FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Farmington Village Nursing Home has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating that it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #36 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among 6 facilities in Fulton County. The facility is showing improvement, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. However, staffing is a notable weakness, rated at 2 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 42%, which is better than the state average but still suggests some instability. Importantly, there have been concerns about residents not having enough seating in the dining room, forcing some to wait long periods to eat, and issues with food storage in the kitchen, where opened items weren't properly labeled or stored, raising potential safety risks. On a positive note, the facility has not incurred any fines, and it maintains a strong quality rating for overall care.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Illinois
- #36/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
May 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to thoroughly cleanse around a wound leaving fecal matter at the exterior boarder of a wound for one of one resident (R72) review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions while providing cares to a resident with a central line for one of one resident (R6) re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient seating was available to accommodate residents who chose to eat in the dining room. This failure affected R1,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient seating was available to accommodate residents who chose to eat in the dining room. This failure has the po...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened items in the kitchen were dated when opened and dry food items were stored in an airtight container. These failu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and review the facility failed have a valid PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident
Review) for one resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to include a biliary drain and a skin condition for two (R33, R42) of 18 residents reviewed for care plan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a plan of care for 1 of 4 (R26) residents reviewed for indwelling catheters in a total sample of 23.
Findings Include:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have orders and follow up on a dermatology order for one (R42) of one resident reviewed for skin conditions in a sample of 23...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify, in writing, and maintain a copy in the Medical Record for notification of Resident/Resident Representatives upon Transfer/Discharge ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify, in writing, and maintain a copy in the Medical Record for notification of Resident/Resident Representatives upon Transfer/Discharge ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the use of an anticoagulant for one of four residents (R9) reviewed for anticoagulants in the sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to include target behaviors for the use of an antipsychotic medication for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for anti...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. R45's Physician's Order Sheets, dated 3/10/2023, documents, Indwelling catheter 16 French with a 30 cc (Centimeter) for a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder.
R45's Care Plan, dated 1/10/2023, document...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and hold food at a safe temperature. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the facility.
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and record the levels of sanitizing solution ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Farmington Village Nrsg's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Farmington Village Nrsg Staffed?
CMS rates FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Farmington Village Nrsg?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG during 2023 to 2025. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Farmington Village Nrsg?
FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ATIED ASSOCIATES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 92 certified beds and approximately 80 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in FARMINGTON, Illinois.
How Does Farmington Village Nrsg Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Farmington Village Nrsg?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Farmington Village Nrsg Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Farmington Village Nrsg Stick Around?
FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Farmington Village Nrsg Ever Fined?
FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Farmington Village Nrsg on Any Federal Watch List?
FARMINGTON VILLAGE NRSG is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.