Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

3405 Mansfield Road, Shreveport, LA 71103 (318) 222-3100
For profit - Corporation 124 Beds CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
11/100
#155 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about care quality and safety. Ranking #155 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana places it in the bottom half, and #13 out of 22 in Caddo County means there are only a few local options that are better. The facility’s conditions appear stable, with two critical issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, but concerningly high staff turnover at 58% suggests challenges in maintaining a consistent care team. While Roseview provides more RN coverage than 88% of state facilities, which is a strength, it has accumulated $32,243 in fines, reflecting average compliance problems. Specific incidents include a critical failure to ensure a two-person assist during incontinence care, leading to a resident's fall and injury, and another incident where a resident was able to wander outside the facility unsupervised, creating risk for elopement. Overall, families should weigh these serious incidents alongside the facility's strengths in RN coverage when considering care options.

Trust Score
F
11/100
In Louisiana
#155/264
Bottom 42%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
2 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$32,243 in fines. Higher than 54% of Louisiana facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 22 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 2 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Near Louisiana average (2.4)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Louisiana avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $32,243

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Louisiana average of 48%

The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Aug 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect during ADL (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect during ADL (activities of daily living) care. The facility failed to ensure S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) asked for assistance for a two person assist before providing incontinence care which resulted in a fall with injuries for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed for neglect.The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on 07/25/2025 at approximately 10:30 a.m. when Resident #1 fell out of the right side of the bed during incontinent care when S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) failed to ensure a two person assist was used during incontinent care to prevent Resident #1 from falling out of the bed. S4 CNA did not ask for assistance before providing ADL care and Resident #1 fell from the bed resulting in multiple injuries. Resident #1 was sent to a local hospital on [DATE] at 10:47 a.m. via stretcher and was admitted due to his injuries. Review of the hospital records dated 07/25/2025 revealed Resident #1 was diagnosed to have a questionable non-displaced fracture to the right maxillary wall, non-displaced right posterior 12th rib fracture, and a remote T(thoracic)5 vertebral body compression fracture.The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a past noncompliance citation.Findings:Abuse and Neglect Policy with a revision date of 04/02/2025.Purpose: The purpose of the Abuse/Neglect policy is to comply with the seven - step approach to abuse and neglect detection and prevention:1). Screening 2.) Training 3.) Prevention 4.) Identification 5). Investigation 6.) Protection 7.) Reporting and ResponsePolicy: It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse. This facility will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, mental and physical abuse, including .Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property.Definition: Abuse and neglect exist in many forms and to varying degrees. G. Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.I. Serious Bodily Injury: The term serious bodily injury is defined as any injury involving extreme physical pain; involving substantial risk of death; involving protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 03/27/2024 with diagnoses, which included in part, ataxia following other non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, essential tremor, muscle wasting and atrophy of left lower leg and right lower leg, weakness, contracture of muscle, multiple sites and aphasia. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) could not be completed due to resident was rarely/never understood. Further review of the Quarterly MDS assessment revealed Resident #1 had upper and lower extremity impairments to both sides, dependent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and shower/bathe self. Resident #1 was dependent for mobility in rolling left and right. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on staff for ADL care. Further review revealed Resident #1 did not return to the facility after his hospitalization on 07/25/2025. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan revealed in part, Resident #1 was at high risk for fall related to neurocognitive disorder and required total care with bedbound status. Further review of the comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #1 had an ADL deficit and required two person assist with all ADLs and transfers.Review of the facility's Incident Log for the past 3 months revealed Resident #1 had a witnessed fall on 07/25/2025.Review of S4 CNAs signed witness statement (undated) revealed: I went to Resident #1's room to check and see was he wet. He was soaked in pee and bowel movement. I looked on the hall to see if there were available aides. I didn't see any so I decided to change Resident #1. His bed was soaked with urine so I had to change, I grabbed my linen to put on his bed. I turned him and put the linen on the bed. I grabbed my pamper and pad. Resident #1 moved a little and hit the floor. I didn't have any time to catch him.Review of Resident #1's nurse's notes dated 07/25/2025 at 11:44 a.m. revealed S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was called to Resident #1's room. Upon entering the room, Resident #1 was lying flat and face first on the floor to the right side of the bed between the air unit and bed. S3 LPN was informed by S4 CNA that while she was performing incontinent care and went to turn Resident #1, Resident #1 rolled off the bed to the floor. Redness was noted to the left cheek, left side of forehead, right cheek, right upper back, both knees, right lower leg and back of head. The ambulance was notified and Resident #1 was transferred out of the facility via stretcher to a local emergency room.Review of Resident #1's hospital record dated 07/25/2025 revealed in part, a chief complaint of Resident #1 fell out of the bed while rolled by staff. Bruising noted to left cheek and upper back. Further review revealed Resident #1 had bruising to the left side of his face, backside of his neck, right side of his shoulder, and both knees. Review of Resident #1's CT (Computed Tomography) scans revealed: questionable non-displaced fracture to the right maxillary wall, non-displaced right posterior 12th rib fracture, and a remote T5 vertebral body compression fracture. During an interview on 08/11/2025 at 8:30 a.m. S1 Corporate Nurse reported Resident #1 was sent to the hospital with major injuries due to the fall incident on 07/25/2025. S1 Corporate Nurse further confirmed Resident #1 was a two person assist and S4 CNA did not call for assistance and performed care without having another person assist her resulting in Resident #1's fall from the bed.Observations made on 08/11/2025 throughout the facility revealed resident rooms were checked for resident wall care plans and all had resident specific wall care plans located on the wall above the resident's bed, on bright orange paper and in bold letters if the resident was a one or two person assist. An observation on 08/12/2025 at 9:15 a.m. revealed S10 CNA and S12 CNA reviewed Resident #3's wall care plan and acknowledged Resident #3 was two person assist with transfers. Resident #3's wall care plan was located on the wall, above Resident #3's bed, on an orange sheet of paper with bold letters. Resident #3 was transferred from her bed to a Geri-Chair via Hoyer lift using two person assist without difficulty. Resident #3 was non-verbal but awake and looking around the room. Resident #3 was in no apparent distress during the transfer. Resident #3 was transferred safely from the bed to the Geri-chair, with 2 person assist as instructed on the wall care plan.Attempted phone calls made to S4 CNA on 08/12/2025 at 10:53 a.m., 12:26 p.m., and 2:21 p.m. were unsuccessful. During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 11:15 a.m. S3 LPN reported seeing Resident #1 face down on the floor between the air unit and the bed. S3 LPN reported Resident #1 was a two person assist with everything; he could not move his legs or his trunk. S3 LPN reported Resident #1 had tremors and could not move his arms good. S3 LPN further confirmed Resident #1's wall care plan was located on the wall above the bed stating Resident #1 required two person assist. During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 11:18 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed there was a sign above Resident #1's bed notifying staff Resident #1 was a two person assist with all ADLs. S2 DON confirmed S4 CNA did not follow the wall care plan which resulted in Resident #1's fall with injuries on 07/25/2025. Attempted phone call made to S4 CNA on 08/13/2025 at 10:48 a.m. and was unsuccessful.During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 1:20 p.m. S5 CNA Supervisor reported S4 CNA had experience working with Resident #1 and knew Resident #1 was a two person assist with all ADL care and should have asked for assistance before providing ADL care to Resident #1. During the survey, in-service records and Quality Assurance (QA) monitoring records were reviewed and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following corrective actions to correct the deficient practice prior to entering the facility. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 11:00 a.m., S1 Corporate Nurse confirmed the following corrective actions put into place were completed on 07/28/2025. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice beginning on 07/25/2025 with a completion date of 07/28/2025:1. In-services were immediately started by S2 DON on 07/25/2025 on that afternoon and evening shift. S2 DON came back to the facility on the 10P-6A shift on 07/25/2025 and met with licensed and unlicensed staff to review care plans on the wall and following them with each resident encounter. 2. S4 CNA did not provide care to other residents at the facility after this event but was asked to remain at the facility to be interviewed by S2 DON and was present at the staff meeting that afternoon when topics relevant to this event were discussed at length. S4 CNA then left the facility following the meeting. S4 CNA was asked by S2 DON to return to the building on 07/26/2025 to talk with the S2 DON. At this point the facility knew the seriousness of the injuries sustained by Resident #1 and S4 CNA was officially suspended. S4 CNA had not provided care to other residents since 07/25/2025 at approximately 10:30 a.m. S4 CNA was officially terminated on 07/27/2025 for not following facility protocol with care. 3. In-services were done on following care plans on the wall began after the incident on 07/25/2025 and continued on 07/26/2025 and 07/27/2025 to licensed and unlicensed nursing staff by nursing administration.4. Staff education continued on 07/28/2025 on the following subjects: Following the care plans on the wall for resident care. Pre and post-tests to license and unlicensed nursing staff on assistance with bed mobility and following the plans on the wall was initiated on 07/28/2025. The administrator and assistant administrator also presented education to the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff beginning on 07/28/2025 regarding the seriousness of the care plans on the wall information and how not following that information could be grounds for termination. 5. Evaluation of all the facility care plans on the wall were completed by nursing administration on 07/26/202, 07/27/2025, and 07/28/2025, even though the care plan on the wall on Resident #1's room was accurate for residents at the facility. The wall care plan updating continues when changes occur to resident abilities and medical status.6. Monitoring of CNAs staff performing care to see if they are following the care plan on the wall instructions while performing resident care was implemented on 07/25/2025 by nursing administration. This monitoring will continue 2-3 times a week for the next 6 weeks then monthly thereafter until compliance is maintained. Nursing administration is actually going into resident's rooms during care to see if the care plan on the wall is being followed by the CNA's providing care. Corrective action and immediate education is provided by nursing administration if care is not being provided according to the care plan on the wall. 7. Effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for 6 weeks at the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Meeting with findings added to the QAPI minutes. Additional in-services and/or corrective actions will be implement as needed.Validation of Past Noncompliance:The facility corrective actions were confirmed through onsite interviews, observations and record reviews.Review of the facility's in-services dated 07/25/2025, 07/28/2025 and 07/29/2025 revealed the facility in-serviced licensed and unlicensed staff, including CNAs, on paying attention to the resident's wall care plan in the resident's room located on the wall above the bed. The facility enforced if the wall care plan stated the resident required two person assistance, to make sure two persons assisted. Review of the Bed Mobility/ADL Care Monitor sheets revealed monitoring was put in place on 07/25/2025 after the incident. Monitoring was done by S2 DON. Further review of the Bed Mobility/ADL Care Monitor sheets revealed they continued monitoring through 07/28/2025 and then the monitoring pages were updated on 07/29/2025 to include more detailed specific information to ensure residents which required two person assist were included and if care was completed without injury. Review of the facility's QAPI meetings dated 07/28/2025, 07/29/2025, 07/30/2025, 08/05/2025, and 08/07/2025 revealed facility ensured wall care plans were discussed, the wall care plans were posted, and the staff were following the wall care plans.Observations made on 08/11/2025 throughout the facility revealed resident rooms were checked for resident wall care plans and all had resident specific wall care plans located on the wall above the resident's bed, on bright orange paper and in bold letters if the resident was a one or two person assist. Review of trainings revealed, on 07/28/2025, the facility put in place a pre-post- and answer bed mobility test and following the plans on the wall. All CNAs have taken the test and passed.During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 9:00 a.m. S10 CNA Restorative Aide, reported she attended an in-services on resident wall care plans and was aware to first review the wall care plan before care was provided. S10 CNA Restorative Aide reported the wall care plan indicated if the resident was a one or two person assist with transfers, lifts, or ADL care. S10 CNA further reported if she had any questions about a resident, she would ask a nurse and all transfers were two person when a lift was used. An observation on 08/12/2025 at 9:15 a.m. revealed S10 CNA and S12 CNA reviewed Resident #3's wall care plan and acknowledged Resident #3 was two person assist with transfers. Resident #3's wall care plan was located on the wall, above Resident #3's bed, on an orange sheet of paper with bold letters. Resident #3 was transferred from her bed to a Geri-Chair via Hoyer lift using two person assist without difficulty. Resident #3 was non-verbal but awake and looking around the room. Resident #3 was in no apparent distress during the transfer. Resident #3 was transferred safely from the bed to the Geri-chair, with 2 person assist as instructed on the wall care plan.During an interview on 08/12/25 at 9:30 a.m. S13 CNA reported she attended an in-service regarding resident wall care plans above resident beds. S13 CNA reported she knew to review the wall care plans prior to resident care and to know if the resident is a one or two person assist. S13 CNA further reported if there were any questions, the nurse would clarify. S13 CNA knew to ask assistance when a two person assist was required for any type of care. During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 9:42 a.m. S11 CNA reported she attended an in-service on resident wall care plans. S11 CNA was knowledgeable in reviewing the wall care plans upon entering a resident's room. S11 CNA reported the wall care plans, above the resident's bed, indicate whether a resident required one or two person assist with care. S11 CNA further reported if she was not sure, she would ask the nurse.During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 2:05 p.m. S15 CNA reported she was trained on the resident wall care plans. S15 CNA further reported she attended an in-service on bed mobility and the number of persons required to assist residents with ADLs. S15 CNA reported each resident had a wall care plan on the wall above the bed and CNAs were to follow that wall care plan. S15 CNA further reported a CNA should always ask for assistance if a resident was a two person assist with ADLs. During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 5:00 p.m. S14 CNA reported she attended in-services on resident wall care plans and knew to look at the sign on the wall to see if the resident was a one or two person assist. S14 CNA understood to never attempt to move or transfer a resident alone if the resident was a two person assist.During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 8:32 a.m. S7 CNA reported she attended the in-service on Bed Mobility and turning schedule. S7 CNA further reported the meeting included how important it was to use two person assist if the wall care plan indicated two person assist. If there was not another CNA to help, she would call the nurse or a supervisor to help and never attempt two person assist care alone. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 8:33 a.m. S8 CNA reported he attended the in-service regarding wall care plans and the importance of following the wall care plans. S8 CNA further reported he checked the wall care plans upon entering a room and checked if the resident was a one or two person assist. If the resident was a two person assist, S8 CNA reported he would ask for assistance and never attempt to move or change a resident without another person to assist. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 8:39 a.m. S9 LPN reported she attended the in-service on bed mobility and wall care plans which included to check residents wall care plans located above the resident's bed. S9 LPN reported she would assist CNAs when needed for residents requiring two person assist patient care. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 8:59 a.m. S2 DON reported S4 CNA was suspended right after the incident. S4 CNA stayed for the in-service on wall care plans and left after that. S2 DON reported S4 CNA did not care for any residents after the incident with Resident #1. S2 DON further reported S4 CNA was called to the facility the next day to sign papers on termination for not following the company policy.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a resident's plan of care for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampl...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a resident's plan of care for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 03/27/2024 with diagnoses, which included in part, ataxia following other non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, essential tremor, muscle wasting and atrophy of left lower leg and right lower leg, weakness, contracture of muscle, multiple sites and aphasia. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) could not be completed due to resident was rarely/never understood. Further review of the Quarterly MDS assessment revealed Resident #1 had upper and lower extremity impairments to both sides, dependent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and shower/bathe self. Resident #1 was dependent for mobility in rolling left and right. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on staff for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan revealed in part, Resident #1 was at high risk for fall related to neurocognitive disorder and required total care with bedbound status. Further review of the comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #1 had an ADL deficit and required two person assist with all ADLs and transfers.Review of S4 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) signed witness statement (undated) revealed: I went to Resident #1's room to check and see was he wet. He was soaked in pee and bowel movement. I looked on the hall to see if there were available aides. I didn't see any so I decided to change Resident #1. His bed was soaked with urine so I had to change, I grabbed my linen to put on his bed. I turned him and put the linen on the bed. I grabbed my pamper and pad. Resident #1 moved a little and hit the floor. I didn't have any time to catch him.Review of Resident #1's nurse's notes dated 07/25/2025 at 11:44 a.m. revealed S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was called to Resident #1's room. Upon entering the room, Resident #1 was lying flat and face first on the floor to the right side of the bed between the air unit and bed. S3 LPN was informed by S4 CNA that while she was performing incontinent care and went to turn Resident #1, Resident #1 rolled off the bed to the floor. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 1:20 p.m. S5 CNA Supervisor reported S4 CNA had experience working with Resident #1 and knew Resident #1 was a two person assist with all ADL care and should have asked for assistance before providing ADL care to Resident #1. During an interview on 08/12/2025 at 11:18 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed there was a sign above Resident #1's bed notifying staff Resident #1 was a two person assist with all ADLs. S2 DON confirmed S4 CNA did not follow the wall care plan on 07/25/2025 and use one person assist and should have used two person assist during ADL care for Resident #1.
Nov 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, interviews, and video footage the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for one (Resident #1) of three (#1, #2, #3) sa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, interviews, and video footage the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for one (Resident #1) of three (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #1's record revealed an admission date of 12/29/2022 with diagnoses including in part. ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease), history of falling, fluid overload, anemia in chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, lack of coordination, cirrhosis of the liver, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), viral hepatitis C without hepatic coma, muscle wasting and atrophy . Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/16/2024 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 which wound indicate the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's Employee Statement dated 10/28/2024 revealed S2 DON (Director of Nursing) interviewed Resident #1. Resident #1 reported S3 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) came into her room complaining about having to provide incontinent care. During an interview on 11/04/2024 at 1:32 p.m. Resident #1 stated S3 CNA came into her room one day and said, I guess I have to change your sh---y a-- diaper again. During a telephone interview on 10/29/2024 at 4:30 p.m. Resident #1's RP (Responsible Party) reported the staff were unprofessional. On 10/24/2024 Resident #1 fell in her room, called the RP and the RP heard S3 CNA say, Shut the f--k up, you haven't been on the floor that long. Stop lying on me. Review of the facility's video footage with audio on 10/24/2024 revealed the following: At 4:30 a.m. S6 LPN (licensed practical nurse) was in the hallway with med-cart when Resident #1 screamed out. S6 LPN looked inside the door and told S4 CNA and S5 CNA Resident #1 was on the floor and they both went to the room. At 4:34 a.m. S3 CNA entered Resident #1's room. At 4:35 a.m. S3 CNA, S4 CNA, and S5 CNA left Resident #1's room and they walked towards the camera. Audio revealed S3 CNA talking loudly in the hall. Some curse words were said by S3 CNA. S3 CNA went back to Resident #1's room at 5:19 a.m. and came out of room at 5:21 a.m. Then S3 CNA entered Resident #1's room again at 5:36 a.m. and exited at 5:39 a.m. S3 CNA had supplies in hand, which appeared to be diaper and pads. During a telephone interview on 10/30/2024 at 2:00 p.m. S3 CNA reported on 10/24/2024 Resident #1 was on the phone telling her daughter she was on the floor. S3 CNA told Resident #1 to tell the truth, don't be lying on her. S3 CNA reported Resident #1 was telling her daughter she was on the floor when she was in her wheelchair. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 3:15 p.m. S2 DON reported Resident #1's RP called S2 DON on 10/24/2024 to report S3 CNA cursed at Resident #1. S2 DON interviewed S3 CNA and S3 CNA did say that she said to Resident #1, Why are you lying, you were not on the floor long? S2 DON reported the language used by S3 CNA violated company policy and they terminated her.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, and facility camera footage, the provider failed to ensure services were provided to meet pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, and facility camera footage, the provider failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of quality by failing to complete a full head to toe assessment with vital signs after a resident fall prior to being moved from the floor to a wheelchair for one (Resident #1) of three (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for falls (Nursing G-10 p. 1), Policy: To provide emergency care. Procedure: 1. Resident will not be moved until a Licensed Nurse has ascertained resident's condition. 2. Assess resident for any abnormalities: i.e., a. Deformed, discolored or painful body parts. b. Open wounds, hemorrhaging. c. Vitals (Vital Signs). d. State of consciousness . Review of Resident #1's record revealed an admission date of 12/29/2022 with diagnoses including, in part, ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease), history of falling, fluid overload, anemia in chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, lack of coordination, cirrhosis of the liver, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), viral hepatitis C without hepatic coma, muscle wasting and atrophy . Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/16/2024 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 which wound indicate the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #1 required one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed the following, in part: Incident note dated 10/24/2024 at 3:32 a.m. by S1 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered note time 7:10 a.m.: CNA called downed the hall and stated resident was on the floor when entering resident was laying on left side on the side of the bed with wheelchair beside resident. Wheelchair noted not locked. Resident was assessed and resident was crying out complaining of left hip pain. ROM (Range of Motion) done resident was able stand and transfer to wheelchair. 10/24/2024 at 12:12 p.m.: Stat x-ray of the left hip. 10/24/2024 at 2:40 p.m.: Received ___ IMAGING results related fall and complains of left hip pain. Findings: No acute fracture or dislocation is identified. Mild joint space reduction of the hip noted. Bony mineralization and the visualized portion of the pelvis are unremarkable. Impressions: No acute findings. Degenerative changes, mild joint space reduction of the hip noted. Notified resident of results. 10/24/2024 at 5:33 p.m.: While CNA's were changing resident writer was notified to resident's room to assess resident's right leg. Writer noted right hip swollen and resident c/o pain. Writer notified NP (Nurse Practitioner), ordered stat x-ray for right hip. --- IMAGING notified. S2 DON (Director of Nursing), and Daughter notified. Pain medication given. Blood pressure 134/64, pulse 81, respirations 18, temperature 99.0 Fahrenheit. 10/24/2024 at 9:27 p.m.: Resident refused ___ IMAGING and stated she wants to go to the hospital. Writer notified NP, NP gave order to send out for evaluation. Resident's daughter and S2 DON, notified, _____ Transportation notified for transport. Resident was transported to hospital at 7:25pm. 10/28/2024 at 4:40 p.m.: Resident returned to facility at 2:30 p.m. via ____ Transportation from hospital, Diagnosis, displaced right peri-trochanteric femur fracture. Resident is in stable condition, in bed resting quietly requesting inflated mattress from hospital be taken off, stated it's uncomfortable. Writer notified CNA's to remove inflated mattress. Review of resident #1's comprehensive care plans included the following, in part: At high risk for falls related to lack of coordination; 02/02/2023 resident lost footing wearing slides while ambulating with walker, no injuries noted, educated on proper shoes to wear. 06/16/2023 resident wheelchair bound, non-ambulatory related to overall decline in physical function since Diagnosis of ESRD. She has increased weakness, debility, and decreased ROM. Anti-anxiety med use 05/16/2024 ambulating with four wheel walker with limited assistance. Non-compliant with asking for assistance 10/02/2024. Supervision with four wheel walker ambulation. 10/24/2024 actual fall when forgot to lock wheelchair brakes- PT/OT in place and notified, stat left hip x-ray ordered, education to lock brakes during transfers. Sent out to hospital for complaint of right hip pain. Daughter called and reported resident has fractured right hip. Interventions included ensure proper footwear, falling star program, keep assistive devices in reach, make sure pathways are clear, resident uses wheelchair for mobility, and needs staff propelling most distances . Review of Resident #1's hospital discharge record revealed the following in part: Discharge 10/28/2024 Patient is a [AGE] year old female .who experienced a ground level fall onto her hip, experienced pain, inability to bear weight, loss of ROM prompting her to seek medical care . Hospital course- Patient with multiple medical problems, nursing home resident. admitted with fall and right femur fracture. She underwent ORIF (Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) . Discharge Diagnosis- Femoral fracture, diabetes, alcoholic cirrhosis, coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and Anemia. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 12:21 p.m., Resident #1 reported she had a fall when she was trying to get into her wheelchair and wound up with a right hip fracture. Two CNAs (S4 CNA and S5 CNA) came in and helped her up to wheelchair after the fall. Review of the facility's video footage with audio on 10/24/2024 revealed the following: At 4:30 a.m. S6 LPN (licensed practical nurse) was in the hallway with med-cart when Resident #1 screamed out. S6 LPN looked inside the door and told S4 CNA and S5 CNA Resident #1 was on the floor and they both went to the room. S6 LPN entered Resident #1's room [ROOM NUMBER]:34:24 a.m. and exited from the room at 4:34:50 a.m. (26 seconds). During an interview on 11/06/2024 at 6:20 a.m. S6 LPN reported on 10/24/2024 at 4:30 a.m. she heard Resident #1 holler and then went to door and saw Resident #1 on the floor. S6 LPN indicated she called out for the CNAs (S4 CNA and S5 CNA) to come to Resident #1's room. S6 LPN verified that she did not complete an assessment for Resident #1 before they moved Resident #1. S6 LPN verified she held the wheelchair in place while S4 CNA and S5 CNA got Resident #1 into the wheelchair. During an interview on 11/06/2024 at 6:35 a.m. S1 LPN reported on 10/24/2024 S6 LPN told S1 LPN that Resident #1 had fallen on the floor. S1 LPN verified when she got in Resident #1's room the resident was sitting in her wheelchair. S1 LPN verified S4 CNA and S5 CNA had gotten Resident #1 off the floor and placed her in a wheelchair. S1 LPN indicated she completed an assessment while Resident #1 was in the wheelchair and Resident #1 complained of left hip pain. S1 LPN verified Resident #1 should have had a full assessment prior to being moved. During an interview on 11/06/2024 at 7:00 a.m. S4 CNA reported she got to the room and Resident #1 was on the floor. S4 CNA indicated her and S5 CNA got Resident #1 off the floor and into her wheelchair while S6 LPN held the wheelchair in place. S4 CNA verified when any resident has a fall they call for the nurse to come and assess the resident, then after assessment is completed they will move the resident off of the floor if the nurse says it is ok to move. If a resident has an injury, a staff member is to remain in room with the resident until EMS (Emergency Medical System) arrives. During an interview on 11/06/2024 at 7:45 a.m. S5 CNA reported S6 LPN called out for help when Resident #1 fell to the floor. S5 CNA then indicated her and S4 CNA got Resident #1 off of the floor and into wheelchair while S6 LPN was holding wheelchair steady. S5 CNA verified that a nurse was supposed to do an assessment before moving a resident off the floor. During an interview on 11/06/2024 at 8:30 a.m. S2 DON verified a full head to toe assessment was to be completed for any resident that had a fall before being moved from the floor. S2 DON further indicated Resident #1 should have had a full assessment before being moved from the floor.
Oct 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to include the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to include the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care by not developing a care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 (#201) of 1 (#201) resident baseline care plan reviewed for dialysis and nutrition. Findings: Review of resident #201's record revealed an admit date of 10/17/2023 with diagnoses in part: chronic pain, ascites, surgical wound care, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring dialysis. Review of resident #201's physician orders revealed in part orders dated: 10/21/2023 Dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday at . 10/17/2023 Nepro, give one (1) by mouth every bedtime. Document percentage of intake. 10/17/2023 Diet: Mechanical soft, Renal limit tomatoes, potatoes, oranges and bananas to no more than 3 times weekly. Review of resident #201's record failed to reveal a baseline care plan that included the care and treatment associated with dialysis and the resident's special diet and nutritional needs. During an interview on 10/25/2023 at 10:20 a.m. S1 Minimum Data Set Nurse confirmed resident #201 failed to have a baseline care plan developed for dialysis and nutritional needs and should have.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's person centered plan of care was reviewed and revised to include approaches and interventions to address th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's person centered plan of care was reviewed and revised to include approaches and interventions to address the resident's need for O2 (Oxygen) for 1 (#90) of 23 sampled resident's care plans reviewed. Findings: An observation on 10/23/2023 at 8:10 a.m. revealed resident #90 with O2 in use via NC (Nasal Cannula) at 2L (liters)/ M (minute) per concentrator. Review of resident #90's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/31/2023 with diagnoses in part Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a-fib), chronic pain, chronic pulmonary embolism, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and angina pectoris. Review of Physician orders revealed in part: 10/13/2023 O2 at 2L per NC continuously for a-fib. 10/12/2023 Change O2 tubing/humidifier bottle and clean filter every week on Fridays. Review of resident #90's comprehensive care plan failed to reveal resident #90 was care planned for use and care of Oxygen. During an interview on 10/24/2023 at 11:30 a.m. S2 Corporate Nurse reviewed resident #90's physician orders and care plan and confirmed resident #90 had not been care planned for the use of oxygen and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance to the professional standards of practice and the resident's plan of care ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance to the professional standards of practice and the resident's plan of care for 2 (#39, #90) of 2 (#39, #90) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of the facility's current Oxygen Administration (Concentrator or Tank) Policy revealed in part: Policy: Humidifier bottles, cannulas and O2 tubing will be changed at least once weekly and dated. Resident #39 Observation on 10/23/2023 at 9:00 a.m. revealed resident #39 sitting on bedside with O2 (Oxygen) in use via nasal cannula (NC) at 2.5L (liters)/minute (M) by oxygen concentrator and an attached humidification bottle dated 10/13/2023. Review of resident #39's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/12/2018 with diagnoses that include in part chronic pain, hypertension, dependence on supplemental oxygen, atrial fibrillation (a-fib), and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of resident #39's Physician orders revealed in part: 03/23/2023 Change O2 tubing/humidifier bottle and clean filter every week on Thursday. 03/07/2021 O2 at 2L/M per NC PRN (as needed) during the day for SOB (short of breath). If ineffective after five minutes notify MD (medical doctor). 03/16/2021 O2 at 2L per NC every HS (bedtime) for obstructive sleep apnea Resident #90 An observation on 10/23/2023 at 8:10 a.m. revealed resident #90 with O2 in use via nasal cannula at 2L/M per concentrator and an attached humidification bottle dated 10/13/2023. Review of resident #90's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/31/2023 with diagnoses that include in part Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic pain, chronic pulmonary embolism, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and angina pectoris. Review of resident #90's Physician orders revealed in part: 10/13/2023 O2 at 2L per NC continuously for a-fib. 10/12/2023 Change O2 tubing/humidifier bottle and clean filter every week on Fridays. During an interview on 10/23/2023 at 11:00 a.m. S4 RN (Registered Nurse)/Charge Nurse confirmed resident #39's and 90's oxygen humidification bottle were dated 10/13/2023. S4 RN/Charge Nurse further reported according to policy, the humidification bottles should have been changed by the night nurse on Thursday and had not been. During an interview on 10/23/2023 at 11:45 a.m. S3 DON reported according to facility policy, the oxygen humidification bottles for residents using oxygen should be changed and dated by the nurse on Thursday nights and as needed.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The de...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The deficient practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 on 07/31/2023 at 8:00 p.m. when Resident #1 exited through the dining room door of the facility. On 7/31/2023 the facility was notified by a concerned community citizen that Resident #1 was found outside approximately 300 feet from facility near a railroad track 12 minutes after Resident #1 exited the facility. On 07-31-2023 at 8:21 p.m., Resident #1 returned to the facility assisted by S3 [NAME] Clerk and S4 LPN (licensed practical nurse). Facility staff immediately notified S2 DON (Director of Nursing), Resident #1's doctor, and S1 Administrator of incident. Resident #1 was assessed and had no injuries when found by S4 LPN. The Immediate Jeopardy continued for 12 other residents who were at risk for wandering until 08/10/2023 when the dining room door hinge was repaired to ensure the door closed completely. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Finding: Review of the facility's Wandering or Missing Resident Policy dated 05/2023 revealed in part, a department or resident care staff which identified a wandering resident is missing must notify all staff of the missing resident by announcing on the public address system, Code W and residents name. Any staff member becoming aware of a resident not being at a designated area or activity shall proceed to notify the charge nurse, director of nursing and the administrator. Review of resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 08/17/2021 with a diagnosis of but not limited to Depressive Episodes, Dementia, History of Falling, Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of the resident #1's Yearly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 07/21/2023 revealed in part, resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Mental Status Interview) score of 3 indicating severe impairment and wandering behavior occurred 7 days of the 7 day look back period, and resident #1 received anti-depressant medication for 7 days of the 7 day look back period. Review of resident #1's August 2023 Physician's Orders revealed in part: 08/17/2021-Visual Checks for resident location every 1 hours 08/17/2021-Wander alert bracelet on resident for elopement precautions at all times, bracelet located on residents right leg 08/17/2023- Check Wander alert bracelet daily to ensure band is intact and transmitter is functioning properly. Review of Resident #1's current Comprehensive Care Plan revealed Resident #1 was care planned for wandering and use of wander alert bracelet with interventions including visual check for resident location every hour, wander alert bracelet on resident for elopement precautions and check wander alert bracelet daily to ensure band is intact and transmitter is functioning properly. Review of Resident #1's elopement risk assessment with start and end date of 08/17/2021 revealed Resident #1 was found to be at risk for elopement. Review of resident #1's progress notes revealed in part: 07/31/2023 at 11:24 p.m. by S4 LPN. Writer was notified by [NAME] Clerk that a lady noticed a person walking down ___ Rd and asked if we were missing a resident, she described the resident that fit her description. Writer and [NAME] Clerk left the facility and found resident standing a couple of feet past the rail road tracks. Lady that notified us about resident came and offered to transport resident back to facility. [NAME] clerk accompanied resident back to the facility. Head to toe assessment done, administrator notified, director of nursing and nurse practitioner notified. During an observation on 08/16/2023 at 3:45 p.m. of the facility's surveillance video from 07/31/2023, revealed Resident #1 walking out of the facility's dining room door alone on at approximately 8:00 p.m. Further review of facility surveillance video revealed at 8:12 p.m. a concerned community citizen walked into the facility's front door and alerted staff of a resident out of the facility and staff ran out of the facility. At 8:21 p.m. resident #1 was seen being assisted back into the facility by staff. During an interview on 8/14/2023 at 2:15 p.m. S3 [NAME] Clerk reported on 07/31/2023 at approximately 8:00 p.m. the dining room door alarm went off and she overhead paged for a staff member to go and check the dining room door alarm. S3 [NAME] Clerk further reported S5 Front Door Screener checked the dining door and reset the alarm. A few minutes later a visitor came in the front door and described a resident who was outside of the facility walking on the street. I (S3 [NAME] Clerk) recognized the resident by the visitor's description. S4 LPN and I (S3 [NAME] Clerk) left the facility and located the resident down the street near the railroad track in some bushes unharmed and assisted the resident back inside of the facility. During an interview on 08/15/2023 at 1:35 p.m. S5 Front Door Screener stated, I was sitting at the front door when the ward clerk said to check the dining room door alarm. I went to the dining room door and looked out the door and did not see any resident. I closed the door and reset the alarm on the door and went back to my station at the front door. A few minutes later a visitor came into the facility and described a resident who was outside of the facility walking down the street. We immediately went to search for the resident. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 2:30 p.m. S4 LPN reported, a lady had come to the facility and reported seeing a possible resident on the street out by the railroad tracks. We (S4 LPN and S3 [NAME] Clerk) went out and located the resident on the road near the railroad track and assisted the resident back inside of the facility. S3 [NAME] Clerk notified the administrator, and I (S4 LPN) notified the director of nurses. During an interview on 08/15/2023 at 8:30 a.m. S2 DON reported resident #1 had been assessed to be a wanderer and was at risk for elopement and wandered in the facility daily. S2 DON confirmed resident #1 had eloped from the facility through the facility's dining room door on 07/31/2023 at approximately 8:00 p.m. S2 DON confirmed the facility's dining room door did not close completely after a staff member had entered and required repairing for safety and supervision of residents. During an interview on 08/15/2023 at 2:00 p.m. interview with S5 Maintenance Supervisor and S1 Administrator reported upon examining the dining room exit door after resident #1's elopement, it was noted that the door did not close completely and remained about one-half inch open after being closed. S1 Administrator and S5 Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the dining room door had to be repaired to ensure resident safety and supervision. On 07/31/2023, the facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice with completion on 08/10/2023: 1. Resident #1 was placed on close supervision and visual check every 1 hour. 2. Daily census checks on each resident. 3. All residents assessed for elopement risk and wandering risk. 4. Staff in-services regarding: monitoring door alarms to include checking outside and inside to find out who activated the alarm, door alarm audit sheet, wandering and missing resident policy and procedures and wander alert bracelet check and documentation. Emphasis on answering door alarms and assuring all wandering resident with and wander alert bracelet are accounted for. 5 All facility door codes were changed and staff were instructed only to enter and exit the facility through the front door. 6. 8/10/2023 the dining room door was repaired to ensure complete closure for safety. 7. A mock drill was completed by administrative staff in which door alarms were triggered and staff were observed following the facility protocol. 8. Monitoring of each door alarm is tracked daily by the ward clerk or nurse at the nurse's station. 9. This plan is monitored in the facility's daily Quality Assurance meetings with indefinite monitoring, changes will be made to current monitoring if issues arise.
Nov 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services with reasonable ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services with reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 (#4) of the 4 (#4, #40, #55 an #69) residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4, who had physical limitations and communication deficits, had a call light within reach. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 99 residents who reside in the facility according to the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form dated 10/31/2022. Findings: Review of facility policy Call light System revealed in part: Essential Points: unless indicated in the care plan, each resident, when in their room or in bed, must have the call light placed within reach at all times, regardless of staff assessment of resident ability to use it. When resident is in bed, the call bell should be fastened to the side rail or side of bed he/she is facing. When put out of bed, call bell is to be pulled so it is accessible from wheelchair or bedside chair. Observation on 10/31/2022 at 9:45 a.m. revealed Resident #4 up to bedside commode located at the foot of the right side of the bed, call light was tied to left upper bedrail, out of reach. Resident #4 attempted but was unable to reach his clothes located in the seat of his wheelchair on the left side of the bed. Resident #4 was unable to reach his clothes when he laid across the foot of the bed and was unable to reach the call light for help. Surveyor requested help for resident at resident's request. During an interview on 10/31/2022 at 9:50 a.m. S2 CCC (Comprehensive Care Coordinator) assisting resident, verified resident #4's call light was not in reach and the call light should be in reach of the resident at all times. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admit date of 3/9/2015 with diagnoses that included, in part, metabolic encephalopathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, major depressive disorder, convulsions, dementia, dysphagia, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, paranoid schizophrenia, pain in right shoulder, muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites, repeated falls, weakness, anxiety disorder and cognitive communication deficit. Review of physician orders revealed, in part: 10/6/2022 fall mat to right side of bed 10/6/2022 electric bed with bilateral mobility bars 8/30/2017 High risk for falls; resident is on the falling star program Review of Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed, in part: Cognitive: Brief interview for mental status=04-severely impaired cognition. Resident uninterviewable.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in consistent with professional standards of practice by not following the resident's comp...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in consistent with professional standards of practice by not following the resident's comprehensive plan of care or following their policy and procedures regarding oxygen therapy. Findings: Observations on 10/31/2022 at 10:48 a.m. revealed resident #42 receiving oxygen by nasal cannula, no date or time was on the nasal cannula tubing and humidifier bottle. During an interview on 10/31/2022 at 10:48 a.m. S4 LPN (License Practical Nurse) confirmed there was no date and time on the nasal cannula tubing or humidifier bottle and it should have been. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure presented by S5 DON (Director of Nursing) revealed, in part, humidifier bottles, cannulas and O2 tubing will be changed at least once weekly and dated. Review of Resident #42's October 2022 Physician Orders revealed an order dated 1/31/2022 for oxygen at 2 Liters per minute per nasal cannula continuously. Review of Resident #42's Comprehensive Plan of Care revealed a problem of potential for impaired gas exchange and shortness of breath. Some of the approaches are to change oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle weekly and dated. Resident #42 Respiratory Care
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan had been developed and impleme...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan had been developed and implemented for 3 (#30, #56, #76) out of 33 total sampled residents. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for: 1. Resident #30 related to diabetes care and management. 2. Resident #56 related to Hospice care and services. 3. Resident #76 related to the post-op care and treatment. Findings: Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admit date of 10/27/2020 with diagnoses that include, in part, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and long term use of insulin. Review of current physician orders include in part: - 9/19/2022 Accuchecks BID (twice a day), administer sliding scale with Novolog 100 unit/ml (milliliter) flexpen, 0-60=give Orange juice and recheck in 1 hour; if persists give glucagon 1 mg(milligram)/ml, notify MD (doctor). 61-199=0 units, 200-250=2 units, 251-300=4 units, 301-350=6 units, 351-400=9 units, 401-999=12 units and notify MD. - 2/9/2022 Levemir 100 units/ml vial inject 35 units subcutaneous at bedtime, rotate site - 12/6/2021 Levemir 100 units/ml vial inject 35 units subcutaneous every morning. Rotate site - 5/25/2021 Tradjenta 5 mg tablet give po (by mouth) every day Review of Resident #30s current comprehensive care plan failed to reveal Resident #30 was care planned for diabetes, diabetes care or use of insulin. During an interview on 11/2/2022 at 2:00 p.m. [NAME] CCC (Comprehensive Care Coordinator) verified Resident #30 was a diabetic, used insulin and was not care planned for diabetes or insulin use and should have been. Resident #56 Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included, in part, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, end stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and malignant neoplasm of colon. Review of Resident #56's current physician orders revealed a 10/18/2022 order for admit to ___ ___ Hospice diagnosis: ESRD. Review of Resident #56's Care Plan failed to reveal Resident #56 was care planned for Hospice. During an interview on 11/2/2022 at 3:20 p.m. S3 CCC reviewed Resident #56's care plan and reported Resident #56 was not care planned for Hospice and should be. Resident #76 Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed an original admit date of 8/21/2020, and a readmission date of 5/5/2022 with diagnoses that include, in part, rotator cuff tear or rupture of right shoulder and Wernicke-Korsakoff encephalopathy. Review of Resident #76's current comprehensive care plan failed to reveal Resident #76 was care planned for post-op care and treatment related to rotator cuff surgery. During an interview on 11/2/2022 at 2:05 p.m. S2 CCC verified Resident #76 had shoulder surgery on 10/5/2022 and should have been care planned for post-op care and treatment and was not.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to complete ADLs (A...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to complete ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain proper grooming and hygiene for 1 (#61) of 2 (#61, #69) residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #61's hair was washed weekly. Findings: Review of Hygiene and Grooming Nursing Policy revealed: Policy: .Resident's hair, scalp and nails will be cleansed at least weekly unless contraindicated by a physician. Nursing personnel will provide assistance as needed. Essential Points: 1. An appropriate, attractive personal appearance is necessary for the maintenance of a feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. . 7. Residents shall receive at least one shampoo weekly. Residents should be assessed on an individual basis for need for more frequent shampoo. . Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included, in part, need for assistance with personal care, age related osteoporosis, dysarthria and anarthria and chronic pain. Review of Resident #61's 9/29/2022 quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15. Further review of 9/29/2022 quarterly MDS revealed Resident #61 required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Care Plan revealed Resident #61 had a self-care ADL deficit with interventions that included assist with hygiene, dressing, and grooming daily. Observation on 10/31/2022 at 1:01 p.m. revealed Resident #61 was lying in bed, dressed in a gown and hair appeared disheveled and oily. During an interview on 10/31/22 at 1:01 p.m. Resident #61 reported staff were washing her maybe every 2-3 weeks. Resident #61 further reported she would like it washed each week. During an interview on 11/1/2022 at 8:05 a.m. Resident #61 reported she believed the last time her hair was washed was 2 weeks ago on Wednesday. Observation on 11/1/2022 at 4:15 p.m. revealed Resident #61's hair was up in a ponytail, appeared oily white flakes in it. During an interview on 11/1/2022 at 4:15 p.m. Resident #61 reported she had been assisted with a bath today but her hair had not been washed. During an interview on 11/2/2022 at 11:05 a.m. S7 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported Resident #61 was getting her hair washed about once a month. During an interview on 11/2/2022 at 11:27 a.m. S6 CNA Supervisor reported residents should have their hair washed once a week. CNA Supervisor further observed and felt Resident #61's hair and agreed it needed to be washed.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 life-threatening violation(s), $32,243 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 12 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $32,243 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (11/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?

CMS rates Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center?

State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center?

Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 124 certified beds and approximately 100 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Shreveport, Louisiana.

How Does Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?

Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has been fined $32,243 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,401. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Roseview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.