CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property.
2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to reenter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left.
3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19.
4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19.
5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility.
6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment
form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility.
7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety
upon hire.
8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment,
conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting.
10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future.
11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings.
12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references,
abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations.
13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff.
14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed
addressing.
15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the
Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the
facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the
codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents.
16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer
scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional
Meeting, on an on-going basis.
17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three
(3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would
remain on the monthly in-service calendar.
18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in
contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident
safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed.
19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the
investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported.
20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months
to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed.
21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station.
22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee;
this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director.
The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows:
1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies.
Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property.
Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19.
Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM.
2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not returned the surveyor's call.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety.
3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident.
4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff.
5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19.
Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call.
Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19.
6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed.
Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance.
Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed.
Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code.
Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy.
Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey.
Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19.
Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations.
8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much.
9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught.
10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19.
11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter.
Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks.
Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed.
13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met.
14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility.
Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility.
Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator.
15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated.
Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times.
Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change.
16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19.
Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed.
17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command.
18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process.
19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough.
20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting.
21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate.
22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results.
Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans.
Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Rep[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property.
2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to re-enter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left.
3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19.
4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19.
5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility.
6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility.
7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire.
8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting.
10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future.
11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings.
12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations.
13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff.
14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing.
15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of
notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents.
16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis.
17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar.
18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed.
19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported.
20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed.
21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station.
22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director.
The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows:
1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies.
Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property.
Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19.
Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM.
2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not returned the surveyor's call.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety.
3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident.
4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff.
5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19.
Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call.
Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19.
6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed.
Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance.
Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed.
Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code.
Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy.
Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey.
Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19.
Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations.
8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much.
9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught.
10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19.
11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter.
Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks.
Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed.
13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met.
14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility.
Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility.
Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator.
15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated.
Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times.
Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change.
16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19.
Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed.
17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command.
18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process.
19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough.
20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting.
21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate.
22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results.
Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans.
Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Reporting Suspect/Alleged Abuse, Protecting Residents by[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property.
2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to re-enter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left.
3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19.
4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19.
5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility.
6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility.
7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire.
8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting.
10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future.
11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings.
12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations.
13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff.
14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing.
15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of
notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents.
16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis.
17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar.
18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed.
19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported.
20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed.
21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station.
22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director.
The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows:
1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies.
Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property.
Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19.
Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM.
2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not returned the surveyor's call.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety.
3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident.
4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff.
5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19.
Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call.
Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19.
6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed.
Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance.
Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed.
Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code.
Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy.
Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey.
Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19.
Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations.
8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much.
9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught.
10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19.
11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter.
Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks.
Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed.
13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met.
14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility.
Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility.
Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator.
15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated.
Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times.
Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change.
16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19.
Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed.
17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command.
18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process.
19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough.
20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting.
21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate.
22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results.
Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans.
Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Reporting Suspect/Alleged Abuse, Protecting Residents by s[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enfo...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility implemented the following actions to remove Immediate Jeopardy:
1. On 03/26/19 at approximately 9:45 PM, a law enforcement officer escorted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 out of the building and off the property.
2. On 03/26/19, the Administrator informed staff to immediately contact the police if CNA #13 attempted to re-enter again, after CNA #13 had re-entered the facility to retrieve alleged belongings and left.
3. On 03/26/19, Administrator suspended CNA #13, pending investigation, and then subsequently terminated her position on 04/02/19.
4. On 03/27/19, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviewed Resident #52 related to possible safety concerns when CNA #13 returned to the facility and entered the resident's room to retrieve personal belongings, after local law enforcement had escorted her out of the facility on 03/26/19.
5. On 03/28/19, the Administrator, at the time of the incident that occurred on 03/26/19, ended their employment with the facility.
6. On 03/27/19 to 03/28/19, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) conducted an in-service on the facility's Abuse Policy to the staff. Staff signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form verifying eighty-eight (88) staff members received training on abuse. The facility assured all newly hired staff would be educated on their Abuse Policy before they were permitted to work in the facility.
7. On 04/15/19, via email, the RDO educated the Administrator on the Abuse Prevention Policy including reporting of abuse, types of abuse, abuse prevention, investigation, and immediate intervention to ensure resident(s) safety upon hire.
8. On 05/10/19, the RDO interviewed Resident #11, to determine his/her mindset (related to fear, intimidation, or abuse) after the abuse incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
9. On 05/11/19, the RDO was educated by the Regional Nurse Consultant on the Abuse Prevention policy; including receiving background and pre-employment reference checks prior to staff starting their employment, conducting a thorough investigation, keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation, and timely reporting.
10. On 05/11/19, the Maintenance Director and Environmental Services Director changed the code on the entry/exit doors to decrease the risk of CNA #13 from entering the building during after hours in the future.
11. On 05/13/19, the Regional Director of Human Resources educated the Payroll Coordinator, per job description, related to facility's policy on pre-employment screenings.
12. From 05/13/19 to 05/14/19, the Payroll Coordinator with the assistance of the RDHR conducted a one hundred percent (100%) audit of Employee files. The audits included checking criminal backgrounds, references, abuse registry, and licensure and/or certification validations.
13. On 05/16/19, the RDO educated the Administrator on the timely reporting of abuse, investigation of abuse allegations, receiving background checks and conducting re-employment reference checks prior to employing staff.
14. From 05/28/19 to 06/06/19, the Social Service Director (SSD) conducted interviews with ten (10) residents regarding their overall satisfaction with facility services and whether they had any issues or concerns that needed addressing.
15. On 06/22/19, the Administrator educated the Maintenance Director on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks. The entry/exit codes would be changed when the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that an employee was suspended related to abuse and/or neglect. According to the new procedure implemented by the facility on 06/22/19, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the facility suspended an employee to decrease the risk of the suspended employee returning to the facility. The facility would notify the Maintenance Director ASAP, assign a staff person to the hallway to monitor exit doors until the codes were changed, and the Maintenance Director would change all entry/exit codes within two (2) hours of
notification, which would ensure the overall safety and security of residents.
16. On 05/01/19, at the Quarterly scheduled meeting, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, Chief Operating Officer, facilitated Abuse Training along with the Corporate Director of Education. The Chief Operating Officer scheduled Quarterly Meetings with all Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Regional Director of Operations and other Regional team members. In addition, Abuse Training would be conducted at each Quarterly Regional Meeting, on an on-going basis.
17. The Administrator and/or Designee would monitor staff understanding of the education by conducting staff interviews three (3) times a week for four (4) weeks regarding Abuse Prevention Program and monthly for three (3) months. The Administrator would add to the monthly in-service the Abuse Prevention education with questions and answer session to validate understanding; then on an on-going basis a segment of the Abuse Program would remain on the monthly in-service calendar.
18. The RDO would monitor the Administrator's understanding of the education by reviewing with the Administrator the initial report of an allegation of abuse to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted. Then would stay in contact with the Administrator throughout the investigation. The RDO would review the final report to ensure the investigation was complete and all aspects of the Abuse policy was followed; to include timely reporting, resident safety was ensured during the investigation, all interviews conducted, interventions were taken, and any other issues of abuse and/or neglect identified to ensure appropriate actions were taken and a thorough investigation completed.
19. The RDO and/or the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on an ongoing basis would review all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and conducted thoroughly. In addition, newly reported allegations discovered during the investigation was reported.
20. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) would review the investigative files and the recommended outcome made by the new Administrator and the RDO related to the self-reported incidences for three (3) months to ensure the Abuse policies and procedures were followed.
21. On 06/21/19, the Administrator reviewed with the Medical Director the change in scope and severity as it related to the immediate jeopardy tags. In addition, discussed actions to correct identified concerns. The Medical Director identified and directed the Maintenance Director and Administrator to fix surveillance cameras outside the facility's building and place monitors at each nursing station.
22. The outcome of the monitoring of the education would be reported to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement Committee (QAPI). If any patterns were identified an action plan would be written by the committee; this action plan would be monitored weekly by the Administrator until resolved. The QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director.
The State Agency Validated the removal immediate jeopardy prior to exit on 06/24/19 as follows:
1. Review of the Law Enforcement Incident/Investigation Report, with a print date of 06/21/19, revealed on 03/26/19 at approximately 9:42 PM, a law enforcement officer came to the facility to investigate the incident of possible charges of Theft by Unlawful Taking Over $500 of Resident #11's missing monies.
Record review of the facility Self Reportable Investigation Summary, not dated, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 immediately went to Resident #11's room upon hearing yelling, and removed CNA #13 from the room, the police entered the building and escorted the CNA off the property.
Review of CNA #13's written statement, dated 03/27/19, revealed the police transported him/her to a gas station and left him/her there around 11:00 PM on 03/26/19.
Interview on 6/23/19 at 10:45 AM, with the current Administrator, revealed staff informed her and per her review of the facility investigation a police officer with the badge number 6163 escorted CNA #13 out of the building on 03/26/19 around 9:45 PM.
2. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed after CNA #13 returned and entered the building, on 03/26/19, staff were instructed not to let her back in the building to ensure resident safety.
3. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form, dated 03/28/19, revealed CNA #13 was terminated on 04/02/19.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she had not seen CNA #13 since the day of the incident.
4. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed the facility assessed the resident with a score of fifteen (15) on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), on 02/09/19, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #52 on 03/26/19, and the resident voiced no safety concerns with facility staff.
5. Review of the facility's Personnel Change Form for the Administrator at the time of the incident, dated effective 03/28/19, revealed Administrator voluntarily surrender the Administrator position on 03/28/19.
Attempted telephone interview with the previous Administrator, on 06/20/19 at 4:00 PM, 06/23/19 at 11:00 AM, and 06/24/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the previous Administrator did not return the surveyor's call.
Interview with the current Administrator of the facility, on 06/23/19 at 10:30 AM, revealed the former Administrator ended their employment on 03/28/19.
6. Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 03/27/19 and 03/28/19, revealed eighty-eight (88) staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Review of the facility's in-service training on Teaching Moment Regarding Abuse and Misappropriation, dated 04/01/19 through 06/20/19, revealed twenty-two (22) newly hired staff members received training and signed an Abuse Program Acknowledgment form.
Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #14, on 06/23/19 at 12:00 PM, revealed she was educated on abuse types, when and to whom to report an abuse allegation. CNA #14 stated after staff were suspended they were not allowed back in the building and the codes to the doors were changed.
Interview with CNA #15, on 06/23/19 at 12:15 PM, revealed the facility had recently re-educated her on the types of abuse and her responsibility to report immediately if witnessed. She stated if an employee was suspended, staff should not allow them back into the building and the door codes would be changed by Maintenance.
Interview with CNA #16, on 06/23/19 at 12:30 PM, revealed she was knowledgeable of the types of abuse She stated if witnessed she would report to her supervisor immediately. CNA #16 stated the facility recently re-educated her on the abuse policy and if an abuse allegation was made against a staff member, they were suspended pending investigation and were not allowed back into the building. In addition, the management team would obtain statements from staff and then Maintenance would change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Housekeeper #1 and #2, on 06/23/19 at 12:45 PM, revealed the facility recently re-educated them on the abuse policy. They stated they would report abuse if witnessed or if an allegation of abuse was reported to them. Each stated if an allegation of abuse was made the employee would be suspended and not allowed back into the building until the investigation was completed. Also that the door codes would be changed to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 06/23/19 at 12:50 PM, revealed the facility recently trained her on abuse, required her to take a test and sign an acknowledgment form that she understood the abuse policy and facility expectations. She also stated if an employee was suspended, they were not allowed back in the building and the door codes were changed.
Interview with CNA #12, on 06/23/19 at 12:55 PM, revealed the facility recently provided training on the abuse policy, that she had to take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement saying she understood the policy. She stated the facility had a strict abuse policy and, if suspended, staff were not allowed back in the building, while the investigation was on going. CNA #12 stated the Administrator would have the Maintenance Director change the door lock codes to ensure resident safety and prevent the suspended employee from gaining entry into the facility by using the code.
Interview with CNA # 17, on 06/23/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed if a staff member threatened a resident, staff would protect the resident and report the incident immediately. In addition, a suspended staff member was not allowed back in the building. CNA #17 stated the facility trained her recently on the abuse policy. She stated she had to sign an acknowledgement sheet and take a test to ensure she understood the policy.
Interview with LPN #1, on 06/23/19 at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility required he re-read the abuse policy, take a test and sign an acknowledgement statement that he understood his responsibility. He stated if he received a report of abuse, he would immediately protect the resident by removing the employee from the building. LPN #1 stated he would then report the incident to the Administrator and other appropriate authorities if needed. In addition, the staff would monitor doors until the Maintenance Director could change the code on the locks to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 06/23/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she had recent training on the abuse policy. She stated she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse, keeping the resident safe, removing the alleged perpetrator form the building and not allowing them back in. LPN #7 stated after suspending the alleged perpetrator the doors would be monitored by assigned staff, until the Maintenance Director could change the door codes to ensure resident safety.
Interview with LPN #4, on 06/23/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed it was her responsibility to report and protect residents from all types of abuse. She stated all staff recently were required to attend abuse training after the incident with Resident #11. LPN #4 stated she would call the Administrator immediately after an allegation of any type of abuse. She would remove the employee and not allow them back in the building. She stated until the door codes were changed she would assign staff to monitor all exit doors.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed the previous DON trained her on abuse, reporting abuse, and residents' safety after the annual survey.
Attempted telephone interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), on 06/24/19 at 5:00 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call. However, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
Attempted telephone interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 06/24/19 at 6:53 PM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message to return call; however, the surveyor did not receive a returned call.
7. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she trained the Administrator on Abuse, via email, by emailing her the abuse policy to read. The RDO stated she later sent the Administrator a questionnaire related to the abuse policy that the Administrator completed and returned to her.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO trained her on the facility's abuse policy. The Administrator stated she also received abuse training from the Director of Education at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19.
Review of the RDO's email correspondence to all administrators in the region, dated sent on 06/14/19 at 9:25 PM, revealed she sent an email telling the administrators that surveyors were verifying facility investigations began immediately and that they were thorough. She attached the Abuse Policy, Incident Report Form, and an Example of Investigation Summary for them to refer to when completing abuse investigations.
8. Review of the facility's Social Services Behavior Assessment forms for Resident #11, dated 03/26/19, 03/27/19, and 03/28/19, revealed the previous ADON assessed the resident's behavior on 03/26/19, as angry about money stolen; on 03/27/19, as tearful and stated found out his/her aunt was ill; and on 03/28/19 with no negative behaviors.
Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she interviewed Resident #11 on 05/10/19, and he/she displayed and voiced no concerns of fear or intimidation related to the incident that occurred on 03/26/19.
Observation of Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed the resident was in bed playing a video game. During interview, the resident smiled continuously even when questioned about the alleged incident of abuse. The resident did not appear intimidated, nor were there any visible bruises or injuries.
Interview with Resident #11, on 06/22/19 at 4:30 PM, revealed he/she was originally upset regarding the incident, before the facility reimbursed the money. The resident stated the previous Administrator came and questioned him/her about the incident and how he/she felt about it, but since it was usually early in the morning when he/she did not talk much.
9. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she received abuse training from the Regional Director of Education/Nurse Consultant at Regional Office Quarterly Meeting conduct on 05/11/19. She said the training included receiving background and pre-employment reference checks, prior to staff starting their employment; conducting a thorough investigation; keeping resident(s) safe during the investigation; and reporting abuse investigations timely.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Nurse Consultant Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught.
10. Attempted telephone interview with the previous Maintenance Director, on 06/22/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed surveyor left a voice mail message for him to return call; however, he never returned surveyor's call.
Interview with the Environmental Services Director, on 06/24/19 at 4:48 PM, revealed she assisted the previous Maintenance Director with changing the door entry/exit codes shortly after the annual survey. She said she assisted him by reading the on-line directions while he physically changed the codes. She stated the previous Director of Nursing trained her on abuse on 05/11/19.
11. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made, however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
12. Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:27 PM, with the previous Payroll Employee was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Attempted telephone interview, on 06/24/19 at 6:37 PM, with the Regional Director of Human Resources was made; however, no one answered and a voice mail message was left to return call.
Review of the facility's Employee Tracking Audit Tool, not dated, revealed the facility-tracked employees' certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks upon hire and annually thereafter.
Review of seven (7) sampled employee files, on 06/21/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed the facility employee files contained certification/license, criminal history, references, TB assessments, and abuse registry checks.
Interview with the Business Office Manager, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed she began employment with the facility on 11/28/18, and started completing pre-employment checks. She stated she was trained by the RDO to complete reference, criminal background, licensee/certification, abuse registry, and Office of Inspector General checks on all potential employees before allowing them to work in the facility.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she audited all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met. In addition, she directed the DON to verify all employee TB assessments were completed.
13. Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she was trained by the RDO on abuse reporting and auditing all new hire employee files to ensure reference, abuse registry, licensure/certification and other mandated pre-employment requirements were met.
14. Review of the facility's Resident Interview forms, not dated, revealed the SSD conducted resident interview questionnaires 05/28/19 through 06/06/19, related to how they felt about their treatment, services, and safety at the facility. The forms noted the residents replied they felt safe in the facility.
Interview with Social Services Director, on 06/23/19 at 11:40 PM, revealed she interviewed residents and documented the interviews on a Resident Interview form on 05/28/19 through 06/06/19. She stated the residents voiced no concerns related to staff treatment or their overall safety at the facility.
Interviews with Resident #35 at 8:10 AM, Unsampled Resident A at 8:15 AM, and Unsampled Resident B at 8:22 AM, on 06/21/19, revealed they felt safe at the facility and had no concerns related to abuse. The residents stated if they felt someone treated them badly they would report it immediately to the nurse on duty or the Administrator.
15. Immediately after the door codes were changed, the Administrator and the Maintenance Director would round to confirm changes of codes were effective. The Maintenance Director documented door code changes on a Door Code Tracking Tool to ensure no prior codes were duplicated.
Review of an In-Service Record, dated 06/22/19, revealed the Administrator trained the Maintenance Director on how to re-code door key locks. The training included information from Secure Care Advantage 1000, [NAME] Simplex 1000 Series, and Door Guard IEI.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed the Administrator/DON/ADON would notify him if they terminated and/or suspended an employee and he would change the door entry/exit codes within two hours of notification. He said they developed a log to track all door code changes and the logs would be housed at each nursing station and in his office. According to the Maintenance Director, the log would be reviewed at QAPI. The Maintenance Director further stated on 06/22/19, he changed all door entry/exit codes and logged them in on the tracking sheet, per the Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator trained him on how to change the entry/exit door codes for three (3) door locks and he read the facility's security manual, which also gave direction on entry/exit door codes.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed the Administrator trained them to immediately remove the alleged perpetrator from the facility premises. They stated if the alleged perpetrator threatened to harm anyone, they were supposed to notify local law enforcement to keep them from returning to the facility. They said they were also trained to notify the Maintenance Director immediately and place a staff member in the hall to monitor the doors until the MD changed the door entry/exit codes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed when the facility terminated an employee the Maintenance Director would change all the facility's entry/exit codes within two (2) hours and track the code changes on a log. Per the Administrator, after the codes were changed, she and the Maintenance Director would round on all doors to ensure codes were working, as a second validation with their signatures after completed. They would keep a copy of all code changes in their Emergency Management Procedure book housed at each nursing station accessible to staff at all times.
Record Review of the facility's Door Code Change Tracking Log, not dated, revealed it contained Door Locations, Date and Time code changes were made, Prior Code and New Code, the Initials of the Individuals verifying code changes were made, and Reason codes were change.
16. Telephone interview with the Chief Operating Officer (COO), on 06/24/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed he scheduled quarterly meetings with all Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members and at the last meeting held on 05/01/19, they were in-serviced on Abuse by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The COO stated Abuse training would be an on-going topic at their quarterly meetings. Their next meeting was scheduled on 07/23/19.
Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she attended the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19 and in-serviced Administrators, DONs, RDOs, and other Regional team members on Abuse. She stated they covered all protocols of abuse and they took abuse allegations extremely serious. She also stated they completed a role-play on abuse and mock surveys to ensure the different types of abuse were covered. According to the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, she audited the facility's abuse investigation files to ensure abuse policies and procedures, which included ensuring the alleged perpetrator was immediately removed from the building.
Telephone interview with the Director of Education/Corporate Trainer, on 06/24/19 at 5:09 PM, revealed she explained the Abuse Policy to the attendees at the Regional Quarterly Meeting held on 05/11/19, and they completed competency questions on abuse to ensure they retained the information she taught. In addition, she stated they reviewed all state survey results at the meetings for quality assurance purposes and gave direction as needed.
17. Interviews with several CNAs, LPNs, Housekeeping staff, Environmental staff, and Dietary Staff during the survey, on 06/20/19 through 06/24/19, revealed the Administrator and DON re-educated them to the facility's Abuse Policy, since their annual survey was completed. Staff stated they signed the Abuse Program Acknowledgement form and completed post-tests ensuring they comprehended the policy. Interviews with Staff hired after 05/01/19, confirmed they were educated on the facility's Abuse Policy.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she rounded the facility and questioned staff on the abuse policy ensuring they comprehended the Abuse Policy by knowing the types of abuse and abuse reporting requirements that included knowing their chain of command.
18. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to monitor the Administrator's understanding of the abuse investigation process. The RDO stated she gave the Administrator scenarios of abuse reporting and the Administrator demonstrated what actions she would take throughout her investigation of the abuse allegations. She also stated the Administrator comprehended the trainings she received on including pre-employment checks.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the RDO monthly audited the facility's abuse investigative files to ensure she conducted a complete and thorough investigation, placed appropriate interventions, and took appropriate actions throughout the investigative process.
19. Interview with the RDO, on 06/23/19 at 3:35 PM, revealed she continued to audit and monitor all initial and final self-reported abuse incidents to ensure all were reported timely, resident safety was established immediately, the investigation was started immediately and thorough.
20. Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services, on 06/24/19 at 4:22 PM, revealed she reviewed and would continue review for three months, all the Administrator's investigative files to ensure the Administrator followed the Abuse policies and procedures when concluding the investigation. The Corporate Director of Education/VP of Clinical Services stated on 05/11/19, they received abuse training at the Regional Meeting.
21. Interview with the Medical Director, on 06/24/19 at 5:25 PM, revealed the Administrator had called him to discuss the notification of immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. He stated they discussed corrective actions and how to ensure residents were protected from abuse.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed she informed the Medical Director that all abuse deficiencies were elevated to immediate jeopardy on 06/21/19. During the meeting the Medical Director suggested the cameras outside the facility be fixed and to place monitors at each nursing station. She stated she contacted a company to come give the facility an estimate.
22. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes' Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 05/21/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss their annual survey results.
Review of the facility's AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting's Agenda and Sign-In Signature Sheet, dated 06/22/19, revealed QAPI Committee met to discuss the identified concern regarding door codes were changed back to previous code changes.
Interview with the Administrator, on 06/24/19 at 7:17 PM, revealed the QAPI Committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Social Services Director (SSD), Activity Director, Dietary Manager (DM), Maintenance Director, Environmental Services Director (ESD), Business Office Manager (BOM), admission Director and Medical Director. She stated the audit and monitoring results would be taken to the QAPI committee for review and if any patterns were identified an action plan would be developed and implemented to ensure issues were resolved.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 06/24/19 at 3:54 PM, revealed he would attend the QAPI committee to discuss his door code changing log and other audits as required.
Interview with the Admissions Director, Business Office Manager, Dietary Services Director, and Activities Director, on 06/24/19 at 6:00 PM, revealed they attended facility QAPI meetings and would review audits and monitoring to determine patterns in need of corrective action plans.
Review of the Facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, revealed the policy address the following components of abuse: Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees, Orientation and Training of Employees, Identifying Abuse, Reporting Suspect/Alleged Abuse, Protecting Residents by sep[TRUNCATED]
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Review of Resident #23's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/12/19, with diagnoses of Generaliz...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Review of Resident #23's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/12/19, with diagnoses of Generalized Muscle Weakness, Unspecified Macular Degeneration, Dementia, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility.
Review of Resident #23's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident required extensive assistance to complete transfers and for locomotion. The facility conducted a BIMS exam with a score of four (4) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was not interviewable.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan, dated 02/12/19, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, Dementia, history of falls, and psychoactive medications. Interventions included all staff was to be sure the resident's call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance.
However, observation of Resident #23, on 05/08/19 at 3:03 PM, revealed the resident was in his/her room in a wheelchair with the wheels locked, positioned between the bed and the door, and the call light was on the resident's bed, out of reach of the resident. Resident #23 leaned over the side of the wheelchair toward bed, was unable to reach the call light, and was unable to unlock his /her wheelchair in order to access the call light.
Interview with CNA #11, on 05/08/19 at 3:07 PM, revealed the resident's call light should be within reach of the resident so the resident could ask for help from staff.
Interview, on 05/08/19 at 3:12 PM, with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1 revealed Resident #23 had attempted previously to transfer himself/herself, was not able to do it safely, and required staff assistance. PTA #1 further stated he assisted Resident #23 with getting a drink, and when he left the resident, he/she was in the wheelchair between the bed and the door and he left the call light out of the resident's reach.
Interview, on 05/10/19 at 1:28 PM, with LPN #7 revealed on 05/08/19, Resident #23 was in his/her room in a wheelchair with the call light out of the resident's reach. The LPN stated call lights needed to be in reach of the residents so they could request staff assistance and prevent an unsafe transfer and fall. LPN #7 revealed the facility had not followed Resident #23's care plan and the purpose of the plan was to communicate the resident's care needs to each staff.
Interview, on 05/10/19 at 2:35 PM, with LPN #8 revealed on 05/08/19, Resident #23 could not reach his/her call light from where he/she was positioned in the wheelchair in the resident's room. The LPN stated the call light should have been within the resident's reach so if the resident needed something or wanted to go to the toilet, he/she could ask for assistance. LPN #8 stated staff did not follow the care plan for keeping the call light in reach.
Interview, on 05/11/19 at 10:22 AM, with the DON revealed call lights should be within reach of the residents so residents could get the needed help from staff. The DON stated staff did not follow Resident #23's care plan when they left the resident with his/her call out of reach.
Interview, on 05/11/19 at 10:50 AM, with the Interim Administrator revealed call lights should be in reach of the residents. He stated if staff did not place the call light in the resident's reach, per the care plan, then staff did not follow the care plan.
2. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #54 on 09/17/15, with diagnoses to include Primary Osteoarthritis, Age-related Osteoporosis, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Review of the Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was interviewable. The resident used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility and required extensive assistance of one (1) staff to walk in his/her room and corridor.
Review of a Physical Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #54 reached maximum functional potential and was able to ambulate 350 feet using a walker with stand-by assistance.
Review of a Physician Order, dated May 2019, revealed Resident #54 could participate in the restorative nursing program.
Review of the Care Plan, initiated 01/09/19, revealed Resident #54 was at risk for compression fractures related to Osteoporosis with a goal to maintain the highest level of function. Interventions included encouraging exercise as tolerated to maintain movement.
Interview with Resident #54, on 05/07/19 at 10:18 AM, revealed the CNAs had walked him/her once in the past four (4) weeks.
Interview with CNA #1, on 05/09/19 at 11:24 AM, revealed Resident #54 was supposed to be walked daily and stated it was important to ensure residents were walked to maintain function.
Interview with CNA #6, on 05/10/19 at 9:47 AM, revealed CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, she never had enough time to ambulate her assigned residents. CNA #6 revealed residents could lose their ability to walk or get pressure ulcers if they were not ambulated daily.
Interview with LPN #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed residents sometimes reported they were not ambulated when the unit was short a CNA. LPN #1 revealed residents could lose function if they were not ambulated according to restorative orders.
Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed the CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, it could be overwhelming because CNAs had a lot to do.
Interview with Physical Therapist (PT) #1, on 05/09/19 at 10:55 AM, revealed the Restorative Program was pretty limited because of staff turnover. The PT revealed she evaluated Resident #54 for therapy services on 05/08/19, and stated the resident ambulated 50 feet using a walker with contact/guard assistance. The PT stated the resident had a decline in mobility since his/her discharge from therapy.
Interview with the ADON, on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed she observed care and reviewed CNA documentation daily to ensure restorative tasks were completed.
Interview with the DON, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed she had no concerns with the ability of staff to complete assigned tasks.
3. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #97 on 07/25/17, with diagnoses to include Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and COPD.
Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #97 exhibited no behavioral symptoms.
Review of Resident #97's Physician Order, dated 02/15/19, revealed to increase Risperidone (Risperdal-antipsychotic medication) to 1 milligram (mg) twice a day for behaviors.
Review of Resident #97's Nursing Progress Notes revealed no behaviors or clinical rationale for the increased dose of Risperdal.
Review of the Care Plan for Resident #97, last reviewed 02/14/19, revealed psychotropic medication was prescribed to manage the resident's appetite. Interventions included assuring the diagnosis corresponded with the prescribed medication, assessing for side effects and complications, and documentation of observed behavioral symptoms on the Behavior Tracking Form. The care plan did not include target behavior(s) or non-pharmacological interventions for management of the behavior(s).
The facility did not provide Behavior Tracking Forms for Resident #97.
Review of Resident #97's Medication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed no monitoring for potential side effects of the medication, as stated in the care plan.
Interview with LPN #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed Resident #97's care plan for psychotropic medication should include a diagnosis and target behavior(s) for use of the Risperdal. He stated behaviors should be documented in the clinical record to justify the need for psychotropic medication. LPN #1 revealed the facility assessed residents quarterly for Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS-side effects, such as involuntary body movements, from antipsychotic drug use); however, he was not sure if EPS were associated with Risperdal use. He further revealed he was not familiar with the side effects of Risperdal and would have to google it.
Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed the purpose of the care plan was to ensure resident centered care and to communicate resident needs. She revealed medication was not a primary intervention to manage behavior(s) and the care plan should include non-pharmacological interventions, such as offering a snack or walking the resident.
Interview with the ADON, on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed the care plan should detail behavior(s) and include interventions to address the behavior(s). The ADON revealed the facility's system for tracking behaviors was broken and stated there was no tool in place to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medication.
Interview with the DON, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed it was important to ensure behaviors and side effects were monitored to provide rationale for the increased dose of Risperdal. The DON revealed Resident #97's care plan for psychoactive medication was not implemented.
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to implement care plans for four (4) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #22, #23, #54, and #97. The facility assessed Resident #22 with a left heel ulcer on 02/04/19. The resident was care planned to have a heel lift boot to the left heel except with ambulating; however, observations on three (3) days during the survey revealed the resident in bed without the heel boot in place. In addition, review of a physician's Wound Evaluation, dated 03/25/19, revealed the resident did not have the heel boot in place and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increase in the area. In addition, Resident #23 was care planned for falls with an intervention to keep the call light within reach; however, observation revealed the call light was not in reach of the resident. The facility did not implement the care plan for Resident #54 who was at risk of compression fractures in order to maintain level of function, and Resident #97's care plan was not implemented related to monitoring of behaviors and potential side effects of psychoactive medication.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Baseline Care Plan Assessment/Comprehensive Care Plans, updated 09/18/18, revealed the Comprehensive Care Plan would expand on the resident's risks, goals and interventions using the Person-Centered plan of care approach for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, physical functioning, mental, and psychosocial needs. The care plan would promote continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff, increase safety, and safeguard against adverse events. In addition, the facility used interventions in an effort to achieve the highest level of functioning and the greatest degree of comfort, safety, and overall well-being attainable for the resident.
1. Review of the facility's policy, Preventive Skin Care, not dated, revealed the facility provided preventive skin care through careful washing, rinsing, and drying to keep residents clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure sores. Heels would be up or specialty ordered therapeutic boots might be used to protect heels on those residents identified to be high risk.
Review of the clinical record for Resident #22 revealed the facility re-admitted the resident on 01/12/19, with diagnoses of Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with Acute Lower Respiratory Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3), Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, and Acute/Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure.
Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 had no pressure ulcers and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. In addition, the facility determined the resident had no arterial or venous ulcers. The facility provided a pressure-reducing device for the chair and bed.
Review of the Care Plan for Resident #22, initiated 11/25/18, revealed the resident was at increased risk for alteration in skin integrity related to incontinence of bladder, incontinence of bowel, impaired mobility, status left heel arterial. Interventions included a heel boot to left heel, as resident would comply, dated 03/27/19. The care plan was revised during surveyor observations, on 05/08/19; with a notation that the resident was non-compliant with heel boots; however, there were no interventions for staff on what to do when the resident was non-compliant.
Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care plan, not dated, for Resident #22, revealed special instructions included moon boots.
Review of a Weekly Skin Check for Resident #22, dated 01/28/19, revealed no skin issues were noted. Review of a Weekly Skin Check, dated 02/04/19, revealed the resident had new loss of skin integrity and the facility was following resident's current skin care interventions.
Review of a Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet revealed Resident #22 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to his/her left heel that originated on 02/04/19, and measured 1.9 centimeters (cm) length by 2.5 cm width. Treatments included elevate on heel boots.
Review of Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care physician, dated 03/25/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2.4 cm by 3 cm. The physician documented the wound was deteriorating. The physician revealed no heel lift boot was in place, and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increased area. The physician documented he personally applied the heel lift boot after his evaluation, orders were re-provided for use of the heel boot and discussed with the nursing staff.
Review of Resident #22's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 05/01/19 to 05/31/19, revealed an order to place heel lift boot to left foot at all times except ambulation.
Observation, on 05/07/19 at 11:45 AM and 12:30 PM, revealed Resident #22 in bed with no boots to his/her feet and the resident's heels laid on the mattress. Heel boots laid on the floor near the foot of the bed.
Observation, on 05/09/19 at 10:47 AM, revealed Resident #22 in bed with no boots on the resident and his/her feet on the mattress.
Observation, on 05/10/19 at 8:20 AM and 9:00 AM, revealed Resident #22 in bed and his/her bilateral boots were next to the sink. The resident's feet laid on the mattress.
Interview with CNA #14, on 05/10/19 at 10:23 AM, revealed she was Resident #22's CNA for today (05/10/19). She stated she had not seen the heel boots on Resident #22, and was not sure when the resident needed to wear the boots. After breakfast (at approximately 8:00 AM) she stated the resident did not have the heel lift boots on, and she did not put them on him/her but she knew Resident #22 wore them. She stated the CNAs received a printout of resident needs for each shift but she did not carry the printout, as she knew what the residents needed. She did not ask the nurse any information regarding the moon boots, also known as the heel lift boots. She stated the purpose of the boots were to protect the resident's heels from rubbing on the bed.
Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, on 05/10/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed she provided some supervision of the CNAs and she tried to make sure each resident was provided the needed care. She stated the purpose of the lift heel boots were to help give support to Resident #22's heels and prevent further skin breakdown. She stated she was not aware the boots were not put on Resident #22 this morning and remained off. She stated it was important to utilize the boots, and to protect the heels, as the boots were to keep the heels lifted off the bed.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 11:07 AM, revealed she was not aware the resident did not have his/her heel boots on. She stated the resident was non-compliant at times and was care planned for that; however, the resident's non-compliance was not added to the care plan until 05/08/19, during the survey. The DON revealed she developed pocket sheets for the CNAs so they would know the care plan needs of each resident and staff should follow resident care plans.
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to prevent the...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer and promote healing for one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #22. The facility re-admitted Resident #22 on 01/12/19 with no pressure ulcers and assessed the resident to be at risk for skin breakdown. On 02/04/19, the resident developed a pressure ulcer to the left heel and the facility put treatments in place, which included elevating the heel with a heel lift boot. However, multiple observations during survey revealed the resident in bed without the heel boot on and his/her heels in contact with the mattress. In addition, review of a physician Wound Evaluation, dated 03/25/19, revealed the resident did not have the heel boot in place and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increase in the area.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Preventive Skin Care, not dated, revealed the facility provided preventive skin care through careful washing, rinsing, and drying to keep residents clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure sores. Heels would be up or specialty ordered therapeutic boots might be used to protect heels on those residents identified to be high risk.
Review of the clinical record for Resident #22 revealed the facility re-admitted the resident on 01/12/19, with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with Acute Lower Respiratory Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3), Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances, and Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure.
Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 had no unhealed pressure ulcers and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. In addition, the facility determined the resident had no arterial or venous ulcers. The facility provided a pressure-reducing device for the chair and bed.
Review of Physician Orders for Resident #22, dated February 2019, March 2019, April 2019, and May 2019, revealed orders for a pressure relief mattress, pressure relief cushion to the chair when up for comfort and skin preventative measures, and heel lift boot to left heel except when ambulating, as resident would comply.
Review of the Care Plan for Resident #22, initiated 11/25/18, revealed the resident was at increased risk for alteration in skin integrity related to incontinence of bladder and bowel, impaired mobility, and status left heel arterial. Interventions included heel boot to left heel, as resident would comply, dated 03/27/19.
Review of Resident #22's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 05/01/19 to 05/31/19, revealed to place heel lift boot to left foot at all times except ambulation.
Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care plan, not dated, for Resident #22, revealed special instructions included moon boots.
Review of a Weekly Skin Check for Resident #22, dated 01/28/19, revealed no skin issues were noted. Review of the Weekly Skin Check, dated 02/04/19, revealed the resident had new loss of skin integrity and the facility was following resident's current skin care interventions.
Review of a Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet revealed Resident #22 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to his/her left heel that originated on 02/04/19, and measured 1.9 centimeters (cm) length by 2.5 cm width, and light serous exudate with 75-100% slough covering the wound bed. Treatments included cleansing with normal saline, apply Iodosorb to the wound bed, cover with an ABD (abdominal) pad, secure with Kerlix, elevate on heel boots, and no shoes-nonskid socks only.
Review of the Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care Physician, dated 03/11/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2.5 cm by 2.6 cm. The physician documented the wound was an unstageable pressure injury with obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss. The wound margins were well defined with necrotic (dead) tissue.
Review of the Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care physician, dated 03/18/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2 cm by 2.5 cm.
Review of the Resident #22's Wound Assessment by the wound care physician, dated 03/25/19, revealed the left heel wound measured 2.4 cm by 3 cm. The physician documented the wound was deteriorating. The physician revealed no heel lift boot was in place, and the combination of comorbidities and lack of off-loading led to an increased area. The physician documented he personally applied the heel lift boot after his evaluation, orders were re-provided for use of the heel boot and discussed with nursing staff.
Review of the facility's Weekly Wound Evaluation for Resident #22, dated 04/08/19, revealed left heel pressure ulcer was unstageable and measured 2 cm by 2.3 cm by 0 cm depth. Treatments included cleansing with normal saline, apply Iodosorb to the wound bed, cover with an ABD pad, and secure with Kerlix. Heel boots, no shoes, nonskid socks only.
Review of the facility's Weekly Wound Evaluation, dated 05/06/19, revealed the left heel pressure ulcer was unstageable and measured 1.5 cm by 2.2 cm by 0 cm depth. Treatments included wearing heel boot at all times when in bed.
Observation of Resident #22, on 05/07/19 at 11:45 AM and 12:30 PM, revealed the resident in bed with no boots to his/her feet and the resident's heels were not off-loaded, as they laid on the mattress. Two (2) boots laid on the floor near the foot of his/her bed.
Observation of Resident #22, on 05/09/19 at 10:47 AM, revealed the resident in bed with no boots on the resident and his/her feet laid on the mattress.
Observation of Resident #22, on 05/10/19 at 8:20 AM and 9:00 AM, revealed the resident in bed and his/her bilateral boots were next to the sink in the resident's room. The resident's feet laid on the mattress.
Interview with CNA #14, on 05/10/19 at 10:23 AM, revealed the CNAs had a printout of what the residents' needs were for each shift but she did not carry one because she knew the residents. She stated Resident #22 turned himself/herself and did not require any cues, or reminders, but was confused at times. She stated she had not seen boots on Resident #22 and was not sure when the resident needed to wear the boots. CNA #14 revealed Resident #22 did not have the heel lift boots on this morning and she did not put them on him/her. She stated the purpose of the boots was to protect the resident's heels from rubbing on the bed.
Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, on 05/10/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed she ensured the CNAs turned the residents and got the residents up when she made rounds. She stated the CNAs made rounds about every two (2) hours. RN #1 stated the purpose of heel boots was to keep Resident #22's heels off the bed to prevent further breakdown; however, she stated she was not aware the boots were not on Resident #22 this morning and remained off the resident. Per interview, Resident #22 had vascular disease problems and it was important to utilize the boots to protect the heels.
Review of the Arterial Bilateral Lower Extremity, Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) Study, for Resident #22, date of service 02/11/19, revealed no evidence of significant lower extremity arterial stenotic or occlusive disease.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 11:07 AM, revealed not all pressure ulcers could be prevented. She stated Resident #22 had bouts of non-compliance, which was care planned; however, further review of the care plan revealed the resident's non-compliance was added to the plan 05/08/19, during the survey.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain re...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #70. Observation revealed staff stood over Resident #70 while assisting the resident with his/her lunch meal.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 11/28/16, revealed the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident.
Review of the facility's policy, Dignity, undated, revealed staff would not stand to feed a resident (unless there was no other option and this was documented and care planned) such as at the bedside. Residents were to have all aspects of their dignity maintained by staff regardless of the resident's cognitive level or ability to realize or understand what was being said or done by others.
Review of Resident # 70's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/08/19, with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the Right Dominant Side, Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, and Major Depressive Disorder.
Review of Resident 70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility's staff assessment for mental status revealed the resident was severely impaired. The facility assessed the resident required extensive assistance of one (1) staff for eating.
Observation of Resident #70 during lunch, on 05/07/19 at 12:35 PM, revealed the resident was in bed and the resident's lunch meal tray was on the over the bed table. The Speech Therapist was standing at the bedside and provided multiple bites of food while standing at the head of the bed. The Speech Therapist left the room and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 entered.
Interview with the Speech Therapist, on 05/07/19 at 12:40 PM, revealed she conducted a swallow trial to see if she could advance Resident #70's diet. She stated she was standing so she could watch the resident swallow; however, she could have sat during the swallowing test. She stated it was not of importance if she stood or sat for the swallow test.
Continued observation of Resident #70, on 05/07/19 at 12:44 PM, revealed CNA #7 stood near head of bed while she continued feeding the resident his/her lunch.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 2:09 PM, revealed staff was to be seated next to the resident when assisting with meals. The DON stated Resident #70 had a diagnosis of Dysphagia and needed close watch; however, staff would be able to watch the resident while seated next to the resident. She stated staff standing over a resident during a meal was not providing an environment that promoted dignity.
Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:06 PM, revealed staff was to sit with the resident during the meal service, and not stand over the resident.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #26. Review of a Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #26 was coded for taking anti-coagulant medication; however, review of the resident's physician orders for February 2019 and March 2019 revealed the resident was not prescribed an anti-coagulant.
The findings include:
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 4:40 PM, revealed the RAI User's Manual was used for reference when completing MDS assessments.
Review of the RAI 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.16, October 2018, Section N0401-Medications Received, revealed the intent of the items in this section was to record the number of days, during the last seven (7) days, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Staff was to review the resident's medical record for documentation of medications received by the resident during the seven (7) day look-back period. For Section N0410E-Anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin), staff was to record the number of days an anticoagulant medication was received by the resident at any time during the seven (7) day look-back period. Include any of these medications given to the resident by any route (e.g., PO, IM, or IV) in any setting (e.g., at the nursing home, in a hospital emergency room) while a resident of the nursing home. Code the medication even if it was given only once during the look-back period.
Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #26 on 10/20/15, with diagnoses to include Fracture of the Right Femur, Chronic Stage 4 Kidney Disease, Dementia, and History of Falls.
Review of the Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #26 was administered an anticoagulant medication for seven (7) days during the seven (7) day look back period, according to Section N0410E.
However, review of Resident #26's Physician Order Sheets, dated 02/01/19 to 02/28/19 and 03/01/19 to 03/31/19, revealed no physician order for an anticoagulant medication.
Interview with MDS Coordinator #1, on 05/09/19 at 1:45 PM, revealed she reviewed Resident #26's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], and stated an anticoagulant was coded for seven (7) days for the look back period. The Coordinator stated at the time she completed the MDS, the resident received Plavix and she believed Plavix to be an anticoagulant, but after she received training last month, she knew Plavix was not an anticoagulant, but an antiplatelet. The MDS Coordinator stated the resident would have been billed incorrectly.
Interview with MDS Coordinator #2, on 05/09/19 at 3:17 PM, revealed Resident #26's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], was coded incorrectly for anticoagulants. She stated Plavix was coded as an anticoagulant but Plavix was not an anticoagulant.
Interview with the DON, on 05/09/19 at 2:41 PM, revealed Resident #26 should not have been coded for anticoagulants on the Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], because the resident was not on an anticoagulant. The DON further revealed there was no negative outcome for the resident, but the billing was inaccurate.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-four (44) r...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-four (44) residents, Resident #54, received the necessary restorative services to prevent a decline in mobility.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's Resident Rights, revised November 2016, revealed the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents.
Review of the facility's Nursing Rehabilitation/Restorative Program Booklet revealed the goal of a successful walking program was to improve or maintain the resident's ability to ambulate, and provide a structured program to facilitate safety and promote independence.
Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #54 on 09/17/15, with diagnoses to include Primary Osteoarthritis, Age-related Osteoporosis, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was interviewable. The resident used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility and required extensive assistance of one (1) staff to walk in his/her room and corridor. Per the MDS, the resident received restorative nursing for walking and dressing and/or grooming.
Observation, on 05/07/19 at 10:18 AM, revealed Resident #54 sitting up in bed. Interview with the resident during the observation revealed he/she was restarting therapy services. The resident stated the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were supposed to walk him/her daily; however, he/she had only walked once in the past four (4) weeks.
Review of a Physical Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #54 was able to ambulate 350 feet using a walker with stand-by assistance and had reached maximum functional potential.
Review of a Physician Order, dated May 2019, revealed Resident #54 could participate in the restorative nursing program.
Review of a Restorative Program Note, dated 04/03/19, revealed the resident participated in the Restorative Ambulation Program. The note stated the resident was to ambulate with the assistance of a CNA/Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) for 15 minutes/day a minimum of 6 days/week to maintain the ability to ambulate.
Review of a Physician Progress Note, dated 04/05/19, revealed a plan to ensure Resident #54 ambulated more with restorative or physical therapy.
Review of a Psychotherapy Progress Note, dated 04/23/19, revealed Resident #54 was frustrated and upset the past couple of weeks because no one had taken him/her for a therapy walk.
Interview with CNA #1, on 05/09/19 at 11:24 AM, revealed the facility did not have a Restorative Program and the CNAs were responsible for ambulating their assigned residents. She stated Resident #54 was supposed to be walked daily and stated it was important to walk residents to maintain function.
Interview with CNA #6, on 05/10/19 at 9:47 AM, revealed she thought residents were supposed to be ambulated 15 minutes a day as part of restorative care. She stated the CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, she never had enough time to ambulate her assigned residents. CNA #6 revealed residents could lose their ability to walk or get pressure ulcers if they were not ambulated daily. Further interview with CNA #6 revealed Resident #54 told her that he/she was not being walked and was afraid of losing strength. The CNA thought she reported the concern to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON).
Interview with CNA #5, on 05/10/19 at 10:42 AM, revealed Resident #54 was a set-up assist because she liked her independence. She stated residents should have the option to exercise because it made them feel good. The CNA revealed it was important to ambulate residents to maintain leg function.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed he monitored CNAs by observing care throughout the shift. According to LPN #1, all the residents had reported once or twice that they were not ambulated when they were short a CNA. The LPN revealed he was aware of Resident #54's concern and stated he reported the issue to the ADON; however, he could not recall if the issue was addressed. LPN #1 stated there was a potential for the resident to have loss of function if he/she was not ambulated according to the program orders.
Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed she monitored CNAs by observing care during medication pass, meals, and throughout the shift. She stated it was important to ambulate residents to ensure they did not lose their strength and ability to ambulate. According to the LPN, the CNAs were responsible for ambulating residents; however, it could be overwhelming because they had a lot to do.
Interview with Physical Therapist (PT) #1, on 05/09/19 at 10:55 AM, revealed Resident #54 was in the Restorative Therapy (RT) program for ambulation; however, the program was pretty limited because of staff turnover. The PT stated she evaluated the resident on 05/08/19 and stated the resident ambulated 50 feet using a walker with staff contact, guard assistance. According to the PT, therapy services were resumed related to the resident's decline in mobility.
Interview with the Restorative Program Manager/MDS Nurse #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:08 PM, revealed the CNAs were responsible for restorative care once the Restorative Program was dissolved. She stated the CNAs were educated regarding the additional restorative tasks approximately one (1) week after the program change. The Program Manager further revealed she reminded the CNAs and reviewed documentation quarterly to ensure the CNAs completed restorative care; however, she had not reviewed CNA documentation since the change. According to the Program Manager, no one monitored to ensure residents were ambulated in her absence.
Interview with the ADON, on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed she reviewed documentation daily to monitor restorative care and ensured the CNAs completed tasks. She further revealed the MDS Nurse reported on CNA documentation during the daily morning meeting and the numbers were really good. The ADON stated she was not aware of any staff concerns related to Resident #54.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed the Ombudsman made her aware of resident concerns with restorative care. The DON stated she had no concerns with the CNAs ability to complete care; however, the facility needed to educate staff and restructure the program.
Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:04 PM, revealed the CNAs were responsible for restorative tasks during their daily routine. He stated he was aware of concerns and the facility needed to continue to in-service staff to make the adjustment.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accidents and hazards for two (2) of forty-four (44) residents, Residents #23 and #95. Resident #23 was at risk for falls and required assistance to transfer and for locomotion. Observation revealed Staff did not place Resident #23's call light within the resident's reach in order for the resident to ask for staff assistance if needed. In addition, Resident #95's bed controller had exposed wiring on the cord.
The findings include:
1. Review of the facility's policy, Call Lights-Resident, undated, revealed it was the facility's intent to respond promptly to resident call lights to provide assistance. Staff was to be sure to position the call light conveniently for the residents' use when staff provided care for residents. The policy additionally noted staff was to ensure all call lights were placed within the residents' reach at all times.
Review of Resident #23's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/12/19, with diagnoses of Generalized Muscle weakness, Unspecified Macular Degeneration, Dementia, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed Resident #23 required extensive assistance for transfers and locomotion. The facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) out of fifteen (15) and determined the resident was not interviewable.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan, dated 02/12/19, revealed the resident was at risk for falls with a goal to maintain a safe environment for the resident. Interventions included all staff was to ensure the resident's call light was within reach.
Observation of Resident #23, on 05/08/19 at 3:03 PM, revealed the resident was in a wheelchair in his/her room and the call light was on the resident's bed, out of reach of the resident. Further observation revealed Resident #23 leaned over the side of the wheelchair toward bed and was unable to reach the call light and was unable to unlock the wheelchair to move closer to the call light.
Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #11, on 05/08/19 at 3:07 PM, revealed if Resident #23's call light was not in reach, the resident would not be able to use the light to request help.
Interview with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1, on 05/08/19 at 3:12 PM, revealed Resident #23 required staff assistance for transfers, as he/she had attempted to transfer himself/herself and was not able to do it safely. He stated he had been in the Resident #23's room and assisted the resident with getting a drink. When he left the resident, he stated he left the call light on the bed out of Resident #23's reach.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7, on 05/10/19 at 1:28 PM, revealed on 05/08/19, she observed Resident #23 in a wheelchair in his/her room with the call light out of the resident's reach. LPN #7 stated call lights should be in reach for all residents as a safety measure, and she revealed Resident #23 fell on [DATE] and the resident might have attempted an unsafe transfer and fallen if the call light was not in reach.
Interview with LPN #8, on 05/10/19 at 2:35 PM, revealed on 05/08/19, Resident #23 could not reach his/her call light from where he/she was positioned in a wheelchair in the room. The LPN stated the call light should have been within the resident's reach. She stated if the resident had needed something or wanted to go to the toilet or get some water, he/she might have tried to get up and could have fallen. In addition, the LPN stated the resident could have been in distress medically and needed help and should have had the call light in reach to get help from staff.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 10:22 AM, revealed call lights should be within reach of residents to ensure residents could get staff attention if they needed help, for safety. The DON stated without a call light, a resident might have attempted to do something for himself/herself and if the resident was unsafe with transfers, the resident could have fallen.
Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 5/11/19 at 10:50 AM, revealed call lights should be in reach of residents and staff should ensure they placed call lights within residents' reach.
2. The facility did not provide a policy specific to equipment maintenance.
Observation and interview with Resident #95, on 05/07/19 at 2:39 PM, revealed the hand-held controller to the bed did not function properly. The controller had exposed wires in two (2) separate places in addition to electrical tape.
Observation of Resident #95, on 05/08/19 at 8:53 AM, revealed the resident in the bed with the hand-held bed controller attached to a left side rail. The bed controller had approximately two (2) inches of intact cord extending from the controller, then a quarter inch of exposed wiring, followed by approximately an inch and a half of black tape. This was followed by approximately two (2) inches of intact cord and then another quarter inch of exposed wiring, followed by black tape, and finally intact cord from that point on.
Interview with Resident #95, on 05/09/19 at 11:28 AM, revealed a CNA noticed the exposed wires and placed the black tape on the hand-held bed controller a couple months ago. The resident revealed the CNA stated they would look for a replacement controller, but did not return with one, nor had any other staff mentioned replacing the controller. Resident #95 stated the exposed wires was concerning for possible electrocution.
Interview with CNA #2, on 05/09/19 at 11:52 AM, revealed she used the controls located on the footboard of the bed and not the hand-held bed controller. CNA #2 stated she informed the maintenance supervisor multiple times of issues with Resident #95's bed controller not working properly. In addition, CNA #2 believed the hand-held controller was not safe for resident use because of the exposed wiring, which might shock or electrocute the resident. CNA #2 stated staff recorded maintenance concerns in a maintenance log, or informed maintenance staff directly.
Interview with CNA #3, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed he became aware of issues with Resident #95's hand-held bed controller approximately three (3) months ago and informed both maintenance staff and a nurse although CNA #3 could not specify the names of the staff members. CNA #3 stated the hand-held bed controller was not safe for use as it might electrocute a person since it was plugged into an electrical outlet in the wall.
Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) # 1, on 05/10/19 at 9:18 AM, revealed she became aware of the hand-held bed controller recently and stated a hand-held bed controller with exposed wires was not safe and should be removed from use. RN #1 stated staff recorded faulty equipment in a maintenance log kept at the nurses' station but could not recall if she recorded the issue.
Review of the Maintenance Request Log, dated 04/21/19 through 05/10/19, revealed no listing for Resident #95 or his/her room number.
Interview with the Maintenance Director, on 05/10/19 at 8:34 AM, revealed he recently became aware of concerns with the hand-held bed controller for Resident #95's bed. The Maintenance Director stated the hand-held controller was not safe for use with the exposed wiring, and revealed a resident might receive a shock from using the controller. The Maintenance Director stated staff recorded items for maintenance to address in a maintenance log, which he reviewed twice daily. In addition, staff notified him in person of items that needed immediate repair.
Interview with the DON, on 05/10/19 at 9:04 AM, revealed staff recorded items for repair in a maintenance log, which the maintenance staff checked throughout the day. The DON stated the hand-held bed controller was not safe for use due to the exposed wires.
Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/10/19 at 9:27 AM, revealed staff documented faulty equipment in the maintenance log when they became aware of an issue. The Interim Administrator stated the hand-held bed controller should be replaced, as it was a safety issue.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-four (44) residents was free from unnecessary medication, Resident #97.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Psychotropic Drugs Usage, undated, revealed factors that might contribute to or were responsible for changes in a resident's behavior would be identified by the facility. When clinically appropriate, the facility staff would initiate non-medication approaches to assist in the treatment or alteration of the resident's behavior. The policy revealed residents receiving an antipsychotic medication for organic brain disorders (referred to as Dementia) would be observed for episodes of the behavioral symptoms being treated and/or manifestation of the disordered thought process; adverse reactions and side effects; and appropriateness of drug selection and dosage.
Review of the facility's policy, Behavioral Tracking, undated, revealed the purpose of the policy was to document facts in the clinical record, including time, antecedents, actual behavior, and consequences or outcome of resident behaviors. The policy revealed when resident behaviors occurred, the staff nurse or psychosocial staff would document in the resident's medical record episodic notes regarding the behavior.
Review of the facility's policy, Psychotropic Medication: Behavior Management Meetings, undated, revealed the facility would investigate behaviors in an effort to determine the root cause of the behavior. In so doing, it might become evident that a non-pharmacological intervention would be effective in managing or even eliminating the behavior without the use of psychoactive medications.
Observation, on 05/07/19 at 3:18 PM, revealed Resident #97 in bed with his/her eyes closed.
Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #97 on 07/25/17 with diagnoses to include Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #97 exhibited no behaviors and receive antipsychotic medication.
Review of Resident #97's Physician Order, dated 02/15/19, revealed to increase Risperidone (Risperdal-antipsychotic medicine) to 1 milligram (mg) twice a day for behaviors.
Review of Nursing Progress Notes for Resident #97 revealed no new or worsening behaviors.
Review of Resident #97's Medication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed no monitoring for potential side effects of the Risperdal.
Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6, on 05/10/19 at 9:47 AM, revealed CNAs were responsible for reporting resident behaviors to the assigned nurse. CNA #6 stated behaviors could be the result of an unmet need and interventions would include repositioning and/or toileting the resident.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 05/09/19 at 2:59 PM, revealed nurses were responsible for documenting any resident behaviors to justify the need for psychotropic medication. LPN #1 stated he did not know the side effects of Risperdal and was not sure if Extrapyramidal Symptoms (side effects, such as involuntary body movements, from antipsychotic drug use) were associated with its use. According to LPN #1, it was important to monitor for potential side effects of psychotropic medication to ensure the safety of the resident.
Interview with LPN #5, on 05/10/19 at 11:32 AM, revealed it was important to document behaviors to provide rationale for increasing the dosage of Risperdal. She stated non-pharmacological interventions should be attempted, such as offering a snack or requesting family support, before increasing a psychotropic medication.
Interview with the Social Services Director (SSD), on 05/10/19 at 2:26 PM, revealed the purpose of monitoring behaviors and psychotropic medications was to ensure medication was needed and/or effective. The SSD stated the facility implemented a new process for monitoring psychotropic medication; however, not all staff was trained on the process.
Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 05/10/19 at 1:35 PM, revealed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) reviewed new orders and progress notes to monitor changes in residents' condition or behaviors. She stated the facility implemented a new behavior tracking system; however, she was not trained on the new process. According to the ADON, the system for monitoring behaviors and psychoactive medication was broken and there was no system in place to ensure nurses assessed residents daily for potential side effects of the medication. She revealed the purpose of monitoring was to identify behaviors and ensure interventions were in place to manage the behaviors. The ADON stated supporting documentation was required to ensure psychoactive medication was necessary.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed nurses were responsible for documenting resident behaviors and interventions to support the use or increase of psychoactive medication. She revealed medication was not a primary intervention to manage behaviors. According to the DON, staff needed to be educated and a tool implemented to monitor for potential side effects of psychoactive medication.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications in one (1) of two (2) medication rooms. Observatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications in one (1) of two (2) medication rooms. Observation revealed unlicensed personnel in the North Hall medication room unsupervised. In addition, staff stored personal items, such as purses, in the medication room.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Medication Storage in the Facility, not dated, revealed medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. The medication supply was accessible only to license nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications.
Observation, on 05/09/19 at 12:25 PM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 unlocked the North Medication Room for Dietary Staff #1 to enter to restock the refrigerator in the medication room. The nurse left the medication room and allowed the dietary staff to remain unattended in the medication room. In addition, a purse was stored in the medication room.
Interview with LPN #2, on 05/09/19 at 12:26 PM, revealed the nurses typically let the dietary staff into the medication room to restock the refrigerator and it was not their routine to stay with dietary staff while they were in the room.
Observation of the North Medication Room, on 05/09/19 at 12:28 PM, revealed the medication refrigerator contained multiple bottles of insulin.
Interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 05/10/19 at 9:50 AM, revealed she was responsible for restocking the refrigerators. She stated the nurses unlocked the medication room doors and let dietary staff in to access the refrigerators, located in the North and South medication rooms. She stated she assumed the doors were kept locked because they were medication rooms. She stated she did not have any type of license that allowed her to remain in the medication room unsupervised.
Interview with Dietary Staff #2, on 05/09/19 at 3:08 PM, revealed dietary staff was responsible for restocking the refrigerators that were located in the medication rooms. Dietary staff obtained the key from the nurse because the nurse did not have time to stay in the medication room.
Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/10/19 at 11:07 AM and 05/11/19 at 2:40 PM, revealed unlicensed staff was not to be left in the medication rooms unsupervised in order to limit the access to medications, and limit opportunities for diversion of medication. She stated only licensed staff was allowed in the room unsupervised. In addition, she stated no personal items, such as bags or purses, were to be left in the medication rooms.
Interview with the Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:04 PM, revealed unlicensed staff, such as dietary staff, was not allowed to be left in the medication rooms unsupervised. He stated unsupervised, unauthorized personnel in the medication room provided an opportunity for diversion of medication. In addition, the medication room was not identified as an area for the storage of staff's personal items, such as bags and purses.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Further review of the TB Control Plan policy revealed the facility assessed employees for TB infection or disease prior to be...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Further review of the TB Control Plan policy revealed the facility assessed employees for TB infection or disease prior to beginning employment and annually. The employee's medical file documented the date the employee received testing, the site of the testing and documentation of personnel administering and reading the test, as well as information regarding the solution used for testing.
Review of seven (7) personnel records revealed six (6) had no evidence the facility administered Tuberculosis Skin Tests (TST) or completed a Tuberculosis Risk Assessment ([NAME]) for the staff members.
Interview with the Staffing Coordinator, on 05/11/19 at 11:05 AM, revealed she did not know which staff person performed TST for staff.
Interview with the DON, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed the Staff Development Coordinator was responsible for conducting TSTs on employees and insuring the testing and results were current. The DON stated TB screenings were completed to prevent potential exposure to TB.
Interview with the Interim Administrator, on 05/11/19 at 3:04 PM, revealed he became aware of the lack of TB screenings during the survey. The Administrator stated TB screening was part of the infection control process and failure to conduct this screening increased the risk for unidentified TB.
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program related to identification of communicable diseases for residents and staff. Record reviews revealed the facility did not complete Tuberculosis Risk Assessments for five (5) of forty-four (44) residents, Residents #26, #50, #56, #61, and #90. In addition, review of personnel records revealed the facility did not administer Tuberculosis Skin Test (TST), nor complete Tuberculosis Risk Assessments, for six (6) staff members.
The findings include:
1. Review of the facility's policy, Tuberculosis (TB) Control Plan, undated, revealed the facility provided a TB Control Plan to meet the Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations and per local/state requirements. Additionally, the facility conducted routine Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) testing (TB testing).
Review of the clinical record for Resident #26 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/15. The facility administered an annual TB skin test (TST) on 12/21/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual Tuberculosis Risk Assessment ([NAME]) after requested by the Surveyor.
Review of the clinical record for Resident #50 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/28/15. The facility administered an annual TST on 09/02/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor.
Review of the clinical record for Resident #56 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/14. The facility administered an annual TST on 02/07/19; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor.
Review of the clinical record for Resident #61 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/03/17. The facility administered an annual TST on 12/05/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor.
Review of the clinical record for Resident #90 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/04/15. The facility administered an annual TST on 09/30/18; however, the facility completed and provided the annual [NAME] after requested by the Surveyor.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 05/11/19 at 9:41 AM, revealed the nurses on night shift administered residents' TSTs when they were due and completed the TRAs at the same time.
Interview with LPN #6, on 05/11/19 at 9:44 AM, revealed the nurses on the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift administered the TSTs and completed the TRAs.
Interview with Payroll/Human Resources, on 05/11/19 at 10:42 AM, revealed the facility conducted TB skin tests for the safety of the residents and everyone in the building.
Interview with the Director of Nursing, on 05/11/19 at 2:09 PM, revealed she could not locate the assessments and completed 100% of the TRAs on 05/08/19. She stated it was important to have TSTs and TRAs completed to prevent an outbreak of TB.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate staffing information on a daily basis.
The findings include:
The facility did not provide a policy related...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate staffing information on a daily basis.
The findings include:
The facility did not provide a policy related to the posting of staffing hours.
Review of the facility's Assignment Schedule, dated 04/12/19, revealed three (3) Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) worked on first shift, as one (1) LPN called in. However, review of the facility's staffing form, dated 04/12/19, revealed four (4) LPNs worked on first shift, as the form did not reflect the call in. In addition, eight (8) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were on the Assignment Schedule but nine (9) were listed on the staffing form.
Review of the facility's Assignment Schedule, dated 04/13/19, revealed no Registered Nurses (RN) worked on first shift; however, review of the staffing form, dated 04/13/19, revealed one (1) RN worked on first shift for sixteen (16) hours. For second shift, there were eight (8) CNAs on the Assignment Schedule and seven (7) listed on the staffing form. In addition, for third shift, the Assignment Schedule did not reflect a Certified Medication Technician (CMT) worked; however, the staffing form listed one (1) CMT worked seven point five (7.5) hours.
Review of the facility's Assignment Schedule, dated 04/24/19, revealed three (3) LPNs worked on first shift; however, review of the staffing form, dated 04/24/19, revealed four (4) LPNs worked. On second shift, the Assignment Schedule listed eight (8) CNAs worked but the staffing form listed nine (9) CNAs worked. In addition, for third shift, the Schedule reflected one (1) CMT worked but the staffing form listed no CMT worked on third shift.
Interview with the Staffing Coordinator, on 05/11/19 at 11:05 AM, revealed she completed the staffing forms in the mornings. She stated the purpose of the form was to keep up with staffing hours and ensure staffing was sufficient for each shift. Upon review of the staffing forms, she stated the 04/13/19 form included one (1) RN for sixteen (16) hours; however, there was no RN coverage on day shift. The Coordinator stated the staffing forms were not updated with schedule changes/updates. She further stated she posted the staffing forms on Friday for Saturday and Sunday because she did not know who was supposed to post the hours for the weekends, as she did not work weekends. She stated she had one day of training before the previous coordinator left and realized she had been doing the forms incorrectly regarding the hours. She had been going back and changing the old forms to correct them. She revealed of the last thirty (30) days of forms requested, she completed maybe ten (10) of the forms today (05/11/19).
Interview with the Director of Nursing, on 05/11/19 at 2:07 PM, revealed the Staffing Coordinator and the current Administrator dealt with staffing.