HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP

600 NORTH COLLEGE AVENUE, GENESEO, IL 61254 (309) 944-6431
For profit - Corporation 38 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#43 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Hammond-Henry District Hospital in Geneseo, Illinois has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performing well compared to other facilities. It ranks #1 out of 5 nursing homes in Henry County and #43 out of 665 in Illinois, placing it in the top half of state facilities. The facility's performance trend is stable, with one issue noted in both 2024 and 2025, and it has a good staffing turnover rate of 31%, significantly lower than the state average. While it has no fines on record and offers solid RN coverage, there are some concerns, including failures to monitor infections and perform proper hand hygiene during care, which could put residents at risk for cross-contamination. Overall, while there are some weaknesses to address, the facility maintains strong strengths in staffing and overall care quality.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Illinois
#43/665
Top 6%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
31% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 54 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (31%)

    17 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 31%

15pts below Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record

Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Facility Failure resulted in two deficient practices. A. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor the active infections of the unit. This failure has the potent...

Read full inspector narrative →
Facility Failure resulted in two deficient practices. A. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor the active infections of the unit. This failure has the potential to affect 34 resident who currently reside in the facility. B. The facility failed to perform perineal care in a way to prevent possible cross contamination for one resident (R1) of three reviewed for perineal care. Findings Include: A. The Facility's Departmental Responsibilities for Infection Control Policy document The Infection Control Practitioner (ICP) performs most aspects of the Infection Control Program decided upon by the Infection Control Committee. Time is devoted to surveillance and implementing procedures of reporting infections, staff education, employee health assisting in the development of policies and procedures, resolving problems related to infection control by assuring that isolation practices are working well and doing paperwork. The Facility's undated Antibiotic Stewardship Program documents The ASP (Antibiotic Stewardship Program) team will review infections and monitor antibiotic usage patterns on a regular basis and address an issue regarding antibiotic use if identified. ASP activities reflect the scope and complexity of the services provided (at the facility) Such activities include: observation of trends, retrospective review of antimicrobial use and susceptibility, monthly monitoring of antibiotic days of therapy per 100 patient days, monthly monitoring of defined daily dose of levofloxacin per 100 patient days. On 01/02/2024 at 10:00 AM V3 (Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nursing) stated that the facility pharmacy monitors the use of some of the antibiotics and will send memos. V3 stated there was no monitoring of infections per each resident, what the antibiotic was ordered for, what the symptoms were, when the symptoms began, what antibiotic the resident was on and when the symptoms were resolved for each resident. V3 also stated that there was no tracking and trending of where the infections were at in the facility or if there were an increase in any certain type of infections. On 01/02/24 at 1:30 PM V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) confirmed that there was no active infection control monitoring for the facility itself for infections and/or antibiotic use. Pharmacy does antibiotic reports for QA (Quality Assurance) reports but nothing on an ongoing basis that I am aware of. Throughout the survey, V14 (Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist) was not available for interview. The facility's room roster listed 34 residents who currently reside in the facility. B. The facility's undated Hand Hygiene policy all employees will use effective hand hygiene. Hand washing is considered the single most important procedure for preventing the spread of microorganisms that may lead to infection. Hand Hygiene is to be completed at each of the 5 moments, but not limited to, according to the World health Organization, regardless of whether gloves are used or not. Hand Hygiene can occur via hand washing with soap and water or use of alcohol-based hand rub. 1. Before touching a patient 2. before clean/aseptic procedure 3. after body fluid exposure risk 4. after touching a patient 5. after touching patient surroundings. The facility's undated Hand Hygiene policy states that Gloves are to be discard/changed after use on a contaminated body site before moving to a clean body site. On 01/03/24 at 10:15 AM both V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) and V3 (Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nursing) that the video dated 11/27/24 at 12:07 AM starts as V6 (CNA) is on R1's right side with a towel/drape of some sort on the bedside table with wipes already laid out in a row. V15 (CNA) is on R1's left side and positioning and calming R1. When the video started both V6 (CNA) and V15 (CNA) were already in place with gloves on. V6 (CNA) unfastened the front of R1's incontinent brief and tucked it between her legs. V6 then removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene with hand sanitizer and regloved. V7 (LPN) can then be seen walking into the room with gloves already on and reached into her shirt pocket and removed a tube of cream. V7 opened the tube with her left hand and squeezed some cream into her left hand and applied the cream to R1's front perineal area. V7 (LPN) then puts the tube of cream back into her pocket and moves to the other side of the bed and reaches back into her shirt pocket and removes the tube of cream and opens it with her left hand and squeezes some onto her left hand and applies it to R1's buttocks. V7 then recaps the tube of cream and puts in back in her pocket and the video then stops before the rest of the incontinent care by the CNAs can be observed. On 01/02/24 at 10:15 AM both V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) and V3 (Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nursing) both confirm that V7 should not have reached into her shirt pocket with gloved hands to retrieve the tube of cream and both V2 and V3 stated that V7 (LPN) should have applied R1's cream to her front perineal area then removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene of some sort and regloved prior to applying the cream to R1's buttocks. On 01/03/24 at 10:30 AM both V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) and V3 (Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed that the video dated 12/23/24 at 6:28 PM shows V6 (Certified Nurse Aid) and V9 (Certified Nurse Aid) enter R1's room and perform hand hygiene with hand sanitizer and then donned gloves. V9 (CNA) had her towel/drape on the bedside table with the wipes already pulled out of the package and lined up on the assumed clean towel/drape. V6 comforted R1 while V9 (CNA) used a wipe and wiped R1's left groin, threw it away, used another clean wipe for R1's right groin, threw it away and then used another clean wipe while cleaning R1's pessary area (vaginal slit area) and then threw it away. V9 then changed gloves without any hand hygiene. V10 (Registered Nurse) can then be seen entering the room, performing hand hygiene with hand sanitizer and then donned gloves. V10 opened a tube of cream that she had laid on the bed and could be seen obviously touching the tip of the tube while squeezing some cream onto her fingers and left the tube open and in her left hand. V10 (RN) then applied some cream to R1's groin area, squeezed more cream onto the same fingers and hand while obviously touching the tip of the tube and applied more to R1's perineal area. V10 (RN) then moved to the other side of the bed and V6 (CNA) rolled R1 so that V10 could squeeze more cream onto the same glove and same finger/hand and apply it to R1's buttocks. V9 (CNA) then removed R1's incontinent brief and incontinent pad and removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene and completed R1's care without any further cross contamination of R1 or the environment. On 01/03/24 at 10:30 AM both V2 (RN/DON) and V3 (RN/ADON) confirmed that when V9 (CNA) changed her gloves after she had wiped R1's front perineal area that she should have performed hand hygiene of some sort. Both V2 and V3 confirmed that V10 (RN) should not have touched the tip of tube of cream with her fingers at any time and that once V10 applied the cream to R1's front perineal area she should have removed her gloves, performed hand hygiene and donned new gloves before applying the cream to R1's buttocks. On 01/03/24 at 11:00 AM both V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) and V3 (Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed that the video dated 12/31/24 at 12:18 AM shows V6 (Certified Nurse Aide), V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) and V8 (Certified Nurse Aid) all enter R1's room and don gloves. V6 (CNA) and V8 (CNA) position R1, V6 unfastened the front of R1's incontinent brief and pushed it in between R1's legs and then without changing gloves or hand hygiene, turned to the bedside table and pulled wipes out of the wipe package. V6 stated she did not have enough wipes to perform incontinent care at that time so V8 left the bedside with her original set of gloves on and went to the bathroom door and opened it and went inside. A couple seconds later V8 returned to the bedside with a new package of wipes that V6 then opened and put a couple on a towel on the bedside table. V6 then used her gloved hands to open R1's bedside drawers but did not state out loud what she was looking for. V6 then used her right hand to wipe the top of R1's pubic area and threw it away. V6 used another wipe and wipe on R1's left groin area, pulled the wipe out, flipped it inside out and wiped R1's right groin and threw it away. V6 then used a new wipe to cleanse R1's urethra. V6 then took her gloves off and put new ones on without performing any hand hygiene. V7 (LPN) then reached into her shirt pocket with her gloved hand and pulled out a tube of cream. V7 opened the tube with her gloved left hand and squirted some cream on her left fingers while obviously touching the tip of the tube before resealing it and putting it back into her shirt pocket. V7 then applied the cream to R1's right and left groin areas. R1 was rolled to the side and V6 (CNA) wiped her with a wipe and then stated, I need to dry her and wiped her with another type of cloth. V7 then pulled the tube of cream out of her shirt pocket and opened it with her right hand and squeezed some cream on her right fingers while obviously touching the tip of the tube and then closed it and dropped it back in her pocket and then applied to the cream to R1's buttocks. V6 (CNA) then pulled out the incontinent pad and rolled up incontinent brief with her gloved hand and then used the same gloved hand to get the new incontinent pads and briefs and apply those to R1. On 01/03/24 at 11:00 AM both V2 (RN/DON) and V3 (RN/ADON) both confirmed that after V6 unfastened R1's incontinent brief and pushed it between her legs that V6 (CNA) should not have touched the wipe package or the drawers. Both V2 and V3 stated that V8 (CNA) should not have kept her gloves on when she left the bedside to get more wipes out of the bathroom. Both confirmed that V8 should have removed her gloves, performed hand hygiene of some sort, obtained the wipes and gave them to V6 (CNA) then V8 (CNA) should have performed hand hygiene and regloved. Both V2 and V3 confirmed that V7 (LPN) should not have reached into her pocket with a gloved hand and that V7 shouldn't have touched the tip of the tube. Both V2 and V3 verified that V7 (LPN) should have removed her gloves, performed hand hygiene and regloved before she put the cream on R1's buttocks. V2 (RN/DON) and V3 (RN/ADON) both confirmed that V6 (CNA) should have removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene after she removed the soiled incontinent pad and incontinent brief before she applied the clean incontinent pad and incontinent brief.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before starting incontinence care and throughout incontinence care for one resident (R24) of three residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before starting incontinence care and throughout incontinence care for one resident (R24) of three residents reviewed for urinary incontinence care in a total sample of 14. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Hand Hygiene policy and procedure documents that handwashing is to occur when a. hands are visibily soiled b. before eating c. after use of the bathroom d. when there is significant build-up of alcohol based hand rub e. caring for a patient on enteric isolation. The Facility's undated Hand Hygiene policy documents Gloves are to be discarded/changed after use on a contaminated body site before moving to a clean body site. On 9/25/24 at 2:40 PM V7 (Certified Nurse Aid) and V8 (Certified Nurse Aid) had gloves on and transferred R24 with a mechanical lift from the toilet to the bed. V7 and V8 both undressed and rolled R 24 while preparing her for incontinence care. V7 used warm wipes to wash R24's front perineal area and then assisted V8 to turn R24 to her side. V7 then changed gloves without washing hands or performing any sort of hand hygiene and washed R24 buttocks. V7 and V8 then rolled R24 back on her back, pulled up her pants, adjusted her shirt and pillow all without changing gloves, removing gloves or doing any sort of hand hygiene. On 9/25/24 at 3:30 PM V7 (Certified Nurse Aid) confirmed that she had not done any hand hygiene during incontinence care and that she should have every time she changed her gloves to prevent cross contamination of R24 clothes and bed.
Aug 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

2. R6's Hospice Plan of Care, dated 6/19/23, documents that R6 is a hospice patient with the diagnosis of Coronary Artery disease. The Plan of care also documents that R6's benefit period is 3/31/23-6...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. R6's Hospice Plan of Care, dated 6/19/23, documents that R6 is a hospice patient with the diagnosis of Coronary Artery disease. The Plan of care also documents that R6's benefit period is 3/31/23-6/28/23. R6's facility care plan, dated 1/31/23, documents, (R6) has a terminal prognosis related to failing health. R6's care plan is not specific to Hospice services or what Hospice cares R6 is receiving. 3. R8's Hospice Plan of Care, dated 6/20/23, documents that R8 is a hospice patient with the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. The Plan of care also documents that R8's benefit period is 5/26/23-7/24/23. R8's facility care plan, dated 5/25/22, documents, (R6) has a terminal prognosis related to end stage disease. R8's care plan is not specific to Hospice services or what Hospice cares R8 should receive. On 8/23/23 at 12:35 PM V2 (Registered Nurse) stated We didn't have the updated Care Plan from Hospice in the building until today. They (Hospice services) said they have volunteers who bring them and the last delivery there was an (unknown) issue. Hospice just came in today and brought the updated Hospice care plans for (R1, R6 and R8). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an end of life care plan includes Hospice services that identify specific resident needs and individualized interventions and ensure Hospice plans of care were kept updated in the resident's record for three of three residents (R1, R6, R8) reviewed for Hospice in the sample of 24. Findings include: The facility's Interdisciplinary Plan of Care policy (undated) documents, All Long Term Care residents will have a comprehensive interdisciplinary care plan developed with quantifiable objectives for the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain, based on the comprehensive assessment. This policy also documents, All staff will be familiar with each resident's plan of care and are responsible for implementation of plan of care. Care plans will be continuously evaluated by each discipline and modified as indicated. The facility's Hospice Programs (undated) policy documents, Policy: Staff members will follow the policies/procedures of Hospice agency depending upon the admitting. Procedure: Communicate with hospice staff members regarding admissions of hospice patient. Follow the plan of treatment which has been initiated. The facility's (undated) Hospice Nursing Facility Hospice Service Agreement documents, C. Hospice will furnish a copy of each Hospice patient's Plan of Care to the facility at the times of the resident's admission into the Hospice program. The Plan of Care will be furnished to the facility in the form of Physician orders. K. Facility acknowledges and agrees that when facility personnel are responsible for the administration of prescribed therapies, including those therapies determined appropriate by Hospice and delineated in the Hospice patient's Plan of Care. Facility personnel may administer the therapies where permitted by State law and as specified by the Facility. 1. R1's current Hospice Plan of Care, dated 6/21/23, documents that R1 was admitted to hospice services on 2/2/23 with the diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain. The Plan of care also documents that R1's current benefit period is 5/3-7/31/23. R1's Physician's orders, dated 8/1-8/31/23, have no documentation of an order for R1 to receive hospice services. R1's facility care plan, dated 2/6/23, documents, R1 was recently admitted to hospice services. R1's care plan is not revised to include person centered interventions to address end of life care. On 08/24/23 at 10:54 AM, V3 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/Infection Preventionist) confirmed that R1 is receiving hospice care, however R1's care plan does not document her hospice diagnosis nor interventions to address end of life care.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance medication was reconciled at the time of medication administration for one of ten residents (R21...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance medication was reconciled at the time of medication administration for one of ten residents (R21) reviewed for controlled medication in the sample of 24. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy (undated) documents Objective/ Purpose: To provide safe, consistent method to administer medications. Controlled Substances: Controlled substances are to be signed out on controlled substance sign out sheet and charted as they are given. On 8/22/23 at 2:00 PM V6 (Registered Nurse) completed a controlled substance count. During this count, R21's Controlled Substances Proof of Use form for Lorazepam 1 milligram (controlled substance medication) documented the count of remaining pills should be 28. At this time the actual count that V6 had of R21's Lorazepam was 27. V6 then stated I gave (R21) a dose at 12:15 PM today. I usually sign them out as given, right when I administer the medication. That's what we are supposed to do. I am not sure why I didn't with this one. The sign-out sheet should say 27.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a resident (R13) transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a resident (R13) transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings: R13's Nursing note, dated 7/4 at 6:34 p.m., documents, R13 sent to ED (Emergency Department) for evaluation and treatment after resident became lethargic, had emesis and was not able to take her evening medications. T (temperature) 101.4 attempted to give Tylenol but was unable to get her to open her mouth. R13's ED Report, dated 7/4/23, documents, Diagnosis/Problems: Pyelonephritis; altered mental status, elevated troponin. Disposition: admitted in patient to our hospital. R13's MDS (Minimum Data Set) log, dated 8/24/23, documents that R13 had a discharge return anticipated on 7/4/23. R13's current medical record has no documentation of the Ombudsman being notified of R13's discharge to the hospital on 7/4/23. On 08/24/23 10:34 AM, V1 (Director of Nursing) stated, The ombudsman is not being notified of any residents when they are discharged to the hospital. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident's Census and Condition of Residents form 672, dated and signed by V3 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) on 8/21/23, documents that 36 residents reside in the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
  • • Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Hammond-Henry District Hsp's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Hammond-Henry District Hsp Staffed?

CMS rates HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 31%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hammond-Henry District Hsp?

State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP during 2023 to 2025. These included: 4 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Hammond-Henry District Hsp?

HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 38 certified beds and approximately 35 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GENESEO, Illinois.

How Does Hammond-Henry District Hsp Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (31%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hammond-Henry District Hsp?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Hammond-Henry District Hsp Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Hammond-Henry District Hsp Stick Around?

HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP has a staff turnover rate of 31%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Hammond-Henry District Hsp Ever Fined?

HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Hammond-Henry District Hsp on Any Federal Watch List?

HAMMOND-HENRY DISTRICT HSP is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.