CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER

1536 CLAIBORNE AVE., SHREVEPORT, LA 71103 (318) 631-3426
For profit - Corporation 81 Beds NEXION HEALTH Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#184 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Claiborne Healthcare Center has received an F Trust Grade, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall performance. The facility ranks #184 out of 264 in Louisiana and #16 out of 22 in Caddo County, placing it in the bottom half of all facilities in the state and county. While the staffing turnover rate is impressively low at 0%, the situation is concerning with $112,947 in fines, which is higher than 88% of Louisiana facilities. Recent inspections revealed critical issues, including staff not following proper procedures for transporting residents, leading to serious safety risks, including a resident's wheelchair flipping over during a lift. Overall, while staffing stability is a positive aspect, the facility has serious deficiencies that families should consider carefully.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#184/264
Bottom 31%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
11 → 11 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
$112,947 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 9 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
42 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 11 issues
2025: 11 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Federal Fines: $112,947

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: NEXION HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 42 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Apr 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #3) residents reviewed with incidents in the past 4 months. An incident report was not completed for a verbal abuse incident involving Resident #1. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy for Resident and Visitor Accident Report dated as reviewed June 2024 revealed in part: A. Procedure Reporting of Resident Incidents and Visitor Accidents: An Incident Report must be completed by the person reporting the incident or the supervisor on the shift that the incident occurred. B. Resident Incident/Accidents: 1. Licensed nurse must: e. Notify the physician family, legal representative. 5. Document in the medical record -Date and Time of Incident -Nature of injury -Circumstances surrounding the incident (FACTS ONLY) -Resident's account of the incident -Names of witnesses -Time that the physician and family were notified -Physician orders received -Condition of resident (VS, Orthostatic BPs (Blood Pressures), mental status, physical status, etc. [et cetera/and other things]) -Disposition of resident (example: transferred to hospital, etc.) -Action taken to prevent a re-occurrence -Follow up documentation regarding the resident's treatment and condition -Other pertinent data Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/15/2024 with a re-admission [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included but not limited to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Schizoaffective disorder-Bipolar type, Anxiety disorder, and Major Depressive disorder. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #1's progress notes for March 2025 failed to reveal documentation of a verbal abuse incident on 03/11/2025. Review of the facility's Incidents by Incident Type report for the date range 11/01/2024 to 03/31/2025 failed to reveal an incident on 03/11/2025. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 3:58 p.m. S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported she notified S1 Administrator of the verbal abuse incident involving Resident #1 on 03/11/2025 and had not completed an incident report regarding the incident. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 4:20 p.m. S1 Administrator confirmed S3 LPN notified her of the verbal abuse incident regarding Resident #1 on 03/11/2025. S1 Administrator confirmed an incident report was not completed as per policy and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 05/17/2024 revealed in part: Intent: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse. Policy: 1. The facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse, including involuntary seclusion and the misappropriation of property or finances of residents. Definitions: Verbal abuse is defined as the use of, oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to resident or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal/mental abuse include, but are not limited to, cursing, yelling, saying thing to frighten a resident, denying food or care, isolating a resident etc. Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident Report initiated on 03/11/2025 revealed in part: Victim: Resident #1 Accused: S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Allegation: Verbal Abuse-substantiated Employee S4 CNA was immediately suspended pending investigation. After facility investigation substantiated allegation of verbal abuse, the employee was terminated. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/15/2024 with a re-admission on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included but not limited to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Schizoaffective disorder-Bipolar type, Anxiety disorder, and Major Depressive disorder. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Review of signed statement provided by Resident #1 on 03/11/2025 revealed in part: Resident #1 voiced to S4 CNA she did not want a dinner tray, then changed her mind and notified S4 CNA. Resident #1 voiced the S4 CNA acted as she did not hear her. Resident #1 voiced that everyone in the dining room was served except for her. Resident #1 voiced S4 CNA continued to fill the dinner cart with trays. Resident #1 voiced she was tired of waiting and went to go outside. Resident #1 reported S4 CNA was coming by with the cart as she was going out the door and S4 CNA was talking fast and yelling at her. Resident #1 voiced she shouted back and went out the door to get away. Resident #1 voiced S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) intervened and provided her dinner tray. Resident #1 voiced later as she passed S4 CNA on the hall to her room S4 CNA started yelling and talking fast saying b**** you got the right one. Review of signed statement provided by S4 CNA on 03/11/2025 revealed in part: S4 CNA voiced before dinner started Resident #1 told and her that she did not want a dinner tray. S4 CNA voiced after dinner was served and she was loading dinner carts for the hall, Resident #1 came into the dining room demanding her dinner tray. S4 CNA voiced she completed the cart and Resident #1 was headed out the door when she went to give Resident #1 her tray. S4 CNA voiced Resident #1 snapped at her. S4 CNA voiced she tried to talk to Resident #1 to let her know it was a misunderstanding. S4 CNA she left to take the cart to the hall and voiced S3 LPN told her to calm down. Review of signed statement provided by S3 LPN on 03/11/2025 revealed in part: S3 LPN voiced she was at the nurse's station when she overheard loud shouting coming from the dining area. S3 LPN voiced she walked toward the dining room door that opened to the patio and observed S4 CNA in the doorway and Resident #1 on the patio. S3 LPN reported Resident #1 yelled b**** I don't want the tray motherf***er and was yelling more that she could not understand. S3 LPN voiced S4 CNA yelled you a motherf***er and b***h too. S3 LPN voiced she asked S4 CNA and Resident #1 to please just stop talking. S3 LPN reported S4 CNA went on with the dining cart and Resident #1 remained on the patio. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 12:04 p.m. S1 Administrator confirmed she was the facility's abuse coordinator. S1 Administrator reported she was notified of the verbal abuse incident regarding S4 CNA and Resident #1 by S3 LPN and S2 DON (Director of Nursing) by phone around 8:20 p.m. on 03/11/2025. S1 Administrator reported S3 LPN obtained a written statement from Resident #1 and S4 CNA and sent S4 CNA home. S1 Administrator reported she was notified S4 CNA and Resident #1 got into a cursing match in the dining room and resident smoking area after dinner was served in the dining room and trays were being sent to the halls. S1 Administrator reported she spoke with Resident #1 the next morning in her office and was notified by Resident #1 of the same. S1 Administrator reported S3 LPN noted no changes in Resident #1 and she noted no changes in Resident #1 when she spoke with her then next morning. S1 Administrator reported life satisfaction rounds were performed with no concern noted and continued weekly. S1 Administrator reported the S4 CNA was terminated 03/12/2025. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 1:30 p.m. Resident #1 reported the incident that happened between her and S4 CNA, S4 CNA started cursing at her first. Resident #1 reported she told S4 CNA she did not want a dinner tray but changed her mind. Resident #1 reported S4 CNA started hollering and screaming at her in the dining area. Resident #1 reported she hollered and screamed back and went to the smoking patio to get away because she was embarrassed. Resident #1 reported S4 CNA came after her and S3 LPN broke it up. Resident #1 reported when she went back to her room, S4 CNA was sitting in one of the chairs on the hall and started yelling. Resident #1 reported S3 LPN sent her home and reported S4 CNA. Resident #1 reported she spoke with S1 Administrator, and S2 DON about the incident. Resident #1 reported she was fine, denied any concerns, and felt safe at the facility. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 3:58 p.m. S3 LPN reported when the verbal abuse incident occurred after dinner between S4 CNA and Resident #1 she was at the nurses station in front of the dining area charting on the computer. S3 LPN reported during dining there was sometimes just loud talking and was not anything out of the ordinary loudness was occurring until she heard Resident #1 call S4 CNA a motherf***ing b***h*. S3 LPN reported she got up to see what was going on and saw Resident #1 headed to the smoking patio and S4 CNA stood in the door and said no you're the mother***ing b***h not me S3 LPN reported she told S4 CNA to stop and S4 CNA was talking as she went away but she could not understand her and Resident #1 remained on the smoking patio. S3 LPN reported she notified S1 Administrator of the incident. S3 LPN reported S1 Administrator told her to send S4 CNA home and S4 CNA sat in the front lobby and wrote her statement and left. S2 DON was on vacation during the time of the survey and could not be reached by phone. During a phone interview on 04/01/2025 at 3:11 p.m. S4 CNA reported Resident #1 notified her she did not want a dinner tray. S4 CNA reported Resident #1 came into the dining room after dinner was served and trays were being prepared to take to the halls and told her from across the dining room she wanted a tray. S4 CNA reported she made eye contact with Resident #1 to let her know she heard her and put her tray on top of the cart she was preparing. S4 CNA reported as Resident #1 was going out to the smoking patio she told Resident #1 she heard her the first time and had put her tray on top of the cart to bring to her. S4 CNA reported Resident #1 got loud and screamed at her. S4 CNA reported she was trying to tell Resident #1 it was all a misunderstanding. S4 CNA reported she and Resident #1 did not call each other names and she did not curse or anything like that because that would be unprofessional. S4 CNA reported the nurse came and told them not to be loud. S4 CNA reported she then took a break. S4 CNA reported she was told to write her statement and was sent home. S4 CNA reported she had not been back to the facility and confirmed she was terminated the next day. During the survey, in-service records and monitoring records were reviewed and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following corrective actions to correct the deficient practice prior to entering the facility. Review of the facility's corrective action plan initiated on 03/11/2025 with completion date of 03/13/2025 consisted of the following: The accused, S4 CNA, was suspended on 03/11/2025 and terminated on 03/12/2025. Resident life satisfaction were performed on Resident #1 and residents who resided on Resident #1's hall and completed on 03/12/2025 with no concerns noted. Further resident life satisfaction rounds were performed on 03/20/2025 on 03/28/2025 with no concerns noted. The administrator will continue resident life satisfaction rounds weekly for 4 weeks and then monthly for 3 months. The administrator will monitor the results of life satisfaction rounds and grievance logs along with the QA committee to ensure any issues are addressed. The facility completed an in-service with staff on 03/13/2025 regarding verbal abuse prevention and response which included understanding, identifying, preventing, and reporting allegations of verbal abuse.
Jan 2025 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 (#47) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 (#47) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47's fingernails and toe nails were trimmed. Findings: Review of Resident #47's medical revealed an admission date of 08/01/2024 with diagnoses that included, in part, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, paraplegia incomplete, and other intervertebral disc degeneration thoracic region. Review of Resident #47's care plan revealed an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) intervertebral disc degeneration, thoracic region, other cord compression, paraplegia incomplete with interventions that included, in part, personal hygiene: substantial/maximal assistance, and nail care as needed. Review of Resident #47's 01/04/2025 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed Resident #47 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 12, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 01/27/2025 at 8:20 a.m. revealed Resident #47's nails on bilateral hands and toenails were long, extending past the end of fingertips and extending past the end of toes. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 8:20 a.m. Resident #47 reported she did not like her fingernails and toenails long and had asked staff to trim her nails but they would always come to trim her nails while she was out at dialysis so they were never trimmed. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 2:35 p.m. S3 DON (Director of Nursing) and S4 Corporate Nurse observed Resident #47's fingernails and toenails and acknowledged both were long and should have been trimmed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all certified nursing assistant (CNA) staff had documented new hire and/or annual competency demonstrations for all skills related...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all certified nursing assistant (CNA) staff had documented new hire and/or annual competency demonstrations for all skills related to their expected roles for 2 out of 5 personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of S6CNA's personnel file revealed S6CNA's date of hire was 08/07/2024. Further review revealed no documented evidence of any competencies being completed upon hire. Review of S7CNA's personnel file revealed S7CNA's date of hire was 12/06/2023. Further review revealed no documented evidence of any competencies being completed upon hire and/or annually. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 9:30 a.m., S8Human Resources, reported he could not produce documentation of competencies being completed upon hire and/or annually for S6CNA and S7CNA . During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:00 a.m., S1Administrator, acknowledged skill competencies had not been completed by employees S6CNA and S7CNA prior to providing patient care and should have been. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:30 a.m., S4Corporate Nurse reported CNA competency checks had not been completed on S6CNA and S7CNA upon hire and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meeting included the required 6 staff members for the facility's last 2 quarte...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meeting included the required 6 staff members for the facility's last 2 quarterly committee meetings. Findings: Review of the facility's QAA committee sign-in sheets dated 06/12/2024 and 10/30/2024 failed to reveal S2Medical Director was in attendance. During an interview on 01/29/2024 at 1:40 p.m., S1Administrator acknowledged S2Medical Director or representative were not in attendance of the quarterly QAA meetings on 06/12/2024 and 10/30/2024. S1Administrator further reported she was not aware the facility's Medical Director was required to attend. During an interview on 01/29/2024 at 1:45 p.m., S3DON (Director of Nursing) reported S2Medical Director does not regularly attend QA meetings.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet resident's medical and nursing nee...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet resident's medical and nursing needs for 1 (#265) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) Resident #265 had an order and was care planned for left knee immobilizer and non-weight bearing to left leg. 2.) Resident #265 received diuretic as ordered by the physician due to diuretic not being reordered timely as per policy. Findings: Review of Resident #265's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/10/2025 with diagnoses that included, in part, other fracture of left femur sequela, unspecified fracture of lower end of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, type 2 Diabetes, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic combined systolic (congestive) heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, and chronic kidney disease unspecified. Review of Resident #265's 01/17/2025 Medicare 5 day MDS (minimum data set) revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated Resident #265 was cognitively intact. 1.) Review of Resident #265's physician orders failed to reveal an order for left knee immobilizer and non-weight bearing to left leg. Review of Resident #265's care plan failed to reveal a care plan for having left knee immobilizer and non-weight bearing status. Review of 01/10/2025 general nurses' note indicated: . At 7:15 p.m. received resident from ______________ hospital per stretcher . splint intact to left lower leg . Observation on 01/27/2025 at 1:29 p.m. revealed Resident #265 wearing a full length knee immobilizer to left leg. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 1:29 p.m. Resident #265 reported she had broken a few bones in the left leg and was non-weight bearing to that leg. Observation on 01/28/2025 at 12:51 p.m. revealed Resident #265 was lying in bed with knee immobilizer in place to left leg. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 3:30 p.m. S3 DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #265 did not have a physician order for left leg knee immobilizer or non-weight bearing to left leg and should have. S3 DON confirmed Resident #265 was not care planned for having left knee immobilizer with interventions and should have been. 2.) Review of Policy and Procedure Manual with revised date 10/01/2019 Section: Medication Policies Subsection: Ordering and Receiving Medications from Pharmacy Subject: Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications revealed: Policy All medication orders will be faxed to the pharmacy or submitted via EHR using the 'MOST ORIGINAL' order. It will be the responsibility of the facility to re-order the medications to avoid any lapse in therapy. Procedure: . 6. Refill Medication Ordering-Maintenance Reorders. B. All refills must be ordered before the last dose is administered. Reorder medications 3-4 days in advance of need to assure an adequate supply is on hand. Review of Resident #265's current physician orders revealed an order dated 01/15/2025 for Bumex oral tablet 1mg (milligram) (Bumetanide) - Give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for diuretic. Review of Resident #265's January 2025 MAR (medication administration record) revealed Bumex oral tablet 1mg was not administered on 01/27/2025 for the 0800 and 1400 doses. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 1:43 p.m. Resident #265 reported she takes Bumex twice a day and had not had a morning dose today. Resident #265 further reported the nurse told her they were out of her Bumex and she was going to order some. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 2:15 p.m. S10 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported Resident #265's Bumex should have been ordered and was not.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 1 (#36) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure safe oral medication administration practices by leaving medications at the bedside. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated 07/08/2024 revealed in part: 27. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/02/2022 with diagnoses that include in part anxiety disorder, encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and arthropathy. Review of Resident #36's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Observation on 01/27/2025 at 1:45 p.m. with S3 DON (Director of Nursing) and S4 Corporate Nurse revealed 2 medicine cups sitting on the bedside table in reach of Resident #36; first cup containing 1 blue and red capsule, 7 white tablets and 1 orange tablet and a second cup containing 2 white tablets and 10 pink tablets. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 1:45 p.m. Resident #36 reported a lady brought them in and left them for him to take and he was not sure what the pills were or what they were for. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 1:45 p.m. S3 DON and S4 Corporate Nurse confirmed the medications should not be left on the bedside table. Review of Resident #36's physician's orders failed to reveal an order for self-administration of medications. Review of Resident #36's evaluations failed to reveal an evaluation for self-administration of medications. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 11:10 a.m. S4 Corporate Nurse acknowledged there is no evaluation or physician's order for Resident #36 to be able to keep meds at the bedside or self-administer medications.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records reflected the resident's wishes for 1 (#20) of 26 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records reflected the resident's wishes for 1 (#20) of 26 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's medical records were consistent with resident's wishes for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Findings: Review of undated policy titled Do Not Resuscitate Order revealed: Policy Statement Our facility will not use cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related emergency measures to maintain life functions on a resident when there is a Do Not Resuscitate Order in effect. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Do not resuscitate orders must be signed by the resident's attending physician on the physician's order sheet maintained in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/11/2024 with diagnoses that included, in part, metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, acquired absence of left and right leg above the knee, other specified peripheral vascular diseases, dementia, and functional quadriplegia. Review of Resident #20's LaPOST (Louisiana Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatement) signed on 12/23/2024 revealed a check beside DNR/Do not attempt resuscitation (Allow Natural Death). Review of Resident #20's profile header on EHR (electronic health record) failed to indicate a code status. Review of Resident #20's current physician orders failed to reveal an order for code status of DNR. Review of Resident #20's care plan revealed have decided that I am a 12/23/2024 DNR . Review of Resident #20's 12/11/2024 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed Resident #20 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 03, which indicated a severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 01/28/2025 at 4:14 p.m. S11 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was asked by this surveyor where to find Resident #20's code status. S11 LPN reviewed Resident #20's EHR profile header initially and then reviewed physician orders and reported no code status was found and should have been there. During an interview on 01/28/2024 at 4:30 p.m. S3 DON (Director of Nursing), with S4 Corporate Nurse present, reviewed Resident #20's LaPOST and reported she would initially pull up the LaPOST and reported Resident #20 was a DNR. S3 DON acknowledged there was no order for Resident #20's code status of DNR and should be. During an interview on 01/28/2025 at 4:32 p.m. S4 Corporate Nurse confirmed there was not an order for Resident #20's Code status of DNR and should be.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 (#5, #29) out of 5 (#5, #28, #29, #45, #265) residents reviewed for unneces...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 (#5, #29) out of 5 (#5, #28, #29, #45, #265) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor Resident #5 for bleeding while receiving an anticoagulant and Resident #29 for edema while receiving a diuretic. Findings : Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed an admit date of 09/09/2022 with the following diagnoses, including in part: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of unspecified precerebral artery and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/20/2023 for Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 mg (milligram); give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for anticoagulant. Further review revealed an order dated 09/09/2022 for anticoagulant medication - monitor for discolored urine, black tarry stools, sudden severe headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, and sudden changes in mental status every shift. Review of Resident #5's January MAR (Medication Administration Record) failed to reveal bleeding was monitored the month of January. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:00 a.m. S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported Resident #29 receives an anticoagulant and confirmed bleeding had not been monitored in January and should have been. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:05 a.m. S4 Corporate Nurse acknowledged Resident #5 was not monitored for bleeding while receiving an anticoagulant for the month of January and should have been. Resident #29 Review of Resident #29's medical records revealed an admit date of 12/18/2024 with the following diagnoses, including in part: chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure and edema/unspecified. Review of Resident #29's comprehensive care plan revealed the resident has hypertension (HTN), CHF (congestive heart failure) - monitor for and document any edema/notify MD (medical director). Review of Resident #29's physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/08/2025 for Bumex oral tablet 1 mg; give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for heart failure. Review of Resident #29's January MAR failed to reveal edema was monitored from January 4-21st. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 8:50 a.m. S5 LPN reported Resident #29 has edema in her lower extremities and receives a diuretic. S5 LPN acknowledged edema was not monitored from January 4-21st. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:05 a.m. S4 Corporate Nurse acknowledged Resident #29 was not monitored for edema from January 4-21st while receiving a diuretic and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure food was stored properly to prevent cross ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure food was stored properly to prevent cross contamination, utensils were not properly stored when not in use, freezer without a thermometer, and undated food items. This had the potential to affect the 70 residents who received food trays from the kitchen. Findings: Observation on 01/27/2025 at 6:30 a.m. during a brief tour of the kitchen revealed the following: 1.Ground beef stored on the top shelf of freezer sitting on top of an opened box of frozen fish, directly above an open box of cookie dough and bags of frozen vegetables. 2.Flour scoop left on top of a box on a shelf above the flour bin not bagged, sugar scoop left inside the container, food serving plates and cover lids stored in an upright position. 3.Upright back-up freezer containing food items without a thermometer 4.Undated items: 1/2 gallon Pimento cheese spread, gallon Ranch dressing, gallon sweet and sour sauce, and a 32 ounce jar of lemon juice. Open and undated items: 5 pound block sliced cheese with exposed slices, sandwich size Ziploc bag of cherry pie filling, gallon bag uncooked fried squash, opened gallon cole slaw dressing, and a box containing a 5 gallon open/unsecured bag of powdered food thickener. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 7:30 a.m. S9 Dietary Manager acknowledged the above kitchen deficiencies related to professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions and the prevention of foodborne illness that should have been instituted prior to the survey.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition by failing to ensure 1) dishwasher food trap was...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition by failing to ensure 1) dishwasher food trap was cleaned out preventing water from overflowing onto the kitchen floor, 2) refrigerator #1 was not leaking water onto the floor and 3) freezer #1 contained food items maintained at a safe temperature range to keep foods frozen. This deficiency had the potential to affect the health and safety of persons entering or working in the kitchen. Findings: Observation on 01/27/2025 at 6:30 a.m. during initial kitchen tour revealed the kitchen area with water standing approximately 1/2 inch deep and 3 feet wide at the entry door of the kitchen between the dishwasher and the steam table. Further observation revealed water pooling on the floor under refrigerator #1 extending approximately 2 feet into the floor walkway of the dry food storeroom. Observation of external temperature reading on freezer #1 revealed -5 degrees (F) Fahrenheit and internal temperature reading revealed 38 degrees F. During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 7:30 a.m. S9 Dietary Manager acknowledged maintenance issues with the refrigerator/freezers and dishwasher and water leakage from the dishwasher and refrigerator/freezer but had not repaired them. S9 Dietary Manager reported he was not aware of the temperature variance for freezer #1. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 2:00 p.m. S12 Service Technician acknowledged there was kitchen equipment that needed repair. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 3:45 p.m. S1 Administrator acknowledged the kitchen maintenance issues and reported she felt the kitchen deficiencies were more of a training issue with staff.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards during transport...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards during transport resulting in a fall for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents who required transportation to appointments. S7Van Driver, S8Van Driver and S4Transportation CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) failed to ensure Resident #1's mode of transportation was verified by his nurse which led to his fall. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #1 on 04/09/2024 at 1:45 p.m., when S7Van Driver attempted to load Resident #1 via wheelchair onto the facility van for a doctor's appointment when he was required to be transported by ambulance on a stretcher. S7Van Driver reported Resident #1's wheelchair tilted backwards after loading it onto the van lift. S7Van Driver further reported Resident #1's wheelchair fell backwards and slid down the front of her legs to the ground with his head resting on her foot. Resident #1 reported feeling increased anxiety prior to and during other transports after the incident on 04/09/2024. Resident #1's physician ordered antianxiety medication to be administered to Resident #1 prior to being transported due to newly diagnosed anxiety disorder unspecified after this second fall from the facility van lift and previous fall from the facility van lift on 02/14/2024. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, End Stage Renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis, acquired absences of left leg above knee and right leg above knee. Further diagnoses from 02/16/2024 included displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra, sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, and sequela related to a subsequent encounter for fracture. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was assessed as moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12. Resident #1's functional status was assessed to require 2 person total assist for transfers and 2 person extensive assist for bed mobility. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed Resident #1 had a witnessed fall without injury on 04/09/2024 while being loaded onto the van. Resident #1's wheelchair tipped backwards, Resident #1's body slid down the van driver's leg with his head landing on the driver's foot. Resident #1 was assessed by nursing staff and immediately transported to the hospital emergency department for evaluation and treatment via emergency transportation. Interventions placed after the fall included anti-tippers were applied to Resident #1's wheelchair to aid in stabilization and to prevent it from tipping over. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 04/29/2024 to refer to Senior Psychological to evaluate and treat. Further review of Resident #1's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/23/2024 for Klonopin oral tablet 0.5mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for anxiety disorder unspecified administer prior to dialysis transport. Review of Certification of Ambulance Transportation revealed: Signed by S9Medical Director - revealed transportation details for Resident #1 - Monday, Wednesday, Friday start 03/06/2024, location (dialysis), and mobility: bed confined. All three of the following criteria must be met: (1) unable to ambulate, (2) unable to get out of bed without assistance, and (3) unable to safely sit in a chair or wheelchair; musculoskeletal: non-healed fractures requiring ambulance, amputation. Review of facility's investigation following Resident #1's fall on 04/09/2024 revealed: Summary: the fall was reenacted after resident was sent to emergency room. It was determined that resident's chair was top heavy due to his bilateral AKA (above the knee), and with the slight incline to the lift, this caused the chair to flip over backwards. The interdisciplinary team determined that adding anti-tippers would help prevent wheelchair from tipping over backwards in the future Incident witness statement on 04/09/2024 - S4Transportation CNA - I walked in S6Social Service Director's office and asked her was Resident #1 to go by ambulance, she asked me to call and confirm the pickup. When I called to confirm by ambulance I was told nothing was scheduled. Then I called the van driver and told him that he had to transport Resident #1 because an ambulance was not scheduled for a transport pick up. Incident witness statement on 04/09/2024 - S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) - This nurse was approached by S4Transportation CNA and S8Van Driver. They asked me for paperwork and how he usually travels. I said he has gone out on stretcher every time since his accident on 02/14/2024. Incident witness statement on 04/09/2024 - S7Van Driver - I S7Van Driver was in training today He (Resident #1) then stated that he was not sure about a lady driver due to his prior accident, but then S8Van Driver stated he was there assisting me with training, Resident #1 then stated he was okay with that I rolled Resident #1 up on lift with hands, once Resident #1 was up on lift, I still had my left hand on lift preparing to lock the wheelchair. The back of Resident #1's wheelchair started tilting, I then tried to move swiftly to catch chair but was unable to stop it from falling .Resident #1's chair tilted backwards hitting both of my legs and his head hit my right foot . Previous incidents - on 02/14/2024 - wheelchair flipped over backwards while being loaded in van, injury - displaced fracture of the third cervical vertebra. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 10:10 a.m. Resident #1 reported the facility had been transporting him by ambulance to appointments but on 04/09/2024, the day he fell, they had to use the van to take him to his appointment. Resident #1 acknowledged he didn't like it when they put him on the van because every time he could feel his wheelchair leaning back. Resident #1 stated, They never should have dropped me. Resident #1 confirmed feeling nervous when he had to go out for appointments. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 11:15 a.m. S6Social Services Director reported Resident #1 must go by ambulance and if he can't go by ambulance the appointment should be rescheduled. S6Social Services Director confirmed S8Van Driver should have been aware of Resident #1's need to be transported by ambulance. S6Social Services Director reported Resident #1 seemed anxious recently since his falls and had voiced concerns about riding on the van. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 11:40 a.m. S10Assistant Administrator reported she verbally told the staff Resident #1 was to be transported by ambulance after a previous fall. S10Assistant Administrator acknowledged the day of the incident the S7Van Driver did not know the transportation mode required for Resident #1. S10Assistant Administrator confirmed S4Transportation CNA made the determination Resident #1 could go by van and should not have. S10Assistant Administrator acknowledged S4Transportation CNA did not ask Resident #1's nurse how to transport him. S10Assistant Administrator confirmed Resident #1 voiced the day of the incident he was apprehensive with a female van driver. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 11:50 a.m. S1DON (Director of Nursing) acknowledged Resident #1 told the S8Van Driver he had reservations regarding being transported in the van by a female driver. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 11:55 a.m. S2Corporate Nurse acknowledged Resident #1 was supposed to be transported by ambulance to appointments since the previous fall incident on 02/14/2024. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 12:30 p.m. S5LPN reported on 04/09/2024 someone came up to her (S5LPN did not remember who) and asked how Resident #1 was supposed to be transported and she told them by ambulance. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 12:45 p.m. S7Van Driver confirmed on the day of the incident she was still in training when she introduced herself to Resident #1 and he said oh Lord, that's how this happened to me referring to Resident #1's neck brace from a previous fall. S7Van Driver stated as she was rolling the wheelchair up onto the ramp of the van lift which is slanted, the wheelchair starting tilting backwards. S7Van Driver confirmed Resident #1 and the wheelchair stayed propped on her legs and the wheelchair slid down to the ground. S7Van Driver reported the day of the incident S4Transportation CNA told her and S8Van Driver Resident #1 did not have an appointment with _____ambulance so they assumed the facility had to transport Resident #1 via the facility van. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 1:20 p.m. S4Transportation CNA reported there was a misunderstanding the day Resident #1 fell because the appointment that day had not been scheduled with _____ambulance for transportation. S4Transportation CNA acknowledged she should have asked the nurse how Resident #1 was to be transported but she did not. S4Transportation CNA further acknowledged Resident #1 was worried about going on the van. During a telephone interview on 04/29/2024 at 1:35 p.m. S8Van Driver reported he had transported Resident #1 before and he went by ambulance after his previous fall. He further reported on 04/09/2024 he and S7Van Driver asked S6Social Services Director and S5LPN (not Resident #1's nurse) how Resident #1 was to be transported and was told by ambulance. He confirmed S4Transportation CNA told him _____ambulance did not have him scheduled so Resident #1 would have to be transported by van. S8Van Driver reported Resident #1 was scared to get on the van lift and told S7Van Driver, as he pointed to his Miami J collar, this is what happened to him the last time they put him on van. During an interview on 04/30/2024 at 7:55 a.m. Resident #1 stated, I don't want to ever fall again and I thought I was going to get help from the nursing home. During a telephone interview on 04/30/2024 at 8:00 a.m. S9Medical Director reported Resident #1 told him he had another fall and went to the hospital but did not injure himself this time. S9Medical Director confirmed Resident #1 told him he gets anxious before he goes to dialysis and was supposed to be going by stretcher. S9Medical Director reported he ordered Klonopin for Resident #1 to be given prior to dialysis to ease his anxiety which he confirmed was due to the falls Resident #1 had. During an interview on 04/30/2024 at 9:20 a.m. S3LPN reported prior to the incident on 04/09/2024 Resident #1 had always gone by stretcher to appointments. S3LPN (Resident #1's nurse) reported the staff did not ask her on 04/09/2024 how resident was to be transported and if they had she would have told them only by stretcher. S3LPN reported Resident #1 does seem more anxious now. During an interview on 04/30/2024 at 10:00 a.m. S1DON acknowledged Resident #1 was not transported by stretcher on 04/09/2024 which resulted in a second fall and Resident #1 appeared to have increased anxiety after the fall on 04/09/2024. On 04/30/2024, S7Van Driver, S8Van Driver, S3LPN, S5LPN, and S4Transportation CNA were interviewed about transporting residents and all staff confirmed they received an in-service on Resident #1 is to be transported by stretcher and the process to find a resident's mode of transportation when leaving for appointments. During an observation on 04/29/2024 at 10:10 a.m. Resident #1's wheelchair had anti-tippers in place to prevent his wheelchair from tipping backwards. Review of Resident Appointment Schedule posted at nurse's station revealed appointments for Resident #1 noted transport by _____ambulance. The facility implemented the following actions on 04/09/2024 and 04/10/2024 to correct the deficient practice and prevent further reoccurrence with completion on 04/10/2024: 1. Anti-tippers immediately placed on Resident #1's wheelchair. 2. Staff In-Serviced on 04/09/2024 that Resident #1 is to be transported by ambulance services only until further evaluation. Appointment transportation - appointment schedule is to have listed how a resident is to be transported, whether it is by ambulance or facility van. In-service included an additional amputee resident requiring transport by ambulance. 3. Audit completed for residents with bilateral knee amputations to determine if anti-tippers are needed for wheelchair, two resident's identified and anti-tippers put in place. 4. Random monitoring of residents with bilateral knee amputations requiring transportation weekly x 2 months beginning on 04/09/2024 and ongoing.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1,#2,#3) sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to: 1. Develop a care plan for Resident #1's diagnosis of anxiety, and 2. Develop and implement a care plan for Resident #1's transportation mode. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Medical Records revealed admit date [DATE] with the following diagnoses, in part: acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, other lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, acquired absence of left leg above the knee other polyosteoarthritis, dependence on renal dialysis, and spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy/lumbosacral region. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan failed to reveal a problem and approach for a diagnosis of anxiety and receiving an antianxiety medication. Further review failed to reveal a problem and approach for Resident #1's required mode of transportation by ambulance to appointments and dialysis. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 04/29/2024 to refer to Senior Psychological to evaluate and treat. Further review revealed an order dated 04/23/2024 for Klonopin oral tablet 0.5mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for anxiety disorder unspecified administer prior to dialysis transport. Review of Certification of Ambulance Transportation form signed by S9Medical Director revealed transportation details for Resident #1 - Monday, Wednesday and Friday start 03/06/2024, location (dialysis), and mobility: bed confined. All three of the following criteria must be met: (1) unable to ambulate, (2) unable to get out of bed without assistance, and (3) unable to safely sit in a chair or wheelchair; musculoskeletal: non-healed fractures requiring ambulance, amputation. During an interview on 04/29/2024 at 11:40 a.m. S10Assistant Administrator reported she verbally notified the staff Resident #1 was to be transported by ambulance only after Resident #1's fall on 04/09/2024. S10Assistant Administrator acknowledged the lack of written documentation to transport Resident #1 by ambulance could have led staff to think it was okay to transport Resident #1 by facility van. During a telephone interview on 04/30/2024 at 8:00 a.m. S9Medical Director confirmed Resident #1 told him he gets anxious before he goes to dialysis. S9Medical Director confirmed he ordered Klonopin for Resident #1 to be given prior to dialysis to ease his anxiety.
Feb 2024 7 deficiencies 4 IJ (4 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and video footage review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and video footage review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow the facility's accident policy by moving a resident after a fall and failing to assess 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #2, #3) residents after a fall. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #2 on 02/14/2024 at approximately 5:35:22 a.m. (per video footage observed) when S3 Van Driver attempted to load Resident #2 on the van lift without following the manufacturer's guidelines for that van lift. S3 Van Driver tried to lift Resident #2's wheelchair over the side of the van lift instead of wheeling Resident #2 on to the front of the lift, as per manufacturer's guidelines. When S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left leg of the wheelchair to get over the side of the van lift, the wheelchair flipped over backwards with Resident #2 in the chair and landed on the concrete. S3 Van Driver called for help and S4 RN (Registered Nurse), S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and S6 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) came out of the facility to help. S4 RN and S6 CNA then lifted Resident #2's wheelchair with him in it to an upright position. S5 LPN and S6 CNA both lifted the wheelchair over the side of the van lift with Resident #2 in the wheelchair. S3 Van Driver continued to load Resident #2 in the van and then took Resident #2 to his scheduled dialysis. Shortly after Resident #2 arrived at dialysis, the dialysis staff called the facility to let them know Resident #2 complained of severe pain to his neck and dialysis staff called EMS (Emergency Medical Service) who transported Resident #2 to an acute ER (Emergency Room). After arriving at the ER, Resident #2 was found to have a C3 (cervical 3) burst fracture. By the facility failing to implement protective measures, there was a high likelihood that additional severe harm, injury, or death could occur to any of the 66 residents residing in the facility who have the potential for transport in the facility van per the Resident Census and Conditions Report dated 02/19/2024. S1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/21/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The immediate jeopardy ended on 02/22/2024 at 6:50 p.m. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite observations, interviews, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Review of facility's Policy for Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report policy (revised 7/23/2018; last reviewed Jan. 2023) revealed in part: Policy The facility will conduct an investigation of all incidents involving residents of the facility. B. Resident Incidents/Accidents: 1. If you witness an incident/accident, you must: immediately summons help; do not move the resident until he/she has been assessed by a licensed nurse; do not leave the resident unattended. 2. Licensed nurse must: a. examine the resident and obtain vital signs b. if the resident hit his/her head or if the incident is unwitnessed initiate neurological checks. c. conduct further assessment as warranted d. render appropriate treatment Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, End Stage Renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis and acquired absences of left leg above knee and right leg above knee. Upon Resident #2's return to the facility on [DATE] the diagnosis of displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra and sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, sequela related to a subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing was added. Record review of Resident #2's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/30/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Review of the facility's video record dated 02/14/2024, revealed the following: At 5:31:35 a.m. S3 Van Driver brought Resident #2 outside next to van and locked wheelchair. S3 Van Driver proceeded to get the lift down to ground. At 5:34:30 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to put Resident #2 on the lift and was struggling due to the other van that was parked on the other side. At 5:35:22 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to raise the front of the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift. S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left side of Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 and the wheelchair flipped over backwards. S3 Van Driver then started knocking on the door to facility trying to get help. At 5:37:31 a.m. S4 RN poked her head out the door and then went back inside. S3 Van Driver stayed with Resident #2. At 5:38:43 a.m. S4 RN came outside. At 5:38:54 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA came out of facility. At 5:39:06 a.m. S4 RN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair to an upright position with the resident in the chair. At 5:39:50 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair onto to the van lift over the lip of the lift. At 5:41:04 a.m. S3 Van Driver loaded Resident #2 into the van and proceeded to take Resident #2 to dialysis. Upon completion of video review by surveyors, the video failed to reveal a head to toe assessment was completed on Resident #2 by S4RN and S5LPN. Record review of Resident #2's hospital records for an admission date of 02/14/2024 revealed the following, in part: Discharge Summary admission Date 02/14/2024 discharge date [DATE] History of Present Illness- Resident #2 is a [AGE] year old male .status post fall from wheelchair this morning on the way to dialysis. Patient states that he was being loaded in the van and was flipped out of his wheelchair and landed on the posterior aspect of his head. Patient denies any loss of consciousness, numbness/tingling, or upper extremity weakness. Endorses some mild pain in his neck, which prompted Cat-Scan for C (cervical)-Spine. He denied nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or headache. Magnetic Resonance Imaging C-spine: C3 burst fracture with retropulsed fragment and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy result in severe spinal canal stenosis and compression upon the spinal cord. Neurosurgery consulted. Patient admitted to team two. Hospital course: Neurosurgery planning intervention on 02/16/2024. Pain medications to control pain. On morning of surgery (02/16/2024), patient decided against surgical intervention. Neurosurgery was made aware of patient's decision and they are ok with the patient discharging with MJ collar. MJ collar to be worn strictly at all times. Given existing cervical stenosis, patient is high risk for spinal cord injury/paraplegia. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, dated 02/17/2024, revealed an order for Miami J (MJ) Collar to neck every shift. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #2 reported S3 Van Driver was trying to load him (Resident #2) on the lift of the van to go to dialysis and there was another van beside the lift. S3 Van Driver tried to get his (Resident #2's) wheelchair loaded on the side of the lift and S3 Van Driver lifted the front wheels of the wheelchair. Resident #2 further reported the wheelchair flipped over backwards and I (Resident #2) hit the concrete. When Resident #2 got to dialysis his neck was hurting bad and dialysis sent him to the emergency room. Resident #2 verified that his neck was broken and a collar was placed on him after he declined having a surgery on his neck. During a telephone interview on 02/20/2024 at 12:35 p.m., S5 LPN indicated on 02/14/2024 she went outside when she was called to help Resident #2 after he fell backwards in wheelchair. S5 LPN then indicated she and S3 Van Driver lifted the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift with S3 Van Driver on the front of the wheelchair and S5LPN on the backside of the wheelchair and they manually lifted the chair on to the van lift and then S3 Van Driver took Resident #2 to the dialysis center. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:36 p.m. S4 RN confirmed she saw Resident #2 lying on his back in the parking lot. S4 RN confirmed she asked Resident #2 if he was okay and he said he wanted to go to dialysis and staff lifted his chair onto the van lift and Resident #2 was transported to dialysis. S4 RN acknowledged she did not do a head to toe assessment on Resident #2 after his fall. During a telephone interview on 02/21/2024 at 11:18 a.m., S8 MD (Medical Doctor) indicated he did not receive a call from the facility on 02/14/2024. S8 MD then indicated he came to the facility on [DATE] and a nurse told him that Resident #2 had a fall and had a neck fracture. S8 MD indicated if the facility had called him when the incident happened he would have told them to not move the resident, call 911 and wait for EMS (Emergency Medical Services) to assess the resident. During a telephone interview on 02/20/2024 at 11:30 a.m., S7 Dialysis Center RN indicated on 02/14/2024, Resident #2 arrived at the dialysis center and he was crying due to pain is his neck. Resident #2 indicated he hit his head during the fall at the facility. S7 Dialysis Center RN indicated Resident #2 should have been sent to the hospital instead of going to dialysis. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:25 p.m. S1 Administrator viewed the video of Resident #2's fall and confirmed S4 RN and S5 LPN were called to the scene and did not assess Resident #2 prior to picking him and his wheelchair up off the ground and should have. S1Administrator acknowledged S4 RN and S5 LPN lifted Resident #2 in his wheelchair onto the van lift and allowed S3 Van Driver to transport Resident #2 to dialysis. S1 Administrator confirmed staff should not have lifted Resident #2 off the ground and EMS (Emergency Medical Services) should have been called. S1 Administrator further verified S4 RN and S5 LPN did not assess Resident #2 prior to picking Resident #2 off the ground. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 2:05 p.m., S2 Corporate Nurse watched the video of Resident #2 from 02/14/2024 and then verified S4 RN and S5 LPN did not assess Resident #2 prior to and after lifting Resident #2 in his wheelchair off the ground and the staff should have called EMS (911) to send Resident #2 to the ER.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interviews, and video review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment rema...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interviews, and video review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for each resident who is transported in the facility's van via wheelchair. The facility's staff failed to follow the guidance of the manufacturer's 'Step by Step Wheelchair Lift Operation Guide' in the loading of wheelchaired residents for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #2 and #3) residents reviewed for falls. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #2 on 02/14/2024 at approximately 5:35:22 a.m. (per video footage observed) when S3 Van Driver attempted to load Resident #2 on the van lift without following the manufacturer's guidelines for that van lift. S3 Van Driver tried to lift Resident #2's wheelchair over the side of the van lift instead of wheeling Resident #2 on to the front of the lift, as per manufacturer's guidelines. When S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left leg of the wheelchair to get over the side of the van lift, the wheelchair flipped over backwards with Resident #2 in the chair and landed on the concrete. S3 Van Driver called for help and S4 RN (Registered Nurse), S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and S6 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) came out of the facility to help. S4 RN and S6 CNA then lifted Resident #2's wheelchair with him in it to an upright position. S5 LPN and S6 CNA both lifted the wheelchair over the side of the van lift with Resident #2 in the wheelchair. S3 Van Driver continued to load Resident #2 in the van and then took Resident #2 to his scheduled dialysis. Shortly after Resident #2 arrived at dialysis, the dialysis staff called the facility to let them know Resident #2 complained of severe pain to his neck and dialysis staff called EMS (Emergency Medical Service) who transported Resident #2 to an acute ER (Emergency Room). After arriving at the ER, Resident #2 was found to have a C3 (cervical 3) burst fracture. By the facility failing to implement protective measures, there was a high likelihood that additional severe harm, injury, or death could occur to any of the 66 residents residing in the facility who have the potential for transport in the facility van per the Resident Census and Conditions Report dated 02/19/2024. S1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/21/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The immediate jeopardy ended on 02/22/2024 at 6:50 p.m. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite observations, interviews, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Review of facility's Policy for Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report policy (revised 7/23/2018; last reviewed Jan. 2023) revealed in part: Policy The facility will conduct an investigation of all incidents involving residents of the facility. B. Resident Incidents/Accidents: 1. If you witness an incident/accident, you must: immediately summon help, do not move the resident until he/she has been assessed by a licensed nurse, do not leave the resident unattended. 2. Licensed nurse must: a. examine the resident and obtain vital signs b. if the resident hit his/her head or if the incident is unwitnessed initiate neurological checks. c. conduct further assessment as warranted d. render appropriate treatment Review of facility's Driver and Vehicle Safety Policy (revised 03/2023) revealed in part: Driver Selection: The following criteria are evaluated when selecting individuals to drive on behalf of the company: Demonstration of full understanding of this safety policy during in-servicing prior to driving for the company; Demonstrated ability to safely load and unload residents if the employee will be driving the company vehicle. Review of the manufacturer's guide for How to Operate a Wheelchair Lift, Step by Step Wheelchair Operation Guide, provided by S1 Administrator, included: Loading a passenger- To load a passenger, start with platform at ground level and the outer barrier fully extended. Move the passenger onto lift platform into position within yellow boundaries. Again, lock the wheelchair brakes or turn off wheelchair power . Observation of the van lift on 02/22/2024 at 10:42 a.m. by surveyor revealed the lift had a raised three to four inch lip (approximately) on each side of the lift and a flat ramp on the front of the lift. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, End Stage Renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis and acquired absences of left leg above knee and right leg above knee. Upon Resident #2's return to the facility on [DATE] the diagnosis of displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra and sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, sequela related to a subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing was added. Record review of Resident #2's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/30/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Record review of Resident #2's comprehensive care plans revealed the following, in part: Focus: The resident has had an actual fall, date initiated 02/14/2024. Interventions included- 02/14/2024 witnessed fall with injury. While attempting to load Resident #2, in wheelchair, onto facility van Resident #2's wheelchair flipped backwards. Resident stated, She (S3 Van Driver) dropped me., but was unable to give any other details. S3 Van Driver stated she underestimated maneuvering needed to navigate wheelchair onto van due to limited space. S3 Van driver also stated she prevented resident's head from hitting concrete/ground. Resident #2 refused to return inside facility for further evaluation stating he needed to go to dialysis today. Resident #2 loaded on facility van and transferred to dialysis clinic for scheduled dialysis at 5:45 a.m. At 6:39 a.m. dialysis nurse notified facility that Resident #2 was sent out to an acute ED (emergency department) for evaluation and treatment due to complaint of neck pain. New order 02/17/2024 Miami J Collar in place to neck every shift; PT (physical therapy) consult for strength and mobility; Monitor/document/report as needed every 72 hours to MD (medical doctor) for signs and symptoms of pain, bruises, change in mental status, new onset confusion, sleepiness, inability to maintain posture, agitation . Review of the facility's video record dated 02/14/2024, revealed the following: At 5:31:35 a.m. S3 Van Driver brought Resident #2 outside next to van and locked wheelchair. S3 Van Driver proceeded to get the lift down to ground. At 5:34:30 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to put Resident #2 on the lift and was struggling due to the other van that was parked on the other side. At 5:35:22 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to raise the front of the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift. S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left side of Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 and the wheelchair flipped over backwards. S3 Van Driver then started knocking on the door to facility trying to get help. At 5:37:31 a.m. S4 RN poked her head out the door and then went back inside. S3 Van Driver stayed with Resident #2. At 5:38:43 a.m. S4 RN came outside. At 5:38:54 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA came out of facility. At 5:39:06 a.m. S4 RN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair to an upright position with the resident in the chair. At 5:39:50 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair onto to the van lift over the lip of the lift. At 5:41:04 a.m. S3 Van Driver loaded Resident #2 into the van and proceeded to take Resident #2 to dialysis. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's notes revealed the following, in part: Note on 02/14/2024 by S5 LPN created 08:05:55 a.m. - Writer (S5 LPN) was called outside per east hall nurse at 5:24 a.m. Upon exiting the writer observed Resident #2 flipped over backward in his wheelchair. Resident #2 wasn't able to explain exactly what happened. Resident #2 just stated she (S3 Van Driver) dropped me. Resident #2 examined and assisted off the ground per three staff. Vital signs collected. Writer (S5 LPN) asked Resident #2 to come back inside. Resident #2 said no he needed his dialysis today. Writer (S5 LPN) said ok and notified dialysis of the situation. Writer (S5 LPN) spoke with S7 Dialysis RN at Dialysis at 5:40 a.m. Resident #2 left the facility at 5:45 a.m. in stable condition. Note on 02/14/2024 by S5 LPN- Staff from dialysis called at 6:39 a.m. to report Resident #2 was being sent to ER for evaluation and treatment due to neck pain. Record review of Resident #2's hospital records for an admission date of 02/14/2024 revealed the following, in part: Discharge Summary admission Date 02/14/2024 discharge date [DATE] History of Present Illness- Resident #2 is a [AGE] year old male .status post fall from wheelchair this morning on the way to dialysis. Patient states that he was being loaded in the van and was flipped out of his wheelchair and landed on the posterior aspect of his head. Patient denies any loss of consciousness, numbness/tingling, or upper extremity weakness. Endorses some mild pain in his neck, which prompted Cat-Scan for C (cervical)-Spine. He denied nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or headache. Magnetic Resonance Imaging C-spine: C3 burst fracture with retropulsed fragment and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy result in severe spinal canal stenosis and compression upon the spinal cord. Neurosurgery consulted. Patient admitted to team two. Hospital course: Neurosurgery planning intervention on 02/16/2024. Pain medications to control pain. On morning of surgery (02/16/2024), patient decided against surgical intervention. Neurosurgery was made aware of patient's decision and they are ok with the patient discharging with MJ collar. MJ collar to be worn strictly at all times. Given existing cervical stenosis, patient is high risk for spinal cord injury/paraplegia. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, dated 02/17/2024, revealed an order for Miami J (MJ) Collar to neck every shift. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #2 reported S3 Van Driver was trying to load him on the lift of the van to go to dialysis on 02/14/2024 and there was another van beside the lift. S3 Van Driver tried to get his wheelchair loaded on the side of the lift and she S3 Van Driver lifted the front wheels of the wheelchair. Resident #2 further reported the wheelchair flipped over backwards and I (Resident #2) hit the concrete. When Resident #2 got to dialysis his neck was hurting bad and dialysis sent him to the emergency room. Resident #2 verified that his neck was broken and a collar was placed on him after he declined having a surgery on his neck. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:15 p.m., S3 Van Driver indicated she was loading up Resident #2 on the van lift on 02/14/2024. The van on the other side was blocking the lift to be able to put the resident on the lift. S3 Van Driver then proceeded to attempt to lift the front of the wheelchair over the side lip of the lift and the wheelchair flipped over backwards. S3 Van Driver indicated she kept the resident's head from hitting the ground. S3 Van Driver then tried to get help from staff in the facility and the nurses came out to help her. During a telephone interview on 02/20/2024 at 12:35 p.m., S5 LPN indicated on 02/14/2024 she went outside when she was called to help Resident #2 after he fell backwards in wheelchair. S5 LPN indicated Resident #2 was shook up and said he hit his head during the fall and there was a hematoma on the back of his head. S5 LPN indicated she completed an assessment and got Resident #2 back up in his wheelchair. S5 LPN told Resident #2 we needed to go back inside the facility and Resident #2 said he had to go to dialysis and he was persistent about going. S5 LPN then indicated she and S3 Van Driver lifted the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift with S3 Van Driver on the front of the wheelchair and S5 LPN on the backside of the wheelchair and they manually lifted the chair on to the van lift and then S3 Van Driver took Resident #2 to the dialysis center. S5 LPN indicated she called the dialysis center to let them know what happened and then after Resident #2 got to the dialysis center, the dialysis nurse called and said his neck was hurting and they were going to send him to the hospital. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:36 p.m. S4 RN confirmed on 02/14/2024 she saw Resident #2 lying on his back in the parking lot. S4 RN confirmed she asked Resident #2 if he was okay and he said he wanted to go to dialysis and staff lifted his chair onto the van lift and Resident #2 was transported to dialysis. S4 RN acknowledged she did not do a head to toe assessment on Resident #2 after his fall. During a telephone interview on 02/21/2024 at 11:18 a.m., S8 MD (Medical Doctor) indicated he did not receive a call from the facility on 02/14/2024. S8 MD then indicated he came to the facility on [DATE] and a nurse told him that Resident #2 had a fall and had a neck fracture. S8 MD indicated if the facility had called him when the incident happened he would have told them to not move the resident, call 911 and wait for EMS to assess the resident. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 9:20 a.m., S1 Administrator indicated facility had a new van driver who was fully trained (S3Van Driver). S1 Administrator reported on 02/14/2024, S3 Van Driver was trying to load Resident #2 on to the lift from behind the van. Another transport van was behind the lift of the van that she was trying to get Resident #2 in. Since the lift was blocked from the back where you normally load residents on the van, S3 Van Driver attempted to put the wheelchair on the side of the lift. When S3 Van Driver lifted the front of the wheelchair, it flipped over backwards. This caused Resident #2 to fall to the concrete and Resident #2 suffered a C3 fracture. During a telephone interview on 02/20/2024 at 11:30 a.m., S7 Dialysis Center RN indicated on 02/14/2024, the nursing home staff called letting her know that Resident #2 had a fall when attempting to be loaded on the facility van. S3 Van Driver came into the clinic and asked for help unloading Resident #2. When she (S7 Dialysis Center RN) went to help the driver, Resident #2 was crying in pain of the due to neck pain. Resident #2 indicated to her that he hit his head during the fall. S3 Van Driver said she caught his head and his head didn't hit the ground. S7 Dialysis Center RN indicated Resident #2 should have been sent to the hospital instead of going to dialysis. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:25 p.m. S1 Administrator viewed the video footage from 02/14/2024 and acknowledged Resident #2 was not loaded onto the van by S3 Van Driver appropriately leading to Resident #2 being dropped onto his back in the facility parking lot. During an interview on 02/20/24 at 1:29 p.m., S3 Van Driver watched the video from 02/14/2024 of the incident of Resident #2 flipping over in wheelchair and she reported, Well I guess I didn't catch him from falling. I thought I did. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 2:05 p.m., after S2 Corporate Nurse watched the video of Resident #2's fall on 02/14/2024 while trying to be lifted on the van, S2 Corporate Nurse indicated that staff should have moved the van so Resident #2 could safely be put on the van lift. S2 Corporate Nurse confirmed S4 RN and S5 LPN did not assess Resident #2 prior to and after lifting Resident #2 in his wheelchair of the ground and they should have. During an interview on 02/22/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S1 Administrator reviewed S3 Van Driver's training and verified S3 Van Driver did not complete watching an online video that is required for safety for lift and tie downs on her checklist sheet.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and video footage review, the facility failed to ensure the van driver possessed the competen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and video footage review, the facility failed to ensure the van driver possessed the competency to load a resident on to the facility van correctly and nursing staff possessed the competency to assess residents after a fall for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #2 and #3) residents reviewed for falls. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #2 on 02/14/2024 at approximately 5:35:22 a.m. (per video footage observed) when S3 Van Driver attempted to load Resident #2 on the van lift without following the manufacturer's guidelines for that van lift. S3 Van Driver tried to lift Resident #2's wheelchair over the side of the van lift instead of wheeling Resident #2 on to the front of the lift, as per manufacturer's guidelines. When S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left leg of the wheelchair to get over the side of the van lift, the wheelchair flipped over backwards with Resident #2 in the chair and landed on the concrete. Did you observe hiS3 Van Driver called for help and S4 RN (Registered Nurse), S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and S6 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) came out of the facility to help. S4 RN and S6 CNA then lifted Resident #2's wheelchair with him in it to an upright position. S5 LPN and S6 CNA both lifted the wheelchair over the side of the van lift with Resident #2 in the wheelchair. S3 Van Driver continued to load Resident #2 in the van and then took Resident #2 to his scheduled dialysis. Shortly after Resident #2 arrived at dialysis, the dialysis staff called the facility to let them know Resident #2 complained of severe pain to his neck and dialysis staff called EMS (Emergency Medical Service) who transported Resident #2 to an acute ER (Emergency Room). After arriving at the ER, Resident #2 was found to have a C3 (cervical 3) burst fracture. By the facility failing to implement protective measures, there was a high likelihood that additional severe harm, injury, or death could occur to any of the 66 residents residing in the facility who have the potential for transport in the facility van per the Resident Census and Conditions Report dated 02/19/2024. S1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/21/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy ended on 02/22/2024 at 6:50 p.m. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite observations, interviews, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Review of facility's Driver and Vehicle Safety Policy (revised 03/2023) revealed in part: Driver Selection: The following criteria are evaluated when selecting individuals to drive on behalf of the company . Demonstration of full understanding of this safety policy during in servicing prior to driving for the company; Demonstrated ability to safely load and unload residents if the employee will be driving the company vehicle What to do in the event of an Emergency or Accident: In the event of an emergency while transporting residents, employees should follow the established policies and procedures of the company as if in the facility. Following are guidelines for the driver in the event of an accident: At the scene of the accident: Always stop if involved in an accident, call or have another party call 911 to summons an ambulance and/or police, and do not drive a resident or employee to the hospital. Wait for an ambulance to transport injured parties. Review of facility's Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report policy (last reviewed 01/2023) revealed in part: Policy: The facility will conduct an investigation of all incidents involving residents of the facility. B. Resident Incidents/Accidents: 1. If you witness an incident/accident, you must: immediately summons help; do not move the resident until he/she has been assessed by a licensed nurse; do not leave the resident unattended. 2. Licensed nurse must: a. examine the resident and obtain vital signs b. if the resident hit his/her head or if the incident is unwitnessed initiate neurological checks. c. conduct further assessment as warranted d. render appropriate treatment Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, End Stage Renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis and acquired absences of left leg above knee and right leg above knee. Upon Resident #2's return to the facility on [DATE] the diagnosis of displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra and sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, sequela related to a subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing was added. Record review of Resident #2's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/30/2023 revealed in part, Resident #2 had a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Review of the facility's video record dated 02/14/2024, revealed the following: At 5:31:35 a.m. S3 Van Driver brought Resident #2 outside next to van and locked wheelchair. S3 Van Driver proceeded to get the lift down to ground. At 5:34:30 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to put Resident #2 on the lift and was struggling due to the other van that was parked on the other side. At 5:35:22 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to raise the front of the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift. S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left side of Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 and the wheelchair flipped over backwards. S3 Van Driver then started knocking on the door to facility trying to get help. At 5:37:31 a.m. S4 RN poked her head out the door and then went back inside. S3 Van Driver stayed with Resident #2. At 5:38:43 a.m. S4 RN came outside. At 5:38:54 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA came out of facility. At 5:39:06 a.m. S4 RN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair to an upright position with the resident in the chair. At 5:39:50 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair onto to the van lift over the lip of the lift. At 5:41:04 a.m. S3 Van Driver loaded Resident #2 into the van and proceeded to take Resident #2 to dialysis. Upon completion of video review by surveyors, the video failed to reveal a head to toe assessment was completed on Resident #2 by S4RN and S5LPN. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #2 reported S3 Van Driver was trying to load him on the lift of the van to go to dialysis on 02/14/2024 and there was another van beside the lift. S3 Van Driver tried to get his wheelchair loaded on the side of the lift and S3 Van Driver lifted the front wheels of the wheelchair. Resident #2 further reported the wheelchair flipped over backwards and I (Resident #2) hit the concrete. When Resident #2 got to dialysis his neck was hurting bad and dialysis sent him to the emergency room. Resident #2 verified that his neck was broken and a collar was placed on him after he declined having a surgery on his neck. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:15 p.m., S3 Van Driver indicated she was loading up Resident #2 on the van lift on 02/14/2024. The van on the other side was blocking the lift to be able to put the resident on the lift. S3 Van Driver then proceeded to attempt to lift the front of the wheelchair over the side lip of the lift and the wheelchair flipped over backwards. S3 Van Driver acknowledged she did not follow proper protocol when loading Resident #2 on to the van lift. S3 Van Driver confirmed Resident #2 should have been loaded going forward on to the lift and not lifted over the side. During a telephone interview on 02/20/2024 at 12:35 p.m., S5 LPN indicated on 02/14/2024 she went outside when she was called to help Resident #2 after he fell backwards in wheelchair. S5 LPN indicated Resident #2 was shook up and said he hit his head during the fall and there was a hematoma on the back of his head. S5 LPN indicated she completed an assessment and got Resident #2 back up in his wheelchair. S5 LPN told Resident #2 we needed to go back inside the facility and Resident #2 said he had to go to dialysis and he was persistent about going. S5 LPN then indicated she and S3 Van Driver lifted the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift with S3 Van Driver on the front of the wheelchair and S5LPN on the backside of the wheelchair and they manually lifted the chair on to the van lift and then S3 Van Driver took Resident #2 to the dialysis center. S5 LPN indicated she called the dialysis center to let them know what happened. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:36 p.m., S4 RN confirmed on 02/14/2024 she saw Resident #2 lying on his back in the parking lot. S4 RN confirmed she asked Resident #2 if he was okay and he said he wanted to go to dialysis and staff lifted his chair onto the van lift and Resident #2 was transported to dialysis. S4 RN acknowledged she did not do a head to toe assessment on Resident #2 after his fall. During a telephone interview on 02/21/2024 at 11:18 a.m., S8 MD (Medical Doctor) indicated he did not receive a call from the facility on 02/14/2024 regarding Resident #2's fall. S8 MD reported if the facility had called him he would have instructed staff to not move the resident, call 911 and wait for EMS to assess the resident. S8 MD acknowledged Resident #2 should not have been moved by staff and loaded on to the facility van for transport to dialysis. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 9:20 a.m., S1 Administrator indicated facility had a new van driver (S3 Van Driver). S1 Administrator reported on 02/14/2024, S3 Van Driver was trying to load Resident #2 on to the lift from behind the van. Another transport van was behind the lift of the van that she was trying to get Resident #2 in. Since the lift was blocked from the back where you normally load residents on the van, S3 Van Driver attempted to put the wheelchair on the side of the lift. When S3 Van Driver lifted the front of the wheelchair, it flipped over backwards. This caused Resident #2 to fall to the concrete and Resident #2 suffered a C3 (cervical 3) fracture. During a telephone interview on 02/20/2024 at 11:30 a.m., S7 Dialysis Center RN indicated on 02/14/2024, the nursing home staff called letting her know that Resident #2 had a fall when attempting to be loaded on van. S3 Van Driver came into the clinic and asked for help unloading Resident #2. When she (S7 Dialysis Center RN) went to help the driver, Resident #2 was crying in pain of the neck. Resident #2 indicated to her that he hit his head during the fall. S7 Dialysis Center RN indicated Resident #2 should have been sent to the hospital instead of going to dialysis. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:25 p.m., S1 Administrator viewed the video footage from 02/14/2024 with surveyors and acknowledged Resident #2 was not loaded onto the van by S3 Van Driver appropriately leading to Resident #2 being dropped onto his back in the facility parking lot. S1 Administrator confirmed S4 RN and S5 LPN were called to the scene and did not assess Resident #2 prior to picking him and his wheelchair up off the ground and should have. S1Administrator acknowledged S4 RN and S5 LPN lifted Resident #2 in his wheelchair onto the van lift and allowed S3 Van Driver to transport Resident #2 to dialysis. S1 Administrator confirmed staff should not have lifted Resident #2 off the ground and EMS (Emergency Medical Services) should have been called. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 2:05 p.m., after S2 Corporate Nurse watched the video of Resident #2's fall while trying to be lifted on the van, S2 Corporate Nurse indicated S3 Van Driver should have moved the van so Resident #2 could safely be put on the van lift. S2 Corporate Nurse verified S4 RN and S5 LPN did not do an assessment after Resident#2 fell backwards in wheelchair and should have. S2 Corporate Nurse further indicated when Resident #2 had the fall; staff should have called EMS and sent Resident #2 to ER for evaluation. During an interview on 02/22/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S1 Administrator reviewed S3 Van Driver's training and verified S3 Van Driver did not complete watching an on line training video, required for safety for lift and tie downs and should have.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on record review, interview and video footage review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interview and video footage review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #2 and #3) residents after a fall: 1. by failing to ensure a system was in place to safely transport Resident #2 in the facility van; 2. by failing to ensure the van driver possessed the competency to load a resident on to the facility van correctly and nursing staff possessed the competency to assess residents after a fall; and 3. by failing to ensure a system was in place to provide necessary care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice to Resident #2 after an incident on 02/14/2024. The lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #2 on 02/14/2024 at approximately 5:35:22 a.m. (per video footage observed) when S3 Van Driver attempted to load Resident #2 on the van lift without following the manufacturer's guidelines for that van lift. S3 Van Driver tried to lift Resident #2's wheelchair over the side of the van lift instead of wheeling Resident #2 on to the front of the lift, as per manufacturer's guidelines. When S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left leg of the wheelchair to get over the side of the van lift, the wheelchair flipped over backwards with Resident #2 in the chair and landed on the concrete. S3 Van Driver called for help and S4 RN (Registered Nurse), S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and S6 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) came out of the facility to help. S4 RN and S6 CNA then lifted Resident #2's wheelchair with him in it to an upright position. S5 LPN and S6 CNA both lifted the wheelchair over the side of the van lift with Resident #2 in the wheelchair. S3 Van Driver continued to load Resident #2 in the van and then took Resident #2 to his scheduled dialysis. Shortly after Resident #2 arrived at dialysis, the dialysis staff called the facility to let them know Resident #2 complained of severe pain to his neck and dialysis staff called EMS (Emergency Medical Service) who transported Resident #2 to an acute ER (Emergency Room). After arriving at the ER, Resident #2 was found to have a C3 (cervical 3) burst fracture. By the facility failing to implement protective measures, there was a high likelihood that additional severe harm, injury, or death could occur to any of the 66 residents residing in the facility who have the potential for transport in the facility van per the Resident Census and Conditions Report dated 02/19/2024. S1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/21/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The immediate jeopardy ended on 02/22/2024 at 6:50 p.m. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite observations, interviews, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Cross Reference F689, F726, F684 During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:25 p.m., S1 Administrator viewed the video footage from 02/14/2024 with surveyors and acknowledged Resident #2 was not loaded onto the van by S3 Van Driver appropriately leading to Resident #2 being dropped onto his back in the facility parking lot. S1 Administrator confirmed S4 RN and S5 LPN were called to the scene and did not assess Resident #2 prior to picking him and his wheelchair up off the ground and should have. S1Administrator acknowledged S4 RN and S5 LPN lifted Resident #2 in his wheelchair onto the van lift and allowed S3 Van Driver to transport Resident #2 to dialysis. S1 Administrator confirmed staff should not have lifted Resident #2 off the ground and EMS (Emergency Medical Services) should have been called. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 2:05 p.m., after S2 Corporate Nurse watched the video of Resident #2's fall while trying to be lifted on the van, S2 Corporate Nurse indicated S3 Van Driver should have moved the van so Resident #2 could safely be put on the van lift. S2 Corporate Nurse verified S4 RN and S5 LPN did not do an assessment after Resident#2 fell backwards in wheelchair and should have. S2 Corporate Nurse further indicated when Resident #2 had the fall; staff should have called EMS and sent Resident #2 to ER for evaluation. During an interview on 02/22/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S1 Administrator reviewed S3 Van Driver's training and verified S3 Van Driver did not complete watching an on line training video, required for safety for lift and tie downs and should have. During an interview on 02/22/2024 at 3:10 p.m., S1 Administrator verified she was the person that was ultimately responsible for what happened in the facility. S1Administrator further verified the facility did not identify areas of concern and they should have been aware.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and video footage review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was comp...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and video footage review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, End Stage Renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis and acquired absences of left leg above knee and right leg above knee. Upon Resident #2's return to the facility on [DATE] the diagnosis of displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra and sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, sequela related to a subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing was added. Record review of a written statement by S4 RN on 02/14/2024 revealed: On 02/14/2024 I, S4 RN (registered nurse) was on east hall making rounds and heard a resident yell out help. When I got to the front door of the building I seen Resident#2 laid back on pavement still in wheelchair. S3 Van Driver was standing next to him and said he fell. Writer went and got S5 LPN (licensed practical nurse) quickly. Assisted resident back to wheelchair at that time. Resident was assisted to the inside of the building. No injuries were seen at that time. Resident #2 stated he was not in pain at that time. Resident #2 stated he still wanted to go to dialysis. Record review of Resident #2's nurse's notes revealed the following, in part: Note on 02/14/2024 by S5 LPN (created 08:05:55 a.m.)- Writer (S5 LPN) was called outside per S4 RN at 5:24 a.m. Upon exiting the writer (S5 LPN) observed Resident #2 flipped over backward in his wheelchair. Resident #2 wasn't able to explain exactly what happened. Resident #2 just stated she dropped me. Resident #2 examined and assisted off the ground per three staff. Vital signs collected. Writer asked Resident #2 to come back inside. Resident #2 said no he needed his dialysis today. Writer said ok and notified dialysis of the situation. Writer spoke with S7 Dialysis Center RN at 5:40 a.m. Resident #2 left the facility at 5:45 a.m. in stable condition. S8 MD (Medical Doctor) notified. Resident is his own Responsible Party. Writer still attempted to reach Resident's emergency contact. Emergency contact phone is disconnected. Review of the facility's video record dated 02/14/2024, revealed the following: At 5:31:35 a.m. S3 Van Driver brought Resident #2 outside next to van and locked wheelchair. S3 Van Driver proceeded to get the lift down to ground. At 5:34:30 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to put Resident #2 on the lift and was struggling due to the other van that was parked on the other side. At 5:35:22 a.m. S3 Van Driver attempted to raise the front of the wheelchair over the lip of the side of the van lift. S3 Van Driver grabbed the front left side of Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 and the wheelchair flipped over backwards. S3 Van Driver then started knocking on the door to facility trying to get help. At 5:37:31 a.m. S4 RN poked her head out the door and then went back inside. S3 Van Driver stayed with Resident #2. At 5:38:43 a.m. S4 RN came outside. At 5:38:54 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA came out of facility. At 5:39:06 a.m. S4 RN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair to an upright position with the resident in the chair. At 5:39:50 a.m. S5 LPN and S6 CNA lifted Resident #2's wheelchair onto to the van lift over the lip of the lift. At 5:41:04 a.m. S3 Van Driver loaded Resident #2 into the van and proceeded to take Resident #2 to dialysis. Upon completion of video review by surveyors, the video failed to reveal a head to toe assessment was completed for Resident #2 by S4 RN or S5 LPN and failed to reveal Resident #2 was brought into facility after the incident. During a telephone interview on 02/21/2024 at 11:18 a.m., S8 MD indicated he did not receive a call from the facility on 02/14/2024. S8 MD then indicated he came to the facility on [DATE] and a nurse told him that Resident #2 had a fall and had a neck fracture. S8 MD indicated if the facility had called him when the incident happened he would have told them to not move the resident, call 911 and wait for EMS (Emergency Medical Services) to assess the resident. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 2:05 p.m., S2 Corporate Nurse watched the video of Resident #2 from 02/14/2024 and then verified S4 RN and S5 LPN did not assess Resident #2 prior to and after lifting Resident #2 in his wheelchair off the ground into a upright position and the staff should have called EMS (911) to send Resident #2 to the ER (emergency room). During an interview on 02/21/2024 at 2:20 p.m. S2 Corporate Nurse reviewed S4 RN's written statement after Resident #2's incident on 02/14/2024. S2 Corporate Nurse verified Resident #2 was not taken back into the facility after the incident. S2 Corporate Nurse reviewed S5 LPN's nurse note from 02/14/2024 which indicated S5 LPN completed vital signs on Resident #2 after the incident and notified S8 MD, S2 Corporate Nurse verified S5 LPN did not complete vital signs and did not notify S8 MD on 02/14/2024.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician/physician's representative was notif...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician/physician's representative was notified after a fall for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of facility's Policy for Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report policy (last reviewed January 2023) revealed in part: Policy The facility will conduct an investigation of all incidents involving residents of the facility. 2. Licensed nurse must: a. examine the resident and obtain vital signs e. notify the physician, family, legal representative 3. Pertinent documentation must be completed: f. obtain physician orders . Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, End Stage Renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis and acquired absences of left leg above knee and right leg above knee. Further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed diagnoses of displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra and sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, sequela related to a subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing on 02/16/2024 upon return to facility. Record review of Resident #2's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/30/2024 revealed in part, Resident #2 had a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Record review of Resident #2's comprehensive care plan revealed the following, in part, Resident #2 has had an actual fall with injury on 02/14/2024. While attempting to load Resident #2, in wheelchair, onto facility van, Resident 2's wheelchair flipped backwards. Resident #2 stated, She (S3 Van Driver) dropped me (Resident #2), but was unable to give any other details. Resident #2 refused to return inside facility for further evaluation stating he needed to go dialysis today. Resident #2 was loaded on facility van and transferred to dialysis clinic for scheduled dialysis on 02/14/2024 at 6:39 a.m. During a telephone interview on 02/21/2024 at 11:18 a.m., S8 MD (Medical Doctor) indicated he did not receive a call from the facility on 02/14/2024. S8 MD then indicated he came to the facility on [DATE] and a nurse told him that Resident #2 had a fall and had a neck fracture. S8 MD indicated if the facility had called him when the incident happened he would have told them to not move the resident, call 911 and wait for EMS (emergency medical services) to assess the resident.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical and/or verbal abuse was repo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical and/or verbal abuse was reported immediately but not later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for an allegation of abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy with a latest revision date of 11/07/2023 revealed the following, in part: Intent: This protocol was intended to assist in the prevention of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Each Resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and financial abuse. Policy: 1. The facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse, including involuntary seclusion and the misappropriation of property. 2. The facility will conduct an investigation of alleged or suspected abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property, and will provide notification of information to the proper authorities according to state and federal regulations. Record review of Resident #1's diagnosis section revealed the following diagnoses, in part: Schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, depression, and alcoholic polyneuropathy, in part. Record review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed in Section C Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 00 which would reflect Resident #1 was severely impaired. During a telephone interview on 02/19/2024 at 9:10 a.m., S9 Community Case Manager indicated Resident #1 had been at the facility for a couple of months. S9 Community Case Manager confirmed Resident #1 reported she was being abused at the facility. S9 Community Case Manager acknowledged after the facility's investigation it was reported that Resident #1 admitted that the allegations were false. During a telephone interview on 02/19/2024 at 10:25 a.m. with Resident #1's son (responsible party) and daughter-in-law, Resident #1's daughter-in-law indicated Resident #1 had a history of making up stories about the nursing home abusing her. She reported the facility was taking great care of Resident #1 and Resident #1 claims of being abused were not true. During an interview on 02/20/2024 at 1:15 p.m., S1 Administrator indicated Resident #1 had spoken with S9 Community Case Manager about getting Resident #1 back to her home. S1 Administrator reported S9 Community Case Manager informed her Resident #1 made accusations of being abused at the facility. S1 Administrator confirmed Resident #1 admitted she was not telling the truth about being abused because she wanted to go home. S1 Administrator verified a SIMS (Statewide Incident Management System) report was not completed after the abuse allegations were made. S2 Corporate Nurse was present during the interview and she verified that a SIMS report should have been completed after accusations of abuse were made.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident received treatment and care in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (#3) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, & #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to apply immobilizer/ splint to Resident #3's left arm for humerus dislocation/ fracture and ensure assist bars to right side of Resident #3's bed. Findings: Review of Resident #3's medical diagnoses revealed the following in part but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, cerebellar ataxia in diseases, muscle wasting and atrophy, right and left upper arm, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity Review of Resident #3's February 2024 Physician Orders dated 04/17/2023 revealed right assist bar to aide in bed mobility (every shift). Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) dated 11/29/2023 revealed BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status): 15 out of 15 indicating cognitively intact and no behaviors of rejection of care. Further review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had limitation in range of motion on one side of upper and lower extremity. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan failed to reveal noncompliance or refusal of care. Review of Progress Notes dated 12/08/2023 revealed: 5:45 p.m. Received X-ray results to the left shoulder, results revealed there has been interval development of an oblique mildly displaced fracture of the proximal humeral shaft extending into the humeral surgical neck. 10:28 p.m. Resident returned to the facility via ______ Ambulance Service per stretcher with a splint to the left arm/ shoulder. Review of Discharge Disposition from hospital dated 12/08/2023 revealed attached education material humerus fracture treated with immobilization -A humerus fracture is a break in the large bone in the upper arm (humerus). If the joint is stable and the bones are still in their normal position (nondisplaced), the injury may be treated with immobilization. This involves the use of a cast, splint, or sling to hold your arm in place. Immobilization ensures that your bones continue to stay in the correct position while your arm is healing. Review of Discharge Disposition from the hospital dated 12/22/2023 revealed attached education material humerus fracture treated with immobilization and a note written on discharge disposition: Do Not Take off Immobilizer until Orthopedic Visit. During an interview on 02/01/2024 at 12:30 p.m. Resident #3 reported she was trained by therapy to use assist bars to transfer and reposition in and out of bed. Resident #3 reported she had fractured bones in her left arm when she had a fall last month and she should be wearing a splint for 6 weeks. Resident #3 reported she wore the splint for about 1 day and she informed the staff the splint material irritated her skin and have not worn it again. During an interview on 02/01/2024 at 3:35 p.m. S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed Resident #3 and confirmed Resident #3 did not have immobilizer/splint to left arm. During an interview on 02/01/2024 at 4:50 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) reported Resident #3 should keep immobilizer/ splint in place to the left arm until follow up orthopedic appointment. S2 DON confirmed Resident #3 has not had a follow up orthopedic appointment and Resident #3 should have been wearing immobilizer/ splint and was not. Observation on 02/01/2024 at 3:30 p.m. revealed assist bar to Resident #3's left side of the bed. During an interview on 02/01/2024 at 3:35 p.m. S3 LPN reported Resident #3's assist bar was on the left side of the bed and should be on the right per physician orders. During an interview on 02/01/2024 at 4:50 p.m. S1 Administrator observed assist bars to left side of Resident #3's bed and confirmed assist bars should be on the right side of Resident #3's bed. .
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident medical records reflected the resident wishes for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident medical records reflected the resident wishes for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician orders and care plan were consistent with the resident's wishes. Findings: Review of the facility's Advance Directives Policy (revision date [DATE]) revealed in part: Policy Statement: Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 10. The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/ or advanced directive. Review of face sheet revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, malignant neoplasm of prostate, secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung, secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, encounter for antineoplastic chemotherapy, atypical atrial flutter, atherosclerotic heart disease of native artery without angina pectoris and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #1's [DATE] Physician Orders dated [DATE] revealed: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Review of Care Plan revealed Resident #1 had been provided the information explaining the Advanced Directive process and following the education have decided that I am a Full Code. Review of the Louisiana Physician Order for Scope of Treatment LaPOST signed by Resident #1 and the physician dated [DATE] revealed: DNR/ (Do not attempt resuscitation) Review of Progress Notes revealed in part: Note dated [DATE] by S2 Social Worker revealed Resident #1 selected to be a DNR code status. Note dated [DATE] by S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed Resident #1 was unresponsive and S3 called 911 and initiated CPR. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:20 p.m., S3 LPN reported Resident #1's son came to the nurses' station to report Resident #1 was unresponsive. S3 LPN reported upon assessment of Resident #1 there were no signs of life, 911 was activated and CPR was initiated until 911 arrived at the facility and took over. S3 LPN reported a resident code status is identified by reviewing the computer MAR (Medication Administration Record). S3 LPN reported Resident #1's code status on the MAR was CPR so she called 911 and started CPR. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:20 p.m. S1 DON (Director of Nursing) reviewed Resident #1's electronic medical record and reported Resident #1 had physician orders and was care planned for CPR while the LaPOST was for DNR. S1 DON reported when Resident #1 became unresponsive CPR was done in the facility. S1DON confirmed Resident #1's wishes indicated in the LaPOST did not match the physician's order and care plan and should have.
Dec 2023 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the building in good condition for 1 (#39) r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the building in good condition for 1 (#39) resident out of 64 residents residing in the facility according to the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 12/11/2023. The facility failed to ensure bathroom sink in Resident #39's bathroom was in good repair. Findings: Review of Resident #39's Medical Records revealed admit date of 10/07/2021 with the following diagnoses, in part: morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, other polyosteoarthritis and chronic pulmonary edema. Review of Resident #39's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed: BIMS 15 (intact cognition). Observation on 12/13/2023 at 7:50 a.m. revealed Resident #39's bathroom sink coming apart from the wall and supported by two wooden poles. Further observation revealed each wooden pole was supported by two wooden blocks. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 7:50 a.m. Resident #39 reported the bathroom sink has been broken and needs to be repaired. Resident #39 further reported she uses the sink to brush her teeth and wash her face. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 7:55 a.m. accompanied by S11 Maintenance reported he was unaware of the sink being broken. S11 Maintenance further reported his log with open jobs did not include repairing the sink in Resident #39's bathroom. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 7:55 a.m. S1 Administrator acknowledged the sink was a safety hazard and needed to be repaired.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure necessary respiratory care and services was provided in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure necessary respiratory care and services was provided in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 1 (#268) out of 1 (#268) resident reviewed for respiratory care out of a total of 35 sampled residents. The facility failed to store nasal cannula and hand held nebulizer to prevent contamination. Findings: Review of Resident #268's Medical Records revealed an admit date of 12/05/2023 with the following diagnoses, in part: sleep apnea/unspecified, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)/unspecified, other asthma, obesity/unspecified, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure and respiratory failure/unspecified/unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia. Review of Resident #268's Physician's Orders revealed the following orders: 12/06/2023 - Albuterol Sulfate HFA (hydrofluoroakane) inhalation aerosol solution 108 mcg (microgram)/act (actuate) 1 puff inhale orally four times a day for SOB (shortness of breath) and 12/01/2023 - O2 (oxygen) at 2 liters per minute via (by way of) nasal cannula continuously . Observation on 12/12/2023 at 3:45 p.m. revealed Resident #268's nasal cannula attached to the oxygen concentrator lying on the floor. Further observation of Resident #268's HHN (hand held nebulizer) was propped on nebulizer machine not enclosed in a bag with mouthpiece touching the divider curtain. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 3:45 p.m. Resident #268 reported the nasal cannula is supposed to be in a bag and her HHN is also supposed to be in a bag. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 3:50 p.m. S9 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) acknowledged Resident #268's nasal cannula was on the floor and should be in a bag. S9 ADON further acknowledged Resident #268's nebulizer treatment tubing was touching the curtain and should also be in a bag.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately submit payroll information for direct care staffing as ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately submit payroll information for direct care staffing as required. Findings: Review of the facility's Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report 1705D Fiscal Year Quarter 3 2023 (April 1- June 30) revealed the facility failed to submit staffing data for the quarter. PBJ revealed triggers for the following: One Star Staffing Rating, Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 1:39 p.m. S1 Administrator acknowledged S8 PBJ Coordinator Payroll Data enters the data for CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and did not include the agency staff working. She further reported S8 PBJ Coordinator Payroll Data informed her she didn't include them for July - [DATE] as well. During a telephone interview on 12/13/2023 at 1:00 p.m. S8 PBJ Coordinator Payroll Data reported another person was helping her with the PBJ and there were missing invoices which left the agency staff off the PBJ report for the 3rd quarter. She acknowledged she did not go behind this person and check the data. She further acknowledged agency staff should have been included in the PBJ 3rd quarter and were not
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly. The facility total census was 64 according to the Resident Cens...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly. The facility total census was 64 according to the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Report form. Findings: Review of the QAPI Policy revealed in part the Committee meets quarterly or more frequently if determined. Review of QAPI meeting documentation provided by S1 Administrator failed to reveal evidence that the QAPI committee met during the fourth quarter of this year as there was no signature page that verified the attendance of staff at the QAPI meeting, or documentation of the minutes/summary of the meeting for September, October or November 2023. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 4:30 PM S1 Administrator reported she forgot to have everyone sign the forms and have been too busy to have a meeting in November. S1 Administrator reported she was aware the staff should have signed the attendance form and did not.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 (#52) of 1(#52) resident out of total of 35 sampled residents. The facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 (#52) of 1(#52) resident out of total of 35 sampled residents. The facility failed to complete resident #52's lab work and chest x-ray as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of resident #52's medical record revealed an initial admit date of 02/02/2023 and a re-admission date of 10/04/2023 with a diagnosis of, but not limited to: Type 2 diabetes, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Infection and Inflammation due to indwelling urethral catheter, and Urinary Tract Infection 10/04/2023. Review of resident #52's October 2023 Physician Orders revealed an order for: 10/05/2023 Admit labs: UA w/C&S (urinalysis with culture and sensitivity) CXR (Chest x-ray) Review of resident #52's medical records failed to reveal the results of a UA w/C&S and CXR, indicating the tests had not been done as ordered by resident #52's physician on 10/5/2023. During an interview on 10/06/2023 at 1:12 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nurses) confirmed resident #52's UA w/C&S and Chest x-ray was not done as ordered on 10/05/2023.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (#19, #34) of 2 residents reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) by: 1. Failing to provide nail care for Resident #19 and #34 2. Failing to shave facial hair for Resident #34. Findings: Resident #19 Review of resident #19's medical record revealed an admit date [DATE] and a diagnosis of but not limited to; Non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, Encephalopathy, left sided hemiparesis, Dysphagia, Left Above Knee Amputation Type 2 diabetes, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Depression. Review of resident #19's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/11/2023 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 7 indicating severely impaired cognition. Further review revealed resident #19 was assessed to be dependent on staff for upper body grooming and maintain of personal hygiene. Review of resident #19's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the following: Resident has an ADL self-care deficit: approaches of nail care as needed, check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Observation on 12/11/2023 at 10:28 a.m. revealed resident #19's fingernails on both hands were long and curved over resident #19's nail beds. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:45 a.m. S12 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported she usually trims resident fingernails when providing a shower. S12 CNA confirmed resident #19's fingernails were long and curved over his nail bed. S12 CNA stated, Resident #19's fingernails had not been trimmed on 12/11/2023 because she did not work on that day. Resident #34 Review of resident #34's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/09/2023 with a diagnosis of but not limited to; Multiple Sclerosis, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Hemiplegia, hemiparesis right side weakness, Epilepsy, Lack of coordination, and Dementia Review of resident #34's Minimum Data Set revealed resident #34 had a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Further review revealed resident #34 was dependent on staff to maintain personal hygiene including combing hair, shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands. Review of resident #34's Comprehensive Plan of Care revealed the following: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit requiring Substantial/ Maximal assistance for upper body and personal hygiene. Approaches of shave facial hair as needed, check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Observation on 12/11/2023 at 6:15 a.m. revealed resident #34 fingernails on both hands were long with dark colored residue underneath the nail beds. Further observation revealed resident #34 had facial hair on her top lip and chin. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:45 a.m. S12 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) confirmed resident #34's fingernails were long and had dark colored residue underneath the nailbeds. S12 CNA further confirmed resident #34 had facial hair that had not been shaved. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 1:00 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nurses) confirmed nail care for resident's #19 and #34 and shaving facial hair for resident #34 should have been done.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by 1. Failing to give a resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by 1. Failing to give a resident's medication dose as prescribed and 2. Failing to notify the physician of missed doses for 1 (#46) resident out of 5 ( #15, #20, #29, #34, #46) residents observed for med pass and 3. Failing to complete glucometer control testing for 6 glucometer machines. This had the potential to affect any of the 15 diabetics in the building. Findings: Review of Administering Medications Policy revealed in part: 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 6. Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training. 7. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Review of the Change of Condition and Physician/Family Notification policy revealed in part: To ensure that resident's family and/or legal representative and physician are notified of resident changes that fall under the following categories: -Medication error Review of resident #46's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/17/2022 with diagnoses that include in part thyrotoxicosis with diffuse goiter without thyrotoxic crisis or storm, essential hypertension, depression, and tachycardia. Review of resident #46's physician orders revealed in part: 06/18/2022 Methimazole tablet 10 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hyperthyroidism 07/02/2022 Methimazole 5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to thyrotoxicosis. Take in addition to Methimazole 10 mg to =15 mg daily. Review of Medication Administration record (MAR) documentation for August 2023-December 2023 revealed in part Methimazole 5 mg doses not given/not available for the following dates; August 3, 4, 5, 6, 26, 27, and 28th. October 30th and 31st. November 1, 2, 3, and 9th. December 5, 6, 8 and 11th. During an interview on 12/11/2023 at 6:15 a.m. S7 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported Methimazole 5 mg was on back order, and the 10 mg cannot be cut in half so at times only the 10 mg dose was given. S7 LPN further reported she had not notified the doctor of the missing doses. During an interview on 12/11/2023 at 3:00 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) reviewed the August 2023-December 2023 MARs for resident #46 and confirmed the Methimazole 5 mg had doses not given and the physician should have been notified and was not. Review of the policy Obtaining a Finger stick Glucose level revealed in part: Preparation: 4. Ensure that the equipment and devices are working properly by performing any calibrations or checks as instructed by the manufacturer or this facility. Review of the glucometer quality control/calibration check logs for the 6 glucometers revealed missing glucometer control checks for; -North med cart glucometer #2 noted as not on the cart for December 10, 11, and 13th. No entry for December 12th 2023. -East med cart glucometer #1 and #2 failed to reveal documentation for December 12th, 2023. -West med cart glucometer #1 and #2 failed to reveal documentation for December 11th and 12th, 2023. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 7:43 a.m. S14 LPN and S13 LPN verified the missing glucometer control checks for the east and west med cart and reported they should have been done by the night nurses and were not. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 8:25 a.m. S2 DON reported the night shift is supposed to check the glucometer machines and calibrate them every night. S2 DON reviewed the glucometer logs for December 2023 for the North, East, and [NAME] med carts and confirmed the glucometer control/calibration checks had not been completed and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for 1 (#268) out of 6 (#63, #37, #10, #15, #49, #268) residents reviewed for unneces...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for 1 (#268) out of 6 (#63, #37, #10, #15, #49, #268) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor edema for Resident #268 who received a diuretic. Findings: Review of Resident #268's Medical Records revealed an admit date of 12/05/2023 with the following diagnoses, in part: sleep apnea/unspecified, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/unspecified, other asthma, obesity/unspecified, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure and respiratory failure/unspecified/unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia. Review of Resident #268's Physician's Orders revealed orders dated: 12/06/2023 - Bumetanide tablet 1mg(milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for fluid retention and 12/05/2023 - diuretics - monitor for the following: decreased po (by mouth) intake, acute confusion, agitation, delusions, aggression, lethargy, decreased sweating, tachycardia, hypotension, orthostasis, generalized weakness and/or sunken eyes. Document Y (yes) if monitored and none of the above observed. N (no) if monitored and any of above was observed, select chart code other. Review of Resident #268's December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) failed to reveal monitoring for edema or monitoring diuretics. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 10:20 a.m. S10 RN (Registered Nurse) viewed December 2023 MAR with surveyor and confirmed edema checks and monitoring diuretics were not completed on Resident #268. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 10:30 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #268 failed to have edema checks and monitoring diuretics for December 2023 and should have.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored and labeled properly in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to monitor the te...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored and labeled properly in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to monitor the temperatures in the medication storage refrigerator. This had the potential to affect any of the 64 residents as listed on the Resident Census and Condition form. Findings: Review of Medication Labeling and Storage policy revealed in part: -The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Review of the Storage of Medication policy revealed in part: Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug administration. 10. Medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 2 degrees C (Celsius) (36 degrees F ((Fahrenheit)) and 8 degrees C (46 degrees F) are kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. Review of Medication Room Refrigerator Temperature monitoring form revealed: temperature between 36 and 46 degrees. Monitored for temperature and appropriate contents. The refrigerator should be clean. If the temperature is not between 36 and 46 degrees, readjust temp and recheck in 10-15 minutes. If temperature not corrected, notify maintenance. If maintenance not available, remove medications and place in another refrigerator until refrigerator repaired. Review of the December 2023 temperature logs for North nurses station failed to reveal temperature checks had been completed December 8 and 9th 2023. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 8:25 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) reviewed the temperature logs for December 2023 and confirmed the missing temperature checks had not been done and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 64 residents served a meal tray from the kitchen as reported by the Dietary Manager. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items in freezers that had been opened were wrapped securely and dated. 2. Evidence of food temperature checks for each food item at each meal had been obtained. 1. Review of Food Receiving and Storage Policy with date of October 2022 revealed: Policy Statement - Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date) .11. The freezer must keep frozen foods frozen solid. Wrappers of frozen foods must stay intact until thawing. Observation of kitchen freezers, with S3 Cook, during the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/11/2023 at 6:20 a.m. revealed the following items: -Metal container with frozen chicken was loosely covered in plastic wrap and was not dated. -An open frozen boneless ham was loosely covered in plastic wrap and was not dated. -Ribs that were loosely wrapped in a plastic bag and were not dated. -Two packages of frozen chicken patties that had been opened and were not dated. -A large bucket of ice cream that had been opened and was not dated. -Four opened packages of scalloped potato powder that were not wrapped or dated. During an interview on 12/11/2023 at 6:35 a.m. S3 [NAME] observed the following items in the freezers and reported each of the opened items should have been securely wrapped and dated with the date they were opened and were not: -Metal container with frozen chicken was loosely covered and was not dated -An open frozen boneless ham was loosely covered and not dated -Ribs that were wrapped loosely in plastic and were not dated -Two packages of frozen chicken patties that had been opened were not dated -Large bucket of ice cream that had been opened was not dated, and -Four opened packages of scallop potato powder packets were not wrapped or dated. 2. Review of Food Preparation and Service Policy revealed: Policy Statement - Food and nutrition services employees prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . Food Preparation, Cooking and Holding Time/Temperatures . 5. Food thermometers used to check food temperatures are clean, sanitized and calibrated for accuracy. 6. The following internal cooking temperatures/times for specific food are reached to kill or sufficiently inactivate pathogenic microorganisms: -Internal Cooking temperature of 145 degrees F (fahrenheit) for 15 seconds for Raw eggs cooked for immediate service; Fish (except as listed below); Meat (except as listed below; and Commercially raised game animals, rabbits. -Internal Cooking temperature of 155 degrees F for 15 seconds for Ground meat (beef, pork;, ground fish; raw eggs held for service; comminuted meat, fish, or commercially raised game animals; injected or mechanically tenderized meats; and Ratites (ostrich, [NAME] and emu). -Internal Cooking temperature of 165 degrees F for 15 seconds for Wild game animals; poultry; stuffed fish, meat, pork, pasta ratites & poultry; and Stuffing containing fish, meat, ratites & poultry. 7. Fresh, frozen or canned fruits and vegetables are cooked to a holding temperature of 135 degrees F. 8. Raw food cooked in a microwave reach 165 degrees F in all part of the food . 11. Mechanically altered hot foods prepared for a modified consistency diet remain above 135 degrees F during preparation or they are reheated to 165 degrees F for at least 15 seconds. Food Service/Distribution 1. Proper hot and cold temperatures are maintained during food service. 2. The temperatures of foods held in steam tables are monitored throughout the meal by food and nutrition services staff. Review of October, November, and December 2023 Food Temperature Logs failed to reveal individual food temperatures had been documented for each food item at each meal. Further review of October, November and December 2023 Food Temperature Logs revealed only a single start temperature and a single end temperature had been recorded for breakfast, lunch, and dinner each day. During an interview on 12/11/2023 at 8:10 a.m. S4 Dietary Manager reported he was providing meals for 64 residents in the facility. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 11:05 a.m. S4 Dietary Manager observed the October, November, and December 2023 Food Temp Logs and reported the kitchen was not recording the temperature of each food item individually for meals. S4 Dietary Manager further reported the staff were only recording the lowest temperature found prior to dispensing meals and the lowest temperature found after meals had been plated.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported immediately, b...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, & #3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy with a revision date of 11/07/2023 revealed in part: Each Resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and financial abuse. Investigation: 2. The Abuse Coordinator will report such allegations to the state agency in accordance with state law. The Abuse Coordinator will report all allegations of abuse, neglect with serious bodily injury, mistreatment with serious bodily injury, exploitation with serious bodily injury, and injuries of unknown source with serious bodily injury within 2 hours of the allegation. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, Type 2 Diabetes, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/20/2023 revealed in part a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed in summary a head to toe assessment was performed by S4Wound Nurse upon notification of the allegation of abuse and revealed no findings abuse. Further record review revealed an x-ray of Resident #2's right shoulder, dated 11/13/2023, revealed no finding of fracture or dislocation. Review of facility's Investigation Report revealed an investigation began on 11/13/2023 for an allegation of physical abuse for the accused employee, S2CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Further review of facility's Investigation Report revealed in part, S3LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported Resident #2 had reported S2CNA was pushing and pulling on her and told Resident #2 she stank and needed to take a shower. Review of S7CNA's written and signed statement dated 11/13/2023 revealed in part: . Approximately 10:30-11:30 a.m. I was working alongside S2CNA . S2CNA was bathing and assisting Resident #2. I was in and out of room. Resident #2 seemed in good spirits; was joking back and forth with S2CNA with no problems, while S6LPN was also present. Review of the facility's SIMS (Statewide Incident Management System) report revealed in part, the incident occurred on 11/13/2023 at 10:00 a.m. The incident was discovered by Administration on 11/13/2023 at 10:30 a.m. and entered into the system on November 13, 2023 at 2:49 p.m. During an interview on 12/05/2023 at 11:20 a.m. Resident #2 was unable to focus, made little eye contact and account was inconsistent with allegation. During a telephone interview on 12/05/2023 at 12:30 p.m. S6LPN reported on the morning of 11/13/2023 she was passing by Resident #2's room when S2CNA asked her to come in because Resident #2 was being rude. S6LPN reported when she walked into Resident #2's room she observed Resident #2 sitting on the toilet wet with soap. S6LPN further reported when she asked Resident #2 what was going on, Resident #2 stated, S2CNA hit me and in response, S2CNA stated No, Resident #2, I did not hit you. S6LPN reported S2CNA then proceeded to demonstrate how she helped position Resident #2 by bracing Resident #2's shoulders, so she would not slide off the toilet. S6LPN reported she stayed with S2CNA and Resident #2 until care had been completed and Resident #2 was dressed. S6LPN reported she had not witnessed any abuse. S6LPN further reported she did not see any signs of abuse or receive any complaints of pain from Resident #2. During an interview on 12/05/2023 at 2:40 p.m., S4Wound Nurse reported S1Adminstrator informed her of the allegation of abuse in the morning meeting on 11/13/2023. S4Wound Nurse reported she and S5ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) then performed a head to toe skin assessment on Resident #2 and found no signs or symptoms of physical abuse. S4Wound Nurse further reported Resident #2 kept saying her shoulder was sore, therefore, an x-ray was ordered. During an interview on 12/05/2023 at 2:50 p.m., S1Administrator acknowledged the allegation of physical abuse had not been reported to State Survey Agency within 2 hours of discovery and should have been.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's property was not misappropriated. The facility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's property was not misappropriated. The facility failed to ensure 2 (#6, #7) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7) resident's narcotic controlled medications were not diverted. The facility failed to ensure narcotic controlled medications were destroyed according to facility policy. Findings: Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy with a revision date of April 2019 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement- The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Only authorized licensed nursing and/or pharmacy personnel have access to controlled drugs maintained on premises. 2. Personnel who are authorized to handle controlled substances are approved by the director of nursing services. 3. Controlled substances are stored in the medication room in a locked container, separate from any non-controlled medications. 8. Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift. 11. Upon Disposition: b. Medications that are opened and subsequently not given (refused or only partly administrated) are destroyed. Waste and/or disposal of controlled medication are done in the presence of the nurse and a witness who also signs the disposition sheet. Review of the facility's Discarding and Destroying Medications with a revision date of November 2022 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Medications that cannot be returned to the pharmacy are disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations governing management of non-hazardous pharmaceuticals, hazardous waste, and controlled substances. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. All unused controlled substances are retained in a securely locked area with restricted access until disposed of. 11. Completed medication disposition records are kept on file in the facility for at least two years, or as mandated by state law governing the retention and storage of such records. Review of the facility's investigation report regarding drug diversion revealed the following, in part: Occurred on 08/23/2023. Victims were Resident #6 and Resident #7. Accused was S3RN (registered nurse). Incident investigation: Administrator wrote, Resident #6 has missing narcotics from north wing medication cart. Investigation has been started. Police have been called. S4LPN (licensed practical nurse) reported to S5LPN that S3RN told her the doctor discontinued Resident #6's Norco medication and S3RN reported she gave the card with 21 pills and the pill count sheet to S2DON (director of nursing). S5LPN told S2DON what was reported about the discontinuation of Resident #6's Norco medications and that the medications was said to be given to S2DON. S2DON indicated she did not receive any Norco medications from S3RN. Immediate narcotic count was conducted on all units and medication carts. There were 21 Norco 7.5mg (milligrams) missing for Resident #6 and an unknown amount of Oxycodone 10mg due to the count sheet could not be found for Resident #7. S3RN was terminated, and reported to the state board. Record review of Resident #6's physician orders for August 2023 revealed the following, in part: An order for Norco 7.5-325mg PO every 8 hours as needed. Start date 8/9/23, discontinued on 08/23/2023 10:21 a.m. An order for Norco 7.5-325mg PO every 8 hours as needed for moderate pain. Start date 8/25/2023. Record review of Resident #7's physician orders for August 2023 included revealed, in part: An order of Oxycodone 10mg PO every 8 hours as needed for pain related to left hip (start date 03/22/2022, discontinued 08/16/2023). An order for Oxycodone 10mg PO every 4 hours as needed for pain (start date 8/16/23, stop date 8/18/23). An order for Oxycodone 10mg PO every 6 hours as needed for pain (Start date 8/18/23, stop date 8/23/23). An order for Oxycodone 10mg PO every 8 hours as needed for pain (start 8/30/23, stop 8/31/23). An order for Oxycodone 10mg PO every 6hrs as needed for pain (start 8/31/23 to current) During an interview on 09/06/2023 at 9:00 a.m., S2DON indicated she received a call from S5LPN and S4LPN to report Resident #6 Norco was not in the cart and also Resident #7's Oxycodone was not on cart. S3RN told S4LPN the cards were given to S2DON. On 8/23/23, S2DON indicated she called S3RN and asked about the cards. S3RNRN told S2DON, Resident #7's Oxycodone card was empty and Resident 6's Norco was sent back to pharmacy. S2DON told S3RN that she didn't think pharmacy would take it back and she would talk to her in the morning. They had a staff meeting the next day and S3RN did not show up at work. S2DON finally reached her via text message at 10:04 a.m. on 08/24/2023. S2DON further indicated S3RN came to the facility 08/24/2023 and wrote a statement. S2DON acknowledged S3RN also took a urine drug test that was negative. S3RN told S2DON she put the count sheet to medical records and pill card was empty for Resident #7's Oxycodone, and Resident #6's Norco cards were in the tote to go back to pharmacy. S2DON confirmed the pharmacy sent 45 count (2 cards, usually 30 in one and 15 in the other) of Resident #7's Oxycodone to the facility on [DATE]. S2DON confirmed the pharmacy sent 21 count of Percocet and 21 count of Norco for Resident #6 on 08/22/2023. S2DON acknowledged Resident #7 was admitted to hospice on 08/16/2023 and hospice provided 80 tablets of Oxycodone in a pill bottle. Resident #7's count sheet was never found. S2DON confirmed Resident #7's two Oxycodone pill cards were never found. During an interview on 09/06/23 at 9:20 a.m., S5LPN indicated S4LPN was working the evening shift on 08/23/2023 and she (S5LPN) was working the night shift on 08/23/2023. Resident #6 was in pain and S5LPN told S4LPN she had orders for Norco and Percocet. S4LPN confirmed to S5LPN, S3RN told me she turned the Norco pills in to S2DON. S5LPN texted S2DON asking if S3RN turned in Norco to her for Resident #6. S2DON said she didn't have drugs turned in to her. S4LPN said the Oxycodone ordered for Resident #7 was missing also. S5LPN indicated S3RN worked the 7a-3p shift, S4LPN worked the 3p-11p shift, and she (S5LPN) worked the 11p-7a shift on 08/23/2023. S5LPN indicated both her and S4LPN looked for count sheets for Residents #6 and #7. S5LPN confirmed they were unable to find any of the count sheets that were missing. During a telephone interview on 09/07/2023 at 11:30 a.m., S6Pharmacist for _____Pharmacy indicated the following: S6Pharmacist indicated Resident #6's Percocet 10mg- 21 count was sent to the facility on [DATE]. Norco 7.5mg was sent to the facility on [DATE]-10 count, 08/14/2023- 21 count, 08/22/2023- 21 count, and also on 8/25/23- 21 count (incident of missing medication was on 08/23/2023). Record review of Resident #6's MAR for August 2023 revealed Resident #6 received Percocet 10mg a total of seven times and received Norco 7.5mg a total of four times (one of the four were given after 8/23/23). S6Pharmacist indicated Resident #7's Oxycodone 10mg- 21 count was sent to facility on 08/14/2023. Record review of Resident #7's MAR for August 2023 revealed Resident #7 received Oxycodone 10mg a total of 35 times. During an interview on 09/07/2023 at 12:40 p.m., S2DON indicated on 08/23/2023 S3RN worked the day shift, S4LPN worked the evening shift, and S5LPN worked the night shift. Resident #6's Norco 7.5mg were not found in the medication cart when S4LPN and S5LPN searched the cart for the medication. Resident #6's count sheet for Norco 7.5 mg was not on the medication cart. S4LPN and S5LPN searched the facility for Resident #6's missing Norco count sheet and were unable to find the count sheet. Resident #7's Oxycodone 10mg was on two different count sheets one sheet that was sent by the pharmacy and another sheet for the bottle that hospice brought to the facility. Resident #7's Oxycodone 10mg that pharmacy sent along with the count sheet were missing and never found. Resident #7's Oxycodone 10mg bottle that hospice brought to the facility had the correct count on the count sheet that matched the medication in the bottle. S2DON then acknowledged she called S3RN around 11:00 p.m. on 08/23/2023 regarding the missing medications. S3RN reported sending the Norco for Resident #6 back to the pharmacy and the Oxycodone medication card for Resident #7 was empty. S3RN indicated the count sheet for Resident #7's Oxycodone was sent to medical records. S3RN verified the count sheet for Resident #6's Norco 7.5mg was placed in the bin with the Norco pill card to go to pharmacy. S2DON verified S3RN did not follow the facility's policy's regarding controlled substances. S2DON indicated two nurses are to verify the correct count for any controlled substances that are being removed from medication cart. S2DON confirmed the two nurses should come to the DON's office where the locked metal cabinet is and the DON will review and put in the medication in the locked box. S2DON acknowledged medications that are placed in the locked metal box will remain there until the Pharmacy Consultant comes to the facility and the consultant and DON destroy the medications.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the provider failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service by: 1. Having several ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the provider failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service by: 1. Having several containers of seasonings and spices that were open and not labeled with dates when opened. 2. Having 2 large rolls of ground beef thawing in a sink of hot water, not thawing properly. 3. Failing to ensure dishwasher was in proper working order through temperature/chemical checks. 4. Failing to monitor food temperatures during and after cooking and keep temperature logs. 5. Flooring and equipment not cleaned and sanitized. This provider had a total census of 60 resident. Findings: Observations on 07/18/2023 at 8:15 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the following: 1. Kitchen floor to be wet, dirty, with food particles, crumbs and empty boxes. 2. The range oven dirty with thick layer of brown greasy substance and food particles inside. The bottom shelf on the outside of the oven with food particles and buildup of dirt present. 3. 2 large round rolls of ground beef thawing in a sink of hot water. 4. A plastic bag of cut sausages laying on the counter top. 5. Small Styrofoam cup inside the bin that contained black beans. 6. Several containers of spices and seasoning did not have an open date on the containers dill weed, white pepper, rotisserie seasoning, lemon pepper, basil and Italian seasoning. 7. 2 large black trash containers in the kitchen with trash present and not covered. Hand washing station did not have a functioning trash dispenser. 8. 2 sinks, as you enter the kitchen on the right side of the wall, dirty with red substance, with old dried food substance. During an interview on 07/18/2023 at 8:15 a.m. with S1 Administrator agreed the kitchen was in bad condition. Review of Dietary Records on 07/19/2023 at 12:30 p.m. with S2 Dietary Worker and S1 Administrator reviewing the dietary papers and was unable to provide any documentation of food temperature, cleaning schedules or dishwasher temperature/chemical checks performed. During an interview on 07/19/2023 at 12:30 p.m. S2 Dietary Worker reported the temperature or chemical checks had not been performed.
Dec 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was followed for 1 (#50) of 1 (#50) resident reviewed for urinary catheter care. The facility failed to ens...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was followed for 1 (#50) of 1 (#50) resident reviewed for urinary catheter care. The facility failed to ensure resident #50's catheter was changed as ordered. Findings: Review of resident #50's medical record revealed an admit date of 9/30/2022 with a diagnosis of but not limited to, traumatic brain injury, Dysphagia following a cerebral vascular accident, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of resident #50's December 2022 Physicians Orders revealed an order for: Foley Catheter 16 French, change as needed and every night shift, every 30 days. Review of resident #50's December 2022 Treatment Administration Record failed to reveal documentation confirming resident #50's catheter had been changed every 30 days on December 4, 2022 as ordered. Review of resident #50's December 2022 Physicians Orders with S3 Corporate Nurse confirmed an order for resident #50's catheter to be changed every 30 days. During an interview on 120/6/2022 at 1:15 P.M. S3 Corporate Nurse confirmed resident #50's catheter had not been changed as ordered.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 (#48) of 6 (#12,#19,#45, #48, #51 #255) residents observed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure resident #48's facial hair was removed. Finding: Review of the facility's policy for Activities of Daily Living, Supporting revealed in part: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (grooming .) Review of resident #48's medical record revealed an admit date [DATE] with diagnosis of but not limited to; Metabolic Encephalopathy, history of [NAME] Nile Virus, Cerebral Vascular Accident, Dementia unspecified, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of resident #48's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed resident #48 required extensive one person physical assistance with dressing and grooming. Review of resident #48's Comprehensive Plan of Care reveal the intervention or approach to shave as needed. Observation on 12/05/22 at 8:57a.m. revealed resident #48's chin had thick facial hair on it. During an interview on 12/5/2022 at 8:57 a.m. S9 CNA confirmed resident #48's chin had thick facial hair on it that should have been removed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to inform and provide written information to residents or resident's representative concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to inform and provide written information to residents or resident's representative concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 15 (#3, #8, #9, #12, #19, #22, #25, #28, #35, #39, #40, #41, #45, #48, #51 ) of 15 (#3, #8, #9, #12, #19, #22, #25, #28, #35, #39, #40, #41, #45, #48, #51 ) residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings: Review of Resident #3's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 4/11/2016. Further review of Resident #3's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #8's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 4/23/2010. Further review of Resident #8's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #9's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 12/27/2011. Further review of Resident #9's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #12's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 6/6/2019. Further review of Resident #12's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #19's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 9/9/2018. Further review of Resident #19's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #22's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 6/10/2022. Further review of Resident #22's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #25's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 12/5/2017. Further review of Resident #25's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #28's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 8/28/2018. Further review of Resident #28's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #35's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 9/4/21. Further review of Resident #35's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #39's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 1/19/2022. Further review of Resident #39's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #40's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 10/7/2022. Further review of Resident #40's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #41's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 7/29/22. Further review of Resident #41's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #45's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 8/19/22. Further review of Resident #45's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #48's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 8/6/2022. Further review of Resident #48's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #51's medical chart revealed resident was admitted to facility on 9/8/2022. Further review of Resident #51's medical chart failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advance directives. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 12:25 p.m. S3, Social Worker confirmed Resident #3's, #8's, #9's, #12's, #19's, #22's, #25's, #28's, #35's, #39's, #40's, #41's, #45's, #48's, and #51's chart did not contain documentation resident was provided with written information concerning advance directives.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0730 (Tag F0730)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for 2 Certified Nurse Aides [CNA (S6 CNA, S7 CNA)] of 5 CNA personnel records ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for 2 Certified Nurse Aides [CNA (S6 CNA, S7 CNA)] of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S6 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 2/15/2018. Further review of S6's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of a performance review at least once every 12 months. Review of S7 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 10/6/2020. Further review of S7 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of a performance review at least once every 12 months. During an interview on 12/7/2022 at 2:58PM S5 Human Resources/Payroll reviewed S6 CNA and S7 CNA's personnel records and acknowledged there was not documentation of a performance review at least once every 12 months and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to atta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for 1 ((#3) of 2 (#3, #19) residents reviewed for behavior-emotional out of 26 total sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received counseling services with a diagnosis of depressive disorders. Findings: Review of Facility's Behavioral Health Services Policy and Procedure: - Each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. - The facility will provide necessary behavioral health care services which include: Rule out underlying causes for the resident's behavioral health care needs through assessment, diagnosis, and treatment by qualified professional, such as physicians, including psychiatrists or neurologists. Demonstrate reasonable attempts to secure professional behavioral health services, when needed. Review of Resident #3's Medical Records revealed admit date [DATE] with the following diagnoses, in part: diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration/subsequent encounter, hemiplegia/unspecified affecting left non-dominant side, cognitive social or emotion deficit following cerebral infarction and other recurrent depressive disorders. Review of Resident #3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE]: Section C: Cognitive Patterns - BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) 13 - intact cognition Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed problem: resident has limited physical mobility related to neurological deficits - resident has a history of trying to commit suicide and shot himself in the head causing his current situation from TBI (traumatic brain injury). Review of Resident #3's Progress Notes revealed: - 12/07/22 12:19PM- Social Services - writer spoke with Resident #3 about wanting counseling services. He stated that he has been asking to see a counselor for a while and has not seen one yet . - 12/07/22 10:57AM- Social Services - writer called _______ Counseling Services to see if a referral was made July 18, 2022, followed up with August 4, 2022 - Spoke with ____, but she did not see a referral for Resident #3 at any time made. - 7/15/22 - Social Services - Therapist reports to writer that resident has stated that he is currently having suicidal thoughts. Therapist reports that resident stated, If I had a wheelchair, I would roll myself out into the streets. Writer followed up with resident bedside who stated, I need to talk with someone. DON (Director of Nursing, ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing), and MD (Medical Director) notified During an interview on 12/05/22 at 2:46 P.M. Resident #3 reported he wanted to see a psychiatrist and requested it but he still hasn't seen one. He further reported he just wanted to talk to someone because of all that he has been through. During an interview on 12/07/22 at 10:50 A.M. S3 Social Services reported she called _____Counseling and they said they never received a referral for Resident #3. Social Services reported she went and talked to Resident #3 and he told her he wanted to speak with someone about how he was feeling. Social Services acknowledged this wasn't taken care of and should have been. During an interview on 12/07/22 at 3:00 P.M. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged Resident #3's was to have a referral for counseling which was never completed and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to meet quarterly and failed to include the Medical Director or Medical Director's Designee. The f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to meet quarterly and failed to include the Medical Director or Medical Director's Designee. The facility's total census was 54 according to the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report provided by the facility on 12/5/2022. Findings: Review of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meeting sign-in sheets failed to reveal meeting were conducted quarterly. Further review revealed meeting were only conducted on June 9, 2022 and September 15, 2022. Review of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meetings sign-in sheets dated June 9, 2022 and September 15, 2022 failed to reveal the facility's medical director or designee attended. During an interview on 12/7/2022 at 2:45 P.M. S1 Administrator confirmed a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meeting was not conducted between January and March 2022. S1 Administrator also confirmed the medical director or designee was not present at Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meetings.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of in-service training per year that included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention trainin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of in-service training per year that included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training for 2 Certified Nurse Aides [CNAs (S6 CNA, S8 CNA)] out of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S6 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 2/15/2018. Further review of S6 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of at least 12 hours of in-service training per year that included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. Review of S8 CNA's personnel record revealed they worked for the facility through an agency and had done so since May of 2021. Further review of S8 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of at least 12 hours of in-service training per year that included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. During an interview on 12/7/2022 at 2:58PM S5 Human Resources/Payroll reviewed S6 CNA's personnel record and acknowledged there was not documentation of at least 12 hours of in-service training per year that included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training and should have been. During an interview on 12/7/2022 S1 Administrator reviewed S8 CNA's personnel record and acknowledged there was not documentation of at least 12 hours of in-service training per year that included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training and should have been.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $112,947 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 42 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $112,947 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 4 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Claiborne Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Claiborne Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Claiborne Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 42 deficiencies at CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 37 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Claiborne Healthcare Center?

CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NEXION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 81 certified beds and approximately 66 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SHREVEPORT, Louisiana.

How Does Claiborne Healthcare Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Claiborne Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Claiborne Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Claiborne Healthcare Center Stick Around?

CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Claiborne Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $112,947 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.3x the Louisiana average of $34,208. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Claiborne Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

CLAIBORNE HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.