BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation in Shreveport, Louisiana has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #62 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the top half of all nursing homes in the state, and #8 out of 22 in Caddo County, indicating that only seven local options are better. The facility’s performance has been stable, with 18 concerns reported in both 2024 and 2025, highlighting some ongoing issues. Staffing is a notable weakness with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 48%, which is typical for the state. However, they have not incurred any fines, which is a positive aspect, and their RN coverage is average, suggesting that while they may not excel, they have sufficient nursing staff to catch potential problems. Specific incidents of concern include a failure to properly manage the care of residents with diabetes and insufficient nutritional care for another resident, which raises questions about the overall quality of care provided. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses when considering this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Louisiana
- #62/264
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Louisiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 8 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Above Louisiana average (2.4)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0624
(Tag F0624)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation for 1(#70) of 1(#70) resident reviewed to ensure safe and orderly transfer or...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques were practiced to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 (#17) of 1 (#17) residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 (#46, #223) of 20 sampled residents recei...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide nutritional and hydration care and services consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 (#69) of 4 (#9, #46, #6...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sample residents. The facility failed to ensure resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care had been developed for 4 (#...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for 1 (#15) out of 6 (#15, #20, #30, #34, #40, #69) sampled residents reviewed for un...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practice...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicab...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicab...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day for 1 of 14 days reviewed for RN staffing hours. This deficien...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 1(#64) of 3(#16, #64, #119) residents investigated for ADLs (activities of daily living) received assistance with inco...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with a urinary catheter received appr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0729
(Tag F0729)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure State Registry verifications were completed prior to hire for 4 [S8 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), S9 CNA, S10 CNA, S11 Therapy]...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure food was served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 62 residents served a meal tray from the ki...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff practices were consistent with current infection control principles to prevent infection and cross contaminatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Louisiana facilities.
- • 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita Staffed?
CMS rates BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA during 2023 to 2025. These included: 18 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita?
BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SHREVEPORT, Louisiana.
How Does Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita Stick Around?
BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita Ever Fined?
BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Booker T.Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilita on Any Federal Watch List?
BOOKER T.WASHINGTON SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITA is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.