THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION

9225 NORMANDIE DRIVE, SHREVEPORT, LA 71118 (318) 686-0515
For profit - Limited Liability company 177 Beds PRIORITY MANAGEMENT Data: November 2025 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#255 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation in Shreveport, Louisiana has a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns. It ranks #255 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the bottom half, and it is the lowest-ranked facility in Caddo County. The facility has shown some improvement, with the number of reported issues decreasing from 15 in 2024 to 14 in 2025. Staffing is a notable weakness, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a 60% turnover rate, which is above the state average of 47%. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $374,262 in fines, a figure that surpasses 96% of other Louisiana facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents of concern include the presence of live ants and other pests in residents' rooms, which posed a risk of bites and infection, and a serious incident of physical and verbal abuse by a staff member towards a cognitively impaired resident. While there is average RN coverage, the facility's ongoing issues with pests and staff behavior raise significant red flags for families considering this option for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#255/264
Bottom 4%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
15 → 14 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$374,262 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 12 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
48 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 15 issues
2025: 14 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 60%

14pts above Louisiana avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $374,262

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (60%)

12 points above Louisiana average of 48%

The Ugly 48 deficiencies on record

9 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Apr 2025 14 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques were practiced to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 (#225) of 1 (#14, #61, #225) residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques were practiced to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 (#225) of 1 (#14, #61, #225) residents observed during urinary catheter care. Findings: Review of facility's Catheter Care, Urinary (revised January 3, 2023) revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections .Infection control - 3. Routine hygiene catheter care with soap and water or equivalent each shift and prn unless otherwise indicated by physician and will be documented in the EMR (electronic medical record) .Steps in the Procedure - 3. Fill the wash basin with warm water. 7. Wash the resident's genitalia and perineum thoroughly with soap and water. Rinse the area well and towel dry. 13. With non-dominant hand separate the labia of the female resident .Maintain the position of this hand throughout the procedure. 15. For a female resident: Use a washcloth with warm water and soap/equivalent to cleanse the labia. Use one area of the washcloth for each downward, cleansing stroke. Change the position of the washcloth with each downward stroke. Next, change the position of the washcloth and cleanse around the urethral meatus. Do not allow the washcloth to dray on the resident's skin or bed linen. With a clean washcloth, rinse the warm water using the above technique. 17. Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward. 20. Discard disposable items into designated containers. Remove gloves and discard into designated container. Review of Resident #225's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/06/2023 with the following diagnoses, including in part: urinary tract infection/site not specified, other chronic cystitis without hematuria, retention of urine and other obstructive and reflux uropathy. Observation of catheter care performed by S3 CNA (certified nursing assistant) on Resident #225 on 04/09/2025 at 9:10 a.m. revealed S3 CNA failed to fill the wash basin with warm water, wash the resident's genitalia and perineum thoroughly with soap and water, and remove gloves and discard into designated container. S3 CNA was observed wiping the bottom section of the catheter tubing and touching the linens with dirty gloves on. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 9:10 a.m. S3 CNA acknowledged she did not clean the perineum. S3 CNA further acknowledged she should have taken off contaminated gloves after providing care and before touching the linens.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews the facility to accurately submit mandatory direct care staffing information to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 1 2025...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews the facility to accurately submit mandatory direct care staffing information to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 1 2025 (October 1-December 31). Findings: Review of the facility Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 1 2025 (October 1-December 31) revealed triggers for the following: One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. Review of the facility's weekend staffing patterns for FY Quarter 1 2025 revealed hours of direct care provided exceeded the hours of care required. During an interview on 04/09/2025 1:20 p.m. S10 Human Resources (HR) reported she started working at the facility in January 2025. S10 HR reported she had not submitted anything directly to CMS. S10 HR reported she only submitted payroll hours to the facility corporate office through their PBJ portal. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 3:00 p.m. S1 Administrator acknowledged the information submitted to CMS for the PBJ Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 1 2025 was not accurate. S1 Administrator confirmed S10 HR did not submit staffing information to CMS. S1 Administrator reported the facility's corporate office submitted staffing information to CMS.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure it was clinically appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications for 1 (Resident #54) of 41 Sampled Reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure it was clinically appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications for 1 (Resident #54) of 41 Sampled Residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy dated as revised April 2019 revealed in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 23. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of resident #54's Physician Orders revealed in part orders dated: 1. 01/29/2025 Albuterol-Budesonide Inhalation Aerosol 90-80 mcg/act (microgram/actuation) (Albuterol-Budesonide) 1 inhalation inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for wheezing related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . 2. 01/29/2025 Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) mg(milligram) /3 ml (milliliter) 1 vial inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for wheezing. Review of March/April 2025 Medication Administration Record documentation failed to reveal Albuterol inhalation medications had been administered. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:50 a.m. with S8 Unit Manager revealed Resident #54 was sitting on his bedside self-administering nebulizer treatment. A large shoe-box sized box full of empty Albuterol respiratory treatment vials was observed on the floor. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:50 a.m. Resident #54 reported the nurses left treatment vials in the nebulizer and he administered the treatments when he needed them. Resident #54 further reported he just threw the empty vials in the box on the floor and the nurse's did not check, he just administered the treatments himself when he needed them. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:55 a.m. S8 Unit Manager reported the nurses should be administering the nebulizer treatments, and Resident #54 should not be giving himself the treatments. During an interview on 04/08/2025 at 2:20 p.m. S8 Unit Manager verified Resident #54 did not have an order, a consent, or assessment for self administration of medication and should have.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 3 (#26, #30, #325) of 41 s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 3 (#26, #30, #325) of 41 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure the resident's call lights remained in reach. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Call Light System Policy revealed the following: Purpose: A call light system (audible or visual) is in place and operative in the facility. This system allows individual residents to access a system that notifies nursing that the resident has a need. Residents can communicate with the Nurse's Station from their room and or bathing and toileting facilities. General Guidelines 4. Ensure that the call light is easily reachable by the resident. Resident #26 Review of Resident #26's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed severe cognitive impairment and functional limitations requiring one person assistance for bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:15 a.m. revealed Resident #26 was sitting in a chair at the bedside, with the call light on the other side of the bed, behind the bedside dresser out of Resident #26's reach. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:40 a.m. with S8 Unit Manager revealed Resident #26's the call light was on the other side of the bed, behind the bedside dresser, and out of Resident #26's reach. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:40 a.m. S8 Unit Manager verified Resident #26's call light was not in reach. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 3 indicating severe impaired cognition and required extensive one person assistance with bed mobility, limited one person physical assistance with transfers, and extensive one person assistance with toilet use. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:00 a.m. with S15 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed Resident #30's call light was lying on the floor out of Resident #30's reach. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:00 a.m. S15 LPN confirmed Resident #30's call light should have been pinned to her bed linen within her reach. Resident #325 Review of Resident #325's MDS assessement dated 03/10/2025 revealed moderate cognitive impairment and functional limitations requiring extensive one person assistance for bed mobility and toilet use and extensive two person assistance for transfers. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:20 a.m. revealed Resident #325 was lying in bed, with the call light on the floor behind bedside dresser, out of Resident #325's reach. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:40 a.m. with S8 Unit Manager revealed Resident #325's call light was on the floor behind bedside dresser and out of Resident #235's reach. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:40 a.m. S8 Unit Manager verified Resident #325's call light was not in reach.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to consider the views of residents' grievances voiced during Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to consider the views of residents' grievances voiced during Resident Council Meeting. The facility failed to act promptly upon 1 (#79) of 1(#79) resident's grievances concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Grievance/Complaints, Recording and Investigating Policy (revised November 2023) revealed in part: Policy Statement: All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective actions will be taken to resolve the grievance (s). Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating grievances and complaints to the Grievance Officer. 2. Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the Grievance Officer will begin an investigation into the allegations. 3. The department director (s) of any named employee (s) will be notified of the nature of the complaint and that an investigation is underway. 4. The investigation and report will include, as applicable: g. Accounts of any other individuals involved (i.e. employee's supervisor, etc.; 5. The Grievance Officer will record and maintain all grievances and complaints on the Resident Grievance Complaint Log. The following information will be recorded and maintained in the log: a. the date of the grievance/complaint was received. B. the name and room number of the resident filing the grievance/complaint (if available). D. the date the alleged incident took place. E. the name of the person (S) investigating the incident. F. the date the resident, or interested party, was informed of the findings. G. the disposition of the grievance (i.e., resolved, dispute, etc.). 6. The resident Grievance/Complaint Form will be filed with the Administrator within five (5) working days of the incident. 7. The resident, or person acting on behalf of the resident, will be informed of the findings of the investigation, as well as any corrective actions recommended, within five (5) working days of the filing of the grievance or complaint. 9. Copies of reports will be made available to the resident or resident representative acting on behalf of the resident upon request. Review of #79's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/10/2022 with the following diagnoses, including in part: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, muscle wasting and atrophy/not elsewhere classified/multiple sites , other reduced mobility and contracture of muscle left hand. Review of #79's MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 (cognitively intact). Further review revealed a functional status of: extensive assistance with one person assist for bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes dated 03/20/2025 revealed: Grievances or Complaints (can be anonymous) - .S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) does not tend to Resident #79 as much for example not tending to him, made him late for the meeting. When S4 CNA has an attitude and acts like it's not his job. Review of the facility's Grievance Log failed to reveal Resident #79's grievance from the 03/20/2025 Resident Council Meeting. Further review failed to reveal a Grievance/Complaint Form filled out concerninging Resident #79's grievance about S4 CNA. During the Resident Council Meeting on 04/07/2025 at 1:30 p.m. Resident #79 reported he had not heard anything about his grievance concerning S4 CNA. Resident #79 further reported S4 CNA was lazy and did not help him or the other residents; especially those who cannot do for themselves. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 8:25 a.m. S5 Activities Director reported she typed up Resident #79's grievance regarding S4 CNA and turned it in to S1 Administrator. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 10:50 a.m. S1 Administrator reported he was aware of Resident #79's grievance regarding S4 CNA. S1 Administrator acknowledged the facility's policy reads, in part, complaint findings are to be discussed with the complainant within five working days of receiving the grievance. S1 Administrator further acknowledged the grievance was not on the grievance log, a grievance form was not completed, and he had not followed up with Resident #79 of the findings.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0637 (Tag F0637)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 (#75) of 3 (#14, #7...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 (#75) of 3 (#14, #75, #84) residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility failed to complete a significant change assessment after Resident #75 was diagnosed with a cerebral vascular infarction resulting in right dominant side hemiplegia. Findings: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an initial admit date of 11/20/2024 and a readmission date of 03/04/2025 with a new diagnosis hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #75's Nurse Practitioner's progress note dated 03/10/2025 revealed Resident #75 had been admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 03/04/2025 and treated for weakness, confusion, and bilateral ptosis. An MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) on 02/26/2025 revealed Resident #75 had experienced a new cerebral vascular accident. Resident #75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of a CVA (cerebral vascular accident) with hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 was assessed to have a BIMS (brief interview mental status) of 13 indicating intact cognition and to have a new diagnosis of hemiplegia affecting Resident #75's right dominant side. Further review failed to reveal a significant change assessment had been completed in connection with Resident #75's new diagnosis of CVAwith hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side on 03/04/2025. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 10:00 a.m. S11 MDS Coordinator confirmed a significant change assessment should have been completed after Resident #75's readmission to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of CVA with hemiplegia and dysphagia. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nurses) confirmed a significant change MDS should have been completed after Resident #75's readmission to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of CVA with hemiplegia and dysphagia.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement residents comprehensive care plan for 2 (#1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement residents comprehensive care plan for 2 (#116, #225) out of 40 total sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to: 1. develop Resident #116's plan of care to include diabetes with insulin use, diuretic use and oxygen use, and 2. monitor Resident #225's urinary catheter for urine color and consistency. Findings: Resident #116 Review of Resident #116's medical record revealed in part an admit date of 02/07/2025 with diagnoses that include in part: type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #116's physician's orders revealed in part orders dated: 02/07/2025 O2 (oxygen) at 2 Liters via N/C (nasal cannula) PRN (as needed) for SOB (shortness of breath) or Sat (saturation) < (less than) 90% O2 sat Q (every) shift. 04/01/2024 Valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide oral tablet 160-25 mg (milligram) (valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension hold for blood pressure under 110/60. 02/14/2025 Humalog Subcutaneous solution cartridge 100 unit/ml (milliliter) (insulin Lispro) inject as per sliding scale: if 150-200=2 units; 201-250 =4 units; 251-300=6 units; 301-350 =8 units; 351-400=10 units; [PHONE NUMBER]=12 units, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for DM2 (type 2 diabetes mellitus). Review of Resident #116's comprehensive care plan failed to reveal Resident #116 had been care planned with appropriate interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus and the use of insulin, diuretic use, and oxygen. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 8:00 a.m. S9 Assistant Administrator reported Resident 116's comprehensive care plan did not include appropriate interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus and the use of insulin, diuretic use, and oxygen and should have. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 8:15 a.m. S11 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator reviewed and confirmed Resident #116 was not care planned for type 2 diabetes mellitus and the use of insulin, diuretic use, and oxygen and should have been. Resident #225 Review of facility's Catheter Care, Urinary Policy (revised January 3, 2023) revealed in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections . Documentation - The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 4. character of urine such as color (straw-colored, dark, or red), clarity (cloudy, solid particles, or blood). Review of Resident #225's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/06/2023 with the following diagnoses, including in part: urinary tract infection/site not specified, other chronic cystitis without hematuria, retention of urine, unspecified and other obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Resident #225's comprehensive care plan revealed: .urinary catheter monitor urine color, 1 = yellow, 2 = bloody, 3 = dark, if not = 1 notify MD (Medical Director) every shift; urinary catheter monitor urine consistency, 1 = clear, 2 = cloudy, 3 = mucus every shift. Review of Resident #225's medical record failed to reveal urine color and consistency were monitored. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 11:00 a.m. S7 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged Resident #225's urine color and consistency were not monitored. During an interview on 04/09/2025 S8 Unit Manager acknowledged Resident #225's urine color and consistency were not monitored. Resident #75
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's plan of care for 2 (#54, #116) of 4 (#54, #75, #89, #116) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to change the oxygen tubing and humidification bottle, change the nebulizer mask or provide a cover for the oxygen tubing and nebulizer mask when not in use for Resident #54 and Resident #116, Findings: Review of the facility policy for Oxygen Administration revised 02/2025, revealed in part: Preparation: 5. Oxygen cannula and tubing will be changed within 7-10 days or if visibly soiled/ Store in a covered device (i.e. plastic bag, kangaroo pouch) between uses. Infection Control Considerations and Maintenance related to Medication Nebulizers 6. Nebulizer Tubing will be changed within 7-10 days, or if visibly soiled. 7. Store nebulizer equipment in a covered device (i.e. plastic bag, kangaroo pouch) between uses. Resident #54 Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/15/2022 with diagnoses that included in part: heart failure, cardiomyopathy, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation. Review of Resident #54's physician orders revealed in part orders dated: 01/29/2025 Albuterol-Budesonide Inhalation Aerosol 90-80 mcg/act (micrograms/actuation) (Albuterol-Budesonide) 1 inhalation inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for wheezing related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation. 01/29/2025 Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML (milligram/milliliter) 1 vial inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for wheezing. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:20 a.m. of Resident #54's oxygen tubing and humidification tubing failed to reveal a date. Further observation revealed Resident #54's nasal cannula and nebulizer mask was not stored in a covered device. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:50 a.m. Resident #54 reported the nurses change the tubing about once a month or so but he did not have a bag to store the oxygen tube or nebulizer mask. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 6:55 a.m. S8 Unit Manager confirmed the oxygen tubing, humidification bottle and the nebulizer mask should have been dated, and bagged when not in use and were not. Resident #116 Review of Resident #116's medical record revealed in part an admit date of 02/07/2025 with diagnoses that include in part type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #116's physician orders revealed in part orders dated: 03/05/2025 Ventolin HFA (hydrofluoroalkane) Inhalation Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT (Albuterol Sulfate) 2 puff inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for SOB (shortness of breath). 03/05/2025 Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML 3 ml inhale orally three times a day for COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) 02/07/2025 Breztri Aerosphere Inhalation Aerosol 160-9-4.8 MCG/ACT (Budesonide-Glycopyrrolate-Formoterol Fumarate) Breztri Aerosphere Inhalation Aerosol 160-9-4.8 MCG/ACT (Budesonide-Glycopyrrolate-Formoterol Fumarate) 02/07/2025 Oxygen: Change Mask, 02 (oxygen) tubing, water bottle and clean concentrator filter every night shift every Wednesday change tubing label and date and as needed for contamination. 02/07/2025 02 2L Nasal Cannula as needed Observation on 04/07/2025 at 6:20 a.m. revealed Resident #116's oxygen concentrator at bedside with undated, un-bagged nasal cannula draped over the concentrator, and humidification bottle dated 03/13/2025. Further observation revealed Resident #116's nebulizer sitting on bedside table, undated and not stored in a covered device. Observation on 04/07/2025 at 7:00 a.m. S8 Unit Manager verified oxygen concentrator at bedside with undated, un-bagged nasal cannula draped over the concentrator, and humidification bottle dated 03/13/2025. Further observation revealed Resident #116's nebulizer sitting on bedside table, undated and not stored in a covered device. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 7:00 a.m. S8 Unit Manager reported Resident #116's tubing should have been changed every week and stored in covered device when not in use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provide for 1 (#52) of 1 (#52) resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed ensure Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provide for 1 (#52) of 1 (#52) resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed ensure Resident #52s dialysis shunt was accurately assessed and monitored. Findings: Review of the facilitys policy for End-Stage Renal Disease Care of a resident (revised September 2010) revealed in part: 2. b. The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition on a daily or per shift basis. 3. The resident's comprehensive care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to ESRD (end stage renal disease) Dialysis care. Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/24/2018 and diagnoses that include in part type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic kidney complications, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #52's comprehensive care plan revealed resident #52 was care planned for dialysis with approaches that included, may have dialysis Monday, Wednesday and Friday, observe for signs and symptoms of bleeding, hemorrhage, bacteremia. Review of Resident #52's medical record failed to reveal Resident #52's dialysis shunt was accurately assessed and monitored During an interview on 04/08/2025 at 2:30 p.m. Resident #52 reported he received dialysis Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and indicated the facility nurse did not assess and monitor his dialysis shunt. During an interview on 04/08/2025 at 1:20 p.m. S16 Unit Manager confirmed Resident #52 received dialysis. S16 Unit Manager reviewed Resident #52's medical record failed to reveal documentation Resident #52s dialysis shunt was accurately assessed and monitored.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0700 (Tag F0700)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the risk of entr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and use for 2 (#43, #80) of 2 residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails policy dated as revised August 2024 revealed in part: General Guidelines 3. Upon admission, readmission, with routine quarterly or significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) and PRN (as needed), therapy/designee will complete the Side Rail Utilization Assessment, or equivalent form to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and rationales for using side rails prior to implementation, When used for mobility or transfer, the assessment will include a review of the resident's: c. Risk of entrapment from the use of side rails; and 5. The resident's care plan will reflect the use of side rails and updated as necessary. Resident #43 Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #43's April 2025 Physician Orders revealed an order dated 09/18/2024 for bilateral assist rails to promote independence in bed mobility, check for placement and functioning every shift. Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #43 required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. During the survey dates of 04/07/2025 to 04/10/2025 observations revealed Resident #43 had bilateral bed assist rails in use. Review of Resident #43's medical record failed to reveal documentation of an assessment for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and use. Resident #80 Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed diagnoses that included, in part, right femur fracture, generalized osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #80's April 2025 Physicians Orders revealed an order dated 08/06/2024 for bilateral assist rails to promote independence and bed mobility, check for placement and functioning every shift. Review of Resident #80's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #80 had a BIMS of 3 which indicated severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #80 required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. During the survey dates of 04/07/2025 to 04/10/2025 observations revealed Resident #80 had bilateral bed assist rails in use. Review of Resident #80's medical record failed to reveal documentation of an assessment for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and use. During an interview on 04/08/2025 at 1:27 p.m. S2 Director of Nursing reviewed Resident #43 and Resident #80's medical records and acknowledged there was not documentation of an assessment for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 3 (#46, #52, #54) out of 8 (#10, #23, #46, #50, #52, #54, #90, #115, #117) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 3 (#46, #52, #54) out of 8 (#10, #23, #46, #50, #52, #54, #90, #115, #117) residents review for unnecesary medications . The facility failed to monitor Resident #46, Resident #52, and Resident #54 for edema while receiving a diuretic. Findings: Resident #46 Review of Resident #46's medical records revealed an admit date of 03/21/2019 with the following diagnoses, including in part: localized edema and hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #46's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 04/01/2025 for Furosemide Oral Tablet 20 mg (milligram) give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for edema. Review of Resident #46's March and April 2025 Medication Administration Records and Treatment Administration Records failed to reveal monitoring for edema while receiving a diuretic. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 2:15 p.m. S8 Unit Manager acknowledged Resident #46 was not monitored for edema while receiving a diuretic and should have been. Resident #52 Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/24/2018 with diagnoses that include in part chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, shortness of breath, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, obesity, edema, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic kidney complication, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #52's Physician's Orders revealed and order dated 2/15/2025 for Furosemide Tablet 80 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for edema. Review of Resident #52's March and April 2025 Medication Administration Records and Treatment Administration Records failed to reveal monitoring for edema while receiving a diuretic. During an interview on 04/08/2025 at 1:20 p.m. S8 Unit Manager verified Resident #52 was not being monitored for edema and stated, I know if it's not documented, it's not done. and should have been. Resident #54 Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/15/2022 with diagnoses that include in part heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #54's Physician Orders revealed in part an order dated 1/30/2025 Furosemide Tablet 40 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to heart failure. Review of Resident #52's March and April 2025 Medication Administration Records and Treatment Administration Records failed to reveal monitoring for edema while receiving a diuretic. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 1:35 p.m. S9 Assistant Administrator and S2 Director of Nursing reviewed Resident #54's medical record and verified there was no documentation that Resident #54 was being monitored for edema and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident drug regimens were free of unnecessary medications...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident drug regimens were free of unnecessary medications for 1 (#117) of 5 (#10, #23, #90, #115, #117) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure monitoring of side effects and behaviors had been conducted on Resident #117 who received psychotropic medications. Findings: Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed Resident #117 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, malignant neoplasm of rectum and depression. Review of Resident #117's April 2025 Physician Orders revealed the following: An order dated 02/18/2025 for Amitriptyline HCL (hydrochloride) 25 mg (milligram) tablet give 1 tablet by mouth once daily. An order dated 02/19/2025 for Buspirone HCL 10 mg tablet give 1 tablet by mouth 3 times a day. An order dated 04/03/2025 for Lorazepam tablet 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. Review of Resident #117's March and April 2025 Medication Administration Records failed to reveal documentation that monitoring of side effects and behaviors had been conducted for Resident #117 who was receiving antidepressant and antianxiety medications. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 3:30 p.m. S2 Director of Nursing reviewed Resident #117's medical record and confirmed Resident #117 received antidepressant and antianxiety medications and there was no documentation that monitoring of side effects and behaviors had been conducted.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional princi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. The facility failed to ensure 1 out of 4 medication carts and 1 out of 3 medication rooms contained unexpired medications. Findings: Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy dated as revised April 2019 revealed in part: Policy Statement - The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 5. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 23. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Observation of Medication Room A on 04/09/2025 at 3:25 p.m. revealed following expired and discontinued medications: 1. Resident #5- blister pack - Sumatriptan Succinate (milligram) 1 tablet as needed - expiration date of 02/2025. 2. Resident #59 - discontinued blister pack - Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day with an expiration date of 11/20/2024. 3. Resident #85 - discontinued blister pack - Ondansetron HCL (hydrochloride) 4 mg 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed for nausea/vomiting with an expiration date of 11/20/2024. 4. Resident #25 - discontinued blister pack - Ondansetron HCL 4 mg 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed with an expiration date of 02/08/2025. During an interview on 04/09/2025 at 3:25 p.m. S6 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged Resident #5's medication Sumatriptan Succinate 1 tablet as needed had an expiration date of 02/2025, Resident #59's blister pack of Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day had an expiration date of 11/20/2024, Resident #85's blister pack of Ondansetron HCL 4 mg 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed for nausea/vomiting had an expiration date of 11/20/2024, and Resident #25 - discontinued blister pack - Ondansetron HCL 4 mg 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed had an expiration date of 02/08/2025. S6 LPN further acknowledged the expired medications should not be in the medication room. Observaton of Medication Cart B on 04/10/2025 at 11:30 a.m revealed the following expired medications: 1. Acetaminophen 500 mg tablets with an expiration date of 10/2024 for general stock. 2. Resident #72's blister pack for Keppra 500 mg 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day with an expiration date of 02/28/2025. During an interview on 04/10/2025 at 11:30 a.m. S7 LPN acknowledged Acetaminophen 500 mg tablets had an expiration date of 10/2024 and Resident #72's blister pack for Keppra 500 mg 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day had an expiration date of 02/28/2025.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) received required abuse prevention and dementia management training for 4 (S4 CNA, S12 CNA, S13 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) received required abuse prevention and dementia management training for 4 (S4 CNA, S12 CNA, S13 CNA, S14 Contract CNA) of 6 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S4 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 01/31/2025. Further review of S4 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of abuse prevention and dementia management training. Review of S12 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 10/02/2024. Further review of S12 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of abuse prevention training. Review of S13 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 11/04/2024. Further review of S13 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of abuse training. Review of S14 Contract CNA's personnel record revealed S14 Contract CNA had worked 201.33 hours in the facility in the last 3 months. Further review of S14 Contract CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of abuse training. During an interview on 04/10/2025 at 12:30 p.m. S9 Assistant Administrator reviewed S4 CNA, S12 CNA, S13 CNA, and S14 Contract CNA's records and acknowledged there was no documentation of abuse prevention training. S9 Assistant Administrator further acknowledged S4 CNA's personnel record failed to have documentation of dementia training as well.
Sept 2024 4 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, video review, and interviews the facility failed to supervise cognitively impaired residents who were h...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, video review, and interviews the facility failed to supervise cognitively impaired residents who were high risk for elopement. Resident #1 exited the facility and Residents #5 and #6 remained at high risk for elopement, 3 (#1, #5, #6) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 04/07/2024 at 2:50 a.m. when Resident #1, a moderately cognitively impaired resident who ambulated with a walker, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 crawled out of the window in her room and exited the facility. Staff did not realize Resident #1 eloped from the facility until staff received a phone call from the S9 Responsible, reporting the Resident #1 was found at a gas station approximately one mile from the facility. Resident #1 walked down a dark single lane highway and a 4 lane divided highway during the night. Resident #1 was returned to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 3:30 a.m. by S9 Responsible Party. The IJ continued as a review of facility video surveillance from 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. revealed staff were not performing visual checks on remaining residents (Resident #5 and Resident #6) who resided on Hall A and were identified at risk for elopement. The facility's system to adequately supervise residents every two hours according to the facility's routine resident checks policy is deficient. S3 Assistant Administrator and S2 Corporate Nurse were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 09/24/2024 at 5:20 p.m. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to the remaining ten residents at risk for elopement residing in the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/25/2024 at 10:18 a.m. when it was determined the facility had implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite interviews, observations, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Review of facility's Wandering and Elopements Policy and Procedure (revised November 15, 2023) revealed in part: Policy: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and implement appropriate protective measures to help guard against a resident wandering from the facility. The facility strives to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Identifying residents at risk: 2. if identified as a risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Wandering and elopement protocols: 1. Staff shall promptly report any resident who tries to leave the premises or is suspected of being missing to the charge nurse or Director of Nursing (DON). 2.Instruct another staff member to inform charge nurse or DON that a resident has left the premises. 3. When the resident returns to the facility, the DON or charge nurse shall: examine the resident for injuries, notify the attending physician and report findings .complete and file report of incident/accident, document the event in the resident's medical record and notify regulatory agencies per state guidelines as indicated. Review of facility's Routine Resident Checks Policy Statement (no date) revealed in part: Staff shall make routine resident checks to help maintain resident safety and well-being. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. to ensure the safety and well-being of our residents, nursing staff shall make a routine resident check on each resident at least four times per each 8-hour shift. 2. Routine resident checks involve entering the resident's room and/or identifying the resident elsewhere on the unit to determine if the resident's needs are being met, identify any change in the resident's condition, identify whether the resident has any concerns, and see if the resident is sleeping, needs toileting assistance, etc. 3. The person conducting routine check shall report promptly to the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse any changes in the resident's condition and medical needs. Review of the Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/2024 with diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/unspecified, heart failure/unspecified, chronic kidney disease/unspecified, depression/unspecified, insomnia/unspecified, problems related to living alone, at risk for elopement and history of falling. Review of Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's Elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed an elopement score of 3.0 indicating resident is at risk. (Score > = 1 = At Risk for Elopement). Review of an internet mapping site revealed Resident #1 was located approximately 1 mile from the facility and had to walk down a single lane highway and a 4 lane divided highway at night. Review of Resident #1's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/04/2024 to perform visual census checks, resident at risk for wandering, exit seeking behaviors, and elopement every 2 hours for elopement risk. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed an entry on 04/04/2024 at 5:53 p.m. read in part, Resident #1 sitting near front door crying with bags packed. When asked what was wrong, resident stated she wants to go home, she is not going back to her room . Will notify all staff to monitor res closely. Further review revealed a late entry on 04/07/2024 at 3:18 a.m. read in part, at approximately 2:50 a.m. staff nurse received a phone call from Resident #1's S9 Responsible Party, stating Resident #1 was found at a gas station. Staff on shift had previously observed resident or what appeared to be the resident asleep in the bed. Upon further inspection, it was noted by staff that the bed was stuffed with pillows and blankets to resemble a body asleep in bed. Upon searching by staff, resident was not found anywhere in the building. The window in Resident #1's room was observed by staff to be raised open, which leads to the outside of the building area. At approximately 3:30 a.m. resident was returned to the facility via S9 Responsible Party . Will continue to monitor and maintain safety measures while on shift. During a telephone interview on 09/19/2024 at 3:50 p.m. S9 Responsible Party of Resident #1, reported resident has dementia and was transferred to a memory care unit. S9 Responsible Party further reported she thought staff were supposed to be doing checks every 2 hours on the residents. S9 Responsible Party confirmed on 04/07/2024 at approximately 3:00 a.m. a gas station clerk notified her Resident #1 was wandering in the parking lot. S9 Responsible Party reported on 04/07/2024 she picked up Resident #1 from the gas station and returned her to the facility at approximately 3:30 a.m. S9 Responsible Party further reported on the way back to the facility she contacted the facility and requested staff check on Resident #1. S9 Responsible Party reported staff confirmed Resident #1 was not in her room. During an interview on 09/23/2024 at 10:10 a.m. S5 Receptionist reported she had witnessed Resident #1 following visitors and/staff out of the locked double doors to the front entrance of the facility prior to 04/07/2024. S5 Receptionist further reported she witnessed Resident #1 during the week of 04/01/2024 walking out behind someone and noticed her walking down the street not realizing she was a resident. S5 Receptionist reported staff was notified and Resident #1 was brought back to the facility. During a telephone interview on 09/23/2024 at 11:45 a.m. S8 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed she worked on 04/07/2024 when Resident #1 eloped. S8 LPN confirmed the night of 04/07/2024 Resident #1's S9 Responsible Party called and told staff she was on her way to pick up Resident #1 at the gas station. S8 LPN reported Resident #1 left out the window in her room. During an interview on 09/23/2024 at 12:15 p.m. S10 Business Office reported Resident #1 would see her put her purse on and follow her to the front door, wanting to leave. During a telephone interview on 09/23/2024 at 11:38 a.m. S6 Former Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reported Resident #1 had behaviors of wanting to leave the facility. During an interview on 09/23/2024 at 1:20 p.m. S4 DON reported Resident #1 always had her bag packed and had exhibited exit seeking behaviors. During an interview on 09/23/2024 at 2:20 p.m. S2 Corporate Nurse reported Resident #1 had been exhibiting exit seeking behaviors. S2 Corporate Nurse further reported Resident #1 would carry her bags around wanting to go home. During a review on 09/24/2024 at 11:55 a.m. of the facility's video surveillance of Hall A dated 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. during the night shift with S2 Corporate Nurse and S3 Assistant Administrator revealed staff failed to perform visual checks every 2 hours on residents. Resident #5 and Resident #6 resided on Hall A and were identified at risk for elopement. Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed an admit date of 11/22/2022 with diagnoses including but not limited to: cognitive communication deficit, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere/moderate with anxiety, insomnia/unspecified, schizoaffective disorder/bipolar type, and major depressive disorder/recurrent/moderate. Review of Resident #5's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 1 (severely cognitively impaired). Review of Resident #5's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 09/23/2024 revealed a score of 1.0 (Score > = 1 = At Risk for Elopement) indicating at risk for elopement. Review of Resident #5's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/23/2024 to perform visual census checks, resident at risk for wandering, exit seeking behaviors, elopement every 2 hours. Review of Resident #6's medical records revealed an admit date of 08/22/2024 with diagnoses including but not limited to: unspecified dementia/unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #6's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 (severely cognitively impaired). Review of Resident #6's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 09/23/2024 revealed a score of 1.0 (Score > = 1 = At Risk for Elopement) indicating at risk for elopement. Review of Resident #6's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/23/2024 to perform visual census checks, resident at risk for wandering, exit seeking behaviors, elopement every 2 hours. During an interview on 09/24/2024 at 12:25 p.m. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged video surveillance of the Hall A on 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. during the night shift revealed rounding was not completed every 2 hours and should have been done. S2 Corporate Nurse further acknowledged the nurse on duty did not enter the rooms to perform visual checks on the residents, including Resident #5 and Resident #6 identified at risk for elopement, every 2 hours according to facility policy. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged the lack of supervision had the potential to adversely affect the remaining ten residents identified at risk for elopement. During an interview on 09/24/2024 at 12:25 p.m. S3 Assistant Administrator acknowledged video surveillance of Hall A on 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. during the night shift revealed rounding was not completed every 2 hours and should have been done. S3 Assistant Administrator further acknowledged the nurse on duty did not enter the rooms to perform visual checks on the residents. Observation on 09/24/2024 at 9:20 a.m. revealed Resident #5 walking around nursing station and staff were redirecting her. Observation on 09/24/2024 at 9:20 a.m. revealed Resident #6 self-propelling her wheelchair down the hallway. Observation on 09/25/2024 at 9:45 a.m. revealed Resident #5 pushing her wheelchair in the hallway being redirected by staff.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video review, an interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resourc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video review, an interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently by failing to have an adequate system in place to ensure 3 (#1, #5, #6) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) sampled residents who were at risk for elopement were adequately supervised to prevent elopement from the facility. The lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 04/07/2024 at 2:50 a.m. when Resident #1, a moderately cognitively impaired resident who ambulated with a walker, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 crawled out of the window in her room and exited the facility. Staff did not realize Resident #1 eloped from the facility until staff received a phone call from S9 Responsible Party, reporting the Resident #1 was found at a gas station. Resident #1 was located at a gas station approximately one mile from the facility, Resident #1 walked down a dark single lane highway and a 4 lane divided highway during the night. Resident #1 was returned to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 3:30 a.m. by S9 Responsible Party. Resident #1 was assessed on 04/04/2024 as at risk for elopement and protective measures had not been put into place related to Resident #1's recent documented history of exit seeking behaviors. Review of facility video surveillance from 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. revealed staff were not performing visual checks on remaining residents (Resident #5 and Resident #6) who resided on Hall A and were identified at risk for elopement. The facility's system to adequately supervise residents every two hours according to the facility's routine resident checks policy is deficient. S3 Assistant Administrator and S2 Corporate Nurse were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 09/24/2024 at 5:20 p.m. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to the remaining ten residents at risk for elopement residing in the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/25/2024 at 10:18 a.m. when it was determined the facility had implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite interviews, observations, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Cross Reference F689 Review of facility's Wandering and Elopements Policy and Procedure (revised November 15, 2023) revealed in part: Policy: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and implement appropriate protective measures to help guard against a resident wandering from the facility. Review of facility's Routine Resident Checks Policy Statement (09/23/2024) revealed in part: Staff shall make routine resident checks to help maintain resident safety and well-being. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. to ensure the safety and well-being of our residents, nursing staff shall make a routine resident check on each resident at least four times per each 8-hour shift. 2. Routine resident checks involve entering the resident's room and/or identifying the resident elsewhere on the unit to determine if the resident's needs are being met, identify any change in the resident's condition, identify whether the resident has any concerns, and see if the resident is sleeping, needs toileting assistance, etc. 3. The person conducting routine check shall report promptly to the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse any changes in the resident's condition and medical needs. During a review on 09/24/2024 at 11:55 a.m. of the facility's video surveillance on the Hall A dated 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. during the night shift with S2 Corporate Nurse and S3 Assistant Administrator revealed staff failed to perform visual checks every 2 hours on residents. Resident #5 and Resident #6 resided on Hall A and were identified at risk for elopement. During an interview on 09/24/2024 at 12:25 p.m. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged video surveillance of the Hall A on 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. during the night shift revealed rounding was not completed every 2 hours and should have been done. S2 Corporate Nurse further acknowledged the nurse on duty did not enter the rooms to perform visual checks on the residents every 2 hours according to facility policy. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged the lack of supervision had the potential to adversely affect the remaining ten residents identified at risk for elopement. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged the facility failed to ensure nurses were performing visual checks and CNAs were rounding every two hours. S2 Corporate Nurse reported administration should be monitoring the night shifts to ensure monitoring every two hours is being completed. During an interview on 09/24/2024 at 12:25 p.m. S3 Assistant Administrator acknowledged video surveillance of the Hall A on 09/19/2024 from 11:18 p.m. until 5:18 a.m. during the night shift revealed rounding was not completed every 2 hours and should have been done. S3 Assistant Administrator further acknowledged the nurse on duty did not enter the rooms to perform visual checks on the residents.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving neglect was reported to the State Survey and Certification Agency for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving neglect was reported to the State Survey and Certification Agency for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed: Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management .Reporting: 4. The Administrator, or his/her designee, will provide the appropriate agencies or individuals listed above with a written report of the findings of the investigation within five (5) working days of the occurrence of the incident . Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed an admit date of 02/27/2024 with the following diagnoses, in part, including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/unspecified, heart failure/unspecified, depression/unspecified, insomnia/unspecified, problems related to living alone, and history of falling. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed a late entry on 04/07/2024 at 3:18 a.m. read in part, at approximately 2:50 a.m. staff nurse received a phone call from Resident #1's S9 Responsible Party, stating Resident #1 was found at a gas station. Staff on shift had previously observed resident or what appeared to be the resident asleep in the bed. Upon further inspection, it was noted by staff that the bed was stuffed with pillows and blankets to resemble a body asleep in bed. Upon searching by staff, resident was not found anywhere in the building. The window in Resident #1's room was observed by staff to be raised open, which leads to the outside of the building area. At approximately 3:30 a.m. resident was returned to the facility via S9 Responsible Party . During a telephone interview on 09/19/2024 at 3:50 p.m. S9 Responsible Party of Resident #1, reported resident has dementia and was transferred to a memory care unit. S9 Responsible Party further reported she thought staff were supposed to be doing checks every 2 hours on the residents. S9 Responsible Party confirmed on 04/07/2024 at approximately 3:00 a.m. a gas station clerk notified her Resident #1 was wandering in the parking lot. S9 Responsible Party reported on 04/07/2024 she picked up Resident #1 from the gas station and returned her to the facility at approximately 3:30 a.m. S9 Responsible Party further reported on the way back to the facility she contacted the facility and requested staff check on Resident #1. S9 Responsible Party reported staff confirmed Resident #1 was not in her room. During a telephone interview on 09/23/2024 at 11:45 a.m. S8 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed she worked on 04/07/2024 when Resident #1 eloped. S8 LPN confirmed the night of 04/07/2024 Resident #1's S9 Responsible Party called and told staff she was on her way to pick up Resident #1 at the gas station. S8 LPN reported Resident #1 left out the window in her room. Review of facility's incident investigation reports failed to reveal documentation for Resident #1's elopement from the facility on 04/07/2024. During a telephone interview on 09/23/2024 at 1:29 p.m. S1 Administrator acknowledged Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 04/07/2024 and an incident investigation was not completed and should have been.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are thoroughly investigated for 1 (#3) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed: Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management .Role of the Investigator: 1. The individual conducting the investigation will, at a minimum: a. Review the completed documentation forms; b. Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; c. Interview the person (s) reporting the incident; d. Interview any witnesses to the incident; e. Interview the resident (medical appropriate); f. Interview the resident's attending physician as needed to determine the resident's current level of cognitive function and medical condition; g. Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident; h. Interview the resident's roommate, family members, and visitors; j. Review all events leading up to the alleged incident. 4. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will record the results of the investigation and provide the completed documentation to the Administrator. Review of facility's Routine Resident Checks Policy Statement (no date) revealed: Staff shall make routine resident checks to help maintain resident safety and well-being. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. to ensure the safety and well-being of our residents, nursing staff shall make a routine resident check on each unit at least four times per each 8-hour shift. 2. Routine resident checks involve entering the resident's room and/or identifying the resident elsewhere on the unit to determine if the resident's needs are being met, identify any change in the resident's condition, identify whether the resident has any concerns, and see if the resident is sleeping, needs toileting assistance, etc. 3. The person conducting routine check shall report promptly to the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse any changes in the resident's condition and medical needs. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed a late entry on 04/07/2024 at 3:18 a.m. read in part, at approximately 2:50 a.m. staff nurse received a phone call from Resident #1's S9 Responsible Party, stating Resident #1 was found at a gas station. Staff on shift had previously observed resident or what appeared to be the resident asleep in the bed. Upon further inspection, it was noted by staff that the bed was stuffed with pillows and blankets to resemble a body asleep in bed. Upon searching by staff, resident was not found anywhere in the building. The window in Resident #1's room was observed by staff to be raised open, which leads to the outside of the building area. At approximately 3:30 a.m. resident was returned to the facility via S9 Responsible Party . During a telephone interview on 09/19/2024 at 3:50 p.m. S9 Responsible Party of Resident #1, reported resident has dementia and was transferred to a memory care unit. S9 Responsible Party further reported she thought staff were supposed to be doing checks every 2 hours on the residents. S9 Responsible Party confirmed on 04/07/2024 at approximately 3:00 a.m. a gas station clerk notified her Resident #1 was wandering in the parking lot. S9 Responsible Party reported on 04/07/2024 she picked up Resident #1 from the gas station and returned her to the facility at approximately 3:30 a.m. S9 Responsible Party further reported on the way back to the facility she contacted the facility and requested staff check on Resident #1. S9 Responsible Party reported staff confirmed Resident #1 was not in her room. During a telephone interview on 09/23/2024 at 11:45 a.m. S8 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed she worked on 04/07/2024 when Resident #1 eloped. S8 LPN confirmed the night of 04/07/2024 Resident #1's S9 Responsible Party called and told staff she was on her way to pick up Resident #1 at the gas station. S8 LPN reported Resident #1 left out the window in her room. During an interview on 09/23/204 at 1:20 p.m. S4 Director of Nursing (DON) reported on 04/08/2024 she was notified of Resident #1 leaving the facility on 04/07/2024. S4 DON acknowledged she did not know if an investigation was completed. During a telephone interview on 09/23/2024 at 1:29 p.m. S1 Administrator reported he was notified of Resident #1's elopement on 04/07/2024. S1 Administrator acknowledged an investigation was not completed and should have been.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident with wounds or history of wounds received necess...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident with wounds or history of wounds received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, to prevent infection, and to prevent wounds for 3 (#1, #2, and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were performed and/or a written wound care plan was implemented. Findings: Review of the facility's Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries with a revision date of November 2017 revealed in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure ulcer/injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors. Risk Assessment: 2. Conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon admission/readmission, including: a. Skin integrity - any evidence of existing or developing pressure ulcers or injuries; b. Areas of impaired circulation due to pressure from positioning or medical devices. 3. Skin problems which are present, or develop later, will be treated according to medical direction. This will be accomplished by making rounds weekly on each resident using the documentation of weekly body audits to determine or identify abnormal skin conditions. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment with a revision date of November 2017 revealed in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and identification of residents at risk of developing pressure ulcer/injuries. General Guidelines: 1. The purpose of using the Braden Risk Assessment is to identify all risk factors and then to determine which can be modified and which cannot, or which can be immediately addressed and which will take time to modify. 3. Once the Braden Risk Assessment is conducted and risk factors are identified and characterized, a resident-centered care plan can be created to address the modifiable risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/15/2024 with diagnoses, including but not limited to, type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Further review of Resident #1's medical record failed to reveal weekly skin assessments had been performed. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a wound assessment dated [DATE] which revealed Resident #1 had a history of an unstageable pressure ulcer of the inferior, left gluteus which had been resolved. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan failed to reveal Resident #1 had been care planned for history of actual wound and interventions were in place. During an interview on 08/27/2024 at 2:20 p.m., S2Corporate Nurse confirmed Resident #1 had not had a weekly skin assessment performed since his previous unstageable pressure ulcer had been resolved on 06/27/2024 and should have. During an interview on 08/27/2024 at 2:30 p.m., S3RN (Registered Nurse) reported she was Resident #1's nurse and confirmed she had not performed any weekly skin assessments on Resident #1. During an interview on 08/27/2024 at 3:15 p.m., S4Treatment Nurse reported a new wound could deteriorate fast if it was not treated. S4Treatment Nurse acknowledged weekly skin assessments were not being completed on any of the residents in the facility and should have been. During an interview on 08/27/2024 at 3:20 p.m., S2Corporate Nurse acknowledged Resident #1 had not been care planned for prevention of pressure ulcers. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/22/2022 with diagnoses, including but not limited to, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and major depressive disorder. Further review of Resident #2's medical record failed to reveal weekly skin assessments had been performed. Review of Resident #2's wound assessment dated [DATE] revealed in part, Resident #2 had a history of a sacral DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) which had been resolved. Review of Resident #2's comprehensive care plan failed to reveal Resident #2 had been care planned for history of actual wound and interventions were not in place. During an interview on 08/29/2024 at 1:00 p.m., S2Corporate Nurse acknowledged weekly skin assessments had not been completed on Resident #2 and Resident #2 had not been care planned for a history of a wound and should have been. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 08/04/2021 with diagnoses, including but not limited to, muscle wasting and atrophy, type 2 diabetes and anxiety disorder. Further review Resident #3's medical record failed to reveal weekly skin assessments had been performed. Review of Resident #3's wound assessment dated [DATE] revealed in part, Resident #3 had a chronic arterial ulcer of the sacrum which has not resolved. During an interview on 08/29/2024 at 1:00 p.m. S2 Corporate Nurse acknowledged weekly skin assessments had not been performed.
Jun 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that met resident's needs by faili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that met resident's needs by failing to accurately dispose of medications for 1 resident (#1) of 3 residents (#1, #2, #3) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Findings: Review of the facility policy for Discarding and Destroying Medications dated [DATE] revealed in part the following: 2. Non-controlled and Schedule V (non-hazardous controlled substances will be disposed of in an accordance with state regulations and federal guidelines regarding disposition of non-hazardous medications. The facility will maintain all unused medications and destroy them routinely, under any circumstance are any of these medications to be released to family members upon death of a resident. Once a prescription is dispensed for a specified resident, it is illegal to use for anybody else and therefore, has to be destroyed. Meds can only be released to the resident they are prescribed for. The following methods for destroying non-controlled and Scheduled V medications will be utilized for drugs that are eligible for recycling. -unused or discontinued non-controlled and Schedule V medications are to be destroyed by the DON (Director of Nurses) or designee and another licensed nurse; -all drugs and liquids shall be flushed in the proper approved method of destruction (hopper, toilet or medication shredders); -medications are to be kept in a locked medication room and/or locked cabinet until destruction; -a log prescription drug inventory for destruction form will be maintained and will include residents name, prescription number, name of drug, amount of drug destroyed, DON or designee signature, method of destruction and date of destruction. The Prescription Drug Inventory for Destruction form will be kept separate from the locked storage of the medications to be destroyed. The Prescription Drug Inventory for Destruction forms will be kept for a period of two (2) years. Review of Resident #1's discontinued medication orders revealed in part on order dated [DATE] for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim 800-160 every 12 hours for bacterial infection of RLE (right lower extremity) for 7 days that was discontinued on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #1's discontinued medication orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim 800-160 every 12 hours for bacterial infection of RLE wound until [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's [DATE] and February 2024 Medication Administration Records revealed documentation of administration of Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim as ordered with a total of 19 documented tablets administered. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 1:38 p.m. _______, Pharmacy Technician with ________, revealed two separate medication cards were dispensed for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim one for Resident #1's order dated [DATE] with 14 tablets dispensed, and one for Resident #1's order dated [DATE] with 18 tablets dispensed for a total of 32 tablets dispensed. Review of the facility's discontinued or expired medication log for destruction failed to reveal documentation of destruction of Resident#1's remaining 13 tablets of Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:40 p.m. S4, Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed Resident #1's record and acknowledged there were two orders for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim. S4 DON further acknowledged the pharmacy dispensed one order with 14 tablets and another order with 18 tablets for Resident #1 which made a total of 32 tablets Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim that were dispensed for Resident #1. S4 DON further acknowledged Resident #1's record revealed a total of 19 tablets of Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim were documented as administered for Resident #1. S4 DON reviewed the facility destruction of medication logs and confirmed there was not documentation of destruction of the remaining 13 tablets that were not dispensed and should have been. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:00 p.m. S3 Corporate Nurse reviewed Resident #1's record and acknowledged there were two orders for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim. S3 Corporate Nurse further acknowledged the pharmacy dispensed one order with 14 tablets and another order with 18 for Resident #1 which made a total of 32 tablets Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim that were dispensed for Resident #1. S3 Corporate Nurse further acknowledged Resident #1's record revealed a total of 19 tablets of Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim were documented as administered for Resident #1. S3 Corporate Nurse reviewed the facility destruction of medication logs and confirmed there was not documentation of destruction of the remaining 13 tablets that were not dispensed and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0839 (Tag F0839)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure 2 (S6, S7) of 44 staff members required to have a professio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure 2 (S6, S7) of 44 staff members required to have a professional license were licensed in accordance with applicable State laws before being allowed to perform the duties of a licensed nurse. Findings: Review of the facility's Credentialing of Nursing Service Personnel dated [DATE] revealed in part the following: -Policy Statement Nursing service personnel who personnel who require a license or certification to provide resident care are treatment without direction or supervision within the scope of the individual's license or certification must present verification of such license or certification prior to or upon employment. -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Nursing personnel who require a license or certification to perform resident care or treatment without direction or supervision must present verification of such license/certification to the Director of Nursing Services prior to or upon employment. 2. Nursing personnel requiring a license/certification are not permitted to perform direct resident care services until all licensing/background checks have been completed. 3. Upon obtaining the applicants informed consent to conducting a license/certification/background investigation, the Director of Nursing Services, or designee will: a. Contact the appropriate state licensing boards to obtain a letter of verification/computer printout of such license/certification. 8. A copy of annual license renewals/certifications (as applicable) must be presented to the Director of Nursing Services no later than February 1st of each year. S6 Review of S6's employee record revealed their date of hire was [DATE]. Further review of S6's employee record failed to reveal verification of licensure on hire. The facility provided documentation S6 had a single state unencumbered practical nurse license for the state of Texas that expired [DATE]. The facility failed to provide documentation S6 had a practical nurse license for the state of Louisiana. During an interview on [DATE] at 6:57 p.m. S1 Corporate Administrator and S2 Administrator reviewed S6's employee record and confirmed S6 was licensed to practice in the state of Texas and did not have a current practical nurse license for the state of Louisiana. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:15 p.m. S6 reported she had applied for a Louisiana multistate license but had not received a license from Louisiana. S6 confirmed she only had a license to practice in Texas. S7 Review of S7's employee record revealed their date of hire was [DATE]. Further review of S7's record failed to reveal a verification of licensure on hire. The facility provided verification that S7 had a Louisiana practical nurse license that expired on [DATE] with verification of Louisiana registered nurse license that indicated as of [DATE] an alert was provided by the Louisiana Registered Nurse Board of Nursing: Please fax a written request to the Louisiana State Board of Nursing at _____ as the information about this license is not available. The facility failed to provide documentation of further verification from the Louisiana State Board of Nursing that indicated S7 was a licensed registered nurse in the state of Louisiana During an interview on [DATE] at 3:40 p.m. S3 Corporate Nurse verified the facility did not run S7 license verification on hire and had not annually verified registered nurse or licensed practical nurse licensures since S7 date of hire. S3 Corporate Nurse confirmed they could not provide documentation that S7 had an active registered nurse or practical nurse license in the state of Louisiana.
May 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care had been revised for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, 2, 3) residents comprehensive care plans reviewed. The facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care had been revised for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, 2, 3) residents comprehensive care plans reviewed. The facility failed to ensure resident #1's care plan had been revised for admission to Hospice. Findings: Review of resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/13/2024 to admit to Hospice. Review of resident #1's comprehensive care plan failed to reveal the plan had been updated to include admission to Hospice or interventions for Hospice and related care and services. During an interview on 05/08/2024 at 4:00 p.m. S2 MDS (minimum Data Set) Coordinator reported resident #1 was admitted to Hospice on 03/13/2024. S2 MDS Coordinator acknowledged resident #1's comprehensive care plan had not been updated to include Hospice.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide residents necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide residents necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 1 (#3) of 2 (#1, #3) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned weekly. Findings: Review of Resident #3's medical records revealed an admit date of 11/07/2023 with the following diagnoses, in part: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/unspecified, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, chronic pain syndrome, depression/unspecified, edema/unspecified, and anxiety disorder/unspecified. Review of Resident #3's Physician's Orders revealed and order, in part dated 11/07/23 for oxygen: may have oxygen at 2 Liter per nasal cannula. Further review revealed an order dated 11/07/2023 for oxygen: change mask, (oxygen) tubing, water bottle and clean concentrator filter every night shift; every Wednesday and as needed for contamination. Observation on 05/07/2024 at 9:40 a.m. revealed Resident #3 wearing continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 2LPM (liters per minute). Further observation revealed oxygen concentrator filter covered with a large thick amount of fluffy gray particles covering 80% of the filter. During an interview on 05/07/2024 at 3:25 p.m. S1 DON (Director of Nursing) reported oxygen tubing and cleaning of oxygen filters is completed every Wednesday on the night shift. DON further acknowledged Resident #3's oxygen concentrator filter was dirty and should have been cleaned when the oxygen tubing was changed.
Mar 2024 6 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual and mental abuse by a staff member resulting in psychosocial harm for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual and mental abuse by a staff member resulting in psychosocial harm for 1 (Resident #64) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in sexual and mental abuse causing actual psychosocial harm for Resident #64 when on 02/02/2024 S11CNA (certified nursing assistant) touched her right breast, asked her for oral sex, and took her hand and placed it on his penis. Resident #64 reported feeling scared and afraid of being alone after the incident occurred. She became tearful when explaining how this incident with S11CNA brought back feelings of anxiousness and fear from a sexual assault in her past. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement- The facility will ensure that each resident has the right to be free from, among other things, physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Staff to Resident Abuse of any Types: Deals with diverse populations including residents with dementia, mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, ethnic/cultural differences, speech/language challenges, and generational differences. The facility assumes the responsibility upon admission of ensuring safety and well-being of the resident. Definitions: Sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident . Review of Resident #64's medical record included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Record review of Resident #64's MDS (minimum data set) dated 12/14/2023 revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 15, which would indicate Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Wheelchair was used for mobility. Record review of Resident #64's Care Plan included, in part: Psychosocial at risk for mood/behaviors: 02/09/2024 - Resident to be monitored for possible PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) s/sx (signs/symptoms) from inappropriate actions from CNA. During an interview on 03/11/2024 at 1:50 p.m., Resident # 64 reported on 02/02/2024 S11CNA came in her room to fix her over bed light. Resident #64 confirmed when S11CNA came into her room he sat down on her bed next to her, hugged her and started feeling on her breast. Record review of Resident #64's incident investigation report revealed the following, in part: Occurred date was 02/02/2024 at 4:38 p.m., discovered on 02/03/2024 at 5:00 p.m. Victim was Resident #64 and accused was S11CNA. Timeline of video camera footage: At 3:51 p.m. Resident #64 entered her room, door shut. At 4:34 p.m. Resident #64's roommate entered her room, door shut. At 4:38 p.m. Resident #64's roommate leaves her room, door shut. At 4:38 p.m. S11CNA enters Resident #64's room, door shut. At 4:41 p.m. Resident #64's roommate re-enters her room, door shut. At 4:43 p.m. S11CNA leaves Resident #64's room, door shut. During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 12:05 p.m., S1Administrator reported an investigation was completed for Resident # 64's allegations of S11CNA touching her breast. S1Administrator further indicated the facility suspended S11CNA pending the investigation and ultimately terminated S11CNA. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 7:45 a.m., Resident # 64 reported she was very nervous about telling staff what happened with S11CNA, but it kept wearing on her. She finally told S4LPN (licensed practical nurse) on the morning of 02/03/2024 and also told S13LPN later around 5:00 p.m. of the non-consensual sexual contact. Resident #64 said S11CNA told her they need to get together sometime. When Resident #64 informed him that she was married, he told her, that's okay. Resident #64 reported when S11CNA left her room she was scared, and she didn't want her roommate to leave and get ice because she was scared of S11CNA coming back in her room. Resident #64 further indicated she was not afraid of S11CNA before the incident but after S11CNA touched her inappropriately she was very afraid and shocked. Resident #64 acknowledged she started blaming herself because she had started wearing makeup again. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 3:20 p.m. Resident #64 confirmed on 02/02/2024 S11CNA came into her room when she was alone and touched her right breast. Resident #64 reported S11CNA asked her to perform oral sex on him and took her hand and placed it on his penis. Resident #64 stated she froze and was shocked by S11CNA's behavior and S11CNA stopped when he heard the door to her room open. Resident #64 reported feeling like S11CNA did this to her because she was in a wheelchair and he looked down on her because of her limitations. Surveyor observed Resident #64 become tearful when she stated she was sexually assaulted in the past and this incident brought back all of the fear and anxiety from that event. During a telephone interview on 03/13/2024 at 9:12 a.m. S12 Psych (Psychiatric) Nurse Practitioner (NP) indicated he was consulted by facility's NP to make a visit after the incident occurred. S12 Psych NP confirmed when he visited with Resident #64 she was alert and oriented. S12 Psych NP indicated Resident #64 was oriented to reality. S12 Psych NP indicated no uncontrolled moods were observed. S12 Psych NP confirmed Resident #64 had been compliant with her medications. Phone interviews were attempted with S11CNA during the survey with no success on 03/12/2024 at 1:17 p.m. and on 03/12/2024 at 3:02 p.m. During the survey, in-service records and QA (Quality Assurance) monitoring records were reviewed, and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice. The facility's QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) Sexual Abuse Allegation 02/05/2024 report, provided by S3CorporateNurse, revealed the following as a result of the allegation of sexual abuse by Resident #64: Introduction: A recent event occurred in the facility in which a resident accused a male staff member of grabbing her breast and solicited her for oral sex . The CNA was suspended pending investigation .Police were notified. Did the facility, once notified, take immediate action to protect the resident from further harm? The facility did ensure that the resident was protected, when notified of the allegation. The resident had a head to toe assessment completed and assured that she was safe. The nurse practitioner was notified and the responsible party was notified. The accused staff member was immediately placed on suspension and has not been present in the facility since notification of the allegation. QAPI Committee plan based on investigation and review: 1. The facility will ensure that resident remains feeling safe in the facility. 2. The facility will reach out to psychiatric services for follow up on resident which did occur on 02/06/2024. 3. Any male staff members entering the room will keep the door open and be escorted by a female staff member for resident comfort. 4. Safe surveys of residents within the facility will occur randomly throughout the building three times a week for the next four weeks to ensure that residents do not feel unsafe. Any adverse findings or concerns will be brought to the administrator immediately and addressed. 5. The accused staff member will be terminated at this time pending police investigation because the facility cannot determine if the incident did or did not occur. The facility only wants the resident of incident to feel safe. 6. The administrative staff will in-service all staff on abuse, neglect and reporting. This started on 02/03/2024 with all staff on duty. All other staff in-service will be completed by 02/09/2024. 7. The facility will also conduct in-service/training on professionalism and burnout of staff. 8. Quality Improvement Nurse or Regional [NAME] President will check in with Administrator and/or Director of Nursing are completing safe surveys. 9. Each week for four weeks the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement committee will review all findings and make any changes as necessary.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation was reported to administration staff in a timely manner per facility policy for 1 (Resident #64) of 1 resident re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation was reported to administration staff in a timely manner per facility policy for 1 (Resident #64) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement- The facility will ensure that each resident has the right to be free from, among other things, physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. The facility assumes the responsibility upon admission of ensuring safety and well-being of the resident. Definitions: Sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident .For an alleged violation of sexual abuse the facility will: a. Immediately implement safeguards to prevent further potential abuse; b. Immediately report the allegation to appropriate authorities; c. Conduct a thorough investigation of the allegation; and d. Thoroughly document and report the result of the investigation of the allegation. Review of Resident #64's medical record included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Record review of Resident #64's MDS (minimum data set) dated 12/14/2023 revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 15, which would indicate Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Wheelchair was used for mobility. During an interview on 03/11/2024 at 1:50 p.m., Resident # 64 indicated on 02/02/2024 S11CNA (certified nursing assistant) came in her room to fix her over bed light. Resident #64 confirmed when S11CNA came into her room he sat down on her bed next to her, hugged her and started feeling on her breast. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 7:45 a.m., Resident # 64 indicated she was very nervous about telling staff what happened with S11CNA, but it kept wearing on her. She finally told S4LPN (licensed practical nurse) on the morning of 02/03/2024 and also told S13LPN later around 5:00 p.m. of the non-consensual sexual contact. Resident #64 reported when S11CNA left her room she was scared, and she didn't want her roommate to leave and get ice because she was scared of S11CNA coming back in her room. Resident #64 further indicated she was not afraid of S11CNA before the incident but after S11CNA touched her inappropriately she was very afraid and shocked. Resident #64 acknowledged she started blaming herself because she had started wearing makeup again. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 3:20 p.m. Resident #64 confirmed on 02/02/2024 S11CNA came into her room when she was alone and touched her right breast. Resident #64 reported S11CNA asked her to perform oral sex on him and took her hand and placed it on his penis. Resident #64 stated she froze and was shocked by S11CNA's behavior and S11CNA stopped when he heard the door to her room open. Resident #64 reported feeling like S11CNA did this to her because she was in a wheelchair and he looked down on her because of her limitations. Surveyor observed Resident #64 become tearful when she stated she was sexually assaulted in the past and this incident brought back all of the fear and anxiety from that event. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 8:15 a.m., S4LPN indicated on Saturday 02/03/2024 around the time breakfast trays were being passed Resident # 64 told her Maybe I should tell you that S11CNA touched me inappropriately. S4LPN indicated she reported it to the ward clerk because it was on the weekend and did not report it to anyone else. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 9:50 a.m. S2DON (director of nursing) indicated she was notified of the non-consensual sexual contact allegation of Resident #64 by S11CNA on the afternoon of 02/03/2024 by S1Administrator. On 02/03/2024 at approximately 5:00 p.m., S13LPN reported the incident to the RN (registered nurse) on duty who in turn reported it to S1Administrator. Surveyor made S2DON aware Resident #64 told S4LPN the morning of 02/03/2024 during breakfast she (Resident #64) was touched inappropriately by S11CNA and S4LPN indicated she reported the incident to the ward clerk. S2DON confirmed S4LPN should not have reported the incident to the ward clerk and should have reported any abuse allegations to administrative staff immediately. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 10:50 a.m. S3 Corporate Nurse confirmed S4LPN should have reported Resident #64's allegation of S11CNA inappropriately touching her to administrative staff and not the ward clerk.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to act promptly to concerns presented in the resident council meetings. The deficient practice affected 4 (#58, #61, #70, #79) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to act promptly to concerns presented in the resident council meetings. The deficient practice affected 4 (#58, #61, #70, #79) of 4 (#58, #61, #70, #79) residents interviewed for resident care and life in the facility. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the total census of 124 residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Grievances/Complaints, Recording and Investigating policy revealed . 5.) The Grievance Officer will record and maintain all grievances and complaints on the Resident Grievance Complaint Log. The following information will be recorded and maintained in the log: a. The date the grievance/complaint was received; b. The name and room number of the resident filing the grievance/complaint; (if available) c. The name and relationship of the person filing the grievance/complaint on behalf of the resident; (if available) d. The date of the alleged incident took place; e. The name of the person(s) investigating the incident; f. The date the resident, or interested party, was informed of the findings; and g. The disposition of the grievance (i.e., resolved, dispute, etc.). 7.) The resident, or person acting on behalf of the resident, will be informed of the findings of the investigation, as well as any corrective actions recommended, within give (5) working days of the filing of the grievance or complaint. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes held on 08/17/2023 at 02:30 p.m. revealed 40 residents attended the meeting. Concerns with the laundry were addressed. Residents want their clothes back from the laundry in a timely manner. S1Administrator assured that this would be happening from now on. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes held on 02/15/2024 at 10:00 a.m. revealed 35 residents attended the meeting. Residents addressed the laundry concerns with S1Administrator. S1Administrator assured the residents that he would be taking care of any laundry concerns they have. Resident #58 During an interview on 03/11/2024 at 1:20 p.m. Resident Council President, Resident #58, reported one main concern was laundry; it takes a long time for residents to get laundry returned. Resident #58 further reported S1Administrator was aware of how long the laundry staff were taking to return clothes to residents and told us to be patient. Resident #61 During an interview on 03/11/2024 at 2:55 p.m. Resident #61 complained of missing clothes and did not have any clean clothes to wear. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 8:58 a.m. Resident #61 reported his clothes were washed by the facility's laundry room and it takes as long as 3 weeks to get his clothes back. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 9:35 a.m. Resident #61 reported the only clean pants were the ones he was wearing. Resident #61 reported his clothes are either in the laundry or someone else will have them. The laundry is horrible around here. You can't get any clean clothes. Resident #70 Review of Resident #70's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) dated 02/01/2024 revealed Resident #70 makes himself understood and usually has the ability to understand others. Review of Resident #70 BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) revealed 15 out of 15 indicating cognitively intact. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 1:55 p.m. Resident #70 reported the pants on his bed needed to be washed but he was not going to send anymore clothes to the laundry because he did not know when the laundry would return his clothes. Resident #70 reported he had been washing his clothes and underwear out in his bathroom sink because he did not know when he would get his clothes back from the laundry. Resident #70 reported he sent 6 pair of jeans to the laundry about 3 weeks ago and the laundry has only returned 3 pair of jeans. Resident #79 During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 8:30 a.m. Resident #79 reported a favorite Boba Fet Star Wars shirt went missing about 1-2 months ago. Resident #79 reported the missing shirt to S7Ward Clerk and nurses. Resident #79 reported seeing another resident wearing his Star Wars shirt while in therapy on 03/06/2024. Resident #79 told S7Ward Clerk and she verbalized she would get the shirt back. During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 12:57 p.m. S7Ward Clerk reported she was informed about Resident #79's gold Boba Fet shirt missing about 1 week ago. S7Ward Clerk reported Resident #79 told her another resident was wearing his shirt while in therapy. S7Ward Clerk acknowledged seeing another resident wearing his shirt and told Resident #79 she would get the shirt back after it was cleaned in the laundry. S7Ward Clerk reported that it takes a long time to get clothes back from the laundry. S7Ward Clerk reported the shirt was probably still in the laundry. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 11:28 a.m. S7Ward Clerk reported she told S8Laundry about Resident #79's missing gold Boba Fet shirt. During an interview 03/13/2024 at 11:40 a.m. S8Laundry reported she was not aware of Resident #79's missing shirt and that no one told her. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 11:28 a.m. S7Ward Clerk reported there was a problem with laundry returning residents clothes to them. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 12:05 p.m. S8Laundry acknowledged the laundry does not have a system in place for missing clothes. S8Laundry reported she just remembers what the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) tell her; the CNAs do not write it down. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 3:30 p.m. S6Laundry Supervisor reported there was not a log or binder for missing clothes and it was not documented anywhere. S6Laundry Supervisor was not able to produce a list of resident missing clothes. S6Laundry Supervisor further reported the laundry had labeled and unlabeled clothes all mixed up and the clothes were not organized. S6Laundry Supervisor acknowledge there was not system in place for residents missing clothes.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, and mental/psychosocial needs identified in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, and mental/psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 (#39, #74) of 34 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure (1) Eliquis and Metoprolol had been administered per physician order for Resident #39 and (2.) Cefdinir had been administered per physician order for Resident #47. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/04/2020 and diagnoses the included, in part, Alzheimer's disease unspecified, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, essential (primary) hypertension, and atherosclerosis of aorta. Review of Resident #39's physician orders revealed: -10/21/2023 Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5mg (milligrams) (Apixaban) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. -10/21/2023 Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25mg (Metoprolol Tartrate), Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #39's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/15/2024 revealed Resident #39 had a BIMS score of 05 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39's February 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed: -Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5mg (Apixaban), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day had Chart Code 9 and S5LPN's (Licensed Practical Nurse) identifier entered for 0900 dose on 02/28/2024 and 02/29/2024. Review of Resident #39's March 2023 MAR revealed: -Eliquis 2.5mg (Apixaban), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day had Chart Code 9 and S5LPN's identifier entered for 0900 dose on 03/02/2024, 03/03/2024, 03/04/2024, 03/10/2024, and 03/11/2024. -Metoprolol Tartrate 25mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day had Chart Code 9 and S5LPN's identifier entered for 0900 dose on 03/02/2024, 03/03/2024, and 9 03/10/2024. Review of Resident #39's February 2023 and March 2023 MARs revealed Chart Code of 9 indicated Other/See Progress Notes. Review of Resident #39's February 2023 and March 2023 Progress Notes failed to reveal any entries in regard to the days Eliquis and Metoprolol were recorded as 9 with S5LPN's identifier. During an interview on 03/14/2024 at 10:20 a.m. S5LPN reviewed Resident #39's February 2024 and March 2024 MAR for Eliquis and Metoprolol doses which she had documented and reported the medications she had marked with a 9 had not been given. 2. Review of Resident #74's Progress Notes dated 02/12/2024 at 2:38 p.m. revealed at 2:10 p.m. resident returned to facility via local transport with 2 staff from local hospital new orders noted, resident currently on Cefdinir 300mg (milligram) twice a day by mouth for 5 days for pneumonia. Review of Resident #74's physician orders dated 02/12/2024 revealed an order for Cefdinir oral capsule 300 mg (milligram); Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for pneumonia for 5 days. Review of Resident #74's care plan revealed a diagnosis of pneumonia with an approach to administer antibiotic therapy. Review of Resident #74's EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) dated 02/13/2024 revealed Cefdinir oral capsule 300 mg was documented as code 9 indicating medication not administered, other see progress notes Review of Resident #74's Progress notes dated 02/13/2024 revealed medication not available. Review of Resident #74's EMAR dated 02/16/2024 revealed Cefdinir oral capsule 300 mg was not administered at 4:00 p.m. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 3:40 p.m. S3 DON (Director of Nurses) reviewed Resident # 74's February 2024 EMAR and confirmed Cefdinir oral capsule 300 mg was not administered on 02/13/2024 at 7:30 a.m. and 02/16/2024 at 4:00 p.m
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure ADLs (activities of daily living) were performed for 3 (#22, #92, #104) out of 5 (#22, #61, #92, #104, #121) residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure ADLs (activities of daily living) were performed for 3 (#22, #92, #104) out of 5 (#22, #61, #92, #104, #121) residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure residents #22, #92 and #104 received nail care. Findings: Resident #22 An observation on 03/11/2024 at 11:04 a.m. revealed Resident #22's fingernails were long, jagged with brown substance under the nail beds. An observation on 03/13/2024 at 9:12 a.m. revealed Resident #22's fingernails were long and jagged with brown substance under the nail beds. Review of Resident #22's Care Plan revealed Resident #22 required assistance with all ADLs with interventions which included assistance needed with shampoo, shower/bath 3 times a week and nails cleaned and checked. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 2:40 p.m. S2DON (Director of Nursing) observed Resident #22's fingernails and acknowledged they needed to be cleaned and trimmed. Resident #92 An observation on 03/11/2024 at 8:12 a.m. revealed Resident #92 eating breakfast with long fingernails with a brown substance under the nail beds. Review of Resident #92's Care Plan revealed ADL self-care deficit with interventions which included assistance with personal hygiene. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 9:07 a.m. Resident #92's RP (Responsible Party) reported Resident #92's fingernails were too long and had a brown substance under the nail beds. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 2:40 p.m. S2DON observed Resident #92's fingernails and acknowledged they needed to be trimmed. Resident #104 An observation on 03/11/2024 at 10:41 a.m. revealed Resident #104's fingernails were long and jagged with a brown substance under the nail beds. Review of Resident #104's Care Plan revealed self-care deficit related to the inability to perform ADLs independently due to left hemiplegia, left hand, elbow contracture and required assistance with ADLs. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 8:45 a.m. Resident #104 reported his fingernails were too long and needed to be trimmed. During an interview on 03/13/2024 at 2:40 p.m. S2DON observed Resident #104's fingernails and acknowledged they needed to be cleaned and trimmed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to monitor edema for 1(#104) of 5(#3, #14, #79, #104, #122) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to provide adeq...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to monitor edema for 1(#104) of 5(#3, #14, #79, #104, #122) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for Resident #104's edema related to the use of a diuretic (Lasix) ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of Resident #104's current physician orders revealed an order dated 11/01/2023 for Lasix 40 milligram give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #104's Care Plan revealed fluid volume deficit/excess-assess and record edema when indicated. Review of Resident #104's January, February and March 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) failed to reveal edema was being monitored while on a diuretic. During an interview on 03/14/2024 at 9:47 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) reviewed Resident #104's January, February and March 2024 MAR's and confirmed Resident #104 was not being monitored for edema and should have been.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 2 (#1, #2) of 4 (#...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 2 (#1, #2) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents reviewed for impaired cognition and/or a diagnosis that may increase their risk of elopement. The deficient practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 09/05/2023 at 1:54 p.m. when Resident #1 pushed Resident #2 in her wheelchair and exited through the Hall A door of the facility. At 2:33 p.m. on 09/05/2023, Resident #1 and Resident #2 were seen in the median of a four lane public road and observed crossing over the last two lanes into a grocery store parking lot by S3 Physical Therapist. Physical Therapist called and notified facility of residents being out of the building and at 2:35 p.m. on 09/05/2023 staff members, including S1 Administrator, exited the facility. On 09/05/2023 at 2:46 p.m. Resident #1 and Resident #2 returned to facility assisted by S4 Medical Records and S5 RN (Registered Nurse). Resident #1 and Resident #2 were assessed with no injuries noted and placed on every 2 hour monitoring. The Immediate Jeopardy continued for 2 other (#3, #4) residents at risk for elopement until 09/05/2023 at 2:46 p.m. when S6 Unit Manager closed the Hall A exit door. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of facility's Wandering and Elopements Policy with revision date of March 2019 revealed in part: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and implement appropriate protective measure to help guard against a resident wandering from the facility. The facility strives to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 08/19/2022 and diagnoses including but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease and bipolar disorder with psych features. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/22/2023 revealed in part, Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment, wandering behavior occurred 0 days during 7 day look back period, and Resident #1 received antipsychotic medication for 4 of the 7 day look back period. Review of Resident #1's physician orders prior to incident on 09/05/2023 revealed in part: Zoloft 100mg (milligrams) 1 by mouth every day. Seroquel XR 400mg 1 by mouth every day at 5 pm Monitor resident for behaviors every shift for use of psychotropics. Monitor resident for side effects of antipsychotic medication every shift. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan 08/05/2023 revealed Resident #1 was care planned for risk of elopement with interventions including place resident's picture at exits to identify not to let resident out, note which exits resident favors for elopement and alert staff working near those areas. Further review of Resident #1's care plan did not reveal an intervention for monitoring resident's whereabouts. Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was found to be at risk for elopement. Review of Resident #1's September 2023 progress notes revealed in part: 09/06/2023 late entry for 09/05/2023 by S7 RN- [NAME] clerk notified S5 RN of someone had called facility and stated 2 residents were outside facility grounds. S5 RN then told writer Residents were last seen between 1:30-1:40 p.m. by writer. Noted Hall A outside door was propped open by plumber working in building on Hall A. Hall A door closed and plumber notified to keep door closed at all times for safety. No apparent injuries to resident when arrived back to facility. Family notified by S6 Unit Manager. 09/08/2023 at 11:11 a.m. late entry for 9/5/2023 by S6 Unit Manager. Resident #1 head to toe assessment completed when back inside facility from elopement incident - skin intact, Resident #1 alert. No distress noted. Blood pressure 128/76, pulse 70, Respirations 18, Temperature. 98.2. Resident #1's whereabouts to be monitored every 2 hours. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a readmit date of 07/24/2013 and diagnoses including but not limited to: Hemiplegia following CVA (cerebral vascular accident) affecting right dominant side, dementia, and anxiety. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed in part, Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment, wandering behavior occurred 0 days during 7 day look back period, and Resident #1 received antianxiety medication for 7 of the 7 day look back period. Review of Resident #2's physician orders prior to incident on 09/05/2023 revealed in part: Lorazepam 0.5mg 1 by mouth every 12 hours Monitor for behaviors every shift for use of psychotropic medication. Monitor for medication side effects every shift. Review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan 08/07/2023 revealed Resident #2 was not care planned for risk of elopement until after elopement incident on 09/05/2023. Review of Resident #2's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was found not to be at risk for elopement. Review of Resident #2's September 2023 progress notes revealed in part: 09/08/2023 at 11:24 p.m. late entry for 09/05/2023 by S6 Unit Manager- Resident #2 was pushed in wheelchair by another resident (Resident #1) outside and off facility grounds. Resident #2 was brought back to facility by nurse. Head to toe assessment done, no skin breakdown or bruising noted. Resident #2 at normal self. NP (Nurse Practitioner) and family notified. 09/08/2023 at 1:02 p.m. by S6 Unit Manager- Follow up from incident on 09/05/2023, Resident #2 up in dining room, no complaint of pain or distress at this time. Blood pressure 128/76, Pulse 79, Respirations 18, Temperature 98.2. During an observation on 09/19/2023 at 3:30 p.m. of facility surveillance video from 09/05/2023 at 1:54 p.m. revealed Resident #1 pushing Resident #2 in wheelchair on Hall A when Resident #1 reached fire doors at end of Hall A, Resident #1 pushed door open and Resident #1 walked through doors pushing Resident #2 in her wheelchair. Resident #1 and Resident #2 were not seen again on video until 2:46 p.m. when Resident #1 and Resident #2 were brought back to the facility by facility staff members. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 3:30 p.m. S1 Administrator confirmed Resident #1 and Resident #2 were found off facility property in a local grocery store parking lot on 09/05/2023 after being notified by S3 Physical Therapist residents were out of the facility, and residents should not have been out of facility unsupervised. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 4:10 p.m. S1 Administrator confirmed Hall A door had been propped open and no facility door should be propped open. During an interview on 09/18/2023 at 2:40 p.m.S3 Physical Therapist reported on 09/05/2023 she was taking a late lunch and had left the facility to go pick up her food when she saw Resident #1 and Resident #2 in the median that separates a public 4 lane road. S3 Physical Therapist reported she got into a turn lane so she could follow the residents and at same time called the facility to notify them of the two residents being out of the facility. S3 Physical Therapist reported she was able to observe the two residents as they crossed over the last 2 lanes of the public 4 lane road into a local grocery store parking lot. S3 Physical Therapist further reported facility staff arrived at the local grocery store parking lot and were able to get residents into a vehicle and take residents back to the facility. S3 Physical Therapist reported she could no longer remember the exact time this incident happened, but stated it was around 2:30 p.m. to 2:45 p.m. During an observation on 09/18/2023 at 4:50 p.m. surveyor observed the local grocery store parking lot in which Resident #1 and Resident #2 were found on 09/05/2023. Surveyor was also able to observe the public 2 lane service road and the public 4 lane road in which residents had to cross to get to the local grocery store parking lot. Surveyor was able to determine the local grocery store parking lot was two tenths of a mile from the facility. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 1:15 p.m. S5 RN reported on 09/05/2023 she was told by a ward clerk that a phone call had been received informing facility of two residents being out in a local grocery store parking lot. S5 RN reported she got in her car and drove over to the local grocery store parking lot and was able to get Resident #1 and Resident #2 into the car and back to the facility. S5 RN further reported she was not sure of the exact time the incident happened but thought it was sometime around 2:30 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 1:20 p.m. S4 Medical Records reported on 09/05/2023 the ward clerk told her she had received a call reporting two residents were in a local grocery store parking lot. S4 Medical Records reported she rode with S5 RN to the local grocery store parking lot and assisted with bringing residents back to the facility. S4 Medical Records reported she was unsure of the incident time but believed it was around 2:30 p.m. Attempted to contact S9 [NAME] Clerk via telephone on 09/19/2023 at 3:20 p.m. S9 [NAME] Clerk did not answer the phone and by end of survey had not returned phone call. Attempted to contact S10 CNA via telephone on 09/20/2023 at 8:05 a.m. and again on 09/20/2023 at 12:30 p.m. without success. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 11:00 a.m. S7 RN reported on 09/05/2023, the day of the elopement incident, she was working on Hall A, Hall B, and part of Hall C. S7 RN reported she had seen S8 Housekeeping and another man working down near the last rooms of the Hall A on 09/05/2023. S7 RN reported Resident #1 and Resident #2 were sitting in common area across from Nurse Station II and the last time she saw the residents prior to the elopement incident was at about 1:40 p.m. S7 RN reported after hearing two residents were out of the building she and S6 Unit Manager found the exit door at the end of the Hall A propped open with a broom stick and S6 Unit Manager closed and secured the door. S7 RN reported she was unsure of time the Hall A exit door was closed but stated it was before Resident #1 and Resident #2 returned to the facility. S7 RN reported once Resident #1 and Resident #2 were returned to the facility she assessed Resident #1 for injuries and no injuries were found. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 11:10 a.m. S6 Unit Manager reported prior to Resident #1 and Resident #2 being returned to the facility, she went down the Hall A through the fire doors where a plumber was working and found the Hall A exit door propped open. S6 Unit Manager reported she closed the Hall A exit door so no one else could get out. S6 Unit Manager reported she assessed Resident #2 after the elopement incident on 09/05/2023 and Resident #2 was assessed to have no injuries. During an interview on 09/19/2023 at 11:25 a.m. S8 Housekeeping reported when plumber arrived at the facility he took the plumber to the Hall A and showed the plumber what work needed to be done. S8 Housekeeping reported he unlocked the exit door on the Hall A for the plumber, and left him to do his work. S8 Housekeeping reported the plumber must have propped the door open once he left. S8 Housekeeping further reported once he heard residents had gotten out, he went to the Hall A exit door to shut it, but it was already closed. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a diagnosis of Dementia and major depressive disorder, MDS dated [DATE] revealed BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and no wandering during 7 day look back period. Review of Resident #3's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was found to be at risk for elopement. Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 09/04/2023 revealed Resident #3 was care planned for risk of elopement with interventions including place resident's picture at exits to identify not to let resident out, note which exits resident favors for elopement and alert staff working near those areas. Visualize resident every shift for risk of elopement. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed a diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and depression, MDS dated [DATE] revealed BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and no wandering during 7 day look back period. Review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 07/11/2023 revealed Resident #4 was care planned for risk of elopement with interventions including Resident #4 likes to go to smoking door, alert staff working near that area. Picture placed at exits to identify not to let resident out. Visualize resident every shift for risk of elopement. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice with completion on 09/12/2023: 1. Resident #1 and Resident #2 were immediately assessed for injuries upon their return on 09/05/2023 and NP and family notified 09/05/2023. 2. All exit doors checked to ensure they were closed and secured on 09/05/2023 immediately following elopement incident. 3. Safe Surveys were immediately conducted on all residents who were deemed to be at risk for elopement with surveys completed on 09/05/2023. 4. Sign was placed on Hall A exit doors stating Emergency Exit Use Only on 09/06/2023. Pictures of residents deemed to be at risk for elopement and signs stating Attention do not let any resident out without checking with nursing staff, doors to remain closed at all times were hung at each exit by end of day 09/07/2023. 5. On 09/05/2023 Administrator notified local plumbing company who was in the building working on Hall A of incident and instructed the company to ensure when they enter or exit the building to make sure doors are closed and secure behind them. Facility received a letter dated 09/12/2023 stating plumbing company had met with all employees and instructed the employees to follow facility policy on entering/exiting the building and ensuring doors are closed behind them at time of entrance or exit. Facility developed a Vendor Acknowledgement form for all vendors to sign in and acknowledge they have been instructed to ensure all doors remain closed and secure which was completed on 09/06/2023. 6. In-serviced staff on facility's Wandering and Elopement, making sure exit doors are secure and not propped open, maintenance staff to remain with vendors while vendors are at facility, and monitoring of residents at risk for elopement every two hours. In-service started on 09/05/2023 at 4:00 p.m., with maintenance staff, and was completed with all other staff by 09/09/2023. 7. All exits of the building have secure magnetic door locks including Hall A which were checked two times a day for one week starting 09/05/2023 and after one week doors checked once a day. Documentation of all door checks placed on door check log daily. The magnetic door locks require a code to be put in or a special key to be used to unlock the doors. This process is on-going and facility does not plan to discontinue this process. 8. All resident charts were reviewed for potential new diagnosis or behaviors putting them at risk for elopement and those deemed to be at risk had elopement risk assessments performed which were completed on 09/07/2023. Charts monitored at Quality Assurance meetings. 9. Care plans for all residents deemed to be at risk for elopement had their care plans updated to include increased supervision by end of day 09/07/2023. Orders to perform visual census checks every two hours received for residents deemed to be at risk for elopement and orders placed on each residents' EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record). 10. Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting was conducted with department heads and medical director immediately following the incident and continues to evolve identifying areas of improvement including but not limited to possibly purchasing wander guard system. The QAPI committee is reviewing the quality assurance plan weekly for the first four weeks with start date of 09/06/2023, then will review plan monthly and as needed. 11. Resident #1 was transferred to a local inpatient behavioral hospital on [DATE] for further evaluation related elopement on 09/05/2023 and ongoing behaviors.
Aug 2023 6 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that used its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure residents were protected from ant infestation and ant bites. The f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that used its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure residents were protected from ant infestation and ant bites. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of pests including ants, roaches and spiders. The deficient practice was identified on 08/14/2023 when live ants and other pests were observed in several residents' rooms and around the interior of facility. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy on 08/14/2023 at approximately 9:15 a.m. when numerous live ants were found on F hallway crawling in the residents' rooms, around the bathroom doors, under the beds and chairs and on personal items. Further observations on 08/17/2023 revealed numerous live ants, roaches and spiders on hallways E, F, G, H, I and J with Resident #6 reported being bitten by ants in the past, live ants crawling on Resident #7 and his bed linen, live ants crawling on Resident #8's bed linens, and live ants crawling on Resident #9's gown. S14Administrator was notified on 08/17/2023 at 4:21 p.m. of the Immediate Jeopardy. The likelihood of harm or death continued for the 132 residents residing in the facility per the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Report. The facility presented the following Plan of Removal on 08/17/2023: 1. The facility will ensure that residents will be protected from being bitten by ants by having staff observe if ants are present in resident rooms and bathrooms and ensure room, bed and clothing are free from ants to prevent ant bites. 2. If ants are noted to be present, the staff will remove ants from the residents' person, remove any bedding or clothing and move resident to a different location until ants are removed from the residents' room or bathroom. 3. Residents' #6 and #7 were identified as having ant bites and Nurse Practitioner was notified and orders for topical steroid cream was given. 4. Residents' #6 and #7 will be monitored q (every) 3 hours and as needed to ensure no anaphylactic reaction occurs. 5. Residents' #8 and #9 both had ants removed from their persons; linens and clothes were changed, head to toe skin assessments were completed and room was treated for pests and room was cleaned. 6. The facility had pest control come in on 08/15/2023 (___ Pest Control) to spray the inside of facility for ants, roaches, spiders, flies and gnats. 7. S14Administrator had maintenance spray again for ants, spiders, roaches, flies and gnats on 08/17/2023, throughout the entire facility on the inside and outside. 8. ___Pest Control will be at the facility 08/19/2023 to treat the entire building inside and out. 9. The facility will contact another pest control vendor on 08/18/2023. 10. All rooms will be inspected by the administrative staff for any ants, spiders, roaches, flies, or gnats. If any ants, spiders, roaches, flies or gnats are discovered then the facility will protect the resident and notify maintenance department and pest control service for treatment. 11. S15Regional [NAME] President will in-service administrative staff on ensuring that residents are protected from biting ants, ensure that monitoring and observing residents, their rooms and environment for presence of ants on 08/17/2023. 12. S15Regional [NAME] President will monitor S14Administrator and progress weekly beginning 08/22/2023. 13. Estimated Completion Date: 08/22/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/17/2023 at 10:00 p.m., after it was determined through observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. Findings: Cross Reference F925. Review of facility's grievance log for the past 6 months revealed grievances related to ineffective pest control on: 05/16/2023 Resident #R10's son complained of roaches in Resident #R10's room on G hallway. 05/30/2023 Resident #R11's daughter complained of roaches in Resident #R11's room on I hallway. 07/28/2023 daughter and sister of Resident #R12 complained of bugs in Resident #R12's room on H hallway. 08/07/2023 family of Resident #R12 complained of roaches in Resident #R12's room on H hallway. Further record review revealed an email correspondence to S14Administrator from the Ombudsman on 07/27/2023 related to ineffective pest control. The Ombudsman shared residents' reports of large and small roaches and numerous other bugs all around the facility. The Ombudsman reported residents' concerns that the facility should do a better job exterminating. Observation of rooms C and D on F hallway on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S6Corporate Nurse revealed a very large amount of ants crawling in the residents' rooms, around the bathroom doors, and under the beds and chairs. Further observation of rooms A and B on F hallway revealed a large amount of ants crawling in the rooms and on personal items. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:45 a.m. S14Administrator acknowledged the ant infestation was not under control. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 7:45 p.m. with S14Administrator, S6Corporate Nurse and S15Regional [NAME] President, S6Corporate Nurse reported the ants and ant bites were a nursing process failure. S14Administrator acknowledged the facility was aware of ants in the building and failed to maintain an effective pest control program. S15Regional [NAME] President acknowledged a pest control failure had occurred and the facility failed to protect the residents.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility was free of pests including ants, roaches and s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility was free of pests including ants, roaches and spiders. The deficient practice was identified on 08/14/2023 when live ants and other pests were observed in several residents' rooms and around the interior of facility. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy on 08/14/2023 at approximately 9:15 a.m. when numerous live ants were found on F hallway crawling in the residents' rooms, around the bathroom doors, under the beds and chairs and on personal items. Further observations on 08/17/2023 revealed numerous live ants, roaches and spiders on hallways E, F, G, H, I and J with Resident #6 reported being bitten by ants in the past, live ants crawling on Resident #7 and his bed linen, live ants crawling on Resident #8's bed linens, and live ants crawling on Resident #9's gown. S14Administrator was notified on 08/17/2023 at 4:21 p.m. of the Immediate Jeopardy. The likelihood of harm or serious injury continued for the 132 residents residing in the facility per the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Report. The facility presented the following Plan of Removal: 1. The facility will ensure that residents will be protected from being bitten by ants by having staff observe if ants are present in resident rooms and bathrooms and ensure room, bed, and clothing are free from ants to prevent ant bites. 2. If ants are noted to be present, the staff will remove ants from the residents' person, remove any bedding or clothing and move resident to a different location until ants are removed from the residents' room or bathroom. 3. Residents #6 and #7 were identified as having ant bites and Nurse Practitioner was notified and orders for topical steroid cream was given. 4. Residents #8 and #9 both had ants removed from their persons, linens and clothes were changed, head to toe skin assessments were completed and room was treated for pests and room was cleaned. 5. The facility will contact a different pest control vendor on 08/18/2023. 6. All rooms will be inspected by the administrative staff for any ants, spiders, roaches, flies and gnats twice per day for 1 week and then as discovered to ensure that the facility is free of ants, spiders, roaches, flies and gnats. If any ants, spiders, roaches, flies or gnats are discovered then the facility will protect the resident, notify maintenance department and pest control service for treatment. 7. The facility will have nursing staff assess each resident each shift for the next 3 days. The physician will be notified of any skin conditions and orders obtained to treat any injury noted. Completed by 08/21/2023. This will be repeated as needed for any observance of ants in the facility. 8. ____Pest Control Company is scheduled to come to facility on 08/19/2023 and treat the entire facility inside and out, all rooms. 9. All staff will be in-serviced on notifying administrative staff immediately when ants, spiders, roaches, flies or gnats are found and insect spray will be available to staff to treat for insects immediately. Staff on duty will be in-serviced on 08/17/2023 and all other staff will be in-serviced by 08/18/2023. 10. The administrative staff will notify new pest control provider as soon as possible for any treatments needed. 11. Estimated completion date: 08/22/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/17/2023 at 10:00 p.m., after it was determined through observations and interviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. Findings: Review of facility's Pest Control policy with the revision date of May 2008 revealed in part: Policy Statement: Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building has minimal insects and rodents. 2. Pest control services are provided by ______. 6. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary in providing pest control services. Review of facility's grievance log for the past 6 months revealed grievances related to ineffective pest control on: 05/16/2023 Resident #R10's son complained of roaches in Resident #R10's room on G hallway. 05/30/2023 Resident #R11's daughter complained of roaches in Resident #R11's room on I hallway. 07/28/2023 daughter and sister of Resident #R12 complained of bugs in Resident #R12's room on H hallway. 08/07/2023 family of Resident #R12 complained of roaches in Resident #R12's room on H hallway. Further record review revealed an email correspondence to S14Administrator from the Ombudsman on 07/27/2023 related to ineffective pest control. The Ombudsman shared residents' reports of large and small roaches and numerous other bugs all around the facility. The Ombudsman reported residents' concerns that the facility should do a better job exterminating. Observation of rooms C and D on F hallway on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S6Corporate Nurse revealed a very large amount of ants crawling in the residents' rooms, around the bathroom doors, and under the beds and chairs. Further observation of rooms A and B on F hallway revealed a large amount of ants crawling in the rooms and on personal items. During an interview on 8/14/2023 at 9:45 a.m. S14Administrator reported the facility has a pest control service that comes regularly. S14Administrator confirmed pest control was just here the other day and sprayed the outside of the building and is supposed to be here again to spray inside. S14Administrator acknowledged the pests are not under control. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:50 a.m. S16Housekeeping acknowledged the facility has ants all over the building Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S6Corporate Nurse revealed a large amount of ants crawling in the room, on Resident #6's personal items, refrigerator and bathroom floor on F hallway. Resident #6 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. Resident #6 reported ants crawling all over the floor. Resident #6 confirmed making staff aware of the ants. Resident #6 confirmed the facility had sprayed for the ants but the spray don't work. Observation on 08/17/2023 at 11:06 a.m. revealed live ants crawling in Resident #6's room, on the refrigerator and microwave. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 11: 08 a.m. Resident #6 stated, I told them ants crawl up my cord and get in my bed. They bit me and made whelps on my back and legs and they burn and sting. Observation on 08/17/2023 at 11:15 a.m. S14 Administrator acknowledged live ants in Resident #6's room. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:15 a.m. revealed ants crawling in Resident #7's room, around the bathroom doors, and under the bed on F hallway. Further observation revealed Resident #7 sitting up in his wheelchair next to the bed, feet resting on the floor and ants crawling around Resident #7's socked feet. Resident #7 unable to seek assistance with ants or ant bites. Observation on 08/17/2023 at 11:00 a.m. revealed ants crawling in Resident #7s room, under the bed and on bed linens. Resident #7 was lying in bed asleep with bed in low position and bed linens touching the floor. During an interview on 08/17/23 at 11:00 a.m. S7LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged ants were on Resident #7's bed linens and crawling on Resident #7. S7LPN confirmed red raised areas as ant bites on Resident #7's feet. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S6Corporate Nurse revealed a large amount of ants crawling in the room on Resident #8's personal items, refrigerator and bathroom on F hallway. Resident #8 was standing in slipper socks straightening her bed covers, and reported there are always ants in her room and having her own insect spray. Further observation revealed ants were noted on the floor under and around Resident #8's feet. S6Corporate Nurse acknowledged ants crawling near Resident #8's feet and on personal items. Resident #8 with a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. Resident #8 reported there are always ants in her room and she has her own insect spray. Resident #8 did not know if she had any ant bites. Observation with S7 LPN on 08/17/2023 at 11:10 a.m. revealed Resident #8 lying in bed with ants crawling on Resident #8's bed linens, refrigerator, and floor. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 11:15 a.m., S14Administrator acknowledged numerous ants crawling on Resident #8's bed linens, refrigerator, and floor. Observation 08/17/2023 at 12:40 p.m. revealed Resident #9 asleep in Geri-chair with multiple ants crawling on Resident #9's gown on F hallway. Further observation revealed multiple ants crawling on Resident #9's floor around the Geri-chair and feeding pump pole while enteral feeding was in progress. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:45 p.m., S17LPN acknowledged multiple ants were crawling on the floor near feeding pump pole. S17LPN further acknowledged multiple ants were crawling on Resident #9's gown. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:50 p.m. S18CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and S19LPN acknowledged multiple ants crawling on Resident #9's floor near feeding pump pole. S18CNA and S19LPN further acknowledged multiple ants were crawling on Resident #9's gown. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 11:30 a.m., S24Hospitality Aide reported she works all over the building and she has noticed ants and flies. Multiple observations on 08/17/2023 starting at 11:30 a.m. revealed in part numerous pests in residents' rooms as follows: E hallway had 1 room with live ants. F hallway had 1 room with live ants. G hallway with 3 rooms with live ants, and 5 rooms with live roaches. H hallway with 2 rooms with live ants, 2 rooms with live roaches. I hallway with 2 rooms with live ants, 2 with spiders, 3 rooms with roaches, and 1 room with flies. J hallway had 1 room with live ants, and 1 room with live roaches. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:00 p.m., Resident #R13's daughter reported there are ants, roaches, and the flies are bad in her mother's room on the G hallway. Resident #R13's daughter confirmed she told management several times and they sprayed but the stuff they used was no good. Resident #R13's daughter acknowledged she went and bought bug spray, sprayed the room and continues to spray a couple times a week. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:10 p.m., S25CNA reported she has seen ants on G hallway. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:15 p.m., S26Ward Clerk reported ants are bad in Nurses station #2 located on O hallway. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:20 p.m. S1LPN reported she has seen ants in resident rooms and all over the facility. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:22 p.m. S27Transportation reported, a resident on the F hallway was complaining yesterday about getting ant bites. Observation on 08/17/2023 at 12:30 p.m. revealed several ants crawling on Resident #R15's bathroom floor on E hallway. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:30 p.m. S9Housekeeper acknowledged ants crawling on Resident #R15's bathroom floor. S9Housekeeper reported ants had been an ongoing issue in Resident #R15's room. Observation of Resident #R18's room on 08/17/2023 at 12:55 p.m. revealed several ants crawling on Resident #R18's bathroom floor and toilet on F hallway. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 12:55 p.m. S16Housekeeper acknowledged ants were crawling on the bathroom floor and toilet in Resident #R18's room. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 7:45 p.m. with S14Administrator, and S15Regional [NAME] President, S14Administrator acknowledged the facility was aware of ants in the building and failed to maintain an effective pest control program. S15Regional [NAME] President acknowledged a pest control failure had occurred and the facility failed to protect the residents. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 9:10 p.m. S5DON (Director of Nursing) reported they had completed the skin sweeps of all the residents and found 10 residents with ant bites; 3 residents on L hallway, 2 residents on E hallway, 2 residents on F hallway, 1 resident on G hallway and 2 residents on H hallway.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with respect and di...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with respect and dignity for 2 (#1, #5) of 9 sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1. Provide privacy for Resident #1 while being disrobed for ADL (activities of daily living) care. 2. Provide a privacy cover for Resident #5's catheter bag. Findings: Review of facility's Quality of Life - Dignity policy with the revision date of October 2, 2022 revealed in part: Policy Statement: Each Resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. 2. Treated with dignity, means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. 10. Staff shall promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 11. Demeaning practices and standards of care the compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by: a. Helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags contained and private. Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included in part: aphasia, gastrostomy status, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/24/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) summary score of 04 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Further review revealed Resident #1 required extensive assistance by 1 person for bathing. An observation of Resident #1's ADL care on 08/15/2023 at 8:50 a.m. with S2CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and S10ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) revealed S2CNA disrobed Resident #1 with the privacy curtain open. Further observation revealed Resident #1's roommate, Resident #3, had full view of Resident #1's bare chest as Resident #1 was disrobed down to only a brief. During an interview on 08/15/2023 at 8:50 a.m., S10ADON and S2CNA acknowledged Resident #3 had full view of Resident #1 while being disrobed. S10ADON further acknowledged this was a dignity issue for Resident #1 and the privacy curtain should have been closed during adl care. Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which include in part: recurrent moderate major depressive disorder, aphasia following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, generalized anxiety disorder, and functional quadriplegia. Review of Resident #5's current Physician orders revealed in part: 08/10/2023 Suprapubic catheter 14 French with 10 ml balloon in place; to be changed by urology. Review of Resident #5's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a BIMS summary score of 07 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. revealed Resident #5 lying in bed with door open and catheter bag hanging on bedrail facing the open door. Further observation failed to reveal a privacy cover in use. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 9:45 a.m., S12RN (Registered Nurse) acknowledged Resident #5's catheter bag was uncovered and should have been in a privacy bag.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' Physician orders were followed fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' Physician orders were followed for 2 (#1, #5) out of 9 sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure continuous enteral feeding was administered for Resident #1. 2. Ensure medication was administered and vital signs were monitored for Resident #5. Findings: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included in part: aphasia, gastrostomy status, and unspecified dementia. Review of quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/24/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 04 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #1's current Physician orders revealed in part: 10/08/2022 Isosource 1.5 at 45 ml (milliliter)/hr. (per hour) continuous via efp (enteral feeding pump). Provides 1620 Kcal (kilocalories)/day and 73.4 gm (grams) protein. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:30 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was not in her room and Isosource 1.5 enteral feeding bag was noted to be hanging from infusion pole and dated 08/14/2023 at 12:00 a.m. Further observation revealed Resident #1's enteral feeding pump was off. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:45 a.m. revealed Resident #1 sitting in dining room without continuous enteral feed infusing. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 12:20 p.m. revealed Resident #1 sitting in dining room eating lunch without continuous enteral feed infusing. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 1:00 p.m. revealed Resident #1 sitting in common area in wheelchair without continuous enteral feed infusing. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 1:00 p.m., S1LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged Resident #1 had a Physician order for continuous enteral feeding. S1LPN further acknowledged Resident #1 had not been receiving her enteral feeding since observed this morning at 9:30 a.m. and should have been. Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included in part: recurrent moderate major depressive disorder, aphasia following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, generalized anxiety disorder, and functional quadriplegia. Review of Resident #5's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a BIMS summary score of 07 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's current Physician orders revealed in part: 08/10/2023 Levsin 0.125 mg (milligram) tablet give 1 by mouth every 4 hours. 08/10/2023 Vital Signs every shift for 7 days. Review of Resident #5's Interdisciplinary notes revealed in part: 08/11/2023 at 10:09 a.m. late entry 08/11/2023 at 0600 resident .arrived at facility from ____ hospital .admitted with VRE UTI (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci Urinary Tract Infection), Sepsis and anemia . Review of Resident #5's August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) failed to reveal documentation of Levsin 0.125 mg tablet; give 1 by mouth three times a day had been administered on 08/14/2023 at 1:00 a.m. Further review failed to reveal vital signs had been monitored on 08/12/2023 and 08/15/2023 for the 3 p.m.-11 p.m. shift and on 08/14/2023 and 08/15/2023 for 11 p.m.-7 a.m. shift. During an interview on 08/16/2023 at 2:55 p.m., S10ADON(Assistant Director of Nursing) reviewed Resident #5's August 2023 MAR and acknowledged the medication had been not administered and the vital signs had not been monitored as ordered.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident fed by enteral means received the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications by allowing non-clinical staff to disconnect and reconnect feeding tubes for 1 (#1) of 9 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 7 residents who receive enteral feedings according to the Resident Census and Conditions Report. Findings: Review of the facility's Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions with the Revision date of November 2018 revealed in part: Preparation: 1. All personnel responsible for preparing, storing and administering enteral nutrition formulas will be trained, qualified and competent in his or her responsibilities. Preventing misconnection errors: 2. Instruct all non-clinical staff, residents and visitors not to reconnect any tubing or lines, but instead to notify a nurse if tubing becomes disconnected. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included in part: aphasia, gastrostomy status, and unspecified dementia. Review of quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/24/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 04 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #'1 current Physician orders revealed in part: 10/08/2022 Isosource 1.5 at 45 ml (milliliter)/hr. (per hour) continuous via efp (enteral feeding pump). Provides 1620 Kcal (kilocalories)/day and 73.4 gm (grams) protein. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:30 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was not in her room and Isosource 1.5 enteral feeding bag was noted to be hanging from infusion pole and dated 08/14/2023 at 12:00 a.m. Further observation revealed Resident #1's enteral feeding pump was off. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 1:35 p.m., S2CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) confirmed she had disconnected Resident #1's feeding tube this morning and turned off the infusion pump in order to take Resident #1 to the dining room. S2CNA reported her normal process was to reconnect the feeding tube to Resident #1's peg site upon returning Resident #1 to her room and would then turn the infusion pump back on. S2CNA acknowledged she had not received any specific facility training on peg tubes and stated, I just knew a lot of the tricks of the trade from being a CNA for so long. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 1:50 p.m., S4CNA reported she does have residents assigned to her that have peg tubes. S4CNA further reported her process for providing ADL (activities of daily living) care to residents receiving enteral feedings was to turn off the infusion pump, disconnect the feeding tube, close off feeding tube and then take resident to shower. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 2:20 p.m., S1LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed she was not the one who disconnected Resident #1 from enteral feeding this morning. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 3:20 p.m., S5DON (Director of Nursing) and S6Corporate Nurse acknowledged CNAs are not permitted to touch peg tubes, including connecting and disconnecting. S6Corporate Nurse reported training on peg tubes is not provided because it is not within a CNA's scope of competency. S6Corporate Nurse acknowledged CNAs should seek assistance with peg tubes from a licensed nurse and had not. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 3:25 p.m., S3CNA Coordinator reported she disconnects and reconnects peg tubes while providing patient care and stated, Because the nurses are busy. S3CNA Coordinator further stated, I know how, because I have watched the nurses do it. S5DON and S6Corporate Nurse were present during the interview and acknowledged CNAs were connecting and disconnecting feeding tubes in the facility and should not. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 4:20 p.m., S3CNA Coordinator acknowledged she knew she was not supposed to be disconnecting and reconnecting residents' peg tubes but she had been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environm...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment by failing to ensure: 1. The shower rooms and equipment on hallways E, G and I had been cleaned. 2. Showers C and D had been cleaned. 3. Soiled shower chair on hallway E had been cleaned. There were 132 residents residing in the facility according to Residents Census and Conditions report provided by the facility. Findings: Review of facility's Shower/Tub Bath policy with a revision date of October 2010 revealed in part: Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. General Guidelines: Steps in the Procedure: 9. be sure the tub or shower is clean. (Note: If the tub or shower is not clean, clean it with approved disinfectant solution. Review of the facility's Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident - Care Items and Equipment policy with the revision date of October 2018 revealed in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Durable medical equipment (DME) must be cleaned/disinfected before reuse by another resident. 3. Reusable resident care equipment will be decontaminated between residents according to manufacturer's instruction. Observation of I hallway shower A on 08/14/2023 at 8:15 a.m. revealed trashcan was overflowing with used paper towels and a large pile of trash had accumulated on the floor. Observation of I hallway shower B revealed dried feces on the toilet bowl. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 8:15 a.m., S12RN (Registered Nurse) acknowledged I hallway showers A and B had not been thoroughly cleaned and should have been. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 8:20 a.m. revealed G hallway shower B had a prescription shampoo bottle in the sink. Further observation revealed the shower chair had white powdery substance and small bits and pieces of debris on the seat and in the catch basin. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 8:22 a.m., S21CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) observed G hallway shower B area and acknowledged the prescription shampoo should not have been left in the sink and the shower chair should have been cleaned after use and was not. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 8:25 a.m. G hallway shower A revealed a shower chair with dry feces on the seat and in the catch basin and dry feces on the handrail with a foul smell. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 8:30 a.m., S4CNA observed G hallway shower A and acknowledged feces was on the shower chair and handrail. S4CNA further acknowledged shower A and equipment should have been cleaned after use and was not. Observation of E hallway community showers on 08/14/2023 at 8:25 a.m. revealed a shower chair sitting in shower A with catch basin full of dirty bath water. Further observation revealed a soiled washcloth lying on the floor of shower B. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 8:25 a.m., S9Housekeeping, acknowledged E hallway shower rooms A and B had not been cleaned. During an interview on 08/14/2023 at 8:30 a.m., S7LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged E hallway shower A had dirty bath water in the catch basin and shower B had a soiled washcloth lying on the shower floor and should not have. Observation on 08/14/2023 at 9:15 a.m. revealed black substance on the floor and walls in the shared bathroom and shower between rooms C and D. Further observation revealed dried feces on a bedpan on the floor next to the toilet and spots of feces on the floor, wall and toilet seat. Observation of the shared bathroom and shower for rooms C and D on 08/14/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S6Corporate Nurse revealed black substance in the shower area measuring approximately 1-1 ½ foot high on the floor and walls. Further observation revealed feces noted on the toilet seat, floor, wall and bedpan in the bathroom area. S6Corporate Nurse acknowledged the bathroom and shower areas should have been cleaned and had not been. Observation on 08/15/2023 at 9:50 a.m. revealed a wet shower chair sitting outside of room K on E hallway with dirty shower water in the catch basin. Further observation revealed a [NAME], foul odor and moderate amount of feces on the shower chair seat and the rim of the catch basin. Further observation revealed a resident standing in E hallway within easy reach of soiled shower chair. During an interview on 08/15/2023 at 10:00 a.m., S8CNA acknowledged the shower chair sitting outside of room K on E hallway was soiled with feces. S8CNA further acknowledged the soiled shower chair should have been taken directly to the shower room, away from residents, and cleaned. During an interview on 08/15/2023 at 10:00 a.m., S11RN acknowledged E hall shower chair was soiled with feces and should have been immediately removed for cleaning.
Mar 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions. Meal trays were served to 116 residents according to the facility's S1, Dietary Manager on 03/27/2023....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions. Meal trays were served to 116 residents according to the facility's S1, Dietary Manager on 03/27/2023. Findings: An observation on 03/27/2023 at 8:05 a.m. revealed a scoop stored inside a clear container labeled Corn Flakes. During an interview on 03/27/2023 at 8:05 a.m. S7, Dietary Manager reported the scoop should not be stored inside the container labeled Corn Flakes. An observation on 03/27/2023 at 8:10 a.m. revealed an opened package of cheese in the refrigerator was not labeled or dated. During an interview on 03/27/2023 at 8:10 a.m. S7, Dietary Manager reported the cheese should be labeled and dated. An observation on 03/27/2023 at 8:15 a.m. revealed fish filets were frozen in a plastic bag with no label or date. During an interview on 03/27/2023 at 8:15 a.m. S7, Dietary Manager reported the fish filets should be labeled and dated and reported there were 116 meal trays served from the kitchen.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity by failing to serve residents lunch in a timely manner in the main dining area for 2 (#89, #112...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity by failing to serve residents lunch in a timely manner in the main dining area for 2 (#89, #112) of 116 residents who were served lunch trays. There were 116 residents served according to the dietary mananger. Findings: Observation on 3/27/2023 at 12:00 p.m. revealed resident #89 sitting at a table alone without a lunch tray. Further observation revealed all other residents in the dining room had been served. Resident #89 received a lunch tray at 12:10, 20 minutes after meals were served to residents at tables around her. During an interview on 3/27/2023 at 12:00 p.m. when approached by surveyor, resident #89 stated I am hungry, where is my food. Observation 3/27/2022 12:10 p.m. in the main dining room revealed resident #112, resident #47 and resident #6 were sitting at a table for lunch. Resident #6 and resident #47 received lunch trays 11:50 a.m. and resident #112 received a lunch tray 12:15 p.m. During an interview on 3/27/2023 at 12:10 p.m. resident #47 asked surveyor where is resident #112's tray. During an interview on 3/27/2023 at 12:12 p.m. resident #112's daughter stated, they usually serve them at the same time, and asked, where is mother's tray? During an interview on 03/27/23 12:43 PM S7 Dietary Manager reported meals should be served by table. All residents at a table should get meal at same time.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to inform and provide written information to residents or resident's r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to inform and provide written information to residents or resident's representative concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 3 (#54, #57, #103) of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #54's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives. Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #57's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives. Review of Resident #103's medical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #103's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives. During an interview on 3/28/23 at 12:27 PM S2 Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #54, #57, and #103's medical records did not contain documentation the residents or residents' representatives were provided with written information concerning advanced directives.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the written plan of care was developed and or implemented for 2 (#109 and #17) of 2 residents whose plan of care was re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the written plan of care was developed and or implemented for 2 (#109 and #17) of 2 residents whose plan of care was reviewed. The facility failed to: 1. develop a plan of care for contractures for resident #109 2. follow resident #17 plan of care for routine lab work Findings: 1. Resident #109 Review of resident #109's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/08/2022 with a diagnosis of but not limited to hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side, history of falling, convulsions, essential hypertension, and lack of coordination. Review of resident #109's nurse note revealed documentation of the following: 11/11/2022 10:01 a.m. Left sided weakness with a contracture to left hand, able to bend at elbow. Review of resident #109's Comprehensive Plan of care failed to reveal a problem or approach related to resident #109's left hand contracture. Observation on 03/28/2023 at 1:00 p.m. revealed resident #109 up in wheelchair in the hallway, left arm with a contracture, no splint device in place. Observation on 03/29/2023 at 9:00 a.m. revealed resident #109 with a contracture to left hand without a splint device in place. During an interview on 03/30/2023 at 8:00 a.m. S3LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed resident #109 had a contracture to his left hand but did not use splint device. During an interview on 03/30/23 at 8:20 p.m. S4RN (Registered Nurse, Unit Manager) reported resident #109 was admitted after fall at home had a contracture to his left hand. During an interview 03/30/2023 at 8:45 p.m. S6 MDS Coordinator reviewed resident #109's comprehensive plan of care and confirmed resident #109 was not care planned for contractures and should have been. 2. Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 02/21/2022 for Hemoglobin A1C every 3 months in January, April, July, October. Review of Resident #17's lab results failed to reveal Hemoglobin A1Cs were done as ordered on 02/21/2022. No Hemoglobin A1Cs were done in the last 12 months. During an interview on 03/30/2023 at 10:10 a.m. S4 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #17's Hemoglobin A1Cs were not done as ordered for Resident #17. During an interview on 03/30/2023 at 10:22 a.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #17's Hemoglobin A1Cs were not done as ordered for Resident #17. Review of Resident #17's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed diagnosis and medical conditions Diabetes Mellitis .with interventions which include - monitor labs as ordered and report as needed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#113) of 1 (#113) resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#113) of 1 (#113) resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to ensure the free water bag with Resident #113's tube feeding was labeled correctly. Findings: Review of the facility's Enteral Tube Feeding Policy Revised November 2018 revealed in part: General Guidelines: 4. Enteral tube set-up and formula bags will be changed every 24 hours during the night shift. Review of resident #113's medical record and admit date of 12/15/2022 with diagnosis including, but not limited to hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, encephalopathy, dysphagia, aphasia, and Parkinson's disease. Review of resident #113's physician's orders for March 2023 revealed an order dated 03/17/2023 for Tube Feeding: Iso-source liquid formula 1.5, 60 milliliter per hour continuous via pump, 2160 kilocalorie, 97.9 grams protein, 1100 milliliter free water During an observation on 03/27/23 at 09:00 a.m. revealed Residnet #113's free water bag with tube feeding was dated 03/25/2023. During an observation on 03/28/2023 at 1:25 p.m. revealed Resident #113's free water bag with tube feeding was dated 03/25/2023. During an interview on 03/27/2023 at 1:30 p.m. S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported that Resident #113's free water bag with tube feeding was dated 03/25/2023 and should have been changed and labeled daily and was not. During an interview on 03/29/2023 2:45 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) reported that the bags and labels used for tube feedings and free water should be changed every 24 hours.
Feb 2023 4 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure staff supervised r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure staff supervised resident who had orders for oxygen for 1 (#1) of 4 ( #1, #3, #4,#6) out of a total of 16 (#1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18) residents who smoke. The immediate jeopardy began for Resident #1 on 02/16/2023 at 1:40 p.m. when Resident #1 entered the secured smoking patio wearing nasal cannula and tubing which were connected to his O2 (oxygen) tank. Resident #1 proceeded to light a cigarette butt and caught his face on fire. Resident #6, who was smoking on patio, removed the O2 cannula and tubing from Resident #1's face in an attempt to put out the fire. Resident #1's O2 tank was found to have been releasing oxygen at 6L (liters) per minute. Resident #1 was transported to a local hospital for burns to his neck, face, tongue and right arm, where he was then transferred to a local Burn Unit and was intubated. S1 Administrator was notified on 02/23/2023 at 12:40 p.m. of the Immediate Jeopardy. The likelihood of harm or death continued for 3 (#3, #4, #6) other residents who were identified by the facility as smokers with orders for oxygen therapy. The facility presented the following Plan of Removal on 02/23/2023: 1. Resident #1 is no longer in facility as of 02/23/2023. 2. The code was changed on the smoking door on 02/23/2023 by Maintenance. 3. Scheduled staff was in-serviced on not allowing any resident with oxygen in the smoking area. All other staff will be in-serviced prior to work completed by 02/28/2023. 4. Staff assigned to Station 2 near smoking area, will observe resident's person to ensure there is no oxygen prior to entering the smoking area, started 02/23/2023. 5. Scheduled staff will be in-serviced on not to give the code to resident and if any resident is seen putting in the code Administration will be notified immediately to address. Started on 02/23/2023. All other staff will be in-serviced prior to work and completed by 02/28/2023. 6. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) and S5 SSD (Social Services Director) will identify all smokers that have oxygen therapy prescribed. Completed on 02/17/2023. Residents - #3, #4, and #6 identified as smokers that have oxygen therapy prescribed. 7. Review of resident smokers BIM (Brief Interview for Mental Status) scores and conduct new assessments to ensure no changes have occurred since last assessment started on 02/17/2023, by S5 SSD completed by 02/20/2023. This will be reviewed by S2 DON by 02/21/2023. 8. Review all smoking assessments and conduct new smoking assessments on all residents that smoke by S5 SSD were completed by 02/20/2023 and reviewed by S2 DON, S6 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and S3 Unit Manager on 02/21/2023. a. Smoking assessments will then be completed quarterly, or with significant changes or as needed. 9. All residents that smoke reviewed smoking policy and have been given a copy and sign smoking policy acknowledgment form. Started 02/17/2023, by S3 Unit Manager and S7 LPN. Completed 02/21/2023. 10. Educated all residents that smoke and are on oxygen therapy with the risk of open flames and flammable oxygen and that oxygen is not allowed in designated smoking area. S3 Unit Manager and S7 LPN completed by 02/17/2023. 11. Educate residents on oxygen therapy that smoke on how to turn O2 tanks off with return demonstration and a sign will be placed into their room with the steps listed. S3 Unit Manager and S2 DON. Completed 02/17/2023. 12. Educate the general assembly of residents on the dangers and policy of oxygen in the designated smoking area. Completed 02/16/2023 in Resident Council meeting on 02/16/2023 with S2 DON and S5 SSD. Noted in the minutes of the meeting. Ombudsman also in attendance. 13. In-service staff on the risk and identifying oxygen in the designated smoking area and that no oxygen or tubing need to be in the designated smoking area. Started on scheduled staff 02/16/2023 and to be completed by all staff prior to work by 02/28/2023. 14. Random observation started 02/17/2023 of the designated smoking area and will be conducted by members of the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee at a minimum of 3 times per day during daylight hours for 4 weeks, then at a minimum of 3 times per week for 4 weeks, then weekly thereafter and as needed. Observations will note if there are any safety issues, oxygen in the area and all will be noted and corrected. Administrator and/or DON will be notified immediately of any concerns. 15. Any negative findings from the Random Smoking are checks will be acted on by the Administrator immediately then report findings to the QAPI weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. 16. Estimated completion 02/28/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 02/23/2023 at 7:15 p.m., after it was determined through observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. Findings: Review of facility's Smoking policy revealed in part: 2. Smoking is only permitted in designated resident smoking areas, which are located outside of the building . Smoking is not allowed inside the facility under any circumstances. 3. Oxygen use is prohibited in smoking areas. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's ED notes dated 02/16/2023 revealed in part Resident #1's skin assessment noted burns to neck, face, mouth, tongue, right arm with soot and burn, and beard burned. Further review of ED notes revealed Resident #1 arrived to the ED via ambulance from the nursing home with facial burns. Resident #1 was smoking while wearing his oxygen resulting in an explosion with burns to his neck and face. Resident #1 was noted to have burns on his anterior neck, lips, tongue, nose, and oropharynx with soot noted in nares and on right arm. Resident #1 was intubated in the emergency department for airway protection. ED physician did speak with Dr. ____, consulted trauma physician, who recommends head and neck CT (Computerized Tomography). Review of MDM (Medical Decision Making) Narrative revealed in part Resident #1 has some blistering and changes which appear to be burns of the anterior tongue. Resident #1 complains of pain in his tongue and a burning sensation going from his posterior oropharynx down to his mid chest. He has soot in his nares first-degree burns around his anterior nose lower face and anterior neck. Review of Resident #1's CT report revealed in part findings of burn and smoke inhalation and trauma. Resident #1 was transferred to a local Burn Unit and was intubated. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, gangrene and necrosis of the lung, and nicotine dependence. Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 02/16/2023 with a return anticipated. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/11/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS summary score of 11 out of 15 indicating Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review of Resident #1's MDS revealed Resident #1 was coded for oxygen therapy and had experienced SOB (shortness of breath) with exertion, when sitting at rest and when lying flat during a 5 day MDS look back period. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/06/2023 which read O2 at 2 liters via nasal cannula as needed for SOB or Saturation (Sat.) less than 90% and O2 Sat. every shift. Review of Resident #1's current care plan revealed Resident #1 was noncompliant with oxygen by turning up oxygen above prescribed liters. A care plan revision dated 02/06/2023 revealed Resident #1 had interventions which prohibited Resident #1 from entering the smoking patio wearing oxygen or carrying oxygen tank. Review of Resident #1's Interdisciplinary notes revealed a nurse's note written by S3 Unit Manager dated 02/06/2023 at 3:43 p.m. which read in part: Met resident in hallway in wheelchair. Visibly short of breath. Insisted he go outside to smoke.sat. 83% RA (room air). Asked if he really wanted to go out and smoke with sat. of 83%. Reported Yes. Yes I do. I have been in the hospital I need to go outside. I need that oxygen in there too. Advised against decision to smoke. Continued to insist and rolled to smoking porch. Further review of Resident #1's Interdisciplinary notes revealed a nurse's note written by S9 RN (Registered Nurse) dated 02/16/2023 at 2:07 p.m. which read in part: Resident outside smoking with oxygen tank. 1:40 p.m. Alerted by S8 LPN that resident caught himself on fire. 911 called. Resident stated my lighter blew up. Resident had blackened areas to nose, face, beard, neck and bilateral hands. Areas cooled with towel . 1:50 pm Resident #1 transported to _____ ER (Emergency Room). No next of kin. Incident witnessed by Resident #6 who pulled tubing from Resident #1's tank. Noted end of tubing black in color. During an interview on 02/22/2023 at 10:20 a.m. S3 Unit Manager reported oxygen was not permitted on the smoking patio. S3 Unit Manager further reported she had often redirected Resident #1 when he would wheel towards patio with O2 tank and would remind Resident #1 oxygen was not allowed on the patio. During an interview on 02/22/2023 at 11:45 a.m. Resident #6, reported he had never witnessed Resident #1 on the smoking patio with his oxygen in use prior to the accident on 02/16/2023. Resident #6 reported he was present on the smoking patio on 02/16/2023 when Resident #1 wheeled out onto the smoking patio. Resident #6 further reported Resident #1 lit a cigarette butt and was consumed in flames. Resident #6 reported Resident #1 tried to pat the fire out but the fire kept coming back. Resident #6 reported he told Resident #1 to take off his oxygen but Resident #1 responded with I can't, like he was panicked. Resident #6 reported he then snatched the tubing off of Resident #1's face and beat on the patio door for help. Resident #6 confirmed Resident #1 was wearing his nasal cannula but was very hard to see because Resident #1 had a thick beard and the tubing was clear. Resident #6 reported he could see Resident #1's O2 tank tucked into his wheelchair beside his right leg. Resident #6 further reported he himself knew the code to enter the smoking patio but Resident #1 did not know the code. During an interview on 02/22/2023 at 12:00 p.m. Resident #3, reported she had never witnessed Resident #1 on the smoking patio with oxygen. Resident #3 further reported she knew the code to get onto the patio. Resident #3 reported Resident #1 did not know the code to get out to the smoking patio. Resident #3 further reported Resident #1 would not have been physically capable of reaching the key pad since his recent hospitalization, if he did know the code. During an interview on 02/22/2023 at 1:20 p.m. S10 Relief Unit Clerk, reported when she arrived to relieve staff for lunch Resident #1 was already outside on the smoking patio. S10 Relief Unit Clerk further reported she saw the fire and went and got S8 LPN to attend to resident. S10 Relief Unit Clerk acknowledged Resident #1 would have been dependent upon staff letting him out the door to smoke. During an interview on 02/22/2023 at 1:30 p.m. S9 RN reported she was Resident #1's nurse on 02/16/2023 and was notified of the incident after the fire had been distinguished. S9 RN further reported Resident #1 was known to wheel himself around facility with oxygen on and acknowledged someone should have stopped him from going out to smoke. During an interview on 02/22/2023 at 1:55 p.m. S11 AD (Activity Director) reported she had not let Resident #1 out to the smoking patio on 02/16/2023 and was not aware of how Resident #1 gained access to the patio while wearing oxygen. S11 AD further reported some of the residents who smoke knew the code but was unsure how they were given the code. S11 AD further reported had not recalled ever seeing Resident #1 using the code to enter the smoking patio. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 8:05 a.m. S12 Unit Clerk reported a lot of the smokers knew the code and would go out to smoke as they wanted. S12 Unit Clerk further reported she was aware Resident #1 required O2 at times and would have been able to see the nasal cannula and tubing on Resident #1, despite his facial hair. S12 Unit Clerk further reported Resident #1 required more assistance after his hospitalization and would often need help with the door to come back in from smoking. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 08:40 a.m. S13 PT (Physical Therapist) reported Resident #1 had been very active and walked around the facility prior to his recent hospitalization. S13 PT further reported Resident #1 was dependent upon a wheelchair to get around after returning to facility. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 8:50 a.m. Resident #7 reported he witnessed Resident #1 on the patio on 2/16/2023 wearing his nasal cannula. Resident #7 further reported he and Resident #1 discussed the flammability and risks of having oxygen on the smoking patio prior to Resident #1 smoking. Resident #7 reported Resident #1 turned off his oxygen and retrieved a cigarette butt from the ash tray caddy. Resident #7 further reported Resident #1 proceeded to light the cigarette butt and the fire ignited. Resident #7 reported that Resident #1 must have turned his oxygen up and not off. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 9:50 a.m. S5 SSD reported Resident #1 had always been independent and knew the code to the smoking patio. S5 SSD further reported Resident #1 would go out and smoke with his girlfriend and would even go out at night after hours utilizing the key pad, in the past. S5 SSD further reported she conducted the Safe Smoking Assessment on Resident #1 upon return from hospital and Resident #1 was designated as a safe smoker. S5 SSD further reported Resident #1 was very weak from his recent hospitalization and was not going out to smoke as much. S5 SSD further reported Resident #1 had received a wheelchair and began to start smoking again. During an interview on 02/22/23 at 2:20 p.m. S2 DON confirmed some of the residents who smoke know the code to unlock the door to the smoking area. S2 DON acknowledged even if residents were aware of the code to get to the smoking area, the facility was still responsible for the residents' safety. S2 DON reported Station 2's staff should confirm residents have removed their oxygen prior to going into the smoking area. S2 DON acknowledged staff were aware Resident #1 had orders for oxygen. S2 DON acknowledged facility had no policy regarding code access to smoking patio. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 12:45 p.m. S2 DON reported she interviewed Resident #1 via telephone today and Resident #1 reported he rolled to the door on 02/16/2023 and someone let him out. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 6:00 p.m. S1 Administrator and S14 Regional [NAME] President acknowledged the facility failed to supervise Resident #1 from entering the smoking patio with Oxygen in place. S1 Administrator and S14 Regional [NAME] President confirmed Resident #1 suffered harm when Resident #1 attempted to light a cigarette while receiving oxygen via nasal cannula.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that used its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure staff supervised resident who had orders for oxygen for 1 (#1) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that used its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure staff supervised resident who had orders for oxygen for 1 (#1) of 4 ( #1, #3, #4,#6) out of a total of 16 (#1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18) residents who smoke. The immediate jeopardy began for Resident #1 on 02/16/2023 at 1:40 p.m. when Resident #1 entered the secured smoking patio wearing nasal cannula and tubing which were connected to his O2 (oxygen) tank. Resident #1 proceeded to light a cigarette butt and caught his face on fire. Resident #6, who was smoking on patio, removed the O2 cannula and tubing from Resident #1's face in an attempt to put out the fire. Resident #1's O2 tank was found to have been releasing oxygen at 6L (liters) per minute. Resident #1 was transported to a local hospital for burns to his neck, face, tongue and right arm, where he was then transferred to a local Burn Unit and was intubated. S1 Administrator was notified on 02/23/2023 at 12:40 p.m. of the Immediate Jeopardy. The likelihood of harm or death continued for 3 (#3, #4, #6) other residents who were identified by the facility as smokers with orders for oxygen therapy. The facility presented the following Plan of Removal: 1. S14 RVP (Regional [NAME] President) will in-service S1 Administrator to ensure an adequate system is in place to ensure residents are supervised to prevent smoking with oxygen in the smoking area. Started and completed on 02/23/2023. 2. S14 RVP or a QI (Quality Improvement) nurse will randomly review system to ensure S1 Administrator and S2 DON (Director of Nursing) maintain an adequate system in place to ensure residents are supervised to prevent smoking with oxygen in the smoking area. Started 02/23/2023 and to be completed by 02/28/2023. 3. The Administrative staff will conduct and complete random smoking area checks on 02/23/2023 to ensure that any further potential injuries will not occur. a. Random smoking area checks will be conducted by Administrative designees daily for 30 days, then weekly thereafter. b. Any negative finding will be reported to the Administrator and acted on immediately. 4. S1 Administrator reviewed the completed random smoking area checks on 02/23/2023 to determine if any potential injuries had occurred. a. Random smoking area checks will be reviewed by S1 Administrator daily for 30 days then weekly thereafter. Any negative finding will be acted upon immediately. 5. Any negative findings from the random smoking area checks will be acted on by S1 Administrator immediately then report findings to the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. 6. Estimated completion date 02/28/2023. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 02/23/2023 at 7:15 p.m., after it was determined through observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. Findings, Cross Reference F689: During an interview on 02/22/23 at 2:20 p.m. S2 DON confirmed some of the residents who smoke know the code to unlock the door to the smoking area. S2 DON acknowledged even if residents were aware of the code to get to the smoking area, the facility was still responsible for the residents' safety while smoking. S2 DON reported Station 2's staff should confirm residents have removed their oxygen prior to going into the smoking area. S2 DON acknowledged staff were aware Resident #1 had orders for oxygen. S2 DON acknowledged facility had no policy regarding code access to smoking patio. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 12:45 p.m. S2 DON reported she interviewed Resident #1 via telephone today and Resident #1 reported he rolled to the door on 02/16/2023 and someone let him out. During an interview on 02/23/23 at 6:00 p.m. S1 Administrator and S14 Regional [NAME] President acknowledged the facility failed to supervise Resident #1 from entering the smoking patio with oxygen in place. S1 Administrator and S14 Regional [NAME] President confirmed Resident #1 suffered harm when Resident #1 attempted to light a cigarette while receiving oxygen via nasal cannula.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, functional, and comfort...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for 1 (#5) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure Residents #5 had a way to turn light on and off from the bed. Findings: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included, in part, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, malignant neoplasm of lower lobe right bronchus or lung, secondary malignant neoplasm of brain, anxiety disorder unspecified; and essential (primary) hypertension. Observation on 02/23/2023 at 9:30 a.m. revealed Resident #5's over bed light had an on/off chain switch approximately 5 inches long hanging from the light and was not in resident #5's reach. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 9:30 a.m. Resident #5 reported the over bed light switch could not be reached from her bed so she could turn the light on/off. Further reported the light could only be turned on and off with the switch on the wall by her entry door. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 9:35 a.m. S4 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed Resident #5's over bed light and reported Resident #5 did not have a light switch within reach from bed to turn the light on/off and there should be. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 9:46 a.m. S4 Unit Manager observed Resident #5's over bed light and agreed Resident #5 did not have a light she could turn on/off herself from her bed and should have.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a major injury was reported immediately but no more than 2 ho...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a major injury was reported immediately but no more than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: Review of facility's Protocol for Reporting Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Misappropriation of Resident Property, or Exploitation policy revealed in part: 3. An investigation must begin in order to have information pertinent to the two hour time frame reporting. Alleged violations of abuse, neglect exploitation, or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. If the events that caused the allegation involved abuse/neglect or result in serious bodily injury, or, no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse/neglect and do not result in serious bodily injury to administrator of the facility and to other official in accordance with state law through established procedures. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, gangrene and necrosis of the lung, and nicotine dependence. Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 02/16/2023 with a return anticipated. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/11/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 out of 15 indicating Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review of Resident #1's MDS revealed Resident #1 was coded for oxygen therapy and had experienced SOB (shortness of breath) with exertion, when sitting at rest and when lying flat during a 5 day MDS look back period. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/06/2023 which read O2 (oxygen) at 2 liters via nasal cannula as needed for SOB or Saturation (Sat.) less than 90% and O2 Sat. every shift. Review of Resident #1's current care plan revealed Resident #1 was noncompliant with oxygen by turning up oxygen above prescribed liters. Review of Resident #1's Interdisciplinary notes revealed a nurse's note written by S9 RN (Registered Nurse) dated 02/16/2023 at 2:07 p.m. which read in part: Resident #1 outside smoking with oxygen tank. 1:40 p.m. Alerted by S8 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) that Resident #1 caught himself on fire. 911 called. Resident #1 stated my lighter blew up. Resident #1 had blackened areas to nose, face, beard, neck and bilateral hands. Areas cooled with towel . 1:50 pm Resident #1 transported to _____ ER (Emergency Room). No next of kin. Incident witnessed by Resident #6 who pulled tubing from Resident #1's tank. Noted end of tubing black in color. Further record review revealed Resident #1 entered the secured smoking patio 02/16/2023 at 1:40 p.m. wearing nasal cannula and tubing which were connected to his O2 tank. Resident #1 proceeded to light a cigarette butt and caught his face on fire. Resident #6, who was smoking on patio, removed the O2 cannula and tubing from Resident #1's face in an attempt to put out the fire. Resident #1's O2 tank was found to have been releasing oxygen at 6L (liters) per minute. Resident #1 was transported to a local hospital for burns to his neck, face, tongue and right arm. Review of SIMS (State Investigation Management System) report revealed incident resulting in major injury to Resident #1 occurred on 02/16/2023 at 1:40 p.m. and event was entered into the State Survey Agency site on 02/17/2023 at 11:04 p.m. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m. S2 DON (Director of Nursing) acknowledged incident resulting in major injury to Resident #1 had not been reported within 2 hours of occurrence and should have been.
Dec 2022 3 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse and psychosocial harm by a staff member for 1 (Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse and psychosocial harm by a staff member for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1, who is cognitively impaired, on 10/18/2022 when S3 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) physically and verbally abused Resident #1 in Resident #1's room by aggressively pulling Resident #1's head up when sitting on the floor and yelled directly into Resident #1's ear, Stop Yelling. Resident #1 was noted to be agitated and fearful and told S3 CNA Don't kill me, don't kill me. On 10/19/2022 S1 Administrator and S2 DON (Director of Nursing) were made aware of the abuse by S3 CNA by viewing the video surveillance provided by Resident #1's Responsible Party (RP). Even though there was no significant decline in mental or physical functioning, it can be determined that the reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm as a result of the physical and verbal abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be treated in this manner in his own home or a health care facility. The facility failed to implement protective measures to protect the other vulnerable residents in the facility. S1 Administrator and S2 DON were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 12/14/2022 at 5:10 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/15/2022 at 5:47 p.m. Through record reviews, interviews and observations the surveyor confirmed the following components of the Plan of Removal (POR) have been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit. The facility's POR included the following: 1. Resident #1 was assessed with no injuries noted from abuse on 10/19/2022 by S4 RN (registered nurse). 2. Staff member in question was terminated on 10/20/2022. 3. Safe survey checks were conducted and completed on 12/15/2022 on all residents by Administration staff to assess, identify, and prevent abuse. a. Safe Survey Checks will be conducted by Administrative staff or designees on random residents weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. Any negative finding will be reported to the Administrator and acted on immediately. 4. The Safe Survey Checks were reviewed and checked by the Administrator for any abuse or mistreatment of residents on 12/15/2022. a. Safe Survey Checks will be reviewed by Administrator weekly for 30 days then monthly thereafter. Any negative finding will be acted upon immediately. 5. The Director of Nursing and Administrator will in-service all scheduled employees on abuse and mistreatment of residents prior to shift start, by Administrative staff or designee by 12/19/2022. 6. We are going to put in place an Abuse Prevention Program initiated by Administration. The Administrator will provide opportunities for staff to express challenges related to their job and work environment by open door practice starting 12/14/2022. a. The Director of Nursing and Administrator will in-service all scheduled staff starting on 12/14/2022 on abuse prevention program. b. All remaining employees will be in-serviced on abuse prevention program prior to the shift start, by Administrative staff or designee by 12/19/2022. 7. Administrator/Designee will in-service all scheduled staff related to Burn Out/Signs and Symptoms, and report to the administrator starting 12/15/2022. a. All remaining employees will be in-serviced on burn out prior to shift start, by Administrative staff or designee by 12/19/2022. b. Administrator/Designee will do random observation of staff interactions with residents to monitor for signs and symptoms of burn out, three times a week for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. Starting 12/19/2022. c. RVP (Regional [NAME] President) or QI (Quality Improvement) nurse will ensure Administrator/Designee is conducting random observation of staff interactions with residents weekly times 30 days. 8. Any negative findings from the Safe Survey Checks will be acted on by the Administrator immediately, then report findings to the Q.A.P.I. (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. 9. Estimated completion date 12/19/2022. Findings: Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed in part: Policy Statement: The facility will ensure that each resident has the right to be free from, among other things, physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Policy Interpretation and Implementation - Staff to Resident Abuse of any Types: Deals with diverse populations including residents with dementia, mental disorders, intellectual disabilities The facility assumes the responsibility upon admission of ensuring safety and well-being of the resident. Staff are expected to be in control of their behavior and behave professionally. The facility will not accept for an employee to claim his/her action was reflexive or a knee-jerk reaction and was not intended to cause harm. Retaliation from staff is abuse, regardless of whether harm was intended. Definitions: Verbal Abuse - the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Physical Abuse - this includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. Record review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the following diagnoses, in part: Alzheimer's disease, Schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, and depression. Record review of Resident #1's care plans revealed the following, in part: Impaired thought process related to Alzheimer's, dementia, Schizoaffective disorder, and aphasia. Interventions included, provide consistent caregiver on all shifts, call light in reach, monitor and document resident behavior and status as needed and report cognitive status to MD (Medical Doctor). Electronic monitoring/camera in room per resident and family request, managed by family related to resident dignity will be maintained and protected the next review. Interventions included placement of camera to ensure privacy during care for resident and roommate and keep sign posted on door. Record review of Resident # 1's MDS (minimum data set) dated 10/4/22 revealed the resident's BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score was 99, which indicated unable to complete the interview. Observation with an interview on 12/12/2022 at 11:25 a.m., revealed Resident #1 in reclining chair that was reclined. Appearance was clean and kept. No foul odors noted. Resident #1 was able to say he was doing okay when asked. Resident #1 would partially talk normal then would do a loud moaning sound that was not understandable. Observation on 12/13/2022 at 6:40 a.m., revealed Resident #1 resting in bed with eyes closed. No foul odors noted. Resident #1 had clean and kept appearance. Bed sheet and blankets were arranged in an orderly manner. Room appeared clean. During a telephone interview on 12/12/2022 at 3:15 p.m., Resident #1's RP indicated after she saw the videos of 10/18/2022 of S3 CNA handling Resident #1 roughly she showed the videos to S1 Administrator and S2 DON. Resident #1's RP confirmed the video showed S3 CNA was attempting to assist Resident #1 out of the recliner. S3 CNA got Resident #1 up and Resident #1 went to the floor. S3 CNA attempted to get Resident #1 off the floor, by grabbing the back of Resident #1's head and pulling his head up in a rough manner. After S3 CNA got Resident #1 back in bed, S3 CNA leaned over and put her mouth right by the resident's ear, close enough to kiss his ear, and yelled at the top of her lungs, Stop yelling! Resident #1's RP stated Resident #1 was a preacher and he served to help others and he did not deserve to be treated this way. Review of five video clips, with audio, provided by Resident #1's RP dated 10/18/2022, time-stamped from 12:51p.m. through 1:04 p.m., revealed in summary Resident #1 was in a recliner that was positioned towards the right lower side of the bed. S3 CNA grabbed Resident #1's hands attempting to assist Resident #1 out of the recliner. Resident #1 was unable to stand and S3 CNA guided him to the floor where he landed softly on his buttocks. S3 CNA then moved the Resident #1 next to the side of the bed while the resident remained on the floor. Resident #1 was next to the bed and S3 CNA grabbed the back of Resident #1's head/neck and aggressively pulled Resident #'s head upwards towards her. S3 CNA left the room while Resident #1 was sitting on floor with upper torso leaning on the side of the bed. S3 CNA reentered the room and appeared to be texting on her phone. S3 CNA then exited the room again. The next video showed Resident #1 was in bed with S3 CNA was next to bed. Another staff member was present for a short time before exiting the room. S3 CNA was seen changing Resident #1's adult diaper. S3 CNA was verbally yelling in the room almost constantly, I hate this place, I am getting out of here, you need a man to take care of you, I am over this . S3 CNA put bed sheet over Resident #1 after completing adult diaper change. Resident #1 yelled out and S3 CNA leaned over and placed her mouth right next to Resident #1's right ear and screamed very loudly, Stop yelling! S3 CNA then lowered the bed Resident #1 was lying in to low position. During a telephone interview on 12/14/2022 at 12:34 p.m., S3 CNA indicated the day of the incident with Resident #1, she got him in the recliner and when checking on the resident she noticed his diaper was wet. S3 CNA confirmed when she attempted to get Resident #1 up he wouldn't stand up and help and resident #1wound up sitting on floor. S3 CNA left the room to try to find somebody to help her. S3 CNA brought another CNA to help her and they got Resident #1 in bed and she changed Resident #1's diaper. S3 CNA admitted that when she was trying to get Resident #1 into bed from the recliner she did not do it correctly. S3 CNA indicated she did not jerked the resident by his head and she quietly told Resident #1 to stop yelling. S3 CNA indicated she was called to S1 Administrator's office two days later and she was terminated. During an interview on 12/12/2022 at 2:15 p.m., S5 LPN (licensed practical nurse) indicated she knew Resident #1 RP had shown S1 Administrator and S2 DON the videos of S3 CNA handling Resident #1 roughly. S5 LPN indicated she did not see the videos but she heard from other staff members S3 CNA grabbed Resident #1's neck roughly when attempting to get the resident off of the floor. S5 LPN further indicated S3 CNA was terminated after the incident. S5 LPN then indicated that another resident (Resident #3) informed her that S3 CNA told Resident #3, I'm sick of all y'all lazy a** people not doing anything for yourself. S5 LPN indicated this was told to her after S3 CNA was terminated and S5 LPN reported it to S2 DON. During an interview on 12/12/2022 at 2:30 p.m., Resident #3 indicated that S3 CNA would always talk to her mean, saying things like she hated this place and hating her job. Resident #3 confirmed S3 CNA told her, Y'all know what y'all need?, Y'all need to get off your lazy a**es and start doing for yourself. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a 9/30/2022 BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 10 out of 15 indicating mildly impaired. During an interview on 12/13/22022 at 1:15 p.m., Resident #6 did not know S3 CNA was terminated and at first she was hesitant to say anything. Resident #6 was informed S3 CNA had been terminated, Resident #6 indicated S3 CNA would talk very rough and mean to her. Resident #6's son was at bedside during the interview and he asked his mother, Was that the one you called me about being rough? and then Resident #6 replied to her son, yes. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed a BIMS score on 11/10/2022 of 4 out of 15 indicating a cognitive status of moderately impaired. During an interview on 12/13/2022 at 1:30 p.m., S6 CNA indicated S3 CNA talked mean to her. S6 CNA worked the opposite side of the hall, S3 CNA told her to stay on her side and don't come down S3 CNA'S hallway. S6 CNA also indicated she would go to another hall to get ice for her residents because she didn't want to go to S3 CNA's hall to get the ice. During an interview on 12/13/2022 at 1:45 p.m., Resident #5 indicated S3 CNA had a real bad attitude and kept everything in an uproar. Resident #5 acknowledged once S3 CNA was gone, things got a lot better. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed a BIMS score on 10/28/2022 of 12 out of 15 indicating a cognitive status of mildly impaired. During an interview on 12/13/2022 at 7:05 a.m., S2 DON indicated Resident #1's RP showed her the video of S3 CNA interacting with Resident #1. S2 DON indicated the videos showed Resident #1 on the floor by his bed, S3 CNA took her hands and placed them behind the resident's neck and then roughly yanked the resident to an upright position. Another video showed S3 CNA putting her mouth directly next to Resident #1's ear and S5 CNA screamed, Shut up! into his ear. S1 Administrator and S2 DON called S3 CNA to the office, S3 CNA told them she just, Lost it. and S3CNA was terminated. S2 DON acknowledged the facility did not assess all residents for any abuse or mistreatment after an abuse allegation was revealed. During an interview on 12/13/2022 at 10:35 a.m., S1 Administrator indicated he had watched the videos shown to him by Resident #1's RP and it showed S3 CNA grab the back of Resident #1's head and forcefully pulled him in upright position. S1 Administrator confirmed the video also showed S3 CNA screaming into Resident #1's ear, Stop hollering! S1 Administrator called S3 CNA to his office and S3 CNA indicated that she Lost it. S3 CNA was terminated on 10/20/2022. S1 Administrator was asked by the surveyor if law enforcement was notified of the staff to resident abuse to which he replied No. During an interview on 12/15/22 at 5:00 p.m., S1 Administrator verified they did not put a system in place to ensure the deficient practice will not happen again. S1 Administrator further verified they did not conduct any ongoing monitoring of residents for evidence of abuse.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to administer its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to administer its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by failing to ensure: 1. Resident #1 was not physically and verbally abused and psychosocially harmed by staff 2. A system was put in place to ensure physical and verbal abuse and psychosocial harm will not happen again and put in place ongoing monitoring of residents for evidence of abuse 3. All residents were assessed and/or interviewed regarding concerns of mental, physical, verbal and/or sexual abuse 4. Facility staff was assessed for burnout sign and symptoms. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1, who is cognitively impaired, on 10/18/2022 when S3 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) physically and verbally abused Resident #1 in Resident #1's room by aggressively pulling Resident #1's head up when sitting on the floor and yelled directly into Resident #1's ear, Stop Yelling. Resident #1 was noted to be agitated and fearful and told S3 CNA Don't kill me, don't kill me. On 10/19/2022 S1 Administrator and S2 DON (Director of Nursing) were made aware of the abuse by S3 CNA by viewing the video surveillance provided by Resident #1's Responsible Party (RP). Even though there was no significant decline in mental or physical functioning, it can be determined that the reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm as a result of the physical and verbal abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be treated in this manner in his own home or a health care facility. The facility failed to implement protective measures to protect the other vulnerable residents in the facility. S1 Administrator and S2 DON (Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/14/2022 at 5:10 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 12/15/2022 at 5:47 p.m. Through record reviews, interviews and observations the surveyor confirmed the following components of the Plan of Removal (POR) have been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit. The facility's POR included: 1. Administrator was in-serviced by Regional [NAME] President (RVP) on Abuse Investigation and Reporting on 12/14/2022 at 7:30 p.m. 2. Administrator was in-serviced by RVP on Burn Out/Signs and Symptoms on 12/15/2022. a. RVP or Quality Improvement Nurse (QI) Nurse will ensure Administrator/Designee is conducting random observation of staff interactions with residents weekly times 30 days. 3. The Administrative Staff will conduct and complete safe survey checks on 12/15/2022 to ensure that any further potential abuse, neglect or mistreatment is prevented. a. Safe survey checks will be conducted by administrative staff or designees on random residents weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. b. Any negative finding will be reported to the Administrator and acted on immediately. 4. The Administrator reviewed the completed safe survey checks on 12/15/2022 to determine if any abuse, neglect or mistreatment has occurred. a. Safe survey checks will be reviewed by Administrator weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. Any negative findings will be acted upon immediately. 5. After abuse investigation is completed by the facility it will be reviewed by Regional [NAME] President or Quality Improvement Nurse prior to closing SIMS. 6. Any negative findings from the safe survey checks will be acted on by the Administrator immediately then report findings to the Q.A.P.I. (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) weekly for 30 days, then monthly thereafter. 7. Estimated completion date 12/19/2022. Findings, Cross Reference F600: Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed in part: Policy Statement: The facility will ensure that each resident has the right to be free from, among other things, physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Policy Interpretation and Implementation - Staff to Resident Abuse of any Types: Deals with diverse populations including residents with dementia, mental disorders, intellectual disabilities The facility assumes the responsibility upon admission of ensuring safety and well-being of the resident. Staff are expected to be in control of their behavior and behave professionally. The facility will not accept for an employee to claim his/her action was reflexive or a knee-jerk reaction and was not intended to cause harm. Retaliation from staff is abuse, regardless of whether harm was intended. Definitions: Verbal Abuse - the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Physical Abuse - this includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. During an interview on 12/15/2022 at 4:35 p.m., S1 Administrator and S2 DON acknowledged the facility did not assess all residents for any abuse or mistreatment after an abuse allegation was revealed to S1 Administrator and S2 DON and the facility did not assess staff for burnout signs and symptoms. During an interview on 12/15/22 at 5:00 p.m., S1 Administrator verified they did not put a system in place to ensure the deficient practice will not happen again. S1 Administrator further verified they did not conduct any ongoing monitoring of residents for evidence of abuse. S1 Administrator confirmed they did not conduct any ongoing monitoring of staff to detect signs and symptoms of burnout.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical and verbal abuse was reported immediately but not later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical and verbal abuse was reported immediately but not later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency and law enforcement 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for an abuse allegation. Findings: Review of the facility Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy (Revised October 15, 2022) revealed in part: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported . Reporting: An alleged violation of abuse will be reported immediately but no later than 2 hours if alleged violation involves abuse . Record review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the following diagnoses, in part: Alzheimer's disease, Schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, and depression. Record review of Resident # 1's MDS (minimum data set) dated 10/4/22 revealed the resident's BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score was 99, which indicated unable to complete the interview. Record review of Resident #1's care plans revealed the following, in part: Electronic monitoring/camera in room per resident and family request, managed by family related to resident dignity will be maintained and protected the next review. Interventions included placement of camera to ensure privacy during care for resident and roommate and keep sign posted on door. During a telephone interview on 12/12/2022 at 3:15 p.m., Resident #1's Resident Representative (RP) indicated she showed videos of Resident #1 being mistreated by S3 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) to S1 Administrator and S2 Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/19/2022. Review of five video clips, with audio, provided by Resident #1's RP dated 10/18/2022, time-stamped from 12:51p.m. through 1:04 p.m., revealed in summary Resident #1 was in a recliner that was positioned towards the right lower side of the bed. S3 CNA grabbed Resident #1's hands attempting to assist Resident #1 out of the recliner. Resident #1 was unable to stand and S3 CNA guided him to the floor where he landed softly on his buttocks. S3 CNA then moved the Resident #1 next to the side of the bed while the resident remained on the floor. Resident #1 was next to the bed and S3 CNA grabbed the back of Resident #1's head/neck and aggressively pulled Resident #'s head upwards towards her. S3 CNA left the room while Resident #1 was sitting on floor with upper torso leaning on the side of the bed. S3 CNA reentered the room and appeared to be texting on her phone. S3 CNA then exited the room again. The next video showed Resident #1 was in bed with S3 CNA was next to bed. Another staff member was present for a short time before exiting the room. S3 CNA was seen changing Resident #1's adult diaper. S3 CNA was verbally yelling in the room almost constantly, I hate this place, I am getting out of here, you need a man to take care of you, I am over this . S3 CNA put bed sheet over Resident #1 after completing adult diaper change. Resident #1 yelled out and S3 CNA leaned over and placed her mouth right next to Resident #1's right ear and screamed very loudly, Stop yelling! S3 CNA then lowered the bed Resident #1 was lying in to low position. Record review of the facility's incident report submitted to the state agency, revealed an abuse allegation involving Resident #1 was discovered on 10/19/2022 at 5:15 p.m. The facility reported the abuse allegation on 10/20/2022 at 2:53 p.m. Thus indicating the facility did not report an abuse allegation within the required two hours after the allegation was made. During an interview on 12/15/2022 at 5:00 p.m., S1 Administrator confirmed the facility was aware of the alleged abuse on 10/19/2022 and failed to report an abuse allegation for Resident #1 within the required two hours after the allegation was made.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 9 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $374,262 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 48 deficiencies on record, including 9 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $374,262 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 9 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 48 deficiencies at THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2025. These included: 9 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 38 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation?

THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 177 certified beds and approximately 119 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SHREVEPORT, Louisiana.

How Does The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Stick Around?

Staff turnover at THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 56%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION has been fined $374,262 across 6 penalty actions. This is 10.2x the Louisiana average of $36,821. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is The Guest House Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

THE GUEST HOUSE SKILLED NURSING REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.