelchair to the open door where the lift was not at the back door. Transportation Aide T was facing Resident #12 and Resident #12's back was to the open door. She stated Transportation Aide T did not notice she had not moved the lift from the ground to the open door. The Administrator stated Transportation Aide T pushed Resident #12 backwards where Resident #12's back was facing the door and pushed her off the van. The Administrator stated it was approximately 3 or 4 feet. She stated Resident #12 fell from the facility van onto the lift located on the ground. She stated the lift was not used to assist Resident #12 off the facility van. The Administrator stated the facility protocol for unloading residents onto the lift of the van was not followed. She stated the white van was used during the incident with Resident #12 was in the shop at a dealership for repair. She stated the repair was not the lift. The Administrator facility staff checked the lift after the incident, and it did not have any mechanical issues. The lift was in good condition. The Administrator did not specify what staff checked the lift.
In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 3:30 PM Resident #12 stated she did fall out of a van, and it was a long fall. She stated she was not hurt and was happy she did not break any bones. Resident #12 stated she was not afraid to ride on the van again. She stated accidents happens and she was lucky. Resident #12 stated she would ride the van anytime she was not afraid and was not nervous over the fall from the van.
In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 3:45 PM Transportation Coordinator stated the protocol listed below was the facility protocol for unloading a resident off the van.
Record review of the facility's protocol for Unloading Transportation Vans, not dated, reflected the following:
1. When unloading a resident, the resident is to be pushed onto the ramp, brakes engaged, and the driver is to ride down the ramp in front of the resident until the ramp is fully down and immobile on the ground.
2. Ensure that wheelchairs are always locked when not actively moving a resident .
3. Residents are required to have their wheelchairs secured in the van and the resident is to be wearing a seat belt.
4. Before unloading a resident, make sure the ramp is up all the way and ready for the resident to be pulled onto the ramp.
5. While unloading the van when transferring two residents, be sure to leave the resident not being unloaded at the same time secure in the van and have their wheelchair locked until ready to unload them.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for misappropriation of property.
The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #38's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, a medication to help with pain.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #38's admission record dated 12/12/24, reflected the resident was admitted [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke), Rheumatoid arthritis (the immune system attacks the body's tissues, leading to swelling and joint deformity and pain), and pain.
Record review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMs score of 0 indicating severe cognitive impairment.
Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 11/3/24 reflected an active order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325mg 1 tablet oral every 24 hours as needed for pain.
Record review of Resident #38's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 11/1/23 through 11/30/24 reflected the Hydrocodone-acetaminophen had not been administered at all.
Record review of the facility's investigation of the missing hydrocodone-acetaminophen medication reflected on 11/03/24 during the shift change around 6AM the oncoming nurse noted a difference in color for 5 of the 60 tablets in the bottle. The charge nurse was notified. The charge nurse was not able to address the situation for some time but once she assessed the situation the on-call nurse and ADM were notified. The off going nurse that worked night shift had already left the facility and refused to return to perform a urine drug screen. The medications were found to be Imdur 60mg tab. No other resident in the facility had an order for Imdur.
Record review of the Pharmacy consultant's notes dated 11/11/24 revealed, DON reported a discrepancy in bottle of Norco 5/325 generic. Bottle contained 60 tablets, but 55 were identified by ID on bottle and Ephorates app as Hydrocodone/Appa 5/325 as dispensed and 5 of the 60 were noted to be Isosorbide Mononitrate 60mg tablets-per ID on the tablets, and per Drugs.com.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:28 AM with LVN E, she stated she had worked at the facility for about a year. She stated that all controlled medications are to be counted when possession of responsibility for the cart changes. LVN E stated the first page in the count binder is a record of how many medications there are to be counted. Once the correct number of medications is verified then the quantity of each medication must match up to its paired sheet. LVN E stated if anything is off with the count or suspicion of anything not matching up correctly then it is to be reported to the DON immediately. She stated missing medications could mean that a resident does not get the medication when they are supposed to.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:53 AM with LVN F, she stated she had worked at the facility for about 4 years. She stated that all medication carts are to be counted before changing shifts. She stated that if anything is off with the count, then the DON is to be notified immediately. She stated if there are medications missing then it could affect the resident by causing a missed dose.
A telephone message was left on 12/12/24 at 1:00 PM for Family member of Resident #38 requesting a return call. A return call was not received before close of business 12/13/24.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 2:39 PM with the DON, she stated she was notified a few hours after shift change about the medication being a different color and possible different pill. She stated that her investigation revealed that during the shift change it was discovered that 5 pills in a bottle of 60 pills were with a different color and imprint than the other 55 pills. The DON stated that the off-going nurse (LVN W) on that day when this discrepancy was revealed refused to do a urine drug screen and has been terminated from employment with this facility. She stated that she contacted the physician, the consultant pharmacist, the resident's responsible party, the dispensing pharmacy and the sheriff's office to make a report. The DON stated the 5 other pills were identified as isosorbide mononitrate 60mg using drugs.com as a reference. She said that she looked and no one in the building at that time was prescribed that medication and dosage. She stated that she has since in serviced staff that she is to be notified immediately and no one is to leave the building until further instructed. The DON stated that her investigation into the missing medication was considered confirmed. She stated that this could have impacted the resident if she had received the wrong medication, it could have caused harm.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 3:04 PM with the ADM, she stated Resident #38's family took her to the doctor in another city and returned with a bag from an outside pharmacy with a bottle of medication in the bag in October. The medication was counted and verified by staff. She stated, they asked their pharmacy to repackage it into a blister pack, but they would not do it because it was filled at a different pharmacy. After the incident, Resident #38's chart was reviewed, and it reflected no medication had been administered since the order was written. She stated the incident was reported to the police and the nurse that worked that night (LVN W) refused to do a urine drug screen and that nurse was terminated. The ADM stated it could have affected the resident if she had taken the medicine, but she looked back over Resident #38's medication administration record and the resident never received any medication from that bottle.
Record Review of Policy titled Storage of Medications dated 2001 and revised in November 2020 states,
Policy Statement: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.
8.
Schedule II-V controlled medications are stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments. Access to controlled medication is separate from access to non-controlled medications.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for medications.
The facility failed to remove 2 expired suppositories and 1 bag of expired medication from the medication storage room when it was observed on 12/11/24 at 12:50 PM.
This failure could place residents at an increased risk of receiving expired and/or contaminated medications which could result in adverse health consequences.
Findings included:
Observation on 12/11/24 at 12:50 PM in the medication storage room revealed 2 suppositories of bisacodyl 10 mg with expiration date 09/24 and one bag of Gentamicin 60 mg in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride for intravenous use with expiration date 12/6/24, belonging to Resident #36.
Review of Resident #36's admission record dated 12/12/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include urinary tract infection, traumatic brain injury, sick sinus syndrome (irregular heart rhythm), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Review or Resident #36's readmission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #36's physicians order summary dated 12/12/24 revealed an order for Gentamicin Sulfate Injection Solution 40 mg/ml. Use 60mg intravenously at bedtime related to bacteremia (an infection in the blood) for 5 days. Status on hold. Start date 12/2/24. End date 12/7/24.
Review of Resident #36's care plan dated 12/2/24 revealed Urinary tract infection; at risk for repeat urinary tract infections. Goal: Resident will show no signs/symptoms of infection. Interventions/Tasks: Administer antibiotic therapy as prescribed.
In an interview on 12/11/24 at 12:50 PM LVN F stated she had been working in the facility since January 2021. She stated nurses and medication aides are responsible for checking for expiration dates. LVN F stated that medications could lose effectiveness over time and may not work as well if administered to a resident.
In an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:27 AM LVN E stated she had been working in the facility since [DATE]. She stated that nurses, medication aides, and administration should check for expired medications at least once a month. LVN E stated the expired medications would not be as effective if given to a resident.
In an interview on 12/12/24 at 1:20 PM LVN G stated she had been working in the facility since August 2022. She stated that nurses should check for expired medications. LVN G stated the expired medications would not be as effective if given to a resident. She stated that the medication that was expired for Resident #36 was because the resident had a lab level drawn to check for the antibiotic in the resident's blood. She stated that the level was too high and so the medication was held and not used.
In an interview on 12/12/24 at 02:39 PM the DON stated she had been working at the facility since March 2021. She stated she expected the pharmacy consultant to check the medication room and carts monthly, and the nurses and medication aides to check at least weekly. The DON stated that using medications after they have expired could lead to decreased effectiveness or a possible adverse reaction.
In an interview on 12/12/24 at 3:04 PM the ADM stated her expectation was for the nurses and medication aides to check the medication carts and room weekly on Sunday nights and for administration to check the carts/room monthly for expired medication. The ADM stated using the medication after the expiration date could lead to decreased effectiveness.
Review of an undated facility policy and procedure titled Storage of Medications reflected The facility will store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.
4.
Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #9, Resident #25 , Resident #102, ) observed for infection control.
1.
The facility failed to ensure all staff donned PPE when entering rooms of residents' rooms who were on droplet precautions.
2.
The facility failed to ensure PPE was adequately stocked for residents on droplet precautions.
These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #9 face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia (a decline in mental ability that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), heart failure, and chronic fatigue (a long-term illness that causes severe fatigue and makes it difficult to perform daily activities).
Review of Resident #9 care plan revealed Resident #9 had increased potential to contract COVID 19 in facility. Interventions included to follow CDC and health department guidelines regarding COVID recommendations and precautions. Further review revealed of care plan with revision date of 12/11/2024 that resident had recent diagnoses of COVID 19 with position test. Interventions included to enforce strict isolation with proper donning and doffing of isolation equipment.
Observation on 12/12/24 at 10:03 AM revealed CNA Y walked into Resident #9's room without face shield or goggles on.
Review of Resident #25 face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects brain function) and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness that can be a normal reaction to stress).
Review of Resident #25 care plan dated 04/09/2024 revealed resident with increased potential to contract COVID due to communal living, interventions included to follow CDC and health department guidelines regarding COVID recommendations and precautions. Further review revealed care plan dated 12/07/2024 Resident #25 had recent diagnoses of COVID 19 with interventions to enforce strict isolation with proper donning and doffing of isolation equipment.
Observation on 12/10/2024 at 2:19 PM revealed PPE observed outside of Resident #25's room. Resident had droplet precaution sign posted on door to room.
Observation on 12/11/24 at 11:47 AM revealed no face shields available for staff outside of Resident #25's room.
Review of Resident #102's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of COVID-19 (respiratory virus), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition that causes excessive and uncontrollable feelings of fear or worry that can interfere with daily life), depression (a mental health condition that can affect how a person feels, thinks, and behaves), and essential hypertension (a condition where blood pressure is chronically elevated but there is no known cause).
Review of nursing progress notes for Resident #102 dated 12/09/2024 revealed Resident to begin strict covid isolation - contact & droplet precautions.
Review of Resident #102's care plan dated 12/09/2024 revealed resident with recent diagnoses of COVID 19 virus with interventions that included enforce strict isolation with proper donning and doffing of isolation equipment along with strict hand washing.
Observation on 12/10/2024 at 12:00 PM revealed CNA O entered Resident #102's room with gown, gloves, N-95 mask and a surgical mask under the N-95 mask. CNA O was not wearing a face shield or goggles.
Observation on 12/10/2024 at 2:13 PM revealed MA Q entered Resident #102's room with gown, gloves and surgical mask. MA Q was not wearing a face shield or goggles.
Observation on 12/10/2024 at 2:14 PM revealed a plastic bin with PPE in front of Resident #102's room and it included gowns, gloves, N-95 masks and surgical masks. There were no goggles or face shields in the cart.
Observation on 12/10/2024 at 2:19 PM revealed a sign on Resident #102's door that revealed droplet precautions were in place. Further observation revealed a sign titled sequence for putting on personal protective equipment (PPE) Instructions included to don gown, mask or respirator, goggles or face shield and gloves. Observation revealed an additional sign posted that everyone must make sure their eyes, nose and mouth are fully covered before room entry.
During an interview on 12/10/2024 at 2:17 PM MA Q stated that Resident #102 had COVID. MA Q did state why she did not have a face shield or goggles on entering Resident #102's room.
Observation on 12/11/2024 at 9:55 AM revealed a plastic bin with PPE in front of Resident #102's room and it included gowns, gloves, N-95 masks and surgical masks. There were no goggles or face shields in the cart.
Observation on 12/11/24 at 11:47 AM revealed no face shields available for staff outside of Resident #25's room.
Observation on 12/12/24 at 10:03 AM revealed CNA walked into Resident number #9's room without face shield or goggles on.
Observation on 12/12/2024 at 10:35 am revealed a large box in the housekeeping manager's office with face shields in it.
During an interview on 12/10/20245 at 2:17 PM MA Q stated that Resident #102 had COVID.
Interview with LVN Z on 12/11/24 at 10:35 am, she stated that if a resident had droplet precaution it should have been posted on the door. They were supposed to follow the sign on the door for putting on and taking off the PPE. They were supposed to wear a face mask, dispose of all the gear inside, and wash their hands. If there was not PPE available, she would have requested it from housekeeping.
Interview with CNA Y on 12/11/2024 at 10:03 am 12/11/2024, she stated that when she went into a room she put on gown, gloves and masks. When she exited a room, she took off gloves first, then gown, then mask, and then washed hands inside. She sanitized her hands outside the room. She stated that she did not like the face shield because it made her hot. She was not sure if she was supposed to wear the face shield. She stated if she did not have PPE, she would go to the nurse and ask her. She stated that housekeeping came to check and stock PPE. She thought she had an in-service from one of the nurses in November. She stated that if she does not have PPE, she could get other residents sick.
Interview with LVN AA on 12/12/2024 at 10:13 am, she stated that housekeeping came to check and stock up on PPE. She thought they needed face shields, and she stated she had an in-service in November for infection control. If they did not have PPE housekeeping or nurses would get PPE it out of the linen closet. She stated that she could get other residents sick if they do not wear PPE properly.
Interview with LA BB A on 12/12/2024 at 10:14 am she stated that another housekeeping staff was responsible for ensuring PPE was available. She stated that she did not check for PPE while she was cleaning the halls. She would occasionally check if the box were was obviously low from the outside. They had someone come this morning to fill up the PPE. If there was no PPE she would not go in the room. She thought her last in-service was 3 months ago.
Interview with LA CC B on 1112/12/2024 at 10:35 am, she stated it was her responsibility to stock PPE. PPE included gowns, gloves, blue bags, face shields, and masks. She was responsible for placing signs on the doors and checking PPE every morning. If there was not enough PPE available when she was in the facility she expected a verbal request, a text or a phone call from any staff that needed more PPE. She stated there were plenty of face shields available for staff. She stated the residents could be in danger if she did not stock the PPE for the direct care staff.
Attempted telephone interview with CNA O on 12/12/2024 at 12:19 PM.
Attempted telephone interview with MA Q on 12/12/2024 at 12:20 PM.
Interview with RN A, the infection preventionist, on 12/12/24 at 01:49 PM, she stated that employees were supposed to wear goggles or face shields when going in the rooms.
Interview with the DON on 12/12/2024 at 1:45 PM she said the facility did yearly PPE in-services or anytime there was a new COVID case. She stated that staffed needed to wear face shields or goggles. There was no reason staff should not have face shields on. The housekeeping was responsible for stocking the PPE. They had designated one person to stock it each morning. She stated that it would spread disease to other residents if staff did not wear proper PPE. DON stated staff were supposed to wear N95 masks and staff should not just wear surgical masks. DON stated staff should not wear an N95 mask over a surgical mask. She stated staff knew the order of PPE because they should look at the signs on the door. DON stated staff should just throw the face shield away and get a new one after they exited a room.
Review of facility in-services revealed an in-service was completed on 09/10/2024 with the topic of COVID-19. Informed review included how COVID-19 spreads, sequence for putting on PPE, and that staff must ensure their eyes, nose and mouth were fully covered.
Review of facility policy dated September 2022 titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Using Personal Protective Equipment revealed Personnel who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection adhere to standard precautions and use NIOSH-approved N95 or equivalent or higher-level respirator, gown, gloves and eye protection. Further review revealed an N95 respirator and eye protection (goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face) is applied upon entry to the resident room or care area.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with resident rights, which included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #17, #41 and #98) reviewed for care plans.
1.
The facility failed to update Resident #17's care plan to reflect current needs for suprapubic catheter care.
2.
The facility failed to update Resident #17's care plan to reflect current needs with transfers.
3.
The facility failed to update Resident #41's care plan to reflect current diet consistency orders.
4.
The facility failed to update Resident #98's care plan to reflect current needs with transfers.
This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest practical well-being.
Findings included:
Record Review of Resident #17's admission record dated 12/11/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #17's diagnoses include benign neoplasm of prostate (an abnormal growth near the prostate), hematuria (blood in the urine), obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine cannot flow in through the urinary system due to an obstruction), need for assistance with personal care, and ankylosing spondylitis (an inflammatory disease that can cause back pain, stiffness, and hunched posture).
Record Review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident was unable to complete a BIMS assessment that indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #17 required substantial/maximal assistance to complete dependence on staff for all the assessment under functional abilities. The quarterly MDS revealed an Indwelling catheter under the section labeled Bladder and Bowel.
Record review of Resident #17's physician order summary dated 12/11/2024 revealed Resident #17 had orders as follows:
1.
Catheter: Catheter care with Incontinent Wipes Every Shift with a start date of 7/11/2024
2.
Catheter: Change Foley Catheter or Supra-pubic Catheter [a tube inserted directly into the bladder through the abdominal wall to drain urine] as indicated for infection, obstruction, or when closed system is compromised as needed with a start date of 12/4/2024.
3.
Catheter: Change Foley Catheter or Supra-pubic Catheter as indicated for infection, obstruction or when closed system is compromised everyday shift on the 4th for 1 day with a start date of 12/4/2024
4.
Catheter: Change leg strap or stat lock with each foley change and prn as needed
5.
Catheter: Ensure Catheter is draining properly to bedside privacy bag and leg strap is in place every shift.
6.
Catheter: Monitor for signs/symptoms of infection with a start date of 7/11/2024
7.
Catheter: Monitor Output Every Shift
8.
Irrigate Foley with 500 ml's distilled water-push 100 ml's in and pull out and repeat until clear as needed for hematuria with a start date of 10/29/2024.
9.
May use [mechanical] lift and x 2 assist to transfer safely.
Record review of Resident #17's Care Plan dated 9/5/2023 and revised on 3/25/24 revealed The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included Transfer: The resident requires assist x one staff member to move between surfaces. Further review revealed no mention of Suprapubic Catheter throughout the plan.
Review of Resident #41 face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, disturbances of salivary secretion, and dysphagia.
Review of Resident #41 care plan with revision date of 03/10/2022 revealed resident was at risk for weight loss and interventions included diet of mechanical soft texture with regular consistency liquids with date of 10/17/2022 with additional interventions listed on 04/20/2024 of mechanical soft texture and regular consistency liquids with date per resident request.
Review of Resident #41 nursing progress note dated 11/07/2024 revealed hospice nurse gave new order per hospice physician to change diet consistency to regular texture.
Review of physician's telephone orders for Resident #41 dated 11/07/2024, revealed change diet consistency to regular texture.
Review of Resident #41 physician order dated 11/07/2024 revealed reduced concentrated sweets diet, regular texture, regular consistency.
Record Review of Resident #98's admission record dated 12/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date 3/6/24. Resident #98's diagnoses included Chronic pain, fatigue, repeated falls, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified dementia (a disease that affects the short- and long-term memory).
Record Review of Resident #98's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score could not be assessed due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #98 was substantial/maximal assistance to dependence on staff for all assessment under the self-care functional abilities section.
Record Review of Resident #98's Care Plan dated 3/15/2024 and revised on 7/9/2024 revealed The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included Transfers: The resident requires assistance x one with transfers, providing weight bearing assistance, guidance as needed.
Record Review of Resident #98's Order Summary Report dated 10/10/24 revealed an order stated, May use [mechanical] lift and x 2 assist to transfer safely.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:28 AM, LVN E stated she had worked at the facility about a year. She stated Resident #17 and Resident #98 require a [mechanical] lift and assistance x 2 staff for a safe transfer. She stated the DON and management are responsible for updating care plans for residents during the resident's care plan meeting or as changes occur. LVN E stated that the CNAs look at ADL sheets, which are provided when they sign in for the day, to determine care for each resident. She stated she was not sure who used the care plan.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:53 AM, LVN F stated she had worked at the facility about 4 years. She stated MDSN, activities, therapy and ADM was responsible for updating all care plans. LVN F stated the care plans are updated every Wednesday during their meeting. She stated she was not sure who used the care plans for the residents.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 2:18 PM, MDSN stated she was responsible for completing and updating care plans. She stated that care plans should be updated for falls, skin issues, changes in medications and any significant event. MDSN stated that care plans should be updated for new catheters and for changes in requirement for transfers. She stated that nursing staff, activities staff and dietary staff all utilized the care plan when they provide care to the resident and not updating the care plans could affect how they provide the care.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 2:39 PM, the DON stated MDSN was responsible for updating the care plans and they should have been updated quarterly, with any significant change in care, and/or new preferences identified by staff. She stated that she expected care plans to be updated when a resident had a new order for a catheter or when the resident's need changes for how care is provided. She stated if diet orders were changed then the care plan should be updated too. The DON stated the care plans are reviewed by MDSN, DON and during the quarterly meetings. She stated that floor staff used the MAR and NMAR and ADL sheets for daily care instructions.
During an interview on 12/12/24 at 3:04 PM, the ADM stated MDSN was responsible for updating the care plans quarterly, annually and with any significant change, incident/accident, or new preference. She stated that care plans should have been updated when a diet order changes, when a resident's requirements for transfers and when a resident had a new order for a catheter. The ADM stated the care plans are used by the interdisciplinary team and if they were not updated correctly then it could cause the team to provide care incorrectly.
Review of policy titled Resident Assessments and dated 2001 and revised in 2022 revealed.
Policy statement
A comprehensive assessment of every resident's needs is made at intervals designated by OBRA and PPS requirements.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1)
The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessment and reviews according to the following requirements:
4. Significant Change in status assessment
3) A comprehensive assessment includes:
a. completion of the MDS.
b. completion of the care is assessment process and
c. development of the comprehensive care plan.