RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average for nursing homes. In Virginia, it ranks #96 out of 285 facilities, placing it in the top half, but it is #2 out of 2 in Lancaster County, indicating limited local options. The facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with reported issues increasing from 3 in 2022 to 10 in 2023. Staffing is a strength, as it boasts a 5/5 star rating and a low turnover rate of 24%, well below the state average. However, there have been serious concerns, including a critical incident where staff failed to provide CPR for a resident in need, and issues with food safety, such as the presence of pests in the kitchen and a bug found in food preparation areas, which could pose a risk to residents' health.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Virginia
- #96/285
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Virginia's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Virginia facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 79 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Virginia nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (24%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (24%)
24 points below Virginia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Virginia's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Aug 2023
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to immediately inform the Resident's physician, and Resident representative of change in co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility failed to ensure that a Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) was completed and issued to 2 Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to complete an assessment that accurately reflects the Resident's status for one Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing for 1 resident (Resident #3) in a sample of 19 residents.
The findings includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff and physician failed to complete a discharge summary to include recapitulation of stay for 1 resident (Resident #30) in the surv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation facility staff failed to provide treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately account for controlled medication for 1 resident (Resident #7) in a survey sample of 19 residents.
The find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic's for 1 Resident (#3) in a survey sample of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program ensure the facility is free of pests in the main kitc...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2022
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide consistent bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards by allowing Resident access to m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to identify the food item and the date opened or to be used by, in 2 of 4 f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure freedom from acc...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Virginia facilities.
- • 24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Virginia's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
About This Facility
What is Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Virginia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury Staffed?
CMS rates RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 24%, compared to the Virginia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY during 2019 to 2023. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 13 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury?
RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 42 certified beds and approximately 33 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in IRVINGTON, Virginia.
How Does Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury Compare to Other Virginia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Virginia, RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (24%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Virginia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury Stick Around?
Staff at RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 24%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the Virginia average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury Ever Fined?
RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury on Any Federal Watch List?
RAPPAHANNOCK WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.