AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK

605 EAST CHURCH STREET, KEWANEE, IL 61443 (309) 852-3389
For profit - Corporation 200 Beds ARCADIA CARE Data: November 2025 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#455 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Avenues at Royal Oak has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates that the facility has significant concerns and is performing poorly. Ranking #455 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois places it in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and it's the lowest rated option in Henry County at #5 out of 5. While the facility is showing some improvement-reducing issues from 29 to 8 over the past year-there are still serious concerns, including $410,381 in fines, which is higher than 87% of Illinois facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. Staffing is a notable weakness, with only 1 out of 5 stars in staffing ratings and less RN coverage than 93% of Illinois facilities, which means fewer registered nurses are available to catch potential problems compared to most others. There have been alarming incidents reported, such as failing to protect residents from verbal abuse by a staff member and allowing residents with abusive histories to remain unsupervised, which raises serious safety concerns for all residents.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#455/665
Bottom 32%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
29 → 8 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
42% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$410,381 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 13 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
74 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 29 issues
2025: 8 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (42%)

    6 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 42%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $410,381

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: ARCADIA CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 74 deficiencies on record

6 life-threatening 6 actual harm
Aug 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents personal preference and dignity was provided for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents personal preference and dignity was provided for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 8.The findings include:On 7/31/25 at 9:58 AM, R2 was in her room in bed on the locked psychiatric unit of the facility. R2 stated that she never said she was flicked in the eye or face by the nurse. R2 stated what she was upset about was that she was told she could not eat in the main dining room. V5 registered Nurse said she had to eat in the small dining room where the TV is at. R2 stated on Friday after she reported a possible suicide attempt for someone else, she was told she had to eat in the TV/small dining room and not the main dining room. R2 stated sitting in the TV room gives her panic attacks. When she told them that on Friday, they let her eat dinner in the main dining room. On Saturday at breakfast, she thought she would be okay to eat in the dining room; instead V5 made her sit in the TV room and left her there. R2 stated she was having a panic attack and was crying. R2 stated the nurse told her if she would mind her own business she would not be in trouble and could sit in the dining room. R2 stated she told V5 that she did not do anything wrong. R2 stated V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was doing a 1:1 for another resident and saw the whole thing. V9 took her to a small TV room and let her eat breakfast there. R2 stated V7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was texting V4 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) while all of this was going on. R2 stated she wasn't allowed to eat in the main dining room until Sunday evening. R2 stated she talked to V1 Administrator, V3 Director of Nursing (DON), V4 ADON, and V8 Social Services about it on Monday.On 7/31/25 at 10:19 AM, V6 Social went over to B hall with the surveyor to view dining room area. The smaller dining room with a TV was the first area that residents can enter before going into the main dining room. There was a doorway that goes from the small dining room/TV area into a large dining room. Inside the dining area to one side is the nurse's station that is open and lacks any privacy. V6 stated the area is split up and due to the wheelchairs and space. Some residents eat in the main dining room, and some eat in the smaller dining room with the TV. Residents can sit wherever they want and there isn't any assigned seating on B hall.On 7/31/25 at 10:37 AM, V5 Registered Nurse (RN) stated, she was instructed to have R2 sit in the TV room because she listens to everyone's conversations. R2 comments on the conversations; she butts in and is listening when she shouldn't. R2 was put in the TV room for breakfast (on Saturday 7/26/25), and she threw a fit. R2 was crying profusely.On 7/31/25 at 11:04 AM, V4 ADON stated nursing staff came to her and stated they were having problems with R2 trying to listen in on their conversations with other residents. On Friday, she asked R2 asked to sit in the other dining room where the TV is located, and she was agreeable. V4 stated she noticed at dinner on Friday, R2 was sitting in the main dining room. The next day V5 asked about it and said R2 didn't want to sit in the other room so I told her to let her sit in the main dining room. As far as I know she continued to sit in the main dining room. Originally on Friday the plan was to have her sit in the other dining room and not the main dining room. On 7/31/25 at 11:33 AM, V2 Assistant Administrator stated she talked to R2 this week and R2 did ask her if I heard about what happened over the weekend. V2 stated she told R2 she would investigate it. V2 stated she talked to V4 who told her she was called this weekend. V4 stated on Friday R2 said she would sit in the dining room/TV room then she got called Saturday because R2 said she didn't want to sit there.On 7/31/25 at 2:12 PM, V9 CNA stated R2 was put in the TV room for breakfast. V5 said R2 had to sit in there and R2 got upset. I didn't see everything but could hear what was going on. V5 said they were told that she is to sit in there. R2 told V5 she talked to the DON, and she could sit in the dining room if she wants to. V5 was being stern, and she was rude to R2. V5 told R2 that it wasn't her job, and she didn't know why this happened. V5 said she could talk to them on Monday. V5 wasn't yelling at R2. This happened on Saturday. I could hear her crying and she was really upset. They were all ignoring her. The nurse and CNAs ignored her. This was right before breakfast was brought out. I went and moved her from the TV room to the smaller tv room on the women's hall.The facility's Residents' Rights policy (11/2018) showed, your rights to dignity and respect: you have the right to make your own decisions. Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life.The Face Sheet Dated 7/31/25 for R2 showed diagnoses including bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, necrotizing fasciitis, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, primary insomnia, body mass index 70 or greater, intermittent explosive disorder, hypertension, polycystic ovarian syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type, other obesity due to excess calories, rheumatoid arthritis, critical illness myopathy, abnormal posture, gastroesophageal reflux disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, blepharitis, vitamin D deficiency, long term use of anticoagulants, anxiety disorder, deep vein thrombosis, major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, inflammation of vagina and vulva, and psoriasis.The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] for R2 showed no cognitive impairment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review, the facility's direct care staff failed to notify the abuse coordinator of an injury of unknown origin for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sam...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, the facility's direct care staff failed to notify the abuse coordinator of an injury of unknown origin for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of eight.The findings include:R1's face sheet indicated an initial admission date of 03/01/2011 with a past medical history not limited to: paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mood affective disorder, anxiety, anemia, pruritis, history of shock therapy, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants.R1's care plan indicated but not limited to: risk for injury related to limited dexterity and cognitive impairment and risk for falls with date initiated of 10/02/2023.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C for cognitive patterns dated 04/13/2025 indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1's skin condition report with effective date of 07/26/2025 submitted by V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented bruising to R1's rear right thigh, chin, front left shoulder, and right front lower leg that were purple in color and a new/change in skin condition.Review of facility reported incidents revealed an initial report for R1 related to a bruise of unknown origin with an incident date of 07/26/2025 that was submitted to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) on 07/28/2025. R1's abuse/neglect screen dated 07/28/2025 indicated R1 is at risk for abuse and/or neglect.R1's hospital after visit summary dated 07/28/2025 indicated R1 was seen by V13 (Medical Doctor) in the emergency department and was diagnosed with chronic iron deficiency anemia, posttraumatic hematoma (localized collection of blood) of right lower extremity, contusion of chin (bruise) and schizoaffective disorder.On 07/31/2025 at 09:55 AM, observed R1 propel herself in a wheelchair out of her room on the A wing. Observed a dark purple colored bruise that measured approximately three centimeters in length and width to the area under R1's chin. R1 was exhibiting verbal outbursts and looking for her babies. R1 was unable to indicate how the bruise occurred. Further assessment was not able to be completed due to R1's behaviors.On 07/31/2025 at 10:03 AM V2 (Administrator in Training) said R1 is currently on 1:1 supervision with staff due to falls. At 10:05 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said R1 is on 1:1 supervision due to a recent change in condition and bruising. On 07/31/2025 at 11:18 AM, V1 (Administrator) said she is the abuse coordinator and reports abuse, allegations to IDPH initially within two hours, then a final report within five days. V1 then said an injury of unknown origin in not investigated as abuse initially, but the facility would submit a report to IDPH in the same timeframe as abuse and would initiate an investigation. On 07/31/2025 at 12:20 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) said she was first notified about R1's bruising on the morning of 07/28/2025 (Monday). V3 added that she was not informed by staff regarding any incidents involving R1 over the past weekend. V3 said she then assessed R1 and observed dark purple discoloration to R1's chin and neck, right inner and upper thigh, right shin and calf areas, and a hematoma to the right shin. V3 then said due to R1's condition and her inability to explain the cause, R1 was transferred to a local emergency room for further evaluation. At 12:40 PM, V3 indicated that during course of her investigation into R1's bruising, it was determined that staff had observed bruising on R1 on 07/26/2025 but did not report the injury to the supervisor on duty/call. V3 added that staff should have reported the initial bruising to on-call supervisor and administrator, should have been reported to IDPH when discovered.On 07/31/2025 at 01:14 PM, V7 (LPN) said she was informed by the aides on 07/26/2025 of R1's bruising and upon her assessment, V7 observed bruising to R1's chin and throat area that were purple in color. V7 then said she informed V4 (ADON) about R1's bruising that same morning (07/26/2025) and again on the morning of 07/28/2025 (Monday) regarding the worsening and other bruises to R1.On 07/31/2025 at 03:09 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said on 07/26/2025 (Saturday) at around 05:00 AM, she noticed a dark spot under R1's chin that looked deep dark purple in color. V14 said when she changed R1's clothes, she saw a light purple colored bruise on her right shoulder and on her belly, she saw a light purple-blueish colored bruise and small dots to her stomach area. V14 indicated that she informed V7 of her findings.On 07/31/2025 at 03:27 PM, V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said she first saw bruising on R1 on 07/26/2025 (Saturday) at around 07:30-07:45 AM. V15 then said the bruising to R1's chin, right and left shins and sides of both legs were purple in color, the right leg was dark purple, and the left was light purple in color. V15 said she reported the bruising to V7 shortly after seeing them. On 07/31/2025 at 03:38 PM, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said she was not informed by V7 on Saturday (07/26/2025) about R1's bruising and was first made aware on the morning of 07/28/2025.On 07/31/2025, facility provided documentation for a facility in-service presented on 07/28/2025 which indicated that all injuries noted during transfers, showers, dressing, etc. must be reported to the nurse, any and all new injuries noted to a resident , including but not limited to bruising, skin tears, lacerations and burns must be documented in a skin-other assessment.if staff cannot ascertain a cause of injury, staff must immediately notify the nursing manager on call; significant injuries of unknown origin are reportable to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) within 2 hours of discovery. Abuse policy with effective date of 09/2024 reads in part: employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, or to the immediate supervisor who must then report it to the administrator.Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Department of Public Health immediately, but not more than two hours after the allegation of abuse. Any incident that does not involve abuse and does result in serious bodily injury shall be reported within 24 hours. The nursing staff is additionally responsible for reporting on a facility incident report the appearance of suspicious bruises, lacerations, or other abnormalities as they occur. Upon report of such occurrences, the nursing supervisor is responsible for assessing the resident, reviewing the documentation and reporting to the administrator or the person designated to act on behalf of the administrator in the administrator's absence.An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: the source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident and the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury (e.g., the injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma) or the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time or the incidence of injuries over time. If classified as an injury of unknown source, the person gathering facts will document the injury, the location and time it was observed, any treatment given and notification of the resident's physician, responsible party. The Department of Public Health will be notified. Timeframes for reporting and investigating abuse will be followed.Incident and Accident policy last approved 10/2024 reads in part: the incident/accident report is completed for all unexplained bruising or abrasion, all accidents or incidents where there is injury or the potential to result in injury, allegations of theft and abuse registered by residents, visitors or other, and resident to resident altercations.The director of nursing, assistant director of nursing, or nursing supervisor must notify the following if an actual injury occurs: the Illinois Department of Public Health via email, fax, or phone within twenty-four (24) hours of the occurrence.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident by not adequately assessing a resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident by not adequately assessing a resident for risk of falls, not assessing a resident for injury after a fall, and not properly transferring a resident off the floor after a fall incident for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of eight.The findings include:R1's face sheet indicated initial admission date of 03/01/2011 with a past medical history not limited to: paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mood affective disorder, anxiety, anemia, pruritis, history of shock therapy, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants.R1's care plan indicated but not limited to: risk for injury related to limited dexterity and cognitive impairment and, is a risk for falls both with date initiated of 10/02/2023; requires use of psychotropic medications (antidepressant, antipsychotic, anti-anxiety) to manage mood and/or behavior issues, date initiated 04/07/2024. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C for cognitive patterns dated 04/13/2025 indicated severe cognitive impairment.R1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] documented that R1 is not at risk for falls.Incident Follow Up note with effective date of 07/29/2025 at 04:00 PM that was created by V3 (Director of Nursing) on 07/31/2025 at 08:52 AM documented, via phone interview with (V10 Agency Nurse) on duty 07/27/2025, [Interdisciplinary Team] has ascertained that resident had been noted sitting on the floor next to her bed that night. Nurse did not believe resident to have actually sustained a fall, but to have scooted/sat from her bed as she is prone to do, so full body assessment and fall documentation were not completed at that time. Nurse has been thoroughly educated on assessment and reporting/notification expectations.On 07/31/2025 at 09:55 AM, observed R1 propel herself in a wheelchair out of her room on the A wing. Observed a dark purple colored bruise that measured approximately three centimeters in length and width to the area under R1's chin. R1 was exhibiting verbal outbursts and looking for her babies. R1 was unable to indicate how the bruise occurred. Further assessment was not able to be completed due to R1's behaviors.On 07/31/2025 at 10:03 AM V2 (Administrator in Training) said R1 is currently on 1:1 supervision with staff due to falls.On 07/31/2025, facility provided corrective action forms for V11 and V12 (Certified Nursing Assistants) that indicated a written warning was given due to a improper transfer on 07/27/2025 when both aides lifted resident (R1) from the floor without using a mechanical lift or gait belt and additional in-servicing was provided via phone on 07/29/2025. In-service log on resident safe transfers dated 07/29/2025 was also provided for V10 (Agency Nurse), V11 and V12. V3 provided documentation related to a facility in-service presented on 07/28/2025 which indicated but not limited to.residents must be assessed fully if noted on the floor at any time, unless having been witnessed purposely and safely placing themselves there or known to have been purposely and safely assisted there by staff if care planned to be so.On 07/31/2025 at 12:20 PM, V3 (DON) said during course of investigation for R1's bruising, it was noted that on 07/27/2025, R1 was found sitting on the floor next to her bed. V10 and V11 got her up by the underarms and the back of her pants, and no gait belt was used. V3 added that V10 didn't think to document the incident as a fall because she believed R1 scooted herself to the floor. V3 also said that V10 did not do a full assessment after staff found R1 on the floor so it was unknown whether R1 had sustained any other injury post fall incident. On 07/31/2025 at 12:58 PM, V11 said she was with another resident on 07/27/2025 at around 8:00 PM when V10 came to get her and told V11 that R1 had fallen, and V10 needed help getting R1 off the floor. V11 said when she entered R1's room, she saw her sitting on the floor next to the bed. V11 then said she and V10 picked [R1] up off the ground with our arms under her arms and grabbing the back of her pants. V11 added that the did not put a gait belt on her but should have. V11 said they put R1 in her bed, then she and V10 left the room and that's why V11 assumed V10 already assessed R1 because she left when V11 left the room. V11 also said that she would normally use a mechanical lift when transferring a resident off the floor after a fall that was discussed at the fall training two months ago where staff were educated on using a mechanical lift, and use of a gait belt when not using a lift.On 07/31/2025 at 01:34 PM, V12 said she was with a resident across the hall from R1's room on 07/27/2025 when she heard R1's roommate said R1 had fallen on the floor around 08:30-09:00 PM. V12 went into R1's room and saw her sitting on the floor next to the bed and wanted help getting up. V12 said she went to get the nurse (V10) to help get R1 up. V12 then said she and V10 put their arms under R1's arms and tried to get her up off the floor but V12 couldn't get [her] side up so V12 went to get V11 to assist V10. V12 then said they got her off the floor by pulling her under the arms and by the back of her pants. V12 added that they no gait belt was applied to R1 at any time but they should have. On 07/31/2025 at 02:45 PM, R9 (R1's roommate) said R1 fell to the floor last weekend so she went out in the hall and told staff. On 07/31/2025 at 12:49 PM and 08/01/2025 at 09:09 AM, called V10 (Agency Nurse with no answer. Detailed message and call back number were both left. No call-backs received from V10.On 08/01/2025, requested fall policy and procedures. V1 indicated facility does not have a fall protocol policy then indicated facility has a prevention policy.Fall Prevention Program policy last approved 10/2024 reads in part: to assure the safety of all residents in the facility when possible. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Quality Assurance Programs will monitor the program to assure ongoing effectiveness.Transfers-Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts policy last approved 04/2025 reads in part: in order to protect the safety and well-being of the staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility will use mechanical lifting devices for the lifting and movement of residents.use of a gait belt for all physical assist transfers is mandatory.
May 2025 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for pain management by not adequately assessing, documenting or treating a resident's (R3) pain while aw...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for pain management by not adequately assessing, documenting or treating a resident's (R3) pain while awaiting further evaluation and treatment post fall with significant injury. This failure applied to one of four residents reviewed for pain management related to falls in a sample size of 6. Findings include: R3's face sheet showed the resident admitted to facility on 03/28/2025 with a past medical history not limited to dementia, neurocognitive disorder, presence of right artificial hip joint (04/29/2025), lack of coordination, anxiety disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 04/10/2025 showed R3 has severe cognitive impairment. R3's admission care plan indicated the resident has impaired cognitive function (rev 04/29/2025); is at risk for falls related to dementia and restless behavior (rev 04/30/2025); is at risk for pain related to left (injury is to the right) femur fracture post-surgery (rev 04/30/2025) with interventions not limited to: pain is alleviated and/or relieved by pain management and repositioning, administer analgesics as per orders, evaluate the effectiveness and monitor/record/report to the nurse any signs or symptoms of non-verbal pain and residents complaint of pain. R3's incident fall assessment completed by V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) with an effective date of 04/10/2025 at 12:23 AM, documented a fall incident on 04/09/2025 at 9:25 PM with pain level of three assessed same day at 10:38 PM under section B/assessment and showed under section C for actions/interventions, the physician was not notified until 12:00 AM on same day (should read as 04/10/2025 not 04/09). Under pain assessment, pain scale documented zero and staff assessment for pain was not conducted. V7's incident note dated 04/10/2025 at 12:23 AM documented R3 sustained a fall on 04/09/2025 at 9:25 PM and denied pain, then documented that the resident's pain in not a new onset. R3's progress note dated 04/10/2025 at 10:00 AM documented mobile x-ray was at the facility to perform an x-ray. Results dated the same day showed the resident sustained an acute minimally displaced fracture of the right femoral neck. V4's (Registered Nurse) follow-up note dated 04/10/2025 at 10:25 AM documented in R3's post fall assessment, No pain. The resident's pain in not a new onset. V4's note dated 04/10/2025 at 12:35 PM documented x-ray results were received and reported to V7 (Medical Doctor). V4's progress note dated 04/10/2025 at 3:43 PM documented an order was received from V7 to send the resident to the hospital for evaluation. Emergency transport services (911) were notified. Emergency department records for R3 dated 04/10/2025 at 4:34 PM indicated the resident presented with complaints of hip fracture. At 5:40 PM, records indicated R3 complains of pain into his right hip and under physical exam for musculoskeletal, R3's records documented, deformity and signs of injury present. Hospital imaging results for R3 showed the right hip was examined on 04/10/2025 at 5:44 PM for history of right hip pain due to a suspected fracture. Final investigation report dated 04/17/2025 indicated R3 had a witnessed fall on 04/10/2025 and sustained a superficial laceration to the right brow and pain to right hip was noted post fall. In-house mobile x-ray was obtained. R3 was transferred to emergency room for further evaluation and admitted with an acute minimally displaced fracture of right femoral neck that required surgical repair. Second hospital records dated 04/29/2025 and signed by V12 (Medical Doctor) indicated R3 was admitted to this hospital for right hip fracture and underwent a right hemiarthroplasty (partial hip surgical replacement) done on 04/11/2025. Review of R3's medication administration record for April 2025 showed two documented pain levels of 3 on 04/09/2025 and two documented pain levels of 4 on 04/10/2025. Record also showed order for acetaminophen oral tablet 325 milligrams (mg) give [two] tablets by mouth every [six] hours as needed for pain with start date of 03/28/2025 at 7:30 PM and discontinued date of 04/28/2025 at 3:14 PM. No documented administrations for acetaminophen were recorded on this administration record. R3's order summary report dated 05/16/2025 received from facility showed orders not limited to pain assessment every shift and acetaminophen 325mg, give two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for pain both with order date of 04/29/2025. On 05/16/2025 at 1:41 PM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said on 04/09/2025 at around 9-10:00 PM, R3 was on the floor in the lounge area of B wing, laying on his right side. V6 then said that R3 yelled out in pain when you touched his legs and indicated that R3 wouldn't straighten out his legs and R3 was in a lot of pain. On 05/16/2025 at 2:13 PM, V4 (Registered Nurse) said she came into work on 04/10/2025 at 6:00 AM and was informed by V6 that R3 fell the night before (04/09/2025) and landed on his right hip. V4 then said she was told in report by V6 that R3 had no complaints of pain during the night until around 5:00 AM. V4 added that she believed V6 had administered acetaminophen to R3 around 5-5:30 AM and that V6 had contacted the physician after R3's fall and after his complaint of pain. V4 then said a resident is sent out emergently after a fall with complaints of pain and/or injury to a specific part of the body. On 05/20/2025 at 12:27 PM V7 (Medical Doctor) said he does not recall being notified of any significant injury for R3 post fall and that he ordered an x-ray be done due to R3's complaints of pain but did not recall the time he was informed of R3's pain complaint. On 05/20/2025 at 12:08 PM, V8 (Unit Attendant) said on 04/09/2025 at 10:00 PM, she was assigned on 1:1 monitoring for R3. V8 then said that R3 moaned a lot during the night and indicated that when the aides came in and changed his brief at approximately 12:00 AM, he was moaning out in pain and was grabbing at their hands, and after the second time they changed R3's brief around 1:30 AM, he really hollered out in pain and that was when the aides noticed bruising starting to his right hip area. She added that the aides went to get V6 (LPN) at this time and believed R3 had received pain medication from V6. On 05/20/2025 at 3:02 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said following R3's fall incident, there was no new order for pain management received. V2 then said her expectation for nursing when administering a pain medication is to complete a pain assessment, document the administration and pain scale then document a follow-up for the effectiveness of medication. On 05/20/2025 at 3:13 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said R3's fall incident occurred about 7:30 PM when he stood up then fell over and landed on his right side. V14 then said about 10:00 PM, R3 started to complain of hip pain during his brief change and continued to complain of pain every time he was checked on which was about every two hours. V14 added that every time R3 was checked on, the nurse (V6) was present and that R3 complained of pain every time staff touched him throughout the night and they placed an ice pack to his hip around 2:00 AM for the pain but R3 wouldn't leave it on. V14 then said that she believed V6 administered acetaminophen to R3 after the fall around 8:00 PM for complaint of head pain and around 4:00 AM and that during last check on R3 at 6:00 AM, that's when R3 was starting to bruise. V14 added that she both V4 (RN) and V6 (LPN) of the bruising to R3's right hip and that he was still complaining of pain. Review of R3's progress notes showed no documentation of resident's complaints of hip pain throughout the night, any pain assessments or monitoring for right hip pain, no administrations of pain medication, or of the bruising noted by V8 and V14 to R3's right hip. On 05/20/2025 at 3:55 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that complaints of pain and the administration of pain medication would be expected post fall with a fracture. Pain management program policy last revised 04/2025 reads in part: to establish a program which can effectively manage pain in order to remove adverse physiologic and physiological effects of unrelieved pain and to develop an optimal pain management plan to enhance healing and promote physiological and psychological wellness. It is the goal of the facility to facilitate resident independence, promote resident comfort, preserve and enhance resident dignity and facilitate life involvement. The purpose of this policy is to accomplish that goal through an effective pain management program .The pain management program includes the following components but not limited to documentation of pain assessment and monitoring.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect two vulnerable residents by not preventing resident to res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect two vulnerable residents by not preventing resident to resident physical abuse. This failure applied to two of four residents (R2, R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 6 that resulted in R2 being hit on the top of the head by R1 and R4 being slapped on the hand by R5. Findings include: 1. Final investigation report dated 04/25/2025 documented that R1 and R2 were both in the main hallway when alleged incident occurred. R2 was in wheelchair and cut in line in front of R1, who was standing. R2 touched R1's back as she was trying to get around her in the wheelchair. R1 instinctively turned and made contact to the top of R2's head. R1's face sheet indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history not limited to bipolar II disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/20/2025 showed R1 has no cognitive impairment. Abuse/neglect screen dated 05/15/2025 (after incident date) indicated R1 is at high risk for abuse/neglect. No aggression screening was noted in R1's electronic medical record. R1's care plan indicated the resident is known to have hallucinations and/or delusions (09/26/2024); uses psychotropic medication to manage mood and/or behavior issues (11/27/2024); and has displayed verbal/physical aggression (11/27/2024). Social Service Note dated 04/22/2025 at 3:29 PM indicated that staff discussed with R1 her behaviors from incident with peer, discussed coping skills and not touching others. R1 stated she was aware. Social Service Note dated 04/23/2025 at 12:35 PM indicated that staff discussed recent behaviors with R1, discussed keeping hands to herself, along with triggers and coping skills. R1 verbalized understanding. On 05/16/2025 at 10:55 AM, R1 said she was standing in line for banking when she (R2) cut in front of her in line. R1 then said R2 had punched her in the back twice so R1 slapped R2 in the face. R1 added that no staff were present during the incident but came afterward and separated them. R2's face sheet indicated the resident last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history not limited to altered mental status, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, phobic anxiety disorder, depression, paranoid personality disorder, strange and inexplicable behavior. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 03/19/2025 showed R2 has no cognitive impairment. Abuse screening dated 04/24/2025 indicated R2 is at high risk for abuse/neglect. R2's care plan indicated the resident has impaired cognitive function (rev 03/27/2025); verbal/physical aggression toward residents and has been involved in open conflict with peers, hit another peer related to poor impulse control (rev 02/05/2025); uses anti-psychotic medications related to behavior management (rev 10/16/2024); behaviors can be seen as is disruptive and socially inappropriate (rev 05/01/2024). Social Service Note dated 04/22/2025 at 3:43 PM documented staff discussed with R2 her recent behaviors and alternative ways to handle feeling frustrated. Social Service Note dated 04/23/2025 at 12:25 PM documented staff discussed with R2 her recent behaviors, discussed keeping her hands to herself and using kind words with others. R2 was educated on triggers and coping skills. Nursing Note dated 04/23/2025 at 2:25 PM indicated the interdisciplinary team met with R2 regarding resident to resident altercation. Residents were immediately separated, and each placed on 15 minute checks to avoid further incident. Resident was counseled on being aware of surroundings and to avoid bumping into others, and on using appropriate and respectful language when speaking to and/or about other residents. On 05/16/2025 at 11:03 AM, R2 said she did not recall the incident with R1. On 05/20/2025 at 11:35 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said she was informed by staff that R1 and R2 were standing in line for banking when R1 said R2 either hit her purse or had tried to grab it, so R1 proceeded to turn around and hit R2 on the top of her head. V5 added that she assessed both residents with no findings. V5 then said the aides are supposed to monitor the banking and shopping lines from the unit dining room but no staff had observed the incident to her knowledge. 2. Final investigation report dated 03/31/2025 documented on 03/24/2025, R4 had reached for R5's drink while at the dining table then R5 instinctively reacted and swatted at R4's hand making contact to the back of her hand. R4's face sheet documented the resident last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history not limited to anoxic brain damage, anxiety disorder, delirium, depression, sleep disorder, and insomnia. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/06/2025 showed R4 has severe cognitive impairment. Abuse/neglect screening dated 05/12/2025 indicated R3 is at a low risk for abuse/neglect. Per R4's care plan, the resident has impaired cognitive function (05/12/2025) and is at low risk for abuse/neglect (03/28/2025). Incident Note dated 03/24/2025 at 8:50 AM documented that writer (V3 Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) was walking in dining room and saw the resident (R4) being slapped on the back of her right hand by peer (R5) that was sitting at the same table. Resident was immediately moved to another table and assessed .Peer stated that this resident (R4) was attempting to take his beverage, so he slapped her hand to stop her. Peer was educated and instructed not to touch other people in any way. On 05/16/2025 at 11:28 AM, R4 was observed sleeping at the dining room table in the main dining room. R4 was non-verbal and did not recall the incident. R5's face sheet documented the resident last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history not limited to major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction, chronic pain and nicotine independence. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 03/21/2025 showed R5 has no cognitive impairment. Abuse/neglect screening dated 03/21/2025 indicated R5 is at a low risk for abuse/neglect. No aggression screening was noted in R5's electronic medical record. R5's care plan documented the resident requires use of psychotropic medication to manage mood and/or behavior issues (rev 04/13/2024); has been involved in prior peer conflict (rev 08/28/2024). Social Service Note dated 03/24/2025 at 4:04 PM documented that social services staff discussed with R5 the incident from that morning. R5 stated his peer (R4) was going to grab his beverage and he slapped the back of her hand. R5 was educated on the importance on not touching other peers. R5 verbalized understanding. Incident Follow Up dated 03/28/2025 at 11:17 AM documented that the interdisciplinary team discussed the peer to peer incident with R5. Seating arrangements were changed to limit contact while in common dining area on date of incident. R5 received 1:1 staff counsel regarding inappropriateness of physical contact with peers and voiced understanding of such on date of incident. Psychiatric provider performed assessment of R5 one day post incident and increased mirtazapine (antidepressant) regimen. R5's active orders as of 05/16/2025 showed order for mirtazapine oral tablet 15 milligrams (mg) give 15mg by mouth in the evening for mood related to major depressive disorder with a start date of 03/30/2025. On 05/16/2025 at 1:23 PM, V3 (ADON) said regarding incident with R4 and R5 that she was walking through the dining room during breakfast when she saw R5 reach out and swat at R4's hand who was reaching for his cup. R5 said she's (R4) trying to steal my drink. V3 then said she moved R4 to another table; was assessed with no injuries. V3 added that no other staff were around and the aides were picking up trays in the dining room, in the vicinity. On 05/16/2025 at 3:10 PM, R5 said regarding incident with R4 that she was trying to take his glass from the table, and he tried to move her arm away and ended up slapping her hand. R5 added that R4 should not have done that to him. Abuse prevention and reporting policy with effective date of 09/2024 reads in part: this facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents .A resident to resident altercation should be reviewed as a potential situation of abuse .
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three residents (R2) from physical abuse by another ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three residents (R2) from physical abuse by another resident, in a sample of seven. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (approved) 09/2024 directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means that requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility Report to State Office, dated 3/8/2025 at 6:00 A.M. and signed by V1/Administrator documents,(R3) alleges (he) was struck by another resident (R2). Injuries: 2 CM (Centimeter) laceration to left forearm. Residents were immediately separated. Laceration assessed and treated by nurse. Responsible party, MD (Medical Doctor), Police and Ombudsman notified. The facility form dated 3/10/2025 and signed by R3 documents, (R3) states that he was sitting in his wheelchair and (R2) threw something across the room then went over and hit (R3) with his crutches. The facility form dated 3/10/2025 and signed by R2 documents, (R2) stated that he got into his chair and went over to (R3) and hit him three times with his crutch. (R2) stated he did it because (R3) was making snoring noises the night before when (R2) was trying to play his game. The facility Original Allegation: Peer to Peer form, dated (final) 3/11/2025 documents, Review of facility investigation documents, (R2) is a [AGE] year old resident with diagnosis to include Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Nonrheumatic Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Alcohol Abuse, Essential Hypertension, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Above Knee, Rheumatic Tricuspid Insufficiency, Chronic Kidney Failure Stage 3 and Major Depressive Disorder. (R3) is a [AGE] year old resident with diagnosis to include Paranoid Schizophrenia, COPD, Depression, Intellectual Disabilities and Anxiety Disorder. It was reported to (V2/Administrator) an altercation between (R2) and (R3) while in their room. (R2 and R3) were immediately separated and assessed. Responsible parties, Physician, Law Enforcement and Ombudsman notified. (R3) noted to have a 5 CM (Centimeter) X .5 CM abrasion to left forearm. Area cleansed and dressed per MD (Medical Doctor) orders. No psychological changes noted to either (R2 or R3). Investigation initiated. Resident interviews were obtained. There were no witnesses to altercation. Summary and Analysis of the Evidence: Staff and residents both reported residents were in room with no witnesses's present when altercation occurred. (R2) became agitated related to (R3) making noises and struck (R3) in left forearm and shoulder. Conclusion and Action Taken: (R2) was moved to another room. No psychological changes were noted to either (R2 or R3). SSD (Social Services Director) or designee will follow up with (R2 and R3) for any psychological needs that arise. Care Plans are reviewed and updated as necessary for both (R2 and R3). Both (R2 and R3) relate that they feel safe in their environment on 3/10/25. On 3/24/2025 at 9:58 A.M., R2 states (R3) was always bugging me. (R3) would make this loud moaning sounds on purpose. (R3) knew it bugged me. I had told (R3) to knock it off and (R3) wouldn't listen. I took my crutches and hit (R3) in the head with it. (R3) still wouldn't stop and I went to hit him again and he put his arm up to block me and I cut his arm with it. I would do it again if (R3) kept bugging me. They came in and moved me to another room. I was by myself for awhile, but they moved some guy in with me. I haven't had any problems with him yet. On 3/27/2025 at 2:30 P.M., V1/Administrator verified the resident to resident abuse between R2 and R3.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) resc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) rescreen after the emergence of a newly diagnosed severe mental illness for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for PASARR screening, in the sample of 7. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review, dated (reviewed) 3/2024 directs staff, Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASARR Level 1 screen for those individuals identified per the Level 11 screen requiring specialized services. The facility will report any changes identified via the screen to the state mental health authority or the state intellectual disability authority promptly. The facility will refer all level 11 residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for a level 11 review upon a significant change in status assessment to the State PASARR representative. R2's most current PASARR screen, dated 5/4/2024 documents, The Level 1 screen indicates that a PASARR disability is not present present because of the following reasons: There is no evidence of a PASARR condition of an intellectual/development disability or a serious behavioral health condition. If changes occur or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted. R2's facility Face Sheet documents that R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Right Above the Knee Amputation, Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Alcohol Abuse. R2's Psychiatric Note, dated 3/10/25 documents, Since last visit, an empty bottle of tequila was found in patient's room and he has tried to attack another resident with a stick. History Of Present Illness: (R2) is a [AGE] years old male patient with a recorded history of Major depressive disorder and Alcohol abuse. Per social work, (R2) has been responding to internal stimuli for the past two months. Last month, this escalated to verbal outbursts. Also since last visit, an empty bottle of tequila was found in his room and (R2) has tried to attack another resident with a stick. Interviewed in his room, sitting in a chair. (R2) is oriented to person, place, time and situation. His mood is anxious, irritable and is cooperative. Minimizes symptoms, his insight and judgment are poor. States he is only reacting to people trying to test him. Denies drinking alcohol over the past year. Patient is an unreliable historian. Sleep patterns remain unaffected, and there have been no significant changes in appetite. No other manic symptoms are observed or reported. No reports of Auditory Hallucinations, Visual Hallucinations, Suicidal Ideation's or Homicidal Ideation's, no paranoid thought were observed or noted on this visit. No other side effects from medication reported. Plan to decrease Duloxetine (Anti depressant) to 60 MG (Milligrams) daily due to behavior change since adjustment.Will start Quetiapine (Anti psychotic)50 mg twice daily due to increasing psychotic symptoms. Diagnosis: Severe recurrent major depression with psychotic features. On 3/27/2025 at 10:35 A.M., V1/Administrator confirmed no updated PASARR screen had been performed for R2 after the emergence of a documented serious mental illness diagnosis on 3/10/2025.
Feb 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a high risk resident from physical abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include:...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a high risk resident from physical abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy, revised 09/2024, documents that the facility affirms the right of our resident it be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation, of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. A resident to resident altercation should be reviewed as potential situation of abuse. Resident to resident altercations that include any willful action that results in physical injury, mental anguish or pain must be reported in accordance with regulations. R1's electronic medical record documents the following diagnosis: bipolar, anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, traumatic brain injury, insomnia, and pseudobulbar affect. R1's Abuse/Neglect Screening, dated 1/27/25, documents a score of 6, indicating R1 is a high risk for abuse. R1's current care plan documents that R1 is at high risk for abuse/neglect as noted from the Abuse Screening. R1's goal is to be free from abuse/neglect through the next review. R1's abuse intervention documents to provide a safe and secure environment. R2's current electronic medical record documents the following diagnosis: traumatic brain injury, paranoid personality, moderate intellectual disabilities, major depression, insomnia, alcohol abuse, and bipolar personality. R1's Progress Notes, dated 1/10/25, documents that R1 was sitting at a table in the dining room, when R2 approached R1 and made contact with his open hand to R1's face. R1 and R2 were separated and assessed. Neither R1 nor R2 had any injuries. R2's Progress Notes, dated 1/10/25, documents that R2 approached R1 during a verbal altercation and made contact with R1's hand to R2's face. R1 told R2 I bet you won't hit me. R2 then made contact with R1's face. Both parties were immediately separated and assessed. No injuries were noted. All parties were notified of the incident and interventions were put into place. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report, dated 1/17/25, documents that on 1/10/25 there was a resident to resident altercation between R1 and R2. Both residents were immediately separated and assessed. There were no injuries noted. All the required parties were notified of the incident and care plans were updated. Abuse is not substantiated, no intent to harm. On 2/19/25 at 10:00am, V1, Administrator, stated that R2 can be impulsive at times, but is easily redirected. On 2/19/25 at 11:35am, V6, Social Service Director, stated that she was doing one on ones with R2 to see if there was anything else going on, but he said it just happened. V6 stated that R1 and R2 were sitting at the table in the dining room, when R1 said I bet you won't hit me. V6 stated that R2 just slapped R1 in the face. V6 stated that both R1 and R2 have traumatic brain injuries and can be impulsive at times. On 2/28/25 at 1:00pm, V16, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated that on 1/10/25, R1 and R2 were at separate tables in the main dining room. V16 stated that R2 rolled up to R1, said B***h, then punched her with a closed fist in the face. V16 stated that R2 was immediately taken out of the dining room. On 2/28/25 at 1:20pm, V17, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated that on 1/10/25, R1 had her back turned to R2, not saying anything. V17 stated that R2 rolled over to R1 and punched her on the left side of her face. V17 stated that both residents were separated. V17 stated that R2 has staff with him when he is out of his room.
Dec 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of employee to resident sexual abuse to the State Agency and to Law Enforcement of one resident (R1) of three residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of employee to resident sexual abuse to the State Agency and to Law Enforcement of one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 09/2024 documents: The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Filing accurate and timely investigative reports. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Sexual Abuse includes, but is not limited to: Unwanted intimate touching of any kind especially of breasts or perineal area.\ Generally, sexual contact is nonconsensual if the resident either: Lacks ability to consent and/or does not want the contact to occur. Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations: Upon learning of the report, the administrator or a designee shall initiate an incident investigation. Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily harm or injury will be reported to the State Agency immediately, but not more than two hours after the allegation of abuse. External Reporting/Initial Reporting of Allegations: When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has occurred, the resident's representative and State Agency's Regional Office shall be informed by telephone or fax. Public Health shall be informed that an occurrence of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has been reported and is being investigated. Informing Law Enforcement: The facility shall also contact local law enforcement authorities in the following situations: Sexual Abuse of a resident by a staff member, another resident, or visitor. The term immediately as it is used in this policy in relation to reporting abuse, neglect exploitation, mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, and suspicion of a crime shall be defined as, following management of the immediate risk to the resident or resident involved or not later than two hours after forming the suspicion, if the events that cause the suspicion result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause suspicion do not result in serious bodily injury. On 12/17/24 at R1 stated V21, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) came into my room wanting to do a room search for missing hand sanitizer. R1 stated he told V21 that he had to go to the bathroom and went into the bathroom, pulled his pants down to his knees and sat on the toilet. R1 stated V21 came into the bathroom and patted down his pants while he was sitting on the toilet and inappropriately touched his groin area. R1 stated I was telling her to get out. I reported it to the Ombudsman and to the State. All the nurses know what happened. Progress Note dated 12/14/24 at 4:57pm indicates V21, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) found the hand sanitizer missing from the medication cart. Note indicates R1 has a history of ingesting hand sanitizer. Note indicates (V21) entered (R1) room to see if the hand sanitizer was in there and it wasn't. (R1) denied having the hand sanitizer and the room was searched. Hand sanitizer was not found. On 12/19/24 at 3:20pm V2, DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed the following written statements were obtained and submitted to her on 12/14/24 following the above incident: V21, Agency LPN This nurse left the dining area and came back to my medication cart and noticed the hand sanitizer was missing off the cart. This nurse went to (R1) bedroom and asked (R1) if he had seen the hand sanitizer. (R1) stated 'No, you can search my room.' (R1) went into the restroom. This nurse and (V19, CNA) searched the room. Hand sanitizer was not found. V18, CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) 12/14/24 at 5pm I asked (R1) why he wasn't coming to out to the evening meal and (R1) stated 'Because the nurse (V21) grabbed my shit.' Later I overheard (R1) talking to (V20, Family) who was telling (R1) that (V21) would be suspended. V19, CNA indicated (V21, Nurse) told me that the sanitizer was missing off her cart. (R1) refused to let (V21) search his room then ran into the bathroom so (V21) and I searched (R1's) room and then (V21) knocked and entered (R1's) bathroom and lightly patted (R1's) pants pockets. At no time was (R1) unclothed nor were any other parts touched. On 12/18/24 at 2:30pm V18, CNA stated I went to ask (R1) if he was coming to dinner, his room smelled very strongly of hand sanitizer. (R1) said he used the sanitizer on the nurses' cart. I was in the hallway when (V21, LPN) and (V19, CNA) went into search (R1) room. Afterwards (R1) was on the phone with (V20, Family). (R1) was upset and said (V21, LPN) grabbed him in his private area. I thought (V19 and V21) had it under control so I didn't report it to anyone else. On 12/18/24 at 1:15pm V20, Family stated that R1 called her the evening of 12/14/24 to report that he had been touched inappropriately during a search for hand sanitizer. V20 stated she then contacted V17, Admissions Liaison and reported the incident to V17. V20 stated she received a phone text at 7:02pm indicating that V21, LPN had been walked out of the facility by V2, DON. On 12/18/24 at 1:45pm V17, Admissions Liaison stated that on 12/14/24 she received a phone call from V20, Family, who was upset and reported that a nurse (V21) had burst into the bathroom when R1 was sitting on the toilet, searched his pants and also searched under (R1's) scrotum. V17 stated she told V20 to call the State Agency and report the incident. V17 stated I then immediately called and reported what I'd been told to (V1, Interim Administrator). (V1) told me (V2, DON) was coming to the facility to remove the employee (V21). I did specifically tell (V1) that (R1) said (V21) inappropriately touched (R1's) genitals. I felt that was unacceptable. On 12/18/24 at 1:25pm V6, Social Service Director stated she received a call from V9, Ombudsman - between 8 and 830am on 12/17/24 to report R1's allegation against V21, LPN that occurred on 12/14/24. V6 stated she then immediately called V1 and then called V2, DON. On 12/19/24 at 11:30am V9, Ombudsman confirmed reporting R1's allegation of being inappropriately touched by V21 to V6 on the morning of 12/17/24. ON 12/18/24 at 2:30pm V2, DON stated she received a call the night of 12/14/24 from V1, Administrator and was told to get statements related to an incident that occurred with R1 and to report back to V1. V2 stated she went to talk to R1 about ingesting the hand sanitizer to determine how much he ingested in order to call Poison Control. V2 stated she was focused on the medical aspect of ingesting hand sanitizer at the time. V2 stated she called V1 back and V1 told me it was a behavioral issue. V2 stated I thought since none of the statements indicated inappropriate touching, it was just behavioral. On 12/17/24 and on 12/19/24 V1, Interim Administrator stated she initially completed a grievance and not an actual reported allegation of sexual abuse because she wasn't aware of R1's allegations of abuse until reported by a State Surveyor at approximately 1:45pm on 12/17/24. V1 did confirm receiving a phone call from V17 on 12/14/24 and did receive a report on V2's interviews with staff on 12/14/24. Preliminary 24-hour Abuse Investigation Report indicates: The facility has received a report of Sexual Abuse of a resident by an employee. The Report identifies R1 as the resident allegedly abused. On 12/19/24 at 1:44pm The State Regional Office confirmed receipt of the facilities/R1's Initial Abuse Investigation Report on 12/17/24 at 2pm. Incident/Sexual Abuse allegation was made R1 at approximately 5pm on 12/14/24. This allegation was reported to V18, CNA and V17, Admissions Liaison on 12/14/24. V17 stated that she informed V1, Interim Administrator of the nature of the allegation on 12/14/24. Report to the State Regional Office was not made until 12/17/24 at 2pm. No evidence was provided indicating Law Enforcement was notified.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (R1) after an allegation of employee to resident sexual abuse was reported for three residents reviewed for abuse. Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (R1) after an allegation of employee to resident sexual abuse was reported for three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 09/2024 documents: The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Immediately protecting residents involved in identified reports of possible abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and misappropriation of property. Protection of Residents: The facility will take steps to prevent potential abuse while the investigation is underway. Employees of the facility who have been accused of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resdient property will be removed from resdient contact immediately. The employee shall not be permitted to return to work until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the administrator and it is determined that any allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resdient property is unsubstantiated. On 12/17/24 at R1 stated V21, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) came into his room wanting to do a room search for missing hand sanitizer (12/14/24). R1 stated he told V21 that he had to go to the bathroom and went into the bathroom, pulled his pants down to his knees and sat on the toilet. R1 stated V21 came into the bathroom and patted down his pants while he was sitting on the toilet and inappropriately touched his groin area. R1 stated I was telling her to get out. I reported it to the Ombudsman and to the State. All the nurses know what happened. R1 stated V21 was walked out of the facility that night, but then came back and was his nurse the next day. Progress Note dated 12/14/24 at 4:57pm indicates V21, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) found the hand sanitizer missing from the medication cart. Note indicates R1 has a history of ingesting hand sanitizer. Note indicates (V21) entered (R1) room to see if the hand sanitizer was in there and it wasn't. (R1) denied having the hand sanitizer and the room was searched. Hand sanitizer was not found. On 12/18/24 at 2:30pm V18, CNA stated I went to ask (R1) if he was coming to dinner, his room smelled very strongly of hand sanitizer. (R1) said he used the sanitizer on the nurses cart. I was in the hallway when (V21, LPN) and (V19, CNA) went into search (R1) room. Afterwards (R1) was on the phone with (V20, Family). (R1) was upset and said (V21, LPN) grabbed him in his private area. On 12/18/24 at 1:15pm V20, Family stated that R1 called her the evening of 12/14/24 to report that he had been touched inappropriately during a search for hand sanitizer. V20 stated she then contacted V17, Admissions Liaison and reported the incident to V17. V20 stated she received a phone text at 7:02pm indicating that V21, LPN had been walked out of the facility by V2, DON. On 12/18/24 at 1:45pm V17, Admissions Liaison stated that on 12/14/24 she received a phone call from V20, Family, who was upset and reported that a nurse (V21) had burst into the bathroom when R1 was sitting on the toilet, searched his pants and also searched under (R1's) scrotum. V17 stated she told V20 to call the State Agency and report the incident. V17 stated I then immediately called and reported what I'd been told to (V1, Interim Administrator). (V1) told me (V2,DON) was coming to the facility to remove the employee (V21). I did specifically tell (V1) that (R1) said (V21) inappropriately touched (R1's) genitals. I felt that was unacceptable. On 12/18/24 at 2:30pm V2, DON stated she received a call the night of 12/14/24 from V1, Administrator and was told to get statements related to an incident that occurred with R1 and to report back to V1. V2 stated that she did ensure V21 left the facility after the incident. V2 stated nurses are supposed to keep hand sanitizer locked up on the unit. V2 stated that V21 did return to work at the facility the following day (12/15/24) and was R1's assigned nurse (on 12/15/24). V2 stated that was a scheduling mistake and shouldn't have been allowed to return. V2 stated V21 is no longer allowed to work at the facility. Time/Shift Details Report dated 12/14/24 indicates V21 started work on that date at 6am and left the facility at 6:12pm. Time/Shift Details Report dated 12/15/24 indicates V21 started work on that date at 5:59am and left the facility at 6:10pm. Incident/Sexual Abuse allegation was made by R1 at approximately 5pm on 12/14/24. This allegation was reported to V18, CNA and V17, Admissions Liaison on 12/14/24. V17 stated that she informed V1, Interim Administrator of the nature of the allegation on 12/14/24. V21 was escorted out of the facility on 12/14/24, however was allowed to return and was R1's assigned nurse on 12/15/24.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0567 (Tag F0567)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure funds were available for 100 of 100 residents (R2, R4, R5, R7-R10, R12-R104) reviewed for personal funds in a sample of 104. Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure funds were available for 100 of 100 residents (R2, R4, R5, R7-R10, R12-R104) reviewed for personal funds in a sample of 104. Findings include: The facility's Resident Funds Policy, dated 3/2024, documents Resident Funds- Guidelines: This facility manages the personal funds of residents when such request is made by the resident. Access to Personal Funds: Residents should have access to petty cash on an ongoing basis and be able to arrange for access to larger funds. Although the facility need not maintain 100.00 dollars (50.00 dollars for Medicaid residents) per resident on its premises, it is expected to maintain petty cash on hand to honor resident requests. Banking hours shall be posted in a visible area and indicate where inquiries should be directed during the posted hours. Resident request for access to their funds should be honored by facility staff as soon as possible but not later than: The same day for amounts less than 100.00 dollars (50.00 dollars for Medicaid residents); Three banking days for amounts of 100.00 dollars (50.00 dollars for Medicaid residents) or more. A facility Email dated 11/25/24 and sent by V7/Regional Financial Coordinator to V8/Vice President of Accounts Receivable, documents Good afternoon, can we (the facility) request for the cash box to be increase to 2000.00 dollars. We have a lot of residents here that take out a lot of money and go out shopping. Please advise. On 12/17/24 at 1:00PM V7 was unable to provide a response from V8 to the email that was sent. On 12/17/24 at 10:30 AM R10 was lying in his bed in his room. R10 stated, I am the resident council president. Everyone, including myself, is complaining about the facility not giving us our money when we ask. The banking hours at the facility used to be every Tuesday and Thursday. Now I only can only ask once a week, and they only are giving me and other residents 10 dollars at a time. V4/Business Office Manager told me that they don't have enough money in (the facility's) account to give us any more than that since the facility changed ownership on November 1st, 2024. One week, V4/Business Office Manager only gave us four dollars because they didn't have enough money. I would like to buy gifts for Christmas for people and can't because I can't access all my money. They (the facility) don't even go shopping for us with our money now, because they (the facility) don't have enough in the account. It's very upsetting. On 12/17/24 at 10:40 AM R4 was sitting in a recliner across from the nurse's station. R4 stated, They (the facility) keeps holding our money and stating that they don't have that money to give us. It's my money, I should be able to ask for it. I haven't been able to get the money I have requested since November 1st, 2024. They changed the banking hours, so I don't even know when I can request money. They (the facility) only have given me ten dollars per week or sometimes four dollars. I wanted to buy a Christmas present for my husband, and I am upset I haven't been able to do so because I can't have my money. No one gives me an explanation why I cannot have access to my own money, just that they (the facility) don't have it. On 12/17/24 at 10:45 AM R5 was standing in the hallway with his wheeled walker. R5 stated, I am supposed to receive 60 dollars per month. The facility's banking used to be twice a week on Tuesday and Thursdays. Now it's only once a week and it's when they come tell me they have money but can only give me ten dollars. V3/Business Office Manager tells me not to worry that the money is in our account that is ours, but they just can't give it to us. This has been going on for a month and a half and I would like to have money to buy soda, snacks, and other things I need. I am really upset about not getting my own money. On 12/17/24 at 10:47 AM R9 was sitting in the dining room. R9 stated she has not had access to her money for the past month or so. R9 stated she would like to have her money to buy pop. On 12/17/24 at 10:48 AM R9 stated, I didn't get my bank money as scheduled. It upsets me because my family is coming for a nice holiday meal tomorrow and I couldn't buy any gifts with my money. 12/17/24 at 11:00 AM R3 stated that her guardian manages her finances but that she has friends at the facility who are not getting their money when requested. R3 stated a few weeks ago, they would only be allowed to receive two dollars, then five dollars and last week they were permitted to withdraw ten dollars. R3 stated her friends have been upset because they would like to buy personal items and Christmas gifts but are not able to. On 12/17/24 at 11:16 AM R6 stated he receives 60 dollars a month which is held in a trust by the facility. R6 stated they used to be able to bank twice weekly, but recently, it has only been less. R6 stated banking is sometimes once a week because they don't have enough money and the most they can receive is ten dollars. 12/17/24 at 11:18 AM R7 stated, This new company doesn't have money from the old company. (This new company) hasn't got it together yet. On 12/17/24 at 11:20 AM V6/Social Service Director stated, I was responsible for getting shopping lists from the resident's and going shopping for them. I have not been able to go shopping for any residents since the facility ownership change on November 1st, 2024, because we (the facility) do not have enough money in the petty cash fund to go shopping for the residents. Tons of resident's have asked me to go shopping and I told them I cannot go shopping for them at this time and I direct them to the Business Office. On 12/17/24 at 11:30 AM V4/BOM (Business Office Manager) stated, The facility changed ownership on November 1st, 2024. V4 stated the last company took all the resident funds from the cash box on October 28th, 2024, leaving us with no funds for the residents. It took two weeks for us (the facility) to receive a check for the resident's trust fund. The first check was in the amount of 500 dollars, which we needed 1500 dollars to 2000 dollars for the size of this facility and all the resident's funds we manage. If a resident asks for 30 dollars, we are not allowed to give it to them because we (the facility) do not have the funds. We (the facility) were only able to give four dollars to the residents one week, and the past two weeks we were able to give ten dollars each week. We (the facility) still do not have enough money in the trust fund account to give the residents any money today either. We (the facility) used to do banking hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays, now its whenever we receive a check for the trust fund account which has only been once a week. Last week we (the facility) did bank on Friday. I have not been told why we are unable to get more money for the trust fund account. On 12/17/24 at 11:40 AM V3/BOM stated, We (the facility) did bank with the residents on Tuesday's and Thursday's. That is no longer happening since November 1st, 2024, when the facility changed ownership. We only have been doing banking one time a week and it depends on the day and when we receive the check. We have not had enough funds to give the resident's the money they request so we limited giving them ten dollars per week. I know one week we were only able to give the resident's four dollars. On 12/17/24 at 12:05 PM V1/Administrator stated, The disbursement of cash to the resident's changes since our new company took over and the new company didn't account for the 130 resident that reside at the facility. We are still trying to get it all straightened out.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor food temperatures to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This failure has the potential to affect all re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor food temperatures to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that reside at the facility. Findings include: A facility policy last revised 09/2023 and titled Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service documents, Food temperatures will be monitored to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures. Procedure: 1. Prior to serving a meal, food temperatures will be taken and and documented for all hot and cold foods to ensure proper serving temperatures. Any food item not found at the correct holding/serving temperature will not be served but will undergo the appropriate corrective action listed below. 2 The temperature for each food item will be recorded on the Food Temperature Log. Foods that required a a corrective action (such as reheating) will have the new temperature recorded with a notation of the corrective action intervention. Resident Council Meeting notes dated November 21, 2024, document, The food is way better and served hot, but some of the residents said food was still not hot when they received it. Resident Council Meeting notes dated October 17, 2024, document, Chicken wrap needs to be warm and soup needs to be warmer. Resident Council Meeting notes dated September 19, 2024, document, Cold food getting served. Facility Food temperature logs were not completed for the evening meal for December 4, 2024, through December 28, 2024. Food temperature log holding temperatures were not documented on any day or meal between 11/13/24 and 12/18/24 for B and C Halls. On 12/17/24 at 11:00 AM R3 stated, The food is terrible and cold. When I asked the staff to reheat it, they refused and said it had to be eaten that way because they wouldn't warm it while they were passing trays. On 12/17/24 at 12:00 PM, R5 had just had a tray served. V10, Assistant Dietary Manager, used a thermometer to check the temperature of R5's food items. R5's mashed potatoes registered 108 degrees Fahrenheit and carrots at 110 degrees Fahrenheit. R5 stated, This is actually warm, it is usually cold, especially the evening meal. On 12/18/24 at 12:19 PM V12/Dietary Manager stated that she obtains food temperatures on all food before it goes out to the residents but The problem that doesn't get addressed is CNAs take some time to come to serve the trays. On 12/18/24 at 1:30 PM V12 stated there is a problem with staff obtaining temperatures, but not documenting. V12 confirmed there are several days with no documentation. V12 further stated that on the evening shift, CNAs are busy on the halls and food is often delayed in being served, especially on the weekends, which is why the food is served cold. A facility roster dated 12/17/24 document there are 132 residents living in the facility. All residents receive meal trays.
Nov 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 of 4 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. The findings include: R9's admission record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, other obesity due to excessive calories and polycystic ovarian syndrome. Her 9/2/24 quarterly assessment documents she is cognitively intact with verbal behaviors and other behaviors not directed at others to include verbal yelling out. On 11/2/24 at 11:10 AM, R9 stated she had concerns with her treatment from a night shift CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), V15. R9 said a couple days ago she started her period for the first time in awhile so she was wearing her underwear to bed. R9 said she put on her call light during the night to use the bedpan, and V15 entered her room to assist her. She said when V15 asked her why she was wearing underwear, she told her about being on her period. R9 said V15 then threw back the covers and said she does not get paid enough to deal with cleaning up someone else's blood. She has also heard the staff calling her big [NAME], and fat. She said V15 makes her feel very insecure. R9 appeared to be young, morbidly obese, alert and oriented. She was not able to propel her wheelchair, and required staff assistance for mobility. On 11/2/24 at 12:24 PM V11 and V12 CNA's said R9 has complained to staff about verbal abuse but nothing specific, just that it involved V15. V12 said R9 reported to her V15 ignores her call light, and not change her, and calls her fat. V11 and V12 said they reported the incidents to V10 (CNA Supervisor) but it does not seem to be addressed. On 11/2/24 at 1:00 PM, V10 (CNA supervisor) said she had not received any reports of verbal abuse towards R9. She had no reports of the previous incident, or the staff calling R9 fat. V10 said if it had been reported to her, she would notify the administrator. She said calling a resident fat would be considered abuse. On 11/2/24 at 1:40 PM, V14 CNA said she works the night shift and has heard R9 complain about V15, and how she downgrades her and makes her feel less of a person. She said R9 is a large person and has bed sores. V14 said she has been walking through the unit and overheard staff being short with R9. On 11/2/24 at 1:16 PM, V1 Administrator said R9 had not reported any incidents of abuse to her. Staff should be re-directing R9 and be professional and not engage with any arguments. V1 said it would be considered abuse if an aide called a resident fat, and made comments to a resident about not getting paid enough to clean them up. On 11/2/24 at 1:30 PM, attempts were made to contact V15, without any response. The facility's 10/2022 policy for Abuse prevention and reporting documents this facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation. Verbal abuse may be considered to be a type of mental abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds to resident within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of mental and verbal abuse include, but are not limed to: mocking, insulting, ridiculing.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were immediately reported to the adminis...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were immediately reported to the administrator for 1 of 4 residents (R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. The findings include: R9's admission record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, other obesity due to excessive calories and polycystic ovarian syndrome. Her 9/2/24 quarterly assessment documents she is cognitively intact with verbal behaviors and other behaviors not directed at others to include verbal yelling out. On 11/2/24 at 11:10 AM, R9 stated she had concerns with her treatment from a night shift CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), V15. R9 said a couple days ago she started her period for the first time in awhile so she was wearing her underwear to bed. R9 said she put on her call light during the night to use the bedpan, and V15 entered her room to assist her. She said when V15 asked her why she was wearing underwear, she told her about being on her period. R9 said V15 then threw back the covers and said she does not get paid enough to deal with cleaning up someone else's blood. She has also heard the staff calling her big [NAME], and fat. She said V15 makes her feel very insecure. R9 said she was told to fill out a grievance form if she had any issues, but then it seems nothing gets done and the staff find out about the grievance and then has to deal with the drama they cause. R9 said due to the grievances some staff will not even go into her room, or answer her call light. On 11/2/24 at 12:24 PM V11 and V12 CNA's said R9 has complained to staff about verbal abuse but nothing specific, just that it involved V15. V12 said R9 reported to her V15 ignores her call light, and not change her, and call her fat. V11 and V12 said they reported the incidents to V10 (CNA Supervisor) but it does not seem to be addressed. On 11/2/24 at 1:00 PM, V10 (CNA supervisor) said she had not received any reports of verbal abuse towards R9. She had no reports of the previous incident, or the staff calling R9 fat. V10 said if it had been reported to her, she would notify the administrator due to being abusive behavior. On 11/2/24 at 1:40 PM, V14 CNA said she works the night shift and has heard R9 complain about V15, and how she downgrades her and makes her feel less of a person. She said R9 is a large person and has bed sores. She has been walking through the unit and overheard staff being short with R9. V14 said she did not recall reporting any of these concerns to the administrator. She said a lot of staff just seem to take it with a grain of salt, and do not do anything about the staff behavior towards R9. On 11/2/24 at 1:16 PM, V1 Administrator said R9 had not reported any incidents of abuse to her. Staff should be re-directing R9 and be professional and not engage with any arguments. V1 said it would be considered abuse if an aide called a resident fat, and made comments to a resident about not getting paid enough to clean them up. V1 said the previous administrator would advise R9 to fill out a grievance form if she had complaints about her care or staff. V1 said the issues would be addressed whenever she would get to the grievance. The facility's 10/2022 policy for Abuse prevention and reporting documents this facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation. Verbal abuse may be considered to be a type of mental abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds to resident within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of mental and verbal abuse include, but are not limed to: mocking, insulting, ridiculing. Internal reporting requirements and identification of allegations: Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator.
Sept 2024 13 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred with a full m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred with a full mechanical lift for one of four residents (R84) reviewed for falls in a sample of 45 residents This failure resulted in R84 being sent to the hospital, suffered a back contusion which required medication for back pain management and ongoing psychosocial fear of being transferred with a mechanical lift. Findings include: The Limited Resident Lift Program and Equipment Use Training Requirements, not dated, stated all direct care staff responsible for resident handling/mechanical lift equipment will be trained by the Director of Nursing or specified facility representative initially upon orientation for all new employees and annually thereafter. Staff must be able to demonstrate proficiency with all types of lifts in the facility. A competency checklist for each type of lift will be completed during training and placed in the employee file. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R84's diagnoses as Bipolar Disorder, Deep Vein Thrombosis Upper Extremity, Neurogenic Bladder, Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder, Depression and Obesity (423 pounds on 4/12/24). The MDS documented R84 is prescribed the following classes of medications: antidepressant, anticoagulant (blood thinners), psychotropic (mind-altering drugs that change brain function and can alter a person's mood, perception, consciousness, cognition, or behavior), hypnotics (promotes sleep) and anti-anxiety. The Careplan initiated on 9/22/23 stated R84 has limited mobility related to morbid obesity, is dependent upon staff to perform activities of daily living. Mostly requires mechanical lift for transfers, Assist to Transfer R84 using mechanical lift and two-three staff members. Ensure lift sheet is intact and correct size; is totally dependent on staff for toilet use; and on 4/16/24, R84 to be assessed for new mechanical lift sling due to body habitus. The Nurse's Progress Note dated 4/15/24 stated R84 appeared to have experienced an alleged (un)intentional change of plane (fall) on 4/15/24 at 1:35 PM. R84 appeared to have been hooked up to a mechanical lift to be transferred to bed by V15 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA). Back/flank pain was rated as a five (pain scale, 0-no pain, 10-worst pain), physician was notified and orders to transfer R84 to hospital for evaluation were received. R84 refused the hospital transfer at that time. The note stated staff were re-educated on the importance of proper mechanical lift safety. The Emergency Department (ED) Physician's Note, dated 4/15/24 at 9:06 PM, stated R84 presented to the ED with a chief complaint of a Back Injury. The note documented R84 fell from a mechanical lift earlier in the day and hit her lower back on a bar, was given Tylenol (for pain) but the non-radiating back pain persisted. The note documented that the back x-rays were negative, the final clinical impression was a Contusion of back, unspecified laterally and was discharged back to the Facility with pain medication. The Incident Investigation Form dated 4/15/24 authored by V15, CNA documented R84 requested to use the restroom, was hooked up to the mechanical lift, V15 told R84 they needed to wait for assistance although R84 had to use the restroom really bad and then slipped out of mechanical lift sling. On 9/22/24 at 11:45 AM, R84 stated V15 lifted R84 with a mechanical lift and dropped R84 while transferring to the toilet due to transferring with only having one staff member. R84 stated V15 was fired but the facility later re-hired V15. R84 said she doesn't currently feel safe because the mechanical lift is old and the newer lift is broken. R84 stated the legs don't open all the way, the legs get stuck under the bed and the facility only has a few extra-large slings so, the facility does not always use the right size of sling. On 9/24/24 at 2:30 PM, V15 stated there were no problems with R84's sling. There should always be two staff members present and assisting with a mechanical lift. On 4/15/24, there were three CNAs assigned to the unit but one had to go on an appointment with a resident and couldn't find anyone else to help. R84 was persistent she had to go potty. V15 stated the facility does run out of extra-large slings sometimes. V15's Personnel File documented V15 was initially hired on 8/4/2016 as a Unit Aide. The Unit Aide Job summary was signed by V15 on 8/16/24 and the documented responsibilities were to execute procedures consistent with interdisciplinary care plan, Procedure Manuals and that are within the scope of the role of the Unit Aide. The Safe Working and Training orientation packet dated 8/4/16 lacked a supervisor's signature for proof of V15's completion of training for a mechanical lift. V15's Notice of Termination, dated 4/17/24, stated R84's fall was from V15 transferring R84 with a mechanical lift without the assist of two staff members which caused R84's fall. The file documented V15 was re-hired on 5/30/24. The Certified Nurse Aide In-Service Record documented V15 received mechanical lift training on 2/3/22 and 5/31/24. The Manufacturer's Guidelines documented the Medium, Large and Extra-Large Slings have a weight capacity of 450 pounds. Although (the lift company) recommends that two assistants be used for all lifting preparation, transferring from and transferring to procedures, our equipment will permit proper operation by one assistant. The use of one assistant is based on the evaluation of the health care professional for each individual case. It is important to inspect all stressed parts, such as slings, spreader bar and any pivot for slings for signs of cracking, fraying, deformation or deterioration. Replace any defective parts immediately and ensure that the lift is not used until repairs are made. The sling should be regularly washed in water, temperature not to exceed 180°F (82°C) and a biocidal (anti-biological) solution.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for one of four residents (R232) reviewed for medication administration, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE:...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for one of four residents (R232) reviewed for medication administration, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 11/18/17, documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an authorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container, verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. The facility's Adverse Drug Reactions and Medication Discrepancy policy, dated 11/6/18, documents, It is the policy of the facility that adverse drug reactions and drug errors are to be reported to the resident's physician, documented in the nursing notes and documented in the Adverse Drug Reaction or Medication Discrepancy Report. These reports are to be completed in coordination with the Director of Nursing and filed with the Administrator and reviewed by the Medical Director and Consult Pharmacist. This policy also documents A medication discrepancy/error has been made when one of the following occurs: Wrong medication administered. Wrong dose administered. Medication administered by wrong route. Medication administered to wrong resident. Medication administered at wrong time. Medication not administered. A medication discrepancy report shall be completed for any of the above occurrences. R232's (hospital) After Visit Summary, dated 9/18/24 includes the following medications: Albuterol (Bronchodilator) Inhaler 90 MCG (Micrograms)/Actuation Take two puffs inhaled by mouth every six hours as needed for Shortness of Breath; Amlodipine (Calcium Channel Blocker) 5 MG (Milligrams) by mouth once daily for Hypertension; Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (Human Immunodeficiency Antiviral) 200/300 MG one tablet daily for HIV Infection; Fluticasone Propionate (Synthetic Glucocorticoid) 220 MCG/Actuation Inhaler two puffs inhaled every morning and evening for Allergies; and Folic Acid (Daily Supplementation) 1 MG one tablet daily. R232's current Medication Administration Record, dated September 18, 2024 through September 24, 2024 includes no nursing documentation that R232's prescribed Albuterol, Amlodipine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir, Fluticasone Propionate or Folic Acid were added to R232's Medication Administration Record or administered from 9/18/24 through 9/24/24. On 9/24/24 at 2:30 P.M., V17/Licensed Practical Nurse stated, I was the nurse that admitted (R232) on 9/18/24. (R232) came with paper prescriptions and pill bottles, that's what I used to do his med (medication) (sign out) sheet. On 9/24/24 at 4:38 P.M., V4/Assistant Director of Nurses stated, Our facility process is to use the hospital transfer sheet to transcribe the (physician ordered) medications to the medication administration record. (V17/LPN) didn't follow our policy when he admitted (R232). At that time, V4/Assistant Director of Nurses confirmed that R232 did not receive the prescribed Albuterol, Amlodipine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir, Fluticasone Propionate or Folic Acid on 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24, 9/23/24 or 9/24/24.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R92's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents R92 is a Full Code. R92's Physician Order Sheet, dated [DATE], documents R92 is a Fu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R92's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents R92 is a Full Code. R92's Physician Order Sheet, dated [DATE], documents R92 is a Full Code. R92's Illinois Department of Public Health Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form, dated [DATE], and signed by R92, V18/Social Services, and V19/Medical Director, documents R92 is a DNR (Do No Resuscitate) with comfort-focused treatment only. On [DATE] at 10:00 AM V12/Care Plan Coordinator and V18/Social Services verified that R42 and R92's Care Plan, Physician Orders do not match R42 and R92's POLST form and they should. Based on Record Review and Interview, the facility failed to ensure residents electronic medical records and care plans matched their Physician's Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) code status for two of 32 residents (R42, R92) reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's Advanced Directive Policy, dated [DATE], documents Policy: The Patient Self Determination Act states that individuals have the right to make their own decisions, and to formulate advance directives to serve as decisions when the individual is incapacitated. It is the policy of this facility to honor resident's wishes as expressed in advanced directives regarding medically indicated treatments whenever possible. The facility shall take all steps necessary to comply with state and federal legislation relating to advanced directives. 4. Any decision made by the resident shall be indicated in the chart in the manner easily understood by all staff. Advanced directives specifying full code/Attempt Resuscitation/CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) or the absence of determination shall be recorded as a Full Code. Those residents indicating Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR) shall be recorded as a DNR. Staff must be aware of any requests for limited Medial Interventions shall be recorded as signifying DNR-Comfort. Code status shall also be recorded on the resident's Physician Order Sheet. 7. It is the Intent of (the facility) to implement the terms of the advanced directive placed in the resident's medical record in accord with appropriate direction of the Power of Attorney and resident's physician. If a resident communicates a revocation of an advance directive to an employee of this facility, that communication, constituting revocation, shall be noted in the resident's medical record, and placed in a central file to avoid any misunderstanding. 1. R42's Physician Orders sheet, dated [DATE], documents R42 has an order to be a Full Code with a start date of [DATE]. R42's Current Care plan, dated [DATE] documents (R42) has designated Advanced Directives: Full Code advanced directives chosen- resident will be resuscitated. Resident does not have legal representation. R42's Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment, dated [DATE] and signed by R42 and V24 (R42's Physician) documents R42 wishes to be a Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) if found with no pulse. On [DATE] at 9:28 AM, V25 (Social Services Director) confirmed Social Services completes Advanced Directives with residents on admission and with changes. V25 stated Nursing does the order and updates the care plans. The electronic chart should match the Physician's Order and the Care Plan and they should both match the POLST.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and implement a baseline care plan for one of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and implement a baseline care plan for one of two residents (R232) reviewed for new admission care plans, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Baseline Care Planning, dated (revised) 11/1/2017 directs staff, It is the policy of the (facility) to promptly assess and plan care for each resident admitted to the facility. A plan of care (Baseline Care Plan) shall be developed to include instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care to each resident, based on his/her initial assessment and the professional standards of quality of care, to serve as a functional guide in delivery of care until such time as a comprehensively plan is developed. R232's current Physician Order Sheet, dated September 2024 documents that R232 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Borderline Personality Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Transsexualism. R232's Hospital History and Physical form, dated 9/8/24 documents, (R232) was transferred form an outside ER (Emergency Room) to (hospital) on an involuntary status. (R232) reports having history of borderline personality disorder and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) for the past. (R232) reports episodes of agitation and self-harming behaviors. (R232) acknowledges a frequent history of self-harm, episodes of anger, impulsive behavior and black and white thinking. (R232) has a long history of mental health issues starting in teenage along with substance use. On 9/22/24 at 3:20 P.M., V12/Care Plan Coordinator verified that R232's medical record contained no baseline care plan. At that time V12 stated, We haven't gotten around to it yet.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care for one of four residents (R84) reviewed for Pressure ulcers in the sample...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care for one of four residents (R84) reviewed for Pressure ulcers in the sample of 45. Finding Include: The Facility's Preventative Skin Care Policy, dated 3/16/2023, documents, It is the facility's policy to provide preventative skin care through repositioning and careful washing, rinsing, drying, and observation of the resident's skin condition to keep them clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure ulcers. All residents will be assessed using the Braden Pressure Ulcer Scale at the time of admission and weekly times four then will be reassessed at least quarterly and/or as needed. Any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown shall be turned and repositioned at a minimum of every two hours. Special mattresses and/or chair cushions will be used on any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown. Encourage resident activity, when feasible. Use repositioning techniques and Range of Motion exercises when indicated. The facility's Dressing Care Policy, dated 3/16/2023, documents Procedure: 8. Wash your hands. 10. Remove soiled dressing and place in plastic bag. 13. Wash hands. 14. Open dressing packages. 15. Arrange topical medication or irrigating solution if ordered by the physician. 21. Remove your gloves and discard in plastic bag. 22. Assist the resident to a comfortable position. 23. Discard all equipment in appropriate container. The Contact Precautions policy, dated 12/7/18, documented while providing care for a resident, change gloves after having contact with infected material, remove gloves before leaving the residents environment and wash hands immediately with an antimicrobial agent or a waterless antiseptic agent. After glove removal and handwashing, ensure that hands do not touch potential contaminated environmental surfaces or items in the resident's room to avoid transfer of microorganisms to other residents or environment. The policy stated ensure that clothing does not contact potentially contaminated environmental surfaces to avoid transfer of microorganisms to other residents or environments Resident care equipment should be dedicated to a single resident when possible. If use of common equipment or items is unavoidable, then adequately clean and disinfect them before use for another resident. 2. R84's Physician's Order dated 9/19/24 documented Contact Precautions for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection right lower leg wound. The Careplan, dated 9/19/24, documented R84 was on Contact Isolation Precautions related to MRSA with the following interventions: dedicate the use of noncritical patient care equipment to a single resident to avoid sharing between residents, If use of common equipment is not unavoidable, then adequately clean and disinfect them before use for another resident; Isolation Precautions: Upon gown and glove removal, ensure hands and clothing does not contact potentially contaminated environmental surfaces; Wear gloves and gowns when performing wound care or any care with potential for contact with wound secretions, wash hands with antimicrobial soap or antimicrobial hand sanitizer, remove gloves and gown before leaving room. On 9/23/24 at 10:30 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN/Wound Nurse) cleansed R84 sacral wound using her left hand to separate R84's gluteal folds and right hand to clean wound, removed her right glove, donned a new right glove and applied the outer dressing without conducting hand hygiene. V5 was observed to remove the dirty/old right ankle wound dressing with scissors and place the contaminated scissors on the bedside table. During the dressing change, a tube of antibiotic ointment was squeezed onto V5's left gloved finger (glove used during removal of dirty/contaminated dressing) with her right gloved hand; removed her right-hand glove and reached under the protective gown into her shirt pocket to grab a marker; dated the right ankle dressing; and reinserted the marker into her shirt pocket without conducting hand hygiene. V5 removed gloves on each hand; picked up the antibiotic ointment tube which was used during the dressing change and the scissors used to remove the dirty dressing prior to dressing change without conducting hand hygiene or cleaning/disinfecting the scissors, the antibiotic ointment and/or the contaminated surfaces. On 9/24/24 at 11:20 AM, V4 (Assisting Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist) confirmed R84 had MRSA in the right ankle wound and had an active order for Contact Isolation. V4 stated the contaminated gloves on both hands should have been removed, hand hygiene should have been conducted before and after donning and doffing gloves and equipment should have been disinfected.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow through ROM (Range of Motion) exercises for residents with functional limited range of motion for one of five residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow through ROM (Range of Motion) exercises for residents with functional limited range of motion for one of five residents (R64) reviewed for limited mobility in the sample of 45. Findings include: The Facility's Restorative Nursing Programs policy, dated 4/2006, documents, It is the policy of (the facility) to facilitate the movements of individuals toward independence while helping them satisfy their needs by providing Restorative Nursing Programs. Goal of the Restorative Nursing Program is to assist a resident to reach and maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Implementing the Program, Determine the setting to implement the plan. Consider the length of time, as well as the time of day involved for teaching. On 09/22/24, at 10:15 AM, R64 was in his wheelchair, able to tell me his name and repeat who I was. R64 yells to communicate. R64 cannot move his bilateral legs, and cannot move his arms, his hands were closed and balled up tight unable to release them. R64's Bed Rail/Transfer Bar Evaluation, dated 9/18/2024, documents interventions to provide restorative care to enhance abilities to safely stand and walk, visual and verbal reminders to use the call bell. The evaluation states that R64 is non-ambulatory, displays difficulty moving to a sitting position or maintaining sitting balance on the bed, displays poor bed mobility or difficulty moving/rolling side to side in the bed, has difficulty with balance or poor trunk control, has a Musculoskeletal Disorder that interferes with bed mobility/transfer in/out of bed, and has a Neurological Disorder that interferes with bed mobility/transfer in/out of bed or may cause involuntary movements in bed. R64's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/7/2024, documents that R64 has functional limitation in Range of Motion on both sides of R63's upper extremity's and both sides of R64's lower extremities. R64's Care plan, dated/revised on 9/24/2024, documents, R64 is usually unable to to perform ADLs (activities of daily living) with out weight bearing/hands on assist of one or two Caregivers, R64 is dependent for cares related to a history of Stroke. R64's Order for Restorative Care, dated 2/14/2023, documents Passive ROM Program: Resident has poor motivation for consistent daily exercise. Sedentary Lifestyle, poor motivation for activities involving exercise. At risk for decreased ROM (range of motion). Everyday, Every Shift, Day (6 AM-2PM), Evening (2 PM- 10PM), Night (10 PM- 6 AM). On 9/24/2024 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed that R64 does have a ROM Restorative Program ordered on 2/14/2023, the order was placed as PRN (as needed) instead of Every Day, Every Shift, Day (6 AM- 2 PM, Evening (2 PM- 10 PM), and Night (10 PM- 6 AM). She does not know how the order got put in wrong but stated that she does see how it was incorrectly put in the PCC (Point Click Care) system.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter tubing was off the floor and urinary drainage bag was covered and failed to keep indwell...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter tubing was off the floor and urinary drainage bag was covered and failed to keep indwelling urinary catheter bag below a resident's bladder for one (R92) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in a sample of 45. Findings include: R92's Physician Orders, dated 9/24/24, documents R92 has a Physician order for an (indwelling) catheter. On 09/22/24 at 11:18 AM R92 was sitting in a recliner in the lounge area by south nurse's desk. R92's indwelling catheter was uncovered with no privacy bag and the indwelling catheter tubing and catheter bag was lying on the floor. On 9/22/24 at 11:50 AM V9/Licensed Practical nurse verified R92's indwelling catheter tubing and catheter bag should not be sitting on the floor and that R12's catheter bag should have a privacy bag over it. On 9/23/24 at 9:50 AM V6/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), V7/CNA, and V8/CNA were preparing to transfer R92 with a mechanical lift from R92's wheelchair to his bed. During the mechanical lift transfer, V6 held up R92's indwelling catheter bag and raised it above R92's bladder while V7 and V8 transferred R92 to his bed. 9/23/24 at 10:05 AM V6/CNA, V7/CNA, and V8/CNA verified R92's indwelling catheter bag should not have been held above R92's bladder during the mechanial lift transfer.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide ongoing communication with the dialysis center ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide ongoing communication with the dialysis center and failed to develop a complete, comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving dialysis services for one of one resident (R233) reviewed for dialysis, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The unnamed, undated facility policy directs staff, It is the policy of this facility to provide coordination of care with the resident's dialysis provider. Procedure: Residents needing dialysis services will be admitted with the co-ordination of their dialysis provider off site with a predetermined schedule. The facility will review contracts to assure resident's needs are met while residing at the facility. The facility will co-ordinate care with the dialysis provider in developing an appropriate plan of care to include, but not limited to: Specific days of the week resident will attend dialysis; Any recommended medication schedule change; Meal or snack sent with resident.; Fluid restriction and weights as ordered per MD; Emergency back up in event of inclement weather or other emergency that may arise that prevents residents from dialyzing; Dialysis center's expectation of care to be completed by SNF (if any) such as: Checking thrills/bruits of grafts and fistulas, documented on TAR, When to remove dressing from the access site placed on from the dialysis center, Center line care if access is a central line. Note: some providers do not want facilities to provide care unless dressing become impaired such as soiled or wet, Emergency protocol for uncontrolled bleeding from any dialysis site, No B/P or lab draws obtained from arm with dialysis site. Documentation of resident weight and vitals prior to being sent to dialysis to be sent with resident to each dialysis session and returned by dialysis center afterwards. R233's current Physician Order Sheet, dated September 2024 documents R233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, End Stage Renal Disease, Kidney Transplant Status, Dependence on Renal Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Rejection. This same form includes the following physician orders: (R233) may attend dialysis 3X's (three times) a week: Monday, Wednesday, Friday. R233's current Care Plan, dated 3/28/24 includes the following Focus area: Hemodialysis. R233's care plan does not address: Specific days of the week resident will attend dialysis; Any recommended medication schedule change; Meal or snack sent with resident.; Fluid restriction and weights as ordered per MD (Medical Doctor) ; Emergency back up in event of inclement weather or other emergency that may arise that prevents residents from dialyzing; Dialysis center's expectation of care to be completed by SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) (if any) such as: Checking thrills/bruits of grafts and fistulas, documented on TAR (Treatment Administration Record), When to remove dressing from the access site placed on from the dialysis center, Center line care if access is a central line. Emergency protocol for uncontrolled bleeding from any dialysis site, No B/P (Blood Pressure) or lab (laboratory) draws obtained from arm with dialysis site. On 9/22/24 at 1:13 P.M., V10/RN (Registered Nurse) stated (R233) goes to dialysis three times weekly, on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. At that time, V10 stated she does not send a (daily dialysis) communication form with (R233). On 9/23/24 at 11:33 A.M., a dialysis shunt was present in V10's right upper chest. At that time, R233 stated no facility staff provide him a dialysis communication form to take to dialysis. On 9/23/24 at 1:15 P.M., V11/LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she did not send a dialysis communication form with (R233) when he left for his dialysis treatment today. At that time, V11/LPN denied being aware of such a (facility) form. On 9/24/2024 at 11:24 A.M., V3/Director of Nurses (DON) verified R233's electronic medical record did not contain any Dialysis Communication Tools for R233's dialysis treatments. and R233's care plan did not include the required care plan interventions. At that time V3/DON verified the facility policy includes the facility nurse completes a Dialysis Communication Tool prior to a resident leaving for dialysis and gives it to the resident to take to the dialysis appointment, the Dialysis Center nurse completes the form and gives it back to the resident who gives it to the facility nurse upon return to the facility.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0742 (Tag F0742)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to provide psychosocial therapies and psychiatric support...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to provide psychosocial therapies and psychiatric support services to resident with diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder and repeated emergency room visits for suicidal ideation's and depression for one of six residents (R102) reviewed for Behavioral Services in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment, dated 9/20/24, documents Cares provided for the resident population include but are not limited to: Mental health and behavior; identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with anxiety, cognitive impairment, depression, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and other psychiatric diagnosis. Support by group and individual therapies, and structured activities. In house psychiatric physician management. This assessment also documents the facility will provide therapy services including psychiatry. The facility's (undated) Social Service Assistant policy documents Job Summary: Assists the Social Service Director (SSD) plan and implement psychosocial programs. Aides SSD in community contacts and involvement. Assists SSD in assessing residents. Duties: Develop, schedule and conduct psychosocial programs, chart residents need for and resident's responses to psychosocial programs. Communication Skills: Consistently records on concurrent basis all observations and psychosocial needs of the residents indicated within the role of the Social Service department in the medical record and other forms as appropriate. On 9/22/24 at 8:30 AM, R102 was sitting in his wheelchair near other residents, in a common area of the facility's locked unit. R102 spoke softly and avoided eye contact when speaking. At this time R102 stated I am not happy here. R102 would not provide any details for what is causing his unhappiness and stated he will be moving soon to another facility. R102's Census Report, dated 9/25/24, documents R102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R102's Medical Diagnosis report, dated 9/25/24, documents R102 has a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder with mixed disturbance of Emotions and Conduct, and Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent. R102's PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), dated 5/31/24, documents (R102) will need to be provided the following services and/or supports: Individual, group and family psychotherapy. R102's current Care Plan, dated 6/12/24, documents (R102) has PASRR recommendation related to Major Depression and Adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotion. Intervention: Individual, group, and/or family psychotherapy with psychiatrist or social worker to learn coping, problem-solving skills, and identify triggers. (R102) has risk factors for self harm. (R102) is having suicidal ideation's. Stating he wants to kill self. Diagnosis, Major depression and adjustment d/disorder with mixed disturbances of emotion. Intervention: Encourage psychotherapy and/or psychiatric consultation as indicated/tolerated by resident. (R102) may display pattern of voicing allegations of mistreatment by caregivers. As evidenced by: false accusations of giving wrong medication or withholding medications. This behavior appears to be related to past history of abuse and adjustment disorder. Refer to psychiatric doctor, psychologist, social worker for further evaluation. Depression and paranoia often underlie this type of behavior. R102's Nursing Progress Note, dated 6/10/2024 at 10:19 PM, documents R102 made comments to a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) voicing suicidal ideation's. This note documents (R102) stated I don't want to live and stated He will try anything, choking him self, drink cleanser, strain himself. anything. This note documents R102 was sent to the hospital by ambulance. R102's hospital After Visit Summary, dated 6/16/24, documents R102 was evaluated in the emergency room for a diagnosis of Suicidal Ideation. This summary documents Instructions: Floor bed. No access to cords, sharp objects, or means of self harm. Make arrangements for counseling services through skilled nursing facility, or (community mental health treatment). Call (V19, Medical Director) in the morning with an update and for further outpatient management. Seek medical attention if new or worsening symptoms, any concerns. R102's Nursing progress note, dated 8/25/24 at 2:55 PM, documents (R102) came to nurse with complaints of having suicidal thought. When asked about what he was thinking and or his plan he said he won't say because we would stop him. (R102) stated that he wanted to go to the emergency room. (V19, Medical Director) aware. Call placed to (local Emergency Medical Services) for transfer. R102's hospital After Visit Summary, dated 8/25/24, documents R102 was evaluated in the emergency room for a diagnosis of Suicidal Ideation's. R102's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 9/17/2024 at 1:12 PM, documents (R102) states he is feeling depressed with suicidal idealizations (R102) states plan is to hang self from call light and door knob Social Services, Management, Hospice all notified. (R102) at nurses station at this time with staff awaiting call back from hospice. R102's hospital After Visit Summary, dated 9/17/24, documents R102 was evaluated in the emergency room for Depression. R102's Social Service note, dated 9/18/2024 at 2:57 PM and signed by V25 (Social Services Director), documents Referral sent to (five surrounding area skilled nursing facilities) at the request of (R102). R102's Nursing Progress notes and Social Service notes, dated 6/11/24- 9/24/24, do not document that R102 was seen by (community mental health treatment), counseling for suicidal ideation's and management, or given psychiatric counseling, in person psychiatry visits or group therapies since admission on [DATE]. On 9/24/24 at 1:20 PM V1 (Administrator in Training) stated (R102) was out of the facility for a little while then came back for re-admission. V1 confirmed the only professional psychiatry notes for R102 since June are from the Physician (V26 Psychiatrist) in August 2024. V1 stated I don't believe he's seen by (community mental health treatment). He would probably refuse. I don't have any documentation to show he's seen by anyone else. On 9/25/24 at 9:28 AM, V25 (Social Service Director) confirmed R102 has had multiple trips to the hospital due to suicidal ideation's and depression. V25 stated I think he's refused (community mental health treatment). I am not as familiar with (R102), but when I meet with him I put a note in the computer. At this same time, V1 sated I looked in the chart and couldn't find any psychiatry notes from June to August until 8/12/24 from (V26). V1 confirmed this visit with V26 was done by telehealth and not in person. V1 also confirmed if R102 has refused any counseling, psychiatric visits or psychiatric therapy treatments with (community mental health) it has not been documented in the record to reflect the offering and refusals.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were responded to in a timely manner for eight of 43 residents (R20, R37, R54, R55, R57, R63, R66 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were responded to in a timely manner for eight of 43 residents (R20, R37, R54, R55, R57, R63, R66 and R109) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 45. Findings include: Monthly Resident Council Meeting Minutes (dated June 2024) document the following concern: CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistant)- Third shift needs to answer call light quicker. On 09/24/24 from 09:15 AM - 10:30 AM, a group meeting was conducted with residents who attend Monthly Resident Council Meetings at the facility. All residents in attendance at the meeting, R37, R54, R55, R57, R63 and R66, verbalized concerns with excessive call light response times from facility staff. All residents stated it can take around 30 minutes to get someone to respond to call lights, especially after meals. R63 stated staff's response to call light times on third shift is way too long and has exceeded one hour on multiple occasions, especially for those residents who need extensive help. All residents present in the meeting stated that some of the staff members who work third shift are, lazy. During the meeting, R63 stated, My roommate (R20) waits so long it has her in tears. It's awful. I have to go get staff for her all the time because they never come when she presses her call light. R55 then stated, I waited for a CNA for over 20 minutes once. She left me on the toilet, and I was so upset. Since I've been in therapy, I can get around much better now and I can do so much more for myself. I will never ask that CNA for help again. On 09/24/24 at 10:47 AM, R109's call light was on. R109 was sitting in her wheelchair with the television on. R109 stated she was waiting for staff assistance to use the restroom, and her call light had already been on for at least 5 minutes. R109 stated, Sometimes it can take them a while to respond. it can take 20 to 30 minutes before someone comes. R109's call light remained on until V20 (Certified Nursing Assistant) responded at 11:03 AM. V20 confirmed that 20 minutes is a long time to wait to use the restroom and stated, There is no noise with our call lights. They just light up so you constantly have to be looking for lights that are on. If you are sitting at the desk charting, you don't always know that someone needs help because there is nothing that alarms to get our attention. It can be difficult to get to everyone quickly sometimes, especially after meals when there are several residents lined up to use the restroom. On 09/24/24 at 11:05 AM, V21 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the call lights at the facility do not alarm or make any type of noise. V21 stated It would be helpful if they did alarm. You just have to walk around and look for the lights to respond when someone needs help. On 09/24/24 at 12:55 PM, R20 was ambulating in the hallway near the entrance to her room. R20 stated she has waited excessive amounts of time for staff to respond to her call light. R20 stated, I get so upset it makes me cry. I have had accidents in my pants after waiting so long, and that has happened more than once. I have had falls too because I tried to get up to use the bathroom myself and ended up falling. I was on the floor once for such a long time before they came to help me up. It has taken someone on third shift two hours to respond, and that is just way too long to have to wait for help. On 09/24/24 at 02:30 PM, V1 (Administrator in Training) stated that staff members should be responding to call lights timely. V1 then stated, We recently terminated a staff member on third shift because she was sleeping. That is not acceptable, and residents should start seeing things improve on third shift.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Contact Precautions throughout the facility to protect vulnerable residents and pre...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Contact Precautions throughout the facility to protect vulnerable residents and prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy, dated 7/13/23, documents Purpose: To reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. EBP should be used when contact precautions do not apply for residents with any of the following: Open wounds that require a dressing change, indwelling medical devices, infection or colonized with a MDRO. EBP requires use of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for the transfer of MDRO's to staff hands and clothing. EBP is primarily intended to use for care that occurs within a resident's room, when high-contact resident care activities are bundled together. Outside of a resident's room, EBP should be followed when performing transfers in the shower/assisting with shower and when assisting a resident with toileting in common restrooms. High-contact care activities include Dressing, Bathing, Showering, Transfers, Hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or toileting, Care for medical devices (Central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomies, drainage tubes, ports), wound care (pressure ulcers, diabetic ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and chronic venous stasis wounds). Procedure: 1. Identify residents with an infection or colonized with a MDRO, residents with medical devices or chronic wounds that do not require contact precautions. 3. Post approved EBP signage that indicates high-contact activities. Ensure that disposable or washable isolation gowns and gloves are available to health care personnel, where high-contact resident care activities may be required. 5. Keep a container or hamper inside resident's room for health care personnel to dispose of personal protective equipment. The facility's Contact Precautions Policy, dated 12/7/2018, documents Policy: In addition to Standard Precautions, use Contact Precautions, or the equivalent for specified residents known or suspected to be infected or colonized with epidemiologically important microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident (hand or skin to skin contact that occurs when performing resident care activities that require touching the residents dry skin) or indirect contact (touching the environmental surfaces or resident care items in the residents environment). On 9/22/24 at 9:00 AM the hallways were toured in entirety and no residents were observed to be in isolation or to have signs on their doors to indicate any EBPs. On 9/23/24 at 9:55 AM V6/CNA, V7/CNA, and V8/CNA performed suprapubic catheter care on R92. V6, V7, and V8 wore gloves but did not wear a gown or any other PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). On 9/23/24 at 9:35AM V1/Administrator in Training and V5/Wound Nurse performed R11's wound care while R11 was lying in R11's bed. V1 assisted moving over R11's brief while V5 performed R11's wound care. V1 and V5 wore gloves but did not wear a gown or any other PPE. On 09/24/24 at 11:15 AM, V4 (Infection Preventionist/Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed Enhanced Barrier Precautions had not been implemented for the following residents, who currently have a wound or an indwelling medical device in place: R3, R11, R14, R35, R62, R75, R86, R92, R108, R113, and R233. V4 also confirmed all procedures related to Contact Isolation Precautions were not implemented for R84. The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid Form 671 dated 9/22/24 and signed by V1/Administrator in Training documents 132 residents currently reside within the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Antibiotic Stewardship program was implemented. This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing at the fac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Antibiotic Stewardship program was implemented. This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy (reviewed 12/12/18) documents the following: Purpose: to improve the use of Antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This will be accomplished by utilizing the Core Elements. Leadership Commitment: Demonstrates support and commitment for safe and appropriate antibiotic use. Accountability: Identify physicians, nursing and pharmacy leads responsible for overseeing antibiotic stewardship activities. Drug Expertise: Establish access to consultant pharmacists or other individuals with expertise or training in antibiotic stewardship. Action: Implement at least one policy or practice to improve antibiotic use. Tracking: Monitor at least one process measure of antibiotic use and at least one outcome from antibiotic use. Reporting: Provide regular feedback on antibiotic use and resistance to prescribing clinicians, nursing staff and other relevant staff. education: Provide resources to clinicians, nursing staff, resident and families about antibiotic resistance and opportunities for improving antibiotics. On 09/24/24 at 01:20 PM, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist) stated the facility does not implement any protocols to review clinical signs and symptoms and/or laboratory reports prior to implementation of an antibiotic for a resident. V4 stated the facility does not utilize any assessment tools or management algorithms to determine if an antibiotic is warranted, We have forms detailing McGeer's protocol, but I do not have record of any completed forms. We just call the doctor and get an order for an antibiotic if we believe one is needed. The facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, Form 671, dated 09/22/24 and signed by V1 (Administrator in Training), documents 132 residents currently reside in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist was adequately implementing and performing duties that accompany the position. This failure has the pote...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist was adequately implementing and performing duties that accompany the position. This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Infection Preventionist Job Description documents the following: Qualifications: Must possess the ability to plan, organize, analyze, develop, implement and interpret the goals, objectives, policies, procedures, etc., of the Infection Control Program. This same job description documents, The Infection Preventionist is accountable for decreasing the incidence and transmission of infectious diseases between residents, staff, visitors and community. Through strategic planning, leadership and consultation, you will lead and direct a robust team in the identification and implementation of infection prevention goals and objectives throughout the facility. The Infection Preventionist reports to the Director of Nursing, Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee and partners with the Medical Director to develop a system of care that promotes sound and scientific infection prevention principles and practices. Work with the facility to meet regulations for infection control. Attends and participates in continuing educational infection control programs. Could be subject to exposure to infectious waste, diseases and conditions. The facility Assessment (dated 09/20/24) documents the following: Cares provided for the resident population include but area not limited to: Infection Control and Prevention- Antibiotic Stewardship, identification and containment of infections. Infection prevention. Early warning tool for identification. Continued staff education. This assessment also documents: Staff members, healthcare professionals, and medical practitioners that provide support and care for residents at (facility): infection control and prevention; Nursing services: Infection Prevention Nurse. On 09/24/24 at 11:15 AM, V4 (Infection Preventionist/Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed Enhanced Barrier Precautions had not been implemented for the following residents, who currently have a wound or an indwelling medical device in place: R3, R11, R14, R35, R62, R75, R84, R86, R92, R108, R113, and R233. V4 also confirmed all procedures related to Contact Isolation Precautions were not implemented for R84. V4 verified she had recently received her Infection Preventionist training certificate in 08/2024 and stated, There really hasn't been anyone training me, so I am just learning as I go. I hadn't yet started the procedure of Enhanced Barrier Precautions for the residents who require this, but I was trying to start doing this. V4 stated she, doesn't have enough time, to dedicate to the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program because she also is responsible for the following activities: Completing staff schedules; Working the floor when additional assistance is needed; Administering disciplinary procedures with staff members; Conducting admission audits; Administering in-services to subordinate staff; Assisting with meal tray distribution at meal times; Attending morning meetings; and attending Weekly and Quarterly Quality Assurance Meetings. V4 stated she works full-time at the facility, and is only able to dedicate approximately 15 hours per week to her role as the Infection Preventionist. On 09/24/24 at 01:20 PM, V4 stated the facility does not implement any protocols to review clinical signs and symptoms and/or laboratory reports prior to implementation of an antibiotic for a resident. V4 stated the facility does not utilize any assessment tools or management algorithms to determine if an antibiotic is warranted, We have forms detailing McGeer's protocol, but I do not have record of any completed forms. We just call the doctor and get an order for an antibiotic if we believe one is needed. V4 verified that she has, Not got things going yet, with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, Form 671, dated 09/22/24 and signed by V1 (Administrator in Training), documents 132 residents currently reside in the facility.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for two (R1 and R2) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 12. Findings include: The f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for two (R1 and R2) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 12. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, dated 11/28/2016, documents This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Abuse is the willful injection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility's Final Abuse Report, dated 6/10/24, submitted to State Agency on 6/15/24, documents an altercation occurred between R1 and R2 resulting in R2 receiving a black eye. This report documents: Reported to ADM (Administrator) that (R2) had discoloration to eye. Upon interview (R2) stated that peer had hit her. Upon interview roommate (R1) stated that she had hit R2 in face and had physical altercation with peer. R1 states that R2 and her were arguing regarding a shower. R2 states they were arguing regarding a boyfriend. No staff witnessed event that occurred in the room. Room move was immediately done. Root cause determined to be paranoid personality disorder. Intervention R1 and R2 had 1:1 with SSD (Social Service Director) and ADM regarding education on appropriate behaviors. R1 and R2 feel safe in their environment. R1 and R2 educated to come to staff when needs assistance. R1 and R2 have conflict resolution 1:1 (one-on-one) with SSD. On 7/10/24 and 7/11/24 R1 and R2 were residing on the A-Wing psychological unit and bedrooms were located next door to each other. The EHR/Electronic Health Record for R1 includes the following diagnoses for R1: Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Phobic Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Paranoid Personality Disorder, Unspecified Psychosis Cognitive Communication Deficit, Extrapyramidal and Movement Disorder, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R1 as cognitively intact. The EHR for R2 includes the following diagnoses for R2: Schizophrenia, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, Mood Disorder, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Depression, Pseudobulbar Affect, and Altered Mental Status. R2 has a BIMS score of 11 out of 15 indicating R2 with moderately impaired cognition. The incident reports for R1 dated 6/10/24 at 1:56 pm documents V14 LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse spoke with R1 who stated (R2) came at her so she punched (R2) in the face. R1 alert and oriented to person, place, situation, and time. R1 is ambulatory without assistance and no injury was noted. QA Note, dated 6/14/24, documents Residents had physical altercation in room. Resident room move completed. Resident has active delusions. Root cause determined to be paranoid personality disorder. Resident had 1:1 with SSD and ADM regarding appropriate behaviors with peer. Resident feels safe in her environment. SSD to have 1:1 educated on communicating to staff for assistance when have needs. 1:1 conflict resolution with resident x 10 days with SSD. The incident report for R2, dated 6/10/24 at 1:38 pm, documents (V15 Unit Aide) reported a bruise to R2's right eye. R2 stated that roommate (R1) hit her in the eye today in the hallway and R2 admitted to hitting (R1) back. R1 alert, oriented to person, ambulatory with assist with bruise. QA Note, dated 6/14/24, documents Resident had physical altercation with peer/roommate. Resident room move completed. Resident educated on getting assistance when needed from staff. 1:1 (one-on-one) with SSD and ADM. Resident feels safe in their environment. POA (Power of Attorney) does not want (R2) moved from unit. Resident to have conflict resolution with SSD x 10 days. The interview form for V14 LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse, dated 6/10/24, documents a CNA reported V14 LPN that R2 had a bruise to her right eye. R2 said R1 punched (R2). R1 said she (R1) did hit (R2) because R2 hit her and called her names. V14 LPN documented she reported to V1 Administrator and the local police department arrived at the facility and spoke to R1 and R2. The interview form for R1 documents (R2) threatened to hit me, I punched her in the face. I was upset with her. It happened by the bathroom. (R1 and R2) were arguing about taking a shower and R1 ripped up R2's book. I didn't tell anyone. The interview form for R2 documents (R1) doesn't have all her marbles, she hit me and I hit her back. It happened last night. I didn't tell anyone. She wanted my boyfriend. I also hit her in the face. We really were not arguing. On 7/11/24 at 1:35 pm, R1 stated if somebody hits her, she will hit them back. R1 stated (R2) hit her a while ago and she hit her back. R1 stated (R2) was trying to get her boyfriend. On 7/11/24 at 1:43 pm, R2 stated her roommate hit her so she hit her back. R2 stated she does not have any problems with anyone in the facility. On 7/12/24 at 1:31 pm, V14 LPN stated V15 UA/Unit Aide reported seeing a bruise to R2's right eye. V14 LPN stated she went to R2 to assess and saw a small bruise to the corner of R2's right eye and reported it to V1 AIT. R2 stated that R1 hit her and that they had been arguing about a man. R2 was moved to another room and there have not been any further problems. On 7/12/24 at 1:10 pm, V5 SSD/Social Service Director stated she spoke with R1 and R2. R2 is very forgetful and changed her story a couple of times about what happened. V5 SSD stated when she asked R1 if she hit R2, R1 said Yep and it was over R1's boyfriend. V5 SSD stated R2 was moved to another room and R1 wanted to know R2 was moved because they were friends. On 7/10/24 at 11:09 am, V1 AIT/Administrator in Training stated it was reported to her, by V14 LPN, that R2 had a bruise to her right eye. R1 and R2 had been roommates. V1 stated she started an investigation, spoke with staff in the area and there were no witnesses. V15 UA/Unit Aide reported to V14 LPN that R2 had a bruise to her right eye. R1 and R2 had been arguing and R2 said that R1 hit her in the eye. One of the residents said it was about the showering and the other said it was about a boyfriend. V1 stated she called the local police who came to the facility and interviewed both R1 and R2. R1 and R2 stated they felt safe in the facility and V5 SSD/Social Service Director and V1 AIT spoke with the residents regarding appropriate conversations and conflict resolution, R2 was moved to another room, and there have not been any further problems.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0825 (Tag F0825)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure Physical and Occupational Therapy services were provided to residents who have been determined to have the need for Phy...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure Physical and Occupational Therapy services were provided to residents who have been determined to have the need for Physical and Occupational Therapy services for eleven of eleven residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11) reviewed for Therapy in the sample of eleven. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment, dated 2/7/24, documents Cares provided for the resident population include but are not limited to: Therapy- Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, music, crafts, management of supporting devices, splints and braces. This assessment also documents the following healthcare professionals and medical practitioners who will provide support and care for residents of the facility includes Therapy services. On 3/5/24 at 10:07 AM, V2 (Administrator in Training, trainee) stated he oversees daily functioning of the facility operations when V1(Administrator in Training) is away. V2 stated February 16th is the last day we had Physical, Occupational or Speech therapy in our building. The company we used for therapy left our building and stopped providing services. I am not sure why they decided to leave. I have been told a new therapy company is starting but we have no actual start date. No therapy services have been here since the 16th. No one has been out to therapy outside of the building that I am aware. The facility's Active Caseload list, dated 2/12/24 and provided by V1, documents the following residents were receiving Physical or Occupational Therapy services prior to 2/16/24: R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8 and R9. This list also documents R1, R10 and R11 were awaiting insurance approval for therapy services. 1. On 3/5/24 at 10:25 AM, R1 was observed walking in the hallway of the facility, pushing a wheelchair. R1's legs and arms were shaking while walking. R1 stated I was getting therapy until they (contracted therapy company) left. R1's Physician Order Sheet, dated 3/5/24, documents an order for Physical Therapy evaluation and Treatment related to tendonopathy of right rotator cuff calcific tendinitis of right shoulder and chronic right elbow pain. Order date: 1/31/24. 2. R2's Physician order from V14 (Facility's Medical Director), dated 2/27/24, documents May have PT/OT/ST (Physical, Occupational and Speech therapy) evaluation as determined by IDT (Inter-disciplinary Team) recommendation. 3. On 3/5/24 at 1:32 PM, R3 was sitting in a recliner in the common area by the nurse's station. R3 stated, I was receiving therapy for my MS (Multiple Sclerosis). I was lifting weights and walking in the parallel bars. No one told me why my therapy ended. R3's Physical Therapy Plan of Care, dated 1/29/24 and signed by V13 (Former Contracted Physical Therapist) and signed by V14 (Facility's Medical Director) on 2/9/24. Documents R3 started Physical Therapy on 1/29/24 with a plan for Frequency/Duration: three times a week for eight weeks. This same Plan of Care lists an End of Care date as 2/18/24. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. 4. On 3/5/24 at 1:39 PM, R4 was sitting in the facility lobby in her wheelchair at a table. R4 stated, I had a fall a couple months ago and was put on therapy for strengthening. Therapy was really helping with my left shoulder pain. R4 denied being told that her therapy had ended. R4's Occupational Therapy Plan of Care, dated 2/7/24 and signed by V15 (Former Contracted Occupational Therapist) and signed by V14 (Facility's Medical Director) on 2/9/24. Documents R4 is recommended for therapy re-certification to be done three times a week for four weeks. This same Plan of Care lists an End of Care date as 2/18/24. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. 5. R5's Physical Therapy Plan of Care, dated 2/1/24 and signed by V13 documents R5 is recommended for therapy re-certification to be done three times a week for four weeks. This same Plan of Care lists an End of Care date as 2/18/24. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. 6. R6's Physical Therapy Plan of Care, dated 2/1/24 and signed by V13. Documents R6 started Physical Therapy on 2/1/24 with a plan for Frequency/Duration: three times a week for eight weeks. This same Plan of Care lists an End of Care date as 2/18/24. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. 7. On 3/5/24 at 12:50 PM, R7 was observed self-propelling her wheelchair in the hallway. R7 stated I go March 20th for a new prosthesis to my amputated leg. It will take two to three weeks and then I will need more therapy to learn how to walk with it. Before the therapy company left, I was still going in there to do exercises but now I am not doing anything. No one else is working with me on muscle exercises. I am just worried if they don't have a company back in here when I get my prosthesis, how I will receive the needed therapy? R7's Physical Therapy Plan of Care, dated 1/4/24 and signed by V13. Documents R7 started Physical Therapy on 1/4/24 with a plan for Frequency/Duration: three times a week for eight weeks. R7's Physical Therapist Updated Plan of Care, dated 2/1/24, documents R7 is recommended for therapy re-certification to be done three times a week for four weeks. This same Plan of Care lists an End of Care date as 2/18/24. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. 8. R8's Physical Therapy Plan of Care, dated 2/6/24 and signed by V13. Documents R8 started Physical Therapy on 2/6/24 with a plan for Frequency/Duration: five times a week for four weeks. This same Plan of Care lists an End of Care date as 2/18/24. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. 9. R9's Occupational Therapy Plan of Care, dated 2/7/24 and signed by V15 and signed by V14 on 2/9/24. Documents R9 is recommended for therapy re-certification to be done three times a week for four weeks. This same Plan of Care does not list an End of Care date. This plan does not contain a discharge summary or notes when care was ended. On 3/5/24 at 1:30 PM, V12 (Business Office Manager) stated (R10 and R11) were both approved by insurance on 2/5/24 for therapy services and (R1) was going to be paid by charity. On 3/5/24 at 10:45 AM, V1 stated We do not have a therapy contract with a therapy company, and I do not have a start date of when a new company will start providing therapy here. On 3/5/24 at 1:05 PM, V1 confirmed that residents receiving therapy were given end of care dates that all were 2/18/24 when the former therapy company was no longer providing services in the facility. V1 also confirmed there have been no therapy staff in the building to complete therapy evaluations since 2/16/24. V1 stated All of the therapy notes for these residents lists 2/18/24 as an end date, regardless of when therapy started, and none of them have a therapy discharge note or a discharge summary of progress. I don't know why, but I don't have any of that information.
Feb 2024 8 deficiencies 4 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to protect residents (R1, R3, R5) from verbal, mental, an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to protect residents (R1, R3, R5) from verbal, mental, and physical abuse from another resident (R2) for three of four residents (R1, R3, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 76. This failure resulted in R2 spitting on R1 on multiple occasions, pouring water over R1's head, cursing at R1 on multiple occasions days before R2 physically assaulted R1 by kicking and stomping R1 in the face which resulted in R1 sustaining lacerations to the nose and left eyelid, head trauma, bruising around the left eye, a hematoma under the left eye, severe pain, and mental anguish that required emergency room care for treatment. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy started on 1-25-24 at 4:00 PM when R2 physically assaulted R1 by kicking and stomping R1 in the face which resulted in R1 sustaining lacerations to the nose and left eyelid, head trauma, bruising around the left eye, a hematoma under the left eye, severe pain, and mental anguish that required emergency room care for treatment. V1 (Administrator-In-Training) and V57 (Regional Director of Operations) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2-2-24 at 9:45 AM. While the immediacy was removed on 2-2-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to educate current and newly hired staff on the facility's Abuse Prevention Program, assess all residents for abusive type behaviors, develop interventions/care plans and implement interventions to address those behaviors, review those care plans quarterly, and the QA (Quality Assurance) team monitors compliance. 1. R2's admission summary dated [DATE] documents, This [AGE] year-old African American was admitted to (facility) from (another long-term care facility). Unaware of time, date, and facility. Ambulates on own. Diagnosis: Bipolar Disorder current episode manic without psychotic features and TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury). R2's Progress Notes dated 11-1-23 at 10:52 PM and signed by V24 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, (R2) reportedly spitting multiple times on peers today. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-12-23 at 12:35 PM and signed by V24 (RN) documents, (R2) reportedly spit on a peer today. Re-directed and behavior not reported by peer again. R1's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 11-10-23 documents R1 is cognitively intact. R1 and R2's Final Report dated 1-25-24 documents on 1-25-24 R1 stated she was on the floor close to R2's room when R2 approached R1 and kicked her. R1 and R2's Police Report dated 1-25-24 at 3:37 PM documents, Event: Battery. Complainant: V4 (AIT/Administrator-In-Training). Victim: (R1). Suspect: (R2). (R2) kicked another resident (R1) in the head. R1's Progress Notes dated 1-25-24 at 5:42 PM and signed by V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) AIM (Acute Illness Management) for Wellness Event Record documents, (R1) appears to have sustained an injury that was unwitnessed. Event was first noted on 1-25-24 at 4:00 PM. Evaluation of the resident and event occurred on or about 1-25-24 at 4:01 PM. Just prior to/at the time of the event (R1) appears to have been sitting on floor. (R1's) account of the event is I was on the floor and (R2) kicked me in my head. (R1) was asked to point out the residents who allegedly kicked (R1) then pointed to (R2). Staff's response is noted as assessing (R1) who reportedly received a kick to their face. (R1) rates pain level as an eight. Vocal complaints of pain at the time of the event. Pain location includes head pain and headache. (R1) sent to the emergency room for evaluation. R1's Hospital Emergency Department Notes dated 1-25-24 document, (R1) was involved in altercation at the (facility) she suffered a contusion to her face. She has some bruising of the lateral aspect of her face and her bridge (of her nose) has been applied some steri-strips. (R1) states she was kicked in the face. Chief Complaint: Head injury and assault victim. R2's current Care Plan does not include interventions addressing R2 spitting on other residents, addressing R2 targeting R1, and addressing R2 kicking R1 in the face on 1-25-24. R1's current Care Plan does not include interventions to protect R1 from R2's past behaviors of spitting on R1 and cursing R1. On 1-29-24 at 10:30 AM R1 was sitting in a recliner in the sitting area across from the nurses' desk. R1's left eye was surrounded with golf-ball sized purple bruising with a 3 cm (centimeter) by 1 cm hematoma beneath the left eye. R1 had a 3 cm laceration to the left eyelid that was approximated with steri-strips. R1 had a 1 cm laceration to the right side of her nose that was approximated with a steri-strip. R1 stated, I was sitting on the floor in my doorway and (R2) came up and kicked me three times in the face and then stomped on me. It hurt really bad. I grabbed (R2's) leg and yelled for help. (R2) threw water on me the day before and spits on me. I was abused. I was scared of (R2). (R2) always walked by me and would call me bad names. On 1-29-24 at 11:20 AM V11 (LPN) stated, I was working on 1-25-24 and a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to me that (R2) kicked (R1) in the face. (R1) was sitting on the floor in her doorway, which she prefers. (R1) was bleeding form her face. I sent (R1) to the emergency room. (R1) was sent back from the emergency room with steri-strips to her lacerations. (R1) knows what is going on and tells the truth. (R1) reported that (R2) kicked her in the face and spit on her. I am not sure if any other behavior interventions have been implemented after (R2) kicked and spit on (R1). I am not sure of any behavior interventions to keep (R2) from spitting, (R2) has a lot of aggressive behaviors and has a history of spitting on (R2) and other residents. (R2) calls (R1) a b***h. I have reported to (V1 Administrator-In-Training) that (R2) spits on staff and other residents. On 1-29-24 at 1:00 PM V26 (Unit Aide) stated, (R2) cusses at (R1) all the time and spits on (R1). (R2) also spit on me so bad I had to change my shirt. On 1-29-24 at 1:10 PM V27 (LPN) stated, (R1) knows what is going on and did not deserve to be kicked by (R2). I know (R2) spits on other residents. (R2) gets agitated very easily. On 1-29-24 at 1:20 PM V28 (CNA) stated, (R2) spits on (R1) and has poured water over her head. (R1) does not lie. (R1) knows exactly what happened. (R1) did get kicked in the face by (R2). (R2) will yell at (R1) f**k you b***h! On 1-29-24 at 1:55 PM V31 (MDS Coordinator) stated, I am responsible for (R2's) care plan. (R2) has not had an intervention developed to address (R2) spitting on other residents or staff. (R2) has not had any additional behavior interventions developed after kicking (R1) in the face. On 1-30-24 at 10:30 AM, V23 (CNA) stated, I was working on 1-25-24 when (R2) kicked (R1) in the face. I was in the bathroom and heard a kicking sound. I heard (R2) kick and (R1) yelling. I came out and (R1) was in sitting on the floor with her head down, crying, with blood dripping. (R1's) head was bloody and (R1) was in a lot of pain and was screaming Get her (R2) away from me! (R2) was standing next to (R1). (R1) was terrified and crying. (R1) was sent to the emergency room. (R1) is of sound mind and knows exactly what happened. I feel really bad for (R1). (R1) is a sweetheart. (R1) is never aggressive. (R1) would not make anything up and I could tell she had been kicked in the face by (R2). (R1) always prefers to sit on the ground in her doorway. (R2) has a history of spitting on (R1) and calling (R1) a b***h. (R2) has also thrown water on (R1). (R2) gets mad at (R1) because they share a bathroom, and their rooms are side by side. When (R1) returned from the hospital, staff had to directly supervise (R2) until (R1) was moved off of the unit on 1-26-24. Every time (R2) would walk by (R1) after (R1) was kicked, (R1) would yell, Get her (R2) away from me. (R1) continued to be terrified when she would see (R2). On 1-30-24 at 12:15 PM V24 (Agency RN) stated, Both times I charted on (R2) spitting on her peers (11-1-24 and 11-12-24), I had witnessed (R2) spit on (R1). I reported both occurrences to V25 (Prior Administrator) as abuse. (R2) would get angry at (R1) because they shared a bathroom and would spit on (R1) and call (R1) a b***h. (R1) would cry and yell out. (R1) was scared of (R2). I do not recall (R1) or (R2) ever being separated. (R1) and (R2) continued to share a bathroom after (R2) would call (R1) names and spit on (R1). (R2) has anger issues and if other residents would not give them their soda, (R2) would call them b*****s. (R2) would call (R1) a b***h quite a bit. On 1-30-24 at 1:50 PM V14 (Social Service Assistant) stated, (R1) always sits on the floor in her doorway. (R1) is care planned that she prefers to sit on the floor. (R1) sat on the floor at home. (R1) reported to me that when (R1) was sitting in the doorway of her room, (R2) went up to her and kicked her in the face. (R1) knows what is going on. (R1) and (R2) have always shared a bathroom and I think that is why (R2) targets (R1). Administration is aware of (R2's) behaviors. (R2) throws tantrums. I am not aware of any interventions implemented to address (R2) spitting in resident faces or throwing water on them. I am not aware of any new behavior interventions to address (R2's) behaviors after (R2) kicked (R1) in the face. 2. R3's BIMS dated 11-9-23 documents R3 is cognitively intact. On 1-29-24 at 11:05 AM R3 was well-groomed and alert and orientated. R3 stated, (R2) always asks me for a phone to call her brother. I do not have a phone. If I do not give (R2) a phone she calls me a b***h. (R2) spit on me a month ago in the dayroom. (R2) called me a b***h yesterday. (R2) calls me a b***h about three to four times a week. I am tired of it. (R2) has also hit me in the cheek because I would not give her my soda. I try to stay away from her. Next time (R2) touches me I will hit her back! On 1-29-24 at 1:40 PM V29 (CNA) stated, I witnessed (R2) hit (R3) in the cheek a few months ago. (R2) wanted (R3's) pop. When (R3) wouldn't give (R2) her pop, (R2) hit (R3) in the cheek. (R3) had a red mark on her cheek. 3. R5's BIMS (Brief Illness of Mental Status) evaluation dated 11-14-23 documents resident is cognitively intact. On 1-29-24 at 12:45 PM R5 was lying flat in his bed. R5 was groomed appropriately, and no odors were noted. V4 (AIT) was in R5's room. R5 stated, Around a month ago this black lady (R2) and I got into an argument in the hallway. (R2) called me a little b***h and calls other residents b*****s. (R2) is very mean. Right when I turned around R2 hit me in the back of my head. (R2) has anger issues and I am scared to even be around her. I sit in my room a lot to stay far away from her because you never know when she will just go off. The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy dated 11/28/2016 documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse of its residents, and have therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse of our residents. This will be occurrences of mistreatment exploitation, neglect, or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: Establishing an environment that promotes resident sensitivity, resident security, and prevention of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Identifying occurrences and patterns of potential mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property. On 2-9-24 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: 1. On 2-2-24 V34 (Medical Director) reviewed and approved the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy. 2. On 2-2-24 R1 met one-on-one with the social service department to address any concerns and to provide TLC (Tender Loving Care). 3. On 2-2-24 V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) in-serviced V1 (AIT) and V4 (AIT) on the facility's Abuse Prevention Program focusing on what constitutes abuse, and how to prevent abuse. 4. On 2-2-24 V1 in-serviced the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) on Abuse Prevention Program focusing on what constitutes abuse and how to prevent abuse. 5. On 2-2-24 V1 and designated IDT members in-serviced all staff on Abuse Prevention Program focusing on what constitutes abuse and how to prevent abuse. 6. On 2-2-24 V1 started an initial report and investigation into R1 and R2's abuse allegations that had not been investigated prior. 7. On 2-2-24 all residents that are able to be interviewed and staff were interviewed by members of IDT to ensure all residents are protected from abuse and feel safe in their home. 8. On 2-2-24 all residents were assessed by the social service department for risk of reprisal from others. 9. On 2-2-24 all residents with noted aggression towards others, behaviors were assessed, and interventions developed, implemented, and care planned and updated accordingly by V31 (MDS Coordinator). 10. On 2-2-24 V1 (AIT) and designated members of the IDT staff in-serviced all staff on adequate supervision of all residents to prevent abuse. 11. R2 was discharged to another facility on 1-30-24. Completion Date: 2-2-24
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Transfer Requirements (Tag F0622)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R11's Pre-screening/Screening Assessment for Harmful Behaviors dated 12-22-2020 (prior to R11's Admission) documents R11 has ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R11's Pre-screening/Screening Assessment for Harmful Behaviors dated 12-22-2020 (prior to R11's Admission) documents R11 has a history of the following: 1. General behavior appears to integrate manipulative statements including small lies and stretching the truth (embellished stories, half-truths, etcetera). 2. Appears to harbor considerable fears concerning issues such as: separation from support system, long term care placement, living in a group situation, being a recipient of care, and prehension regarding the disease or illness. 3. Attempts to make others including caregivers and/or family members feel guilty, ineffective, angry, and/or inadequate. 4. History or active use of addictive substances (example: alcohol abuse) and/or attempts to have doctor prescribe narcotics. Recognize chemical addiction as self-destructive behavior. 5. Non-compliance with medication and treatment regimen and/or makes frequent requests for order changes (examples: medications, diet). R11's current POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents R11 was admitted on [DATE] and has the following, but not limited to, diagnoses: schizoaffective disorder; Bipolar Type, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Heart Failure, Low Back Pain, Unspecified Asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. This same form documents R11 receives Buspirone HCL (Hydrochloride) 10mg (milligram) one tablet two times a day for obsessive compulsive disorder and Clonazepam 0.5mg 1 tablet two times a day for Obsessive compulsive disorder. R11's BIMS (Brief Mental Interview Status) dated 12-19-2023 documents R11 is cognitively intact. R11's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R3 has exhibited no physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others. R11's Progress Notes dated 11-20-23 through 1-17-24 documents the following: On 11-29-23, 12-06-23, 12-07-23, 12-9-23, 12-11-23, 12-27-23, 12-28-23, 1-9-24, 1-10-24, 1-16-24, 1-18-24, 1-22-24, and 1-23-24 R11 had verbal behaviors or arguments directed towards staff. These same notes did not document any behavioral interventions that were attempted for R11's behaviors or if they were effective. R11's Behavior Monitoring and Interventions Report dated 11-6-23 documents R11 had verbal behaviors and physical behaviors. The only intervention attempted was one on one of staff and the form documents R11's behavior did not change. No other interventions were attempted by staff. R11's Behavior Monitoring and Interventions Report dated 11-20-23 documents R11 had multiple verbal and physical behaviors and no interventions were attempted by staff. R11's Behavior Monitoring and Interventions Report dated 12-6-23 documents R11 had verbal behaviors and insomnia and no interventions were attempted by staff. R11's Behavior Monitoring and Interventions Report dated 12-7-23 documents R11 had verbal behaviors that improved with one-on-one intervention. R11's Behavior Monitoring and Interventions Report dated 1-17-24 documents R11 had multiple physical and abusive verbal behaviors and no interventions were attempted by staff. R11's Behavior Monitoring and Intervention Report dated 11-1-23 through 1-17-24 documents R11 had no other behaviors within this time frame, except for the behaviors identified above. R11's Physician Notes dated November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024 and signed by V34 (R1's Primary Physician) does not document any behavioral concerns related to R11. R11's Progress Note dated 1-23-24 and signed by V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) documents, This writer received call from facility Administrator. Reviewed concerns in regard to resident (R11). Reported peer concern during care plan meeting today that (R11) causes such an unpleasant environment with his constant badgering of staff and others that peer has not been coming to meal or activities. Reporting staff concerns related to behavior as (R11) continues to create an environment where staff do not feel safe to work. (R11) continues to call staff racial slurs and other derogatory names. It was reported (R11) also allegedly spat at staff. R11's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Care Plan does not document any behaviors of R11 spitting on staff prior to 1-23-24 and does not include behavioral interventions to address R11 spitting on staff on 1-23-24. R11's (EHR) also does not document any interventions or new interventions to address R11 creating an unpleasant environment for staff and/or residents. R11's Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge and Opportunity for Hearing for Nursing Home Residents form dated 11-20-23 documents an involuntary transfer or discharge issued to R11 on 11-20-23 due to the physical safety of other residents, the facility's staff, or visitors. The Department of Public Health State of Illinois form dated 11-30-23 documents, R11 versus (the facility). On Wednesday, December 6, 2023, at 9:30 AM, a pre-hearing will be held concerning the involuntary transfer or discharge of the Complainant to determine whether the involuntary transfer or discharge is authorized for the reasons specified by the Respondent in the Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge. The hearing will be held via teleconference. R11's Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge and Opportunity for Hearing Nursing Home Residents form dated 1-23-24 documents an emergency transfer or discharge issued to R11 on 1-23-24 due to the safety of individuals in (the facility) being endangered. R11's Medical Record does not include documentation from the Physician (V34) of the specific needs the facility could not meet, the facility efforts to meet R11's needs, and the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet the needs of the resident which cannot be met at the current facility. R11's Plan of Care dated 11-20-23 through 1-17-24 does not include any new interventions regarding R11's increase in behaviors, including but not limited to, verbal behaviors towards staff, entering staff areas, causing an unpleasant environment for other residents, or spitting on staff prior to R11's initiated involuntary emergency discharge on [DATE]. On 1-29-24 at 9:45 AM V1 AIT (Administrator in Training stated (the facility) had to initiate an emergency involuntary discharge to R11 because R11 was spitting on staff and entering staff areas without permission, and the facility had several staff walk out because of R11. V1 stated the facility emergency discharged R11 to the (homeless shelter). V1 also stated there was a hearing set on 1-30-24 with (the facility), the judge, and R11 regarding R11's involuntary discharge. (The facility) decided to initiate an emergency involuntary discharge to R11 (prior to the hearing date set on 1-30-24). V1 stated the facility emergently discharged R11 to the (homeless shelter). On 1-29-2024 at 10:11 AM R4 stated, I lived on the same hall as (R11) and was never bothered by him. I had never seen (R11) be mean to any other residents. On 1-29-24 at 10:15 AM V5 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, R11 could be accusatory, but for the most part was easy to deal with. On 1-29-24 at 10:30 AM V7 CNA stated, I liked (R11). I did not have any concerns with him. I have never witnessed him do anything physical to anyone. On 1-29-24 at 2:10 PM V17 (Laundry Aide) stated, On 1-17-24 (R11) came barging through the laundry room doors wanting to warm his coffee up in the microwave. (R11) is not supposed to be in the laundry area. I kept telling (R11) to get out, get out! (R11) refused to get out so we called for staff to help remove (R11). (R11) was removed by staff. I did not call (R11) any names until I closed the laundry room door. After I closed the door, I called (R11) a dumb b*****d to my co-worker. I do not know what to do for (R11's) behaviors. I have never been trained in de-escalating behaviors or what to do when (R11) has behaviors. On 1-30-24 at 12:40PM R8 stated, I have never seen R11 be mean to any other resident. R11 did not prevent me from coming out of my room. I always come out to the front lobby to watch television. On 1-30-24 at 1:55 PM V32 (Regional Ombudsman) stated, I was aware of (R11's) involuntary discharge from the facility. I submitted an appeal because it was an illegal involuntary discharge. We were supposed to meet with the judge, the facility, and (R11) today regarding the appeal however the facility had already done an emergency involuntary discharge on (R11). I came to the facility on 1-23-24 when the facility was initiating an emergency involuntary discharge to (R11). (R11) was very angry and had tears and did not want to leave. The staff made (R11) leave and called the police. (R11) felt intimidated by the police so he thought it would be better just to go ahead and leave. I was told the reasoning for the emergency involuntary discharge was due to two staff members quitting because (R11) spit on them. (R11) is now living at the (homeless shelter) and is not handling it well. (R11's) anxiety has worsened and he reports being in more pain. The facility should have allowed for the appeal process to be done prior to involuntary discharging (R11). On 1-31-24 at 1:10 PM V12 CNA stated, (R11) was pretty good. He could be very rude to staff, but usually always apologized. On 1-31-23 at 2:05 PM R10 stated, I was (R11's) roommate. (R11) did not have any behaviors unless management staff taunted him. (R11) was tired of seeing how the residents were being treated at the facility and started to speak up, and the managers did not like it. I never saw (R11) abuse any residents. On 2-1-24 at 1:15 PM R11 stated, I lived at (the facility) for three years and have had no issues until (V25 prior Administrator) started to come into me and my roommate's room without my permission. (V25) was taking my roommates items without his permission. I confronted (V25) about it, and (V25) then put his foot in front of my wheelchair and would not let me move forward. I was tired of seeing the way administration was treating other residents, so I started advocating for the other residents and staff did not like it. Staff would laugh at me and treat me like an animal. They were treating me like a dog and making me stay in my room like I was in a prison around there (the facility). When I would say something back to the staff, I was told that staff were quitting because of me and that they would have to discharge me. I had put in an appeal and the facility did not even allow me to meet for the appeal. They decided to hurry up and do an emergency discharge right before the appeal (1-30-24) because their reasoning was staff were quitting because of me. I was forced to leave by the facility calling the police and intimidating me with the police. I had to go to the (homeless shelter). The (homeless shelter) was unable to accommodate my wheelchair to enter the building, I am sleeping on a floor which has caused me to be in excruciating pain due to my lower back. I have had major chest pains, and I am a nervous wreck. I am angry and I am scared I will not find anywhere to live or have transportation to make it to any doctor's appointments. I miss the staff at the facility that treated me good. On 2-2-24 at 8:20 AM V34 (R11's Primary Physician) stated, I did not know the facility involuntarily discharged (R11) to the (homeless shelter). I was not asked to provide (R11's) needs, needs that could not be met by the facility, or the reason for (R11's) transfer. I was unaware that the facility was doing an emergency involuntary discharge due to (R11's) behaviors. I am unable to recall the facility notifying me of any increase behaviors (R11) may have been experiencing or ever writing an order for (R11) to be involuntarily discharged . On 2-2-24 at 11:30 AM V14 (Social Service Director) stated, I had nothing to do with (R11's) discharge. I am not the one who dealt with the situation. I have not updated (R11's) care plan with any new interventions regarding (R11's) behaviors. On 2-2-24 at 11:35 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she was not aware of any documentation in R11's record of the needs the facility could not provide to R11 or the interventions attempted to meet those needs prior to involuntarily discharging R11 to the (homeless shelter). On 2-2-24 at 3:27PM V36 CNA stated, I worked at the facility for five years on and off. The reasoning for leaving was not because of (R11). I do not know why administration is telling people that. I was not there at the time (R11) was discharged . I was there that morning and (R11) was not acting like himself. (R11) seemed off and seemed upset and angry. (R11) had never done anything to me since I have worked there. (R11) could easily be directed when he had behaviors. I do not think (R11) should have been discharged for behaviors. I think (R11) came to our facility because of his behaviors. I walked out because I was being harassed by another staff member because of another staff member and (the facility) did not do anything about it. I don't remember (R11) ever acting bad. On 2-2-24 at 3:34PM V37 CNA stated, I have worked at the facility for around six months. (R11) had very few behaviors when I first worked for him. Within the last couple months, I noticed his behaviors were increasing. I believe it was after the involuntary discharge was given to him. I never see (R11) get physical with residents. There was one time a resident was talking to herself and (R11) went up to her and started to be bossy, but that's about it. The facility did not train me or tell me behavioral interventions to deal with (R11's) behaviors besides getting the nurse. I never received any behavioral training. I did not see an individual plan of care that had interventions to help manage (R11's) behaviors. I was not taught any other behavior interventions to deal with (R11). On 2-2-24 at 11:45 AM V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) stated R11's medical record does not have physician documentation of R11's specific needs the facility could not meet, the facility efforts to meet R11's needs, and the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet the needs of the resident which cannot be met at the current facility. On 2-4-24 at 11:30AM V1 AIT (Administrator in Training) stated she was only aware of two staff members that quit or threatened to quit because of R11. V1 stated, (V36 CNA) quit because of him and (V17 Laundry Aide) threatened to quit because of him. V1 was unaware of any other staff members quitting over R11. V1 also stated she is unaware of the resident that (V18 Corporate Regional Nurse) documented on in R11's progress note on 1-23-24 that was staying in their room and not coming out to meals because of R11. The facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy and Procedure policy (undated) documents, It is the policy of (the facility) not to transfer or discharge a resident unless: 1. The transfer or discharge is necessary to meet the resident's welfare, and the resident's welfare cannot be met in the facility. In all cases except the last, documentation in the resident's clinical record shall be required. The residents attending physician must document in the resident's clinical record that the facility cannot provide for the resident's welfare, or that the resident no longer requires the facilities services. Documentation in the resident's clinical record by any physician that the health of other individuals would be endangered is cause for transfer or discharge. Involuntary transfers or discharges. Except for the case of late payment or nonpayment, the facility shall notify the resident and the residents family member, surrogate or representative of the transfer and the reasons for the transfer as stated in the clinical record. Notice of involuntary transfer/discharge shall be on the forms prescribed by Illinois Department of Health. In all other instances of involuntary transfer or discharge the mandated and federal and state 30 day Notice Transfer or Discharge will be issued, and the following steps taken: 1. The planned involuntary transfer or discharge shall be discussed with the resident, guardian, residents' representative and/or the person or agency responsible for the resident's placement, maintenance, and care in the facility. 2. The discussion shall be carried out by the administrator or his/her designee. The content of the discussion and explanation shall be summarized in writing, including the names of those in attendance. The summary shall be made a part of the residents clinal record. 3. A physicians discharge order shall be obtained in the residents record prior to discharge. 4. Prior to transfer or discharge the Social Service Director shall counsel the resident and summarize the counseling session in the resident's record. The Facility Assessment Policy dated 10-23-23 documents, Resident admission based on common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, or a combination of conditions that require complex medical care and condition management. The list below describes residents' that (the facility) accommodates for and regularly manages. Category: Psychiatric/Mood disorder- Psychosis, Hallucinations (auditory), delusions, mental disorder, MR (Mental Retardation) disorder, depression, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), behavior requiring interventions, suicidal ideation, hx (history) of substance abuse. Cares provided for the resident population include by are not limited to: Mental health and behavior- Identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with anxiety, cognitive impairment, depression, PTSD, and other psychiatric diagnosis. Support by group and individual therapies, and structured activities. In house psychiatric physician management. Management of medical conditions- Assessment an early identification of problems and change in condition. Management of medical and psychiatric symptoms and conditions. Special Care Needs- Hospice, end of life care, Mental Health Programming. Provide resident-centered- Supporting psychosocial needs, building relationships with residents, honoring resident preferences, discussion on individualized resident plan of care, culturally competent care provided, religious preferences acknowledged (if identified), opportunities for social events, prevention of abuse and neglect, identification of hazards and resident risks, family and representative support provided. On 2-9-24 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: 1. On 2-7-24 V34 (Medical Director) reviewed the Emergency Care Behavior Problem policy. 2. On 2-7-24 V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) in-serviced V1 (AIT) and V4 (AIT) regarding the facility's Emergency Care: Behavior Problem policy and the facility's Discharge policy including resident, resident representative, and ombudsman notification of discharge and appeal rights and thoroughly documenting needs that cannot be met. V1 and V4 were also in-serviced on facility assessment regarding services and cares the facility is able to provide based on residents needs/diagnoses, and Admission/Transfer/Discharge procedures. 3. On 2-7-24 V1 (AIT) in-serviced the IDT (Inter-Disciplinary Team) and Nursing Staff regarding the facility's Emergency Care: Behavior Problem policy and the facility's Discharge policy including resident, resident representative, and ombudsman notification of discharge and appeal rights and thoroughly documenting needs that cannot be met. The IDT and Nursing Staff were also in-serviced on facility assessment regarding services and cares the facility is able to provide based on residents needs/diagnoses, and Admission/Transfer/Discharge procedures. 4. All staff prior to their next scheduled shifts reviewed the facility training videos: How to Strategies for Intervening with Challenging Individuals, as well as Calming the Agitated Resident and were in-serviced on 2-7-24 by V1 (AIT) and/or IDT designee on Emergency Care: Behavior Problem revised policy. 5. On 2-7-24 V1 (AIT) and/or IDT designated staff in-serviced all staff on any newly developed resident behavior interventions and where in (electronic medical record) monitored behaviors and interventions are located. 6. On 2-7-24 V31 (MDS/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) assessed all residents, with noted aggressions towards others, behaviors and PASSR Level II recommendations and developed and implemented interventions that were not already in place. 7. An Immediate QA (Quality Assurance) meeting was held on 2-7-2024. This meeting was held with Facility IDT Team and Regional Team. IDT in conjunction with Regional Team reviewed R2 and R11. R2's and R11's re-admission to the facility did not occur. Many factors were considered including the safety of all other residents who reside in the facility as well as Illinois Public Health Code; section 3-402. Section 3-415, and section 3-416. R11 was deemed an immediate safety risk to others and decision stands on emergency involuntary discharge. R2 posed a safety risk to her and others and was accepted by and currently residing in a facility who is able to meet her needs. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to document all measures the facility took to meet R2 and R11's behavioral and mental health needs that could not be met by the facility, failed to develop and implement behavioral interventions and care plans to meet those behaviors, failed to document the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet R2 and R11's needs which could not be met by the facility, prior to discharging R2 to another long-term care facility, failed to notify R2's Physician of R2's discharge and R11's emergency discharge, and failed to allow R11 to remain in the facility while a discharge appeal was pending for two of three residents (R2 and R11) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 76. These failures resulted in R2 being transferred back to the same long-term care facility (name of facility) that was unable to meet R2 behavioral needs prior to admission to this facility and R2 experiencing increased anxiety and behaviors after being transferred to the accepting facility on 1-30-24. These failures also resulted in R11 being involuntarily discharged on 1-23-24, before R11's scheduled discharge appeal date of 1-30-24, to a homeless shelter that could not accommodate R11's wheelchair, where R11 has been sleeping on the floor causing R11 excruciating back pain, having major chest pain, having increased anxiety, having increased anger, having fearfulness of not finding adequate housing, and being unable to find transportation to doctor appointments from the homeless shelter. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy started on 1-23-24 at 3:00 PM when the facility involuntarily discharged R11 to a homeless shelter that could not accommodate R11's wheelchair, where R11 has been sleeping on the floor causing R11 excruciating back pain, having major chest pain, having increased anxiety, having increased anger, having fearfulness of not finding adequate housing, and being unable to find transportation to doctor appointments from the homeless shelter. V1 (Administrator-In-Training) and V57 (Regional Director of Operations) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2-6-24 at 9:40 AM. While the immediacy was removed on 2-7-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to in-service all staff and newly hired staff on Admission, Discharge, Transfer, including Involuntary Discharge, and Emergency Care: Behavior Problem policies and watches facility training videos and all residents care plans are reviewed quarterly, or sooner, including behaviors and interventions by the Care Plan Coordinator and other members of IDT (Inter-Disciplinary Team). Regional Directors will monitor compliance of the above mentioned through internal QA (Quality Assurance) process quarterly. 1. R2's Pre-admission Referral Packet including R2's Care Plan and Progress Notes dated 4-28-23 through 5-23-23 that was provided to the facility on 6-7-23 from (transferring Long Term Care Facility) documents R2 was exhibiting verbal and physical outbursts, was easily agitated with peers, responded at times with verbal and physical aggression, and was spitting on other people prior to admission to the facility on 6-7-23. R2's admission summary dated [DATE] documents, This [AGE] year-old African American was admitted to (facility) from (transferring long-term care facility) on 6-7-23. Unaware of time, date, and facility. Ambulates on own. Diagnosis: Bipolar Disorder current episode manic without psychotic features and TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury). R2's Progress Notes dated 11-1-23 at 10:52 PM and signed by V24 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, (R2) reportedly spitting multiple times on peers today. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-12-23 at 12:35 PM and signed by V24 (RN) documents, (R2) reportedly spit on a peer today. Re-directed and behavior not reported by peer again. R2's Final Report dated 1-25-24 documents on 1-25-24 R1 stated she was on the floor close to R2's room when R2 approached R1 and kicked her. R2's current Care Plan does not include interventions addressing R2 spitting on other residents, addressing R2 targeting R1, and addressing R2 kicking R1 in the face on 1-25-24. R2's Behavioral Care Solutions for Adults and Seniors Physician's Notes dated 1-13-24, 11-12-23, 10-9-23, and 8-10-23 and signed by V35 (Psychiatric Medical Doctor) all documents R2 has had no prior history of aggression or violence. R2's Social Services Notes dated 1-30-24 at 2:24 PM and signed by V14 (Social Service Director) documents R2 will be moving to another long-term care facility (back to the Long-Term Care Facility that the resident transferred in from on 6/07/24). This same note does not document the reason for R2's transfer to another facility. R2's Discharge summary dated [DATE] is incomplete. Section K. Brief Medical History and Section L. Current Treatments and Therapies of R2's Discharge Summary are incomplete and do not include R2's medical history, current treatment, or current therapies. R2's Care Plan dated 6-7-23 (Admission) through 1-30-24 (Discharge) does not include a comprehensive discharge plan. R2's Medical Record does not include documentation from the Physician (V34) of the specific needs the facility could not meet, the facility efforts to meet R2's needs, and the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet the needs of the resident which cannot be met at the current facility. On 1-29-24 at 1:55 PM V31 (MDS/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated, I am responsible for (R2's) care plan. (R2) has not had an intervention developed to address (R2) spitting on other residents or staff. (R2) has not had any additional behavior interventions developed after kicking (R1) in the face. On 2-2-24 at 8:20 AM V34 (R2's Physician) stated, I do not know a lot about (R2). I did not know the facility transferred (R2) to another facility. I was not asked to provide (R2's) needs, needs that could not be met by the facility, or the reason for (R2's) transfer. On 2-2-24 at 11:15 AM V33 (R2's POA) stated, The facility admitted (R2) from the same facility (transferring Long Term Care Facility) that they just discharged (R2) back to on Wednesday. That facility was not able to manage (R2's) behaviors either. I did not want (R2) to go back to that same facility. I did not even get a chance to decide on whether I was okay for the facility to transfer (R2) to another facility. (R2) had major behaviors when living at that facility before. The facility left messages on my phone and did not get my permission before sending (R2) to another facility. I called the facility and was told they had already transferred (R2) back to the old facility again because (R2) was having behaviors that they facility could not manage. The facility knew (R2) had behaviors when they accepted (R2) that she had major behaviors. (R2's) behaviors is the reason why the prior facility transferred her to this facility. V14 (Social Service Director) told me the facility transferred (R2) to another facility so that (R2) would have a clean medical record regarding (R2's) behaviors and that would allow (R2) to get closer to me eventually. (R2) has had increased behaviors and anxiety the last two days since being sent to the other facility, and (R2) has been blowing up my phone. On 2-2-24 at 11:30 AM V14 stated, I tried to call (V33) four times on 1-30-24 about the facility transferring (R2) to another facility. (V33) did not answer. The other facility was a safer place for (R2). (V33) called me back the next day on 1-31-24 and I let him know we transferred (R2) to the other facility. (V33) did not really like that (R2) was transferred to the facility that she had was at before. V14 stated she was not aware of any documentation in R2's record of the needs the facility could not provide to R2 or the interventions attempted to meet those needs prior to transferring R2 to another facility. On 2-2-24 at 11:35 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she was not aware of any documentation in R2's record of the needs the facility could not provide to R2 or the interventions attempted to meet those needs prior to transferring R2 to another facility. On 2-2-24 at 11:45 AM V18 (Corporate Nurse) stated, We (the facility) decided to transfer (R2) to another facility because we felt like the other facility could offer (R2) better services for her behaviors. R2's medical record does not have physician documentation of the specific needs the facility could not meet, the facility efforts to meet R2's needs, and the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet the needs of the resident which cannot be met at the current facility. On 2-2-24 at 1:35 PM V32 (Regional Ombudsman) stated, The facility did not inform me that they were transferring (R2) to another facility.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their Abuse policy by failing to protect mul...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their Abuse policy by failing to protect multiple residents from verbal, physical, and mental abuse from another resident (R2), failing to provide adequate supervision of (R2) to prevent (R2) from further abusing other residents, failing to investigate and report to the state surveying agency multiple reports of resident-to-resident abuse, failed to thoroughly investigate resident-to resident abuse allegations, and failing to notify the police of resident-to-resident abuse for three of four residents (R1, R3, and R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 76. These failures resulted in R2 (alleged perpetrator) having continued unsupervised access to all residents residing within the alarmed unit after R2 physically assaulted R1 by spitting on R1 on multiple occasions, cursing at R1 on multiple occasions, kicking and stomping R1 in the face, striking R3 in the face, striking R5 in the back of the head, and pushing R5 backwards. These failures have the potential to affect all residents (R3, R5, R12-R47) residing within the alarmed unit that R2 resides. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy started on 11-01-23 at 10:52 AM when R2 was spitting on peers and an abuse investigation was not done and the residents were not protected from R2, resulting in R2 continuing to spit on other residents and R2 continuing to physically abuse other residents. V1 (Administrator-In-Training) and V57 (Regional Director of Operations) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2-2-24 at 9:45 AM. While the immediacy was removed on 2-2-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to educate current and newly hired staff on the facility's Abuse Prevention Program, assess all residents for abusive type behaviors and protections from abuse, develop interventions/care plans and implement interventions to address those behaviors, review those care plans quarterly, and the QA (Quality Assurance) team monitors compliance. R2's admission summary dated [DATE] documents, This [AGE] year-old African American was admitted to (facility) from (another long-term care facility). Unaware of time, date, and facility. Ambulates on own. Diagnosis: Bipolar Disorder current episode manic without psychotic features. R2's Order Summary Report dated 1-29-24 documents R2 has the diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder, Episode Manic Without Psychotic Features, and anxiety disorder. R2's Social Services Note Late Entry dated 9-5-23 at 10:08 AM and signed by V26 (Prior Social Service Director) documents, (R2) was involved in an alleged altercation with a female peer (R3) on 9-4-23. R3's BIMS dated 11-9-23 documents R3 is cognitively intact. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-1-23 at 10:52 PM and signed by V24 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, (R2) reportedly spitting multiple times on peers today. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-12-23 at 12:35 PM and signed by V24 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, (R2) reportedly spit on a peer today. Re-directed and behavior not reported by peer again. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-30-23 through 12-2-23 documents on 11-30-23 R2 had an alleged physical altercation with a peer in the common area. R2's AIM (Acute Illness Management) for Wellness Event Record dated 1-6-24 at 5:05 PM and signed by V11 (LPN) documents, (R2) appears to have been involved in an altercation with a peer (R5). Just prior to/at time of the event (R2) appears to have been in the dining room. (R2's) papers states (R2) punched (R5) in the back of the head because he would not share his soda. R5's BIMS (Brief Illness of Mental Status) evaluation dated 11-14-23 documents resident is cognitively intact. R1 and R2's Final Report dated 1-25-24 documents on 1-25-24 R1 stated she was on the floor close to R2's room when R2 approached R1 and kicked her. This same investigation provided by V4 (Administrator-In-Training/AIT) does not include any staff statements regarding the incident. R2's current Care Plan does not include interventions addressing R2 spitting on other residents, addressing R2 targeting R1, and addressing R2 kicking R1 in the face on 1-25-24. R1's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 11-10-23 documents R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Progress Notes dated 1-25-24 at 5:42 PM and signed by V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) AIM (Acute Illness Management) for Wellness Event Record documents, (R1) appears to have sustained an injury that was unwitnessed. Event was first noted on 1-25-24 at 4:00 PM. Evaluation of the resident and event occurred on or about 1-25-24 at 4:01 PM. Just prior to/at the time of the event (R1) appears to have been sitting on floor. (R1's) account of the event is I was on the floor and (R2) kicked me in my head. (R1) was asked to point out the residents who allegedly kicked (R1) then pointed to (R2). Staff's response is noted as assessing (R1) who reportedly received a kick to their face. (R1) rates pain level as an eight. Vocal complaints of pain at the time of the event. Pain location includes head pain and headache. (R1) sent to the emergency room for evaluation. R1's Hospital Emergency Department Notes dated 1-25-24 document, (R1) was involved in altercation at the (facility) she suffered a contusion to her face. She has some bruising of the lateral aspect of her face and the bridge (of her nose). Applied some steri-strips. (R1) states she was kicked in the face. Chief Complaint: Head injury and assault victim. R1's Health Status Notes dated 1-25-24 at 9:49 PM documents, (R1) presenting with discoloration around the left periorbital area. Wound present on left side of face above left eyelid. Wound present on right side of nose. Wound dressed with steri-strips. Will continue to monitor. On 1-29-24 at 10:30 AM R1 was sitting in a recliner in the sitting area across from the nurse's desk. R1's left eye was surrounded with golf-ball sized purple bruising with a 3 cm (centimeter) by 1 cm hematoma beneath the left eye. R1 had a 3 cm laceration to the left eyelid that was approximated with steri-strips. R1 had a 1 cm laceration to the right side of her nose that was approximated with a steri-strip. R1 stated, I was sitting on the floor in my doorway and (R2) came up and kicked me three times in the face and then stomped on me. It hurt really bad. I grabbed (R2's) leg and yelled for help. (R2) threw water on me the day before and spits on me. I was abused. I was scared of (R2). (R2) always walked by me and would call me bad names. On 1-29-24 at 11:05 AM R3 was well-groomed and alert and orientated. R3 stated, (R2) always asks me for a phone to call her brother. I do not have a phone. If I do not give (R2) a phone she calls me a b***h. (R2) spit on me a month ago in the dayroom. (R2) called me a b***h yesterday. (R2) calls me a b***h about three to four times a week. I am tired of it. (R2) has also hit me in the cheek because I would not give her my soda. I try to stay away from her. Next time (R2) touches me I will hit her back! On 1-29-24 at 12:45 PM R5 was lying flat in his bed. R5 was groomed appropriately, and no odors were noted. V4 (AIT) was in R5's room. R5 stated, Around a month ago this black lady (R2) and I got into an argument in the hallway. (R2) called me a little b***h and calls other residents b*****s. (R2) is very mean. Right when I turned around R2 hit me in the back of my head. (R2) has anger issues and I am scared to even be around her. I sit in my room a lot to stay far away from her because you never know when she will just go off. On 1-29-24 from 1:10 PM through 1:45 PM and on 1-30-24 from 11:00 AM through 11:45 AM R2 was walking around without staff supervision throughout the hallways, dining room, and sitting area. All other residents who reside on the same unit (R3, R5, R12-R47) as R2 were in the dining room, sitting area, and hallways where R2 was wandering around unsupervised. On 1-29-24 at 11:20 AM V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I was working on 1-25-24 and a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to me that (R2) kicked (R1) in the face. (R1) was sitting on the floor in her doorway, which she prefers. (R1) was bleeding form her face. I sent (R1) to the emergency room. (R1) was sent back from the emergency room with steri-strips to her lacerations. (R1) knows what is going on and tells the truth. (R1) reported that (R2) kicked her in the face and spit on her. We put direct supervision of staff on (R2) after she kicked (R1), until the next day when (R1) returned to the facility. (R1) was moved to a different unit. I am not sure if any other behavior interventions have been implemented after (R2) kicked and spit on (R1). I am not sure of any behavior interventions to keep (R2) from spitting, (R2) has a lot of aggressive behaviors and has a history of spitting on (R1) and other residents. (R2) has also spit on me and (V21/Unit Aide). (R2) calls (R1) a b***h. (R2) has also punched (R5) in the back of the head. I have reported to (V1 AIT/Administrator-In-Training) that (R2) spits on staff and other residents. (R2) is allowed to roam and be around all of the residents on this unit (R3, R5, 12-R47). This unit is alarmed at the doors and (R2) is not allowed to leave this unit. On 1-29-24 at 1:10 PM V27 (LPN) stated, (R1) knows what is going on and did not deserve to be kicked by (R2). I know (R2) spits on other residents. (R2) gets agitated very easily. On 1-29-24 at 1:20 PM V28 (CNA) stated, (R2) spits on (R1) and has poured water over her head. (R1) does not lie. (R1) did get kicked in the face by (R2). (R2) will yell at (R1) f**k you b***h! (R2) is always cussing at the residents. We try to re-direct (R2) as much as possible. (R2) roams the hallways of this closed unit and is able to be around all of the residents on this unit. On 1-29-24 at 1:40 PM V29 (CNA) stated, I witnessed (R2) hit (R3) in the cheek a few months ago. (R2) wanted (R3's) pop. When (R3) wouldn't give (R2) her pop, (R2) hit (R3) in the cheek. (R3) had a red mark on her cheek. On 1-29-24 at 1:55 PM V31 (MDS/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated, I am responsible for (R2's) care plan. (R2) has not had an intervention developed to address (R2) spitting on other residents or staff. (R2) has not had any additional behavior interventions developed after kicking (R1) in the face. On 1-29-24 at 5:10 PM V13 (LPN) stated, (R1) has been scared of (R2) for quite some time now. (R2) spits on staff and other residents. (R1) is completely alert and would be able to tell the truth if she was kicked in the face by (R2). (R5) is also alert and would also know if (R2) hit him in the head. (R2) has a fight or flight attitude. On 1-30-24 at 11:15 AM V1 (Administrator-In-Training) stated, Residents spitting on other residents is abuse. I have no evidence of investigations being completed or reported to IDPH (State Agency) for the allegations of (R2) spitting on her peers. On 1-30-24 at 12:15 PM V24 (Agency RN/Registered Nurse) stated, I have not worked at the facility for about one month. Both times I charted on (R2) spitting on her peers, I had witnessed (R2) spit on (R1). I reported both occurrences to V25 (Prior Administrator) as abuse. (R2) would get angry at (R1) because they shared a bathroom and would spit on (R1) and call (R1) a b***h. (R1) would cry and yell out. (R1) was scared of (R2). I do not recall (R1) or (R2) ever being separated. (R1) and (R2) continued to share a bathroom after (R2) would call (R1) names and spit on (R1). (R2) has anger issues and if other residents would not give her their soda, (R2) would call them b*****s. (R2) would call (R1) a b***h quite a bit. (R2) is able to roam the hallways of the unit and is not separated from any of the residents. On 1-30-24 at 1:50 PM V14 (Social Service Assistant) stated, (R1) always sits on the floor in her doorway. (R1) is care planned that she prefers to sit on the floor. (R1) sat on the floor at home. (R1) reported to me that when (R1) was sitting in the doorway of her room, (R2) went up to her and kicked her in the face. (R1) knows what is going on. (R2) spits on other residents and throws water on other residents. Administration is aware of (R2's) behaviors. (R2) throws tantrums. I am not aware of any interventions implemented to address (R2) spitting in other resident's faces or throwing water on them. After (R2) kicked (R1) in the face, we put direct supervision on (R2) until the next morning when we moved (R1) off of the unit. After the next morning, (R2) was no longer directly supervised. I am not aware of any new behavior interventions to address (R2's) behaviors after (R2) kicked (R1) in the face. (R2) walks around the hallways and dining room of this unit. On 1-31-24 at 7:24 AM V25 (Prior Administrator) stated, I do not remember anyone reporting to me that (R2) was spitting on other residents. I never did an abuse investigation about (R2) spitting on other residents or contacted the police. I would consider spitting on other residents a form of abuse. On 1-31-24 at 11:05 AM V4 (Administrator in Training) stated, When I completed my investigation for the alleged allegation between R1 and R2 on (1-25-24), I did not interview any staff members beside the reporting nurse V11 (LPN) on the unit that R1 and R2 were on to see if they had witnessed the altercation. The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy dated 11/28/2016 documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse of its residents. and have therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation neglect or abuse of its residents and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse of our residents. This will be occurrences of mistreatment exploitation, neglect, or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: Establishing an environment that promotes resident sensitivity, resident security, and prevention of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Identifying occurrences and patterns of potential mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property; Dementia management and resident abuse prevention. Immediately protecting residents involved in identified reports of possible abuse; Implementing systems to investigate all reports and allegations of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property; promptly and aggressively and making the necessary changes to prevent future occurrences. The facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Abuse: Abuse is the willful injection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Willful, as used in this definition abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Physical Abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Verbal Abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance regarding of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, threats of harm, or saying things to frighten a resident, such as telling a resident that he/she will never to be able to see his/her family again. Serious Bodily Injury: an injury involving extreme physical pain; involving substantial risk of death; involving protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation; Employees are required to immediately report any occurrences of potential/alleged mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to a supervisor and the administration. Upon learning of the report, the administrator or designee shall initiate an investigation. The facility will take steps to prevent mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of any residents and misappropriation of resident property while the investigation is underway. Residents who allegedly mistreat or abuse another resident or misappropriate resident property will be removed from contact with that resident during the course of investigation. The accused resident's condition shall be immediately evaluated to determine the most suitable therapy, care approaches and placement considering his or her safety, as well as the safety of other residents and employees of the facility. Following the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. The appointed investigator will follow the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures, attached to this policy. The Procedures contain specific investigation paths depending on the nature of the allegation, procedures for investigation, interview parameters, and reporting requirements. Final Investigation Report. The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. External Reporting of Potential Abuse: 1. Initial Reporting of Allegations. The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries from unknown source, misappropriation of resident property, and reasonable suspicion of a crime, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures. If the events that cause the reasonable suspicion result in serious bodily injury or suspected criminal sexual abuse, the report shall be made to at least on law enforcement agency of jurisdiction and IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) immediately after forming the suspicion (but not later than two hours after forming the suspicion), Otherwise, the report must be made no later than 24 hours forming the suspicion. A written report shall be sent to the Department of Public Health. The written report should contain the following information, if known at the time of report; Name, age, diagnosis and mental status of the resident allegedly abused or neglected; Type of abuse reported (physical, sexual, theft, neglect, exploitation, verbal or mental abuse); Date, time, location and circumstances of the alleged incident; Any obvious injuries or complaints of injury; and, Steps the facility has taken to protect the resident. Five-day Final Investigation Report. Within five working days after the report of the occurrence a complete written report of the confusion of the investigation, including steps the facility has taken in response to the allegation, will be sent to the department of Public Health. The Public Health requirements for a final investigation report are detailed in paragraph five of the Internal Investigations section of this procedure. Investigation Procedures: Regardless of the specific nature of the allegation (physical, sexual, verbal/exploitation/mental, theft, or neglect), the investigation shall consist of: A review of the initial written reports; Completion of a written report on the status of the investigation of the occurrence; An interview with the person(s) reporting the incident; Interviews with any witnesses to the incident; An interview with the resident; Where appropriate, an interview with the resident's attending physician or psychiatrist; A review of the medical records of any resident involved in the occurrence; If the accused individual is an employee, review the personnel file to check for references, background check, and documentation of orientation and training; An interview with staff members having contact with the resident and accused individual during the period of the alleged incident; Where appropriate, interviews with the resident's roommate, family members, visitors or others who were in the vicinity of the incident; Interviews with other residents to which the accused individual has regular contact; Interview other employees to determine if they have ever witnessed other incidents of mistreatment involving the accused individual; Obtain address, phone number and social security number of the accused individual; An interview with the accused individual or individuals (with a witness present); and a review of all circumstances surrounding the incident. On 2-9-24 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: 1. On 2-2-24 V34 (Medical Director) reviewed and approved the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy. 2. On 2-2-24 R1, R5, and R6 met one-on-one with the social service department to address any concerns and to provide TLC (Tender Loving Care). 3. On 2-2-24 V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) in-serviced V1 (AIT) and V4 (AIT) on the facility's Abuse Prevention Program focusing on what constitutes abuse, protecting residents from abuse, thoroughly investigating all allegations of abuse, and reporting to the state surveying agency and the police department allegations of abuse. 4. On 2-2-24 V1 in-serviced the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) and on Abuse Prevention Program focusing on procedures to protect all residents from abuse, implementing interventions to prevent further abuse, and providing adequate supervision to prevent abuse. 5. On 2-2-24 V1 and designated IDT members in-serviced all staff on Abuse Prevention Program focusing on procedures to protect all residents from abuse, implementing interventions to prevent further abuse, and providing adequate supervision to prevent abuse. 6. On 2-2-24 V1 started an initial report and investigation into R1 and R2's abuse allegations that had not been investigated prior. 7. On 2-2-24 all interviewable residents were interviewed by the social service department to ensure all residents are protected from abuse. 8. On 2-2-24 all residents with noted aggression towards others with behaviors were assessed and interventions developed, implemented, and care planned by updated accordingly by V31 (MDS Coordinator). 9. On 2-2-24 the Chief of Police for the local police department and V58 (Regional Marketing Director) reviewed the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy with focus on local police department expectations. 10. R2 was discharged to another facility on 1-30-24. Completion Date: 2-2-24
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the administration failed to develop behavior management policies; failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the administration failed to develop behavior management policies; failed to perform resident background checks within 24 hours of admission; failed to follow the facility's Identified Offender Policy and Procedure resulting in residents with a history of qualifying identified offender criminal conviction offenses being admitted to the facility for treatment for mental health services, without having an adequate amount of staff or adequate staff training on managing mental health disorders and behaviors, without care planning or acquiring specialized needs services as documented on those residents' PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level II screenings and their pre-admission screenings; failed to ensure resident behavioral health needs were met and behavioral interventions were developed and implemented, failed to ensure the facility's discharge policy was followed, failed to ensure the facility provided adequate direct care staff and social service staff to provide behavioral health needs, failed to ensure a licensed administrator conducted thorough abuse investigations, and failed to ensure residents were protected from abuse. These failures resulted in residents having an unsafe environment, residents exhibiting increased behaviors causing multiple resident to resident abuse altercations, resident rights not being protected, staff experiencing burnout and frustration, and residents being involuntarily discharged to a homeless shelter and a long-term care facility that was unable to meet this resident's needs prior to admission. These failures have the potential to affect all 131 residents within the facility. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy started on 12-4-23 when the facility admitted R37 who was a known high risk identified offender and did not inform staff or implement a plan of care to address R37's identified offender behavioral interventions, did not provide adequate supervision of R37 to prevent resident-to-resident altercations, and did not provide R37 a private room. V1 (Administrator-In-Training) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2-9-24 at 9:45 AM. While the immediacy was removed on 2-9-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to in-service all staff and newly hired staff on Emergency Care: Behavior Problem policies and watches facility training videos: How to Strategies for Intervening with Challenging Individuals, as well as Calming the Agitated Resident two times a month for three months, all residents' care plans are reviewed quarterly, or sooner, including behaviors and interventions focusing on residents with Level II PASRR's, by the Care Plan Coordinator (V30) and other members of IDT (Inter-Disciplinary Team), and all abuse investigations will be reviewed for thoroughness by a Licensed Nursing Home Administrator or Regional Director until the next QA (Quality Assurance) meeting. Regional Directors will monitor compliance of the above mentioned through internal QA process quarterly. The facility's Midnight Census form (dated 1-29-24) indicates that 131 residents are currently residing in the facility. On 2-2-24 at 12:00 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) provided a list that documents 32 residents (R1, R3, R4, R7, R8, R10, R12, R13, R16, R21, R25, R26, R27, R32, R35, R36, R37, R42, R56, R57, R58, R59, R61, R62, R63, R64, R67, R68, R69, R70, R73, R75) have a level two PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) indicating R1, R3, R4, R7, R8, R10, R12, R13, R16, R21, R25, R26, R27, R32, R35, R36, R37, R42, R56, R57, R58, R59, R61, R62, R63, R64, R67, R68, R69, R70, R73, and R75 have mental illness requiring specialized mental health services. R1, R3, R4, R7, R8, R10, R12, R13, R16, R21, R25, R26, R27, R32, R35, R36, R37, R42, R56, R57, R58, R59, R61, R62, R63, R64, R67, R68, R69, R70, R73, and R75's current Care Plans do not include level two PASRR recommendations. 1. R2's Social Services Note Late Entry dated 9-5-23 at 10:08 AM and signed by V26 (Prior Social Service Director) documents, (R2) was involved in an alleged altercation with a female peer (R3) on 9-4-23. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-1-23 at 10:52 PM and signed by V24 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, (R2) reportedly spitting multiple times on peers today. R2's Progress Notes dated 11-12-23 at 12:35 PM and signed by V24 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, (R2) reportedly spit on a peer today. Re-directed and behavior not reported by peer again. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents R2 was in a physical altercation with R1 on 1-25-24 and R2 was in a physical altercation with R5 on 1-6-24. R2's current Care Plan does not include interventions addressing R2 spitting on other residents, addressing R2 targeting R1, and addressing R2 kicking R1 in the face on 1-25-24. R2's Social Services Notes dated 1-30-24 at 2:24 PM and signed by V14 (Social Service Director) documents R2 will be moving to another long-term care facility. 2. R11's current Face Sheet documents R11 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This same document lists R11 as being his own responsible party. R11's CHIRP (Criminal History Information Response Process) dated 12-22-2020 documents, Result: HIT. R11's CHIRP documents several convictions, Retail theft, possession of cannabis, criminal damage to property, coin machine theft, and theft. The following convictions are included on the identified offender list: Retail theft, Coin machine theft, and theft. Although requested, this was the only background check document the facility was able to provide that was completed on R11. R11's Care Plan dated 11-20-23 to 1-23-24 does not include a plan of care to address R11's CHIRP document indicating R11 was an identified offender. R11's Medical Record and Business Office Record does not include a request for a live scan State and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) fingerprint check. R11's Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge and Opportunity for Hearing Nursing Home Residents form dated 1-23-24 documents an emergency transfer or discharge issued to R11 on 1-23-24 due to the safety of individuals in (the facility) being endangered. 3. R37's IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Identified Offender Program Criminal History Analysis Security Recommendation Report dated 10-5-18 and signed by V55 (Clinical Psychologists) and V56 (Clinical Psychologists) documents, (R37) is high risk. (R37) has convictions for violate order protection, retail theft offenses three times, disorderly conduct, domestic battery/bodily harm, and possession liquor by minor. (R37) has a history of substance abuse and many physical difficulties as the result of a traumatic brain injury. (R37) is dysphagic, paraplegic, and uses a wheelchair to ambulate. Since his admission (to another facility) on August 27, 2018, he has been both verbally and physically aggressive. He has been involved in verbal altercations with other residents and threw a urinal full of urine on another resident. He had threatened to kill his roommate as he felt he was stealing from him. He has been verbally aggressive at his last placement at (another long-term care facility). His compliance with medical treatment and abstinence from alcohol/drug use should be closely monitored. I would deem (R37) a high risk due to verbal aggression, threats to kill another resident, and his throwing a urinal at another resident. R37's Face Sheet documents R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R37's Care Plan dated 12-4-23 to 2-5-24 does not include a plan of care to address R37 being a high risk identified offender with the recommendations as documented on R37's IDPH Identified Offender Program Criminal History Analysis Security Recommendation Report dated 10-5-18. R2, R4, R7, R8, R13, R17, R21, R25, R26, R32, R42, R56, R64, R66, R68, R69, R70, R71, R73, and R76's Business Office File and Medical Records do not contain evidence of the facility obtaining background checks of these residents since admission to the facility. R3, R27, R34, R36, R54, R57, R59, and R75 UCIA (Uniform Conviction Information Act) background checks document R3, R27, R34, R36, R54, R57, R59, and R75 had a documented hit that would require criminal fingerprinting to be conducted to determine of a resident is high, moderate, or low risk offender. No fingerprinting has yet to be conducted for R3, R27, R34, R36, R54, R57, R59, and R75. The facility's 2023-2024 Identified Offenders List documents R3, R18, R27, R34, R36, R37, R41, R44, R48, R49, R50, R51, R53, R54, R56, R57, R59, and R75 are identified offenders. R27, R37, R51, and R57's current care plans do not include a plan of care that addresses the identified offender risks and interventions to address those risks. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents R37 was in a verbal altercation with R71 on 2-4-24, R37 was in a physical altercation with R25 on 2-4-24 and was in a physical altercation with R46 on 1-30-24. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents R27 was in a verbal altercation with R25 on 2-2-24. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents R57 had a verbal altercation with R66 on 2-4-24 and 1-10-24 and R57 had a physical altercation with R66 on 12-10-23. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents R35 was in a verbal altercation with R42 on 2-2-24, was in a physical altercation with R73 on 12-18-23, R68 was in a verbal altercation with R72 on 12-15-23, R10 was in a physical altercation with R66 on 12-21-23, R25 was in a physical altercation with R40 on 12-19-23, and R66 was in a verbal altercation with R12 on 1-22-24. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents R44 was in a verbal altercation with R7 on 12-26-23, R44 was in a physical altercation with R30 on 12-26-23. On 1-29-24 at 10:30 AM R1 was sitting in a recliner in the sitting area across from the nurse's desk. R1's left eye was surrounded with golf-ball sized purple bruising with a 3 cm (centimeter) by 1 cm hematoma beneath the left eye. R1 had a 3 cm laceration to the left eyelid that was approximated with steri-strips. R1 had a 1 cm laceration to the right side of her nose that was approximated with a steri-strip. R1 stated, I was sitting on the floor in my doorway and (R2) came up and kicked me three times in the face and then stomped on me. It hurt really bad. I grabbed (R2's) leg and yelled for help. (R2) threw water on me the day before and spits on me. I was abused. I was scared of (R2). (R2) always walked by me and would call me bad names. On 1-29-24 at 11:05 AM R3 was well-groomed and alert and orientated. R3 stated, (R2) always asks me for a phone to call her brother. I do not have a phone. If I do not give (R2) a phone she calls me a b***h. (R2) spit on me a month ago in the dayroom. (R2) called me a b***h yesterday. (R2) calls me a b***h about three to four times a week. I am tired of it. (R2) has also hit me in the cheek because I would not give her my soda. I try to stay away from her. Next time (R2) touches me I will hit her back! On 1-29-24 at 12:45 PM R5 was lying flat in his bed. R5 was groomed appropriately, and no odors were noted. V4 (AIT) was in R5's room. R5 stated, Around a month ago this black lady (R2) and I got into an argument in the hallway. (R2) called me a little b***h and calls other residents b*****s. (R2) is very mean. Right when I turned around R5 hit me in the back of my head. (R2) has anger issues and I am scared to even be around her. I sit in my room a lot to stay far away from her because you never know when she will just go off. On 1-29-24 from 1:10 PM through 1:45 PM and on 1-30-24 from 11:00 AM through 11:45 AM R2 was walking around without staff supervision throughout the hallways, dining room, and sitting area. All other residents who reside on the same unit (R3, R5, R12-R47) as R2 were in the dining room, sitting area, and hallways where R2 was wandering around unsupervised. On 2-6-24 at 9:45 AM R37 was in the room with his roommate R67. R37 was not in a private room as recommended by his IDPH Identified Offender Program. On 2-6-24 at 10:00 AM V1 (Administrator-In-Training/AIT) provided a list of current staff who have not received behavioral training for mental illness, or CPI (Crisis Prevention and Intervention) Nonviolent Crisis Training. This list documents V1 (AIT), V2 (Director of Nursing), V4 (AIT), V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant), V8 (CNA), V12 (CNA), V17 (Laundry Aide), V20 (CNA), V24 (Agency RN/Registered Nurse), V25 (Prior Administrator), V30 (Care Plan Coordinator), V37 (CNA), V38 (CNA), V39 (CNA, V40 (CNA), V41 (CNA), V42 (CNA), V43 (Unit Aide), V44 (Unit Aide), V46 (CNA), V47 (CNA), V48 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse), V49 (LPN), V50 (Nursing Assistant), V51 (Nursing Assistant), V52 (CNA), V53 (CNA), V54 (CNA), V55 (CNA), V57 (CNA), and V58 (CNA) have not received the CPI Nonviolent Crisis Interventions Training. The facility's Annual Mandatory Training Log dated 1-1-23 through 12-31-23 documents staff should be trained annually on behavior management. This same document indicates no staff has been trained within the last year on behavioral management. The facility's CNA staffing sheets dated 1-16-24 through 1-22-24 and signed by V4 (Administrator-In-Training/AIT) document the facility did not have the required amount of CNA staff needed according to the facility's minimum staff calculator to meet the needs of the residents. On 1-29-24 at 2:00 PM, V4 (Administrator in Training) confirmed that the daily CNA staffing sheets (dated 1-16-24 through 1-22-24) were accurate and staffing was below (the facility's) minimum requirements based off the staffing calculator utilized to determine staffing needs. V58's (CNA) Notice of Termination form dated 9-12-23 documents V58 was terminated from employment immediately due to an inappropriate interaction with a resident. V58's Employee Business File documents V58 was re-hired to the facility on 1-25-24. On 1-29-24 at 9:45 AM V1 stated (the facility) had to initiate an emergency involuntary discharge to R11 because R11 was spitting on staff and entering staff areas without permission, and the facility had several staff walk out because of R11. V1 stated she did not know R11 was an identified offender and the facility emergency discharged R11 to (homeless shelter). On 1-29-24 at 10:05 AM V8 (CNA) stated, We could use some more staff here. It is hard to get everyone up and dressed and deal with residents' behaviors with the number of staff we have now. On 1-29-24 at 10:30 AM V7 (CNA) stated, We do not have enough staff here. Most resident have behaviors or mental health concerns. There is not enough staff to supervise all of the residents with behaviors. The staff here are getting burned out. On 1-29-24 at 2:00 PM V1 stated she was unaware when she re-hired V58 that V58 had been terminated from employment on 9-12-23 for an inappropriate interaction with a resident. On 1-29-24 at 2:10 PM V17 (Laundry Aide) stated, I have never been trained in de-escalating behaviors. On 1-30-24 at 11:19 AM V59 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) and V60 (LPN) stated they are unaware of any policies readily available to them regarding dealing with mental illness and behaviors. On 1-31-24 at 2:05 PM R10 stated, I had a camera I wanted to use so the facility could see how staff was treating me and my roommate (R11). (V25/Prior Administrator) came into my room and took my camera without my permission. I have not seen the camera since. I bought the camera with my own money. I have my own hot spot on my phone that I can use for Wi-Fi connection. I do not need the facility's Wi-Fi. (V25) never offered to have me sign a consent form to use the camera. I would have signed the consent form so I can use my camera. The facility will try anything in their ability to allow me to not be able to use my camera. On 2-1-24 at 1:15 PM R11 stated, I lived at (the facility) for three years and have had no issues until (V25/prior Administrator) started to come into me and my roommate's room without my permission. (V25) was taking my roommates items without his permission. I confronted (V25) about it, and (V25) then put his foot in front of my wheelchair and would not let me move forward. I was tired of seeing the way administration was treating other residents, so I started advocating for the other residents and staff did not like it. Staff would laugh at me and treat me like an animal. They were treating me like a dog and making me stay in my room like I was in a prison around there (the facility). When I would say something back to the staff, I was told that staff were quitting because of me and that they would have to discharge me. I had put in an appeal and the facility did not even allow me to meet for the appeal. They decided to hurry up and do an emergency discharge right before the appeal (1-30-24) because their reasoning was staff were quitting because of me. I was forced to leave by the facility calling the police and intimidating me with the police. I had to go to the (homeless shelter). The (homeless shelter) was unable to accommodate my wheelchair to enter the building, I am sleeping on a floor which has caused me to be in excruciating pain due to my lower back. I have had major chest pains, and I am a nervous wreck. I am angry and I am scared I will not find anywhere to live or have transportation to make it to any doctor's appointments. I miss the staff at the facility that treated me good. On 2-2-24 at 10:30 AM V14 (Social Service Director) stated, I did not know PASRR level II's existed. All residents with PASRR level II recommendations have not had care plans developed with those recommendations. On 2-2-24 at 11:15 AM V33 (R2's POA/Power of Attorney) stated, The facility admitted (R2) from the same facility that they just discharged (R2) back to on Wednesday. That facility was not able to manage (R2's) behaviors either. I did not want (R2) to go back to that same facility. I did not even get a chance to decide on whether I was okay for the facility to transfer (R2) to another facility. (R2) had major behaviors when living at that facility before. The facility left messages on my phone and did not get my permission before sending (R2) to another facility. I called the facility and was told they had already transferred (R2) back to the old facility again because (R2) was having behaviors that they facility could not manage. The facility knew (R2) had behaviors when they accepted (R2) that she had major behaviors. (R2's) behaviors is the reason why the prior facility transferred her to this facility. (V14Social Service Director) told me the facility transferred (R2) to another facility so that (R2) would have a clean medical record regarding (R2's) behaviors and that would allow (R2) to get closer to me eventually. (R2) has had increased behaviors and anxiety the last two days since being sent to the other facility, and (R2) has been blowing up my phone. On 2-2-24 at 11:30 AM V14 (Social Service Director) stated, I tried to call (V33) four times on 1-30-24 about the facility transferring (R2) to another facility. (V33) did not answer. The other facility was a safer place for (R2). (V33) called me back the next day on 1-31-24 and I let him know we transferred (R2) to the other facility. (V33) did not really like that (R2) was transferred to the facility that she had was at before. V14 stated she was not aware of any documentation in R2's record of the needs the facility could not provide to R2 or the interventions attempted to meet those needs prior to transferring R2 to another facility. On 2-2-24 at 1:00 PM V54 (Business Office Manager/BOM) stated, I am responsible to ensure any resident that has a HIT with a qualifying conviction on their background check, gets set up for fingerprinting. I follow our policy and guidelines to ensure every step is being taken and things are followed appropriately. Once a HIT is identified we will put that resident in a private room until all steps have been completed per policy and we receive an email from the state police that lists security measures and recommendations for an identified offender. The report usually states if the resident is at low, moderate, or high risk with recommendations. V54 acknowledge R11 is an identified offender and confirmed that the only paperwork she could locate was R11's background check. V54 stated she was not here when R11 admitted , but she is now conducting a facility wide audit to ensure correct resident offender status. V54 also confirmed R11 had a roommate (R10) while residing at the facility. On 2-2-24 at 1:15 PM V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) verified R11 is an identified offender. V18 stated the facility must have not set up R11 to have fingerprints done because (the facility) cannot find any documentation that R11 was ever set up for fingerprints. On 2-2-24 at 3:34 PM V37 (CNA) stated, I have worked at the facility for around six months. (R11) had very few behaviors when I first worked for him. Within the last couple months, I noticed his behaviors were increasing. I believe it was after the involuntary discharge was given to him. I never see (R11) get physical with residents. There was one time a resident was talking to herself and (R11) went up to her and started to be bossy, but that's about it. The facility did not train me or tell me behavioral interventions to deal with (R11's) behaviors besides getting the nurse. I never received any behavioral training. I was not taught any other behavior interventions to deal with (R11). On 2-6-24 at 2:00 PM V1 and V54 (BOM) both stated they were not aware that R37 was a high risk identified and needed a private room. V1 and V54 both stated R37 has had a roommate (R67) since admission on [DATE]. On 2-7-24 at 2:00 PM V16 (CNA Supervisor) verified she tracks the employee trainings and the employees have not received behavioral management training since last year. The facility's Administrator's Job Description (undated) documents, The administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting, budgeting, and the physical management of the facility, residents, and equipment in a way that the purpose of the facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws, and applicable State Regulations. The Administrator will manage and conduct the business of the facility in a manner that protects the facility licensed and certification at all times. The major goal of the Administrator is to provide an atmosphere in which residents may achieve their highest physical, mental, and social well-being. Responsibilities: 1. Operate the facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations. 2. Operate the facility in accordance with established policies and procedures. 5. Ensure that an adequate number of appropriately trained professional and auxiliary personnel are on duty at all times to meet the needs of the residents. Resident Rights: 2. Ensure that the resident's rights to fair and equitable treatment, self-determination, individuality, privacy, property, and civil rights, including the right to wage complaints are well established and maintained at all times. 5. Ensure that policies governing a timely notice for resident discharges and room, or roommate changes are strictly followed by all personnel. Administrative Functions: 2. Maintain written policies and procedures that govern the operation of the facility. 6. Ensure that all employees, residents, and visitors follow established policies and procedures. 14. Ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when conducting background checks and when providing information to the Nurse Aide Registry. The facility's Identified Offender Policy and Procedure documents, Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. In accordance with the provisions of the Nursing Home Care Act, this facility shall check the criminal history background on any resident seeking admission to the facility in order to identify previous criminal convictions. It is the policy of (the facility) that no person will be admitted if they are sex offenders. Responsibility: Administrator or a person designated by the Administrator. Identifying Offenders: 3. Conduct a Criminal History Background Check: Within 24 hours of admission, request a name-based Uniform Conviction Information ACT (UCIA) criminal history background check based on name, date of birth , and other identifiers required by the Department of State Police for any resident seeking admission to the facility. 4. Check the UCIA response against the statue citation numbers from IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) identified offender conviction list and the IDPH sex offenses list. b. If the UCIA response contains convictions that match the identified offender or sex offender statute citation numbers, the resident is an identified offender and must be reported to Identified Offenders Program. Reporting Results If the Resident is an Identified Offender: 1. Once the facility determines the resident is an Identified Offender, the facility must request in 72 hours for the resident to undergo a live scan State and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) fingerprint check within five business days. 2. Immediately complete and submit the IDPH Identified Offender Information (IOI) form attached and fax it to the IDPH Identified Offender Program (IOP) along with a copy of the UCIA response. 4. After the confirmation from the (IOP), the facility will receive a phone call from the Illinois State Police Division of Internal Investigation within three business days scheduling an on-site facility interview with the resident and the administrator. 6. The facility will receive an Identified Offender Report and Recommendations within four to six weeks. The identified Offender Report Recommendations shall detail whether and to what extent the Identified Offender's criminal history necessitates the implementation of security measure with the long-term care facility. The Identified Offender Report and Recommendations shall be incorporated into the facility's plan of care. Maintain written documentation of compliance with the above requirement. The Facility Assessment Policy (reviewed 10-23-23) documents the following: Resident admission based on common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, or a combination of conditions that require complex medical care and condition management. The list below describes residents' that (the facility) accommodates for and regularly manages. Category: Psychiatric/Mood disorder- Psychosis, Hallucinations (auditory), delusions, mental disorders, MR (Mental Retardation) disorders, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), behavior requiring interventions, suicidal ideations, and hx (history) of substance abuse. Evaluation of the overall number of facility (direct care) staff members to ensure a sufficient number of qualified staff is determined based on the number of residents requiring skilled services. (The facility) acuity level to assist in identifying the intensity of care and services needed to provide and meet resident care needs: Special Treatments and Conditions- Behavioral Health Needs- 123 average number of residents. The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Identified Offenders Program Criminal History Analysis Security Recommendation Report (undated) documents, High Risk-The resident requires a single room in close proximity to the nursing station to permit ongoing visual monitoring. The level of observation should be sufficient for early detection of behavioral changes. Regular assessment is necessary to determine whether closer monitoring or more frequent individual contact is indicated. Moderate Risk-The resident requires closer supervision and more frequent observation than standard or routine for most residents in an open facility. Regular monitoring should be attentive to behavioral changes that may signal a need for closer observation or sustained visual monitoring on a time-limited basis. Periodic assessments should ascertain whether the level of supervision is sufficient. Low Risk-the resident is subject to standard requirements for supervision in an open facility. Behavioral changes suggesting a need for closer observation should be noted and responded to according to standard facility procedures. On 2-14-24 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: 1. On 2-7-24 V34 (Medical Director) reviewed and approved the Emergency Care: Behavior Problem policy. 2. On 2-7-24 V18 (Corporate Regional Nurse) in-serviced V1 (AIT) and V4 (AIT) on Emergency Care: Behavior Problem and on the facility assessment regarding services and cares the facility is able to provide based on residents needs/diagnoses. 3. On 2-7-24 V1 (AIT) in-serviced the IDT (Inter-Disciplinary Team) and Nursing Staff regarding the Emergency Care: Behavior Problem policy and on the facility assessment regarding services and cares the facility is able to provide based on residents needs/diagnoses. 4. All staff prior to their next scheduled shifts reviewed the facility training videos: How to Strategies for Intervening with Challenging Individuals, as well as Calming the Agitated Resident and were in-serviced on 2-7-24 by V1 (AIT) and/or IDT designee on Emergency Care: Behavior Problem revised policy. 5. On 2-7-24 V1 (AIT) and/or IDT designated staff in-serviced all staff on any newly developed resident behavior interventions and where in (Electronic Medical Record) monitored behaviors and interventions are located. 6. On 2-2-24 V18 in-serviced Social Service Staff regarding PASRR level II recommendations and implementation of recommendations. 7. On 2-9-24 V1 completed a screen of all employees, including re-hired staff for abusive backgrounds using IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) healthcare worker registry. 8. On 2-13-24 and 2-14-24 V61 (Trained CPI Instructor) trained staff currently not certified in CPI. 9. On 2/9/24 a staff survey was made available for staff to complete for recommendations on improved employee engagement and burnout and a PIP (Plan of Improvement) was developed to include front line staff. 10. The facility continued to follow and implement the plan to accrue more staff to meet the needs of the mental health residents and residents with behavioral needs and the IDT Team reviewed the staffing PIP on 2/9/24. 11. On 2/9/24 V62 (Director of a Behavioral Management Company), has been scheduled through 2/16/2024 to complete training in regard to staff burnout and stress and ways to deal with it focusing on how to deal with residents with mental illness. 12. On 2-9-24 the Facility QA Team initiated a Behavior Management PIP focused on Abuse including resident to resident abuse, to aide in promoting an abuse free environment. 13. On 2-2-24 V18 in-serviced V4 on the thoroughness of abuse investigations. 14. On 2-9-24 V54 (Business Office Manager) completed all current resident background checks. 15. On 2-9-24 V54 ensured all identified offenders with qualifying convictions were fingerprinted. 16. On 2-9-24 V31 (MDS Coordinator) implemented care plans of all residents who are identified offenders.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident while showering. The f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident while showering. The facility also failed to transfer a resident with assistance of two staff as directed by the plan of care to prevent a fall for one of three residents (R55) reviewed for falls in the sample of 76. These failures resulted in R55 sustaining a fall while in the shower room, resulting in R55 suffering a head injury, head swelling, left ankle swelling with bruising, neck pain, and a traumatic hematoma to the forehead which required hospital treatment. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention policy dated 11-10-18 documents, Policy: To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence with mobility. Responsibility: All staff. Procedure: 1. Conduct fall assessments on the day of admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition. 2. Identify, on admission, the resident's risk for falls. 4. Assignment of the final risk category will be determined by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) at their conferences based on: a. Fall risk score. b. History of falls. c. Medical condition which directly impacts on equilibrium and/or ambulation. d. Discussion of individual circumstances. 7. Report all falls during the morning Quality Assurance meetings Monday through Friday. All falls will be discussed in the Morning Quality Assurance meeting and any new interventions will be written on the care plan. R55's admission Record documents R55 was admitted on [DATE]. This same form documents R55 has the following, but not limited to, diagnoses: Mild Intellectual Disabilities, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Morbid (Severe) Obesity due to excess calories, Anxiety Disorder, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage affecting left non-Dominant side, Weakness, Polyneuropathy, and Difficulty in Walking. R55's Care Plan dated 1-17-24 documents on 9-22-23 documents R55 is a high risk for falls and has right-side hemiplegia, bilateral weakness, and impaired cognition and safety awareness. This same care plan documents on 9-22-23 an intervention to assist to transfer R55 using a mechanical device and/or two staff members. R55's AIM (Acute Illness Management) for Wellness Event Record dated 11-23-23 at 7:05 AM documents V3 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) was assisting R55 with transferring from the shower chair to the stand bar in the shower room. R55 became weak and lost her balance. V3 (CNA) lowered R55 to the floor. R55 then complained of pain and had bruising to the left knee. R55 was sent to the local ED (Emergency Department) for evaluation. R55's Emergency Department Notes dated 11-11-23 documents, Chief Complaint: (R55) presents with fall, head injury (left anterior), head swelling, and neck pain. This same form documents R55 suffered from a fall at nursing home and has a traumatic hematoma to the forehead. R55's CT (Computed Tomography) Head Scan dated 11-11-23 documents, Impression: Acute posttraumatic left frontal scalp hematoma. R55's Left Ankle X-Ray dated 11-11-23 documents, Soft tissue swelling. R55's Progress Notes dated 11-12-23 at 1:45 PM documents, (R55) left ankle has a purple discoloration to it, moderate swelling, and is having some discomfort to it. X-Ray results sent to advanced practice nurse and new order to ice, elevate, and PRN (As Needed) APAP (Acetaminophen). On 1-29-24 at 9:55 AM V3 (CNA) stated, On 11-11-23 I heard (R55) yelling for help so I went into the shower room. (R55) had tried to stand up by herself from the shower chair to grab bars on the wall. (R55) got weak and I had to lower her to the floor. I was the only one transferring (R55). I did not know (R55) needed two staff for transfers or could not be left unattended in the shower. On 1-29-24 V5 (CNA) and V8 (CNA) both stated that R55 should always be a two assist for transfers and sometimes they even have to use a (mechanical) lift to transfer R55. V5 and V8 verified R55 should never be transferred with just one assist and should not be left alone in the shower room. On 1-30-24 at 10:00 AM (R55) was crying with visible tears and stated, I was left alone in the shower room for a long time. I had to yell for help. There was a bunch of water on the floor. Someone came in and tried to get up me up and I slid and fell. I hit my head and knee. I hurt my back and neck. On 1-30-24 at 10:30 AM V9 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, (R55) can stand during transfers, but requires two assists. (R55) becomes unsteady periodically, so requires a (mechanical) lift at times. On 1-30-24 at 1:00 PM (AIT/Administrator in Training) stated that he was a therapist in the past and after reviewing R55's care plan confirmed that R55 should have been a two assist when being transferred in the shower room on 11-11-23.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow a resident to use an electronic monitoring camera for one of three residents (R10) reviewed for resident rights in the s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow a resident to use an electronic monitoring camera for one of three residents (R10) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 76. Findings include: The Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Authorized Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Act Public Act 99-043 date 12/2017 documents, The authorized electronic monitoring in long-term care facilities act provided a way for residents of long-term care facilities and their families to help ensure that residents receive the best care possible. The Illinois Attorney General's office worked closely with resident advocates and long-term care facility associations to create a framework that allows residents and their families to use cameras while protecting the privacy rights of others and ensuring there is no cost to facilities. Under the Law: A resident has the right to purchase and use an electronic monitoring device that records or broadcasts audio and video after providing notice to the facility using the Electronic Monitoring Notification and Consent Form. A resident or resident's guardian must consent to the use of a camera in his/her room. A facility cannot retaliate or discriminate against any resident for consenting to electronic monitoring. R10's Final Report Investigation dated 12-21-23 documents, (R10) reported to (V1 Administrator-In-Training) of missing camera from resident's room. (R10) stated he had setup a wireless camera to record in his room and months ago. It was taken. Investigation initiated. Upon investigation (R10) was using facility Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) to run camera and recoding without filing proper state paperwork, such as consents for cameras and resident consent to be recorded. (R10's) recording devices will be stored in a safe place until he can either comply with state regulations or he discharges. R10's Medical Record does not include documentation of R10 being presented the consent to use a camera, or R10's refusal to sign the consent to use a camera. R10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12-26-23 documents R10 is cognitively intact. On 1-31-24 at 12:00 PM V1 (Administrator-In-Training) stated, (R10) refused to sign the consent to use a camera in his room. (V32 Regional Ombudsman) is aware that (R10) refused to sign the consent. (R10) cannot use the facility's Wi-Fi if he uses a camera. On 1-31-24 at 2:05 PM R10 was sitting in his room. R10 did not have a camera in his room. R10 stated, I had a camera I wanted to use so the facility could see how staff was treating me and my roommate (R11). (V25 Prior Administrator) came into my room and took my camera without my permission. I have not seen the camera since. I bought the camera with my own money. I have my own hot spot on my phone that I can use for Wi-Fi connection. I do not need the facility's Wi-Fi. (V25) never offered to have me sign a consent form to use the camera. I would have signed the consent form so I can use my camera. The facility will try anything in their ability to allow me to not be able to use my camera. On 2-1-24 at 1:15 PM R11 stated, I lived at (the facility) for three years and have had no issues until (V25 prior Administrator) started to come into me and my roommate's room (R10) without our permission. (V25) was taking my roommate's items (camera) without his permission. On 2-2-24 at 1:35 PM V32 (Regional Ombudsman) stated, I was never aware of (R10) refusing to sign a consent to use his camera in his room. Using a camera is his right.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice of a facility initiated discharge, includin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice of a facility initiated discharge, including the reason for discharge, the location to where the resident is discharged , the regional Ombudsman's and the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder contact information, or the resident's appeal rights to the resident, the resident's POA (Power of Attorney), and the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for notice of discharge in a sample of 76. Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy and Procedure policy (undated) documents, Involuntary transfers or discharges: Except for the case of late payment or nonpayment, the facility shall notify the resident and the residents family member, surrogate or representative of the transfer and the reasons for the transfer as stated in the clinical record. Notice of involuntary transfer or discharge shall be on the forms prescribed by Illinois Department of Health. In all other instances of involuntary transfer or discharge the mandated and federal and state 30 day Notice Transfer or Discharge will be issued, and the following steps taken: 1. The planned involuntary transfer or discharge shall be discussed with the resident, guardian, residents' representative and/or the person or agency responsible for the resident's placement, maintenance, and care in the facility. R2's Order Summary Report dated 1-29-24 documents R2 has the diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder, Episode Manic Without Psychotic Features, and anxiety disorder. R2's Social Services Notes dated 1-30-24 at 2:24 PM and signed by V14 (Social Service Director) documents R2 will be moving to another long-term care facility (Name of facility). This same note does not document the reason for R2's transfer to another facility. R2's Discharge summary dated [DATE] is incomplete. Section K. Brief Medical History and Section L. Current Treatments and Therapies of R2's Discharge Summary are incomplete and do not include R2's medical history, current treatment, or current therapies. R2's Medical Record does not include documentation of V33 (R2's POA), or V32 (Regional Ombudsman) receiving a notice of R2's discharge including the reason for discharge, the location to where the resident is discharged , the regional Ombudsman's and the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder contact information, or the resident's appeal rights prior to R2's discharge on [DATE]. On 2-2-24 at 11:15 AM V33 (R2's POA) stated, The facility admitted (R2) from the same facility (facility name) that they just discharged (R2) back to on Wednesday. That facility was not able to manage (R2's) behaviors either. I did not want (R2) to go back to that same facility. I did not even get a chance to decide on whether I was okay for the facility to transfer (R2) to another facility. I did not get a written notice of discharge either. On 2-2-24 at 11:30 AM V14 (Social Service Director) stated a written notice of discharge was not provided to R2, V32 (Regional Ombudsman), or V33 (R2's POA). On 2-2-24 at 11:45 AM V18 (Corporate Nurse) stated, We (the facility) decided to transfer (R2) to another facility because we felt like the other facility could offer (R2) better services for her behaviors. On 2-2-24 at 1:35 PM V32 (Regional Ombudsman) stated, The facility did not inform me that they were transferring (R2) to another facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0741 (Tag F0741)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff and train a sufficient number o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff and train a sufficient number of staff to care for and meet the behavioral needs of residents with mental and psychosocial disorders. These failures have the potential to affect all 131 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Midnight Census form (dated 1-29-24) indicates that 131 residents are currently residing in the facility. The facility's Nurse Staffing policy (undated) documents the following: It is the policy of (facility) to provide sufficient licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Nursing staff shall be based upon resident evaluation by the Administrator and Director of Nursing as specified by the (State Agency). Each skilled care resident shall receive at least 3.8 hours of nursing and personal care each day, and 2.5 hours of nursing and personal care each day for a resident needing intermediate care. A minimum of 25% of nursing and personal care time shall be provided by licensed nurses, with at least 10% of nursing and personal care time by Registered Nurses. Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses employed by a facility in excess of these requirements may be used to satisfy the remaining 75% of the nursing and personal care time requirements. The division of nursing needs by shift will be calculated based on resident census and needs. The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents the following: Resident admission based on common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, or a combination of conditions that require complex medical care and condition management. The list below describes residents' that (the facility) accommodates for and regularly manages. Category: Psychiatric/Mood disorder- Psychosis, Hallucinations (auditory), delusions, mental disorders, MR (Mental Retardation) disorders, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), behavior requiring interventions, suicidal ideations, and hx (history) of substance abuse. Evaluation of the overall number of facility (direct care) staff members to ensure a sufficient number of qualified staff is determined based on the number of residents requiring skilled services. (The facility) acuity level to assist in identifying the intensity of care and services needed to provide and meet resident care needs: Special Treatments and Conditions- Behavioral Health Needs- 123 average number of residents. On 1-29-24, V1 (Administrator in Training) provided copies of the facility's Daily Staffing Assignment sheets (dated 12-20-23 through 1-29-24) which indicate the length of time and location of the staff members working for each day. V1 also noted the facility's census with a breakdown of the census into skilled and intermediate residents and noted the facility does not have enough staff to meet the minimum requirements. V1 and V4 (Administrator in Training) both stated the facility determines their minimum requirements based on the numbers stated in their staffing policy. On 2-2-24 at 12:00 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) provided a list that documents 36 residents have a level two PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) indicating those 36 residents have mental illness requiring specialized mental health services. The facility's Resident Council dated 11/2023 documents, Social Service: Never enough time. People always coming in and out of the office when trying to talk with social worker. The facility's Resident Council dated 12-21-23 documents, CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) need to be flexible and meet resident needs. The facility's Abuse Log dated November 2023 to current date (February 6, 2024) documents the following residents with mental illness were in altercations: R35 was in a verbal altercation with R42 on 2-2-24 and was in a physical altercation with R73 on 12-18-23. R68 was in a verbal altercation with R72 on 12-15-23. R10 was in a physical altercation with R66 on 12-21-23. R25 was in a physical altercation with R40 on 12-19-23. R66 was in a verbal altercation with R12 on 1-22-24. This same Abuse Log documents V17 (Laundry Aide) was in a verbal altercation with R11 on 1-17-24. On 2-6-24 at 10:00 AM V1 (AIT/Administrator-In-Training) provided a list of current staff who have not received behavioral training for mental illness, or CPI (Crisis Prevention and Intervention) Nonviolent Crisis Training. This list documents V1 (AIT), V2 (Director of Nursing), V4 (AIT), V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant), V8 (CNA), V12 (CNA), V17 (Laundry Aide), V20 (CNA), V24 (Agency RN/Registered Nurse), V25 (Prior Administrator), V30 (Care Plan Coordinator), V37 (CNA), V38 (CNA), V39 (CNA), V40 (CNA), V41 (CNA), V42 (CNA), V43 (Unit Aide), V44 (Unit Aide), V46 (CNA), V47 (CNA), V48 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse), V49 (LPN), V50 (Nursing Assistant), V51 (Nursing Assistant), V52 (CNA), V53 (CNA), V54 (CNA), V55 (CNA), V57 (CNA), and V58 (CNA) have not received the CPI Nonviolent Crisis Interventions Training. The facility's Annual Mandatory Training Log dated 1-1-23 through 12-31-23 documents staff should be trained annually on behavior management. This same document indicates no staff has been trained within the last year on behavioral management. On 1-29-24 at 10:05 AM V8 (CNA) stated, We could use some more staff here. It is hard to get everyone up and dressed and deal with residents' behaviors with the number of staff we have now. On 1-29-24 at 10:30 AM V7 (CNA) stated, We do not have enough staff here. Most resident have behaviors or mental health concerns. There is not enough staff to supervise all of the residents with behaviors. On 1-29-24 at 2:00 PM, V4 (Administrator in Training) confirmed that the daily CNA staffing sheets dated 1-16-24 through 1-22-24 were accurate and staffing was below the facility's minimum requirements based off the staffing calculator utilized to determine staffing needs. On 1-29-24 at 2:10 PM V17 (Laundry Aide) stated, I have never been trained in de-escalating behaviors. On 1-30-24 at 11:19 AM V59 (LPN) and V60 (LPN) stated they are unaware of any policies readily available to them regarding dealing with mental illness and behaviors. On 2-2-24 at 3:34 PM V37 (CNA) stated, I have worked at the facility for around six months. (R11) had very few behaviors when I first worked for him. Within the last couple months, I noticed his behaviors were increasing. I believe it was after the involuntary discharge was given to him. I never saw (R11) get physical with residents. There was one time a resident was talking to herself and (R11) went up to her and started to be bossy, but that's about it. The facility did not train me or tell me behavioral interventions to deal with (R11's) behaviors besides getting the nurse. I never received any behavioral training. I was not taught any other behavior interventions to deal with (R11). On 2-7-24 at 2:00 PM V16 (CNA/Supervisor) verified she tracks the employee trainings and the employees have not received behavioral management training since last year
Oct 2023 18 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one (R117) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in R117 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one (R117) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in R117 receiving an open laceration to his left jaw requiring three sutures. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 11/28/2016, documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Physical Abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The Initial Report for Physical Abuse of R117, dated 10/18/23, documents an allegation of Physical abuse occurred on 10/18/23 at 12:15 pm between R117 and R92 and the police was called. The Final Report for Physical Abuse of R117, documents It was reported to (V1 Administrator) that (R92) made physical contact with (R117). (R92) stated that he was trying to make peace with (R117) by bringing him his tray. (R92) stated that he offered (R117) the tray and (R117) pushed it back into (R92) spilling it on him. (R92) the stated that he became angry and threw the tray towards (R117). (R117) states that (R92) approached him with the tray and thought that (R92) was trying to dump the tray on him and blocked him resulting in the food going on (R92). According to (R117), (R92) then picked up the tray and threw it like a Frisbee that hit (R117) on the left side of his face. Residents were then separated. Staff interviews stated that (R92) had grabbed a tray from the serving table and approached (R117). (R117) attempted to block (R92's) approach and then (R92) made contact with the tray. (R92) was removed from the area and (R117) went to Social Services office to be assessed. (R117) stated that he wanted charges to be pressed and when police arrived, they were informed of this desire. (R92) was removed from the facility in police custody. (R117) was assessed by the nurse and was recommended to be assessed at the ER (emergency room). (R117) initially declined, but with encouragement went for assessment. (R117) returned to facility after receiving three sutures to left jaw. (R92) did not return to facility. (R92) called facility to pick up belongings with friend off facility grounds. (R92) expressed no desire to return to facility. On 10/23/23 at 10:30 am, R117 was lying in bed with sutures visible to left jaw line. On 10/23/23 at 10:38 am, R117 stated he was in the dining room and R92 approached (R117) with R117's meal tray and was touching all R117's food and then pushed the tray toward R117. R117 stated he did not know if R92 was trying to hit him with the tray or dump the tray on him, so he put his arms up blocking the tray which spilled on R92. R117 stated R92 then flung the meal tray at him like a Frisbee and hit him in the face. R117 stated he ended up getting three stitches and pressed charges against R92 and R92 has not come back to the facility. On 10/23/23 at 12:00 pm, V1 (Administrator) confirmed an allegation of physical abuse was reported on 10/18/23 of R92 hitting R117 in the face with a meal tray. V1 stated there were witnesses in the dining area that he obtained statements from. V1 stated R117 did go to the hospital for an evaluation and received three stitches to his left jaw. V1 stated R117 wanted to press charges and the police took R92 to jail. V1 stated R92 was released from jail but did not want to return to the facility.
SERIOUS (H)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered and assess pain...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered and assess pain on a daily basis for four of four residents (R88, R117, R233, R285) reviewed for pain in the sample of 23. These failures resulted in R285 having intractable pain following a fall that resulted in a fractured rib. Findings include: The facility's Pain Prevention & Treatment policy, dated 12/7/17, It is the facility policy to assess for, reduce the incidence of and the severity of pain in an effort to minimize further health problems, maximize ADL (Activities of Daily Living) functioning and enhance quality of life. Responsibility: All nursing personnel, physical therapists, occupational therapist, attending physician, Interdisciplinary Care Team. Pain Treatment Plan: a plan based on information gathered during a resident pain assessment that identifies the resident's needs and specifies appropriate interventions to alleviate pain to the extent feasible and medically appropriate. The Pain Management Flow Sheet will be initiated for those residents with but no limited to routine pain medication, daily pain, diagnosis that may anticipate pain (i.e., arthritis, wounds, fractures, etc.). Information collected on the Pain Assessment Form will be used to formulate and implement a resident specific Pain Treatment Plan documented in the resident's care plan. 1. On 10/22/23 at 10:50 AM, R285 was alert and oriented sitting up in a wheelchair in the dining room. R285 had tremors to his bilateral hands. R285 stated, I fell last week getting up out of bed. I fell back onto my side rail and broke a rib on my back side. They were out of my (narcotic pain medication) for a few days. The pain was awful, and it's still not good. Right now, my pain is a sharp stabbing '7' (scale of 0-10). I can't even breath or talk without it hurting. I tried to pull myself up in bed, and the pain got so bad I'm pretty sure I passed out. My pain was a 10+. R285's Pain Evaluation, dated 10/11/23, documents that R285 has almost constant pain to his right shoulder rating it at a 9 on a scale of 0-10. R285's After Visit Summary, dated 10/14/23, documents, Reason for visit: Fall. Shoulder pain. Diagnoses: Closed fracture of one rib of right side. Mood disorder. Recurrent falls. Contusion of right shoulder. The Summary also documents that he has an order to receive (Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg (milligrams) every four hours prn (as needed), and a follow up appointment at a Pain Clinic on 10/23/23 at 8:00 a.m. R285's Pain care plan, dated 10/11/23, documents, The resident has chronic pain related to Parkinson's. The care plan has no revision to include R285's pain related to his closed fracture of a rib of the right side as a result of the 10/14/23 fall. R285's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated 10/23, documents that R285 started (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5-325 mg one every six hours as needed for moderate and severe pain on 10/14/23. R285 received an as needed doses on 10/14/23 at 8:00 p.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/15/23 at 3:30 a.m. for pain at a level 7, at 11:52 a.m. for pain at a level 5, and at 5:30 p.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/16/23 at 4:01 a.m. for pain at a level 9, and at 10:57 a.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/17/23 at 5:43 a.m. for pain at a level 4, at 5:25 p.m. for pain at a level 9, and at 11:21 p.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/18/23 at 6:57 a.m. for pain at a level 9 and at 2:46 p.m. for pain at a level 9. On 10/19/23 at 5:41 a.m. for pain at a level 9. 10/21/23 at 10:15 p.m. for pain at a level 3. 10/22/23 at 6:35 a.m. for pain at a level 10 and at 1:17 p.m. for pain at a level 9. 10/23/23 at 4:30 a.m. for pain of a level 3. The MAR has no documentation of a daily pain assessment to assess the effectiveness of R285's pain control. R285's Controlled Substances Proof of Use, dated 10/15/23, documents that the pharmacy delivered two doses of (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg and he received them on 10/15/23 at 11:52 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. After the 5:30 p.m. dose R285 had no doses remaining. R285's Controlled Substances Proof of Use, dated 10/16/23, documents that the pharmacy delivered seven doses of (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg and he received them on 10/17/23 at 5:53 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 5:25 p.m.; 10/18 12:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m.; 10/19 at 5:30 a.m. After the 5:30 a.m. dose on 10/19, R285 had no doses remaining. R285's Controlled Substances Proof of Use, dated 10/21/23, documents that the pharmacy delivered twenty doses of (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg on this date, and he didn't receive his first dose from this delivery until 10/21/23 at 10:15 p.m. The facility transportation calendar dated 10/23-10/25/23, has no documentation of an appointment for R285 to be transported to his pain clinic appointment. On 10/25/23 at 09:59 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, There is no formal pain assessment or pain flow sheet that we do regularly scheduled pain assessments. We do the assessments as needed when they need PRN (as needed) pain medication. (R285) receives (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) prn around the clock. I would hope that with him receiving it as often as often as he does, he wouldn't have a pain level as high as he does when he asks for it. Sometimes it's as high as a 9 when we administer it. I don't know how effective that is. When he went to the ER, they set up the pain clinic appointment because of his rib fracture. With the fracture and how much pain he has that he gets the (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) around the clock that pain clinic appointment was very important. He can't wait for three months to go to it. V16 confirmed that R285 did not have any (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) available after the 5:30 a.m. dose on 10/19/23 until 10/21/23's dose at 10:15 p.m. On 10/25/23 at 10: 30 a.m., V13 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated, (R285's) pain care plan wasn't revised after he fell and got the fracture. On 10/25/23 at 12:15 p.m., V1 (Administrator) confirmed that R285 did not attend his pain clinic appointment on 10/23/23 and it was rescheduled for some time in January. 2.) Current Physician's Order Summary indicates R233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic Pain Syndrome, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. admission Nursing Pain assessment dated [DATE] indicates R233 had vocal complaints of pain; chronic pain and acute pain related to right foot fracture. On 10/23/23 at 9am R233 was in bed and had both lower legs wrapped with elastic bandages. R233 stated that she had wounds on her left leg and was having pain in her left leg at that time as well as a headache. R233 stated that she must ask for Tylenol (analgesic) but thinks the doctor ordered it to be given without asking four times a day. R233 stated that sometimes she must wait for the nurses to bring the Tylenol and they do not bring it unless she asks. R233 stated the nurses only ask about her pain when she asks for Tylenol. On 10/23/23 at 9:10am V21 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated that she was R233's nurse and did not give R233 Tylenol when she gave R233 her morning medications because she did not ask for it. On 10/24/23 at 10am R233 had bilateral lower leg dressings changed. R233's left leg bandages were soaked with drainage from wounds - soaking through multiple layers of bandages and soaking through to the bed sheet. Once removed, R233's left lower leg was approximately 50% intact skin and 50% open, ulcerated tissue with several full thickness affected areas. At that time R233 stated that the pain in her leg is 10 out of 10 when the areas are touched and reported entire left leg throbbing after areas were cleansed and dressed. R233 also reported having pain in left leg when self-propelling her wheelchair with her feet. Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 10/12/23 indicates R233 has a venous wound of left leg/full thickness with only 60% intact skin. Wound summary objective to Manage pain and control infection. Current Physician's Order Summary Report indicates R233 has orders for Acetaminophen/Tylenol 650mg (milligrams) every four hours as needed for pain/fever, ordered on 9/14/23. September 2023 MAR (Medication Administration Record) indicates R233 received Tylenol 650 mg 11 times from 9/16/23 to 9/30/23. MAR indicates R233 rated her pain as an 8 five times and 10 once. MAR indicates R233 rated pain at time of Tylenol administrations between 4 and 10 on the scale of 1 (mildest) to 10 (most severe). October 2023 MAR indicates R233 received Tylenol 650 mg every day except on 10/1/23, 10/8/23 and 10/21/23. MAR indicates R233 reported pain at an 8 10 times and a 10 six times. Progress Notes indicate the following: 9/28/23 at 8:10pm R233 complaints of chronic bilateral lower extremity pain. 10/3/23 at 6:31pm R233 complaints of generalized discomfort, especially bilateral lower extremity. 10/7/23 at 8:14pm R233 complaints of bilateral lower extremity pain, chronic wound, arthritic knees. 10/13/23 at 7:38pm R233 complaints of chronic bilateral knee pain and left lower extremity wound pain. 10/20/23 at 10:26pm R233 reports severe generalized pain and requests medication. Reports I feel like I want to die. 10/20/23 at 10:34pm R233 observed tearful and upset upon assessment, reports severe generalized pain. Tylenol administered. R233 reports I feel like I want to die related to her pain. Pain Evaluation with Interview dated 10/13/23 at 11:28am indicates R233 denied having pain or hurting in the past five days, did not receive scheduled pain medication, did not receive prn (as needed) pain medication, and did not receive non-medication interventions for pain. On 10/25/23 at 10:25am V12 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated R233 asks for pain meds a lot and would definitely qualify for scheduled pain medication which would probably help manage R233's pain better. V12 stated any nurse could call the physician and request scheduled pain medications. R233's Current Comprehensive Care Plan did not include a focus area/problem identifying acute or chronic pain. On 10/25/23 at 10:00am V10 (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed that she completed R233's pain assessment and is responsible for developing and revising resident care plans. V10 stated that R233 didn't say anything about pain in the care plan meeting (held on 10/3/23) or in the pain assessment interview. V10 stated that she wasn't aware of R233's admission pain assessment or the frequency of Tylenol given for pain. V10 acknowledged that she did see the progress note that documented R233 reported pain and wanting to die. V10 stated she should have reviewed all R233's medical record and developed a pain care plan. V10 stated there is a communication issue between staff/departments and not getting the total information. V10 stated I did question whether (R233) should have a scheduled pain medication regimen. V10 also stated there should be pain assessments done every shift - not just with prn's. V10 stated there used to be pain assessments included with resident MAR's, I don't know when they stopped being done. 3.) On 10/22/23 at 9:35 am, R88 was sitting at a table in the dining room with facial grimacing and furrowed brow and stated she has pain in ankles, knees, and hip that R88 rated 10 out of 10 on pain scale. R88 stated she has no cartridge in her knees, torn meniscus, can't lift her left leg, and if her legs dangle down it causes greater pain. R88 also stated her feet swell up which causes more pain. R88 stated she must request a pillow to put under her feet while in the wheelchair and will have the staff take her to the dining room up to a table so that she can lean on the table to help relieve pain. R88 stated sometimes she doesn't eat because she is in so much pain. R88 stated no one asks her about pain or she would tell them. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) for R88, dated 10/1/23 through 10/31/23, includes the following diagnoses for R88: Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Deep Veins of upper extremity, Necrotizing Fasciitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, Obesity, Critical Illness Myopathy, Psoriasis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inflammation of Vagina and Vulva. The current Care Plan for R88 documents (R88) has chronic pain r/t (related to) Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Order Summary Report for R88, dated 10/25/23, documents the following physician orders and pain medications as: Tramadol 50 mg (milligram) every six hours as needed for moderate or more severe pain; Tizanidine 4 mg, one tablet two times a day for Rheumatoid Arthritis/muscle spasms. Do not give with Tramadol. Monitor bilateral feet for any discoloration or abnormalities that may present related to incident every shift for 7 days, every day and night shift for 7 days until finished; Rheumatology appointment for bilateral feet neuropathy; Collagenase Powder to right third toe topically every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday for non-pressure wound; and Collagenase Powder to sacrum topically every day shift for infection. This same Order Summary Report does not include assessing R88's pain level. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 10/1/23 through 10/31/23, EHR (Electronic Health Record) and Paper Chart for R88, do not include any documentation of routine pain assessments occurring or having been completed for R88. 4.) On 10/23/23 at 10:30 am, R117 was lying in bed with facial grimacing while stating he has been in so much pain that all he does is just lay around, and affects all of me and has continued losing weight. R117 stated his doctor started him on Lyrica, Ibuprofen and Gabapentin at night and takes Methotrexate every week. R117 stated his right hand sticks in place at times and is painful at times. The Order Summary Report for R117, dated 10/24/23, documents the following Diagnoses for R117: Ankylosing Spondylitis of multiple sites in Spine, Rheumatoid Arthritis. This same Order Summary Report documents the following Physician Orders: Gabapentin 600 mg (milligrams) at bedtime; Ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily; Lyrica 75 mg every morning and bedtime; and Methotrexate 2.5 mg, Give 5 (five) tablets one time a day every Thursday. The current Care Plan for R117 documents The resident has Rheumatoid Arthritis. The resident is on pain medication therapy. The resident has pain r/t (related to) rheumatoid arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis. Receives Inflectra infusions via outpatient services at local hospital. One intervention listed on R117's Care Plan is to Complete pain assessment as needed. There are no routine pain assessments being completed for R117. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 10/1/23 through 10/31/23, EHR (Electronic Health Record) and Paper Chart for R117, do not include any documentation of routine pain assessments occurring or having been completed for R117.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document current Advance Directives and code status in the physician...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document current Advance Directives and code status in the physician's orders and on the care plan for one resident (R233) of 27 residents reviewed for Advance Directives in the sample of 40. Findings include: Facility Policy/Advance Directives dated [DATE] documents: After confirming the accuracy of provided documents with the resident/responsible party, the document will be sent for appropriate signatures. No order for No Code or DNR shall be effective until the Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form is signed by resident/responsible party and physician order is received and documented. Any decision made by the resident shall be indicated in the chart in the manner easily understood by all staff. Those resident's indicating Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR shall be recorded as a DNR. Code status shall be recorded on the resident's Physician Order Sheet. Staff must be aware of any requests for Medical Interventions shall be recorded appropriately on the care plan. On [DATE] at 11:39am State POLST form, located in the front of R233's (paper) medical record chart, indicates R233 selected No CPR: Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) and selected No artificial nutrition or hydration desired. POLST form was signed by R233 on [DATE] and signed by V9 (Physician) on [DATE]. At that time, R233's electronic medical record and care plan indicated R233 as FULL CODE. R233's Current Care Plan indicates Full Code: Resident has designated Advanced Directives: Resident will be resuscitated. R233's Current Care Plan interventions indicate Resident has chosen to be resuscitated. If found unresponsive-begin CPR. On [DATE] at 2:45pm V10 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated (R233) was designated a Full Code until the physician signed the POLST form, so the care plan also was developed as Full Code. On [DATE] at 2:50pm V1 (Administrator) stated after the physician signed R233's POLST form on [DATE], the nurse should have changed or given to another staff to change R233's code status to DNR in the medical record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wrist restraints were applied according to manufacturer's safety guidelines and failed to evaluate bed rails. The facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wrist restraints were applied according to manufacturer's safety guidelines and failed to evaluate bed rails. The facility also applied arm weights as restraints for one (R5) of two residents reviewed for physical restraints in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 11/28/2016, documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The facility's limb restraint Manufacturer's Guidelines for the use of R5's wrist restraints documents in Application Instructions: Triangulation process; to restrict patient's range of motion: Separate the straps and attach at different points along the frame that moves with the patient, out of the patients reach, using quick-release ties (do not attach to side rail or head/footboard). Additional Warnings documented under Safety guidelines include: Always secure straps to a part of the frame that moves with the patient (not foot/headboard or side rails, out of the patients reach, using quick-release ties or buckles and Never secure restraint strap to side rail or head/foot board. The Face Sheet for R5 includes the following diagnoses: Cerebral Palsy, Psychosis not due to a substance, Gastroparesis, Classical Phenylketonuria, Severe Intellectual Disabilities, Mental Disorder due to known physiological condition, Pain, Pruritus, Depression, Weakness, and Insomnia. The Order Summary Report for R5, dated 10/25/23, documents the following physician orders as: May use 4-1/2 (half) padded bedrails to enhance functional ability in sliding up in bed and to promote safety r/t (related to) unaware of Physical limitations and random unpredictable movements every shift; May use 4 LB (pound) weight to right wrist while in w/c (wheel chair) at all times, left hand free, every shift; May use bilateral wrist restraints while in bed every shift; May use bilateral wrist restraints in chair r/t self-harming behavior as needed; Staff supervision of restraint removal use of bilateral wrist weight on RUE (right upper extremity) and nothing on LUE (left upper extremity). The Physical Restraint/Enabler Consent for R5, dated 8/13/18, documents R5 consent for wrist restraints. This consent does not include R5's bed rails or the four-pound weights restricting movement of R5's right arm. The Restraint-Enabler Evaluation for R5, dated 8/7/23, documents evaluation for wrist restraints. There are no evaluations for the use of bed rails and right arm weights for R5. The most recent Plan of Care Note for R5, dated 8/7/23, documents QA (quality assurance) team met. Resident continues with bilateral wrist restraints while in bed and PRN (as needed) while in chair r/t self-harm. Restraints released every 2 hours while in use and assessed for safety. Consent for restraint current and up to date. On 10/22/23 at 8:00 am, 10/23/23 at 11:00 am, and 10/24/23 at 8:15 am and 3:00 pm R5 was lying in bed with bilateral wrist restraints attached to each of the moveable unpadded bed rails that were in upright position on both sides of R5's bed. On 10/24/23 at 10:00 am and 10/25/23 08:32 AM R5 was sitting up in a high back reclining wheelchair with (two) two-pound weights (total four pounds) wrapped around R5's right arm, preventing R5 from raising his right arm while sitting up. The Annual MDS (minimum data set) assessment for R5, dated 7/5/23, documents R5 with severely impaired cognition, requires extensive assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, total assist for eating and bathing, is non-ambulatory and uses a wheelchair for mobility. This same MDS documents R5 uses limb restraints used daily in and out of bed. On 10/23/23 at 11:39 am V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) untied and removed R5's right wrist restraint from the right bed rail and V22 (CNA) untied and removed R5's left wrist restraint from the left bed rail. V17 stated R5 must have the wrist restraints while he is bed because if he is not distracted, he will start punching himself and when R5 is up we put weights on his right arm so he can't hurt himself. V17 applied a two-pound weight to R5's wrist and then applied another two-pound weight next to the first weight. On 10/24/23 at 3:08 pm, V17 (CNA) stated all the staff have been educated to tie the wrist restraint using a three-point knot and to tie it to the side rail. V17 CNA stated have never been told to tie it to the bed frame. V17 stated that at one point, R5's side rails were padded but have not been for some time and is not sure why. The current Care Plan for R5 documents Restraint: Least restrictive measure to ensure safety include use of device that limits movement and accessibility (meets definition of physical restraint). Bilateral wrist restraints d/t (due to) self-abusive behaviors hitting self in the face, head, ears (Particularly the ear areas). Alternative devices tried: Mitts, helmet, pillows, restorative cares. Related Dx (diagnoses) Condition: Profound MR (Mental Retardation), Organic Mental Syndrome, Agitation with psychosis. Will sometimes bend over at the waist in his w/c and try to hit his head with hands even with restraints on. Has no control over own actions/unaware of own safety concerns. Interventions listed as: Bilateral wrist restraints used when up in w/c and when in bed. Release every 2 hours and prn, at mealtimes, toileting, during safety checks, when attended, during one-on-one activities and prn; Release device and assist to reposition at least every 2 hours and prn for restlessness. Monitor skin for redness. Restraints to be tied as quick release; 15-minute checks for positioning, location, and placement of enables; one-on-one as needed if/when agitated/restless; Resident to have 4-pound wrist restraint on right wrist at all times when up in w/c with left hand free. R5 to only be restrained when in bed, continue with strict 15-minute checks; May apply bilateral wrist restraints while up in chair prn for self-harming behaviors. The current Care Plan for R5 also documents R5 has need for use of bed rail as enabler that does not limit movement/accessibility. Bed Rail in place: 4 padded 1/2 rails up on bilateral sides related to diagnosis to promote safety r/t unaware of physical limitations and random unpredictable movements and to enhance functional ability in sliding up in bed. Potential Risks of enabler use for this resident include Bumping extremity on rails causing redness or discolorations. R5 sleeps in an upright position and padded bedrails do not restrict his vision from the bed. On 10/25/23 at 8:55 AM V6 (Maintenance Director) stated he does not recall whether R5 is to have two or four bedrails or if they are to be padded or not. V6 stated he is not allowed to put bed rails on any bed without management telling him he can. V6 stated residents are moved around the facility periodically and unless told to put on or take off bed rails or one needs fixed, he doesn't do anything with them. On 10/24/23 at 2:55 pm, V8 (Corporate Nurse) confirmed R5 uses bilateral wrist restraints when in bed, four-pound arm weights to right arm when up in chair and bed rails to his bed. V8 stated (R5) has had wrist restraints since he came to the facility and probably longer. The side rails should be padded, and the wrist restraints should be tied to the bed frame, not the bed rails. V8 stated she will have to find out if R5 is to use two or four bed rails.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive assessment for the use of sid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive assessment for the use of side rails and pain management for two of 29 residents (R233, R285) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy, dated 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of the facility to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history, and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. On 10/22/23 at 08:17 AM, R285's bed had a full padded side rail up on the left side in the upright position, and a full padded side rail down on the right side. On 10/22/23 at 10:50 AM, R285 was alert and oriented sitting up in a transport wheelchair in the dining room. R285 stated, I fell last week getting up out of bed. I fell back onto my side rail, and broke a rib on my back side. I have two full side rails with pads on them. R285's Bedrail/Transfer Rail Zone Assessment, dated 10/16/23, documents that R285 has bilateral full padded side rails on his bed. R285's current care plan has no documentation of a comprehensive care plan addressing R285's use of side rails. On 10/25/23 at 10:35 AM, V13 (Care plan coordinator) confirmed that R285 does not have a comprehensive care plan addressing his use of side rails. 2) Current Physician's Order Summary indicates R233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic Pain Syndrome, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. R233's admission Nursing Pain assessment dated [DATE] indicates R233 had vocal complaints of pain; chronic pain and acute pain related to right foot fracture. Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 10/12/23 indicates R233 has a venous wound of left leg/full thickness with only 60% intact skin. Wound summary objective to Manage pain and control infection. R233's Current Comprehensive Care Plan did not include a focus area/problem identifying acute or chronic pain. On 10/25/23 at 10:00am V10, Care Plan Coordinator confirmed that she completed R233's pain assessment and is responsible for developing and revising resident care plans. V10 stated that R233 didn't say anything about pain in the care plan meeting (held on 10/3/23) or in the pain assessment interview. V10 stated that she wasn't aware of R233's admission pain assessment or the frequency of Tylenol given for pain. V10 acknowledged that she did see the progress note that documented R233 reported pain and wanting to die. V10 stated she should have reviewed all of R233's medical record and developed a pain care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify triggers, develop a Trauma Informed Care Plan and intervent...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify triggers, develop a Trauma Informed Care Plan and interventions for one resident (R112) identified with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) of 32 residents in the sample of 40. Findings include: Facility Policy/Trauma Informed Care dated 8/23/23 documents: Upon admission the SSD (Social Service Director) will review hospital discharge records and interview the resident or resident's representative to determine any history of trauma. If the resident is determined to have suffered a traumatic event, the SSD will discuss with the resident or resident's representative regarding potential triggers that may cause re-traumatization and interventions or preferences that eliminate or decrease triggers that may cause re-traumatization. The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) will develop a resident centered care plan that will identify the stressor, triggers, clinical manifestations, and interventions to mitigate against re-traumatization. The IDT will monitor the resident's response and adjustment to placement through collaboration and communication and input from the resident or resident's representative. Residents will be assessed for any history of trauma annually, quarterly and with a significant change in condition. Trauma Informed Care assessment dated [DATE] indicates R112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has experienced traumatic events in her life. Assessment indicates R112 experiences nightmares about the event or events, tries hard not to think about the event or events and/or went out of her way to avoid situations that reminded her of the event(s). Electronic Medical Record Assessments page indicates R112's Trauma Informed Care Assessment is 167 days Overdue - referencing the last date of assessment as 5/11/23. No other Trauma Informed Care Assessments were found or presented. R112's current care plan indicates R112 has a known history of displaying inappropriate behavior and/or resisting care/services. Care Plan indicates R112's specific behaviors have included suicidal ideation, hallucinations/delusions, paranoia, anxiousness, restlessness, sadness, sleep disturbances, delusions, and physical aggression. R112's care plan does not address or include history of traumatic events (PTSD/Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), triggers, stressors, or interventions to mitigate re-traumatization. On 10/25/23 at 12:30pm V11 (Social Service) stated V10 (Care Plan Coordinator) is responsible for completing the care plan after the Trauma Informed Care Assessment is completed. V11 stated triggers should be identified especially with a resident with a history of suicide ideation.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication was available as physician ordered for a resident with a new rib fracture for one of four res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication was available as physician ordered for a resident with a new rib fracture for one of four residents (R285) reviewed for pain in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 11/18/17, documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an authorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. If the medication is not available for a resident, call the pharmacy and notify the physician when the drug is expected to be available. 1. On 10/22/23 at 10:50 AM, R285 was alert and oriented sitting up in a wheelchair in the dining room. R285 had tremors to his bilateral hands. R285 stated, I fell last week getting up out of bed. I fell back onto my side rail and broke a rib on my back side. They were out of my (narcotic pain medication) for a few days. The pain was awful, and it's still not good. Right now, my pain is a sharp stabbing '7' (scale of 0-10). I can't even breath or talk without it hurting. I tried to pull myself up in bed, and the pain got so bad I'm pretty sure I passed out. My pain was a 10 plus. R285's After Visit Summary, dated 10/14/23, documents, Reason for visit: Fall. Shoulder pain. Diagnoses: Closed fracture of one rib of right side. Mood disorder. Recurrent falls. Contusion of right shoulder. The Summary also documents that he has an order to receive (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg (milligrams) every four hours prn (as needed), and a follow up appointment at a Pain Clinic on 10/23/23 at 8:00 a.m. R285's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated 10/23, documents that R285 started (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5-325 mg one every six hours as needed for moderate and severe pain on 10/14/23. R285 received an as needed doses on 10/14/23 at 8:00 p.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/15/23 at 3:30 a.m. for pain at a level 7, at 11:52 a.m. for pain at a level 5, and at 5:30 p.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/16/23 at 4:01 a.m. for pain at a level 9, and at 10:57 a.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/17/23 at 5:43 a.m. for pain at a level 4, at 5:25 p.m. for pain at a level 9, and at 11:21 p.m. for pain at a level 8. On 10/18/23 at 6:57 a.m. for pain at a level 9 and at 2:46 p.m. for pain at a level 9. On 10/19/23 at 5:41 a.m. for pain at a level 9. 10/21/23 at 10:15 p.m. for pain at a level 3. 10/22/23 at 6:35 a.m. for pain at a level 10 and at 1:17 p.m. for pain at a level 9. 10/23/23 at 4:30 a.m. for pain of a level 3. R285's Controlled Substances Proof of Use, dated 10/15/23, documents that the pharmacy delivered two doses of (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg and he received them on 10/15/23 at 11:52 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. After the 5:30 p.m. dose R285 had no doses remaining. R285's Controlled Substances Proof of Use, dated 10/16/23, documents that the pharmacy delivered seven doses of (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg and he received them on 10/17/23 at 5:53 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 5:25 p.m.; 10/18 12:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m.; 10/19 at 5:30 a.m. After the 5:30 a.m. dose on 10/19, R285 had no doses remaining. R285's Controlled Substances Proof of Use, dated 10/21/23, documents that the pharmacy delivered twenty doses of (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 5/325 mg on this date, and he didn't receive his first dose from this delivery until 10/21/23 at 10:15 p.m. On 10/25/23 at 09:59 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that R285 did not have any (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) available after the 5:30 a.m. dose on 10/19/23 until 10/21/23's dose at 10:15 p.m.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document behaviors to warrant the use of an antipsych...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document behaviors to warrant the use of an antipsychotic and perform a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) for one of six residents (R24) reviewed for psychotropics in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy, dated 11/28/17, documents, Any resident receiving such medications shall have a psychiatric diagnosis or documented evidence of maladaptive behavior, which can be considered harmful to themselves or others, destructive to property, or if emotional problems exist which cause the resident frightful distress. Residents who use antipsychotic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions and behavior interventions unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the drugs. Reductions shall be attempted at least twice in one year, unless the physician documents the need to maintain the resident regimen according to the Regulatory Guidelines for such. On 10/23/23 at 09:48 AM, R24 was alert sitting up in her wheelchair. R24 was clean well kempt. R24 was pleasant conversing with no noted behaviors. R24's Psychosocial Evaluation, dated 7/5/23, documents the behaviors that R24 displays are uncooperative, attention seeking, obsessions, refuses cares/services, socially inappropriate, repetitive movements, and inappropriate comments. R24's Physician's orders, dated 10/24/23, document that R24 has an order to receive Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth in the evening for the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. R24's care plan, dated 10/2/23, documents, Resident has behaviors that others may find disruptive/socially inappropriate. Others may seek reprisal against this Resident. Behavior exhibited: refuses cares and later reports that cares were not offered, false accusation. Verbal aggression or cursing at others. Demanding when voicing needs. Uncooperative when approached by others. R24's care plan, dated 10/2/23, documents, The resident uses psychotropic medications related to Behavior management. R24's Psychiatrist progress note, dated 10/5/23, documents, Complaint: Mood swings. Cooperative. Flat affect; Stable mood. Assessment & Plan: Bipolar disorder, current episode manic without psychotic features. Plan: [AGE] year-old female with stable mood symptoms, no acute exacerbation, compliant with treatment. R24's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/6/23, documents that R24 received seven days of an antipsychotic that was last GDR on 4/13/22. R24's Behavior Monitoring and Interventions Report, dated 8/1-10/24/23, documents that during that time span R24 had two episodes of behaviors: agitated and tearful on 10/20/23 and screaming at others on 8/8/23. R24's current medical record has no documentation of GDR since R24 most recent GDR on 4/13/22 to the current dose of Olanzapine 2.5 mg by mouth every evening. On 10/25/23 at 10:06 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, (R24) gets offended easily or upset and tearful when she thinks someone is upset with her. At times she will yell at staff as well. No psychotic behaviors that I'm aware of or anything that she would harm herself or others. On 10/24/23 at 3:00 p.m., V8 (Cooperate Nurse), stated, In May, the pharmacy recommended a reduction in (R24's) Olanzapine), but the doctor declined it because she continues with psychotic symptoms. The (Olanzapine) was decreased in April of 2022 with no issues. V8 could not state what the psychotic symptoms were that the physician was referring to.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were not falsified for one of one resident (R284) reviewed for falsified records in the sample of 40. Findings inclu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were not falsified for one of one resident (R284) reviewed for falsified records in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Progressive Discipline Policy, no date, documents, The Administrator is responsible for monitoring supervisory actions to ensure that corrective discipline is both communicated and equally applied by them to all employees. Critical Offenses: These offenses are serious violations of rules, or employee's misconduct which justify immediate termination without regard to the employee's length of service or prior record of conduct. The Notice of Termination would be completed for qualifying offense. Examples of critical offenses include but are not limited to: Deliberate omission or falsification of significant information on: Records. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/7/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. The report was signed by V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) that she assisted R284 with the shower. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/21/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. The report was signed by V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) that she assisted R284 with the shower. On 10/25/23 at 3:00 p.m., V19 stated, I primarily work the hallway that (R284) lives on, but I've never assisted her with a shower. V19 was handed R284's shower sheets signed by V19 on 10/7 and 10/21/23. Immediately, V19 stated, That is not my signature. First of all, I don't write my name in cursive. My signature is more in print and very sloppy. I did not sign either of those sheets. This is ridiculous. I haven't even helped (R284) with a shower, why would they try and sign my name?
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a care plan meeting with a resident and revis...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a care plan meeting with a resident and revise a care plan following a fall, new onset of pain, use of an antipsychotic and target behaviors, and significant weight loss for six of 29 residents (R5, R24, R49, R117, R284, R285) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 40. Findings include: 1. R24's Physician's orders, dated 10/24/23, document that R24 has an order to receive Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth in the evening for the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. R24's care plan, dated 10/2/23, documents, The resident uses psychotropic medications related to behavior management. Disease process. R24's care plan has no documentation to include that R24 receives an antipsychotic nor the diagnosis or behaviors for the use of the antipsychotic. On 10/25/23 at 10:45 AM, V13 (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed that R24's care plan is not revised to include that R24 is receiving an antipsychotic. 2. R49's Quarterly Dietician review, dated 10/23/23, documents, 3 months 276.4 lbs. (-11.1% weight loss). 6 months 281.8 (-12.8% weight loss). R49's Nutrition care plan, dated 8/17/23, documents, R49 is obese. Has some interest in reducing overall weight. Willing to vary from usual habits in small ways to reduce overall intake. Has history of snacking on unhealthy food choices between meals. Likes candy bars and regular soda. R49's care plan has no documentation addressing R49's significant weight loss. On 10/25/23 at 10:50 AM, V13 (Care plan coordinator) confirmed that R49's care plan was not revised to include R49's significant weight loss. 3. On 10/23/23 at 10:23 AM, R284 was alert sitting on the side of her bed with her wheel walker sitting in front of her. R284 stated, I'm new here and they haven't even invited me to my care plan meeting. I want to be involved with my care. I'm just so depressed. That's one of my main issues is my mind. That's why I get the medicine that I do. I get depressed then I start having bad thoughts, and I'm getting there. R284's current electronic record documents that R284 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R284's Care Plan Summary & Attendance Record, dated 10/3/23, is blank and has no documentation of a meeting occurring. R284's Physician's orders, dated 10/25/23, document that R284 has an order to receive Haldol Decanoate (antipsychotic) Intramuscularly 100 mg/ml (milligrams/milliliter) every 28 days for the diagnosis of Schizophrenia. R284's Behavioral Care Solutions progress note, dated 10/3/23, documents, The resident describes severe depression with impulsive behavior. This has led to multiple attempts at suicide over the course of her life. Overdose has been the method of choice. She admits to auditory hallucinations, 'especially at night and when I wake up.' They hate me and want to kill me. She states it has been about a year since she has experienced visual hallucinations of people. R284's care plan, dated 9/26/23, documents, R284 uses psychotropic medication. The care plan has no documentation to include that R284 is receiving an antipsychotic nor the diagnosis or behaviors for the use of the antipsychotic. On 10/25/23 at 10:29 AM, V13 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated, I don't have that (R285) receives an actual antipsychotic on her care plan or what her target behaviors are. On 10/25/23 at 10:24 a.m., V10 (Care Plan Coordinator) We have not had (R284's) care plan meeting it's been looked over. 4. The facility's Fall Prevention policy, dated 11/10/18, documents, Policy: To provide resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls, and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. All staff must observe residents for safety. Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. Report all falls during the morning Quality Assurance meetings Monday through Friday. All falls will be discussed in the Morning Quality Assurance meeting and any new interventions will be written on the care plan. The facility's Pain Prevention & Treatment policy, dated 12/7/17, It is the facility policy to assess for, reduce the incidence of and the severity of pain in an effort to minimize further health problems, maximize ADL (Activities of Daily Living) functioning and enhance quality of life. Responsibility: All nursing personnel, physical therapists, occupational therapist, attending physician, Interdisciplinary Care Team. Pain Treatment Plan: a plan based on information gathered during a resident pain assessment that identifies the resident's needs and specifies appropriate interventions to alleviate pain to the extent feasible and medically appropriate. On 10/22/23 at 10:50 AM, R285 was alert and oriented sitting up in a wheelchair in the dining room. R285 had tremors to his bilateral hands. R285 stated, I fell last week getting up out of bed. I fell back onto my side rail and broke a rib on my back side. The pain was awful, and it's still not good. Right now, my pain is a sharp stabbing '7' (scale of 0-10). I can't even breath or talk without it hurting. R285's Fall Investigation, dated 10/14/23, documents that R285 had an unwitnessed fall on that date at 3:17 p.m. when he attempted to self-transfer. The investigation also documents, QA (Quality Assurance) team met and reviewed resident status post incident. Resident to have attempted to self-transfer and felt weak causing change in plane. Resident assessed and noted complaint of pain to shoulder. Resident sent to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation and treatment, noted rib fracture to right. Resident educated to allow staff to assist for transfer related to tremors and weakness due to Parkinson's. Padded side rail for positioning also available. R285's Hospital progress note, dated 10/14/23, documents, He suffered a fall and had a contusion to his right shoulder. He has problems with pain as requested pain medicine. He has no obvious deformity. It hurts when he takes a deep breath, and he felt some pain over the scapula. Medical Decision Making: Closed fracture of one rib of right side, initial encounter: acute illness or injury. Contusion of right shoulder, initial encounter: acute illness or injury. R285's After Visit Summary, dated 10/14/23, documents, Reason for visit: Fall. Shoulder pain. Diagnoses: Closed fracture of one rib of right side. Mood disorder. Recurrent falls. Contusion of right shoulder. The Summary also documents that he has an order to receive Norco 5/325 mg every four hours as needed for pain, and a follow up appointment at a Pain Clinic. R285's fall care plan, dated 10/22/23, documents, Risk for Falls related to seizure disorder and Parkinson's. The care plan has no documentation of revision following R285's fall on 10/14/23. R285's Pain care plan, dated 10/11/23, documents, The resident has chronic pain related to Parkinson's. The care plan has no revision to include R285's pain related to his closed fracture of a rib of the right side as a result of the 10/14/23 fall. On 10/25/23 at 10:33 AM, V13 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated, (R285's) new intervention following his fall was to allow staff to assist when feeling shaky or off balance. I did not revise the care plan until 10/23/23 even though he fell on [DATE]. His pain care plan was not revised with the rib fracture that he got after he fell that day either. 5. On 10/23/23 at 10:54 am and 10/24/23 at 10:00 am, 2:44 pm, and 3:08 pm there were two unpadded bedrails in up position on R5's bed. On 10/25/23 at 8:30 am there were two padded bedrails in up position on R5's bed. On 10/24/23 at 3:08 pm, V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) confirmed there are only two unpadded half bedrails attached to R5's bed and stated they used to be padded but have not been for some time and not sure why. The current Care Plan for R5, documents four padded half bed rails up on bilateral sides of bed related to diagnosis to promote safety r/t unaware of physical limitations and random unpredictable movements and to enhance functional ability in sliding up in bed. On 10/24/23 at 2:55 pm, V8 (Corporate Nurse) stated the bedrails should be padded and she will have someone get them padded. On 10/23/23 at 3:25 pm, V10 CPC (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed R5's current Care Plan documents there should be four bedrails used on his bed. V10 stated she was unaware that the staff were no longer using four. V10 stated the staff should be updating the plan of care if something changes or letting her know so she can update the Care Plan. 6. On 10/23/23 at 10:30 am, R117 stated the food has not been very good lately, they run out of alternates and peanut butter and jelly, he is in so much pain and just lays around, and he continues to just keep losing weight. On 10/23/23 at 11:00 am, R117 was assisted to the scale and weighed with current weight at 103.4. The Weight Log for R117 documents: On 07/25/2023, R117 weight is documented as 119.0 lbs. On 08/31/2023, the resident weighed 106.0 pounds which is a -10.92 % weight loss in one month; On 10/09/2023, the resident weighed 104.0 pounds which is a -12.61 % loss in three months; On 04/06/2023, the resident weighed 119.2 lbs. On 10/09/2023, the resident weighed 104 pounds which is a -12.75 % loss in six months. This same Weight Log shows continued gradual weight loss from 1/31/23 of 128.4. The current Nutritional Care Plan for R117, was initiated on 10/19/23 and revised on 10/23/23 and does not include any of R117's significant weight loss. On 10/23/23 at 3:30 pm, V10 (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed R117's does not include any significant weight changes and stated He (R117) did not trigger for significant weight loss. Just unplanned weight loss that she revised yesterday (10/22/23). V10 stated R117 has had a ten-pound weight loss overall.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers to a resident dependent on assistance...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers to a resident dependent on assistance with showering for one of one resident (R284) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 10/23/23 at 10:23 AM, R284 was alert sitting on the side of her bed with her wheel walker sitting in front of her. R284's hair was disheveled with a wet like appearance to it. R284's right eye is completely closed surgically. R284 stated, I don't have a right eye and I'm practically blind in my left eye. I can see shadows and shapes. Look at this dirty hair! It's greasy and I stink. I haven't had a shower for over a week. I'm supposed to get a shower every Wednesday and Saturday on 2nd shift, and I haven't gotten one for at least a week. This is disgusting. I'm going to ask them if I can have one today, even if it isn't my shower day but I doubt they will give me one. They will have some kind of excuse. They always tell me they can't because they are short staffed. I'm blind and they do nothing for me with it. R284's current electronic record documents that R284 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R284's Care plan, dated 10/23/23, documents, Resident is usually able to perform ADLs with substantial hands-on assist. R284's Task List Report, dated 10/25/23, documents that R284 is to receive showers twice a week on Tuesdays and Thursdays. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/4/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/7/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. The report was signed by V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) that she assisted R284 with the shower. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/11/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/18/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/21/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. The report was signed by V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) that she assisted R284 with the shower. On 10/25/23 at 3:00 p.m., V19 stated, I primarily work the hallway that (R284) lives on, but I've never assisted her with a shower. V19 was handed R284's shower sheets signed by V19 on 10/7 and 10/21/23. Immediately, V19 stated, That is not my signature. First of all, I don't write my name in cursive. My signature is more in print and very sloppy. I did not sign either of those sheets. This is ridiculous. I haven't even helped (R284) with a shower, why would they try and sign my name?
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide responses, actions, and rationale taken regarding resident council concerns, grievance complaints, suggestions, and re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide responses, actions, and rationale taken regarding resident council concerns, grievance complaints, suggestions, and recommendations. These failures have the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Census and Conditions Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program; provide an atmosphere in which Residents may achieve their highest physical, mental and social wellbeing; assure proper facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance/QA Program; responsible for maintaining good business practices; establish and conduct an annual public relations program promoting the Facility; works effectively and maintains a cooperative working relationship with Residents; and consult with department managers concerning the operation of their departments to assist in eliminating/correcting problem areas and/or improvements of services. Facility Resident Rights, revised 11/18, documents: that Residents have the right to complain to the Facility and get a prompt response; the Facility may not threaten or punish you in any way for asserting your rights or contacting outside organizations and advocates. Facility Resident Council Minutes dated 1/19/23 through 10/19/23, document concerns with Nursing (malfunctioning call lights, activities of daily living and smoking), Housekeeping (dirty furniture, not mopping floors, not emptying trash cans and dirty shower rooms), Laundry (missing clothing) Maintenance (dirty vents, light bulbs, leaking ceiling, leaking shower room, equipment repair, leaking toilets and hot water). Facility Grievance Logs dated 7/20/23 through 10/23/23, document concerns with administration, nursing, maintenance, dietary and housekeeping/laundry, call lights, not cleaning bathrooms, not emptying commodes/cleaning bowel movement off the floor, cleaning of the facility, shower rooms not being cleaned, food quantity, missing items/clothing, dining room not being cleaned, dirty vents, sticky floors, administration response and housekeeping. The Grievance Log does not document tracking of Resident/Family Member names on the designated form. On 10/22/23 at 11:00 am and 10/23/23, 6:30 am through 12:00 noon, during tour of the Facility, floors throughout the facility were soiled, with built up debris at the baseboard corners, detached baseboards, flooring strips between carpet and tile/change of plane were not in place, loose handrails in Resident hallways, exposed metal on the A Wing (300 Hall and 400 Hall), white drywall plaster crumbling at the baseboards of various corners, broken fire extinguisher glass doors, warped, stained and misshapen ceiling tiles and excessive chipped paint on walls and doorways. On 10/23/23 at 8:30 am, a Resident Council group meeting was conducted. During this meeting, R47 (Resident Council President) and R75 stated concerns of poor housekeeping, dirty shower rooms, grime in the corners of floorboards and malfunctioning equipment. R47 and R75 stated that during the Resident Council meetings they give suggestions and recommendations, and the facility does not give them an explanation as to why they will not implement remedies and will generally act like they are doing something, but it does not get addressed or fixed. R47 and R75 stated the facility says they are going to do something and they never follow-up or follow through on issues of concern. On 10/24/23 at 11:45 am, R29 stated, It is pointless to file a grievance they never do anything about it or get back to us and tell us a reasonable reason. I feel like it is useless to even tell them things that we do not like or are having problems with. I have told them that I have had clothes and that my ear buds are missing, and they are not even helping me find them. I have had issues with my room being clean and dirty looking equipment and they do nothing. I do not eat their food; I bring my own food in, and I have been telling them that I need help microwaving my food. I always have to wait to get my food microwaved and the last I know, the microwave I was using was broke and no one has done anything to help me. On 10/23/23 at 8:30 am, R75 stated, They never listen to us. They always tell us that they will 'look into it' and we never hear anything back from anyone. This place has so many problems with fixing stuff around here. You can see all the built-up layers of dirt on the floors around here too. They never do anything to help. On 10/23/23 at 8:30 am, R47 (Resident Council President) stated, There are so many broken things around this building, and they make no attempt to improve the paint or grime. We bring up all our concerns in Resident Council and most the time we never hear anything back from anyone and they never fix it. V1 (Administrator) lets everything go by the wayside and does not make anyone address our concerns. Look at our Minutes, we always have concerns with call lights, broken equipment, and cleanliness. No one ever fixes our concerns, and they never get back to us and tell us what they are doing to fix things. They all just say they will 'look into it.' On 10/24/23 at 9:43 a.m., V20 (Activity Director) stated, I am responsible for all Facility grievances. I do not write down the Resident names on the Grievance Log that I give V1 (Administrator) after the Resident Council group meetings. It is just multiple residents generally complain about all the same issues. I can't recall all the residents that were involved with each individual grievance that is on the grievance log, so we do not track who is complaining about what. I am not sure that there is a tracking system to follow-up with each individual Resident's complaints. On 10/24/23 at 11:12 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I think that the Social Service Department is in charge of the Facility Grievances. I do not keep a log or follow up with the Residents on their concerns. On 10/24/23 at 11:21 am, V4 (Social Service Director) and V5 (Social Service Assistant) stated, We do not do the Facility grievances, actually V20 (Activity Director) handles all of those. We do not really get involved with the grievances. On 10/24/23 at 11:30 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I was wrong, it is not Social Services' (V4's and V5's) responsibility to handle all the grievances. Actually, it is V20's (Activity Director's) responsibility to handle and track all the Facility grievances.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0577 (Tag F0577)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Facility Survey Results were maintained, up to date and in a location accessibility for the Residents and visitors ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Facility Survey Results were maintained, up to date and in a location accessibility for the Residents and visitors to review. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, revised 11/18, documents that Residents have the right to see reports of all inspections by the (State Agency) from the last five years and the most recent review of your facility along with any plan that your facility gave to the surveyors saying how your facility plans to correct the problem. On 10/23/23 at 9:00 am, a black binder documenting the Facility's Survey Results,, was on a table in the front lobby entrance to the Facility. The Facility survey binder documents survey results dated January 2021 through January 2023. No previous or recent survey results were documented in the binder. On 10/23/23, at 8:30 am, during the Resident Group meeting, R47 stated, I do not have any idea where they keep the Survey Book, I have never even heard of that. On 10/23/23, at 8:30 am, during the Resident Group meeting, R75 stated, I am the Resident Council President and they have never told me that they keep the results of these surveys in a book anywhere. R75 stated, I was unaware that I could even review any prior survey results. I also do not know where the location of the survey results is at, or how to find them. On 10/23/23, at 10:45 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I did not know that five years of survey results were supposed to be in the binder. It looks like it has not been updated since January of this year (2023). I have only been here since May, and I cannot speak for the person before me, but since I have been here, I have never put any of our survey results in the binder. I honestly did not know that I had to do that. I probably should have been putting the survey results from of all our Complaint surveys, we have had since January (2023), that binder. I will get them in there.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This has the potential to affect all 135 residents in the Facility. Findings include: Facility Census and Conditions Report, date 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. Facility Resident Rights, revised 11/18, documents: that Residents have the right to complain to the Facility and get a prompt response; must treat Residents with dignity and respect, and care for Residents in a manner that promotes quality of life; and must be a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program; provide an atmosphere in which Residents may achieve their highest physical, mental and social wellbeing; assure proper facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance/QA Program; responsible for maintaining good business practices; establish and conduct an annual public relations program promoting the Facility; works effectively and maintains a cooperative working relationship with Residents; and consult with department managers concerning the operation of their departments to assist in eliminating/correcting problem areas and/or improvements of services. The Maintenance Director Job Summary, undated, documents: that Maintenance maintains all building, equipment, systems and ground in good, safe and presentable condition; conducts preventative maintenance for all mechanical, signal, fire alarm and suppression and other systems; solicit for repair/replacement from contractors; maintains the Facility in compliance with Life Safety Codes; implements preventative maintenance programs; regularly inspects and maintains electrical, signaling, mechanical, plumbing, heating, cooling and protection systems; maintains the building in good, safe repair; and maintains furniture, fixtures and furnishings in a clean, safe, attractive and repaired manner. Facility Resident Council Minutes dated 1/19/23 through 10/19/23, document concerns with Nursing (malfunctioning call lights), Housekeeping (dirty furniture, not mopping floors, not emptying trash cans, dirty shower rooms), Maintenance (dirty vents, light bulbs, leaking ceiling, leaking shower room, equipment repair, leaking toilets, hot water). Facility Grievance Logs dated 7/20/23 through 10/23/23, documents concern with administration, short nursing staff, maintenance, dietary and housekeeping/laundry, call lights, not cleaning bathrooms, not emptying commodes/cleaning bowel movement off floor, cleaning of facility, shower rooms not being cleaned, dining room not being cleaned, dirty vents, sticky floors, administration response and housekeeping. On 10/22/23 at 11:00 am and on 10/23/23 6:30 am through 12:00 noon, during tour of the Facility, floors throughout the facility were soiled, with built up debris at the baseboard corners, detached baseboards, flooring strips between carpet and tile/change of plane were not in place, loose handrails in Resident hallways, exposed metal on the A Wing (300 Hall and 400 Hall), white drywall plaster crumbling at the baseboards of various corners, broken fire extinguisher glass doors, warped, stained and misshapen ceiling tiles and excessive chipped paint on walls and doorways. On 10/23/23 at 8:30 am, a Resident Council group meeting was conducted. During this meeting, the R47 (Resident Council President) and R75 stated concerns of poor housekeeping, dirty shower rooms, grime in the corners of floorboards and malfunctioning equipment. R47 and R75 stated that during the Resident Council meetings they give suggestions and recommendations, and the facility does not give them an explanation as to why they will not implement remedies and will generally act like they are doing something, but it does not get addressed or fixed. R47 and R75 stated the facility says they are going to do something and they never follow-up or follow through on issues of concern. On 10/24/23 at 11:45 am, R29 stated, It is pointless to file a grievance they never do anything about it or get back to us and tell us a reasonable reason. I feel like it is useless to even tell them things that we do not like or are having problems with. I have had issues with my room being clean and dirty looking equipment and they do nothing. On 10/23/23 at 8:30 am, R75 stated, They never listen to us. They always tell us that they will 'look into it' and we never hear anything back from anyone. This place has so many problems with fixing stuff around here. You can see all the built-up layers of dirt on the floors around here too. They never do anything to help. On 10/23/23 at 8:30 am, R47 (Resident Council President) stated, There are so many broken things around this building, and they make no attempt to improve the paint job or clean all the built-up grime. We bring up all our concerns in Resident Council and most the time we never hear anything back from anyone and they never fix it. V1 (Administrator) lets everything go by the wayside and does not make anyone address our concerns. Look at our Minutes, we always have concerns with call lights, broken equipment, and cleanliness. No one ever fixes our concerns, and they never get back to us and tell us what they are doing to fix things. They all just say they will 'look into it.' On 10/24/23 at 9:43 a.m., V20 (Activity Director) stated, I am responsible for all Facility grievances. I do not write down the Resident names on the Grievance Log that I give V1 (Administrator) after the Resident Council group meetings. It is just multiple residents generally complain about all the same issues. I can't recall all the residents that were involved with each individual grievance that is on the grievance log, so we do not track who is complaining about what. I am not sure that there is a tracking system to follow-up with each individual Resident's complaints. On 10/24/23 at 11:12 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I think that the Social Service Department is in charge of the Facility Grievances. I do not keep a log or follow up with the Residents on their concerns. On 10/24/23 at 11:21 am, V4 (Social Service Director) and V5 (Social Service Assistant) stated, We do not do the Facility grievances, actually V20 (Activity Director) handles all of those. We do not really get involved with the grievances. On 10/24/23 at 11:30 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I was wrong, it is not Social Services' (V4's and V5's) responsibility to handle all the grievances. Actually, it is V20's (Activity Director's) responsibility to handle and track all the Facility grievances. On 10/24/25 at 1:30pm to 1:45pm the following interior room/unit concerns were identified: room [ROOM NUMBER] - bathroom door frame with heavy rust. room [ROOM NUMBER] - drawer front missing on wooden built-in drawers; wood peeling off closet door; chipped paint and plaster missing on wall near bathroom. room [ROOM NUMBER] - floor tile discolored, wall corner between bathroom and Bed 1 crumbling/missing; entire lower walls in bathroom with chipped paint and plaster from floor to approximately 1 foot up the wall; wood on closet doors peeling or missing; wall behind Bed 1 with peeling plaster/paint from floor up 75% of the wall to ceiling; entire wall under window with peeling, cracked and large chunks of missing plaster; bedside table metal stand/legs completely covered in rust. room [ROOM NUMBER] - wall between the bathroom and Bed 1 has a large piece of wall plaster and paint missing. room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] (rooms are next to each other and share wall in bathrooms) - wall behind the toilet and sink water stained with black/brown mold-like substance on affected stained area/paint and plaster bubbling/peeling; missing drawer front on built-in wood drawers. room [ROOM NUMBER] - wall between the bathroom and Bed 1 paint/plaster cracked, crumbling and with dark built-up grime. A-Wing Dining Room entire floor and all along baseboards discolored, chipped with built up dirt/grime. At that time, R61 stated It all looks horrible. I don't even want to look at it. On 10/24/23 at 11:10 am, V6 (Maintenance Director) conducted a tour of the A Wing and stated, We are trying to get bathrooms fixed right now. I am not sure why the glass is broken out of the fire extinguishers, but they have not replaced them. Usually, when I need paint or maintenance work orders I send them in to 'Corporate.' V6 verified that plaster drywall was crumbled on the floor by the ice machine, buildup of debris on the floors and baseboards, detached baseboards, warped/stained ceiling tiles, floor strips with change of plane between carpet and tile and paint chipped on doorways and walls. V6 stated, We have had some water problems on the 400 Hall, so I think this is where some of the paint issues are coming from.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0865 (Tag F0865)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to oversee, govern, and initiate programs for Quality Assurance Performance Improvement programs/plans and follow-up for the calendar year. Thi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to oversee, govern, and initiate programs for Quality Assurance Performance Improvement programs/plans and follow-up for the calendar year. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; and assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program. The Facility's Quality Improvement/QA Teams and Tools, undated, documents: the QA improvement team is responsible for generating ideas, organizing ideas, planning tasks, reaching consensus and documenting accomplishments; the team membership shall include a facilitator who will supervise the project and is knowledgeable of the problem and have authority to implement changes; meeting organization should involve identifying a facilitator, setting an agenda, setting a start and end time for each meeting, assigning someone to take minutes, arriving on time, determining agenda items and completing assigned work prior to the next meeting. Facility Quality Assurance/QA and Improvement Committee Agenda, revised 4/9/19, documents an agenda including: Resident concerns (Resident Council Minutes/Grievance Logs), Consultant/Department Reports, Policy and Procedure review and updates and Nursing Quality Improvement information (restraints, psychotropic medication, falls, medication errors, pressure injuries, weight loss, catheters, enteral feedings, infection control, dietary, social service, activity, survey compliance, life safety, personnel, environmental and census/marketing recruitment). The Facility Grievance Log dated 7/20/23 through 10/22/23, documents issues with completion of nursing skin treatments, not getting medications timely, call lights, staffing, laundry services, maintenance issues and housekeeping services. On 10/23/23 through 10/25/23, during the survey, the Facility could not produce the last calendar year entire QA Sign-in Sheets. The Facility documents one sign-in sheet for a QA meeting dated 6/5/23. The Facility could not produce additional QA notes, supporting documentation or minutes for meetings during the time frame of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/23/23 (at 12:00 PM), 10/24/23 (8:00 am, 10:30 am and 2:10 pm) and 10/25/23 (at 9:00 am and 11:05 am), V1 (Administrator) could produce one completed sign-in sheet for QAPI Meeting Minutes, dated 6/5/23. The Facility could not produce any further QA meeting sign-in sheets, supporting documentation or minutes for additional QA meetings that occurred 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:05 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I just started here in May, and I cannot find any other sign-in sheets, other than the 6/5/23 QA meeting, or documentation or any minutes at all, for meetings for the time period of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:42 am, V8 (Corporate Nurse) verified that the Facility could not produce documentation of QA minutes, oversight, programming or plans for the period of 10/22/23 through 10/25/23.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance/QA Performance Improvement meetings and failed to identify, monitor, and correct QA potential concerns f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance/QA Performance Improvement meetings and failed to identify, monitor, and correct QA potential concerns for the last calendar year. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; and assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program. The Facility's Quality Improvement/QA Teams and Tools, undated, documents: the QA improvement team is responsible for generating ideas, organizing ideas, planning tasks, reaching consensus and documenting accomplishments; the team membership shall include a facilitator who will supervise the project and is knowledgeable of the problem and have authority to implement changes; meeting organization should involve identifying a facilitator, setting an agenda, setting a start and end time for each meeting, assigning someone to take minutes, arriving on time, determining agenda items and completing assigned work prior to the next meeting. The Quality Assurance Plan, undated, documents: the Facility works continuously to improve the way residents are cared for, safety and operations through the Quality Assurance/QA process; QA activities are to be completed continuously and objectively to provide a comprehensive review of the Facility's activities; help identify problems or potential problems; provide information upon which corrective action can be planned; analyze the need for policy or procedural changes or in-service training; act as a record, when analyzed will prevent similar mishaps or injuries; improve quality of Resident care and overall safety in the Facility; QA Assurance Committee will conduct daily meetings, quarterly meetings at a minimum; and the QA committee will review all the activities of the daily QA team and will review patterns, trends, areas identified for improvement and make recommendations as needed. Facility Quality Assurance/QA and Improvement Committee Agenda, revised 4/9/19, documents an agenda including: Resident concerns (Resident Council Minutes/Grievance Logs), Consultant/Department Reports, Policy and Procedure review and updates and Nursing Quality Improvement information (restraints, psychotropic medication, falls, medication errors, pressure injuries, weight loss, catheters, enteral feedings, infection control, dietary, social service, activity, survey compliance, life safety, personnel, environmental and census/marketing recruitment). The Facility Grievance Log dated 7/20/23 through 10/22/23, documents issues with completion of nursing skin treatments, not getting medications timely, call lights, staffing, laundry services, maintenance issues and housekeeping services. On 10/23/23 through 10/25/23, during the survey, the Facility could not produce the last calendar year QA Sign-in Sheets. The Facility documents one sign-in sheet for a QA meeting dated 6/5/23. The Facility could not produce additional QA documentation supporting the Resident concerns, correction plan or monitoring for the QA meetings, during the time frame of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/23/23 (at 12:00 PM), 10/24/23 (8:00 am, 10:30 am and 2:10 pm) and 10/25/23 (at 9:00 am and 11:05 am), V1 (Administrator) could produce one completed sign-in sheet for QAPI Meeting Minutes, dated 6/5/23. The Facility could not produce any further QA meeting sign-in sheets, supporting documentation for Resident concerns or minutes for additional QA meetings that occurred 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:05 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I just started here in May, and I cannot find any other sign-in sheets, other than the 6/5/23 QA meeting, or documentation or corrections to concerns, or any minutes at all, for meetings for the time period of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:42 am, V8 (Corporate Nurse) verified that the Facility could not produce QA documentation for identification or monitoring of Resident QA concerns, and that the only QA sign-in sheet that was completed was dated 6/5/23.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance/QA Performance Improvement meetings and assure the required committee members were present for the last ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance/QA Performance Improvement meetings and assure the required committee members were present for the last calendar year. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; and assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program. The Facility's Quality Improvement/QA Teams and Tools, undated, documents: the QA improvement team is responsible for generating ideas, organizing ideas, planning tasks, reaching consensus and documenting accomplishments; the team membership shall include a facilitator who will supervise the project and is knowledgeable of the problem and have authority to implement changes; meeting organization should involve identifying a facilitator, setting an agenda, setting a start and end time for each meeting, assigning someone to take minutes, arriving on time, determining agenda items and completing assigned work prior to the next meeting. The Quality Assurance Plan, undated, documents: the Facility works continuously to improve the way residents are cared for, safety and operations through the Quality Assurance/QA process; QA activities are to be completed continuously and objectively to provide a comprehensive review of the Facility's activities; help identify problems or potential problems; provide information upon which corrective action can be planned; analyze the need for policy or procedural changes or in-service training; act as a record, when analyzed will prevent similar mishaps or injuries; improve quality of Resident care and overall safety in the Facility; QA Assurance Committee will conduct daily meetings, quarterly meetings at a minimum; and the QA committee will review all the activities of the daily QA team and will review patterns, trends, areas identified for improvement and make recommendations as needed. The Facility Grievance Log dated 7/20/23 through 10/22/23, documents issues with completion of nursing skin treatments, not getting medications timely, call lights, staffing, laundry services, maintenance issues and housekeeping services. On 10/23/23 through 10/25/23, during the survey, the Facility could not produce the last calendar year QA Sign-in Sheets. The Facility documents one sign-in sheet for a QA meeting dated 6/5/23. The Facility could not produce additional QA notes, supporting documentation or minutes for meetings during the time frame of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/23/23 (at 12:00 PM), 10/24/23 (8:00 am, 10:30 am and 2:10 pm) and 10/25/23 (at 9:00 am and 11:05 am), V1 (Administrator) could produce one completed sign-in sheet for QAPI Meeting Minutes, dated 6/5/23. The Facility could not produce any further QA meeting sign-in sheets, supporting documentation or minutes for additional QA meetings that occurred 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:05 am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I cannot find any other sign-in sheets, documentation or any minutes at all, for meetings for the time period of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:42 am, V8 (Corporate Nurse) verified that the Facility could not produce Minutes and sign-in sheets for 10/22/23 through 10/25/23, with the exception of the Minutes, dated 6/5/23.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Nurse Staffing was posted in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible area to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Nurse Staffing was posted in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible area to residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents V1's (Administrator) job duties including managing, directing, and coordinating the physical management of the Facility in an accordance with all established practices, laws, and applicable State regulations; managing and conducting business of the Facility in a manner that protects the Facility License and Certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations. Resident Census and Conditions Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. On 10/22/23, during the hours 6:00 am and 1:30 pm, and on 10/23/23, during the hours of 6:30 am and 8:59 am, the Daily Nurse Staffing was not posted in the Facility. On 10/23/23, at 11:15 am, the Daily Nurse Staffing was not posted in the Facility. On 10/23/23, at 8:59 am, V8 (Corporate Nurse) stated, The daily Nurse Staffing should be posted here in the Facility front lobby in this glass display case. Oh, I am not sure why the staffing is not in there, it should be in there. I will have them put it in there.
Sept 2023 3 deficiencies 2 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse from staff V4 (Certified Nursing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse from staff V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) to a resident for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. This failure resulted in V4 yelling at R1Stop f*****g talking to me (V4). You are an ass! resulting in R1 crying and experiencing mental anguish. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9-6-23 when the facility failed to prevent V4 from verbally abusing R1, resulting in R1 crying and experiencing mental anguish. V1 (Administrator) and V9 (Activity Director) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9-8-23 at 2:28 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9-8-23. On 9-13-23 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy. The facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to train staff and all new staff on the abuse policy and how to respond appropriately to resident behaviors. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy dated 05/2021 documents, This facility affirms the right of our resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. The facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members, or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Abuse is the willful injection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Verbal abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This same MDS documents R1 is cognitively intact and requires extensive assistance of staff for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1's Illinois Department of Public Health Notification Form dated 9-6-23 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents, On this date (R1) reported that two CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistants) were verbally abuse (sic) towards him. Time of Incident: 12:30 PM. R1's Incident Investigation Form (undated) and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents, I (R1) was in the dining room, and I was joking around with another CNA. (V4 CNA) called me a name. (V4) called me an a**. I didn't like it. V3's (CNA) written statement (undated) documents R1 refused to allow V4 to help him and V4 stated to R1, You are acting like an a**! V7's (CNA) written statement (undated) documents, (R1) called (V4 CNA) a f*****g b***h in the dining room and (V4) said to (R1) stop f*****g talking to me. The facility's Inservice Attendance Form dated 8-25-23 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents V4 was in-serviced regarding the facility's abuse policy on 8-25-23. On 9-8-23 at 8:30 AM V3 (CNA) stated, I was in the dining room on Wednesday (9-6-23). Around 12:30 PM (R1) asked (V4) for help with eating his Chinese. (V4) refused to help (R1). (R1) started to yell at (V4) for not helping him and (V4) yelled back at (R1) to stop f*****g talking to her and called (R1) an a**. (V4) should not be able to talk to (R1) that way. I immediately took (R1) to (V8's/Social Service Assistant) office and reported this to (V8 and V1). On 9-8-23 at 10:07 AM V8 (Social Service Assistant/SSA) stated, On Wednesday (R1) reported to me that (V4) had called him an a** and refused to help feed him. That is definitely verbal abuse. I know (V3) witnessed the abuse. (R1) was very angry and told me he was tired of it and that something better be done about (V4), or he was going to take legal action. I immediately got (V1) and had (R1) report his concerns to (V1). (R1) is newer to the facility, but I have never known (R1) to make up false allegations. On 9-8-23 at 10:10 AM R1 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room. R1 was alert and orientated to person, place, and time. R1 stated with tears in his eyes, On Wednesday (9-6-23) at lunchtime I was trying to eat Chinese food that I had for lunch. (V4) is always mean to me and never wants to help me. I asked (V4) for help eating and (V4) said to me I am not helping you. You are an a**. I called (V4) names and (V4) said to me, Stop f*****g talking to me! I have reported this to (V1 Administrator) and V8 (SSA). Something needs to be done with (V4) or I am going to get legal advice. (V4) should not talk to me that way. I felt abused and it made me cry. I am still upset over it. On 9-8-23 at 11:00 AM V7 (CNA) stated, I was in the dining room on Wednesday (9-6-23) around 12:30 PM I heard (R1) ask (V4) for help and (V4) refused to help (R1). (R1) yelled at (V4) and told (V4) she was a f*****g b***h. (V4) told (R1) to stop f*****g talking to her. (V4) was mad and not joking with (R1). (V4) was verbally abusive to (R1). On 9-13-23 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. V15 (Regional Director of Operations) in-serviced V1 (Administrator) on the facility's Abuse Policy, types of abuse, and how to respond to resident behaviors on 9-8-23. 2. The facility Social Service department and designees interviewed all appropriate residents regarding feeling safe and comfortable in the facility on 9-8-23. 3. V1 in-serviced all staff on 9-8-23 on the facility's Abuse Policy, types of abuse, how to reduce resident behaviors, abuse prevention, and how to respond appropriately to resident behaviors. 4. V4 (Alleged Perpetrator) removed from the floor and schedule on 9-8-23. 5. Facility staff will continue to be trained by (V1) on how to reduce behaviors, abuse prevention and reporting weekly times four weeks then monthly times four and then quarterly and prn (as needed). 6. All newly hired staff will be trained by (V1) on how to respond appropriately to resident behaviors, abuse prevention and reporting. 7. The Quality Assurance (QA) team will monitor abuse in-servicing through the QA process and determine its effectiveness, and changes that may need to occur to ensure abuse training is effective to all staff. 8. The QA team will identify resident at risk of abuse of new admissions and care plan as appropriate. Completion Date: 9-8-23
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove an alleged perpetrator V4 (Certified Nursing As...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove an alleged perpetrator V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) from resident cares following staff (V4) to resident verbal abuse, failed to protect residents from an alleged abuser (V4), and failed to recognize verbal abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. These failures resulted in V4 returning to work with all residents within the facility after verbally abusing R1, resulting in R1 feeling angry and experiencing fear. These failures have the potential to affect all 134 residents residing within the facility. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9-6-23 when the facility failed to remove V4 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) from the facility after verbally abusing R1 and failed to protect R1 and all other residents from V4 after V4 verbally abused R1. V1 (Administrator) and V9 (Activity Director) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9-8-23 at 2:28 PM. The immediacy was removed on 9-8-23. On 9-13-23 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to train staff and all new staff on the abuse policy weekly for four weeks, then monthly for four months, and then quarterly, the Quality Assurance (QA) monitors the abuse training, and the QA identifies residents at risk of abuse and care plan as appropriate, including new admission residents. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy dated 05/2021 documents, This facility affirms the right of our resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. The facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members, or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Protection of Residents: The facility will take steps to prevent mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property while the investigation is underway. Employees of this facility who have been accused of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse, or misappropriation of resident property will be immediately removed from resident contact until the results of the investigation have been reviewed. The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 672 dated 9-8-23 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents 134 residents reside within the facility. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This same MDS documents R1 is cognitively intact and requires extensive assistance of staff for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1's Illinois Department of Public Health Notification Form dated 9-6-23 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents, On this date (R1) reported that two CNAs were verbally abuse towards him. Time of Incident: 12:30 PM. The facility's Incident Investigation Forms (undated) and signed by V1 (Administrator) document R1, V3 (CNA), and V7 (CNA) reported to V1 that V4 verbally abused (sic) R1 in the dining room on 9-6-23 at 12:30 PM. On 9-8-23 at 8:30 AM V3 (CNA) stated V4 verbally abused R1 while in the dining room on 9-6-23 at 12:30 PM and V4 is still working within the facility with all the residents. On 9-8-23 at 10:10 AM R1 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room. R1 was alert and orientated to person, place, and time. R1 stated with tears in his eyes, On Wednesday (9-6-23) at lunchtime I was trying to eat Chinese food that I had for lunch. (V4) is always mean to me and never wants to help me. I asked (V4) for help eating and (V4) said to me I am not helping you. You are an a**. I called (V4) names and (V4) said to me, Stop f*****g talking to me! I have reported this to (V1 Administrator) and V8 (Social Service Assistant/SSA). Something needs to be done with (V4) or I am going to get legal advice. (V4) should not talk to me that way. I felt abused and it made me cry. I am still upset over it. (V4) is still here today. I do not want her (V4) anywhere around me. On 9-8-23 at 10:25 AM R1 was sitting in the sitting area in front of the nurse's desk. V4 was standing within one foot of R1 at this time. R1 had his head down. On 9-8-23 at 10:30 AM V4 stated, (R1) refuses cares from me and on Wednesday (9-6-23) (R1) was talking about his egg roll. I said something about the egg roll and (R1) said to me It is none of your business you f*****g b***h. I responded to (R1) and asked him to not talk to me and please leave me alone. I was allowed to return to work today and was not told that I could not take care of (R1). I am able to help take care of all of the residents within the facility whenever other CNA's need help or when I am in the dining room. On 9-8-23 at 11:00 AM V7 (CNA) stated V4 verbally abused R1 in the dining room on 9-6-23 around 12:30 PM and is working today (9-8-23) with the residents. On 9-8-23 at 11:35 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, I did not consider it willful when (V4) cussed at (R1). I did not feel like cussing at (R1) was verbal abuse. I allowed (V4) to return to work today. (V4) really should not have been able to work with (R1), but I did not make that clear to (V4). (V4) really should not have been on the hallway with (R1) today. On 9-13-23 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. V15 (Regional Director of Operations) in-serviced V1 (Administrator) on the facility's Abuse Policy, types of abuse, and how to respond to resident behaviors on 9-8-23. 2. The facility Social Service department and designees interviewed all appropriate residents regarding feeling safe and comfortable in the facility on 9-8-23. 3. V1 in-serviced all staff on 9-8-23 on the facility's Abuse Policy, types of abuse, how to reduce resident behaviors, abuse prevention, and how to respond appropriately to resident behaviors. 4. V4 (Alleged Perpetrator) removed from the floor and schedule on 9-8-23. 5. Facility staff will continue to be trained by (V1) on how to reduce behaviors, abuse prevention and reporting weekly times four weeks then monthly times four and then quarterly and prn (as needed). 6. All newly hired staff will be trained by (V1) on how to respond appropriately to resident behaviors, abuse prevention and reporting. 7. The Quality Assurance (QA) team will monitor abuse in-servicing through the QA process and determine its effectiveness, and changes that may need to occur to ensure abuse training is effective to all staff. 8. The QA team will identify resident at risk of abuse of new admissions and care plan as appropriate. Completion Date: 9-8-23
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a care plan to address a resident's behaviors for one of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a care plan to address a resident's behaviors for one of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy dated 7-20-22 documents a comprehensive care plan should be developed to reflect a resident's current medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and should describe a need/problem indicating approaches/interventions to be instituted to assist the resident in maintaining/receiving care in relation to the need/problem. V7's (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) written statement (undated) documents, (R1) called (V4/CNA) a f*****g b***h in the dining room. R1's Care Plan dated 8-22-23 does not include a plan of care with interventions to address R1's verbal behaviors. On 9-8-23 at 10:07 AM V8 (Social Service Assistant) stated, (R1) has behaviors of yelling and cussing at staff when he is upset. On 9-8-23 at 11:30 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, The facility has not developed a care plan to address (R1's) behaviors.
Jun 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during a Covid-19 outbreak. This failure has the potential to affe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during a Covid-19 outbreak. This failure has the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility policy named Covid-19 Control Measures, documents, Purpose: To prevent transmission of the Covid-19 virus and to control outbreaks. 5.) In the event of a facility outbreak, all HCP (Health Care Personnel) must wear an N95 mask when caring for all residents and or are in an area where they may encounter residents. The facility's tracking log for Covid-19 positive residents, dated, 6/14/23 through 6/23/23, documents the following: On 6/14/23, R1 through R13 tested positive for Covid-19. On 6/16/23, R14 through R21 tested positive for Covid-19, and 6/21/23 R22 and R23 tested positive for Covid-19. On 6/23/2023 at 7:50AM observed V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) wearing a surgical mask and not wearing an N95 mask and V4 (LPN) wearing a surgical mask hanging below V4's nose. V3 and V4 were right outside the main dining room near the end of C-hallway with residents present up and down the hall going back from breakfast. V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA Supervisor) and V7 (CNA) were observed not wearing any type of mask. V6 was walking down C-hallway with residents present and V7 was in C-hallway taking a resident back from the main dining room. On 6/23/2023 at 8:10AM V5 (Administrator Assistant) stated, All staff should be wearing an N95 masks because we do have residents in isolation. On 6/23/2023 at 8:15AM V3 (LPN) stated, You caught me not wearing an N95 mask. On 6/23/2023 at 7:55AM V4 (LPN) stated, I know I should be wearing an N95 mask. On 6/23/2023 at 8:30AM V6 stated, I can't breathe with the N95 mask on my face. I do have a doctor's excuse to be able to wear a surgical mask. But I will try to wear the N95. Total Census from Facility Roster dated 6/23/2023 is 126 residents reside in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on Observation, Record Review and Interview the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist to be responsible for the Infection Prevention control program. This failure has the poten...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on Observation, Record Review and Interview the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist to be responsible for the Infection Prevention control program. This failure has the potential to affect all 126 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: The facility policy named Surveillance and Monitoring documents, It is the policy of the facility to do routine surveillance and monitoring of the facility to determine if compliance with infection control practices is maintained. The facility shall employ, at a minimum, a part time Infection Control Preventionist. On 6/23/2023 at 8:10AM V5 (Administrator Assistant) stated, The DON (Director of Nursing) was the Infection Preventionist, but she left. I don't know who is doing it now. I think V1 (Administrator) is the Infection Preventionist. On 6/23/2023 at 9AM V1 (Administrator) stated, V8 (Regional Nurse Consultant) is our Infection Preventionist. I believe V8 spends at least 20 hours at the facility. Not sure if she spends it doing the infection control task. On 6/24/2023 at 9:16AM V1 stated, I was informed by V8 that V2 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) is the Infection Preventionist. On 6/24/2023 at 9:46AM V2 stated, NO, I am not the Infection Preventionist. I was helping the DON with the program, but I am working the floor all the time now. The facility uses my IP certificate when they need to. I am not involved with the program anymore. There has not been an Infection Preventionist for at least a month. Total Census from Facility Roster dated 6/23/2023 is 126 residents reside in the facility.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine medications as ordered and failed to ensure receivi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine medications as ordered and failed to ensure receiving, dispensing, and administering is completed according to physician orders for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for medications in a sample of 3. Findings include: R1's admitting POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 3/1/23 to 3/16/23 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Quadriplegia, Suicidal Ideation's, Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, severe with Psychotic Symptoms, Convulsions, Hypertension, Obesity, and anxiety disorder. R1's local hospital discharge records dated 3/9/23 document, Medications at time of discharge: Docusate sodium 100 mg (milligrams) two times daily, Ondansetron 4 mg every six hours as needed, Propranolol 80 mg daily, Tramadol 50 mg every six hours as needed, Diazepam 2 mg 4 times daily, Quetiapine (Seroquel) 25 mg daily, Amitriptyline 25 mg nightly, Duloxetine (Cymbalta) 60 mg daily, Keppra 500 mg daily, and Lithium Carbonate 300 mg 3 times daily. Physician medication orders starting on 3/10/23 of Amitriptyline HCL 25 mg (milligrams) daily, Cymbalta 60 mg daily, Diazepam 2 mg four times daily, Docusate Sodium 100 mg two times daily, Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg three tablets daily, Quetiapine Fumarate 300 mg at bedtime, Seroquel 25 mg daily, Propranolol HCL 80 mg daily, Loratadine 10 mg daily, Lithium Carbonate 300 mg three times daily, and Keppra 500 mg daily. R1's MAR's (Medication Administration Records dated 3/9/23 through 3/12/23 document R1 did not receive her scheduled ordered 3/10/23: 8:00 AM medications of Cymbalta 60 mg (milligrams), Keppra 500 mg, Propranolol 80 mg, Seroquel 25 mg, Lithium Carbonate 300 mg, Diazepam 2 mg. 11:00 AM medications of Lithium Carbonate 300 mg. 12:00 PM medications of Diazepam 2 mg, and Quetiapine Fumarate 75 mg. 4:00 PM medications of Lithium Carbonate 300 mg, and Diazepam 2 mg. 8:00 PM medications of Quetiapine Fumarate 300 mg, Diazepam 2 mg and evening medications Amitriptyline 25 mg and Flonase Sensimist 1 spray both nostrils. R1's progress notes dated 3/10/23 between 9:11 AM and 9:16 AM and signed by V3 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) documents Cymbalta 60 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. Diazepam 2 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. Keppra 500 mg Not available. Pharmacy aware. Lithium Carbonate 300 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. Propranolol HCL 80 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. Seroquel 25 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. These same progress notes signed by V3 between 12:01 PM and 12:04 PM, documents, Lithium Carbonate 300 mg not available. Pharmacy aware, Diazepam 2 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. Quetiapine 25 mg not available. Pharmacy aware. R1's progress notes dated 3/10/23 at 3:38 PM and signed by V11 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents, Docusate Sodium 100 mg awaiting arrival, Diazepam 2 mg awaiting arrival, and Lithium Carbonate 300 mg awaiting arrival. Again on 3/10/23 between 8:31 PM and 8:52 PM and signed by V11 documents, Diazepam 2 mg Awaiting authorization and arrival, Flonase Sensimist Nasal Suspension awaiting arrival, Quetiapine Fumarate 300 mg awaiting arrival. On 3/16/23 at 2:00 PM, V2 (Regional Clinical Director) stated, The nurses are always supposed to call the on call when we have physician orders after hours or get them from the Facility's Convenience Emergency Box. No resident should have to go without their medicine. On 3/20/23 at 11:48 AM, V5 (Pharmacy Technician) stated, The facility faxed (R1's) medication orders to the Pharmacy on 3/9/23 at 11:34 PM. When we get an order after hours it is sent out the next day in the evening unless it is called to us STAT Urgent (which this was not) and would have been delivered soon as possible usually within a couple of hours. On 3/20/23 at 1:15 PM, V4 (LPN) stated, If I have a new admit after pharmacy hours I either get the medications out of the Facility's Emergency Convenience Box or I call the on-call pharmacy to get them right away. On 3/20/23 at 1:30 PM, V7 (RN) stated, We are supposed to call the on-call pharmacy if we do not have the medications for the residents in the Emergency Convenience Medication Box so the resident can get their medication as scheduled. On 3/20/23 at 2:15 PM, V6 (R1's Physician) stated, (R1) was only at the facility for a couple of days. I was not aware she did not get her medications for the first full day. The nurses are supposed to notify me when this happens. The facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 11-18-17 documents, Document any medications not administered for any reason by circling initials and documenting on the back of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) the date, the time, the medication and dosage, and reason for omission and initials. If the medication is not available for the resident, call the pharmacy and notify the physician when the drug is expected to be available. Notify the physician as soon as practical when a scheduled dose of a medication has not been administered for any reason. Report errors in medication administration immediately per policy. No Pharmacy Policy was received from the facility.
Feb 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and fully investigate an allegation of physical abuse and failed to follow its policy and obtain signed statements from w...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and fully investigate an allegation of physical abuse and failed to follow its policy and obtain signed statements from witness accounts for one of two allegations of abuse (R3 and R4) reviewed. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy, revised 11/28/16, states, The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: Implementing systems to investigate all reports and allegations of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property; promptly and aggressively and making the necessary changes to prevent future occurrences. VI. Internal Investigation of Allegations and Response 1. Appointing an investigator. Once the Administrator or designee receives an allegation of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property; the administrator will appoint a person to take charge of the investigation. The person in charge of the investigation will obtain a copy of any documentation relative to the incident and follow the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. 2. Following the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. The appointed investigator will follow the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures, attached to this policy. The Procedures contain specific investigation paths depending on the nature of the allegation, procedures for investigation, interview parameters, and reporting requirements. The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Resident Protection Investigation Procedure(s), revised 11/28/16, states, This procedure is implemented where there is reasonable cause to suspect that willful abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft may have occurred. Definition: Abuse: is the willful injection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Step 5. Investigation Procedures. Regardless of the specific nature of the allegation (Physical, sexual, verbal/exploitation/mental, theft or neglect) the investigation shall consist of: An interview with the person(s) reporting the incident; Interviews with any witnesses to the incident; An interview with staff members having contact with the resident and accused individual during the period of the alleged incident; A review of all circumstances surrounding the incident. Step 6. The interview Process. Determine whether the interviewer will be asking the person being interviewed to write the details of the incident in their own handwriting or whether the interviewer or witness will take notes, type up the interview, and have the witness sign the typed interview. If the person handwrites their statement, grammar and spelling are not important, particularly in relation to the facts. Whether the statement is handwritten or typed, continue to carefully differentiate the person's observed facts and their conclusions about the facts. Whether handwritten or typed, witnesses must sign and date the statements. On 2/7/23 at 11:33 AM, R3 stated that (on 12/7/22) R3 got into a fight in the smoke shack. R3 stated that R4 punched R3 in the jaw. The facility's Initial/Final Report to the State Agency documents on 12/7/22, R3 and R4 were in an alleged physical altercation. This report documents R3 and R4 were out smoking and R4 struck R3 in the jaw. This report documents R3 and R4 were in line to come inside after smoking and that a staff member was holding the door open for all of the smokers. On 2/8/23, V1 (Administrator in Training) identified the staff member as V6 (Housekeeping). R3's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R3 was on a smoke pass, R4 asked R3 if R3 wanted to fight and R4 struck R3 in the jaw. R4's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R3 and R4 were on a cigarette break and R4 struck R3. R13's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R13 witnessed R4 ask R3 if R3 wanted to fight and then R4 struck R3 in the jaw. As of 2/8/23, R3 and R4's Investigation Report did not contain an Incident Investigation Form with a statement obtained from V6. On 2/8/23 at 4:24 PM, V6 stated that on 12/7/23, V6 had taken the residents out to smoke. V6 stated, I thought everyone was following behind me. I guess a few were left in the (smoking) shack. We are supposed to go in and out as a group. Once everyone was inside, I heard (R3) telling a nurse (unknown) that (R3) had been hit by (R4). I guess it happened after I left the shack. I walk behind everyone from now on. V6 denied that V6 completed a witness statement form regarding the events that occurred between R3 and R4 on 12/7/22. On 2/8/23 at 5:15 PM, V1 stated that on 12/7/22, V1 asked V6 if V6 saw R4 hit R3 and V6 stated he did not. V1 denied that V6 was questioned about any events that V6 might have witnessed prior to R4 hitting R3 or if anything happened in the smoke shack that might have caused the physical altercation. V1 denied that a written/typed statement was completed regarding V6's account of the incident. At this time, V1 denied that the residents who gave their witness statements were asked to sign or date their statement. V1 verified that the statements completed on Incident Investigation Forms were not signed or dated by the person giving the statement. V1 stated that V1 became aware of the incident between R3 and R4 because a nurse was told by R3 that R3 had been hit. This (unknown) nurse assisted R3 in talking to V1 on the telephone so R3 could tell V1 what had happened. V1 denied that a statement was obtained from the nurse who R3 originally reported the incident to. Incident Investigation Forms containing statements regarding R3 and R4's altercation on 12/7/22 from R3, R4, R8, R12, R13, and R14 are handwritten and obtained from V1. As of 2/8/23, R3, R4, R8, R12, R13, and R14's statements are not signed or dated from the residents themselves. On 2/8/23 at 5:11 PM, V2 (Regional Registered Nurse) stated that V2 would expect V1 to follow the facility policy in regards to conducting an investigation into an allegation of abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include smoking for one of fou...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include smoking for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 14. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning Policy, revised 7/20/22, states, It is the policy of (name of skilled nursing facility organization) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident Assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop of person centered comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 3. Components of the CPC /Comprehensive Care Plan may include: Care Plan Summary-pertinent information about the resident including a summary listing of healthcare information such as physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services 4. The Comprehensive Care Plans shall strive to describe: a. The resident's preferences, choices, and goals to the extent possible to assist in attaining or maintaining the resident's highest practicable quality of life. b. The resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs and preferences. 8. Communication of the Care Plan contents if paramount to the success of consistent care delivery. R1's Facesheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Smoking Safety Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 on the Assisted Smoking Program and that R1 requires supervision at all times. R1's Social Service Notes, dated 12/28/22 documents R1 continues on an assisted smoke pass. R1's Social Service Notes, dated 1/7/23 documents V5 (Social Service Director) was notified that R1 was exhibiting smoking behaviors of asking staff to allow R1 to exit the facility to smoke extra cigarettes. (R1) forming groups of resident to assemble to boycott the smoking policy. R1's Social Service Notes, dated, 1/20/23, states, (R1) was heard yelling in the front lobby this morning during morning meeting. (R1) separated after hearing (R1) stating, Keep my name out of your fu***** mouth! (R1) then called peer a snitch and to stay away from (R1). This same note documents R1's smoke pass was moved to section B. R1's Social Service Notes, dated 1/30/23, documents R1 being unhappy about smoke passes not being independent. As of 2/8/23, R1's current Care Plan did not document R1's current smoking history or R1's behaviors related to smoking. On 2/8/23 at 5:45 PM, V2 (Regional Registered Nurse) verified R1's Care Plan did not contain any documentation related to R1 being a smoker and verified that it should.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan after an allegation of abuse for one of four residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. Findings ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan after an allegation of abuse for one of four residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning Policy, revised 7/20/22, states, It is the policy of (name of skilled nursing facility organization) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident Assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop of person-centered comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This same policy documents the Comprehensive Care Plan will be revised as necessary to reflect the resident's current medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. On 2/7/23 at 11:33 AM, R3 stated that (on 12/7/22) R3 got into a fight in the smoke shack. R3 stated that R4 punched R3 in the jaw. The facility's Initial/Final Report to the State Agency documents on 12/7/22, R3 and R4 were in an alleged physical altercation. This report documents R3 and R4 were out smoking and R4 struck R3 in the jaw. This report states, (R4) will smoke on Section B away from all other smoking residents. (R4) will meet with V5 (Social Service Director) two times weekly for three weeks for one-on-one counseling on impulse control and aggression. (R4) placed on one-on-one attention for 72 hours after incident. (R3) educated on impulse control and the effects of schizophrenia. (R3) was also educated on others responding to internal stimuli. R3's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R3 was on a smoke pass, R4 asked R3 if R3 wanted to fight and R4 struck R3 in the jaw. R4's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R3 and R4 were on a cigarette break and R4 struck R3. R13's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R13 witnessed R4 ask R3 if R3 wanted to fight and then R4 struck R3 in the jaw. R4's current Care Plan documents R4 with altered mood state (anger/easily upset) potential for altered social reaction. R4 has a history of aggression while in the community, history of noncompliance and resistive to redirection. May become argumentative. As of 2/8/23, R4's Care Plan did not contain documentation regarding R4's altercation with R3 and did not contain documentation of R4's newly implemented abuse prevention interventions. On 2/8/23 at 5:15 PM, V2 (Regional Registered Nurse) stated that the department heads were just in-serviced regarding abuse prevention interventions getting added to the resident's care plan. V2 stated the staff was doing what they were supposed to, but they were not adding the information on the care plan. At this time, V2 verified R4's Care Plan was not updated to reflect R4's 12/7/22 resident to resident altercation and newly implemented abuse prevention interventions. V2 stated, If a new intervention was done after an altercation, I would expect that to be on the care plan.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator (R1 and R2) and failed to report allegations of physical ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator (R1 and R2) and failed to report allegations of physical abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner (R3 and R4) for two of two allegations of abuse reviewed. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy, revised 11/28/16, states, The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: Procedures for reporting of potential incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation or the misappropriation of resident property. IV. Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations: Employees are required to immediately report any occurrences of potential/alleged mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about or suspect to a supervisor and the administrator. VII. External Reporting of Potential Abuse: 1. Initial Reporting of Allegations. The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, misappropriation of resident property, and reasonable suspicion of a crime, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State Law through established procedures. If the events that cause the reasonable suspicion result in serious bodily injury or suspected criminal sexual abuse, the report shall be made to at least one law enforcement agency of jurisdiction and (local state agency) immediately after forming the suspicion (but not later than two hours after forming the suspicion). Otherwise, the report must be made not later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion. A written report shall be sent to the Department of Public Health 1. R1's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents R1 with diagnoses to include but not limited to: Substance Abuse; Bipolar Disorder; Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; Antisocial Personality Disorder; Morbid Obesity and Schizoaffective Disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/30/22, documents R1 as cognitively intact, exhibits verbal behavior symptoms directed towards others and is independent with mobility. R1's A.I.M. (Assess, Intercommunicate, Manage) for Wellness Form, signed and dated by V3 (Registered Nurse) on 1/29/23, documents R1 was exhibiting increased agitation with a peer (R2). Behavioral Evaluation documents R1 as a danger to others and verbal aggression. This form states, (R1) followed peer (R2) down hall from DR (dining room) yelling at (R2). (R1) then trapped (R2) on hall by parking w/c (wheelchair) in front of (R2's) wheelchair. (R1) would not allow (R2) to pass. (R1) continued to verbally attack (R2). (V3) had to move (R1's) chair and take (R2) from hall. R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents R2 with diagnoses to include but not limited to: Major Depressive Disorder; Mixed Anxiety and Depressive and Low Vision. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated, 11/7/22, documents R2 as cognitively intact. The facility's Initial/Final Report regarding R1, dated 1/30/23, documents R1 with diagnoses to include Bipolar Disorder, Other psychoactive substance abuse and antisocial personality disorder. This report states, It was reported to (V1 Administrator in Training) on 1/30/23 that (R1) had multiple behaviors over the weekend. On Saturday, 1/28/23, (R1 and R2) were having a verbal disagreement. (R1) parked himself in his wheelchair on (name of hall), blocking the doorway, not allowing (R2) back off of the hall. (V3 RN) immediately intervened to remove (R1). (V3) states (R1) pulled his arm back as if he was going to hit someone. (R2) stated he was kicking at (R1) but did not get him. (V3) used her foot to move (R1's) wheelchair and removed (R2) from the hallway. (R2) went to finish breakfast and then to the front lobby to smoke. (R1) remained in B side nurses lounge. V3's written statement, dated 1/30/23 at 9:00 AM states, (R1) followed (R2) from dining room down hall being vulgar. (R2) and staff asked (R1) to stop and leave hall since he doesn't reside on this hall. (R1) then pulled (wheelchair) in front of (R2) so (R2) couldn't past him in hall. Staff and (R2) asked (R1) several times to move. (R1) refused. (R1) drew left arm back as to indicate he was going to strike at (R2). Staff pulled/pushed (R1) wheelchair away from (R2) and removed (R2) from hall. On 2/8/23 at 9:40 AM, V3 stated, On Saturday (1/28/23), (R1) was screaming profanities at (R2). I asked (R1) to calm down, but he was screaming and irate. (R1) had parked (R1's) wheelchair in the hallway so that (R2) couldn't get by. I wasn't sure that (R1) wasn't going to hit (R2) but I knew (R1) wouldn't hit me. I got in between them and used my foot to push (R1's) wheelchair back and pulled (R2's) wheelchair away from (R1). (R1) pulled (R1's) arm back as if he was going to hit (R2). I remember this because it happened in front of a family that was meeting with hospice, and I was so embarrassed. I couldn't take care of everyone else with the two of them trying to kill each other. R2's written statement, dated 1/30/23 at 11:00 AM, regarding R1 and R2's altercation on 1/28/23 documents that R1 had blocked the end of the hallway when R2 was attempting to go back out to the dining room after getting R2's coat to go smoke. R1 told R2 that R1 was getting past the camera so that R1 could beat (R2's) a**. V3 came out of a nearby room and told both R1 and R2 to move. R2 stated that R2 could not move because R1 was blocking the hallway. R1 continued to kick towards R2. V3 separated the two residents. R1's written statement, dated 1/30/23 at 2:00 PM, regarding R1 and R2's altercation on 1/28/23 documents that after R2 had went to R2's room, R1 met R2 at the entrance of (name of hall). R1 told R2, 'This sh** needs to stop. R2 told R1 to move and was making fat jokes. R1 stated V3 came out of a hospice patient's room and R1 and R2 went separate ways. On 2/28/23 at 12:20 PM, V1 (AIT) stated that on Monday, 1/30/23, (R1) was given (R1's) morning medications by (V3) and (R1) flicked the medications off the desk and onto the floor. (R1) began cursing at (V3). I asked (V3) what was going on and it was then that (V3) said, 'Oh, he's been on one all weekend.' At that time, (V3) began to tell me about (R1) and (R2's) altercation from Saturday, 1/28/23. V1 stated that V1 was not aware of R1 and R2's altercation before 1/30/23. V1 stated that V3 should immediately called V1 on 1/28/23 to report the altercation between R1 and R2 and stated that V3 did not. On 2/8/23 at 5:15 PM, V1 stated that one to one education regarding Abuse Policy and Procedures was completed with V3 for V3 not immediately reporting an allegation of abuse to the Administrator. 2. The facility's Initial/Final Report to the State Agency documents on 12/7/22, R3 and R4 were in an alleged physical altercation. This report documents R3 and R4 were out smoking and R4 struck R3 in the jaw. On 2/7/23 at 11:33 AM, R3 stated that (on 12/7/22) R3 got into a fight in the smoke shack. R3 stated that R4 punched R3 in the jaw. R3's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R4 asked R3 if R3 wanted to fight and R4 struck R3 in the jaw. R4's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R3 and R4 were on a cigarette break and R4 struck R3. R13's written statement, dated 12/7/22, documents R13 witnessed R4 ask R3 if R3 wanted to fight and then R4 struck R3 in the jaw. The fax cover sheet for the report written by the facility to the local state agency is dated 12/12/22. The fax received confirmation from the local state agency is dated 12/13/22 at 4:08 PM. On 2/8/23 at 12:20 PM, V1 verified that all investigations of abuse should be sent to the local state agency within two hours and no more than 24 hours after the allegation. On 2/8/23 at 1:22 PM, the State Agency verified the report sent to the local state agency by the facility regarding the alleged physical altercation between R3 and R4 on 12/7/22 was received late.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to employ a Director of Nursing/DON on a full-time basis. This failure has the potential to affect all 121 residents who reside in the facility...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to employ a Director of Nursing/DON on a full-time basis. This failure has the potential to affect all 121 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: The Facility Assessment, updated 2/8/22, documents the facility has an average daily census of 120 and that the facility will staff a Director of Nursing. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) Job Summary, undated, documents, Job Summary: To plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of our Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility and as may be directed by the Administrator and the Medical Director to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times. Personnel Functions: 8. Make daily rounds of the nursing service departments to ensure that all nursing service personnel are performing their work assignments in accordance with acceptable nursing standards. On 2/8/23 at 9:40 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse) stated that the facility currently does not have a full-time DON. V3 stated, They say that (V2 Regional Registered Nurse) is the acting DON, but she is only here maybe one or two times a week. On 2/8/23 at 5:45 PM, V2 stated the facility has been without a DON since 1/16/23. On 2/8/23 at 6:10 PM, V2 stated that V2 has multiple facilities that V2 is responsible for and that the travel radius of the facilities is an hour and a half drive. The Facility Resident Room Roster, dated 2/7/23, documents 121 residents currently reside in the facility.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy for transfers using a mechanical lif...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy for transfers using a mechanical lift; and failed to use proper transfer technique for one (R2) of five residents reviewed for falls in a sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Limited Resident Lift Policy, Undated, documents: (Facility) wants to ensure that its residents are cared for safely, while maintaining a safe work environment for employees. This infrastructure includes resident handling and movement equipment, employee training, and a Culture of Safety approach to safety in the work environment. Use mechanical lifting devices and other approved resident handling aids in accordance with instructions and training. The facility's Fall Prevention Policy (Revised 11/10/18), documents: Policy: To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls, decreases falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. 11. Transfer with proper number of assist and gait belt. R2's Fall Documentation Worksheet and Investigation Report for Falls, Dated 12/11/22, document: Two-person transfer with lift. R2's Care Plan documents: (Mechanical Lift) for transfers; has poor safety awareness. Interventions: Fall Risk Assessment quarterly and as needed with change in condition or fall status; 12/11/22 fall without injury. Hospice to eval (mechanical lift) sling appropriateness. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 9. (MDS indicates that on a scale of 0 - 15, 13 to 15 cognitively intact; 8 to 12 moderate impairments; and 0 to 7 severe impairment.) R2's Quality Improvement Review note, dated 12/12/22, documents: (Quality Assurance) Team review status post incident. Resident being transferred two assist with Mechanical Lift. Resident slid from Mechanical Lift sling to floor. No injuries noted. On 12/14/22 at 9:30am V1 (Administrator in Training) stated regarding R2's fall, V1 believed the issue was with the sling; and it was operator error. V1 stated that R2 had no injury, and the hospice physician said no hospital. On 12/14/22 at 11:25am V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that R2's hospice determined that (R2) had the appropriate sling at the time of the fall; and the fall was from operator error. V2 stated, There were two people and not just one doing the transfer (for R2). On 12/14/22 at 2:55pm V2 (DON) stated that the facility has two mechanical lifts; and two people are required for transfers. V2 stated, Company policy is to always have two people for mechanical lift transfers. On 12/15/22 at 9:55am V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), stated she was the nurse on duty on 12/11/22 when R2 fell from the mechanical lift. V18 stated that both V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V14 (CNA) were the staff transferring R2 after breakfast. V18 stated that both CNAs were in the room with R2 at that time; that the mechanical lift sling was still in place on the lift, correctly placed with loops after the fall, when she went to assess R2. Stated that V9 stated that R2's body shifted while in the sling, and R2's upper body came out of the sling first and R2 fell to the floor. V18 stated at this time that she did not ask the CNAs if they were both assisting with the transfers. V18 stated, They are to go by the book. I was at the nursing station and did not see either of them come out of the room; and did not feel the need to ask if both were assisting in transferring R2. Policy is having to have two people at all times for transfers to operate any kind of mechanical lift; two people, one to operate the machine and another to assist. I did not ask if one was assisting. On 12/14/22 at 11:05am V13 (CNA) stated that V14 (CNA) assisted V9 (CNA) at the time of R2's fall on 12/11/22. V13 stated she was told that the mechanical lift got caught on something and when the lift was moved, momentum of the move swung the sling that R2 was in and that is when the fall occurred. V13 stated, I believe the resident (R2) was not secure in the sling. On 12/14/22 at 1:25pm, V14 (CNA) stated: I have to be honest; I was not in the room at the time of (R2's) fall. I was pottying residents in another room; only one person was doing the mechanical lift and that was V9 (CNA). V14 stated at that time that V18 (LPN) did not ask who was in the room; and (V18) did not know that V9 was transferring R2 from chair to bed by herself with the mechanical lift. V14 stated, V9 said that (R2) was coughing and kind of sat up in the mechanical lift and then fell out of the side of the mechanical lift. V9 said she should not have been transferring R2 by herself. I went into the room and V9 was standing by the (mechanical lift) and (R2) was on the floor; the sling was still in place, about 3 ft from the floor, all straps were connected, and the mechanical lift was up in the air, raised up. On 12/15/22 at 10:30am V2 (DON) stated that V9 (CNA) was suspended on 12/14/22 pending further investigation and did not work. V2 stated, It was brought to my attention on yesterday (12/14/22) that V14 (CNA) was not in the room at the time V9 transferred R2. This was not in V18's reports.
Sept 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one resident (R271) of 24 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 81. Findings include: R271's Face Sheet documents R271 was recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 09/26/22 at 12:45 PM, R271 was lying in bed with her eyes closed. R271's head of bed was elevated 45 degrees and a tube feeding was infusing at 50 milliliters per hour. R271 stated I don't know when asked how things were going, and if she knew where her call light was located. R271's call light was out of her reach, sitting several feet away on a bedside table. At 12:49 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) entered R271's room and verified R271's call light was out of her reach. V8 stated R271 was recently admitted to the facility after having a stroke. On 09/29/22 10:00 AM, V1 (Administrator in Training) stated the facility does not have a formal policy for staff to reference regarding call lights. V1 stated a resident's call light should be always placed within their reach.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor daily weights and daily vitals for one of one resident (R56...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor daily weights and daily vitals for one of one resident (R56), reviewed for daily weights, in a sample of 81. Findings include: R56's current facility Face Sheet documents that R56 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Cardiomegaly, Dyspnea, Asthma, Systolic Congestive Heart Failure, History of Respiratory Failure and History of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R56's Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 7/31/22 documents, Today's Visit. You were seen today for: Shortness of Breath, COPD Exacerbation and Hypoxia. R56's Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 9/12/22 documents, Recent Hospitalization from 9/3/22 through 9/12/22 for the following reasons: Acute on Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. This same After Visit Summary includes the following physician orders: Check your weight every day; Follow Up at the Heart Failure Transitional Care Unit on 9/15/22. R56's (Physician) After Visit Summary, dated 9/15/22 documents, Today's Visit. You were seen today in the (hospital) Heart Failure Transitional Care Unit, and the following issues were addressed: Acute on Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. Instructions: Increase (neprilysin inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker) to 49/51 MG (milligrams) twice daily. Reinforce to (R56) and staff at facility to call us if (R56) has any issues. Weights daily and vitals daily and record. RTC (Return to Clinic) in 2-3 weeks. R56's September 2022 Treatment Administration Record, dated 9/15/22 to 9/30/22 includes the following daily weights for R56, September 18, 2022, September 24, 2022, and September 25, 2022. There are no weights documented for September 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 or 26. R56's September 2022 Treatment Administration Record, dated 9/15/22 to 9/30/22 includes the following daily vital signs for R56, September 18, 2022, September 24, 2022, and September 25, 2022. There are no vital signs documented for September 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 or 26. On 9/26/22 at 9:52 A.M., V5 (Registered Nurse) verified the missing weights and vital signs for R56.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to secure and apply a privacy cover on an indwelling urinary catheter tubing for two of four residents (R44, R421) reviewed for c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to secure and apply a privacy cover on an indwelling urinary catheter tubing for two of four residents (R44, R421) reviewed for catheter care in a sample of 81. Findings include: The facility Catheterization's Foley Catheter Insertion policy, revised 2/18, documents to secure the catheter to the thigh and attach drainage collection unit. Fasten the urinary drainage bag to the bed, below the level of the bladder and off the floor. On 9/27/22 at 10:00am, R421 was sitting on the couch in the main living area. R421's urinary catheter drainage bag was sitting on the floor under the front of the couch, with no cover or privacy bag. R421's urinary bag had clear dark yellow urine in the urinary drainage bag. On 9/27/22 at 10:15am, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) verified that the urinary drainage bag is not to be on the floor and must be covered for privacy. On 9/28/22 at 10:00am, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant) cleansed R44's urinary catheter. R44's catheter was not secured to R44's thigh, to prevent the catheter from pulling. V11 stated that R44's catheter is not secured, and she has not seen any catheter secure devices in the building. V11 verified that R44's urinary catheter drainage tubing is supposed to be secured to her thigh to prevent trauma.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction). The facility also failed to document behaviors and diagnoses to warrant the use of an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction). The facility also failed to document behaviors and diagnoses to warrant the use of an antipsychotic for two of seven residents (R62, R109) reviewed for antipsychotics in the sample of 81. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy, dated 6/17/22, documents, It is the policy of this facility that residents shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Unnecessary drug is any drug used: For excessive duration. Without adequate indications for its use. The policy also documents, Any resident receiving such medications shall have a psychiatric diagnosis or documented evidence of maladaptive behavior, which can be considered harmful to themselves or others, destructive to property, or if emotional problems exist which cause the resident frightful distress. Residents who use antipsychotic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions. Reductions shall be attempted at least twice in one year, unless the physician documents' the need to maintain the resident regimen according to the regulatory guidelines for such. In addition, the policy documents, Any resident receiving any psychotropic medication will have certain aspects of their use and potential side effects addressed in the residents' care plan at least quarterly. The care plan will identify target behaviors causing the use of psychotropic medications. The care plan will address the problem, approaches and goals to address these behaviors. 1. R62's Physician's Orders, dated 9/1-9/30/22, documents that R62 has an order dated 7/6/21 to receive Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25 mg (milligrams) by mouth three times a week at bedtime on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for Mood disorder. R62's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/23/22, documents in Section E Behaviors that R62 has not displayed any behaviors in the seven day look back period. R62's Care plan, dated 7/15/22, documents, R62 has sad/depressed mood indicators as evidence by history of withdrawn behavior sadness. Diagnosis mood disorder. He is quiet and polite. Cooperative with cares. Does have a history of making inappropriate comments to staff. R62's Care plan, dated 7/5/22, documents, R62 requires use of psychotropic medication to manage mood and/or behavior issues. Candidate for GDR. Needs monitored for drug related complications. Diagnosis mood disorder. Past history of delusions with delusional thoughts, physical aggression. History of sadness, withdrawn behavior, wandering, exit seeking, history inappropriate comments towards staff. The care plan also documents the following intervention: Attempt initiate gradual dose reduction as recommended by pharmacist. R62's Pharmacy Consultation Report, dated 7/11/22, documents, R62 has received an antipsychotic, Seroquel 25 mg at bedtime on Monday-Wednesday-Friday nights only since it was decreased to this dose 7/6/21. It has been one year now and he is due for an annual dose review. Recommendation: Please attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) to Seroquel 12.5 mg at bedtime on Monday-Wednesday-Friday nights only after current 25 mg supply is done. The report also documents the physician declined the recommendation, and the rationale is R62 is psychotic. R62's Behavioral Care Solutions note, dated 9/1/22, documents, R62 follow up psychiatric assessment/medication management. No acute change in mood or behavior. No aggression. Assessment & Plan: Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Plan: R62 with confusion, stable mood symptoms, no acute changes. Major depressive disorder recurrent moderate. Plan: R62 with confusion, stable mood symptoms, no acute changes. On 09/28/22 at 11:06 AM, V13 (Medical Social Worker) stated, (R62) doesn't really have any behaviors. He's been delusional before, but he really isn't a behavior issue. On 09/28/22 at 11:14 AM, V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, (R62) never has any behaviors. He is the sweetest person. I don't have any issues with him having any behaviors whatsoever. On 09/29/22 at 09:41 AM, V18 (Resident Care Coordinator) stated, (R62) has episodes of delusions, and he gets irritated at times, but he doesn't blow up. He's doing pretty well right now. I'm not sure why the doctor declined the GDR. 2. R109's Psychotropic Medication Consent (dated 01/27/22) documents R109 takes Abilify (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams by mouth twice daily for the following: Major Depressive Disorder, Psychotic Features, Recurrent Paranoia, Worrying, Fearful. R109's current Physician's Order Sheet documents the following medication order: Abilify 5 milligrams take one tablet twice daily. Diagnosis: Major Depressive Disorder with psychotic tendencies (date of order 05/06/21). R109's Monthly Behavior Monitoring Record (dated 07/2022 - 09/2022) document R109's target behaviors to include: Hallucinations, Delusions, Impatience, False Accusations, Negative Comments, Manipulation, Restlessness. These behavior monitoring forms document less than 5 of these behaviors were displayed for the duration of each month during this time. R109's Consultation Report (dated 08/12/22) documents a recommended gradual dose reduction was declined for the following: Too Psychotic. On 09/29/22 09:55 AM, V18 (Resident Care Coordinator) verified that R109 has not displayed consistent behaviors to warrant the continued use of R109's current dose of Abilify. V18 verified that R109 has been taking the same dose of Abilify since 05/06/21 and confirmed that a gradual dose reduction was not suggested or attempted on R109 for greater than 12 months. 2. R109's Psychotropic Medication Consent (dated 01/27/22) documents R109 takes Abilify (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams by mouth twice daily for the following: Major Depressive Disorder, Psychotic Features, Recurrent Paranoia, Worrying, Fearful.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** These failures resulted in two deficient practices. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** These failures resulted in two deficient practices. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before/after medication administration. This failure had the potential to affect 17 residents (R1, R2, R13, R31, R46, R52, R62, R64, R73, R78, R99, R101, R110, R116-118, R120). B. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to quarantine an unvaccinated resident upon admission to the facility, for one of one residents (R321), reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions, in a sample of 81. Findings include: A. The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 12/7/18, documents, All staff will wash hands, as washing hands as promptly and thoroughly as possible after resident contact and after contact with blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, and equipment or articles contaminated by them is an important component of the infection control and isolation precautions. The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 11/18/17, documents, Appropriate hand washing is to be completed and/or alcohol-based gel rub must be used, throughout the medication pass. This should occur: Before and after medication pass; before performing invasive procedures; After any contact with mucous membranes, blood or body fluids, secretions, or excretions. On 09/26/22 at 11:12 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered R31's medication to R31. V16 returned to her medication cart, and without performing hand hygiene began preparing R1's medications. On 09/26/22 at 11:18 AM, without performing hand hygiene, V16 administered R1's medications. V16 returned to her medication cart, and without performing hand hygiene began preparing R117's medications. On 09/26/22 at 11:23 AM, without performing hand hygiene, V16 administered R117's medications. V16 returned to her medication cart, and without performing hand hygiene began preparing R52's medications. On 09/26/22 at 11:30 AM, without performing hand hygiene, V16 administered R52's medications. V16 returned to her medication cart, and without performing hand hygiene began preparing R78's medications. On 09/26/22 at 11:33 AM without performing hand hygiene, V16 administered R78's medications. V16 returned to her medication cart, and without performing hand hygiene began preparing R99's medications. On 09/26/22 at 11:43 AM, without performing hand hygiene, V16 administered R99's medications. V16 washed her hands. V16 returned to her medication cart and began preparing R110's medications. On 09/26/22 at 11:55 AM, V16 applied gloves, and checked R110's blood glucose level. V16 removed her gloves and administered R110's medication. Without performing hand hygiene, V16 returned to her medication cart, and began preparing R110's insulin. At 12:01 PM, V16 applied gloves and administered 8 units of Lispro insulin in R110's right lower abdomen subcutaneously. Without performing hand hygiene, V16 returned to her medication cart and began preparing R13's medications. On 9/26/22 at 12:10 PM, V16 administered R13's medications crushed in chocolate pudding. Without performing hand hygiene, V16 returned to her medication cart. On 09/26/22 at 12:15 PM, V16 confirmed that she only washed her hands one time during her medication pass, and that she should have performed hand hygiene before and after administering each residents' medications. The facility Room Roster dated 9/26/22 and provided by V1 (Administrator), documents that 17 residents (R1, R2, R13, R31, R46, R52, R62, R64, R73, R78, R99, R101, R110, R116-118, R120) reside on the XXX hall that V16 administered medications to. B. The facility policy, Covid-19 Control Measures to Prevent Transmission of the Covid-19 Virus and to Control Outbreaks, dated (revised) 3/25/22 directs staff, New admissions and readmissions, that are not up to date with their Covid-19 vaccinations, are to be quarantined for 10 days. Residents who are on TBP (Transmission Based Precautions) cannot participate in communal dining. R321's facility Face Sheet documents that R321 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R321's facility Immunization Record, dated 9/21/22 documents Tuberculin Test administered on 9/21/22. No Covid-19 vaccinations were recorded on the form. R321's facility Care Plan Summary form, dated 9/22/22 includes the following identified Specialty Nursing area: Droplet Precaution. On 9/26/22 at 9:45 AM, a sign posted outside or R321's stated, Droplet Precautions. Isolation barrels were located just inside R321's room. R321 was not present in his room. On 9/26/22 at 9:52 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) verified that R321 was recently admitted on [DATE]. At that time V5 stated, I have no one on Isolation or Quarantine over here. We are all green. On 9/26/22 at 10:17 AM, R321 was present in the facility Therapy Room, receiving treatment. R321 did not have a mask on. The facility Physical Therapy Assistant, Occupational Therapy Assistant and two residents (R4 and R76) were also present in the Therapy Room. On 9/26/22 at 11:45 AM, R321 was seated in the facility Activity Room at a table, conversing with R97 and R114, without a face mask. On 9/26/22 at 11:54 AM, V1 (Administrator In Training/AIT) stated, (R321) is in Quarantine due to his vaccination status. At that same time V1 verified R321 should not be in the facility Activity Room or Therapy Room and should be quarantined to his room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the walls and a floor heating unit were intact in resident living areas for seven of seven residents (R14, R22, R23, R38, R44, R85, and...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the walls and a floor heating unit were intact in resident living areas for seven of seven residents (R14, R22, R23, R38, R44, R85, and R111) reviewed for environment in a sample of 81. Findings include: On 9/29/22 at 10:00am, the three bathrooms in the rooms affecting R14, R22, R23, R38, R85 and R111 had plaster crumbling out of the walls with piles of plaster and chipped paint observed on the floor under the sink and behind the toilets. The floor heating unit in R44's room did not have a cover on it and the hard metal coil units were exposed. R44 stated that the heating unit has been broken for a long time and that she is afraid she is going to fall into it and get hurt. On 9/29/22 at 10:30am, V1 (Administrator in Training) stated that the areas in the bathrooms are from prior leaks in either the sinks or the toilets. V1 stated that the facility has to put in bids for maintenance repairs, but they have been declined for some reason lately. V1 stated that she was not aware of the heating unit in R44's room being exposed.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen were labeled and dated, ensure food items were covered, ensure scoops were not left in dry storage ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen were labeled and dated, ensure food items were covered, ensure scoops were not left in dry storage containers, perform food temperatures prior to serving, and failed to follow a cleaning schedule to maintain clean kitchen floors and exhaust fans. This failure has the potential to affect all 119 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Storage policy dated 10/2020 documents the following: It is the policy of (the facility) that food shall be stored on shelves in areas that provide the best preservation. Food shall be stored at the proper temperature and for appropriate lengths of time to protect quality of food and food cost. Procedure: All items will be dated upon receipt. Individual cans or bags shall each be dated to ensure that stock is rotated properly. Store chemical and poisonous materials in a separate area that can be locked. Store leftovers in covered, labeled, and dated containers under refrigeration or frozen. When using only part of a product, the remaining product should be in the original package or airtight container and labeled and dated. Clean up all debris dropped on the floor immediately. On 09/26/22 at 11:01 AM an Initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 9/26/2022 from 10:26 am-11:00 am. This tour was conducted with V3 (Administrative assistant). V3 stated she and V1 (Administrator) are overseeing the kitchen because the facility's Dietary Manager walked out and quit on 9/16/2022. The entire kitchen floor was visibly dirty and sticky. The floor under the three-compartment sink was starting to crack and had broken pieces of tile. There were three containers, one with oats, one with sugar and one with flour. On top of these containers was a round, unlabeled bin with a white substance and a scoop sitting in it. Kitchen staff identified the substance as powdered sugar. Next to this powdered sugar was a brown paper bag that was open and undated and contained powdered sugar. The container that contained flour had an N95 face mask, pliers and a tube of tub and tile caulk sitting on top of it. This was sitting next to the open bag of powdered sugar. The walk-in freezer contained a container of ice cream that was open, not labeled or dated. The walk-in freezer also had an opened bottle of water that was not labeled. The walk-in refrigerator fan was dirty with visible hanging dust and was leaking what appeared to be water. Under this fan was a 4-tiered shelf. On the top shelf was a pan with water in it. On the 2nd shelf was a box of pulled pork that was wet, 1 package of meat that was unlabeled or dated as well as some meat wrapped in plastic wrap that was undated or labeled. The box with the meat was also wet. On the 2nd shelf was a tray of baked potatoes wrapped in aluminum foil with water in the tray. On the floor under the leaking fan was standing water and 2 visibly wet mop heads. On the third shelf was a wet box that contained water chestnuts in bacon, an open, unsealed wet box of bacon. All these items were under the walk-in refrigerator fan that was dirty and leaking. V3 (Administrative Assistant) stated a work order has been put in for the fan but it is dripping and that is why the boxes are wet. On another shelf in the walk-in refrigerator was a full tray of individual disposable cups of tomato juice, not labeled and a half empty bag of shredded cheese that was not dated. On another shelf in the walk-in refrigerator was a container of chocolate pudding with a dirty, wet rag sitting on the shelf next to the pudding and other various foods. On 9/26/2022 at 11:33 am-12:00 pm the walk-in refrigerator still contained boxes under the leaking fan. In addition to the mentioned items there was a bag of diced chicken also on the shelf. On the floor near the walk-in freezer were 2 boxes of Italian bread. On 9/26/2022 at 11:44 am the following food temperatures were recorded: Mashed Potatoes-140 degrees, Puree Vegetables-160 degrees, puree casserole-120 degrees, pork chops-180, casserole-80 degrees, vegetables-130 degrees, crème corn-150 degrees, small container of vegetables-168 degrees. V7 (Head Cook) put all items back in the oven to re heat. On 9/26/2022 at 12:15 pm V17 (Dietary aide) was serving lunch to the residents on A wing which included the casserole that previously registered at 80 degrees Fahrenheit. On 9/26/2022 at 12:20 pm when asked why A wing was served their lunch when the food was not rising to appropriate temperatures, V4 (Dietary) replied they were in smaller containers. The facility's Food Temperature chart was reviewed on 9/26/2022 at 1:00 pm and did not have recorded temperatures for breakfast or lunch on 9/26/2022. The facility's most recent dietary cleaning schedule was provided dated August 25-30th and September 1st. On 9/28/2022 V3 (Administrative Assistant) verified this was the last cleaning schedule the facility has. On 9/26/2022 at 12:15 pm while staff were serving food a fly was in the kitchen flying around the uncovered food. At this same day and time there was a gnat that was flying around the drinks and landed on a cup. On 9/27/2022 at 11:40 am the kitchen floors were visibly dirty and sticky. Food serving was beginning, during this time a fly was in the kitchen flying around. Facility document, entitled Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 9/26/2022, documents 119 residents reside in the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 42% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 6 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, 6 harm violation(s), $410,381 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 74 deficiencies on record, including 6 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $410,381 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Avenues At Royal Oak's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Avenues At Royal Oak Staffed?

CMS rates AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 70%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Avenues At Royal Oak?

State health inspectors documented 74 deficiencies at AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK during 2022 to 2025. These included: 6 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 6 that caused actual resident harm, 61 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Avenues At Royal Oak?

AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ARCADIA CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 200 certified beds and approximately 128 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a large facility located in KEWANEE, Illinois.

How Does Avenues At Royal Oak Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avenues At Royal Oak?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Avenues At Royal Oak Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Avenues At Royal Oak Stick Around?

AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Avenues At Royal Oak Ever Fined?

AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK has been fined $410,381 across 4 penalty actions. This is 11.0x the Illinois average of $37,183. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Avenues At Royal Oak on Any Federal Watch List?

AVENUES AT ROYAL OAK is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.