TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for care, though there are areas for improvement. The facility ranks #127 out of 690 in Florida, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 9 in Alachua County, meaning only one local option is better. While the facility is improving, having reduced issues from 7 in 2023 to 5 in 2024, staffing is a concern with a low 2/5 star rating and a high turnover rate of 68%, which is significantly above the state average. Additionally, the center has been fined $13,674, which is average for Florida, and has concerning RN coverage that is lower than 99% of facilities in the state. Specific incidents noted by inspectors include failures in properly storing medications and food, as well as not providing necessary treatments and wound care for some residents, highlighting both strengths in management but also significant weaknesses in care practices.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Florida
- #127/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 68% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $13,674 in fines. Higher than 85% of Florida facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Florida. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
22pts above Florida avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
20 points above Florida average of 48%
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions, Resident #3.
Findings include:
During an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care according to standard of practice for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions, Resident #374.
Findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while providing wound care according to the practice standard for 1 of 4 residents review...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0573
(Tag F0573)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received copies of their medical records in a time...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care services were provided consist...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications under proper temperature for 1 of 4 medication carts.
Findings include:
During an observation on 6/6/23 at 3:15 p.m. of the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for 1 of 3 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided treatments, wound care,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure stored food is labeled and dated, thawed according to professional standards, and that food is distributed in a safe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete and accurately documented for 7 of 12 residents, Residents #44, #54, #18, #274, #80, #85, a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis.
Findings include:
During an observation on 3/6/2023 at 8:35 AM...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #69's records revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic kidney diseas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care received such care consistent with professional standards of practice for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service.
Findings:
1. Duri...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • $13,674 in fines. Above average for Florida. Some compliance problems on record.
- • 68% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Staffed?
CMS rates TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 68%, which is 22 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 15 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GOLD FL TRUST II, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 138 certified beds and approximately 130 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GAINESVILLE, Florida.
How Does Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (68%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER is high. At 68%, the facility is 22 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 62%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?
TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $13,674 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Florida average of $33,216. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?
TERRACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.