BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Bay Area Healthcare Center in Oakland, California, has received an impressive Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with a high level of care. It ranks #17 out of 1,155 nursing homes in California, placing it in the top tier, and #3 out of 69 in Alameda County, meaning there are only two local options rated higher. The facility is on an improving trend, with concerns decreasing from five issues in 2023 to two in 2025, indicating a commitment to better practices. Staffing is generally strong with a 4 out of 5 rating and a low turnover rate of 16%, which is well below the state average. However, there have been some concerning incidents, such as the improper storage of food items that were not labeled or dated, and failures in assessing residents' ability to self-administer medications safely. Overall, while the facility has strengths in care quality and staffing, families should be aware of the specific areas that need attention.
- Trust Score
- A+
- In California
- #17/1155
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 16% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 32 points below California's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most California facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 98 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of California nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (16%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (16%)
32 points below California average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among California's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medications was assessed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications that were stored on 1 of 5 medication carts.
Findings in...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (medications with high ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident156) when:
1.
Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident in a census of 58 (Resident 156) was free from significant medication error when:
For Resident 156, Oxycod...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical products were stored and labele...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage of food under sanitary conditions when the following food items were not labeled and dated with use-by date in...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2019
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in California.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most California facilities.
- • 16% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 32 points below California's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Bay Area Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within California, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Bay Area Healthcare Center Staffed?
CMS rates BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 16%, compared to the California average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Bay Area Healthcare Center?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2019 to 2025. These included: 9 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Bay Area Healthcare Center?
BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 99 certified beds and approximately 65 residents (about 66% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in OAKLAND, California.
How Does Bay Area Healthcare Center Compare to Other California Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in California, BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (16%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bay Area Healthcare Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Bay Area Healthcare Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in California. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Bay Area Healthcare Center Stick Around?
Staff at BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 16%, the facility is 30 percentage points below the California average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 12%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Bay Area Healthcare Center Ever Fined?
BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Bay Area Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?
BAY AREA HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.