OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Oak Hammock at the University of Florida has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families looking for a nursing home. It ranks #241 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the top half of options available in the state, and #3 out of 9 in Alachua County, meaning only two other local facilities are rated higher. However, the trend is concerning as the number of reported issues has increased from 4 in 2023 to 7 in 2025. While staffing is a strength with a 4/5 star rating and a low turnover rate of 0%, there are some notable weaknesses, including incidents where food safety standards were not met, with unlabelled items found in storage, and medication carts lacking proper labeling and expiration dates. Overall, while there are positives, families should weigh these issues carefully when considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Florida
- #241/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Florida. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Florida's 100 nursing homes, only 0% achieve this.
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of minimum data set assessments for 2 of 5 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards related to the assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted profession...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #41.
Findings include:
R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control standards for following enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide Advance Beneficiary notice of non-coverage in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification, Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored according to professional standard of practice, failed to serve foods at safe temperatures, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record view, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accepted professional standards of practice we...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted prof...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during intravenous medication administration.
Findings include:
During an observation of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided for gastrojejunostomy tube care met professional standards of quality to 1 of 5 residents with g...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the possible development and transmission of communicabl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc Staffed?
CMS rates OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 13 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc?
OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 73 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GAINESVILLE, Florida.
How Does Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc Stick Around?
OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc Ever Fined?
OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.