GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Generations of Red Bay, LLC has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided, which is poor compared to other facilities. It ranks #200 out of 223 nursing homes in Alabama, placing it in the bottom half of the state, and is the least favorable option in Franklin County. While the facility is reportedly improving, going from seven issues in 2022 to four in 2023, it still faces serious staffing challenges with a turnover rate of 62%, much higher than the state average, and received $14,521 in fines, which is concerning. Although RN coverage is average, there have been critical incidents, such as a resident falling and sustaining serious injuries due to a lack of proper assistance during bathing. Additionally, expired medications were found in the crash cart, which poses a risk to residents needing emergency care.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Alabama
- #200/223
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 62% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $14,521 in fines. Higher than 53% of Alabama facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Alabama. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Alabama average (2.9)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
16pts above Alabama avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
14 points above Alabama average of 48%
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Mar 2023
4 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Bsed on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #1's medical record, a revview of the Hospital Discharge Summary Report, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of medical records, facility policies titled, Incident and Accident Reporting and Fall Assessment Wo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of RI #1's medical records and facility policies titled, Content of the Medical Record, and Thinning...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike, and orderly environment for Resident Ide...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff contacted the physician to obt...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #33 was provided sh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #29's PICC (Periphera...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. A review of RI #29's Face Sheet revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Benef...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Storage and Destruction of Medications, the facility failed to ensure the crash cart did not contain expired intravenous fluid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and a facility document titled RESIDENTS-These are YOUR Rights, the facility fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, medical records, and a facility policy titled Handwashing, the facility failed to ensure a Lic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interview and review of facility policy titled, Refrigerator/Freezer Storage, the facility failed to ensure:
1. outdated food was not stored in the stand-up refrigerator/walk-i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2018
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, review of the facility's online reports to the State Agency, and review of the facility policy titled, Resident Abuse, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review and a facility policy tilted Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to ensure a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. A review of the facility's policy, titled Hand Washing , no date, revealed: 3.When to Wash Hands . d. Before preparing to han...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $14,521 in fines. Above average for Alabama. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (14/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Generations Of Red Bay, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Generations Of Red Bay, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 62%, which is 16 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 64%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Generations Of Red Bay, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC during 2018 to 2023. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 15 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Generations Of Red Bay, Llc?
GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 90 certified beds and approximately 57 residents (about 63% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in RED BAY, Alabama.
How Does Generations Of Red Bay, Llc Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (62%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Generations Of Red Bay, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Generations Of Red Bay, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Generations Of Red Bay, Llc Stick Around?
Staff turnover at GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC is high. At 62%, the facility is 16 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 64%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Generations Of Red Bay, Llc Ever Fined?
GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC has been fined $14,521 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Alabama average of $33,224. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Generations Of Red Bay, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
GENERATIONS OF RED BAY, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.