VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
VMRC, Complete Living Care in Harrisonburg, Virginia, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for care. It ranks #113 out of 285 nursing facilities in Virginia, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among two facilities in Rockingham County. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2021 to 5 in 2023. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, indicating staff stability, but RN coverage is only average. While there have been no fines, which is positive, recent inspections revealed some concerning incidents, including failure to accommodate residents' food preferences and not maintaining proper food temperature logs, which could affect resident health. The facility also has not implemented necessary water management programs to prevent Legionella, which poses a potential health risk. Overall, VMRC shows strengths in staffing and a lack of fines, but families should be aware of the recent issues highlighted in inspections.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Virginia
- #113/285
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Virginia facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Virginia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Virginia's 100 nursing homes, only 0% achieve this.
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Mar 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of thirteen residents in the survey sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a medication pass and pour observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to accommodat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. The facility staff failed to ensure food temperatures were obtained prior to serving food and failed to maintain food tempera...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information for all nursing areas. There w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2021
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 22 residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2018
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to honor the right to r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 25 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medication pass and pour observation, staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to administer a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement a program for prevention of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens and failed to ensure infection contr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Virginia.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Virginia facilities.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Vmrc, Complete Living Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Virginia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Vmrc, Complete Living Care Staffed?
CMS rates VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Vmrc, Complete Living Care?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE during 2018 to 2023. These included: 10 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Vmrc, Complete Living Care?
VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 110 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HARRISONBURG, Virginia.
How Does Vmrc, Complete Living Care Compare to Other Virginia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Virginia, VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Vmrc, Complete Living Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Vmrc, Complete Living Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Virginia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Vmrc, Complete Living Care Stick Around?
VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Vmrc, Complete Living Care Ever Fined?
VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Vmrc, Complete Living Care on Any Federal Watch List?
VMRC, COMPLETE LIVING CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.