CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder and bowel receive the...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder and bowel receive the services and assistance to maintain continence, unless his or her clinical condition is or becomes such that continence is not possible to maintain for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R32) for incontinence.
While R32 had an episode of acute illness, staff documented his bladder and bowel incontinence changed from occasionally incontinent to frequently incontinent. The facility failed to complete a bowel and bladder assessment to assess R32's incontinence or implement interventions to improve R32's incontinence.
The facility staff did not do a bladder or bowel diary or bladder or bowel assessment since admission.
R32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include unspecified lack of normal physiological development, and cognitive communication deficit. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicates his cognitive ability is mildly impaired.
R32's MDS dated [DATE] indicated he was frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. The MDS documents he requires supervision for toileting.
R32's MDS dated [DATE] indicated he was frequently incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS documents he requires limited assistance from staff for toileting.
During December 2021, R32 experienced an acute illness of esophageal candida. This illness caused a very sore throat, so that R32 was unable to eat, drink or talk for a few days.
On 2/22/22 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor spoke to R32. Surveyor asked R32 if he needed assistance from staff with toileting. R32 signaled an OK sign to the Surveyor.
On 2/22/22 at 1:00 PM, Surveyor spoke to CNA K (Certified Nurse Assistant). CNA K said that during the time R32 was ill, he was weak and had more incontinence. Surveyor asked how CNA K knew R32 was more incontinent, if CNA K checked his brief or asked R32 if he was soiled. CNA K said no, we never check R32 he uses the bathroom independently, we just check the trash can. If he has more soiled briefs in the trash can, we empty it.
On 2/22/22 at 1:30 PM, Surveyor spoke to CNA R. CNA R said when R32 was sick in December, he got weak and soiled himself more. Surveyor asked CNA R how she knew he soiled himself more. CNA R said R32 always changes his briefs himself, so the staff check the trash can to see if R32 was incontinent.
The facility failed to complete a bowel and bladder diary to assess R32's bowel and bladder incontinence and failed to implement interventions to improve R32's continence.
On 2/23/22 at 2:00 PM, Surveyor spoke with DON B (Director of Nursing). DON B said a bladder diary is completed at admission for the residents. DON B said a bowel or bladder assessment or diary is done once for each resident and not repeated if their incontinence increases.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure drug regimens are free from unnecessary psychotropic medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure drug regimens are free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R21) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 14.
R21 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance and is taking Seroquel.
This is evidence by:
Facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use, undated, states, in part . Purpose: Facility Name Professional Nursing Staff will administer all psychotropic medication (as ordered. Nursing staff will work to ensure those medications being used to treat challenging behaviors will be used only after all non-pharmalogical care-planned interventions have failed and other medical causes (infections, pain, etc.) or environmental factors have been eliminated. Procedure: 6. A mood/behavior care plan will be initiated if not already in place. 9. The Interdisciplinary team will review psychotropic medications at least quarterly to ensure the appropriate medication is administered (at least 3 other interventions should be attempted before medication use).
R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R21's diagnoses include in part . Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, and restlessness and agitation.
R21's Physician Orders state, in part: Quetiapine Fumarate, Seroquel, tablet 25 mg, Give 2 tablet (50 mg) by mouth two times daily for Alzheimer's disease.
R21's care plan states in part .
Problems/Strengths: Exhibits mood and behavior symptoms related to diagnosis of dementia as well as anxiety. She often exhibits a flat affect. She can be resistive to cares. She does wander and will wander into other resident's rooms. R21 will often 'shadow' others and attempts to be helpful (pushing others in wheelchairs, guiding other residents, soothing, etc.)
R21 does occasionally have peer incidents - pushing. She is quick and incidents appear to be unprovoked and come with little/no warning. R21 has thrown items. She has a history of flushing personal items. R21 has a history of paying close attention to males. R21 will also bang on the doors/windows. When she had her beauty shop she would often bang on the window to wave at passerby's [sic].
Interventions: Medication(s) as ordered, see current Physician Orders for specific meds/doses/times. Consent for medication(s) obtained from resident representative with listed use and potential side effects explained. If exhibiting mood or behavior symptoms, i.e., intrusive wandering, combative, resistive, anxious, restless, etc., provide redirection. If persists, and assisting with cares, leave (if safe to do), and return later. Loves to dance - provide redirection/distraction with music. Redirect by offering to take for a guided walk/stroll, as R21 allows. R21 does better with physical redirection vs. verbal redirection. Make sure you are very mindful of R21 when other residents have items in their hands, dolls or stuffed animals, as she may attempt to take items out of others hands. Keep in line of sight when able. Utilize relaxing aromatherapy lotion as indicated when R21 appears agitated, stressed, or irritable.
Note: Care plan does not have specific care plan for which targeted behaviors to monitor for.
Surveyor reviewed R21's behaviors charting from 12/2021 to 2/2022 which shows documented behaviors as follows .
2/16 - yelling, wandering/pacing, and going into other peoples rooms
2/03 - yelling, going into other peoples rooms, and resisting cares
12/24 - yelling/screaming, going into other peoples rooms, and wandering
12/23 - wandering and yelling
12/22 - yelling and banging hands on walls,
12/07 - yelling, wandering, banging on windows
12/02 - yelling/screaming, banging on windows, wandering, and going into other peoples rooms
R21's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/21/21 indicates the following . BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status): 99 indicating R21 has severe cognitive impairment; bed mobility extensive assistance of two staff; transfers limited assistance of one staff; eating extensive assistance of one staff member; toileting dependent assistance of two staff; hygiene dependent assistance of one staff member.
On 2/24/22 at 11:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E (Certified Nursing Assistant). Surveyor asked CNA E what type of behaviors R21 has. CNA E stated, Only behaviors is wandering. Surveyor asked CNA E if R21's behaviors were persistent and harmful to herself or others. CNA E stated, They are not harmful to self or others. On occasional she does touch people but she is not mean, she just likes to touch. She has a short attention span but if you sit and play with or do her hair she will sit for like 2 hours.
On 2/24/22 at 1:54 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B if Alzheimer's Dementia was an appropriate diagnosis for the use of Seroquel. DON B stated, I have seen it used before for more the behaviors. R21 has behaviors of yelling, rattling doors, banging on windows. Surveyor asked DON B if these behaviors would be persistent, harmful to herself or others. DON B stated, I think so, if she would hit a window and it would break she could be injured. Surveyor asked DON B how often these types of behaviors occur. DON B stated, It used to happen more often but not so much anymore. Surveyor asked DON B to review R21's behaviors documented by staff. Surveyor asked DON B if what was documented would be appropriate for the use of Seroquel. DON B stated, I would have to look.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhan...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, this affected 3 sampled residents (R10, R40, and R23) and 4 supplemental residents (R12, R24, R34 and R29).
R10, R40, R23, R12, R24, R34 and R29 stated that LPN T (Licensed Practical Nurse) spoke roughly and rudely to them over the course of several months. Residents stated they had reported LPN T's rude and rough communication to staff members. Staff interviewed said they had informed DON B (Director of Nursing) of residents' reports.
LPN T's personnel file contains multiple counselings from 2021 and continuing to 2022.
The subjects of the counselings are respecting residents rights, being courteous to residents and not to disrespect resident's belongings.
Surveyor reviewed resident grievances on the grievance log as part of survey process. R40 submitted a grievance on September 29, 2021 about LPN T. R40 stated in her grievance that LPN T removed her commemorative cap from R40's head, and removed the commemorative stickers. The commemorative stickers indicated the cap was a collectable item. R40 asked LPN T why she removed her cap from her head and removed the stickers. LPN T said the stickers did not need to be on the cap. R40 reported this to SW S (Social Worker). R40 told SW S about what LPN T did with her cap. SW S told DON B and both went to retrieve R40's cap stickers from the trash container where LPN T threw them. SW S and DON B were able to replace the stickers on R40's cap.
On 2/22/22 at 1:15 PM., Surveyor spoke with R40. Surveyor asked R40 about the incident with LPN T and her cap. R40 said I was so upset, I cried, and I don't cry easily. That cap cost me $33 dollars. It made me feel violated when she took the stickers off my hat.
On 2/23/22 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor spoke with CNA Q (Certified Nurse Assistant). CNA Q said she has heard LPN T be rude to residents a lot. I was working the evening that R40 had an incident with LPN T and her cap. R40 was crying and really upset. I did not see the incident, but I saw R40 crying and being very upset over her cap and the stickers being removed. I have told DON B about LPN T and how she talks to residents.
On 2/24/22 at 2:32 PM, Surveyor spoke with SW S. SW S said when a grievance or incident happens, we investigate it right away. I focus on the resident the grievance or incident that occurred and the staff involved. I receive guidance from the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) and DON on when to report it. I will speak to the resident and staff involved. When R40's incident happened, we were still here and were able to get the stickers out of the trash. I have heard things about LPN T but I did not follow up on it.
On 2/23/22, Surveyor spoke to residents about LPN T:
-R10 said when she talks rude to me I feel dismayed;
-R12 said LPN T talks rough to me a week or so ago, when she put me in my chair, I thought she was a little rough;
-R23 said LPN T is rude, she makes me feel like I want to be left alone;
-R24 said LPN T talks rude at times. I feel disgusted when she does that;
-R29 said about three weeks ago I had a visitor come in. LPN T didn't say anything but she had an attitude that made us feel like we were doing something wrong. I was in tears and felt humiliated and condescended to;
-R34 said about two weeks ago I asked her to help me move in bed a little, that I wasn't comfortable. LPN T said to me that she wasn't going to break her back so I can be more comfortable. That made me feel angry and apprehensive. I felt like if there was an emergency, she would protect herself before she would protect me.
On 2/23/22 at 12:45 PM, Surveyor spoke with CNA K. CNA K said I have worked with LPN T and she is rude to residents.
On 2/24/22 at 4:00 PM, Surveyor spoke with DON B. DON B said she did not consider the incidents she received from coworkers as reportable or abuse. The resident or family has to use the word abuse for me to consider it to be abuse.
The facility failed to ensure each resident is treated with dignity and respect.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident and his/her family member rece...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident and his/her family member received a written summary of the baseline care plan for 3 of 3 (R9, R20 and R45) sampled and 2 of 15 supplemental residents (R29 and R34) reviewed.
The facility had no evidence that they provided a written summary of the resident baseline or comprehensive care plan for R9, R20, R29, R34, and R45.
Evidenced by:
Facility policy titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, last revised 3/2021, states in part: .Policy: A base-line, comprehensive care plan will be completed and signed by all contributors, resident, and representative within 48 hours of admission.
Example 1
R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There is no evidence that the facility shared or reviewed R9's care plan with R9 or her POA (Power of Attorney).
Example 2
R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There is no evidence that the facility shared or reviewed R20's care plan with him.
Example 3
R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There is no evidence that the facility shared or reviewed R29's care plan with her.
On 2/23/22 at 12:39 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B the process for completing the baseline care plans for residents. DON B stated, Those are completed by the Nurse that is doing the admission. Surveyor asked DON B if the facility documents that the care plan was reviewed and provided to the resident or resident representative. DON B stated, We do not chart or document that they review the baseline care plans with the resident or resident representative. Surveyor asked DON B if that should be completed. DON B stated, I would have to look.
Example 4
R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, chronic obstructive heart failure, dementia and osteoporosis. R45 MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicates her cognitive ability is severely impaired.
R45 had a baseline care plan, but the baseline was not documented as reviewed with the activated POA, or signed that the activated POA reviewed the care plan with the facility staff.
Example 5
R34 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of fractured right hip. R34 is cognitively aware. R34 had a baseline care plan but the baseline care plan was not documented as reviewed with R34 or signed by R34 that she reviewed and agreed with the plan of care.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 14 sampled ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 14 sampled (R14 and R2) and 4 of 15 supplemental residents (R22, R41, R36, R19) reviewed for person centered care plans.
R22 does not have a care plan for COVID-19.
R41 does not have a care plan for COVID-19.
R36 does not have a care plan for COVID-19.
R14 does not have a care plan for COVID-19.
R2 does not have a care plan for COVID-19.
R19 does not have a care plan for COVID-19.
The facility failed to develop and implement individualized, patient specific care plans that addressed precautions, psychosocial concerns, or active disease related to COVID-19.
This is evidenced by:
The facility's policy titled, Care Plans- Comprehensive last reviewed March of 2021, states in part: .3. Each resident's care plan is designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas; b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; g. Aid in preventing or reducing declines in the resident's functional status and/ or functional levels; i. Reflect currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions.
Example 1:
R22 resides on a hall that has 2 COVID-19 positive residents. R22 is not up to date on her COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility failed to implement a COVID-19 care plan to address TBP (Transmission Based Precautions), psychosocial concerns related to isolation, or monitoring for disease.
Example 2:
R41 resides on a hall that has 2 COVID-19 positive residents. R41 is not up to date on her COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility failed to implement a COVID-19 care plan to address TBP, psychosocial concerns related to isolation, or monitoring for disease.
Example 3:
R36 resides on a hall that has 2 COVID-19 positive residents. R36 is not up to date on her COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility failed to implement a COVID-19 care plan to address TBP, psychosocial concerns related to isolation, or monitoring for disease.
Example 4
R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include stroke, Alzheimer's Dementia and anxiety disorder.
R2 was infected with COVID 19 virus while residing in the facility. The facility failed to implement a COVID-19 care plan to address TBP, psychosocial concerns related to isolation, or monitoring for disease.
Example 5
R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R14 was infected with COVID 19 while residing in the facility. R14 did not have a care plan The facility failed to implement a COVID-19 care plan to address TBP, psychosocial concerns related to isolation, or monitoring for disease.
Example 6
R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include osteoarthritis,and Alzheimer's Disease. R19 was infected with COVID 19 virus while residing in the facility. The facility failed to implement a COVID-19 care plan to address TBP, psychosocial concerns related to isolation, or monitoring for disease.
On 2/23/22 at 12:50 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B the process for completing care plans for residents. DON B stated, Care plans should be created.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This has the potential to affect 2 of 2 supplemental residents (R6, R38) and 2 of 2 sampled residents (R17 and R21) residents in the Memory Care Unit.
R6, R17, R21, and R38 are on the facility's Memory Care Unit and were observed on several occasions to be seated in the common area without an activities or a diversional activity provided.
This is evidenced by the following:
Example 1
The facility's Memory Care Unit is located on the back end of one hallway in the facility with alarming doors separating it from the rest of the facility. At the end of the hall on the left is a lounge with 1 square table, 4 recliners, a love seat, a television and small radio. On the right is the dining room with approximately 6 tables. The lounge and dining room are used for all activities on the unit including meals, structured activities and unstructured activities.
On 2/23/22, at 12:57 PM Surveyor completed a direct observation from 12:57 PM until 3:52 PM. Surveyor observed residents sitting in the lounge in the Memory Care Unit. Music was playing lightly in the background, the television was shut off and residents R21 and R17 were just sitting in the day room in recliners. R6 and R38 were sitting in the dining room at tables with nothing in front of them.
Surveyor completed direct observation for approximately 6.5 hours over a 2 day period. Throughout the almost 4 hour direct observation on 2/23/22, Surveyor observed R17 and R21 get up out of recliners and ambulate about the unit. R21 was also observed going in and out of resident rooms. Both R17 and R21 were continuously redirected back to the recliners in the day room on the unit. These residents would sit for a few minutes, then get back up and again start pacing and wandering the unit. Surveyor observed staff sit residents back in chairs in day room on approximately 30 different occasions. Surveyor did observe CNA E (Certified Nursing Assistant) attempt to give R17 a doll while she was in the recliner but R17 was not interested, no other activities or diversions were attempted for these residents. R6 and R38 were in their rooms until approximately 2:30 PM, at which time they were brought out to the dining room and placed at the tables with nothing in front of them. During Surveyors direct observation on 2/24/22, it was again noted that residents were not participating in any activities. R17 and R21 were sitting in recliners in the day room and R6 and R38 were either in their rooms or sitting at tables in the dining room with nothing in front of them.
Throughout the 4 day survey there were no activities observed by Surveyor on the Memory Care Unit.
Surveyor reviewed the activity participation logs for the Memory Care Unit and noted the activity choices are: Music therapy, craft, nails, hair, storytelling, reading, courtyard time, 1:1.
The following activities were documented:
2/21/22-Sensory and 1:1 for R6, R17, R21, and R38.
2/22/22-1:1 and reading out loud for R17 and 1:1, reading, and ball toss for R6, R21, and R38.
2/23/22-1:1 and sing along for R6, R17, R21 and R38
Note: Staff working on the unit report activities are not or rarely occurring on the Memory Care Unit.
Example 2
Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, alcohol dependence, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, and unspecified mood disorder. R17 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and has an AHCPOA (Activated Health Care Power of Attorney).
Resident 17's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] states in section F0800 for Staff Assessment of daily Activity Preferences for Resident 17 are listed as I. Family or significant other involvement of care discussion. M. Listening to music.
Activities Director H provided Surveyor with a hand written form titled, Initial/Annual Activity Assessment, dated December 2021, which states in part . Loves sports and pet visits. Items listed as very important, are as follows . Have snacks available between meals, have your family or a close friend involved in discussion about your care, and being around animals such as pets.
R17's comprehensive care plan dated 3/25/19, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Activity Deficit. Husband reports that R17 enjoyed traveling - Hawaii was her favorite. She likes all animals, football (Badgers/Packers). Interventions: R17 will participate in the Music Therapy program on the Memory Care Unit to promote socialization and general well-being. Provide weekly calendar of events. Provide with 1:1 room visits weekly.
R17 comprehensive care plan dated 3/10/21, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Potential Activity Deficit related to psychosocial diagnosis/behaviors, characteristics. She reports she enjoys music, enjoys pet visits, does not enjoy keeping up with the news, enjoys activities with groups of people, enjoys going outdoors when the weather is good, and does not enjoy participating in religious services and practices. Hobbies and interests include: She is not able to tell me what she really enjoys. Interventions: Invite to activities of interest daily; especially memory care activities, provide with leisure material for room as requested/needed; i.e. fancy hats, encourage to reminisce over past roles as needed, provide with 1:1 room visits 3 times a week, and encourage to participate in no religious services.
On 2/23/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 12:45 PM to 3:50 PM. At 12:57 AM, R17 was pacing/wandering in the day room, dining room and hallway of the memory care unit. Staff would approach R17 and would repeatedly redirect her to sit back in the recliner in the day room. Other residents were sitting at the tables in the dining room, the dining room table was empty. The television was off and music was playing very softly in the background. Residents were not engaged in any activities during this time frame. R17 was up pacing/wandering the memory care unit and redirected to sit in a recliner on approximately 15 different occasions. At 1:19 PM CNA E did attempt to give R17 a doll to hold but R17 had no interest in the doll. That was the only occasion in which a staff member offered any type of activity or diversion to any resident on the unit.
On 2/24/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 8:55 AM to 11:13 AM. At 8:55 AM, R17 was sitting in day room in recliner. At 10:42 AM, CNA G was noted to be cutting R17's nails. R17 remained in recliner sleeping on and off with no activities provided to her throughout the observation time.
Note: On 2/24/22, staff report to Surveyor that R17 had 2 falls on 2/23/22, one in the morning and one in the afternoon.
Example 3
R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and restlessness and agitation. R21's BIMS of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R21 also has an AHCPOA.
Resident 21's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], states in section F0800 for Staff Assessment of Daily Activity Preferences that it is Resident Prefers to D. Receiving shower, G. Snacks between meals, I. Family or significant other involvement in care discussions. M. Listening to music, P. Doing things with groups of people, Q. Participating in favorite activities, S. Spending time outdoors, T. Participating in religious activities or practices.
Activities Director H provided Surveyor with a hand written form titled, Initial/Annual Activity Assessment, dated December 2021, which states in part . Baby dolls, dancing, and loves music. Items listed as very important, are as follows . Have your family or a close friend involved in discussion about your care, and listening to music you like.
R21's comprehensive care plan dated 12/31/19, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Communication deficit. R21 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease which affects her communication. She has no hearing difficulty. R21 sometimes usually understands verbal content/understands message when spoken to, may miss part/intent of message. Her speech is clear but she is minimally verbal and she is sometimes understood, only able to make concrete requests by giving simple answers. Her responses are not always appropriate to content of conversation. R21 can make very few basic needs known secondary to her cognitive impairments, most needs are anticipated. Interventions: Encourage/assist resident to participate in memory care activity schedule.
R21 comprehensive care plan dated 12/20/21, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Potential Activity Deficit related to cognitive impairment, psychosocial diagnosis/behaviors/characteristics. R21 reports she enjoys music, enjoys pet visits, enjoys keeping up with the news, enjoys activities with groups of people, enjoys going outdoors when the weather is good, and does not enjoy participating in religious services and practices. Hobbies and interests include: music and dancing. Interventions: Provide weekly calendar of events, provide with 1:1 room visits 3-5 times a week, and consult with Music Therapy as needed to promote music interests and preferences.
On 2/23/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 12:45 PM to 3:50 PM. At 12:57 PM, R21 was pacing/wandering in the day room, dining room and hallway of the memory care unit. Staff would approach R21 and would repeatedly redirect her to sit back in the recliner in the day room. Other residents were sitting at the tables in the dining room, the dining room table was empty. The television was off and music was playing very softly in the background. Residents were not engaged in any activities during this time frame. R21 was up pacing/wandering the memory care unit and redirected to sit in a recliner on approximately 24 different occasions. At no time did any staff member offer R21 any type of activity or diversion.
On 2/24/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 8:55 AM to 11:13 AM. At 8:55 AM, R21 was lying in bed awake. At 9:11 AM, CNA G brought R21 out to the day room and sat her in a recliner. At 9:30 AM, R21 was observed wandering the around on the unit. CNA G approached R21 and offered to paint her nails. R21 was in agreement but the CNA got busy and never returned to paint R21's nails. R21 observed to wander the unit and be redirected by staff to sit back in recliner on approximately 12 different occasions. No activity or diversion was offered to R21.
On 2/24/22 at 11:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E. Surveyor asked CNA E what type of behaviors R21 has. CNA E stated, Only behaviors is wandering. Surveyor asked CNA E if R21's behaviors were harmful to herself or others. CNA E stated, They are not harmful to self or others. On occasional she does touch people but she is not mean, she just likes to touch. She has a short attention span but if you sit and play with or do her hair she will sit for like 2 hours. It makes me nervous on PM's when they are more active. Most are two assist too we go into a room and they are down here alone. Like yesterday R19 had two falls, one in the morning and one in the afternoon.
Example 4
Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. R38 has a BIMS of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R38 has an AHCPOA.
Resident 38's Initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], states in section F0800 for Staff Assessment of Daily Activity Preferences that it is Resident Prefers to C. Receiving a tub bath, D. Receiving shower, G. Snacks between meals, I. Family or significant other involvement in care discussions. M. Listening to music, Q. Participating in favorite activities, S. Spending time outdoors, T. Participating in religious activities or practices.
Activities Director H provided Surveyor with a hand written form titled, Initial/Annual Activity Assessment, dated January 2022, which states in part . Enjoys sports, blocks, and music. Items listed as very important, are as follows . Have your family or a close friend involved in discussion about your care, listening to music you like, go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good, and participate in religious services or practices.
R38's comprehensive care plan dated 11/15/12, last updated 4/19/18, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Psychosocial Well-Being/Activities: Due to decline in overall status and unable to make his needs known and he requires assist for all of his needs. Interventions: Encourage participation in Namaste Program and Namaste Day Music Programs, Involve in activities not dependent on R38's ability to communicate; resident choir and church services, Provide with 1:1 attention during Namaste, and R38 will participate in the Music Therapy program on the Memory Care Unit to promote quality of life and general well-being.
R38 comprehensive care plan dated 1/12/16, last updated 8/01/17, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Severe cognitive impairment related to dementia - poor short and long-term memory and poor decision-making. R38 is non-verbal and unable to make his needs known. R38 has a guardian to assist in decision making, his sister. She is his resident representative. R38 resides on the Memory Care Unit and is able to benefit from the smaller/quieter environment. R38 is a long term resident at this facility with no plans to discharge. Interventions: Take to activities as resident allows.
On 2/23/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 12:45 PM to 3:50 PM. At 2:27 PM, R38 was brought out to the dining room by staff and placed at a table alone with nothing in front of him. At no time did any staff member offer R38 any type of activity or diversion.
On 2/24/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 8:55 AM to 11:13 AM. At 10:05 AM, R38 was brought out to the dining room by staff and placed at a table alone with nothing in front of him. At no time did any staff member offer R38 any type of activity or diversion.
Example 5
R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include dementia with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder. R6 has a BIMS of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R6 has an AHCPOA.
Resident 6's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], states in section F0800 for Staff Assessment of Daily Activity Preferences that it is Resident Prefers to D. Receiving shower, G. Snacks between meals, I. Family or significant other involvement in care discussions. M. Listening to music, P. Doing things with groups of people, Q. Participating in favorite activities, S. Spending time outdoors, T. Participating in religious activities or practices.
Activities Director H provided Surveyor with a hand written form titled, Initial/Annual Activity Assessment, dated February 2022, which states in part . Loves music. Items listed as very important, are as follows . Have your family or a close friend involved in discussion about your care, listening to music you like, go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good, and participate in religious services or practices.
R6's comprehensive care plan dated 11/15/12, last updated 4/19/18, states in part . Problem/Strengths: Potential Activities Deficit related to cognitive impairments, Physiological impairments, psychosocial diagnosis/behaviors/characteristics. R6's wife reports that he responds positively music (specifically hymns and classic country), enjoys pet visits, seems to enjoy activities with groups of people such as mass and music, enjoys going outdoors when the weather is good, and enjoys participating in religious services and practices. Hobbies and interests include: music and mass. Interventions: Provide with weekly calendar of events, invite to activities of interest daily; especially group activities, memory care activities, music activities/groups, outdoor activities, respect resident's right to refuse and document, consult with Music Therapy as needed to promote music interests and preferences. Encourage to participate in Catholic religious services, R6 will participate in the Music Therapy program on the Memory Care Unit to promote socialization and general well-being.
On 2/23/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 12:45 PM to 3:50 PM. At 12:49 PM, upon entering the memory care unit, Surveyor observed R6 sitting at the dining room table alone with nothing in front of him. At no time did any staff member offer R6 any type of activity or diversion.
On 2/24/22, Surveyor did continuous observations on the memory care unit from 8:55 AM to 11:13 AM. At 10:00 AM, R6 was brought out to the day room by staff with nothing in front of him. At no time did any staff member offer R6 any type of activity or diversion.
On 2/23/22 at 10:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed AD H. Surveyor asked AD H, to tell her about the facilities activity program on the memory care unit. AD H stated, For the Activity Program we strive to meet all the areas for state regulations. We do 1:1, beauty shop/manicure, hit as many criteria as we can. Surveyor asked if there was an activities aide that goes to the Memory Care Unit. AD H stated, We do and don't, they want us to have a CNA back there. We have people that go back and help during breaks in the afternoons. I go back and do 1:1 as much as I can. We strive to see everyone 3-5 times a week. At least three times a week, whether weekend or during the week. Surveyor asked if there is activity calendar on the Memory Care Unit. AD H stated, We have the weekly one. There is not one back there (calendar). If the aide is back there they communicate it with the staff back there and we communicate with the residents what is going and what things can be done.
On 2/23/22 at 2:32 PM, Surveyor asked CNA G about the activities log. CNA G states, They haven't had a lot of activities back here due to staffing. She also states she normally works approximately 40 hours a week but mostly days and rarely does anyone come back to do activities, maybe 1 time a week, if that. Surveyor asked CNA G if activities occurred on the unit today. CNA G stated, not today.
On 2/24/22 at 1:50 PM, Surveyor interviewed Activity Aide M. Surveyor asked Activity Aide M if she was expected to do activities on the Memory Care Unit. Activity Aide M stated, We don't usually have a specific staff that does the activities down there. Surveyor asked Activity Aide M if any staff go down and do activities on the Memory Care Unit. Activity Aide M stated, I think our director might go down there. Surveyor asked Activity Aide M if a log of attendance was for activities on the Memory Care Unit. Activity Aide M stated, I don't think so. Surveyor asked Activity Aide M how long it has been since the Memory Care Unit had an activity person down there. Activity Aide M stated, Maybe at least a month. Surveyor asked Activity Aide M if there was a separate calendar for the Memory Care Unit. Activity Aide M stated, No. Surveyor asked Activity Aide M if activities occurred on the unit today. Activity Aide M stated, to my knowledge, not today.
On 2/24/22 at 2:03 PM, Surveyor interviewed AD (Activities Director) H. Surveyor asked AD H about activities log and activities on the Memory Care Unit. AD H stated, If it is on the log as being done, it was done. Surveyor asked how I could see the time in which the activity was completed. AD H stated, We don't document the time it was done, just that it was done. AD H also states, Staff are expected to go back on the Memory Care Unit and complete activities with them daily. If the staff don't have time I will do it.
Per Surveyor direct observations and staff interviews individualized activity program is not consistently being provided on the Memory Care Unit.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 6 residents (R2, R9, R17, and R32) reviewed for fall concerns out of a total sample of 14 residents.
R9 had a fall resulting in a fracture on 11/21/21 and the facility did not ensure that they identified the root cause of the fall to ensure proper intervention were put into place to prevent further falls.
R17 had 5 falls between 9/11/21 and 1/31/22, 3 of which the facility did not ensure that they identified the root cause of and ensure proper interventions were put into place to prevent further falls.
R2 and R32 have multiple falls with no identified root cause thoroughly investigated and interventions ineffective.
This is evidenced by:
The facility's Fall Risk Assessment policy and procedure, dated 7/01/21, states, in part: . Purpose: The nursing staff will seek to identify resident risk factors for falls. This will be documented on a Fall Risk Assessment. The assessment will be completed upon admission, along with the MDS (minimum data set) schedule and after every fall. Implementation: 1. The nursing staff will review a resident's record for a history of falls, especially falls in the last 90 days and recurrent or periodic bouts of falling over time. The nursing staff will ask the resident and/or his/her family about any history of the resident falling. 6. The staff will evaluate functional and psychological factors that may increase fall risk, including ambulation, mobility, gait, balance, excessive motor activity, continence, and cognition. The attending Physician will be consulted as needed. Therapy screens to be completed if indicated.
The facility's Fall Huddles policy and procedure, dated 7/01/21, states in part: .Purpose: Fall Huddle forms will be completed by nursing staff following any resident fall. All facility staff in the vicinity should actively participate. Objectives: 1. To determine the root cause of the fall, 2. To identify any potential safety concerns in the physical environment, 3. To allow for prospective and ideas by a variety of staff members, 4. To help decrease risk for additional falls. Procedure: 6. All staff members participating in the fall huddle will sign and date at the bottom of the form.
The facility's Falls: Assessment and Root Cause Analysis policy and procedure, dated 7/01/21, states in part: . Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff identifying causes of the fall. General Guidelines: 1. Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly in nursing homes. 2. Approximately 50 percent of residents fall annually and 10 percent of these falls result in serious injury. 3. Fear of falling may limit an individual's participation in activities. 4. Falling may be related to underlying clinical conditions and functional decline, medication side effects, and/or environment risk factors, 5. Resident must be assessed in a timely manner for potential causes of falls, 6. Relevant environmental issues should be addressed promptly. Steps in the Procedure: f. All staff caring for the resident and those in the vicinity of the fall should meet to discuss the fall and events leading to the fall to begin investigation into the root cause of the fall. 2. Defining Details of Falls: a. After an observed or probable fall, that staff will clarify the details of the fall, such as when the fall occurred and what the individual was trying to do at the time the fall occurred. Obtain statements as indicated. 3. Identifying Causes of a fall or Fall Risk: a. The licensed nursing staff will begin to try to identify possible or likely causes of the incident. They will refer to resident-specific evidence including medical history, known functional impairments, etc. b. Staff will evaluate chains of events or circumstances preceding a recent fall. c. The staff will continue to collect and evaluate information until they either identify the cause of falling or determine that the cause cannot be found. f. If cause of fall is identified, interventions will be put in to place to assist in preventing future falls of the same nature. Care plan will be updated to reflect these interventions.
Example 1
R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, weakness, and anemia.
R9's quarterly MDS on 11/24/21 noted a BIMS (Brief interview for Mental Status) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
R9's Comprehensive Care Plan, date initiated 3/08/21 and last revised on 12/03/21, includes, in part: Problem: Impaired Mobility/Potential for Falls r/t (related to) hx (history) of falls, weakness. Interventions: Anticipate needs and remind/encourage resident to use call light for assistance, initiated 11/21/21. Ambulates independently with FWW (front wheeled walker), initiated 12/02/21.
R9 had a fall resulting in a fracture of the coccyx on 11/12/21. The fall on 11/12/21 was a result of R9 trying to take her food tray out to staff, using her bedside table as a walker. The facility evaluated R9 and completed the Fall Assessment. The facility failed complete root cause analysis, implement interventions related to R9's fall to prevent further falls.
R9's fall was documented on the Fall Assessment, as follows .11/12/21 at 13:16 (1:16 PM), Summary of Call: Resident was pushing her side table to her door and lost balance and fell and hit her head. Unwitnessed. Contributing Factors, [NAME] all that apply . Arthritis, dementia, and incontinence. Plan: Educated resident to use walker and not table when ambulating.
On 2/23/22 at 8:11 AM, Surveyor reviewed fall investigation with DON B and RN C. Surveyor asked RN C what the root cause of R9's fall was. RN C stated, She always tries to take her food tray out to staff and in doing so used her tray table as a walker and fell. Surveyor asked RN C and DON B what the root cause of R9's fall was based on that information. RN C stated, Using her tray table as a walker. Surveyor asked what RN C what R9 was attempting to do when she fell. RN C stated, Take her lunch tray out to staff. Surveyor asked RN C if this would be considered the root cause. RN C stated, Yes. Surveyor asked based on that information was the intervention of educating R9 to use her walker was an appropriate intervention. RN C stated, No. Surveyor asked when it is no longer appropriate to use education for a resident with dementia. RN C stated, I think you wouldn't educate anyone with a BIMS of less than 13. Surveyor asked RN C if the fall assessment was complete. RN C stated, No, staff did not fill in some of informations, such as, was the resident incontinent at the time of the fall. Surveyor asked RN C if she would expect forms to be complete thoroughly to help staff identify a root cause. RN C stated, Yes.
Example 2
R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include, Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, Other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions an awareness, alcohol dependence, anxiety disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder, and delusional disorder.
R17's annual MDS on 12/03/21 noted a BIMS (Brief interview for Mental Status) score of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R17 has an AHCPOA (Activated Healthcare Power of Attorney) and is not her own decision maker.
R17 had 5 falls between 9/11/21 and 1/31/22, for 3 of those falls the facility failed to identify the root cause of the falls and put interventions in place that would prevent further falls.
R17's fall was documented on the Fall Assessment, as follows, .9/11/21 at 10:05 AM, Summary of fall: Resident was lowered to the floor by the CNA. Residents legs gave out while she was getting dressed. Witnessed. Contributing Factors, [NAME] all that apply . Dementia, Alzheimer's, decline in cognitive skills, incontinence, and impaired vision and speech. Plan: Continue current interventions, wears padded hip protectors to protect from injury if she does fall.
Arthritis, dementia, Alzheimer's, anxiety, depression, incontinence, and impaired speech. Plan: POA in agreement to continue current interventions.
Note: The facility did not identify the root cause of the fall or care plan an appropriate intervention to prevent further falls.
R17's fall was documented on the Fall Assessment, as follows, .12/30/21 at 11:25 AM, Summary of fall: Resident attempted to sit on arm of love seat et (and) slid to floor landing on buttocks, did not hit head. Witnessed. Contributing Factors, [NAME] all that apply . Dementia, Alzheimer's, decline in cognitive skills, and incontinence. Plan: Put towels on arms of love seat. Staff educated.
R17's fall was documented on the Fall Assessment, as follows, .1/31/22 at 8:33 AM, Summary of fall: Called back to Memory Care, CNA reported She just fell back to her butt, I seen her do it, she didn't hit her head, R17 sitting on her butt in dining area. Witnessed. Contributing Factors, [NAME] all that apply . Arthritis, dementia, Alzheimer's, anxiety, depression, incontinence, and impaired speech. Plan: Continue current interventions, wears padded hip protectors to protect from injury if she does fall.
Note: The facility did not identify the root cause of the fall or care plan an appropriate intervention to prevent further falls.
On 2/23/22 at 8:11 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B and RN C. Surveyor asked DON B and RN C what the facility process is for falls. DON B states, We review falls in morning huddle. RN C knows more about the falls investigations that I do. RN C states, If I am the nurse on and a fall happens it is my responsibility to assess the resident and do the fall investigation. If a resident has a BIMS of less that 13, we would assume they hit there head. Interventions would need to be put into place, and eAssignment sent to staff so they are aware of the new intervention, and the care plan needs to be updated. The nurse on the floor or the first to respond should complete this. Surveyor asked DON B and RN C what the facility determined to be the root cause of the fall on 9/11/21 for R17. RN C stated, R17's legs gave out while getting dressed. Surveyor asked RN C if she could tell from the fall assessment where this incident occurred. RN C reviewed falls assessment and stated, In the shower room. Surveyor asked if it was possible that R17 slipped on the wet floor in the shower room. RN C stated, I would have to believe that the reason she was being dressed in the shower room was because she just got done with her shower. If that is the case that would be the root cause of the fall. I guess we need to do some education with staff. Surveyor asked DON B and RN what the intervention was that was put into place for this fall. RN C states, There wasn't any. Surveyor asked RN C if there should have been an intervention. RN C stated, Yes, for every fall. Surveyor asked DON B and RN C what the root cause for the fall on 12/30/21 was for R17. RN C stated, R17 was trying to sit on the arm of the love seat. Surveyor asked RN C what intervention was put into place for that fall. RN C stated, To put towels on the arm of the love seat. We did this so there was a color variance from the seat. Surveyor asked RN C if she thought that adding these towels would cause a slippery surface that could contribute to a fall. RN C stated, I guess we didn't think of that. We were just trying to find a way for her to be able to see the seat of the love seat. Surveyor asked DON B and RN C to look at R17's fall from 1/31/21. Surveyor asked DON B and RN C what the root cause of this fall was. RN C stated, It doesn't identify the root cause only that she sat down. Surveyor asked RN C what intervention was put into place for this fall. RN C stated, It says to continue current interventions. Surveyor asked RN C if an intervention should have been put into place for this fall. RN C stated, Yes.
The facility failed to identify the root cause of falls and put interventions in place to prevent residents from having further falls.
Example 3
R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include stroke, Alzheimer's Disease and anxiety disorder. His most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) measures R2's cognitive ability at 3, which is severely cognitively impaired. The MDS measures R2's transferring and toileting ability as limited assistance required from staff. Limited assistance indicates assistance of one staff member.
R2's fall care plan includes wear gripper socks or shoes with grip, clear path of clutter.
R2's most recent falls and interventions include:
-1/14/22 9: 50 AM-Noted to be sitting on buttocks in hallway against wall. Was previously wandering, redirected back to bed or chair several times. No injury noted. Intervention-Continue current care plan interventions. There is no root cause analysis for this fall.
-2/14/22 6: 22 AM-Noted to be on buttocks in front of wife's recliner, had walker. Gripper socks did not have quality grip. Intervention-ensure gripper socks have quality grip. There is no root cause analysis for this fall.
-2/14/22 1: 15 PM- Resident on back next to bed-skin tear right wrist-Intervention-Continue plan of care and fall prevention interventions. Encourage activity attendance during day due to sleeps a lot during the day. There is no root cause analysis for this fall.
-2/22/22 9:49 AM-Found resident sitting on floor next to his recliner. He said I slid off the recliner. Intervention-place non slip pad under soaker pad in recliner. There is no root cause analysis for this fall.
Example 4
R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include kyphosis, unspecified lack of normal physiological development, artificial right eye and cognitive communication deficit.
R32's MDS measures he requires supervision with transfers and his cognitive ability measures at 13, which is mildly cognitively impaired.
R32 has multiple fall interventions dating from 2017. Interventions include gripper socks at all times, (repeated three times in care plan), sign placed in room for resident to ask for assistance (R32 is kyphotic and unable to raise his head), keep floor free of clutter (repeated twice in care plan), remind to use call light, keep walker close to him (repeated twice in care plan).
R32's care plan documents he is independent with transfers.
R32's activity of choice is to polish pop tops in the lounge area. The call light in the lounge area is across the room from where R32 sits at a table doing his activity.
R32's most recent falls and interventions include:
-1/11/22 9:12 AM-in lounge counting pop tops and dropped some to floor-while trying to pick them up, lost balance and fell-Intervention-educated resident to ask for help to get things off floor-remind him to use call bell on table. During four day recertification survey, Surveyor observed R32 in lounge all days. No call bell observed on table.
-2/7/22 8:00 PM-Returning from bathroom with his walker, turned to get in bed and lost balance. Intervention-resident to wear nonskid footwear at all times. There is no root cause analysis for this fall.
-2/11/22 1:00 PM-At table in dining room, reached for walker and lost balance, fell to floor. Intervention-keep walker close to him at table. There is no root cause analysis for this fall.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environme...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections such as COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents (R) in the facility.
-The facility did not have a system in place to keep up to date on COVID-19 guidance.
-The facility did not place residents (R22, R36, and R41) that were unvaccinated in TBP (Transmission Based Precautions) during a COVID-19 outbreak.
-Staff were hanging gowns used in a COVID-19 positive room on the outside of the room door.
-Receptacles used for removal of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for COVID-19 positive residents were in the hallway.
-The facility did not have a process in place to accurately monitor staff and visitors temperatures during screenings.
This is evidenced by:
The CDC's (Center for Disease Control) updated guidance, titled Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes dated 2/2/22, states in part: .Residents and HCP (Health Care Providers) who are not up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccination doses: .should generally be restricted to their rooms, even if testing negative, and cared for by HCP using an N95 or higher- level respirator, eye protection, gloves, and gown. They should not participate in group activities.
The facility's policy titled COVID-19: Infection Control, revision date 4/7/21 states in part: .ii. Will use protective equipment (PPE) appropriately. Donning PPE upon room entry and properly discarding before exiting the resident room is done to contain pathogens .Removing and discarding the gown in a dedicated container for waste or linen before leaving the resident room or care area.
The facility does not have a policy for employee screening. They have a Daily Staff Screening that instructs the employee to take his/ her temperature, and review signs and symptoms of COVID-19. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide Surveyor with the manufacturer's recommendations for their facial scanner kiosk that scans the employee for their temperature.
Example 1:
The facility is currently in a COVID-19 outbreak, there are 2 COVID-19 positive residents on the 400 wing. R22 resides on the 400 wing. R22 has received 2 COVID-19 vaccinations, but has declined the 3rd dose; therefore, she is not considered up to date with the vaccine. R36 resides on the 400 wing. R36 has received 2 COVID-19 vaccinations, but is not yet due for the 3rd dose; therefore, he is not considered up to date with the vaccine. R41 resides on the 400 wing. R41 has declined all doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, therefore she is not considered up to date with the vaccine. The facility has not placed R22, R36, or R41 on TBP, nor have they required their staff to wear full PPE (gown, N95 respirator, or gloves) when caring for these residents.
On 2/21/22 at 10:21 AM, Surveyor was on the 400 wing. Surveyor observed reusable isolation gowns hanging on the outside of a COVID Positive room. The gowns were on the outside of the room door and the dirty linen bin in the hallway. Staff working the 400 wing were observed wearing eye protection and surgical masks.
On 2/23/22 at 8:00 AM, Surveyor observed reusable isolation gowns hanging on the outside of the door of room COVID positive room on the 400 wing.
On 2/23/22 at 9:15 AM, Surveyor observed reusable isolation gowns hanging on the outside of the door of the COVID positive room on the 400 wing.
On 2/24/22 at 12:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed IP I (Infection Preventionist) Surveyor asked IP I to help this Surveyor understand why there were used isolation gowns hanging outside of a COVID positive room, IP I stated that during the facility's big COVID-19 outbreak, they had to reuse gowns and that staff is just used to reusing equipment. Surveyor asked IP I if the gowns should be doffed inside the room or outside, IP I stated staff should exit the room and then take their PPE off in the hallway. Surveyor asked IP I why the soiled linen bin is in the hallway, IP I stated that is for when staff remove their PPE. Surveyor asked IP I if doffing in the hallway and hanging used gowns on the outside of resident's doors is considered appropriate infection control practices to prevent infection, IP I stated no. Surveyor asked IP I if she had reviewed the updated guidance from the CDC regarding TBP and residents that are not up to date on their COVID-19 vaccinations, IP I stated that she had thought that she had read the most recent guidance. Surveyor reviewed the updated guidance with IP I, which states that residents that are not up to date should be isolated to their room and that staff should be wearing full PPE; IP I stated that she had not read the updated guidance.
On 2/24/22 at 1:08 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA J (Certified Nursing Assistant). Surveyor asked CNA J if she had received education regarding donning and doffing PPE, CNA J stated yes and explained to Surveyor the donning and doffing process. Surveyor asked CNA J where she received the guidance to hang the used isolation gowns on the outside of the resident's room, CNA J stated that they started doing it at the beginning of COVID. Surveyor asked CNA J if the dirty linen bins had ever been inside the resident rooms, CNA J stated that they have always been in the hallway.
On 2/24/22 at 1:34 PM Surveyor interviewed CNA K. Surveyor asked CNA K if she had received education regarding donning and doffing PPE, CNA K stated yes and explained to Surveyor the donning and doffing process. Surveyor asked CNA K where she received the guidance to hang the used isolation gowns on the outside of the resident's room, CNA K stated that she had heard it from multiple people through shift to shift report.
On 2/24/22 Surveyor interviewed CNA L. Surveyor asked CNA L if she had received education regarding donning and doffing PPE, CNA L stated yes and explained to Surveyor the donning and doffing process. Surveyor asked CNA L where she received the guidance to hang the used isolation gowns on the outside of the resident's room, CNA L stated that was from when they were using cloth gowns and that the ones they are using now should be disposed with.
Example 2:
Surveyor reviewed staff screenings for the last 4 weeks. Surveyor noted that many staff had a temperature reading of 96.01 degrees F (Fahrenheit). The following list is the temperature data:
1/23/22: 23 out of 44 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/24/22: 41 out of 52 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/25/22: 49 out of 60 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/26/22: 62 out of 65 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/27/22: 46 out of 59 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/28/22: 47 out of 59 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/29/22: 21 out of 30 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/30/22: 18 out of 32 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
1/31/22: 43 out of 52 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/1/22: 44 out of 65 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/2/22: 57 out of 63 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/3/22: 45 out of 52 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/4/22: 40 out of 48 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/5/22: 30 out of 37 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/6/22: 29 out of 39 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/7/22: 47 out of 56 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/8/22: 37 out of 56 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/9/22: 52 out of 66 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/10/22: 42 out of 62 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/11/22: 41 out of 60 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/12/22: 18 out of 32 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/13/22: 23 out of 33 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/14/22: 45 out of 55 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/15/22: 38 out of 60 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/16/22: 43 out of 64 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/17/22: 45 out of 54 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/18/22: 40 out of 51 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/19/22: 39 out of 45 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/20/22: 27 out of 39 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/21/22: 41 out of 59 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/22/22: 34 out of 50 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
2/23/22: 7 out of 7 staff screened with a temperature of 96.01 degrees F.
It is important to note that the screening log indicates that on 2/23/22, no staff screened in after 4:04 AM. Additionally, the 3 Surveyors screened in at 96.01 degrees F on all 4 days of the survey.
On 2/23/22 at 12:46 PM, Surveyor interviewed BOM N (Business Office Manager). Surveyor asked BOM N how often she reviews the employee and visitor screenings, BOM N stated that she reviews them at least once a week. Surveyor asked BOM N if she noticed the frequent readings of 96.01 degrees F on the screening log, BOM N stated that it was because everyone is coming in from the cold and that is the lowest temperature that the machine reads. Surveyor asked if that would be considered an accurate temperature, BOM N stated that even when they had the hand- help thermometer, it would read low and would have to wait for staff to warm up and then re-check it. Surveyor asked BOM N how often the machine gets calibrated, BOM N stated that she does not know.
On 2/24/22 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B what her expectation was for staff screenings, DON B stated that she expects all staff to screen before going to the floor. Surveyor asked DON B how often the screenings should be reviewed, DON B stated they should be reviewed as needed and that if staff have a temperature it is reported to the nurse and they are asked to leave the building. DON B stated that she doesn't really have anything to do with it. Surveyor asked DON B how she can be assured that the scanner is giving an accurate reading if instead of reading low, it gives a reading of 96.01 degrees F, DON B stated that we can't be assured of an accurate reading with any thermometer.
On 2/24/22 at 10:33 AM, Surveyor interviewed MS O (Maintenance Supervisor). MS O reported to Surveyor that the temperature scanner updates itself with ambient temperature automatically, so he has never calibrated the machine. MS O stated that it will not give an accurate temperature if you walk in from the cold and that staff needs to wait 30-40 seconds before scanning. MS O stated that it is set to read 96.01 degrees F as the lowest temperature and flags staff if reading is 99.0 degrees F or above. Surveyor asked MS O if he has shared this information with the DON or the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator), MS O stated that he just received this information. Surveyor asked MS O if he had the manufacturer's recommendations for the scanner, MS O reported that they are supposed to be sending him something.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not post the actual hours for licensed and unlicensed staff scheduled on the daily nurse staffing postings during the month of February 202...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not post the actual hours for licensed and unlicensed staff scheduled on the daily nurse staffing postings during the month of February 2022. This has the potential to affect all 46 residents in the facility.
The facility's Nursing Staff sheet postings were not updated and do not reflect actual hours worked.
Evidenced by:
Division of Quality Assurance (DQA) memo 12-020 titled Clarification Concerning Posting Requirements for Nurse Staffing documents: Required Staffing Information .Nursing homes must post information about the number of staff directly responsible for resident care on each shift. This information must be posted in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors at the start of each shift .
The information that is posted must include the following .
1. Facility name. 2. The current date. 3. The total number of staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for each of the following categories: licensed (RNs (Registered Nurse), LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurse)), and unlicensed (CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant)). (For example, 1 RN, 2 LPNs, and 4.5 CNAs.) The number of RNs must be separate from the number of LPNs. 4. The actual hours worked per shift for each of the following categories: licensed (RNs, LPNs), and unlicensed (CNAs). 5. Resident census. Timing: Information is to be posted daily and must be present at the start of each shift. Nursing homes can choose to post staffing information for the entire day or for the current shift. Nursing homes are required to update the posted staffing if any changes arise, for example, if a nursing assistant calls in sick or goes home sick and is not replaced.
The facility posts individual forms of the daily Nursing Staff sheet. Surveyor reviewed the facility's Nursing Staff and the facility's Staff Schedules for February 6th thru February 24th, 2022 noting the following discrepancies: Staff posting do not include the actual hour staff worked and are not updated when staffing changes occur.
On 2/23/22 at 8:55 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA/Scheduler P. Surveyor asked CNA/Scheduler P to explain her process for completing the daily census postings for staff. CNA/Scheduler P stated, I post them daily and then I try to get them updated on who actually worked within a few days. Surveyor asked if the Nurse Staff postings should be updated to reflect any changes related to staff call-in's and total the actual hours worked as they occur, CNA/Scheduler P stated this is how I was taught to complete them and I don't do that as it occurs, as I am not always here. Surveyor asked CNA/Scheduler P if she is the one that updates the staffing sheets. CNA/Scheduler P stated, Yes. Surveyor asked CNA/Scheduler P about posting actual hours staff worked on staffing census sheets. CNA/Scheduler P stated, This is how I was taught to do it. If it is not right I want to know so I am doing it right.
The facility's Nursing Staff posting do not reflect actual staffing hours and are not updated with changes and should be.