PAVILION OF OTTAWA
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Pavilion of Ottawa has a Trust Grade of B+, meaning it is recommended and above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #74 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 9 in La Salle County, indicating that only one nearby option is better. The facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from 6 in 2023 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is an average strength with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 32%, which is better than the state average of 46%. Notably, there have been no fines recorded, which is a positive sign. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. For instance, one serious incident involved a failure to prevent skin breakdown, leading to multiple severe pressure wounds for a resident. Additionally, there were concerns about staff not properly covering their hair in the kitchen, which could impact food safety for all residents. Lastly, the facility did not promptly identify and report a viral infection, resulting in its spread among residents and staff. While there are commendable aspects of this nursing home, families should weigh these concerns when making their decision.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Illinois
- #74/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 32% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 48 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (32%)
16 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) resc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming assistance for one of three residents (R12) reviewed for activities of daily living assistance in a sample o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure range of motion was implemented for a resident with functional limitations and failed to ensure an assistive device was...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a respiratory treatment was administered according to facility policy for one (R54) of one residents reviewed for brea...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a diagnosis, targeted behaviors, and indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication was in place for a resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 9/26/23 at 9:56am, R108's room had oxygen tubing and a humidifier dated 9/24/23. On 9/27/23 at 11:30am and 9/28/23 at 3:08pm, R108 was in her room with oxygen on.
R108's current order summary r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff covered hair in a sanitary manner while in the kitchen. This failure has the potential to affect all 124 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a potential viral infection, immediately repo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was answered in a timely manner to m...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a treatment dressing change order for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for treatments in a sample of four.
Findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent skin bre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented to prevent further falls and implement safety interventions to prevent foot injurie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction of a psychotropic medication for one of four residents (R63) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 32% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Pavilion Of Ottawa's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PAVILION OF OTTAWA an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Pavilion Of Ottawa Staffed?
CMS rates PAVILION OF OTTAWA's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Pavilion Of Ottawa?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at PAVILION OF OTTAWA during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Pavilion Of Ottawa?
PAVILION OF OTTAWA is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PAVILION HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 135 certified beds and approximately 126 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in OTTAWA, Illinois.
How Does Pavilion Of Ottawa Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, PAVILION OF OTTAWA's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pavilion Of Ottawa?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Pavilion Of Ottawa Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PAVILION OF OTTAWA has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Pavilion Of Ottawa Stick Around?
PAVILION OF OTTAWA has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Pavilion Of Ottawa Ever Fined?
PAVILION OF OTTAWA has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Pavilion Of Ottawa on Any Federal Watch List?
PAVILION OF OTTAWA is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.