Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation

900 Gagel Avenue, Louisville, KY 40216 (502) 368-5827
For profit - Limited Liability company 120 Beds INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING Data: November 2025 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#247 of 266 in KY
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided, which is poor and below acceptable standards. It ranks #247 out of 266 nursing homes in Kentucky, placing it in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and #32 out of 38 in Jefferson County, meaning there are very few local options that are worse. However, the facility is showing signs of improvement, as the number of issues reported has decreased from 14 in 2019 to 6 in 2024. Staffing is a concern, with a rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 49%, which is close to the state average, indicating staff may not stay long enough to build strong relationships with residents. There are serious issues as well, including a critical incident where a resident eloped from the facility unsupervised, which required police intervention, and another incident involving safety concerns related to a staff member who was escorted out by law enforcement after unauthorized access to resident areas. Overall, while there are some signs of improvement, the facility has significant weaknesses that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Kentucky
#247/266
Bottom 8%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
14 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
49% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$28,492 in fines. Lower than most Kentucky facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Kentucky. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 14 issues
2024: 6 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Kentucky average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 49%

Near Kentucky avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $28,492

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record

5 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Jul 2024 6 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of a facility investigation, the facility failed to hav...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of a facility investigation, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure resident safety for one (Resident (R) 140) of two sampled residents reviewed for elopements. On 09/04/2022, R140 eloped from the facility unescorted and unsupervised, and required police intervention to locate the resident and return him to the facility. On 06/28/2024, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were provided a copy of the CMS IJ Template and notified that the failure to ensure residents were provided supervision and protected from further elopement, constituted immediate jeopardy at F 689. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F 689 also constituted Substandard Quality of Care at 42 CFR 483.25. The IJ was determined to exist on 09/04/2022 when the facility discovered R140 had eloped from the building. The facility completed the following: 1. Resident 140 no longer resides in the facility. Resident was returned to facility by police at 22:29 on 09/04/2022. A head-to-toe assessment was completed by a licensed nurse on 09/04/2022, the nurse practitioner was notified by a licensed nurse on 09/04/2022, and SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment Record] was completed on 09/04/2022 by a licensed nurse. (A) An elopement assessment was completed by a licensed nurse on 09/04/2022. (B) Ad Hoc QAPI [Quality Assurance Performance Improvement] meeting was held with the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Admissions Coordinator, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Human Resources Director, Housekeeping Director, Activities Director, and Therapy Director on 09/04/2022. (C) One-on-one supervision was initiated, and the care plan was updated by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Director of Nursing, Social Services Director, Therapy Director, and clinical managers on 09/04/2022. (D) The resident Representative was notified in person of the incident by a licensed nurse on 09/05/2022. (E) Every shift behavior monitoring for exit-seeking behavior was continued per MAR and TAR [Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record] on 09/04/2022 until discharge. The resident had a wanderguard placement prior to the incident on 09/04/2022 and was added to the care plan at the time by a licensed nurse. (F) Resident 140 was seen by NP [Nurse Practitioner] and/or physician on 09/06/2022. (G) One-on-one monitoring was placed on orders on 09/08/2022. (H) Resident was monitored by Social Services from 09/06-09/08/2022. (I) Resident 140 was reviewed by IDT for changes in behavior on 09/06/2022. 1. How other residents having the potential to be affected by the same deficient practice will be identified, and what corrective action will be taken: An elopement assessment was completed for 81 residents on 09/04/2022 to 09/06/2022 by licensed nurses. There were 3 residents at risk for elopement at the time the assessment was completed with elopement care plans in place. There were zero new residents identified at risk for elopement at the time the assessments were initiated and completed. Training What measures will be put into place and what systemic changes will be made to ensure that the deficient practice does not re-occur? Clinical and agency clinical staff were educated regarding elopement policy and elopement drill beginning 09/04/2022 and completed on 09/12/2022. Education was completed by the Director of Nursing, ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing], MDS [Minimum Data Set] nurse, other nurse managers, and the Dietary Manager. Any staff who fails to comply with the points of the in-servicing would be further educated and /or progressively disciplined as indicated up to termination. As an ongoing practice, an elopement assessment was completed upon admission, quarterly and as needed related to changes in the resident's exit-seeking behaviors. Discussion at clinical meetings of changes in behaviors with review of orders, review of MARs/TARs, care plan review, nurse' notes review, and reports by staff. Care plans will be updated as needed based on these reviews by the clinical leadership and IDT. Individual resident's care plans will be reviewed at least quarterly for needed updates as part of the resident's quarterly care plan conference. 1. How the corrective actions will be monitored to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur, (i.e., what Quality Assurance Program will be put into place and by what date the systemic changes for each deficiency will be completed). Resident 140 was reviewed by IDT for changes in behavior on 09/13/2022, 09/21/2022, 09/27/2022, 10/04/2022, 10/25/2022, 11/01/2022, 11/04/2022, 11/08/2022, 11/15/2022, 11/29/2022, 12/05/2022, and 12/16/2022. One on Two monitoring on 09/23/2022 and changed to every 15-minute checks on 11/04/2022 with care plan revisions by licensed nurse, which remained until discharge. Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held with the Administrator, Medical Director, and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on 09/04/2022. (C) Elopement Drills conducted daily for 14 days by the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Housekeeping Supervisor, and /or the Maintenance Director. The QAPI Committee included but not limited to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Unit Managers, MDS Nurse and Medical Director will review the results. An extended survey was initiated on 07/02/2024, and the State Survey Agency (SSA) validated the facility's IJ Removal Plan on 07/03/2024. Based on the findings of this survey, it was determined the immediate jeopardy was removed and the deficient practice was corrected as alleged on 09/13/2022, prior to initiation of the investigation. Therefore, the IJ was determined to constitute Past Jeopardy. The findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Elopement Guideline, dated 04/05/2023, revealed it was to provide a safe and secure environment for all residents. In the event of resident elopement, the facility would implement its policies and procedures immediately to locate the resident in a timely manner. Elopement was defined as a situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without staff knowledge and necessary supervision. A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Regarding Missing Residents and Elopement revealed all residents were provided adequate supervision to meet each resident's nursing and personal care needs. All residents would be assessed for behaviors or conditions that put them at risk of elopement. All residents assessed to be at risk of elopement would have this issue addressed in their plan of care. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and alcohol dependence. A review of the EMR elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed R140 had a low risk score of zero for elopement. A review of an EMR wandering risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R140 was at low risk for wandering. A review of the admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/02/2022, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Per the MDS, the resident used a walker or a wheelchair, and needed physical assistance of one person for ambulation and locomotion. The MDS showed no wandering behaviors as of the date of this assessment. A review of the EMR progress noted dated 08/07/2022 revealed R140 had been wandering during the night. Per the note, at 5:59 AM, Resident also noted to wander as reported to me by his CNA [Certified Nurse Aide] tonight. Although there was no information in the progress note to indicate exit seeking behavior, a review of the EMR care plan revealed the care plan was updated that same date (08/07/2022) to show that the resident was now actively wandering and may be in other beds or close to exits. In response, interventions were added to place the resident on 15-minute location checks until a physician-ordered wander guard device arrived and placed on the left ankle. A review of the EMR physician's orders dated 08/10/2022 revealed the wander guard device was placed to the left ankle. Placement and function of the wander guard per physician orders was verified per documentation on the MAR. A review of Progress Notes revealed that on 08/18/2022, the resident reported that he was not feeling well. He went out to the emergency room (ER) on 08/19/2022 and returned on 08/20/2022 with no medical diagnosis identified; however, upon return R140 continued to state he did not feel well. On 08/25/2022, R140 was diagnosed as COVID-19 positive and was moved to the COVID Unit on the Southeast Hall. A wandering risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was now at high risk for wandering, due to a history of wandering and the placement of the wander guard device. This assessment showed the resident was now independent with locomotion in his wheelchair. Further review of the EMR revealed that on 08/31/2022, R140 was moved to a room on the Southwest Hall that was approximately 60 feet from an emergency exit door. A review of the EMR progress note (SBAR), dated 09/04/2022, revealed that at approximately 10:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 15, heard the alarm on the Southwest exit door, (which was equipped with a wander guard alarm) sounding. R140 was not in his room and the wheelchair was next to the bed. Staff were alerted and an elopement protocol was enacted. Police were notified and they found the resident, who was returned to the facility at approximately 10:29 PM. R140 was dressed appropriately for the weather and sustained no injuries in response to the elopement. Per the SBAR, the resident stated he was going home, and was placed on one-to-one supervision. Review of the facility investigation revealed that on 09/04/2022, sometime between 10:00 PM to 10:15 PM, R140 exited the facility through the Southwest emergency door, setting off the alarm. Per the investigation, the resident was found at a convenience store which was .6 tenth of a mile from the facility, downhill on a two-lane road. The facility stated the root cause was the resident's desire to go home. Review of the investigation revealed that the facility did not identify how long the alarm had been sounding before staff responded to it. A review of the facility form titled Confidential Witness Statement dated 09/04/2022, revealed LPN15 was in another resident's room to provide care and exited that room sometime between 10:10 PM to 10:15 PM. At that time, she heard the Southwest Door alarming. When she heard the alarm, she asked why the door was alarming and an unnamed resident stated that a tall male went out the door. Per the witness statement, LPN15 started searching the residents' rooms and did not find R140, whose wheelchair was still in his room. She alerted the other staff to search and notified the DON by 10:21 PM. Another nurse called 911 to notify the police of the elopement. At 10:28 PM the administrator was notified and at approximately 10:29 PM, the police returned R140 to the facility. Review of facility records revealed LPN15 was no longer employed at the facility and was unavailable for interview. Review of the witness statements for the other three staff who were assigned to the Southwest Unit that night revealed that all staff were either in resident rooms or on break and had not heard the alarm on the Southwest Door sound. The witness statements indicated that they were unaware that R140 had eloped from the facility until LPN15 identified the issue. Review of witness statements from staff working on the other units revealed that they, also, failed to hear the alarm sound when R140 eloped through the Southwest Hall door. A review of former Social Services progress notes found in the electronic medical record dated 09/06/2022, 09/07/2022, and 09/08/2022, revealed R140 did not remember leaving the facility. Per the resident's closed record, R140 was discharged from the facility on 12/16/2022 and was not available for an interview. Interview with R61 on 07/02/2024 at 9:30 AM revealed he was the resident who saw R140 go out the door and the alarm sounded. He stated he told staff he saw R140 go out the door. R61 could not remember how long the alarm had been sounding prior to staff responding. In an interview with LPN2 on 06/28/2024 at 1:15 PM, he stated he did not remember R140. LPN2 stated the emergency door alarmed if a resident tried to go out the door wearing the wander guard device. In an interview with CNA14 on 06/28/2024 at 2:27 PM, she stated she was one of the staff working on the Southwest Unit on the night that R140 eloped. She stated that she did not recall specifically where she was at the time, and did not hear the alarm sounding, CNA14 stated she was unaware that R140 had eloped. CNA14 stated R140's room was located near the south nurses' station to observe him for wandering the unit and she checked on R140 hourly. Attempts to interview the additional staff who were present on the night of 09/04/2022 were made; however, calls to these staff were not returned. In an interview with the DON on 06/28/2024 at 3:50 PM, she stated she was not the DON when R140 eloped; however, since 2022, the facility had assessments and interventions for elopement in place to ensure residents were safe and elopement does not reoccur. In an interview with the Administrator on 06/28/2024 at 11:05 AM, she stated she was not the Administrator at the time of R140's elopement and the Quality Assurance plan has ensured there have been no other elopements since 2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-cente...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident (R) 85) of 76 sampled residents, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. The Care Area Assessments (CAA) that triggered for care planning, as well as, other areas such as medical needs, goals, and discharge planning, were not included in R85's comprehensive care plan by the required completion date (no later than 21 days from admission). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Baseline, comprehensive, resident centered care plan guideline dated 09/01/2017 and reviewed 04/12/2024, revealed the comprehensive care plan expands on resident's baseline care plan to include risks, goals and interventions using person centered plan of care approach to meet the medical, physical functioning, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs of a resident. Further review of the policy revealed the comprehensive care plan should be finalized with seven days of completion of the full comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment and will include discharge planning. Review of the face sheet for R85 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, malfunction of tracheostomy stoma, and history of blood clots. A baseline care plan for R85, dated 05/05/2024, was completed within 48 hours of admission to facility and addressed the resident's initial goals, functional status, health conditions, dietary, therapy and social services. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R85, dated 05/09/2024, revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 14/15, meaning intact cognition. The Care Area Assessments (CAA) triggered for the following areas of concern: The Communication trigger revealed R85 had impaired ability to make herself understood through verbal and non-verbal expression of ideas/wants. The Functional Ability trigger revealed R85 needed partial/moderate assistance with showering and bathing, and supervision or touching assistance with lower body dressing, personal hygiene, chair/bed to chair transfer, sub/shower transfer, walking 10 feet, and partial/moderate assistance with walking 50 feet with two turns, and walking 150 feet. The Fall trigger revealed R85 was at fall risk related to received antidepressant medications on one or more of the last seven days. The Nutritional status trigger revealed R85 had a low body mass index (BMI). The Psychotropic drug use trigger revealed R85 received antidepressant medications on one or more of the last seven days. The Urinary incontinence trigger revealed R85 had occasional urinary incontinence. The Pressure Ulcer/injury trigger revealed R85 had frequent bowel incontinence. The MDS documented that all CAA triggers were reviewed and addressed in the care plan on 05/16/2024 and signed by the facility's MDS nurse, who also signed as the person completing the care plan decision process on 05/23/2024. Based on the resident's date of admission, the comprehensive care plan was scheduled to be completed no later than 05/23/2024. Review of the care plan on 06/25/2024 revealed that it did not address the triggered areas of Communication, Functional Ability, Falls, Psychotropic Drug Use, Urinary Incontinence, or Pressure Ulcer/Injury. The care plan also failed to address medical needs related to the resident's care related to the tracheostomy/stoma. In addition, it failed to address the resident's goals and/or plans for discharge. Interview conducted with R85 on 06/24/2024 at 8:58 AM revealed she has been in the facility for about six weeks, and in that time, had a swallow study, received tracheostomy care, and reported that staff often had a hard time understanding what she says due to having a tracheostomy and use of a speaking valve. R85 stated she was unaware of what her plan of care was, did not know how long she will be in the facility, and did not know plans for discharge. Interview conducted with the Assistant MDS Coordinator on 06/26/2024 at 3:00 PM revealed that she has been in her current position for about six weeks and received training from the facility's MDS Coordinator and a nurse from the corporate office and attended a few training seminars. The Assistant MDS Coordinator was unable to recall the time frame requirements for completion of comprehensive care plans. Interview conducted with the facility MDS Coordinator on 06/26/2024 at 3:13 PM revealed that she has been in her current position for 13 months. The MDS Coordinator stated she completes the MDS assessment within five to seven days of admission and then has a total of 14 days from admission to complete the comprehensive care plan. The MDS Coordinator stated she was responsible for the completion of the nursing portion of the comprehensive care plan and other department heads completed their portion. In further interview, the MDS Coordinator stated she printed a list monthly of new residents and checked the list to ensure all care plans were completed. When asked to produce R85's comprehensive care plan (addressing all areas noted above), she stated that it was not there, adding, I take full responsibility on the comprehensive not being there, it should have been done by the end of May.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that two (Resident (R) 49 and R 58) of two sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living/communication did not decline in their ability to communicate. The residents were not provided communication tools in accordance with their plans of care. The findings include: 1. Review of R49's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included parkinsonism, dysarthria and anarthria (slurred and raspy speech and inability to articulate words), occlusion and stenosis of right middle cerebral artery, cognitive communication deficit, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and/or weakness on one side of the body). Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2/15, which indicated a severe cognitive deficit. Per the MDS, the resident had unclear speech, but was usually understood. Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan for Impaired Communication dated 02/19/2024, revealed a goal that, I will be able to communicate with staff daily and as needed. Interventions included to utilize appropriate augmentative devices like communication boards/cards, large print signs, and writing pad. The intervention also stated to help the resident acquire and learn to use appropriate devices. Review of the Speech Therapist Evaluation and Plan of Treatment, dated 03/01/2024, revealed the resident has reached his maximum level of potential and been verbally educated and trained on word retrieval strategies. Per this Plan of Treatment, communication picture pages were left in the resident's room in help the resident communicate basic wants/needs to family/staff. The resident verbalized understanding of what had been discussed. Observation on 06/23/2024 at 2:30 PM revealed R49 and the resident's sister (F49) were playing a game of rolling the dice, the State Survey Agency (SSA) survey team member entered the resident's room. Observation of the resident's room revealed no evidence of communication picture pages or a communication board in the resident's room. Although the MDS had documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, during an interview on 06/23/2024 at 2:30 PM, the resident was able to answer questions by nodding and saying yes or no. Interview with both R49 and the resident's sister revealed they had not seen anything left in the room for communication. During an additional interview with R49 in the resident's room on 06/25/2024 at 1:31 PM, he appeared to have awareness/cognition of the conversation. When asked if he could understand the questions, he stated yes. When asked if he could write, he stated yes. The resident was observed to have flaccid paralysis to the left side. When asked if he was right or left-handed, R49 raised his right hand, and stated yes when asked if he would benefit from a dry erase board for communication. 2. Review of R58's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysarthria following cerebral infarction, dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 9/15, which indicated moderate cognitive decline. Per the MDS, the resident had unclear speech, but was usually understood. Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 02/09/2024, revealed the resident had an alteration in ability to communicate related to impaired speech. Per the care plan, the problems were evidenced by: ability with transmission of information. Resident was able to communicate via steno pad in order to clarify his needs, but reports speech was affected by stroke occurring last year. The resident will communicate through verbal/non-verbal means through the next review. Intervention included for staff to Assess the resident's communication strengths and deficits. Emphasize abilities. Utilize appropriate augmentative devices, i.e., eyeglasses, magnifying glass, hearing aid, listen aider (power ear), communication board/cards, large print signs, writing pad, etc. Help the resident acquire and learn to use appropriate devices. Make sure augmentative devices are in good working order. Review of a therapy discharge note, dated 03/01/2024, revealed the resident was discharged due to reaching maximum functional potential. Per this note, the resident, understands yes/no questions at 60% accuracy with moderate cues with training on auditory processing strategies to increase comprehension for the communication of basic wants/needs to family/staff. Resident discriminates pictures in a field of 4 with moderate cues with training on word retrieval strategies in increase communication of basic wants/needs to family/staff. States goals not met due to the resident reached maximum level of potential. During an interview on 06/24/2024 at 12:38 PM, R58 was difficult to understand. Observation of the resident's room at this time revealed no evidence of a communication board or pen and paper in the room. R58 motioned to use the surveyor's pen and pad to write a note. The resident had legible writing skills and was able to communicate this way throughout the interview. An additional observation and interview on 06/25/2024 at 10:53 AM in R58's room revealed no communication aids at bedside. When asked if the facility had ever had any aids to help him communicate with (including a board to write on), he said No. When asked if it benefited him to have something in his room to communicate with, he responded. Yes. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 2:38 PM with the Speech Therapist, she stated she has worked with both R49 and R58. She stated she had placed large picture signs and communication boards in each resident's room and did not know why the communication aids were not in the rooms now. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 on 06/27/2024 at 10:30 AM, she stated she was able to understand R58 pretty good but sometimes, she has to have him write something down. LPN5 added, I know I have to take something into the room for him to write on since nothing seems to stay in his room. LPN5 was also familiar with R49 and stated that, If I ask [R49] a question, the answer has to be written down since he says yes sometimes and means no. She stated the communication boards as well as paper and pencils were never in the residents' rooms. During an interview with the Director of Rehabilitation on 06/28/2024 at 12:56 PM, he stated each of the therapists tries hard to keep devices and tools for each resident who requires them for communication. However, he added, they have a hard time keeping the communication devices/tools in the residents' room as, things disappear and were hard to replace at times. The Director of Rehabilitation added that after the resident was discharged from therapy, he was not sure when or where the devices would go. He stated he expected the nursing staff to make sure those communication devices were in the residents' rooms and to communicate with the therapist if something needed to be replaced. The Director of Rehabilitation stated after the resident had been discharged from therapy service, We do not usually see the resident again unless a referral was completed. Then we evaluate the resident for further services. An interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/28/2024 at 1:26 PM revealed she expected the nursing staff to make sure the resident had the aids needed for communication, adding that she took pencils and pads of paper back to the residents if they were running low. During an interview on 06/27/2024 at 10:48 AM with the facility administrator, she stated the facility had no policy on activities of daily living regarding communication devices for residents with communication deficits with speech communication tools. An additional interview with the Administrator on 06/28/2024 on 2:34 PM revealed she expected the staff to follow the rehabilitation care plans to provide communication devices to ensure residents could communicate with staff, friends, family, and other residents.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to provide a clean an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for residents. The bathrooms and hallways had a strong odor of urine and were not clean, floors were soiled, sticky, stained and/or rusted. The failure to maintain a clean, homelike environment had the potential to affect Resident (R) 31, R44, and R75, as well as, all other residents residing on two of the three facility halls, with 15 resident rooms on each hallway. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Landmark-Clinical Standard and Guidance: Resident Rights Guidelines, effective date 07/12/2023 and last reviewed 04/12/2024, revealed the resident's comfort, safety, and overall welfare must be promoted, protected, and enhanced at all times. Review of the facility's policy titled, Landmark-Clinical Standard and Guidance: Homelike Environment Guidance, effective date 06/20/2023 and last reviewed 04/12/2024, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to ensure that the environment provided by the facility is safe, sanitary, functional, and comfortable. All room contents to include clothes, furniture, devices, linens, bedspreads, privacy curtains, window coverings, wall hangings, wallpaper, and floors should be clean and in good repair. Review of the facility's policy titled, Landmark-Clinical Standards and Guidance: Resident Room Clean Policy, effective date 02/17/2021 and last reviewed on 02/16/2024, explained the procedure for cleaning a resident's room, which including mopping floors. 1. a. Observation on 06/23/2024 at 12:27 PM of the facility revealed the hallway which contained Rooms 106-116 smelled of urine. Further observation on 06/23/2024 at 12:59 PM revealed that the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] smelled of urine. At 1:04 PM on 06/23/2024 it was observed that the hallway containing Rooms 121 -135 smelled strongly of urine. At 1:06 PM on 06/23/2024 observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the room had a strong urine smell and the floors were dirty. The floors had black marks and a clear, dry, sticky substance on them. At 1:46 PM on 06/23/2024, it was observed that room [ROOM NUMBER] smelled strongly of urine. The floors were dirty. There were black smudges on the floor and a large, dried puddle of urine from a resident's indwelling catheter, which had leaked onto the floor. Paper towels and other paper debris littered the floor on the side of the room near the window. The floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on 06/23/2024 at 1:57 PM to be dirty and looked like it had not been mopped recently. b. Observation on 06/24/2024 at 11:45 AM revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER] still smelled strongly of urine; however, the dried puddle of urine had been mopped up. The hallway with Rooms 121 -135 still had a strong smell of urine. c. Observation on 06/25/2024 at 8:49 AM revealed that the hallway containing Rooms 121 - 135, smelled strongly of urine. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 9:36 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 confirmed that the hallway with Rooms 121 -135 smelled like urine. d. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 8:31 AM revealed that the hallway with Rooms 121 - 135 once again smelled strongly of urine. Observation later at 9:05 AM on the hallway that contained Rooms 108 -116, revealed it also smelled of urine. e. An interview with R75 on 06/27/2024 at 10:25 AM revealed that she felt like the entire facility smelled like urine, especially the hallway that housed Rooms 121 -135. An interview with Housekeeper (HK) 1 at 9:58 AM on 06/25/2024 revealed that the common areas (such as the hallways and dining rooms) and residents' rooms and bathrooms were cleaned daily. A later interview with another housekeeper, HK 2, on 06/25/2024 at 1:40 PM, also revealed residents' rooms and bathrooms were cleaned daily. On 06/26/2024 at 8:31 AM, during a second interview with HK 1, he stated that it sometimes smelled bad in the morning. Although members of the survey team verified the urine smell at this time, HK1 stated that he did not think that the hallway containing Rooms 121 through 135 smelled like urine. On 06/26/2024 at 8:33 AM in an interview with CNA 2, she stated that she did not think the hallway smelled like urine even though members of the survey team verified there was a strong smell of urine. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 on 10:27 AM on 06/27/2024 confirmed the odor of urine and added that the odor was much better today than usual. She stated that up front, when you entered the facility, it sometimes had a strong smell of urine. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/27/2024 at 10:29 AM revealed that R75, who resided on one of the halls which smelled of urine, refused to send her undergarments to the laundry. Instead, the resident washed them out and hung them up in her room to dry. She did not use soap on the undergarments, only water, and, per the DON, this was the reason that the hallway containing her room, continually smelled like urine. Interview with the Administrator on 06/26/2024 at 2:10 PM revealed that she was unaware of the urine smell. When asked if she felt the smell of urine constituted a homelike environment, she stated no. 2. a. During an observation on 06/23/2024 at 4:01 PM, R44's bathroom had a quarter-sized brown substance on the floor beside the toilet, as well as a brown substance smeared on the wall located above the toilet paper holder. Review of R44's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 06/06/2024, revealed the facility assessed R44 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview with R44 on 06/23/2024 at 4:01 PM, he stated his biggest concern at the facility was with housekeeping services. R44 confirmed his bathroom currently had stool (feces) on the floor and smeared on the wall. R44 stated the stool had been in the bathroom for at least two or three days. R44 stated the housekeeping staff was in his room every day; however, the housekeeper did not speak good English and would just look at him and not respond when he would voice his concerns. During an interview with Housekeeper (HK) 4 on 06/24/2024 at 1:53 PM, she stated she spoke limited English. The Administrator was present during the interview and assisted by using a translator app. HK4 stated she was responsible for cleaning R44's bathroom and cleaned them every day and even every hour. HK4 stated she did not see the brown substance on the floor or wall. At that time, the Administrator told HK4 to clean the brown substance from R44's bathroom floor and wall. Additional observation of R44's bathroom on 06/24/2024 at 2:25 PM revealed the brown substance had been cleaned off of the wall above the toilet paper holder; however, there was still a quarter-sized brown substance on the floor beside the toilet. The DON was made aware that R44's bathroom was not clean, and she stated she would send another Housekeeper to clean it. The DON stated rounds were done by other staff this morning and she did not think the brown spots were there. b. Review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 05/13/2024, revealed the facility assessed R31 to have a BIMS score of 15/15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview with R31 on 06/26/2024 at 2:35 PM, she stated housekeeping does not clean well. She stated a female housekeeper that did not speak English would have to be told by residents that she needed to sweep prior to mopping. R31 further stated the housekeeper did not clean the vanity or mirrors and therefore, her roommate would often do that. During an interview with CNA12 on 06/26/2024 at 7:00 PM, she stated she did not feel like the facility was not clean or homelike for the residents. During an interview with CNA13 on 06/26/2024 at 7:30 PM, she stated the facility was very dirty, actually filthy and she did not think housekeeping staff was doing very much. CNA13 stated there had been feces in the bathroom floors and when she reported to housekeeping staff, nothing would be done. During an interview with HK3 on 06/28/2024 at 9:49 AM, he stated he would clean resident rooms and bathrooms one to two times daily depending on the condition of the rooms. He stated deep cleans were done by schedule and would be logged into a book; however, daily cleans were not logged. HK3 stated he thought the facility could be cleaner. HK3 further stated they did not have an acting manager and the Administrator oversaw the housekeeping staff. Logs referenced by HK3 were reviewed. The facility's document titled, Quality Control Inspection-Housekeeping, revealed random daily spot checks of 34 residents' bathrooms over a three-week period from 05/23/2024 through 06/12/2024. The spot checks showed nine of the inspected bathrooms had to be re-cleaned. Review of facility's Deep Clean Room Schedule and Carpet and Hard Floors Cleaning Schedule revealed that the facility only had these check off sheets for the months of January and April of 2024. Neither the Deep Clean Room Schedule nor the Carpet and Hard Floors Cleaning Schedule from January were signed or dated by the Administrator. For the month of April, the Deep Clean Room Schedule for April was not signed and dated (to indicate that it was complete.). During an interview with the Administrator on 06/28/2024 at 10:07 AM, she stated she thought the facility was clean and homelike for the most part. The Administrator stated she expected housekeeping to maintain a homelike and clean environment for the residents. 3. Observation at 1:20 PM on 06/23/2024 an observation of the bathroom shared between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] revealed the floors of the bathroom had rust stains on them from the rusting door jamb of the bathroom door. Observation on 06/23/2023 at 1:28 PM revealed the floors in the bathroom shared by rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] also had rust stains from the rusting door frames of the bathroom door. It was observed on 06/23/2024 at 1:39 PM and 1:43 PM that the flooring under the window in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were stained with rust and discolored with water stains. At 1:46 PM on 06/23/2024, observation of the floor under the window and in the bathroom shared by rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] revealed rust stains from the rusting bathroom door's door jamb. On 06/23/2024 at 1:57 PM, the bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and 131 had rust stains on the floor and rust on the door jamb leading into the bathroom. On 06/26/2024 at 8:55 AM, interview with the Maintenance Director revealed that he was unaware of the rust on the floors in the rooms and bathrooms in Rooms 121,123, 125, 127, 128, and 129 and was unaware of the rust on the door jambs for these rooms. He stated that the facility was in the process of repainting and remodeling. An outside company had been hired to do the remodel; however, they had only done part of the remodel prior to quitting. He also stated that there were no plans to replace the flooring, but housekeeping could try and remove the rust. During an interview with the DON on 06/27/2024 at 10:29 AM, she was asked about the rust on the flooring and on the door jambs and stated that maintenance was in the process of remodeling, and both were to be replaced.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for two of 76 sampled residents (Resident (R)11 and R35). Staff failed to perform hand hygiene when indicated, as well as failed to handle and dispose of a soiled dressing in a manner to prevent the possible spread of infection. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was readily available and worn by staff when providing care for a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy, Clinical Standard and Guidance Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines, dated 08/25/2019 and reviewed 01/26/2024, revealed, It is the policy of the facility that a comprehensive system is in place that prevents, identifies, investigates reports, records and controls infections and prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease processes for residents/care providers, staff, visitors and others within the facility. Review of the Hand Hygiene Guidance policy, dated 02/10/2024, revealed that, Hand hygiene is the single most efficient means of preventing the spread of infection. Wash hands with either a non-antimicrobial soap and water or an antimicrobial soap and water when hands are visibly dirty or are visibly soiled with blood or other body fluids such as urine or feces. Wash hands before eating, after eating and after using the restroom with a non-anti-microbial soap and water or an anti-microbial soap and water. If hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based hand rub for routinely decontaminating hands in all other clinical situations. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R11 had a Stage IV pressure ulcer to the sacrum which was identified on 04/22/2024. On 06/24/2024, the Wound Care Physician gave an order for treatment of the sacral wound, with staff to Cleanse wound with normal saline, apply alginate and cover with medi-honey. Cover with silicone foam border dressing every day. Observation, during a wound care observation for R11 on 06/24/2024 at 2:11 PM, revealed the Infection Control Registered Nurse (IC/RN) placed her large set of keys and a clean dressing on a PPE box inside the door of the room. She then put on clean gloves without first performing hand hygiene. The IC/RN next removed R11's soiled dressing and threw it in the resident's trash can. The IC/RN then failed to perform hand hygiene after degloving. She then took a pen out of her pocket and wrote a date on the dressing. The IC/RN next picked up the clean dressing off of the PPE container and opened the dressing on the resident's bed with no barrier underneath. The IC/RN proceeded to spray the wound with cleanser; however, as she was holding the resident on his side, she let go of him to wash her hands, allowing the resident to roll back onto his wound, and contaminate it. She then put gloves on again, picked up the dressing from the bed and placed it on the wound. The IC/RN then contaminated the brief and bedding as she pulled up the brief and bedding without removing her soiled gloves. After pulling up the brief and linens, she then degloved without performing hand hygiene. The nurse then left the room, leaving the soiled dressing in the trash in the resident's room. After the dressing change, an interview with the IC/RN revealed there was nothing she would do differently. The IC/RN stated that at another facility, she used wax paper as a barrier; however, there was nothing here to use. She stated she considered the resident's bed linens and the PPE storage box were clean and thought putting the clean dressing on those areas was OK. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/27/2024 at 2:43 PM revealed she expects all staff to follow the infection control policy and hand hygiene policies as written. Per the DON, hands were to be washed before, during, and after any dressing changes. Also, a barrier was to be used on the overbed table in resident's rooms to prevent contamination of supplies, and this can be a plastic bag or a clean towel. She further stated she expected staff to keep any personal items, like keys, in the staff's pockets. The DON stated that all soiled dressings were to be bagged and removed from the resident's room after wound care and if the resident cannot stay in any position for wound care, staff should get another staff member to assist them. An interview with the Administrator on 06/28/2024 at 2:34 PM revealed she expected staff to follow the policies and procedures of infection control regarding correct hand hygiene. 2. Review of a facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Guideline, dated 07/12/2022 and reviewed 04/12/2024, revealed the facility would ensure that additional and appropriate PPE was utilized, when indicated, to prevent the spread of Multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs). Per the policy, EBP was defined as the use of PPE (gowns and gloves) during high-contact resident care activities that generate opportunities for transfer of MDROs in the form of blood or body fluids, onto the hands and/or the clothing of the rendering care giver. Record review of a face sheet revealed the facility admitted R35 on 03/15/2024. Per the face sheet, the resident's diagnoses included Ogilvie syndrome and colostomy status. Review of R35's comprehensive care plan, dated 10/30/2023, revealed the resident was on EBP due to the colostomy. Observation of R35's room on 06/23/2024 at 1:04 PM revealed a sign on the wall at the head of the bed stating the resident was on EBP. However, there was no PPE container (which included gowns) in the room, behind the resident's door, or in the hall. During an observation of colostomy care provided to R35 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 9 on 06/26/2024 at 2:45 PM, LPN9 did not wear a gown during the procedure. In addition, LPN9 failed to perform handwashing after the care was provided, prior to exiting R35's room. During an interview with LPN9 on 06/26/2024 after the 2:45 PM care was completed, she stated she did not know she was supposed to wear a gown when she did colostomy care. LPN9 further stated she thought she had washed her hands when she finished providing care but if she didn't, she should have. During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)10 on 06/24/2024 at 1:55 PM, she stated if a resident was on any type of precautions, there would be a sign posted above the bed or on the door. CNA10 stated she would need to wear a gown and gloves for residents on EBP and there should be a PPE cart in the hallway. Interview on 06/24/24 2:23 PM with the DON revealed that all EBP care plans were kept in a binder at the nursing station, and she was currently trying to get all the care plans scanned into the EMR. Per the DON, residents on EBP or any precautions should have a sign up at the head of their bed or on their door, The DON stated staff would need to wear a gown and gloves to provide care for these residents. The DON stated there should be a cart in the hall or on the back of the resident's door stocked with PPE. The DON stated she did not know why PPE was not available for staff's use. During an interview with CNA10 on 06/26/2024 at 7:00 PM, she stated she was not sure what EBP was. CNA10 further stated she received a report from the off going shift and that was how she would know how to care for a resident. CNA10 stated if a resident was in isolation, she would wear a gown and gloves. Additionally, CNA10 stated gowns were usually in a clear box outside of the resident's room with other types of PPE. During an interview with CNA13 on 06/26/2024 at 7:30 PM, she stated she would suit up prior to entering a room for a resident on EBP. CNA13 stated there should be a sign on the resident's door and PPE should be placed outside the resident's room. CNA13 further stated she had not been educated on EBP and thought this meant that a resident would need more barrier cream applied. During an interview with LPN11 on 06/26/2024 at 7:51 PM, she stated she did not know what EBP was and there were no signs posted that she was aware of. LPN11 further stated that PPE was in bins outside of the resident rooms. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 6 on 06/28/2024 at 10:00 AM, she stated she had received education related to EBP approximately two weeks ago and again this morning, after the issue with a lack of EBP was identified during the survey. RN6 stated staff was required to wear gown and gloves when providing direct contact care for resident's on EBP. RN6 stated there was usually a cart with PPE in the hall or in the resident room and it was always accessible. During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 06/27/2024 at 3:15 PM, she stated she was responsible for training staff on EBP and would train based on facility policy. The ADON stated when a resident was on EBP, there would be a sign posted on the resident's door or over their bed. The ADON further stated if the resident was on EBP, a PPE bin or cart would be placed outside of the doorway or in an over the door bin. The ADON stated she expected PPE to be readily accessible and for staff to be aware and knowledgeable of what PPE to use and what they were using it for. During an additional interview with the DON on 06/28/2024 at 10:15 AM, she stated she was also the acting Infection Preventionist (IP). The DON stated EBP education was provided as well as skills check offs quarterly and as needed. The DON stated the expectation that PPE was always accessible and available for staff to use. The DON again stated PPE should be on the halls in a cart or bin or behind the resident's door. The DON further stated staff was expected to follow facility policy, be knowledgeable of what EBP were and to wear the appropriate PPE when a resident was on barrier precautions. During an interview with the Administrator on 06/28/2024 at 10:07 AM, she stated the ADON was responsible for staff education, which was weekly, monthly, and quarterly and was ongoing. She further stated her expectation was that PPE would always be available for staff, who would follow policy and wear the appropriate PPE when providing care.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy and food storage reference material, the facility failed to store food in accordance with facility policy and accepted sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy and food storage reference material, the facility failed to store food in accordance with facility policy and accepted standards of food service/management. Foods were not dated and/or labeled when opened. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 85 of 89 residents who consumed food stored and /or used in this kitchen. The findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage, dated 03/25/2012, revealed food was stored and prepared in a clean safe sanitary manner that would comply with state and federal guidelines. Per the policy, containers for bulk items are leakproof, non-absorbent, and sanitary, with tight-fitting lids. In addition, the policy stated that containers are labeled with their content and date. A review of the website www.Servesafe.com revealed a poster titled How to Store Food, dated 2019, which stated to label and date all food. The poster noted that safe food handling practice was: First in and first out (FIFO). Review of a Roster/Matrix form provided by the facility during the survey revealed that four of 89 residents received nutrition via a tube, with the other 85 residents consuming their food orally. Observation of the kitchen on 06/23/2024 at 12:35 PM during the initial tour revealed a shelf in the walk-in refrigerator contained a steam table pan covered in foil with no date or label. Observation of the dry storage revealed a clear container with a red top and white particle substance with no open date or label. Observation of open oatmeal and farina packages revealed they were not dated when opened. In addition, there were two saran-wrapped packages of elbow noodles with no open date, two open packages of buttermilk mix, and two open brown sugar in saran wrap with no open date. Five containers of seasonings in dry storage had no open date. In an interview with the [NAME] on 06/28/2024 at 9:30 AM, she stated that she was Servesafe certified. The [NAME] stated that when food was opened, staff were to label the food with the current date and then, throw it away in three days. The [NAME] stated that food without a label and/or date was to be thrown away because it was not known how long the food was opened and this could make residents sick. In an interview with Dietary Aide (DA) 1 on 06/28/2024 at 9:37 AM, she stated opened food items were to have the current date and item labeled. Food without a label and no date was to be thrown out because it was not known how long it had been on the shelf. In an interview with DA 2 on 06/28/2024 at 9:39 AM, she also stated that food was to be dated and labeled when opened, and discarded if there was no label or date. In an interview with the Dietary Manager on 06/28/2024 at 10:07 AM, she stated all food in dry storage must have a label and open date. If a food item does not have a label or open date, it must be thrown out because the food can be spoiled, and they do not know the length of time it was on the shelf. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/28/2024 at 10:59 AM, she stated her expectation was for dietary staff to label, date, and rotate food based on its date.
Jun 2019 14 deficiencies 4 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property. 2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to reenter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left. 3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19. 4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19. 5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility. 6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility. 7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire. 8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19. 9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting. 10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future. 11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings. 12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations. 13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff. 14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing. 15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents. 16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis. 17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar. 18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed. 19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported. 20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed. 21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station. 22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows: 1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies. Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property. Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19. Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM. 2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not returned the surveyor's call. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety. 3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident. 4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff. 5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call. Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19. 6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed. Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance. Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety. Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed. Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code. Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy. Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey. Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. 7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations. 8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19. Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much. 9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. 10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19. 11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. 12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter. Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks. Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed. 13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. 14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility. Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility. Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator. 15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated. Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times. Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change. 16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed. 17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command. 18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process. 19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough. 20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting. 21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate. 22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results. Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans. Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Rep[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property. 2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to re-enter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left. 3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19. 4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19. 5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility. 6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility. 7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire. 8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19. 9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting. 10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future. 11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings. 12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations. 13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff. 14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing. 15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents. 16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis. 17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar. 18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed. 19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported. 20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed. 21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station. 22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows: 1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies. Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property. Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19. Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM. 2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not returned the surveyor's call. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety. 3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident. 4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff. 5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call. Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19. 6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed. Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance. Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety. Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed. Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code. Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy. Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey. Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. 7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations. 8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19. Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much. 9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. 10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19. 11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. 12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter. Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks. Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed. 13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. 14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility. Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility. Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator. 15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated. Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times. Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change. 16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed. 17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command. 18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process. 19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough. 20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting. 21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate. 22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results. Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans. Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Reporting Suspect/Alleged Abuse, Protecting Residents by[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property. 2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to re-enter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left. 3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19. 4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19. 5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility. 6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility. 7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire. 8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19. 9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting. 10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future. 11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings. 12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations. 13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff. 14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing. 15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents. 16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis. 17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar. 18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed. 19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported. 20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed. 21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station. 22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows: 1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies. Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property. Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19. Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM. 2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not returned the surveyor's call. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety. 3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident. 4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff. 5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call. Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19. 6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed. Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance. Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety. Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed. Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code. Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy. Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey. Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. 7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations. 8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19. Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much. 9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. 10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19. 11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. 12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter. Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks. Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed. 13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. 14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility. Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility. Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator. 15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated. Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times. Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change. 16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed. 17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command. 18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process. 19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough. 20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting. 21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate. 22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results. Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans. Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Reporting Suspect/Alleged Abuse, Protecting Residents by s[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property. 2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to re-enter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left. 3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19. 4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19. 5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility. 6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility. 7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire. 8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19. 9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting. 10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future. 11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings. 12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations. 13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff. 14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing. 15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents. 16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis. 17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar. 18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed. 19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported. 20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed. 21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station. 22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows: 1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies. Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property. Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19. Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM. 2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety. 3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident. 4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff. 5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call. Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19. 6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed. Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance. Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety. Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed. Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code. Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy. Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety. Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey. Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call. 7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations. 8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19. Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries. Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much. 9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. 10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call. Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19. 11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. 12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter. Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks. Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed. 13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. 14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility. Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility. Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator. 15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated. Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times. Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change. 16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building. Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed. 17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command. 18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process. 19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough. 20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting. 21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate. 22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results. Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required. Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans. Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Reporting Suspect/Alleged Abuse, Protecting Residents by sep[TRUNCATED]
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Review of Resident #23's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/12/19, with diagnoses of Generaliz...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Review of Resident #23's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/12/19, with diagnoses of Generalized Muscle Weakness, Unspecified Macular Degeneration, Dementia, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of Resident #23's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident required extensive assistance to complete transfers and for locomotion. The facility conducted a BIMS exam with a score of four (4) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was not interviewable. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan, dated 02/12/19, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, Dementia, history of falls, and psychoactive medications. Interventions included all staff was to be sure the resident's call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance. However, observation of Resident #23, on 05/08/19 at 3:03 PM, revealed the resident was in his/her room in a wheelchair with the wheels locked, positioned between the bed and the door, and the call light was on the resident's bed, out of reach of the resident. Resident #23 leaned over the side of the wheelchair toward bed, was unable to reach the call light, and was unable to unlock his /her wheelchair in order to access the call light. Interview with CNA #11, on 05/08/19 at 3:07 PM, revealed the resident's call light should be within reach of the resident so the resident could ask for help from staff. Interview, on 05/08/19 at 3:12 PM, with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1 revealed Resident #23 had attempted previously to transfer himself/herself, was not able to do it safely, and required staff assistance. PTA #1 further stated he assisted Resident #23 with getting a drink, and when he left the resident, he/she was in the wheelchair between the bed and the door and he left the call light out of the resident's reach. Interview, on 05/10/19 at 1:28 PM, with LPN #7 revealed on 05/08/19, Resident #23 was in his/her room in a wheelchair with the call light out of the resident's reach. The LPN stated call lights needed to be in reach of the residents so they could request staff assistance and prevent an unsafe transfer and fall. LPN #7 revealed the facility had not followed Resident #23's care plan and the purpose of the plan was to communicate the resident's care needs to each staff. Interview, on 05/10/19 at 2:35 PM, with LPN #8 revealed on 05/08/19, Resident #23 could not reach his/her call light from where he/she was positioned in the wheelchair in the resident's room. The LPN stated the call light should have been within the resident's reach so if the resident needed something or wanted to go to the toilet, he/she could ask for assistance. LPN #8 stated staff did not follow the care plan for keeping the call light in reach. Interview, on 05/11/19 at 10:22 AM, with the DON revealed call lights should be within reach of the residents so residents could get the needed help from staff. The DON stated staff did not follow Resident #23's care plan when they left the resident with his/her call out of reach. Interview, on 05/11/19 at 10:50 AM, with the Interim Administrator revealed call lights should be in reach of the residents. He stated if staff did not place the call light in the resident's reach, per the care plan, then staff did not follow the care plan. 2. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #54 on 09/17/15, with diagnoses to include Primary Osteoarthritis, Age-related Osteoporosis, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was interviewable. The resident used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility and required extensive assistance of one (1) staff to walk in his/her room and corridor. Review of a Physical Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #54 reached maximum functional potential and was able to ambulate 350 feet using a walker with stand-by assistance. Review of a Physician Order, dated May 2019, revealed Resident #54 could participate in the restorative nursing program. Review of the Care Plan, initiated 01/09/19, revealed Resident #54 was at risk for compression fractures related to Osteoporosis with a goal to maintain the highest level of function. Interventions included encouraging exercise as tolerated to maintain movement. Interview with Resident #54, on 05/07/19 at 10:18 AM, revealed the CNAs had walked him/her once in the past four (4) weeks. Interview with CNA #1, on 05/09/19 at 11:24 AM, revealed Resident #54 was supposed to be walked daily and stated it was important to ensure residents were walked to maintain function. Interview with CNA #6, on 05/10/19 at 9:47 AM, revealed CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, she never had enough time to ambulate her assigned residents. CNA #6 revealed residents could lose their ability to walk or get pressure ulcers if they were not ambulated daily. Interview with LPN #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed residents sometimes reported they were not ambulated when the unit was short a CNA. LPN #1 revealed residents could lose function if they were not ambulated according to restorative orders. Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed the CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, it could be overwhelming because CNAs had a lot to do. Interview with Physical Therapist (PT) #1, on 05/09/19 at 10:55 AM, revealed the Restorative Program was pretty limited because of staff turnover. The PT revealed she evaluated Resident #54 for therapy services on 05/08/19, and stated the resident ambulated 50 feet using a walker with contact/guard assistance. The PT stated the resident had a decline in mobility since his/her discharge from therapy. Interview with the ADON, on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed she observed care and reviewed CNA documentation daily to ensure restorative tasks were completed. Interview with the DON, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed she had no concerns with the ability of staff to complete assigned tasks. 3. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #97 on 07/25/17, with diagnoses to include Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and COPD. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #97 exhibited no behavioral symptoms. Review of Resident #97's Physician Order, dated 02/15/19, revealed to increase Risperidone (Risperdal-antipsychotic medication) to 1 milligram (mg) twice a day for behaviors. Review of Resident #97's Nursing Progress Notes revealed no behaviors or clinical rationale for the increased dose of Risperdal. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #97, last reviewed 02/14/19, revealed psychotropic medication was prescribed to manage the resident's appetite. Interventions included assuring the diagnosis corresponded with the prescribed medication, assessing for side effects and complications, and documentation of observed behavioral symptoms on the Behavior Tracking Form. The care plan did not include target behavior(s) or non-pharmacological interventions for management of the behavior(s). The facility did not provide Behavior Tracking Forms for Resident #97. Review of Resident #97's Medication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed no monitoring for potential side effects of the medication, as stated in the care plan. Interview with LPN #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed Resident #97's care plan for psychotropic medication should include a diagnosis and target behavior(s) for use of the Risperdal. He stated behaviors should be documented in the clinical record to justify the need for psychotropic medication. LPN #1 revealed the facility assessed residents quarterly for Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS-side effects, such as involuntary body movements, from antipsychotic drug use); however, he was not sure if EPS were associated with Risperdal use. He further revealed he was not familiar with the side effects of Risperdal and would have to google it. Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed the purpose of the care plan was to ensure resident centered care and to communicate resident needs. She revealed medication was not a primary intervention to manage behavior(s) and the care plan should include non-pharmacological interventions, such as offering a snack or walking the resident. Interview with the ADON, on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed the care plan should detail behavior(s) and include interventions to address the behavior(s). The ADON revealed the facility's system for tracking behaviors was broken and stated there was no tool in place to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medication. Interview with the DON, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed it was important to ensure behaviors and side effects were monitored to provide rationale for the increased dose of Risperdal. The DON revealed Resident #97's care plan for psychoactive medication was not implemented. Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to implement care plans for four (4) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #22, #23, #54, and #97. The facility assessed Resident #22 with a left heel ulcer on 02/04/19. The resident was care planned to have a heel lift boot to the left heel except with ambulating; however, observations on three (3) days during the survey revealed the resident in bed without the heel boot in place. In addition, review of a physician's Wound Evaluation, dated 03/25/19, revealed the resident did not have the heel boot in place and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increase in the area. In addition, Resident #23 was care planned for falls with an intervention to keep the call light within reach; however, observation revealed the call light was not in reach of the resident. The facility did not implement the care plan for Resident #54 who was at risk of compression fractures in order to maintain level of function, and Resident #97's care plan was not implemented related to monitoring of behaviors and potential side effects of psychoactive medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Baseline Care Plan Assessment/Comprehensive Care Plans, updated 09/18/18, revealed the Comprehensive Care Plan would expand on the resident's risks, goals and interventions using the Person-Centered plan of care approach for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, physical functioning, mental, and psychosocial needs. The care plan would promote continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff, increase safety, and safeguard against adverse events. In addition, the facility used interventions in an effort to achieve the highest level of functioning and the greatest degree of comfort, safety, and overall well-being attainable for the resident. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Preventive Skin Care, not dated, revealed the facility provided preventive skin care through careful washing, rinsing, and drying to keep residents clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure sores. Heels would be up or specialty ordered therapeutic boots might be used to protect heels on those residents identified to be high risk. Review of the clinical record for Resident #22 revealed the facility re-admitted the resident on 01/12/19, with diagnoses of Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with Acute Lower Respiratory Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3), Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, and Acute/Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 had no pressure ulcers and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. In addition, the facility determined the resident had no arterial or venous ulcers. The facility provided a pressure-reducing device for the chair and bed. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #22, initiated 11/25/18, revealed the resident was at increased risk for alteration in skin integrity related to incontinence of bladder, incontinence of bowel, impaired mobility, status left heel arterial. Interventions included a heel boot to left heel, as resident would comply, dated 03/27/19. The care plan was revised during surveyor observations, on 05/08/19; with a notation that the resident was non-compliant with heel boots; however, there were no interventions for staff on what to do when the resident was non-compliant. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care plan, not dated, for Resident #22, revealed special instructions included moon boots. Review of a Weekly Skin Check for Resident #22, dated 01/28/19, revealed no skin issues were noted. Review of a Weekly Skin Check, dated 02/04/19, revealed the resident had new loss of skin integrity and the facility was following resident's current skin care interventions. Review of a Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet revealed Resident #22 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to his/her left heel that originated on 02/04/19, and measured 1.9 centimeters (cm) length by 2.5 cm width. Treatments included elevate on heel boots. Review of Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care physician, dated 03/25/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2.4 cm by 3 cm. The physician documented the wound was deteriorating. The physician revealed no heel lift boot was in place, and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increased area. The physician documented he personally applied the heel lift boot after his evaluation, orders were re-provided for use of the heel boot and discussed with the nursing staff. Review of Resident #22's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 05/01/19 to 05/31/19, revealed an order to place heel lift boot to left foot at all times except ambulation. Observation, on 05/07/19 at 11:45 AM and 12:30 PM, revealed Resident #22 in bed with no boots to his/her feet and the resident's heels laid on the mattress. Heel boots laid on the floor near the foot of the bed. Observation, on 05/09/19 at 10:47 AM, revealed Resident #22 in bed with no boots on the resident and his/her feet on the mattress. Observation, on 05/10/19 at 8:20 AM and 9:00 AM, revealed Resident #22 in bed and his/her bilateral boots were next to the sink. The resident's feet laid on the mattress. Interview with CNA #14, on 05/10/19 at 10:23 AM, revealed she was Resident #22's CNA for today (05/10/19). She stated she had not seen the heel boots on Resident #22, and was not sure when the resident needed to wear the boots. After breakfast (at approximately 8:00 AM) she stated the resident did not have the heel lift boots on, and she did not put them on him/her but she knew Resident #22 wore them. She stated the CNAs received a printout of resident needs for each shift but she did not carry the printout, as she knew what the residents needed. She did not ask the nurse any information regarding the moon boots, also known as the heel lift boots. She stated the purpose of the boots were to protect the resident's heels from rubbing on the bed. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, on 05/10/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed she provided some supervision of the CNAs and she tried to make sure each resident was provided the needed care. She stated the purpose of the lift heel boots were to help give support to Resident #22's heels and prevent further skin breakdown. She stated she was not aware the boots were not put on Resident #22 this morning and remained off. She stated it was important to utilize the boots, and to protect the heels, as the boots were to keep the heels lifted off the bed. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 11:07 AM, revealed she was not aware the resident did not have his/her heel boots on. She stated the resident was non-compliant at times and was care planned for that; however, the resident's non-compliance was not added to the care plan until 05/08/19, during the survey. The DON revealed she developed pocket sheets for the CNAs so they would know the care plan needs of each resident and staff should follow resident care plans.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to prevent the...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer and promote healing for one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #22. The facility re-admitted Resident #22 on 01/12/19 with no pressure ulcers and assessed the resident to be at risk for skin breakdown. On 02/04/19, the resident developed a pressure ulcer to the left heel and the facility put treatments in place, which included elevating the heel with a heel lift boot. However, multiple observations during survey revealed the resident in bed without the heel boot on and his/her heels in contact with the mattress. In addition, review of a physician Wound Evaluation, dated 03/25/19, revealed the resident did not have the heel boot in place and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increase in the area. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Preventive Skin Care, not dated, revealed the facility provided preventive skin care through careful washing, rinsing, and drying to keep residents clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure sores. Heels would be up or specialty ordered therapeutic boots might be used to protect heels on those residents identified to be high risk. Review of the clinical record for Resident #22 revealed the facility re-admitted the resident on 01/12/19, with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with Acute Lower Respiratory Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3), Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances, and Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 had no unhealed pressure ulcers and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. In addition, the facility determined the resident had no arterial or venous ulcers. The facility provided a pressure-reducing device for the chair and bed. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #22, dated February 2019, March 2019, April 2019, and May 2019, revealed orders for a pressure relief mattress, pressure relief cushion to the chair when up for comfort and skin preventative measures, and heel lift boot to left heel except when ambulating, as resident would comply. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #22, initiated 11/25/18, revealed the resident was at increased risk for alteration in skin integrity related to incontinence of bladder and bowel, impaired mobility, and status left heel arterial. Interventions included heel boot to left heel, as resident would comply, dated 03/27/19. Review of Resident #22's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 05/01/19 to 05/31/19, revealed to place heel lift boot to left foot at all times except ambulation. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care plan, not dated, for Resident #22, revealed special instructions included moon boots. Review of a Weekly Skin Check for Resident #22, dated 01/28/19, revealed no skin issues were noted. Review of the Weekly Skin Check, dated 02/04/19, revealed the resident had new loss of skin integrity and the facility was following resident's current skin care interventions. Review of a Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet revealed Resident #22 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to his/her left heel that originated on 02/04/19, and measured 1.9 centimeters (cm) length by 2.5 cm width, and light serous exudate with 75-100% slough covering the wound bed. Treatments included cleansing with normal saline, apply Iodosorb to the wound bed, cover with an ABD (abdominal) pad, secure with Kerlix, elevate on heel boots, and no shoes-nonskid socks only. Review of the Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care Physician, dated 03/11/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2.5 cm by 2.6 cm. The physician documented the wound was an unstageable pressure injury with obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss. The wound margins were well defined with necrotic (dead) tissue. Review of the Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care physician, dated 03/18/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2 cm by 2.5 cm. Review of the Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care physician, dated 03/25/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2.4 cm by 3 cm. The physician documented the wound was deteriorating. The physician revealed no heel lift boot was in place, and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increased area. The physician documented he personally applied the heel lift boot after his evaluation, orders were re-provided for use of the heel boot and discussed with nursing staff. Review of the facility's Weekly Wound Evaluation for Resident #22, dated 04/08/19, revealed left heel pressure ulcer was unstageable and measured 2 cm by 2.3 cm by 0 cm depth. Treatments included cleansing with normal saline, apply Iodosorb to the wound bed, cover with an ABD pad, and secure with Kerlix. Heel boots, no shoes, nonskid socks only. Review of the facility's Weekly Wound Evaluation, dated 05/06/19, revealed the left heel pressure ulcer was unstageable and measured 1.5 cm by 2.2 cm by 0 cm depth. Treatments included wearing heel boot at all times when in bed. Observation of Resident #22, on 05/07/19 at 11:45 AM and 12:30 PM, revealed the resident in bed with no boots to his/her feet and the resident's heels were not off-loaded, as they laid on the mattress. Two (2) boots laid on the floor near the foot of his/her bed. Observation of Resident #22, on 05/09/19 at 10:47 AM, revealed the resident in bed with no boots on the resident and his/her feet laid on the mattress. Observation of Resident #22, on 05/10/19 at 8:20 AM and 9:00 AM, revealed the resident in bed and his/her bilateral boots were next to the sink in the resident's room. The resident's feet laid on the mattress. Interview with CNA #14, on 05/10/19 at 10:23 AM, revealed the CNAs had a printout of what the residents' needs were for each shift but she did not carry one because she knew the residents. She stated Resident #22 turned himself/herself and did not require any cues, or reminders, but was confused at times. She stated she had not seen boots on Resident #22 and was not sure when the resident needed to wear the boots. CNA #14 revealed Resident #22 did not have the heel lift boots on this morning and she did not put them on him/her. She stated the purpose of the boots was to protect the resident's heels from rubbing on the bed. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, on 05/10/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed she ensured the CNAs turned the residents and got the residents up when she made rounds. She stated the CNAs made rounds about every two (2) hours. RN #1 stated the purpose of heel boots was to keep Resident #22's heels off the bed to prevent further breakdown; however, she stated she was not aware the boots were not on Resident #22 this morning and remained off the resident. Per interview, Resident #22 had vascular disease problems and it was important to utilize the boots to protect the heels. Review of the Arterial Bilateral Lower Extremity, Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) Study, for Resident #22, date of service 02/11/19, revealed no evidence of significant lower extremity arterial stenotic or occlusive disease. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 11:07 AM, revealed not all pressure ulcers could be prevented. She stated Resident #22 had bouts of non-compliance, which was care planned; however, further review of the care plan revealed the resident's non-compliance was added to the plan 05/08/19, during the survey.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #70. Observation revealed staff stood over Resident #70 while assisting the resident with his/her lunch meal. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 11/28/16, revealed the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. Review of the facility's policy, Dignity, undated, revealed staff would not stand to feed a resident (unless there was no other option and this was documented and care planned) such as at the bedside. Residents were to have all aspects of their dignity maintained by staff regardless of the resident's cognitive level or ability to realize or understand what was being said or done by others. Review of Resident # 70's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/08/19, with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the Right Dominant Side, Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident 70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility's staff assessment for mental status revealed the resident was severely impaired. The facility assessed the resident required extensive assistance of one (1) staff for eating. Observation of Resident #70 during lunch, on 05/07/19 at 12:35 PM, revealed the resident was in bed and the resident's lunch meal tray was on the over the bed table. The Speech Therapist was standing at the bedside and provided multiple bites of food while standing at the head of the bed. The Speech Therapist left the room and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 entered. Interview with the Speech Therapist, on 05/07/19 at 12:40 PM, revealed she conducted a swallow trial to see if she could advance Resident #70's diet. She stated she was standing so she could watch the resident swallow; however, she could have sat during the swallowing test. She stated it was not of importance if she stood or sat for the swallow test. Continued observation of Resident #70, on 05/07/19 at 12:44 PM, revealed CNA #7 stood near head of bed while she continued feeding the resident his/her lunch. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 2:09 PM, revealed staff was to be seated next to the resident when assisting with meals. The DON stated Resident #70 had a diagnosis of Dysphagia and needed close watch; however, staff would be able to watch the resident while seated next to the resident. She stated staff standing over a resident during a meal was not providing an environment that promoted dignity. Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:06 PM, revealed staff was to sit with the resident during the meal service, and not stand over the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #26. Review of a Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #26 was coded for taking anti-coagulant medication; however, review of the resident's physician orders for February 2019 and March 2019 revealed the resident was not prescribed an anti-coagulant. The findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 4:40 PM, revealed the RAI User's Manual was used for reference when completing MDS assessments. Review of the RAI 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.16, October 2018, Section N0401-Medications Received, revealed the intent of the items in this section was to record the number of days, during the last seven (7) days, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Staff was to review the resident's medical record for documentation of medications received by the resident during the seven (7) day look-back period. For Section N0410E-Anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin), staff was to record the number of days an anticoagulant medication was received by the resident at any time during the seven (7) day look-back period. Include any of these medications given to the resident by any route (e.g., PO, IM, or IV) in any setting (e.g., at the nursing home, in a hospital emergency room) while a resident of the nursing home. Code the medication even if it was given only once during the look-back period. Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #26 on 10/20/15, with diagnoses to include Fracture of the Right Femur, Chronic Stage 4 Kidney Disease, Dementia, and History of Falls. Review of the Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #26 was administered an anticoagulant medication for seven (7) days during the seven (7) day look back period, according to Section N0410E. However, review of Resident #26's Physician Order Sheets, dated 02/01/19 to 02/28/19 and 03/01/19 to 03/31/19, revealed no physician order for an anticoagulant medication. Interview with MDS Coordinator #1, on 05/09/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she reviewed Resident #26's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], and stated an anticoagulant was coded for seven (7) days for the look back period. The Coordinator stated at the time she completed the MDS, the resident received Plavix and she believed Plavix to be an anticoagulant, but after she received training last month, she knew Plavix was not an anticoagulant, but an antiplatelet. The MDS Coordinator stated the resident would have been billed incorrectly. Interview with MDS Coordinator #2, on 05/09/19 at 3:17 PM, revealed Resident #26's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], was coded incorrectly for anticoagulants. She stated Plavix was coded as an anticoagulant but Plavix was not an anticoagulant. Interview with the DON, on 05/09/19 at 2:41 PM, revealed Resident #26 should not have been coded for anticoagulants on the Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], because the resident was not on an anticoagulant. The DON further revealed there was no negative outcome for the resident, but the billing was inaccurate.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-four (44) r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #54, received the necessary restorative services to prevent a decline in mobility. The findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Rights, revised November 2016, revealed the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents. Review of the facility's Nursing Rehabilitation/Restorative Program Booklet revealed the goal of a successful walking program was to improve or maintain the resident's ability to ambulate, and provide a structured program to facilitate safety and promote independence. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #54 on 09/17/15, with diagnoses to include Primary Osteoarthritis, Age-related Osteoporosis, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was interviewable. The resident used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility and required extensive assistance of one (1) staff to walk in his/her room and corridor. Per the MDS, the resident received restorative nursing for walking and dressing and/or grooming. Observation, on 05/07/19 at 10:18 AM, revealed Resident #54 sitting up in bed. Interview with the resident during the observation revealed he/she was restarting therapy services. The resident stated the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were supposed to walk him/her daily; however, he/she had only walked once in the past four (4) weeks. Review of a Physical Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #54 was able to ambulate 350 feet using a walker with stand-by assistance and had reached maximum functional potential. Review of a Physician Order, dated May 2019, revealed Resident #54 could participate in the restorative nursing program. Review of a Restorative Program Note, dated 04/03/19, revealed the resident participated in the Restorative Ambulation Program. The note stated the resident was to ambulate with the assistance of a CNA/Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) for 15 minutes/day a minimum of 6 days/week to maintain the ability to ambulate. Review of a Physician Progress Note, dated 04/05/19, revealed a plan to ensure Resident #54 ambulated more with restorative or physical therapy. Review of a Psychotherapy Progress Note, dated 04/23/19, revealed Resident #54 was frustrated and upset the past couple of weeks because no one had taken him/her for a therapy walk. Interview with CNA #1, on 05/09/19 at 11:24 AM, revealed the facility did not have a Restorative Program and the CNAs were responsible for ambulating their assigned residents. She stated Resident #54 was supposed to be walked daily and stated it was important to walk residents to maintain function. Interview with CNA #6, on 05/10/19 at 9:47 AM, revealed she thought residents were supposed to be ambulated 15 minutes a day as part of restorative care. She stated the CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, she never had enough time to ambulate her assigned residents. CNA #6 revealed residents could lose their ability to walk or get pressure ulcers if they were not ambulated daily. Further interview with CNA #6 revealed Resident #54 told her that he/she was not being walked and was afraid of losing strength. The CNA thought she reported the concern to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Interview with CNA #5, on 05/10/19 at 10:42 AM, revealed Resident #54 was a set-up assist because she liked her independence. She stated residents should have the option to exercise because it made them feel good. The CNA revealed it was important to ambulate residents to maintain leg function. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed he monitored CNAs by observing care throughout the shift. According to LPN #1, all the residents had reported once or twice that they were not ambulated when they were short a CNA. The LPN revealed he was aware of Resident #54's concern and stated he reported the issue to the ADON; however, he could not recall if the issue was addressed. LPN #1 stated there was a potential for the resident to have loss of function if he/she was not ambulated according to the program orders. Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed she monitored CNAs by observing care during medication pass, meals, and throughout the shift. She stated it was important to ambulate residents to ensure they did not lose their strength and ability to ambulate. According to the LPN, the CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, it could be overwhelming because they had a lot to do. Interview with Physical Therapist (PT) #1, on 05/09/19 at 10:55 AM, revealed Resident #54 was in the Restorative Therapy (RT) program for ambulation; however, the program was pretty limited because of staff turnover. The PT stated she evaluated the resident on 05/08/19 and stated the resident ambulated 50 feet using a walker with staff contact, guard assistance. According to the PT, therapy services were resumed related to the resident's decline in mobility. Interview with the Restorative Program Manager/MDS Nurse #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:08 PM, revealed the CNAs were responsible for restorative care once the Restorative Program was dissolved. She stated the CNAs were educated regarding the additional restorative tasks approximately one (1) week after the program change. The Program Manager further revealed she reminded the CNAs and reviewed documentation quarterly to ensure the CNAs completed restorative care; however, she had not reviewed CNA documentation since the change. According to the Program Manager, no one monitored to ensure residents were ambulated in her absence. Interview with the ADON, on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed she reviewed documentation daily to monitor restorative care and ensured the CNAs completed tasks. She further revealed the MDS Nurse reported on CNA documentation during the daily morning meeting and the numbers were really good. The ADON stated she was not aware of any staff concerns related to Resident #54. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed the Ombudsman made her aware of resident concerns with restorative care. The DON stated she had no concerns with the CNAs ability to complete care; however, the facility needed to educate staff and restructure the program. Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:04 PM, revealed the CNAs were responsible for restorative tasks during their daily routine. He stated he was aware of concerns and the facility needed to continue to in-service staff to make the adjustment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accidents and hazards for two (2) of forty-four (44) residents, Residents #23 and #95. Resident #23 was at risk for falls and required assistance to transfer and for locomotion. Observation revealed Staff did not place Resident #23's call light within the resident's reach in order for the resident to ask for staff assistance if needed. In addition, Resident #95's bed controller had exposed wiring on the cord. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy, Call Lights-Resident, undated, revealed it was the facility's intent to respond promptly to resident call lights to provide assistance. Staff was to be sure to position the call light conveniently for the residents' use when staff provided care for residents. The policy additionally noted staff was to ensure all call lights were placed within the residents' reach at all times. Review of Resident #23's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/12/19, with diagnoses of Generalized Muscle weakness, Unspecified Macular Degeneration, Dementia, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed Resident #23 required extensive assistance for transfers and locomotion. The facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was not interviewable. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan, dated 02/12/19, revealed the resident was at risk for falls with a goal to maintain a safe environment for the resident. Interventions included all staff was to ensure the resident's call light was within reach. Observation of Resident #23, on 05/08/19 at 3:03 PM, revealed the resident was in a wheelchair in his/her room and the call light was on the resident's bed, out of reach of the resident. Further observation revealed Resident #23 leaned over the side of the wheelchair toward bed and was unable to reach the call light and was unable to unlock the wheelchair to move closer to the call light. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #11, on 05/08/19 at 3:07 PM, revealed if Resident #23's call light was not in reach, the resident would not be able to use the light to request help. Interview with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1, on 05/08/19 at 3:12 PM, revealed Resident #23 required staff assistance for transfers, as he/she had attempted to transfer himself/herself and was not able to do it safely. He stated he had been in the Resident #23's room and assisted the resident with getting a drink. When he left the resident, he stated he left the call light on the bed out of Resident #23's reach. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 05/10/19 at 1:28 PM, revealed on 05/08/19, she observed Resident #23 in a wheelchair in his/her room with the call light out of the resident's reach. LPN #7 stated call lights should be in reach for all residents as a safety measure, and she revealed Resident #23 fell on [DATE] and the resident might have attempted an unsafe transfer and fallen if the call light was not in reach. Interview with LPN #8, on 05/10/19 at 2:35 PM, revealed on 05/08/19, Resident #23 could not reach his/her call light from where he/she was positioned in a wheelchair in the room. The LPN stated the call light should have been within the resident's reach. She stated if the resident had needed something or wanted to go to the toilet or get some water, he/she might have tried to get up and could have fallen. In addition, the LPN stated the resident could have been in distress medically and needed help and should have had the call light in reach to get help from staff. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 10:22 AM, revealed call lights should be within reach of residents to ensure residents could get staff attention if they needed help, for safety. The DON stated without a call light, a resident might have attempted to do something for himself/herself and if the resident was unsafe with transfers, the resident could have fallen. Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 5/11/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed call lights should be in reach of residents and staff should ensure they placed call lights within residents' reach. 2. The facility did not provide a policy specific to equipment maintenance. Observation and interview with Resident #95, on 05/07/19 at 2:39 PM, revealed the hand-held controller to the bed did not function properly. The controller had exposed wires in two (2) separate places in addition to electrical tape. Observation of Resident #95, on 05/08/19 at 8:53 AM, revealed the resident in the bed with the hand-held bed controller attached to a left side rail. The bed controller had approximately two (2) inches of intact cord extending from the controller, then a quarter inch of exposed wiring, followed by approximately an inch and a half of black tape. This was followed by approximately two (2) inches of intact cord and then another quarter inch of exposed wiring, followed by black tape, and finally intact cord from that point on. Interview with Resident #95, on 05/09/19 at 11:28 AM, revealed a CNA noticed the exposed wires and placed the black tape on the hand-held bed controller a couple months ago. The resident revealed the CNA stated they would look for a replacement controller, but did not return with one, nor had any other staff mentioned replacing the controller. Resident #95 stated the exposed wires was concerning for possible electrocution. Interview with CNA #2, on 05/09/19 at 11:52 AM, revealed she used the controls located on the footboard of the bed and not the hand-held bed controller. CNA #2 stated she informed the maintenance supervisor multiple times of issues with Resident #95's bed controller not working properly. In addition, CNA #2 believed the hand-held controller was not safe for resident use because of the exposed wiring, which might shock or electrocute the resident. CNA #2 stated staff recorded maintenance concerns in a maintenance log, or informed maintenance staff directly. Interview with CNA #3, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed he became aware of issues with Resident #95's hand-held bed controller approximately three (3) months ago and informed both maintenance staff and a nurse although CNA #3 could not specify the names of the staff members. CNA #3 stated the hand-held bed controller was not safe for use as it might electrocute a person since it was plugged into an electrical outlet in the wall. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) # 1, on 05/10/19 at 9:18 AM, revealed she became aware of the hand-held bed controller recently and stated a hand-held bed controller with exposed wires was not safe and should be removed from use. RN #1 stated staff recorded faulty equipment in a maintenance log kept at the nurses' station but could not recall if she recorded the issue. Review of the Maintenance Request Log, dated 04/21/19 through 05/10/19, revealed no listing for Resident #95 or his/her room number. Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 05/10/19 at 8:34 AM, revealed he recently became aware of concerns with the hand-held bed controller for Resident #95's bed. The Maintenance Director stated the hand-held controller was not safe for use with the exposed wiring, and revealed a resident might receive a shock from using the controller. The Maintenance Director stated staff recorded items for maintenance to address in a maintenance log, which he reviewed twice daily. In addition, staff notified him in person of items that needed immediate repair. Interview with the DON, on 05/10/19 at 9:04 AM, revealed staff recorded items for repair in a maintenance log, which the maintenance staff checked throughout the day. The DON stated the hand-held bed controller was not safe for use due to the exposed wires. Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/10/19 at 9:27 AM, revealed staff documented faulty equipment in the maintenance log when they became aware of an issue. The Interim Administrator stated the hand-held bed controller should be replaced, as it was a safety issue.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-four (44) residents was free from unnecessary medication, Resident #97. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Psychotropic Drugs Usage, undated, revealed factors that might contribute to or were responsible for changes in a resident's behavior would be identified by the facility. When clinically appropriate, the facility staff would initiate non-medication approaches to assist in the treatment or alteration of the resident's behavior. The policy revealed residents receiving an antipsychotic medication for organic brain disorders (referred to as Dementia) would be observed for episodes of the behavioral symptoms being treated and/or manifestation of the disordered thought process; adverse reactions and side effects; and appropriateness of drug selection and dosage. Review of the facility's policy, Behavioral Tracking, undated, revealed the purpose of the policy was to document facts in the clinical record, including time, antecedents, actual behavior, and consequences or outcome of resident behaviors. The policy revealed when resident behaviors occurred, the staff nurse or psychosocial staff would document in the resident's medical record episodic notes regarding the behavior. Review of the facility's policy, Psychotropic Medication: Behavior Management Meetings, undated, revealed the facility would investigate behaviors in an effort to determine the root cause of the behavior. In so doing, it might become evident that a non-pharmacological intervention would be effective in managing or even eliminating the behavior without the use of psychoactive medications. Observation, on 05/07/19 at 3:18 PM, revealed Resident #97 in bed with his/her eyes closed. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #97 on 07/25/17 with diagnoses to include Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #97 exhibited no behaviors and receive antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #97's Physician Order, dated 02/15/19, revealed to increase Risperidone (Risperdal-antipsychotic medicine) to 1 milligram (mg) twice a day for behaviors. Review of Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #97 revealed no new or worsening behaviors. Review of Resident #97's Medication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed no monitoring for potential side effects of the Risperdal. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6, on 05/10/19 at 9:47 AM, revealed CNAs were responsible for reporting resident behaviors to the assigned nurse. CNA #6 stated behaviors could be the result of an unmet need and interventions would include repositioning and/or toileting the resident. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed nurses were responsible for documenting any resident behaviors to justify the need for psychotropic medication. LPN #1 stated he did not know the side effects of Risperdal and was not sure if Extrapyramidal Symptoms (side effects, such as involuntary body movements, from antipsychotic drug use) were associated with its use. According to LPN #1, it was important to monitor for potential side effects of psychotropic medication to ensure the safety of the resident. Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed it was important to document behaviors to provide rationale for increasing the dosage of Risperdal. She stated non-pharmacological interventions should be attempted, such as offering a snack or requesting family support, before increasing a psychotropic medication. Interview with the Social Services Director (SSD), on 05/10/19 at 2:26 PM, revealed the purpose of monitoring behaviors and psychotropic medications was to ensure medication was needed and/or effective. The SSD stated the facility implemented a new process for monitoring psychotropic medication; however, not all staff was trained on the process. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) reviewed new orders and progress notes to monitor changes in residents' condition or behaviors. She stated the facility implemented a new behavior tracking system; however, she was not trained on the new process. According to the ADON, the system for monitoring behaviors and psychoactive medication was broken and there was no system in place to ensure nurses assessed residents daily for potential side effects of the medication. She revealed the purpose of monitoring was to identify behaviors and ensure interventions were in place to manage the behaviors. The ADON stated supporting documentation was required to ensure psychoactive medication was necessary. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed nurses were responsible for documenting resident behaviors and interventions to support the use or increase of psychoactive medication. She revealed medication was not a primary intervention to manage behaviors. According to the DON, staff needed to be educated and a tool implemented to monitor for potential side effects of psychoactive medication.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications in one (1) of two (2) medication rooms. Observatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications in one (1) of two (2) medication rooms. Observation revealed unlicensed personnel in the North Hall medication room unsupervised. In addition, staff stored personal items, such as purses, in the medication room. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Medication Storage in the Facility, not dated, revealed medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. The medication supply was accessible only to license nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Observation, on 05/09/19 at 12:25 PM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 unlocked the North Medication Room for Dietary Staff #1 to enter to restock the refrigerator in the medication room. The nurse left the medication room and allowed the dietary staff to remain unattended in the medication room. In addition, a purse was stored in the medication room. Interview with LPN #2, on 05/09/19 at 12:26 PM, revealed the nurses typically let the dietary staff into the medication room to restock the refrigerator and it was not their routine to stay with dietary staff while they were in the room. Observation of the North Medication Room, on 05/09/19 at 12:28 PM, revealed the medication refrigerator contained multiple bottles of insulin. Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 05/10/19 at 9:50 AM, revealed she was responsible for restocking the refrigerators. She stated the nurses unlocked the medication room doors and let dietary staff in to access the refrigerators, located in the North and South medication rooms. She stated she assumed the doors were kept locked because they were medication rooms. She stated she did not have any type of license that allowed her to remain in the medication room unsupervised. Interview with Dietary Staff #2, on 05/09/19 at 3:08 PM, revealed dietary staff was responsible for restocking the refrigerators that were located in the medication rooms. Dietary staff obtained the key from the nurse because the nurse did not have time to stay in the medication room. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 11:07 AM and 05/11/19 at 2:40 PM, revealed unlicensed staff was not to be left in the medication rooms unsupervised in order to limit the access to medications, and limit opportunities for diversion of medication. She stated only licensed staff was allowed in the room unsupervised. In addition, she stated no personal items, such as bags or purses, were to be left in the medication rooms. Interview with the Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:04 PM, revealed unlicensed staff, such as dietary staff, was not allowed to be left in the medication rooms unsupervised. He stated unsupervised, unauthorized personnel in the medication room provided an opportunity for diversion of medication. In addition, the medication room was not identified as an area for the storage of staff's personal items, such as bags and purses.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Further review of the TB Control Plan policy revealed the facility assessed employees for TB infection or disease prior to be...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Further review of the TB Control Plan policy revealed the facility assessed employees for TB infection or disease prior to beginning employment and annually. The employee's medical file documented the date the employee received testing, the site of the testing and documentation of personnel administering and reading the test, as well as information regarding the solution used for testing. Review of seven (7) personnel records revealed six (6) had no evidence the facility administered Tuberculosis Skin Tests (TST) or completed a Tuberculosis Risk Assessment ([NAME]) for the staff members. Interview with the Staffing Coordinator, on 05/11/19 at 11:05 AM, revealed she did not know which staff person performed TST for staff. Interview with the DON, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed the Staff Development Coordinator was responsible for conducting TSTs on employees and insuring the testing and results were current. The DON stated TB screenings were completed to prevent potential exposure to TB. Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:04 PM, revealed he became aware of the lack of TB screenings during the survey. The Administrator stated TB screening was part of the infection control process and failure to conduct this screening increased the risk for unidentified TB. Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program related to identification of communicable diseases for residents and staff. Record reviews revealed the facility did not complete Tuberculosis Risk Assessments for five (5) of forty-four (44) residents, Residents #26, #50, #56, #61, and #90. In addition, review of personnel records revealed the facility did not administer Tuberculosis Skin Test (TST), nor complete Tuberculosis Risk Assessments, for six (6) staff members. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy, Tuberculosis (TB) Control Plan, undated, revealed the facility provided a TB Control Plan to meet the Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations and per local/state requirements. Additionally, the facility conducted routine Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) testing (TB testing). Review of the clinical record for Resident #26 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/15. The facility administered an annual TB skin test (TST) on 12/21/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual Tuberculosis Risk Assessment ([NAME]) after requested by the Surveyor. Review of the clinical record for Resident #50 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/28/15. The facility administered an annual TST on 09/02/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor. Review of the clinical record for Resident #56 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/14. The facility administered an annual TST on 02/07/19; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor. Review of the clinical record for Resident #61 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/03/17. The facility administered an annual TST on 12/05/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor. Review of the clinical record for Resident #90 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/04/15. The facility administered an annual TST on 09/30/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 05/11/19 at 9:41 AM, revealed the nurses on night shift administered residents' TSTs when they were due and completed the TRAs at the same time. Interview with LPN #6, on 05/11/19 at 9:44 AM, revealed the nurses on the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift administered the TSTs and completed the TRAs. Interview with Payroll/Human Resources, on 05/11/19 at 10:42 AM, revealed the facility conducted TB skin tests for the safety of the residents and everyone in the building. Interview with the Director of Nursing, on 05/11/19 at 2:09 PM, revealed she could not locate the assessments and completed 100% of the TRAs on 05/08/19. She stated it was important to have TSTs and TRAs completed to prevent an outbreak of TB.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate staffing information on a daily basis. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy related...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate staffing information on a daily basis. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy related to the posting of staffing hours. Review of the facility's Assignment Schedule, dated 04/12/19, revealed three (3) Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) worked on first shift, as one (1) LPN called in. However, review of the facility's staffing form, dated 04/12/19, revealed four (4) LPNs worked on first shift, as the form did not reflect the call in. In addition, eight (8) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were on the Assignment Schedule but nine (9) were listed on the staffing form. Review of the facility's Assignment Schedule, dated 04/13/19, revealed no Registered Nurses (RN) worked on first shift; however, review of the staffing form, dated 04/13/19, revealed one (1) RN worked on first shift for sixteen (16) hours. For second shift, there were eight (8) CNAs on the Assignment Schedule and seven (7) listed on the staffing form. In addition, for third shift, the Assignment Schedule did not reflect a Certified Medication Technician (CMT) worked; however, the staffing form listed one (1) CMT worked seven point five (7.5) hours. Review of the facility's Assignment Schedule, dated 04/24/19, revealed three (3) LPNs worked on first shift; however, review of the staffing form, dated 04/24/19, revealed four (4) LPNs worked. On second shift, the Assignment Schedule listed eight (8) CNAs worked but the staffing form listed nine (9) CNAs worked. In addition, for third shift, the Schedule reflected one (1) CMT worked but the staffing form listed no CMT worked on third shift. Interview with the Staffing Coordinator, on 05/11/19 at 11:05 AM, revealed she completed the staffing forms in the mornings. She stated the purpose of the form was to keep up with staffing hours and ensure staffing was sufficient for each shift. Upon review of the staffing forms, she stated the 04/13/19 form included one (1) RN for sixteen (16) hours; however, there was no RN coverage on day shift. The Coordinator stated the staffing forms were not updated with schedule changes/updates. She further stated she posted the staffing forms on Friday for Saturday and Sunday because she did not know who was supposed to post the hours for the weekends, as she did not work weekends. She stated she had one day of training before the previous coordinator left and realized she had been doing the forms incorrectly regarding the hours. She had been going back and changing the old forms to correct them. She revealed of the last thirty (30) days of forms requested, she completed maybe ten (10) of the forms today (05/11/19). Interview with the Director of Nursing, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed the Staffing Coordinator and the current Administrator dealt with staffing.
Mar 2018 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to investigate an injury of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one (1) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents, Resident #3. The facility failed to investigate to determine the origin of Resident #3's fracture. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, undated, revealed all personnel were to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to the supervisor or to the Director of Nursing services immediately. The policy revealed signs of actual physical abuse included fractures, dislocations, or sprains of questionable origin. Review of the facility's policy, Reporting Abuse to Facility Management, undated, revealed it was the responsibility of the employees, facility consultants, attending physicians, family members, and visitors of the facility to promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of an unknown source, to facility management. The Administrator and Director of Nursing services must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such incidents occurred, or were discovered after hours, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) must be called at home or must be paged and informed of such incident. The policy stated when an alleged or suspected case of mistreatment, neglect, injuries of an unknown source, or abuse was reported, the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, would notify: the State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; the resident's representative; Adult Protective Services (APS); the Attending Physician; and law enforcement officials, when necessary. Review of the facility's policy, Reporting/Investigating Resident Accidents/Incidents, undated, revealed, management would thoroughly investigate all accidents/incidents involving residents and would document findings of such investigation in appropriate locations. The policy stated all injuries of an unknown source would be reported to appropriate agencies. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse Investigations, undated, revealed should an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, neglect, or injury of an unknown source be reported, the Administrator, or his/her designee, would appoint a member of management to investigate the alleged incident. The individual conducting the investigation would, at a minimum: review the completed Resident Abuse Report Form; review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; interview the person(s) reporting the incident; interview any witnesses to the incident; interview the resident (as medically appropriate); interview the resident's attending physician as needed to determine the resident's current level of cognitive function and medical condition; interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident; interview the resident's roommate, family members, and visitors as may be necessary; interview other residents to whom the accused employee provided care or services; and review all events leading up to the alleged incident. Employees of the facility who had been accused of resident abuse might be reassigned to nonresident care duties or suspended from duty until the results of the investigation had been reviewed by the Administrator. Review of the clinical record for Resident #3 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/11/17, with diagnoses to include Acute Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five (5) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident not interviewable. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance of one (1) person for all transfers. Interview with Resident #3's family member, on 03/29/18 at 3:52 PM, revealed the resident complained of left arm pain for several weeks following a swallow study appointment and reported a staff member pulled on his/her arm during a transfer. The family member stated she reported the resident's complaints of pain to nursing staff multiple times and the family eventually requested an x-ray of the affected arm. Further review of the clinical record revealed a Video Swallow Report was performed at the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Nursing Progress Notes, dated 02/24/18, revealed Resident #3's family member reported the resident's complaint of mild left arm pain. The note stated the resident and the family member requested an x-ray evaluation of the arm. According to the note, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 attempted to contact the on-call provider by phone and left a message. Further review of the Nursing Progress Notes, dated 02/25/18 at 10:34 AM, revealed LPN #7 notified the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) of Resident #3's complaints of arm pain, and obtained an order for an x-ray to the left upper extremity. Review of Resident #3's Physician Order, dated 02/25/18, revealed the APRN ordered an x-ray of the left humerus, elbow, and forearm related to a diagnosis of pain. Review of the Radiology Report, dated 02/25/18, revealed an acute non-displaced fracture of the left humerus and diffuse osteopenia/osteoporosis. Further review of the Physician Orders, dated 2/26/18, revealed an order for a therapy consult for a sling and an orthopedic evaluation related to a diagnosis of a non-displaced fracture. Review of the Orthopedic History and Physical (H&P), dated 03/05/18, revealed the physician recommended Resident #3 begin physical therapy for range of motion and strengthening training. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8, on 03/29/18 at 4:45 PM, revealed Resident #3 reported arm pain and stated a CNA pulled on his/her arm during a transfer. The CNA stated the resident reported the alleged incident approximately one (1) month ago. The CNA revealed she did not report the alleged incident because the resident was confused and sometimes said things that did not happen. CNA #8 stated it was important to report alleged incidents to ensure there was no injury to the resident and to determine how the incident happened. Interview with LPN #7, on 03/29/18 at 5:06 PM, revealed Resident #3's family reported the resident complained of arm pain and he contacted the APRN to request an x-ray. The LPN stated he did not know why the x-ray was not completed until a day later. He stated it would be important to ensure the physician was notified of the resident's complaint of pain to ensure adequate pain management and interventions. The LPN revealed nurses were responsible for reporting any incidents, especially a fracture, to the DON. Interview with the Registered Nurse (RN) South Supervisor, on 03/29/18 at 4:35 PM, revealed it was important to ensure Resident #3's physician was contacted in a timely manner to ensure follow up of his/her concerns and pain management. She further revealed it would be important to initiate an investigation to determine the cause of Resident #3's fracture. Interview with the DON, on 03/29/18 at 5:25 PM, revealed there was no investigation of Resident #3's allegation or injury. She further revealed it was important to investigate injuries of unknown origin to determine the cause of the injury and protect the resident. The DON stated she was under the impression from the family that the arm fracture was an old injury.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to revise the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to revise the care plans for three (3) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents, Resident #3, #45, and #90. The facility did not revise Resident #3's care plan after the resident sustained a fracture, did not revise Resident #45's care plan after a fall that required stitches, and did not revise Resident #90's care plan after staff observed unsafe smoking practices. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, American Health Foundation Resident Assessment and Care Planning, not dated, revealed a comprehensive care plan must be periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment with the intent to provide the facility with ongoing assessment information necessary to develop a care plan, to provide the appropriate care and services for each resident, and to modify the care plan and care/services based on the resident's status. 1. Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed the facility admitted him/her on 12/11/17, with diagnoses of Acute Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five (5) out of fifteen (15) and determined him/her not interviewable. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance of one (1) person for all transfers. Interview with Resident #3's family member, on 03/29/18 at 3:52 PM, revealed the resident complained of left arm pain for several weeks following a swallow study appointment and reported a staff member pulled on his/her arm during a transfer. The family member stated she reported the resident's complaints of pain to nursing staff multiple times and the family eventually requested an x-ray of the affected arm. Review of Resident #3's Radiology Report, dated 02/25/18, revealed an acute non-displaced fracture of the left humerus. Review of Resident #3's Physician Orders, dated 02/26/18, revealed therapy orders for placement of a sling and an orthopedic physician consult. Review of Resident #3's Orthopedic History and Physical (H&P), dated 03/05/18, revealed an order for physical therapy services. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan, dated 01/20/16, revealed Resident #3 was at risk for pain related to immobility syndrome and right scapular fracture/shoulder pain. Further review revealed the care plan was not revised after the left humerus fracture was diagnosed; it was not revised until 03/28/18, for pain related to the humerus fracture diagnosed on [DATE]. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 03/29/18 at 6:30 PM, revealed the nursing supervisor was responsible for revising care plans. The LPN revealed it was important to revise the care plan for Resident #3 due to potential changes in his/her ability to transfer and ensure adequate pain management interventions. LPN #1 further revealed the revised care plan would ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were aware of the resident's care needs. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 03/29/18 at 5:25 PM, revealed the purpose of the care plan was to ensure staff was aware of resident care needs and prevent reinjuring the affected arm. The DON revealed she had not identified any concerns with revision of care plans. 2. Observation, on 03/27/18 at 8:30 AM, revealed Resident #45 abed, eyes closed, with a cut over his/her left eyebrow, which had stitches, and a dark discoloration around his/her left eye. Observation, on 03/28/18 at 2:10 PM, revealed Resident #45 seated in a wheelchair near the North Unit Nurses' Station. Resident #45 was reaching forward in the wheelchair as if he/she saw something on the floor to pick up. The resident was leaning far forward in the chair as if about the fall from the chair. The Surveyor asked CNA #4, whose back was to the resident at the time, what the resident was reaching for, and CNA #4 turned to attend to the resident and redirected the resident from bending forward and reaching toward the floor. Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/20/15, with diagnoses of Dementia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Coronary Artery Disease without Angina Pectoris, and Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 2. Review of the resident's annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility determined the resident was not interviewable due to the resident was rarely/never understood. Review of the Care Area Assessment revealed the resident was at risk for falls. Review of Resident #45's Nurses Notes revealed the resident had a witnessed, non-injury fall in the dining room on 02/02/18, when he/she attempted to rise from a wheelchair and missed the wheelchair when trying to sit back down. Review of a facility Incident Report, dated 02/02/18, revealed the resident was assessed for fall risk with a score of eleven (11), which placed the resident at high risk for falls according to the report. Review of Resident #45's Care Plan, dated 07/21/15, revealed the resident had the potential for injury from falls. On 02/02/18, an evaluation note revealed staff was to offer to toilet the resident before bringing him/her to the dining room. Further review of Resident #45's Nurse's Notes, dated 03/25/18 at 10:23 AM, revealed at approximately 9:45 AM, a CNA found Resident #45 on the floor on his/her left side. The note further revealed the resident tipped forward in the wheelchair while the CNA was obtaining clothes to assist the resident with dressing. According to the note, a copious amount of red drainage was observed on the tile floor beneath the resident's head. The resident was sent to the hospital emergency department for evaluation. Review of the Emergency Department Report, dated 03/25/18, revealed Resident #45 received repair of a (2) centimeter laceration of the forehead. Diagnostic testing did not reveal any intracranial abnormality or evidence of a fracture. Resident #45 was transferred back to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a facility Incident Report, dated 03/25/18, revealed Resident #45 had a history of one (1) to two (2) falls in the past three (3) months, and the resident was assessed as unable to stand/walk on his/her own. The facility assessed the resident for fall risk with a score of fourteen (14), which placed the resident at high risk for falls according to the report. Continued review of Resident #45's Care Plan revealed no evidence of review or revision of the care plan after the fall on 03/25/18, which resulted in an injury requiring stitches to the resident's left eyebrow. Interview, on 03/29/18 at 9:20 AM, with CNA #4 revealed on 03/25/18, she was in Resident #45's room when the resident fell from his/her wheelchair. She stated she was assisting the resident with morning care and thought Resident #45 was seated all the way back in the wheelchair and not leaning forward. CNA #4 stated as soon as she turned her back for a moment while wetting some washcloths at the sink, Resident #45 fell forward. CNA #4 saw blood on the tile floor near the resident's head and called for help and the nursing supervisor responded quickly. She stated Resident #45 had a habit of trying to stand on his/her own, and of leaning too far forward when in his/her wheelchair, as if trying to reach for or touch things that were not actually there. Interview, on 03/29/18 at 9:40 AM, with the Unit Manager (UM) for the North Unit revealed Resident #45 demonstrated confusion and forgetfulness. She stated she had seen the resident try to stand and lean forward in the wheelchair, but she had not seen the resident try to reach for items on the floor. The UM said she could not recall the resident having any other falls aside from the one on 03/25/18. The UM stated in the past few days, she was informed by the MDS Nursing Staff that she was responsible for updating resident care plans. She stated when there were new physician orders or a change in condition, such as a resident's fall that sent him/her to the hospital, she would need to review and update the resident's care plan. The UM stated she would interview staff that was with the resident at the time of the fall and review the care plan approaches already in place before updating the care plan. The UM state the resident care plans should always be up-to-date to reflect any changes in a resident's condition. Interview, on 03/29/19 at 10:10 AM, with MDS Nurse #1 revealed any licensed nurse could update a resident's care plan, but it was usually the supervising nurse on duty when the event occurred. She stated examples would be after a hospitalization or when new physician orders were given. In addition, the nurse would document in the evaluation section of the care plan if a change to the care plan were needed. MDS Nurse #1 stated she thought the previous revision to Resident #45's care plan, on 02/08/18, was added because the resident tried to get up from his/her chair and staff never knew when he/she would do so, as the resident would just pop up. Interview, on 03/29/18 at 10:25 AM, with MDS Nurse #2 revealed nurses on duty when Resident #45 fell, or when he/she returned from the hospital, should have reviewed and updated the resident's care plan. MDS Nurse #2 stated the purpose of a falls care plan was to have a means of communicating falls prevention interventions to all direct care staff and to try to prevent the resident from falling again. Interview, on 03/29/18 at 11:10 AM, with the DON revealed the UM for the North Unit had assumed the MDS Nursing Staff would update the residents' care plans. The DON stated she and the MDS Nurses recently informed the UM she would be responsible for updating the care plans of residents assigned to the North Unit. She stated any licensed nurse could update a resident care plan after obtaining new orders and/or with changes in a resident's condition. The DON further stated the facility also held a weekly meeting (on Thursdays) to review the details of any resident falls that occurred that week. Attendees included the Social Worker, The Restorative Nurse, the Staff Development Nurse, Unit Managers, a Housekeeping Staff Representative, and herself. 3. Review of the facility's policy, Smoking Policy-Resident, dated 11/28/17, revealed residents who smoked and were not considered to be at risk, related to the smoking assessment, could smoke in the designated resident smoking area located in the facility's enclosed courtyard. In the event a resident's smoking practice placed the resident at risk for injury to self or other, the resident would be assessed to determine if the resident would need interventions such as protective equipment, or supervised and limited smoking breaks. Review of Resident #90's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/28/17. Current diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation, Anxiety Disorder, Essential Tremor, Atrial Fibrillation, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a significant change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a BIMS score of thirteen (13) out of fifteen (15) and determined him/her interviewable. The facility assessed the resident had impairments on both sides of the upper extremities. Observation of Resident #90, on 03/27/18 at 9:41 AM revealed the resident sitting in a wheelchair. The resident's pants had multiple burn holes throughout the thigh and lap area of the pants. Review of Resident #90's Care Plan, dated 05/24/17, revealed the resident was a smoker with the potential for injury with a goal the resident would not sustain injury to self or others from smoking. Interventions included assessing the resident per facility protocol. Interview with Resident #90, on 03/27/18 at 9:41 AM, confirmed the resident was a cigarette smoker and did not require supervision or safety interventions when he/she smoked on the outside smoking patio. Resident #90 stated practically every time he/she smoked, it was not unusual for the cigarette ashes to blow and fall all over his/her lap area, and sometimes the ashes burned a hole in his/her pants. The resident stated he/she was not aware if staff noticed the burns on his/her pants, but no one had ever said anything about the cigarette burns to him/her. Observation of Resident #90, on 03/28/18 at 9:30 AM, revealed the resident sitting outside smoking on the patio. There were several large and small cigarette ashes on his/her lap area. Continued interview with Resident #90, on 03/28/18 at 9:35 AM, revealed he/she did not want to catch on fire while sitting on the patio smoking. The resident stated he/she would be agreeable to wearing a smoking apron; however, had never been offered a smoking apron by the staff, but, was aware other residents wore them while smoking and it was a good safety measure. Interview, on 03/28/18 at 10:34 AM, with the Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor revealed laundry staff was very good about observing residents' clothing for possible cigarette burns and immediately notified the nurses. She stated Resident #90's pants might have been brought in by the resident or the family with burn holes already in them. However, the facility did not track that information and without tracking, it would be impossible to determine. She continued to state she observed Resident #90 on the smoking patio about one (1) month ago smoking. At that time, she observed a long cigarette ash on the resident's cigarette. She stated she told the resident to be careful and offered the resident a smoking apron at that time, but the resident only became aggravated and refused the apron. She stated she then made the nurse aware. She was unaware of the nurse's name but stated it occurred one day during the week, and the nurse stated she would pass the information on to staff. Interview with Laundry Worker #1, on 03/28/18 at 1:05 PM, revealed damaged clothing was reported to the Laundry Supervisor. She stated she remembered a pair of Resident #90's pants around the December 2017 holidays, which contained cigarette burns and the nurses were immediately notified. She went on to to state smokers were at risk for burns and a dropped cigarette, or cigarette ash, could cause real damage to a resident. She stated the facility provided the resident with a pair of green and burgundy pants and the residents were not given clothing that had cigarette burns already on them. Interview with CNA #3, on 03/29/18 at 9:10 AM, revealed she noticed burns in Resident #90's pants about a month ago, and the resident told her the burn holes were from dropping cigarette ashes all over himself/herself. She stated she had been educated to report that type of finding; however, she forgot. She went on to state she was concerned because unsafe smoking could have brought harm to the resident. Continued review of Resident #90's Care Plan revealed it had not been revised to reflect the resident had been re-assessed for possible unsafe smoking after staff discovered cigarette burns on his/her clothing. Interview with the UM, on 03/29/18 at 9:59 AM, revealed the care plan reflected what each resident needed, and what type of care staff should deliver to them. She stated Resident #90's care plan should have been updated to include goals and interventions related to unsafe smoking practices. Interview with the Administrator, on 03/29/18 at 5:30 PM, revealed nursing staff updated resident care plans and it was a constant and continuous process. He stated the care plan was a very important document that guided the care each resident received.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #201 on 03/14/18, with diagnoses of Paresthesia of skin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #201 on 03/14/18, with diagnoses of Paresthesia of skin-face numbness, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a BIMS score of fifteen (15) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident interviewable. Interview with Resident #201, on 03/28/18 at 10:09 AM, revealed he/she was a smoker and had sneaked outside to smoke earlier in the week. Review of Resident #201's admission Smoking Assessment, dated 03/14/18, revealed staff assessed the resident did not smoke. Observation, on 03/29/18 at 8:54 AM, revealed Resident #201 smoking on the patio. Interview during observation revealed the resident began smoking at the facility on 03/26/18. Review of the facility's Smokers List, updated 03/26/18, revealed Resident #201 was an independent smoker; however, further review of the clinical record revealed the facility did not complete another Smoking Assessment until 03/28/18, and determined the resident smoked. Interview with the Social Services Director (SSD), on 03/29/18 at 8:35 AM, revealed she observed Resident #201 in the smoking area but could not recall the date. The SSD revealed she reported her observation to the nursing staff. The SSD revealed she updated the Smokers List when notified by nursing staff. Interview with CNA #5, on 03/29/18 at 8:45 AM, revealed she observed Resident #201 smoking on 03/28/18. The CNA stated she did not report the observation to the resident's nurse because the resident was independent and assumed he/she had already talked with the SSD. CNA #5 revealed residents had to be assessed as a safe smoker before being allowed to smoke at the facility. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, on 03/29/18 at 8:50 AM, revealed the assigned nurse was responsible for ensuring the smoking assessment was completed when notified a resident had been smoking. The RN revealed it was important to assess and observe a resident smoking to ensure his/her safety. Interview, on 03/28/18 at 2:35 PM, with the RN Supervisor for the South Wing revealed the facility had a smokers list and staff was assigned to monitor the residents during scheduled smoking periods. The Supervisor stated she was not aware Resident #201 smoked until she was notified on 03/27/18. The RN revealed the nurse assigned to the resident was responsible for ensuring the smoking assessment was completed immediately after being notified a resident had been smoking. The Supervisor revealed it was important to assess a resident for smoking, including observation of the entire smoking process, to ensure resident safety. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 03/29/18 at 5:25 PM, revealed the door to the patio required a pass code and a staff member or resident might have held the door open for Resident #201 to exit to the smoking area. Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking practices for two (2) of twenty-two sampled residents, Resident #90 and #201. The facility did not reassess Resident #90 for safe smoking practices after staff noted the resident had multiple cigarette burns on his/her pants. In addition, the facility did not assess Resident #201 was safe to smoke until two (2) days after the resident was placed on the facility Smoker's List. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Smoking Policy-Resident, dated 11/28/17, revealed residents who smoked and were not considered to be at risk, related to the smoking assessment, could smoke in the designated resident smoking area located in the facility's enclosed courtyard. In the event a resident's smoking practice placed the resident at risk for injury to self or other, the resident would be assessed to determine if the resident would need interventions such as protective equipment, or supervised and limited smoking breaks. 1. Review of Resident #90's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/28/17. Current diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation, Anxiety Disorder, Essential Tremor, Atrial Fibrillation, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of thirteen (13) out of fifteen (15) and determined him/her interviewable. The facility assessed the resident had impairments on both sides of the upper extremities. Observation of Resident #90, on 03/27/18 at 9:41 AM, revealed the resident in a wheelchair and his/her pants had multiple burn holes throughout the thigh and lap area of the pants. Interview with Resident #90, on 03/27/18 at 9:41 AM, confirmed the resident was a cigarette smoker and did not require supervision or safety interventions when he/she smoked on the outside smoking patio. He/she stated practically every time he/she smoked, it was not unusual for the cigarette ashes to blow and fall all over his/her lap area, and sometimes the ashes burned a hole in his/her pants. The resident stated he/she did not know if staff was aware of the burns on his/her pants, as staff had never said anything about the cigarette burns to him/her. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, on 03/27/18 at 10:15 AM, revealed all residents had a safe smoking assessment performed upon admission and quarterly. She stated each residents' smoking ability coincided with their ability to perform activities of daily living as well as cognitive ability. She stated observations of ashes/cigarette holes in clothing indicated a safety issue; therefore, the resident would need a smoking apron or supervision while smoking to prevent burns. Review of Resident #90's Care Plan, dated 05/24/17, revealed the resident was a smoker with the potential for injury with a goal the resident would not sustain injury to self or others from smoking. Interventions included assessing the resident per facility protocol. Observation of Resident #90, on 03/28/18 at 9:30 AM, revealed the resident outside smoking on the patio. The resident had several large and small cigarette ashes on his/her lap area. Continued interview with Resident #90, on 03/28/18 at 9:35 AM, revealed he/she did not want to catch on fire while sitting on the patio smoking. He stated he/she would be agreeable to wear a smoking apron; however, staff had never offered a smoking apron. The resident stated he/she knew other residents wore aprons while smoking and it was a good safety measure. Interview with LPN #3, on 03/28/18 at 9:45 AM, revealed he was not aware of cigarette burns in Resident #90's pants. He stated safe smoking assessments were performed quarterly and as needed to determine if a resident was a safe smoker and could smoke independently. He stated residents sometimes brought in clothing upon admission, which might of had cigarette burns on them but was unsure if Resident #90's pants already had cigarette holes in them on admission, or if the burns occurred while the resident was living in the facility. He stated he would expect the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) to notify the nurses anytime cigarette burns were suspected on resident clothing and the resident needed to wear a smoking apron before he/she was burned. Observation, on 03/28/18 at 9:55 AM, with Resident #90's permission and assistance of LPN #3, revealed the resident had three (3) pairs of pants, burgundy, black, and camouflage colored. All three (3) pairs of pants had multiple burns on the thigh and groin areas. Resident #90 confirmed he/she brought all three (3) pairs of pants with him/her upon admission to the facility and the pants were new and without burn holes. Observation of the resident's legs, arms, and hands revealed no burn marks. Interview, on 03/28/18 at 10:34 AM, with the Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor revealed laundry staff was very good at monitoring resident clothing for cigarette burns and immediately notified the nurses. She stated the resident's pants might have been brought in by the resident or the family with burn holes already in them; however, the facility did not track that information and without tracking, it would be impossible to determine. She continued to state she observed Resident #90 on the smoking patio about one (1) month ago smoking and a long cigarette ash was on his/her cigarette. She stated she told the resident to be careful and offered the resident a smoking apron but the resident became aggravated and refused the apron. She stated she informed the nurse and the nurse said she would pass the information on to the appropriate staff. Interview with Laundry Worker #1, on 03/28/18 at 1:05 PM, revealed damaged clothing was reported to the Laundry Supervisor via a Reporting Log. She stated she remembered a pair of Resident #90's pants around the December 2017 holidays, which contained cigarette burns and the nurses were immediately notified. She stated smokers were at risk for burns and a dropped cigarette, or cigarette ash, could cause real damage to a resident. She stated the facility provided the resident with a pair of green and burgundy pants and residents were not given clothing that had cigarette burns already on them. Review of the Laundry Log with Laundry Worker #1, on 03/28/18 at 1:05 PM, revealed Resident #90 had burn holes in a gray pair of pants on 12/22/17, and on both legs of a pair of pants on 02/13/18, and burns in a pair of pants on 03/06/18. Continued interview with Laundry Worker #1, on 03/28/18 at 1:05 PM, revealed she notified the nurses each time the burn holes were discovered in the resident's pants. She stated she had received training and education on reporting that type of finding when she first started working at the facility. Interview with the Unit Manager, on 03/28/18 at 3:00 PM, revealed observations of burns in clothes would prompt a safe smoking assessment by staff and the Director of Nursing (DON) would be notified. She stated the CNAs were expected to always report to the nurses any signs of burned clothing. She also stated the CNAs were the first line of defense, which obviously fell through for Resident #90, and the resident could have sustained significant burns on his/her body. She stated she was unaware Resident #90 had burn holes in his/her pants. Interview with CNA #3, on 03/29/18 at 9:10 AM, revealed she noticed burns in Resident #90's pants about a month ago and the resident told her the burn holes were from dropping cigarette ashes all over himself/herself. She stated she had been educated to report that type of finding; however, she forgot. She went on to state she was concerned about it now because unsafe smoking could have brought harm to the resident. Continued review of Resident #90's Care Plan revealed it had not been revised to reflect the resident had been re-assessed for possible unsafe smoking after cigarette burns were discovered by staff on his/her clothing. Interview with the Administrator, on 03/29/18 at 5:30 PM, revealed he had not been aware of the burns found on Resident #90's clothing and he was concerned.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Interview, on 03/29/18 at 5:25 PM, with the Administrator revealed the SDC would make observations and re-educate direct care staff if there were breaks in technique which might increase the risk of c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Interview, on 03/29/18 at 5:25 PM, with the Administrator revealed the SDC would make observations and re-educate direct care staff if there were breaks in technique which might increase the risk of cross-contamination among residents. The Administrator stated breaks in infection control had not been identified as a matter to be addressed by the Quality Assurance Committee. Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for one (1) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents, Resident #100, in regards to lack of hand hygiene and glove changes during catheter care The findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control General Staff Training, undated, revealed hand hygiene should be performed after removing gloves. Review of the facility's Non Sterile Dressing Change Policy, undated, revealed gloves should be changed after contact with soiled dressings, hand hygiene performed, and then new gloves applied prior to cleansing the wound. After cleansing the wound, soiled gloves should be removed. Subsequently, hand hygiene and glove change should be performed prior to application of any topical agent and the dressing. Review of Resident #100's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/11/17, with diagnoses of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, Other Retention of Urine, Encounter for Attention to Cystostomy, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder unspecified, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Pain. Review of Resident #100's Physician Order, initiated 04/11/17, revealed to clean around the suprapubic catheter with a washcloth, apply Triamcinolone Acetonide cream 0.1 %, and dress with a 4 x 4 gauze dressing secured with paper tape, twice daily. Another order, initiated 11/08/17, revealed application of zinc twice daily and as needed to bilateral buttocks as resident will comply. Observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, on 03/29/18 at 10:44 AM, revealed she provided suprapubic catheter care for Resident #100. While wearing gloves, LPN #2 removed the resident's adult brief and applied zinc oxide cream to the sacrum and buttocks. After removing her soiled gloves, LPN #2 failed to perform hand hygiene prior to applying clean gloves. She then removed the old dressing with brownish colored drainage, disposed of it, and used washcloths to cleanse the area. LPN #2 failed to remove her gloves and perform hand hygiene before she applied Triamcinolone Acetonide cream 0.1 % around the catheter opening, followed by a gauze dressing to the area. While wearing the same gloves, she then touched the paper tape roll to remove a piece of tape, secured the dressing with tape, pulled up the resident's pants, adjusted the covers, and touched the buttons on the end of the bed to adjust the bed to the resident's preference. She then removed the soiled gloves and performed hand hygiene prior to exiting the resident's room. Interview with LPN #2, on 03/29/18 at 10:51 AM, revealed the purpose of infection control was to keep compromised areas clean, lessen the chance of infection, and to keep skin intact. She stated hand hygiene involved washing hands or using hand sanitizer prior to application of gloves. She acknowledged she failed to change gloves during the suprapubic catheter care when going from a dirty to a clean area. She stated her failure to change gloves and perform hand hygiene was an oversight. Interview with LPN #4, on 03/29/18 at 10:57 AM, revealed the purpose of hand hygiene and glove changes was to be clean and not cause cross-contamination. She further stated with any dressing change, staff should perform hand hygiene and apply fresh gloves between dirty and clean areas to decrease the risk of infection. Interview with the North Unit Manager, on 03/29/18 at 1:30 PM, revealed hand hygiene was important to keep from spreading unwanted germs and bacteria. With any dressing change, hand hygiene should be performed before and after the procedure, as well as between dirty and clean procedures. She stated when handling a dirty dressing, staff was considered contaminated and should perform hand hygiene after removing the dirty dressing. She revealed she had not performed spot-checks of nursing staff performing wound care or suprapubic catheter care. Interview with the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), on 03/29/18 at 1:40 PM, revealed the facility had conducted in-services on infection control for staff. She stated it was important to ensure proper infection control practices and would educate employees at the time a practice deficit was determined. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 03/29/18 at 4:54 PM, revealed staff should follow the infection control program to keep the infection rate low and to keep residents safe and free of infections. She stated staff was trained at monthly in-services regarding infection control and would be monitored by the SDC who would also provide teachable moments as identified. She revealed she had not identified any infection control concerns prior to the survey; however, she acknowledged failure to change gloves and perform hand hygiene was concerning as it could cause the spread of infections. She stated a breakdown in infection control practices required staff re-education with return demonstration to ensure understanding.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 5 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $28,492 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 24 deficiencies on record, including 5 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $28,492 in fines. Higher than 94% of Kentucky facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 5 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Kentucky, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 49%, compared to the Kentucky average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 58%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation during 2018 to 2024. These included: 5 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, 16 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation?

Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 98 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Louisville, Kentucky.

How Does Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation Compare to Other Kentucky Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kentucky, Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (49%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Kentucky. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation Stick Around?

Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation has a staff turnover rate of 49%, which is about average for Kentucky nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation has been fined $28,492 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Kentucky average of $33,364. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.