CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/17/22 indicates that they require...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/17/22 indicates that they require total assistance with activities of daily living including bed mobility. R13 is rarely to never understood. R13 was noted to be at high risk for pressure injuries.
On 9/14/22 at 3:50 PM Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
On 9/14/22 at 9:50 AM, Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
On 9/14/22 at 12:35 PM, Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
On 9/14/22 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
On 9/15/22 at 8:35 AM, Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
On 9/15/22 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
On 9/15/22 at 1:05 PM, Surveyor observed R13's feet resting directly on their mattress.
Surveyor reviewed R 13's skin integrity care plan dated 7/17/22 reads Resident is at risk for skin integrity condition, or pressure sores r/t: Diabetes, PVD, end-stage renal, History of pressure sores, Impaired mobility, Incontinence, Thin/Fragile skin. R13's skin integrity care plan interventions include prevalon boots while in bed with an initiation date of 7/27/22. R13's CNA Kardex indicates R13 is to wear prevalon boots while in bed.
On 9/19/22 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor shared concerns related to observations of R13's feet resting directly on their mattress on 9/14/22 and 9/15/22. No additional information was provided to Surveyor at this time.
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents (R) without a Pressure Injury (PI) do not develop pressure injuries, and receive appropriate care, treatment, & preventative measures to promote healing for 2 (R18 & R13) of 8 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries.
*An unavoidable skin integrity care plan was developed for R18 on 09/02/20, which was R18's admission date. On 07/13/21, R18 was identified with a Stage 3 coccyx pressure injury. On 07/15/21, the facility developed a pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan. R18's coccyx pressure injury healed on 07/20/21. On 08/18/21, the weekly skin review documents a Stage 2 sacrum pressure injury.
On 08/19/21, the pressure injury weekly tracker documents a Stage 3 coccyx pressure injury with measurements of 4.6 x 2.5 x 0.1 The facility did not clarify R18's at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores intervention of encouraging frequent repositioning in bed and chair when R18 required extensive assistance with one person physical assist for bed mobility. The facility did not revise R18's pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan after R18 developed the stage 3 coccyx pressure injury. This care plan did not include repositioning until 06/16/22.
On 09/07/21, R18's coccyx pressure injury declined to unstageable. There was no revision to either at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores or pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan until 05/27/22.
On 11/29/21, R18's coccyx pressure injury with measurements of 2 x 2 x 0.4 is identified as a Stage 4. WD (Wound Doctor) R's recommendations of limit sitting to 60 minutes; off-load wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side and front to back in bed every 1-2 hours if able, were not implemented into R18's plan of care or clarified with WD R and R18's care plans were not revised to include turn and reposition every 1-2 hours until 06/16/22. On 11/29/21, WD R ordered treatment of: wash with soap and water, dry, apply Dakins soaked gauze to wound bed, apply bordered gauze, change twice daily and as needed. This pressure injury treatment was not started until 12/02/21, three days later.
On 06/06/22, R18's coccyx pressure injury was identified as being infected and Doxycycline (an antibiotic) 100 mg (milligrams) twice daily was ordered.
On 06/20/22, WD R recommended R18 be sent out to the ER (emergency room) for debridement under GA (general anesthesia), due to necrotizing fasciitis.
R18 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 06/25/22.
On 09/15/22 & 09/20/22, Surveyor observed R18 in bed with the air mattress off.
The facility's failure to revise R18's skin integrity care plan when R18 developed a Stage 3 coccyx pressure injury on 08/19/22, not revising the care plan after the pressure injury declined to unstageable on 09/07/21, and not clarifying encourage frequent repositioning when R18 required extensive assistance with bed mobility and the progression of the coccyx pressure injury to a Stage 4 on 11/29/21, created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 11/29/21.
Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A & ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) D of the immediate jeopardy on 09/21/22 at 2:05 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 09/22/22. The deficient practice continues at a scope and severity of D (potential for harm/isolated) related to the example involving R13 and as the facility continues to implement its action plan.
*R13's heels were not off-loaded according to the plan of care.
Findings include:
The Pressure and Non-pressure Injuries policy & procedure with an original effective date of 08/2/21 documents under Policy: This center will complete a comprehensive assessment to identify risk factors for the development of pressure injuries and put in place measures intended to achieve the goal of prevention of pressure injuries in our residents.
Under procedure documents:
Complete the Braden scale to assess risk of developing a PI (pressure injury). It consists of six categories: sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction/shear. A Braden Scale assessment tool will be completed:
i. Upon admission/re-admission
ii. Weekly for 3 more weeks in addition to initial assessment.
iii. Upon a significant Change in Condition
iv. Quarterly with the MDS (minimum data set) schedule
v. As needed.
Under the Care Plan section documents: A Comprehensive Skin Integrity Care Plan is based on resident history, review of Skin Assessment, Braden Scale Scoring, Nutritional Assessments, resident and family interviews, and staff observations. Consider the area of risk, as well as overall risk assessment score of the Braden Scale. Communicate identified risk factors and interventions to direct care staff.
2. Develop interventions based on individual Risk Factors including, but not limited to, weight, presence of edema, overall health status/comorbidities, use of medical devices, presence of acute infection, end-of life/hospice, resident choice/preferences, or medications that may impact healing.
a. In the context of the resident's choices, clinical condition, and physician input, the resident's care plan should establish relevant goals and approaches to stabilize or improve co-morbidities, such as attempts to minimize clinically significant blood sugar fluctuations, and other interventions aimed at limiting the effects of risk factors associated with pressure injuries. Alternatively, center staff and practitioner should document clinically valid reasons why such interventions were not appropriate or feasible. For a resident to exercise his or her right appropriately to make informed choices about care and treatment or to decline treatment, the center and the resident (or if applicable, the resident representative) must discuss the resident's condition, treatment options, expected outcomes, and consequences of declining treatment or interventions. Centers should document this discussion in the Risk vs Benefit UDA in the electronic medical record. The care plan should be updated to reflect the resident's choice and what interventions will be in place to minimize risk to the resident.
R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus (DM), Parkinson's Disease, and hypertension. R18 was admitted to hospice on 06/17/21.
The at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores r/t lymphedema, edema, DM care plan initiated 09/02/20 & revised 06/27/22 has the following interventions:
* Apply pressure reduction chair cushion on wheelchair and pressure reduction mattress on the bed. Ensure cushion is properly placed, clean and dry. Initiated 09/20/20 and revised & canceled on 07/28/22.
* Assess skin for redness or pressure related changes with each care encounter. Report any changes immediately. Initiated 09/02/20 & revised 07/28/22.
* Conduct pressure injury skin assessments (i.e. Braden scale) as indicated. Initiated 09/02/20.
* Encourage frequent repositioning in bed and chair. Initiated 09/02/20 & revised 09/30/20.
* Encourage to float heels off the surface of the bed. Initiated 09/30/20.
* Head to toe assessment by licensed nurse performed weekly at minimum. Initiated 09/02/20.
* Keep resident clean and dry. Use barrier cream after good peri-care. Apply proper incontinent products as indicated. Initiated 09/02/20 & revised 07/19/21.
* Place washcloth (palm guards) between hands check placement every shift. Initiated 12/10/21 & revised 07/28/22.
* Unavoidable statement signed by MD (medical doctor). Initiated 05/27/22.
* Apply alternating pressure air mattress to bed if indicated. Assure proper inflation check frequently. Initiated & revised 07/28/22.
* Avoid friction/shearing while repositioning: if Resident is unable to assist use at least 2 staff members, use lift sheet, bed should be as flat as possible with lifting. Initiated 07/28/22.
* Prevalon boots on while in bed and as tolerated by resident. Initiated 08/03/22.
The significant change MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 06/24/21 documents R18 has short term & long term memory problems and is severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. R18 requires extensive assistance with one person physical assist for bed mobility, transfer, eating, & toilet and does not ambulate. R18 is coded as always being incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. R18 is at risk for pressure injuries and is coded as not having any pressure injuries.
The pressure injury CAA (care area assessment) dated 06/24/21, under analysis of findings documents: Significant change in status assessment. Resident signed onto hospice services. Diagnoses include; Parkinson's, DM2 (diabetes mellitus) with Neuropathy, HLD (hyperlipidemia), HTN (hypertension), Lymphedema, UTI (urinary tract infection). Always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel during the look back period. Staff provides incontinence cares. Incontinent briefs in place. Takes diuretic which can contribute to urgency and frequency. Staff to provide incontinence care in timely manner to maintain clean dry skin. Staff to assess skin integrity. Staff to assist with repositioning while in bed and/or chair.
The wound evaluation tracker dated 07/13/22 for the question, When was the wound identified? documents 07/13/2021. Under current wound status/additional comments documents, New acquire stage III (3) pressure injury to coccyx. 0.4 x (times) 0.4 x 0.1 in dimensions. 100% granular tissue. No drainage, no s/s (signs/symptoms) of infection, surrounding tissues are warm, dry and intact. No pain with cleansing. New wound care orders received. Applying air mattress through hospice care. Hospice nurse in to eval. (evaluate). POA (power of attorney) [name] updated. [Name] NP (Nurse Practitioner) updated.
A treatment to wash, dry, apply foam dressing with directions to change every 72 hours and as needed was implemented on 07/14/21 and continued until the treatment was discontinued on 09/08/21. A pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan was initiated on 07/15/21.
The Braden Scale assessment dated [DATE] has a score of 15 which indicates at risk. Surveyor noted the next Braden was completed 07/02/22.
The pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan initiated 07/15/21 & revised 08/03/22 documents interventions of:
* Air mattress - monitor for proper setting/function q (every) shift and prn (as needed) (keep at 150 pounds). Initiated 7/15/21 & revised 7/28/22.
* Complete Braden scale per Living Center Policy. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Conduct weekly skin inspection. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Do not massage over bony prominence. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Nutritional and hydration support. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Prevalon boots on while in bed and as tolerated by resident. Initiated 7/19/21 & revised 8/3/22.
* Provide pressure reducing wheelchair cushion. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Provide pressure reducing/relieving mattress. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Provide thorough skin care after incontinent episodes and apply barrier cream. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Skin assessment to be completed per Living Center Policy. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Treatments as ordered. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Weekly wound assessment. Initiated 7/15/21.
* Turn and reposition Q (every) 1-2 hours. Initiated 06/16/22.
The social service note dated 07/16/21 documents: Writer met with husband this date. Aware of change in transfer status; Res currently requires hoyer lift with staff due to decreased strength/difficulty standing. Support provided to husband. No concerns noted at this time. SS (social service) will cont (continue) to follow.
The wound evaluation tracker dated 07/20/21 under current wound status/additional comments documents: Wound is now closed. Continue to monitor weekly for re-opening with wound rounds. Surrounding tissues are warm, dry, and intact.
The nurses note dated 08/18/21 documents: CNA called writer to room to report open area, pressure injury to top crease of buttocks. Writer cleansed area with saline and covered with Mepilex. Resident skin warm and dry. No active bleeding noted, no s/s (signs/symptoms) of infection noted. Call out to MD (medical doctor) to update. Call out to POA (power of attorney) to update. All aware. Will monitor.
The weekly skin review dated 08/18/21 documents: Sacrum Stage 2 pressure injury in top crease of buttocks. Surveyor noted there are no measurements or description of wound bed for this weekly skin review.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 08/19/21 documents: Coccyx, Pressure, with measurements of 4.6 x 2.5 x 0.1. Stage III (3), 100% granulation.
The nurses note dated 08/19/21 documents: Follow up O/A (open area) to crease in buttocks. O/A (open area) measured today by unit manager. Treatment changed and C/D/I (clean dry intact). Skin warm and dry. Resident in bed resting at this time. Will monitor.
The nurses note dated 08/20/21 documents: IDT (interdisciplinary team) reviewed new pressure injury to coccyx. Resident with stage 3 4.6 x 2.5 x 0.1 cm pressure injury to coccyx. Resident often sitting in Broda chair with limited mobility to reposition off of one spot d/t (due to) disease process. Resident with air mattress in place and protective foam dressing. Reposition side to side q 2 hours and as patient tolerates while in bed. POA, ADON, and MD aware and dressing order received. Will follow with weekly wound rounds.
The Facility did not clarify R18's at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores intervention of encourage frequent repositioning in bed and chair when R18 required extensive assistance with one person physical assist for bed mobility. The Facility did not revise R18's pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan after R18 developed the stage 3 coccyx pressure injury. This care plan did not include repositioning until 06/16/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 08/24/21 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 4.0 x 3.0 x 0.1, Stage III (3) and the wound bed described as 100% granulation.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 08/31/21 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 4.0 x 3.0 x 0.1, Stage III (3) and the wound bed described as 100% granulation.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 09/07/21 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 4.0 x 3.0 x 0.1. The stage is unstageable and the wound bed is 75% slough and 25% granulation. Under comments, documents slough scattered throughout wound bed, new order received for santyl. Surveyor noted there was no revision to either at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores or pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan until 05/27/22.
R18's treatment was changed on 09/09/21 with directions to wash with 1/2 strength Dakins, dry, apply santyl to wound bed, apply foam dressing and change every day and as needed. This treatment was discontinued on 11/23/21.
The nutrition note dated 09/09/21 documents: Last weight was 152.9# (8/9), has order for d/c (discontinue) weights per hospice. Has S-DTI (suspected deep tissue injury) to L (left) heel (unchanged per 9/7 wound tracker) and PI unstageable to coccyx (worsening per 9/7 wound tracker). Estimated needs are 1738-2085 kcal (kilocalorie's) (25-30 kcal/kg(kilogram)) and 70-83 g (grams) PRO (protein)(1-1.2 g/kg). Intake is 73% avg (average) plus snacks of a regular diet. Meal intake provides approximately 1791 kcal and 70 g PRO. Has order for 2 cal supplement 4 oz BID (twice daily) (480 kcal and 20 g PRO), per MAR (medication administration record) res (resident) drinks 50-100% of supplement. Meeting estimated needs. No new nutrition interventions recommended at this time. Goal is comfort cares. Will continue to monitor/follow-up PRN.
The pressure injury weekly trackers dated 09/14/21 & 09/21/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 4.0 x 3.0 x 0.1. Stage is unstageable and wound bed is 100% slough.
The quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of 09/24/21 documents R18 has short & long term memory problems and is severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. R18 is dependent with two plus person physical assist for bed mobility & transfer, does not ambulate, requires extensive assistance with one person for eating, and is dependent with one person physical assist for toilet use. R18 is always incontinent of urine and bowel. R18 is at risk for developing pressure injuries and is coded as having 1 Unstageable pressure injury.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 09/28/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 2.7 x 2.0 x 0.1. Stage is unstageable and wound bed is 25% granulation and 75% slough.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 10/05/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 2.0 x 1.5 x 0.1. Stage is unstageable and wound bed is 50% granulation and 50% slough.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 10/12/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 2.0 x 1.1 x 0.1. Stage is unstageable and wound bed is 90% granulation and 10% slough.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 10/19/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 2.0 x 1.0 x 0.1. Stage is Stage III (3) and wound bed is 100% granulation.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 10/26/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 1.8 x 1.0 x 0.1. Stage is Stage III (3) and wound bed is 100% granulation.
The NP (nurse practitioner) note dated 10/28/21 documents no new open areas on skin noted. Under plan, includes pressure offloading.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 11/02/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 1.5 x 1.0 x 0.1. Stage is Stage III (3) and wound bed is 100% granulation.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 11/08/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.1. Stage is Stage III (3) and wound bed is 100% granulation.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 11/15/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.1. Stage is Stage III (3) and wound bed is 95% granulation and 5% necrotic. Under comments documents same as previous week. Small amount of necrotic tissue noted towards wound margin. Scant serous drainage noted. No pain. Surveyor noted there was no MD notification on this pressure injury weekly tracker. Surveyor noted there was no revision to either at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores or pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan until 05/27/22 and the treatment was not changed until 11/24/21.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 11/22/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements as 1.3 x 1.2 x 0.2. Stage is unstageable and wound bed is 25% granulation and 75% slough. Surveyor noted there was no revision to either at risk for unavoidable skin integrity condition or pressure sores or pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan until 05/27/22.
R18's treatment was changed with a start date of 11/24/21 with direction to wash coccyx pressure injury with 1/2 strength Dakins, dry, apply medihoney to wound bed, apply foam dressing change every day and as needed. This treatment was discontinued on 12/01/21.
The nutrition note dated 11/23/21 documents Using 11/3 weight res (resident) triggers for 6.3% weight loss over 1 month and 10.7% weight loss over 3 months. Weight loss likely r/t (related to) varied intake at times and overall decline in condition, on hospice. Weight is PRN per hospice. Per wound trackers on 11/15 res has shearing to R (right) butt and PI stage 3 to coccyx (unchanged). Intake is 71% avg plus snacks of a regular diet x 7 days. Meal intake provides approximately 1754 kcal and 68 g PRO. Has order for 2 cal supplement 4 oz BID (twice daily) (480 kcal, 20 g PRO, Per MAR drinking avg 68% of supplement). Estimated needs are 1586-1904 kcal (25-30 kcal/kg) and 76-95 g PRO (1.2-1.5 g/kg). Meeting estimated needs. BMI is 26.4 (overweight but optimal for geriatric population). Potential for weight fluctuations r/t fluid shifts d/t (due to) diuretic tx. Potential for weight loss r/t decline in condition. Goal is comfort cares. Will monitor/follow-up PRN.
The MD note dated 11/23/21 includes pressure offloading and wound cares as ordered.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 11/29/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.4. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 60% granulation and 40% slough.
On 11/29/21, WD (wound doctor) R assessed R18's coccyx pressure injury. The initial wound evaluation & management summary dated 11/29/21 for site (1) documents: Stage 4 pressure wound sacrum full thickness with measurements of 2 x 2 x 0.4 cm (centimeters). Under surgical excision debridement procedure for indication for procedure documents. Remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents: Sodium hypochlorite solution (Dakins) apply twice daily for 30 days: soaked gauze. Secondary dressing(s) documents: Gauze island w/bdr (with border) apply twice daily for 30 days. For plan of care reviewed and addressed under recommendations documents: Limit sitting to 60 minutes; off-load wound; reposition per facility protocol; Turn side to side and front to back in bed every 1-2 hours if able. Surveyor noted R18's care plans were not revised to include turn and reposition every 1-2 hours until 06/16/22.
The treatment to R18's coccyx pressure injury to wash with soap and water, dry, apply Dakins soaked gauze to wound bed, apply bordered gauze, change twice daily and as needed was not started until 12/02/21, three days later. This treatment was discontinued on 12/07/21.
Surveyor noted WD R assessed R18's coccyx pressure injury weekly with the exception of the week of 05/01/22 to 05/07/22 and 07/03/22 to 07/09/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 12/06/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 1.5 x 2.2 x 0.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 60% granulation and 40% slough.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 12/06/21 under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents: Leptospermum honey apply once daily for 30 days and secondary dressing(s) documents: Gauze island w/bdr apply once daily for 23 days. The Facility started a treatment to wash with soap and water, dry, apply medihoney to wound bed, apply bordered gauze, change daily and as needed on 12/08/22, two days later. This treatment was discontinued on 12/17/21.
WD R continues to recommend limit sitting to 60 minute; off-load wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side and front to back in bed every 1-2 hours if able. Surveyor noted R18's care plans were not revised to include turn and reposition every 1-2 hours until 06/16/22. Surveyor noted there is no indication the facility clarified WD R's recommendation if there were questions regarding WD R's recommendations on repositioning for R18.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 12/13/21 for coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.0 x 2.5 x 0.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 60% granulation and 40% slough. On 12/17/21 the treatment was changed from the day shift to the evening shift.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 12/20/21 changes the pressure injury site to sacrum. Measurements are 1.8 x 2 x 0.7. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 60% granulation and 40% slough. Under additional intervention/plan documents: slowly improved no s/s of infection.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 12/27/21 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements are 1.8 x 2.8 x 1.2. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 60% granulation and 40% slough.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 12/27/21 includes the same measurements as the Facility's pressure injury weekly tracker. Under wound progress documents: Deteriorated. Under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents: Collagen gel/paste apply once daily for 30 days; Alginate calcium apply once daily for 30 days and secondary dressing(s) documents Gauze island w/bdr apply once daily for 30 days. The Facility started the treatment to wash with soap and water, dry, apply silvakollagen to wound bed, cover with calcium alginate followed by bordered gauze change daily and as needed on 12/29/21, two days later. This treatment was discontinued on 01/19/22.
WD R continues to recommend limit sitting to 60 minutes; off-load wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side and front to back in bed every 1-2 hours if able. Surveyor noted R18's care plans were not revised to include turn and reposition every 1-2 hours until 06/16/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 01/03/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.0 x 3.0 x 1.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 30% granulation, 40% slough, & 30% necrotic. Under comments documents continue treatment x 1 more week if continues to deteriorate then change larger in size moderate drainage no s/s of infection wound doctor debrided necrotic/slough tissue as able 30% necrotic.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 01/10/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.5 x 2.4 x 1.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 40% granulation, 40% slough, & 20% necrotic.
The physician progress note dated 01/13/22 under plan includes every two hours turning and skin & back care.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 01/17/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.5 x 2.4 x 1.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 40% granulation, 40% slough, & 20% necrotic.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 01/17/22 includes the same measurements as the Facility's pressure injury weekly tracker. Under wound progress documents no change. Under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents Alginate calcium apply once daily for 9 days; Leptospermum honey apply once daily for 30 days and secondary dressing(s) documents Gauze island w/bdr apply once daily for 9 days. The Facility started the treatment to wash with soap and water, dry, apply medihoney to wound bed, cover with calcium alginate followed by bordered gauze change daily and as needed on 01/19/22, two days later. This treatment was discontinued on 02/01/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 01/24/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.5 x 2.4 x 2.0. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 50% granulation, 30% slough, & 20% necrotic.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 01/31/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 2.5 x 2.0 x 2.0. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 50% granulation, 30% slough, & 20% necrotic.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 01/31/22 includes the same measurements as the Facility's pressure injury weekly tracker. Under wound progress documents improved. Under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents Sodium hypochlorite solution (Dakins) apply twice daily for 30 days: pack the wound with a wet gauze, wet to dry dressing and secondary dressing(s) documents Gauze island w/bdr apply twice daily for 23 days. The Facility started the treatment to wash with soap and water, dry, lightly pack with Dakins soaked gauze, cover with bordered gauze twice daily and as needed on 02/01/22. This treatment was discontinued on 02/15/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 02/07/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 3.0 x 3.0 x 2.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 30% granulation, 30% slough, & 40% necrotic. Under comments documents worsening. No s/s of infection. New wound treatment started last week. Improvement to wound bed noticed. Larger in size.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 02/07/22 continues to recommend limit sitting to 60 minute; off-load wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side and front to back in bed every 1-2 hours if able. Surveyor noted R18's care plans were not revised to include turn and reposition every 1-2 hours until 06/16/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 02/14/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 3.0 x 3.0 x 2.5. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 50% granulation, 30% slough, & 20% necrotic. Under comments documents Size remains same. Tissue to wound bed improving significantly since prior week. More granular tissue present with less amount of slough/necrotic tissue. Surrounding tissue is warm, dry and intact. No s/s of infection. Debrided with wound doctor. New treatment ordered.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 02/14/22 includes the same measurements as the Facility's pressure injury weekly tracker. Under wound progress documents improved. Under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents Leptospermum honey apply once daily for 30 days; Alginate calcium apply once daily for 30 days and secondary dressing(s) documents Gauze island w/bdr apply twice daily for 9 days. The Facility started the treatment to cleanse, dry, apply medihoney to wound bed, cover with calcium alginate then bordered gauze daily and as needed with a start date of 02/16/22, two days later. This treatment was discontinued on 02/21/22.
The pressure injury weekly tracker dated 02/21/22 for the coccyx pressure injury documents measurements of 4.5 x 3.5 x 3. Stage is Stage 4 and wound bed is 10% granulation, 30% slough, & 60% necrotic. Under comments documents Wound is larger in size with worsening tissue noted to wound bed. New treatment ordered. Wound debrided by wound doctor. Surrounding tissue is warm, dry and intact. No pain noted to area.
WD R's wound evaluation & management summary dated 02/21/22 includes the same measurements as the Facility's pressure injury weekly tracker. Under wound progress documents deteriorated. Under dressing treatment plan for primary dressing(s) documents Metronidazole gel apply once daily for 30 days; Sodium hypochlorite solution (Dakins) apply twice daily for 30 days and secondary dressing(s) documents Gauze island w/bdr apply twice daily for 30 days. The Facility started the treatment to cleanse, dry, apply Metronidazole cream to wound bed for AM shift followed by Dakins soaked gauze. Change twice daily and as needed with a[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0557
(Tag F0557)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility did not treat 1 (R18) of 3 Residents reviewed with dignity and respect.
Findings include:
R18's diagnoses includes diabetes mellitus, Par...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility did not treat 1 (R18) of 3 Residents reviewed with dignity and respect.
Findings include:
R18's diagnoses includes diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, and hypertension.
R18's Annual MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 6/30/22 documents a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 00 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R18 requires extensive assistance with one person physical assist for bed mobility, is dependent with two plus persons for transfers, does not ambulate, and is dependent with one person physical assist for toilet use. R18 is coded as always incontinent of urine and bowel.
On 9/15/22, at 3:44 p.m. Surveyor observed CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-L with gloves on, remove the pillow from under R18's right side, remove the sheet from R18 and informed R18 she is going to change her bed. CNA-L removed R18's pressure relieving boots & pants, removed her gloves, stated she needed to get a fitted sheet and left R18's room. CNA-L did not cover R18 with a sheet prior to leaving the room leaving R18 wearing a shirt and an incontinence product. CNA-L returned to R18's room a couple minutes later, placed gloves on and placed the fitted sheet partially on R18's bed. CNA-L removed R18's shirt, washed R18's upper body, and unfastened R18's incontinent product.
At 3:54 p.m., CNA-L indicated she needed to get another aide, covered R18 with a bath blanket, removed her gloves and left R18's room.
At 4:00 p.m., CNA-L returned to R18's room, placed gloves on, removed the bath blanket, pulled the soiled product out from under R18 and threw the soiled incontinence product in the garbage and placed the sheet on the floor.
At 4:02 p.m., CNA-M entered R18's room. CNA-L removed the dressing from R18's coccyx stating it's saturated. CNA-M informed CNA-L she was going to let the nurse know & left R18's room. CNA-L washed R18's buttocks and placed the incontinence product under R18's right side.
At 4:05 p.m., CNA-L informed R18's she's almost done. Surveyor observed R18 has not been covered with a sheet/blanket since CNA-L returned at 4:00 p.m.
At 4:09 p.m., CNA-L washed R18's frontal perineal area, pulled the incontinence product between R18's legs and fixed the bottom sheet. CNA-L placed a pillow under R18's head, emptied the wash basin, added fresh water, and washed under left arm R18's. Surveyor noted R18 has not been covered and is wearing only an incontinence product.
At 4:18 p.m., CNA-M entered R18's room, picked up the soiled items from the floor and placed the linen in a bag, removed her gloves and placed gloves on. CNA-M informed CNA-L she needs to have boots on and placed the pressure relieving boots at the end of the bed.
At 4:22 p.m., CNA-L & CNA-M positioned R18 towards the left of the bed and rolled to the right. CNA-L then washed R18's back.
At 4:23 p.m., DON (Director of Nursing)-B entered R18's room with treatment supplies which DON-B started to open.
At 4:25 p.m. DON-B stated let's get a gown on her and a gown was placed on R18 covering R18.
On 9/20/22, at 9:05 a.m. Surveyor asked DON-B during cares if staff has to leave the room or they are finished washing portions of the Resident's body, should staff cover a Resident. DON-B replied yes and informed Surveyor she thinks this would be common sense. Surveyor informed DON-B of the observation on 9/15/22. DON-B informed Surveyor she would follow up and educate.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the environment was safe, clean, comfortable, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the environment was safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike for 1 (R19) of 19 sampled residents.
R19's room had medications and debris in the air conditioning unit below the window that had been present for an indeterminate amount of time.
Findings include:
R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of colon cancer, cerebral palsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malnutrition, and legal blindness.
R19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/6/2022 indicated R19 had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 and needed limited to extensive assistance with activities of daily living. The Cognitive Care Area Assessment (CAA) with the admission MDS assessment stated R19 had intact vision with corrective lenses.
On 9/14/2022, at 9:49 AM, R19 was observed in his room in a wheelchair. R19 had garbled speech and did not fully comprehend Surveyor's questions. Surveyor observed the air conditioning unit in R19's room. The air conditioning unit was located below the window and had slotted vents approximately half an inch apart, about the width of a finger. Surveyor observed a small peach-colored pill and a smaller white pill in the vent portion of the air conditioning unit that was in touching range along with other crumb-like debris.
Surveyor had been made aware medications were observed in the air conditioning unit in July 2022.
In an interview on 9/19/2022, at 1:30 PM, Surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-U how often resident rooms are cleaned. LPN-U stated they are cleaned daily by the housekeeping staff. Surveyor asked LPN-U if anyone had complained of air conditioning units not being clean. LPN-U stated no one had ever complained about that to LPN-U. Surveyor asked LPN-U if anyone had told any staff members about medications in the air conditioning unit in R19's room. LPN-U stated LPN-U was not aware of any report about medications. Surveyor and LPN-U went into R19's room and observed the two medications in R19's air conditioning unit. LPN-U got a spoon and removed the white pill and when attempting to remove the peach pill, the peach pill disintegrated into a powder. LPN-U cleaned up the powder and disposed of the white pill. LPN-U was not able to fully identify the types of medications the two pills were, but stated they were not R19's pills.
On 9/19/2022, at 3:10 PM, Surveyor shared with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B the observations of pills in R19's air conditioning unit. NHA-A stated LPN-U had shared that finding with administration earlier and stated the pills should not have been there and the air conditioning units should have been cleaned. No further information was provided at that time.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R73) of 1 resident reviewed was properly asses...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R73) of 1 resident reviewed was properly assessed for physical restraints.
R73 did not have an assessment for an abdominal binder that was to be on at all times.
Findings include:
R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: Cerebral Palsy, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and dysphagia.
R73's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/31/2022 indictes R73 is rarely/never understood, is totally dependent on staff for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including eating, and section K is marked none of the above for swallowing disorders and tube feeding is not checked.
R73 is receives continuous tube feeding related to dysphagia and episodes of nausea/vomiting.
R73's Care Plan, dated 08/31/2021 and revised on 02/24/2022 with a target date of 09/18/2022 documents, Need for feeding tube/potential for complications of feeding tube use. Interventions include, abdominal binder in place to prevent displacement (of feeding tube). This intervention was initiated on 07/20/2022.
Surveyor reviewed R73's medical record and noted an active physician's order documenting, Abdominal binder on at all times. Check placement q (every) shift for prevent pulling out G(gastrostomy)-tube. This order was dated 07/26/2022.
Surveyor noted a discontinued physician order stating, Abdominal binder at all times. May remove for showers and skin checks every shift Ensure G(Gastrostomy)-Tube is well secured under binder to prevent resident from pulling it out. Assess skin during flushes and as needed. This order had a start date of 06/01/2022 and a discontinued date of 06/29/2022. Surveyor could not locate a current physician order to assess skin under the abdominal binder.
Surveyor noted R73's medical record documented R73 was sent to the hospital at least six times from January 2022 to June 2022 due to dislodgement of feeding tube.
R73 had an after visit summary from [name of hospital] dated 05/31/2022, which documents: Remove binder twice a day to clean and check g-tube. Surveyor could not find any documentation prior to 05/31/2022 relating to the use of an abdominal binder.
On 09/14/22, at 9:30 AM, Surveyor noted CNA(Certified Nursing Assistant) care card on the back of R73's room door which documented, abd (abdominal) binder on at all times.
Surveyor reviewed R73's medical record for an assessment for the use of the abdominal binder, which surveyor could not locate.
Surveyor observed R73 wearing the abdominal binder on the following dates and times:
On 09/14/22, at 1:10 PM, R73 was lying in bed on back, abdominal binder in place
On 09/14/22, at 3:32 PM, R73 was lying in bed and had abdominal binder in place
On 09/19/22, at 7:52 AM, R73 was dressed, sitting in Broda chair and had abdominal binder in place
On 09/20/22, at 8:01 AM, R73 was lying in bed with abdominal binder in place
On 09/21/22, at 7:54 AM, R73 was dressed, sitting in Broda chair with abdominal binder in place
On 09/15/22, at 2:02 PM, Surveyor interviewed R73's nurse, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-G. LPN-G informed surveyor that R73 did not come to the facility with the abdominal binder and LPN-G was unsure of when R73 received the abdominal binder. LPN-G told surveyor even though R73 wears the abdominal binder, R73 can still pull out the feeding tube.
On 09/19/22, at 1:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed R73's nurse, LPN-G. LPN-G told Surveyor the tube feeding site is cleaned daily and R73 should have the abdominal binder on at all times due to R73 pulling out the feeding tube.
On 09/21/22, at 9:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN-P. LPN-P told surveyor she checks R73's skin every shift and washes the abdominal binder when needed and there should be order for that.
On 09/21/22, at 8:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON (Director of Nursing)-B. DON-B informed Surveyor R73 had the abdominal binder implemented due to R73 pulling out the feeding tube; which per DON-B R73 has been transferred to the hospital multiple times for pulling out the G-Tube. Per DON-B the binder does not have to be on super tight and prior to implementing the abdominal binder, the facility tried covering the tube feeding site with a dressing, keeping the area covered with a shirt/gown/blanket and tried keeping R73 engaged in other activities. DON-B informed Surveyor the nurses should be checking R73's skin under the abdominal binder daily. Surveyor asked if R73 can remove the abdominal binder themselves. DON-B told Surveyor R73 could remove the abdominal binder if R73 got hold of the end of the binder since R73 likes to play with things that are felt. DON-B confirmed that R73 would not be able to remove the abdominal binder on command. Surveyor asked DON-B if any type of restraint/device assessment was done prior to implementing the abdominal binder and if there was a physician's order for nurses to do a skin check under the abdominal binder, because surveyor could not locate a current skin check order. DON-B was not aware of any assessment but would check R73's medical record.
After Surveyor spoke with DON-B, a physician's order for checking skin under the abdominal binder every shift was entered into R73's medical record and a risk vs benefit assessment for the abdominal binder was completed.
On 09/21/22, at 2:02 PM, Surveyor asked ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing)-D
and NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A for a copy of the facilities policy on device/restraints relating to R73's abdominal binder.
Surveyor was told by facility that no policy exists on abdominal binders.
On 9/21/22 Surveyor informed NHA-A and DON-B of the concern the facility did not complete a restraint/device assessment for the use of an abdominal binder on R73 prior to the implementation of the binder and the facility did not identify when the binder would be removed and the skin under the binder would be cleaned and assessed.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to incorpor...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to incorporate all aspects of the resident's medical status for 1 (R21) of 19 sampled residents.
R21 was taking an anticoagulant medication and the comprehensive care plan did not include the effects of the medication or the interventions to ensure R21 did not have bleeding concerns from the medication.
Findings:
The facility policy and procedure entitled Comprehensive Care Planning dated 8/23/2021 states: . 4. Care plans are modified between care plan conferences when appropriate to meet the resident's current needs, problems, and goals.
5. The Care Plan should be reviewed and may need to be revised for the following reasons: a. Significant change in the resident's condition. b. A change in planned interventions. c. Goals are met and new goals are established to meet current resident needs and/or goals. d. New diagnosis, new medications, or abnormal labs.
R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction due to an embolism, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, breast cancer, and depression.
R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R21 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 and requires extensive assistance for all activities of daily living.
R21 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 4/25/2022.
On 4/25/2022, R21 had an order for Apixaban 5 mg (milligrams) twice daily to prevent blood clots. Surveyor reviewed R21's Care Plan. R21's Care Plan did not address the use of an anticoagulant medication. Surveyor reviewed R21's Medication Administration Record (MAR). R21's MAR did not address monitoring R21 for signs of bleeding due to the use of an anticoagulant medication.
R21 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 5/3/2022.
On 5/3/2022, R21 had an order for Apixaban 5 mg twice daily to prevent blood clots. Surveyor reviewed R21's Care Plan. R21's Care Plan did not address the use of an anticoagulant medication. Surveyor reviewed R21's Medication Administration Record (MAR). R21's MAR did not address monitoring R21 for signs of bleeding due to the use of an anticoagulant medication.
R21 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 6/6/2022.
On 6/6/2022, R21 had an order for Apixaban 5 mg twice daily to prevent blood clots. Surveyor reviewed R21's Care Plan. R21's Care Plan did not address the use of an anticoagulant medication. Surveyor reviewed R21's Medication Administration Record (MAR). R21's MAR did not address monitoring R21 for signs of bleeding due to the use of an anticoagulant medication.
On 6/6/2022, a Baseline Care Plan was hand-written and put in R21's hard chart. The Baseline Care Plan indicated R21 was at risk for bleeding and should be monitored related to the use of apixaban. Surveyor did not find this Baseline Care Plan carried over to the comprehensive Care Plan in R21's electronic medical record.
In an interview on 9/19/2022, at 3:22 PM, Surveyor asked Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-D what the facility process was for developing a comprehensive Care Plan for residents. ADON-D stated a new admission will have a Baseline Care Plan implemented that addresses falls, pain, skin conditions, activities of daily living, and bowel and bladder, and then medications are reviewed and added to the Care Plan such as a history of using anticoagulants or anything like that. Surveyor shared with ADON-D that R21 had been taking apixaban since readmission on [DATE] and Surveyor did not see a care plan related to R21's anticoagulant use or monitoring for bleeding in R21's MAR. ADON-D reviewed R21's electronic medical record and agreed she could not locate a Care Plan or monitoring for R21's anticoagulant use. ADON-D stated she would revise R21's Care Plan to include the use of anticoagulant medication and would add monitoring for bleeding to the MAR.
In an interview on 9/20/2022, at 10:14 AM, MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-W stated the nurses on the unit and the Unit Managers initiate the resident Care Plans. MDS LPN-W stated if the MDS triggers a Care Plan that is not already in place, the MDS nurse will initiate the Care Plan and tell the Unit Manager the specific Care Plan was added for the resident and the Unit Manager would need to go in and individualize the interventions.
On 9/20/2022, at 4:35 PM, Surveyor shared with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A the concern R21 did not have a Anticoagulant Care Plan or monitoring for bleeding when R21 had been taking apixaban since 4/25/2022. No further information was provided at that time.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordan...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for non-pressure injuries for 2 (R19 and R18) of 19 sampled residents.
*R19 was admitted on [DATE] with a wound to the left inner buttocks that was not comprehensively assessed until 9/18/2022, eighteen days after admission. The wound was categorized as a pressure injury with a treatment on admission, but the wound was not measured and the wound base was not described until 9/18/2022 where it was determined to be a non-pressure wound.
*R18 had contractures to the hands and interventions of washcloths to the fists to prevent puncture wounds from the nails were observed to not be in place.
Findings include:
The facility policy and procedure entitled Pressure and Non-pressure Injuries dated 8/2/2021 states: PROCEDURE:
1. Upon admission:
a. A head-to-toe body evaluation will be completed on every resident upon admission/readmission and will be documented on the Admission/readmission Evaluation UDA (User Defined Assessment). If skin is compromised:
i. If pressure Injury: Initiate the Pressure Injury Weekly Tracker UDA - one per wound
ii. If non-pressure: initiate the Non-Pressure Injury Tracker UDA - one per wound.
iii. Ensure primary care physician (PCP) is aware of wound/location of wounds and current treatment orders
iv. Ensure appropriate treatment orders for each wound area, as needed
v. Ensure resident/responsible party is aware of wounds and current treatment plan
vi. Evaluate for pain related to wounds and develop management plan if pain related to wounds is present.
2. Weekly: a. Complete a head-to-toe skin check and document findings on the Skin Review - Weekly (facility form). b. Assess current wounds at least every seven days, or more frequently as needed (e.g., decline in wound, presence of infection, wound healed).
1) R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of colon cancer, cerebral palsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malnutrition, and legal blindness.
R19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/6/2022, indicated R19 had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 and needed limited to extensive assistance with activities of daily living. The MDS coded R19 as being frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel and had no wounds to the skin. The Cognitive Care Area Assessment (CAA) with the admission MDS assessment documented R19 had intact vision with corrective lenses. The Pressure Injury CAA stated the Braden on 8/31/2022 scored a 12 indicating high risk for pressure injury and on admission has abrasion, bruising, open area to sacrum - see admn (admission) skin asmt (assessment) for details, at potential risk remains r/t (related to) impaired mobility, incontinence, impaired skin integrity. Surveyor noted the MDS Section M: Skin Conditions indicated R19 did not have any skin impairment but the Pressure Injury CAA documented R19 had an open area to the sacrum on admission.
R19's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] had no documentation of skin impairment.
On 8/31/2022, on the facility Admission/readmission Evaluation form, nursing documented R19 had a pressure injury to the sacrum. The wound did not have any measurements, wound base description, or staging of the pressure injury.
On 8/31/2022, on R19's Skin Assessment body diagram, nursing hand-wrote on the form two circles, one circle on the right inner buttock and one circle on the left inner buttock. O/A was hand-written above the two circles indicating Open Areas.
On 8/31/2022, on R19's Baseline Care Plan form, nursing hand-wrote in the Skin Care Needs section of the form R19 had a pressure injury to the sacrum with a skin treatment in the Treatment Administration Record.
On 8/31/2022, at 6:11 PM in the progress notes, nursing charted R19 was admitted to the facility; no edema was noted. Nursing charted R19 had an open area to the sacrum and treatment orders were received.
The nurse that completed R19's admission assessment and documentation on 8/31/2022 was unavailable for interview.
On 8/31/2022, R19's treatment order documented: cleanse sacrum wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply Medihoney and bordered foam daily.
No documentation was found indicating R19's responsible party was notified of the open area to the sacrum.
R19's care plan documents: At Risk for Alteration in Skin Integrity, initiated on 8/31/2022 with the following interventions:
-Barrier cream to peri area/buttocks as needed.
-Encourage fluids.
-Encourage to reposition as needed; use assistive devices as needed.
-Float heels as able.
-Observe skin condition with daily cares; report abnormalities.
-Pressure redistributing device on bed/chair.
-Provide preventative skin care routinely and as needed.
-Use pillows/positioning devices as needed.
On 9/2/2022, R19's Care Conference Summary form, nursing documented nursing had no concerns. No documentation was found regarding R19's skin integrity.
On 9/2/2022, on the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Initial Visit note, Nurse Practitioner (NP)-H documented R19 had no rashes and no lesions on exposed skin. No documentation was found indicating NP-H was aware of R19's documented wound to the sacrum.
On 9/3/2022, at 6:10 PM, in the progress notes, Registered Nurse (RN)-BB charted R19 had a pressure area to the sacrum with a Medihoney treatment.
On 9/7/2022 on the Skin Review - Weekly, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-D documented R19 did not have any skin impairments. Surveyor noted R19 continued to receive a treatment to the sacrum.
On 9/7/2022, at 6:10 PM, in the progress notes, RN-BB charted R19 had a pressure area to the butt with a treatment of normal saline and Medihoney with a border foam dressing.
On 9/7/2022, on the SNF Progress Note, NP-H documented R19 had no rashes and no lesions on exposed skin. No documentation was found indicating NP-H was aware of R19's wound to the sacrum.
On 9/8/2022, at 12:02 PM, in the progress notes, Registered Dietician (RD)-F documented R19 had no skin issues noted and no edema present.
On 9/8/2022, at 6:10 PM, in the progress notes, RN-BB charted R19 had a pressure area to the butt with a treatment of normal saline and Medihoney.
On 9/8/2022, on the SNF Progress Note, NP-H documented R19 had no rashes and no lesions on exposed skin. No documentation was found indicating NP-H was aware of R19's wound to the sacrum.
On 9/9/2022, at 6:10 PM, in the progress notes, RN-BB charted R19 had a pressure ulcer to the left butt with a treatment of Medihoney with a border foam dressing.
On 9/10/2022, at 2:34 PM, in the progress notes, nursing charted R19 had a pressure ulcer to the left butt.
On 9/11/2022, at 7:16 PM, in the progress notes, nursing charted R19 had a no skin conditions or treatments.
On 9/12/2022, at 7:16 PM, in the progress notes, RN-BB charted R19 had a pressure ulcer to the coccyx with a treatment of Mepilex to the coccyx.
On 9/13/2022, at 7:16 PM, in the progress notes, nursing charted R19 had a pressure area to the coccyx with a treatment of Mepilex.
On 9/13/2022, on the SNF History and Physical, the physician documented R19 had no rashes and no lesions on exposed skin. No documentation was found indicating the physician was aware of R19's wound to the sacrum.
On 9/14/2022, at 5:16 PM, in the progress notes, nursing charted R19 had Mepilex to the coccyx.
On 9/14/2022, at 9:49 AM, R19 was observed his room in a wheelchair. R19 had garbled speech and did not fully comprehend Surveyor's questions. Surveyor observed R19 had a cushion in the wheelchair and a regular mattress on the bed, not an air mattress.
On 9/15/2022, at 3:33 PM, in the progress notes, Social Services documented a care conference was held with R19 and R19's activated Power of Attorney (POA). No documentation was found stating R19's POA was aware of R19's wound to the coccyx/sacrum.
On 9/16/2022, at 11:47 AM, in the progress notes, nursing documented R19 was being monitored for a left buttock wound/excoriation.
On 9/17/2022, at 3:53 AM, in the progress notes, nursing documented R19 was being monitored for left buttock wound/excoriation.
On 9/17/2022, R19's treatment was changed from Medihoney to the sacrum to cleanse the left buttock with normal saline, apply Medihoney and manuka zinc to the peri wound and cover with a foam border dressing.
On 9/17/2022, at 5:16 PM, in the progress notes, RN-BB charted R19 had a Stage 2 pressure injury to the left butt with a treatment of Medihoney and Mepilex.
On 9/17/2022, at 6:53 PM, in the progress notes, nursing documented R19 was being monitored for a left butt wound and treatment was in place.
On 9/18/2022, at 3:35 AM, in the progress notes, nursing documented R19 was being monitored for a left buttock wound and treatment was provided per plan of care.
On 9/18/2022, on the Non-Pressure Weekly Tracker form, Director of Nursing (DON)-B documented R19 had a wound to the left perineum that was present on admission. The wound was described as moisture-associated skin damage and measured 0.7 cm (centimeters) x (by) 0.2 cm x 0.1 cm with 100% granulation. DON-B documented the wound was improving with the area smaller in size and R19's POA was at bedside and updated on the wound. This was the first comprehensive assessment of the wound since R19's admission, eighteen days prior. No measurements had been documented prior to this assessment and Surveyor noted DON-B documented the wound was smaller in size with no comparison measurement.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary states the definition of the perineum to be: an area between the thighs that marks the approximate lower boundary of the pelvis and is occupied by the urinary and genital ducts and rectum; also: the area between the anus and the posterior part of the external genitalia. Surveyor noted the described location of the wound as the perineum does not correlate with the previous charting of the wound to be at the coccyx, sacrum, or left buttock.
On 9/18/2022, at 5:16 PM, in the progress notes, RN-BB documented R19 had an excoriated butt with a treatment of Medihoney to the left butt.
On 9/18/2022, at 5:47, PM in the progress notes, nursing documented R19 was being monitored for excoriation on the butt and a treatment was in place.
On 9/19/2022, at 5:53 AM, in the progress notes, nursing documented R19 was being monitored for excoriation to the left buttocks and treatment was provided per plan of care.
On 9/19/2022, at 11:17 AM, in the progress notes, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-U documented R19 was being monitored for excoriation to the buttock and the dressing was clean, dry, and intact and the surrounding skin was intact.
In an interview on 9/19/2022, at 2:11 PM, Surveyor asked RN-BB how long she had worked at the facility. RN-BB stated she started about two weeks ago and received training on the facility policies and procedures at that time. Surveyor asked RN-BB about R19's skin integrity. RN-BB stated R19 had an excoriated area and an area that was more reddened and open. RN-BB stated at previous job, she would stage the pressure injury, but this facility does not want anyone to stage the wound until the wound team looks at the wound. Surveyor asked RN-BB who the wound team consisted of. RN-BB stated DON-B and Wound Physician (WP)-R is the wound team and they round on Mondays for most of the residents with wounds, but not all of them. Surveyor asked RN-BB to describe R19's wound. RN-BB stated the first time RN-BB saw the wound, R19 had an open area on the left butt cheek with a red wound base that had Mepilex to the open area. RN-BB stated R19 had really sensitive skin with blotches and redness. RN-BB stated the PM shift does the wound treatment on even days and the treatment was Medihoney and border foam. Surveyor asked RN-BB if the wound had any slough in the base. RN-BB stated no, just red tissue. Surveyor clarified with RN-BB the location of the wound. RN-BB denied the wound was on the coccyx or sacrum; RN-BB stated the wound was on the left butt cheek. RN-BB thought R19's hospital record documented an open area but could not remember if they said it was from pressure or not. Surveyor asked RN-BB if an air mattress would be part of the facility protocol for a resident with a pressure injury. RN-BB was not aware of a policy for an air mattress. Surveyor asked RN-BB what the facility procedure was for completion of a skin assessment for a newly admitted resident. RN-BB stated the admitting nurse would measure and describe the wound; a sheet is filled out with skin charting on the head-to-toe assessment. RN-BB stated a treatment is always put in place and when the wound team sees the resident, they would stage the wound if it was a pressure injury.
On 9/19/2022, at 3:39 PM, Surveyor observed R19 in bed. R19 had been placed in bed so the treatment could be done on the left buttock. Surveyor observed an air mattress had been placed on the bed since the last observation on 9/15/2022. Surveyor asked LPN-U and DON-B when the air mattress had been placed on the bed. LPN-U stated she did not know. DON-B stated she did not know, but probably today. Surveyor observed DON-B and LPN-U complete the treatment to R19's wound. LPN-U rolled R19 to the side and no dressing was observed to be in place over the wound. LPN-U stated she had put a dressing on R19 the previous night and it must have fallen off. No dressing was observed in the bed or in R19's incontinence product. The wound was located on the inner upper left buttock and measured approximately 1 cm x 1 cm with a red wound base. DON-B applied Medihoney to the wound base, zinc to the peri wound, and covered the area with a foam dressing. DON-B stated the wound was from excoriation, not pressure and was linear in appearance and has shrunk in size.
In an interview on 9/20/2022, at 9:35 AM, Surveyor asked RD-F if RD-F was aware R19 had an open area to the skin. RD-F stated the 9/7/2022 Weekly Skin Assessment had no skin issues documented. RD-F stated if the skin check had said an open area, RD-F would have asked further questions. RD-F stated they usually talk about wounds at their meetings so RD-F can monitor the resident and add supplements. RD-F stated she was unaware of R19 having any skin issues. RD-F stated R19 was not on the list for residents with pressure injuries. RD-F stated normally RD-F would have gotten supplements in place due to increased protein needs. RD-F stated R19 was eating pretty good so R19 may be meeting nutritional needs. RD-F stated she would add yogurt, cottage cheese, or Prostat depending on the assessment.
In an interview on 9/20/2022, at 10:09 AM, Surveyor asked MDS LPN-W why the admission MDS dated [DATE] did not have any skin integrity concerns marked in Section M of the MDS. MDS LPN-W stated another nurse did the assessment and that nurse works remotely so MDS LPN-W could not say what documents the nurse looked at to code the assessment that way. Surveyor shared with MDS LPN-W that R19 had a treatment ordered to the wound on admission. MDS LPN-W was unaware of R19's skin status. MDS LPN-W stated the admitting nurse puts pressure on the admission assessment and then MDS LPN-W waits until DON-B determines what the wound actually is.
In an interview on 9/20/2022, at 3:16 PM, Surveyor asked Medical Doctor (MD)-O if MD-O was aware of R19's wound. MD-O stated MD-O would check to see if the wound MD was involved. Surveyor shared with MD-O the concern NP-H did not document any observation or status of R19's wound. MD-O stated the NP does not always document on a wound every time they see a resident; the NP will focus on one or two things with each visit. Surveyor asked MD-O when MD-O would expect to see a comprehensive assessment of a wound. MD-O stated a comprehensive assessment should be done within 24 hours.
In an interview on 9/20/2022, at 3:51 PM, Wound Physician (WP)-R stated WP-R would be seeing R19 for the first time that afternoon. Surveyor asked WP-R if a copy of the report of today's assessment would be available for Surveyor in the morning. WP-R stated a copy would be ready for Surveyor.
On 9/21/2022, at 7:28 AM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A provided Surveyor with WP-R's initial assessment of R19's wound from 9/20/2022. The assessment documented the wound was caused by moisture-associated skin damage and was located on the left buttock. The wound measured 0.7 cm x 0.4 cm x 0.1 cm with 100% granulation tissue. The treatment continued as previously prescribed.
In an interview on 9/21/2022, at 8:17 AM, DON-B stated 9/18/2022 was the first time DON-B saw R19's wound. Surveyor asked DON-B why DON-B did not see R19 on wound rounds prior to 9/18/2022. DON-B thought she had seen R19 on 9/1/2022 or 9/2/2022 and R19 did not have a wound on the buttocks, it was red and dry. DON-B stated R19 had a bordered foam in place, so DON-B did not change anything. DON-B stated they did wound rounds on 9/5/2022 but could not remember seeing R19 at that time. Surveyor asked DON-B why nothing was charted by DON-B when DON-B made the observation of R19's wound. DON-B could not say why no charting was completed. DON-B stated nurses were educated they are not to stage a wound because DON-B saw someone had charted R19 had a pressure injury. DON-B stated they can describe the wound and measure the wound, but they cannot stage the wound. DON-B stated the NP looked at R19 with DON-B on 9/17/2022 and that was when they added zinc to the treatment. Surveyor asked DON-B why no measurements were completed until 9/18/2022. DON-B stated DON-B should have charted earlier. Surveyor asked DON-B how DON-B is notified of a resident with a skin concern. DON-B stated nursing staff can contact DON-B in any way to let DON-B know there is a skin condition. DON-B stated the next day at morning meeting they talk about wounds and DON-B will look at the new admissions the next day. DON-B stated they use a spread sheet that says which residents have a skin issue and that list is re-evaluated at the stand down meeting at the end of the day. DON-B stated the admitting nurse had told DON-B R19 did not have any wounds other than dry skin. DON-B stated the nurse was educated to not stage or call a wound pressure. Surveyor asked DON-B if RD-F was notified of R19's altered skin integrity. DON-B stated RD-F would have asked DON-B if R19 had a pressure injury and DON-B would have said no. Surveyor asked DON-B why DON-B documented the wound was located on the left perineum. DON-B stated the hospital documented R19 had a wound to the left perineum. (Surveyor reviewed the hospital documentation and did not locate any documentation of a wound to R19's skin.) DON-B stated when DON-B looked at R19's skin on 9/1/2022 or 9/2/2022, R19 did not have an open area close to the anus. Surveyor asked DON-B if the wound that this Surveyor observed with DON-B on 9/19/2022 was the same area that had an open wound on admission. DON-B stated yes, that was the same area. Surveyor shared with DON-B the definition of perineum and DON-B agreed the wound was not on the perineum.
In an interview on 9/21/2022, at 10:18 AM, Surveyor asked ADON-D about R19's Skin Review - Weekly dated 9/7/2022 that ADON-D completed. ADON-D stated ADON-D had helped R19 to the toilet a day or two after admission and did not see any open areas at that time. Surveyor asked ADON-D if a comprehensive assessment was completed at that time. ADON-D stated no, an assessment was not done by ADON-D. ADON-D stated when she assisted R19 to the toilet, that was the only time ADON-D saw R19's backside. ADON-D stated normally the nurses on the floor do the assessment and the nurse must have called in so ADON-D was helping out so filled out the form only after toileting R19.
In an interview on 9/21/2022, at 10:41 AM, NP-H stated the NP on-call was notified of R19's skin on admission. NP-H stated NP-H looked at R19's skin last week and confirmed the treatment orders were appropriate. Surveyor verified with NP-H the location of R19's wound. NP-H stated the wound was on the upper left buttock and not the perineum.
On 9/21/2022, at 2:18 PM, Surveyor shared concerns with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A regarding R19's skin. R19 was admitted on [DATE] and the admission assessment skin diagram had two circles on the left and right upper buttocks. No measurements or wound descriptors were documented. A treatment was obtained at that time to the sacrum and treatments were done daily. The admission MDS did not code the wound, the dietician was unaware R19 had any skin integrity issues, and the wound was not comprehensively assessed until 9/18/2022, eighteen days after admission, where it was determined the wound etiology was moisture-associated skin damage. Prior to that assessment, the wound had been considered pressure and had conflicting locations: sacrum, coccyx, butt, left butt, left buttock, and perineum. No further information was provided at that time.
2) R18's diagnoses includes diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, and hypertension.
The pressure ulcer actual or at risk care plan initiated 7/15/21 & revised 8/3/22 includes an intervention of place washcloths (palm guards) between hands check placement every shift. Initiated 12/10/21 & revised 7/28/22.
R18's Annual MDS (minimum data set), with an assessment reference date of 6/30/22, documents a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 00 which indicates severe cognitive impairment.
The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) [NAME], dated 9/14/22, documents under the skin section: place washcloths (palm guards) between hands check placement every shift.
On 9/14/22 at 9:07 a.m., Surveyor observed R18 in bed with the head of the bed elevated high. CNA-K is sitting on the right side R18's bed feeding R18. Surveyor observed R18 does not have washcloths or palm guards in her hands.
On 9/14/22, at 10:46 a.m., Surveyor observed R18 in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated holding onto a two handled cup. R18 does not have either washcloths or palm guards in her hands.
On 9/15/22, at 7:29 a.m., Surveyor observed R18 in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated slightly. Surveyor observed R18 does not have either washcloths or palm guards in her hands.
On 9/15/22, at 8:29 a.m., Surveyor observed R18 in bed on her right side with the head of the bed elevated slightly. Surveyor observed R18 does not have either washcloths or palm guards in her hands.
On 9/19/22, at 9:16 a.m,. Surveyor observed R18 in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated high. R18 is holding onto a two handled cup, there is a washcloth in R18's right hand but the left hand does not have anything.
On 9/21/22, at 8:32 a.m., Surveyor met with DON (Director of Nursing)-B to inquire about the washcloths or palm guards in R18's hands. DON-B explained R18 developed wounds which have healed from her nails being quite long and were digging into her hands. DON-B informed Surveyor they trimmed her nails and now place gauze or washcloth as the palm guard went to be washed. Surveyor informed DON-B of the observations of R18 not having any device in her hands per her care plan.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure proper foot care for 1 (R74) of 1 Residents reviewed for foot care.
* R74's toenails were very long and in need of trimmi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure proper foot care for 1 (R74) of 1 Residents reviewed for foot care.
* R74's toenails were very long and in need of trimming.
Findings include:
R74's diagnoses includes down syndrome and anxiety disorder.
On 9/15/22 from 7:49 a.m. to 8:04 a.m. Surveyor observed morning cares & transfer for R74 with CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-E and ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing)-D. During this observation at 7:45 a.m. CNA-E stated to R74 ok [first name of R74] going to pick you out an outfit, showed R74 the outfit she chose asking R74 if it's okay. CNA-E then removed R74's socks. Surveyor checked R74's feet noting there are no open areas but R74's toe nails are extremely long on both feet.
On 9/19/22 at 7:32 a.m. during R74's record review Surveyor noted a podiatry consult dated 6/22/22 which documented patient uncooperative refused treatment today.
On 9/19/22 at 1:58 p.m. Surveyor spoke to DON (Director of Nursing)-B regarding R74. Surveyor informed DON-B during an observation on 9/15/22 Surveyor observed R74's toe nails are extremely long on both feet, did note a podiatry consult dated 6/22/22 which indicated R74 was uncooperative but did not note any follow up as to what is the plan for R74's toe nails. DON-B informed Surveyor R74 is more cooperative if she knows the person and thinks the next time the podiatrist is at the Facility she will have someone who R74 knows be in there with her.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R6, R13, R74) of 6 residents reviewed who are...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R6, R13, R74) of 6 residents reviewed who are at risk for falls received the necessary services and supervision to prevent an injury from a fall or conduct through fall investigations.
* The facility did not thoroughly investigate to determine a root cause analysis of R6's fall on 7/27/22. R6 sustained a hematoma to their face and were sent to the emergency room for evaluation.
R6 is assessed to be at high risk for falls. R6's care plan and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) [NAME] indicates the use of a low bed and floor mat. On 9/14/22 and 9/15/22, Surveyor observed R6 in bed with no floor mat in place. On 9/15/22 Surveyor observed R6 in bed with the bed in high position.
* R13 was at risk for falls and was observed by Surveyor in a bed in a high position.
* R74 sustained a fall on 1/21/22 when R74 was transferred with a Hoyer lift with 1 assist. R74's care plan directed staff to transfer R74 with the use of a Hoyer lift with 2 staff assist.
On 1/21/22 the CNA did not follow R74's care plan using the assist of 2 staff members.
Findings include:
1. R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. R6's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/8/22 documents R6's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 07, indicating R6 is moderately cognitively impaired for daily decision making. R6's MDS documents that R6 requires extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility and transfers. R6 is at high risk for falls.
On 9/14/22 at 08:50 AM, Surveyor observed R6 in a low bed with no floor mat in place.
On 9/14/22 at 11:15 AM, Surveyor observed R6 in a low bed with no floor mat in place.
On 9/14/22 at 02:02 PM, Surveyor observed R6 in a low bed with no floor mat in place.
On 9/15/22 at 10:46 AM, Surveyor noted R6's Bed in a high position with no floor mat next to the bed. No staff were present in the room.
Surveyor reviewed R6's CNA [NAME] which reads low bed to be in place and floor mat to be in place.
On 7/27/22, R6 was found on the floor on the left side of her bed with a hematoma to the left side of their forehead. R6 was taken to the emergency room for evaluation.
Surveyor reviewed R6's fall care plan dated 3/17/22 includes the following interventions: bed in low position, when in bed place floor mat next to left side of bed, review information on past falls in attempt to determine causes of falls for prevention and to minimize injuries. Surveyor did not note any care plan revisions after R6's 7/27/22 fall.
On 9/14/22 Surveyor requested the facility's fall investigation for R6's 7/27/22 fall including staff statements and root cause analysis. On 9/15/22 at 8:00 AM, NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A told Surveyor there were no staff statements obtained after R6's fall and that there was no root cause analysis or new care plan interventions implemented after R6's fall. Surveyor shared concerns related to facility's investigation of R6's fall and lack of care plan updates. No additional information was supplied to Surveyor at this time.
2. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/17/22 indicates R13 requires total assistance with activities of daily living including bed mobility. R13 is rarely to never understood. R13 is at high risk for fall.
On 9/14/22 at 3:50 PM, Surveyor observed R13's bed in an elevated position. On 9/14/22 at 9:50 AM, Surveyor observed R13's bed in an elevated position. On 9/14/22 at 12:35 PM, Surveyor observed R13's bed in an elevated position. On 9/14/22 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor observed R13's bed in an elevated position.
Surveyor reviewed R13's CNA [NAME]. CNA [NAME] reads low bed to be in place,
Surveyor reviewed R13's fall care plan dated 7/29/22 includes the following interventions: Place bed in low position, place call light within reach, anticipate and meet the residents needs. Encourage the resident to always call for assistance.
Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing) -B if a resident is at risk for falls if they should have their bed in a low position. DON-B responded Yes.
On 9/15/22 at 2:00 PM, Surveyor shared concerns with NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A related to observations of R13's bed not being in a low position as per their fall safety care plan. No additional information was supplied to Surveyor at this time.
The Using a Portable Lift policy and procedure with an effective date of December 2016 under purpose documents, The purpose of this procedure is to help lift residents using a manual lifting device. Under procedure for general guidelines documents Two (2) nursing assistants or nurses or therapists are required to perform this procedure.
3. R74's diagnoses includes down syndrome and anxiety disorder.
The physical functioning deficit care plan initiated 8/25/21 & revised 9/30/21 includes an intervention of transfer assistance of 2 mechanical lift. Medium sling (purple) initiated 8/26/21 & revised 4/29/22.
The quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/30/21 documents R74 has short & long term memory problems and is severely impaired for cognitive skills for daily decision making. R74 requires extensive assistance with two plus person physical assist for transfers.
The nurses note dated 1/21/22 documents, Writer called into resident's room after CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported that Hoyer collapsed/tilted while transferring resident causing resident to grab onto sling. Writer walked into resident's room and noted resident sitting on the floor with neck and head up against CNA leg for support. Resident has soft neck collar on AAT (at all times) for previous cervical fracture. No s/s (signs/symptoms) of pain or discomfort at this time. CNA explained that while transferring resident, she fell out of Hoyer and onto bed but slid out of bed onto floor. Bed in lowest position; close to the floor. Resident unable to explain, resident non verbal. Skin warm and dry. No injuries noted at this time. Call out to NP (Nurse Practitioner); NOR (new order received) cervical spine X-ray x (times) 1. Call out to POA (power of attorney). POA updated. DON (Director of Nursing) updated. No new apparent injuries noted at this time. Will monitor. 98.0 18 65 130/75.
The fall investigation dated 1/21/22 under incident description for nursing description documents, Writer called into room after resident let go of the grab bar causing Hoyer machine to tilt. CNA was present at time and was able to lower safely onto the floor. No apparent injuries noted. For Resident description documents Resident unable to give description.
Under notes dated 1/21/22 documents IDT (interdisciplinary team) discuss fall Lift Education and policy reviewed with CNA. A 1:1 competency check with DON completed with CNA involved in incident r/t (related to) transferring resident with Hoyer lift by self and not having a 2nd person to assist. X-ray results negative.
Surveyor noted the CNA did not follow R74's plan of care when she attempted to transfer R74 with a Hoyer lift by herself.
The nurses note dated 1/22/22 documents Resident's Vitals are normal. No c/o (complaint of) of pain/discomfort. Neuro check is WDL (within defined limits) to her baseline. Dressing changed to her Right posterior thigh.
The nurses note dated 1/23/22 documents Patient being monitored after having a witnessed fall/slide out of Hoyer sling on 1/21. No outward signs of pain at rest; some tensing noted when turning patient. No new obvious injuries r/t fall noted at this time such as skin discoloration/redness.
On 9/19/22 at 11:27 a.m. Surveyor asked Administrator-A if anyone else other than CNA-C was educated. Administrator-A replied no.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 (R325) residents reviewed for urinary inco...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 (R325) residents reviewed for urinary incontinence received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible.
* R325 was admitted into the facility with urinary incontinency. The facility did not initiate a 3 day voiding pattern diary as part of their assessment to assist in determining what type of toileting program R325 may benefit from and in order to restore continence to the extent possible.
R325's Bladder/Incontinence Evaluation with an effective date of 9/17/22 indicated a treatment program of scheduled toileting/habit training, which is not reflected on R325's care plan. Instead, R325's most recent care plans/cardx dated 9/8/22 and 9/20/22 indicate staff should provide incontinence care as needed, provide assistance with toileting and check and change every 2 -3 hours. R325 was not provided with a toileting program based upon individual needs in order restore continence to the extent possible.
Findings include:
On 9/20/22, Surveyor reviewed the facility's Incontinence Prevention Program policy not dated.
The Incontinence Prevention Program policy states in part,
Upon admission, complete admission Nursing Evaluation. If any box other than continent is checked, begin a Urinary Continence Evaluation.
Based on the results of the Evaluation of Continence, identify if the resident is motivated and cognitively appropriate for a toileting program
4. If No refer to additional programs:
Types of Toileting Programs:
Prompted Voiding (Bladder Retraining) .
Habit Training/Schedule Toileting .
Routine Toileting (ADL based) .
All 3 of the above programs include guidelines stating, determine voiding intervals through use of the 3 day voiding diary .
On 9/19/22, at 1:35 pm, Surveyor observed R325 in bed. Surveyor questioned R325 if she had been taken to the bathroom recently. R325 stated that's where I want to go. Surveyor noted R325 did not have her call light on. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) T came into the room and R325 informed CNA T she wanted to go to the bathroom. R325 also stated she was wet.
CNA T responded with that's OK I will change you and applied a gait belt around R325 to take her to the bathroom. R325 refused taking her wheelchair to the bathroom as she stated, I can't wait .it's coming out. CNA T ambulated R325 with her front wheeled walker to the toilet, and removed R325's wet brief. CNA T removed the wet bed linens and replaced them with clean sheets.
CNA T informed Surveyor that while she was not specifically assigned to R325 today, the nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN U) thought R325 may have needed something and therefore CNA T went in to check on R325.
Upon leaving R325's room, Surveyor interviewed LPN U who stated when R325 returned from the hospital earlier today at 9:30 am. LPN U had changed R325 as she was wet upon her return. Surveyor asked LPN U if R325 had any changes with incontinence. LPN U reported sometimes R325 will say when she has to go to the bathroom, she is check and change, she's been the same since being here.
On 9/19/22, at 2:00 p.m., Surveyor interviewed R325's assigned CNA V who stated she started work this morning at 6 am. CNA V reported R325 came back from the hospital at around 9:00-9:30 am and the nurse changed her. CNA V stated she then changed R325 at around 10:30 am and again at 12:30 pm. CNA V stated she has worked with R325 over the last 3 days and that sometimes she uses her call light otherwise, if she sees us she will call out to us.
On 9/19/22, Surveyor reviewed R325's medical record. A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] noted discharge diagnosis included but not limited to; delirium underlying dementia, generalized weakness, suspected community acquired pneumonia and urinary retention resolved, chronic kidney disease stage 2, etc. The hospital discharge summary referenced R325 retaining urine requiring straight cath and as having a urinary tract infection.
On 9/19/22, Surveyor reviewed R325's care plan with a focus area of Urinary incontinence related to impaired mobility initiated on 9/8/22 and with revision on 9/8/22.
The care plan goals were, will be free from skin break down and will be maintained in as clean and dry dignified state as possible and lastly, Will have no complications due to incontinence initiated on 9/8/22.
Interventions dated 9/8/22 consist of:
Apply skin moisturizer/barrier creams as needed
Provide Assistance with toileting
Provide incontinent care
Report changes in amount, frequency, color or odor of urine,
Report changes in skin integrity found during daily cares
Report S&S (signs and symptoms) of UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) such as flank pain, c/o (complaint/of) burning/pain, fever, hematuria, change in mental status
Use absorbent products as needed.
Surveyor reviewed a Bladder/Incontinence Evaluation with an effective date of 9/17/22 which indicated impaired mobility and severe cognitive impairment as risk factors for bladder incontinence, is currently incontinent of bladder, daytime frequency (greater than 8 times during waking hours), contributing diagnosis Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia.
Summary and Program Placement Decision- Based on the above assessment, the resident is most likely experiencing the following type of incontinence: Stress and urge are checked.
Under Treatment Program, Schedule toileting/habit training is checked.
The facility's Incontinence Prevention Program policy, not dated, defines in part; Habit Training/Schedule Toileting- Habit training is a scheduled bladder management program designed according to the patient's/resident's individual voiding pattern .
There is no indication as part of the Bladder/Incontinence evaluation that a 3 day voiding diary was included as part of the assessment to determine what type of toileting program R325 might benefit from and to develop an individualized incontinence care plan.
On 9/20/22, at 9:40 am, Surveyor interviewed LPN U as to whether R325 can use her call light. LPN U stated the family tends to use it, we re-educate her but she is forgetful, she is a heavy wetter too, even with toileting. She (R325) will call you when she has to have a BM (bowel movement), you'll hear her and she'll say she has to go.
Surveyor asked LPN U if the facility uses a 3 day voiding diary to establish any patterns for R325's incontinence. LPN U stated the CNAs fill out a 3 day voiding pattern. LPN U looked into a binder on the unit and stated there wasn't one for [R325] and when admitted a 3 day voiding diary would have been done .this is the rehab unit so toilet every 2 hours up here where people are more continent and alert, they will turn on their lights. LPN U stated she was not sure where the summary of the results of the 3 day voiding would be. LPN U stated initially there is a baseline care plan and we do what we can see and know after therapy evaluates her .the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing do the care plans. LPN U thought maybe the MDS (Minimum Data Set) nurse may have the 3 day voiding diary.
Surveyor reviewed R325's baseline care plan and there is no reference to R325's toileting/continence care needs.
On 9/20/22, at 7:01 am, Surveyor observed R325 up in her chair in her room. Surveyor observed R325 leaning to her left with a pillow behind her and another pillow on her left side. R325 was able to recall Surveyor from the day before. R325 started saying maybe she'd better go (referring to having to go to the bathroom). CNA X offered to take R325 to the bathroom and reported taking R325 earlier this morning to the bathroom as well.
On 9/20/22, at 7:20 am, Surveyor asked R325 as to whether staff take her to the bathroom enough. R325 stated yes, that's all you have to do is ask. Surveyor asked R325 if she knew how to use the call light and R325 pointed to the call light and said all you have to do is push this if you have to go. Although R325 was able to point to the call light and provide instructions on it's use, Surveyor noted R325 had not turned on her call light both times R325 had informed Surveyor of needing to go to the bathroom.
On 9/20/22, Surveyor reviewed R325's admission MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) date of 9/13/22. The MDS indicated R325 came from an acute care hospital, had adequate hearing, clear speech, usually understood and understands others. R325's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 4 indicating R325 had severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making skills.
The MDS indicated R325 requires extensive assist with toileting and personal hygiene.
R325's balance is not steady when moving off the toilet. The MDS indicated R325 is frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel and a toileting program has not been tried for either bladder or bowel.
The Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet dated 9/17/22 indicates status: In Progress however the urinary incontinence and indwelling catheter section of the CAA has been completed and signed as being completed by MDS RN Y on 9/17/22.
The CAA Worksheet indicates an actual problem/need being triggered related to needing assistance with toileting and is incontinent of bladder. The CAA worksheet indicates;
Modifiable factors contributing to transitory urinary incontinence is restricted mobility. Other factors contributing to incontinence is urinary urgency and need for assistance in toileting. Type of incontinence is not checked. Medications-diuretics can cause urge incontinence. Resident and family are agreeable with current plan of care. Care plan considerations, urinary incontinence-functional status will be addressed in the care plan and the overall objective for care planning of this problem is to avoid complications. The impact of this problem/need on the resident and the rationale to care plan is: Resident requires assistance with toileting and is incontinent of bladder. Therapy is working with resident to improve toileting function. Goal is to ensure resident will be dry, clean, odor free and comfortable. Nursing staff will continue to offer and assist with toileting and provide incontinent care as needed will proceed POC (plan of care.)
Surveyor noted R325 has an order dated 9/8/22 for Furosemide/Lasix (diuretic) 20 mg (milligrams) 1x (time) a day for edema, which may contribute to urge incontinence as mentioned in the CAA worksheet.
There is no indication, as part of the Care Area Assessment, that a 3 day voiding diary was included as part of the assessment to determine what type of toileting program R325 may benefit from as well as developing an individualized incontinence care plan.
Surveyor received a CNA cardx (sheet of instructions) for R325 dated 9/20/22 which indicated Toileting check and change every 2-3 hours, toileting assistance of 1.
On 9/20/22, at 9:50 am, Surveyor interviewed the MDS-LPN W who stated R325's MDS was not done yet in that Social Services still needs to complete the Care Area Assessment (CAAS) and section E. LPN W stated RN Y, who is a float MDS nurse, is the one who signed off on the 9/13/22 ARD and that she helps out remotely with MDS.
Surveyor asked LPN W when would the facility initiate a toileting program. LPN W stated she would go off of what is charted regarding coding incontinence and then would go ask the staff. LPN W stated if there is no indication in the record to show that a toileting program is being done then we document No on the MDS. The Nurse would initiate a toileting program or who ever admits the resident. LPN W stated she initiates the 3-day voiding diary for annual MDS's, significant changes and quarterly MDS.
On 9/20/22, at 10:55 am Surveyor asked LPN U if she initiated a toileting program for R325 upon admission. LPN U looked at Director of Nursing (DON) B who was standing nearby. DON B stated after we establish continence and incontinence then the MDS nurse will ask management to put a plan in place.
On 9/20/22, at 10:55 am Surveyor along with DON B and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) D went into ADON D's office where R325's incontinence care plan was discussed. Surveyor was informed R325 is assist of 1 for toileting. At times R325 refuses toileting and other times she may already be wet. Surveyor was informed they (the facility) would be initiating a Bowel and Bladder record if one had not been done. DON B and ADON D informed Surveyor they were going to start looking for it (3 day voiding diary), and that typically the B&B (Bowel and Bladder) record is on a paper and filled out by the CNAs who complete it and are then kept in the binder. Surveyor was informed R325's cardx indicated check and change and did not reflect a toileting program.
On 9/20/22, at 2:00 pm, Surveyor met with Director of Rehab Z who was aware of R325. Director of Rehab Z stated R325 is receiving Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Speech Therapy. Director of Rehab Z reported R325 is quite confused and it is hard getting her to do anything functional. Director of Rehab Z indicated R325 is up all night. Director of Rehab Z reported working with R325 earlier this morning on range of motion. Director of Rehab Z stated at times therapy gets involved with assessing incontinence care depending on need and was aware different types of toileting programs such as scheduled toileting etc.
Surveyor informed Director of Rehab Z that Surveyor did not locate a 3 day voiding diary for R325. Surveyor informed Director of Rehab Z that R325's incontinent care plan was not individualized to reflect a toileting program based off of a comprehensive assessment (inclusive of a 3 day voiding diary) in order for R325 to receive incontinence services to restore continence to the extent possible.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as usual body weight for 2 (R50 and R53) of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition.
* R50 had severe weight loss of 27.8 pounds, a 14.4% loss, in twelve days that was not identified by the facility or Registered Dietician, and no notification was made to the physician or Nurse Practitioner.
* R53 had a weight loss of 10.3 pounds, a 6.7% loss, in one month, with no re-weight to establish the validity of the weight loss, and no notification was made to the physician or Nurse Practitioner.
Findings:
The facility policy and procedure entitled, Weight Assessment and Intervention dated 2/24/2022 states:
1. The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, the next 2 days, and weekly for 3 additional weeks thereafter.
2. If no weight concerns are noted after the initial 3 days and 3 weeks after, routine weights will be measured monthly thereafter, unless ordered more frequently by the physician.
3. Weights will be recorded in the individual's electronic health record.
5. Team members will follow a consistent approach to weighing and use an appropriately calibrated and functioning scale (e.g., wheelchair scale or bed scale).
6. Any weight change of five (5) pounds or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation.
7. The Dietitian will review the monthly weights to follow individual weight trends over time. Weight trends will be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met.
8. The threshold for significant weight change will be based on the following criteria [where percentage of body weight change = (usual weight - actual weight) / (usual weight) x 100]:
a. 1 month - 5% weight change is significant; greater than 5% is severe.
b. 3 months - 7.5% weight change is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe.
c. 6 months - 10% weight change is significant; greater than 10% is severe.
10. The nursing staff will notify the individual or responsible party, physician and RDN (Registered Dietician) or designee of any individual with an unintended significant weight change.
1. R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture to the right lower fibula, anemia, diabetes, encephalopathy, and chronic kidney disease. R50's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R50 had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 and needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living but was able to eat independently.
The Nutrition Care Area Assessment (CAA) associated with this MDS stated R50 had too high of a BMI (Body Mass Index); R50 and the dietician were aware and would work toward trending down the BMI. The goal was to ensure R50 would not have a significant weight change or complications from the trending down.
On 8/11/2022, R50 had an order for hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic) 25 mg daily for hypertension.
On 8/11/2022 on the Hospital Summary, R50's discharge weight was 193 pounds.
On 8/11/2022 on admission, the facility documented R50 weighed 193.2 pounds.
On 8/11/2022, R50 had an order to obtain daily weights for three days starting on 8/12/2022 and then weekly times three weeks starting on 8/18/2022; the order stated to obtain a re-weight if there was a change of 5 pounds since the last weight.
On 8/12/2022 in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), the space for R50's weight was blank.
On 8/13/2022 in the TAR, a 9 was entered where the weight should have been recorded. A 9 was code for other/see progress notes. No entry regarding weight was made in the progress notes on 8/13/2022.
On 8/14/2022 in the TAR, a 2 was entered where the weight should have been recorded. A 2 was code for drug refused. No entry regarding the refusal of weight was documented in R50's medical record.
On 8/16/2022 at 11:42 AM in the progress notes, Registered Dietician (RD)-F documented R50 weighed 193.2 pounds on 8/11/2022 on admission, R50's weight history was unknown, and R50 had no edema present. RD-F documented R50's current diet order remained appropriate for management with potential weight fluctuations related to fluid shifts due to diuretic. RD-F documented RD-F met with R50 and R50's family and R50's family brings in food for R50 and R50 was eating okay per family. RD-F documented gradual weight loss was desirable due to BMI of 34.2 (obese). RD-F documented RD-F would monitor and follow up as needed with R50.
A Nutritional Care Plan was initiated on 8/16/2022 with the following interventions:
-Administer medications as ordered.
-Administer vitamins/mineral supplements as ordered.
-Encourage and assist as needed to consume foods and/or supplements and fluids offered.
-Honor food preferences.
-Obtain labs as ordered and notify physician of results.
-Provide diet as ordered.
-Record weight per facility protocol/physician orders.
-Review weights and notify Dietician, Physician, and responsible party of significant weight change.
On 8/18/2022 in the TAR, the space for R50's weight was blank.
On 8/25/2022 in the TAR, R50 weighed 193.2 pounds.
On 9/1/2022 in the TAR, a 2 was entered where the weight should have been recorded. A 2 was code for drug refused. No entry regarding the refusal of weight was documented in R50's medical record.
On 9/6/2022, R50 weighed 165.4 pounds. This was a weight loss of 27.8 pounds, or 14.4%, in 12 days.
No documentation was found after 9/6/2022 that the physician or dietician was notified of R50's severe weight loss.
On 9/9/2022, R50 weighed 166.8 pounds.
On 9/13/2022 at 11:32 AM in the progress notes, RD-F documented a weight warning from 9/9/2022 of R50's weight of 166.8 pounds and 13.5% weight loss in the last month. RD-F documented the weights from 8/11/2022 of 193.2 pounds, 9/6/2022 of 165.4 pounds, and 9/9/2022 of 166.8 pounds. RD-F documented RD-F was unsure the weight change was accurate and would continue to weigh R50 per physician orders and facility policy to establish a weight trend. RD-F documented R50's BMI was 29.5 (overweight) and the weight decrease was desirable. RD-F documented RD-F checked in with R50 that day and had discussed R50 with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) previously. The IDT reported family continued to bring in food for R50 and the intake tracker indicated R50 was eating approximately 50-75% of meals plus snacks. RD-F documented the goal was weight stability and would continue to monitor R50 and follow up as needed.
No documentation was found indicating R50's physician or Nurse Practitioner was notified of R50's severe weight loss.
On 9/14/2022 at 10:35 AM, Surveyor observed R50 in bed. R50's family member was at the bedside. R50 did not speak English and a family member was at R50's bedside to help staff interpret for R50. Surveyor asked R50 if R50 had any recent weight loss or decrease in appetite. R50's family member was not sure of R50's weight status.
On 9/14/2022, R50 was sent to the hospital to have an intravenous line inserted for fluids and antibiotic for a urinary tract infection. R50 was admitted to the hospital at that time.
In an interview on 9/19/2022 at 3:26 PM, Surveyor asked Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-D if ADON-D was aware of R50's weight loss. ADON-D stated the facility was having issues with scales not being calibrated and had someone come in to calibrate the scales. ADON-D thought R50 had been sent out to the hospital before they had another weight on the recalibrated scales. ADON-D stated the facility realized the scales were not accurate and told Maintenance-AA and Maintenance-AA recalibrated the scales at that time. Surveyor asked ADON-D when Maintenance-AA was notified of the scale concern. ADON-D pulled up email and stated the email was sent out on 9/2/2022. ADON-D stated R50's weight on 8/25/2022 was not correct, but the following weights were correct. Surveyor shared with ADON-D R50's admission weight of 193.2 pounds was comparable to the hospital discharge weight of 193 pounds on the same date, 8/11/2022. Surveyor shared the concern R50's weights on 9/6/2022 and 9/9/2022 were after the scales were calibrated and there was a significant weight loss from R50's admission on [DATE]. ADON-D agreed the weight difference was significant. Surveyor asked ADON-D if the hospital could be contacted to get a current weight. ADON-D stated the hospital would be contacted.
On 9/19/2022 at 4:04 PM, ADON-D reported the hospital was contacted and R50's current weight that morning was 164 pounds.
On 9/19/2022 at 2:00 PM in the progress notes, ADON-D charted ADON-D spoke with a nurse at the hospital and R50's weight as of 9/19/2022 AM was 165 pounds.
In an interview on 9/20/2022 at 9:37 AM, Maintenance-AA stated three scales were recalibrated on 9/1/2022 and a fourth scale had to be repaired with a new part; the new part was installed on 9/2/2022 and the scale was calibrated at that time. Surveyor asked Maintenance-AA if all the scales were currently calibrated. Maintenance-AA stated all four scales in the building were calibrated and good to use.
In an interview on 9/20/2022 at 9:50 AM, Surveyor asked RD-F how weights were reviewed for R50. RD-F stated the facility talked as a team at one of the meeting to get a reweight for R50 because of the large weight loss. RD-F stated family was bringing in food for R50 and the kitchen had done a good job of finding out preferences for R50. RD-F stated the actual weight loss may not be accurate because of the admission weight being on a broken scale and RD-F did not believe it was a reliable weight loss. Surveyor shared with RD-F R50's hospital discharge weight on 8/11/2022 was 193 pounds, the same as the facility admission weight on the same date. RD-F stated RD-F wanted to monitor further to see if the weight loss was accurate. Surveyor asked RD-F if any supplements were added due to the potential weight loss. RD-F stated no supplements were added because they were monitoring R50 to make sure R50 was eating well. RD-F referred to the nutrition progress note and stated edema was unknown. RD-F stated because it was such a large weight loss, the scale was more to blame than not eating. Surveyor shared with RD-F the scales were calibrated before the weights were obtained on 9/6/2022 and 9/9/2022. RD-F stated RD-F did not anticipate such a great loss. Surveyor asked RD-F if the physician was notified of the weight loss. RD-F stated RD-F did not notify the physician of the weight loss.
In an interview on 9/20/2022 at 2:23 PM, Surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-U if the computer charting system alerted LPN-U of a significant difference in R50's weight on 6/6/2022 when LPN-U entered R50's weight. LPN-U stated no alert or warning came up when R50's weight was entered and maybe LPN-U entered the wrong weight. Surveyor showed LPN-U R50's weight on 9/9/2022 that was comparable to the 9/6/20222 weight. LPN-U stated LPN-U was not aware R50 had a weight loss and did not notify anyone because LPN-U was unaware there was a weight loss.
In an interview on 9/20/2022 at 3:16 PM, Surveyor reviewed R50's weights with Medical Doctor (MD)-O and asked if MD-O had been notified of R50's severe weight loss. MD-O stated that was a lot of weight to lose. MD-O stated the Nurse Practitioner may have been notified, but MD-O had not been notified.
On 9/20/2022 at 11:24 PM in the progress notes, nursing charted R50 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital.
On 9/20/2022, R50 weighed 156.2 pounds.
In an interview on 9/21/2022 at 8:41 AM, Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON)-B when a re-weight would be expected for a resident with a great increase or decrease in weight. DON-B stated the expectation would be to have the weight taken the next day.
In an interview on 9/21/2022 at 9:03 AM, ADON-F stated ADON-F talked to Nurse Practitioner (NP)-H about R50's weight loss and NP-H provided a note regarding R50's weight. ADON-D provided the note dated 9/20/2022 to Surveyor: In discussion with ADON, discrepancy in weight, 8/25/2022 patient's weight was 193.2, weight on 9/6/2022 165.4. Patient is eating, patient is eating food brought from home. Per family and patient, no loss of appetite. Discussed with ADON in regards to recalibrating scale as scale has been off. Patient does not seem to appear to have lost weight. Will reweigh patient once scale is recalibrated. Also different scales are used may show different weights.
In an interview on 9/21/2022 at 10:37 AM, NP-H stated R50's weight on 9/6/2022 was discussed with the facility staff regarding a weight loss. NP-H stated the family brought in food and R50 did not look like R50 was losing weight. NP-H stated the scale needed to be recalibrated. NP-H stated NP-H talked to R50 and R50 was eating just fine. Surveyor shared with NP-H R50's hospital discharge weight on 8/11/2022 and the facility admission weight on 8/11/2022 were equivalent at 193 pounds. Surveyor shared with NP-H the scales were recalibrated on 9/1/2022 and 9/2/2022 so the 9/6/2022 weight of 165.4 pounds was taken after the recalibrations. Surveyor asked NP-H if the facility staff told NP-H about R50's reweight on 9/9/2022 of 166.8 pounds. NP-H stated there was no discussion about R50's re-weight on 9/9/2022 and NP-H was not aware the weight loss was actual. Surveyor shared with NP-H the hospital weight on 9/19/2022 was 164 pounds which correlated with the previous weights taken at the facility.
On 9/21/2022 at 1:04 PM in the progress notes, nursing charted R50's recent admission weight on 9/20/2022 was 156.2 pounds which was a 6.4% weight loss since the last weight on 9/9/2022 of 166.8 pounds, a loss of 10.6 pounds. NP-H was notified of the change.
On 9/21/2022 at 1:15 PM in the progress notes, RD-F documented an email was reviewed from NP-H regarding supplements for R50 and suggested trying magic cup twice daily. RD-F documented RD-F would monitor acceptance of supplements and adjust recommendations accordingly.
On 9/21/2022 at 2:18 PM, Surveyor shared the concern with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and DON-B R50 had a severe weight loss that was not identified by facility staff or Registered Dietician and notifications were not made to the physician or Nurse Practitioner to address the weight loss. No further information was provided at that time.
2. R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include displacement of the greater trochanter of the right femur, CAD (coronary artery disease), HTN (hypertension) and dementia.
R53's MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment), with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/10/2022 documented R53 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 3, indicating that R53 is cognitively impaired; R53 needs limited assist of one for eating, and section K documents a weight of 153lbs (pounds).
R53's care plan documents, At Risk for Nutritional/Hydration Status Change r/t(related to) Dementia, Dysphagia which is dated 08/09/2022, revised on 08/11/2022 and has a target date of 11/30/2022. Goals for this care plan include:
Will maintain weight as evidenced by no significant wt (weight) changes (>/= 5% in 30 days, >/= 7.5% in 90 days, or >/= 10% in 180 days).
Interventions for this care plan include:
Record weight per facility protocol/MD (medical doctor) orders.
Review weights and notify RD (registered dietician), MD(medical doctor), and responsible party of significant weight change
R53's current physician's order for weights states:
WEIGHT - daily (for) 3 days, weekly (for) 3, monthly (Obtain re-weight if change of 5 lbs (pounds) since last weight) one time a day for monitoring for 3 Days AND one time a day every Fri for monitoring for 3 Weeks AND one time a day every 1 month(s) starting on the 1st for 1 day(s) for monitoring
Surveyor reviewed R53's medical record and noted the following weights documented:
9/01/2022 at 22:14(10:14pm) 144.7 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
8/19/2022 at 06:33AM
154.4 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
8/12/2022 at 07:54AM 153.0 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
8/07/2022 at 12:55PM 153.2 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
8/05/2022 at 18:17(6:17PM) 152.4 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
8/04/2022 at 18:46(6:46PM) 153.0 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
8/04/2022 at 18:45(6:45PM) 155.0 lbs (pounds) using the wheelchair scale
Surveyor noted a 9.7 lb weight loss (a 6.28%) weight loss from 08/19 to 09/01 (in 13 days).
On 09/14/22 at 12:54 PM, surveyor observed R53 sitting in a wheelchair in room and appeared to have just finished lunch. R53 was accompanied by wife who is also R53's HCPOA(Healthcare Power of Attorney) and daughter whom confirmed R53 had finished eating lunch and surveyor noted R53 had eaten 75%-100%.
On 09/14/22 at 01:19 PM R53's HCPOA told surveyor R53 has lost about 10lbs (pounds) since admission to the facility and R53 has been on a pureed diet for a long time. Per HCPOA, R53 can feed self, though it might be difficult with the Styrofoam container. (The facility had been using Styrofoam containers due to a broken dishwasher. This issue had been addressed by the facility and was in the process of being fixed). R53's HCPOA told surveyor she assists R53 with lunch daily in R53's room, but for breakfast and dinner R53 eats in the dining room.
On 09/15/22 08:33 AM, DON (Director of Nursing)-B told surveyor R53 can feed self but needs encouragement.
On 09/15/22 08:38 AM, Surveyor observed R53 sitting in a wheelchair eating breakfast, which was served in a Styrofoam container, in a dining room with other residents and staff members present. R53 was feeding self with no apparent issues.
On 09/19/22 at 12:29 PM, surveyor observed R53 sitting in a wheelchair in room accompanied by HCPOA. R53 ate 75-100% of lunch.
On 09/20/22 at 09:50 AM, R53 told surveyor breakfast was good, but not enough.
On 09/20/22 at 10:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed RD (Registered Dietician)-F. RD-F told surveyor she has been in this building since 2019 and weights are monitored via the weights and vitals tab in Point Click Care (the facilities charting system). This tab will prompt RD-F when there is 3% weight change from the last weight, however, RD-F told surveyor she is looking for the significant/severe weight changes of 5% over a month, 7.5% over 3 months and 10% over 6 months. RD-F told surveyor per Northshore policy reweighs are supposed to be done if there is a 5 lb (pound) weight change from the last weight, but other weight changes are discussed as a team and the team will decide if a reweigh is needed.
On 09/20/22 at 10:15 AM, Surveyor asked if RD-F was aware that R53 had an 10 lb (pound) weight loss from 08/14/22 to 09/01/22, which is a 6.28% weight loss in less than one month. RD-F told surveyor R53 was talked about as a team, put on the list to be reweighed and should be reweighed. Surveyor stated the last documented weight for R53 was 19 days ago and questioned RD-F as to whether a reweigh should have already been obtained. RD-F told surveyor a reweigh was expected by now. Surveyor told RD-F R53 had told surveyor that breakfast was good, but not enough.
On 09/20/22 at 11:23 AM, RD-F told surveyor R53 was reweighed today for 146.9 lbs(pounds), a progress note was entered addressing the weight loss, and an order for weekly weights for four weeks was entered. RD-F told surveyor R53 will be given larger portions at mealtimes with the goal of weight stability and R53's wife asked about diet upgrade which RD-F will follow up with speech therapy. RD-F also told surveyor that the new weight puts R53's weight loss at 4.86%, not as severe as the prior weight.
Surveyor noted the following progress note entered into R53's medical record on 09/20/2022 at 11:00AM by RD-F:
Nutrition/Dietary Note
Note Text: Wt (Weight) hx (History) is:
146.9#(pounds) on 9/20
144.7#(pounds) on 9/1
154.4#(pounds) on 8/19
155# (pounds) on 8/4
Reweight today confirms weight has decreased some. Weight decrease may be r/t (related to) scale recalibration at the beginning of September. Using 9/20 weight, weight is down 4.9% over 1 month, not a significant weight change. Intake is 76% avg plus occasional snacks of a dysphagia puree diet with nectar thick liquids. Meal intake provides approximately 1832 kcal (kilocalories) and 72 g(grams) PRO (protein). Has order for magic cup BID (twice a day) (580 kcal(kilocalories), 18 g(grams) PRO(protein)), per MAR(medication administration record) eating supplement 100%. Estimated needs are 1669-2003 kcal(kilocalories) (25-30 kcal/kg(kilocalories/kilogram)) and 67 g(grams) PRO(protein) (1 g/kg(gram/kilogram)). Meeting estimated needs with PO(by mouth) intake.
Met with wife. Wife reports he eats good and enjoys the magic cup. She states at times he seems like he could eat more food. Discussed possibility of large portions, wife is agreeable to try. Wife was wondering about a potential diet upgrade, will relay to SLP (speech language pathologist). (SLP states diet texture is needed r/t (related to) cognition, but she will eval(evaluate) and follow-up with wife). Wife reports historically res was 170-180#(pounds) as a normal weight and lost a significant amount of weight while hospitalized prior to admission in facility. Overall wife feels clothes are a little looser, but it is unclear if that is from weight loss previous to facility. Recommending weekly weight x (times) 4 to monitor weight trend.
On 09/20/22 at 02:19 PM, surveyor interviewed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-G and confirmed that LPN-G entered R53's 09/01/22 weight. LPN-G told surveyor CNAs (certified nursing assistants) weigh the residents and if there is a discrepancy of 5 lbs (pounds) or more the weight is redone to ensure it is accurate. LPN-G told surveyor the dietician would be notified of any discrepancy and LPN-G stated (I) don't recall notifying anybody about R53's weight on 09/01/22 and R53 was not reweighed at that time.
On 09/21/22 at 08:41 AM, DON-B told surveyor reweights should be obtained the same day, if not the next day.
On 09/21/22 at 10:44 AM, NP (Nurse Practitioner)-H told surveyor, (I) do not believe (I) was updated regarding R53's weight loss from 08/19-09/01. At this time NP-H checked records, and confirmed she was not updated regarding R53's weight loss.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents who are fed by enteral means receiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding, including risk for dehydration for 1 of 2 (R13) residents reviewed for enteral feeding.
R13's continuous tube feeding was observed disconnected from R13's PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube and lying on the floor.
Findings include:
R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Metabolic Encephalopathy, Diabetes Mellitus and protein calorie malnutrition. R13's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/17/22 indicates that they require total assistance with activities of daily living including bed mobility. R13 is rarely to never understood. R13 receives all medications and nutrition through a gastrostomy tube.
On 9/14/22 at 09:35 AM, R13 was observed in bed with a continuous tube feeding running at 55 cc/hr connected to R13's gastrostomy tube. Surveyor noted the tube feeding bag was unlabeled.
On 9/14/22 at 3:06 PM, Surveyor noted R13's continuous tube feeding was disconnected from R13's gastrostomy tube running at 55 cc/hr with a puddle of formula dripping on the floor next to R13's bed.
On 9/14/22 at 3:10 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-M entered R13's room and did not address the puddle of formula on the floor. CNA-M turned off R13's tube feeding pump and left R13's room.
On 9/14/22 at 3:21 PM, Surveyor asked CNA-M where they could find the unit nurse. CNA-M told Surveyor I don't know .I think he is agency .he might be doing a treatment somewhere.
09/14/22 at 3:30 PM, Surveyor found Agency Nurse-CC. Agency Nurse-CC told Surveyor that they had only been working at the facility for a couple of days and was not very familiar with the residents. Surveyor showed Agency Nurse-CC to R13's room. Surveyor asked Agency Nurse-CC if they were aware that R13's tube feeding had become disconnected. Agency Nurse-CC told Surveyor that they were not aware of this and did not know R13 was on a continuous tube feeding. Surveyor asked Agency Nurse-CC if CNAs should be telling nurse right away if a problem with a resident's tube feeding pump or if it becomes disconnected. Agency Nurse-CC responded Yes. Surveyor asked Agency Nurse-CC if tube feeding should be labeled with a residents name. Agency Nurse-CC responded Yes.
On 9/14/22 at 3:35 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA-M. Surveyor asked CNA-M what they should do if a resident's tube feeding pump is beeping or the tubing becomes disconnected. CNA-M responded that they would tell a nurse. Surveyor asked why they had not informed Agency Nurse-CC that R13's tube feeding had become disconnected. Surveyor did not receive a response from CNA-M.
On 9/15/22 at 8:00 AM, Surveyor shared concerns with NHA-A related to R13's continuous tube feeding being disconnected, CNA-M not notifying R13's nurse of this occurrence and the unlabeled tube feeding formula bag. No additional information was supplied to Surveyor at this time.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine (which delivers a stream of oxygenated air to the person's airway) was ordered, ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine (which delivers a stream of oxygenated air to the person's airway) was ordered, care planned, and cleaned for 1 (R25) of 1 Residents reviewed with CPAP machines.
There is no physician order for R25's CPAP, there is no evidence R25's CPAP is being cleaned and there is no care plan.
Findings include:
The CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) Therapy policy reviewed/revised 6/24/2022 under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents
1.) Verify physician orders
2.) Assemble equipment at bedside.
3.) Observe universal precautions and wash your hands.
4.) Place system close to where the patient will be sleeping on a clean dry surface.
6.) Insert the oxygen adaptor and tubing if supplemental O2 (oxygen) is ordered.
7.) Place mask/pillows with headgear on patient and adjust to a proper fit.
8.) Ensure a proper fit and adjust as necessary. If excessive air leaks around the eyes and nose, adjust the headgear. Resize mask for excessive leaks or to increase patient comfort.
9.) If ordered, connect humidifier to CPAP unit. Fill humidifier with distilled or sterile water.
10.) If ordered, adjust ramp to prescribed time 29.
R25's diagnoses includes morbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea.
Surveyor reviewed R25's care plans and noted the following care plans:
* Physical functioning deficit initiated 1/12/21 & revised 4/12/21.
* At risk for falls initiated 1/12/21 & revised 5/6/22.
* Infection actual or at risk initiated & revised 8/9/22.
* Pain or potential for pain initiated & revised 1/12/21.
* At risk for adverse effects r/t (related to) use of antidepressant medication, mood stabilizer, and Antianxiety initiated 1/7/21 & revised 8/6/21.
* At risk for skin integrity initiated & revised 1/12/21.
* At risk for nutritional/hydration status initiated 1/12/21 & revised 4/12/22.
* Alteration in blood glucose initiated 7/17/21 & revised 4/12/22.
* Prefers not to attend group activities initiated 1/8/21 & revised 8/4/22.
* Resident does not show potential for discharge to community initiated 1/13/22.
* Resident's advance directive initiated 1/7/21.
* Use of bilateral side rails initiated & revised 8/17/22.
* At risk for injury related to physical restraint initiated 2/22/22 & revised 8/17/22.
* Alteration in visual acuity initiated & revised 1/19/21.
* At risk for behavior symptoms initiated & revised 6/21/22.
* Alteration in elimination of bowel and bladder functional incontinence initiated 1/12/21.
* HX (history) suicidal risk initiated & revised on 1/7/21.
* Unsettled relationships/conflicts initiated & revised 6/21/22.
* Inappropriate sexual behaviors initiated 9/15/22.
Surveyor was unable to locate a respiratory care plan for R25's CPAP.
On 9/14/22 at 9:11 a.m. Surveyor observed R25 in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated watching TV. Surveyor observed a CPAP machine on the dresser to the left of R25's bed and asked R25 if she uses the CPAP. R25 informed Surveyor she uses the CPAP at night and if she naps.
On 9/14/22 at 2:20 p.m. Surveyor observed R25 in bed on her back wearing the CPAP with two transfer bars up on the bed.
On 9/14/22 at 3:17 p.m. Surveyor reviewed R25's physician orders and was unable to locate an order for the use or maintenance of R25's CPAP.
On 9/15/22 at 10:07 a.m. Surveyor observed R25 in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated wearing the CPAP. After Surveyor entered R25's room, R25 removed the CPAP informing Surveyor she was waiting for a brief change.
On 9/19/22 at 7:21 a.m. Surveyor observed R25 in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated, two transfer bars up and wearing the CPAP. After Surveyor entered R25's room, R25 removed her CPAP. Surveyor asked R25 how she was. R25 informed Surveyor her blood sugar was low and they gave her orange juice. Surveyor informed R25 Surveyor wanted to look to see the manufacturer of her CPAP machine was. Surveyor noted the manufacturer is Resmed airsense 10. R25 informed Surveyor the water chamber has a crack as it fell.
On 9/19/22 at 10:15 a.m. Surveyor reviewed R25's September 2022 MAR (medication administration record) and TAR (treatment administration record) and did not note any documentation regarding cleaning R25's CPAP machine.
According to the website www.resmed.com for the user guide under the section for cleaning documents You should clean the device weekly as described. Refer to the mask user guide for detailed instructions on cleaning your mask.
1. Wash the water tub and air tubing in warm water using only mild detergent. Do not wash in a dishwasher or washing machine.
2. Rinse the water tub and air tubing thoroughly and allow to dry out of direct sunlight and/or heat.
3. Wipe the exterior of the device with a dry cloth.
On 9/19/22 at 10:30 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-G where Surveyor would be able to locate an order for R25's CPAP. LPN-G looked at R25's electronic medical record and informed Surveyor he's not seeing it either. Surveyor informed LPN-G Surveyor wasn't able to locate any orders regarding cleaning R25's CPAP. LPN-G informed Surveyor he doesn't see any CPAP orders in here.
On 9/19/22 at 10:34 a.m. Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing)-B if R25 uses her CPAP. DON-B replied yes. Surveyor informed DON-B Surveyor is unable to locate any orders for the CPAP including how/when the CPAP should be cleaned and a care plan for the CPAP. DON-B looked at R25's electronic medical record and then stated to Surveyor I don't see anything myself. Surveyor asked who would develop the CPAP care plan. DON-B informed Surveyor nursing, herself or the manager. Surveyor asked DON-B if there is a manager on R25's unit. DON-B informed Surveyor technically she is the manager now. Surveyor asked DON-B if she was aware R25's water chamber has a crack. DON-B replied no.
On 9/20/22 Surveyor noted with a start date of 9/19/22 C-PAP Mask, first shift remove mask and rinse canister with warm water & dry on side of sink in the morning for COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)/Sleep apnea and C-PAP Mask at bedtime related to COPD, sleep apnea. Second shift to fill canister with distilled water. Make sure mask is on and machine is powered ON at bedtime for COPD/Sleep apnea.
On 9/20/22 Surveyor noted at risk for respiratory impairment care plan had been developed with an initiated & revised date of 9/19/22. Interventions documented are:
* Administer medications as ordered initiated & revised 9/19/22.
* CPAP per MD (medical doctor) orders initiated 9/19/22.
* Evaluate lung sounds and VS (vital signs) as needed. Report abnormalities to MD initiated 9/19/22.
* Obtain pulse ox as ordered and report abnormal findings initiated 9/19/22.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not always follow through on obtaining physician ordered labs for 1 of 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not always follow through on obtaining physician ordered labs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for lab services.
On 1/13/22, R73's physician ordered weekly basic metabolic panel (BMP) labs. The facility did not consistently follow through on obtaining the BUN lab. Surveyor noted missing BMP labs for 1/13, 1/20, 1/27, 2/3, 2/10, 2/17, 3/10, 3/17, and 3/24/22
Findings include:
The facility policy, entitled Laboratory Services dated December 2016 states, Lab Results: Lab results will be reported to the physician; Abnormal lab tests will be sent to the physician; The physician will be notified as soon as possible upon receipt of the panic/critical lab value.
The facility policy, entitled Hydration, dated 01-2017 states, Sufficient fluid means the amount of fluid needed to prevent dehydration (output of fluids far exceeds fluid intake) and maintain health. The amount needed is specific for each resident and fluctuates as the resident's condition fluctuates (i.e., increase fluids if resident has fever or diarrhea)
5. Monitoring/revision:
. x. Abnormal laboratory values ( .sodium .blood urea nitrogen (BUN) .)
6. Documentation:
. e. Document physician/family notifications and any responses .
R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: Cerebral Palsy, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and dysphagia. R73 is on continuous tube feeding related to episodes of nausea/vomiting and dysphagia.
R73's Care Plan, dated 08/31/2021 and revised on 02/24/2022, with a target date of 09/18/2022 states:
Need for feeding tube/potential for complications of feeding tube use and has interventions that include, Administer tube feeding formula, hydration, and flushes per orders.
R73's Care Plan, dated 09/08/2021 and revised on 02/24/2022, with a target date of 09/18/2022 states:
Risk for Alteration in Hydration r/t (related to) tube feeding, dependent on staff. Interventions include, Obtain lab results as ordered and notify MD (medical doctor) of results.
R73's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/31/2022 indicted that R73 is rarely/never understood, is totally dependent on staff for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including eating, and section K is marked none of the above for swallowing disorders and tube feeding is not checked in section K0510.
Per R73's medical record, R73 was diagnosed with Covid-19 on 12/30/2021.
On 1/4/2022 at 11:07AM, a nurses progress notes documents: Writer took patients vitals, VS (vital signs) 77/53, 90, 16, 98.4, 88% on RA(room air), writer updated NP-N (name of NP), NP-N (name of NP) in building and evaluated pt (patient), NP-N (name of NP) would like pt (patient) to be sent out to be evaluated and treated for hypoxia and hypotension, Writer called (name of) ambulance at 9:37AM to transport pt (patient) to (name of hospital) main .(name of )ambulance here to transport pt out to ER at 10:04AM.
R73 was sent to (name of hospital) on 01/04/2022 related to hypotension and hypoxia.
Lab work drawn at the hospital on 10:45AM on 01/04/2022 included a BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel) which documented a sodium level of 156, which is greater than defined limits of 135-154 meq/l (milliequivalents) and a BUN (Blood Urea Nitrogen) of 50 which is greater than defined limits of 7-20 mg/dL.
Per hospital records, R73 was diagnosed with hypernatremia/dehydration and acute kidney injury, both of which resolved with fluid resuscitation.
R73 was discharged back to the facility on [DATE].
Hospital discharge instructions recommended rechecking BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel) to ensure adequate free water intake and no return of hypernatremia.
R73 was readmitted into the facility on 1/9/22.
R73's physician's orders upon return to the facility on 1/9/22 include:
1. BMP (basic metabolic panel) weekly on Thursdays starting 01/13/2022, one time a day every Thursday for lab monitoring; this order has a discontinued date of 06/29/2022
2. Enteral Feed Order: six times a day Flush feeding tube with 200 cc (cubic centimeters) of water q (every) 4 hours. This order has a start date of 10/11/2021 and a discontinued date of 06/06/2022.
R73's physician's order for enteral water flushes, upon return to the facility on January 9, 2022 continued to be the same order as prior to the hospitalization: six times a day Flush feeding tube with 200 cc (cubic centimeters) of water q (every) 4 hours. This order had a start date of 10/11/2021 and a discontinued date of 06/06/2022.
R73 was seen by NP (Nurse Practitioner)-N on 01/11/2022. NP-N documents in a Provider Progress note: .Hypernatremia due to poor free water intake, resolved with fluid resuscitation, encourage increased PO (by mouth)/G (gastrostomy)-tube intake of fluids, Monitor BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel) weekly .AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) Due to hypovolemia; improved with IVF (intravenous fluids), Monitor with weekly BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel).
R73 continues with the physician order for Enteral Feed Order: six times a day Flush feeding tube with 200 cc (cubic centimeters) of water q (every) 4 hours.
R73 had a monthly physician monthly progress note dated 02/21/2022 that documented: check BMP, CBC (complete blood count), TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) .Hypernatremia due to poor free water intake .labs have not been drawn, however-check BMP (basic metabolic panel), CBC (complete blood count), TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) .AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) due to hypovolemia .labs continue to not be drawn.
Surveyor reviewed R73's medical record and noted laboratory results from 02/24/2022, which was a BMP. No laboratory results were noted prior to 02/24/2022, even though R73's physician ordered BMP weekly starting on 1/13/22 (Surveyor noted missing BMP labs for 1/13, 1/20, 1/27, 2/3, 2/10, and 2/17/22).
Surveyor interviewed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-P, on 09/19/22 at 12:35 PM, regarding the facility's process for obtaining/reporting laboratory results. LPN-P told surveyor facility staff access lab results via the lab's website. The labs are printed and then given to the NP (Nurse Practitioner) to review. The lab results are then sent to medical records. LPN-P did not think lab results would be scanned into the computer.
On 09/19/22 at 01:48 PM, Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing)-B for R73's laboratory results from January 2022-June 2022, specifically BMP results. Surveyor was given BMP results from 02/24/2022, 03/03/2022, 03/31/2022, 04/06/2022 (lab report documented patient declined/refused), 04/14/2022, 04/21/2022, 04/28/2022, 05/01/2022 (lab report documented patient declined/refused), 05/05/2022, 05/11/2022 (lab report documented patient declined/refused), 05/12/2022(lab report documented patient declined/refused), 05/15/2022 (lab report documented patient declined/refused), 05/19/2022, 05/26/2022 and 06/02/2022.
Surveyor did not receive the weekly BMP labs prior to 2/24/2022 or after 2/24/22 for 3/10, 3/17, 3/24/22.
On 02/24/2022, a nutrition assessment by RD-F documents, . labs .NA (sodium) 156 (referencing the last 90 days when R73 was in the hospital) .No concerns with hydration .Fluids provided via TF (tube feeding) and flushes at this time.
R73's sodium levels remained within the defined limits of 135-145 MEq/L until 05/26/2022 when the laboratory reported a sodium level of 150.
R73's BUN on 05/26/2022 was reported at 36, which is greater than defined limits which of 7-20 mg/dL.
During review of R73's medical record, surveyor noted R73 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] and 05/31/2022 related to dislodgement of R73's gastrostomy tube. Surveyor did not note any documentation in R73's medical record that R73's physician was aware of R73's basic metabolic panel results from 05/26/2022 which reported an abnormal sodium of 150 and a BUN of 36.
On 09/22/2022 at 09:48, Surveyor interviewed NP-N. NP-N told surveyor while she was at the facility, she would usually check the lab results and update the facility staff with any new orders. Per NP-N either the floor nurse would be updated in person, via phone, or the director of nursing would be updated via email. NP-N told surveyor she was aware of R73's sodium level on 05/26/2022 and a repeat sodium was ordered, but R73 was sent to the hospital back and forth during that time and NP-N believed that was why the repeat sodium was not drawn.
NP-N told surveyor for a sodium level of 150, she would have ordered a repeat lab for the next day or two. NP-N told surveyor that she could not remember if the repeat lab order was documented and that she could not check because the company that NP-N worked for in May 2022 was bought out by (name of current company). NP-N did not have access to the records prior to (name of current company). NP-N told surveyor she was not sure if the 05/26/2022 lab results were called to her by the facility or if she had checked on the lab results herself. Surveyor asked NP-N if there were any additional water flushes ordered for R73 between 05/26/2022 and 06/02/2022, since R73 already had an elevated sodium on 05/26/2022 was sent to hospital twice in that time period, which may have resulted in a decrease in water flushes. NP-N told surveyor she did not order any additional water flushes and was not terribly concerned with a sodium of 150 since R73 had been stable up to that point. NP-N told surveyor she was shocked to see a sodium level of 159 on 06/02/2022 and subsequently sent R73 to the hospital.
Even though NP-N was made aware of the 5/26/22 lab, Surveyor noted the facility did not have documentation of notifying NP-N of the abnormal laboratory results nor documentation of what NP-N would like done related to the abnormal laboratory.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of the ankle, diabetes, anemia, and chronic kidney dise...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of the ankle, diabetes, anemia, and chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. R20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R20 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.
In an interview on 9/14/2022 at 2:11 PM, R20 stated the food served at the facility was cold and did not taste good. R20 stated the previous day R20 had ordered egg salad and what R20 got was one piece of bread with a pile of egg salad on the bread with way too much mayonnaise. R20 stated R20 had diarrhea after eating the egg salad on bread. R20 stated R20 could not call it a sandwich since there was only one slice of bread.
Based on food complaints from R38, R35, R33, R24, & R20, during the Resident Council meeting with Surveyors, 8 of 11 Residents raised their hands to indicate the food is not hot, and testing lunch food items on 9/19/22, the Facility did not ensure Resident's food was palatable for 13 of 72 residents who receive their meals from the kitchen.
Findings include:
1. On 9/14/22 at 9:51 a.m., Surveyor asked R38 how his breakfast was? R38 replied it was alright. Surveyor asked how the food usually is? R38 informed Surveyor it's so-so and the food is hit or miss. Surveyor asked R38 when he receives his meals is the food hot? R38 informed Surveyor it wasn't hot this morning.
2. On 9/14/22 at 10:08 a.m., Surveyor asked R35 how the food is at the Facility? R35 informed Surveyor lately the food has been crappy. R35 informed Surveyor in the beginning, whoever was cooking the food was good, but now the food is greasy. R35 indicated last night they were served tater tot casserole which was greasy.
3. On 9/15/22, Surveyor reviewed prior Resident's council meeting minutes. Surveyor noted the 3/18/22 minutes listed under new concerns is Temperature of food is cold when served/delivered. The 4/13/22 Resident council meeting minutes are checked for not resolved for the concern temperature of food is cold when served/delivered. The 6/26/22 Resident council meeting minutes is checked for not resolved for the concern - Residents are still dissatisfied with menu options high frequency for mashed potatoes, canned fruit, dry/tough protein. The 8/18/22 Resident council meeting minutes under new concerns, include Proteins too tough; more variety.
On 9/15/22 at 10:36 a.m. Surveyors conducted a Resident Council meeting with 11 Residents. During the meeting, at 10:56 a.m., R33 informed Surveyor they are receiving their food 15 or 20 minutes late, it's cold, and now they are getting their meals in take out boxes. R33 stated one time for breakfast all she received was a roll and nothing else. Surveyor asked Residents if they were also having concerns with their food not being hot and to raise their hands if they had this concern. 8 of the 11 Residents attending the meeting raised their hands. R28 then informed Surveyors one time she received puree food which tasted like dog food.
4. On 9/19/22 at 11:57 a.m., Surveyor observed the food truck arrive on the 200 unit.
On 9/19/22 at 11:58 a.m., Surveyor observed Activities I starting to pass out trays to Resident's rooms from the food truck. Surveyor asked Activities I which Resident would be the last tray served from the food truck. Activities I informed Surveyor R3 would be. Surveyor informed Activities I Surveyor will be taking R3's tray at the time it would be served to him and requested someone call the kitchen so R3 wouldn't have to wait for his lunch.
On 9/19/22 at 12:13 p.m., Surveyors received R3's lunch tray which was served in a Styrofoam container due to the dish machine being out of order. The temperature of the coffee was 135 degrees and tasted hot. The mashed potatoes were 117.5 degrees, were tasty but were warm, not hot. The turkey with gravy was 105.3 degrees and was cool to the taste. The carrots were 103 degrees and were cool. The roll was soft and the cake was moist.
On 9/19/22 at 12:25 p.m., Surveyor asked R24 if her lunch was hot today. R24 informed Surveyor it wasn't ice cold then stated, I can say it's luke warm, some days it's cold.
On 9/19/22 at 3:29 p.m., Surveyor asked DM (Dietary Manager) J if she has received complaints regarding the food not being hot. DM J replied yes, we have had a couple and explained some of the Residents who receive room trays. DM J informed Surveyor when the food leaves the kitchen it is hot, you would think the Residents would get it hot but you never know. Surveyor asked DM J how she ensures Resident's food is served hot. DM J informed Surveyor she makes sure she looks at the temperatures, the temperature is 180 degrees, the food is served on hot plates and she makes sure the plate warmer is on and temperature is taken for all food in the serving table. Surveyor asked about the room trays which are currently being served in a Styrofoam container. DM J informed Surveyor the food temperature should be maintained and when they serve the food it is hot not cold. Surveyor informed DM J Surveyor took temperatures and tasted R3's lunch meal and noted the food was not hot but warm or cool.
On 9/19/22 at 4:41 p.m. Administrator A was informed of the above.