THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Blossoms at Hot Springs Rehab and Nursing Center has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is a good choice, indicating generally positive conditions for residents. It ranks #83 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 9 in Garland County, suggesting it is one of the better options locally. However, the facility is facing a worsening trend, with the number of reported issues increasing from 3 in 2022 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is rated 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average, with a turnover rate of 57%, indicating that while some staff remain, there may be challenges in maintaining a consistent workforce. On a positive note, there have been no fines recorded, and RN coverage is average, which is important for ensuring quality care. Specific incidents raised during inspections included issues with food safety, where an ice scoop holder was found dirty, risking contamination of meals for residents. Additionally, there were concerns about temperature comfort for some residents, which could affect their overall well-being. Lastly, the facility failed to accurately document care needs for several residents, potentially impacting their treatment plans. Overall, while there are strengths in safety and oversight, these weaknesses highlight areas that need improvement.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #83/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
11pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
9 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide comfortable water te...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to Physician ' s orders and oxygen ordered for whenever necessary was monitored or do...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set [MDS] assessment accuratel...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were regularly provided to residents on the weekends. The failed practice had the potential to affect 73 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with the planned, written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of cold product and at temperatures that were acceptable t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents clean laundry was transported in a safe and sanitary manner to protect clean clothing from soil and dust to p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 ice scoop holders was maintained in a clean condition to prevent the potential contamination of residents' food ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the Administrator immediately after a suspected allegation of abuse and/or neglect to rule out possible abuse/neglect...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves during...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean and groomed to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Resident #5) of 21 (Resident #3...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent Staffed?
CMS rates THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent?
THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE BLOSSOMS NURSING AND REHAB CENTER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 152 certified beds and approximately 81 residents (about 53% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOT SPRINGS, Arkansas.
How Does The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent Stick Around?
Staff turnover at THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent Ever Fined?
THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing Cent on Any Federal Watch List?
THE BLOSSOMS AT HOT SPRINGS REHAB AND NURSING CENT is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.