JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Jewish Home and Care Center has a Trust Grade of D, which means it is below average and raises some concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #153 out of 321 facilities in Wisconsin, placing it in the top half, and #9 out of 32 in Milwaukee County, indicating there are only a few local options that are better. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 2 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, and it has reported serious incidents, including a resident receiving medication that was not prescribed and another resident experiencing multiple falls leading to serious injuries due to inadequate supervision. Staffing is a strength, earning a 5-star rating, with a turnover rate of 33%, which is lower than the state average, but the facility has less RN coverage than 90% of facilities in Wisconsin, which is concerning. Additionally, the facility has incurred average fines of $8,959, suggesting some compliance issues that need to be addressed.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Wisconsin
- #153/321
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near Wisconsin's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $8,959 in fines. Lower than most Wisconsin facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wisconsin. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below Wisconsin average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Wisconsin average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
13pts below Wisconsin avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, document review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure narcotic counts were initialed by two nurses on all three shifts (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, 3:00 PM to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R18 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses include ankylosing spondylitis of unspecified sites in spine, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a pertinent diagnosis of dementia. R43 was began hospice services on 12/19/...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 34 staff received annual N95 respirator fit testing.
Surveyor reviewed the facility's infection control program. On 1/21/25 at 8:27 a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store and prepare food in accordance with professional ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to administer medications as ordered for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (R2) was free from significant medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
7 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R55) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that staff promptly consulted with a physician when residents experienced significant changes of condition for 1 (R48) of 4 residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents who entered the facility with limit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they followed the posted menus and meet the nutritional needs of residents who required an alternative...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they stored, prepared and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safet...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not follow its water management plan control measures which could affect a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility did not immediately notify the Resident representative for 1 (R1) of 3 sample...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 1 (R1) of 3 Residents reviewed for falls received treatmen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 33% turnover. Below Wisconsin's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Jewish Home And's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Jewish Home And Staffed?
CMS rates JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Jewish Home And?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 13 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Jewish Home And?
JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 102 certified beds and approximately 75 residents (about 74% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin.
How Does Jewish Home And Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) matches the state average, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Jewish Home And?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Jewish Home And Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Jewish Home And Stick Around?
JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Wisconsin nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Jewish Home And Ever Fined?
JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER has been fined $8,959 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Wisconsin average of $33,168. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Jewish Home And on Any Federal Watch List?
JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.