GREENWAY MANOR

501 S WINSTED ST, SPRING GREEN, WI 53588 (608) 588-2586
For profit - Corporation 50 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
80/100
#38 of 321 in WI
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Greenway Manor in Spring Green, Wisconsin, has a Trust Grade of B+, which indicates that it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #38 out of 321 facilities in Wisconsin, placing it in the top half, and is the best option out of five in Sauk County. However, the facility is facing a concerning trend, as the number of issues reported has increased from 2 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is a strength with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 41%, which is lower than the state average, suggesting that staff are stable and familiar with the residents. Although there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, recent inspector findings revealed serious issues, including a failure to contact a physician after a resident experienced bleeding during a routine procedure and a lack of proper investigation into an alleged abuse case, indicating that there are significant areas for improvement despite some strengths.

Trust Score
B+
80/100
In Wisconsin
#38/321
Top 11%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
2 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
41% turnover. Near Wisconsin's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wisconsin facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 54 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wisconsin. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
6 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 4 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (41%)

    7 points below Wisconsin average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 41%

Near Wisconsin avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 6 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Oct 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident physical ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed in the sample of 14 residents to the State Agency (SA) immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made when the incident involved abuse. This failure had the possibility to negatively impact all 46 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedures for grievances, Mistreatment Investigations, Mistreatment Prevention and Injuries of Unknown Source dated 04/25/24 provided by the Administrator as the facility's Abuse policy indicated, Purpose: To prevent and prohibit mistreatment, abuse .of all residents.Policy: It is the policy of (Facility Name) that all residents will live in a safe, secure environment that is free of any type of mistreatment, abuse . If the event that causes the allegation involves abuse .a report of the violation will be made to the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) and DQA (Division of Quality Assurance) no later than two hours after the allegation is made. Reports are to be made .via the online reporting system . Review R46's Face Sheet, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia of the left dominant side, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphasia, and type II diabetes. Review of R46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/19/24, located in the EMR under the MDS tab with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R46 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated that R46 was dependent for mobility of rolling from side to side, no psychosis, no behavioral symptoms, and no behavior of resisting care or medications. Review of the facility's investigative file indicated an email dated 06/11/24 at 8:00 AM from the Director of Nursing (DON) to the Social Service Director (SSD) that stated, Nurse Manager (NM)1 was informed of 'behaviors' when listening to night shift report .Writer (NM1) immediately went to assess resident at 7:35 AM. Upon entering the room writer asked R46 how her night was. R46 stated that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was rough with her last night. Writer asked if R46 explain how CNA1 was being rough. R46 stated that CNA1 was checking her during cares/rounds and pulled the soaker pad to the side causing her to hit the side of her head on the assist bar that is closest to the bathroom side. Writer checked R46's head where she said she had hit it. There are no marks, redness, skin issues or bruising noted. R46 said that after CNA1 had finished rolling her towards the bathroom and she then rolled her back to the window side by pushing on her hip area. Writer checked R46's legs which were equal in length with no hip rotation noted. Writer asked if R46 was in any pain or discomfort and R46 stated, 'No.' Writer completed a full body skin assessment. There were no bruises, red marks, cuts, scrapes, or skin issues noted . Review of R46's EMR Progress note' in the Progress note tab dated 06/12/24 indicated, Late entry 6/11/24. Behavior: CNA1 reported resident demonstrated resistance to care behavior. CNA1 reported resident was pushing back when she was trying to lead her in another direction in an attempt to change her brief. Additionally, resident was calling her names. Review of the facility's investigative file indicated on 06/13/24 at 2:36 PM the SSD documented, .Concern resolved on: 06/13/24 Actions/Response to Concern: Investigation completed, and action concluded CNA1 no longer works in this facility. During an interview on 09/30/24 at 11:23 AM, the SSD was asked why the incident of alleged staff to resident abuse with CNA1 and R46 was not reported to the SA (State Agency). The SSD replied, We addressed it right then, so we did not send a report to the state. R46 said she did not want to file a grievance. SSD stated the incident was not considered abuse and was handled internally. CNA1 was 'let go' so we did not feel it needed to be reported to the SA. SSD stated that the time period to report abuse to the SA was eight hours. During an interview on 10/02/24 at 11:50 AM with the DON and the Human Resources Manager, they stated this incident did not meet our (the facility's) definition of abuse and that the incident was not intentional so that was why the SA was not notified of the abuse allegation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14 residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact all 46 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedures for grievances, Mistreatment Investigations, Mistreatment Prevention and Injuries of Unknown Source dated 04/25/24 provided by the Administrator as the facility's Abuse policy indicated, Purpose: To prevent and prohibit mistreatment, abuse .of all residents. To ensure that all residents and family complaints are investigate thoroughly and appropriate corrective action is promptly taken . 5. If the complaint is directed toward a staff member, it is to be handled by Social Services and Administrator/Director of Nursing .8. Immediately begin a thorough investigation of any .mistreatment allegations. Thorough internal investigation may include .Interviewing alleged victim(s) and witness(es); interviewing accused individual(s) .interviewing other residents to determine if they have been abused .Interviewing staff who worked the same shift as the accused to determine if they ever witnessed any mistreatment by the accused .Document steps taken during the internal investigation .9. Assess validity of complaint based on information gathered and gather additional information if needed. Identify whether or not alleged misconduct occurred .10. Document the investigation, outcome and any corrective action taken if any is needed. Documentation to be filed in the Grievances folder, which is located in the Social Services office . Review of R46's Face Sheet, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) tab, revealed R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia of the left dominant side, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphasia, and type II diabetes. Review of R46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/19/24, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R46 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated that R46 was dependent for mobility of rolling from side to side, no psychosis, no behavioral symptoms, and no behavior of resisting care or medications. Review of the facility's investigative file indicated a document titled, Date of Concern dated 06/10/24 that revealed, R46 reported Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 is rough when performing cares. R46 reported Monday 06/10/24 CNA1 rolled R46 to her side and R46 bumped her head on the top rail. R46 stated CNA1 is arrogant offering no apology.Director of Nursing (DON) updated and investigation in progress. Review of the facility's investigative file indicated an email from the DON to the Social Service Director (SSD) dated 06/11/24 at 8:00 AM that indicated, Nurse Manager (NM)1 was informed of 'behaviors' when listening to night shift report .Writer (NM1) immediately went to assess resident at 7:35 AM. Upon entering the room writer asked R46 how her night was. R46 stated that CNA1 was rough with her last night. Writer asked R46 to explain how CNA1 was rough. R46 stated that CNA1 was checking her during cares/rounds and pulled the soaker pad to the side causing her to hit the side of her head on the assist bar that is closest to the bathroom side. Writer checked R46's head where she said she had hit it. There are no marks, redness, skin issues or bruising noted. R46 said that after CNA1 had finished rolling her towards the bathroom and she then rolled her back to the window side by pushing on her hip area. Writer checked R46's legs which were equal in length with no hip rotation noted. Writer asked if R46 was in any pain or discomfort and R46 stated, 'No.' Writer completed a full body skin assessment. There were no bruises, red marks, cuts, scrapes, or skin issues noted . Review of the facility's investigative file indicated a document from the SSD dated 06/13/24 at 2:36 PM which indicated, .Concern resolved on: 06/13/24 Actions/Response to Concern: Investigation completed, and action concluded CNA1 no longer works in this facility. During an interview on 09/30/24 at 11:43 AM, the DON stated she went to R46 to obtain her description of rough and R46 stated rough was moving faster than usual. The DON stated she talked to R46 and that she did not feel the incident was abuse, just that CNA1 was just too fast with her care. During an interview on 09/30/24 at 1:24 PM, R46 was asked about the incident that happened with CNA1 four months ago, R46 stated she felt it was abusive. R46 stated this was the first and only time something like this had happened. R46 stated that CNA1 had not been back to provide her care since the incident. During an interview on 10/03/24 at 11:50 AM, the DON stated as part of the investigative process she interviewed various residents and asked how their night was the night of the incident. The DON stated the residents indicated that CNA1 was too fast and did not explain what she was doing, but the residents did not state that CNA1 had abused them. However, she had no documentation of the residents' interviews. The DON provided no documentation of R46's interview and said that CNA1 would not cooperate with the investigation so she did not have CNA1's statement.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 6 (Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA5 and CNA8) completed the minimum of 12 hours of inservice training per year. The la...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 6 (Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA5 and CNA8) completed the minimum of 12 hours of inservice training per year. The lack of inservice trainings could have a negative impact for all 46 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of CNA5's personnel file indicated CNA5's Date of Hire (DOH) was 08/22/23 and that CNA5 had completed 10.25 hours of training during the past year (August 2023 through August 2024). Review of CNA8's personnel file indicated CNA8's DOH was 07/25/1995 and that CNA8 had completed 8.75 hours of training during the past year. (July 2023 through July 2024). During an interview on 10/03/24 at 3:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the two CNAs' personnel files did not include documentation of 12 hours of inservice training for the past year. The DON stated that the facility did not have a policy regarding CNAs having 12 hours of inservice training per year.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement the facility's Abuse policy that prohibit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement the facility's Abuse policy that prohibits staff to resident abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. Specifically, the facility did not protect R46 and other residents during the abuse investigation and failed to conduct a thorough investigation into the allegation of physical abuse as instructed in the facility's Abuse policy. This failure had the potential to negatively impact all 46 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedures for grievances, Mistreatment Investigations, Mistreatment Prevention and Injuries of Unknown Source dated 04/25/24 provided by the Administrator as the facility's Abuse policy indicated, Purpose: To prevent and prohibit mistreatment, abuse .of all residents. To ensure that all residents and family complaints are investigated thoroughly, and appropriate corrective action is promptly taken. Policy: It is the policy of (Facility Name) that all residents will live in a safe, secure environment that is free of any type of mistreatment, abuse .Procedure .3. Ensure that all residents are kept safe during the investigation and the alleged abuser shall not work directly with residents until the outcome of the investigation is determined .5. If the complaint is directed toward a staff member, it is to be handled by Social Services and Administrator/Director of Nursing .8. Immediately begin a thorough investigation of any .mistreatment allegations. Thorough internal investigation may include .Interviewing alleged victim(s) and witness(es); interviewing accused individual(s) .interviewing other residents to determine if they have been abused .Interviewing staff who worked the same shift as the accused to determine if they ever witnessed any mistreatment by the accused .Document steps taken during the internal investigation .10. Document the investigation, outcome and any corrective action taken if any is needed. Documentation to be filed in the Grievances folder, which is located in the Social Services office. 11. Ensure that the resident filing a complaint is to remain safe during the investigation procedure . Review of R46's Face Sheet, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia of the left dominant side, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphasia, and type II diabetes. Review of R46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/19/24, located in the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R46 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated that R46 was dependent on staff for mobility of rolling from side to side. The MDS indicated that R46 had no psychosis, no behavioral symptoms, and no behavior of resisting care or medications. Review of the facility's investigative file indicated an email from the Director of Nursing (DON) to the Social Service Director (SSD) dated 06/11/24 at 8:00 AM that indicated, Nurse Manager (NM)1 was informed of 'behaviors' when listening to night shift report .Writer (NM1) immediately went to assess resident at 7:35 AM. Upon entering the room writer asked R46 how her night was. R46 stated that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was rough with her last night. Writer asked R46 to explain how CNA1 was rough. R46 stated that CNA1 was checking her during cares/rounds and pulled the soaker pad to the side causing her to hit the side of her head on the assist bar that is closest to the bathroom side. Writer checked R46's head where she said she had hit it. There are no marks, redness, skin issues, or bruising noted. R46 said that after CNA1 had finished rolling her towards the bathroom and she then rolled her back to the window side by pushing on her hip area. Writer checked R46's legs which were equal in length with no hip rotation noted. Writer asked if R46 was in any pain or discomfort and R46 stated, No. Writer completed a full body skin assessment. There were no bruises, red marks, cuts, scrapes, or skin issues noted . During an interview on 09/30/24 at 1:24 PM, R46 was asked about the incident with CNA1 that occurred four months ago. R46 stated she felt it was abusive. R46 stated this was the first and only time something like this had happened. R46 stated that CNA1 had not been back in the room to provide care. During an interview on 10/02/24 at 11:10 AM with the DON and Human Resources Manager, CNA1's time sheet was reviewed, and it was confirmed that CNA1 worked at the facility on 06/11/24 from 10:00 PM through 06/12/24 at 7:35 AM. The DON and Human Resource Manager confirmed that CNA1 returned to work on R46's hallway the night of 06/11/24 after they were aware of the incident that occurred on 06/10/24 between CNA1 and R46. The DON stated the investigation was not completed prior to CNA1 returning to work on 06/11/24 and that they wanted to complete the abuse investigation prior to placing CNA1 on suspension. Interview on 10/02/24 at 12:00 PM, Nurse Manager (NM) 1 stated that on 06/11/24 in the morning, facility staff became aware of R46's statement that CNA1 treated her roughly based on the night shift nurse report. NM1 stated that she immediately completed R46's full body skin assessment which indicated no skin abnormalities. R46 denied any pain at this time. NM1 stated that she notified the DON of R46's statement. During an interview on 10/02/24 at 12:15 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated that she heard from R46 that when CNA1 rolled her over in bed, without a verbal warning, it felt unsafe. R46 told RN1 that she bumped her head on the grab bars during the incident. RN1 stated she reported the incident to the DON and SSD.
May 2023 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility did not consult with resident's physician or extender when 1 of 3 residents (R1) had a significant change in her medical condition. R1 was receiving ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not consult with resident's physician or extender when 1 of 3 residents (R1) had a significant change in her medical condition. R1 was receiving an anticoagulant medication and experienced a change in condition when RN C (Registered Nurse) used a Q-tip to remove hard wax from R1's ears. R1's ears began to bleed, and RN C did not contact R1's Medical Doctor (MD) or an on-call MD when R1 had this change in condition. RN H also did not contact R1's MD or an on-call MD regarding uncontrolled bleeding when she became aware. All of this resulted in R1 being sent to the emergency room where she received medical intervention to control bleeding. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Anticoagulant Use Policy, dated 7/20/22, includes in part: when taking warfarin, the international normalized ratio is monitored as ordered to be sure medication is given as therapeutic dose . residents who are taking anticoagulants will have a care plan stating that they are taking the Med and what adverse effects (bleeding) that nursing staff should be monitoring for. signs of adverse bleeding may be bruising without obvious cause, head injury, severe or prolonged headache, hematuria, prolonged bleeding from small cuts, etc. MD should be updated if the above are noted . Facility policy, entitled Resident Change in Condition Policy and Procedure, dated 8/7/22, includes in part: .in the long-term care setting a primary goal of identifying an acute change in condition is to enable staff to evaluate and manage a patient at the facility and avoid transfer to a hospital or emergency room. to achieve this goal the facility staff must recognize an acute change in condition and identify its nature, severity, and cause. Physicians are notified of changes in resident condition. Procedure: if a nurse notices a change in condition she or he should assess the resident to determine the nature, severity, and possible cause of the change. The nurse should determine from the suggested Guidelines for physician notification of clinical problems in facility residence grid if and when the resident's attending physician or on call physician needs to be notified. Abrasion . immediate: accompanied by significant pain or bleeding . non-immediate: if bleeding continues or if associated with evidence of local infection . Injuries and complaints . immediate: abrupt onset of severe pain secondary to fall or injury . hematuria . immediate: gross hematuria with pain . puncture wounds . immediate: deep or open wound . note these are general guidelines which cannot anticipate all circumstances. a nurse should not hesitate to call anytime a situation is unclear or if a physician support is felt to be needed. The National Institute of Health, Drug Information Portal, U.S. National Library of Medicine, last updated 7/25/2022, includes, in part: . TXA or Tranexamic Acid is a medication used to treat or prevent excessive blood loss from major trauma, postpartum bleeding, surgery, tooth removal, nosebleeds, and heavy menstruation . Indications: The only FDA-approved usage for tranexamic acid (TXA) is for heavy menstrual bleeding and short-term prevention in patients with hemophilia. R1's most recent admission to the facility was on 6/11/2021. Her diagnoses include: chronic congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, and longtime anticoagulant therapy. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/28/23, indicates R1 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. R1's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 3/8/2019, includes in part: problem - potential for uncontrolled bleeding related to longtime anti-coagulant therapy, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, and heart failure. Manifested by bleeding, recent bloody nose unable to control and recent hospitalization . approach - nurses assess condition after incidents . administer anticoagulant as ordered . report to MD as needed, assess any bleeding, observe/monitor for bleeding and adverse reactions of warfarin . Update MD if above are noted . nurse aide report any bleeding . goal - no uncontrolled bleed . R1's Physician Orders, January 2023, include in part: start date: 11/09/22 - Warfarin 1 mg by mouth every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday . start date: 11/09/22 -Warfarin 6mg by mouth every Monday, Wednesday, Friday . start date:11/09/22 - Carbamide Peroxide 6.5% . 3 drops two times a day each ear to remove ear wax as needed . R1's Nurse Notes include: 1/6/23 at 1:34 PM Writer was able to remove large hard chunk of cerumen from both ear canals. Wax was visibly blocking outer ear canals. Resident said she did not get ear drops in last night before bed. Writer was able to use Q tip gently to remove hard wax from canal and writer was able to see tympanic membrane without difficulty. Ears cleaned out before lunch. During lunch resident requested cotton balls be placed in outer ear because they were bleeding. Writer updated DON B (Director of Nursing) on bleeding and after lunch writer used warm water in ear flusher to rinse out both outer ears and used dry washcloth to clean outer ears. Writer encouraged resident to leave her ears alone and not put anything in them so they can heal. Will continue to monitor. Signed RN C (Registered Nurse). (It is important to note neither RN C, nor DON B contacted R1's MD when she had a change in condition / bleeding and pain in her ear.) 1/6/23 at 9:38 PM behaviors occurred: No 1/7/23 at 7:15 AM called into patients room at 6:15 AM to assess, as nurse entered room patient is lying in bed on her back, walked around to the right side of her bed and noted copious amounts of wet blood saturated through pillowcase and pillow, onto sheets through onto mattress {sic}, noted a 4 by 4 gauze packed into right ear completely saturated with blood and with large dried blood clot, used a warm wet washcloth to moisten and remove the packing from right ear, noted ear still actively bleeding and placed a cotton ball into the opening of the ear canal. Resident stated, I was supposed to have my ear flushed yesterday after receiving debrox drops to remove the wax and (RN C) dug hard into my ear with several Q-tips just before lunch and kept digging and digging . and then after lunch she flushed my ear with water and it was still bleeding. call place to MD updated on findings from nurse note yesterday 1/6/23 and right ear continues with bleeding and concerns that resident is on 6 milligrams of warfarin daily. order received to transfer resident to local hospital ER for evaluation. 1/7/23 at 7:26 AM call place 911 for ambulance transport and resident's daughter per resident's request to update {sic}. 1/7/23 at 7:36 AM cotton ball nearly saturated with blood again at this time, left cotton ball in place and placed 4 by 4 gauze over her right ear . 1/7/23 at 8:03 AM writer placed hand over resident's left ear to check hearing of right ear and resident reported, not able to hear you as well. 1/7/23 at 8:04 AM prior to leaving facility resident requested to do a formal complaint. message left with SW G (Social Worker) and DON B. 1/7/23 at 1:08 PM R1 returned from ER visit. 1/7/23 at 1:55 PM R1 returned from ER visit for bleeding ear via ambulance. TXA (tranexamic acid) was used in ear to alleviate bleeding. Cotton ball in place to right ear upon return. Assisted off stretcher and into wheelchair. INR checked in ER with result being 2.4. New order to hold warfarin tonight 1/7 and tomorrow 1/8, repeat INR Monday 1/9. Leave cotton balls in the ear and change it once daily (can change cotton ball anytime saturated per MD). (It is important to note according to Drug Information Portal. U.S. National Library of Medicine, TXA or Tranexamic Acid is a medication used to treat or prevent excessive blood loss from major trauma, postpartum bleeding, surgery, tooth removal, nosebleeds, and heavy menstruation.) R1's Nurse Note, 1/7/23 at 2:41 PM, includes, Per nurse to nurse with ER nurse and facility nurse, it was reported that R1's eardrum was not compromised but there was an abrasion present . R1 admits to pain inside my ear. R1's ER Notes, dated 1/7/23, include, in part: . history of hyperthyroidism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and on Coumadin presenting for bleeding from the right ear. Patient reports she has been with significant earwax which has been treated with drops although yesterday afternoon (a staff member) used a Q-tip and subsequently was bleeding from the right ear. Patient reports her most recent INR was over 3. Patient reports they were unable to achieve hemostasis at her facility for which she was sent to the Emergency Department . Right external auditory canal with slight oozing of bright red blood. Tympanic membrane is slightly obscured although visualized aspect appears intact. Emergency Department Course - history of hyperthyroidism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and on Coumadin presenting for bleeding from the right ear secondary to trauma from a Q-tip. Upon arrival patient is hemodynamically stable and nontoxic. Patient has slight bleeding from the right external auditory canal and visualized aspect of the tympanic membrane appears intact. Gauze soaked in TXA (tranexamic acid) were packed into the right ear. Today your INR was 2.4. Given the bleeding from your ear do not take your Coumadin tonight or tomorrow night. You may resume your Coumadin on Monday if bleeding has stopped. Also recheck your INR Monday. Leave the current cotton balls in the ear and change it once daily. Tomorrow morning it is okay if the ear is bleeding just reapply cotton ball. If there is continued active bleeding on Monday return to the ER for evaluation. On 5/11/23 at 10:38 AM during an interview, CNA E (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated on 1/6/23 she observed RN C go into R1's room with a handful of Q-tips before lunch. CNA E indicated right after lunch she observed R1's ears to be bleeding. CNA E indicated RN C stated, Oh my God (R1's) ears are bleeding, and took R1 into her room. CNA E then saw RN C return to the hallway with a handful of blood-stained washcloths. CNA E indicated R1 wanted to speak to DON B about this and CNA F and CNA E pushed R1 to DON B's office. In DON B's office R1 stated RN C hurt her ear and was digging and digging in her ear. R1 stated she asked RN C to stop, and she did not stop. CNA E indicated on 1/7/23, R1 was found lying in bed in a pool of blood that saturated the bedding, R1's pajamas, and the pillow. CNA E indicated there was now 4x4 gauze packed in R1's ear that was saturated and had large clots on it. CNA E stated LPN D came in the room and pulled out the 4x4 gauze from R1's right ear and more blood gushed out and at this time R1 stated, I want to file a formal complaint. I thought I did this yesterday. I told her it hurt, and she dug and dug and dug and wouldn't stop. Q-tips don't belong inside the ear. CNA E indicated R1 went to the ER on the morning of 1/7/23 and when she came back R1 was saying her ear still hurt and she was very upset. CNA E added at the end of interview, When someone tells me to stop, I stop. My primary residents are family to me. I was upset because R1 was in so much pain. On 5/11/23 at 11:58 AM, LPN D indicated on 1/7/23 at 6:15 AM CNA F called her to come to R1's room due to her lying in an excessive amount of blood. LPN D indicated she observed R1 bleeding from her right ear and 4x4 gauze packed in her ear. LPN D indicated blood clots could be seen on the gauze and on the pillow, the blood had soaked through R1's hair, the sheets, pillowcase, pillow, R1's pajamas, and pooled onto R1's mattress. LPN D indicated she received report in the morning before coming onto the floor and nothing was said about R1 and her ears. LPN D indicated she read through R1's nurse notes from 1/6/23 and noticed R1 was already bleeding then, and her MD was never notified, and no RN assessment was completed. LPN D indicated she called R1's MD and got an order for her to go to ER right away because, I knew she was on Warfarin. I removed the 4x4 to see what was going on and it was still bleeding. I repacked it. I called MD on call. I was embarrassed to report that R1's ears were supposed to be irrigated yesterday. I never dig in anyone's ear with anything. LPN D indicated she reported immediately to DON B because she was the RN on call and when someone tells her to stop, she stops. On 5/11/23 at 12:02 PM during an interview, RN C indicated she was aware R1 was on an anticoagulant. RN C indicated she was also aware R1's ears were bleeding after RN C used a q tip to clean out R1's ears. RN C indicated she did not complete an RN assessment that included the source of the blood, the amount of the blood, the color of the blood, vital signs, and pain level of R1's pain. RN C indicated she placed a cotton ball in R1's ears. RN C indicated she did not recall if R1 had asked her to stop due to pain in her ear. RN C stated, I did not call R1's Medical Doctor to consult with him after the incident and I should have. On 5/10/23 at 12:06 PM, CNA F indicated on 1/6/23 before lunch she saw RN C going in to R1's room with Q-tips to flush R1's ears. She saw R1 coming back from lunch and her ears were bleeding. CNA F indicated R1 was on coumadin at that time and was at a higher risk for uncontrolled bleeding. CNA F indicated RN C probably should have reported the bleeding to R1's MD right away especially with the blood thinner. CNA F indicated she observed RN C carrying blood-stained washcloths from R1's room after lunch. CNA F indicated the next day she found R1 in a pool of blood and it was a mess. CNA F got LPN D right away and there was 4x4 gauze packed in R1's ears that the night shift nurse must have put in there. When LPN D pulled the packing out of ear there was a big clot and blood everywhere. CNA F indicated R1 reported that she had told RN C to stop digging in her ears, but she wouldn't stop. CNA F stated, They didn't say anything about it to us in report that morning. I walked in and was in shock. RN C and RN H knew about it because the nurse put packing in her ears. (It is important to note RN H did not contact R1's MD regarding uncontrolled bleeding, pain, and the injury R1 sustained in her ear.) On 5/10/23 at 1:00 PM during an interview, R1 stated, I was using drops for 5 days and 5th day they were supposed to flush them. RN C took a Q-tip and dug and dug and dug. I told her to stop, and she said we must get that out of there. She kept at it. It bled for a long time and a lot after that. She was only supposed to flush it and not stick anything in there. I don't know if she contacted my doctor. The other nurse came in and put stuff in there. I am on coumadin. They had to change my pillowcase throughout the night because of it. They are supposed to call my doctor if I have bleeding anywhere. I don't let her near me to do anything like that again, but I do take medications from her. On 5/10/23 at 1:27 PM, DON B indicated RN C, RN H, and/or DON B should have notified R1's MD when she was injured, was bleeding with verbal reports of pain, and when bleeding was uncontrolled, and they didn't.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and medical record review, facility staff did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1) R1 was receiving...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and medical record review, facility staff did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1) R1 was receiving an anticoagulant medication and experienced a change in condition when RN C used a Q-tip to remove hard wax from R1's ears and R1's ears began to bleed. RN C (Registered Nurse) did not stop when R1 verbally expressed pain and said Stop, did not complete an RN assessment after an injury was noted, did not contact R1's Medical Doctor (MD) or an on-call MD. RN H, the night shift nurse, did not contact R1's MD or an on-call MD regarding uncontrolled bleeding when she became aware, did not perform an RN assessment, and did not pass on R1's change in condition to the next shift for continued monitoring. All of this resulted in R1 being sent to the emergency room where she received medical intervention to control bleeding. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Anticoagulant Use Policy, dated 7/20/22, includes, in part: when taking warfarin, the international normalized ratio is monitored as ordered to be sure medication is given as therapeutic dose . residents who are taking anticoagulants will have a care plan stating that they are taking the Med and what adverse effects (bleeding) that nursing staff should be monitoring for. signs of adverse bleeding may be bruising without obvious cause, head injury, severe or prolonged headache, hematuria, prolonged bleeding from small cuts, etc. MD should be updated if the above are noted . Facility policy, entitled Resident Change in Condition Policy and Procedure, dated 8/7/22, includes, in part: . in the long-term care setting a primary goal of identifying and acute change in condition is to enable staff to evaluate and manage a patient at the facility and avoid transfer to a hospital or emergency room. to achieve this goal the facility staff must recognize an acute change in condition and identify its nature, severity, and cause. Physicians are notified of changes in resident condition. Procedure: if a nurse notices a change in condition she or he should assess the resident to determine the nature, severity, and possible cause of the change. The nurse should determine from the suggested Guidelines for physician notification of clinical problems in facility residence grid if and when the resident's attending physician or on call physician needs to be notified. Abrasion . immediate: accompanied by significant pain or bleeding . non-immediate: if bleeding continues or if associated with evidence of local infection . Injuries and complaints . immediate: abrupt onset of severe pain secondary to fall or injury . hematuria . immediate: gross hematuria with pain . puncture wounds . immediate: deep or open wound . note these are general guidelines which cannot anticipate all circumstances. a nurse should not hesitate to call anytime a situation is unclear or if a physician support is felt to be needed. The National Institute of Health, Drug Information Portal, U.S. National Library of Medicine, last updated 7/25/2022, includes, in part: . TXA or Tranexamic Acid is a medication used to treat or prevent excessive blood loss from major trauma, postpartum bleeding, surgery, tooth removal, nosebleeds, and heavy menstruation . Indications: The only FDA-approved usage for tranexamic acid (TXA) is for heavy menstrual bleeding and short-term prevention in patients with hemophilia. R1's most recent admission to the facility was on 6/11/21. Her diagnoses include: chronic congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, and longtime anticoagulant therapy. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/28/23, indicates R1 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. R1's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 3/8/19, includes, in part: problem- potential for uncontrolled bleeding related to longtime anti-coagulant therapy, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, and heart failure. Manifested by bleeding, recent bloody nose unable to control and recent hospitalization . approach- nurses assess condition after incidents . administer anticoagulant as ordered . report to MD as needed, assess any bleeding, observe/monitor for bleeding and adverse reactions of warfarin . Update MD if above are noted . nurse aid report any bleeding . goal- no uncontrolled bleed . R1's Physician Orders, January 2023, include in part: start date: 11/09/22- Warfarin 1 mg by mouth every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday . start date: 11/09/22-Warfarin 6mg by mouth every Monday, Wednesday, Friday . start date:11/09/22- Carbamide Peroxide 6.5% . 3 drops two times a day each ear to remove ear wax as needed . R1's Nurse Notes include: 1/6/23 at 1:34 PM Writer was able to remove large hard chunk of cerumen from both ear canals. Wax was visibly blocking outer ear canals. Resident said she did not get ear drops in last night before bed. Writer was able to use Q-tip gently to remove hard wax from canal and writer was able to see tympanic membrane without difficulty. Ears cleaned out before lunch. During lunch resident requested cotton balls be placed in outer ear because they were bleeding. Writer updated DON B (Director of Nursing) on bleeding and after lunch writer used warm water in ear flusher to rinse out both outer ears and used dry washcloth to clean outer ears. Writer encouraged resident to leave her ears alone and not put anything in them so they can heal. Will continue to monitor. Signed RN C. (It is important to note when R1 was noted to be bleeding from her ears an RN Assessment was not completed, including a description of the amount of blood, the color of blood, and the source of blood.) (It is important to note RN H was the night shift nurse the facility provided no documentation as to R1's condition through the night and RN H did not return call to Surveyor during Survey. The facility failed to provide evidence of RN H completing an RN assessment or updating R1's MD with her uncontrolled bleeding.) 1/7/23 at 7:15 AM called into patients room at 6:15 AM to assess, as nurse entered room patient is lying in bed on her back, walked around to the right side of her bed and noted copious amounts of wet blood saturated through pillowcase and pillow, onto sheets through onto mattress, noted a 4 by 4 gauze packed into right ear completely saturated with blood and with large dried blood clot, used a warm wet washcloth to moisten and remove the packing from right ear, noted ear still actively bleeding and placed a cotton ball into the opening of the ear canal. Call place to MD updated on findings from nurse note yesterday 1/6/23 and right ear continues with bleeding and concerns that resident is on 6 milligrams of warfarin daily. Order received to transfer resident to local hospital ER for evaluation. 1/7/23 at 7:26 AM call placed to 911 for ambulance transport and resident's daughter per resident's request to update. 1/7/23 at 7:36 AM cotton ball nearly saturated with blood again at this time, left cotton ball in place and placed 4 by 4 gauze over her right ear . 1/7/23 at 1:55 PM R1 returned from ER visit for bleeding ear via ambulance. TXA (tranexamic acid) was used in ear to alleviate bleeding. New order to hold warfarin tonight 1/7 and tomorrow 1/8, repeat INR Monday 1/9. Leave cotton balls in the ear and change it once daily (can change cotton ball anytime saturated per MD). (It is important to note according to Drug Information Portal. U.S. National Library of Medicine, TXA or Tranexamic Acid is a medication used to treat or prevent excessive blood loss from major trauma, postpartum bleeding, surgery, tooth removal, nosebleeds, and heavy menstruation.) 1/7/23 at 2:41 PM Per nurse to nurse with ER nurse and facility nurse, it was reported that R1's eardrum was not compromised but there was an abrasion present . R1 admits to pain inside my ear. R1's ER Notes, dated 1/7/23, include, in part: .history of hyperthyroidism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and on Coumadin presenting for bleeding from the right ear. Patient reports she has been with significant earwax which has been treated with drops although yesterday afternoon (a staff member) used a Q-tip and subsequently was bleeding from the right ear. Patient reports her most recent INR was over 3. Patient reports they were unable to achieve hemostasis at her facility for which she was sent to the Emergency Department . Right external auditory canal with slight oozing of bright red blood. Tympanic membrane is slightly obscured although visualized aspect appears intact. Emergency Department Course- history of hyperthyroidism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and on Coumadin presenting for bleeding from the right ear secondary to trauma from a Q-tip. Upon arrival patient is hemodynamically stable and nontoxic. Patient has slight bleeding from the right external auditory canal and visualized aspect of the tympanic membrane appears intact. Gauze soaked in TXA (tranexamic acid) were packed into the right ear. Today your INR was 2.4. Given the bleeding from your ear do not take your Coumadin tonight or tomorrow night. You may resume your Coumadin on Monday if bleeding has stopped. Also recheck your INR Monday. Leave the current cotton balls in the ear and change it once daily. Tomorrow morning it is okay if the ear is bleeding just reapply cotton ball. If there is continued active bleeding on Monday return to the ER for evaluation. On 5/11/23 at 10:38 AM, during an interview, CNA E indicated on 1/6/23 she observed RN C go into R1's room with a handful of Q-tips before lunch. CNA E indicated right after lunch she observed R1's ears to be bleeding. CNA E indicated RN C stated, Oh my God (R1's) ears are bleeding, and took R1 into her room. CNA E then saw RN C return to the hallway with a handful of blood-stained washcloths. CNA E indicated R1 wanted to speak to DON B about this and CNA F and CNA E pushed R1 to DON B's office. In DON B's office R1 stated RN C hurt her ear and was digging and digging in her ear. R1 stated she asked RN C to stop, and she did not stop. CNA E indicated on 1/7/23 R1 was found lying in bed in a pool of blood that saturated the bedding, R1's pajamas, and the pillow. CNA E indicated there was now 4x4 gauze packed in R1's ear that was saturated and had large clots on it. CNA E stated LPN D came in the room and pulled out the 4x4 gauze from R1's right ear and more blood gushed out and at this time R1 stated, CNA E indicated R1 went to the ER on the morning of 1/7/23 and when she came R1 was saying her ear still hurt and she was very upset. On 5/11/23 at 11:58 AM LPN D indicated on 1/7/23 at 6:15 AM CNA F called her to come to R1's room due to her lying in an excessive amount of blood. LPN D indicated she observed R1 bleeding from her right ear and 4x4 gauze packed in her ear. LPN D indicated blood clots could be seen on the gauze and on the pillow, the blood had soaked through R1's hair, the sheets, pillowcase, pillow, R1's pajamas, and pooled onto R1's mattress. LPN D indicated she received report in the morning before coming onto the floor and nothing was said about R1 and her ears. LPN D indicated she read through R1's nurse notes from 1/6/23 and noticed R1 was already bleeding then, and her MD was never notified, and no RN assessment was completed. LPN D indicated she called R1's MD and got an order for her to go to ER right away because, I knew she was on Warfarin. I removed the 4x4 to see what was going on and it was still bleeding. I repacked it. I called MD on call. LPN D indicated she reported immediately to DON B because she was the RN on call. On 5/11/23 at 12:02 PM during an interview RN C indicated she was aware R1 was on an anticoagulant. RN C indicated she was also aware R1's ears were bleeding after RN C used a q tip to clean out R1's ears. RN C indicated she did not complete an RN assessment that included the source of the blood, the amount of the blood, the color of the blood, vital signs, and pain level of R1' pain. RN C indicated she placed a cotton ball in R1's ears. RN C indicated she did not recall if R1 had asked her to stop due to pain in her ear. RN C stated, I did not call R1's Medical Doctor to consult with him after the incident and I should have. On 5/10/23 at 12:06 PM CNA F indicated on 1/6/23 before lunch she saw RN going in to R1's room with q tips to flush ears. She saw R1 coming back from lunch and her ears were bleeding. CNA F indicated R1 was on coumadin at that time and was at a higher risk for uncontrolled bleeding. CNA F indicated RN C probably should have reported the bleeding to R1's MD right away especially with the blood thinner. CNA F indicated she observed RN C carrying blood-stained washcloths from R1's room after lunch. CNA F indicated the next day she found R1 in a pool of blood and it was a mess. CNA F got LPN D right away and there was 4x4 gauze packed in R1's ears that the night shift nurse must have put in there. When LPN D pulled the packing out of R1's ear there was a big clot and blood everywhere. CNA F indicated R1 reported that she had told RN C to stop digging in her ears, but she wouldn't stop. CNA F stated, They didn't say anything about it to us in report that morning. I walked in and was in shock. RN H knew about it because the nurse put packing in her ears. On 5/10/23 at 1:00 PM during an interview R1 stated, I was using drops for 5 days and 5th day they were supposed to flush them. RN C took a Q-tip and dug and dug and dug. I told her to stop, and she said we must get that out of there. She kept at it. It bled for a long time and a lot after that. She was only supposed to flush it and not stick anything in there. I don't know if she contacted my doctor. The other nurse came in and put stuff in there. I am on coumadin. They had to change my pillowcase throughout the night because of it. They are supposed to call my doctor if I have bleeding anywhere. I don't let her near me to do anything like that again, but I do take medications from her. On 5/10/23 at 1:27 PM DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated RN C should have performed an RN assessment which included R1's pain level, amount of blood, description of blood, and maybe vital signs. DON B indicated RN C should have updated R1's MD on the incident after she became aware of the blood, especially since she is receiving anticoagulant therapy. DON B indicated she did not update R1's MD and did not perform an RN assessment on R1 when she was made aware of the injury by R1, CNA E, and CNA F on 1/6/23. DON B indicated RN H from the night shift should have performed an RN assessment on R1 when she packed the ears with 4x4 gauze but didn't and she should have completed an RN assessment also with information regarding the blood like what color, how much, and where it was coming from. DON B indicated RN C and RN H should have notified R1's MD when she was aware of her bleeding.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Wisconsin.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wisconsin facilities.
  • • 41% turnover. Below Wisconsin's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 6 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Greenway Manor's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GREENWAY MANOR an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Greenway Manor Staffed?

CMS rates GREENWAY MANOR's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Greenway Manor?

State health inspectors documented 6 deficiencies at GREENWAY MANOR during 2023 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 4 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Greenway Manor?

GREENWAY MANOR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 50 certified beds and approximately 49 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SPRING GREEN, Wisconsin.

How Does Greenway Manor Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, GREENWAY MANOR's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Greenway Manor?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Greenway Manor Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GREENWAY MANOR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Greenway Manor Stick Around?

GREENWAY MANOR has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Wisconsin nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Greenway Manor Ever Fined?

GREENWAY MANOR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Greenway Manor on Any Federal Watch List?

GREENWAY MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.