ADAMS HERITAGE

12011 WHITTERN RD, MONROEVILLE, IN 46773 (260) 623-6440
Government - City/county 61 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#1 of 505 in IN
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Adams Heritage in Monroeville, Indiana, has an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performing excellently. With a state rank of #1 out of 505 facilities in Indiana and a county rank of #1 out of 29 in Allen County, it is clearly among the best options available. The facility's trend is stable, with only 1 issue reported in both 2024 and 2025, suggesting consistent performance. Staffing is also a strength, with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 43%, which is better than the state average. However, there are some concerns, such as incidents involving unlabeled food items in the kitchen and the improper storage of medications that could pose risks. Overall, while Adams Heritage has strong ratings and a good reputation, families should be aware of these specific areas that need attention.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Indiana
#1/505
Top 1%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
43% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 54 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Indiana. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (43%)

    5 points below Indiana average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 43%

Near Indiana avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated in the kitchen. 37 of 37 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated in the kitchen. 37 of 37 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation, on 5/21/25 at 9:10 AM, about 20 salad dressing packets were observed in a cooler in the dining room. No expiration dates were observed on the packets. Two open boxes of assorted cheesecake slices, an open box of carrot cake, a plastic container of cupcakes and an open box of cookie dough were observed in the walk-in cooler with no labels or dates. An open bag of shredded cheese had an open date of 4/13/25 with instructions marked on the package to discard on 4/20/25. An open box in the reach in freezer contained an open plastic bag containing hamburger patties with the meat exposed to the air. An open box contained an open plastic bag of hot dogs. The hot dogs were open to air and covered with about 1/2 inch of frost in most places. Neither the hamburgers nor hot dogs were labeled and dated. 9 eggs were observed in a container in the reach-in salad cooler with no label or date. In an interview, on 5/21/25 at 9:12 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated the dressing packets came from boxes in the dry storage area, but she had no written record of rotation of product to verify each packet coming from the existing boxes in dry storage. She indicated the packets needed to be discarded since the expiration date was unknown. The dietary manager indicated the boxes of cheesecake, carrot cake, cookie dough and container of cupcakes should have been labeled and dated. She indicated the expired cheese should have been discarded. In an interview, on 5/23/25 at 10:53 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated all 37 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared in the kitchen. A current policy, dated 9/24, provided by the Administrator on 5/21/25 at 2:20 PM indicated all food should be labeled, dated and discarded appropriately. The policy indicated food should be labeled and dated as soon as the original packaging is broken. Any food manufactured in house and served in individual portions will be labeled with a name and expiration date. 3.1-21(i)(2)
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to separate oral medications from external medications for 1 of 1 cart reviewed affecting 1 resident. (100 hall, Resident 28). O...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to separate oral medications from external medications for 1 of 1 cart reviewed affecting 1 resident. (100 hall, Resident 28). On 07/24/24, at 09:45 AM, during an observation and interview with RN 2; Resident 28's oral medications were obsered stored in locked medication cart (100 Hall) alongside his external medication Triad hydrophilic wound dressing paste and Bengay. RN 2 denied any problem mixing orals with externals. RN 2 explained all the medications were for Resident 28. RN 2 explained one of the creams was Bengay and the other was a topical for a wound. RN 2 offered to move external medications to the treatment cart. In an interview on 7/25/24 at 7:51AM, the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated RN 2 was from the hospital and was not up to date on nursing home requirements. The DON further indicated after speaking with RN 2 she had just completed the dressing change and put the cream there due to being called away. The medication cart and treatment cart were within 10 feet of each other. Resident 28's record review began on 7/29/24 at 9:36AM. Diagnoses included parplegia, pain, and heart disease. A medication administration audit report dated July 2024, indicated Resident 28's dressing change was completed on 7/24/24 at 6AM and at 1:41PM by RN 2. The 100 Hall cart was observed 7/24/24 at 09:45AM, approximately 3 hours later. Resident 28's physician orders included Triad hydrophilic external paste, apply to buttocks/thighs topically every day and evening shift for excoriation apply to areas around wound vac; dated 5/24/24. Additionally, an order for Bengay lidocaine external cream 4%, apply to joints topically every 12 hours as needed for pain, ok for unsupervised self-administration was dated 4/10/24. A current facility policy, titled Storing Medications, dated 2/1/94 was provided by DON on 7/29/24 at 11:10AM. The policy indicated .all drugs intended for internal use should be stored together in a medication cart. No other policies were provided at time of exit. 3.1- 25(j)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Indiana.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Adams Heritage's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ADAMS HERITAGE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Adams Heritage Staffed?

CMS rates ADAMS HERITAGE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Adams Heritage?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at ADAMS HERITAGE during 2024 to 2025. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Adams Heritage?

ADAMS HERITAGE is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 61 certified beds and approximately 39 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MONROEVILLE, Indiana.

How Does Adams Heritage Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, ADAMS HERITAGE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Adams Heritage?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Adams Heritage Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ADAMS HERITAGE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Adams Heritage Stick Around?

ADAMS HERITAGE has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Adams Heritage Ever Fined?

ADAMS HERITAGE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Adams Heritage on Any Federal Watch List?

ADAMS HERITAGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.