PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Parklands Care Center and Rehab in Gainesville, Florida, has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is considered a good option for families seeking care. It ranks #254 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the top half, and #4 out of 9 in Alachua County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility is improving, as it reduced its issues from 4 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. However, staffing is a concern with a low rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 64%, significantly above the state average of 42%. There have been no fines recorded, which is a positive sign, but the facility has less registered nurse coverage than 93% of Florida facilities, which could impact the quality of care. Specific incidents include a failure to complete and maintain accurate resident records for multiple residents, exposing potential risks in their care plans. Additionally, during inspections, the facility was noted to have cleanliness issues, including debris and insects found in resident rooms and hallways. While there are strengths at Parklands Care Center, such as no fines and an overall good health inspection rating, families should weigh these with the staffing concerns and cleanliness issues.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Florida
- #254/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Florida. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
18pts above Florida avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
16 points above Florida average of 48%
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident rights for 5 (Resident #1, #3, #4, #5, #6) of 6 and failed to ensure 2 of 2 hallways were safe, clean, comfortable and homel...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 1 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for administration of medications through subcutan...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident records were complete and accurate for 3 of 3 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection during medication administration through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PI...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. During an observation on [DATE] at 12:38 PM Resident #23 had two bottles of moisture shield skin protectant on the bedside ta...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received nutritional supplement as ordered by physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition, Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods and beverages were stored in a safe and sanitary manner in 2 of 2 facility nourishment rooms.
Findings include:
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly.
Findings include:
During an observation of the facility dumpsters and surrounding areas...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Parklands And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Parklands And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 64%, which is 18 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Parklands And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB during 2023 to 2025. These included: 11 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Parklands And Rehab?
PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE SHERMAN FAMILY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 114 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GAINESVILLE, Florida.
How Does Parklands And Rehab Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (64%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Parklands And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Parklands And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Parklands And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff turnover at PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB is high. At 64%, the facility is 18 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Parklands And Rehab Ever Fined?
PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Parklands And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
PARKLANDS CARE CENTER AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.