NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Nashville Nursing and Rehab Services of Arkansas has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality and some concerns about care. They rank #157 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing them in the bottom half, and #3 out of 3 in Howard County, meaning only one local option is better. However, the facility is showing improvement, having reduced issues from 7 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a concern with a 60% turnover rate, which is higher than the state's average, while their RN coverage is average, meaning they have adequate nursing staff but not exceptional. Although there are no fines on record, recent inspector findings indicate serious concerns, such as staff not ensuring safe food handling practices and failing to create comprehensive care plans for residents, which could lead to potential harm. Overall, while there are some strengths like the absence of fines and an improving trend, families should be aware of the significant weaknesses in staffing and specific care practices.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Arkansas
- #157/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Arkansas average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
14pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
12 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and update a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was not served carrots from a resident ' s dislike list to prevent weight loss and ensure proper nutrition f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that resident ' s personal information was protected according to policy to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled narcotics were properly stored in the medication room refrigerator, in the locked narcotic box sep...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure room deodorizer spray, disinfectant w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed 1) to ensure food items were labeled with an accurate use by date to ensure food was not used beyond its safety period, 2) to ensure food was st...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during peri-care to reduce the risk of cross contaminat...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required extensive assistance with personal hygiene was regularly offered tri...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
11 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a procedure in place to monitor activities of daily living [ADL] decline in Residents to accurately record resident assessment. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide Resident #9 with adequate incontinence/catheter care this failed practice had the potential to cause infection/irrit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident was receiving oxygen at the flow rate ordered by the physician, nebulizer and oxygen tubing was changed as ord...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure trash was properly contained within the trash can in the kitchen to minimize the presence of foul odors and decrease the potential for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes mai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, that facility failed to ensure that keys to the medication room and treatment cart were secure this had the potential to all resident who wonder, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents had sufficient water at the bedside to maintain hydration and health. This failed practice affected 2 Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were turned off when Residents were laid flat for personal care to prevent the risk for aspiration for 2 (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed ensure that medication cart and medication room was free from expired medication, and that refrigerator used to store narcotic ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure peri care supplies were transported to resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure personal drinks were not stored with resident food, and the facility failed to ensure staff distributed and served food in a safe and s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written discharge summary was completed that included a re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that nail care was given to maintain good personal hygiene, and to prevent infections for 2 (Resident #31 and #144) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a system of medication records that enabled accurate reconciliation and accounting for controlled medications in accordance with state...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade D (45/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas Staffed?
CMS rates NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS during 2022 to 2025. These included: 22 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas?
NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 70 certified beds and approximately 41 residents (about 59% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NASHVILLE, Arkansas.
How Does Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas Stick Around?
Staff turnover at NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas Ever Fined?
NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Nashville Nursing And Rehab Services Of Arkansas on Any Federal Watch List?
NASHVILLE NURSING AND REHAB SERVICES OF ARKANSAS is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.