SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environme...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 2 out of 23 sampled residents, residents did not receive preventative interventions and/or adequate supervision to prevent falls and accidents from occurring. Resident identifiers: 2 and 35.
Findings included:
1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, chronic osteomyelitis of left thigh, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left thigh with necrosis of muscle, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, staphlococcus, proteus, essential hypertension, postpolio syndrome, paraplegia, chronic pain syndrome, and retention of urine.
On 10/24/22 at 12:38 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 2. Resident 2 stated that he had fallen at the facility. Resident 2 stated that he had broken his leg during one of the falls. Resident 2 stated that he was dumped out of the shower chair by accident by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Resident 2 stated the staff thought his leg was sprained but resident 2 stated his leg hurt too bad to be a [NAME]. Resident 2 stated the CNA turned the shower chair around with him in it and the CNA was not paying attention when he fell out of the shower chair.
Resident 2's medical record was reviewed on 10/25/22.
A Care Plan Focus initiated on 4/8/22 documented FALLS [name of resident 2 removed] is at risk for falls r/t [related to] postpolio syndrome, long term use of opioid medications, fall hx [history]. Interventions included, but not limited to, Staff educated regarding shower chairs and safe transfers. Initiated on 2/2/22.
On 2/4/22 at 4:25 PM, a Fall incident report documented Nursing Description: Aide [CNA] had just finished showering resident and was trying to wheel him back towards his bed in the shower chair when it tipped over. That specific shower chair needs to be pulled backwards instead of pushed forward so it doesn't tip, aide said she forgot about that. Resident Description: Resident stated that he didn't his [sic] his head when he fell, just landed on shoulder. Injuries Observed at Time of Incident bruise, right inner ankle, bruise, right outer ankle. Level of pain 4/10.
On 2/5/22 at 4:58 PM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident c/o [complains of] pain continuing in right foot. Area that is bruised has increased from 1x1 cm [centimeter] in two spots to three 3x3 cm spots on foot. Swelling has also increased. Notified on-call doctor and received order for ankle and foot x-ray to rule out fracture. [Name of x-ray company removed] x-ray tech [technician] arrived at 1700 [5:00 PM] and is getting x-ray. Will update physician and PCC [Point Click Care] with results. Resident is his own responsible party.
On 2/5/22 at 5:05 PM, a Lab/XRAY documented Type of Lab/XRAY Completed: 3-view ankle and 3-view foot Abnormal Results?: Fx [Fracture] of tibia and fibula New Orders or Redraws?: Order for rigid walking boot to keep foot in correct position. Order to set up ortho [orthopedic] consult next week. Changing oxycodone 10 mg [milligrams] from tid [three times daily] to q6h [every 6 hours], adding new order for ibuprofen 800 mg q8h [every 8 hours] PRN [as needed] x 14 days for breakthrough pain.
On 2/5/22 at 8:07 PM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Received order from [Name of physician removed] to send resident to ER [Emergency Room] to assess fx. [Name of Ambulance company removed] EMTs [Emergency Medical Technicians] picked him up at 1800 [6:00 PM]. They weren't sure which hospital would take him but said that it would probably either be [name of hospital removed] or [name of hospital removed]. Administered scheduled oxycodone and methadone to resident before he left in an attempt to manage pain before leaving.
On 2/5/22 at 9:13 PM, a Lab/XRAY documented Type of Lab/XRAY Completed: Right ankle and right foot 3-view x-ray Abnormal Results?: Right ankle: There are acute osteoporotic fractures involving distal tibial metaphysis and distal fibular metastasis without significant displacement. Ankle joint is still maintained. There is significant soft tissue swelling. IMPRESSION: Acute distal tibia and fibula fractures. New Orders or Redraws?: Sent to ER to have fx assessed and fitted with boot.
On 2/6/22 at 12:29 AM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident was brought from the [name of hospital removed] at 23.30 [11:30 PM] pm by [name of Ambulance company removed] [NAME] [sic] having Diagnosed Closed rt [right] ankle fracture & F/U [follow up] orthopedic Surgeon. Resident is alert & oriented, asked for HS [at bedtime] meds [medications] & went to sleep v/s [vital signs] BP [blood pressure] 116/55, pulse 87, Resp [respirations] 18, Temp [temperature] 98.6 & O2 [oxygen] sat [saturations] 93 . Will cont [continue] to monitor.
On 2/7/22 at 5:23 PM, a Skilled Progress Note documented Alert and oriented. Uses electric w/c [wheelchiar] for mobility. Feeds himself. Verbalizes needs. Currently NWB [non-weight bearing] to his right leg d/t [due to] closed ankle fx. To f/u with orthopedic. Not yet scheduled. Resp even and unlabored.
On 2/8/22 at 5:01 PM, a Skilled Progress Note documented Resident is alert and oriented x 3-4 [oriented to person, place, time, and situation]. resident co [complains] generalized increased pain andesp [sic] d/t right ankle fx. Resident has breakdown on his gluteal area. Right ankle splinted. Resident is able to make needs known. Resident oob [out of bed] in electric chair this morning. New orders for scheduled tylenol 650 mg q 6 hrs.
On 2/9/22 at 11:13 AM, a Skilled Progress Note documented Resident is alert and oriented x4. Resident c/o generalized increased pain d/t right ankle fx. Resident has breakdown on his gluteal area. Right ankle splinted. Resident is able to make needs known. F/u ortho appt [appointment] scheduled today at 1300 [1:00 PM]. New orders for scheduled Tylenol 650 mg q6h. Resident stable today. Will update with any new orders from appt.
On 2/9/22 at 8:24 PM, a Nursing Progress Note documented [Name of physician removed] ordered to increase Oxycodone to q4h [every 4 hours] prn x 10 days then back to original order.
On 2/10/22 at 12:54 PM, a Skilled Progress Note documented [Name of resident 2 removed] is AXOx4 [alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation]. He is able to make his wants and needs known. He has been pleasant and cooperative with all aspects of care. He continues to c/o generalized increased pain d/t right ankle fx. Continues to have breakdown on his gluteal area with treatments being followed per MD [Medical Director] order. Right ankle is casted.
A care plan intervention initiated on 2/18/22, documented CNAs educated on transfers and proper use of shower chair. [Note: No new interventions were implemented. The same intervention was initiated on 2/2/22, Staff educated regarding shower chairs and safe transfers.]
On 3/9/22 at 12:01 PM, a COMMUNICATION - with Physician documented Situation: Ortho follow-up appt with [name of physician removed] at [name of hospital removed] Background: Orders to continue vitamin D3, continue cast x 4 weeks, follow-up appt in 4 weeks (left copy of order for appt coordinator), continue NWB. Notified house physician, no other orders. Resident stable.
On 10/25/22 at 1:11 PM, an interview was conducted with Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 1. RNA 1 stated when she showered a resident she would ask the resident if it was there shower day, if the resident would like a shower, and what clothes would the resident like to pick out. RNA 1 stated if the resident could walk or use a walker RNA 1 would assist the resident to walk to the shower room. RNA 1 stated if the resident used a wheelchair RNA 1 would take the resident to the shower room in a wheelchair. RNA 1 stated the shower chair was located in the shower room. RNA 1 stated she would use the shower chair to move the resident if the resident required the hoyer lift to transfer. RNA 1 stated that she would transfer the resident from the bed with the hoyer lift to the shower chair with two CNAs. RNA 1 stated that she pushed the shower chair forward with the resident facing the direction she was moving. RNA 1 stated that she had never had a shower chair tip over. RNA 1 stated that resident 2 should be transferred with the hoyer lift but resident 2 did not like the hoyer lift. RNA 1 stated that two CNAs' would transfer resident 2 to the shower chair by lifting him. RNA 1 stated that resident 2 had an accident in the shower chair one time. RNA 1 stated that she heard that the CNA had pushed the shower chair with resident 2 in the shower chair and RNA 1 thought the wheel was not working very well and the CNA pushed the shower chair harder and the wheel got stuck. RNA 1 stated that the CNA that was pushing resident 2 did not work at the facility anymore.
On 10/25/22 at 2:22 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 stated that she was a shower CNA. CNA 4 stated that she transported the residents to the shower room in the shower chair. CNA 4 stated there were two shower chairs, a small shower chair and a big shower chair. CNA 4 stated that she had no issues with the shower chairs. CNA 4 stated that resident 2 used the small shower chair. CNA 4 stated that resident 2 required a two person transfer to the shower chair and CNA 4 would put a towel under his legs. CNA 4 stated that resident 2 did not have any accidents with her. CNA 4 stated that resident 2 told her that he had an accident when the CNA transferred the resident from his motorized wheelchair to the bed. CNA 4 stated that resident 2 required two persons for a transfer.
On 10/26/22 at 10:52 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated the CNA was helping resident 2 and the shower chair only worked if pushed backwards. RN 2 stated that the CNA was pushing resident 2 forward in the shower chair and resident 2's foot got stuck somehow and the shower chair may have tipped. RN 2 stated that the CNA forgot that she needed to push the shower chair backwards. RN 2 stated that she had understood that if resident 2's feet were not stuck under the chair it would not have been an issue. RN 2 stated that the weight of resident 2 falling caused the break. RN 2 stated that she helped resident 2 back to bed and resident 2 had no pain until the next day and his ankle swelled more. RN 2 stated that was the first time she had heard of the shower chair having problems. RN 2 stated that she had not seen that shower chair in the facility since the incident. RN 2 stated that the CNA involved in the accident stopped working at the facility a few months ago.
On 10/26/22 at 1:26 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated if a resident had a fall the nursing staff would do an assessment of the resident if the resident was on the floor. The DON stated if the resident hit their head the staff would start neurological checks for 72 hours after the fall. The DON stated that staff were to Notify the MD, family, and case manager. The DON stated after everything was completed the staff were to watch the resident. The DON stated if the resident had an injury the staff were to get clarification from the MD. The DON stated if the resident had broken bones the staff were to get an x-ray or send the resident to the hospital with guidance from the MD. The DON stated that the staff were to do as much diagnostics in house as they could. The DON stated the facility had a funky shower chair that was a newer shower chair and resident 2 was getting a shower from one of his favorite CNAs. The DON stated that the shower chair was designed to be pulled backwards. The DON stated that the CNA was pushing resident 2 forward in the shower chair at resident 2's request and the shower chair abruptly stopped and resident 2 fell out of the shower chair. The DON stated that resident 2 had no bruising at the time of fall. The DON stated that the MD was notified and resident 2 was his own representative. The DON stated that the next day bruising was noticed on resident 2 and a X-ray was obtained. The DON stated that resident 2 had lack of feeling in his lower extremities. The DON stated the shower chair and all similar shower chairs were thrown out and new shower chairs were purchased. The DON stated that the CNAs and nurses had to pass competencies with the new shower chairs. The DON stated the incident was a singular incident and interventions were implemented immediately.
2. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, depression, restless leg syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease and diabetic neuropathy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, opioid dependence, essential hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and repeated falls.
On 10/24/22 at 11:05 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 35. Resident 35 stated she had a fall three to four weeks ago. Resident 35 stated the bed pushed her out and it flipped over. Resident 35 stated that she had a new bed now. Resident 35 stated that she had cut her knee when she fell and had to have 15 stitches in her right knee. Resident 35 stated that her knee was healing very well, and staff were quick to help when she fell.
Resident 35's medical record was reviewed on 10/27/22.
On 9/7/21, an Alert Charting documented that resident 35 was a High Risk for falls.
On 11/19/21 at 4:09 PM, a Fall incident report documented an Incident Description Nurses were called over radio to assist a patient at the front entrance parking lot. Pt [Patient] was found supin [sic] on parking lot floor next to open car door. Patient was A&Ox3 [alert and oriented to person, place, and time], Asked if pt was in pain and pt responded no. Assessed for any lacerations, bruises, bumps or any bleeding and all negative. PERRLA [pupil, equal, round, reactive to light and accommodation] intact. Denied any headaches, neck pain, or lingering pain. Resident Description Pt stated she just fell. Husband [name removed] stated he thought he had her and was not able to tolerate all the weight. Immediate Action Taken Patient was pulled up and transferred to wheel chair with the help of another nurse and therapy director. Pt was brought back into bldg. [building] and assessed for 30 mins [minutes] Vital signs WNL [within normal limits]. Asked by DON if she felt comfortable of [sic] going home and if she was going to have some help getting [sic] out of the care. Pt stated she would ask neighbors for help with trasnferring [sic] out of car when arriving at home. No injuries observed at time of incident.
On 11/19/21, an Alert Charting was Incomplete and a fall risk score was not documented.
On 11/19/21 at 5:16 PM, a Skilled Progress Note documented Resident is alert and oriented x3 with some forgetfulness. Resident is pleasant and cooperative. PRN Medications given whole with water, no issue noted. Resident uses call light to use toilet instead of brief. Pt happy to go home today.
On 11/20/21 at 5:18 PM, a Skilled Progress Note documented Resident is alert and oriented x3
with some forgetfulness. Generalized weakness. Resident is pleasant and cooperative. PRN Medications given whole with water, no issue noted. Resident uses call light to use toilet instead
of brief. Pt re-admitted today around 1800.
On 11/23/21, an Alert Charting was Incomplete and a fall risk score was not documented.
A care plan Focus initiated on 11/28/21, documented RESOLVED: ACTUAL FALL The resident has an actual [fall] on 11/19/21. The Goal initiated on 11/22/21, documented RESOLVED: The infection will resolve without complication by the next review. The Interventions initiated included the following:
a. RESOLVED: Call light within reach.Date initiated 11/23/21 and date resolved 1/4/22.
b. RESOLVED: Educate family, significant other, & visitors of importance of quarantine/transmission based precautions in room on admission & for out of facility absences, LOA [leave of absence], appointments, etc. per facility policy. Date initiated 11/22/21 and date resolved 1/4/22.
c. RESOLVED: PT [physical therapy]/OT [occupational therapy] to treat as ordered. Date initiated 11/23/21 and date resolved 1/4/22.
On 12/15/21, an Alert Charting documented that resident 35 was a High Risk for falls.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. A BIMS score of 13 to 15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact. In addition, resident 35 required extensive assistance of one person for transfers, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene.
On 2/2/22 at 9:10 PM, a Fall incident report documented an Incident Description Aides called me into resident's room and stated that they found her on the ground. Aides had been rounding on all residents regularly all evening and her door was open. They had changed her brief 1-2 hours before her fall. Resident Description Resident stated that she had to go to the bathroom and got out of bed by herself. She made it to the wall by her bed by herself and lost her balance and fell to the floor. She fell onto her right hand and back but stated that she lifted her head up so she wouldn't hit it. She stated that she forgot that she should have used her call light. An order was received from physician to send resident to emergency room for x-ray. No signs or symptoms of injury but acute pain from right shoulder all the way down the arm. [Note: Resident 35 did not have a care plan in place to prevent falls. The previous care plan was resolved on 1/4/22.]
On 2/2/22, an Alert Charting documented that resident 35 was a High Risk for falls.
On 2/2/22 at 11:22 PM, a Diagnostic Radiology report from the Medical Center documented that an x-ray of the right shoulder with three views was obtained. Resident 35 had a mildly displaced and angulated fracture at the surgical neck of the humerus.
On 2/3/22 at 1:38 PM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident was seen at [name of Medical Center removed] after an unwitnessed fall. Discharge Dx [diagnoses]: Fall, right Shoulder fracture and UTI [urinary tract infection] symptoms. Follow up appt to be made with [name of physician removed]. Order state to leave shoulder immobilizer or sling in place (adjust so that hand is level with elbow). Apply ice pack to sight for 20 min [minutes] q [every] 1-2 hrs [hours] day one then 3-4 times a day for 2-3 days then as needed. Sling is to remain in place until appt. New order for Norco 5/325 for prn pain po [by mouth] q4h prn x 2 days.
On 2/15/22 at 5:24 PM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident returned from [Name of
Orthopedic physician removed] F/U for shoulder fracture. Orders are for PT to RUE [right upper extremity], hand/wrist and elbow - ROM [range of motion] as tolerated. Forward hang of right shoulder. Follow up in 3 weeks.
On 2/17/22 at 10:37 AM, an Orders-Administration Note documented Hand/Wrist and Elbow: ROM as tolerated. Passive only flexion to right shoulder. Every shift Notified Therapy to see if they will follow up. [Note: There were no therapy notes located within resident 35's medical record for the timeframe indicated.]
On 3/11/22 at 2:44 PM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident returned from appt with new orders: Wean out of sling. Okay to progress range of motion and strengthening at the shoulder but limit to less than 5 lbs [pounds]. Return in 6 weeks with repeat XR [xray]. Resident is own rp [representative] and aware.
On 3/31/22, an Alert Charting was Incomplete and a fall risk score was not documented.
On 4/16/22 at 12:54 PM, a Lab/XRAY documented a 2-view right shoulder x-ray for follow up orthopedic appointment. Impression documented a surgical neck fracture with impaction present of the right shoulder. Resident stable.
On 6/14/22, an Alert Charting was In Progress and a fall risk score was not documented.
A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 35 had a BIMS score of 99. A BIMS score of 99 indicated the resident was unable to complete the interview. In addition, resident 35 required extensive assistance of one person for transfers, walk in room, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene.
On 8/2/22 at 4:19 AM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident had a unwitnessed fall off the bed. Resident found sitting on the floor leaning against the side of the bed. She states she had a dream and rolled off the bed, right knee scraping the side of the bed and having a laceration up to her bone. Left hand also got a small laceration. Resident fully conscious, states that did not hit her head. Vitals stable. Resident helped back into bed with keeping leg stable. Leg raised on pillows and iced. Called 911 and resident is taken to the hospital.
On 8/2/22 at 4:54 AM, a Fall incident report documented an Incident Description Resident found sitting on floor leaning against the left hand side of the bed yelling for help. Resident visibly has a big deep laceration on right knee the size of the the [sic] length of the knee and a smaller one on left hand the size of 1 inch x 1 inch. Resident is conscious and responsive and does not appear to have hit her head. Resident Description Resident states she had a bad dream and rolled off the left side of the bed. She states she did not hit her head, does not feel any dizziness or feel any discomfort or pain in chest.
On 8/2/22, an Alert Charting documented that resident 35 was a High Risk for falls.
On 8/2/22 at 10:39 AM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident returned from hospital. With her knee laceration sutured. Left forearm laceration bandaged. She was also treated for atrial fibrillation and given a dose of metoprolol IV [intravenous]. House NP [Nurse Practitioner] and notified.
On 8/2/22, the Medical Center Discharge Handout documented that resident 35 had a fall from bed, knee laceration, and rapid atrial fibrillation. Resident 35's right knee required 15 sutures.
On 8/2/22 at 10:45 AM, a Nursing Progress Note documented Resident also stated that her righ [sic] knee hit the bottom of the sink cabinet when she fell. That's where she believes she cut her knee open.
On 8/26/22, an Alert Charting documented that resident 35 was a Low Risk for falls.
A care plan Focus initiated on 8/26/22, documented [Name of resident 35 removed] is high risk for falls r/t generalized weakness, repeated falls in facility, confusion/poor safety awareness. The Goal initiated on 8/26/22, documented [Name of resident 35 removed] will not sustain serious injury through the review date. The Interventions initiated included the following:
a. RESOLVED: Anticipate and meet the resident's needs. Encourage to wait for assistance. Date initiated 11/23/21 and date resolved. 11/28/21.
b. Be sure The resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all request for assistance. Date initiated 11/22/21.
c. Call don't fall sign added to room. Date initiated 2/18/22.
d. Continually educate the resident regarding safety issues. Date initiated 11/23/21.
e. RESOLVED: Educate family, significant other, & visitors of importance of quarantine/transmission based precautions in room on admission & for out of facility absences, LOA, appointments, etc. per facility policy. Date initiated 1/4/22 and date resolved 4/17/22.
f. Encourage Resident to wait for assistance. Date initiated 10/25/22.
g. Encourage to wear well-fitting, non-skid footwear when transferring/ambulating. Date initiated 2/18/22.
h. Ensure proper body positioning. Date initiated 10/25/22.
i. Keep room free of clutter and ensure objects the resident may need are within reach. Date initiated 10/25/22.
j. Make sure eyeglasses are clean & properly fitting. Date initiated 11/23/21.
k. Monitor for signs and symptoms of discomfort, i.e., pain, anxiety, thirst or hunger and the need to toilet. Date initiated 10/25/22.
l. Pt/ot evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN. Date initiated 1/4/22.
m. RESOLVED: UA [urinalysis] to be done. 2/4/22. Date initiated 8/26/22 and date resolved 10/25/22.
n. Visual Cue to use call light (Call don't fall). Date initiated 2/4/22.
[Note: The care plan was initiated on 8/26/22, after resident 35 had a fall that resulted in a right shoulder fracture and a fall that resulted in a laceration of the knee to the bone that required sutures.]
On 10/25/22 at 11:20 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated if a resident was found on the floor, she would use the radio to call for help, tell the nurse, ask the resident if he or she was okay, ask what happened, stay with the resident and assist the nurse, and explain what happened. CNA 1 stated the fall prevention measures for resident 35 included to put bed in low position, check on resident frequently, put table close so resident 35 could reach water and personal items, and make sure the call light was within reach.
On 10/25/22 at 12:12 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated that resident 35 had not had any recent falls. CNA 2 stated interventions used to prevent falls were to put bed in low position and answer call lights quickly.
On 10/25/22 at 2:42 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3. LPN 3 stated that resident 35 had not had any recent falls.
On 10/26/22 at 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the CNA Coordinator. The CNA Coordinator stated that resident 35 had not had any recent falls. The CNA Coordinator stated interventions in place to prevent falls were to keep resident 35's door open, help resident 35 to the bathroom or change her in bed, round every two hours or more frequently, put personal items and call light close to resident 35, put bed in lowest position, make sure resident 35 wore shoes or grippy socks with transfers.
On 10/26/22 at 2:20 PM, an observed was conducted of resident 35 in bed watching TV, the door was open, bed in lowest position, call light in reach, and a Call, don't fall sign was observed on the bathroom door.
On 10/27/22 at 1:20 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated that resident 35 had not had any recent fall. CNA 3 stated that she ensured that resident 35's bed was down, the call light was answered, the door was kept open, and CNA 3 would check resident 35 every time she went by the room. CNA 3 stated that resident 35 stayed in the bed most of the time.
On 10/27/22 at 2:13 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated pre-fall interventions included call don't fall signs posted in the resident room, education and talking to the resident, and reminding the resident to use the call light. The DON stated an initial fall assessment would be completed and frequent rounding was done. The DON stated that after a fall the resident was assessed for injuries. If the resident hit their head the staff would initiate neurological checks. If the fall was unwitnessed and the resident was not able to state what happened, the nurse would assess and initiate neurological checks. The DON stated the nurses would notify the MD and family after the assessment and ensure the resident was safe. The DON stated the staff were to send the resident to the hospital or conduct diagnostics if needed. The DON stated that staff were to treat the resident as ordered. The DON stated that the care plan should be updated after each fall or injury. The DON stated the care plan to [NAME] or point of care should be updated for the CNAs and nurses would have access to the care plan. The DON stated she would expect to see new interventions identified after each fall. The DON stated that resident 35's fall on 11/19/21, happened at resident 35's house. The DON stated that she did not know the full details, resident 35 was discharged from the facility at the time and came back the same day. The DON stated that resident 35 had no injuries identified after the fall. The DON stated that resident 35's husband stated that resident 35 fell. The DON stated that upon readmission resident 35 had no injuries noted. The DON stated the fall resident 35 had on 2/2/22, was an unwitnessed fall and resident 35 was on her way to the bathroom. The DON stated that resident 35 should have used the call light and she did not. The resident was A&Ox3. The interventions were to use call light, and to send resident 35 for an x-ray due to her complaints of shoulder pain. The DON stated that the intervention was to use the call light as resident 35 stated she had not done. The DON stated that the fall on 8/2/22, the resident reported she had a bad dream and fell out of bed. The DON stated that resident 35 refused to have the bed in a low position. It should be noted that no documentation could be found for the refusal of this intervention. The DON stated that resident 35 had fall mats in place prior to the fall and they helped to break the fall. The DON stated the laceration was because resident 35 twisted and fell and she caught her knee under the sink. The DON stated that they placed foam on the area under the sink where she lacerated her leg after the fall occurred. The DON stated that the bed was placed next to the sink. The DON stated that she asked resident 35 if they could move her bed and the resident said no. The DON stated they did not identify this as an intervention and they did not document it anywhere.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that the right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident was self administering a medication without an evaluation to determine if the practice was safe. Resident identifier: 6.
Findings included:
Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS), polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, urogential implants, sinusitis, history of urinary tract infections, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, insomnia, mood disorder, psoriasis, rosacea, and intervertebral disc degeneration.
On 10/26/22, resident 6's medical record was reviewed.
Review of resident 6's physician orders revealed Tecfidera Capsule Delayed Release 240 milligrams, give 1 capsule by mouth in the evening every other day for MS, takes with dinner. The order stated, medication may be left in residents room for self administration. The order was initiated on 4/20/21.
No documentation could be found for a self administration evaluation for the Tecfidera medication.
On 10/27/22 at 8:35 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that resident 6 was knowledgeable about her medication. LPN 1 stated that the Tecfidera was kept in the medication cart and resident 6 could self administer. LPN 1 stated that resident 6 took all her medication on her own. LPN 1 stated that the Tecfidera was left at resident 6's bedside because she preferred to take the medication after she had eaten dinner.
On 10/27/22 at 11:37 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that she would locate the self administration evaluation for the Tecfidera medication. The DON stated that was something that was implemented prior to her arrival at the facility. The DON stated that there were a few medications that were evaluated.
On 10/27/22 at 12:23 PM, an interview was conducted with Corporate Resource Nurse (CRN) 1. CRN 1 stated that resident 6 did not self administer the Tecfidera medication. CRN 1 stated that the order had been there a long time. CRN 1 stated that they did not perform a self administration evaluation for the Tecfidera medication. CRN 1 stated that if the medication was left in resident 6's room for self administration, then they would need to conduct a self administration evaluation.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined, the facility did not consult with the resident's physician and notify, when there was a need to alter the resident's treatment. Specifically, fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review it was determined, the facility did not consult with the resident's physician and notify, when there was a need to alter the resident's treatment. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident's physician was not notified when the resident had a decline in mental status after a fall. Resident identifier: 55.
Findings included:
Resident 55 was admitted to facility on 7/17/22 with diagnoses which included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, benign prostatic hyperplasia, dementia, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and pneumonia.
Resident 55's closed medical record was reviewed on 10/25/22.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/29/22 at 4:06 PM, documented that a Certified Nurse Assistant reported resident 55 to be on the floor. The day nurse noted resident 55 was on the floor with his nose bleeding. A bump and abrasion above the left forehead and brow were noted.
An incident report was initiated at 3:45 PM on 8/29/22. Immediate action taken, Assessed, placed cold to back of neck and pinched nose bridge to stop bleeding. Initiated neuro [neurological] checks.
Review of resident 55's physician orders revealed an order for an anticoagulant mediation - monitor for discolored urine, black tarry stools, sudden severe headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, vital signs (V/S), shortness of breath, and nose bleeds. Monitor every shift. Order was initiated on 7/17/22.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/29/22 at 5:10 PM, documented that neurological assessments where initiated.
Review of resident 55's Neurological Flow Sheet revealed a statement listed near the bottom of form, Notify MD [Medical Director] IMMEDIATELY of signs and symptoms of Intracranial Pressure!!! There were no neuro-checks documented on 8/29/22 at 6:30 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM, 9:30 PM, and 10:30 PM and there were not any checks completed on 8/30/22. There were no V/S documented at 8/29/22 at 4:00 PM, 4:30 PM, 5:00 PM, 5:30 PM, 6:00 PM, 6:30 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM, and 9:30 PM.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/30/22 at 12:57 AM, documented resident 55 was found at 12:30 AM, with some emesis on bed. Emesis was black and chunky and had a foul smell. Resident 55 would not rouse with sternal rub stimulation. [Note: Documentation was not located that a physician was contacted regarding signs and symptoms of lethargy and vomiting as ordered by the physician on 7/17/22.]
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/30/22 at 5:12 AM, documented resident 55 passed away at 4:44 AM on 8/30/22.
On 10/26/22 at 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the protocols for all resident falls that involve head injuries was the nurse was to notify the family, physician, and DON as soon as possible and start the Neuro Matrix immediately. The DON stated a Neuro Matrix was a neurological assessment over a 72-hour period which was documented on the Neurological Flow Sheet and the information was passed along at shift changes. The DON stated that any change of status of the resident including medical, physical, and mental alertness needed to be reported to the nurse who was to notify the physician, even if the family decided not to treat. The DON stated the nurse was to document any notification in the nursing notes.
On 10/27/22 at 2:18 PM, an interview was conducted with physician 1. Physician 1 stated that she was notified regarding the fall and initial assessment of resident 55. Physician 1 stated she did not get notified about the change in condition for resident 55's status. Physician 1 stated she would have liked to have been notified of the change of status.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that services provided met pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a nasojejunal (NJ) tube feeding did not have the bag labeled with the formula type, rate of infusion, or the nurse initials who initiated and prepared the infusion. Resident identifier: 27.
Findings included:
Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, altered mental status, hypertension, depression, malignant neoplasm of esophagus, gastrostomy status, cirrhosis of liver, nutritional anemia, hyperlipidemia, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
On 10/25/22, resident 27's record was reviewed.
Review of resident 27's physician orders revealed the following:
a. Enteral Feed one time a day, on at 2:00 PM Enteral Nutrition via Pump - Jevity 1.5 at 71 milliliters (ml) per hour (hr) times (x) 20 hours, and a free water flush (FWF) 35 ml/hr x 20 hours via pump per (NJ) tube. The order was initiated on 9/26/22.
b. Enteral Feed one time a day, off at 10:00 AM Formula: Jevity 1.5 (1422 ml or 6 cartons) at 71 ml/hour x 20 hours, FWF 35 ml/hour x 20 hours (700 ml total). Nutrients provided: 1422 ml formula, 2133 kilocalorie, 91 grams protein, 1780 ml total free water (1080 ml form., 700 ml FWF). The order was initiated on 9/26/22.
Resident 27's care plan revealed a focus area of required tube feedings related to malignant neoplasm of the esophagus. The interventions identified included to administer tube feeding and water flushes as ordered; check tube for placement prior to starting tube feeding or flushing tube; elevate the head of the bed at least 30 degrees while tube feeding was running; and monitor/document/report as needed any signs and symptoms of aspiration. The care plan was initiated on 9/23/22.
On 10/25/22 at 8:36 AM, resident 27 was observed seated in a chair at the bedside. Resident 27's tube feed (TF) was infusing through a NJ tube in the right nare. The TF was infusing at a rate of 71 ml/hr with a water flush infusing at 35 ml/hr. The TF formula was contained in an enteral feeding pump bag and had approximately 300 ml remaining. The TF bag was labeled with resident 27's first name, and the date was documented as 10/24 at 1430 (2:30 PM). The formula type, infusion rate or the initials of the staff who initiated the infusion were not documented on the bag label. The water pump bag was not labeled and the water bag had approximately 400 ml remaining.
On 10/25/22 at 12:07 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that she disconnected resident 27's TF at 10:00 AM. RN 1 stated that the formula was Jevity 1.5. RN 1 stated that she hung the TF bag yesterday at 2:46 PM, and the time was verified on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). RN 1 stated that she put the name, date, and time on the label of the formula bag. RN 1 stated that she did not put the formula type, infusion rate, or her signature on the TF bag. RN 1 stated that she did not fill out the entire sticker with all the fields of information completed. RN 1 stated that she did not label the TF bag with the formula type because the order was in the computer. RN 1 stated that she did not sign the TF bag because she figured she was on shift and it was documented on the MAR.
On 10/25/22 at 1:32 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the TF bag should have a label sticker that documented the start time, stop time, formula, date, and rate of infusion. The DON stated that the nurse was encouraged to sign the label but it was not required, as it was not in the policy. The DON stated that staff should date and time the TF bag because a lot of them are timed feedings. The DON stated she did not believe it needed a signature by the nurse who initiated the infusion as they could look in the electronic medical records to see who signed it off.
On 10/25/22 at 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated that she was hanging resident 27's TF and wanted to show me the label. The TF label contained the resident's name, room number, formula type, rate of infusion, date and time initiated, and the nurse's initials. RN 1 stated that the water flush bag did not require a label, but she was surprised that the TF label did not have a spot for the water flush information. Resident 27 was observed with the head of the bed elevated to 30 degrees. Resident 27 was observed to reposition himself in bed and utilized the side rail to pull himself up further in bed.
Review of the Lippincott Nursing Procedures documented under Enteral Gastric, Duodenal, and Jejunal Tube Feedings and Implementation to Make sure that the enteral formula container is labeled with the patient's identifiers; formula name (and strength if diluted); date and time of formula preparation; date and time the formula was hung; administration route, rate, and duration (if cycled or intermittent); initials of who prepared, hung, and checked the enteral formula against the order; expiration date and time; dosing weight (if appropriate); and notation ENTERAL USE ONLY--NOT FOR IV USE.
Wolters Kluwer. Lippincott Nursing Procedure. Ninth Edition. Philadelphia, PA. (2023), pp. 296.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents unable to carr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident who was dependent on staff for grooming and personal hygiene did not receive the services needed for his toenails. Resident identifier: 47.
Findings included:
Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia unspecified severity with anxiety, abnormal weight loss, history of falling, depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and chronic pain. Resident 47 was receiving hospice services when admitted .
On 10/24/22 at 9:49 AM, resident 47 was observed to have very long, jagged, thick toenails.
A review of resident 47's medical record was completed.
Resident 47's ADL-Bathing task revealed that from 9/28/22 through 10/6/22, resident 47 received one shower on 9/28/22, two showers on 10/1/22, and one shower on 10/5/22. Resident 47's ADL - Personal Hygiene task showed that from 9/28/22 through 10/6/22, resident 47 received assistance with personal hygiene twice daily every day except for 10/8/22, 10/18/22, and 10/22/22, where he received assistance once daily. The assistance resident 47 required ranged from independent to total dependence.
Resident 47's facility Care Plan had a focus which stated [Resident 47] has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] Impaired cognition an associated goal which stated [Resident 47] will maintain current level of function in ADLs through the review date, and interventions which stated BATHING/SHOWERING: [Resident 47] requires usually dependent assistance by 1 staff Date Initiated: 10/07/2022 and PERSONAL HYGIENE: [Resident 47] requires usually limited assistance by 1 staff with personal hygiene and oral care. Date Initiated: 10/07/2022. The care plan showed that the staff to provide these interventions were Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Registered Nurses.
Resident 47's Hospice Care Plan showed that resident 47 received care from the hospice CNA to assist with ADL's three times per week. No documentation was found in resident 47's chart that showed what cares or services to assist with ADLs were provided to resident 47 by hospice.
On 10/25/22 at 10:31 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 2. LPN 2 stated if the facility had a podiatrist that came to the building, LPN 2 had never seen him. LPN 2 stated he was told not to touch the residents' feet, and the podiatrist was the one who provided foot care. LPN 2 stated he had told the CNAs not to provide foot care. LPN 2 stated that nurses and CNAs could clean, trim, and file fingernails. LPN 2 stated he checked the resident nails as he did assessments. LPN 2 stated if a resident needed their fingernails trimmed or cleaned, he would ask a CNA to do it or would do it himself. LPN 2 stated resident 47 was on hospice, and hospice provided his showers. LPN 2 stated the hospice CNAs were not required to chart in the facility's electronic health record. LPN 2 stated he had not received a report on resident 47 or feedback from hospice. LPN 2 stated he was unaware that resident 47 needed his toenails trimmed.
On 10/25/22 at 11:20 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated she provided personal cares to the residents. CNA 1 stated she did not do anything with toenails but would clean resident fingernails. CNA 1 stated she told the nurse and the CNA Coordinator if she saw that a resident had really long toenails. CNA 1 stated she saw that resident 47 had long toenails and told her supervisor. CNA 1 stated her supervisor told her to tell the nurse, which she did. CNA 1 stated she did not remember which nurse she told.
On 10/25/22 at 12:12 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated he cleaned resident fingernails if needed, but not toenails.
On 10/25/22 at 2:42 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN 3. LPN 3 stated the podiatrist came to the facility once a month. LPN 3 stated she told the Unit Manager (UM) which residents needed to see the podiatrist and the UM added them to the list. LPN 3 stated the facility shower CNA was really good to report any issues like long toenails. LPN 3 stated she conducted a weekly head to toe assessment on all residents if they allowed it. LPN 3 stated she would see during the assessment if a resident needed foot care, or their toenails trimmed.
On 10/26/22 at 9:31 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the podiatrist came monthly (every 3rd Thursday) to see the residents on the list. The DON stated the podiatrist would also see anyone in need who was not on the list. The DON stated that any resident on hospice could see the facility's podiatrist if needed.
On 10/26/22 at 9:53 AM, an interview was conducted with UM 1. UM 1 stated she scheduled the resident appointments with the podiatrist. UM 1 stated residents, nurses, and CNAs could tell her when a resident needed to see the podiatrist, and she would add them to the list. UM 1 stated she arranged for residents on hospice to see the podiatrist if needed.
On 10/26/22 at 3:23 PM, an observation was made of resident 47 lying in his bed, not wearing shoes or socks. Resident 47 was observed to have very long, jagged, thick toenails.
On 10/27/22 at 1:20 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated the CNAs were required to ask the nurse before resident fingernails could be trimmed. CNA 3 stated she felt it was safer to file the nails instead. CNA 3 stated she checked resident nails all the time, cleaned them frequently, and assisted residents to wash their hands after using the bathroom.
On 10/27/22 at 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the CNA Coordinator. The CNA Coordinator stated that CNAs should clean resident fingernails when dirty and could file resident fingernails with approval from the nurse. The CNA Coordinator stated CNAs were not allowed to cut or file resident toenails but should notify the nurse if a resident needed to see the podiatrist. The CNA Coordinator stated resident nails should be checked on their shower days, and the shower CNA should clean nails if dirty. The CNA Coordinator stated the shower CNA should do a full body check on each resident with each shower. The CNA Coordinator turned in a skin check/shower sheet for each resident after their shower. The CNA Coordinator stated that hospice showered resident 47, and scheduled showers directly with resident 47. The CNA Coordinator stated he did not know when hospice came to shower resident 47 or how many showers he received each week. The CNA Coordinator stated that hospice should arrange for a podiatrist to visit resident 47 or notify the facility. The CNA Coordinator stated resident 47 did not like to be checked on, often refused care, dressed himself with standby assist only, and was very particular about cares. The CNA Coordinator stated that hospice did not communicate with the facility.
On 10/27/22 at 3:29 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated hospice nurses signed in at the front desk, but hospice CNAs did not. The DON stated the facility did not track showers or personal care provided by hospice but could get information from the company if needed.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choice. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident was not provided treatment and care after a fall and the resident had a decline in mental status. Resident identifier: 55.
Findings included:
Resident 55 was admitted to facility on 7/17/22 with diagnoses which included essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, dementia, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and pneumonia.
Resident 55's closed medical record was reviewed on 10/25/22.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/29/22 at 4:06 PM, documented that a Certified Nurse Assistant reported resident 55 to be on the floor. The day nurse noted resident 55 was on the floor with his nose bleeding. A bump and abrasion above the left forehead and brow were noted.
An incident report was initiated at 3:45 PM on 8/29/22. The incident documented action taken, Assessed, placed cold to back of neck and pinched nose bridge to stop bleeding. Initiated neuro [neurological] checks.
A physician's order for resident 55 dated 7/17/22, documented an anticoagulant mediation - monitor for discolored urine, black tarry stools, sudden severe headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, vital signs (V/S), shortness of breath, and nose bleeds. Monitor every shift. Order was initiated on 7/17/22.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/29/22 at 5:10 PM, documented that a neurological assessment was initiated.
Review of resident 55's Neurological Flow Sheet revealed the following:
a. Hand-written date of 8/29 and time 1545 (3:45 PM).
b. Instructions stating, Vital Signs and Neuro Checks: Every 15 minutes for 1 hour, every 30 minutes for 1 hour, every hour over 4 hours, and every 4 hours for 24 hours. Progress along this time scheduled ONLY if signs are stable. Hand-written time beginning at 16 (4:00 PM) continuing until 8/31 at 1430 (2:30 PM).
c. Statement listed near the bottom of form, Notify MD [Medical Director] IMMEDIATELY of signs and symptoms of Intracranial Pressure!!!
d. Neuro-checks which include level of consciousness, movement, hand grasps, pupil size and reaction for both eyes, and speech were documented on 8/29/22 at 16, 4:15 PM, 4:30 PM, 4:45 PM, 17 (5:00 PM), 5:30 PM, and 6:00 PM.
e. There were no neuro-checks documented on 8/29/22 at 6:30 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM, 9:30 PM, and 10:30 PM, and there were not any neuro-checks completed on 8/30/22.
f. V/S which included Blood Pressure, Pulse, Respirations, Temperature, and Oxygen Saturations were documented on 8/29 at 4:15 PM, 4:45 PM, 10:30 PM, and on 8/30/22 at 2:30 AM.
g. There were no V/S documented on 8/29/22 at 16, 4:30 PM, 17, 5:30 PM, 6:00 PM, 6:30 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM, and 9:30 PM.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/30/22 at 12:57 AM, documented resident 55 was found at 12:30 AM, with some emesis on bed. Emesis was black and chunky and had a foul smell. Resident 55 would not rouse with sternal rub stimulation. Resident is a DNR [Do Not Resuscitate] and will be monitored closely this shift to ensure comfort and safety.
Review of resident 55's Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment effective date 7/17/22, revealed the following:
a. Section B. Medical Interventions Treatment options when the patient has a pulse and is
breathing.
b. Limited Additional Interventions. Treating medical conditions while avoiding burdensome measures. Medical care may include treatment of airway obstruction, bag/valve/mask ventilation, monitoring of cardiac rhythm, IV [intravenous] fluids, IV antibiotics and other medications as indicated. Also, included medical care described below. No endotracheal intubation or mechanical ventilation. Generally avoid the Intensive Care Unit.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 8/30/22 at 5:12 AM, documented resident 55 passed away at 4:44 AM on 8/30/22.
On 10/26/22 at 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the protocols for all resident falls that involved head injuries was the nurse was to notify the family, physician, and DON as soon as possible and start the Neuro Matrix immediately. The DON stated that a Neuro Matrix was a neurological assessment over a 72-hour period which was documented on the Neurological Flow Sheet and the information was passed along at shift changes. The DON stated that any change of status of the resident to include medical, physical, and mental alertness needed to be reported to the nurse who was to notify the physician, even if the family decided not to treat. The DON stated the nurse was to document any notifications in the nursing notes.
On 10/27/22 at 2:18 PM, an interview was conducted with physician 1. Physician 1 stated that she was notified regarding the fall and initial assessment of resident 55. Physician 1 stated she did not get notified about the change in condition for resident 55's status. Physician 1 stated she would have liked to have been notified of the change of status.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents who used psychotropic drugs ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents who used psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident was receiving an anxiolytic, Diazepam, and had not had a GDR attempted or had an evaluation with rationale by the provider to determine that a GDR was clinically contraindicated. Resident identifier: 6.
Findings included:
Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS), polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, urogential implants, sinusitis, history of urinary tract infections, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, insomnia, mood disorder, psoriasis, rosacea, and intervertebral disc degeneration.
On 10/26/22, resident 6's medical record was reviewed.
Review of resident 6's physician orders revealed the following:
a. Diazepam Tablet 5 milligrams (mg), Give 1 tablet by mouth with meals for MS. The order was initiated on 4/19/21 and discontinued on 4/20/21.
b. Diazepam Tablet 5 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for MS. The order was initiated on 4/20/21 and discontinued on 4/20/21.
c. Diazepam Tablet 5 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for Muscle Spasms. The order was initiated on 4/20/21 and discontinued on 7/2/21.
d. Diazepam Tablet 5 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms AND Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms AND Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms. The order was was initiated on 7/2/21 and discontinued on 2/3/22.
e. Diazepam Tablet 5 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms AND Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms AND Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for Muscle Spasms prefers with her other meds at 2000 [8:00 PM]. The order was initiated on 2/4/22 and discontinued on 2/27/22.
f. Diazepam Tablet 5 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms AND Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms AND Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Muscle Spasms prefers with her other meds at 2000. The order was active and was initiated on 2/27/22.
Review of resident 6's Medication Administration Record for October 2022 revealed that the Diazepam 5 mg was administered three times a day at 8:00 AM, 4:00 PM, and 9:30 PM. All scheduled doses were documented as administered per the physician order.
No documentation could be found in resident 6's medical record of a GDR attempt or a physician rationale for a clinical contraindication to a GDR for the Diazepam medication.
On 10/27/22 at 11:37 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the diazepam was used for muscle spasms and not as an anxiolytic so there was not a GDR attempted. The DON stated that anytime they had tried to do a GDR resident 6 was opposed to that. It should be noted that no documentation was found of any prior attempt at a GDR or a failed GDR for resident 6's diazepam.
On 10/27/22 at 12:23 PM, an interview was conducted with Corporate Resource Nurse (CRN) 2. CRN 2 stated that they never attempted a GDR for a psychotropic medication if the clinical use was intended for muscle spasms as was the case with the Diazepam. CRN 2 stated that she had worked in the industry for 25 years and was not aware that a GDR was required for all psychotropic medication regardless of the intended use of the medication.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the grill in the food preparation area was dirty, the oil in the deep fryer was cloudy, food items in the walk-in freezer were open to air, food items in the walk-in refrigerator were open to air, food items in the dry storage area were open to air, and a dented can was not removed from the area where usable canned goods were stored.
Findings included:
On 10/24/22 at 8:28 AM, an initial walk-through was conducted in the kitchen. In the dry storage area, a can of jellied cranberry sauce was observed to be dented and with the usable cans of cranberry sauce. A box of raisins was open to air and a box of fried oriental noodles was open to air. In the walk-in freezer, a box of cinnamon rolls was open to air, a box of cookie dough was open to air, a box of beef patties was open to air and a box of Krabbycakes was open to air. Additionally, the oil in the deep fryer was cloudy and the griddle in the food preparation area had dried grease drippings on the grates.
On 10/24/22 at 8:38 AM, an interview was conducted with the morning cook. The morning cook stated the oil in the deep fryer was changed every week.
On 10/27/22 at 9:06 AM, a second walk-through was conducted in the kitchen. In the dry storage area, a box of raisins was open to air, a box of dried cranberries was open to air, a box of fried oriental noodles was open to air, and a can of jellied cranberry sauce was dented and with the cans of usable cranberry sauce. In the walk-in refrigerator a box of sausage patties was open to air and a package of luncheon meat was open to air. In the walk-in freezer, a box of beef patties was open to air, a box with lasagna sheets was open to air and had ice crystals on the lasagna sheets, a box of pita chips was open to air, a box of Krabbycakes was open to air, a box of oatmeal raisin cookie dough was open to air, a box of chocolate cookie dough was open to air. [Note: While surveyors were in the walk-in freezer, the Dietary Manager (DM) came to the walk-in freezer and removed the box of chocolate chip cookie dough. The morning cook was making cookies and the DM stated she needed more chocolate chip cookie dough.]
On 10/27/22 at 9:23 AM, an interview was conducted with the DM. The DM stated he received the shipments of food items weekly. The DM stated he inspected and dated the food items before putting them away. The DM stated he liked to check the quality of the food items coming to the kitchen. The DM stated the Corporate Dietitian (CD) was at the facility every Tuesday for meetings and would walk through the kitchen to inspect for sanitation and food safety. The DM stated the CD completed a form that would be sent to himself and the Administrator. The DM stated the inspection included sanitation, temperature logs, labeling and dating of food items, and open containers. The DM stated the oil in the deep fryer was changed after every use. The DM stated he did not keep a bunch of oil in the kitchen and did not have any oil for the deep fryer at the time. The DM stated there were no fried foods on the menu for the week, however, chicken strips were always available on the alternate menu. The DM stated chicken strips were served yesterday. The DM stated he told staff to put dented cans in a specific area in the dry food storage room so they could be returned. The DM stated he was aware that there was a can of hominy in the dry food storage room that was not put in the designated spot. The DM stated he had explained to staff about concern for botulism with dented cans and they could not be used. The DM stated staff were aware of where to place dented cans. The DM stated he tried to do weekly education with staff and then stated, but to be honest, it ends up being monthly. The DM stated there was a language barrier with some of the staff so staff had to be educated and shown how to do things correctly in the kitchen. The DM stated he had tried to educate staff about sealing food when they put it back in the refrigerator and freezer, but the language barrier is a thing. The DM stated his assistant or the Certified Nursing Assistant Coordinator were willing to help with communication. The DM stated the in-services he had provided to staff included proper food temperatures, food presentation, hand washing, and sanitation.