ELKHART MEADOWS
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Elkhart Meadows has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #30 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the top half of the state, and #2 out of 12 in Elkhart County, meaning only one local facility is rated higher. However, the facility's trend is concerning as it has doubled its issues from 2 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is a mixed bag; while there is a decent turnover rate of 40%, which is below the state average, the RN coverage is lower than 87% of other Indiana facilities, potentially impacting resident care. Notably, there have been specific concerns, such as unclean kitchen conditions that could affect food safety for all residents and a resident with dirty fingernails and soiled clothes, indicating lapses in personal care. Overall, while Elkhart Meadows has strengths in its ranking and some staffing areas, families should be aware of the recent trends and specific incidents that need addressing.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Indiana
- #30/505
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 22 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Indiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an Annual Minimun Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 15 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident 25)
Finding includes:
A record review for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of great...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary food preparation and storage areas, which had the potential to affect 51 of 51 residents whose food was prepared...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure notification of change in Medicare covered services was provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Medicare services. (Resident 99)
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide activities that support the physical, ment...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan on a residents skin condition of bruises and abrasions for 1 out of 21 recor...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities for 1 of 1 residents that were reviewed for transmission based precautions. (Resident 41)
Finding includes:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
During a random observation, on 9/08/2022 at 11:31 A.M., Resident 34 had long soiled fingernails.
During an observation of Resident 34, on 9/12/2022 at 9:48 A.M., the resident's fingernails were dirt...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated, and failed to remove expired foods. In addition, the facility failed to follow the recip...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0920
(Tag F0920)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient space in the dining room. This potentially affected 30 of 53 residents in the building that ate their meals in t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Indiana.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 40% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Elkhart Meadows's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ELKHART MEADOWS an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Elkhart Meadows Staffed?
CMS rates ELKHART MEADOWS's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Elkhart Meadows?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at ELKHART MEADOWS during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Elkhart Meadows?
ELKHART MEADOWS is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 58 certified beds and approximately 44 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ELKHART, Indiana.
How Does Elkhart Meadows Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, ELKHART MEADOWS's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Elkhart Meadows?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Elkhart Meadows Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ELKHART MEADOWS has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Elkhart Meadows Stick Around?
ELKHART MEADOWS has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Elkhart Meadows Ever Fined?
ELKHART MEADOWS has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Elkhart Meadows on Any Federal Watch List?
ELKHART MEADOWS is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.