SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility did not provide adequate supervision, implement interventions nor complete interventions in an effort to prevent falls from occurring. One resident fractured each wrist, one week apart and one resident, had a fall after no interventions and fractured a wrist. Resident identifiers: 3, 30 and 41.
Findings include:
1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], she was discharged to the hospital and returned on 8/28/19, with diagnoses which included fracture of right wrist and hand, cystitis, fracture of left wrist and hand, acute respiratory failure, dementia, bipolar disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, need for assistance with personal care, neuropathy, glaucoma, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, restless legs syndrome, osteoarthritis, dissociative identity disorder, pseudobulbar affect, pain in left knee, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, encephalopathy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, sciatica, pain in right leg, generalized anxiety disorder, repeated falls, muscle weakness, hypoxemia, hyperglycemia, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and asthma.
On 9/9/19 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 3. Resident 3 stated that she had had multiple falls at the facility, and had hit her head at least once.
Resident 3's medical record was reviewed on 9/10/19 and revealed the following falls:
a. On 12/28/18 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injury. A nurse's note documented Nurse was assisting resident's roommate and saw this resident standing up after using the restroom and slipped and fell into a sitting position on the floor. Resident stated that her feet started to slide and she fell to a sitting position.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Encouraged resident to wear nonskid socks when walking or transferring.
[Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
b. On 12/30/18 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head. A nurse's note documented Res (resident) roommate used call light, CNA (certified nurse assistant) answer and found res in rest room res was sitting on floor. Res did not have traction socks on. Ask res what happens? res stated that she was on toilet, reach for walker then started to slipping. Res stated she hit her R (right) side of head on wall, and R arm on the floor.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated educate res to used traction socks and put on for res.
[Note: this was the same intervention documented for the fall that happened 2 days prior. Additionally, this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
c. On 1/12/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head which caused a scalp hematoma. A nurse's note documented Recreation notified this nurse that she was in resident's room helping her and saw her fall to the floor and her back was leaning against the bed frame. Resident stated she was standing up and was reaching for her walker but it was too far and lost her balance and fell. She said she hit her back and her head on the bed frame.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Encourage resident to ask for assistance.
[Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
d. On 1/14/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injury. A nurse's note documented Res stated that she was in her recliner, try to get up to her walker and slipped to floor. Res was next to her recliner.Res (sic) stated she did not hit her head, and denied pain.
An intervention documented in the nurse's note stated Educate res to use call light, and help res to used rest room. Another intervention documented as an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) note stated Staff to remind and assist resident in keeping her walkerclose (sic) by.
[Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
e. On 5/27/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head which caused a laceration. A nurse's note documented [Resident 3] fell in her room at approx. (approximately) 1100 (11:00 AM). She was standing and trying to sign a piece of paper for [NAME] the housekeeper. she (sic) said all of a sudden I just felt myself going down. She hit her head on the left side and has a small laceration to her left ear.
An intervention documented on 5/28/18 as an IDT note stated Resident is currently on OT (occupational therapy). OT to instruct to keep one hand on a solid surface.
[Note: the fall and interventions were not documented on resident 3's care plan. Additionally, an interview with staff indicated that there was not a housekeeper named Jack, nor was anyone trying to obtain a signature from resident 3.]
f. On 6/29/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injury. A nurse's note on 6/30/19 documented [Resident 3] was using her 4 wheeled walker as a wheelchair and another resident brought her dog in. [Resident 3] leaned over to pet the dog forgetting to lock the brakes on her walker. The walker then rolled out from under her causing her to slide to her bottom. No injury noted and was witnessed by 3 other people, she did not hit her head.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Re-educate [resident 3] to use her walker as a walker and apply the brakes when moving.
[Note: this was the first fall intervention documented on resident 3's care plan since 2017, which was prior to these most recent falls.]
g. On 7/9/19 resident 3 had a fall with no injury noted. A nurse's note on 7/10/19 documented ~1930 (7:30 PM) Resident was found on the floor sitting on her buttock by CNA. Res stated she was going to the restroom and her legs gave out. Then she butt walked forward to let staff know. She did not hit her head, No skin injuries upon assessment.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Repair [resident 3's] electric wheelchair so she will no longer use walker as a wheelchair and remind to use call light for assistance.
On 9/11/19 at 9:32 AM, an observation was made of resident 3 sitting in her recliner. Resident 3's call light was clipped to her bed and was not within reach.
h. On 7/19/19 resident 3 had a fall in which she hit her head and had a change in her vital signs and level of consciousness. A nurse's note on 7/20/19 documented Res was found in he (sic) bathroom sitting on floor. Res stated she feel (sic) while standing up reaching for her wheel walker. Res wheel walker was not lock. Res has two lumps on right skull, res stated pain in R shoulder, R side of head, and R breast. Res initial vitals were WNL (within normal limits), after second vital res BP (blood pressure), O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation) begin to decline. Res become more confused. [Nurse Practitioner] gives the OK to send res toER (sic) (emergency room). Res came back from [name of hospital] at 0400 (4:00 AM), with no new orders.
An intervention documented resident 3's care plan stated Putting her walker closer to her while in the bathroom and ensuring the brake is engaged.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated She continues to use her walker as a wheelchair and has had falls rt (related to) not using her walker appropriately. Resident educated regarding walker use and to call staff for assistance.
[Note: this was the 2nd time these interventions were used.]
i. On 7/30/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head. A nurse's note documented CNA heard a call for help and found [resident 3] on the floor in her room. She stated she was getting up to go to the bathroom and slipped on some water she spilled. Denies any pain. No physical injuries noted. States she slightly hit her head.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Provide [resident 3] new grippy socks for traction.
[Note: this was the 3rd time this intervention was used, but the 1st time it was documented on the care plan.]
On 9/10/19 at 3:12 PM, an observation was made of resident 3 with no grippy socks on.
On 9/11/19 at 8:04 AM, resident 3 was observed sitting on the side of her bed with no grippy socks on. There were no grippy socks on her bed or anywhere near her to indicate that she had them on recently.
On 9/11/19 at 11:26 AM, an observation was made of resident 3 in her recliner with no grippy socks on. Resident 3's spouse was in the room at that time and stated that staff never put grippy socks on resident 3 unless she requested it.
j. On 8/5/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head which caused a laceration, she also had a left wrist fracture. A nurse's note documented This nurse and two other staff members heard resident yelling for help and went in room to find resident on ground face down at 1900 (7:00 PM) this evening. Staff members helped resident back up into her recliner. She stated she was on her way to the bathroom and tripped on her side table. She has a bump on her forehead with a small laceration, cleaned and dressed with a bandaid. She had increased pain in her left arm rated 10/10 with decreased ROM. Pain medication and ice given. MD notified and ordered x-ray for left shoulder and wrist. X-ray performed and showed fracture to left wrist. MD notified and ordered to send out for further treatment in ER.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Install grippy tape to the bathroom floor for traction in the event there is water inadvertently splashed on the floor.Install grippy tape to the foot of [resident 3's] recliner.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Staff to apply brightly colored tape on her bedside table to assist with visual cues.
On 9/10/19 at 3:12 PM, an observation was made of resident 3's bathroom with no grip tape on the floor. Resident 3's roommate stated that to her knowledge, there had never been any grip tape on the floor in the bathroom.
On 9/11/19 at 9:32 AM, an observation was made of resident 3's bedside table without any brightly colored tape for visual cues.
k. On 8/10/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injuries. A facility incident report documented CNA found res is room sitting on floor by her recliner. Res stated she slid out of recliner onto floor, and did not hit her head.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's noted stated Grippy tape to be placed at the foot of her recliner.
[Note: this was the 2nd time this intervention was used. Additionally, no updates were made to resident 3's care plan.]
l. On 8/16/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injuries. A nurse's note documented Res more alert today, however she tried once to get up on her own at 1100 (11:00 AM), nurse found res on floor, examined res, found no injury.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated PT (physical therapy) eval (evaluation) for strength and training to use bedside commode and ambulate.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Resident educated regarding call light use. Bedside commode placed by bedside to assist resident.
On 9/11/19 at 9:32 AM, an observation was made of resident 3's room with no bedside commode.
m. On 8/18/19 resident 3 had a fall with a right wrist fracture. A nurse's noted documented Around 0330 (3:30 AM) CNA found res on the floor in prone position, bed was on the lowest position. Res stated she tried to get up and some how rolled out of bed.
[Note: there was no intervention documented for this fall on resident 3's care plan, in the nurse's note, or in a facility incident report.]
n. On 8/22/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injuries. A facility incident report documented RES found on floor have way to bathroom, res on R side, bed was in the lowest position r/t res trying 2 other times that morning to get out of bed.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report stated that resident 3 was sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation.
[Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
A review of resident 3's care plan revealed the following interventions were initiated prior to the fall on 12/28/18:
a. Resident referred to pt (physical therapy) for proper walker usage and eval (evaluation) for front wheeled walker. Initiated on 9/17/17
b. Anticipate and meet [resident 3's] needs. Initiated on 6/13/16
c. Be sure [resident 3's] call light is within reach and encourage [resident 3] to use it for assistance as needed. [Resident 3] needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. Initiated on 6/13/16
d. Pt (physical therapy) evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN (as needed). Initiated on 6/13/16
e. [Resident 3] given education to let staff help her with toileting to prevent further falls. Initiated on 5/8/17
f. Education given to [resident 3] to ensure that she asks for assistance with bed mobility Initiated on 3/20/173
g. Staff education to check with [resident 3] frequently for toileting needs and if she needs any assistance with toileting to prevent falls. Initiated on 5/8/17
[Note: the intervention to remind resident 3 to ask for assistance and use her call light for mobility and transfers was used seven times.]
On 9/9/19 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 3's spouse. Resident 3's spouse stated that resident 3 usually fell when trying to get up to go the bathroom because staff did not answer call lights very quickly.
[Note: seven of the fourteen falls were going to or from the bathroom.]
A review of call light times around resident 3's falls found:
a. On 12/28/19, just prior to resident 3's fall, her call light was on for 11 minutes and 4 seconds.
b. On 12/30/19, just prior to resident 3's fall, her call light was on for 8 minutes and 56 seconds.
c. On 1/12/19, just prior to resident 3's fall, her call light was on for 3 minutes and 33 seconds.
d. On 1/14/19, just prior to resident 3's fall, her call light was on for 4 minutes and 45 seconds.
e. On 7/9/19, just prior to resident 3's fall, her call light was on for 10 minutes and 30 seconds.
f. On 8/5/19, call light times surrounding this fall were not provided by the facility.
g. On 8/10/19, just prior to resident 3's fall, her call light was on for 6 minutes and 42 seconds.
h. On 8/16/19, call light times surrounding this fall were not provided by the facility.
i. On 8/18/19, call light times surrounding this fall were not provided by the facility.
j. On 8/22/19, call light times surrounding this fall were not provided by the facility.
A review of the Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for the previous year documented that resident 3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13-15 which would indicate resident 3 was cognitively intact. Additionally, resident 3's functional status was documented as requiring one person, extensive assistance for toilet use and transfers.
On 9/11/19 at 8:04 AM, an observation was made of resident 3 sitting on the side of her bed. Resident 3 stated she had a headache and was trying to call the nurse but could not figure out how to push her call light. Resident 3 was observed holding her oxygen tube in her hand and trying to push it as if it were a call light. When told that it was her oxygen tubing in her hand, resident 3 insisted it was the call light.
On 9/11/19 at 10:08 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 3's Physical Therapist (PT). The PT stated that resident 3 was only oriented to person and her room. The PT stated that resident 3 was not able to retain education that was completed with her, even with practice and repetition. The PT stated that PT and OT would work with residents that were high risk for falls to identify causes. The PT stated that one of resident 3's issues was the clutter in her room. The PT stated that he assisted in initiating interventions, stated that he would talk to the floor staff about implementing those interventions. The PT stated that there was no paperwork or documentation that they use to communicate with the floor staff, stated that all communication was word of mouth.
On 9/11/19 at 7:31 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 6. CNA 6 stated that resident assistance needs were listed on their CNA report sheets. [Note: resident 3 was documented needing 2 person assistance.] CNA 6 stated that the CNA's had to ask the nurses if a resident had any fall interventions ordered. CNA 6 stated that the CNA's did not have access to any of that information. CNA 6 stated that she was very familiar with resident 3, stated that she did not know of any fall prevention interventions that were supposed to be used for resident 3. CNA 6 stated that resident 3 never refused interventions.
On 9/11/19 at 7:36 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that new interventions were entered into the care plan by nurse management, stated that the interventions were also entered into the electronic charting system as an order to communicate the interventions to the staff. RN 1 stated that some examples of interventions ordered for falls were to put the resident beds in the lowest position, place fall mats on the floor by the bed, and use pressure alarms; RN 1 verified that resident 3 had no orders for fall prevention interventions. RN 1 stated that resident 3 required frequent reminders to use her call light, stated that resident 3 often forgot. RN 1 reviewed resident 3's care plan and stated that resident 3's fall interventions were to keep her room free of clutter and provide prompt nursing care. RN 1 was unable to verbalize what prompt nursing care was. RN 1 stated that resident 3 was very compliant with cares and interventions, stated that resident 3 never refused.
On 9/11/19 at 11:37 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that all falls were followed up on by the clinical team on the next business day. The DON stated that the team tried to identify root cause and trends, stated that no trends had been identified for resident 3. The DON stated that interventions were usually entered into the resident care plans during the fall follow up meeting by the nurse management, stated the interventions were also entered as an order to communicate to the nurses. The DON stated that the CNA Coordinator would also document the interventions on the CNA report sheets immediately following the meeting. The DON stated that interventions were also documented on the resident's Kardex. The DON stated that during the fall follow up meeting past interventions were re-evaluated for effectiveness. The DON verified that the intervention of prompt nursing care for resident 3, as verbalized by the floor nurse was kind of vague and was unable to provide further clarification. The DON was unable to explain the discrepancies between the incident reports and care plan interventions. The DON stated that all of those interventions should have been implemented; the DON was unable to explain why resident 3 did not have grippy socks, the call light was not within reach, there was no grip tape on the bathroom floor, no bedside commode, nor bright tape on the bedside table.
A review of resident 3's Kardex documented the following interventions:
a. Anticipate and meet [resident 3's] needs.
b. Be sure [resident 3's] call light is within reach and encourage [resident 3] to use it for assistance as needed. [Resident 3] needs prompt response to all requests for assistance.
c. Ensure that [resident 3's] floor is free from tripping hazards and personal items.
On 9/11/19 at 12:00 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 7. CNA 7 stated that the CNA report sheets did not have any interventions documented on them. CNA 7 stated that he was very familiar with resident 3, stated that resident 3 was only oriented to person and place. CNA 7 stated that resident 3 could not remember to use her call light and ask for assistance despite reminders from staff. CNA 7 stated that CNA's could not access the nurse's notes or incident reports for any interventions documented in those places. CNA 7 stated that he did not know where to find the Kardex to review it for interventions. [Note: A copy of a CNA report sheet was obtained and verified there were no interventions listed for any residents.]
On 9/11/19 at 2:57 PM, a follow up interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated that resident 3 was continent of bowel and bladder but that resident 3 had urinary urgency and could not always get to the bathroom in time. RN 1 stated that education was not effective with resident 3 because despite constant safety reminders, resident 3 never remembered them. RN 1 stated that the facility had not tired a toileting program for resident 3, stated that a toileting program would probably be a good option for resident 3 because of her urinary urgency. RN 1 stated that she did not review past nurse's notes or incident reports for interventions documented in those places.
On 9/16/19, further information was provided by the facility via e-mail.
A Risk vs. Benefits form dated and signed by resident 3 on 8/9/19 documented:
1. Area of concern:
Using [NAME] in place of wheelchair to sit on.
2. Benefits:
Autonomy in decision making. [Resident 3] had the ability to sit if she becomes fatigued when walking and has episodes of SOB (shortness of breath) or anxiety.
3. Risks related to noncompliance:
[Resident 3] falls when trying to sit down on walker seat. [Resident 3] forgets to lock the brakes when using walker as appropriate, this could lead to further broken bones and critical/severe injuries up to and including death. [Note: resident 3's walker was not a factor in her falls that occurred after 8/9/19 when this form took effect.]
A note from MD 1 provided by the facility stated [Resident 3] also suffered from complex psychiatric diagnoses, which include Bipolar Disorder and Dissociative Identity Disorder which was evidenced by frequent changes in her mood, cognition and tangential responses, often multiple times throughout the day. This complexity of [Resident 3's] mental health status ultimately resulted in a psychiatric crisis which made fall prevention impossible as she was impulsive, reactionary, and extremely labile in her moods and actions. MD 1 also indicated that no matter what the facility implemented to prevent a fall with [resident 3], her constant mood changes and flight of ideas would have still resulted in falls. The complexity of her Dissociative Identity Disorder would have also complicated the ability of the facility to identify an intervention because the person for which the intervention was directed to would not be effective for one of [Resident 3's] alternate personalities.
Review of the facility behavior monitoring and nurse's notes did not document that the facility floor staff was aware of, or monitoring for mood changes, cognition, or tangential responses.
Resident 3's Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II was provided by the facility as further information. Documented under Current Psychiatric Functioning the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW), that evaluated resident 3, documented:
Pt's (patient's) husband reported pt (patient) having 5 or 6 personalities. Pt's husband stated that pt has not had many exacerbations in regards to dissociative identity disorder since admission into the SNF (skilled nursing facility). Pt was evaluated by [mental health facility] in July 2019 for counseling and medication management; pt is getting counseling ever (sic) couple weeks and medication management every few months.
On 9/19/19 at 1:50 PM, a phone interview was conducted with MD 1. MD 1 stated that resident 3 arrived at the inpatient geriatric psychiatric unit on 8/22/19 very agitated and had impulsivity. MD 1 stated he was the attending physician that treated her. MD 1 stated that based on her previous information from resident 3's mental health facility he believed this psychiatric issue was an acute exacerbation and could only be a contributing factor in the most recent fall. MD 1 stated that the cases where resident 3 fell while going to and from the bathroom were not psychiatric issues. MD 1 stated that he treated resident 3's impulsivity and agitation, not tripping over things. MD 1 stated that regardless of the reason for the falls, the facility should have attempted to keep resident 3 safe with continued interventions. MD 1 stated that resident 3 required a one-on-one staff assignment to keep resident 3 safe while in the hospital.
3. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), muscle weakness, Alzheimer disease, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) without esophagitis, dementia, dysphagia oral phase, and cognitive communication deficit.
On 9/9/19 at 7:54 AM an observation was made of resident 30. Resident 30 was was observed to have a bruise above her left eye brow.
On 9/11/19, resident 30's medical record was reviewed.
Nursing progress notes revealed the following:
a. 8/26/2019, CNA found res [resident 30] on floor in fetal position by her bathroom. Res [resident 30] was confused thinking the floor was her bed. Did skin checks, res [resident 30] have a bump and bruise on back of head, a small cut on left of ring finger. Res [resident 30] initial vitals are BP (blood pressure) 131/81, P (pulse) 63, Resp (respiration)18, Temp (temperature) 96.7, O2 (oxygen saturation) 96 RA. Res [resident 30] is in a lot of pain, clutching her hands on her head, and grimacing. Administer prn Tramadol 50 mg, cleaned res [resident 30] ring finger with wound cleanser and applied bandaid. Contact Hospice and talked to [hospice nurse] she wants us to keep an eye on her, and let Tramadol have a chance to work. If her condition changes then call back. Notify [resident 30's son][phone on file].
b. 9/3/2019, Resident had an unwitnessed fall with head injury. Staff noted a bump on her left forehead with redness, and dried blood around her lips this am. Bruising is beginning to appear on resident's right forehead. Neuro checks have been initiated and are at baseline for resident. Hospice and family notified. Supervisor also notified.
c. 9/5/2019, IDT (interdisciplinary team) team met regarding residents recent falls. Social work, PT, nursing and administration present. While CNA's were doing rounds the CNA noticed [resident 30] walking around holding her blankets. At that time [resident 30] stated to the CNA that she fell out of bed. The resident bit her lip when she fell. Staff to place night light for better visualization in room. Staff also to give resident a thicker blanket so she wont get tangled in her blankets. Neuro checks were started. Resident was not complaining of any pain. Nurse and CNA were interviewed regarding residents fall. Time and situation were confirmed. Will monitor.
Resident 30's medical record revealed that resident 30 had falls on 6/28/19, 6/30/19, 8/26/19 and 9/3/19.
Incident reports revealed the following:
a. 6/28/19, CNA found resident on the floor in her bedroom. When a nurse came to asses her, she was asleep on the floor with little bump on her head. Per the incident report, the facility initiated routine neurochecks, did assessment and informed all responsible parties.
b. 6/30/19, resident 30 had another unwitnessed fall. She was found lying on the floor in her bedroom with no apparent injury. Per the incident report, the facility started the neurochecks, assessed resident 30 head to toe and notified responsible parties.
c. 8/26/19, resident 30 was found on the bathroom floor in fetal position with no apparent injury. Per the incident report, the facility performed head to toe assessment, started vitals and neurochecks and informed responsible parties.
d. 9/3/19, resident had unwitnessed fall with a head injury. The facility did a head to toe assessment, initiated neurochecks and notified all responsible parties.
No neurological checks could be located in resident 30's medical record for the fall on 9/3/19 when she sustained an injury to the left side of her forehead.
A care plan for resident 30 dated 2/19/16 with revision date of 6/14/19, revealed that resident 30 is a wanderer r/t (related to) Dementia, Impaired safety awareness, Disoriented to place. [Resident 30] has had an actual fall r/t dementia and poor safety awareness, with head injury. [Resident 30] is Moderate risk for falls r/t Confusion, weakness and hx (history) of fall. The interventions on the care plan included were for staff to ensure that resident 30 wore [TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the resident or her family were not abl...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the resident or her family were not able to make choices about aspects of residents life in the facility, that were significant to the resident. Specifically, the facility did not provide requested liquids to the resident after the request had been made and risk versus benefit form had been signed by the resident's family. Resident identifier: 46.
Findings include:
Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type II diabetes, Cerebral Palsy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), vascular dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) with esophagitis, Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase and tremor.
On 9/9/19 at 8:47 AM an observation was made of resident 46 as she was seated in the dining room in the 200 hall. Resident 46's breakfast tray was observed to be at the table and the food and drinks were observed to be untouched.
On 9/9/19 at 8:47 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 46. Resident 46 was hard to understand, but appeared to be anxious and frustrated. Resident 46 stated that her food reminded her of poop and that she was thirsty, but wanted water instead of juice. No staff were observed to assist resident 46 with her requests. At 8:50 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 was observed cleaning the tables in the dining room. CNA 1 was observed taking resident 46's tray without asking any questions. Resident 46 stayed sitting at the table with her head between her hands.
On 9/9/19 at 8:55 AM, an observation was made of resident 46's room. The wall above the chest of drawers had a sheet of paper with free water protocol instructions on it. The paper had a date of 6/14/19 on it and a note that resident 46 was on free water protocol per her own preference. No observation was made of a water mug or cup available for resident 46 in her room.
On 9/9/19 at 11:28 AM, an observation was made of resident 46's sister in the room with resident 46. Resident 46 was observed sitting in the wheelchair next to her bed.
On 9/9/19 at 11:28 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 46's sister. Resident 46's sister stated that she was resident 46's power of attorney. Resident 46's sister stated that a few months ago, she signed a risk vs benefits for her sister regarding the water and thin liquids. Resident 46's sister stated that her sister was thirsty and that the facility did not serve water to her sister. Resident 46's sister stated that resident 46 was evaluated by speech therapy and was found to be at risk for aspiration so they recommended thickened liquids. Resident 46's sister stated that resident 46 did well with thin liquids too, but more importantly, she needed water. Resident 46's sister stated that she talked to the nurses and the Director of Nursing (DON) about the risk vs benefits form that she had signed and that every time she visits her sister, there was no water available at her bedside nor with her meals. Resident 46's sister stated that the problem in the facility was that the nurses and aides did not talk to each other and that she believed that her request to serve thin liquids and water to her sister was not communicated to all staff and so they continued to serve only thickened milk and juice to resident 46. During this interview, resident 46 stated that she was thirsty and that she had stomach cramps.
On 9/9/19 at 12:54 PM, an observation was made of resident 46 as her lunch tray was served. No observation was made of water available on resident 46's tray. There was no water available on the cart with drinks.
On 9/11/19 at 12:46 PM, an observation was made of resident 46 as her lunch was served. Resident 46 received a puree diet, a thickened cup of milk, a thickened cup of coffee and a thickened shake. No observation was made of water being available on her tray.
On 9/11/19 at 12:57 PM the cart with the drinks was observed by the wall. There was a coffee mug, the hot chocolate mug, and the bottle of juice on it. No water was available. [Note: No observation was made of water available on the drink cart for the residents in the 200 hall on 9/9/19, 9/10/19 nor on 9/11/19.]
On 9/11/19, resident 46's medical record was reviewed.
Resident 46's medical record revealed that resident 46 was on hospice.
Physician orders revealed that resident 46's physician prescribed consistent carbohydrate diet (CCD) and honey thick liquids for resident 46. [Note: the medical record revealed that on 9/11/19 the facility made an adjustment to this order and added a note that resident 46's sister signed risk vs benefits form for thin liquids.]
A care plan dated 12/19/17 and revised on 7/24/19 revealed that resident 46 had a Nutritional problem or Potential Nutritional Problem r/t (related to) swallowing difficulty AEB (as evidenced by) dysphagia and the need for puree texture diet with honey thick liquids .Requires set up assist and supervision with meals. Adaptive equipment includes 2 handled cup with spouted lid for increased independence with drinking. Supplements and fortified food in placer to aid in calorie intake. The interventions listed on the care plan included provide and serve supplements and snacks as ordered, provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q (every) meal. RD (Registered Dietitian) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed).
Speech therapy notes revealed the following:
a. 6/18/19, Pt [resident 46] seen with puree texture for skilled dysphagia tx (treatment). Pt [resident 46] with noted tremors, however wished to independently self feed. Pt [resident 46] sister present for portion of the session. ST educated on importance of adhering to diet recommendations and risks of aspiration. Pt sister signed a risk vs benefits for thin liquids. Pt exhibit coughing with thin liquids. Pt sister expresses knowledge of risk.
b. 6/20/19, Pt seen in her room for skilled dysphagia services with her sister present. ST assisted with feeding as pt's tremors were significant. ST educated pt sister on risk of aspiration and we discussed [NAME] Free water protocol. Pt nurse began administering med's via apple sauce with water (thin) to follow. ST educated nurse on Free Water protocol and that pt should take all med's with apple sauce only. We reviewed specifics of water protocol and nurse expressed understanding. Pt sister also expressed understanding.
Resident 46's medical record revealed that the risk vs benefits form was signed by resident 46's sister on 5/16/19 for resident 46 to change honey thickened liquids to thin liquids. The benefit listed that resident will have autonomy of choice in water that she drinks. Resident 46's physician signed the risk vs benefits on 6/14/19.
On 9/11/19 at 1:40 PM, CNA 4 was interviewed. CNA 4 stated that the staff served water to residents in 200 hall twice daily and when they requested the water. CNA 4 stated that residents who were allowed to drink water, the aides offered the water regularly. CNA 4 stated that for residents who were on thickened liquids, the drinks were mixed with the thickening powder in the kitchen or at the nursing station. CNA 4 stated that resident 46 received thickened liquids from the kitchen and did not know if resident 46 had water pitcher in her room.
On 9/11/19 at 1:44 PM, CNA 5 was interviewed. CNA 5 stated that they offer water to residents who were allowed to drink at lease twice per shift. CNA 5 stated that most of their residents were on dysphagia diet and they provided only thickened liquids to them. CNA 5 stated that thickening powder was added to the drinks in the kitchen or at the nursing station. She stated that if the dietary slip did not say water, then water was not served with the meals. CNA 5 stated that every time she went to residents room she asked if they needed water. CNA 5 stated that some residents were allowed to have water pitchers in their rooms and they were the ones who did not have behavioral issues. She stated that some residents throw the water pitcher on the staff or other residents when they became anxious. CNA 5 stated that resident 46 received thickened liquids so her water would need to get mixed with thickening powder before they would give it to her.
On 9/11/19 at 2:02 PM CNA 3 was interviewed. CNA 3 stated that resident 46 was on thickened liquid diet and that she never asked her for water. CNA 3 stated that they would only offer water to residents in 200 hall if they were allowed to drink thin liquids. CNA 3 stated that resident 46 did not have a pitcher in her room because she had behavioral issues in the past and threw her pitcher at the staff.
On 9/11/19 at 2:02 PM the Clinical Resource Nurse (CRN) was interviewed. The CRN stated that resident 46's sister signed the risk vs benefits form for resident 46 to be able to receive thin liquids and water a few months ago, but that they never communicated this to the dietary and other staff on the floor.
On 9/11/19 at 2:21 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 4 stated that a few residents had water mugs in their rooms. RN 4 stated that the aides fill the ice and water in the morning and in the afternoon. RN 4 stated that water was not served during the meal; only juices, milk, coffee and hot chocolate were given before the meals. RN 4 stated that for residents who were on a dysphagia diet, they mixed water with thickening powder at the nursing station in the smaller plastic cups. RN 4 stated that she just heard about the risk vs benefits form that resident 46's sister signed a few months ago today, and that she was doing new dietary requisition form to add water and to change from thickened liquids to thin liquids.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, it was determined for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility failed to ensure a resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, it was determined for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and services for a catheter. Specifically, the facility did not follow physician orders for changing the catheter and they did not use the correct size catheter. Resident identifier 18.
Findings include:
Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a catheter in place and a diagnosis of a Neurogenic bladder.
On 9/10/19 resident 18's medical record was reviewed.
Resident 18 had a physician's order dated 3/19/19 for a catheter 16 Fr (French) and 10 cc (cubic centimeters) balloon to be changed on the 1st of each month. The treatment administration record (TAR) documented that the catheter was changed on 4/1/19 and 5/1/19.
A Nursing progress note dated 5/20/19 documented that LPN 3 changed the catheter on 5/20/19. The progress note documented that the nurse used a 14 Fr catheter 10cc catheter. The Nursing progress note documented the nurse attempted a catheter placement 2 times and on the second attempt the nurse only had blood return in the catheter line.
A Nursing progress note dated 5/20/19 at 1646 (4:46 PM) revealed that LPN 3 notified the nurse practitioner (NP) of resident 18's b/p (blood pressure) 78/52, heart rate 126, temperature 99.2, Oxygen saturation of 88 on 3 liters and of the catheter change at 1530 with only blood return. The NP ordered for resident 18 to go to the Emergency Room. Resident 18 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE].
On 9/10/19 at 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN 2. LPN 2 stated that you would find information for catheters in the orders, and in the orders you would find the size of catheter and how and when the catheter should be changed. LPN 2 stated this then populates to the TAR and that most catheters are changed every 30 days, and some have as needed orders. LPN 2 stated when changing a catheter she would follow the orders for the size of the catheter and balloon of catheter.
On 9/11/19 at 1:14 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that if a patient needed a catheter change and there was not a prn (as needed) physician order, the nurse would be expected to obtain a physician order.
Resident 18 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Upon return a new physician's order from the Hospital stated, Foley exchanges per urology clinic. The physician order to change the Foley catheter in urology clinic was not transcribed to the facility active physician orders. The facility physician documented a note dated 6/18/19 that stated urology to see as outpatient in the future for monthly Foley exchanges.
It was documented in resident 18 's TAR that the catheter was changed on 7/25/19 by LPN 1. During an interview with the DON on 9/12/19 at 7:27 a.m., she stated that she interviewed the nurse who documented insertion of the catheter on 7/25/19 and resident 18. The DON stated that LPN 1 and Resident 18 both stated that the catheter was not changed on 7/25/19. The DON stated that the catheter should only be changed by urology and that this order has been entered into system as of 9/12/19.
On resident 18's August 2019 TAR, documentation for a catheter change on 8/25/19, was coded as 9. Code 9 means see the nurse note. The Nursing progress note dated 8/25/19 documented Resident 18 had refused the catheter change stating that his urologist is supposed to change his catheter.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible. Specifically, one resident who had experienced a significant weight loss did not have interventions put in place for 4 months. Additionally, facility staff were not assisting the residents with eating. Resident identifier: 41.
Findings include:
Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute urinary tract infection, altered mental status, fracture of left ulna, orthopedic aftercare, dementia without behaviors, protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm of the vulva, asthma, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, glaucoma and an anxiety disorder.
On 9/9/19 at 7:50 AM, an observation was made as resident 41's breakfast meal was placed in front of her. No observation was made of any utensils in place for resident 41 to use to eat her meal.
On 9/9/19 at 8:13 AM, an observation was made as resident 41 started to feed herself using her fingers. Resident 41 was observed to attempt to open her milk cup for approximately 3 minutes without success. Resident 41 was then observed to finally open her milk and drink 2 sips of her milk. Resident 41 was observed to drink half of her orange juice. Resident 41 was observed to eat 2 small bites of her food with her fingers.
On 9/9/19 at 8:20 AM, resident 41 was observed to inform the staff that she needed to use the bathroom. CNA 1 was observed to take resident 41 to her room to use the bathroom.
On 9/9/19 at 8:30 AM, CNA 1 was observed to return to the dining room, clean resident 41's breakfast meal and clean the rest of the dining room tables. By 8:40 AM, the dining room tables had been cleaned and resident 41 had not returned to the dining room to finish her breakfast.
On 9/10/19 resident 41's medical record was reviewed.
The Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 41 required Limited Assistance, resident highly involved in activity; staff provided guided maneuvering of limbs or other non-weight-bearing assistance. The MDS Assessment revealed that resident 30 required One person physical assist for eating her meals.
A care plan dated 7/14/19 revealed that resident 41 had a Nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem, altered mental status, dementia, dehydration, HTN (hypertension), UTI (urinary tract infection), dehydration, anxiety, and DM (diabetes mellitus). BMI (body mass index) normal range. Resident has a hx (history) of weight loss, snacks in place to aid in calorie intake. No significant weight loss of 5% in 30 days or 10% in 180 days. The goal was [Resident 41] will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced. The interventions for resident 30 included Provide and serve supplements/snacks as ordered, Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q meal. by maintaining weight, no s/sx (signs/symptoms) of malnutrition within next 90 days. RD to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed). Weigh per facility policy.
No specifics were made to the care plan to assist resident as needed with eating her meals per the one person assistance required as documented in the MDS.
On 9/9/19 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated that resident 41 had difficulty at times eating her meals. CNA 1 stated that resident 41 did not want to come back to the dining room. CNA 1 stated that no alternative meal had been offered and that she had not asked resident 41 if she wanted her meal in her room.
Resident 41's weights revealed the following:
a. 3/4/2019 08:19 144.8 Lbs
b. 4/1/2019 09:14 147.0 Lbs
c. 5/6/2019 08:57 142.6 Lbs
d. 6/3/2019 09:20 138.8 Lbs
e. 7/1/2019 09:22 136.0 Lbs
f. 8/5/2019 09:46 131.0 Lbs
g. 8/13/2019 08:07 131.2 Lbs
h. 8/19/2019 09:16 129.0 Lbs
i. 9/3/2019 09:14 124.0 Lbs
j. 9/9/2019 09:56 125.0 Lbs
Resident 41 had a 20 pound weight loss for a 13.79% weight loss in 6 months which was determined to be significant.
On 9/12/19 at 9:36 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility Registered Dietitian (RD). The facility RD stated that she relied on the facility Online Medical Record to alert her to significant weight loss and that the program had not alerted her to resident 41's significant weight loss. The facility RD stated that somehow this one slipped through my fingers. The facility RD stated that she attended the weekly weight meetings but that facility staff had not alerted her to the weight loss either. The facility RD stated that looking now at the 20 pound weight loss and the fact that resident 41 was averaging 50% for eating meals, she would have and should have fortified her diet prior to the significant weight loss. The facility RD stated that she placed resident 41 on a magic cup rather than med pass due to resident 41 having dysphagia, then the facility staff did not have to thicken the med pass. The facility RD stated that the magic cup had been implemented on 9/3/19 and that there should have been more timely interventions.
On 9/12/19 at 10:04 AM, an interview was again conducted with the facility RD. The facility RD stated that she had fortified resident 41's diet in April but that there was a period from April through September 3 2019 without any interventions.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not est...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail and enable an accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled. Specifically, a resident narcotic record log did not match the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for narcotic administration. Resident identifier: 50.
Findings include:
1. Resident 50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included injury of left quadriceps muscle and tendon, left artificial knee joint, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, asthma, encephalopathy, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, anemia, major depressive disorder, recurrent, bipolar disorder, acute osteomyelitis, open wound of left great toe, acquired absence of other right toes, chronic pain, allergic rhinitis, bacteremia, cellulitis of left lower limb, thrombocythemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, convulsions, neuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, and polymyositis.
On 9/12/19 resident 50's medication records were reviewed.
Review of resident 50's physician orders revealed the following:
a. On 5/23/19, an order was entered into the electronic medication order system for Oxycodone HCl (hydrochloride) 5 MG (milligrams) by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. This order was discontinued on 8/15/19.
b. On 5/23/19, an order was entered into the electronic medication order system for Oxycodone HCl 10 MG by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. This order was discontinued on 8/15/19.
c. On 5/22/19, an order was entered into the electronic medication order system for Tramadol HCl 50 MG by mouth every six hours as needed for pain.
Review of the narcotic record log entries with the corresponding Medication Administration Record for Oxycodone 5 MG revealed that the medication was documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered on the following dates: 6/4/19 at 1:20 AM and 6/20/19 at 8:00 PM.
Review of the narcotic record log entries with the corresponding MAR for Oxycodone 10 MG revealed that the medication was documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered on the following dates: 6/4/19 at 8:10 PM, 6/5/19 at 8:00 AM, 6/5/19 at 12:00 PM, 6/5/19 at 10:20 PM, 6/6/19 at 11:35 PM, 6/8/19 at 12:00 PM, 6/10/19 at 5:30 AM, 6/10/19 at 10:30 AM, 6/11/19 at 6:40 PM, 6/12/19 at 6:00 PM, 6/12/19 at 10:00 PM, 6/13/19 at 2:00 AM, 6/13/19 at 10:00 PM, 6/14/19 at 2:00 AM, 6/14/19 at 10:00 AM, 6/15/19 at 4:00 AM, 6/16/19 at 6:05 AM, 6/19/19 at 7:00 AM, 6/20/19 at 1:00 AM, 6/22/19 at 7:00 AM, 6/22/19 at 12:00 PM, 6/22/19 at 8:00 PM, 6/23/19 at 10:00 PM, 6/26/19 at 8:00 AM, 6/26/19 at 6:30 PM, 6/28/19 at 9:00 PM, 6/29/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/1/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/3/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/3/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/4/19 at 1:30 AM, 7/4/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/4/19 at 11:50 PM, 7/6/19 at 8:30 AM, 7/6/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/7/19 at 7:30 AM, 7/8/19 at 12:30 PM, 7/8/19 at 8:30 PM, 7/9/19 at 12:55 PM, 7/10/19 at 7:00 PM, 7/11/19 at 8:30 PM, 7/12/19 at 2:45 AM, 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/13/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/13/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/13/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/14/19 at 11:30 PM, 7/15/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/15/19 at 7:00 PM, 7/16/19 at 12:30 AM, 7/16/19 at 10:15 AM, 7/17/19 at 6:00 AM, 7/17/19 at 10:00 AM, 7/17/19 at 2:00 PM, 7/17/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/17/19 at 11:00 PM, 7/18/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/19/19 at 12:00 AM, 7/20/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/22/19 at 2:00 PM, 7/22/19 at 3:45 PM, 7/22/19 at 10:00 PM, 7/23/19 at 2:00 AM, 7/24/19 at 11:00 PM, 7/25/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/25/19 at 7:00 PM, 7/25/19 at 11:00 PM, 7/26/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/27/19 at 12:15 PM, 7/27/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/27/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/29/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/29/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/29/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/30/19 at 10:00 AM, 7/30/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/30/19 at 8:00 PM, 7/31/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/31/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/1/19 at 2:00 PM, 8/1/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/2/19 at 12:00 AM, 8/2/19 at 1:45 AM, 8/5/19 at 7:00 PM, 8/6/19 at 2:00 AM, 8/6/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/7/19 at 7:30 AM, 8/8/19 at 4:00 AM, 8/8/19 at 1:00 PM, 8/8/19 at 7:00 PM, 8/9/19 at 12:30 AM, 8/9/19 at 4:30 AM 8/9/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/10/19 at 8:00 AM, 8/10/19 at 12:00 PM, 8/10/19 at 4:00 PM, 8/11/19 at 1:00 PM, 8/12/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/14/19 at 12:00 AM.
Review of the narcotic record log entries with the corresponding MAR for Tramadol 50 MG revealed that the medication was documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered on the following dates: 6/4/19 at 3:00 AM, 6/8/19 at 4:00 AM, 6/10/19 at 10:15 AM, 6/14/19 at 10:00 AM, 6/22/19 at 2:20 AM, 7/3/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/12/19 at 1:00 AM, 7/27/19 at 12:00 PM, 8/17/19 at 1:00 AM, 8/19/19 at 5:15 AM, 8/22/19 at 9:30 PM, 8/23/19 at 9:45 PM, 8/28/19 at 8:15 AM, 8/29/19 at 9:30 PM.
It should be noted that from June 2019 through August 2019, resident 50 had:
a. Two doses of Oxycodone 5 MG were documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered.
b. One hundred one doses of Oxycodone 10 MG were documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered.
c. Fourteen doses of Tramadol 50 MG were documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered.
d. Oxycodone 10 MG was signed out of the narcotic log three times on 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, and two times on 7/13/19 at 12:00 PM.
On 9/12/19 at 8:53 AM, in interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that when she administered narcotic pain medication she reviewed the MAR and the narcotic log book to see when the resident last had a dose, which determined if the resident could have another dose at that time. RN 1 stated that sometimes the previous nurse would sign the medication out in the narcotic log book, but would forget to document in the MAR. RN 1 stated that all nurses were supposed to count the narcotics against the log book at the beginning and end of each shift.
On 9/12/19 at 9:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that she randomly reconciled the narcotic log against the MAR, stated that any discrepancies found were discussed one-on-one with the nurse at fault. The DON stated that she would be very concerned with the large amount of discrepancies between the MAR and the narcotic log, stated that it would affect resident pain assessments and monitoring of effectiveness of pain medication. The DON stated that the nurses should have signed out all of the narcotics in the narcotic log book, as well as documented in the MAR when the narcotic was administered.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not act upon pharmacy...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not act upon pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. Specifically, one recommendation was not implemented for more than 60 days after the recommendation was made. Resident identifier 46.
Findings include:
Resident 46 readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial fibrillation, Other Cerebral Palsy, Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Dysphagia, Unspecified Dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, psychotic disorder due to known physiological condition, and tremors.
On 11/21/19, a recommendation from the Pharmacist was made to monitor for involuntary movements by using of the available scales AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale), or DISCUS (dyskinesia identification system: condensed user scale). The physician signed this recommendation on 12/3/18, and a nurse noted and signed the recommendation on 2/18/19. However, no record could be found of completion of the assessments in resident 46's medical record.
During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/12/19, she stated that the physician signature at the bottom of the pharmacy recommendation dated 12/3/18 indicated that he is agreeing with the recommendations to be implemented. The DON also stated she does not know why this recommendation has not been completed, and she has initiated for this to be completed today and scheduled regularly thereafter.
On 11/27/19, a recommendation from the pharmacist was made to reduce Seroquel to 25mg QHS (nightly) for 2 weeks then discontinue, discontinue Paxil, start Depakote 125mg BID (two times daily), and to clarify the diagnosis for the Ativan. The physician signed this recommendation on 12/3/18, and a nurse noted recommendations on 2/18/19. Depakote 125mg BID was not implemented per medical record until 1/30/19. Paxil per medical record was not discontinued until 1/30/19. Seroquel was not tapered to 25mg QHS x 2 weeks and then discontinued. The Seroquel was increased to 25mg TID (three times daily) on 1/30/19.
During an interview with the DON on 9/12/19 at 1:00 p.m., the DON stated that the physician signature at the bottom of the pharmacy recommendation dated 12/3/18 indicated that he is agreeing with the recommendations. The DON did not know why the recommendations were not implemented in a timely manner.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not monitor psychoti...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not monitor psychotic medication side effects and indications for use. Specifically, medications being monitored on the medication administration record (MAR) did not match the physician ordered medications resident 46 was receiving or resident drug class of medication. Monitoring of medications were omitted, a recommendation for an Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale (AIMS) or formal assessment to monitor extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were not implemented. Resident identifier 46.
Findings include
Resident 46 readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial fibrillation, Other Cerebral Palsy, Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Dysphagia, Unspecified Dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, psychotic disorder due to known physiological condition, and tremors.
On 9/12/19 resident 46's medical record was reviewed.
Resident 46 had physician orders for Seroquel 50mg TID (three times daily) dated 9/6/19 and Buspirone 5mg BID (two times daily) dated 7/25/19. Resident 46 ' s MAR documented the monitoring for behaviors and side effects for the medications Divaloproex and Olanzapine which were discontinued medications.
No monitoring for side effects or efficacy for Seroquel or buspirone could be located in the medical record.
On 9/12/19 at 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that side effects and behavior monitoring was monitored by nurses in the MAR. When asked why the monitoring for resident 46 was for Divaloproex and Olanzapine and not Seroquel and Buspirone, the DON stated it had not been updated with the recent medication change.
On 11/21/18 a recommendation from the Pharmacist was made to monitor for involuntary movements due to the use of psychotropic medications. The physician signed this recommendations on 12/3/18, and a nurse noted recommendations 2/18/19. However no record could be found of completion of assessments in resident 46's medical record.
During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 9/12/19 at 1:00 p.m., she stated that she did not know why this recommendation has not been completed.
During an observation on 9/12/19 at 7:53 a.m., resident 46 was sitting in his room at a bedside table and chair eating breakfast with a CNA in room. It was observed that resident 46 had abnormal movements including; heel rocking, toe tapping, abnormal arm and hand movements, and rocking of head. During another observation on 9/12/19 at 9:00 a.m., resident 46 was lying in bed and it was noted he had abnormal movements toe tapping, and abnormal jaw/mouth movements.
During an interview with RN 2 at 9:13 a.m., she stated that resident 46 has EPS (extrapyramidal symptoms) from years of antipsychotics.
Record review revealed that on 7/16/19, 7/23/19 and 7/30/19 the hospice physician documented that resident 46 was having EPS and should consider tapering of Seroquel or possible introduction of the medication Mysoline. There was no evidence of any follow up with the physician recommendations for EPS symptoms after that date. This was confirmed by the DON and she did not have any further documentation of any follow up regarding EPS management.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On [DATE] at 10:42 AM the wound treatment cart by the nursing station and hall 200 was observed to be unlocked and unattended.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On [DATE] at 10:42 AM the wound treatment cart by the nursing station and hall 200 was observed to be unlocked and unattended.
The treatment cart contained the following:
a. 20 little packets of Vitamin A and D ointment,
b. More that 100 little packets of Hydrocortisone cream 1%,
c. 20 little packets of Bacitracin with Zinc cream,
d. One 1.75 oz tube of Plurogel burn and wound dressing and one 1.75 oz tube of Silver Sulfadiazene cream,
e. 4- 1.5 oz tubes of Therahoney gel,
f. 1-1.5 oz tube of Antifungal cream,
g. 2-4 oz tubes of Calmoseptine,
h. 3-4 oz tubes of Skin Integrity Hydrogel,
i. 10 individually packed pliers, scissors and nail clippers,
j. 4-8 oz spray bottles of Skin Integrity Wound Cleanser.
At 10:53 AM, the treatment cart was locked, leaving the treatment cart unlocked and unattended for 11 minutes.
On [DATE] at 8:42 AM registered nurse (RN) 3 was interviewed. She stated that the wound treatment cart always stayed in the middle of the halls, between the nursing station and next to hall 200. RN 3 stated that at the end of the day she would make sure that it was fully stocked and then the nurses were in charge. RN 3 stated that in hall 200 they had residents with confusion and that the treatment cart needed to stay locked at all times.
On [DATE] at 9:00 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was interviewed. LPN 2 stated that their wound treatment cart was mainly used by the wound nurse during the day, but that other nurses had a key as well and that they used it in afternoon and as needed. She stated that because this cart contained medications such as antibiotics or wound cleansers/ topical ointments they were supposed to be locked at all times.
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not ensure safe and secure storage of drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional principles; or include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date on the medication. Specifically, medications were on the medication cart without a pharmacy label, a multidose vial of Tuberculin had two different open dates and enteral feedings were expired.
Findings include:
On [DATE] at 7:40 AM, an observation was made of the 100 hall med cart. The 100 hall med cart had a Novolog SS Insulin Pen for a resident that did not have a pharmacy label.
On [DATE] at 8:45 AM, an observation was made of the 500 hall medication room refrigerator. The 500 hall medication room refrigerator had an open multidose vial of Tuberculin with a date on the box of [DATE] and a date on the bottle of [DATE].
The 500 hall medication room had 29 cans of Two Cal HN Calorie and Protein Dense Nutrition 8 oz with an expiration date of [DATE].
The 500 hall medication room had 14 individual boxes of Peptamen AF Complete Nutrition with an expiration date of [DATE].
On [DATE] at 9:20 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility Director of Nursing (DON). The facility DON stated that the Tuberculin should not have had either of those dates since she thought that they were out and had ordered new Tuberculin in. The DON stated that they would remove the enteral feedings from the med room.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a catheter in place and a diagnosis of a Neurogenic bladder.
Resident 18...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a catheter in place and a diagnosis of a Neurogenic bladder.
Resident 18 had a physician order initiated on 7/1/19 that stated change foley catheter and drainage bag monthly on the 25th of the month.
It was documented in resident 18 ' s TAR that the catheter was changed on 7/25/19 by LPN 1.
During an interview with the DON on 9/12/19 at 7:27 a.m., she stated that she interviewed the nurse who documented insertion of the catheter on 7/25/19 and resident 18. The DON stated that LPN 1 and Resident 18 both stated that the catheter was not changed on 7/25/19.
Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not maintain accurate documentation of medical records for each resident. Specifically, a resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and narcotic record log did not match. Additionally, a nurse charted that a resident's urinary catheter was changed when it was not. Resident identifiers: 18 and 50.
Findings include:
1. Resident 50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included injury of left quadriceps muscle and tendon, left artificial knee joint, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, asthma, encephalopathy, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, anemia, major depressive disorder, recurrent, bipolar disorder, acute osteomyelitis, open wound of left great toe, acquired absence of other right toes, chronic pain, allergic rhinitis, bacteremia, cellulitis of left lower limb, thrombocythemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, convulsions, neuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, and polymyositis.
On 9/12/19 resident 50's medication records were reviewed.
Review of resident 50's physician orders revealed the following:
a. On 5/23/19, an order was entered into the electronic medication order system for Oxycodone HCl (hydrochloride) 5 MG (milligrams) by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. This order was discontinued on 8/15/19.
b. On 5/23/19, an order was entered into the electronic medication order system for Oxycodone HCl 10 MG by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. This order was discontinued on 8/15/19.
c. On 5/22/19, an order was entered into the electronic medication order system for Tramadol HCl 50 MG by mouth every six hours as needed for pain.
Review of the narcotic record log entries with the corresponding Medication Administration Record for Oxycodone 5 MG revealed that the medication was documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered on the following dates: 6/4/19 at 1:20 AM and 6/20/19 at 8:00 PM.
Review of the narcotic record log entries with the corresponding MAR for Oxycodone 10 MG revealed that the medication was documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered on the following dates: 6/4/19 at 8:10 PM, 6/5/19 at 8:00 AM, 6/5/19 at 12:00 PM, 6/5/19 at 10:20 PM, 6/6/19 at 11:35 PM, 6/8/19 at 12:00 PM, 6/10/19 at 5:30 AM, 6/10/19 at 10:30 AM, 6/11/19 at 6:40 PM, 6/12/19 at 6:00 PM, 6/12/19 at 10:00 PM, 6/13/19 at 2:00 AM, 6/13/19 at 10:00 PM, 6/14/19 at 2:00 AM, 6/14/19 at 10:00 AM, 6/15/19 at 4:00 AM, 6/16/19 at 6:05 AM, 6/19/19 at 7:00 AM, 6/20/19 at 1:00 AM, 6/22/19 at 7:00 AM, 6/22/19 at 12:00 PM, 6/22/19 at 8:00 PM, 6/23/19 at 10:00 PM, 6/26/19 at 8:00 AM, 6/26/19 at 6:30 PM, 6/28/19 at 9:00 PM, 6/29/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/1/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/3/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/3/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/4/19 at 1:30 AM, 7/4/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/4/19 at 11:50 PM, 7/6/19 at 8:30 AM, 7/6/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/7/19 at 7:30 AM, 7/8/19 at 12:30 PM, 7/8/19 at 8:30 PM, 7/9/19 at 12:55 PM, 7/10/19 at 7:00 PM, 7/11/19 at 8:30 PM, 7/12/19 at 2:45 AM, 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/13/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/13/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/13/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/14/19 at 11:30 PM, 7/15/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/15/19 at 7:00 PM, 7/16/19 at 12:30 AM, 7/16/19 at 10:15 AM, 7/17/19 at 6:00 AM, 7/17/19 at 10:00 AM, 7/17/19 at 2:00 PM, 7/17/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/17/19 at 11:00 PM, 7/18/19 at 6:00 PM, 7/19/19 at 12:00 AM, 7/20/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/22/19 at 2:00 PM, 7/22/19 at 3:45 PM, 7/22/19 at 10:00 PM, 7/23/19 at 2:00 AM, 7/24/19 at 11:00 PM, 7/25/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/25/19 at 7:00 PM, 7/25/19 at 11:00 PM, 7/26/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/27/19 at 12:15 PM, 7/27/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/27/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/29/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/29/19 at 12:00 PM, 7/29/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/30/19 at 10:00 AM, 7/30/19 at 4:00 PM, 7/30/19 at 8:00 PM, 7/31/19 at 7:00 AM, 7/31/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/1/19 at 2:00 PM, 8/1/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/2/19 at 12:00 AM, 8/2/19 at 1:45 AM, 8/5/19 at 7:00 PM, 8/6/19 at 2:00 AM, 8/6/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/7/19 at 7:30 AM, 8/8/19 at 4:00 AM, 8/8/19 at 1:00 PM, 8/8/19 at 7:00 PM, 8/9/19 at 12:30 AM, 8/9/19 at 4:30 AM 8/9/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/10/19 at 8:00 AM, 8/10/19 at 12:00 PM, 8/10/19 at 4:00 PM, 8/11/19 at 1:00 PM, 8/12/19 at 8:00 PM, 8/14/19 at 12:00 AM.
Review of the narcotic record log entries with the corresponding MAR for Tramadol 50 MG revealed that the medication was documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered on the following dates: 6/4/19 at 3:00 AM, 6/8/19 at 4:00 AM, 6/10/19 at 10:15 AM, 6/14/19 at 10:00 AM, 6/22/19 at 2:20 AM, 7/3/19 at 8:00 AM, 7/12/19 at 1:00 AM, 7/27/19 at 12:00 PM, 8/17/19 at 1:00 AM, 8/19/19 at 5:15 AM, 8/22/19 at 9:30 PM, 8/23/19 at 9:45 PM, 8/28/19 at 8:15 AM, 8/29/19 at 9:30 PM.
It should be noted that from June 2019 through August 2019, resident 50 had:
a. Two doses of Oxycodone 5 MG were documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered.
b. One hundred one doses of Oxycodone 10 MG were documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered.
c. Fourteen doses of Tramadol 50 MG were documented signed out of the narcotic log, but the medication was not documented on the MAR as being administered.
d. Oxycodone 10 MG was signed out of the narcotic log three times on 7/13/19 at 8:00 AM, and two times on 7/13/19 at 12:00 PM.
On 9/12/19 at 8:53 AM, in interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that when she administered narcotic pain medication she reviewed the MAR and the narcotic log book to see when the resident last had a dose, which determined if the resident could have another dose at that time. RN 1 stated that sometimes the previous nurse would sign the medication out in the narcotic log book, but would forget to document in the MAR.
On 9/12/19 at 9:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that when the medical team conducted at pain assessment on a resident the team would review the current orders, reports of uncontrolled pain, and the frequency of 'as needed' pain medication use. The DON stated that she would be very concerned with the large amount of discrepancies between the MAR and the narcotic log, stated that it would affect resident pain assessments and monitoring of effectiveness of pain medication.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not dev...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, care plans were not updated with interventions after resident falls and interventions and/or assessments were not carried out. Resident identifiers: 3 and 41.
Findings include:
1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], she was discharged to the hospital and returned on 8/28/19, with diagnoses which included fracture of right wrist and hand, cystitis, fracture of left wrist and hand, acute respiratory failure, dementia, bipolar disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, need for assistance with personal care, neuropathy, glaucoma, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, restless legs syndrome, osteoarthritis, dissociative identity disorder, pseudobulbar affect, pain in left knee, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, encephalopathy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, sciatica, pain in right leg, generalized anxiety disorder, repeated falls, muscle weakness, hypoxemia, hyperglycemia, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and asthma.
On 9/9/19 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 3. Resident 3 stated that she had had multiple falls at the facility, and had hit her head at least once.
Resident 3's medical record was reviewed on 9/10/19 and revealed the following falls:
a. On 12/28/18 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injury. A nurse's note documented Nurse was assisting resident's roommate and saw this resident standing up after using the restroom and slipped and fell into a sitting position on the floor. Resident stated that her feet started to slide and she fell to a sitting position.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Encouraged resident to wear nonskid socks when walking or transferring. [Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
b. On 12/30/18 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head. A nurse's note documented Res (resident) roommate used call light, CNA (certified nurse assistant) answered and found res in rest room res was sitting on floor. Res did not have traction socks on. Ask res what happened? res stated that she was on toilet, reach for walker then started to slipping (sic). Res stated she hit her R (right) side of head on wall, and R arm on the floor.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated educate res to used traction socks and put on for res. [Note: this was the same intervention documented for the fall that happened 2 days prior. Additionally, this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
c. On 1/12/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head which caused a scalp hematoma. A nurse's note documented Recreation notified this nurse that she was in resident's room helping her and saw her fall to the floor and her back was leaning against the bed frame. Resident stated she was standing up and was reaching for her walker but it was too far and lost her balance and fell. She said she hit her back and her head on the bed frame.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Encourage resident to ask for assistance. [Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
d. On 1/14/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injury. A nurse's note documented Res stated that she was in her recliner, try (sic) to get up to her walker and slipped to floor. Res was next to her recliner.Res (sic) stated she did not hit her head, and denied pain.
An intervention documented in the nurse's note stated Educate res to use call light, and help res to use rest room. Another intervention documented as an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) note stated Staff to remind and assist resident in keeping her walkerclose (sic) by. [Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
e. On 5/27/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head which caused a laceration. A nurse's note documented [Resident 3] fell in her room at approx. (approximately) 1100 (11:00 AM). She was standing and trying to sign a piece of paper for [Name of Housekeeper] the housekeeper. she said all of a sudden I just felt myself going down. She hit her head on the left side and has a small laceration to her left ear.
An intervention documented on 5/28/18 as an IDT note stated Resident is currently on OT (occupational therapy). OT to instruct to keep one hand on a solid surface. [Note: the fall and interventions were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
f. On 6/29/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injury. A nurse's note on 6/30/19 documented [Resident 3] was using her 4 wheeled walker as a wheelchair and another resident brought her dog in. [Resident 3] leaned over to pet the dog forgetting to lock the brakes on her walker. The walker then rolled out from under her causing her to slide to her bottom. No injury noted and was witnessed by 3 other people, she did not hit her head.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Re-educate [resident 3] to use her walker as a walker and apply the brakes when moving. [Note: this was the first fall intervention documented on resident 3's care plan since 2017, which was prior to these most recent falls.]
g. On 7/9/19 resident 3 had a fall with no injury noted. A nurse's note on 7/10/19 documented ~1930 (7:30 PM) Resident was found on the floor sitting on her buttock by CNA. Res stated she was going to the restroom and her legs gave out. Then she butt walked forward to let staff know. She did not hit her head, No skin injuries upon assessment.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Repair [resident 3's] electric wheelchair so she will no longer use walker as a wheelchair and remind to use call light for assistance.
On 9/11/19 at 9:32 AM, an observation was made of resident 3 sitting in her recliner. Resident 3's call light was clipped to her bed and was not within reach.
h. On 7/19/19 resident 3 had a fall in which she hit her head and had a change in her vital signs and level of consciousness. A nurse's note on 7/20/19 documented Res was found in he (sic) bathroom sitting on floor. Res stated she feel (sic) while standing up reaching for her wheel walker. Res wheel walker was not lock. Res has two lumps on right skull, res stated pain in R shoulder, R side of head, and R breast. Res initial vitals were WNL (within normal limits), after second vital res BP (blood pressure), O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation) begin to decline. Res become more confused. [Nurse Practitioner] gives the OK to send res to ER (emergency room). Res came back from [name of hospital] at 0400 (4:00 AM), with no new orders.
An intervention documented resident 3's care plan stated Putting her walker closer to her while in the bathroom and ensuring the brake is engaged.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated She continues to use her walker as a wheelchair and has had falls rt (related to) not using her walker appropriately. Resident educated regarding walker use and to call staff for assistance. [Note: this was the 2nd time these interventions were used.]
i. On 7/30/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head. A nurse's note documented CNA heard a call for help and found [resident 3] on the floor in her room. She stated she was getting up to go to the bathroom and slipped on some water she spilled. Denies any pain. No physical injuries noted. States she slightly hit her head.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Provide [resident 3] new grippy socks for traction. [Note: this was the 3rd time this intervention was used, but the 1st time it was documented on the care plan.]
On 9/10/19 at 3:12 PM, an observation was made of resident 3 with no grippy socks on.
On 9/11/19 at 8:04 AM, resident 3 was observed sitting on the side of her bed with no grippy socks on. There were no grippy socks on her bed or anywhere near her to indicate that she had them on recently.
On 9/11/19 at 11:26 AM, an observation was made of resident 3 in her recliner with no grippy socks on. Resident 3's spouse was in the room at that time and stated that staff never put grippy socks on resident 3 unless she requested it.
j. On 8/5/19 resident 3 had a fall and hit her head which caused a laceration, she also had a left wrist fracture. A nurse's note documented This nurse and two other staff members heard resident yelling for help and went in room to find resident on ground face down at 1900 (7:00 PM) this evening. Staff members helped resident back up into her recliner. She stated she was on her way to the bathroom and tripped on her side table. She has a bump on her forehead with a small laceration, cleaned and dressed with a bandaid. She had increased pain in her left arm rated 10/10 with decreased ROM. Pain medication and ice given. MD notified and ordered x-ray for left shoulder and wrist. X-ray performed and showed fracture to left wrist. MD notified and ordered to send out for further treatment in ER.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated Install grippy tape to the bathroom floor for traction in the event there is water inadvertently splashed on the floor.Install grippy tape to the foot of [resident 3's] recliner.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Staff to apply brightly colored tape on her bedside table to assist with visual cues.
On 9/10/19 at 3:12 PM, an observation was made of resident 3's bathroom with no grip tape on the floor. Resident 3's roommate stated that to her knowledge, there had never been any grip tape on the floor in the bathroom.
On 9/11/19 at 9:32 AM, an observation was made of resident 3's bedside table without any brightly colored tape for visual cues.
k. On 8/10/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injuries. A facility incident report documented CNA found res is room sitting on floor by her recliner. Res stated she slid out of recliner onto floor, and did not hit her head.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's noted stated Grippy tape to be placed at the foot of her recliner. [Note: this was the 2nd time this intervention was used. Additionally, no updates were made to resident 3's care plan.]
l. On 8/16/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injuries. A nurse's note documented Res more alert today, however she tried once to get up on her own at 1100 (11:00 AM), nurse found res on floor, examined res, found no injury.
An intervention documented on resident 3's care plan stated PT (physical therapy) eval (evaluation) for strength and training to use bedside commode and ambulate.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report and the nurse's note stated Resident educated regarding call light use. Bedside commode placed by bedside to assist resident.
On 9/11/19 at 9:32 AM, an observation was made of resident 3's room with no bedside commode.
m. On 8/18/19 resident 3 had a fall with a right wrist fracture. A nurse's noted documented Around 0330 (3:30 AM) CNA found res on the floor in prone position, bed was on the lowest position. Res stated she tried to get up and some how rolled out of bed. [Note: there was no intervention documented for this fall on resident 3's care plan, in the nurse's note, or in a facility incident report.]
n. On 8/22/19 resident 3 had a fall with no noted injuries. A facility incident report documented RES found on floor have (sic) way to bathroom, res on R side, bed was in the lowest position r/t res trying 2 other times that morning to get out of bed.
An intervention documented on the facility incident report stated that resident 3 was sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. [Note: this fall and intervention were not documented on resident 3's care plan.]
A review of resident 3's care plan revealed the following interventions were initiated prior to the fall on 12/28/18:
a. Resident referred to pt (physical therapy) for proper walker usage and eval (evaluation) for front wheeled walker. Initiated on 9/17/17
b. Anticipate and meet [resident 3's] needs. Initiated on 6/13/16
c. Be sure [resident 3's] call light is within reach and encourage [resident 3] to use it for assistance as needed. [Resident 3] needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. Initiated on 6/13/16
d. Pt (physical therapy) evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN (as needed). Initiated on 6/13/16
e. [Resident 3] given education to let staff help her with toileting to prevent further falls. Initiated on 5/8/17
f. Education given to [resident 3] to ensure that she asks for assistance with bed mobility Initiated on 3/20/17
g. Staff education to check with [resident 3] frequently for toileting needs and if she needs any assistance with toileting to prevent falls. Initiated on 5/8/17. [Note: the intervention to remind resident 3 to ask for assistance and use her call light for mobility and transfers was used seven times.]
On 9/11/19 at 10:08 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 3's Physical Therapist (PT). The PT stated that he assisted in initiating interventions, stated that he would talk to the floor staff about implementing those interventions. The PT stated that there was no paperwork or documentation that they use to communicate with the floor staff, stated that all communication was word of mouth.
On 9/11/19 at 7:31 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 6. CNA 6 stated that the CNA's had to ask the nurses if a resident had any fall interventions ordered. CNA 6 stated that the CNA's did not have access to nurse's notes or incident reports. CNA 6 stated that she was very familiar with resident 3, stated that she did not know of any fall prevention interventions that were supposed to be used for resident 3.
On 9/11/19 at 7:36 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that new interventions were entered into the care plan by nurse management. RN 1 stated that the interventions were also entered into the electronic charting system as an order to communicate the interventions to the staff. RN 1 verified that resident 3 had no orders for fall prevention interventions.
On 9/11/19 at 11:37 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that all falls were followed up on by the clinical team on the next business day. The DON stated that interventions were usually entered into the resident care plans during the fall follow up meeting by the nurse management. The DON stated the interventions were also entered as an order in the electronic charting system to communicate to the nurses. The DON stated that during the fall follow up meeting past interventions were also re-evaluated for effectiveness. The DON was unable to explain the discrepancies between the incident reports and care plan interventions. The DON stated that all of those interventions should have been implemented; the DON was unable to explain why resident 3 did not have grippy socks, the call light was not within reach, there was no grip tape on the bathroom floor, no bedside commode, nor bright tape on the bedside table.
On 9/11/19 at 2:57 PM, a follow up interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated that she did not review past nurse's notes or incident reports for interventions documented in those places.
2. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute urinary tract infection, altered mental status, fracture of left ulna, orthopedic aftercare, dementia without behaviors, protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm of the vulva, asthma, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, glaucoma and an anxiety disorder.
On 9/11/19 resident 41's medical record was reviewed.
Nursing progress notes revealed the following entries:
a. 7/4/2019 10:46 (AM) Nursing Note Late Entry: Note Text: Pt (patient) was in the bathroom when staff heard her yelling for help. Pt was sitting on the floor, stated she was pulling her pants up, when she lost her balance and fell to her knees and then sat on the floor. No injuries noted, neuro (neurological) checks started. MD (medical doctor) and family notified.
b. 7/5/2019 19:37 (7:37 PM) Nursing Note Note Text: FALL: Resident denies any pain/discomfort r/t (related to) fall in restroom yesterday. This RN (Registered Nurse) encountered her toileting herself unsafely in restroom this afternoon and mentioned her fall yesterday, to which she replied I didn't fall, did I? No visible injuries/bruising/redness r/t fall yesterday. Neuro checks are continuing per facility protocol and vital signs remain WNL (within normal limits) for resident. She did request assistance (extensive given) from this RN to get her legs up onto her bed to lie down early in shift, which shows a substantial decline in her strength over last couple of months.
c. 7/31/2019 04:39 (AM) Nursing Note Note Text: Resident was using her wheeled walker to bathroom with gripper socks on and felt dizzy and sat down per resident. Nurse assessed resident and no injuries noted at this time. Floor with (sic) clean and dry and there was a sign for wet floor by the door. Resident stated she was dizzy and sat down and hit the sign. When asked if she hit her head she stated NO. Nurses helped resident up off the floor and sat her on her walker. She stated she needed to use the bathroom. She was helped on the toilet, nurse was able to assess her for injuries at this time, no redness no injuries noted. [Nurse Practitioner] notified of fall and nurse left message for her nephew to call facility when he gets the message. Vital signs completed; T (temperature):97.6, BP(blood pressure):142/89, P (pulse):76, R (respirations) :14, O2 (oxygen) Sat (saturations): 97% on room air. Staff will continue to monitor for 3 day on fall charting.
d. 7/31/2019 09:54 (AM) Nursing Note Note Text: IDT (interdisciplinary) team met regarding residents recent fall. Social work, PT (physical therapy), nursing and administration present. Resident was found down by her room. Resident stated she felt dizzy and sat down on the floor. Resident was assessed by nurse and no injuries were noted. Resident is currently on OT (occupational therapy) Orthostatic BP to be completed the next three days. Will monitor.
e. 8/18/2019 18:17 (6:17 PM) Nursing Note Note Text: Staff answered call light and found resident laying on her back on the floor next to her bed. Resident stated she was standing to go to the bathroom and she fell backwards. Resident denies hitting her head. Two staff members assisted resident up and she ambulated to the bathroom. Resident is able to move all extremities. No apparent injuries noted upon assessment. Neuro checks have been initiated and are at baseline for resident. Resident was wearing non-slip socks. Family called and message left. MD and supervisor notified.
f. 8/19/2019 09:58 (AM) Nursing Note Note Text: IDT team met regarding residents recent fall. Social work, PT, nursing and administration present. Resident was found down in her room by her bed. Resident stated she was trying to walk to the restroom when she fell backwards. No injuries noted and resident denies hitting her head. Resident was helped to the restroom. Resident had non-slip footwear on. PT to eval (evaluate). Will monitor.
g. 8/19/2019 13:17 (1:37 PM) Nursing Note Note Text: Resident is alert and oriented to self with confusion. Resident is complaining of left hand and left wrist pain s/p (status post) fall. Some bruising noted this morning on left hand and left forearm area. Resident received prn (as needed) pain med (medication) this am with positive effect. Resident took a nap after taking her pain meds. Left hand and left wrist are tender when touched. MD has been notified and order received for X-ray of the left hand and left wrist. [X-ray company] has been notified to perform x-ray. Resident is currently sitting in the dining room eating lunch. She's pleasant.
h. 8/19/2019 22:33 (10:33 PM) Nursing Note Note Text: Hand 2 views - Left 8/19/19 Impression: Displaced fracture of the distal left ulna. [Resident 41's physician] notified. Res (resident) was sent out to [Name of Hospital] for further evaluation. Report was given to ER (emergency room) Charge nurse. Nephew [Name of nephew] notified. Res reported pain in her Left wrist and received tramadol at bedtime w (with)/effectiveness. Res stated the pain decreased a little bit. Res's Left hand was wrapped with ACE wrap for stability.
i. 8/20/2019 03:49 (AM) Nursing Note Note Text: [Resident 41] returned to this facility at approx. 0200 (2:00 AM) from [Name of Hospital]. She arrived via stretcher and accompanied by EMT (emergency medical technician) in [Name of Ambulance] ambulance. She was transferred to ED (emergency department) following a fall with UE (upper extremity) ulnar fx (fracture). She was in good spirits when she came back, she is wearing a cast/splint on her fractured arm, and she returns with new orders to schedule acetaminophen 1000mg (milligrams) q (every) 6 [hours] PO (by mouth) PRN (as needed) x (times) 3 days for pain. No other changes were made to her meds, she reported pain after being transferred to her bed and was given PRN dose of hydrocodone. She also returned with order to schedule a f/u (follow up) with [Orthopedic physician]. She is currently lying in bed resting quietly, no new complaints at this time.
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 41 had impaired memory and a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) revealed that resident 41 had a score of 7, indicating that resident 41 had severe cognitive impairment.
A care plan dated 7/14/19 revealed that resident 41 was at Risk for Falls: [Name of Resident] is at risk for falls r/t Weakness, Deconditioning, Hx (history) Dehydration, Hx UTIs (urinary tract infections). The goal for resident 41 was [Name of Resident] will be free of minor injury within next 90 days. The interventions for resident 41 included Be sure [Name of Resident] call light is within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed. [Name of Resident] needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. Educate [Name of Resident] her family and caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if a fall occurs. Encourage [Name of Resident] to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. Ensure that [Name of Resident] is wearing appropriate footwear (non-skid shoes, nonskid socks, etc.) prior to any transfers or ambulating. Follow facility fall protocol. Pt (physical therapy) evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN.
A care plan dated 7/14/19 revealed that resident 41 had an Actual Fall - [Name of Resident] has had an actual falls without injury and with minor injury. *7/4/19 - [Name of Resident] had an actual fall without injury r/t (related to) unsteady gait and poorly fitting slacks. 7/30/19 pt (patient) had fall no injuries noted. The goal for resident 41 was [Name of Resident] will resume usual activities without further incident within next 90 days. The interventions for resident 41 included 7/9/19 - [Name of Resident] clothes will be altered to fit her more properly. Alterations to [Name of Resident] existing slacks/clothing and replacement with new properly fitting slacks/clothing. Do orthostatic blood pressure in the AM for 3 days to see if we need to make changes to meds (medications), cares, etc. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) of any concerns. Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) x (times) 72h (hours) to MD for s/sx (signs/symptoms): confusion, sleepiness, inability to maintain posture, agitation. Neuro-checks x 72 hours. PT consult for strength and mobility.
No documentation could be located in the medical record to show that new interventions had been put in place in resident 41's care plan after the fall on 7/31/19 prior to the fall on 8/18/19 when resident 41 sustained the left distal ulnar fracture.
On 9/11/19 at 3:32 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility Director of Nursing (DON). The facility DON stated that she did not know why there were no interventions between the fall on 7/31/19 and the fall on 8/18/19. The facility DON stated that the unit managers were to update the care plans when falls occurred. The facility DON stated that she would check for further information regarding interventions.
On 9/12/19 at 9:18 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility DON. The facility DON stated that the OT (Occupational Therapy) note dated 8/1/19 was a great note that could have been considered an intervention. The facility DON stated that in the note, OT was providing resident 41 with patient education. The facility DON stated that even though resident 41 had a BIMS of 7, she is able to comprehend. The facility DON stated that the use of OT was never implemented on resident 41's care plan. [NOTE: According to the MDS, resident 41 had a BIMS of 7, indicating that there was severe cognitive impairment. According to documentation in the incident reports, resident 41 had confusion and impaired memory.]
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 3 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 3 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, three residents were not assisted or cued during the meal times. Residents identifier: 30, 41 and 46.
Findings include:
1. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), muscle weakness, Alzheimer disease, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) without esophagitis, dementia, dysphagia oral phase, and cognitive communication deficit.
On 9/9/19 at 7:54 AM, an observation was made of resident 30 as her breakfast tray was served. Resident 30 was observed to be seated in the chair with her eyes closed.
On 9/9/19 at 7:56 AM, an observation was made of resident 30 as she opened her eyes, and reached toward the plate. Resident 30 was observed to use her fingers to reach for the food and then brought her empty fingers toward her mouth. Resident 30 was observed to be eating the air. No observation was made of any staff members approaching resident 30 to assist her with cuing, to put utensils into her hands nor to assist her to eat her meal.
On 9/9/19 at 8:10 AM, an observation was made as resident 30 was able to reach a little plastic cup with the butter and tried to drink the butter from the cup.
On 9/9/19 at 8:15 AM, an observation was made of resident 30 as she was able to grab the cup with the hot chocolate and in her attempt to drink it, she spilled the hot chocolate on her self and on the table. No observation was made of staff approaching resident 30 to assist her to clean the spill or to assist resident 30 with eating her meal. During this observation, resident 30 was observed to attempt to open her milk several times without success.
On 9/9/19 at 8:30 AM, an observation was made of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 as she assisted resident 30 to her room to change her clothes.
On 9/9/19 at 8:37 AM, an observation was made as resident 30 was brought back to the dining room and seated by the window. Resident 30's breakfast meal had already been picked up by CNA 1. No observation was made of any attempt by facility staff to assist or to feed resident 30.
On 9/9/19 at 12:56 PM, an observation was made as the lunch tray was served to resident 30. It was observed that CNA 3 sat down with resident 30 and fed her. Resident 30 ate 100% of her meal.
On 9/11/19, resident 30's medical record was reviewed.
The Change of Condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident 30 required Limited Assistance, resident highly involved in activity; staff provided guided maneuvering of limbs or other non-weight-bearing assistance. The MDS Assessment revealed that resident 30 required One person physical assist for eating her meals.
A care plan dated 2/19/16 and revised on 12/5/19 for resident 30 revealed that resident 30 had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Alzheimer's. The interventions listed by the facility included Limited to extensive assist of 1 staff for eating. Will participate with restorative nursing assistance (RNA) on self feeding. RNA to encourage resident 30 to adequately eat her meal and increase independence with eating. She will be offered the program at least 15 minutes during one meal per day.
Resident 30's weights revealed that she was trending down with a 9.76 % loss since January.
Nursing progress notes revealed the following:
a. 5/5/19, Resident (30) has poor oral intake of foods and fluids, she requires lots of cuing during meals and at times she refuses to eat even when staff offers to assist her. Resident does have very poor vision and she sometimes holds the spoon in the wrong direction.
b. 5/6/19, Resident (30) has poor safety awareness and she does not know what to do when her food is placed in-front of her. Resident needs frequent cuing and encouragement in order to eat. Resident has very poor vision.
c. 6/1/19, Resident was confused at dinner and was unable to understand staff directions. She was able to take her medications crushed in applesauce and med pass once nurse told her pain medications were in it.
d. 9/1/19, total dependence with hygiene care, moderate assistance with transfer, and extensive assistance with meal.
e. 9/6/19, Set up, supervision and cuing for meals.
RNA daily notes were reviewed and revealed following:
a) 5/18/19-The pt (patient) [resident 30] was able to eat by (sic) own, but she needs encourage (sic), and her appetite is low.
b) 5/26/19-Pt. [resident 30] was cooperative with eating with no problems, pt ate 50%.
c) 6/22/19-cooperative with eating her lunch meal, she ate 25% with assist and cue.
d) 7/17/19-pt [resident 30] was cooperative when eating, pt ate 15%.
e) 8/24/19-pt [resident 30] has low appetite and she needs encourage (sic) to focus to eat
f) 8/31/19-pt [resident 30] needs encourage (sic) and extensive assistance to eat. her appetite is low and she gets distracted easily.
On 9/11/19 at 7:32 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated that resident 30 required assistance with eating and that resident was able to feed herself but she did not remember to eat. CNA 3 stated that resident 30 was very confused and that she was better if she was fed by someone. CNA 3 stated that all residents who required assistance would be fed as soon as they delivered food trays to the rest of residents in the hall 200.
On 9/12/19 at 7:47 AM , resident 30 was observed to be seated in 200 hall dining room. She talked to another resident and drank her coffee. Her breakfast tray was served to her at 7:52 AM. She was fed by an aide. No issues were noted; resident ate 100% of her meal.
3. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type II diabetes, Cerebral Palsy, COPD, vascular dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, GERD with esophagitis, Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase and tremor.
On 9/9/19 at 8:00 AM, an observation was made of resident 46 as her breakfast tray was served.
On 9/9/19 at 8:47 AM, an observation was made of resident 46's breakfast meal. Observation of the meal revealed that resident 46 had not eaten her meal, but had drank a few sips of juice and milk. No observation was made of facility staff assisting or cueing resident 46.
On 9/9/19 at 8:47 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 46. Resident 46 was hard to understand, and appeared anxious and frustrated. Resident 46 stated that she did not like her food.
On 9/9/19 at 8:50 AM, an observation was made as CNA 1 cleaned the tables in the dining room. CNA 1 was observed to take resident 46's tray without asking any questions. Resident 46 was observed to stay sitting at the table with her head between her hands.
On 9/9/19 at 11:28 AM, an observation was made of resident 46's sister in the room with resident 46. Resident 46 was observed sitting in the wheelchair next to her bed.
On 9/9/19 at 11:28 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 46's sister. Resident 46's sister stated that she was resident 46's power of attorney. Resident 46's sister stated that a few months ago, she signed a risk vs benefits for her sister regarding the water and thin liquids. Resident 46's sister stated that her sister was thirsty and that the facility did not serve water to her sister. Resident 46's sister stated that resident 46 was evaluated by speech therapy and was found to be at risk for aspiration so they recommended thickened liquids. Resident 46's sister stated that resident 46 did well with thin liquids too, but more importantly, she needed water. Resident 46's sister stated that she talked to the nurses and the Director of Nursing (DON) about the risk vs benefits form that she had signed and that every time she visits her sister, there was no water available at her bedside nor with her meals. Resident 46's sister stated that resident 46 had severe tremors in both of her hands and sometimes she was not able to feed herself. She stated that resident 46 had difficulty drinking from her cups because her hands were shaking and she spilled the drinks which made her more frustrated and anxious.
On 9/11/19 at 12:46 PM, an observation was made as lunch was served to resident 46. Resident 46 received a pureed diet, cup of milk, cup of coffee and a healthshake. An observation was made of resident 46 and noted that she had a severe tremor in her hands. Resident 46 was observed to have a difficult time drinking with the straw and required constant cuing or assistance from facility staff. It was observed that it took her 3 attempts to reach the straw. For each bite of food that she ate, resident 46 made 2-3 attempts to grab the food and she spilled half of the food due to the tremor. No observation was made of special utensils provided to resident 46.
On 9/11/19, resident 46's medical record was reviewed.
The medical record revealed that resident 46 was on hospice.
The Change of Condition MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 46 required extensive one person assistance for eating her meals.
A care plan dated 12/19/17 with a revision date of 10/23/19 revealed that resident 46 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. The interventions listed on resident 46's care plan included that the facility would provide extensive assist from staff for eating and that they would also provide weighted utensils to assist with eating due to tremors.
On 9/12/19 at approximately 9:00 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated that resident 46 was able to feed her self. She stated that resident 46 had shaky hands and that she did not like to be fed by others. CNA 2 stated that if they noticed that resident 46 or any other resident needed assistance with feeding, the aides would then assist them.
On 9/11/19 at 1:44 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 5. CNA 5 stated that resident 46 had some behavioral issues. CNA 5 stated that resident 46 needed assistance with feeding, but she preferred to feed herself. CNA 5 stated that resident 46's hands were shaky and that she spilled half of her food and her drinks. CNA 5 stated that resident 46 was confused and if not assisted or at least cued she would not eat.
On 9/11/19 at 2:02 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated that resident 46 was 1 to 2 person assist with all activities of daily living. CNA 3 stated that resident 46 preferred to eat on her own. CNA 3 stated that resident 46 was confused and that she did not eat and drink if she did not receive the assistance or cuing from staff. CNA 3 stated that resident 46 had a tremor in both hands, that she had difficult time to keep her head still and when she drank or ate she spilled half of it if she was not assisted. CNA 3 stated that this made resident 46 even more frustrated and then she yelled or screamed at the staff and other residents.
3. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute urinary tract infection, altered mental status, fracture of left ulna, orthopedic aftercare, dementia without behaviors, protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm of the vulva, asthma, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, glaucoma and an anxiety disorder.
On 9/9/19 at 7:50 AM, an observation was made as resident 41's breakfast meal was placed in front of her. No observation was made of any utensils in place for resident 41 to use to eat her meal.
On 9/9/19 at 8:13 AM, an observation was made as resident 41 started to feed herself using her fingers. Resident 41 was observed to attempt to open her milk cup for approximately 3 minutes without success. Resident 41 was then observed to finally open her milk and drink 2 sips of her milk. Resident 41 was observed to drink half of her orange juice. Resident 41 was observed to eat 2 small bites of her food with her fingers.
On 9/9/19 at 8:20 AM, resident 41 was observed to inform the staff that she needed to use the bathroom. CNA 1 was observed to take resident 41 to her room to use the bathroom.
On 9/9/19 at 8:30 AM, CNA 1 was observed to return to the dining room, clean resident 41's breakfast meal and clean the rest of the dining room tables. By 8:40 AM, the dining room tables had been cleaned and resident 41 had not returned to the dining room to finish her breakfast.
On 9/10/19 resident 41's medical record was reviewed.
The Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 41 required Limited Assistance, resident highly involved in activity; staff provided guided maneuvering of limbs or other non-weight-bearing assistance. The MDS Assessment revealed that resident 30 required One person physical assist for eating her meals.
A care plan dated 7/14/19 revealed that resident 41 had a Nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem, altered mental status, dementia, dehydration, HTN (hypertension), UTI (urinary tract infection), dehydration, anxiety, and DM (diabetes mellitus). BMI (body mass index) normal range. Resident has a hx (history) of weight loss, snacks in place to aid in calorie intake. No significant weight loss of 5% in 30 days or 10% in 180 days. The goal was [Resident 41] will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced. The interventions for resident 30 included Provide and serve supplements/snacks as ordered, Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q meal. by maintaining weight, no s/sx (signs/symptoms) of malnutrition within next 90 days. RD to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed). Weigh per facility policy.
No specifics were made to the care plan to assist resident as needed with eating her meals per the one person assistance required as documented in the MDS.
On 9/9/19 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated that resident 41 had difficulty at times eating her meals. CNA 1 stated that resident 41 did not want to come back to the dining room. CNA 1 stated that no alternative meal had been offered and that she had not asked resident 41 if she wanted her meal in her room.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not employ sufficient support personn...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not employ sufficient support personnel competent to carry out the functions of the dietary service. Specifically, meals were served later than the scheduled times. Resident identifiers: 2, 30, 37, 41 and 46.
Findings include:
1. The facility provided the following dining schedule:
a. Breakfast:
Halls 500/400/200- 7:00 AM-7:35 AM.
Main dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:35 AM-7:45 AM.
Halls 100/300-7:45 AM-8:00 AM.
b. Lunch:
Halls 500/400/200-12:00 PM-12:35 PM.
Main dining room-12:35 PM-12:45 PM.
Halls 100/300-12:45 PM-1:00 PM.
2. During breakfast service on 9/09/19, the following observations were made in hall 200:
a) At 7:44 AM, the first hall tray was served. [Note: This was 9 minutes after the posted start time.]
b) At 7:58 AM, resident 37 had the breakfast tray served at the assisted table. At 7:59 AM resident 2, who was seated at the same table, had his breakfast tray served. Both of these residents required assistance with the feeding. [Note: The trays were served 23 and 24 minutes after the posted start time.]
c) At 8:00 AM, resident 46 had her breakfast tray served. No observation was made of resident 46 receiving any assistance for eating her meal. On 09/09/19 at 11:28 AM resident 46's sister was interviewed. She stated that her sister needed cuing with meals. She stated that resident 46 did not want to eat puree diet because it did not look good to her. She stated that resident 46 did receive assistance with her meals from time to time. [Note: The tray was served to resident 46, 25 minutes after the posted start time.]
d) Residents 30 and 41 were seated at the regular table. It was observed that resident 41 had her breakfast tray served at 7:50 AM. Resident 30 had her breakfast tray served at 7:54 AM. [Note: this was 15 and 19 minutes after posted start time.]
e) Resident 30 reached out for the food and drinks in a front of her. It was observed that she moved her fingers toward her mouth, looked like she was eating the air or pretending to eat. At 8:10 AM, resident 30 picked up the little cup with the butter and tried to drink from it. At 8:15 AM, resident 30 grabbed the cup with the hot chocolate, in attempt to drink she spilled the drink on her self and on the table. At 8:30 AM, certified nursing assistant (CNA) 2 helped resident 30 to go to her bedroom to change her clothes. Resident 30 was brought back to the dining room at 8:37 AM; she was seated to the chair by the window. CNA 1 already picked up resident 30's tray. No one was observed offering the food to resident 30.
f) After resident 41 had her tray served at 7:50 AM, no one assisted her with eating. Resident 41 was observed not to have utensils served on her tray. At 8:13 AM resident 41 started to eat with her fingers. Resident 41 tried to take the lid off of her milk cup for 3 minutes. At 8:17 AM, she was able to opened it and had 2 sips of milk. She also took 2 small bites of her food (eating with her fingers). At 8:20 AM she wanted to go to the bathroom. CNA 3 helped resident 41 to the bathroom. Resident 41 was brought back at 8:30 AM, was seated down at the table. Resident 41's tray was gone. No offer of the breakfast to resident 41 was observed.
During breakfast observation, a metal bowl with the snacks was observed to be in the cabinet in the dining room of 200 hall. The bowl contained 3 bananas, 2 apples, 8 packs of crackers and 6 individually packed sandwiches. The sandwiches were not dated or labeled.
On 9/09/19 at 9:10 AM, CNA 3 was interviewed. CNA 3 stated that majority of residents in their unit were confused and had some mental health disorders. CNA 3 stated that few of residents required assistance with feeding. She stated that resident 2 and 37 were always assisted with their meals because they had weight loss and were not able to feed themselves. CNA 3 stated that resident 30 and 41 needed cuing, but that they were able to feed themselves. She stated that resident 46 had behavioral issues and some times she was able to eat on her own and other times she required cuing.
3. During lunch time on 9/09/19 at 12:12 PM the cart with coffee and juice (cranberry or punch) was brought into the hall 200.
a) At 12:54 PM resident 46 had her lunch tray served. CNA 3 started to feed resident 46 at 12:56 PM. [Note: Lunch was served 19 minutes after posted start time.]
b) At 12:56 PM resident 30 had her lunch tray served. Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) assisted resident 30 with feeding at 12:58 PM. [Note: Lunch was served 21 minute after posted start time.]
c) At 12:30, resident 41 was observed to have her hot chocolate served. It was observed that her lunch tray was served at 12:47 PM. [Note: Lunch was served 12 minutes after posted start time.]
d) At 12:25 PM resident 37 was brought into a dining room and was seated at the assist table.
At 12:52 PM, resident 37 had her lunch tray served. CNA 2 started to feed resident 37 at 12:55 PM. [Note: lunch tray was served 17 minutes after posted start time.]
e). At 12:33 PM resident 2 was brought into a dining room. He received his coffee at 12:48 PM. It was observed that he received his lunch tray at 12:53 PM and that CNA 3 started to feed him at 12:55 PM. [Note: resident 2 had his lunch tray served 18 minutes after posted start time.]